Revision as of 05:54, 18 October 2011 editJimbo Wales (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Founder14,538 edits →Investment banker category: new section← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 18:55, 3 January 2025 edit undoAnne drew (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,974 edits →Newer 2024 image?: re |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header|search=yes}} |
|
{{skiptotoctalk}} |
|
|
|
{{Article history |
|
{{talkheader|search=yes}} |
|
|
|
| action1 = AFD |
|
{{pp-move-indef}} |
|
|
|
| action1date = 14 October 2005 |
|
{{FAQ|collapsed=no}} |
|
|
|
| action1link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|blp=yes|collapsed=yes|1= |
|
|
|
| action1result = kept |
|
{{WikiProject Biography|class=B|s&a-work-group=yes|s&a-priority=Mid|living=yes|listas=Wales, Jimmy}} |
|
|
|
| action1oldid = 14579563 |
|
{{WikiProject Misplaced Pages|class=B|importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Alabama|class=B}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Indiana|class=B|importance=Low|autoi=no}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Chicago|importance=mid|class=B}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Computing|class=B|importance=Mid|websites=yes|websites-importance=high}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Internet culture|class=B|importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Investment|class=B|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WP1.0|WPCD=people|class=B}} |
|
|
{{Talk Spoken Misplaced Pages|Jimmy_Wales.ogg}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
<!-- <inputbox> |
|
|
bgcolor=transparent |
|
|
type=fulltext |
|
|
prefix=Talk:Jimmy Wales |
|
|
break=yes |
|
|
width=60 |
|
|
searchbuttonlabel=Search Jimmy Wales talk archives |
|
|
</inputbox> no longer needed--> |
|
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
|
|action1=AFD |
|
|
|action1date=2005-10-14 |
|
|
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales |
|
|
|action1result=kept |
|
|
|action1oldid=25464126 |
|
|
|action2=PR |
|
|
|action2date=23:22, 15 June 2006 |
|
|
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Jimmy Wales/archive1 |
|
|
|action2result=reviewed |
|
|
|action2oldid=58840827 |
|
|
|action3=GAN |
|
|
|action3date=2006-07-05 |
|
|
|action3result=listed |
|
|
|action3oldid=62024022 |
|
|
|action4=FAC |
|
|
|action4date=2006-10-10 |
|
|
|action4link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Jimmy Wales/archive1 |
|
|
|action4result=not promoted |
|
|
|action4oldid=80703703 |
|
|
|action5=GAR |
|
|
|action5date=2006-10-17 |
|
|
|action5link=Misplaced Pages:Good articles/Disputes/Archive 8#Jimmy Wales |
|
|
|action5result=kept |
|
|
|action5oldid=81895538 |
|
|
|action6=PR |
|
|
|action6date=2007-06-13 |
|
|
|action6link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Jimmy Wales/archive2 |
|
|
|action6result=reviewed |
|
|
|action6oldid=137788265 |
|
|
|action7=AFD |
|
|
|action7date=2007-08-14 |
|
|
|action7link=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales (2nd nomination) |
|
|
|action7result=speedily kept |
|
|
|action7oldid=151226064 |
|
|
|action8=AFD |
|
|
|action8date=2007-08-31 |
|
|
|action8link=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales (3rd nomination) |
|
|
|action8result=speedily kept |
|
|
|action8oldid=154849721 |
|
|
|action9=GAR |
|
|
|action9date=2007-12-20 |
|
|
|action9link=/GA3 |
|
|
|action9result=delisted |
|
|
|action9oldid=178824205 |
|
|
|action10=GAN |
|
|
|action10date=15:01, 16 September 2008 |
|
|
|action10link=Talk:Jimmy Wales/GA4 |
|
|
|action10result=listed |
|
|
|action10oldid=238817156 |
|
|
|action11=GAR |
|
|
|action11date=09:34, 16 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|action11link=Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/Jimmy Wales/1 |
|
|
|action11result=delisted |
|
|
|action11oldid=277600818 |
|
|
|currentstatus=DGA |
|
|
|topic=engtech |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
|
|target=Talk:Jimmy Wales/Archive index |
|
|
|mask=Talk:Jimmy Wales/Archive <#> |
|
|
|leading_zeros=0 |
|
|
|indexhere=no |
|
|
}}<!-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| action2 = AFD |
|
-->{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|
| action2date = 14 August 2007 |
|
|archiveheader = {{atnhead}} |
|
|
|
| action2link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales (2nd nomination) |
|
|counter = 13 |
|
|
|
| action2result = speedily kept |
|
|blp = yes|collapsed=yes|maxarchivesize = 200K |
|
|
|
| action2oldid = 151188864 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 5 |
|
|
|algo = old(60d) |
|
|
|archive = Talk:Jimmy Wales/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
}}<!-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| action3 = AFD |
|
-->{{AutoArchivingNotice |
|
|
|
| action3date = 31 August 2007 |
|
|small=yes |
|
|
|
| action3link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales (3rd nomination) |
|
|age=60 |
|
|
|
| action3result = speedily kept |
|
|bot=MiszaBot I}}<!-- |
|
|
|
| action3oldid = 154846896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| action4 = GAN |
|
--> |
|
|
|
| action4date = 25 March 2012 |
|
|
| action4link = Talk:Jimmy Wales/GA1 |
|
|
| action4result = failed |
|
|
| action4oldid = 477279005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action5 = AFD |
|
{{pressmulti|collapsed=yes|small=yes| year = 2009| title = How I fell in love with Misplaced Pages | author = Nicholson Baker | date = 10 April 2008 | month = April | url = http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/apr/10/wikipedia.internet| org = '']''| section = News:Technology:Misplaced Pages|author2=Stephen Foley|date2=03 February 2009|url2=http://www.independent.ie/business/technology/is-wikipedia-cracking-up-1625816.html|title2=Is Misplaced Pages cracking up?|org2='']'' |section2=February 2009|author3=Nicole Markwald|date3=14 January 2011|url3=http://www.tagesschau.de/korrespondenten/wikipedia116.html|title3=Jimmy Wales und seine "Erfindung" Misplaced Pages|org3='']''|section3=January 2011}} |
|
|
|
|action5date = 14:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|action5link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales (8th nomination) |
|
|
|action5result = speedily kept |
|
|
|action5oldid = 758452878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|currentstatus = FGAN |
|
== This might be helpful == |
|
|
|
|topic = Social sciences and society |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes |collapsed=yes |class=B |vital=yes |listas=Wales, Jimmy |1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Misplaced Pages|importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Internet culture|importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Chicago|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=Mid |websites=yes |websites-importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Finance & Investment|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Business|importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low |IN=yes |IN-importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Alabama}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Spoken Misplaced Pages}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Objectivism|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Open |importance=High}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
<!-- Inactive Projects --> |
|
|
<!-- End of Inactive Projects --> |
|
|
{{Press |
|
|
| subject = article |
|
|
| author = Yermi Brenner |
|
|
| title = Taking On Misplaced Pages's Bias |
|
|
| org = Medium |
|
|
| url = https://medium.com/better-humans/11acd4a7f44c |
|
|
| date = {{date|24 June 2013}} |
|
|
| quote = |
|
|
| archiveurl = http://www.webcitation.org/6ITfm2rhu |
|
|
| archivedate = {{date|28 July 2013}} |
|
|
| accessdate = {{date|28 July 2013}} |
|
|
|
|
|
| author2 = Madeleine Spence |
|
|
| title2 = Larry Sanger: ‘I wouldn’t trust Misplaced Pages — and I helped to invent it’ |
|
|
| org2 = The Sunday Times |
|
|
| url2 = https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/larry-sanger-i-wouldnt-trust-wikipedia-and-i-helped-to-invent-it-cflrhmdhx |
|
|
| date2 = {{date|1 August 2021}} |
|
|
| quote2 = |
|
|
| archiveurl2 = |
|
|
| archivedate2 = |
|
|
| accessdate2 = |
|
|
|
|
|
| author3 = ] |
|
|
| title3 = VIPs expect special treatment. At Misplaced Pages, don’t even ask. |
|
|
| org3 = ] |
|
|
| url3 = https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/wikipedia-jimmy-wales-john-eastman-editing/2021/10/28/f2d61bea-35fd-11ec-9bc4-86107e7b0ab1_story.html |
|
|
| date3 = 28 October 2021 |
|
|
| quote3 = |
|
|
| accessdate3 = 29 October 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| author4 = ] |
|
Two things that might be helpful: |
|
|
|
| title4 = Misplaced Pages's Jimmy Wales Has Already Solved the Internet's Problems |
|
# |
|
|
|
| org4 = ] |
|
#"Neither Sanger nor Wales expected very much from the Nupedia wiki initiative." This is false.--] (]) 07:11, 8 May 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| url4 = https://reason.com/video/2022/04/28/wikipedias-jimmy-wales-has-already-solved-the-internets-problems/ |
|
:With respect to point #2, two sources are cited. I can't see the Atlantic Monthly cite because it doesn't have an online link - the quote in the reference is unhelpful to this point. The New Yorker cite says the following after wiki was added to Nupedia: "Wales braced himself for “complete rubbish.” He figured that if he and Sanger were lucky the wiki would generate a few rough drafts for Nupedia." (The article states all this right after the opening sentence.) We could replace the opening sentence to say "Wales did not expect very much from the Nupedia wiki initiative" - mainly because the New Yorker quote doesn't say anything about ''Sanger's'' expectations. Or we could eliminate the topical sentence completely, but it does flow a bit better with an intro sentence.--] (]) 14:21, 8 May 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| date4 = 28 April 2022 |
|
::The claims in the New Yorker article are false. I have said in many interviews over the years that I was always very optimistic about Misplaced Pages. Larry was, too. It's just false to say that we didn't expect much from it. That's just not true. What has happened here is a cherry-picking of sources. Of course it is true, as it is true of anything, that we were unsure what would come of it in the early days. It isn't at all correct - and a total synthesis on the part of Misplaced Pages - to claim that we never expected much of it. Of course we braced ourselves for the possibility of complete rubbish - any sane person would. That didn't mean that we didn't expect much of it - expectations of the future are more complex than that. |
|
|
|
| quote4 = |
|
::This entire section of the article is wrong and should be replaced.--] (]) 10:01, 10 May 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| accessdate4 = 6 May 2022 |
|
:::1 is . Two quick points - '''1.''' Couldn't find a secondary source. '''2.''' Not 100% on the translation of "21st Century Enterprise University". ] (]) 15:22, 10 May 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
}} |
|
::::I'm not sure a translation is necessary, since it is a proper name.--] (]) 07:50, 11 May 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{Notable Wikipedian|Jimbo Wales|declared=yes|editedhere=yes}} |
|
:::::Reverted to Spanish. I was trying to follow suit with ] of this place on en.wikipedia that I could find. ] (]) 13:49, 11 May 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{tmbox|type=content|class=tmbox-talk-notice|text= |
|
|
<big>This talk page is '''only for discussions concerning Misplaced Pages's article on Jimmy Wales'''.</big> |
|
|
* '''To talk to Jimmy Wales himself''', please use ''']'''. |
|
|
* '''To get help with general Misplaced Pages questions''', see the ''']'''. |
|
|
* '''To discuss Misplaced Pages policy or practices''', see the ''']'''. |
|
|
* '''For other useful links''', see the ''']'''.}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{merged-from|Jimmy Wales Foundation|14 December 2020}} |
|
Again, like the last two times the second issue has been raised, no-one, Mr. Wales included, has been able to come up with a reliable source which contradicts Marshall Poe's ''The Atlantic'' article. I for one am all ears. ] 12:34, 13 May 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{pp-move-indef}} |
|
:@Skomor - see BB's comment re "I can't see the Atlantic Monthly cite because it doesn't have an online link - the quote in the reference is unhelpful to this point." - Can you give us the passage from Alantic that is relevant? ] (]) 13:23, 13 May 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
::The link is in the references section: is direct link to the relevant page, start of last paragraph quoted below: |
|
|
|
|target=Talk:Jimmy Wales/Archive index |
|
::{{quote|Wales and Sanger created the first Nupedia wiki on January 10, 2001. The initial purpose was to get the public to add entries that would then be “fed into the Nupedia process” of authorization. Most of Nupedia’s expert volunteers, however, wanted nothing to do with this, so Sanger decided to launch a separate site called “Misplaced Pages.” Neither Sanger nor Wales looked on Misplaced Pages as anything more than a lark. This is evident in Sanger’s flip announcement of Misplaced Pages to the Nupedia discussion list. “Humor me,” he wrote. “Go there and add a little article. It will take all of five or ten minutes.” And, to Sanger’s surprise, go they did. Within a few days, Misplaced Pages outstripped Nupedia in terms of quantity, if not quality, and a small community developed.}} |
|
|
|
|mask=Talk:Jimmy Wales/Archive <#> |
|
|
|
|
|
|leading_zeros=0 |
|
::'''': |
|
|
|
|indexhere=no |
|
::{{quote|After a year, Nupedia had only twenty-one articles, on such topics as atonality and Herodotus. In January, 2001, Sanger had dinner with a friend, who told him about the wiki, a simple software tool that allows for collaborative writing and editing. Sanger thought that a wiki might attract new contributors to Nupedia. (Wales says that using a wiki was his idea.) Wales agreed to try it, more or less as a lark. Under the wiki model that Sanger and Wales adopted, each entry included a history page, which preserves a record of all editing changes. They added a talk page, to allow for discussion of the editorial process—an idea Bayle would have appreciated. Sanger coined the term Misplaced Pages, and the site went live on January 15, 2001. Two days later, he sent an e-mail to the Nupedia mailing list—about two thousand people. “Misplaced Pages is up!” he wrote. “Humor me. Go there and add a little article. It will take all of five or ten minutes.”<br/><br/>Wales braced himself for “complete rubbish.” He figured that if he and Sanger were lucky the wiki would generate a few rough drafts for Nupedia. Within a month, Misplaced Pages had six hundred articles. After a year, there were twenty thousand. |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
|
|
|counter = 14 |
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|
|
|algo = old(30d) |
|
|
|archive = Talk:Jimmy Wales/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
::We have yet to see a credible refutation of these accounts. ] 13:40, 13 May 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|target=/Archive index |
|
|
|
|
|
|mask=/Archive <#> |
|
:::I have explained this, up above. In any event, it is not appropriate to place your interpretation - which I have declared to be flatly wrong - on these articles - particularly not when I am telling you that it is flatly wrong. |
|
|
|
|leading_zeros=0 |
|
:::You are cherry picking sources, I'm afraid. There are hundreds of interviews in which I have described my optimism at the start of the project.--] (]) 12:12, 15 May 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|indexhere=yes}} |
|
|
|
|
|
__TOC__ |
|
::::I can scarcely believe this. An editor who champions a strict application of the ], who has a deep and manifested conflict of interest with this article, is sincerely urging that his – entirely unsupported – personal sentiments should be deferred to over the flat contradiction of two of the most respected journalistic publications in the English-speaking world, and furthermore has the temerity to lay bad faith accusations at those who merely ask him to substantiate his claims. The editors of this article have been patient in indulging your wish to express your feelings on our biography, but this really is ludicrous. ] 18:54, 15 May 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
== Date/age issue == |
|
:::::Oh come on. That's a lot of dancing to avoid saying that I am the subject of this BLP and therefore hardly likely to be about to victimize myself with some violation of ]. We are talking about a portion of the article that claims to describe my own state of mind, and you are defending your interpretation of two cherry-picked sources that I am telling you are wrong. There are hundreds of interviews in which I have described my optimism at the start of the project. Ludicrous is right, my friend.--] (]) 20:43, 15 May 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::@Skomorokh - The issue I take with those two articles is that both of them suggest Sanger and Wales didn't expect v. much in a "commentative/narrative" fashion. Neither really explains how the author arrived at the conclusion that Wales/Sanger had low expections outside pointing to Sanger's "Humor me" e-mail. But thier interpretation of Sanger's e-mail seems to be just that. An interpretation. After reading what they offer of the e-mail I don't think it is 100% certain that Sanger was inferring he didn't expect much from WP. |
|
|
::::::The only objective evidence for Sanger/Wales having low expectations would be if they were quoted as saying, "We have low expectations". Any other evidence pointed to would be subjective interpretation, and as such might fall foul of ]. |
|
|
::::::The one thing I do find a little disconcerting though is the "complete rubbish" bit. It sounds like they are actually directly quoting Wales as saying "I expected ''complete rubbish''". I wonder if the quote is taken out of context. I'd be curious to know if Mr. Wales could even recollect saying it after all these years..... ] (]) 22:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::Sure, the quote is taken out of context and the use in this article is itself complete rubbish. I did not expect complete rubbish. What we were, was sane people testing a new concept. I can't speak directly for Larry, of course. But I was excited and optimistic and we didn't know for sure how it would work, and we weren't ideologically committed to any particular view on how we might have to adapt the software to adjust for problems that might arise. That's just sensible. To say that neither of us expected much from it is just - flatly - false.--] (]) 21:47, 3 June 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
I have been searching for some details about this as Jimmy seems to be contenting the present content and has been rejecting the newyorker interview as incorrect. Here is some results that I feel clear up this issue. I will post them here for interested users to peruse and I would be grateful for any ideas for content additions to include something from them. The Sanger quote (number3) I am intending to add as is presented..as a quote, Sanger said.."..." ] (]) 15:22, 4 June 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
] is a respected author/writer.. |
|
|
|
|
|
1. "Sanger wanted to revitalise Nupedia, but Wales saw a more radical possibility: to create an entirely open, highly collaborative approach to knowledge.*" |
|
|
|
|
|
URL: http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ipHhSn00OeQC&pg=PA14&dq=sanger+wanted+to+revitalise+nupedia,+but+Wales+saw%22&hl=en&ei=eo7pTcGHBs-j-gaTmtDFDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=sanger%20wanted%20to%20revitalise%20nupedia%2C%20but%20Wales%20saw%22&f=false |
|
|
> <http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ipHhSn00OeQC&pg=PA14&dq=sanger+wanted+to+revitalise+nupedia,+but+Wales+saw%22&hl=en&ei=eo7pTcGHBs-j-gaTmtDFDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=sanger%20wanted%20to%20revitalise%20nupedia%2C%20but%20Wales%20saw%22&f=false |
|
|
|
|
|
Ref template: <nowiki><ref name="Leadbeater2009">{{cite book|author=Charles Leadbeater|title=We-Think: Mass Innovation, Not Mass Production|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=ipHhSn00OeQC&pg=PA14|accessdate=4 June 2011|date=1 July 2009|publisher=Profile Books|isbn=9781861978370|page=14}}</ref></nowiki> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. "Wikis would speed up Nupedia's development /whilst transforming it into the true collaborative effort Wales dreamed of/. As a result of this new technology, Misplaced Pages was born in earnest on 15 January 2001." |
|
|
|
|
|
URL: http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=lOr8ic7WVMEC&pg=PA84&dq=%22whilst+transforming+it+into+the+true+collaborative+effort+Wales+dreamed+of%22&hl=en&ei=PpbpTdKvC87OsgbopsDnCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22whilst%20transforming%20it%20into%20the%20true%20collaborative%20effort%20Wales%20dreamed%20of%22&f=false |
|
|
> <http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=lOr8ic7WVMEC&pg=PA84&dq=%22whilst+transforming+it+into+the+true+collaborative+effort+Wales+dreamed+of%22&hl=en&ei=PpbpTdKvC87OsgbopsDnCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22whilst%20transforming%20it%20into%20the%20true%20collaborative%20effort%20Wales%20dreamed%20of%22&f=false> |
|
|
|
|
|
Ref template: <nowiki><ref name="Gobillot2011">{{cite book|author=Emmanuel Gobillot|title=Leadershift: Reinventing Leadership for the Age of Mass Collaboration|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=lOr8ic7WVMEC&pg=PA84|accessdate=4 June 2011|date=28 June 2011|publisher=Kogan Page Publishers|isbn=9780749463038|pages=84–}}</ref></nowiki> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.(This is by Sanger himself.) To be clear, the idea of an open source, collaborative/encyclopedia, open to contribution by ordinary people, was entirely Jimmy's, not mine, and the funding was entirely by Bomis. I was merely a grateful employee .. |
|
|
|
|
|
URL: http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=q9GnNrq3e5EC&pg=PA312&dq=%22to+be+clear,+the+idea+of+an+open+source,+collaborative%22&hl=en&ei=OpfpTdv2DcPLsgaC1uHnCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22to%20be%20clear%2C%20the%20idea%20of%20an%20open%20source%2C%20collaborative%22&f=false http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=q9GnNrq3e5EC&pg=PA312&dq=%22to+be+clear,+the+idea+of+an+open+source,+collaborative%22&hl=en&ei=OpfpTdv2DcPLsgaC1uHnCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22to%20be%20clear%2C%20the%20idea%20of%20an%20open%20source%2C%20collaborative%22&f=false> |
|
|
|
|
|
Ref template:<nowiki><ref name="DiBonaCooper2005">{{cite book|author1=Chris DiBona|author2=Danese Cooper|author3=Mark Stone|title=Open sources 2.0: the continuing evolution|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=q9GnNrq3e5EC&pg=PA312|accessdate=4 June 2011|date=1 November 2005|publisher=O'Reilly Media, Inc.|isbn=9780596008024|pages=312–}}</ref></nowiki> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:I can't help being pointing out how amused I am by this discussion. I already anticipated where this would end up, I already saw it coming, quite at the beginning of the section (well, it has happened before) ... Jimbo as primary source for his own thoughts vs. reliable (well, "reliable") secondary (journalistic) sources on what he said. This may seem silly, but to be fair, all kinds of sources are fallible, and while journalists are known to frequently misquote people (or quote them in misleading ways; not necessarily always intentionally, or with malicious intent; also, misunderstandings may arise), even Jimbo himself is in principle not immune to misremembering things, painting the past overly rosy and other such human, all too human fallacies, even when it comes to his own past, and in principle – i. e., if we could take the accuracy of journalistic sources, such as transcripts and interviews, for granted –, funny enough, these journalistic sources could even be ''more'' reliable than Jimbo's own memories, as we know how memories are reconstructed rather than simply recalled perfectly. So it turns out that the seemingly silly obsession with reliable sources on Misplaced Pages is an actually quite sensible principle, even if it leads to Jimbo having to dispute sources, and thus, struggle with the principle he has established himself: Citations from secondary sources reign supreme and trump (almost?) everything else. (I've seen E-mail from scholars on a relevant point rejected as not really useable sources to justify modifications in articles or clarify points, which I do understand, but on the face of it it sounds truly bizarre.) |
|
|
:That said, even in scientific works you can occasionally see attributions such as "pers. comm.", or in German "mündlich" or "Unterricht", which isn't exactly up to the best standards of scientific practice, but as long as personal communication isn't used to support any major points or only to indicate where an idea comes from, I suppose there's nothing wrong with it. --] (]) 03:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
I think that there are a couple of articles in the Misplaced Pages that make sense to overview / manage separately. One of them is the Silicon Valley. If you will have a chance to take a look to the current you will definitely have fun and perhaps some insight as well. --] (]) 05:39, 19 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Regarding style of quotes == |
|
|
|
|
|
I recently took the trouble to convert all the straight quotation marks to curly ones. I expected to be reverted, and indeed it was, but now the article has a combination of curly and straight quotes (inconsistent). |
|
|
|
|
|
I just want to remember that ] is just a guideline and not policy. This encyclopedia is not just online, its articles also end up printed in books. |
|
|
|
|
|
I know that <code>"</code> is easier for type, but you are not encouraged to use <code>“</code> and <code>”</code>. If someone took the time to change those little signs, do not undo that just for following the manual of style. In that case, don’t you think that ] also should follow strictly MoS? <small>—] <sup>]]</sup> \\ 19 July, 2011 </small> |
|
|
|
|
|
== External link == |
|
|
|
|
|
The "External links" section doesn't seem the right place for a wikipedia article - ] - what do others think? ] (]) 12:52, 25 July 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:It is, as far as this article is concerned, an external link. It would go against ] to put it anywhere else, in my opinion. Remember, Misplaced Pages articles are commonly hosted elsewhere. Misplaced Pages is merely the framework that supports the development of these articles. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 02:41, 27 July 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:Also note, it (]) is not a "Misplaced Pages article", (i.e. it is not in the ]) it is in the ]. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 02:44, 27 July 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is a date/age issue in the second paragraph of the "Early life and education section". "When he was three, in 1968" cannot be correct if he was born on August 7 or 8, 1966. In 1968 he was either one or two, not three. ] (]) 09:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
== Jimmy Wales == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:That ''Daily Beast'' source says "When he was three, his mother bought a World Book Encyclopedia from a door-to-door salesman..", so no year mentioned. I am unable to open the first source, ''The News Courier'', either original or archived, so can't see what it says. ] (]) 09:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
Hey. It's RJennings07. I was wondering about how I can chat with other Misplaced Pages members. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:17, 28 August 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
::@] Returning to this, the other source says: "Doris Wales’ husband, Jimmy, wasn’t sure what she was thinking when she bought a World Book Encyclopedia set from a traveling salesman in 1968. Their first-born son, also named Jimmy, was not yet 3." So the cited sources disagree about whether he was 3 or not yet 3. ''''']''''' (]) 05:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Jimbo == |
|
== Laws: (WIKITICS) Displaying, Creating, User Modification through process of elimination. Every modification has to meet curtain criteria to advance... == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sure we need to mention he’s username in the intro? Barely any sources mention it, and it isn’t a common name given to him. Cheers. ] (]) 16:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
I think WIKIMEDIA needs to come up with a website where people, if given the chance, could ultimately create, modify and advance laws, to be voted on through popular public participation. Pros and cons grouped to eliminate redundancy and listed so people are fully aware of the argument. Most popular laws move to the front for easy access. This will alow math, instead of prejudice, to shape our lopsided, outdated and corrupt laws. I think a website like this could ultimately replace congress, saving the country headaches and trillions of dollars. If you eliminate congress... you minimize secret government activities. |
|
|
John Kelsch, Fairbanks, Alaska <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:32, 19 September 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
:I think this should be on ] is an article about Jimmy Wales not his user page.--] (]) 01:27, 26 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Errrm, the article opens with: "{{tq|'''Jimmy Donal Wales''' (born August 7, 1966), also known on Misplaced Pages by the nickname '''Jimbo Wales'''...}}" So that's the 15th word in? ] (]) 16:55, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
==Early career in finance== |
|
|
|
::What? That’s my point. It’s in the intro. Yet it’s a username without any real-life importance. (I mean that it’s not notable enough to be mentioned in the intro. It’s not a common name, it’s his username). Jimmy Wales has no special rights! Down with the dictatorship! ] (]) 16:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
There is a discussion at ] ({{oldid|User talk:Jimbo Wales#Your early career in finance.|453463146|permalink}}) where Jimbo responded to some questions. ] (]) 02:32, 2 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:::Sorry, I misunderstood your comment. I think it's been there for quite a long time. And I think it probably makes him more accessible, to editors and readers alike. I also can't imagine anything much less like ]. ] (]) 17:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
:Of course the weakness in having the discussion there is that 1) it's clearly the wrong place for a content discussion, 2) Jimbo's page gets archived so frequently the discussion will simply vanish into his talk archives without meaningful clash (and as a content discussion, many editors will choose not to get involved there, IMHO), and 3) the questions raised are reasonable and important ones not answered by sources or content on Jimbo's subject page. If the living subject were, say, a politician or an economist, a large omission like the one raised would cry out for filling in and citation. So if that discussion goes stale, expect me to start a fresh discussion here to find answers to the questions raised. ] (]) 03:34, 2 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
::::{{ping|Martinevans123}} Inform yourself better before making bold claims with no factual truth (see: ]). As to Jimbo Wales, you might think I’m a picky asshole, and I might think it myself, and it might be true, but clearly this goes against policies, or more generally the way biographies are written. This is just a guy who created an online encyclopedia, might be this one, who knows? That this guy is also coincidentally a user on Misplaced Pages should not be in the article, and definitely not in the intro. Cheers. ] (]) 17:30, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
::Looks more like trolling than discussion for article improvement. ] (]) 08:54, 2 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:::::What an wonderfully enlightening essay, full of "factual truth". Thank you so much for sharing that. And yes, what an amazing coincidence that is - an inventor occasionally using his own invention. Who knows, maybe that nice ] will be using ] before too long? ] (]) 17:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
:::Please AGF. It may be the IP is trolling, but the questions raised are pointed and not currently covered on the article page. I did not raise these issues myself, but as a long established editor in good standing, I'd like to see the questions answered myself. I'm clearly NOT trolling, but interested in page improvement. Has anyone written a book length treatment of the subject? Why the heck not? ] (]) 11:05, 2 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:::::: {{ping|Martinevans123}} This biography is like any other. The username Jimbo Wales, is not a common way of calling him, and is not described ''enough'' in the sources to be notable. ] (]) 17:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
::::Those who have watched Jimbo's talk for a considerable period know that trolls frequently pop in to ask pointed questions. Clearly Jimbo would have mentioned if he knew of a book or other reliable source. As no one has found such a source, it is evident that it does not exist, so speculating about issues is not productive (and certainly lies outside the ]). ] (]) 11:32, 2 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:::::::And this is an article Talk page, like any other. So, as per ], we need to arrive at a consensus to remove that detail, instead of just edit warring? ] (]) 17:53, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
::::: Ahem I certainly am not trolling, please assume good faith. I am concerned that claims in supposedly reliable sources conflict. This article says that Jimmy was a 'research director' at Chicago Options Associates. Where did that come from? All claims should be linked to reliable sources, and this one is not, moreover it conflicts with the claim that he was 'Research Director' (a research director would not be allowed to trade because of conflict of interest, although I am sure it happens). Also COA was deregistered in 1991, so that claim conflicts as well. Either delete these claims from the article or find the most reliable one and substantiate it. ] (]) 11:41, 2 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
::::::::{{ping|Martinevans123}} Sorry. Then let’s discuss. Taking aside what I said before, I did genuinely want to discuss if his username, which is not really notable in any way, should be mentioned in his article. Considering that, yes, genuinely, this article is nothing special, and if Elon Musk was editing Misplaced Pages, his account would not be mentioned. In other words, stating that he edits Misplaced Pages under Jimbo Wales, provided there is a source, can be added, but having Jimbo Wales in the intro just seems a little bizarre. He is not commonly referred to as such, and the ] has nothing to do at the very top of an article. He is not commonly referred to as such, only in Misplaced Pages, and only by those who know he is there. ] (]) 18:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
::::::arh, hg,,, cough. Good faith is not a blind man in the dark we are able to assess your contributions. - I'm off - bye, you realize you can be bold and improve the article yourself. ] (]) 01:26, 3 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:::::::::Experience shows that no good comes from new editors popping in here and poking the bear. I know it's terribly unfair that Jimbo gets special treatment just because he founded Misplaced Pages but most of us have learned to live with it. See ] and ] for why rules that generally apply are not always applied if there is a good reason to do otherwise. ] (]) 00:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
:::::::The ip is trolling, plain and simple. His questions are incoherent and his insinuations are transparent. BusterD, I'd be happy to hear what you think is missing from the article right now, and what clarifications you think I might provide.--] (]) 10:09, 3 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
::::::::::{{ping|Johnuniq}} I get it. Again, sorry if it seemed that way. What I find frustrating is that what I said on my first message was serious, I genuinely want to discuss if we need to put his username in the Intro. It legitimately feels bizarre. It’s not a common name by which he is called, I also know that Misplaced Pages "rules" are just recommendations, and I also do not care that much about this intro. Cheers. ] (]) 01:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::]… This sums it up perfectly. I am legitimately asking if we can keep a not commonly known ''username'' of an online encyclopedia, as an alt/name of Jimmy Wales, in addition to making it sound professional by writing "is known on Misplaced Pages", instead of "known on Misplaced Pages by his username". And in fact, it makes this article a lot less professional, seriously, I’m not kidding. Cheers. ] (]) 01:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::, took about 20 seconds to find this one. ] (]) 01:58, 3 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::::Ok. I better shut up now shouldn’t I? Cheers, and happy new year. ] (]) 02:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::::<small>Looking forward to Twitterpedia. Now that might well be a ]? But at least we'd get updates . ] (]) 10:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC) </small> |
|
|
For the next time this comes up, {{user|Encyclopédisme}} was CU indeffed and globally locked on 27 June 2024. ] (]) 00:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Hatnote == |
|
I don't think this is the place for ] by Misplaced Pages editors drawing primary source material from talk page interviews with Jimmy. However, he may be able to give some helpful tips on how to find reliable sources on this topic. That said, secondary sources often do get things wrong and this is someone's BLP, after all, so don't be startled if, when asking about something in a source, the answer's along the lines of, "that's flat wrong." ] (]) 23:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:Thanks for the offer, Jimbo, but I was asking about reliable sources, not opinions (even informed opinions). After looking in from a wikibreak, I was quite surprised at the above response from the "father" of this project. Jimmy should know the policies and guidelines better than anyone. And I think Gwen makes the essential point. Subjects of BLPs who suddenly pop up on article talk to discuss issues are clearly in COI. Communication via OTRS is a slightly different matter. The primary value of such COI contribution would be in the discovery of RS, not self-assessment. The issues the ip "troller" raises deserve answers documented by RS citation (or IMHO they'll never go away). The confusion of the Chicago trading days isn't imagined, it's authentic. Another example: since Nupedia and WP were originally launched on Bomis servers, it's not to the pedia's credit the Bomis page has many of its sourcing legs kicked out from under it by dead internet links (and Archive.org isn't as helpful as I would normally expect it to be). It's fine with me that Bomis had sections related to pretty girls. I like pretty girls myself; I don't think that detail undercuts the project. As Wikipedians, we owe readers good sourcing on all pages, but especially on certain key pages, particularly those related to the history and credibility of the project. It might serve the Foundation well to commission an authorized biography of Jimbo to dissipate some of this confusion. |
|
|
:On Misplaced Pages I consider myself primarily a compiler of minor biographies (mostly people long deceased). If one of those figures suddenly popped up on article talkspace to discuss content issues, I'd first be surprised and somewhat pleased (even flattered), then I'd be suspicious (see page histories of ] and ]). Maybe that's just me. Per Seigenthaler, we need to pay attention to the "that's flat wrong" statements, but I'm not over-interested in what subjects of BLP have to say about the way they are portrayed on the pedia. It's a potential pitfall, and not one I'd expect a Foundation official to perpetuate. ] (]) 10:50, 9 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::There is a tremendous amount of confusion in the above comment (Jimbo did ''not'' say anything like what is suggested by BusterD, either here or at his user talk page). Future comments should focus on improvements to the article, per ]. ] (]) 02:46, 10 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I'd like to reiterate though that I don't think there is any actual confusion here. If BusterD has a question, I can try to answer it.--] (]) 07:39, 10 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::::As an update - , added the retired templates to his userpage the day after posting here and has not yet returned to editing. ] (]) 21:45, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{u|JLCop}} recently removed the hatnote. I reinstated it for now but I do think this subject is worth discussing, given that projectspace links within mainspace are generally discouraged. I noticed that ] also has a similar hatnote but that this is not the case for the average person listed at ]. Thoughts? ] ] 03:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
==Personal life update== |
|
|
If that ''Guardian'' article is true, Mr. Wales might have a second child by this point in time, and be married to Kate Garvey. I tried Googling on this topic and found nothing. Does anyone know of any reliable sources which might help us keep Misplaced Pages current? ] (]) 20:49, 11 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Delete. ] (]) 00:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
=='Pornography' vs 'adult content'== |
|
|
|
*] which doesn't seem to have been closed or concluded (first item on the page). ] (]) 13:04, 1 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
* I removed this before seeing this discussion. This is a clear case of ], as the edit notice itself says. I also removed the hatnote from ], for the same reason. ] ] 03:35, 12 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*:Fair enough. Given recent events, I think it's best to stay away from this article going forward just to be on the safe side. I appreciate the input from others in this discussion. ] ] 03:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== RfC using ] to link ] and ] == |
|
I'm referring to the sentence: |
|
|
"In 1996, he and two partners founded Bomis, a male-oriented web portal featuring entertainment and adult content," in which my edit to change the word "adult" to "pornographic" was reverted. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I propose that we add something like this to the top of the article, as Jimbo has an information page other than user page, and there are many other mainspace articles related to Misplaced Pages that links to internal pages like this. |
|
In the above sentence, "adult" is being used as a euphemism for pornography. This isn't a matter of opinion, this is an established, referenced fact (See ]). Using the word "adult" is ambiguous, and makes an implicit value judgement of the content. This is why it is preferred to simply use a more precise term and allow readers to make their own opinions. For further information: ]. ] (]) 04:16, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:Problem is, the word "pornography" is not at all precise, and it has a meaning now (when extreme porn is one click away from everyone) that is rather different from ]. ] (]) 06:06, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::Adult content is far less precise and is a loaded term. Who decides what is and isn't "adult"? Discussion of gambling, alcohol, tobacco, or recreational drugs could constitute adult content, but Bomis did not have any of that. Retirement could even be considered "adult" content. ] (]) 21:02, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Hi, I would say pornography was more loaded - there are legal statutes relating to age that assert who can look at what legally and when - whereas, one mans pornography is another mans naked humanoid. What do the reliable citations say and are there any links in the wayback to borris? all I get is redlink - - ] (]) 21:10, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::::The content was decidedly erotic. That is not disputed . See the Bomis Misplaced Pages page for more. ] (]) 21:18, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Yes, thanks - imo - erotic is closer defined in adult content than pornography ,"Bomis found its niche in erotica and adult content", I had a look a the wiki boris article, thanks for the detail. Its hair splitting imo and this is a ] so I prefer as policy suggests to err on the side of caution. ] (]) 21:24, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::So we are in agreement to go with "erotic" in place of "adult"? ] (]) 21:28, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::No, please don't put words into my mouth - I support adult as being a neutral reflective expression, in this BLP. I will remove this from my watchlist for a bit now - one of the worst aspects of this project is endless worthless discussions over hair splitting trivia. - imo, from my investigations the NPOV position is adult content, bye. ] (]) 21:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::Well, you argued the point for me. Erotica is more closely defined in adult content. It is a more specific, less loaded, and less ambiguous term than "adult content", which you even indicate that it is a subset of. If you do not want to discuss this further, and if no one else has any further comments, I'll go ahead and change the term "adult content" in a few days time. ] (]) 21:36, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::: Hello| Your not listening at all .... I do not support your desired change - I support as the article currently is, adult content - ] (]) 21:40, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::: You cannot simply say you don't agree, abandon the discussion, and then expect whatever your opinion is to be fulfilled. Misplaced Pages works by building a consensus. If you want to discuss this further, then let's talk. Otherwise, step aside and let the rest of us form a consensus. ] (]) 21:49, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::Again you misrepresent me - I have stated my position - I have nothing else to say about it - its so trivial I have already wasted more time on it than it is worth. Simply count my vote for the consensus in support of the position I have stated. ] (]) 21:56, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::I have not misrepresented your position. I cannot be faulted for misinterpreting what you've said when your unstated final conclusion went against your stated argument. I wasn't able to make that leap of logic and I doubt anyone else but you could have. But, please, if you have nothing else to say in regards to the original discussion do not feel obliged to continue. Unlike what you've said, this isn't a vote. ] (]) 22:07, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Yes, "adult content" is not precise—no single term can precisely identify anything let alone a web site where a range of material is available. The main problem with "pornography" is what I said above: it has a meaning now that is totally different from 1996 and it misrepresents what ] says. From the latter: "{{xt|categorized broadly as "Babe", "Entertainment", "Sports", "Adult", "Science fiction", and "Other"}}" (and later in the article, we see that ''Bomis Premium'' offered pornography). The {{diff|Jimmy Wales|prev|454429983|proposed edit}} describes that simply as "{{xt|a male-oriented web portal featuring entertainment and ] content}}". That misrepresents what was apparently quite different to what is known as porn today (where one click takes you to anal sex and more), and is not suitable, particularly in the lead of a BLP. Is there a reliable source describing Bomis as a porn site? ] (]) 22:36, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::::See above for a reference. And what are your thoughts on the term "erotic" instead? ] (]) 22:47, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::If by "above" you mean , that article says "Bomis found its niche in erotica and adult content, making enough revenue from ads and paid subscriptions for premium X-rated content" which is pretty much what ] says. What is the actual problem that needs to be solved here? Who says that "adult content" is such a heinous euphemism that it must not be used? Describing ] as "adult content" would be an absurd euphemism, but the term seems precisely appropriate (and sourced) for Bomis. ] (]) 00:59, 15 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::Other websites are not bound to neutrality (cultural and otherwise). Adult content adds nothing but vagary. Who decides what is and isn't "adult"? Discussion of gambling, alcohol, tobacco, or recreational drugs could constitute adult content, but Bomis did not have any of that. Retirement could even be considered "adult" content. Also see . ] (]) 15:48, 15 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::Bomis did, in fact, have information about gambling, alcohol, tobacco, and recreational drugs. Dr. WTF is pushing an agenda here that is not in line with the sources or the facts. Bomis was a platform for people to come and build "web rings" - links to content of all kinds and guess what, some people liked to collect links to adult content (of all kinds).--] (]) 05:42, 18 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{For|the personal user page and related internal page|User:Jimbo Wales|WP:JIMBO}} |
|
== Is Bomis best labeled as "adult", "pornographic", or "erotic"? -- RfC == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was a ] on this, editors refused to link the user page in the article itself because it would constitute an exception, but the new proposal using a "for" template to link the user page does not constitute an exception per above. ] (]) 22:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
{{rfc|bio|rfcid=46D3B3C}} |
|
|
|
* '''Oppose''' per the previous discussion, this is still a blaring ] violation. It shows internal strength to not let our guard down when writing about Misplaced Pages, and instead write the article in the exact same way we would about unrelated subjects. In no other context would it even be conceivable to link to someone's official website at the very top of the article rather than at the bottom in the "external links" section, so we must not do so here. ] ] 22:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
There is some disagreement regarding the appropriate labeling of Bomis in the (lead "adult", "pornographic", or "erotic"?) and whether or not a more ] should be used. Prior consensus settled on "erotic" (also see footnote in main article). ] (]) 16:08, 15 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
*:] only applies to ] and not ] though, and this is an internal link, not jimbowales.com which would belong at the bottom. ] (]) 00:11, 29 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
:The source says "erotica and adult" - why not just go with that? I think "erotica" is better than "erotic", because the latter may be a matter of opinion. If Jimmy's willing to email me some archived content then I'll make a judgement and get back to you. --] (]) 23:05, 17 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
*:: It's only a "internal link" because you're letting your guard down in exactly the way I said not to do. Please read the edit notice: "This article relates to Misplaced Pages itself. Please note that links to non-article namespaces should be treated as external links and not included in the body. Misplaced Pages is not a reliable source, so references to it must comply with WP:ABOUTSELF." ] ] 01:14, 29 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
::None of those labels is actually accurate. Bomis was a web directory built by end users and contained all kinds of content. The idea that it should be primarily referred to as "adult" even is just wrong. It was about as adult as Yahoo. (Indeed, I used to send reporters links to Yahoo when they would ask me about what this adult content at Bomis stuff meant.) |
|
|
|
*:::That edit notice exists in other pages such as ], ], ], etc and still use hats containing internal links. Do you suggest to remove those hats? ] (]) 10:07, 29 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
::FormerIP, I don't have any archived content to email you. But here is a link to that Dr. WTF might find interesting. Perhaps it is time to go over to the article on one of the Yahoo founders to make wild claims about pornography? |
|
|
|
*::::Pinging participants in ] @] @] @] |
|
::There are some serious errors in some of the sources, which I'll just mention now. One source - a very high quality source - claims that Bomis came to be known as the "Playboy of the Internet" - that is completely false, and I dare anyone to find anyone even saying such a thing prior to the source claiming it. It was a turn of phrase by a reporter which is now sometimes in my article. (I haven't looked just now.) It's editorially misleading to the public to use that phrase since it is a factual claim which is provably false--] (]) 05:51, 18 October 2011 (UTC). |
|
|
|
*::::Pinging participants in ] @] @] @] |
|
|
*::::Let's see which is the consensus on this. ] (]) 21:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*:::::<s>Whoever this Noel Body is, I just don't trust him.</s> Whatevs. ] (]) 22:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*:::::Per the newly added COI section on my user page, I don't think I'm the best person to be commenting here. ] ] 22:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Oppose''' per Pppery, non-article namespaces are treated as external links in articles related to Misplaced Pages itself. Also, the fact that other pages also use these hats isn't a good argument, and I would suggest also removing them: someone searching for our project page ] most likely isn't going to type ]. ] (] · ]) 23:01, 2 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Investment banker category == |
|
== Newer 2024 image? == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure whether or not it'd be right from me to change the infobox portrait myself, so I decided to ask y'all here. I propose that the current 2023 image (which has an admittedly distracting blurry background) is changed to a newer, fresher image from the 2024 Wikimania. Below are my proposals. I personally favor Option C. |
|
- but I have never been an investment banker.--] (]) 05:54, 18 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
<gallery> |
|
|
File:Jimmy Wales in New York City March 2023 blurred cropped.jpg|Current image |
|
|
File:Jimmy Wales 2024 portrait 3x4 (1).jpg|A |
|
|
File:Jimmy Wales 2024 portrait 3x4 (2).jpg|B |
|
|
File:Jimmy Wales 2024 portrait 3x2 (3).jpg|C |
|
|
File:Jimmy Wales 2024 portrait 3x2 (4).jpg|D |
|
|
</gallery> ]<sup>(])</sup> 21:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:I prefer the current image. It's better lit and less grainy than the other options provided. – ] (] <b>·</b> ]) 18:55, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
There is a date/age issue in the second paragraph of the "Early life and education section". "When he was three, in 1968" cannot be correct if he was born on August 7 or 8, 1966. In 1968 he was either one or two, not three. Timothy Cooper (talk) 09:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Sure we need to mention he’s username in the intro? Barely any sources mention it, and it isn’t a common name given to him. Cheers. Encyclopédisme (talk) 16:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
I propose that we add something like this to the top of the article, as Jimbo has an information page other than user page, and there are many other mainspace articles related to Misplaced Pages that links to internal pages like this.
For the personal user page and related internal page, see Not sure whether or not it'd be right from me to change the infobox portrait myself, so I decided to ask y'all here. I propose that the current 2023 image (which has an admittedly distracting blurry background) is changed to a newer, fresher image from the 2024 Wikimania. Below are my proposals. I personally favor Option C.