| Revision as of 21:43, 23 October 2011 view sourceMirokado (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors21,586 edits →AltGr: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:13, 19 November 2024 view source MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,136,056 edits →ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{pp-protected|small=yes}} | |||
| {{notice|'''Note:''' I like to keep discussion threads together, so if you leave a message here I will usually respond here. If I have begun a discussion on your page, I'll see it if you respond there. | |||
| <small>A {{tl|ping}} would be appreciated if you reply at a later date. {{tl|Talkback}} notes here will generally not be needed.</small> | |||
| Note to '''new and non-logged-in editors''': Due to a long-term issue with vandalism, this talkpage has unfortunately had to be ]. If you need to contact me and can't post here, please just post your message on your own talkpage or the talkpage of the relevant article and add the code "<nowiki>{{ping|Future Perfect at Sunrise}}</nowiki>" to it, then I'll be sure to see it. }} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 250K | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 33 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 3 | |minthreadsleft = 3 | ||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 3 | |minthreadstoarchive = 3 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 17: | ||
| {| class="infobox" width="315px" | {| class="infobox" width="315px" | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| ! align="center" | |
! align="center" | {{/Archives}} | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| {{bots|deny= |
{{bots|deny=SineBot}} | ||
| '''Note: If you leave a message here I will most often respond here''' | |||
| {{notice|Hello fellow Wikipedians, due to changed circumstances in my private and professional life I am currently hovering somewhere in between "busy in real life and may not respond quickly to inquiries" and "semi-retired". I'll probably be around from time to time, but please don't rely on me for quick admin action or the like, for the time being. All the best, – ] ] 05:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC) }} | |||
| == Discretionary sanctions: topic ban == | |||
| You appear to have imposed an invalid ban on my account. An appeal will be sent directly to the Committee. ] (]) 08:26, 10 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| : It would have been more appropriate if you had pointed out to me why you felt the ban is invalid; that way, we might even have discussed it, like reasonable people. But in any case, it seems you have already gone ahead and asked the arbs directly, so I guess I'll just leave it to them to handle. ] ] 12:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::I received a ban appeal by email, and I am replying here in order to keep conversations together as much as possible. Firstly, as a general principle, I would never think to undo a fellow administrator's action without some sort of communication with them first, both from the appealing party and from myself. Secondly, whilst I was the Arbitration Committee clerk in the Senkaku Islands arbitration case, I am otherwise uninvolved in this dispute, and do not intend to involve myself further. Thirdly, if the intent is to appeal directly to the committee, I do not see what role I am expected to play. I will consequently not be taking any action on the ban appeal. --] (]) 12:42, 10 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Thanks for the note. From what STSC said, I gather he meant to appeal to the committee itself, so maybe he thought you as the clerk would be forwarding it to them; but in any case he seems to have written to NYB too so I suppose the committee has what it needs. STSC: in principle, you could also appeal to the community via ]; the process is outlined there. ] ] 12:48, 10 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :: I was advised by an arbitrator to appeal via AE before appealing to the Committee. I would discuss this issue with you first before going through the AE process. As you have mentioned "like reasonable people", I feel that you should at least contact the editor directly on their talk page to raise any issue you may have before you decide to impose any ban on them. Besides, I believe it is a requirement to warn the editor directly before any sanction is imposed. I had made one revert in order to restore a version close to the original version before the change of the wording in the NCGN page. I don't think I fit into this description for a sanction: "if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process". ] (]) 02:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Warning was given on the guideline talkpage; besides, it is longstanding practice that editors who are named parties of the Arbcom case in question don't need extra notifications about the formalities, as they are already aware of the decision, especially when it's so recent. Edit-warring on a guideline page is a particularly serious matter, and you were continuing this problematic conduct after the warning. Moreover, the style and tone of your accompanying talkpage message displayed an aggressive, unconstructive attitude in your editing. I get the same impression from going over your talkpage contributions in the archives of ]; they are repetitive, fail to constructively address arguments by other editors, and could well be described as ]. For these reasons, I believe the sanction is justified. ] ] 06:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Your general statement on the NCGN page is hardly a warning at all; and a direct warning should be given to the editor as required by the Committee. I also refute the allegations you made to justify your questionable sanction. This serves as a notice to you that an arbitration enforcement action appeal is lodged. ] (]) 18:46, 11 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::: I would like to point out that you yourself have been warned by another admin "to remain civil with no attacks to others anywhere on Misplaced Pages" in . ] (]) 19:20, 11 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::::And what on earth does that have to do with the subject at hand? How has FutPerf attacked you or been uncivil? I see nothing remotely of the sort here. ] ] 00:42, 12 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::It was in response to his allegations on me being uncivil apparently. ] (]) 02:49, 12 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Well, ] is hardly an argument for the lifting of sanctions. And that's assuming the accusation up the page that FutPerf has been uncivil is even accurate, which I don't see much evidence for. ] ] | |||
| :::::::: From the content in the "Civility please" alone, we can see his tone of aggressive and nonconstructive attitude. ] (]) 03:53, 13 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
| == Essay on AE == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| I just wrote a ] of what is intended as some advice on how to make one's case at AE. Any comments would be greatly appreciated. ] (]) 10:42, 13 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
| == Voyevoda edit-warring again == | |||
| You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
| Undiscussed reverts with insults in edit summaries - http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Ivan_Fyodorov_(printer)&curid=576666&action=history.--] (]) 15:09, 16 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
| == You assistance == | |||
| Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
| Hi there. I would appreciate your assistance on the below matter. In the article about ], two users keep reverting all the time pics that I have put there to help the article on the grounds that they are "technically poor". On the other hands the photos they put are a) a photo about Rio-antirrio bridge, which to begin with, its not even in Peloponnese, and b) the Corinth Canal, which again is not part of Peloponnese! The first is a bridge that connects the mainland with Peloponnese and the second is a Canal that seperates the mainland and Peloponnese! Total inconsistency! If you recall, you had also praised many of my pictures and you moved them in Misplaced Pages Commons as well. I would like your assistance in this article, since you are an experienced and "old" user. Thanks.] (]) 16:26, 16 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| == FYI I mentioned you == | |||
| ] | |||
| here and btw your chiming in might help. Thanks! -] (]) 17:40, 16 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| == Taichung Edit == | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 --> | |||
| ==Happy Adminship Anniversary!== | |||
| You reverted the table format at ] stating that there were many non-free images. Would you consider reverting to the table format, but replacing the non-free images with the national flag of the country? Would this fix the problem? Please advise me. ] (]) 22:49, 18 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| {{ombox | |||
| | name = Happy Adminship | |||
| | image = ] | |||
| | imageright = ] | |||
| | style = border: 2px solid SlateBlue; background: linear-gradient(to right, #c5c5ec, #bfd1f2, #a9efea); | |||
| | textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center; | |||
| | plainlinks = yes | |||
| | text = <big>'''Happy adminship anniversary!'''</big><br />Hi Future Perfect at Sunrise! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your ]. Enjoy this special day! ] (]) 02:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| == Reverts == | |||
| : Well, I can't object to such a table version on image policy grounds, so I wouldn't prevent you from reinstating that in my role as an administrator, but as an editor, I am still opposed to it, on the grounds I and others explained on ]. I very strongly recommend you start listening more carefully to what other editors tell you, because you appear to be editing stubbornly against consensus. I am also not particularly happy you reinstated that list of countries on ], ''again'' without providing a reason for it on the talkpage as you were asked to do. This is edit-warring, and it's not good. ] ] 06:13, 19 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::I understand and am listening, and apologise for the Byzantine edit, I just thought the objection was for the length added, and not content. The edit was a very time consuming one and I would very much appreciate if you would allow me to revert to it. Also, a concensus has yet to be reached at that page. | |||
| ] (]) 18:17, 19 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| If I come across one of their additions to RSN would it be helpful if I pinged you? -- <small>LCU</small> ''']''' <small>''«]» °]°''</small> 20:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ARBMAC restriction on LAz17 == | |||
| : Thanks, but I guess it's enough to get them reverted promptly – if they then start revert-warring it back in, there should be enough admin eyeballs on that page to push the block button eventually, right? It doesn't have to be always me. That person is a pest (I suppose you're familiar with their ]?), thanks for helping deal with them. ] ] 23:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::I looked it up after their recent posts, I'll keep an eye out for them. -- <small>LCU</small> ''']''' <small>''«]» °]°''</small> 23:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == | |||
| I see you weakened the deal that I struck with LAz17, logged at ], shortly after it was struck. What's up with that? ] <small>(])</small> 05:24, 19 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| : Honestly I don't remember the exact details of the situation around that request right now, but as far as I can figure out, I had no intention of interfering with any sanction imposed by you. I imposed an original topic ban, you then added a strengthened version on top of it, then you rescinded your part of the topic ban, leaving mine intact, and I later modified "my" part too. Do you feel it interferes unduly with what you were doing? ] ] 06:08, 19 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::No, I'm just trying to figure out what the current restriction is. ] <small>(])</small> 18:18, 19 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, | |||
| == Arydberg again == | |||
| I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. | |||
| Since you are the warning admin, please take a look at . -- ] (]) 17:06, 19 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Take the survey ''''''. | |||
| == A barnstar for you! == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you so much for this It saved a lot of disruption, both in the form of continued discussion from an editor, and also from the disruption that long and unnecessary dispute resolution causes. Cutting to the chase in such a clear cut case was a wise thing to do. Thanks! -- ] (]) 00:52, 20 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == ] evaded his topic-ban using ] as a proxy. == | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| Hi Future Perfect at Sunrise. ] edited a banned article using ] as a proxy. | |||
| *Lvhis halted to respond to my post to ] at 21:17, 11 October (UTC). | |||
| *STSC requested Lvhis to enable e-mail account of Misplaced Pages at 4:06, 17 October (UTC). | |||
| *Lvhis enabled his e-mail account of Misplaced Pages at 23:43, 18 October (UTC). | |||
| *STSC sent an e-mail to Lvhis at 01:38, 19 October (UTC). | |||
| *Lvhis received the e-mail at 03:56, 19 October (UTC). | |||
| *Lvhis edited ] 14 hours after receiving the e-mail at 17:55, 19 October (UTC). | |||
| Lvhis is a SPA and solely editing Senkaku Islands articles. The purpose of STSC's communication with Lvhis by e-mail is nothing other than to suggest Lvhis a proxy editing of the STSC's idea. I think a banned user should not communicate with an editor who is involved in a banned article and discuss about the article. Even if it is not a direct edit request but a simple advice, such an action will affect the editor with STSC's idea. I would appreciate if you could impose an extended period of ban and block on both users as a violation of ]. ―― ] (]) 00:54, 20 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| == ] == | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| Hi. It appears that after his block and , {{UV|Gersoncharles}} has neglected to clean up after his mess of copyright violations. I tried to contact you before about this, but . — '''<span style="background:Yellow;font-family:Helvetica Bold;color:Blue;">] ]</span>''' 03:01, 20 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 --> | |||
| : I only see two remaining images contributed by him, which are probably legitimate, and no upload attempts after that warning. Is there other problematic stuff around? ] ] 05:18, 20 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| == Topic-banned - user:samofi == | |||
| Its clear ethnic nationalism of 6-7 Hungarian users, they are canvassing, they contact together by email, they told that Slovakia is neofascist state (http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=454209623). They makes a falsification of history and Iam banned? What exactly is nationalistic in my edits? I used talk:pages and discuss all my edits. But nothing happened to this users (they were reported for a few times), they were not even warned because of their behaviour. They can create a synthesis and original research or fringe theory and it will be no opposition against this original research? Look honestly to this article: ] - is it no reason to discuss it? I started terminological discussion between terms Magar(http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/magyar) and Hungarian(http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hungarian). Is it nationalistic? Is this an open encyclopedia? This elimination of Slovak history and Slovak Wikipedians is crazy. I see the black future of Misplaced Pages, we will have a big inviolate ideological groups and other significant opinions will be banned. Congratulation, bravo. --] (]) 08:07, 20 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| ==Fakirbakir== | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| This unpleasantness with Samofi has crossed my path a few times now, and I'm not really trying to get involved, but I had to investigate one thing - please see ]. --] (]) 10:36, 21 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == AltGr == | |||
| </div> | |||
| I have just started a section ] about this distinction. --] (]) 21:43, 23 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 00:13, 19 November 2024
 | Note: I like to keep discussion threads together, so if you leave a message here I will usually respond here. If I have begun a discussion on your page, I'll see it if you respond there.
A {{ping}} would be appreciated if you reply at a later date. {{Talkback}} notes here will generally not be needed. Note to new and non-logged-in editors: Due to a long-term issue with vandalism, this talkpage has unfortunately had to be semi-protected. If you need to contact me and can't post here, please just post your message on your own talkpage or the talkpage of the relevant article and add the code "{{ping|Future Perfect at Sunrise}}" to it, then I'll be sure to see it. |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hello fellow Wikipedians, due to changed circumstances in my private and professional life I am currently hovering somewhere in between "busy in real life and may not respond quickly to inquiries" and "semi-retired". I'll probably be around from time to time, but please don't rely on me for quick admin action or the like, for the time being. All the best, – Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC) |
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
 | Happy adminship anniversary! Hi Future Perfect at Sunrise! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC) |  |
Reverts
If I come across one of their additions to RSN would it be helpful if I pinged you? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 20:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I guess it's enough to get them reverted promptly – if they then start revert-warring it back in, there should be enough admin eyeballs on that page to push the block button eventually, right? It doesn't have to be always me. That person is a pest (I suppose you're familiar with their LTA entry?), thanks for helping deal with them. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- I looked it up after their recent posts, I'll keep an eye out for them. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 23:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)