| Revision as of 18:21, 1 November 2011 editJimbo Wales (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Founder14,538 edits →I responded: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:08, 30 December 2024 edit undoZ1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators29,642 edits Decompression equipment listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper) | ||
| (998 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 250K | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 15 | ||
| |algo = old(7d) | |algo = old(7d) | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 1 | |||
| |archive = User talk:Jclemens/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Jclemens/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{archivebox|auto=yes}} | {{archivebox|auto=yes}} | ||
| I'm no longer an administrator, so if you're looking for someone to undelete something I deleted, you'd be better off asking at ] | |||
| {{User:Jclemens/icons}} | |||
| '''Welcome, correspondents''' | |||
| '''If you're here because I deleted an article you think should be undeleted, please ]''' and remember--Most of the time, I didn't write the text that appears in the deletion summary. | |||
| <br>'''N.B.''' I don't respond well to either fawning or abuse. Talk to me like a peer, assume good faith, and you'll find I reciprocate in my helpfulness. | |||
| '''Functionary Assistance''' My ability to help as a checkuser, oversighter, or arbitrator in individual matters is currently limited by my positional and non-Misplaced Pages obligations. For non-trivial assistance, especially that which requires extensive consideration of private correspondence, you will likely get a faster response by asking another functionary. | |||
| '''Position Essays''' may help you understand my point of view with regard to... | '''Position Essays''' may help you understand my point of view with regard to... | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| == Merry Christmas! == | |||
| '''Administrator Goals''' | |||
| Doing my best to improve the tiny little wedge in the top center:<br> | |||
| ] | |||
| == I don't understand your reasoning here... == | |||
| In your vote on WMC's request , it would be helpful if you could clarify your reasoning. It ''looks'' like you're punishing WMC because you dislike the behaviour of other parties to the case (and other individuals who have commented on his request, or who are involved in the topic area); I hope that that wasn't your intent, but it is difficult to read your "group of people" and "public tug-of-war" comments any other way. | |||
| You also wrote about "lifting sanctions" (actually, just a reduction) sending "a particularly bad message". Can you elaborate on what you mean by that? WMC was sanctioned by the ArbCom. After he has spent nearly a year without causing trouble, ''and continued to contribute extensively and positively to the project'', he has asked for another chance to edit in an area where he has personal expertise, with the awareness that his conduct will be closely monitored. This is not an instance where a troublemaker has been subject to multiple topic bans and returned to disrupt the project after the expiry of each. Is "the ArbCom admits that it is possible for editors to reform their behaviour" really such a terrible message? ](]) 04:05, 17 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ''*ping*'' I'm not sure if you saw that I had left this message; I'm still hoping you'll take the time to clarify, elaborate on, or revise your comment. ](]) 04:18, 23 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Though the motion has been resolved, I was still hoping you might elaborate on your reasoning...? ](]) 13:11, 28 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I found it a little troubling that you scolded RAP for his incivility, but let the comments by others pass, especially given that Moni3 at one point went so far as to say . I've been trying to keep the conversation on-point and the tone moderate, but frankly as far as I'm concerned at least three of the contributors there have behaved somewhat inappropriately; I don't think it's prudent to scold one while letting the others' comments pass. ] (]) 12:31, 27 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Really? == | |||
| I'm surprised you only put Rusted AutoParts on notice ]. Moni's behavior is terrible, why have you ignored it? I left her a warning.--v/r - ]] 13:24, 27 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :Indeed, it was. I considered making it mutual, but decided against it. One of the nice thing about putting someone "on notice" is that it also removes me from actually having to block anyone, though. ] (]) 04:54, 28 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Notice == | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ]. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. <span style="border:1px solid #100;padding:1px;"><small>] </small>|<small> <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small></span> 21:05, 27 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :Wow, what a lot of text. I don't see any reason to pop in there, but if anyone has a question they'd like me to answer, I'm available. ] (]) 04:59, 28 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::No idea (wasn't really following it, and not involved in it at all)... I just noticed people weren't notified, suggested it there, and SandyGeorgia and I went about notifying those who were not. Best, Rob <span style="border:1px solid #100;padding:1px;"><small>] </small>|<small> <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small></span> 05:07, 28 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::It's kind of amusing, actually, that an offhanded "shape up!" remark generated that much interest, and that no one prior to you had even bothered to notify me of the bonfire I'd inadvertently sparked. As anyone can see from my contribution history, I've not been very active on-wiki as of late, (been wordsmithing the accursed Abortion proposed decision more than actually doing anything fun...) and I don't regularly read ANI anyway, so I might have missed it entirely had you not seen fit to mention it to me. ] (]) 05:19, 28 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| * We now have some procedural wrangling at ]. Please can you help advise on the best way forward. ] (]) 11:55, 28 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| **Odds are that I will have some time to look into this in 14ish hours. For now, if everyone can be polite and source things like they should have been all along, and agree to a reasonable pace for doing so, there shouldn't need to be any more issues. ] (]) 13:09, 28 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) is wishing you a ] ]! This greeting (and season) promotes ] and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! <br /> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{]:]}} to their talk page with a friendly message. | |||
| Is my draft attempt at reducing core policies to simple language by furnishing the ''reasons'' for them. Feel free to tear it apart. Cheers. ] (]) 16:45, 29 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| :The problem with those is that everyone sees things differently. On first blush, yours looks mostly OK, although I would have said some things in entirely different ways. I'll see if I can get you more detailed feedback, but I'm up to my alligators in eyeballs. ] (]) 01:42, 30 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::Will Beback made a lot of changes - I rewrote a bit to make it as clear as possible, but when your eyeballs clear <g> yor input would be invaluable. Also anyone else who is lurking and wishes to see Misplaced Pages be made comprehensible to non-lawyers. Cheers. ] (]) 13:11, 30 October 2011 (UTC) Appending: It was sort of nice to see my suggestion about the "double or nothing" rule being adopted <g>. Cheers. ] (]) 13:17, 30 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| <small>I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :)</small> ] (]) 18:18, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == I responded == | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| I just now responded to something you wrote on my talk page by asking you a question. Since the discussion is really long and it was many hours ago when you wrote, I wanted to leave you a note here to make sure you see it, because I'm very curious to learn your answer.--] (]) 18:21, 1 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 22:08, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:08, 30 December 2024
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
I'm no longer an administrator, so if you're looking for someone to undelete something I deleted, you'd be better off asking at WP:REFUND
Position Essays may help you understand my point of view with regard to...
Merry Christmas!
BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ (talk) 18:18, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Decompression equipment
Decompression equipment has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:08, 30 December 2024 (UTC)