Misplaced Pages

Gulf War: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:28, 28 March 2006 view sourceAhwaz (talk | contribs)1,959 edits I have done a Google search: only 15% of the 29 million pages on the Gulf War refer to the "Persian Gulf War" - it is best to stick to the commonly understood term← Previous edit Latest revision as of 06:15, 15 December 2024 view source Boston Mayflower (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,195 editsNo edit summary 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|1990–1991 conflict between Iraq and a 42-country coalition}}
:''See also: ] and ]''
{{About|the conflict against Iraq in 1990–1991|other conflicts with the same name|Gulf War (disambiguation)}}
{{Infobox Military Conflict
{{Redirect|Desert Storm}}
|conflict=Gulf War
{{pp|small=yes}}
|campaign=
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2020}}
|image=]
{{Infobox military conflict
|caption=
| conflict = Gulf War
|date=], ]–], ]
| image = {{Multiple image
|place=]
| perrow = 1/2/2
|casus=Successful Iraqi invasion of ]
| total_width = 300
|result=Decisive Coalition Victory, Liberation of Kuwait
| border=infobox
|combatant1=U.S.-led coalition
| image1=
|combatant2=]
USAF F-16A F-15C F-15E Desert Storm edit2.jpg
|commander1=], ]
| image2= Tank in Desert Storm.JPEG
|commander2=]
| image3= British_gulf_war_(cropped).jpg
|strength1=660,000
| image4= Demolished vehicles line Highway 80 on 18 Apr 1991.jpg
|strength2=~1,000,000
| image6= Gulf war target cam.jpg
|casualties1=345 dead,<br>1,000 wounded
| footer_align =
|casualties2=25,000 - 100,000 dead,<br>100,000 - 300,000 wounded
| footer =
}} '''From top to bottom, left to right''':{{flatlist|
* U.S. Air Force ], ], and a ] flying over ]
* a U.S. Army ] laying down a smokescreen
* British troops from the ] practicing casualty evacuation
* wrecked and abandoned vehicles on the ]
* camera view from a ]
}}
| date = ]{{snd}}]<br/>(''Operation Desert Shield'')<br/>]{{snd}}]<br/>(''Operation Desert Storm'')<br/>({{Age in years, months, weeks and days|month1=08|day1=02|year=1990|month2=02|day2=28|year2=1991}})
| place = {{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}
| result = ] victory
| territory = * ] resumes self-governance over all Kuwaiti sovereign territory
* Establishment of a ] and construction of a ] along the ]
| combatant1 = {{plainlist|
* {{Flag|United States}}
* {{nowrap|{{Flag|United Kingdom}}}}
* {{Flag|France}}
* {{Flag|Saudi Arabia}}
* {{Flag|Egypt}}
* {{Flag|Kuwait}}
}}<!-- COUNTRIES THAT DID NOT DEPLOY ANY MILITARY UNITS SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED. --><!-- DO NOT ADD ISRAEL. --><!-- DESCENDING SORTED BY THE NUMBER OF MILITARY PERSONNEL OF EACH COUNTRY Source are references listed in the "Coalition of the Gulf War" article in Misplaced Pages-->
----
{{Collapsible list
| title = {{flagicon|UN}} ]{{nobold|:}}
| {{Flagicon image|Flag of the Afghan interim government-in-exile (1988–1992).svg}} ]<ref name="auto7">{{cite web |url=https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a234743.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190412060905/https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a234743.pdf |url-status=live |archive-date=12 April 2019 |website=apps.dtic.mil |access-date=2018-12-18 |title=Desert Shield And Desert Storm: A Chronology And Troop List for the 1990–1991 Persian Gulf Crisis}}</ref>
| {{Flag|Argentina}}
| {{Flag|Australia}}
| {{Flagcountry|State of Bahrain}}
| {{Flag|Bangladesh}}
| {{Flag|Belgium}}
| {{Flag|Canada}}
| {{Flagdeco|Czechoslovakia}} ]
| {{Flag|Denmark}}
| {{Flag|Germany}}
| {{Flag|Greece}}
| {{Flag|Honduras|1949}}
| {{Flag|Hungary}}
| {{Flag|Italy}}
| {{Flag|Japan|1870}}
| {{Flag|Luxembourg}}
| {{Flag|Morocco}}
| {{Flag|Netherlands}}
| {{Flag|New Zealand}}
| {{Flag|Niger}}
| {{Flag|Norway}}
| {{Flag|Oman|1970}}
| {{Flag|Pakistan}}
| {{Flag|Philippines|1936}}
| {{Flag|Poland}}
| {{Flag|Portugal}}
| {{Flag|Qatar}}
| {{Flag|Romania}}
| {{Flag|Senegal}}
| {{Flag|Sierra Leone}}
| {{Flag|Singapore}}
| {{Flag|South Korea|1984}}
| {{Flag|Spain}}
| {{Flag|Sweden}}
| {{flagcountry|Ba'athist Syria}}
| {{Flag|Turkey}}
| {{nowrap|{{Flag|United Arab Emirates}}}}}}
| combatant2 = {{flagcountry|Ba'athist Iraq}}
| commander1 = {{plainlist|
* {{flagdeco|United States}} ]
* {{flagdeco|United States}} ]
* {{flagdeco|United States}} ]
* {{flagdeco|United States}} ]
* {{flagdeco|United States}} ]
* {{flagdeco|United States}} ]
* {{flagdeco|United States}} ]
* {{flagdeco|United States}} ]
* {{flagdeco|United States}} ]
* {{flagdeco|United Kingdom}} ]
* {{flagdeco|United Kingdom}} ]
* {{flagdeco|United Kingdom}} ]
* {{flagdeco|France}} ]
* {{flagdeco|France}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Kuwait}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Kuwait}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Saudi Arabia}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Saudi Arabia}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Saudi Arabia}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Saudi Arabia}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Saudi Arabia}} ]<ref>''Persian Gulf War, the Sandhurst-trained Prince<br/>Khaled bin Sultan al-Saud was co-commander with General Norman Schwarzkopf'' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303195039/http://www.casi.org.uk/discuss/2002/msg01184.html |date=3 March 2016 }}</ref><ref>''General Khaled was Co-Commander, with US General Norman Schwarzkopf, of the allied coalition that liberated Kuwait'' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110430043714/http://www.thefreelibrary.com/FEATURE+Gulf+War+commander+signs+publishing+agreement+with...-a016226901 |date=30 April 2011 }}</ref>
* {{flagdeco|Saudi Arabia}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Saudi Arabia}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Saudi Arabia}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Egypt}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Egypt}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Egypt}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Egypt}} ]
}}
| commander2 = {{plainlist|
* {{flagdeco|Ba'athist Iraq}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Ba'athist Iraq}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Ba'athist Iraq}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Ba'athist Iraq}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Ba'athist Iraq}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Ba'athist Iraq}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Ba'athist Iraq}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Ba'athist Iraq}} ]
* {{flagdeco|Ba'athist Iraq}} ]
}}
| strength1 = Over 950,000 soldiers<br>3,113 tanks<br>1,800 aircraft<br>2,200 artillery pieces
| page = https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-PEMD-96-10/pdf/GAOREPORTS-PEMD-96-10.pdf
| strength2 = 1,000,000+ soldiers (~600,000 in Kuwait)<br>5,500 tanks<br>700+ aircraft<br>3,000 artillery systems<ref name="auto1">{{cite book |author=Knights, Michael |page= |title=Cradle of Conflict: Iraq and the Birth of Modern U.S. Military Power |publisher=] |year=2005 |isbn=978-1-59114-444-1 |url=https://archive.org/details/cradleofconflict00knig/page/20 }}</ref>
| casualties1 = '''Total:<br />13,488'''<hr>
'''Coalition:'''<br/>292 killed (147 killed by enemy action, 145 non-hostile deaths)<br/>776 wounded<ref name="ca.encarta.msn.com">{{cite web|title=Persian Gulf War |publisher=MSN Encarta |url=http://ca.encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761551555_2/Arabian_Gulf_War.html |archive-url=https://www.webcitation.org/5kwqMXGNZ?url=http://ca.encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761551555_2/Persian_Gulf_War.html |archive-date=1 November 2009 }}</ref> (467 wounded in action)<br/>31 tanks destroyed/disabled<ref>18 M1 Abrams, 11 M60, 2 AMX-30</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.checkpoint-online.ch/CheckPoint/Histoire/His0010-CombatTawakalna.html|title=Guerre du Golfe: le dernier combat de la division Tawakalna|first=Ludovic Monnerat |last=CheckPoint}}</ref><ref>Scales, Brig. Gen. Robert H.: ''Certain Victory''. Brassey's, 1994, p. 279.</ref><ref>Halberstadt 1991. p. 35</ref><br/><ref>Atkinson, Rick. ''Crusade, The untold story of the Persian Gulf War''. Houghton Mifflin Company, 1993. pp. 332–3</ref><ref>Captain Todd A. Buchs, B. Co. Commander, ''Knights in the Desert''. Publisher/Editor Unknown. p. 111.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tanks.net/tank-history/tanks-during-the-first-gulf-war.html|title=Tanks During the First Gulf War{{snd}}Tank History|first=Marcia|last=Malory|access-date=5 July 2016|archive-date=3 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303220002/http://www.tanks.net/tank-history/tanks-during-the-first-gulf-war.html}}</ref><ref>M60 vs T-62 Cold War Combatants 1956–92 by Lon Nordeen & David Isby</ref><br/>28 Bradley IFVs destroyed/damaged<br/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/du_ii/du_ii_tabh.htm|title=TAB H{{snd}}Friendly-fire Incidents|access-date=5 July 2016|archive-date=1 June 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130601053948/http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/du_ii/du_ii_tabh.htm}}</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140221225558/http://www.gao.gov/products/NSIAD-92-94 |date=21 February 2014 }} US General Accounting Office, 10 January 1992. Quote: "According to information provided by the Army's Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations and Plans, 20 Bradleys were destroyed during the Gulf war. Another 12 Bradleys were damaged, but four of these were quickly repaired. Friendly fire accounted for 17 of the destroyed Bradleys and three of the damaged ones</ref><br/>1 M113 APC destroyed<br/>2 British Warrior APCs destroyed<br/>1 artillery piece destroyed<br/>75 aircraft destroyed{{citation needed|date=February 2023}}<br/>'''Kuwait:'''<br/>420 killed<br/>
12,000 captured<br/>
≈200 tanks destroyed/captured<br/>
850+ other armored vehicles destroyed/captured<br/>
57 aircraft lost<br/>
8 aircraft captured (Mirage F1s)<br/>
17 ships sunk, 6 captured<ref name="airCombatInformationGroup"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141006231817/http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_213.shtml |date=6 October 2014 }}. Acig.org. Retrieved on 12 June 2011</ref>
| casualties2 = '''Total:<br />175,000–300,000+'''<hr>
'''Iraqi:'''<br/>20,000–50,000 killed{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=455}}<ref>{{cite web|title=Appendix – Iraqi Death Toll {{!}} The Gulf War {{!}} FRONTLINE {{!}} PBS |url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/appendix/death.html|access-date=2021-07-24|website=www.pbs.org}}</ref><br/>75,000+ wounded<ref name="ca.encarta.msn.com"/> <!-- The source means "casualties" as killed, comparing these new estimates with the old ones of 10,000–100,000 killed; for all losses it uses "losses". --><br/>80,000–175,000 captured{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=455}}<ref name="google1990">{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oNSwBAAAQBAJ&dq=gulf+war+175%2C000+pows&pg=PT204 |title=The Gulf War: Operation Desert Storm 1990–1991 |isbn=978-1-4738-3730-0 |access-date=22 April 2022 |archive-date=5 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221205102940/https://books.google.it/books?id=oNSwBAAAQBAJ&pg=PT204&lpg=PT204&dq=gulf+war+175,000+pows&source=bl&ots=b459KDbkKn&sig=ACfU3U3WjDztYFB8TFHeon0hnUwpxAkJIA&hl=it&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi1nP7Myqj3AhXeR_EDHSOHA00Q6AF6BAgFEAM#v=onepage&q=gulf%20war%20175%2C000%20pows&f=false |url-status=live |last1=Tucker-Jones |first1=Anthony |date=31 May 2014 |publisher=Pen and Sword }}</ref><ref name="google1991">{{Cite web |url=https://www.hrw.org/reports/1991/IRAQ391.htm |title=Human Rights Watch |access-date=22 April 2022 |archive-date=22 April 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220422211557/https://www.hrw.org/reports/1991/IRAQ391.htm |url-status=live }}</ref><br/>3,300 tanks destroyed{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=455}}<br/>2,100 APCs destroyed{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=455}}<br/>2,200 artillery pieces destroyed{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=455}}<br/>110 aircraft destroyed{{citation needed|date=February 2023}}<br/>137 aircraft flown to Iran to escape destruction<ref>{{Cite web |title=Appendix A: Chronology – February 1991 |url=https://www.history.navy.mil/research/library/online-reading-room/title-list-alphabetically/u/us-navy-in-desert-shield-desert-storm/february-1991.html |access-date=2024-02-04 |website=] |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=10 August 2007 |title=Iraq air force wants Iran to give back its planes |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSCOL544157/ |work=]}}</ref><br/>19 ships sunk, 6 damaged{{citation needed|date=February 2023}}
| casualties3 = '''Kuwaiti civilian losses:'''<br/>Over 1,000 killed<ref name=useofterrorkuwait>{{cite web|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050124091425/http://www.jafi.org.il/education/actual/iraq/3.html |archive-date=24 January 2005|url=http://www.jafi.org.il/education/actual/iraq/3.html |title=The Use of Terror during Iraq's invasion of Kuwait|access-date=22 June 2010 |publisher=The Jewish Agency for Israel}}</ref><br/>600 ]<ref>{{cite web |publisher=Red Cross |title=Kuwait: missing people: a step in the right direction |url=http://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/misc/57jmjf.htm |access-date=5 March 2014 |archive-date=7 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160307210107/https://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/misc/57jmjf.htm }}</ref><br/>'''Iraqi civilian losses:'''<br/>3,664 killed directly<ref name=Wagesofwar>{{cite web |url=http://www.comw.org/pda/0310rm8ap2.html#1.%20Iraqi%20civilian%20fatalities%20in%20the%201991%20Gulf |title=The Wages of War: Iraqi Combatant and Noncombatant Fatalities in the 2003 Conflict|access-date=9 May 2009 |publisher=Project on Defense Alternatives}}</ref><br/>'''Total Iraqi losses (including ]):'''<br/>142,500–206,000 deaths (According to ]){{Efn|Including 100–120,000 military deaths, 3–15,000 civilian deaths during the war, 4–6,000 civilian deaths up to April 1991, and 35–65,000 civilian deaths from the ] after the end of the Gulf War.}}<ref name=":2" /><br/>'''Other civilian losses:'''<br/>75 killed in ] and Saudi Arabia, 309 injured
| campaignbox = {{Campaignbox Persian Gulf Wars}}
{{Campaignbox Gulf War}}
{{Ba'athism sidebar}}
{{Saddam Hussein series}}
{{George H. W. Bush series}}
}} }}
{{Campaignbox Gulf Wars}}


The ] '''Gulf War''' was a conflict between ] and a coalition force of approximately 30 nations{{ref|coalition01}} led by the ] and mandated by the ] to liberate ]. The '''Gulf War''' was an armed conflict between ] and a ] led by the ]. The coalition's efforts against Iraq were carried out in two key phases: '''Operation Desert Shield''', which marked the military buildup from August 1990 to January 1991; and '''Operation Desert Storm''', which began with the ] on 17 January 1991 and came to a close with the American-led ] on 28 February 1991.


On 2 August 1990, Iraq, governed by ], ] neighboring ] and fully occupied the country within two days. The invasion was primarily over disputes regarding Kuwait's alleged ] in Iraq's ], as well as to cancel Iraq's large debt to Kuwait from the recently ended ]. After Iraq briefly occupied Kuwait under a rump puppet government known as the ], it split Kuwait's sovereign territory into the ] in the north, which was absorbed into Iraq's existing ], and the ] in the south, which became Iraq's 19th governorate.
The lead up to the war began with the ] invasion of Kuwait on ], ], following unproven Iraqi contentions that Kuwait was illegally "]" ] across Iraq's border. The invasion was met with immediate ] by the ] against Iraq. Hostilities commenced in January 1991, resulting in a decisive victory for the coalition forces, which drove Iraqi forces out of Kuwait with minimal coalition deaths. The main battles were aerial and ground combat within Iraq, Kuwait, and bordering areas of ]. The war did not expand outside the immediate Iraq/Kuwait/Saudi border region, although Iraq fired ]s on ]i cities.


The invasion of Kuwait was met with immediate international condemnation, including the adoption of ], which demanded Iraq's immediate withdrawal from Kuwait, and the imposition of comprehensive ] with the adoption of ]. British prime minister ] and U.S. president ] deployed troops and equipment into ] and urged other countries to send their own forces. Many countries joined the American-led coalition forming the largest military alliance since ]. The bulk of the coalition's military power was from the ], with ], the ], and ] as the largest lead-up contributors, in that order.
==Name==
:{{main|Naming the Gulf War}}
''Gulf War'' and ''Gulf War'' are the most common terms for the conflict used within the Western countries. These names have been used by the overwhelming majority of popular historians and journalists in the United States. Since "Operation Iraqi Freedom" on March 22, 2003 and America's subsequent occupation of Iraq, the 1991 conflict is now often referred to as Gulf War I. The conflict is also known to Americans as Operations '''Desert Shield''' and '''Desert Storm''' and to the ] as ]. ] and most ] coalition members refer to the conflict as ''Harb Tahrir al-Kuwait'' or "The war of Kuwait Liberation". In Iraq, the war is often colloquially called ''Um M'aārak'' - "The Mother of All Battles".


], adopted on 29 November 1990, gave Iraq an ultimatum, expiring on 15 January 1991, to implement Resolution 660 and withdraw from Kuwait, with member-states empowered to use "all necessary means" to force Iraq's compliance. Initial efforts to dislodge the Iraqis from Kuwait began with aerial and naval bombardment of Iraq on 17 January, which continued for five weeks. As the Iraqi military struggled against the coalition attacks, ] to provoke an Israeli military response, with the expectation that such a response would lead to the withdrawal of several Muslim-majority countries from the coalition. The provocation was unsuccessful; Israel did not retaliate and Iraq continued to remain at odds with most Muslim-majority countries. ] were also largely unsuccessful, and on 24 February 1991, the coalition launched a major ground assault into Iraqi-occupied Kuwait. The offensive was a decisive victory for the coalition, who liberated Kuwait and promptly began to advance past the ] into Iraqi territory. A hundred hours after the beginning of the ground campaign, the coalition ceased its advance into Iraq and declared a ceasefire. Aerial and ground combat was confined to Iraq, Kuwait, and areas straddling the ].
==Causes==
Prior to ], under the ], ] was considered to be an ''autonomous caza'' within ] ]. Following the war, Kuwait fell under ] rule who treated Kuwait and Iraq as separate countries known as ]. However, Iraqi officials did not accept the legitimacy of Kuwaiti independence or the authority of the Kuwaiti Emir. Iraq never recognized Kuwait's sovereignty and in the 1960s, the United Kingdom deployed troops to Kuwait to deter an Iraqi annexation.
]
During the ] of the ], Kuwait was allied with Iraq, largely due to desiring Iraqi protection from ] ]. After the war, Iraq was heavily ] to several Arab countries, including a $14 billion debt to Kuwait. Iraq hoped to repay its debts by raising the price of ] through ] oil production cuts, but instead, Kuwait increased production, lowering prices, in an attempt to leverage a better resolution of their border dispute. In addition, Iraq began to accuse Kuwait of ] into neighboring Iraqi oil fields, and furthermore charged that it had performed a collective service for all Arabs by acting as a buffer against Iran (Persia) and that therefore Kuwait and Saudi Arabia should negotiate or cancel Iraq's war debts. Iraqi President ]'s primary two-fold justification for the war was a blend of the assertion of Kuwaiti territory being an Iraqi province arbitrarily cut off by imperialism, with the use of annexation as retaliation for the "economic warfare" Kuwait had waged through slant drilling into Iraq's oil supplies while it had been under Iraqi protection.


The conflict marked the introduction of live news broadcasts from the front lines of the battle, principally by the American network ]. It has also earned the nickname ''Video Game War'', after the daily broadcast of images from cameras onboard American military aircraft during Operation Desert Storm. The Gulf War has also gained fame for some of the largest tank battles in ]: the ], the ], and the ].
The war with Iran had also seen the destruction of almost all of Iraq's port facilities on the ], cutting off Iraq's main trade outlet. Many in Iraq, expecting a resumption of war with Iran in the future, felt that Iraq's security could only be guaranteed by controlling more of the Persian Gulf Coast, including more secure ports. Kuwait thus made a tempting target.


{{TOC limit|3}}
Ideologically, the invasion of Kuwait was justified through calls to ]. Kuwait was described as a natural part of Iraq carved off by British imperialism. The annexation of Kuwait was described as a step on the way to greater Arab union. Other reasons were given as well. Hussein presented it as a way to restore the empire of ] in addition to the Arab nationalist rhetoric. The invasion was also closely tied to other events in the Middle East. The ] by the ] was raging, and most Arab states, including Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and ], were dependent on ] ]s. Saddam thus presented himself as the one Arab statesman willing to stand up to ] and the ].


==Names==
==Pre-war Iraqi-American Relations==
The war is also known under other names, such as the '''Second Gulf War''' (not to be confused with the 2003 ], also referred to as such<ref>{{Cite web |title=Research: Second Gulf War |url=https://veteranmuseum.net/research-second-gulf-war/ |access-date=2024-11-12 |website=Veterans Museum at Balboa Park |language=en-US}}</ref>), '''Persian Gulf War''', '''Kuwait War''', '''First Iraq War''', or '''Iraq War'''<ref name=FrontlineCron>{{cite web |url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/cron/ |title=Frontline Chronology |access-date=20 March 2007|publisher=Public Broadcasting Service}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |work=CNN |date=16 January 2001 |title=Tenth anniversary of the Gulf War: A look back |url=http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/01/16/gulf.anniversary/index.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071022115600/http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/01/16/gulf.anniversary/index.html |archive-date=2007-10-22 |access-date=6 June 2007 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="cfr.org">{{cite web |author=Kenneth Estes |url=http://www.cfr.org/publication/13865/isn.html |title=ISN: The Second Gulf War (1990–1991){{snd}}Council on Foreign Relations |publisher=Cfr.org |access-date=18 March 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110102171502/http://www.cfr.org/publication/13865/isn.html |archive-date=2 January 2011 }}</ref><ref group=lower-alpha name=numbering/> before the term "Iraq War" became identified with the 2003 Iraq War (also known in the US as "]").<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171205184417/https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL34387.pdf |date=5 December 2017 }}. (PDF). Retrieved on 2014-05-24.</ref> The war was named {{Transliteration|ar|Umm al-Ma'arik}} ("mother of all battles") by Iraqi officials.<ref>{{cite web |date=5 November 1991 |title=A 1991 Dossier on the Role of the Iraqi Air Force in the Gulf War |url=https://conflictrecords.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/sh-aadf-d-000-396_tf.pdf |id=SH-AADF-D-000-396}}</ref> After the ] in 2003, the Gulf War of 1990–1991 is often known as the "'''First Iraq War'''".<ref>{{Cite book |last=Stoker |first=Donald |title=Purpose and Power |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2024 |isbn=978-1-009-25727-5 |location=Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8EA, UK |pages=537–559 |chapter=16: The Gulf War, or First Iraq War, 1990-1991 |lccn=2022040999}}</ref>
Prior to the ], U.S.-Iraqi relations were cool, and Iraq had been chiefly an ally of the ]. The U.S. was concerned with Iraq's belligerence toward ] and disapproval of moves towards peace with other Arab states. It also condemned Iraqi support for various Arab and Palestinian militant groups such as ], which led to its inclusion on the incipient ] on ], ]. The U.S. remained officially neutral during the outbreak of hostilities in the ], as it had previously been humiliated by a 444 day long ] and expected that Iran was not likely to win. In March 1982, however, Iran began a successful counteroffensive (Operation Undeniable Victory). In a bid to open the possibility of relations to Iraq, the country was removed from the list of state sponsors of terrorism. Ostensibly this was because of improvement in the regime's record, although former ] Noel Koch later stated, "No one had any doubts about'' ''continued involvement in terrorism...The real reason was to help them succeed in the war against Iran." {{ref|www.army.mil.25}}
With Iran's newfound success in the war and its rebuff of a peace offer in July, ] from other states (most importantly the ], ], ], and starting that year, ]) reached a record spike in 1982, but an obstacle remained to any potential U.S.-Iraqi relationship - Abu Nidal continued to operate with official support in Baghdad. When the group was expelled to ] in November ], the ] sent ] as a special envoy to cultivate ties.


The following names have been used to describe the conflict itself:
Due to fears that revolutionary Iran would defeat Iraq and export its Islamic Revolution to other Middle Eastern nations, the U.S. began giving aid to Iraq. From ] to ], the U.S. government approved around $200 million in ], according to the Stockholm International Peace Institute (SIPRI). {{ref|web.sipri.org.26}} These sales amounted to less than 1% of the total arms sold to Iraq in the relevant period, though the US also sold helicopters which, although designated for civilian use, were immediately deployed by Iraq in its war with Iran. {{ref|www.army.mil.27}}
''Gulf War'' and ''Persian Gulf War'' are the most common terms for the conflict used within ], though it may also be called the ''First Gulf War'' (to distinguish it from the ] and the subsequent Iraq War). Some authors have called it the ''Second Gulf War'' to distinguish it from the ].<ref>''Iraq and the Second Gulf War: State Building and Regime Security'', Mohammad-Mahmoud Mohamedou, 1997</ref> '']'' ({{langx|ar|تحرير الكويت}}) (''taḥrīr al-kuwayt'') is the term used by Kuwait and most of the coalition's Arab states, including Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Egypt, and the ]. Terms in other languages include {{langx|fr|la Guerre du Golfe}} and {{lang|fr|Guerre du Koweït}} (''War of Kuwait''); {{langx|de|Golfkrieg}} (''Gulf War'') and {{lang|de|Zweiter Golfkrieg}} (''Second Gulf War'').{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}


===Operational names===
An investigation by the Senate Banking Committee in 1994 determined that the U.S. Department of Commerce had approved, for the purpose of research, the shipping of ] biological agents to Iraq during the mid ], including '']'' (]), later identified by the Pentagon as a key component of the Iraqi ] program, as well as '']'', '']'', '']'', and '']''. The Committee report noted that each of these had been "considered by various nations for use in war." {{ref|www.gulfweb.org.28}} Declassified U.S. government documents indicate that the U.S. government had confirmed that Iraq was using ] "almost daily" during the Iran-Iraq conflict as early as 1983. {{ref|www.gwu.edu.29}} The chairman of the Senate committee, Don Riegle, said: “The executive branch of our government approved 771 different export licences for sale of dual-use technology to Iraq. I think it’s a devastating record”.
Most of the coalition states used various names for their operations and the war's operational phases. These are sometimes incorrectly used as the conflict's overall name, especially the US ''Desert Storm'':
* ''Operation Desert Shield'' was the US operational name for the US buildup of forces and Saudi Arabia's defense from 2 August 1990 to 16 January 1991{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}
* ''Operation Desert Storm'' was the US name of the ] from 17 January 1991 through 28 February 1991<ref>{{cite web|title=Operation DESERT STORM|website=U.S. Army Center of Military History|url=https://www.history.army.mil/html/bookshelves/resmat/desert-storm/index.html|access-date=20 November 2024}}</ref>
** ''Operation Desert Sabre'' (early name ''Operation Desert Sword'') was the US name for the air and land offensive against the Iraqi Army in the Kuwaiti Theater of Operations (the "100-hour war") from 24 to 28 February 1991, in itself, part of ''Operation Desert Storm''{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}
* ] was the name given to the return of US units and equipment to the US in 1991 after Kuwait's liberation, sometimes referred to as ''Operation Desert Calm''
* ] was the Argentine name for Argentine military activities
* ] was the French name for French military activities in the conflict
* ] was the name of the Canadian operations<ref>{{Cite web |last=Defence |first=National |date=2018-12-11 |title=Gulf War – FRICTION |url=https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/services/military-history/history-heritage/past-operations/middle-east/friction.html |access-date=2023-11-21 |website=www.canada.ca}}</ref>
* ] was the British name for British military activities during the operations and conflict<ref>{{Cite web |title=Gulf War – Op Granby {{!}} Royal Signals Museum |url=https://www.royalsignalsmuseum.co.uk/gulf-war-op-granby/ |access-date=2023-11-21 |language=en-GB}}</ref>
* ] (Italian for ]) was the Italian name for the operations and conflict


===Campaign names===
Chiefly, the U.S. government provided Iraq with economic aid. Iraq's war with Iran, and the consequent disruption in its oil export business, had caused the country to enter a deep debt. U.S. government economic assistance allowed Hussein to continue using resources for the war which would have otherwise had to have been diverted. Between 1983 and 1990, Iraq received $5 billion in credits from the Commodity Credit Corporation program run by the ], beginning at $400 million per year in 1983 and increasing to over $1 billion per year in 1988 and 1989, finally coming to an end after another $500 million was granted in 1990. {{ref|archive.gao.gov.30}} Besides agricultural credits, the U.S. also provided Hussein with other loans. In 1985 the U.S. ] extended more than $684 million in credits to Iraq to build an oil pipeline through Jordan with the construction being undertaken by Californian construction firm ]. {{ref|www.army.mil.31}} {{ref|refbot.32}}
The US divided the conflict into three major campaigns:
* ''Defense of Saudi Arabian country'' for the period 2 August 1990, through 16 January 1991{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}
* ''Liberation and Defense of Kuwait'' for the period 17 January 1991, through 11 April 1991{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}
* ''Southwest Asia Cease-Fire'' for the period 12 April 1991, through 30 November 1995, including ]{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}


==Background==
Following the war, however, there were moves within the ] to isolate Iraq diplomatically and economically over concerns about human rights violations, its dramatic military build-up, and hostility to Israel. Specifically, the Senate in 1988 unanimously passed the "]," which imposed sanctions on Iraq. The legislation passed. {{ref|thomas.loc.gov.33}}
{{See also|Iran–United States relations after 1979|List of modern conflicts in the Middle East|Rationale for the Persian Gulf war}}


Throughout the ], Iraq had been an ally of the ], and there was a history of friction between Iraq and the United States.<ref>{{cite book|author-link=Elaine Sciolino|last=Sciolino|first=Elaine|title=The Outlaw State: Saddam Hussein's Quest for Power and the Gulf Crisis|publisher=]|year=1991|isbn=978-0-471-54299-5|page=}}</ref> The US was concerned with Iraq's position on Israeli–] politics. The US also disliked Iraqi support for ] groups, which led to Iraq's inclusion on the developing US list of ] in December 1979.<ref>{{cite book|author-link=Elaine Sciolino|last=Sciolino|first=Elaine|title=The Outlaw State: Saddam Hussein's Quest for Power and the Gulf Crisis|publisher=]|year=1991|isbn=978-0-471-54299-5|pages=-}}</ref>
These moves were disowned by some Congressmen though some U.S. officials, such as Reagan's head of Policy Planning Staff at the State Dept. and Assistant Secretary for East Asian Affairs ] disagreed with giving support to the Iraqi regime.


], US special envoy to the Middle East, meets ] on 19–20 December 1983.]]
The relationship between Iraq and the United States remained unhindered until the day Iraq invaded Kuwait. On October 2, 1989, President ] signed secret National Security Directive 26, which begins, "Access to Persian Gulf oil and the security of key friendly states in the area are vital to U.S. national security." {{ref|www.fas.org.34}} With respect to Iraq, the directive stated, "Normal relations between the United States and Iraq would serve our longer term interests and promote stability in both the Persian Gulf and the Middle East."


The US remained officially neutral after Iraq's invasion of Iran in 1980, which became the Iran–Iraq War, although it provided resources, political support, and some "non-military" aircraft to Iraq.<ref name="stork">{{cite journal |title=Background to the Crisis: Why War? |first1=Joe |last1=Stork|first2=Ann M. |last2=Lesch |journal=Middle East Report |issue=167, November–December 1990 |pages=11–18 |publisher=Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP)|jstor=3012998|year=1990 |doi=10.2307/3012998 | issn = 0899-2851 }} {{subscription required}}</ref> In March 1982, Iran began a successful ] (]), and the US ] to prevent Iran from forcing a surrender. In a US bid to open full diplomatic relations with Iraq, the country was removed from the US list of State Sponsors of Terrorism.<ref>{{cite book|author-link=Elaine Sciolino|last=Sciolino|first=Elaine|title=The Outlaw State: Saddam Hussein's Quest for Power and the Gulf Crisis|publisher=]|year=1991 |isbn=978-0-471-54299-5|page=}}</ref> Ostensibly, this was because of improvement in the regime's record, although former US Assistant Defense Secretary Noel Koch later stated: "No one had any doubts about continued involvement in ]&nbsp;... The real reason was to help them succeed in the war against Iran."<ref name="Borer">{{cite web |url=http://www.army.mil/professionalWriting/volumes/volume1/july_2003/7_03_2v2.html |title=Inverse Engagement: Lessons from U.S.-Iraq Relations, 1982–1990 |access-date=12 October 2006 |author=Douglas A. Borer |year=2003 |work=U.S. Army Professional Writing Collection |publisher=US Army |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061011195656/http://www.army.mil/professionalwriting/volumes/volume1/july_2003/7_03_2v2.html |archive-date=11 October 2006 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author-link=Elaine Sciolino|last=Sciolino|first=Elaine|title=The Outlaw State: Saddam Hussein's Quest for Power and the Gulf Crisis|publisher=]|year=1991 |isbn=978-0-471-54299-5|page=}}</ref>
In late July, ], as negotiations between Iraq and Kuwait stalled, Iraq massed troops on Kuwait's borders and summoned American Ambassador ] for an unanticipated meeting with Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. Two transcripts of that meeting have been produced, both of them controversial. According to the transcripts, Saddam outlined his grievances against Kuwait, while promising that he would not invade Kuwait before one more round of negotiations. In the version published by '']'' on ], ], Glaspie expressed concern over the troop buildup, but went on to say:


With Iraq's newfound success in the war, and the Iranian rebuff of a peace offer in July, ] reached a record spike in 1982. When Iraqi President ] expelled ] to Syria at the US's request in November 1983, the ] sent ] to meet Saddam as a special envoy and to cultivate ties. By the time the ] was signed in August 1988, Iraq was heavily debt-ridden and tensions within society were rising.{{sfnp|Simons|2004|p=333}} Most of its ] was owed to ] and Kuwait.{{sfnp|Simons|2004|pp=341–342}} Iraq's debts to Kuwait amounted to $14&nbsp;billion.<ref>{{cite news |title=On this day in 1990: The world decides to stop Saddam Hussein's forces marauding around Kuwait |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/30/day-world-decided-stop-saddam-husseins-forces-marauding-around/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220110/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/30/day-world-decided-stop-saddam-husseins-forces-marauding-around/ |archive-date=10 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |work=The Daily Telegraph |date=30 November 2017}}{{cbignore}}</ref> Iraq pressured both nations to forgive the debts, but they refused.{{sfnp|Simons|2004|pp=341–342}}<ref name="airCombatInformationGroup2">{{cite journal |last1=Cooper |first1=Tom |author-link1=Tom Cooper (author) |last2=Sadik |first2=Ahmad |date=6 August 2007 |title=Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait; 1990 |url=http://www.acig.info/CMS/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=68&Itemid=1 |url-status=live |journal=Air Combat Information Group Journal |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130706142817/http://www.acig.info/CMS/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=68&Itemid=47 |archive-date=6 July 2013 |access-date=27 October 2016}}</ref>
:''We have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts, like your border disagreement with Kuwait. I was in the American Embassy in Kuwait during the late '60s. The instruction we had during this period was that we should express no opinion on this issue and that the issue is not associated with America. James Baker has directed our official spokesmen to emphasize this instruction. We hope you can solve this problem using any suitable methods via Klibi ] General Secretary] or via ]. All that we hope is that these issues are solved quickly.''


The Iraq–Kuwait border dispute involved Iraqi claims to Kuwaiti territory.<ref name="stork" /> Kuwait had been a part of the ]'s ], something that Iraq claimed made Kuwait rightful Iraqi territory.{{sfnp|Simons|2004|pp=343–344}} Kuwait's ruling dynasty, the ], had concluded a ] agreement in 1899 that assigned responsibility for Kuwait's foreign affairs to the United Kingdom. The UK drew the border between Kuwait and Iraq in 1922, making Iraq almost entirely landlocked.<ref name="stork" /> Kuwait rejected Iraqi attempts to secure further provisions in the region.{{sfnp|Simons|2004|pp=343–344}}
Some have interpreted these statements as diplomatic language signalling an American "green light" for the invasion. Although the State Department did not confirm the authenticity of these transcripts, U.S. sources say that she had handled everything "by the book" (in accordance with the US's official neutrality on the Iraq-Kuwait issue) and had not signaled Iraqi President Saddam Hussein any approval for defying the Arab League's Jeddah crisis squad, which had conducted the negotiations. Many believe that Saddam's expectations may have been influenced by a perception that the US was not interested in the issue, for which the Glaspie transcript is merely an example, and that he may have felt so in part because of U.S. support for the reunification of ], another act that he considered to be nothing more than the nullification of an artificial, internal border. Others, such as ], believe he had no such illusion, or that he simply underestimated the extent of American military response.


Iraq also accused Kuwait of exceeding its ] quotas for oil production.<ref name="OPEC2">"OPEC pressures Kuwait to moderate quota demand", ''New Straits Times'', 7 June 1989</ref> In order for the cartel to maintain its desired price of $18 per barrel, discipline was required. The United Arab Emirates and Kuwait were consistently overproducing; the latter at least in part to repair losses caused by Iranian attacks in the Iran–Iraq War and to pay for the losses of an economic scandal. The result was a slump in the oil price{{snd}}as low as {{convert|10|$/oilbbl|$/m3}}{{snd}}with a resulting loss of $7&nbsp;billion a year to Iraq, equal to its 1989 ] deficit.{{sfnp|Simons|2004|pp=339–340}} Resulting revenues struggled to support the government's basic costs, let alone repair Iraq's damaged infrastructure. ] and Iraq both looked for more discipline, with little success.{{sfnp|Simons|2004|p=341}} The Iraqi government described it as a form of economic warfare,{{sfnp|Simons|2004|p=341}} which it claimed was aggravated by Kuwait ] across the border into Iraq's ].<ref>Cleveland, William L. ''A History of the Modern Middle East. 2nd Ed'' pg. 464</ref> According to oil workers in the area, Iraq's slant drilling claim was fabricated, as "oil flows easily from the Rumaila field without any need for these techniques."<ref name=hayes>{{cite news|last=Hayes |first=Thomas C.|newspaper=]|date=3 September 1990|title=Confrontation in the Gulf; The Oilfield Lying Below the Iraq-Kuwait Dispute|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1990/09/03/world/confrontation-in-the-gulf-the-oilfield-lying-below-the-iraq-kuwait-dispute.html|quote=Oil formations frequently run beneath political boundaries, whether they involve unfriendly leaseholders in West Texas or neighboring Arab states, and procedures have existed for years to settle disputes that arise. Typically, participants in the same field share both production costs and revenues, using a formula that sets percentages of ownership. But Iraq refused to negotiate with Kuwait on such an agreement. So Kuwait produced oil from Rumaila without any agreement, and then adopted a policy of producing far more oil than it was allowed under the quota system of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries.&nbsp;... But during the Iraq mined its giant share of the Rumaila field to keep it from falling into Iranian hands, Western political experts say. Kuwait stepped up its total oil production, capturing some of Iraq's customers and pumping millions of barrels from the Rumaila field.&nbsp;... Some Iraqi officials have accused Kuwait in the past of using advanced drilling techniques developed by American oilfield specialists to siphon oil from the Rumaila field, a charge that American drillers deny, noting that the oil flows easily from the Rumaila field without any need for these techniques.&nbsp;... W. C. Goins, senior vice president of OGE Drilling Inc., a Houston company that provided oilfield supervisors and workers for Kuwait in the same area, said he was 'positive' all of the wells his employees drilled and operated ran vertically down to the Rumaila pay zone. 'That field crosses the border in north Kuwait,' he added. 'Iraqis were drilling on one side, and Kuwaitis on the other side.'}}</ref> At the same time, Saddam looked for closer ties with those Arab states that had supported Iraq in the war. This move was supported by the US, who believed that Iraqi ties with pro-Western Gulf states would help bring and maintain Iraq inside the US' sphere of influence.{{sfnp|Simons|2004|p=334}}
In November 1989, CIA director ] met with the Kuwaiti head of security, Brigadier Fahd Ahmed Al-Fahd. Subsequent to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, Iraq claimed to have found a memorandum pertaining to their conversation. '']'' reported that Kuwaiti's foreign minister fainted when confronted with this document at an Arab summit in August. Later, Iraq cited this memorandum as evidence of a CIA-Kuwaiti plot to destabilize Iraq economically and politically. The CIA and Kuwait have described the meeting as routine and the memorandum as a forgery. The purported document reads in part:


In 1989, it appeared that ], strong during the war, would be maintained. A pact of non-interference and non-aggression was signed between the countries, followed by a Kuwaiti-Iraqi deal for Iraq to supply Kuwait with water for drinking and irrigation, although a request for Kuwait to lease Iraq ] was rejected.{{sfnp|Simons|2004|p=334}} Saudi-backed development projects were hampered by Iraq's large debts, even with the ] of 200,000 soldiers. Iraq also looked to increase arms production so as to become an exporter, although the success of these projects was also restrained by Iraq's obligations; in Iraq, resentment to OPEC's controls mounted.{{sfnp|Simons|2004|p=335}}
:''We agreed with the American side that it was important to take advantage of the deteriorating economic situation in Iraq in order to put pressure on that country's government to delineate our common border. The Central Intelligence Agency gave us its view of appropriate means of pressure, saying that broad cooperation should be initiated between us on condition that such activities be coordinated at a high level.''


Iraq's relations with its Arab neighbors, particularly Egypt, were degraded by mounting violence in Iraq against expatriate groups, who were well-employed during the war, by unemployed Iraqis, among them demobilized soldiers. These events drew little notice outside the Arab world because of fast-moving events directly related to the fall of Communism in Eastern Europe. However, the US did begin to condemn Iraq's human rights record, including the well-known use of torture.{{sfnp|Simons|2004|p=336}} The UK also condemned the execution of ], a journalist working for the British newspaper '']''.<ref name="stork" /> Following Saddam's declaration that "binary chemical weapons" would be used on Israel if it used military force against Iraq, Washington halted part of its funding.{{sfnp|Simons|2004|pp=337–338}} A UN mission to the ], where riots had resulted in Palestinian deaths, was ] by the US, making Iraq deeply skeptical of US foreign policy aims in the region, combined with the reliance of the US on Middle Eastern energy reserves.{{sfnp|Simons|2004|p=338}}
] magazine ], ] cover]]

]

In early July 1990, Iraq complained about Kuwait's behavior, such as not respecting their quota, and openly threatened to take military action. On the 23rd, the ] reported that Iraq had moved 30,000 troops to the Iraq-Kuwait border, and the US naval fleet in the ] was placed on alert. Saddam believed an anti-Iraq conspiracy was developing{{snd}}Kuwait had begun talks with Iran, and Iraq's rival Syria had arranged a visit to Egypt.{{sfnp|Simons|2004|p=343}} On 15 July 1990, Saddam's government laid out its combined objections to the ], including that policy moves were costing Iraq $1&nbsp;billion a year, that Kuwait was still using the Rumaila oil field, and that loans made by the UAE and Kuwait could not be considered debts to its "Arab brothers".{{sfnp|Simons|2004|p=343}} He threatened force against Kuwait and the UAE, saying: "The policies of some Arab rulers are American&nbsp;... They are inspired by America to undermine Arab interests and security."<ref>Yousseff M. Ibrahim, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170630060909/http://www.nytimes.com/1990/07/18/business/iraq-threatens-emirates-and-kuwait-on-oil-glut.html |date=30 June 2017 }} ''New York Times'', 18 July 1990</ref> The US sent ] planes and combat ships to the Persian Gulf in response to these threats.<ref>Michael R. Gordon, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170630054533/http://www.nytimes.com/1990/07/25/world/us-deploys-air-and-sea-forces-after-iraq-threatens-2-neighbors.html |date=30 June 2017 }} ''New York Times'', 25 July 1990</ref> Discussions in ], Saudi Arabia, mediated on the Arab League's behalf by Egyptian President ], were held on 31 July and led Mubarak to believe that a peaceful course could be established.{{sfnp|Finlan|2003|pp=25–26}}

During Saddam Hussein's 2003–2004 interrogation following his capture he claimed that in addition to economic disputes, an insulting exchange between the Kuwaiti ] ] and the Iraqi foreign minister – during which the emir stated his intention to turn "every Iraqi woman into a $10 prostitute" by bankrupting the country – was a decisive factor in triggering the Iraqi invasion.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/interrogator-shares-saddams-confessions/4/|title=Interrogator Shares Saddam's Confessions
|website=cbsnews.com|date=24 January 2008
}}</ref>

On the 25th, Saddam met with ], the ], in Baghdad. The Iraqi leader attacked American policy with regards to Kuwait and the UAE:

{{blockquote|So what can it mean when America says it will now protect its friends? It can only mean prejudice against Iraq. This stance plus maneuvers and statements which have been made has encouraged the UAE and Kuwait to disregard Iraqi rights&nbsp;... If you use pressure, we will deploy pressure and force. We know that you can harm us although we do not threaten you. But we too can harm you. Everyone can cause harm according to their ability and their size. We cannot come all the way to you in the United States, but individual Arabs may reach you&nbsp;... We do not place America among the enemies. We place it where we want our friends to be and we try to be friends. But repeated American statements last year made it apparent that America did not regard us as friends.<ref name="nytimes.com"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170111062914/http://www.nytimes.com/1990/09/23/world/confrontation-in-the-gulf-excerpts-from-iraqi-document-on-meeting-with-us-envoy.html |date=11 January 2017 }} ''New York Times'', 23 September 1990</ref>}}

Glaspie replied:

{{blockquote|I know you need funds. We understand that and our opinion is that you should have the opportunity to rebuild your country. But we have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts, like your border disagreement with Kuwait&nbsp;... Frankly, we can only see that you have deployed massive troops in the south. Normally that would not be any of our business. But when this happens in the context of what you said on your national day, then when we read the details in the two letters of the Foreign Minister, then when we see the Iraqi point of view that the measures taken by the UAE and Kuwait is, in the final analysis, parallel to military aggression against Iraq, then it would be reasonable for me to be concerned.<ref name="nytimes.com" />}}

Saddam stated that he would attempt last-ditch negotiations with the Kuwaitis but Iraq "would not accept death."<ref name="nytimes.com" />

According to Glaspie's own account, she stated in reference to the precise border between Kuwait and Iraq, "...&nbsp;that she had served in Kuwait 20 years before; 'then, as now, we took no position on these Arab affairs'."{{citation needed|date=November 2023}} Glaspie similarly believed that war was not imminent.{{sfnp|Finlan|2003|pp=25–26}}

On 26 July 1990, only a few days before the Iraqi invasion, OPEC officials said that Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates had agreed to a proposal to limit their oil output to {{convert|1.5|e6oilbbl|m3}} per day, "down from the nearly 2 million barrels a day they had each been pumping," thus potentially settling differences over oil policy between Kuwait and Iraq.<ref name=NY>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1990/07/26/world/iraq-said-to-prevail-in-oil-dispute-with-kuwait-and-arab-emirates.html?pagewanted=1|work=The New York Times|first=Youssef M.|last=Ibrahim|title=Iraq Said to Prevail in Oil Dispute With Kuwait and Arab Emirates|date=26 July 1990}}</ref>


==Invasion of Kuwait== ==Invasion of Kuwait==
] main battle tanks, common Iraqi battle tank used in the Gulf War by the ].]]
At the break of dawn on ], ], Iraqi troops crossed the Kuwaiti border with ] and ], occupying strategic posts throughout the country, including the Emir's palace. The Kuwaiti Army was quickly overwhelmed, though they bought enough time for the Kuwaiti Air Force to flee to Saudi Arabia. The heaviest fighting occurred at the Emir's Palace, where members of the royal guard fought a rear guard action to allow the royal family time to escape. A cousin of the Emir, who commanded the guard, was amongst those killed. Iraqi troops looted medical and food supplies, detained thousands of civilians and took over the media. There were reports of incidents of murder, brutality, and rape being committed by Iraqi troops against Kuwaiti citizens. However, later evidence showed that many of these reports were probably exaggerated or false. However, Iraq detained thousands of ] visitors as hostages and later attempted to use them as bargaining chips. After a brief puppet government headed by ] was installed, Iraq annexed Kuwait. Hussein then installed a new Iraqi provincial governor, describing this as "liberation" from the Kuwaiti Emir; this was largely dismissed as war ].


{{Main|Iraqi invasion of Kuwait|Timeline of Gulf War}}
==Diplomacy==
Within hours of the initial invasion, the Kuwaiti and United States of America delegations requested a meeting of the ], which passed ], condemning the invasion and demanding a withdrawal of Iraqi troops. On ], the ] passed its own resolution condemning the invasion and demanding a withdrawal of Iraqi troops. The Arab League resolution also called for a solution to the conflict from within the Arab League, and warned against foreign intervention. On ], the Security Council passed ], placing ]s on Iraq.


The result of the Jeddah talks was an Iraqi demand for $10&nbsp;billion<ref name="AFPS Timeline" /> to cover the lost revenues from Rumaila; Kuwait offered $500&nbsp;million.<ref name="AFPS Timeline" /> The Iraqi response was to immediately order an invasion,{{sfnp|Finlan|2003|p=26}} which started on 2 August 1990<ref name="s21423">{{cite news |last1=Abulhasan |first1=Mohammad A. |date=2 August 1990 |title=Letter dated 2 August 1990 from the Permanent Representative of Kuwait to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council |work=S/21423 |publisher=United Nations OFFICIAL DOCUMENT SYSTEM |url=https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N90/178/84/img/N9017884.pdf?OpenElement |access-date=7 March 2023 |archive-date=7 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230307153614/https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N90/178/84/img/N9017884.pdf?OpenElement |url-status=dead }}</ref> with the bombing of Kuwait's capital, ].
The decision by the ] to repel the Iraqi invasion had as much to do with preventing an Iraqi invasion of Saudi Arabia, a nation of far more importance to the world than Kuwait, as it did with Kuwait itself. The rapid success of the Iraqi army against Kuwait had brought Iraq's army within easy striking distance of the ] oil fields, Saudi Arabia's most valuable resources. Iraqi control of these fields as well as Kuwait and Iraqi reserves would have given it a large share of the world's oil supply, second only to Saudi Arabia itself. The United States, Europe, and Japan in particular saw such a potential ] as dangerous. Saudi Arabia, a geographically large nation with dispersed population centers would have found it difficult to quickly mobilize to meet the Iraqi division deployed in Southern Kuwait. Very likely Iraq would have gained control of the Eastern oil fields but it is heavily debatable whether Iraq could have fought into the Saudi capital of Riyadh. The Iraqi armoured divisions would face the same difficulties that Saudi forces were facing in order to defend the Oil fields, namely to transverse large distances across inhospitable desert. This would have all occurred against the backdrop of intense bombing by the Saudi Airforce, by far the most modern arm of the Saudi military.


Before the invasion, the ] was believed to have numbered 16,000 men, arranged into three armored, one mechanized infantry and one under-strength artillery brigade.<ref name="loccs">{{cite web |url=http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+kw0058) |title=Kuwait: Organization and Mission of the Forces |publisher=Library of Congress Country Studies |access-date=14 April 2012}}</ref> The pre-war strength of the ] was around 2,200 Kuwaiti personnel, with 80 fixed-wing aircraft and 40 helicopters.<ref name="loccs" /> In spite of Iraqi ], Kuwait did not mobilize its force; the army had been stood-down on 19 July,{{sfnp|Finlan|2003|p=25}} and during the Iraqi invasion many Kuwaiti military personnel were on leave.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}
Iraq had a number of grievances with Saudi Arabia. The concern over debts stemming from the Iran-Iraq war was even greater when applied to Saudi Arabia, which Iraq owed some 26 billion dollars. The long desert border was also ill-defined. Soon after his victory over Kuwait Saddam began verbally attacking the Saudi kingdom. He argued that the American-supported Kingdom was an illegitimate guardian of holy cities of ] and ]. Saddam combined the language of the Islamist groups that had recently fought in ] with the rhetoric Iran had long used to attack the Saudis.


By 1988, at the end of the Iran–Iraq war, the Iraqi Army was the world's fourth largest army, consisting of 955,000 standing soldiers and 650,000 paramilitary forces in the Popular Army. According to John Childs and André Corvisier, a low estimate shows the Iraqi Army capable of fielding 4,500 tanks, 484 combat aircraft and 232 combat helicopters.<ref name="MilSize">{{cite book |author1=Childs, John |author2=Corvisier, André |page= |title=A Dictionary of Military History and the Art of War |publisher=] |year=1994 |isbn=978-0-631-16848-5}}</ref> According to Michael Knights, a high estimate shows the Iraqi Army capable of fielding one million troops and 850,000 reservists, 5,500 tanks, 3,000 artillery pieces, 700 combat aircraft and helicopters; it held 53 divisions, 20 special-forces brigades, and several regional militias, and had a strong air defense.<ref name="auto1"/>
The addition of ] "God is Great" to the flag of Iraq and images of Saddam praying in Kuwait were seen as part of a plan to win the support of the ] and detach Islamist ] from Saudi Arabia. There was further escalation of such propaganda attacks on Saudi Arabia as western troops poured into the country.


] ]s]]
] ] was one of several naval vessels deployed for Operation Desert Shield.]]
Iraqi commandos infiltrated the Kuwaiti border first to prepare for the major units, which began the attack at midnight. The Iraqi attack had two prongs, with the primary attack force driving south straight for Kuwait City down the main highway, and a supporting attack force entering Kuwait farther west, but then turning and driving east, cutting off Kuwait City from the country's southern half. The commander of a Kuwaiti armored battalion, 35th Armoured ], deployed them against the Iraqi attack and conducted a robust defense at the ] near ], west of Kuwait City.<ref>{{cite web|author=Dan Vaught |url=http://users.lighthouse.net/danvaught/eyewitness01.html |title=Eyewitness, Col. Fred Hart 1 |publisher=Users.lighthouse.net |access-date=1 February 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090818141800/http://users.lighthouse.net/danvaught/eyewitness01.html |archive-date=18 August 2009 }}</ref>
] ] quickly announced that the US would launch a "wholly defensive" mission to prevent Iraq from invading Saudi Arabia - '''Operation Desert Shield''' - and US troops moved into Saudi Arabia on ]. On ], Iraq declared parts of Kuwait to be extensions of the Iraqi province of ] and the rest to be the 19th province of Iraq.


Kuwaiti aircraft ] to meet the invading force, but approximately 20% were lost or captured. A few combat sorties were flown against Iraqi ground forces.<ref name=autogenerated3>{{cite journal |last1=Cooper |first1=Tom |last2=Sadik |first2=Ahmad |title=Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait; 1990 |date=16 September 2003 |journal=Air Combat Information Group |url=http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_213.shtml |access-date=17 April 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141006231817/http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_213.shtml |archive-date=6 October 2014 }}</ref>
The United States Navy mobilized two naval battle groups, ] and ], to the area, where they were ready by ]. Also on August 8th, 1990, 48 US Air Force F-15s from the 1st Fighter Wing at Langley AFB, Virginia, landed in Saudia Arabia and immediately commenced round the clock air patrols of the Saudi-Kuwait-Iraq border areas to prevent further Iraqi advances. The United States also sent the ]s ] and ] to the region, and they would later become the last battleships to actively participate in a war. Military buildup continued from there, eventually reaching 500,000 troops. The consensus among military analysts is that until October, the American military forces in the area would have been insufficient to stop an invasion of Saudi Arabia had Iraq attempted one.


The main Iraqi thrust into Kuwait City was conducted by ]s deployed by helicopters and boats to attack the city from the sea, while other divisions seized the airports and two ]s. The Iraqis ], the Royal Residence of ], ], which was defended by the Emiri Guard supported with ] tanks. In the process, the Iraqis killed ], the Emir's youngest brother.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}
A long series of UN Security Council and Arab League resolutions were passed regarding the conflict. One of the most important was ], passed on ], giving Iraq a withdrawal deadline of ] ], and authorizing "all necessary means to uphold and implement Resolution 660", a diplomatic formulation authorizing the use of force.


Within 12 hours, most resistance had ended within Kuwait, and the royal family had fled, allowing Iraq to control most of Kuwait.{{sfnp|Finlan|2003|p=26}} After two days of intense combat, most of the Kuwaiti military were either overrun by the ], or had escaped to Saudi Arabia. The Emir and key ministers fled south along the highway for refuge in Saudi Arabia. Iraqi ground forces consolidated their control of Kuwait City, then headed south and redeployed along the Saudi border. After the decisive Iraqi victory, Saddam initially installed a puppet regime known as the "]" before installing his cousin ] as Kuwait's governor on 8 August.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}
The United States, especially ] ], assembled a coalition of forces to join it in opposing Iraq, consisting of forces from 34 countries: ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], the ], the ] and the ] itself. US troops represented 74% of 660,000 troops in the theater of war. Many of the coalition forces were reluctant to join; some felt that the war was an internal Arab affair, or feared increasing American influence in Kuwait. In the end, many nations were persuaded by Iraq's belligerence towards other Arab states, and offers of economic aid or debt forgiveness.


] ] ], after being captured by a US Marine Corps unit at the start of the ground phase of Operation Desert Storm]]
] and President Bush Sr. visit U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia on Thanksgiving Day, 1990.]]
After the invasion, the Iraqi military looted over $1 billion in banknotes from Kuwait's Central Bank.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.upi.com/Archives/1990/09/07/Iraqis-loot-Kuwaits-central-bank-of-gold-cash/4632652680000/|title=Iraqis loot Kuwait's central bank of gold, cash|website=UPI}}</ref> At the same time, Saddam Hussein made the Kuwaiti dinar equal to the Iraqi dinar, thereby lowering the Kuwaiti currency to one-twelfth of its original value. In response, Sheikh Jaber al-Ahmad al-Sabah ruled the banknotes as invalid and refused to reimburse stolen notes, which became worthless because of a UN embargo. After the conflict ended, many of the stolen banknotes made their way back into circulation. The stolen banknotes are a collectible for ]s.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.pmgnotes.com/news/article/6160/The-Stolen-Dinars-of-Kuwait/#fn1|title=The Stolen Dinars of Kuwait – PMG|website=www.pmgnotes.com}}</ref>
The United States gave several public justifications for involvement in the conflict. The first reason given was the importance of the United States' longstanding friendly relationship with Saudi Arabia. However, some Americans were dissatisfied with this explanation and "No Blood For Oil" became a rallying cry for domestic opponents of the war, though they never reached the size of opposition to the ]. Later justifications for the war included Iraq's history of human rights abuses under President Saddam Hussein, the potential that Iraq may develop ] or ], and that "naked aggression will not stand."


===Kuwaiti resistance movement===
Although the human rights abuses of the Iraq regime before and after the Kuwait invasion were well-documented, the government of Kuwait set out to influence American opinion with a few accounts. Shortly after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, the organization '']'' was formed in the U.S. It hired the public relations firm Hill and Knowlton for about $11 million, money from the Kuwaiti government. This firm went on to manufacture a campaign which described Iraqi soldiers pulling babies out of incubators in Kuwaiti hospitals and letting them die on the floor. One year later, however, this allegation was labeled a fabricated hoax. The person that testified to this allegation was found to be a member of the Kuwaiti Royal Family living in Paris during the war, and therefore could not have been present during the alleged crime. (See '']''.)
Kuwaitis founded a local armed resistance movement following the Iraqi occupation of Kuwait.<ref name=sh>{{cite web|url=http://www.netanya.ac.il/ResearchCen/StrategicDialogue/AcademicPub/Documents/IRAN%20STUDY%20book-full.pdf|title=Iran, Israel and the Shi'ite Crescent|work=S. Daniel Abraham Center for Strategic Dialogue|pages=14–15|access-date=5 March 2014|archive-date=6 November 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141106055548/http://www.netanya.ac.il/ResearchCen/StrategicDialogue/AcademicPub/Documents/IRAN%20STUDY%20book-full.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |url=https://www.academia.edu/1022103 |title=Saddam's Security Apparatus During the Invasion of Kuwait and the Kuwaiti Resistance |journal=The Journal of Intelligence History |date=Winter 2003 |pages=74–75|last1=Al-Marashi |first1=Ibrahim |volume=3 |issue=2 |doi=10.1080/16161262.2003.10555087 |s2cid=157844796 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://theses.ncl.ac.uk/dspace/bitstream/10443/730/1/Taqi10.pdf |title=Two ethnicities, three generations: Phonological variation and change in Kuwait |work=Newcastle University |year=2010 |access-date=5 March 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131019130212/https://theses.ncl.ac.uk/dspace/bitstream/10443/730/1/Taqi10.pdf |archive-date=19 October 2013 }}</ref> The {{ill|Kuwaiti Resistance|lt=Kuwaiti resistance's|ar|المقاومة الكويتية}} casualty rate far exceeded that of the coalition military forces and Western hostages.<ref name=resist/> The resistance predominantly consisted of ordinary citizens who lacked any form of training and supervision.<ref name=resist>{{cite journal |url=http://www.meforum.org/238/the-kuwaiti-resistance |title=The Kuwaiti Resistance |journal=] |date=March 1995|last1=Levins |first1=John M. }}</ref>


==Run-up to the war==
Various peace proposals were floated, but none were agreed to. The United States insisted that the only acceptable terms for peace were Iraq's full, unconditional withdrawal from Kuwait. Iraq insisted that withdrawal from Kuwait must be "linked" to a simultaneous withdrawal of Syrian troops from ] and Israeli troops from the ], ], the ], and southern Lebanon. ] and ] were persuaded by this proposal, but ], ], and the anti-Iraq coalition denied that there was any connection to the Kuwait issue. Syria joined the coalition to expel Saddam but Israel remained officially neutral despite rocket attacks on Israeli civilians. The Bush administration persuaded Israel to remain outside the conflict with promises of increased aid, while the ] under ] openly supported Saddam Hussein, leading to a later rupture in Palestinian-Kuwaiti ties and the expulsion of many Palestinians from Kuwait.
===Diplomatic means===
A key element of US political, military and energy economic planning occurred in early 1984. The Iran–Iraq war had been going on for five years by that time and both sides sustained significant casualties, reaching into the hundreds of thousands. Within President ]'s ] concern was growing that the war could spread beyond the boundaries of the two belligerents. A National Security Planning Group meeting was formed, chaired by then Vice President ], to review US options. It was determined that the conflict would likely spread into Saudi Arabia and other Persian Gulf states, but that the United States had little capability to defend the region. Furthermore, it was determined that a prolonged war in the region would induce much higher oil prices and threaten the fragile recovery of the world economy, which was just beginning to gain momentum. On 22 May 1984, President Reagan was briefed on the project conclusions in the ] by ] who had served as the head of the NSC staff that organized the study. (The full declassified presentation can be seen here:<ref>{{cite web|title=Presentation on Gulf Oil Disruption|date=22 May 1984 |url=http://www.wpainc.com/Archive/Reagan%20Administration/WFM%20Papers%20from%20Reagan%20Archives/Iran-Iraq/Presentation%20on%20Gulf%20Oil%20Disruption%205-22-84.pdf|website=wpainc.com|access-date=17 January 2017|archive-date=4 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304041513/http://www.wpainc.com/Archive/Reagan%20Administration/WFM%20Papers%20from%20Reagan%20Archives/Iran-Iraq/Presentation%20on%20Gulf%20Oil%20Disruption%205-22-84.pdf }}</ref>) The conclusions were threefold: first, oil stocks needed to be increased among members of the ] and, if necessary, released early if the oil market was disrupted; second, the United States needed to beef up the security of friendly Arab states in the region; and third, an embargo should be placed on sales of military equipment to Iran and Iraq. The plan was approved by President Reagan and later affirmed by the ] leaders headed by the United Kingdom's Prime Minister, ], in the ]. The plan was implemented and became the basis for US preparedness to respond to the Iraqi occupation of Kuwait in 1991.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}


]
On ], ] the ] authorized the use of military force to drive Iraq out of Kuwait. Soon after the other states in the coalition did the same.


Within hours of the invasion, Kuwait and US delegations requested a meeting of the ], which passed ], condemning the invasion and demanding a withdrawal of Iraqi troops.{{sfnp|Finlan|2003|p=29}}<ref name="s21425">{{cite news |date=2 August 1990 |title=DRAFT RESOLUTION /CANADA, COLOMBIA, CÔTE D'IVOIRE, ETHIOPIA, FINLAND, FRANCE, MALAYSIA, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |work=S/21425 |publisher=United Nations OFFICIAL DOCUMENT SYSTEM |url=https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N90/178/72/img/N9017872.pdf?OpenElement |access-date=7 March 2023 |archive-date=7 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230307153615/https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N90/178/72/img/N9017872.pdf?OpenElement |url-status=dead }}</ref>{{Clarify|reason=Is it page 29 or 13?|date=February 2023}}<ref name=UN>{{cite journal|title=Report of the Security Council: 16 June 1990{{snd}}15 June 1991|journal=Report of the Security Council|date=1993 |publisher=United Nations|location=New York|issn=0082-8238|page=30|type=digital document}}</ref> On 3 August 1990, the Arab League passed its own resolution, which called for a solution to the conflict from within the league, and warned against outside intervention. Iraq and Libya were the only two Arab League states that opposed the resolution for Iraq to withdraw from Kuwait; the ] (PLO){{efn| Since 1988 the PLO had assumed, for Arab League purposes, the seat for the ].}} opposed it as well.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |title=Myths & Facts{{snd}}The Gulf Wars |url=https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/myths/mf12.html |encyclopedia=Jewish Virtual Library |access-date=13 May 2011}}</ref> The Arab states of Yemen and Jordan{{snd}}a Western ally which bordered Iraq and relied on the country for economic support<ref name="lkjomzvc">{{cite journal |title=The 1991 Gulf War And Jordan's Economy |author1=Ziad Swaidan |author2=Mihai Nica |url=http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2002/issue2/jv6n2a7.html |archive-date=2002-08-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020804061624/http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2002/issue2/jv6n2a7.html |journal=Middle East Review of International Affairs |volume=6 |issue=2 |date=June 2002}}</ref>{{snd}}opposed military intervention from non-Arab states.<ref>{{cite journal |first=David A |last=Deese |title=Persian Gulf War, Desert Storm{{snd}}War with Iraqi |journal=The History Professor |publisher=Concord Learning Systems |url=http://www.laughtergenealogy.com/bin/histprof/misc/desertstorm.html |archive-date=2005-01-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050114141303/http://www.laughtergenealogy.com/bin/histprof/misc/desertstorm.html}}</ref> Separately, Sudan, also an Arab League member, aligned itself with Saddam.<ref name="lkjomzvc"/>
==Air campaign==
] ], ], ] combat aircraft flying over burning ]s (set alight by retreating Iraqi forces) during Desert Storm.]]
A day after the deadline set in Resolution 678, the coalition launched a massive air campaign codenamed ''Operation Desert Storm'' with more than 1,000 sorties launching per day, beginning early morning on ], ]. Five hours after the first attacks, Baghdad state radio broadcast a voice identified as Saddam Hussein declaring that "The great duel, the mother of all battles has begun. The dawn of victory nears as this great showdown begins."


On 6 August, ] placed ] on Iraq.<ref name=UN2>{{cite journal|title=Report of the Security Council: 16 June 1990{{snd}}15 June 1991|journal=Report of the Security Council|date=1993|publisher=United Nations|location=New York|issn=0082-8238|pages=33–35}}</ref>{{sfnp|Finlan|2003|p=29}}<ref>{{cite web |url=https://fas.org/news/un/iraq/sres/sres0661.htm |title=Resolution 661 (1990) |publisher=United Nations |access-date=13 April 2012}}</ref> ]<ref name=UN/> followed soon after, which authorized a ] to enforce the sanctions. It said the "use of measures commensurate to the specific circumstances as may be necessary&nbsp;... to halt all inward and outward maritime shipping in order to inspect and verify their cargoes and destinations and to ensure strict implementation of resolution 661."<ref name=UN3>{{cite journal|title=Report of the Security Council: 16 June 1990{{snd}}15 June 1991|journal=Report of the Security Council|date=1993|publisher=United Nations|location=New York|issn=0082-8238|pages=52–53}}</ref><ref>Lori Fisler Damrosch, ''International Law, Cases and Materials'', West Group, 2001</ref>
Weapons used in the air campaign included ]s (or "smart bombs"), ]s, ] "daisy cutters", and ]s. Iraq responded by launching 8 ] missiles into ] the next day. The first priority for coalition forces was destruction of the Iraqi air force and anti-aircraft facilities. This was quickly achieved and for the duration of the war Coalition aircraft could operate largely unchallenged. Despite Iraq's better-than-expected anti-aircraft capabilities, only one coalition aircraft was lost in the opening day of the war. ] aircraft were heavily used in this phase to elude Iraq's extensive ] systems and anti-aircraft weapons; once these were destroyed, other types of aircraft could more safely be used. The sorties were launched mostly from ] and the six coalition ] groups in the Persian Gulf.
] ground attack plane flying over target area during Desert Storm.]]


The US administration had at first been indecisive with an "undertone ... of resignation to the invasion and even adaptation to it as a fait accompli" until the UK's prime minister Margaret Thatcher<ref name="margaretthatcher.org">{{cite web |title=George Bush (Sr) Library – Margaret Thatcher Foundation |url=http://www.margaretthatcher.org/archive/us-bush.asp |website=www.margaretthatcher.org}}</ref> played a powerful role, reminding the President that appeasement in the 1930s had led to war, that Saddam would have the whole Gulf at his mercy along with 65 percent of the world's oil supply, and famously urging President Bush "not to go wobbly".<ref name="margaretthatcher.org"/>
The next coalition targets were command and communication facilities. Saddam had closely micromanaged the Iraqi forces in the Iran-Iraq War and initiative at the lower levels was discouraged. Coalition planners hoped Iraqi resistance would quickly collapse if deprived of command and control. The first week of the air war saw a few Iraqi sorties but these did little damage, and thirty-eight Iraqi ]s were shot down by Coalition planes. Soon after, the Iraqi airforce began fleeing to Iran, with between 115 to 140 aircraft flown to Iran {{ref|www.globalsecurity.org}}. The mass exodus of Iraqi aircraft to Iran took coalition forces by surprise and they were unable to react before most of the Iraqi aircraft had made it "safely" to Iranian airbases. Iran has never returned the aircraft to Iraq and didn't release the aircrews to return home until years later. On ], Iraq began ] approximately 1 million tons of crude oil into the gulf, causing the largest ] in history.


Once persuaded, US officials insisted on a total Iraqi pullout from Kuwait, without any linkage to other Middle Eastern problems, accepting the British view that any concessions would strengthen Iraqi influence in the region for years to come.<ref name="hard line">{{cite news |last=Friedman |first=Thomas L. |title=Confrontation in the Gulf: Behind Bush's Hard Line; Washington Considers a Clear Iraqi Defeat To Be Necessary to Bolster Its Arab Allies |newspaper=] |location=New York |pages=A1 |date=22 August 1990 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1990/08/22/world/confrontation-gulf-behind-bush-s-hard-line-washington-considers-clear-iraqi.html |access-date=16 September 2010 |author-link=Thomas Friedman}}</ref>
The third and largest phase of the air campaign targeted military targets throughout Iraq and Kuwait: ] missile launchers, ] sites, weapons research facilities and naval forces. About one third of the Coalition airpower was devoted to attacking Scuds, which were on trucks and therefore difficult to locate. In addition, it targeted facilities useful for both the military and civilians: electricity production facilities, nuclear reactors, telecommunications equipment, port facilities, oil refineries and distribution, railroads and bridges. Electrical power facilities were destroyed across the country. At the end of the war, electricity production was at four percent of its pre-war levels. Bombs destroyed the utility of all major dams, most major pumping stations and many sewage treatment plants. Some US and British ] teams had been covertly inserted into western Iraq to aid in the search and destruction of scuds. However, the lack of adequate terrain for concealment hindered their operations and many of them were killed or captured.


]
].]]
In most cases, the Allies avoided hitting civilian-only facilities. However, on ] ], two laser-guided ] destroyed the ] ], which the Iraqis claimed was for the auspices of an air shelter. U.S. officials claimed that the blockhouse was a military communications center, but Western reporters have been unable to find evidence for this. The White House claims, in a report titled ''Apparatus of Lies: Crafting Tragedy'', that U.S. intelligence sources reported the blockhouse was being used for military command purposes. {{ref|www.whitehouse.gov.35}} In his book, ''Saddam's Bombmaker'', the former director of Iraq's nuclear weapon program, who defected to the west, supports the theory that the facility was used for both purposes.


On 12 August 1990, Saddam "propose that all cases of occupation, and those cases that have been portrayed as occupation, in the region, be resolved simultaneously". Specifically, he called for Israel to withdraw from occupied territories in Palestine, Syria, and Lebanon, Syria to withdraw from Lebanon, and "mutual withdrawals by Iraq and Iran and arrangement for the situation in Kuwait." He also called for a replacement of US troops that mobilized in Saudi Arabia in response to Kuwait's invasion with "an Arab force", as long as that force did not involve Egypt. Additionally, he requested an "immediate freeze of all boycott and siege decisions" and a general normalization of relations with Iraq.<ref>{{cite news |title=Confrontation in the Gulf; Proposals by Iraqi President: Excerpts From His Address |newspaper=] |location=New York |pages=A8 |date=13 August 1990 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1990/08/13/world/confrontation-in-the-gulf-proposals-by-iraqi-president-excerpts-from-his-address.html |access-date=17 October 2010}}</ref> From the beginning of the crisis, President Bush was strongly opposed to any "linkage" between Iraq's occupation of Kuwait and the Palestinian issue.<ref name=sam />
<blockquote>
We sought refuge several times at the shelter.... But it was always filled.... The shelter had television sets, drinking fountains, its own electrical generator, and looked sturdy enough to withstand a hit from conventional weapons. But I stopped trying to get in one night after noticing some long black limousines slithering in and out of an underground gate in the back. I asked around and was told that it was a command center. After considering it more closely, I decided it was probably Saddam's own operational base.
</blockquote>


{{anchor|Stuart Lockwood}}On 23 August, Saddam appeared on state television with Western hostages to whom he had refused exit visas. In the video, he asks a young British boy, Stuart Lockwood, whether he is getting his milk, and goes on to say, through his interpreter, "We hope your presence as guests here will not be for too long. Your presence here, and in other places, is meant to prevent the scourge of war."<ref name="BBCOTD">BBC News. " {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080201022736/http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/august/23/newsid_2512000/2512289.stm |date=1 February 2008 }}". Retrieved 2 September 2007.</ref>
Iraq launched missile attacks on coalition bases in Saudi Arabia and on ], in the hopes of drawing Israel into the war and drawing other ] states out of it. This strategy proved ineffective. Israel did not join the coalition, and all Arab states stayed in the coalition except ], which remained officially neutral throughout. The Scud missiles generally caused fairly light damage, although its potency was felt on ] when 28 Americans were killed when a Scud destroyed their barracks in ]. The Scuds targeting Israel were ineffective due to the fact that increasing the range of the Scud resulted in the dramatic reduction in accuracy and payload. On ], Iraq attacked and occupied the lightly Marine defended Saudi city of ] with tanks and infantry. However, the ] ended when Iraqis were driven back by Saudi forces supported by US Marines with close air support over the following two days. Khafji was a strategic city immediately after the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. The Iraqi reluctance to commit several armoured divisions to the occupation and subsequent use of Khafji as a launching pad into the initially lightly defended Eastern portion of Saudi Arabia was a grave strategic error. Not only would Iraq have secured a majority of Middle Eastern Oil Supplies, it would have found itself better able to threaten the subsequent U.S. deployment along superior defensive lines.


Another Iraqi proposal communicated in August 1990 was delivered to US ] ] by an unidentified Iraqi official. The official communicated to the White House that Iraq would "withdraw from Kuwait and allow foreigners to leave" provided that the UN lifted sanctions, allowed "guaranteed access to the Persian Gulf through the Kuwaiti islands of Bubiyan and Warbah", and allowed Iraq to "gain full control of the Rumaila oil field that extends slightly into Kuwaiti territory". The proposal also "include offers to negotiate an oil agreement with the United States 'satisfactory to both nations' national security interests,' develop a joint plan 'to alleviate Iraq's economical and financial problems' and 'jointly work on the stability of the gulf.'"<ref name="Secret Offer">{{cite news |last=Royce |first=Knut |title=MIDDLE EAST CRISIS Secret Offer Iraq Sent Pullout Deal to U.S |newspaper=] |location=New York |date=29 August 1990 |url=https://www.scribd.com/doc/38969813/MIDDLE-EAST-CRISIS-Secret-Offer-Iraq-Sent-Pullout-Deal-to-U-S-ALL-EDITIONS |access-date=17 October 2010}}</ref>
The effect of the air campaign was to decimate entire Iraqi brigades deployed in the open desert in combat formation. The air campaign also prevented effective Iraqi resupply to forward deployed units engaged in combat, as well preventing the large number (450,000) of Iraqi troops from achieving the force concentration essential to victory.


On 29 November 1990, the Security Council passed ], which gave Iraq until 15 January 1991 to withdraw from Kuwait, and empowered states to use "all necessary means" to force Iraq out of Kuwait after the deadline.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}
The air campaign had a significant effect on the tactics employed by opposing forces in subsequent conflicts. No longer were entire divisions dug in the open facing U.S. forces but rather they were dispersed, e.g. ]. Opposing forces also reduced the length of their supply lines and the total area defended. This was seen during the ] when the ] preemptively abandoned large swaths of land and retreated into their strongholds. This increased their force concentration and reduced long vulnerable supply lines. This tactic was also observed in the invasion of Iraq when the Iraqi forces retreated from northern ] into the cities.

] during the Gulf War]]

In December 1990, Iraq made a proposal to withdraw from Kuwait provided that foreign troops left the region and that an agreement was reached regarding the Palestinian problem and the dismantlement of both Israel's and Iraq's ]. The White House rejected the proposal.<ref>{{cite news |last=Royce |first=Knut |title=Iraq Offers Deal to Quit Kuwait U.S. rejects it, but stays 'interested' |newspaper=] Washington Bureau |date=3 January 1991|location=Long Island, N.Y |page=5 |url=https://www.scribd.com/doc/38969954/Iraq-Offers-Deal-to-Quit-Kuwait-U-S-rejects-it-but-stays-interested-NASSAU-AND-SUFFOLK-Edition |access-date=24 October 2010}}</ref> The PLO's ] expressed that neither he nor Saddam insisted that solving the Israel–Palestine issues should be a precondition to solving the issues in Kuwait, though he did acknowledge a "strong link" between these problems.<ref>{{cite news |last=Tyler |first=Patrick E. |title=CONFRONTATION IN THE GULF; Arafat Eases Stand on Kuwait-Palestine Link |newspaper=] |location=New York |date=3 January 1991 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/03/world/confrontation-in-the-gulf-arafat-eases-stand-on-kuwait-palestine-link.html |access-date=17 October 2010}}</ref>

Ultimately, the US and UK stuck to their position that there would be no negotiations until Iraq withdrew from Kuwait and that they should not grant Iraq concessions, lest they give the impression that Iraq benefited from its military campaign.<ref name="hard line" /> Also, when US Secretary of State ] met with ] in Geneva, Switzerland, for last minute peace talks in early 1991, Aziz reportedly made no concrete proposals and did not outline any hypothetical Iraqi moves.<ref>{{cite news|last=Friedman|first=Thomas L.|title=CONFRONTATION IN THE GULF; As U.S. Officials See It, Hands of Aziz Were Tied|newspaper=The New York Times|pages=A10|date=11 January 1991|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/11/world/confrontation-in-the-gulf-as-us-officials-see-it-hands-of-aziz-were-tied.html|access-date=30 September 2010}}</ref>

On 14 January 1991, France proposed that the UN Security Council call for "a rapid and massive withdrawal" from Kuwait along with a statement to Iraq that Council members would bring their "active contribution" to a settlement of the region's other problems, "in particular, of the Arab–Israeli conflict and in particular to the Palestinian problem by convening, at an appropriate moment, an international conference" to assure "the security, stability and development of this region of the world." The French proposal was supported by Belgium (at the moment one of the rotating Council members), Germany, Spain, Italy, Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, and several non-aligned states. The US, the UK, and the Soviet Union rejected it; US Ambassador to the UN ] stated that the French proposal was unacceptable, because it went beyond previous Council resolutions on the Iraqi invasion.<ref>See Paul Lewis, "Confrontation in the Gulf: The U.N.; France and 3 Arab States Issue an Appeal to Hussein," ''New York Times'', 15 January 1991, p. A12</ref><ref>Michael Kranish et al., "World waits on brink of war: Late effort at diplomacy in gulf fails," ''Boston Globe'', 16 January 1991, p. 1</ref><ref>Ellen Nimmons, A.P., "Last-ditch pitches for peace; But U.S. claims Iraqis hold key," ''Houston Chronicle'', 15 January 1991, p. 1</ref> France dropped this proposal when it found "no tangible sign of interest" from Baghdad.<ref>Alan Riding, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161026174110/http://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/16/world/confrontation-gulf-france-paris-says-its-last-ditch-peace-effort-has-failed.html |date=26 October 2016 }} ''New York Times'' 16 January 1991</ref>

===Military means===
{{Anchor|Operation Desert Shield}}
{{Redirect|Operation Desert Shield|the 2006 operation by the Iraqi insurgency|Operation Desert Shield (Iraq)}}
]

One of the main concerns in the Western world was the significant threat Iraq posed to Saudi Arabia. Following Kuwait's conquest, the Iraqi Army was within easy striking distance of Saudi ]s. Control of these fields, along with Kuwaiti and Iraqi reserves, would have given Saddam control over the majority of the world's oil reserves. Iraq also had a number of grievances with Saudi Arabia. The Saudis had lent Iraq 26&nbsp;billion dollars during its war with Iran. The Saudis had backed Iraq in that war, as they feared the influence of ] Iran's ] on its own Shia minority. After the war, Saddam felt he should not have to repay the loans due to the help he had given the Saudis by fighting Iran.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

Soon after his conquest of Kuwait, Saddam began verbally attacking the Saudis. He argued that the US-supported Saudi state was an illegitimate and unworthy guardian of the holy cities of ] and ]. He combined the language of the ] groups that had recently fought in Afghanistan with the rhetoric Iran had long used to attack the Saudis.<ref>] ''Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam.''</ref>

Acting on the ] policy, and out of fear the Iraqi Army could launch an invasion of Saudi Arabia, US President George H. W. Bush quickly announced that the US would launch a "wholly defensive" mission to prevent Iraq from invading Saudi Arabia, under the codename Operation Desert Shield. The operation began on 7 August 1990, when US troops were sent to Saudi Arabia, due also to the request of its monarch, ], who had earlier called for US military assistance.<ref name="AFPS Timeline">{{cite web|title=The Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm Timeline |url=http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Aug2000/n08082000_20008088.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080526135240/http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=45404 |archive-date=26 May 2008 |access-date=30 June 2010}}</ref> This "wholly defensive" doctrine was quickly abandoned when, on 8 August, Iraq declared Kuwait to be Iraq's 19th province and Saddam named his cousin, Ali Hassan Al-Majid, as its military-governor.<ref name=AFPS15years>{{cite web|title=15 Years After Desert Storm, U.S. Commitment to Region Continues |url=http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=14792 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110608084842/http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=14792|archive-date=2011-06-08|access-date=29 March 2007}}</ref>

]
The ] dispatched two naval battle groups built around the ] ] and ] to the Persian Gulf, where they were ready by 8 August. The US also sent the battleships ] and ] to the region. A total of 48 US Air Force F-15s from the ] at ], Virginia, landed in Saudi Arabia and immediately commenced round-the-clock air patrols of the Saudi–Kuwait–Iraq border to discourage further Iraqi military advances. They were joined by 36 F-15 A-Ds from the ] at ]. The Bitburg contingent was based at ], approximately an hour south east of Riyadh. The 36th TFW would be responsible for 11 confirmed Iraqi Air Force aircraft shot down during the war. Two Air National Guard units were stationed at Al Kharj Air Base, the ]'s 169th Fighter Wing flew bombing missions with 24 F-16s flying 2,000 combat missions and dropping {{convert|4000000|lb|kg t|spell=in|abbr=off|sp=us}} of munitions, and the ]'s 174th Fighter Wing from ] flew 24 F-16s on bombing missions. Military buildup continued from there, eventually reaching 543,000 troops, twice the number used in the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Much of the material was airlifted or carried to the staging areas via ], allowing a quick buildup. As part of the buildup, amphibious exercises were carried out in the Gulf, including Operation Imminent Thunder, which involved the ] and 15 other ships, 1,100 aircraft, and a thousand Marines.<ref>{{cite web|title=U.S., Saudi Forces Start 'Imminent Thunder' Exercise in Gulf|url=https://apnews.com/article/b725461875b6227b7757a809c1ed4a3e|access-date=2021-05-20|website=AP NEWS}}</ref> In a press conference, General Schwarzkopf stated that these exercises were intended to deceive the Iraqi forces, forcing them to continue their defense of the Kuwaiti coastline.<ref>{{Cite AV media|title=Gen. Schwarzkopf's Famed News Conference| date=29 December 2012 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKi3NwLFkX4|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210901232144/https://youtube.com/watch?v=wKi3NwLFkX4 | archive-date=2021-09-01 | via=] |access-date=2021-05-20}}</ref>

===Creating a coalition===
]

A ] and Arab League resolutions were passed regarding Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. Resolution 678, passed on 29 November 1990, gave Iraq a withdrawal deadline until 15 January 1991 and authorized "all necessary means to uphold and implement Resolution 660", and a diplomatic formulation authorizing the use of force if Iraq failed to comply.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cfr.org/publication/11205/un_security_council_resolution_678_iraq_kuwait.html?breadcrumb=%2Fregion%2F408%2Fkuwait |website=Council on Foreign Relations |title=UN Security Council Resolution 678, Iraq / Kuwait |date=29 November 1990 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090614131250/http://www.cfr.org/publication/11205/un_security_council_resolution_678_iraq_kuwait.html?breadcrumb=%2Fregion%2F408%2Fkuwait |archive-date=14 June 2009}}</ref>

To ensure that the US received economic backing, James Baker went on an 11-day journey to nine countries in September 1990, which the press dubbed "The Tin Cup Trip". The first stop was Saudi Arabia, which a month before had already granted permission to the United States to use its facilities. However, Baker believed that Saudi Arabia should assume some of the cost of the military efforts to defend it. When Baker asked King Fahd for $15 billion, the King readily agreed, with the promise that Baker ask Kuwait for the same amount.{{citation needed|date=May 2020}}

The next day, 7 September, he did just that, and the ], displaced in a Sheraton hotel outside his invaded country, easily agreed. Baker then moved to enter talks with Egypt, whose leadership he considered "the moderate voice of the Middle East". President Mubarak of Egypt was furious with Saddam for his invasion of Kuwait, and for the fact that Saddam had assured Mubarak that an invasion was not his intention. Egypt received approximately $7&nbsp;billion in debt forgiveness for its providing of support and troops for the US-led intervention.<ref>New York Times, 10 Apr. 1991, " {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181118035402/https://www.nytimes.com/1991/04/10/business/egypt-s-reward-forgiven-debt.html |date=18 November 2018 }}</ref>

After stops in Helsinki and Moscow to smooth out Iraqi demands for a Middle-Eastern peace conference with the Soviet Union, Baker traveled to Syria to discuss its role in the crisis with its President ]. Assad had a deep personal enmity towards Saddam, which was defined by the fact that "Saddam had been trying to kill him for years." Harboring this animosity and impressed with Baker's diplomatic initiative to visit Damascus (relations had been severed since the ] in ]), Assad agreed to pledge up to 100,000 Syrian troops to the coalition effort. This was a vital step in ensuring Arab states were represented in the coalition. In exchange, Washington gave al-Assad the green light to wipe out forces opposing Syria's rule in ] and arranged for weapons valued at a billion dollars to be provided to Syria, mostly through Gulf states.<ref name="newstatesman.com">'']'', 23 September 2002, " {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181118081556/https://www.newstatesman.com/node/192550 |date=18 November 2018 }}"</ref> In exchange for Iran's support for the US-led intervention, the US government promised the Iranian government to end US opposition to ] loans to Iran. On the day before the ground invasion began, the World Bank gave Iran the first loan of $250m.<ref name="newstatesman.com"/>

Baker flew to Rome for a brief visit with the Italians in which he was promised the use of some military equipment, before journeying to Germany to meet with American ally ]. Although ] (which was brokered essentially by the United States) prohibited military involvement outside Germany's borders, Kohl committed a two billion dollar contribution to the coalition's war effort, as well as further economic and military support of coalition ally Turkey, and the transportation of Egyptian soldiers and ships to the Persian Gulf.<ref>Baker, James Addison, and Thomas M. DeFrank. ''The Politics of Diplomacy: Revolution, War, and Peace, 1989–1992''. New York: Putnam, 1995.</ref>

] and President ] visit US troops in Saudi Arabia on ], 1990.]]

A coalition of forces opposing Iraq's aggression was formed, consisting of forces from 42 countries: Argentina, Australia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Egypt, France, Germany, Greece, Honduras, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Kuwait, Luxembourg, Morocco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, the Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Syria, Turkey,<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Haberman |first1=Clyde |date=20 January 1991 |title=WAR IN THE GULF: Turkey; Turkey's Role in Air Assault Sets Off Fear of Retaliation (Published 1991) |newspaper=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/20/world/war-in-the-gulf-turkey-turkey-s-role-in-air-assault-sets-off-fear-of-retaliation.html}}</ref> the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/15/world/meast/gulf-war-fast-facts/index.html|title=Gulf war fast facts|publisher=CNN Editorial Research|year=2020|access-date=15 December 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112020744/https://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/15/world/meast/gulf-war-fast-facts/index.html |archive-date=12 November 2020}}</ref> It was the largest coalition since ].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar/|title=The Unfinished War: A Decade Since Desert Storm|publisher=CNN In-Depth Specials|year=2001|access-date=5 April 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080317110507/http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar/ |archive-date=17 March 2008}}</ref> A group of ] soldiers also reportedly joined towards the end of the war.<ref name="auto72">{{cite web |title=DESERT SHIELD AND DESERT STORM A CHRONOLOGY AND TROOP LIST FOR THE 1990–1991 PERSIAN GULF CRISIS |url=https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a234743.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190412060905/https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a234743.pdf |archive-date=12 April 2019 |access-date=2018-12-18 |website=apps.dtic.mil}}</ref>

US Army General ] was designated to be the commander of the coalition forces in the Persian Gulf area. The Soviet Union condemned Baghdad's aggression against Kuwait, but did not support the United States and allied intervention in Iraq and tried to avert it.<ref name="auto">{{cite news |title=The Gulf War: Moscow's role|publisher=CNN|year=2001|url=https://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/01/16/russia.iraq/index.html|access-date=18 October 2020}}</ref>

Although they did not contribute any forces, Japan and Germany made financial contributions totaling $10&nbsp;billion and $6.6&nbsp;billion respectively. ] also provided financial support to the coalition.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Luxembourg (09/06) |url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/outofdate/bgn/luxembourg/74191.htm |access-date=2023-08-04 |website=U.S. Department of State}}</ref> US troops represented 73% of the coalition's 956,600 troops in Iraq.<ref>Freedman, Lawrence, and Efraim Karsh. ''The Gulf Conflict 1990–1991: Diplomacy and War in the New World Order''. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1993. Print.</ref>

Many of the coalition countries were reluctant to commit military forces. Some felt that the war was an internal Arab affair or did not want to increase US influence in the Middle East. In the end, however, many governments were persuaded by Iraq's belligerence towards other Arab states, offers of economic aid or debt forgiveness, and threats to withhold aid.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/31/AR2006103101217.html |title=Security Council Seat Tied to Aid |newspaper=The Washington Post |access-date=18 March 2010 |first=Colum |last=Lynch |date=1 November 2006}}</ref>

====Justification for intervention====
The US and the UN gave several public justifications for involvement in the conflict, the most prominent being the Iraqi violation of Kuwaiti territorial integrity. In addition, the US moved to support its ally Saudi Arabia, whose importance in the region, and as a key supplier of oil, made it of considerable ] importance. Shortly after the Iraqi invasion, US Defense Secretary ] made the first of several visits to Saudi Arabia where King Fahd requested US military assistance. During a speech in a special joint session of the US Congress given on 11 September 1990, Bush summed up the reasons with the following remarks: "Within three days, 120,000 Iraqi troops with 850 tanks had poured into Kuwait and moved south to threaten Saudi Arabia. It was then that I decided to act to check that aggression."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://millercenter.org/scripps/archive/speeches/detail/3425|first=George H. W.|last=Bush|title=Address Before a Joint Session of Congress|publisher=Miller Center of Public Affairs|date=11 September 1990|access-date=1 February 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110116162710/http://millercenter.org/scripps/archive/speeches/detail/3425|archive-date=16 January 2011}}</ref>

The Pentagon stated that satellite photos showing a buildup of Iraqi forces along the border were the source of this information, but this was later alleged to be false. A reporter for the '']'' acquired two commercial Soviet satellite images made at the time, which showed nothing but empty desert.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/tampabay/access/50586247.html?dids=50586247:50586247&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Jan+6%252C+1991&author=JEAN+HELLER&pub=St.+Petersburg+Times&edition=&startpage=1.A&desc=Photos+don%2527t+show+buildup |title=Photos don't show buildup |work=St. Petersburg Times |date=6 January 1991 |access-date=13 January 2012 |first=Jean |last=Heller |archive-date=4 February 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130204014848/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/tampabay/access/50586247.html?dids=50586247:50586247&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Jan+6%252C+1991&author=JEAN+HELLER&pub=St.+Petersburg+Times&edition=&startpage=1.A&desc=Photos+don%2527t+show+buildup }}</ref>

Other justifications for foreign involvement included Iraq's history of human rights ]. Iraq was also known to possess ] and ], which Saddam had used against Iranian troops during the Iran–Iraq War and against his own country's ] population in the ]. Iraq was also known to have a ]s program; the report about it from January 1991 was partially declassified by the CIA on 26 May 2001.<ref>], Volume 59, page 33, Educational Foundation for Nuclear Science (Chicago, Ill.), Atomic Scientists of Chicago, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (Organization), 2003.</ref>

====Public relations campaign targeting the public====
{{see also|Nayirah testimony}}
] (left), Gen. ], and ] (right) listen as Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney addresses reporters regarding the 1991 Gulf War.]]

Although the Iraqi military committed human rights abuses during the invasion, the alleged incidents that received the most publicity in the US were fabrications of the ] firm hired by the government of Kuwait to persuade Americans to support military intervention.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Chardell |first=Daniel |date=29 June 2023 |title=The Origins of the Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait Reconsidered |url=https://tnsr.org/2023/06/the-origins-of-the-iraqi-invasion-of-kuwait-reconsidered/ |website=Texas National Security Review}}</ref> Shortly after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, the organization '']'' was formed in the US. It hired the public relations firm ] for about $11&nbsp;million, paid by ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.prwatch.org/books/tsigfy10.html |title=How PR Sold the War in the Persian Gulf &#124; Center for Media and Democracy |publisher=Prwatch.org |access-date=1 February 2011|date=2004-10-28 }}</ref>

Among many other means of influencing US opinion, such as distributing books on Iraqi atrocities to US soldiers deployed in the region, "Free Kuwait" T-shirts and speakers to college campuses, and dozens of video news releases to television stations, the firm arranged for an appearance before a group of members of the ] in which a young woman identifying herself as a ] described Iraqi soldiers pulling babies out of incubators and letting them die on the floor.<ref name=kuwaitgate />

The story helped tip both the public and Congress towards a war with Iraq: six Congressmen said the testimony was enough for them to support military action against Iraq and seven Senators referenced the testimony in debate. The Senate supported the military actions in a 52–47 vote. However, a year after the war, this allegation was revealed to be a fabrication. The young woman who had testified was found to be a member of Kuwait's royal family and the daughter of Kuwait's ambassador to the US.<ref name=kuwaitgate><!-- Rowse (1992) "Kuwaitgate – killing of Kuwaiti babies by Iraqi soldiers exaggerated", Washington Monthly-->{{cite Q|Q123698876}}</ref> She had not lived in Kuwait during the Iraqi invasion.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

The details of the Hill & Knowlton public relations campaign, including the incubator testimony, were published in ]'s ''Second Front: Censorship and Propaganda in the Gulf War'',<ref>], ''Second Front: Censorship and Propaganda in the Gulf War'' (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1992)</ref> and came to wide public attention when an ] by MacArthur was published in '']''. This prompted a reexamination by ], which had originally promoted an account alleging even greater numbers of babies torn from incubators than the original fake testimony. After finding no evidence to support it, the organization issued a retraction. President Bush then repeated the incubator allegations on television.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

In reality, the Iraqi Army did commit various well-documented crimes during its occupation of Kuwait, such as the ] of three brothers, after which their bodies were stacked and left to decay in a public street.{{sfnp|Makiya|1993|p=40}} Iraqi troops also ransacked and looted private Kuwaiti homes; one residence was repeatedly defecated in.{{sfnp|Makiya|1993|pp=31–33}} A resident later commented: "The whole thing was violence for the sake of violence, destruction for the sake of destruction&nbsp;... Imagine a ] painting by ]".{{sfnp|Makiya|1993|p=32}}

US President Bush repeatedly compared Saddam Hussein to ].<ref>New York Times, 24 Oct. 1990, " {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181112101338/https://www.nytimes.com/1990/10/24/world/mideast-tensions-no-compromise-on-kuwait-bush-says.html |date=12 November 2018 }}"</ref>

==Early battles==

===Air campaign===
{{Main|Gulf War air campaign}}
] ], one of the key aircraft used in Operation Desert Storm]]

The Gulf War began with an extensive ] campaign on 16 January 1991. For 42 consecutive days and nights, the coalition forces subjected Iraq to one of the most intensive air bombardments in military history. The coalition flew over 100,000 ]s, dropping 88,500 tonnes of bombs,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.clemson.edu/caah/history/FacultyPages/EdMoise/limit1.html |author=Edwin E. Moïse |title=Limited War: The Stereotypes |publisher=Clemson University |access-date=2 July 2010}}</ref> which widely destroyed military and civilian infrastructure.{{citation needed|date=February 2023}}

Iraqi anti-aircraft defenses, including ], were surprisingly ineffective against enemy aircraft, and the coalition suffered only 75 aircraft losses in over 100,000 sorties, 44 due to Iraqi action. Two of these losses are the result of aircraft colliding with the ground while evading Iraqi ground-fired weapons.<ref name=cnnstats>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080612131747/http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar/ |archive-date=12 June 2008 |title=CNN.com In-depth specials — Gulf War (via Internet Archive) |access-date=23 March 2008 |year=2001 |publisher=CNN}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.rjlee.org/aaloss.html |title=Fixed-Wing Combat Aircraft Attrition in Desert Storm |year=2002 |access-date=30 January 2012 |author=Lee, Robin J. |quote=Sources: Gulf War Airpower Survey, Vol. 5; Norman Friedman, Desert Victory; World Air Power Journal. Additionally, Mark Bovankovich and LT Chuck Chase offered corrections and several intriguing details on these incidents. All errors, however, remain entirely mine.}}</ref> One of these losses is a confirmed air-air victory.<ref>] (1994). ''Crusade: The Untold Story of the Persian Gulf War''. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, p. 47. {{ISBN|978-0-395-71083-8}}</ref>

===Iraqi Scud missile strikes on Israel and Saudi Arabia===
{{main|Iraqi rocket attacks on Israel|Iraqi rocket attacks on Saudi Arabia}}
] Transporter Erector Launcher (TEL) with missile in upright position]]

Iraq's government made no secret that it would attack Israel if invaded. Prior to the war's start, in the aftermath of the failed US–Iraq peace talks in Geneva, Switzerland, a reporter asked Iraq's English-speaking Foreign Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz: "Mr. Foreign Minister, if war starts&nbsp;... will you attack Israel?" His response was: "Yes, absolutely, yes."<ref>Lawrence Freedman and Efraim Karsh, ''The Gulf Conflict: Diplomacy and War in the New World Order'', 1990–1991 (Princeton, 1993), 332.</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.c-spanarchives.org/program/ID/176306&start=607&end=657 |title=Geneva Meeting on Persian Gulf Crisis |publisher=C-SPAN |date=9 January 1991 |access-date=18 March 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110501102548/http://www.c-spanarchives.org/program/ID/176306%26start%3D607%26end%3D657 |archive-date=1 May 2011}}</ref>

Five hours after the first attacks, Iraq's state radio broadcast declared that "The dawn of victory nears as this great showdown begins." Iraq fired eight missiles the next day. These missile attacks were to continue throughout the war. Iraq fired 88 Scud missiles during the war's seven weeks.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/US/Pentagon/dodscud.htm|title=Information Paper: Iraq's Scud Ballistic Missiles|first=Bernard|last=Rostker|year=2000|publisher=Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control from 2000 to 2006|access-date=21 May 2009|archive-date=14 May 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514212635/http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/US/Pentagon/dodscud.htm}}</ref>

Iraq hoped to provoke a military response from Israel. The Iraqi government hoped that many Arab states would withdraw from the Coalition, as they would be reluctant to fight alongside Israel.<ref name=sam>Waldman, Shmuel (2005). ''Beyond a Reasonable Doubt''. Feldheim Publishers, p. 179. {{ISBN|978-1-58330-806-6}}</ref> Following the first attacks, ] jets were deployed to patrol the northern airspace with Iraq. Israel prepared to militarily retaliate, as its policy for the previous 40 years had always been retaliation. However, President Bush pressured Israeli Prime Minister ] not to retaliate and withdraw Israeli jets, fearing that if Israel attacked Iraq, the other Arab states would either desert the coalition or join Iraq. It was also feared that if Israel used Syrian or Jordanian airspace to attack Iraq, they would intervene in the war on Iraq's side or attack Israel. The coalition promised to deploy ] to defend Israel if it refrained from responding to the Scud attacks.<ref>Lawrence Freedman and Efraim Karsh, ''The Gulf Conflict: Diplomacy and War in the New World Order'', 1990–1991 (Princeton, 1993), 331–41.</ref><ref>Thomas, Gordon, ''Gideon's Spies: The Secret History of the Mossad''</ref>

The Scud missiles targeting Israel were relatively ineffective, as firing at extreme range resulted in a dramatic reduction in accuracy and payload. Two Israeli civilians died as a direct result of the missile attacks.<ref name="JPostCasualtyCount">{{cite news |title=The day Israel's wars changed forever |url=https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/the-day-israels-wars-changed-forever-655785 |access-date=2022-03-01 |newspaper=The Jerusalem Post &#124; Jpost.com |language=en-US}}</ref> Between 11 and 74 were killed from incorrect use of gas masks, heart attacks, and incorrect use of the anti-chemical weapons drug ].<ref name="JPostCasualtyCount" /> Approximately 230 Israelis were injured.<ref name=autogenerated4>{{cite journal |last1=Fetter |first1=Steve |last2=Lewis |first2=George N. |last3=Gronlund |first3=Lisbeth|author3-link= Lisbeth Gronlund |title=Why were Casualties so low? |journal=] |volume=361 |pages=293–296 |publisher=] |location=London |date=28 January 1993 |url=http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/1903/4282/1/1993-Nature-Scud.pdf |doi=10.1038/361293a0 |issue=6410 |hdl=1903/4282 |s2cid=4343235 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> Extensive property damage was also caused, and, according to the Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, "Damage to general property consisted of 1,302 houses, 6,142 apartments, 23 public buildings, 200 shops and 50 cars."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/aboutisrael/history/pages/the%20gulf%20war%20-%201991.aspx|title=The Gulf War (1991)|access-date=5 July 2016}}</ref> It was feared that Iraq would fire missiles filled with ]s such as ]. As a result, Israel's government issued ]s to its citizens. When the first Iraqi missiles hit Israel, some people injected themselves with an antidote for nerve gas. It has been suggested that the sturdy construction techniques used in Israeli cities, coupled with the fact that Scuds were only launched at night, played an important role in limiting the number of casualties from Scud attacks.<ref name="publicpolicy.umd.edu">{{cite journal |last1=Fetter |first1=Steve |last2=Lewis |first2=George N. |last3=Gronlund |first3=Lisbeth |title=Why were Casualties so low? |journal=] |volume=361|pages=293–296 |location=London |date=28 January 1993 |url=http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/1903/4282/1/1993-Nature-Scud.pdf |doi=10.1038/361293a0 |issue=6410 |hdl=1903/4282 |s2cid=4343235 |hdl-access=free }}</ref>

{{multiple image|right
| direction = vertical
| total_width = 230
| image1 = Gulfwar 1991 in Israeli shelter.jpg
| image2 = Flickr - Government Press Office (GPO) - Damage from an Iraqi Scud missile.jpg
| footer = Israeli civilians taking shelter from missiles (top) and aftermath of attack in Ramat Gan, Israel (bottom)
| align =
| alt1 =
| caption1 =
| caption2 =
}}

In response to the threat of Scuds on Israel, the US rapidly sent a Patriot missile air defense artillery battalion to Israel along with two batteries of MIM-104 Patriot missiles for the protection of civilians.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://tech.mit.edu/V110/N60/war1.60n.html|title=Three Israelis killed as Scuds hit Tel Aviv|newspaper=]|year=1991|access-date=11 January 2009|archive-date=28 December 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081228034422/http://tech.mit.edu/V110/N60/war1.60n.html}}</ref> The ] also deployed a Patriot missile squadron to Israel and Turkey. The Dutch Defense Ministry later stated that the military use of the Patriot missile system was largely ineffective, but its psychological value for the affected populations was high.<ref name=nederland2009>{{cite web|url=http://www.defensie.nl/landmacht/onderwijs/werkstukken_basisvorming/golfoorlog/betrokkenheid_van_nederland|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110428093020/http://www.defensie.nl/landmacht/onderwijs/werkstukken_basisvorming/golfoorlog/betrokkenheid_van_nederland|archive-date=2011-04-28|title=Betrokkenheid van Nederland|publisher=]|year=2009|access-date=11 January 2009|language=nl}}</ref>

Coalition air forces were also extensively exercised in "Scud hunts" in the Iraqi desert, trying to locate the camouflaged trucks before they fired their missiles at Israel or Saudi Arabia. On the ground, special operations forces also infiltrated Iraq, tasked with locating and destroying Scuds – including the ill-fated ] patrol of the ]. Once special operations were combined with air patrols, the number of attacks fell sharply, then increased slightly as Iraqi forces adjusted to coalition tactics.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

As the Scud attacks continued, the Israelis grew increasingly impatient, and considered taking unilateral military action against Iraq. On 22 January 1991, a Scud missile hit the Israeli city of ], after two coalition Patriots failed to intercept it. Three elderly people suffered fatal heart attacks, another 96 people were injured, and 20 apartment buildings were damaged.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Kifner|first1=John|title=WAR IN THE GULF: TEL AVIV; 3 DIE 96 ARE HURT IN ISRAELI SUBURB|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/23/world/war-in-the-gulf-tel-aviv-3-die-96-are-hurt-in-israeli-suburb.html|work=]|date=23 January 1991}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Atkinson|first1=Rick|last2=Balz|first2=Dan|title=Scud Hits Tel Aviv, Leaving 3 Dead, 96 Hurt|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/fogofwar/archive/post012291.htm|newspaper=]|access-date=2 June 2013|date=23 January 1991}}</ref> After this attack, the Israelis warned that if the US failed to stop the attacks, they would. At one point, Israeli commandos boarded helicopters prepared to fly into Iraq, but the mission was called off after a phone call from US Defense Secretary Dick Cheney, reporting on the extent of coalition efforts to destroy Scuds and emphasizing that Israeli intervention could endanger US forces.<ref>Cheney, Richard: ''In My Time: A Personal and Political Memoir''</ref>

In addition to the attacks on Israel, ], and one missile was fired at Bahrain and another at Qatar. The missiles were fired at both military and civilian targets. One Saudi civilian was killed, and 78 others were injured. No casualties were reported in Bahrain or Qatar. The Saudi government issued all its citizens and expatriates with gas masks in the event of Iraq using missiles with warheads containing chemical weapons.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Ottaway|first=David B.|date=1990-08-31|title=SAUDI KING FAHD ORDERS GAS MASKS FOR EVERYONE|language=en-US|newspaper=]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1990/08/31/saudi-king-fahd-orders-gas-masks-for-everyone/990b9314-d55f-4b60-bdc4-bb0f7b0d237a/|access-date=2021-03-25|issn=0190-8286}}</ref> The government broadcast alerts and 'all clear' messages over television to warn citizens during Scud attacks.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

On 25 February 1991, a Scud missile hit a US Army barracks of the 14th Quartermaster Detachment, out of Greensburg, Pennsylvania, stationed in ], Saudi Arabia, killing 28 soldiers and injuring over 100.<ref name="iraqwatch.org">{{cite web |url=http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/US/Pentagon/dodscud.htm |title=DOD: Information Paper- Iraq's Scud Ballistic Missiles |publisher=Iraqwatch.org |access-date=18 March 2010 |archive-date=14 May 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514212635/http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/US/Pentagon/dodscud.htm }}</ref> A subsequent investigation found that the assigned Patriot missile battery had failed to engage due to the ] in the onboard computer's ] compounding over 100 hours of consecutive use, shifting the range gate position far enough to lose contact with the Scud during tracking action.<ref>{{cite web|author=U. S. Government Accountability Office|title=Patriot Missile Defense: Software Problem Led to System Failure at Dhahran, Saudi Arabia|url=https://www.gao.gov/products/imtec-92-26|access-date=2022-01-25|website=www.gao.gov|language=en}}</ref>

===Iraqi invasion of Saudi Arabia (Battle of Khafji)===
{{Main|Battle of Khafji}}
{{More citations needed|section|date=December 2018}}
]

On 29 January, Iraqi forces attacked and occupied the lightly defended Saudi city of ] with tanks and infantry. The Battle of Khafji ended two days later when the Iraqis were driven back by the ], supported by Qatari forces and US Marines.<ref>{{Cite news|title=Washingtonpost.com: Fog of War – Post Archive|newspaper=]|language=en-US|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/fogofwar/archive/post013091.htm|access-date=2021-03-25|issn=0190-8286}}</ref> The allied forces used extensive artillery fire.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

Both sides suffered casualties, although Iraqi forces sustained substantially more dead and captured than the allied forces. Eleven Americans were killed in two separate ] incidents, an additional 14 US airmen were killed when their ] gunship was shot down by an Iraqi surface-to-air missile,<ref>{{cite web|last=Wilkinson|first=Jeff|date=May 29, 2016|title=25 years ago, this University of South Carolina graduate gave his life in Desert Storm|url=https://www.thestate.com/news/local/article80667657.html|access-date=March 25, 2021|website=The State}}</ref> and two US soldiers were captured during the battle. Saudi and Qatari forces had a total of 18 dead. Iraqi forces in Khafji had 60–300 dead and 400 captured.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

The Battle of Khafji was an example of how air power could single-handedly hinder the advance of enemy ground forces. Upon learning of Iraqi troop movements, 140 coalition aircraft were diverted to attack an advancing column consisting of two armored divisions in battalion-sized units. Precision stand-off attacks were conducted during the night and through to the next day. Iraqi vehicle losses included 357 tanks, 147 armored personnel carriers, and 89 mobile artillery pieces. Some crews simply abandoned their vehicles upon realizing that they could be destroyed by guided bombs, stopping the divisions from massing for an organized attack on the town. One Iraqi soldier, who had fought in the Iran–Iraq War, remarked that his brigade "had sustained more punishment from allied airpower in 30 minutes at Khafji than in eight years of fighting against Iran."<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140219160549/http://www.airforcemag.com/MagazineArchive/Pages/2014/February%202014/0214reversal.aspx |date=19 February 2014 }}. ''Air Force Magazine''. 1 February 2014.</ref>

==Counter reconnaissance==
{{Main|Battle of Norfolk}}
{{See also|Task Force 1-41 Infantry}}
], February 1991]]
] was a ] heavy battalion task force from the 2nd Armored Division (Forward). It was the spearhead of ], consisting primarily of the 1st Battalion, ], 3rd Battalion, ], and the 4th Battalion, ]. Task Force 1–41 was the first coalition force to breach the Saudi Arabian border on 15 February 1991, and to conduct ground combat operations in Iraq engaging in direct and indirect fire fights with the enemy on 17 February 1991.<ref name="VUA Citation"/> Shortly after arrival in theatre Task Force 1–41 Infantry received a counter-reconnaissance mission.{{sfnp|Hillman|1993|p=6}} 1–41 Infantry was assisted by the 1st Squadron, 4th Armored Cavalry Regiment. This joint effort would become known as Task Force Iron.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=95}} Counter-reconnaissance generally includes destroying or repelling the enemy's reconnaissance elements and denying their commander any observation of friendly forces. On 15 February 1991 4th Battalion of the 3rd Field Artillery Regiment fired on a trailer and a few trucks in the Iraqi sector observing American forces.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=96}}

On 16 February 1991 several groups of Iraqi vehicles appeared to be performing reconnaissance on the Task Force and were driven away by fire from 4–3 FA.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=98}} Another enemy platoon, including six vehicles, was reported as being to the northeast of the Task Force. They were engaged with artillery fire from 4–3 FA.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=99}} Later that evening another group of Iraqi vehicles was spotted moving towards the center of the Task Force. They appeared to be Iraqi Soviet-made ] and tanks. For the next hour the Task Force fought several small battles with Iraqi reconnaissance units. TF 1–41 IN fired ] at the Iraqi formation destroying one tank. The rest of the formation was destroyed or driven away by artillery fire from 4–3 FA.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=99}} On 17 February 1991 the Task Force took enemy mortar fire, but the enemy forces managed to escape.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=102}} Later that evening the Task Force received enemy artillery fire but suffered no casualties.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=103}} That same evening the Task Force identified an Iraqi mortar position and engaged it with both direct and indirect fires.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=159}} The Iraqis continued probing operations against the Task Force for approximately two hours.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=159}} For the next two days the Task Force observed Iraqi wheeled vehicles and small units move in front of them. Several times Iraqi mortars fired on Task Force 1–41 Infantry positions.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=159}} On 18 February Iraqi mortar positions continued to conduct fire missions against the Task Force. The Task Force returned fire on the Iraqi positions with artillery fire from 4–3 FA and 1st Infantry Division Artillery.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=160}} During the Iraqi mortar attacks two American soldiers were wounded.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|pp=159–160}} Iraqi reconnaissance elements continued to patrol the area between the Task Force and the 1st Cavalry Division.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=160}} VII Corps air units and artillery conducted combat operations against Iraqi defensive positions.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=160}}

==Breach==
] pose with a captured Iraqi tank, February 1991]]
{{Main|Battle of Norfolk}}
{{See also|Task Force 1-41 Infantry}}

Task Force 1–41 Infantry was the first coalition force to breach the Saudi Arabian border on 15 February 1991 and conduct ground combat operations in Iraq engaging in direct and indirect fire fights with the enemy on 17 February 1991.<ref name="VUA Citation"/> Prior to this action the Task Force's primary fire support battalion, 4th Battalion of the 3rd Field Artillery Regiment, participated in a massive artillery preparation. Around 300 guns from multiple countries participated in the ]. Over 14,000 rounds were fired during these missions. ]s contributed an additional 4,900 rockets fired at Iraqi targets.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=164}} Iraq lost close to 22 artillery battalions during the initial stages of this barrage,{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=161}} including the destruction of approximately 396 Iraqi artillery pieces.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=161}}

By the end of these raids Iraqi artillery assets had all but ceased to exist. One Iraqi unit that was totally destroyed during the preparation was the Iraqi 48th Infantry Division Artillery Group.<ref name="armyhistory.org">{{cite web|url=https://armyhistory.org/the-gulf-war-and-european-artillery/|title=The Gulf War and "European Artillery" – The Campaign for the National Museum of the United States Army|date=20 January 2015}}</ref> The group's commander stated his unit lost 83 of its 100 guns to the artillery preparation.<ref name="armyhistory.org"/> This artillery prep was supplemented by air attacks by ] and ] fixed wing gunships.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=163}} 1st Infantry Division ]s and B-52 bombers conducted raids against Iraq's 110th Infantry Brigade.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=201}} The 1st Engineer Battalion and 9th Engineer Battalion marked and proofed assault lanes under direct and indirect enemy fire to secure a foothold in enemy territory and pass the 1st Infantry Division and the ] forward.<ref name="VUA Citation"/>{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|pp=156–157}}

] T-55 tank destroyed by Task Force 1–41 Infantry, February 1991]]
On 24 February 1991 the 1st Cavalry Division conducted a couple artillery missions against Iraqi artillery units.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=206}} One artillery mission struck a series of Iraqi bunkers, reinforced by Iraqi T-55 tanks, in the sector of the Iraqi 25th Infantry Division.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=206}} The same day the 2nd Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division with the 1st Battalion, 5th Cavalry, 1st Battalion, 32nd Armor, and the 1st Battalion, 8th Cavalry destroyed Iraqi bunkers and combat vehicles in the sector of the Iraqi 25th Infantry Division.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=206}} On 24 February 2nd Brigade, 1st Infantry Division rolled through the breach in the Iraqi defense west of ] and also cleared the northeastern sector of the breach site of enemy resistance.<ref name="VUA Citation"/> Task Force 3–37th Armor breached the Iraqi defense clearing four passage lanes and expanding the gap under direct enemy fire.<ref name="VUA Citation"/> Also on 24 February the 1st Infantry Division along with the 1st Cavalry Division destroyed Iraqi outposts and patrols belonging to the Iraqi 26th Infantry Division.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=207}} The two divisions also began capturing prisoners.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=207}} The 1st Infantry Division cleared a zone between Phase Line Vermont and Phase Line Kansas.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=207}} Once the 1st Infantry Division's 3rd Battalion, 37th Armor reached the Iraqi rear defensive positions it destroyed an Iraqi ] artillery battery and many trucks and bunkers.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=225}}

Task Force 1–41 Infantry was given the task of breaching Iraq's initial defensive positions along the Iraq–Saudi Arabia border.<ref name="VUA Citation"/> The 1st Squadron, 4th Armored Cavalry Regiment handled similar responsibilities in its sector of operations.<ref name="VUA Citation"/> The 1st Infantry Division's 5th Battalion, 16th Infantry also played a significant role clearing the trenches and captured 160 Iraqi soldiers in the process.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=225}} Once into Iraqi territory Task Force 1–41 Infantry encountered multiple Iraqi defensive positions and bunkers. These defensive positions were occupied by a brigade-sized element.<ref name="VUA Citation"/> Task Force 1–41 Infantry elements dismounted and prepared to engage the enemy soldiers who occupied these well-prepared and heavily fortified bunkers.<ref name="VUA Citation"/> The Task Force found itself engaged in six hours of combat in order to clear the extensive ] complex.<ref name="VUA Citation"/> The Iraqis engaged the Task Force with ] fire, ], ] fire, and what was left of Iraqi ] assets. A series of battles unfolded resulting in heavy Iraqi casualties and the Iraqis being removed from their defensive positions with many becoming prisoners of war. Some escaped to be killed or captured by other coalition forces.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|pp=113–133}} In the process of clearing the bunkers, Task Force 1–41 captured two brigade command posts and the command post of the Iraqi 26th Infantry Division.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=259}} The Task Force also captured a brigade commander, several battalion commanders, company commanders, and staff officers.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=259}} As combat operations progressed Task Force 1–41 Infantry engaged at short range multiple dug in enemy tanks in ambush positions.<ref name="VUA Citation"/> For a few hours, bypassed Iraqi RPG-equipped anti-tank teams, ] tanks, and dismounted Iraqi infantry fired at passing American vehicles, only to be destroyed by other US tanks and fighting vehicles following the initial forces.<ref name="usdefensewatch.com">{{cite web|url=http://usdefensewatch.com/2015/04/correcting-myths-about-the-persian-gulf-war-the-last-stand-of-the-tawakalna/|title=CORRECTING MYTHS ABOUT THE PERSIAN GULF WAR: THE LAST STAND OF THE TAWAKALNA|date=30 April 2015}}</ref>

The 1st Infantry Division's Task Force 2–16 Infantry cleared four lanes simultaneously through an enemy fortified trench system while inflicting heavy casualties on Iraqi forces.<ref name="VUA Citation"/> Task Force 2–16 continued the attack clearing over {{convert|13|mi|km|order=flip|abbr=on}} of entrenched enemy positions resulting in the capture and destruction of numerous enemy vehicles, equipment, personnel and command bunkers.<ref name="VUA Citation"/>


==Ground campaign== ==Ground campaign==
], 2nd Armored Division (FWD) conducts artillery strikes on Iraqi positions during the ]. 4-3 FA was the primary fire support battalion for Task Force 1–41 during the ], February 1991.]]
]
{{See also|Battle of Al Busayyah|Battle of Phase Line Bullet|Battle of 73 Easting|Battle of Norfolk|Battle of Medina Ridge|Battle of Kuwait International Airport|Battle of Rumaila}}
On ], ], Iraq agreed to a ]-proposed ] agreement. The agreement called for Iraq to withdraw troops to pre-invasion positions within three weeks following a total cease-fire, and called for monitoring of the cease-fire and withdrawal to be overseen by the UN Security Council. The US rejected the proposal but said that retreating Iraqi forces would not be attacked, and gave twenty-four hours for Iraq to begin withdrawing forces.


A 90,000 round artillery preparation fire on Iraqi defensive positions preceded the major ground assault, lasting 2.5 hours.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=194}} 1st Infantry Division Artillery, which included 4-3 FA battalion, was decisive during artillery combat operations performing multiple raids and fire missions. These combat operations resulted in the destruction of 50 enemy tanks, 139 APCs, 30 air defense systems, 152 artillery pieces, 27 missile launchers, 108 mortars, and 548 wheeled vehicles, 61 trench lines and bunker positions, 92 dug in and open infantry targets, and 34 logistical sites.<ref>Lingamfelter P.190-191</ref> The ground campaign consisted of three or possibly four of the largest ] battles in American military history.<ref name="wearethemighty.com">{{cite web|url=http://www.wearethemighty.com/articles/6-massive-tank-battles-from-us-history|title=These were the 6 most massive tank battles in US history|date=24 March 2016}}</ref><ref name="auto6">{{cite book |title=Semper Fi: The Definitive Illustrated History of the U.S. Marines |last=Chenoweth |first=H. Avery |year=2005 |page=408}}</ref> The battles at 73 Easting, Norfolk, and Medina Ridge are well noted for their historical significance.<ref name="wearethemighty.com"/> Some consider the ] the largest tank battle of the war.<ref name="VUA Citation"/><ref name="wearethemighty1">{{cite web |author=Logan Nye |date=2021-04-16 |title=These were the 6 most massive tank battles in US history |url=https://www.wearethemighty.com/mighty-history/6-massive-tank-battles-from-us-history/ |access-date=2021-11-20 |publisher=We Are The Mighty}}</ref> Other sources consider the ] the largest tank battle of the war and the second largest tank battle in American history.<ref name="wearethemighty1"/> The U.S. Marine Corps also fought the biggest tank battle in its history at ].<ref name="auto6"/> The U.S. 3rd Armored Division also fought a significant battle at Objective Dorset not far from where the Battle of Norfolk was taking place. The U.S. 3rd Armored Division destroyed approximately 300 enemy combat vehicles during this particular encounter with Iraqi forces.<ref name="VUA Citation"/>
On ], the U.S.-led forces began ''Operation Desert Sabre'', the ground portion of its campaign. Soon after, U.S. Marines and their Arab allies penetrated deep into Kuwait, collecting thousands of deserting Iraqi troops, weakened and demoralized by the extensive air campaign. A few days into the campaign, Kuwait City was recaptured by units of the Kuwaiti Army.


The U.S. VII Corps was the primary combat formation of the coalition forces.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/bs-xpm-1991-02-26-1991057001-story.html|title = VII Corps leads armored surge into Iraq WAR IN THE GULF| date=26 February 1991 }}</ref> It was a formidable fighting force consisting of 1,487 tanks, 1,384 infantry fighting vehicles, 568 artillery pieces, 132 MLRS, 8 missile launchers, and 242 attack helicopters.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=90}} It had a total troop strength of 146,321 troops.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=473}} Its primary full strength fighting formations were the ], the ] and the ]. The ] was assigned to the 1st Infantry Division as its third maneuver brigade.{{sfnp|Dinackus|2000|p=4–10}} Its Task Force 1-41 Infantry would be the spearhead of VII Corps.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://history.army.mil/html/forcestruc/vua_citations.html | title=Operations DESERT SHIELD and DESERT STORM: Valorous Unit Award Citations &#124; Unit Award Orders & Citations &#124; U.S. Army Center of Military History }}</ref> In addition, the corps had the ] to act as a scouting and screening force, and two further heavy divisions, the ] and the United Kingdom's 1st Armoured Division, as well as the U.S. ].<ref name="VUA Citation"/>{{sfnp|Bourque|Burdan|2007|p=275}}{{sfnp|Bourque|Burdan|2007|p=377}} VII Corps fought a number of large battles against Iraqi forces. Some of them historical in scope and size. Three of the battles at Norfolk, Medina Ridge, and 73 Easting are considered among the largest tank battles in history.<ref>{{cite web|author=Logan Nye |url=https://www.wearethemighty.com/mighty-history/6-massive-tank-battles-from-us-history/ |title=These were the 6 most massive tank battles in US history |publisher=We Are The Mighty |date=2022-04-22 |access-date=2022-05-09}}</ref> By the end of combat operations on 28 February 1991, U.S. VII Corps had driven {{Convert|260|km}}, captured 22,000 Iraqi soldiers, and destroyed 1,350 Iraqi tanks, 1,224 armored personnel carriers, 285 artillery pieces, 105 air defense systems, and 1,229 trucks.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://armyhistory.org/jayhawk-goes-to-war-vii-corps-in-operation-desert-storm/ |title=Jayhawk Goes to War: VII Corps in Operation DESERT STORM – The Campaign for the National Museum of the United States Army |date=30 April 2016 |publisher=Armyhistory.org |access-date=2021-11-20}}</ref>
At the same time, the U.S. VII Corps launched a massive armored attack into Iraq, just to the west of Kuwait, taking the Iraqis completely by surprise. The left flank of this movement was protected by the French 6th Light Armored Division (which included units of the ]), and their right flank by the ]. Once the allies had penetrated deep into Iraqi territory, they turned eastward, launching a massive flank attack against the Republican Guard. Tank battles flared as the Republican Guard attempted to retreat, which the Allies won with minimal losses.
] briefs President ] and his advisors on the progress of the ground war]]


]
Once Iraq had decided it was not going to advance into the eastern oil fields of Saudi Arabia, there was no reason for Iraqi forces to deploy further south from Kuwait City in great numbers. The decision to deploy significant quantities of troops along the desert border of Kuwait unnecessarily increased the length of Iraqi supply lines. Secondly once the decision had been made to deploy along the border, the decision to extend it only slightly along the Iraqi border invited a massive flanking. Indeed the Iraqis did not possess enough forces to maintain a long enough front along the border of Kuwait and South Western Iraq. Therefore it was imperative that the deployment and the front should have been shortened to just South of Kuwait City and extending to the outskirts of Basra. Iraq possesed only one absolute military advantage over the allies being the quality and quantity of its artillery pieces. Most of Iraq's artillery pieces were towed and hence not well suited to large expansive maneuvers. This also meant that it was in Iraq's interest to slow down the movement of opposition forces and engage along lines that could not be easily broken or flanked.
The primary combat vehicles of the American divisions were the ] tank and the ].{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|pp=75, 92}} The primary American artillery system was the self propelled ].{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=107}} The primary American attack helicopter was the ] (Army) with the ] (Army and Marines) also being in theatre.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=107}} The U.S. ] ground attack aircraft would distinguish itself during the Gulf War aided by the ] ] eyes in the sky. Together they inflicted significant damage on Iraqi ground forces.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=244}} U.S. A-10 "Warthog" crews would destroy 900 Iraqi tanks, 2,000 other military vehicles and 1,200 artillery pieces during combat operations.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}


The ] was represented by the ] and the ].<ref name="marinesmil">{{cite magazine |author=Paul W. Westermeyer |title=The Battle of al-Khafji |magazine=U.S. Marines in Battle |date=28 January – 1 February 1991 |url=https://www.marines.mil/Portals/1/Publications/U.S.%20Marines%20in%20Battle%20Al-Khafji%20%20PCN%20106000400_1.pdf?ver=2012-10-11-164150-403}}</ref> They were supported by the U.S. Army's 2nd Armored Division's Tiger Brigade to provide the Marines with additional armor support.<ref name="marinesmil"/> Marine armor units mostly consisted of the older ] tank.<ref name="marinesmil"/> The 1st Marine Division destroyed around 60 Iraqi tanks near the Burgan oil field without suffering any losses.<ref>Blitzkrieg in the Gulf by Yves Debay</ref> The ] Task Force Ripper led the drive to the Kuwait International Airport on 27 February 1991. Marine Task Force Ripper destroyed about 100 Iraqi tanks and ]s, including ] tanks.<ref>U.S. Marines in the Persian Gulf, 1990–1991 With the 1st U.S. Marine Division in Desert Shield and Desert Storm. pp.92–93.</ref> The division commander Maj. Gen. J.M. Myatt said,{{sfnp|Nordeen|Isby|2010|p=66}} "During the first day of combat operations 1st Platoon, D Company, 3rd Tank Battalion destroyed 15 Iraqi tanks".{{sfnp|Nordeen|Isby|2010|p=73}} The Marines also destroyed 25 ]s and took 300 ].<ref>U.S. Marines in the Persian Gulf, 1990–1991 With the 1st U.S. Marine Division in Desert Shield and Desert Storm Cureton P.94</ref> The U.S.M.C. would often encounter the Iraqi 3rd Armored Division in their theater of operations. Once the 1st Marine Division reached Kuwait International Airport they found what remained of the Iraqi 12th Armored Brigade, 3rd Armored Division defending it. The Marines destroyed 30 to 40 Iraqi T-72 tanks which had taken up defensive positions around the airport.{{sfnp|Nordeen|Isby|2010|p=73}} The Iraqi 3rd Armored Division losses included more than 250 T-55/62s and 70 T-72 tanks by the end of combat operations.{{sfnp|Nordeen|Isby|2010|p=73}} The Iraqi 3rd Armored Division would be totally destroyed. The 2nd Marine Division played a major role repelling the attempted Iraqi invasion of Saudi Arabia which is known as the ]. The 2nd Marine Division also faced heavy resistance during the ]. The battle featured the "Reveille Engagement" which went on to become the largest tank battle in United States Marine Corps' entire history.<ref>Col H. Avery Chenoweth (2005) Semper Fi: The Definitive Illustrated History of the U.S. Marines</ref> Marine Reserve unit Bravo Company, 4th Tank Battalion, 4th Marine division was assigned to the 2nd Marine Division.<ref name="bravocompany4thtankbattalion.org">{{cite web |url=http://bravocompany4thtankbattalion.org |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160109120912/http://bravocompany4thtankbattalion.org/ |archive-date=9 January 2016 |title= History of Bravo Company, 4th Tank Battalion in Desert Storm 1991 |access-date=5 January 2019 }}</ref> Bravo Company destroyed a total of 119 enemy vehicles and took over 800 ]s by the end of combat operations.<ref name="bravocompany4thtankbattalion.org"/> The 1st Tank Battalion claimed 50 Iraqi T-55 and T-62 tanks and 25 APCs. The 3rd Battalion claimed 57 T-55s and T-62s along with 5 T-72s, 7 APCs, and 10 trucks. The 8th Battalion destroyed more than three dozen tanks and a number of other vehicles.<ref>M60 vs T-62 Cold War Combatants 1956–92, Nordeen & Isby, p.73</ref> U.S. Marine Corps armor units would destroy hundreds of Iraqi tanks by the end of combat operations.{{sfnp|Nordeen|Isby|2010|p=73}}<ref>{{cite web | url=https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/m60-old-tank-crushed-saddam-hussein-during-first-gulf-war-146816 | title=M60: This Old Tank Crushed Saddam Hussein During the First Gulf War | date=22 April 2020 }}</ref> U.S. Marine Corps tank losses would be light as they suffered the loss of ten M-60 tanks during combat operations.{{sfnp|Nordeen|Isby|2010|p=74}}
The allied advance was much swifter than US generals expected. On ], Iraqi troops began retreating out of Kuwait, ] to Kuwaiti oil fields as they left. A long convoy of retreating Iraqi troops formed along the main Iraq-Kuwait highway. This convoy was bombed so extensively by the Allies that it came to be known as the ]. One hundred hours after the ground campaign started, President Bush declared a ceasefire and on ] declared that Kuwait had been liberated.
]".]]


]
Both sides had roughly equal numbers of troops- approximately 540,000 Allied troops to approximately 545,000 Iraqi troops. A further 100,000 Turkish troops were deployed along the common border of Turkey and Iraq. This caused significant force dilution of the Iraqi military by forcing it to deploy its forces along all its borders (except, ironically, its bitter enemy Iran). This allowed the main thrust by the Americans to not only possess a significant technological advantage but also an equality in force numbers.
]
The main surprise of the ground campaign was relatively low Allied casualties. This was due to the Iraqis failing to find an effective countermeasure to the thermal sights and the ]s used by the ] and the other Coalition tanks. This equipment enabled Coalition tanks to effectively engage and destroy Iraqi tanks from three times the distance (or more) that Iraqi tanks could engage. The Iraqi forces also failed to utilize the advantage that could be gained from using ] - fighting within ], which could have inflicted significant casualities on the attacking forces. Urban combat reduces the range at which fighting occurs and thus favours the technologically inferior force when it is defending. This has been proven most recently in the combat between U.S. forces and Iraqi partisans in urban environments after the ]. The confines of the urban geography would have reduced the greatest advantage of the Allies, the ability to kill at long range.


The United Kingdom was represented by its 1st Armoured Division known as the Desert Rats. The British 1st Armoured Division fielded approximately 176 ] tanks.<ref>Dunstan P.8</ref> British infantry rode into battle on the ]. It had reasonable armour protection and a 30mm gun. Modified versions of the vehicle included mortar carriers, ] antitank systems, and command and control vehicles; and the British possessed a variety of excellent light armoured vehicles built on their ] chassis. British artillery was primarily American made M109 howitzers (155mm), ]s (203mm), and ] which were compatible with American systems. Their air support consisted of ]s, used for reconnaissance, and the ] which was comparable to the American ]. The British had their full contingent of engineer, logistics, and medical units.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=260}}
==The end of hostilities==
A peace conference was held in Iraqi territory occupied by the coalition. At the conference, Iraq won the approval of the use of armed helicopters on their side of the temporary border, ostensibly for government transit due to the damage done to civilian transportation. Soon after, these helicopters &mdash; and much of the Iraqi armed forces &mdash; were refocused toward fighting against a ] uprising in the south. In the North, ] leaders took heart in American statements that they would support an uprising and began fighting, in the hopes of triggering a coup. However, when no American support was forthcoming, Iraqi generals remained loyal and brutally crushed the Kurdish troops. Millions of Kurds fled across the mountains to Kurdish areas of ] and ]. These incidents would later result in ]s being established in both the North and the South of Iraq. In Kuwait, the Emir was restored and suspected Iraqi collaborators were repressed. Eventually, over 400,000 people were expelled from the country, including a large number of Palestinians (due to their support of and collaboration with Saddam Hussein).


The British 1st Armoured Division was responsible for protecting the right flank of VII Corps. It was assumed by the Corps' planners the Iraqi 52nd Armored Division would counterattack VII Corps once their penetration into Iraqi defenses was discovered. The British 1st Armoured Division had two brigades (the 4th and 7th) which participated in ], the name given to the British military operations during the 1991 Gulf War. The British 1st Armoured Division had traveled 217 miles in 97 hours. The British 1st Armored Division had captured or destroyed about 300 Iraqi tanks{{citation needed|date=February 2023}} and a very large number of armored personnel carriers, trucks, reconnaissance vehicles, etc.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=275}}{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=377}} The Desert Rats also destroyed multiple Iraqi artillery positions.<ref name="Halberstadt P.117, 121">Halberstadt P.117, 121</ref> The division also took over 7,000 Iraqi prisoners of war including two division commanders and two other general officers.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=319}} The British 1st Armoured Division destroyed or isolated four Iraqi infantry divisions (the 26th, 48th, 31st, and 25th) and overran the Iraqi 52nd Armored Division in several sharp engagements. The Iraqi 80th Armored Brigade would also fall victim to the British 1st Armoured Division.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=265}}
There was some criticism of the Bush administration for its decision to allow Saddam Hussein to remain in power, rather than pushing on to capture Baghdad and overthrowing his government. In their co-written 1998 book, ''A World Transformed'', Bush and ] arguing that such a course would have fractured the alliance and would have had many unnecessary political and human costs associated with it.


Iraq was represented mostly by its own VII Corps and its Jihad Corps.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=244}} Its most notable participants were its elite Republican Guard Divisions Tawakalna, Medina, Hammurabi, and Adnan.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=43}}{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=350}} The first three of these had a strength of over 660 tanks, 660 infantry fighting vehicles, and thousands of antitank weapons, self propelled artillery, and other combat systems.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=244}} The Tawakalna Republican Guard Division was Iraq's most powerful division which included approximately 14,000 soldiers, 220 ] tanks, 284 ]s, 126 artillery pieces, and 18 MLRS.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=324}} The Iraqi 52nd Armored Division was also a primary participant.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=377}} It was a powerful division consisting of 245 tanks and 195 ]s.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=185}} The Iraqi 10th and ]s were also present. The two divisions formed the foundation of the Jihad Corps.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=244}} The Iraqi ] was considered the best regular division in the Iraqi Army.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=243}} It had more modern equipment than the other regular Iraqi units.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=243}} It was equipped with T-72 and ] tanks.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=243}} The T-62 tank being its primary system.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=243}} Overall the primary tank of the Iraqi forces was the ] tank.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=19}} The Iraqis fielded them in great numbers.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=19}} The Iraqis also had elements of two other independent armored brigades in theatre, those being the 50th and 29th Armored Brigades.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|pp=333–337}}
In 1992, the ] during the war, ], made the same point:
Iraq would also field multiple Infantry Divisions.<ref>U.S. Marines in the Persian Gulf, 1990–1991 With the 1st U.S. Marine Division in Desert Shield and Desert Storm Cureton P.97</ref>


The Iraqis suffered the loss of over 3,000 tanks and over 2,000 other combat vehicles during these battles against the American-led coalition.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=455}} It is estimated that Iraqi forces suffered 20,000–50,000 troops killed during combat operations.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=455}} It is also estimated that over 75,000 Iraqi soldiers were wounded.<ref>"Persian Gulf War". MSN Encarta. Archived from the original on 1 November 2009.</ref> Between 80,000 and 175,000 Iraqi troops were taken prisoner.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=455}}<ref name="google1990"/><ref name="google1991"/> Iraqi forces inflicted very minimal damage on Coalition forces.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=471}}<ref>Carhart, Tom (1994). Iron Soldiers: How America's 1st Armored Division Crushed Iraq's Elite Republican Guard. New York: Random House. p.323 {{ISBN|0671791656}}</ref><ref>Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 December 2016. Retrieved 28 October 2017.</ref>
<blockquote>I would guess if we had gone in there, I would still have forces in Baghdad today. We'd be running the country. We would not have been able to get everybody out and bring everybody home.</blockquote>


===Liberation of Kuwait===
<blockquote>And the final point that I think needs to be made is this question of casualties. I don't think you could have done all of that without significant additional U.S. casualties. And while everybody was tremendously impressed with the low cost of the (1991) conflict, for the 146 Americans who were killed in action and for their families, it wasn't a cheap war.</blockquote>
{{Main|Liberation of Kuwait campaign}}
{{See also|Order of battle of the Gulf War ground campaign}}
] tanks from the ] along the Line of Departure]]


US decoy attacks by air attacks and naval gunfire the night before Kuwait's liberation were designed to make the Iraqis believe the main coalition ground attack would focus on central Kuwait.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}} For months, American units in Saudi Arabia had been under almost constant Iraqi artillery fire, as well as threats from Scud missiles and chemical attacks. On 24 February 1991, the 1st and 2nd Marine Divisions and the 1st Light Armored Infantry Battalion crossed into Kuwait and headed toward Kuwait City. They encountered trenches, barbed wire, and minefields. However, these positions were poorly defended, and were overrun in the first few hours. Several tank battles took place, but otherwise coalition troops encountered minimal resistance, as most Iraqi troops surrendered. The general pattern was that the Iraqis would put up a short fight before surrendering. However, Iraqi air defenses shot down nine US aircraft. Meanwhile, forces from Arab states advanced into Kuwait from the east, encountering little resistance and suffering few casualties.{{citation needed|date=March 2017}}
<blockquote>And the question in my mind is how many additional American casualties is Saddam (Hussein) worth? And the answer is not that damned many. So, I think we got it right, both when we decided to expel him from Kuwait, but also when the president made the decision that we'd achieved our objectives and we were not going to go get bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq.{{ref|Pope}}</blockquote>


Despite the successes of coalition forces, it was feared that the Iraqi Republican Guard would escape into Iraq before it could be destroyed. It was decided to send British armored forces into Kuwait 15 hours ahead of schedule, and to send US forces after the Republican Guard. The coalition advance was preceded by a heavy artillery and rocket barrage, after which 150,000 troops and 1,500 tanks began their advance. Iraqi forces in Kuwait counterattacked against US troops, acting on a direct order from Saddam Hussein himself. Despite the intense combat, the Americans repulsed the Iraqis and continued to advance towards Kuwait City.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=375}}
Instead of greater involvement of its own military, the United States hoped that Saddam would be overthrown in an internal ]. The ] used its assets in Iraq to organize a revolt, but the Iraqi government defeated the effort.


Kuwaiti forces were tasked with liberating the city. Iraqi troops offered only light resistance. The Kuwaitis quickly liberated the city despite losing one soldier and having one plane shot down.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}} On 27 February, {{Citation needed span|text=Saddam ordered a retreat from Kuwait,|date=February 2023}} and President Bush declared it liberated.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Rosenthal |first=Andrew |date=1991-02-28 |title=War in the Gulf: Bush Halts Offensive Combat; Kuwait Freed, Iraqis Crushed |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1991/02/28/world/war-in-the-gulf-bush-halts-offensive-combat-kuwait-freed-iraqis.html |access-date=2023-02-26 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> However, an Iraqi unit at Kuwait International Airport appeared not to have received the message and fiercely resisted. US Marines had to fight for hours before securing the airport, after which Kuwait was declared secure. After four days of fighting, Iraqi forces were expelled from Kuwait.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}} As part of a ] policy, they ] and placed land mines around the wells to make extinguishing the fires more difficult.<ref>{{cite web|last=International|first=Radio Canada|date=2015-11-06|title=History: November 6, 1991 Canadians cap the last oil fire in the Gulf War|url=https://www.rcinet.ca/en/2015/11/06/history-november-6-1991-canadians-cap-the-last-oil-fire-in-the-gulf-war/|access-date=2021-03-25|website=RCI {{!}} English}}</ref>{{Failed verification|date=February 2023}}
On ], ], ] began to move 540,000 American troops out of the ].

===Initial moves into Iraq===
]]]
The war's ground phase was officially designated Operation Desert Saber.{{citation needed|date=February 2023}} The first units to move into Iraq were three patrols of the British Special Air Service's B squadron, call signs Bravo One Zero, Bravo Two Zero, and Bravo Three Zero, in late January. These eight-man patrols landed behind Iraqi lines to gather intelligence on the movements of Scud mobile missile launchers, which could not be detected from the air, as they were hidden under bridges and camouflage netting during the day.{{sfnp|Riley|2010|p=207}} Other objectives included the destruction of the launchers and their fiber-optic communications arrays that lay in pipelines and relayed coordinates to the ] operators launching attacks against Israel. The operations were designed to prevent any possible Israeli intervention. Due to lack of sufficient ground cover to carry out their assignment, One Zero and Three Zero abandoned their operations, while Two Zero remained, and was later compromised, with only Sergeant ] escaping to Syria.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

Elements of the 2nd Brigade, 1st Battalion ] of the 1st Cavalry Division of the US Army performed a direct attack into Iraq on 15 February 1991, followed by one in force on 20 February that led directly through seven Iraqi divisions which were caught off guard.{{citation needed|date=February 2009}} On 17 January 1991 the 101st Airborne Division Aviation Regiment fired the first shots of the war when eight ] helicopters successfully destroyed two Iraqi early warning radar sites.<ref name="ReferenceA">Screaming Eagles 101st Airborne Division by Russ & Susan Bryant P.85</ref> From 15 to 20 February, the ] took place inside Iraq; this was the first of two attacks by 1 Battalion 5th Cavalry of the 1st Cavalry Division. It was a feint attack, designed to make the Iraqis think that a coalition invasion would take place from the south. The Iraqis fiercely resisted, and the Americans eventually withdrew as planned back into the Wadi al-Batin. Three US soldiers were killed and nine wounded, with one M2 Bradley IFV turret destroyed, but they had taken 40 prisoners and destroyed five tanks, and successfully deceived the Iraqis. This attack led the way for the XVIII Airborne Corps to sweep around behind the 1st Cav and attack Iraqi forces to the west. On 22 February 1991, Iraq agreed to a Soviet-proposed ceasefire agreement. The agreement called for Iraq to withdraw troops to pre-invasion positions within six weeks following a total ceasefire, and called for monitoring of the ceasefire and withdrawal to be overseen by the UN Security Council.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

The coalition rejected the proposal, but said that retreating Iraqi forces would not be attacked,{{citation needed|date=February 2009}} and gave 24 hours for Iraq to withdraw its forces. On 23 February, fighting resulted in the capture of 500 Iraqi soldiers. On 24 February, British and American armored forces crossed the Iraq–Kuwait border and entered Iraq in large numbers, taking hundreds of prisoners. Iraqi resistance was light, and four Americans were killed.<ref name="leyden.com">{{cite web|author=Andrew Leydon |url=http://www.leyden.com/gulfwar/week6.html |title=Carriers in the Persian Gulf War |publisher=Leyden.com |access-date=18 March 2010}}</ref>

===Coalition forces enter Iraq===
] tank, ] and ] armored personnel carriers and trucks on Highway 8 in March 1991]]

Shortly afterwards, the US VII Corps, in full strength and spearheaded by the 2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment, launched an armored attack into Iraq early on 24 February, just to the west of Kuwait, surprising Iraqi forces. Simultaneously, the ] launched a sweeping "left-hook" attack across southern Iraq's largely undefended desert, led by the US ] and the ]. This movement's left flank was protected by the French ]. The ] conducted a combat air assault into enemy territory.<ref name="ReferenceA" /> The 101st Airborne Division had struck {{convert|155|mi|km|order=flip|abbr=on}} behind enemy lines.<ref name="ReferenceA" /> It was the deepest air assault operation in history.<ref name="ReferenceA" /> Approximately 400 helicopters transported 2,000 soldiers into Iraq where they destroyed Iraqi columns trying to flee westward and prevented the escape of Iraqi forces.<ref>''Screaming Eagles: The 101st Airborne Division from D-Day to Desert Storm'' by Christopher J Anderson P.8</ref> The 101st Airborne Division travelled a further {{convert|50|to|60|mi|km|sigfig=1|order=flip|abbr=on}} into Iraq.<ref name="ReferenceA" /> By nightfall, the 101st cut off Highway 8 which was a vital supply line running between Basra and the Iraqi forces.<ref name="ReferenceA" /> The 101st had lost 16 soldiers in action during the 100-hour war and captured thousands of enemy prisoners of war.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

The French force quickly overcame Iraq's 45th Infantry Division, suffering light casualties and taking a large number of prisoners, and took up blocking positions to prevent an Iraqi counterattack on the coalition's flank. The movement's right flank was protected by the United Kingdom's 1st Armoured Division. Once the allies had penetrated deep into Iraqi territory, they turned eastward, launching a flank attack against the elite Republican Guard before it could escape. The Iraqis resisted fiercely from dug-in positions and stationary vehicles, and even mounted armored charges.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

Unlike many previous engagements, the destruction of the first Iraqi tanks did not result in a mass surrender. The Iraqis suffered massive losses and lost dozens of tanks and vehicles, while US casualties were comparatively low, with a single Bradley knocked out. Coalition forces pressed another {{Convert|10|km|abbr=on}} into Iraqi territory, and captured their objective within three hours. They took 500 prisoners and inflicted heavy losses, defeating Iraq's 26th Infantry Division. A US soldier was killed by an Iraqi land mine, another five by friendly fire, and 30 wounded during the battle. Meanwhile, British forces attacked Iraq's Medina Division and a major Republican Guard logistics base. In nearly two days of some of the war's most intense fighting, the British destroyed 40 enemy tanks and captured a division commander.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

Meanwhile, US forces attacked the village of ], meeting fierce resistance. The US force destroyed military hardware and took prisoners, while suffering no casualties.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

On 25 February 1991, Iraqi forces fired a Scud missile at an American barracks in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. The missile attack killed 28 US military personnel.<ref>''Twentieth Century Battlefields'', "The Gulf War".</ref>

The coalition's advance was much swifter than US generals had expected. On 26 February, Iraqi troops began retreating from Kuwait, after they had set 737 of its oil wells on fire. A long convoy of retreating Iraqi troops formed along the main Iraq–Kuwait highway. Although they were retreating, this convoy was bombed so extensively by coalition air forces that it came to be known as the ]. Thousands of Iraqi troops were killed. American, British, and French forces continued to pursue retreating Iraqi forces over the border and back into Iraq, eventually moving to within {{convert|150|mi|km|order=flip|abbr=on}} of Baghdad, before withdrawing back to Iraq's border with Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.<ref name="Holsti2011">{{cite book|last=Holsti|first=Ole R.|author-link=Ole R. Holsti|title=American Public Opinion on the Iraq War|page=20|chapter=The United States and Iraq before the Iraq War|date=2011-11-07|publisher=]|isbn=978-0-472-03480-2|quote=Air attacks inflicted heavy casualties on retreatng forces along what became known as 'the highway of death.' American, British, and French units pursued the Iraqis to within 150 miles of Baghdad.}}</ref>

==End of active hostilities==
{{Main|1991 Iraqi uprisings}}
]
In coalition-occupied Iraqi territory, a peace conference was held where a ceasefire agreement was negotiated and signed by both sides. At the conference, Iraq was authorized to fly armed helicopters on their side of the temporary border, ostensibly for government transit due to the damage done to civilian infrastructure. Soon after, these helicopters and much of Iraq's military were used to fight an ]. On March 1, 1991, one day after the Gulf War ceasefire, a revolt broke out in ] against the Iraqi government. The uprising spread within days to all of the largest Shia cities in southern Iraq: ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]. The rebellions were encouraged by an airing of "The Voice of Free Iraq" on 24 February 1991, which was broadcast from a CIA-run radio station out of Saudi Arabia. The Arabic service of the Voice of America supported the uprising by stating that the rebellion was well supported, and that they would soon be liberated from Saddam.<ref>]. '']'', Vintage (2007 reprint), at p. 646.</ref>

In the North, Kurdish leaders took American statements that they would support an uprising to heart, and began fighting, hoping to trigger a ]. However, when no US support came, Iraqi generals remained loyal to Saddam and brutally crushed the Kurdish uprising and the uprising in the south.<ref>{{Cite news|date=2007-08-21|title=Flashback: the 1991 Iraqi revolt|language=en-GB|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2888989.stm|access-date=2021-03-25}}</ref> Millions of Kurds fled across the mountains to Turkey and Kurdish areas of Iran. On April 5, the Iraqi government announced "the complete crushing of acts of sedition, sabotage and rioting in all towns of Iraq." An estimated 25,000 to 100,000 Iraqis were killed in the uprisings.<ref name="ENDLESS">{{cite web |url=https://www.hrw.org/reports/1992/Iraq926.htm |title=ENDLESS TORMENT, The 1991 Uprising in Iraq And Its Aftermath |publisher=Hrw.org |access-date=2009-09-25 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100615171955/http://www.hrw.org/reports/1992/Iraq926.htm |archive-date=June 15, 2010 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees |url=http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/publisher,HRW,,KWT,467fca591e,0.html |title=Refworld &#124; Human Rights Watch World Report 1992 – Iraq and Occupied Kuwait |publisher=UNHCR |access-date=2013-08-14}}</ref> These events later resulted in ]s being established in northern and southern Iraq.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

In Kuwait, the Emir was restored, and suspected Iraqi collaborators were repressed. Eventually, over 400,000 people were expelled from the country, including a large number of ], because of PLO support of Saddam. Yasser Arafat did not apologize for his support of Iraq, but after his death ] formally apologized in 2004 on behalf of the PLO. This came after the Kuwaiti government formally forgave the group.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4089961.stm |work=BBC News |title=Abbas apology to Kuwait over Iraq |date=12 December 2004}}</ref>

There was some criticism of the Bush administration, as they chose to allow Saddam to remain in power instead of pushing on to capture Baghdad and overthrowing his government. In their co-written 1998 book, '']'', Bush and Brent Scowcroft argued that such a course would have fractured the alliance, and would have had many unnecessary political and human costs associated with it.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

In 1992, the US Defense Secretary during the war, Dick Cheney, made the same point:

{{blockquote|I would guess if we had gone in there, we would still have forces in Baghdad today. We'd be running the country. We would not have been able to get everybody out and bring everybody home.

And the final point that I think needs to be made is this question of casualties. I don't think you could have done all of that without significant additional US casualties, and while everybody was tremendously impressed with the low cost of the (1991) conflict, for the 146 Americans who were killed in action and for their families, it wasn't a cheap war.

And the question in my mind is, how many additional American casualties is Saddam worth? And the answer is, not that damned many. So, I think we got it right, both when we decided to expel him from Kuwait, but also when the President made the decision that we'd achieved our objectives and we were not going to go get bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.seattlepi.com/national/192908_cheney29.html|title="Cheney changed his view on Iraq", by Charles Pope, ''Seattle Post-Intelligencer'', 29 September 2004|date=28 September 2004|access-date=7 January 2005}}</ref>}}

On 10 March 1991, 540,000 US troops began moving out of the Persian Gulf.{{citation needed|date=December 2018}}

On 15 March 1991, ] ] returned to Kuwait, staying at the private home of a wealthy Kuwaiti as his own palace had been destroyed. He was met with a symbolic arrival with several dozens cars filled with people honking their horns and waving Kuwaiti flags who tried to follow the Emir's convoy. According to ''The New York Times'', he faced a population divided between those who stayed and those who fled, a government straining to reassert control and a rejuvenated opposition that is pressing for greater democracy and other postwar changes, including voting rights for women. Democracy advocates had been calling for restoration of Parliament that the Emir had suspended in 1986.<ref>New York Times, 15 Mar. 1991, " {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171012095410/http://www.nytimes.com/1991/03/15/world/after-war-kuwait-kuwaiti-emir-tired-tearful-returns-his-devastated-land.html |date=12 October 2017 }}"</ref>


==Coalition involvement== ==Coalition involvement==
{{Main|Coalition of the Gulf War}}
]
]


Coalition members included Argentina, Australia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Denmark,<ref>{{cite web |date=24 September 2010 |title=Den 1. Golfkrig |url=http://www.forsvaret.dk/SOK/Internationalt/Tidligere/Golf1/Pages/default.aspx |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110112215511/http://forsvaret.dk/SOK/Internationalt/Tidligere/Golf1/Pages/default.aspx |archive-date=12 January 2011 |access-date=1 February 2011 |publisher=Forsvaret.dk}}</ref> Egypt, France, Germany, Greece, Honduras, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Kuwait, Luxembourg, Morocco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, the Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania,<ref>{{cite book |author-last1=Alexandrescu |author-first1=Grigore |url=https://cssas.unap.ro/ro/pdf_studii/operatii_militare_expeditionare.pdf |title=Operații militare expediționare |author-last2=Băhnăreanu |author-first2=Cristian |date=2007 |publisher=Editura Universității Naționale de Apărare "Carol I" |isbn=978-973-663-499-4 |place=] |page=33 |language=ro}}</ref> Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Syria, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States.<ref name="Tread">{{Cite book|last=Crocker III|first=H. W.|title=Don't Tread on Me|publisher=Crown Forum|year=2006|location=New York|page=|isbn=978-1-4000-5363-6|url=https://archive.org/details/donttreadonme40000croc/page/384}}</ref> The United States had 700,000 troops.<ref>Gulf War coalition forces (latest available) by country {{cite web |title=www.nationmaster.com |url=http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/mil_gul_war_coa_for-military-gulf-war-coalition-forces |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131105011128/http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/mil_gul_war_coa_for-military-gulf-war-coalition-forces |archive-date=5 November 2013 |access-date=2007-09-13}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Hersh |first=Seymour |title=Chain of Command |publisher=Penguin Books |year=2005 |page=181}}</ref>
Members of the Coalition included ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and the ]. ] and ] provided financial assistance and donated military hardware instead of direct military assistance. America asked Israel not to participate in the war despite air strikes on Israeli citizens. ] wasn't a part of the coalition but did extend military support to the United States in the form of refuelling facilities.

Germany and Japan provided financial assistance<ref>{{cite web|title=Splitting the Check: When Allies Helped Pay for Middle East War|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/isis-terror/splitting-check-when-allies-helped-pay-middle-east-war-n203756|access-date=2021-03-25|website=NBC News|date=16 September 2014 |language=en}}</ref> and donated military hardware, although they did not send direct military assistance. This later became known as '']''.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

===Australia===
{{Main|Australian contribution to the 1991 Gulf War}}

Australia contributed a Naval Task Group, which formed part of the multi-national fleet in the Persian Gulf and ], under Operation Damask. In addition, medical teams were deployed aboard a US ], and a ] took part in de-mining Kuwait's port facilities following the end of combat operations. Australian forces experienced a number of incidents in the first number of weeks of the Desert Storm Campaign including the detection of significant air threats from Iraq as a part of the outer perimeter of Battle Force Zulu; the detection of free sea floating mines and assistance to the aircraft carrier USS ''Midway''. The Australian Task Force was also placed at great risk with regard to the sea mine threat, with HMAS ''Brisbane'' narrowly avoiding a mine. The Australians played a significant role in enforcing the sanctions put in place against Iraq following Kuwait's invasion. Following the war's end, Australia deployed a medical unit on ] to northern Iraq as part of ].<ref>Odgers 1999, pp. 356–371.</ref>

===Argentina===
{{main|Operativo Alfil}}
] helicopter on board {{USNS|Comfort}}, February 1991]]

Argentina was the only South American country to participate in the 1991 Gulf War. It sent a destroyer, ], a corvette, ] (later replaced by another corvette, ]) and a supply ship, ] to participate on the ] blockade and sea control effort of the Persian Gulf. The success of "Operación Alfil" (English: "Operation Bishop") with more than 700 interceptions and {{convert|25000|nmi|km}} sailed in the theatre of operations helped to overcome the so-called "]".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.fuerzasnavales.com/magazine/mekosgolfo.html|title=La Armada Argentina en el Golfo|trans-title=The Argentine Armed Forces in the Gulf|publisher=Fuerzas Navales Magazine|access-date=14 January 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180624194606/http://www.fuerzasnavales.com/magazine/mekosgolfo.html|archive-date=24 June 2018|language=es}}</ref>

Argentina was later classified by the US as a ] due to its contributions during the war.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/intlrel/hfa44953.000/hfa44953_0.htm |title=Overview of U.S. Policy Toward South America and the President's Upcoming Trip to the Region|access-date=14 January 2020}}</ref>


===Canada=== ===Canada===
{{main|Operation Friction}}
] was one of the first nations to agree to condemn Iraq's invasion of Kuwait and it quickly agreed to join the U.S.-led coalition. In August ] ] sent the destroyers ] and ] to enforce the trade blockade against Iraq. The supply ship ] was also sent to aid the gathering coalition forces.

Canada was one of the first countries to condemn Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, and it quickly agreed to join the US-led coalition. In August 1990, Prime Minister ] committed the ] to deploy a Naval Task Group. The destroyers {{HMCS|Terra Nova|DDE 259|6}} and {{HMCS|Athabaskan|DDG 282|6}} joined the maritime interdiction force supported by the supply ship {{HMCS|Protecteur|AOR 509|6}} in ]. The Canadian Task Group led the coalition's maritime logistics forces in the Persian Gulf. A fourth ship, {{HMCS|Huron|DDG 281|6}}, arrived in-theater after hostilities had ceased and was the first allied ship to visit Kuwait.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

Following the UN-authorized use of force against Iraq, the Canadian Forces deployed a ] and ] squadron with support personnel, as well as a ] to deal with casualties from the ground war. When the air war began, the CF-18s were integrated into the coalition force and were tasked with providing air cover and attacking ground targets. This was the first time since the ] that Canada's military had participated in offensive combat operations. The only CF-18 Hornet to record an official victory during the conflict was an aircraft involved in the beginning of the ] against the Iraqi Navy.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Morin|last2=Gimblett|first1=Jean H.|first2=Richard Howard|title=Operation Friction, 1990–1991: The Canadian Forces in the Persian Gulf|url=https://archive.org/details/operationfrictio0000mori|url-access=registration|year=1997|publisher=Dundurn Press|isbn=978-1-55002-257-5|page=}}
The Canadian Commander in the Middle East was Commodore ].</ref>

===France===
{{main|Opération Daguet}}
] tank destroyed by the French ] during Operation Desert Storm]]

The second largest European contingent was from France, which committed 18,000 troops.<ref name="Tread"/> Operating on the left flank of the US XVIII Airborne Corps, the French Army force was the Division Daguet, including troops from the ]. Initially, the French operated independently under national command and control, but coordinated closely with the Americans (via CENTCOM) and Saudis. In January, the Division was placed under the tactical control of the XVIII Airborne Corps. France also deployed several combat aircraft and naval units. The French called their contribution ].{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

===Italy===
{{main|Operazione Locusta}}

Following the invasion and annexation of ] by ], on September 25, 1990, the Italian Government sent eight multirole fighter bombers ] (plus two spare) in the Persian Gulf, belonging to the ], ] and ], which were deployed at the ], near ], in the United Arab Emirates.<ref name="difesaonline.it">{{cite web |url=http://en.difesaonline.it/news-forze-armate/cielo/25-anni-dalloperazione-locusta|title=25 years from the &quot;Locust&quot; operation|date=25 September 2015}}</ref><ref name="difesa.it">{{cite web |url=http://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/missione/attivitaoperative/operazioni_concluse/opr_internazionali_concluse/Pagine/Iraq(1990).aspx|title=Iraq (1990)|work=Minestero Della Difesa| language=it-IT}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.aviation-report.com/celebrato-93-anniversario-aeronautica-militare/| title=Celebrato il 93° Anniversario dell'Aeronautica Militare – Aviation Report| access-date=2018-02-01| language=it-IT}}</ref> During the 42 days of war, Italian fighters made 226 sorties for a total of 589 flight hours. The Italian Air Force recorded the loss of a single aircraft in the Gulf War. The use of Italian aircraft as part of the Desert Storm operation represented the first operational employment in combat missions of Italian Air Force aircraft since the end of World War II.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

===United Kingdom===
{{Main|Operation Granby}}
]

The United Kingdom committed the largest contingent of any European state that participated in the war's combat operations. Operation Granby was the code name for the operations in the Persian Gulf. ] regiments (mainly with the 1st Armoured Division), ], ] and ] vessels were mobilized in the Persian Gulf. Both Royal Air Force and Naval Air Squadrons, using various aircraft, operated from ] in Saudi Arabia and Naval Air Squadrons from various vessels in the Persian Gulf. The United Kingdom played a major role in the Battle of Norfolk, where its forces destroyed over 200 Iraqi tanks and a large quantity of other vehicles.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=275}}{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=377}} After 48 hours of combat the British 1st Armoured Division destroyed or isolated four Iraqi infantry divisions (the 26th, 48th, 31st, and 25th) and overran the Iraqi 52nd Armored Division in several sharp engagements.{{sfnp|Bourque|2001|p=377}}


Chief Royal Navy vessels deployed to the Persian Gulf included ], and ]; other R.N. and ] ships were also deployed. The light aircraft carrier ] was deployed to the ].{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}
After the UN authorized full use of force in the operation Canada sent a ] squadron with support personnel. Canada also sent a field hospital to deal with casualties from the ground war. When the air war began, Canada's planes were integrated into the coalition force and provided air cover and attacked ground targets. This was the first time since the ] that Canadian forces had participated in offensive combat operations.


Several SAS squadrons were deployed.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}
Canada suffered no casualties during the conflict but since its end many veterans have complained of suffering from ].


A British Challenger 1 achieved the longest range confirmed tank kill of the war, destroying an Iraqi tank with an ] (APFSDS) round fired over {{convert|4700|m|mi}}—the longest tank-on-tank kill shot recorded.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://britisharmyblog.wordpress.com/2016/02/28/desert-storm-part-22-charge-of-the-heavy-brigade/ |title=Desert Storm Part 22: Charge of the Heavy Brigade |publisher=British Army Official Blog |date=28 February 2016 |access-date=27 December 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://britisharmyblog.wordpress.com/2016/03/11/desert-storm-part-24-back-to-germany/ |title=Desert Storm Part 24: Back to Germany |publisher=British Army Official Blog |date=11 March 2016 |access-date=27 December 2016}}</ref>
===Troop Deployment===
* ]: 550,000 troops
* ]: 118,000 troops
* ]: 100,000 troops
* ]: 43,000 troops
* ]: 40,000 troops
* ]: 40,000 troops
* ]: 25,500 troops
* ]: 18,000 troops
* ]: 17,000 troops
* ]: 11,000 troops
* ]: 6,000 troops
* ]: 4,500 troops
* ]: 500 troops
* ]: 400 troops
* ]: 300 troops
* ]: 212 troops
* ]: 150 troops


==Casualties== ==Casualties==
===Casualties during the War===
Gulf War casualty numbers are controversial. Coalition military deaths have been reported to be around 378, but the DoD reports that US forces suffered 147 battle-related and 325 non-battle-related deaths. The UK suffered 24 deaths (nine of those due to ]), the Arab countries lost 39 men (18 Saudis, 10 Egyptians, 6 from the UAE, 3 Syrians, and 1 Kuwaiti), and France lost 2 men. The largest single loss of Coalition forces happened on ], ], when an ] ] hit an American military barracks in ], ] killing 28 ] from ]. The number of coalition wounded seems to have been less than 1,000. However, as of the year 2000, 183,000 Gulf War veterans, more than a quarter of the troops who participated in the War, have been declared permanently disabled by the Department of Veterans Affairs (National Gulf War Resource Center May 31, 2000 ; See also, ] and U.S. use of ]).


===Civilian===
Before the war Pentagon officials were estimating 30,000-40,000 coalition casualties. The Dupuy Institute stood alone and in front of Congress predicted Coalition Casualties below 6,000. They used the TNDM model which makes use of historical data from previous wars to predict casualties. While the Institute was phenomenally accurate, it was because the Iraqi armed forces fought in the open desert with tanks placed behind sand berms. Had the Iraqi military made use of urban warfare in Kuwait city and dug their tanks in within the city perimeters instead of behind sand berms the actual figures may have been different. The TNDM model makes use of 'human' factors such as morale and they predicted that very few Iraqi divisions would put up resistance. This is a value judgment that is difficult to make accurately before war. The 120,000 professional Iraqi soldiers backed by 4,500 tanks, 4,000 armored vehicles and 3,000 artillery pieces and with another 280,000 conscripted soldiers armed with RPG's, heavy mortars and heavy machine guns provided a force that could have made the low casualty estimate not inevitable. The United States, on the other hand had 3,400 tanks, 3,700 artillery pieces, 4,000 armored personnel carriers, 2,000 helicopters and about 2,600 aircraft.
] fleeing to Turkey shortly after the war]]
Over 1,000 Kuwaiti civilians were killed by Iraqis.<ref>{{cite web|title=The Use of Terror During Iraq's Invasion of Kuwait|url=http://www.jewishagency.org/news/content/28866|date=2007-08-22 |website=The Jewish Agency |access-date=2 May 2016|archive-date=20 September 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160920094524/http://www.jewishagency.org/news/content/28866}}</ref> More than 600 Kuwaitis went ] during Iraq's occupation,<ref>{{cite news|title=Iraq and Kuwait Discuss Fate of 600 Missing Since Gulf War |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2003-jan-09-fg-missing9-story.html |work=Los Angeles Times |date=9 January 2003 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171010152741/https://articles.latimes.com/2003/jan/09/world/fg-missing9 |archive-date= 10 October 2017 }}</ref> and approximately 375 remains were found in mass graves in Iraq. The increased importance of air attacks from both coalition ] and ] led to controversy over the number of civilian deaths caused during Desert Storm's initial stages. Within Desert Storm's first 24 hours, more than 1,000 sorties were flown, many against targets in Baghdad. The city was the target of heavy bombing, as it was the seat of power for Saddam and the Iraqi forces' ]. This ultimately led to ].{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}


In one noted incident, two ] stealth planes bombed ], causing the deaths of 408 Iraqi civilians in the shelter.<ref name=CSM2002>Scott Peterson, , ''Christian Science Monitor'', 22 October 2002. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090709205401/http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1022/p01s01-wosc.htm |date=9 July 2009 }}.</ref> Scenes of burned and mutilated bodies were subsequently broadcast, and controversy arose over the bunker's status, with some stating that it was a civilian shelter, while others contended that it was a center of Iraqi military operations, and that the civilians had been deliberately moved there to act as ]s.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}
The ] and ] have aptly demonstrated how casualties can be inflicted by a technologically inferior force which utilizes urban environments for concealment and cover against precise artillery and air strikes. It has demonstrated how urban warfare might have blunted the greatest advantage of the Coalition, long distance killing. 120,000 committed soldiers backed by modern equipment could be expected to cause large causalities on the order of several thousand; the fact that it did not happen in the Gulf War is no guarantee that it will not happen in the future.


Saddam's government gave high civilian casualty to draw support from Islamic countries. The Iraqi government claimed that 2,300 civilians died during the air campaign.{{sfnp|Tucker|2010|p=265}} According to the Project on Defense Alternatives study, 3,664 Iraqi civilians were killed in the conflict.<ref name="POL">{{cite web|url=http://www.comw.org/pda/0310rm8ap2.html |date= 20 October 2003 |first1=Carl |last1=Conetta |title=Wages of War{{snd}}Appendix 2: Iraqi Combatant and Noncombatant Fatalities in the 1991 Gulf War |publisher=The Commonwealth Institute and the Project on Defense Alternatives |access-date=1 February 2011}}</ref>
Independent analysts generally agree the Iraqi death toll was well below initial post-war estimates. In the immediate aftermath of the war, these estimates ranged as high as 100,000 Iraqi troops killed and 300,000 wounded. According to "]" by ] and ], (a report commissioned by the U.S. Air Force; 1993-ISBN 0-16-041950-6), there were an estimated 10-12,000 Iraqi combat deaths in the air campaign and as many as 10,000 casualties in the ground war. This analysis is based on enemy prisoner of war reports. The Iraqi government claimed that 2,300 civilians died during the air campaign, most of them during an F-117 Stealth Fighter strike on what was believed to be an Iraqi military communications center in Baghdad (it turned out to be an air raid shelter also).


During the nationwide ] against the Ba'athist Iraqi government that directly followed the end of the Gulf War in March and April, an estimated 25,000 to 100,000 Iraqis were killed, overwhelmingly civilians.<ref name="ENDLESS"/>
One infamous incident during the war highlighted the question of large-scale Iraqi combat deaths. This was the `] assault' in which two brigades from the ] (Mechanized) used anti-mine plows mounted on ]s and combat earthmovers to bury Iraqi soldiers defending the fortified "Saddam Line." While approximately 2,000 of the troops surrendered, escaping burial, one newspaper story reported that the U.S. commanders estimated thousands of Iraqi soldiers had been buried alive during the two-day assault February 24-25, 1991. However, like all other troop estimates made during the war, the estimated 8,000 Iraqi defenders was probably greatly inflated. While one commander, Col. ] of the ], thought the numbers might have been in the thousands, another reported his brigade buried between 80 and 250 Iraqis. After the war, the Iraqi government claimed to have found 44 such bodies. {{ref|www.pbs.org.36}}


A ] study released in June 1991 predicted that there would be tens of thousands of additional Iraqi civilian deaths by the end of 1991 due to the "public health catastrophe" caused by the destruction of the country's electrical generating capacity. "Without electricity, hospitals cannot function, perishable medicines spoil, water cannot be purified and raw sewage cannot be processed,". The US government refused to release its own study of the effects of the Iraqi public health crisis.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Tyler |first=Patrick E. |date=1991-06-03 |title=U.S. Officials Believe Iraq Will Take Years to Rebuild |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1991/06/03/world/us-officials-believe-iraq-will-take-years-to-rebuild.html |issn=0362-4331 |url-access=subscription |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181118164729/https://www.nytimes.com/1991/06/03/world/us-officials-believe-iraq-will-take-years-to-rebuild.html |archive-date=18 November 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref>
===The Post-War Effects of Depleted Uranium===
In 1998, Iraqi government doctors reported that Coalition use of ] caused a massive increase in birth defects and cancer among Iraqis, particularly leukemia. The government doctors claimed they were unable to provide evidence linking depleted uranium to the cancer and birth defects because the sanctions prevented them from obtaining necessary testing equipment. Subsequently, a ] team visited Basra and proposed a study to investigate the causes of higher cancer rates in southern Iraq, but Saddam refused.


An investigation in 1992 by Beth Osborne Daponte estimated about 13,000 civilians were directly killed in the war, while another 70,000 died indirectly from the war's other effects.<ref name="autogenerated1" /><ref>{{cite web|title=Toting the Casualties of War |url=http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/feb2003/nf2003026_0167_db052.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030219033933/http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/feb2003/nf2003026_0167_db052.htm |archive-date=19 February 2003 |work=Businessweek |date=6 February 2003}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Ford |first=Peter |title=Bid to stem civilian deaths tested |url=http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0409/p06s01-woiq.html |work=Christian Science Monitor |date=9 April 2003}}</ref> According to a 1992 study published in ] by researchers known as the International Study Team (IST), child mortality increased threefold as a result of the war, with 46,900 children under the age of 5 dying between January and August 1991.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=Effect of the Gulf War on infant and child mortality in Iraq |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1513350/#:~:text=Conclusions%3A%20These%20results%20provide%20strong,between%20January%20and%20August%201991. |journal=The New England Journal of Medicine| date=1992 | pmid=1513350 | last1=Ascherio | first1=A. | last2=Chase | first2=R. | last3=Coté | first3=T. | last4=Dehaes | first4=G. | last5=Hoskins | first5=E. | last6=Laaouej | first6=J. | last7=Passey | first7=M. | last8=Qaderi | first8=S. | last9=Shuqaidef | first9=S. | last10=Smith | first10=M. C. | volume=327 | issue=13 | pages=931–936 | doi=10.1056/NEJM199209243271306 }}</ref> However, these figures have been challenged by a 2017 study published in ], which stated that the "IST survey probably understated the level of child mortality that prevailed during 1985–1990 and overstated the level during 1991." According to this study, "there was no major rise in child mortality in Iraq after 1990".<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Dyson|first1=Tim|last2=Cetorelli|first2=Valeria|date=2017-07-01|title=Changing views on child mortality and economic sanctions in Iraq: a history of lies, damned lies and statistics|journal=BMJ Global Health|language=en|volume=2|issue=2|pages=e000311|doi=10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000311|pmid=29225933|issn=2059-7908|pmc=5717930}}</ref> A report published in 2002 by ] estimated the total number of Iraqi deaths caused directly and indirectly by the Gulf War to be between 142,500 and 206,000, including 100,000–120,000 military deaths, and 20,000–35,000 civilian deaths in the ] and 15,000–30,000 refugee deaths after the end of the Gulf war.<ref name=":2"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200719070432/https://www.ippnw.org/pdf/medact-iraq-2002.pdf |date=19 July 2020 }}, '']''</ref>
The World Health Organization was nonetheless able to assess the health risks of Depleted Uranium in a post-combat environment thanks to a 2001 mission to Kosovo. A 2001 WHO fact sheet on depleted uranium concludes: "because DU is only weakly radioactive, very large amounts of dust (on the order of grams) would have to be inhaled for the additional risk of lung cancer to be detectable in an exposed group. Risks for other radiation-induced cancers, including leukaemia, are considered to be very much lower than for lung cancer." In addition, "no reproductive or developmental effects have been reported in humans" as a result of DU exposure. {{ref|www.who.int.37}}


Iraq also launched numerous attacks on civilian targets in Israel and Saudi Arabia. A 1991 report by ] said that at least one Saudi civilian was killed after they were hit by Iraqi shelling in ].<ref>{{cite web |title=9 |url=https://www.hrw.org/reports/1991/gulfwar/CHAP9.htm |access-date=2022-05-06 |website=www.hrw.org}}</ref> A disputed number of people were also killed during the ].{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}
The U.S. Department of State has also published a fact sheet on depleted uranium. It states: "World Health Organization and other scientific research studies indicate Depleted Uranium poses no serious health risks" and "depleted Uranium does not cause birth defects. Iraqi military use of chemical and nerve agents in the 1980's and 1990's is the likely cause of alleged birth defects among Iraqi children." In regard to cancer claims, the fact sheet states that "according to environmental health experts, it is medically impossible to contract leukemia as a result of exposure to uranium or depleted uranium," and "cancer rates in almost 19,000 highly exposed uranium industry workers who worked at Oak Ridge National Laboratory projects between 1943 and 1947 have been examined, and no excess cancers were observed through 1974. Other epidemiological studies of lung cancer in uranium mill and metal processing plant workers have found either no excess cancers or attributed them to known carcinogens other than uranium, such as radon." {{ref|www.au.af.mil.38}}


===Iraqi===
However, some claim that the effect is more severe as the Depleted Uranium ammunition would fragment into tiny particles when it hit the target. {{ref|www.ccnr.org.39}} In fact, most recently a comprehensive study by The Royal Society, a fellowship of over 1400 distinguished scientists, researchers and professors, found that Depleted Uranium poses serious health risks for civilians as well as soldiers. {{ref|www.royalsoc.ac.uk.40}}


A United Nations report in March 1991 described the effect on Iraq of the US-led bombing campaign as "near apocalyptic", bringing back Iraq to the "pre-industrial age."<ref>''New York Times'', 22 March 1991 " {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181118164833/https://www.nytimes.com/1991/03/22/world/after-the-war-un-survey-calls-iraq-s-war-damage-near-apocalyptic.html |date=18 November 2018 }}"</ref> The exact number of Iraqi combat casualties is unknown, but is believed to have been heavy. Some estimate that Iraq sustained between 20,000 and 35,000 fatalities.<ref name="autogenerated1">Robert Fisk, ''The Great War For Civilisation; The Conquest of the Middle East'' (Fourth Estate, 2005), p.853.</ref> A report commissioned by the US Air Force estimated 10,000–12,000 Iraqi combat deaths in the air campaign, and as many as 10,000 casualties in the ground war.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Keaney |first=Thomas |author2=Eliot A. Cohen |title=Gulf War Air Power Survey |publisher=United States Dept. of the Air Force |year=1993 |isbn=978-0-16-041950-8}}</ref> This analysis is based on Iraqi prisoner of war reports.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}
==Cost==
]
The cost of the war to the United States was calculated by Congress to be $61.1 billion. Other sources estimate up to $71 billion. About $53 billion of that amount was paid by different countries around the world: $36 billion by ], ] and other Gulf States; $16 billion by ] and ] (which sent no forces due to the treaties that ended ]). About 25% of ]'s contribution was paid in the form of in-kind services to the troops, such as food and transportation.


According to the Project on Defense Alternatives study, between 20,000 and 26,000 Iraqi military personnel were killed in the conflict while 75,000 others were wounded.<ref name="POL" />
U.S. troops represented about 74% of the combined force, and the global cost was therefore higher. The ], for instance, spent $4.1 billion during this war.


According to ], "For the Iraqi people, the cost of enforcing the will of the United Nations has been grotesque."<ref>{{Cite magazine|url=https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1991/04/11/iraq-and-its-future/|title=Iraq and Its Future &#124; by Samir al-Khalil &#124; The New York Review of Books|first=Samir|last=al-Khalil|website=www.nybooks.com |date=11 April 1991}}</ref> General Schwarzkopf talked about "a very, very large number of dead in these units, a very, very large number indeed."{{sfnp|al-Khalil|1991}} The chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, ], estimated that "at least 65,000 Iraqi soldiers were killed".{{sfnp|al-Khalil|1991}} A figure was supported by Israeli sources who speak of "one to two hundred thousand Iraqi casualties." Most of the killing "took place during the ground war. Fleeing soldiers were bombed with a device known as a 'fuel-air explosive.'"{{sfnp|al-Khalil|1991}}
==Media==
The Gulf War was a heavily televised war. For the first time people all over the world were able to watch live pictures of missiles hitting their targets and fighters taking off from aircraft carriers. Allied forces were keen to demonstrate the accuracy of their weapons.


===Coalition===
In the United States, the "big three" network anchors led the ] coverage of the war: ] ], ] ], and ] ] were anchoring their evening newscasts when air strikes began on ], ]. ] correspondent Gary Shepard, reporting live from Baghdad, told Jennings of the quietness of the city. But, moments later, Shepard was back on the air as flashes of light were seen on the horizon and tracer fire was heard on the ground. On CBS, viewers were watching a report from correspondent Allen Pizzey, who was also reporting from Baghdad, when the war began. Rather, after the report was finished, announced that there were unconfirmed reports of flashes in Baghdad and heavy air traffic at bases in Saudi Arabia. On the "NBC Nightly News", correspondent Mike Boettcher reported unusual air activity in ], ]. Moments later, Brokaw announced to his viewers that the air attack had begun. But it was ] who gained the most popularity for their coverage. CNN correspondents John Holliman and ] and CNN anchor ] relayed telephone reports from the ] as the air strikes began. Newspapers all over the world also covered the war and '']'' published a special issue dated ], ], the headline "WAR IN THE GULF" emblazoned on the cover over a picture of Baghdad taken as the war began.
{|class="wikitable sortable floatright" style="text-align:right;"
|+Coalition troops killed by country
!Country
!Total
!Enemy<br/>action
!Accident
!Friendly<br/>fire
!Ref
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|United States}} || 148 || 113 || 35 || 35 ||<ref name=cnn/>
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|Senegal}} || 92 || || 92 || ||<ref>{{cite web|url=http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19910321-0|title=ASN Aircraft accident Lockheed C-130H Hercules 469 Rash Mishab|first=Harro|last=Ranter|access-date=5 July 2016}}</ref>
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|United Kingdom}}|| 47 || 38 || 1 || 9 ||<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.britains-smallwars.com/gulf/Roll.html |title=Roll of Honour |publisher=Britains-smallwars.com |access-date=13 May 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110501162112/http://www.britains-smallwars.com/gulf/Roll.html |archive-date=1 May 2011}}</ref>
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|Saudi Arabia}} || 24 || 18 || 6 || ||<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-11661.html |title=Saudi Arabia{{snd}}Persian Gulf War, 1991 |publisher=Country-data.com |access-date=1 February 2011}}</ref><ref name="92-senegalese-soldiers-die" />
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|Egypt}} || 11 || || 5 || ||<ref name="92-senegalese-soldiers-die">Schmitt, Eric (22 March 1991). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171020063210/http://www.nytimes.com/1991/03/22/world/after-the-war-92-senegalese-soldiers-die-in-saudi-arabia-air-crash.html |date=20 October 2017 }}. ''The New York Times''.</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140203102032/http://www.apnewsarchive.com/1991/Soldier-Reported-Dead-Shows-Up-at-Parents-Doorstep/id-6f675aabb4b07225fea68fa64e3f976c |date=3 February 2014 }}. Associated Press. 22 March 1991.</ref>
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|France}} || 9 || 2 || || ||<ref name=cnn />
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|United Arab Emirates}} || 6 || 6 || || ||<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-14256.html |title=The Role of the United Arab Emirates in the Iran-Iraq War and the Persian Gulf War |publisher=Country-data.com |access-date=1 February 2011}}</ref>
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|Qatar}} || 3 || 3 || || ||<ref name=cnn />
|-
|align=left|{{Flagdeco|Ba'athist Syria}} Syria || 2 || || || ||<ref name=nyt-syria-double>Miller, Judith. "Syria Plans to Double Gulf Force." ''The New York Times'', 27 March 1991.</ref>
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|Spain}} || 2 || || 2 || ||<ref>{{cite news |title=Muere en accidente de tráfico en Abu Dabi un cabo de la fragata 'Victoria' |trans-title=Corporal of the frigate "Victoria" dies in traffic accident in Abu Dhabi |url=https://elpais.com/diario/1991/03/15/espana/668991613_850215.html |website=El País |access-date=13 July 2022 |language=es |date=14 March 1991 }}</ref>
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|Kuwait}} || 1 || 1 || || ||<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-14245.html |title=Role of Kuwaiti Armed Forces in the Persian Gulf War |publisher=Country-data.com |date=24 February 1991 |access-date=1 February 2011}}</ref>
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|Italy}} || 1 || || 1 || ||<ref>{{cite web |title=FESTA, LACRIME E AMAREZZA PER I MARO' RIENTRATI DAL GOLFO |url=https://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/1991/03/02/festa-lacrime-amarezza-per-maro-rientrati-dal.html |website=la Repubblica |access-date=13 July 2022 |location=] |language=it |date=2 March 1991}}</ref>
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|Czechoslovakia}} || 1 || || 1|| ||<ref>{{cite web |title=podporučík in memoriam Petr ŠIMONKA {{!}} inmemoriam.army.cz |url=https://inmemoriam.army.cz/podporucik-memoriam-petr-simonka |access-date=2022-04-19 |website=inmemoriam.army.cz}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Sornas |first=Ladislav |date=2021-07-15 |title=Střelecká soutěž – Memoriál ppor. Petra Šimonky |url=https://www.svvcr.cz/strelecka-soutez-memorial-ppor-petra-simonky/ |access-date=2022-04-19 |website=Sdružení válečných veteránů ČR |language=cs-CZ}}</ref>
|}


]'s remains.]]
U.S. policy regarding media freedom was much more restrictive than in the ]. The policy had been spelled out in a Pentagon document entitled '']''. Most of the press information came from briefings organized by the military. Only selected journalists were allowed to visit the front lines or conduct interviews with soldiers. Those visits were always conducted in the presence of officers, and were subject to both prior approval by the military and ] afterward. This was ostensibly to protect sensitive information from being revealed to Iraq, but often in practice it was used to protect politically embarrassing information from being revealed. This policy was heavily influenced by the military's experience with the ], which it believed it had lost due to public opposition within the United States.


The ] reports that US forces suffered 148 battle-related deaths (35 to friendly fire{{sfnp|Tucker|2010|p=470}}), with ] listed as ] (his remains were found and identified in August 2009). A further 145 Americans died in non-combat accidents.<ref name=cnn /> The UK suffered 47 deaths (nine to friendly fire, all by US forces), France nine,<ref name=cnn /> and the other countries, not including Kuwait, suffered 37 deaths (18 Saudis, one Egyptian, six UAE and three Qataris).<ref name=cnn>{{Cite news |url=http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar/ |title=In-Depth Specials – Gulf War |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070510125644/http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar/ |archive-date=2007-05-10 |year=2001 |work=CNN}}</ref> At least 605 Kuwaiti soldiers were still missing 10 years after their capture.<ref>{{cite journal|first=Nicholas|last=Blanford |url=http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1223/p07s01-wome.html |title=Kuwait hopes for answers on its Gulf War POWs |journal=Christian Science Monitor |year=2001}}</ref>
At the same time, the coverage of this war was new in its instantaneousness. Many American journalists remained stationed in the Iraqi capital ] throughout the war, and footage of incoming missiles was carried almost immediately on the nightly ] news and the ] news channels such as CNN. A British crew from ] (David Green and Andy Thompson), equipped with satellite transmission equipment travelled with the front line forces and, having transmitted live TV pictures of the fighting en route, arrived the day before the forces in ], broadcasting live television from the city and covering the entrance of the Arab forces (and other journalists!) the following day.


The largest single loss of life among coalition forces happened on 25 February 1991, when an Iraqi ] hit a US military barrack in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, killing 28 ] from ]. In all, 190 coalition troops were killed by Iraqi fire during the war, 113 of whom were American, out of 358 coalition deaths. Another 44 soldiers were killed and 57 wounded by friendly fire. 145 soldiers died of exploding munitions or non-combat accidents.{{sfnp|Tucker|2010|p=264}}
==Consequences==
] picture overseeing a war scene in the foreground.]]
Following the uprisings in the north and south, no-fly zones were established to help protect the ] and ] groups in South and North Iraq, respectively. These no-fly zones (originally north of the 36th parallel and south of the 32nd parallel) were monitored mainly by the United States and the United Kingdom, though ] also participated. Combined, they flew more sorties over Iraq in the eleven years following the war than were flown during the war. These sorties dropped bombs nearly every other day against surface-to-air missiles and anti-aircraft guns which engaged the patrolling aircraft. However, the greatest amount of bombs was dropped during two sustained bombing campaigns: ], which lasted a few weeks in September 1996, and ], in December 1998. ], the no-fly zone covering the Kurds, allowed the population to focus on developing security and infrastructure, which was reflected after Saddam's fall in 2003 by a much more progressive and sustainable region (when compared to the rest of the country falling ]). ], on the other hand, was not successful in providing the ] population the opportunity to build.


The largest accident among coalition forces happened on 21 March 1991, when a Royal Saudi Air Force C-130H crashed in heavy smoke on approach to Ras Al-Mishab Airport, Saudi Arabia. 92 Senegalese soldiers and six Saudi crew members were killed.<ref name="92-senegalese-soldiers-die" />
Widespread infrastructure destruction during the ground war hurt the Iraqi population. Years after the war, electricity production was less than a quarter of its pre-war level. The destruction of water treatment facilities caused sewage to flow directly into the ], from which civilians drew drinking water, resulting in widespread disease. Funds provided by Western nations to help combat the problem were diverted instead to maintaining Saddam's military control over the country.


The number of coalition wounded in combat was 776, including 458 Americans.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|title=Persian Gulf War{{snd}}MSN Encarta |url=http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761551555_2/Arabian_Gulf_War.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091021004902/http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761551555_2/Persian_Gulf_War.html |archive-date=21 October 2009 }}</ref>
] were kept in place following the war, pending a weapons inspection regime with which Iraq never fully cooperated. Iraq was later allowed to import certain products under the UN's ]. A 1998 ] report found that the sanctions resulted in an increase to 90,000 deaths per year. Many argue that the sanctions on Iraq and the American military presence in Saudi Arabia contributed to an increasingly negative image of the United States in the Arab world.


190 coalition troops were killed by Iraqi combatants, the rest of the 379 coalition deaths were from friendly fire or accidents. This number was much lower than expected. Among the American combat dead were four female soldiers.<ref>{{cite web|title=The Cost of Women in Combat|url=https://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=79646&page=1|access-date=2021-03-25|website=ABC News|language=en}}</ref>
A ] (UNSCOM) on weapons was established, to monitor Iraq's compliance with restrictions on weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles. Iraq accepted some and refused other weapons inspections. The team found some evidence of biological weapons programs at one site and non-compliance at many other sites.


====Friendly fire====
In 1997, Iraq expelled all U.S. members of the inspection team, alleging that the United States was using the inspections as a front for espionage; members of UNSCOM were in regular contact with various intelligence agencies to provide information on weapons sites back and forth. The team returned for an even more turbulent time period between 1997 and 1999; one member of the weapons inspection team, U.S. Marine ], resigned in 1998, alleging that the ] administration was blocking investigations because they did not want a full-scale confrontation with Iraq. In 1999, the team was replaced by ], which began inspections in ]. In 2002, Iraq &mdash; and especially Saddam Hussein &mdash; became targets in the United States' ], leading to the ], led by the United States and, to a lesser extent, the United Kingdom.
While the death toll among coalition forces engaging Iraqi combatants was very low, a substantial number of deaths were caused by accidental attacks from other Allied units. Of the 148 US troops who died in battle, 24% were killed by friendly fire, a total of 35 service personnel.{{sfnp|Tucker|2010|p=207}} A further 11 died in detonations of coalition munitions. Nine British military personnel were killed in a friendly fire incident when a USAF ] destroyed a group of two Warrior IFVs.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}


==Aftermath==
The ] (whose army in many ways resembled the Iraqi army) was surprised at the performance of American technology on the battlefield. The swiftness of the coalition victory resulted in an overall change in Chinese military thinking and began a movement to technologically modernize the ].
{{main|Aftermath of the Gulf War}}


===Gulf War illness===
A crucial result of the Gulf War, according to ], was the sharp revival in Islamic extremism. The change of face by Saddam's secular regime did little to draw support from Islamist groups. However, it, combined with the Saudi Arabian alliance with the United States and Saudi Arabia being seen as being on the same side of Israel dramatically eroded that regime's legitimacy. Activity of Islamist groups against the Saudi regime increased dramatically. In part to win back favour with Islamist groups Saudi Arabia greatly increased funding to those that would support the regime. Throughout the newly independent states of ] the Saudis paid for the distribution of millions of ]s and the building of hundreds of ]s for extremist groups. In ] the Saudi regime became a leading patron of the ] in that nation's civil war, and one of the only foreign countries to officially recognize the government.
{{Main|Gulf War syndrome}}
Many returning coalition soldiers reported illnesses following their action in the war, a phenomenon known as ] (GWS) or Gulf War illness (GWI). Common symptoms reported are chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia, and gastrointestinal disorder.<ref>{{cite web|title=Gulf War Veterans' Medically Unexplained Illnesses |url=http://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/gulfwar/medically-unexplained-illness.asp|publisher=U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs|access-date=25 February 2014}}</ref> There has been widespread speculation and disagreement about the causes of the illness and the possibly related birth defects. Researchers found that infants born to male veterans of the 1991 war had higher rates of two types of heart valve defects. Some children born after the war to Gulf War veterans had a certain kidney defect that was not found in Gulf War veterans' children born before the war. Researchers have said that they did not have enough information to link birth defects with exposure to toxic substances.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Gulf war syndrome; higher rates of specific birth defects in gulf war veterans' children|date=29 June 2003 |journal=Medical Letter on the CDC & FDA |page=14 |id={{ProQuest|211397084}}}}</ref>


In 1994, the US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs with Respect to Export Administration published a report entitled, "U.S. Chemical and Biological Warfare-Related Dual Use Exports to Iraq and their Possible Impact on the Health Consequences of the Gulf War". This publication, called the ], summarized testimony this committee had received establishing that the U.S. had in the 1980s supplied Saddam Hussein with chemical and biological warfare technology, that Saddam had used such chemical weapons against Iran and his own native Kurds, and possibly against U.S. soldiers as well, plausibly contributing to the GWS.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}
'''Gulf War Syndrome''' <br>

Many returning coalition soldiers reported illnesses following their participation in the Gulf War, a phenomenon known as ]. There has been widespread speculation and disagreement about the causes of the syndrome and reported birth defects (the number of children born in soldier's families with serious congenital defects or serious illnesses has been reported as high as 67%, according to a study by the ].{{ref|www.projectcensored.org.41}}) A report published in ] by the ] said that American troops were exposed to 21 potential "reproductive toxicants". Some factors considered as possibly causal include exposure to radioactive materials, oil fires, and the fast series of ] vaccine given to deploying soldiers (the normal series is a graduated, multi-month process).
A 2022 study by Dr. Robert W. Haley of the ], ''et al.'', of 1,016 U.S. Gulf War veterans found evidence of a ] link between GWS and exposure to low levels of the nerve agent sarin, which was released into the air by coalition bombing of Iraqi chemical weapons facilities. Significantly, the study found an increased incidence of GWS not only among veterans who recounted hearing nerve agent alarms, but also among veterans with the RR or QR (as opposed to the QQ) forms of the ] gene, which produces an ] that deactivates ]s (including sarin) through ]. By contrast, GWS was ''inversely'' associated with higher levels of the type Q ], which is more efficient at breaking down sarin than its type R counterpart. The authors "found that the PON1 ] and hearing nerve agent alarms were independent and the findings robust to both measured and unmeasured ], supporting a mechanistic interaction.&nbsp;... Moreover, the change in the combined effect from one category to the next was significantly greater than the sum of the independent effects of the environmental exposure and the genotype".<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Haley|first1=Robert W.|last2=Kramer|first2=Gerald|last3=Xiao|first3=Junhui|last4=Dever|first4=Jill A.|last5=Teiber|first5=John F.|title=Evaluation of a Gene–Environment Interaction of PON1 and Low-Level Nerve Agent Exposure with Gulf War Illness: A Prevalence Case–Control Study Drawn from the U.S. Military Health Survey's National Population Sample|journal=]|volume=130|issue=5|date=11 May 2022|page=57001 |publisher=]|doi=10.1289/EHP9009|pmid=35543525 |pmc=9093163 |bibcode=2022EnvHP.130e7001H |s2cid=248694742 }} cf. {{cite web|url=https://www.utsouthwestern.edu/newsroom/articles/year-2022/sarin-nerve-gas-gulf-war-illness.html|title=UTSW genetic study confirms sarin nerve gas as cause of Gulf War illness|publisher=]|date=11 May 2022|access-date=11 May 2022|quote=For Gulf War veterans with the QQ genotype, hearing nerve agent alarms—a proxy for chemical exposure—raised their chance of developing GWI by 3.75 times. For those with the QR genotype, the alarms raised their chance of GWI by 4.43 times. And for those with two copies of the R gene, inefficient at breaking down sarin, the chance of GWI increased by 8.91 times. Those soldiers with both the RR genotype and low-level sarin exposure were over seven times more likely to get GWI due to the interaction per se, over and above the increase in risk from both risk factors acting alone. For genetic epidemiologists, this number leads to a high degree of confidence that sarin is a causative agent of GWI.}}</ref>

===Effects of depleted uranium===
{{Main|Depleted uranium#Health considerations}}
]

The US military used ] in tank kinetic energy penetrators and {{Convert|20-30|mm|abbr=on}} cannon ]. Significant controversy regarding the long term safety of depleted uranium exists, including claims of ], ], and ] ] effects. Many have cited its use during the war as a contributing factor to a number of major health issues in veterans and in surrounding civilian populations, including in birth defects and child cancer rates. Scientific opinion on the risk is mixed.<!--<ref name=r1/>--><ref name="bostonglobe">Elizabeth Neuffer {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130902013328/http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0126-03.htm |date=2 September 2013 }} ''Boston Globe'' 26 January 2003, Page: A11 Section: National/Foreign</ref><ref>Larry Johnson {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081120013734/http://www.seattlepi.com/national/95178_du12.shtml |date=20 November 2008 }} ''Seattle Post-Intelligencer'' 12 November 2002. Retrieved 25 January 2009.</ref><ref>{{cite news|author=Ron McKay |url=http://www.commondreams.org/views01/0114-01.htm |title=Depleted Uranium: The Horrific Legacy of Basra |newspaper=Sunday Herald |location=Scotland |date=14 January 2001 |access-date=15 February 2013 |archive-date=27 May 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130527015017/http://www.commondreams.org/views01/0114-01.htm}}</ref> In 2004, Iraq had the highest mortality rate due to ] of any country.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.who.int/entity/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/gbddeathdalycountryestimates2004.xls |title=WHO Data, 2004 |access-date=4 September 2013}}</ref><ref name="Doctor's Gulf War Studies Link Cancer to Depleted Uranium">{{cite news |title=Doctor's Gulf War Studies Link Cancer to Depleted Uranium |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2001/01/29/world/doctor-s-gulf-war-studies-link-cancer-to-depleted-uranium.html |website=] |date=29 January 2001}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Hindin R. |year=2005 |title=Teratogenicity of depleted uranium aerosols: A review from an epidemiological perspective |journal=Environmental Health |volume=4 |issue=1 |page=17 |pmid=16124873 |doi=10.1186/1476-069X-4-17 |pmc=1242351 |display-authors=etal |doi-access=free |bibcode=2005EnvHe...4...17H }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Marshall |first=AC |year=2005 |title=An Analysis of Uranium Dispersal and Health Effects Using a Gulf War Case Study |publisher=] |url=http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/2005/054331.pdf |access-date=16 July 2012}}</ref>

Depleted uranium has 40% less radioactivity than natural uranium, but the negative effects should not be overlooked.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/depleted_uranium//|title=Depleted Uranium – Public Health|author=((US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration)) |website=www.publichealth.va.gov}}</ref> Depleted uranium is not a significant health hazard unless it is taken into the body. External exposure to radiation from depleted uranium is generally not a major concern because the alpha particles emitted by its isotopes travel only a few centimeters in air or can be stopped by a sheet of paper. Also, the uranium-235 that remains in depleted uranium emits only a small amount of low-energy gamma radiation. However, if allowed to enter the body, depleted uranium, like natural uranium, has the potential for both chemical and radiological toxicity with the two important target organs being the kidneys and the lungs.<ref>{{cite web |title=Depleted Uranium Health Effects |url=http://web.ead.anl.gov/uranium/guide/depletedu/health/index.cfm |publisher=ead.anl.gov|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130406015817/http://web.ead.anl.gov/uranium/guide/depletedu/health/index.cfm |archive-date=6 April 2013|access-date=2014-05-24}}</ref>

===Highway of Death===
{{Main|Highway of Death}}
]]]
In the night of 26–27 February 1991, some Iraqi forces began leaving Kuwait on the main highway north of Al Jahra in a column of some 1,400 vehicles. A patrolling ] aircraft observed the retreating forces and relayed the information to the DDM-8 air operations center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.{{citation needed|date=February 2023}} These vehicles and the retreating soldiers were subsequently attacked by two A-10 aircraft, resulting in a {{convert|60|km|mi}} stretch of highway strewn with debris—the Highway of Death. ''New York Times'' reporter Maureen Dowd wrote, "With the Iraqi leader facing military defeat, Mr. Bush decided that he would rather gamble on a violent and potentially unpopular ground war than risk the alternative: an imperfect settlement hammered out by the Soviets and Iraqis that world opinion might accept as tolerable."<ref>{{cite web |last=Chediac |first=Joyce |title=The massacre of withdrawing Soldiers on the highway of death |url=http://deoxy.org/wc/wc-death.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140814211443/http://deoxy.org/wc/wc-death.htm |archive-date=14 August 2014}}</ref>

Chuck Horner, Commander of US and allied air operations, has written:

{{blockquote|, the Iraqis totally lost heart and started to evacuate occupied Kuwait, but airpower halted the caravan of Iraqi Army and plunderers fleeing toward Basra. This event was later called by the media "The Highway of Death." There were certainly a lot of dead vehicles, but not so many dead Iraqis. They'd already learned to scamper off into the desert when our aircraft started to attack. Nevertheless, some people back home wrongly chose to believe we were cruelly and unusually punishing our already whipped foes.
...<br/>
By February 27, talk had turned toward terminating the hostilities. Kuwait was free. We were not interested in governing Iraq. So the question became "How do we stop the killing."<ref>{{Harvnb|Clancy|Horner|1999|pp=499–500}}.</ref>}}

==={{anchor|Bulldozer assault}} Bulldozer assault===
] similar to the ones used in the attack]]

Another incident during the war highlighted the question of large-scale Iraqi combat deaths. This was the "] assault", wherein two brigades from the US 1st Infantry Division (Mechanized) were faced with a large and complex trench network, as part of the heavily fortified "Saddam Hussein Line". After some deliberation, they opted to use anti-mine ]s mounted on tanks and combat earthmovers to simply plow over and bury alive the defending Iraqi soldiers. Not a single American was killed during the attack. Reporters were banned from witnessing the attack, near the neutral zone that touches the border between Saudi Arabia and Iraq.<ref name=":0">Sloyan, Patrick. . ''The Seattle Times''. 12 September 1991. Retrieved 4 March 2014.</ref> Every American in the assault was inside an armored vehicle.<ref name=":0" />

Patrick Day Sloyan of '']'' reported, "Bradley Fighting Vehicles and Vulcan armored carriers straddled the trench lines and fired into the Iraqi soldiers as the tanks covered them with mounds of sand. 'I came through right after the lead company,' Moreno said. 'What you saw was a bunch of buried trenches with peoples' arms and things sticking out of them.{{'"}}<ref name="Sloyan 1991-9-12">{{Citation |title=Buried Alive: U.S. Tanks Used Plows To Kill Thousands in Gulf War Trenches |newspaper=Newsday |place=New York |date=12 September 1991 |page=1 |first=Patrick Day |last=Sloyan}}</ref> However, after the war, the Iraqi government said that only 44 bodies were found.<ref>{{cite web|newspaper=Frontline |title=The gulf war: appendix: Iraqi death toll |url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/appendix/death.html |access-date=4 December 2005}}</ref> In his book ''The Wars Against Saddam'', ] alleges that US forces attempted to cover up the incident.<ref>{{Citation |first=John |last=Simpson |title=The Wars Against Saddam |publisher=MacMillan |place=Basingstoke |year=2003}}</ref> After the incident, the commander of the 1st Brigade said: "I know burying people like that sounds pretty nasty, but it would be even nastier if we had to put our troops in the trenches and clean them out with bayonets."<ref name="Sloyan 1991-9-12" /> Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney did not mention the First Division's tactics in an interim report to Congress on Operation Desert Storm.<ref name=":0" /> In the report, Cheney acknowledged that 457 enemy soldiers were buried during the ground war.<ref name=":0" />

===Palestinian exodus from Kuwait===
{{Main|Palestinian exodus from Kuwait (1990–91)}}

A ] took place during and after the Gulf War. During the Gulf War, more than 200,000 Palestinians fled Kuwait during the ] due to harassment and intimidation by Iraqi security forces,<ref name="ir"/> in addition to getting fired from work by Iraqi authority figures in Kuwait.<ref name=ir>{{cite web|author=Shafeeq Ghabra|title=The PLO in Kuwait|url=http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/1457|date=8 May 1991|access-date=2 September 2013|archive-date=7 March 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230307074924/https://www.greenleft.org.au/node/1457|url-status=dead}}</ref> After the Gulf War, the Kuwaiti authorities forcibly pressured nearly 200,000 Palestinians to leave Kuwait in 1991.<ref name="ir"/> Kuwait's policy, which led to this exodus, was a response to alignment of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and the PLO with Saddam Hussein.

The Palestinians who fled Kuwait were ].<ref name=jor>{{cite journal|author1=Yann Le Troquer |author2=Rozenn Hommery al-Oudat |title=From Kuwait to Jordan: The Palestinians' Third Exodus |journal=Journal of Palestine Studies|volume=28 |issue=3 |date=Spring 1999|pages=37–51|jstor=2538306 |doi=10.2307/2538306 }}</ref> In 2013, 280,000 Jordanian citizens of Palestinian origin lived in Kuwait.<ref name=mon>{{cite web |title=Jordanians of Kuwait |url=http://www.joshuaproject.net/countries.php?rog3=KU|work=]|year=2013}}</ref> In 2012, 80,000 Palestinians (without Jordanian ]) lived in Kuwait.<ref name=monitor>{{cite news|url=http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/04/palestinians-open-kuwait-embassy.html|work=Al Monitor|title=Palestinians Open Kuwaiti Embassy|date=23 May 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130522150710/http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/04/palestinians-open-kuwait-embassy.html|archive-date=22 May 2013}}</ref>

Saudi Arabia expelled ]i workers after Yemen supported Saddam during the Gulf War.<ref>" {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180922211449/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/yemen/8557546/Yemens-president-flees-for-medical-treatment-as-search-for-new-leader-begins.html |date=22 September 2018 }}". ''The Daily Telegraph''. 5 June 2011</ref>

===Coalition bombing of Iraq's civilian infrastructure===
In the 23 June 1991 edition of ''The Washington Post'', reporter Bart Gellman wrote:
{{blockquote|Many of the targets were chosen only secondarily to contribute to the military defeat of Iraq&nbsp;... Military planners hoped the bombing would amplify the economic and psychological impact of international sanctions on Iraqi society&nbsp;... They deliberately did great harm to Iraq's ability to support itself as an industrial society&nbsp;...<ref>23 June 1991, Washington Post, Bart Gellman</ref>}}
In the Jan/Feb 1995 edition of ''Foreign Affairs'', French diplomat Eric Rouleau wrote:
{{blockquote|he Iraqi people, who were not consulted about the invasion, have paid the price for their government's madness&nbsp;... Iraqis understood the legitimacy of a military action to drive their army from Kuwait, but they have had difficulty comprehending the Allied rationale for using air power to systematically destroy or cripple Iraqi infrastructure and industry: electric power stations (92 percent of installed capacity destroyed), refineries (80 percent of production capacity), petrochemical complexes, telecommunications centers (including 135 telephone networks), bridges (more than 100), roads, highways, railroads, hundreds of locomotives and boxcars full of goods, radio and television broadcasting stations, cement plants, and factories producing aluminum, textiles, electric cables, and medical supplies.<ref>"The View From France: America's Unyielding Policy toward Iraq," ''Foreign Affairs'', Vol. 74, No. 1, January/February 1995, pp.61–62</ref>}}
However, the UN subsequently spent billions rebuilding hospitals, schools, and ] facilities throughout the country.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Rubin |first=Michael |title=Sanctions on Iraq: A Valid Anti-American Grievance? |journal=] |volume=5 |issue=4 |url=http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2001/issue4/mrubin.pdf |pages=100–115 |date=December 2001 |author-link=Michael Rubin (historian) |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060907153101/http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2001/issue4/mrubin.pdf |archive-date=7 September 2006 |access-date=24 May 2017}}</ref>

===Abuse of Coalition POWs===
During the conflict, coalition aircrew shot down over Iraq were displayed as prisoners of war on TV, most with visible signs of abuse. Amongst several testimonies to poor treatment,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/war/ |title=Frontline: War Stories |publisher=Pbs.org |access-date=1 February 2011}}</ref> USAF Captain Richard Storr was allegedly tortured by Iraqis during the Persian Gulf War. Iraqi secret police broke his nose, dislocated his shoulder and punctured his eardrum.<ref>Patrice O'Shaughness. "Gulf War POW denounces abuse of Iraqi detainees". ''New York Daily News''. 12 May 2004.</ref> Royal Air Force ] crew ] and ] have both alleged that they were tortured during this time.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.johnnichol.com/The%20Beginning.htm |title=The Flight That Changed My Life |publisher=Johnnichol.com |access-date=1 February 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110429013825/http://www.johnnichol.com/The%20Beginning.htm |archive-date=29 April 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/war/4.html |title=War Story:John Peters |publisher=Pbs.org |access-date=1 February 2011}}</ref> Nichol and Peters were forced to make statements against the war on television. Members of British Special Air Service Bravo Two Zero were captured while providing information about an Iraqi supply line of Scud missiles to coalition forces. Only one, Chris Ryan, evaded capture while the group's other surviving members were violently tortured.<ref>''The One that Got Away'' by Chris Ryan & ''Bravo Two Zero'' by Andy McNab</ref> Flight surgeon (later General) ] was sexually assaulted by one of her captors<ref name=Time>{{cite news |url=http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,438760,00.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030404061056/http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,438760,00.html |archive-date=4 April 2003 |title=A Woman's Burden |magazine=] |date=28 March 2003}}</ref> after the ] in which she was riding was shot down while searching for a downed ] pilot.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

===Operation Southern Watch===
{{Main|Operation Southern Watch}}
Since the war, the US has had a continued presence of 5,000 troops stationed in Saudi Arabia{{snd}}a figure that rose to 10,000 during the 2003 conflict in Iraq.<ref name="bbc">{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2984547.stm|title=US pulls out of Saudi Arabia |access-date=29 November 2009 |work=BBC News |date=29 April 2003}}</ref> Operation Southern Watch enforced the ] over southern Iraq set up after 1991; oil exports through the Persian Gulf's shipping lanes were protected by the Bahrain-based ].{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

Since Saudi Arabia houses Mecca and Medina, Islam's holiest sites, many Muslims were upset at the permanent military presence. The continued presence of U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia after the war was one of the stated motivations behind the ],<ref name="bbc"/> the ], and the date chosen for the ] (7 August), which was eight years to the day that US troops were sent to Saudi Arabia.<ref>Plotz, David (2001) {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110810171041/http://www.slate.com/default.aspx?id=115404 |date=10 August 2011 }}, Slate</ref> ] interpreted the Islamic prophet ] as banning the "permanent presence of infidels in Arabia".<ref name="holywar-p3">{{cite book|author=Bergen, Peter L. |title=Holy War Inc. |publisher=Simon & Schuster |year=2001 |page=3}}</ref> In 1996, bin Laden issued a ], calling for US troops to leave Saudi Arabia. In a December 1999 interview with ], bin Laden said he felt that Americans were "too near to Mecca" and considered this a provocation to the entire Islamic world.<ref name="guardian-20010926">{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/g2/story/0,3604,558075,00.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080119011449/http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0%2C3604%2C558075%2C00.html |archive-date=19 January 2008 |title=Face to face with Osama |work=The Guardian |location=London |date=26 September 2001 |access-date=30 June 2010 |first=Rahimullah |last=Yusufzai }}</ref>

===Sanctions===
{{Main|United Nations Security Council Resolution 661|Sanctions against Iraq}}
{{Wikisource|United Nations Security Council Resolution 661}}
On 6 August 1990, after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 661 which imposed economic sanctions on Iraq, providing for a full trade ], excluding medical supplies, food and other items of humanitarian necessity, these to be determined by the council's sanctions committee. From 1991 until 2003, the effects of government policy and sanctions regime led to ], widespread poverty and malnutrition.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

During the late 1990s, the UN considered relaxing the sanctions imposed because of the hardships suffered by ordinary Iraqis. Studies dispute the number of people who died in south and central Iraq during the years of the sanctions.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.unicef.org/newsline/99pr29.htm |title=Iraq surveys show 'humanitarian emergency' |website=UNICEF |date=12 August 1999 |access-date=29 November 2009 |archive-date=6 August 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090806193122/http://www.unicef.org/newsline/99pr29.htm }}</ref><ref name=Spagat>{{cite magazine |url=http://personal.rhul.ac.uk/uhte/014/Truth%20and%20Death.pdf |title=Truth and death in Iraq under sanctions |first=Michael |last=Spagat |date=September 2010 |magazine=] |access-date=21 December 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180711190050/http://personal.rhul.ac.uk/uhte/014/Truth%20and%20Death.pdf |archive-date=11 July 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Rubin |first=Michael |title=Sanctions on Iraq: A Valid Anti-American Grievance? |journal=] |volume=5 |issue=4 |url=http://www.iraqwatch.org/perspectives/meria-rubin-sanctions-1201.htm |pages=100–115 |date=December 2001 |author-link=Michael Rubin (historian) |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121028003924/http://www.iraqwatch.org/perspectives/meria-rubin-sanctions-1201.htm |archive-date=28 October 2012}}</ref><ref name="Dyson & Cetorelli 2017">{{Cite journal|last1=Dyson|first1=Tim|last2=Cetorelli|first2=Valeria|date=2017-07-01|title=Changing views on child mortality and economic sanctions in Iraq: a history of lies, damned lies and statistics|journal=BMJ Global Health|language=en|volume=2|issue=2|pages=e000311|doi=10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000311|pmid=29225933|issn=2059-7908|pmc=5717930}}</ref>

===Draining of the Qurna Marshes===
{{Main|Draining of the Mesopotamian Marshes}}
The draining of the ] was an irrigation project in Iraq during and immediately after the war, to drain a large area of ] in the ]. Formerly covering an area of around {{Convert|3000|km2|abbr=on}}, the large complex of ] were nearly emptied of water, and the local Shi'ite population relocated, following the war and 1991 uprisings. By 2000, the ] estimated that 90% of the marshlands had disappeared, causing ] of over {{convert|7500|sqmi|km2}}.{{Citation needed|date=August 2010}}

The draining occurred in Iraq and to a smaller degree in Iran between the 1950s and 1990s to clear large areas of the marshes. Formerly covering an area of around {{Convert|20000|km2|abbr=on}}, the large complex of wetlands was 90% drained before the ]. The marshes are typically divided into three main sub-marshes, the ], Central, and ] and all three were drained at different times for different reasons. Initial draining of the Central Marshes was intended to reclaim land for agriculture but later all three marshes would become a tool of war and revenge.<ref name=":1" />

Many international organizations such as the ], the ], the ], and Middle East Watch have described the project as a political attempt to force the ] out of the area through water diversion tactics.<ref name=":1">{{cite web |url=http://www1.american.edu/ted/marsh.htm |title=Marsh Arabs |access-date=1 August 2010 |publisher=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100627142037/http://www1.american.edu/ted/marsh.htm |archive-date=27 June 2010}}</ref>

===Oil spill===
{{Main|Gulf War oil spill}}
On 23 January, Iraq dumped {{convert|400|e6USgal|m3}} of ] into the Persian Gulf,{{#tag:Ref|Note: The cited supporting source<ref name=dukemag030403 /> uses the term ''Arabian Gulf'' to name this body of water. This article uses the proper name ''Persian Gulf''. For more information, see the ] article.}} causing the largest offshore ] in history at that time.<ref name=dukemag030403>{{cite web |url=http://www.dukemagazine.duke.edu/dukemag/issues/030403/oil1.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100613021006/http://www.dukemagazine.duke.edu/dukemag/issues/030403/oil1.html|archive-date=2010-06-13 |title=Duke Magazine-Oil Spill-After the Deluge |author=Jeffrey Pollack |date=Mar–Apr 2003 |work=Duke Magazine |access-date=1 February 2011}}</ref> It was reported as a deliberate natural resources attack to keep US Marines from coming ashore (''Missouri'' and ''Wisconsin'' had shelled ] during the war to reinforce the idea that there would be an amphibious assault attempt).<ref name="Desert Storm">{{cite web|title=V: "Thunder And Lightning"- The War With Iraq (Subsection:The War at Sea) |work=The United States Navy in "Desert Shield" / "Desert Storm" |url=http://www.history.navy.mil/wars/dstorm/ds5.htm |publisher=] |access-date=26 November 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061205022732/http://history.navy.mil/wars/dstorm/ds5.htm |archive-date=5 December 2006 }}</ref> About 30–40% of this came from allied raids on Iraqi coastal targets.<ref>{{cite book|author=Leckie, Robert |title=The Wars of America |url=https://archive.org/details/warsofamerica00robe |url-access=registration |publisher=Castle Books |year=1998|isbn=978-0-7858-0914-2 }}</ref>

===Kuwaiti oil fires===
{{Main|Kuwaiti oil fires}}
{{See also|Environmental impact of war}}
]
The Kuwaiti oil fires were caused by the ] setting fire to 700 oil wells as part of a scorched earth policy while retreating from Kuwait in 1991 after conquering the country but being driven out by coalition forces. The fires started in January and February 1991, and the last one was extinguished by November.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://earthshots.usgs.gov/Iraq/Iraqtext|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20021028200910/http://earthshots.usgs.gov/Iraq/Iraqtext|archive-date=2002-10-28|title="Iraq and Kuwait: 1972, 1990, 1991, 1997." Earthshots: Satellite Images of Environmental Change|last=Wellman|first=Robert Campbell|date=14 February 1999|publisher=U.S. Geological Survey|access-date=27 July 2010}}</ref>

The resulting fires burned uncontrollably because of the dangers of sending in firefighting crews. ] had been placed in areas around the oil wells, and a military cleaning of the areas was necessary before the fires could be put out. Somewhere around {{convert|6|Moilbbl|m3|-4}} of oil were lost each day. Eventually, privately contracted crews extinguished the fires, at a total cost of US$1.5&nbsp;billion to Kuwait.<ref>{{cite book|last=Husain |first=T. |title=Kuwaiti Oil Fires: Regional Environmental Perspectives |year=1995 |publisher=BPC Wheatons Ltd |location=Oxford |page=68}}</ref> By that time, however, the fires had burned for approximately 10 months, causing widespread pollution.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

==Cost==
]
The cost of the war to the United States was calculated by the US Congress in April 1992 to be $61.1&nbsp;billion<ref name="autogenerated2">{{cite web|url=http://people.psych.cornell.edu/~fhoran/gulf/GW_cost/GW_payments.html |title=How much did the Gulf War cost the US? |publisher=People.psych.cornell.edu |date=20 May 1997 |access-date=1 February 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100821200403/http://people.psych.cornell.edu/~fhoran/gulf/GW_cost/GW_payments.html |archive-date=21 August 2010}}</ref> (equivalent to ${{Format price|{{Inflation|US-GDP|61100000000|1992}}}} in {{Inflation-year|US-GDP}}).{{Inflation-fn|US-GDP}} About $52&nbsp;billion of that amount was paid by other countries: $36&nbsp;billion by Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and other Arab states of the Persian Gulf; $16&nbsp;billion by Germany and Japan (which sent no combat forces due to their constitutions). About 25% of Saudi Arabia's contribution was paid with in-kind services to the troops, such as food and transportation.<ref name="autogenerated2" /> US troops represented about 74% of the combined force, and the global cost was therefore higher.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

===Effect on developing countries===
Apart from the impact on ], the resulting economic disruptions after the crisis affected many states. The ] (ODI) undertook a study in 1991 to assess the effects on developing states and the international community's response. A briefing paper finalized on the day that the conflict ended draws on their findings which had two main conclusions: Many developing states were severely affected and while there has been a considerable response to the crisis, the distribution of assistance was highly selective.<ref name="odi.org.uk">{{cite web|title=The Impact of the Gulf Crisis on Developing Countries|url=http://www.odi.org.uk/resources/details.asp?id=5466&title=gulf-crisis-impact-ldcs|work=ODI Briefing Paper|date=March 1991|access-date=29 June 2011|archive-date=3 August 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120803110221/http://www.odi.org.uk/resources/details.asp?id=5466&title=gulf-crisis-impact-ldcs}}</ref>

The ODI factored in elements of "cost" which included oil imports, remittance flows, re-settlement costs, loss of export earnings and tourism. For Egypt, the cost totaled $1&nbsp;billion, 3% of GDP. Yemen had a cost of $830&nbsp;million, 10% of GDP, while it cost Jordan $1.8&nbsp;billion, 32% of GDP.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Peters |first1=John E |url=https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2007/MR629.pdf |title=Out of Area or Out of Reach? European Military Support for Operations in Southwest Asia |last2=Deshong |first2=Howard |publisher=] |year=1995 |isbn=978-0-8330-2329-2}}</ref>{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

International response to the crisis on developing states came with the channeling of aid through The Gulf Crisis Financial Co-ordination Group. They were 24 states, comprising most of the OECD countries plus some Gulf states: Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Kuwait. The members of this group agreed to disperse $14&nbsp;billion in development assistance.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}

The World Bank responded by speeding up the disbursement of existing project and adjustment loans. The ] adopted two lending facilities{{snd}}the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility (ESAF) and the Compensatory & Contingency Financing Facility (CCFF). The ] offered $2&nbsp;billion{{clarify|date=August 2011}} in assistance.<ref name="odi.org.uk" />

==Media coverage==
{{Main|Media coverage of the Gulf War}}
{{Globalize|section|date=January 2010}}
US policy regarding media freedom was much more restrictive than in the ].<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120426005120/http://www.iraquenewst55.jex.com.br/3+guerra+terrorismo/o+maior+bombardeio+da+historia|date=26 April 2012}}, access on 27 November 2011.</ref> The policy had been spelled out in a Pentagon document entitled '']''. Most of the press information came from briefings organized by the military. Only selected journalists were allowed to visit the front lines or conduct interviews with soldiers. Those visits were always conducted in the presence of officers, and were subject to both prior approval by the military and censorship afterward. This was ostensibly to protect sensitive information from being revealed to Iraq. This policy was heavily influenced by the military's experience with the Vietnam War, in which public opposition within the US grew throughout the war's course. It was not only the limitation of information in the Middle East; media were also restricting what was shown about the war with more graphic depictions like ]'s image of a burnt Iraqi soldier being pulled from the American AP wire whereas in Europe it was given extensive coverage.<ref name="AJR">{{cite web |year=2007 |url=http://www.ajr.org/article_printable.asp?id=3759 |title=Images of War |publisher=AJR |access-date=20 July 2007 |last=Lori Robertson |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130724001706/http://www.ajr.org/article_printable.asp?id=3759 |archive-date=24 July 2013}}</ref><ref name="BBC.4528745">{{cite news |date=9 May 2005|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4528745.stm|title=Picture power: Death of an Iraqi soldier|work=BBC News|access-date=14 October 2010 |last=Ken Jarecke's account to the BBC World Service programme}}</ref><ref name="FamousPictures">{{cite web |year=2007 |url=http://www.famouspictures.org/iraqi-soldier/|title=Famous Pictures Magazine{{snd}}Iraqi Soldier|publisher=Famous Pictures Magazine|access-date=23 May 2013 |last=Lucas, Dean}}</ref>

Two BBC journalists, John Simpson and ] (no relation), defied their editors and remained in Baghdad to report on the war's progress. They were responsible for a report which included an "infamous cruise missile that travelled down a street and turned left at a traffic light."<ref>{{cite news |author=Peter Ruff |date=31 July 2006 |title=Obituary: Bob Simpson |newspaper=The Guardian |location=London |url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2006/jul/31/broadcasting.guardianobituaries |access-date=4 September 2011}}</ref>

Alternative media outlets provided views opposing the war.<ref>{{cite web |title=Memória Globo |url=http://memoriaglobo.globo.com/Memoriaglobo/0%2C27723%2CGYN0-5273-256436%2C00.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110725085143/http://memoriaglobo.globo.com/Memoriaglobo/0%2C27723%2CGYN0-5273-256436%2C00.html |archive-date=25 July 2011 |access-date=2017-03-26}}, access on 29 March 2011.</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Livraria da Folha{{snd}}Livro conta como Guerra do Golfo colocou a CNN no foco internacional{{snd}}08/09/2010 |url=http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/livrariadafolha/794646-livro-conta-como-guerra-do-golfo-colocou-a-cnn-no-foco-internacional.shtml |access-date=13 May 2011 |publisher=.folha.uol.com.br}}</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130204020203/http://www.colegioweb.com.br/historia/guerra-do-golfo.html|date=4 February 2013}}, accessed on 29 March 2011</ref> Deep Dish Television compiled segments from independent producers in the US and abroad, and produced a 10-hour series that was distributed internationally, called The Gulf Crisis TV Project.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.deepdishtv.org/Series/Default.aspx?id=4 |title=Series (The Gulf Crisis TV Project) |date=11 July 2010 |access-date=17 January 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100711090755/http://www.deepdishtv.org/Series/Default.aspx?id=4 |archive-date=11 July 2010 }}</ref> The series' first program ''War, Oil and Power''<ref>{{cite web |url=https://archive.org/details/ddtv_50_war_oil_and_power|title=War, Oil and Power|access-date=17 January 2017|via=Internet Archive}}</ref> was compiled and released in 1990, before the war broke out. ''News World Order'' was the title of another program in the series; it focused on the media's complicity in promoting the war, as well as Americans' reactions to the media coverage.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://archive.org/details/ddtv_56_new_world_order|title=News World Order|access-date=17 January 2017|via=Internet Archive}}</ref>

] group ] (FAIR) critically analyzed media coverage during the war in various articles and books, such as the 1991 ''Gulf War Coverage: The Worst Censorship was at Home''.<ref name="fair.org.1518">{{cite web |date=April 1991 |url=https://fair.org/extra/gulf-war-coverage/|title=Gulf War Coverage: The Worst Censorship Was at Home|publisher=] (FAIR)|access-date=14 October 2010 |last=Naureckas|first=Jim |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160406043739/https://fair.org/extra/gulf-war-coverage/ |archive-date=2016-04-06 |url-status=live}}</ref>


==Technology== ==Technology==
{{Further|List of Gulf War military equipment}}
] launches a ].]]
] launching a ]. The Gulf War was the last conflict in which ]s were deployed in a combat role.]]
] (PGMs, also "smart bombs"), such as the ] guided missile AGM-130, were heralded as key in allowing military strikes to be made with a minimum of civilian casualties compared to previous wars. Specific buildings in downtown ] could be bombed whilst journalists in their hotels watched cruise missiles fly by. PGMs amounted to approximately 7.4% of all bombs dropped by the coalition. Other bombs included ]s, which break up into clusters of bomblets, and ], 15,000-pound bombs which can disintegrate everything within hundreds of yards.
]s were heralded as key in allowing military strikes to be made with a minimum of civilian casualties compared to previous wars, although they were not used as often as more traditional, less accurate bombs. Specific buildings in downtown Baghdad could be bombed while journalists in their hotels watched cruise missiles fly by.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}


Precision-guided munitions amounted to approximately 7.4% of all bombs dropped by the coalition. Other bombs included ]s, which disperse numerous submunitions,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/dumb/cluster.htm |title=Dumb Bombs |publisher=Fas.org |access-date=18 March 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100328110957/http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/dumb/cluster.htm |archive-date=28 March 2010}}</ref> and ], 15,000-pound bombs which can disintegrate everything within hundreds of yards.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}
] is a tactical ballistic missile that the Soviet Union developed and deployed among the forward deployed Red Army divisions in Eastern Germany. The role of the Scuds which were armed with nuclear and chemical warheads was to destroy Command and Control, Communication Facilities and delay full mobilisation of Western German and Allied Forces in Germany. It could also be used to directly target ground forces. Scud missiles utilise inertial guidance which operates for the duration that the Engines operate. Iraq used Scud missiles, launching them into both Saudi Arabia and Israel. Some bombs caused extensive casualties, others caused little damage. Concerns were raised of possible chemical or biological warheads on these rockets, but if they existed they were not used. Scud missile are not as effective at delivering chemical payloads as is commonly believed because intense heat during the Scud's flight at approximately Mach 5 denatures most of the chemical payload. Chemical weapons are inherently better suited to being delivered by cruise missiles or fighter bombers. The Scud is best suited to delivering tactical nuclear warheads, a role for which it is as capable today as it was when it was first developed.


] (GPS) units were relatively new at the time and were important in enabling coalition units to easily navigate across the desert. Since military GPS receivers were not available for most troops, many used commercially available units. To permit these to be used to best effect, the "selective availability" feature of the GPS system was turned off for the duration of Desert Storm, allowing these commercial receivers to provide the same precision as the military equipment.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sVgf41ic6LgC&q=gulf%20war%20gps&pg=PR4|title=GPS for Dummies|first=Joel|last=McNamara|isbn=978-0-470-19923-7|year=2007|publisher=John Wiley & Sons }}</ref>
America's ] was used for the first time in combat. The U.S. military claimed to have shot down many Scud rockets in flight, with an effectiveness of 100%. Afterwards, it was demonstrated that the Patriots' effectiveness was primarily psychological: some claim that their effectiveness was as low as between 0% to 10%. Further, there is at least one incident of a software error causing a Patriot missile to fail, resulting in deaths. However, there really is no good evidence to prove whether the Scuds were intercepted or not, so no figures are really backed up by undisputed facts. The higher figures tend to be calculated based on the percentage of Scud warheads which were known to have impacted and exploded compared to the number of Scud missiles launched, but due to factors such as duds, misses and impacts which were not reported (some Scud variations were re-engineered in a manner outside their original tolerance, and said to have frequently failed or broken up in flight), this is not really a good way to measure effectiveness. The lowest figures are typically based upon the number of interceptions where there is proof that the warhead was hit by at least one missile, but due to the way the poorly built Al-Hussein (Scud derivative) missiles broke up in flight, it was often hard to tell which piece was the warhead, and there were few radar tracks which were actually stored which could be analyzed later, hence the very low figures. Realistically the actual performance was probably somewhere in between. The U.S. Army maintains the Patriot delivered a "miracle performance" in the Gulf War. {{ref|www.ceip.org.42}}


] (AWACS) and satellite communication systems were also important. Two examples of this are the US Navy's ] and the US Air Force's ]. Both were used in command and control area of operations. These systems provided essential communications links between air, ground, and naval forces. It is one of several reasons coalition forces dominated the air war.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}
] units were key in enabling coalition units to navigate easily across the desert. ] (AWACS) and satellite communication systems were also important..


American-made color photocopiers were used to produce some of Iraq's battle plans. Some of the copiers contained concealed high-tech transmitters that revealed their positions to American ], leading to more precise bombings.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.economist.com/node/18527456 |title=Something wrong with our **** chips today |newspaper=The Economist |date=7 April 2011|access-date=13 June 2011}}</ref>
==See also==
===See also===
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*], ], ]
*]
*]
*]
*]


===Films about the Gulf War=== ===Scud and Patriot missiles===
]
*'']
The role of Iraq's Scud missiles featured prominently in the war. Scud is a tactical ] that the Soviet Union developed and deployed among the forward deployed ] ] in ].{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}
*'']
*'']
*'']
*'']


Scud missiles utilize inertial guidance which operates for the duration that the engines operate. Iraq used Scud missiles, launching them into both Saudi Arabia and Israel. Some missiles caused extensive casualties, while others caused little damage.{{citation needed|date=March 2017}}
===Further reading===

*Felicity Arbuthnot. ''Allies Deliberately Poisoned Iraq Public Water Supply In Gulf War''{{ref|www.commondreams.org.43}} September 17, 2000. Sunday Herald (Scotland)
The US Patriot missile was used in combat for the first time. The US military claimed a high effectiveness against Scuds at the time, but later analysis gives figures as low as 9%, with 45% of the 158 Patriot launches being against debris or false targets.<ref name="Cirincione"/> The ], which also sent Patriot missiles to protect civilians in Israel and Turkey, later disputed the higher claim.<ref name=nederland2009 /> Further, there is at least one incident of a software error causing a Patriot missile's failure to engage an incoming Scud, resulting in deaths.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ima.umn.edu/~arnold/disasters/patriot.html |title=The Patriot Missile Failure |publisher=Ima.umn.edu |access-date=1 February 2011}}</ref> Both the US Army and the missile manufacturers maintained the Patriot delivered a "miracle performance" in the Gulf War.<ref name="Cirincione">{{cite web |first=Joseph |last=Cirincione |author-link=Joseph Cirincione |title=The Performance of the Patriot Missile in the war |url=http://www.ceip.org/files/projects/npp/resources/georgetown/PatriotPaper.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20031223120310/http://www.ceip.org/files/projects/npp/resources/georgetown/PatriotPaper.pdf |publisher=]|date=October 1992 |archive-date=23 December 2003 |access-date=4 December 2005}}</ref>
*Rick Atkinson and Ann Devroy. ''U.S. Claims Iraqi Nuclear Reactors Hit Hard''{{ref|www.washingtonpost.com.44}} Jan 12, 1991. Washington Post.

*Mitchell Bard. ''The Gulf War.''{{ref|refbot.45}} Jewish virtual library.
==Popular culture==
*BBC News. ''Timeline: War in the Gulf''{{ref|news.bbc.co.uk.46}} August 2000.
The Gulf War has been the subject of several video games including '']'', '']'', '']'', and '']''. There have also been numerous depictions in film including '']'' (2005), which is based on US Marine ]'s 2003 ].<ref>{{Cite news|issn = 0261-3077|last = Adams|first = Tim|title = Observer review: Jarhead by Anthony Swofford|work = The Guardian|access-date = 2018-06-13|date = 2003-03-23|url = https://www.theguardian.com/books/2003/mar/23/biography.writersoniraq}}</ref> The 2016 ] movie ] is based on ], the evacuation of Indian citizens stranded in Kuwait during the Gulf War.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.wionews.com/photos/pics-from-kuwait-airlift-in-1990-to-operation-ganga-in-2022-here-are-a-few-evacuation-missions-by-india-457085#:~:text=Kuwait%20airlift%201990,the%20course%20of%20two%20months|title=Pics: From Kuwait airlift in 1990 to operation Ganga in 2022, here are a few evacuation missions by India|date=27 February 2022}}</ref>
*William Blum. ''Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II''{{ref|members.aol.com.47}} 1995. Common Courage Press. ISBN 1567510523

*Christoper Bolkom and Jonathan Pike. ''Attack Aircraft Proliferation: Areas for Concern''{{ref|www.fas.org.48}}
==See also==
*Miland Brown. ''First Gulf War''{{ref|www.libraryreference.org.49}}
{{div col|colwidth=27em}}
*Daniel Forbes. ''Gulf War crimes?''{{ref|www.salon.com.50}} May 15, 2000. Salon Magazine.
* ]
*T. M. Hawley. ''Against the Fires of Hell: The Environmental Disaster of the Gulf War''. 1992. ISBN 0-15-103969-0.
* ]
*Dilip Hiro. '']''. 1992. Routledge.
* ]
*Ronald Andrew Hoskinson and Norman Jarvis. ''Gulf War Photo Gallery''{{ref|www.hoskinson.net.51}} 1994.
* ]
*Gilles Kepel. "From the Gulf War to the Taliban Jihad." ''Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam.'' 2002.
* ]
*Allan Little. ''Iraq coming in from the cold?''{{ref|news.bbc.co.uk.52}} December 1, 1997. BBC.
* ]
*John MacArthur. ''Independent Policy Forum Luncheon Honoring''{{ref|www.whatreallyhappened.com.53}}
* ]
* ] 2006. ISBN 1845111281.
* ]
*Naval Historical Center. ''The United States Navy in Desert Shield/Desert Storm''{{ref|www.history.navy.mil.54}} May 15, 1991.
* ]
*Larry A. Niksch and Robert G. Sutter. ''Japan's Response to the Persian Gulf Crisis: Implications for U.S.-Japan Relations''{{ref|digital.library.unt.edu.55}} May 23, 1991. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
*] and ]. ''The Gulf War Reader''. 1991. ISBN 0812919475. * ]
{{div col end}}
*], ''George Bush's War'', New York: Henry Holt & Company, 1992.
*Peter Turnley. ''The Unseen Gulf War'' (photo essay){{ref|www.digitaljournalist.org.56}} December 2002.
*Paul Walker and Eric Stambler. ''...and the dirty little weapons''{{ref|www.bullatomsci.org.57}} 1991. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol 47, Number 4.
*Andre Gunder Frank. ''Third World War in the Gulf: A New World Order''{{ref|rrojasdatabank.info.58}}May 20, 1991. Political Economy Notebooks for Study and Research, no. 14, pp. 5-34.
*PBS Frontline. ''The Gulf War:an in-depth examination of the 1990-1991 Persian Gulf crisis''{{ref|www.pbs.org.59}}
* Report to Congress on the Conduct of the Persian Gulf War, Chapter 6{{ref|es.rice.edu.60}}


==Notes== ==Notes==
{{reflist |group=lower-alpha |refs=
<div style="font-size: 85%">
<ref name=numbering>
# {{note|coalition01}} The reported number of countries participating in the Coalition varies according to source. These variations may be in part be due to uncertainty over what level of participation constitutes being a Coalition member, and vagueness over the organization timeline of the Coalition. Examples of count variations include: ; ; ; ; . The number of Coalition members has been reported to be as low as at the beginning of the air campaign.
The numbering of Persian Gulf conflicts depends on whether the ] (1980–1988) is referred to as the First (Persian) Gulf War (English language sources prior to the start of the Kuwait war in 1990 usually called it the Gulf War), which would make the 1990 war the Second (Persian) Gulf War. Different sources may call the conflicts by different names. The name ']' is itself a subject of ]. The start date of the Kuwait War can also be seen as either August 1990 (when Iraq's ] invaded ]) or as January 1991 (the start of Operation Desert Storm, when the US-led coalition forced Iraq out of Kuwait), so that the war is also often called the 1991 Gulf War, the 1990–1991 Gulf War, the 1990s Gulf War, etc ... This dating is also used to distinguish it from the other two 'Gulf Wars'.</ref>
# {{note|www.army.mil.25}} {{cite web | title=U.S. Army Professional Writing | url=http://www.army.mil/professionalwriting/volumes/volume1/july_2003/7_03_2v2.html | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
}}
# {{note|web.sipri.org.26}} {{cite web | title=- Arms transfers to Iraq, 1970-2004 | url=http://web.sipri.org/contents/armstrad/atirq_data.html | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}

# {{note|www.army.mil.27}} {{cite web | title=U.S. Army Professional Writing (See above) | url=http://www.army.mil/professionalwriting/volumes/volume1/july_2003/7_03_2v2.html | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
==References==
# {{note|www.gulfweb.org.28}} {{cite web | title=Senator Riegle's Report | url=http://www.gulfweb.org/bigdoc/report/riegle1.html | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
{{Reflist|24em|refs=
# {{note|www.gwu.edu.29}} {{cite web | title=Shaking Hands with Saddam Hussein | url=http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/index.htm | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
<ref name="VUA Citation">Desert Storm/Shield Valorous Unit Award Citations.{{full citation needed|date=May 2022}}</ref>
# {{note|archive.gao.gov.30}} {{cite web | title=T-NSIAD-91-13 Iraq's Participation in the Commodity Credit Corporation's GSM-102/103 Export Credit Guarantee Programs | url=http://archive.gao.gov/d38t12/143407.pdf | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
}}
# {{note|www.army.mil.31}} {{cite web | title=U.S. Army Professional Writing (See above) | url=http://www.army.mil/professionalwriting/volumes/volume1/july_2003/7_03_2v2.html | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}

# {{note|refbot.32}} {{cite web | title=More U.S. Exports to Iraq?, by John Haldane, Nov. 26, 1984 | url=http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/112684/841126008.html | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
===Works cited===
# {{note|thomas.loc.gov.33}} {{cite web | title=Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress) | url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d100:SN02763:@@@L&summ2=m& | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
{{Refbegin}}
# {{note|www.fas.org.34}} {{cite web | title=http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/nsd/nsd26.pdf | url=http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/nsd/nsd26.pdf | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
* {{cite book|first=Stephen A.|last=Bourque |title=Jayhawk! The 7th Corps in the Persian Gulf War |publisher=Center of Military History, United States Army|date=2001 |lccn=2001028533|oclc=51313637}}
# {{note|www.globalsecurity.org}} {{cite web | title=Iraqi Air Force Equipment - Introduction | url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iraq/air-force-equipment-intro.htm | accessdate=January 18 | accessyear=2005 }}
* {{cite book |first1=Stephen A. |last1=Bourque |first2=John |last2=Burdan |year=2007 |title=The road to Safwan the 1st Squadron, 4th Cavalry in the 1991 Persian Gulf War |publisher=University of North Texas Press |location=Denton, TX |isbn=978-1-57441-232-1}}
# {{note|www.whitehouse.gov.35}} {{cite web | title=Apparatus of Lies: Crafting Tragedy | url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/ogc/apparatus/crafting.html#3 | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
*{{cite web |last1=Hillman |first1=James L. |title=Task Force 1-41 Infantry: The Fratricide Experience in Southwest Asia |url=http://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a264134.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141226024546/http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a264134.pdf |url-status=live |archive-date=December 26, 2014 |publisher=US Army War College |location=Carlisle Barracks, PA |access-date=26 December 2014 |date=1993 |oclc=28169776}}
# {{note|Pope}} {{cite web | title= "Cheney changed his view on Iraq", by Charles Pope, ''Seattle Post-Intelligencer'', September 29, 2004 | url=http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/192908_cheney29.html | accessdate=January 7 | accessyear=2005 }}
* ''Desert Storm: Ground War'' by Hans Halberstadt
# {{note|www.pbs.org.36}} {{cite web | title=frontline: the gulf war: appendix: iraqi death toll | url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/appendix/death.html | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
* Challenger Squadron by Simon Dunstan
# {{note|www.who.int.37}} {{cite web | title=WHO : Depleted Uranium | url=http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/env/du/en/ | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
* Desert Rats:The British 4 and 7 Armoured Brigades, WW2 to Today by Hans Halberstadt
# {{note|www.au.af.mil.38}} {{cite web | title=Fact Sheet on the Health Effects of Depleted Uranium | url=http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/state/1007dufactsheet.htm | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
*{{cite book|first=Thomas D.|last=Dinackus|title=Order of Battle: Allied Ground Forces of Operation Desert Storm|publisher= Hellgate Press|place=], Oregon|date=2000|isbn=978-1-55571-493-2}}
# {{note|www.ccnr.org.39}} {{cite web | title=Gulf War Veterans and Depleted Uranium | url=http://www.ccnr.org/du_hague.html | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
* Burton, James G. ''The Pentagon Wars: Reformers Challenge the Old Guard'', Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 1993. {{ISBN|978-1-55750-081-6}}.
# {{note|www.royalsoc.ac.uk.40}} {{cite web | title=Royal Society : Science issues : Depleted uranium | url=http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/landing.asp?id=1243 | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
* Blitzkrieg in the Gulf: Armor of the 100 Hour war by Yves Debay
# {{note|www.projectcensored.org.41}} {{cite web | title=Project Censored Media democracy in action | url=http://www.projectcensored.org/publications/2005/4.html | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
*Desert Redleg: Artillery Warfare in the First Gulf War by Col. L. Scott Lingamfelter
# {{note|www.ceip.org.42}} {{cite web | title=Conclusions | url=http://www.ceip.org/files/projects/npp/resources/georgetown/PatriotPaper.pdf | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Nordeen |first1=Lon |last2=Isby |first2=David |year=2010 |title=M60 vs T-62: Cold War Combatants 1956–92 |series=Dual |others=Illustrated by Richard Chasemore |publisher=Osprey Publishing |location=Oxford, UK |isbn=978-1-84603-694-1 |lccn=2010525413 |oclc=495780787}}
# {{note|www.commondreams.org.43}} {{cite web | title= ''Allies Deliberately Poisoned Iraq Public Water Supply In Gulf War'' | url=http://www.commondreams.org/headlines/091700-01.htm | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
{{Refend}}
# {{note|www.washingtonpost.com.44}} {{cite web | title= ''U.S. Claims Iraqi Nuclear Reactors Hit Hard'' | url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/fogofwar/archive/post012091.htm | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}

# {{note|refbot.45}} {{cite web | title=The Gulf War | url=http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/History/Gulf_War.html | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
==Bibliography==
# {{note|news.bbc.co.uk.46}} {{cite web | title= ''Timeline: War in the Gulf'' | url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/middle_east/newsid_861000/861164.stm | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
{{Refbegin|30em|indent=yes}}
# {{note|members.aol.com.47}} {{cite web | title= ''Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II'' | url=http://members.aol.com/bblum6/iraq2.htm | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
* {{cite news |last=Arbuthnot |first=Felicity |title=Allies Deliberately Poisoned Iraq Public Water Supply in Gulf War |url=http://www.commondreams.org/headlines/091700-01.htm |access-date=4 December 2005 |date=17 September 2000 |newspaper=Sunday Herald |location=Scotland |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051205094328/http://www.commondreams.org/headlines/091700-01.htm |archive-date=5 December 2005 }}
# {{note|www.fas.org.48}} {{cite web | title= ''Attack Aircraft Proliferation: Areas for Concern'' | url=http://www.fas.org/spp/aircraft/part08.htm | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
* {{cite news |last=Atkinson |first=Rick |author2=Devroy, Ann |title=U.S. Claims Iraqi Nuclear Reactors Hit Hard |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/fogofwar/archive/post012091.htm |access-date=4 December 2005 |date=12 January 1991 |newspaper=] }}
# {{note|www.libraryreference.org.49}} {{cite web | title= ''First Persian Gulf War'' | url=http://www.libraryreference.org/gulfwar.html | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
# {{note|www.salon.com.50}} {{cite web | title= ''Gulf War crimes?'' | url=http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/05/15/hersh/ | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }} * {{cite web |last=Austvik |first=Ole Gunnar |title=The War Over the Price of Oil |url=http://www.kaldor.no/energy/glob9205.htm |year=1993 |publisher=International Journal of Global Energy Issues }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Bard |first=Mitchell |title=The Gulf War |url=https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/Gulf_War.html |access-date=25 May 2009 |encyclopedia=Jewish Virtual Library }}
# {{note|www.hoskinson.net.51}} {{cite web | title= ''Gulf War Photo Gallery'' | url=http://www.hoskinson.net/gulfwar/ | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
* {{cite book |last=Barzilai |first=Gad |editor1-link=Aaron Klieman |editor=Klieman, Aharon |editor2=Shidlo, Gil |title=The Gulf Crisis and Its Global Aftermath |year=1993 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-08002-6 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/gulfcrisisitsglo0000unse }}
# {{note|news.bbc.co.uk.52}} {{cite web | title= ''Iraq coming in from the cold?'' | url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/from_our_own_correspondent/newsid_34000/34588.stm | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
* {{cite book |last=Blum |first=William |title=Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II |url=https://archive.org/details/killinghopeusmil00blum_0 |access-date=4 December 2005 |year=1995 |publisher=Common Courage Press |isbn=978-1-56751-052-2 }}
# {{note|www.whatreallyhappened.com.53}} {{cite web | title= ''Independent Policy Forum Luncheon Honoring'' | url=http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/LIE/HK/HK_IRAQ.html | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
* {{cite web |last=Bolkom |first=Christopher |author2=Pike, Jonathan |title=''Attack Aircraft Proliferation: Areas for Concern'' |url=https://fas.org/spp/aircraft/part08.htm |access-date=4 December 2005 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051227093110/http://www.fas.org/spp/aircraft/part08.htm |archive-date=27 December 2005 }}
# {{note|www.history.navy.mil.54}} {{cite web | title= ''The United States Navy in Desert Shield/Desert Storm'' | url=http://www.history.navy.mil/wars/dstorm/ | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Brands |first=H. W. |date=March 2004 |title=George Bush and the Gulf War of 1991 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27552567 |url-status=live |journal=Presidential Studies Quarterly |volume=34 |issue=1 |pages=113–131 |doi=10.1111/j.1741-5705.2004.00038.x |issn=0360-4918 |jstor=27552567 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190429203358/https://www.jstor.org/stable/27552567 |archive-date=29 April 2019}}
# {{note|digital.library.unt.edu.55}} {{cite web | title= ''Japan's Response to the Persian Gulf Crisis: Implications for U.S.-Japan Relations'' | url=http://digital.library.unt.edu/govdocs/crs/permalink/meta-crs-8 | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
* {{cite web |first=Miland |last=Brown |year=2005 |title=First Persian Gulf War |url=http://www.libraryreference.org/gulfwar.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070121233845/http://www.libraryreference.org/gulfwar.html |archive-date=21 January 2007 }}
# {{note|www.digitaljournalist.org.56}} {{cite web | title= ''The Unseen Gulf War'' (photo essay) | url=http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0212/pt_intro.html | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
* {{cite book|last=Emering |first=Edward John|title=The Decorations and Medals of the Persian Gulf War (1990 to 1991)|location=Claymont, DE |publisher=Orders and Medals Society of America|year=2005| isbn=978-1-890974-18-3|oclc=62859116}}
# {{note|www.bullatomsci.org.57}} {{cite web | title= ''...and the dirty little weapons'' | url=http://www.bullatomsci.org/issues/1991/may91/may91walker.html | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
* {{cite book |last=Finlan |first=Alastair |title=The Gulf War 1991 |publisher=Osprey |year=2003 |isbn=978-1-84176-574-7 |url=https://archive.org/details/gulfwar199100finl }}
# {{note|rrojasdatabank.info.58}} {{cite web | title= ''Third World War in the Gulf: A New World Order'' | url=http://rrojasdatabank.info/agfrank/gulf_war.html | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
* {{cite web |last=Forbes |first=Daniel |title=Gulf War crimes? |url=http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/05/15/hersh/ |access-date=4 December 2005 |date=15 May 2000 |publisher=Salon Magazine |archive-date=6 August 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110806072152/http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/05/15/hersh }}
# {{note|www.pbs.org.59}} {{cite web | title= ''The Gulf War:an in-depth examination of the 1990-1991 Persian Gulf crisis'' | url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/script_b.html | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
* {{cite book |first=T. M. |last=Hawley. |title=Against the Fires of Hell: The Environmental Disaster of the Gulf War |year=1992 |isbn=978-0-15-103969-2 |publisher=Harcourt Brace Jovanovich |location=New York u.a. |url=https://archive.org/details/againstfiresofhe00hawl }}
# {{note|es.rice.edu.60}} {{cite web | title= Report to Congress on the Conduct of the Persian Gulf War, Chapter 6 | url=http://es.rice.edu/projects/Poli378/Gulf/gwtxt_ch6.html | accessdate=December 4 | accessyear=2005 }}
* {{cite book |last=Hiro |first=Dilip |year=1992 |title=Desert Shield to Desert Storm: The Second Gulf War |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-90657-9 |url=https://archive.org/details/desertshieldtode00hiro }}
</div>
* {{cite book |last1=Clancy |first1=Tom |last2=Horner |first2=Chuck |title=Every Man a Tiger: The Gulf War Air Campaign |publisher=Putnam |year=1999 |isbn=978-0-399-14493-6 |url=https://archive.org/details/everymantiger00clan |url-access=registration }}
* {{cite web |first=Ronald Andrew |last=Hoskinson |author2=Jarvis, Norman |title=Gulf War Photo Gallery |url=http://www.hoskinson.net/gulfwar/ |access-date=4 December 2005 |year=1994 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Kepel |first=Gilles |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tttzgNKFAI8C |title=Jihad: the trail of political Islam |publisher=] |year=2002 |isbn=978-0-674-01090-1 |location=Cambridge, Mass |chapter=From the Gulf War to the Taliban Jihad}}
* {{cite book|first=Jon |last=Latimer |author-link=Jon Latimer|title=Deception in War |location=London |publisher=John Murray |year=2001 |isbn=978-0-7195-5605-0}}
* {{cite news |first=Allan |last=Little |title=Iraq coming in from the cold? |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/from_our_own_correspondent/newsid_34000/34588.stm |access-date=4 December 2005 |date=1 December 1997 |work=BBC }}
* {{cite web |first=Richard S |last=Lowry |title=The Gulf War Chronicles |publisher=iUniverse (2003 and 2008) |url=http://www.gwchronicles.com |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080415211818/http://www.gwchronicles.com/ |archive-date=15 April 2008 }}
* {{cite web |first=John |last=MacArthur |date=October 7, 1993 |title=Independent Policy Forum Luncheon Honoring |url=http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/LIE/HK/HK_IRAQ.html |access-date=4 December 2005 }}
* {{cite book |last=Makiya |first=Kanan |author-link=Kanan Makiya |title=Cruelty and Silence: War, Tyranny, Uprising, and the Arab World |publisher=W.W. Norton |year=1993 |isbn=978-0-393-03108-9 |url=https://archive.org/details/crueltysilencewa00maki }}
* {{cite web |first=Edwin |last=Moise |title=Bibliography: The First U.S.{{snd}}Iraq War: Desert Shield and Desert Storm (1990–1991) |url=http://www.clemson.edu/caah/history/FacultyPages/EdMoise/iraqbib.html#first |access-date=21 March 2009 }}
* {{cite book|first=Alan |last=Munro |title=Arab Storm: Politics and Diplomacy Behind the Gulf War |publisher=I.B. Tauris |year=2006 |isbn=978-1-84511-128-1}}
* {{cite web |author=Naval Historical Center |title=The United States Navy in Desert Shield/Desert Storm |url=http://www.history.navy.mil/wars/dstorm/ |access-date=4 December 2005 |date=15 May 1991 |archive-date=2 December 2005 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051202183506/http://www.history.navy.mil/wars/dstorm/ }}
* {{cite book|last=Wright |first=Steven |title=The United States and Persian Gulf Security: The Foundations of the War on Terror |publisher=Ithaca Press |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-86372-321-6}}
* {{Cite web |last1=Niksch |first1=Larry A. |last2=Sutter |first2=Robert G. |date=23 May 1991 |title=Japan's Response to the Persian Gulf Crisis: Implications for U.S. -Japan Relations |url=https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs8/ |access-date=4 December 2005 |website=UNT Digital Library |publisher=Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress |language=English}}
* {{cite book |last=Odgers |first=George|year=1999|title=100 Years of Australians at War |publisher=Lansdowne |location=Sydney |isbn=978-1-86302-669-7}}
* {{cite book|first=Jonathon|last=Riley|title=Decisive Battles: From Yorktown to Operation Desert Storm|publisher=Continuum|year=2010|isbn=978-1-84725-250-0|url=https://archive.org/details/decisivebattlesf0000rile|url-access=registration|page=|quote=SAS first units ground January into iraq.}}
* {{cite book |first=Paul William |last=Roberts |author-link=Paul William Roberts |title=The Demonic Comedy: Some Detours in the Baghdad of Saddam Hussein |isbn=978-0-374-13823-3 |year=1998 |publisher=Farrar, Straus and Giroux |location=New York |url=https://archive.org/details/demoniccomedysom00robe }}
* {{cite book |first1=Micah |last1=Sifry |last2=Cerf |first2=Christopher |author-link2=Christopher Cerf (musician and television producer) |title=The Gulf War Reader |year=1991 |isbn=978-0-8129-1947-9 |publisher=Random House |location=New York, NY |url=https://archive.org/details/gulfwarreaderhis00mica }}
* {{cite book |first=Geoff |last=Simons |title=Iraq: from Sumer to post-Saddam |year=2004 |edition=3rd |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |isbn=978-1-4039-1770-6}}
* {{cite book |first=Jean Edward |last=Smith |author-link=Jean Edward Smith |title=George Bush's War |location=New York |publisher=Henry Holt |year=1992 |isbn=978-0-8050-1388-7 |url=https://archive.org/details/georgebushswar00smit }}
* {{cite book|first=Spencer|last=Tucker|title=The Encyclopedia of Middle East Wars: The United States in the Persian Gulf, Afghanistan, and Iraq Conflicts|publisher=ABC-Clio|year=2010|isbn=978-1-84725-250-0 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/decisivebattlesf0000rile}}
* {{cite web |first=Peter |last=Turnley |title=The Unseen Gulf War (photo essay) |url=http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0212/pt_intro.html |access-date=4 December 2005 |date=December 2002 }}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Walker |first1=Paul F. |last2=Stambler |first2=Eric |date=May 1991 |title=…And the Dirty Little Weapons |journal=Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists |language=en |volume=47 |issue=4 |pages=20–24 |doi=10.1080/00963402.1991.11459971 |bibcode=1991BuAtS..47d..20W |issn=0096-3402}}
* {{cite book|last1=Victoria|first1=William L. Cleveland, late of Simon Fraser University, Martin Bunton, University of|title=A History of the Modern Middle East|date=2013|publisher=Westview Press |location=Boulder, CO|isbn=978-0-8133-4833-9|page=450|edition=5th|quote=Last paragraph: "On 16 January 1991 the air war against Iraq began}}
* {{cite web |first=Andre Gunder |last=Frank |title=Third World War in the Gulf: A New World Order |url=http://rrojasdatabank.info/agfrank/gulf_war.html |access-date=4 December 2005 |date=20 May 1991 |work=Political Economy Notebooks for Study and Research, No. 14, pp. 5–34 }}
* {{cite web |author=Frontline |title=The Gulf War: an in-depth examination of the 1990–1991 Persian Gulf crisis |website=] |url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/script_b.html |access-date=4 December 2005 }}
* {{cite web|title=Report to Congress on the Conduct of the Persian Gulf War, Chapter 6 |url=http://es.rice.edu/projects/Poli378/Gulf/gwtxt_ch6.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190831094256/http://es.rice.edu/projects/Poli378/Gulf/gwtxt_ch6.html |archive-date=31 August 2019|access-date=18 Aug 2021}}
* {{cite web|title=25 years since the "Locusta" Operation|date=25 September 2015|url=https://en.difesaonline.it/news-forze-armate/cielo/25-anni-dalloperazione-locusta}}
* {{cite web|title=Iraq (1990)|work=Ministero Della Difesa|language=it |url=http://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/missione/attivitaoperative/operazioni_concluse/opr_internazionali_concluse/Pagine/Iraq(1990).aspx}}
{{Refend}}

===Films===
{{refbegin|30em}}
* '']'' (2008)
* '']'' (1999)
* '']'' (1996)
* '']'' (1991)
* '']'' (1991)
* '']'' (1992) (a documentary)
* '']'' (2002)
* '']'' (2007)
* '']'' (1999)
* '']'' (2004)
* Used as a back drop for the film '']'' (1998). It is frequently discussed as well.
* Used in ] backstory for '']'' (2004)
* '']'' (2016){{snd}} A ] film based on the true story of ].
{{refend}}

===Novels===
{{refbegin|30em}}
* ''Braving the Fear{{snd}}The True Story of Rowdy US Marines in the Gulf War'' (by Douglas Foster) {{ISBN|978-1-4137-9902-6}}
* ''Bravo Two Zero'' (by ]) {{ISBN|978-0-440-21880-7}}
* '']'' (by ]) {{ISBN|978-0-553-09126-7}}
* ''Glass (Pray the Electrons Back to Sand)'' (by James Chapman)
* ''Gulf in the War Story: A US Navy Personnel Manager Confides in You'' (diary from inside the real Top Gun, VF-1 "Wolfpack" by Bob Graham) {{ISBN|978-1-4751-4705-6}}
* ''Hogs'' ] series by James Ferro
* ''Jarhead'' (by Anthony Swofford) {{ISBN|978-0-7432-3535-8}}
* ''Savant'' (by ])
* ''Summer 1990'' (by Firyal AlShalabi)
* ''Third Graders at War'' (by Felix G)
* ''To Die in Babylon'' by ]
* '' M60 vs T-62 Cold War Combatants 1956–92'' (by Lon Nordeen & David Isby)
{{refend}}


==External links== ==External links==
{{sister project links|c=Category:Gulf War|d=yes|q=yes|n=no|b=no|v=no|voy=no|m=no|mw=no|wikt=no|s=no|species=no}}
*
* (Video: ABC, 1991)
* from the
* from the
*
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101231231437/http://www.history.army.mil/reference/Finding%20Aids/DSMI.htm |date=31 December 2010 }} by the ]
* compiled by the ] {{link note|note=via Wayback Machine}}
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017021409/http://cdm16635.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/search/collection/p16635coll2!p16635coll25!p16635coll13!p16635coll18!p16635coll20!p16635coll15!p16635coll27!p16635coll3!p16635coll11!p16635coll8!p16635coll28!p16635coll23!p16635coll29!p16635coll10!p16635coll12!p16635coll5!p16635coll4!p16635coll14!p16635coll9!p16635coll21!p16635coll1!p16635coll22/searchterm/XVIII%20Airborne%20Corps%20History%20Office/field/all/mode/all/conn/and/order/nosort/ad/asc, |date=17 October 2015 }} US Army Heritage and Education Center, Carlisle, Pennsylvania
*
*
*
* ]
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130601053948/http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/du_ii/du_ii_tabh.htm |date=1 June 2013 }}{{snd}}www.gulflink.osd.mil
* by the ]


{{Navboxes|list=
]
{{Gulf War}}
]
{{Middle East conflicts}}
]
{{American conflicts}}
{{Presidency of George H. W. Bush}}
{{Saddam Hussein}}
{{Iraq topics}}
{{US history}}
{{Cold War}}
{{Gulf Cooperation Council}}
}}
{{Portal bar|Iraq|Kuwait|United States|1990s}}
{{Authority control}}
<!-- Don't add {{Link GA|lv}} – there hasn't been discussion about the status of article. -->


]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 06:15, 15 December 2024

1990–1991 conflict between Iraq and a 42-country coalition This article is about the conflict against Iraq in 1990–1991. For other conflicts with the same name, see Gulf War (disambiguation). "Desert Storm" redirects here. For other uses, see Desert Storm (disambiguation).

Gulf War
From top to bottom, left to right:
Date2 August 1990 – 17 January 1991
(Operation Desert Shield)
17 January – 28 February 1991
(Operation Desert Storm)
(6 months, 3 weeks and 5 days)
Location
Result Coalition victory
Territorial
changes
Belligerents

United Nations Coalition:
 Iraq
Commanders and leaders
Strength
Over 950,000 soldiers
3,113 tanks
1,800 aircraft
2,200 artillery pieces
1,000,000+ soldiers (~600,000 in Kuwait)
5,500 tanks
700+ aircraft
3,000 artillery systems
Casualties and losses
Total:
13,488

Coalition:
292 killed (147 killed by enemy action, 145 non-hostile deaths)
776 wounded (467 wounded in action)
31 tanks destroyed/disabled

28 Bradley IFVs destroyed/damaged

1 M113 APC destroyed
2 British Warrior APCs destroyed
1 artillery piece destroyed
75 aircraft destroyed
Kuwait:
420 killed
12,000 captured
≈200 tanks destroyed/captured
850+ other armored vehicles destroyed/captured
57 aircraft lost
8 aircraft captured (Mirage F1s)

17 ships sunk, 6 captured
Total:
175,000–300,000+

Iraqi:
20,000–50,000 killed
75,000+ wounded
80,000–175,000 captured
3,300 tanks destroyed
2,100 APCs destroyed
2,200 artillery pieces destroyed
110 aircraft destroyed
137 aircraft flown to Iran to escape destruction
19 ships sunk, 6 damaged
Kuwaiti civilian losses:
Over 1,000 killed
600 missing people
Iraqi civilian losses:
3,664 killed directly
Total Iraqi losses (including 1991 Iraqi uprisings):
142,500–206,000 deaths (According to Medact)
Other civilian losses:
75 killed in Israel and Saudi Arabia, 309 injured
Persian Gulf Wars
Gulf War
Invasion of Kuwait

Coalition intervention

Naval operations

Air campaign

Liberation of Kuwait

Post-ceasefire

Part of a series on
Ba'athism
Flag of the Ba'ath Party
Organizations
Arab Ba'ath1940–1947
Arab Ba'ath Movement1940–1947
Ba'ath Party1947–1966
Baath Party (pro-Iraqi)1968–2003
Baath Party (pro-Syrian)1966–present
Variants
Neo-Ba'athism1966–2024
Saddamism1979–2003
People
Literature
History
Regional organizations
Algeria
Bahrain
Egypt
Iraq
Jordan
Kuwait
Lebanon
Libya
Mauritania
Palestine
Sudan
Syria
Tunisia
Yemen
Splinter groups
Arab Socialist Revolutionary Ba'ath Party1960–1962/63
Socialist Lebanon1965–1970
Arab Revolutionary Workers Party1966–present
Democratic Socialist Arab Ba'ath Party1970–present
Sudanese Ba'ath Party2002–present
Armed groups
Related topics
This article is part of
a series aboutSaddam Hussein

Personal
Affiliations
Political offices
Rise to power
Presidency
Desposition
Elections and referendums
Novels
Saddam Hussein's signature
This article is part of
a series aboutGeorge H. W. Bush

Personal
43rd Vice President of the United States
Vice presidential campaigns
41st President of the United States
Tenure
Policies
Appointments
Presidential campaigns
George H. W. Bush's signature Seal of the President of the United States

The Gulf War was an armed conflict between Iraq and a 42-country coalition led by the United States. The coalition's efforts against Iraq were carried out in two key phases: Operation Desert Shield, which marked the military buildup from August 1990 to January 1991; and Operation Desert Storm, which began with the aerial bombing campaign against Iraq on 17 January 1991 and came to a close with the American-led liberation of Kuwait on 28 February 1991.

On 2 August 1990, Iraq, governed by Saddam Hussein, invaded neighboring Kuwait and fully occupied the country within two days. The invasion was primarily over disputes regarding Kuwait's alleged slant drilling in Iraq's Rumaila oil field, as well as to cancel Iraq's large debt to Kuwait from the recently ended Iran-Iraq War. After Iraq briefly occupied Kuwait under a rump puppet government known as the Republic of Kuwait, it split Kuwait's sovereign territory into the Saddamiyat al-Mitla' District in the north, which was absorbed into Iraq's existing Basra Governorate, and the Kuwait Governorate in the south, which became Iraq's 19th governorate.

The invasion of Kuwait was met with immediate international condemnation, including the adoption of UN Security Council Resolution 660, which demanded Iraq's immediate withdrawal from Kuwait, and the imposition of comprehensive international sanctions against Iraq with the adoption of UN Security Council Resolution 661. British prime minister Margaret Thatcher and U.S. president George H. W. Bush deployed troops and equipment into Saudi Arabia and urged other countries to send their own forces. Many countries joined the American-led coalition forming the largest military alliance since World War II. The bulk of the coalition's military power was from the United States, with Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom, and Egypt as the largest lead-up contributors, in that order.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 678, adopted on 29 November 1990, gave Iraq an ultimatum, expiring on 15 January 1991, to implement Resolution 660 and withdraw from Kuwait, with member-states empowered to use "all necessary means" to force Iraq's compliance. Initial efforts to dislodge the Iraqis from Kuwait began with aerial and naval bombardment of Iraq on 17 January, which continued for five weeks. As the Iraqi military struggled against the coalition attacks, Iraq fired missiles at Israel to provoke an Israeli military response, with the expectation that such a response would lead to the withdrawal of several Muslim-majority countries from the coalition. The provocation was unsuccessful; Israel did not retaliate and Iraq continued to remain at odds with most Muslim-majority countries. Iraqi missile barrages against coalition targets in Saudi Arabia were also largely unsuccessful, and on 24 February 1991, the coalition launched a major ground assault into Iraqi-occupied Kuwait. The offensive was a decisive victory for the coalition, who liberated Kuwait and promptly began to advance past the Iraq–Kuwait border into Iraqi territory. A hundred hours after the beginning of the ground campaign, the coalition ceased its advance into Iraq and declared a ceasefire. Aerial and ground combat was confined to Iraq, Kuwait, and areas straddling the Iraq–Saudi Arabia border.

The conflict marked the introduction of live news broadcasts from the front lines of the battle, principally by the American network CNN. It has also earned the nickname Video Game War, after the daily broadcast of images from cameras onboard American military aircraft during Operation Desert Storm. The Gulf War has also gained fame for some of the largest tank battles in American military history: the Battle of Medina Ridge, the Battle of Norfolk, and the Battle of 73 Easting.

Names

The war is also known under other names, such as the Second Gulf War (not to be confused with the 2003 Iraq War, also referred to as such), Persian Gulf War, Kuwait War, First Iraq War, or Iraq War before the term "Iraq War" became identified with the 2003 Iraq War (also known in the US as "Operation Iraqi Freedom"). The war was named Umm al-Ma'arik ("mother of all battles") by Iraqi officials. After the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, the Gulf War of 1990–1991 is often known as the "First Iraq War".

The following names have been used to describe the conflict itself: Gulf War and Persian Gulf War are the most common terms for the conflict used within western countries, though it may also be called the First Gulf War (to distinguish it from the 2003 invasion of Iraq and the subsequent Iraq War). Some authors have called it the Second Gulf War to distinguish it from the Iran–Iraq War. Liberation of Kuwait (Arabic: تحرير الكويت) (taḥrīr al-kuwayt) is the term used by Kuwait and most of the coalition's Arab states, including Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Egypt, and the United Arab Emirates. Terms in other languages include French: la Guerre du Golfe and Guerre du Koweït (War of Kuwait); German: Golfkrieg (Gulf War) and Zweiter Golfkrieg (Second Gulf War).

Operational names

Most of the coalition states used various names for their operations and the war's operational phases. These are sometimes incorrectly used as the conflict's overall name, especially the US Desert Storm:

  • Operation Desert Shield was the US operational name for the US buildup of forces and Saudi Arabia's defense from 2 August 1990 to 16 January 1991
  • Operation Desert Storm was the US name of the airland conflict from 17 January 1991 through 28 February 1991
    • Operation Desert Sabre (early name Operation Desert Sword) was the US name for the air and land offensive against the Iraqi Army in the Kuwaiti Theater of Operations (the "100-hour war") from 24 to 28 February 1991, in itself, part of Operation Desert Storm
  • Operation Desert Farewell was the name given to the return of US units and equipment to the US in 1991 after Kuwait's liberation, sometimes referred to as Operation Desert Calm
  • Operativo Alfil was the Argentine name for Argentine military activities
  • Opération Daguet was the French name for French military activities in the conflict
  • Operation Friction was the name of the Canadian operations
  • Operation Granby was the British name for British military activities during the operations and conflict
  • Operazione Locusta (Italian for Locust) was the Italian name for the operations and conflict

Campaign names

The US divided the conflict into three major campaigns:

  • Defense of Saudi Arabian country for the period 2 August 1990, through 16 January 1991
  • Liberation and Defense of Kuwait for the period 17 January 1991, through 11 April 1991
  • Southwest Asia Cease-Fire for the period 12 April 1991, through 30 November 1995, including Operation Provide Comfort

Background

See also: Iran–United States relations after 1979, List of modern conflicts in the Middle East, and Rationale for the Persian Gulf war

Throughout the Cold War, Iraq had been an ally of the Soviet Union, and there was a history of friction between Iraq and the United States. The US was concerned with Iraq's position on Israeli–Palestinian politics. The US also disliked Iraqi support for Palestinian militant groups, which led to Iraq's inclusion on the developing US list of State Sponsors of Terrorism in December 1979.

Donald Rumsfeld, US special envoy to the Middle East, meets Saddam Hussein on 19–20 December 1983.

The US remained officially neutral after Iraq's invasion of Iran in 1980, which became the Iran–Iraq War, although it provided resources, political support, and some "non-military" aircraft to Iraq. In March 1982, Iran began a successful counteroffensive (Operation Undeniable Victory), and the US increased its support for Iraq to prevent Iran from forcing a surrender. In a US bid to open full diplomatic relations with Iraq, the country was removed from the US list of State Sponsors of Terrorism. Ostensibly, this was because of improvement in the regime's record, although former US Assistant Defense Secretary Noel Koch later stated: "No one had any doubts about continued involvement in terrorism ... The real reason was to help them succeed in the war against Iran."

With Iraq's newfound success in the war, and the Iranian rebuff of a peace offer in July, arms sales to Iraq reached a record spike in 1982. When Iraqi President Saddam Hussein expelled Abu Nidal to Syria at the US's request in November 1983, the Reagan administration sent Donald Rumsfeld to meet Saddam as a special envoy and to cultivate ties. By the time the ceasefire with Iran was signed in August 1988, Iraq was heavily debt-ridden and tensions within society were rising. Most of its debt was owed to Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Iraq's debts to Kuwait amounted to $14 billion. Iraq pressured both nations to forgive the debts, but they refused.

The Iraq–Kuwait border dispute involved Iraqi claims to Kuwaiti territory. Kuwait had been a part of the Ottoman Empire's province of Basra, something that Iraq claimed made Kuwait rightful Iraqi territory. Kuwait's ruling dynasty, the al-Sabah family, had concluded a protectorate agreement in 1899 that assigned responsibility for Kuwait's foreign affairs to the United Kingdom. The UK drew the border between Kuwait and Iraq in 1922, making Iraq almost entirely landlocked. Kuwait rejected Iraqi attempts to secure further provisions in the region.

Iraq also accused Kuwait of exceeding its OPEC quotas for oil production. In order for the cartel to maintain its desired price of $18 per barrel, discipline was required. The United Arab Emirates and Kuwait were consistently overproducing; the latter at least in part to repair losses caused by Iranian attacks in the Iran–Iraq War and to pay for the losses of an economic scandal. The result was a slump in the oil price – as low as $10 per barrel ($63/m) – with a resulting loss of $7 billion a year to Iraq, equal to its 1989 balance of payments deficit. Resulting revenues struggled to support the government's basic costs, let alone repair Iraq's damaged infrastructure. Jordan and Iraq both looked for more discipline, with little success. The Iraqi government described it as a form of economic warfare, which it claimed was aggravated by Kuwait slant-drilling across the border into Iraq's Rumaila oil field. According to oil workers in the area, Iraq's slant drilling claim was fabricated, as "oil flows easily from the Rumaila field without any need for these techniques." At the same time, Saddam looked for closer ties with those Arab states that had supported Iraq in the war. This move was supported by the US, who believed that Iraqi ties with pro-Western Gulf states would help bring and maintain Iraq inside the US' sphere of influence.

In 1989, it appeared that Saudi–Iraqi relations, strong during the war, would be maintained. A pact of non-interference and non-aggression was signed between the countries, followed by a Kuwaiti-Iraqi deal for Iraq to supply Kuwait with water for drinking and irrigation, although a request for Kuwait to lease Iraq Umm Qasr was rejected. Saudi-backed development projects were hampered by Iraq's large debts, even with the demobilization of 200,000 soldiers. Iraq also looked to increase arms production so as to become an exporter, although the success of these projects was also restrained by Iraq's obligations; in Iraq, resentment to OPEC's controls mounted.

Iraq's relations with its Arab neighbors, particularly Egypt, were degraded by mounting violence in Iraq against expatriate groups, who were well-employed during the war, by unemployed Iraqis, among them demobilized soldiers. These events drew little notice outside the Arab world because of fast-moving events directly related to the fall of Communism in Eastern Europe. However, the US did begin to condemn Iraq's human rights record, including the well-known use of torture. The UK also condemned the execution of Farzad Bazoft, a journalist working for the British newspaper The Observer. Following Saddam's declaration that "binary chemical weapons" would be used on Israel if it used military force against Iraq, Washington halted part of its funding. A UN mission to the Israeli-occupied territories, where riots had resulted in Palestinian deaths, was vetoed by the US, making Iraq deeply skeptical of US foreign policy aims in the region, combined with the reliance of the US on Middle Eastern energy reserves.

Map of Kuwait

In early July 1990, Iraq complained about Kuwait's behavior, such as not respecting their quota, and openly threatened to take military action. On the 23rd, the CIA reported that Iraq had moved 30,000 troops to the Iraq-Kuwait border, and the US naval fleet in the Persian Gulf was placed on alert. Saddam believed an anti-Iraq conspiracy was developing – Kuwait had begun talks with Iran, and Iraq's rival Syria had arranged a visit to Egypt. On 15 July 1990, Saddam's government laid out its combined objections to the Arab League, including that policy moves were costing Iraq $1 billion a year, that Kuwait was still using the Rumaila oil field, and that loans made by the UAE and Kuwait could not be considered debts to its "Arab brothers". He threatened force against Kuwait and the UAE, saying: "The policies of some Arab rulers are American ... They are inspired by America to undermine Arab interests and security." The US sent aerial refuelling planes and combat ships to the Persian Gulf in response to these threats. Discussions in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, mediated on the Arab League's behalf by Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, were held on 31 July and led Mubarak to believe that a peaceful course could be established.

During Saddam Hussein's 2003–2004 interrogation following his capture he claimed that in addition to economic disputes, an insulting exchange between the Kuwaiti emir Al Sabah and the Iraqi foreign minister – during which the emir stated his intention to turn "every Iraqi woman into a $10 prostitute" by bankrupting the country – was a decisive factor in triggering the Iraqi invasion.

On the 25th, Saddam met with April Glaspie, the US Ambassador to Iraq, in Baghdad. The Iraqi leader attacked American policy with regards to Kuwait and the UAE:

So what can it mean when America says it will now protect its friends? It can only mean prejudice against Iraq. This stance plus maneuvers and statements which have been made has encouraged the UAE and Kuwait to disregard Iraqi rights ... If you use pressure, we will deploy pressure and force. We know that you can harm us although we do not threaten you. But we too can harm you. Everyone can cause harm according to their ability and their size. We cannot come all the way to you in the United States, but individual Arabs may reach you ... We do not place America among the enemies. We place it where we want our friends to be and we try to be friends. But repeated American statements last year made it apparent that America did not regard us as friends.

Glaspie replied:

I know you need funds. We understand that and our opinion is that you should have the opportunity to rebuild your country. But we have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts, like your border disagreement with Kuwait ... Frankly, we can only see that you have deployed massive troops in the south. Normally that would not be any of our business. But when this happens in the context of what you said on your national day, then when we read the details in the two letters of the Foreign Minister, then when we see the Iraqi point of view that the measures taken by the UAE and Kuwait is, in the final analysis, parallel to military aggression against Iraq, then it would be reasonable for me to be concerned.

Saddam stated that he would attempt last-ditch negotiations with the Kuwaitis but Iraq "would not accept death."

According to Glaspie's own account, she stated in reference to the precise border between Kuwait and Iraq, "... that she had served in Kuwait 20 years before; 'then, as now, we took no position on these Arab affairs'." Glaspie similarly believed that war was not imminent.

On 26 July 1990, only a few days before the Iraqi invasion, OPEC officials said that Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates had agreed to a proposal to limit their oil output to 1.5 million barrels (240,000 m) per day, "down from the nearly 2 million barrels a day they had each been pumping," thus potentially settling differences over oil policy between Kuwait and Iraq.

Invasion of Kuwait

Lion of Babylon main battle tanks, common Iraqi battle tank used in the Gulf War by the Iraqi Army.
Main articles: Iraqi invasion of Kuwait and Timeline of Gulf War

The result of the Jeddah talks was an Iraqi demand for $10 billion to cover the lost revenues from Rumaila; Kuwait offered $500 million. The Iraqi response was to immediately order an invasion, which started on 2 August 1990 with the bombing of Kuwait's capital, Kuwait City.

Before the invasion, the Kuwaiti military was believed to have numbered 16,000 men, arranged into three armored, one mechanized infantry and one under-strength artillery brigade. The pre-war strength of the Kuwait Air Force was around 2,200 Kuwaiti personnel, with 80 fixed-wing aircraft and 40 helicopters. In spite of Iraqi saber rattling, Kuwait did not mobilize its force; the army had been stood-down on 19 July, and during the Iraqi invasion many Kuwaiti military personnel were on leave.

By 1988, at the end of the Iran–Iraq war, the Iraqi Army was the world's fourth largest army, consisting of 955,000 standing soldiers and 650,000 paramilitary forces in the Popular Army. According to John Childs and André Corvisier, a low estimate shows the Iraqi Army capable of fielding 4,500 tanks, 484 combat aircraft and 232 combat helicopters. According to Michael Knights, a high estimate shows the Iraqi Army capable of fielding one million troops and 850,000 reservists, 5,500 tanks, 3,000 artillery pieces, 700 combat aircraft and helicopters; it held 53 divisions, 20 special-forces brigades, and several regional militias, and had a strong air defense.

Kuwaiti Armed Forces M-84 main battle tanks

Iraqi commandos infiltrated the Kuwaiti border first to prepare for the major units, which began the attack at midnight. The Iraqi attack had two prongs, with the primary attack force driving south straight for Kuwait City down the main highway, and a supporting attack force entering Kuwait farther west, but then turning and driving east, cutting off Kuwait City from the country's southern half. The commander of a Kuwaiti armored battalion, 35th Armoured Brigade, deployed them against the Iraqi attack and conducted a robust defense at the Battle of the Bridges near Al Jahra, west of Kuwait City.

Kuwaiti aircraft scrambled to meet the invading force, but approximately 20% were lost or captured. A few combat sorties were flown against Iraqi ground forces.

The main Iraqi thrust into Kuwait City was conducted by commandos deployed by helicopters and boats to attack the city from the sea, while other divisions seized the airports and two airbases. The Iraqis attacked the Dasman Palace, the Royal Residence of Kuwait's Emir, Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, which was defended by the Emiri Guard supported with M-84 tanks. In the process, the Iraqis killed Fahad Al-Ahmed Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, the Emir's youngest brother.

Within 12 hours, most resistance had ended within Kuwait, and the royal family had fled, allowing Iraq to control most of Kuwait. After two days of intense combat, most of the Kuwaiti military were either overrun by the Iraqi Republican Guard, or had escaped to Saudi Arabia. The Emir and key ministers fled south along the highway for refuge in Saudi Arabia. Iraqi ground forces consolidated their control of Kuwait City, then headed south and redeployed along the Saudi border. After the decisive Iraqi victory, Saddam initially installed a puppet regime known as the "Provisional Government of Free Kuwait" before installing his cousin Ali Hassan al-Majid as Kuwait's governor on 8 August.

An Iraqi Air Force Bell 214ST transport helicopter, after being captured by a US Marine Corps unit at the start of the ground phase of Operation Desert Storm

After the invasion, the Iraqi military looted over $1 billion in banknotes from Kuwait's Central Bank. At the same time, Saddam Hussein made the Kuwaiti dinar equal to the Iraqi dinar, thereby lowering the Kuwaiti currency to one-twelfth of its original value. In response, Sheikh Jaber al-Ahmad al-Sabah ruled the banknotes as invalid and refused to reimburse stolen notes, which became worthless because of a UN embargo. After the conflict ended, many of the stolen banknotes made their way back into circulation. The stolen banknotes are a collectible for numismatists.

Kuwaiti resistance movement

Kuwaitis founded a local armed resistance movement following the Iraqi occupation of Kuwait. The Kuwaiti resistance's [ar] casualty rate far exceeded that of the coalition military forces and Western hostages. The resistance predominantly consisted of ordinary citizens who lacked any form of training and supervision.

Run-up to the war

Diplomatic means

A key element of US political, military and energy economic planning occurred in early 1984. The Iran–Iraq war had been going on for five years by that time and both sides sustained significant casualties, reaching into the hundreds of thousands. Within President Ronald Reagan's National Security Council concern was growing that the war could spread beyond the boundaries of the two belligerents. A National Security Planning Group meeting was formed, chaired by then Vice President George H. W. Bush, to review US options. It was determined that the conflict would likely spread into Saudi Arabia and other Persian Gulf states, but that the United States had little capability to defend the region. Furthermore, it was determined that a prolonged war in the region would induce much higher oil prices and threaten the fragile recovery of the world economy, which was just beginning to gain momentum. On 22 May 1984, President Reagan was briefed on the project conclusions in the Oval Office by William Flynn Martin who had served as the head of the NSC staff that organized the study. (The full declassified presentation can be seen here:) The conclusions were threefold: first, oil stocks needed to be increased among members of the International Energy Agency and, if necessary, released early if the oil market was disrupted; second, the United States needed to beef up the security of friendly Arab states in the region; and third, an embargo should be placed on sales of military equipment to Iran and Iraq. The plan was approved by President Reagan and later affirmed by the G7 leaders headed by the United Kingdom's Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, in the London Summit of 1984. The plan was implemented and became the basis for US preparedness to respond to the Iraqi occupation of Kuwait in 1991.

President Bush visiting American troops in Saudi Arabia on Thanksgiving Day, 1990

Within hours of the invasion, Kuwait and US delegations requested a meeting of the UN Security Council, which passed Resolution 660, condemning the invasion and demanding a withdrawal of Iraqi troops. On 3 August 1990, the Arab League passed its own resolution, which called for a solution to the conflict from within the league, and warned against outside intervention. Iraq and Libya were the only two Arab League states that opposed the resolution for Iraq to withdraw from Kuwait; the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) opposed it as well. The Arab states of Yemen and Jordan – a Western ally which bordered Iraq and relied on the country for economic support – opposed military intervention from non-Arab states. Separately, Sudan, also an Arab League member, aligned itself with Saddam.

On 6 August, Resolution 661 placed economic sanctions on Iraq. Resolution 665 followed soon after, which authorized a naval blockade to enforce the sanctions. It said the "use of measures commensurate to the specific circumstances as may be necessary ... to halt all inward and outward maritime shipping in order to inspect and verify their cargoes and destinations and to ensure strict implementation of resolution 661."

The US administration had at first been indecisive with an "undertone ... of resignation to the invasion and even adaptation to it as a fait accompli" until the UK's prime minister Margaret Thatcher played a powerful role, reminding the President that appeasement in the 1930s had led to war, that Saddam would have the whole Gulf at his mercy along with 65 percent of the world's oil supply, and famously urging President Bush "not to go wobbly".

Once persuaded, US officials insisted on a total Iraqi pullout from Kuwait, without any linkage to other Middle Eastern problems, accepting the British view that any concessions would strengthen Iraqi influence in the region for years to come.

Weapons training at Abu Hydra Range, 1990

On 12 August 1990, Saddam "propose that all cases of occupation, and those cases that have been portrayed as occupation, in the region, be resolved simultaneously". Specifically, he called for Israel to withdraw from occupied territories in Palestine, Syria, and Lebanon, Syria to withdraw from Lebanon, and "mutual withdrawals by Iraq and Iran and arrangement for the situation in Kuwait." He also called for a replacement of US troops that mobilized in Saudi Arabia in response to Kuwait's invasion with "an Arab force", as long as that force did not involve Egypt. Additionally, he requested an "immediate freeze of all boycott and siege decisions" and a general normalization of relations with Iraq. From the beginning of the crisis, President Bush was strongly opposed to any "linkage" between Iraq's occupation of Kuwait and the Palestinian issue.

On 23 August, Saddam appeared on state television with Western hostages to whom he had refused exit visas. In the video, he asks a young British boy, Stuart Lockwood, whether he is getting his milk, and goes on to say, through his interpreter, "We hope your presence as guests here will not be for too long. Your presence here, and in other places, is meant to prevent the scourge of war."

Another Iraqi proposal communicated in August 1990 was delivered to US National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft by an unidentified Iraqi official. The official communicated to the White House that Iraq would "withdraw from Kuwait and allow foreigners to leave" provided that the UN lifted sanctions, allowed "guaranteed access to the Persian Gulf through the Kuwaiti islands of Bubiyan and Warbah", and allowed Iraq to "gain full control of the Rumaila oil field that extends slightly into Kuwaiti territory". The proposal also "include offers to negotiate an oil agreement with the United States 'satisfactory to both nations' national security interests,' develop a joint plan 'to alleviate Iraq's economical and financial problems' and 'jointly work on the stability of the gulf.'"

On 29 November 1990, the Security Council passed Resolution 678, which gave Iraq until 15 January 1991 to withdraw from Kuwait, and empowered states to use "all necessary means" to force Iraq out of Kuwait after the deadline.

US Army soldiers from the 11th Air Defense Artillery Brigade during the Gulf War

In December 1990, Iraq made a proposal to withdraw from Kuwait provided that foreign troops left the region and that an agreement was reached regarding the Palestinian problem and the dismantlement of both Israel's and Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. The White House rejected the proposal. The PLO's Yasser Arafat expressed that neither he nor Saddam insisted that solving the Israel–Palestine issues should be a precondition to solving the issues in Kuwait, though he did acknowledge a "strong link" between these problems.

Ultimately, the US and UK stuck to their position that there would be no negotiations until Iraq withdrew from Kuwait and that they should not grant Iraq concessions, lest they give the impression that Iraq benefited from its military campaign. Also, when US Secretary of State James Baker met with Tariq Aziz in Geneva, Switzerland, for last minute peace talks in early 1991, Aziz reportedly made no concrete proposals and did not outline any hypothetical Iraqi moves.

On 14 January 1991, France proposed that the UN Security Council call for "a rapid and massive withdrawal" from Kuwait along with a statement to Iraq that Council members would bring their "active contribution" to a settlement of the region's other problems, "in particular, of the Arab–Israeli conflict and in particular to the Palestinian problem by convening, at an appropriate moment, an international conference" to assure "the security, stability and development of this region of the world." The French proposal was supported by Belgium (at the moment one of the rotating Council members), Germany, Spain, Italy, Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, and several non-aligned states. The US, the UK, and the Soviet Union rejected it; US Ambassador to the UN Thomas Pickering stated that the French proposal was unacceptable, because it went beyond previous Council resolutions on the Iraqi invasion. France dropped this proposal when it found "no tangible sign of interest" from Baghdad.

Military means

"Operation Desert Shield" redirects here. For the 2006 operation by the Iraqi insurgency, see Operation Desert Shield (Iraq).
American F-15Es parked in Saudi Arabia during Operation Desert Shield

One of the main concerns in the Western world was the significant threat Iraq posed to Saudi Arabia. Following Kuwait's conquest, the Iraqi Army was within easy striking distance of Saudi oil fields. Control of these fields, along with Kuwaiti and Iraqi reserves, would have given Saddam control over the majority of the world's oil reserves. Iraq also had a number of grievances with Saudi Arabia. The Saudis had lent Iraq 26 billion dollars during its war with Iran. The Saudis had backed Iraq in that war, as they feared the influence of Shia Iran's Islamic revolution on its own Shia minority. After the war, Saddam felt he should not have to repay the loans due to the help he had given the Saudis by fighting Iran.

Soon after his conquest of Kuwait, Saddam began verbally attacking the Saudis. He argued that the US-supported Saudi state was an illegitimate and unworthy guardian of the holy cities of Mecca and Medina. He combined the language of the Islamist groups that had recently fought in Afghanistan with the rhetoric Iran had long used to attack the Saudis.

Acting on the Carter Doctrine policy, and out of fear the Iraqi Army could launch an invasion of Saudi Arabia, US President George H. W. Bush quickly announced that the US would launch a "wholly defensive" mission to prevent Iraq from invading Saudi Arabia, under the codename Operation Desert Shield. The operation began on 7 August 1990, when US troops were sent to Saudi Arabia, due also to the request of its monarch, King Fahd, who had earlier called for US military assistance. This "wholly defensive" doctrine was quickly abandoned when, on 8 August, Iraq declared Kuwait to be Iraq's 19th province and Saddam named his cousin, Ali Hassan Al-Majid, as its military-governor.

M3 Bradleys of L Troop, 3rd ACR, stand in line at a holding area during the build-up to Operation Desert Shield.

The US Navy dispatched two naval battle groups built around the aircraft carriers USS Dwight D. Eisenhower and USS Independence to the Persian Gulf, where they were ready by 8 August. The US also sent the battleships USS Missouri and USS Wisconsin to the region. A total of 48 US Air Force F-15s from the 1st Fighter Wing at Langley Air Force Base, Virginia, landed in Saudi Arabia and immediately commenced round-the-clock air patrols of the Saudi–Kuwait–Iraq border to discourage further Iraqi military advances. They were joined by 36 F-15 A-Ds from the 36th Tactical Fighter Wing at Bitburg, Germany. The Bitburg contingent was based at Al Kharj Air Base, approximately an hour south east of Riyadh. The 36th TFW would be responsible for 11 confirmed Iraqi Air Force aircraft shot down during the war. Two Air National Guard units were stationed at Al Kharj Air Base, the South Carolina Air National Guard's 169th Fighter Wing flew bombing missions with 24 F-16s flying 2,000 combat missions and dropping four million pounds (1,800,000 kilograms; 1,800 metric tons) of munitions, and the New York Air National Guard's 174th Fighter Wing from Syracuse flew 24 F-16s on bombing missions. Military buildup continued from there, eventually reaching 543,000 troops, twice the number used in the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Much of the material was airlifted or carried to the staging areas via fast sealift ships, allowing a quick buildup. As part of the buildup, amphibious exercises were carried out in the Gulf, including Operation Imminent Thunder, which involved the USS Midway and 15 other ships, 1,100 aircraft, and a thousand Marines. In a press conference, General Schwarzkopf stated that these exercises were intended to deceive the Iraqi forces, forcing them to continue their defense of the Kuwaiti coastline.

Creating a coalition

Countries that deployed coalition forces or provided support (On behalf of Afghanistan, 300 Mujaheddin joined the coalition on 11 February 1991. Niger contributed 480 troops to guard shrines in Mecca and Medina on 15 January 1991.)

A series of UN Security Council resolutions and Arab League resolutions were passed regarding Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. Resolution 678, passed on 29 November 1990, gave Iraq a withdrawal deadline until 15 January 1991 and authorized "all necessary means to uphold and implement Resolution 660", and a diplomatic formulation authorizing the use of force if Iraq failed to comply.

To ensure that the US received economic backing, James Baker went on an 11-day journey to nine countries in September 1990, which the press dubbed "The Tin Cup Trip". The first stop was Saudi Arabia, which a month before had already granted permission to the United States to use its facilities. However, Baker believed that Saudi Arabia should assume some of the cost of the military efforts to defend it. When Baker asked King Fahd for $15 billion, the King readily agreed, with the promise that Baker ask Kuwait for the same amount.

The next day, 7 September, he did just that, and the Emir of Kuwait, displaced in a Sheraton hotel outside his invaded country, easily agreed. Baker then moved to enter talks with Egypt, whose leadership he considered "the moderate voice of the Middle East". President Mubarak of Egypt was furious with Saddam for his invasion of Kuwait, and for the fact that Saddam had assured Mubarak that an invasion was not his intention. Egypt received approximately $7 billion in debt forgiveness for its providing of support and troops for the US-led intervention.

After stops in Helsinki and Moscow to smooth out Iraqi demands for a Middle-Eastern peace conference with the Soviet Union, Baker traveled to Syria to discuss its role in the crisis with its President Hafez Assad. Assad had a deep personal enmity towards Saddam, which was defined by the fact that "Saddam had been trying to kill him for years." Harboring this animosity and impressed with Baker's diplomatic initiative to visit Damascus (relations had been severed since the 1983 bombing of US Marine barracks in Beirut), Assad agreed to pledge up to 100,000 Syrian troops to the coalition effort. This was a vital step in ensuring Arab states were represented in the coalition. In exchange, Washington gave al-Assad the green light to wipe out forces opposing Syria's rule in Lebanon and arranged for weapons valued at a billion dollars to be provided to Syria, mostly through Gulf states. In exchange for Iran's support for the US-led intervention, the US government promised the Iranian government to end US opposition to World Bank loans to Iran. On the day before the ground invasion began, the World Bank gave Iran the first loan of $250m.

Baker flew to Rome for a brief visit with the Italians in which he was promised the use of some military equipment, before journeying to Germany to meet with American ally Chancellor Kohl. Although Germany's constitution (which was brokered essentially by the United States) prohibited military involvement outside Germany's borders, Kohl committed a two billion dollar contribution to the coalition's war effort, as well as further economic and military support of coalition ally Turkey, and the transportation of Egyptian soldiers and ships to the Persian Gulf.

General Norman Schwarzkopf, Jr. and President George H. W. Bush visit US troops in Saudi Arabia on Thanksgiving Day, 1990.

A coalition of forces opposing Iraq's aggression was formed, consisting of forces from 42 countries: Argentina, Australia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Egypt, France, Germany, Greece, Honduras, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Kuwait, Luxembourg, Morocco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, the Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Syria, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States. It was the largest coalition since World War II. A group of Afghan mujahideen soldiers also reportedly joined towards the end of the war.

US Army General Norman Schwarzkopf, Jr. was designated to be the commander of the coalition forces in the Persian Gulf area. The Soviet Union condemned Baghdad's aggression against Kuwait, but did not support the United States and allied intervention in Iraq and tried to avert it.

Although they did not contribute any forces, Japan and Germany made financial contributions totaling $10 billion and $6.6 billion respectively. Luxembourg also provided financial support to the coalition. US troops represented 73% of the coalition's 956,600 troops in Iraq.

Many of the coalition countries were reluctant to commit military forces. Some felt that the war was an internal Arab affair or did not want to increase US influence in the Middle East. In the end, however, many governments were persuaded by Iraq's belligerence towards other Arab states, offers of economic aid or debt forgiveness, and threats to withhold aid.

Justification for intervention

The US and the UN gave several public justifications for involvement in the conflict, the most prominent being the Iraqi violation of Kuwaiti territorial integrity. In addition, the US moved to support its ally Saudi Arabia, whose importance in the region, and as a key supplier of oil, made it of considerable geopolitical importance. Shortly after the Iraqi invasion, US Defense Secretary Dick Cheney made the first of several visits to Saudi Arabia where King Fahd requested US military assistance. During a speech in a special joint session of the US Congress given on 11 September 1990, Bush summed up the reasons with the following remarks: "Within three days, 120,000 Iraqi troops with 850 tanks had poured into Kuwait and moved south to threaten Saudi Arabia. It was then that I decided to act to check that aggression."

The Pentagon stated that satellite photos showing a buildup of Iraqi forces along the border were the source of this information, but this was later alleged to be false. A reporter for the St. Petersburg Times acquired two commercial Soviet satellite images made at the time, which showed nothing but empty desert.

Other justifications for foreign involvement included Iraq's history of human rights abuses under Saddam. Iraq was also known to possess biological weapons and chemical weapons, which Saddam had used against Iranian troops during the Iran–Iraq War and against his own country's Kurdish population in the Al-Anfal campaign. Iraq was also known to have a nuclear weapons program; the report about it from January 1991 was partially declassified by the CIA on 26 May 2001.

Public relations campaign targeting the public

See also: Nayirah testimony
Gen. Colin Powell (left), Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf Jr., and Paul Wolfowitz (right) listen as Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney addresses reporters regarding the 1991 Gulf War.

Although the Iraqi military committed human rights abuses during the invasion, the alleged incidents that received the most publicity in the US were fabrications of the public relations firm hired by the government of Kuwait to persuade Americans to support military intervention. Shortly after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, the organization Citizens for a Free Kuwait was formed in the US. It hired the public relations firm Hill & Knowlton for about $11 million, paid by Kuwait's government.

Among many other means of influencing US opinion, such as distributing books on Iraqi atrocities to US soldiers deployed in the region, "Free Kuwait" T-shirts and speakers to college campuses, and dozens of video news releases to television stations, the firm arranged for an appearance before a group of members of the US Congress in which a young woman identifying herself as a nurse working in the Kuwait City hospital described Iraqi soldiers pulling babies out of incubators and letting them die on the floor.

The story helped tip both the public and Congress towards a war with Iraq: six Congressmen said the testimony was enough for them to support military action against Iraq and seven Senators referenced the testimony in debate. The Senate supported the military actions in a 52–47 vote. However, a year after the war, this allegation was revealed to be a fabrication. The young woman who had testified was found to be a member of Kuwait's royal family and the daughter of Kuwait's ambassador to the US. She had not lived in Kuwait during the Iraqi invasion.

The details of the Hill & Knowlton public relations campaign, including the incubator testimony, were published in John R. MacArthur's Second Front: Censorship and Propaganda in the Gulf War, and came to wide public attention when an Op-ed by MacArthur was published in The New York Times. This prompted a reexamination by Amnesty International, which had originally promoted an account alleging even greater numbers of babies torn from incubators than the original fake testimony. After finding no evidence to support it, the organization issued a retraction. President Bush then repeated the incubator allegations on television.

In reality, the Iraqi Army did commit various well-documented crimes during its occupation of Kuwait, such as the summary execution without trial of three brothers, after which their bodies were stacked and left to decay in a public street. Iraqi troops also ransacked and looted private Kuwaiti homes; one residence was repeatedly defecated in. A resident later commented: "The whole thing was violence for the sake of violence, destruction for the sake of destruction ... Imagine a surrealistic painting by Salvador Dalí".

US President Bush repeatedly compared Saddam Hussein to Hitler.

Early battles

Air campaign

Main article: Gulf War air campaign
The USAF F-117 Nighthawk, one of the key aircraft used in Operation Desert Storm

The Gulf War began with an extensive aerial bombing campaign on 16 January 1991. For 42 consecutive days and nights, the coalition forces subjected Iraq to one of the most intensive air bombardments in military history. The coalition flew over 100,000 sorties, dropping 88,500 tonnes of bombs, which widely destroyed military and civilian infrastructure.

Iraqi anti-aircraft defenses, including man-portable air-defense systems, were surprisingly ineffective against enemy aircraft, and the coalition suffered only 75 aircraft losses in over 100,000 sorties, 44 due to Iraqi action. Two of these losses are the result of aircraft colliding with the ground while evading Iraqi ground-fired weapons. One of these losses is a confirmed air-air victory.

Iraqi Scud missile strikes on Israel and Saudi Arabia

Main articles: Iraqi rocket attacks on Israel and Iraqi rocket attacks on Saudi Arabia
Scud Transporter Erector Launcher (TEL) with missile in upright position

Iraq's government made no secret that it would attack Israel if invaded. Prior to the war's start, in the aftermath of the failed US–Iraq peace talks in Geneva, Switzerland, a reporter asked Iraq's English-speaking Foreign Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz: "Mr. Foreign Minister, if war starts ... will you attack Israel?" His response was: "Yes, absolutely, yes."

Five hours after the first attacks, Iraq's state radio broadcast declared that "The dawn of victory nears as this great showdown begins." Iraq fired eight missiles the next day. These missile attacks were to continue throughout the war. Iraq fired 88 Scud missiles during the war's seven weeks.

Iraq hoped to provoke a military response from Israel. The Iraqi government hoped that many Arab states would withdraw from the Coalition, as they would be reluctant to fight alongside Israel. Following the first attacks, Israeli Air Force jets were deployed to patrol the northern airspace with Iraq. Israel prepared to militarily retaliate, as its policy for the previous 40 years had always been retaliation. However, President Bush pressured Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir not to retaliate and withdraw Israeli jets, fearing that if Israel attacked Iraq, the other Arab states would either desert the coalition or join Iraq. It was also feared that if Israel used Syrian or Jordanian airspace to attack Iraq, they would intervene in the war on Iraq's side or attack Israel. The coalition promised to deploy Patriot missiles to defend Israel if it refrained from responding to the Scud attacks.

The Scud missiles targeting Israel were relatively ineffective, as firing at extreme range resulted in a dramatic reduction in accuracy and payload. Two Israeli civilians died as a direct result of the missile attacks. Between 11 and 74 were killed from incorrect use of gas masks, heart attacks, and incorrect use of the anti-chemical weapons drug atropine. Approximately 230 Israelis were injured. Extensive property damage was also caused, and, according to the Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, "Damage to general property consisted of 1,302 houses, 6,142 apartments, 23 public buildings, 200 shops and 50 cars." It was feared that Iraq would fire missiles filled with nerve agents such as sarin. As a result, Israel's government issued gas masks to its citizens. When the first Iraqi missiles hit Israel, some people injected themselves with an antidote for nerve gas. It has been suggested that the sturdy construction techniques used in Israeli cities, coupled with the fact that Scuds were only launched at night, played an important role in limiting the number of casualties from Scud attacks.

Israeli civilians taking shelter from missiles (top) and aftermath of attack in Ramat Gan, Israel (bottom)

In response to the threat of Scuds on Israel, the US rapidly sent a Patriot missile air defense artillery battalion to Israel along with two batteries of MIM-104 Patriot missiles for the protection of civilians. The Royal Netherlands Air Force also deployed a Patriot missile squadron to Israel and Turkey. The Dutch Defense Ministry later stated that the military use of the Patriot missile system was largely ineffective, but its psychological value for the affected populations was high.

Coalition air forces were also extensively exercised in "Scud hunts" in the Iraqi desert, trying to locate the camouflaged trucks before they fired their missiles at Israel or Saudi Arabia. On the ground, special operations forces also infiltrated Iraq, tasked with locating and destroying Scuds – including the ill-fated Bravo Two Zero patrol of the SAS. Once special operations were combined with air patrols, the number of attacks fell sharply, then increased slightly as Iraqi forces adjusted to coalition tactics.

As the Scud attacks continued, the Israelis grew increasingly impatient, and considered taking unilateral military action against Iraq. On 22 January 1991, a Scud missile hit the Israeli city of Ramat Gan, after two coalition Patriots failed to intercept it. Three elderly people suffered fatal heart attacks, another 96 people were injured, and 20 apartment buildings were damaged. After this attack, the Israelis warned that if the US failed to stop the attacks, they would. At one point, Israeli commandos boarded helicopters prepared to fly into Iraq, but the mission was called off after a phone call from US Defense Secretary Dick Cheney, reporting on the extent of coalition efforts to destroy Scuds and emphasizing that Israeli intervention could endanger US forces.

In addition to the attacks on Israel, 47 Scud missiles were fired into Saudi Arabia, and one missile was fired at Bahrain and another at Qatar. The missiles were fired at both military and civilian targets. One Saudi civilian was killed, and 78 others were injured. No casualties were reported in Bahrain or Qatar. The Saudi government issued all its citizens and expatriates with gas masks in the event of Iraq using missiles with warheads containing chemical weapons. The government broadcast alerts and 'all clear' messages over television to warn citizens during Scud attacks.

On 25 February 1991, a Scud missile hit a US Army barracks of the 14th Quartermaster Detachment, out of Greensburg, Pennsylvania, stationed in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, killing 28 soldiers and injuring over 100. A subsequent investigation found that the assigned Patriot missile battery had failed to engage due to the loss of significance effect in the onboard computer's floating point calculations compounding over 100 hours of consecutive use, shifting the range gate position far enough to lose contact with the Scud during tracking action.

Iraqi invasion of Saudi Arabia (Battle of Khafji)

Main article: Battle of Khafji
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Gulf War" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (December 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Military operations during Khafji's liberation

On 29 January, Iraqi forces attacked and occupied the lightly defended Saudi city of Khafji with tanks and infantry. The Battle of Khafji ended two days later when the Iraqis were driven back by the Saudi Arabian National Guard, supported by Qatari forces and US Marines. The allied forces used extensive artillery fire.

Both sides suffered casualties, although Iraqi forces sustained substantially more dead and captured than the allied forces. Eleven Americans were killed in two separate friendly fire incidents, an additional 14 US airmen were killed when their AC-130 gunship was shot down by an Iraqi surface-to-air missile, and two US soldiers were captured during the battle. Saudi and Qatari forces had a total of 18 dead. Iraqi forces in Khafji had 60–300 dead and 400 captured.

The Battle of Khafji was an example of how air power could single-handedly hinder the advance of enemy ground forces. Upon learning of Iraqi troop movements, 140 coalition aircraft were diverted to attack an advancing column consisting of two armored divisions in battalion-sized units. Precision stand-off attacks were conducted during the night and through to the next day. Iraqi vehicle losses included 357 tanks, 147 armored personnel carriers, and 89 mobile artillery pieces. Some crews simply abandoned their vehicles upon realizing that they could be destroyed by guided bombs, stopping the divisions from massing for an organized attack on the town. One Iraqi soldier, who had fought in the Iran–Iraq War, remarked that his brigade "had sustained more punishment from allied airpower in 30 minutes at Khafji than in eight years of fighting against Iran."

Counter reconnaissance

Main article: Battle of Norfolk See also: Task Force 1-41 Infantry
Iraqi tanks destroyed by Task Force 1-41 Infantry, February 1991

Task Force 1-41 Infantry was a US Army heavy battalion task force from the 2nd Armored Division (Forward). It was the spearhead of VII Corps, consisting primarily of the 1st Battalion, 41st Infantry Regiment, 3rd Battalion, 66th Armor Regiment, and the 4th Battalion, 3rd Field Artillery Regiment. Task Force 1–41 was the first coalition force to breach the Saudi Arabian border on 15 February 1991, and to conduct ground combat operations in Iraq engaging in direct and indirect fire fights with the enemy on 17 February 1991. Shortly after arrival in theatre Task Force 1–41 Infantry received a counter-reconnaissance mission. 1–41 Infantry was assisted by the 1st Squadron, 4th Armored Cavalry Regiment. This joint effort would become known as Task Force Iron. Counter-reconnaissance generally includes destroying or repelling the enemy's reconnaissance elements and denying their commander any observation of friendly forces. On 15 February 1991 4th Battalion of the 3rd Field Artillery Regiment fired on a trailer and a few trucks in the Iraqi sector observing American forces.

On 16 February 1991 several groups of Iraqi vehicles appeared to be performing reconnaissance on the Task Force and were driven away by fire from 4–3 FA. Another enemy platoon, including six vehicles, was reported as being to the northeast of the Task Force. They were engaged with artillery fire from 4–3 FA. Later that evening another group of Iraqi vehicles was spotted moving towards the center of the Task Force. They appeared to be Iraqi Soviet-made BTRs and tanks. For the next hour the Task Force fought several small battles with Iraqi reconnaissance units. TF 1–41 IN fired TOW missiles at the Iraqi formation destroying one tank. The rest of the formation was destroyed or driven away by artillery fire from 4–3 FA. On 17 February 1991 the Task Force took enemy mortar fire, but the enemy forces managed to escape. Later that evening the Task Force received enemy artillery fire but suffered no casualties. That same evening the Task Force identified an Iraqi mortar position and engaged it with both direct and indirect fires. The Iraqis continued probing operations against the Task Force for approximately two hours. For the next two days the Task Force observed Iraqi wheeled vehicles and small units move in front of them. Several times Iraqi mortars fired on Task Force 1–41 Infantry positions. On 18 February Iraqi mortar positions continued to conduct fire missions against the Task Force. The Task Force returned fire on the Iraqi positions with artillery fire from 4–3 FA and 1st Infantry Division Artillery. During the Iraqi mortar attacks two American soldiers were wounded. Iraqi reconnaissance elements continued to patrol the area between the Task Force and the 1st Cavalry Division. VII Corps air units and artillery conducted combat operations against Iraqi defensive positions.

Breach

Soldiers of 2nd Platoon, Company C, 1st Battalion, 41st Infantry Regiment pose with a captured Iraqi tank, February 1991
Main article: Battle of Norfolk See also: Task Force 1-41 Infantry

Task Force 1–41 Infantry was the first coalition force to breach the Saudi Arabian border on 15 February 1991 and conduct ground combat operations in Iraq engaging in direct and indirect fire fights with the enemy on 17 February 1991. Prior to this action the Task Force's primary fire support battalion, 4th Battalion of the 3rd Field Artillery Regiment, participated in a massive artillery preparation. Around 300 guns from multiple countries participated in the artillery barrage. Over 14,000 rounds were fired during these missions. M270 Multiple Launch Rocket Systems contributed an additional 4,900 rockets fired at Iraqi targets. Iraq lost close to 22 artillery battalions during the initial stages of this barrage, including the destruction of approximately 396 Iraqi artillery pieces.

By the end of these raids Iraqi artillery assets had all but ceased to exist. One Iraqi unit that was totally destroyed during the preparation was the Iraqi 48th Infantry Division Artillery Group. The group's commander stated his unit lost 83 of its 100 guns to the artillery preparation. This artillery prep was supplemented by air attacks by B-52 bombers and Lockheed AC-130 fixed wing gunships. 1st Infantry Division Apache helicopters and B-52 bombers conducted raids against Iraq's 110th Infantry Brigade. The 1st Engineer Battalion and 9th Engineer Battalion marked and proofed assault lanes under direct and indirect enemy fire to secure a foothold in enemy territory and pass the 1st Infantry Division and the British 1st Armored Division forward.

An Iraqi Republican Guard T-55 tank destroyed by Task Force 1–41 Infantry, February 1991

On 24 February 1991 the 1st Cavalry Division conducted a couple artillery missions against Iraqi artillery units. One artillery mission struck a series of Iraqi bunkers, reinforced by Iraqi T-55 tanks, in the sector of the Iraqi 25th Infantry Division. The same day the 2nd Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division with the 1st Battalion, 5th Cavalry, 1st Battalion, 32nd Armor, and the 1st Battalion, 8th Cavalry destroyed Iraqi bunkers and combat vehicles in the sector of the Iraqi 25th Infantry Division. On 24 February 2nd Brigade, 1st Infantry Division rolled through the breach in the Iraqi defense west of Wadi al-Batin and also cleared the northeastern sector of the breach site of enemy resistance. Task Force 3–37th Armor breached the Iraqi defense clearing four passage lanes and expanding the gap under direct enemy fire. Also on 24 February the 1st Infantry Division along with the 1st Cavalry Division destroyed Iraqi outposts and patrols belonging to the Iraqi 26th Infantry Division. The two divisions also began capturing prisoners. The 1st Infantry Division cleared a zone between Phase Line Vermont and Phase Line Kansas. Once the 1st Infantry Division's 3rd Battalion, 37th Armor reached the Iraqi rear defensive positions it destroyed an Iraqi D-30 artillery battery and many trucks and bunkers.

Task Force 1–41 Infantry was given the task of breaching Iraq's initial defensive positions along the Iraq–Saudi Arabia border. The 1st Squadron, 4th Armored Cavalry Regiment handled similar responsibilities in its sector of operations. The 1st Infantry Division's 5th Battalion, 16th Infantry also played a significant role clearing the trenches and captured 160 Iraqi soldiers in the process. Once into Iraqi territory Task Force 1–41 Infantry encountered multiple Iraqi defensive positions and bunkers. These defensive positions were occupied by a brigade-sized element. Task Force 1–41 Infantry elements dismounted and prepared to engage the enemy soldiers who occupied these well-prepared and heavily fortified bunkers. The Task Force found itself engaged in six hours of combat in order to clear the extensive bunker complex. The Iraqis engaged the Task Force with small arms fire, RPGs, mortar fire, and what was left of Iraqi artillery assets. A series of battles unfolded resulting in heavy Iraqi casualties and the Iraqis being removed from their defensive positions with many becoming prisoners of war. Some escaped to be killed or captured by other coalition forces. In the process of clearing the bunkers, Task Force 1–41 captured two brigade command posts and the command post of the Iraqi 26th Infantry Division. The Task Force also captured a brigade commander, several battalion commanders, company commanders, and staff officers. As combat operations progressed Task Force 1–41 Infantry engaged at short range multiple dug in enemy tanks in ambush positions. For a few hours, bypassed Iraqi RPG-equipped anti-tank teams, T-55 tanks, and dismounted Iraqi infantry fired at passing American vehicles, only to be destroyed by other US tanks and fighting vehicles following the initial forces.

The 1st Infantry Division's Task Force 2–16 Infantry cleared four lanes simultaneously through an enemy fortified trench system while inflicting heavy casualties on Iraqi forces. Task Force 2–16 continued the attack clearing over 21 km (13 mi) of entrenched enemy positions resulting in the capture and destruction of numerous enemy vehicles, equipment, personnel and command bunkers.

Ground campaign

M109 howitzers belonging to 4th Battalion of the 3rd Field Artillery Regiment, 2nd Armored Division (FWD) conducts artillery strikes on Iraqi positions during the 1st Gulf War. 4-3 FA was the primary fire support battalion for Task Force 1–41 during the 1st Gulf War, February 1991.
See also: Battle of Al Busayyah, Battle of Phase Line Bullet, Battle of 73 Easting, Battle of Norfolk, Battle of Medina Ridge, Battle of Kuwait International Airport, and Battle of Rumaila

A 90,000 round artillery preparation fire on Iraqi defensive positions preceded the major ground assault, lasting 2.5 hours. 1st Infantry Division Artillery, which included 4-3 FA battalion, was decisive during artillery combat operations performing multiple raids and fire missions. These combat operations resulted in the destruction of 50 enemy tanks, 139 APCs, 30 air defense systems, 152 artillery pieces, 27 missile launchers, 108 mortars, and 548 wheeled vehicles, 61 trench lines and bunker positions, 92 dug in and open infantry targets, and 34 logistical sites. The ground campaign consisted of three or possibly four of the largest tank battles in American military history. The battles at 73 Easting, Norfolk, and Medina Ridge are well noted for their historical significance. Some consider the Battle of Medina Ridge the largest tank battle of the war. Other sources consider the Battle of Norfolk the largest tank battle of the war and the second largest tank battle in American history. The U.S. Marine Corps also fought the biggest tank battle in its history at Kuwait International Airport. The U.S. 3rd Armored Division also fought a significant battle at Objective Dorset not far from where the Battle of Norfolk was taking place. The U.S. 3rd Armored Division destroyed approximately 300 enemy combat vehicles during this particular encounter with Iraqi forces.

The U.S. VII Corps was the primary combat formation of the coalition forces. It was a formidable fighting force consisting of 1,487 tanks, 1,384 infantry fighting vehicles, 568 artillery pieces, 132 MLRS, 8 missile launchers, and 242 attack helicopters. It had a total troop strength of 146,321 troops. Its primary full strength fighting formations were the 1st Armored Division (United States), the 3rd Armored Division (United States) and the 1st Infantry Division (United States). The 2nd Armored Division (Forward) was assigned to the 1st Infantry Division as its third maneuver brigade. Its Task Force 1-41 Infantry would be the spearhead of VII Corps. In addition, the corps had the 2nd Cavalry Regiment (United States) to act as a scouting and screening force, and two further heavy divisions, the 1st Cavalry Division (United States) and the United Kingdom's 1st Armoured Division, as well as the U.S. 11th Aviation Group. VII Corps fought a number of large battles against Iraqi forces. Some of them historical in scope and size. Three of the battles at Norfolk, Medina Ridge, and 73 Easting are considered among the largest tank battles in history. By the end of combat operations on 28 February 1991, U.S. VII Corps had driven 260 kilometres (160 mi), captured 22,000 Iraqi soldiers, and destroyed 1,350 Iraqi tanks, 1,224 armored personnel carriers, 285 artillery pieces, 105 air defense systems, and 1,229 trucks.

An OH-58D Kiowa helicopter departs from a communications site in the desert during Operation Desert Shield

The primary combat vehicles of the American divisions were the M1A1 Abrams tank and the Bradley Fighting Vehicle. The primary American artillery system was the self propelled M109 howitzer. The primary American attack helicopter was the Boeing AH-64 Apache (Army) with the Bell AH-1 Cobra (Army and Marines) also being in theatre. The U.S. Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II ground attack aircraft would distinguish itself during the Gulf War aided by the OH-58D JAATT eyes in the sky. Together they inflicted significant damage on Iraqi ground forces. U.S. A-10 "Warthog" crews would destroy 900 Iraqi tanks, 2,000 other military vehicles and 1,200 artillery pieces during combat operations.

The U.S. Marine Corps was represented by the 1st Marine Division and the 2nd Marine Division. They were supported by the U.S. Army's 2nd Armored Division's Tiger Brigade to provide the Marines with additional armor support. Marine armor units mostly consisted of the older M-60 tank. The 1st Marine Division destroyed around 60 Iraqi tanks near the Burgan oil field without suffering any losses. The 1st Marine Division Task Force Ripper led the drive to the Kuwait International Airport on 27 February 1991. Marine Task Force Ripper destroyed about 100 Iraqi tanks and armored personnel carriers, including T-72 tanks. The division commander Maj. Gen. J.M. Myatt said, "During the first day of combat operations 1st Platoon, D Company, 3rd Tank Battalion destroyed 15 Iraqi tanks". The Marines also destroyed 25 APCs and took 300 prisoners of war. The U.S.M.C. would often encounter the Iraqi 3rd Armored Division in their theater of operations. Once the 1st Marine Division reached Kuwait International Airport they found what remained of the Iraqi 12th Armored Brigade, 3rd Armored Division defending it. The Marines destroyed 30 to 40 Iraqi T-72 tanks which had taken up defensive positions around the airport. The Iraqi 3rd Armored Division losses included more than 250 T-55/62s and 70 T-72 tanks by the end of combat operations. The Iraqi 3rd Armored Division would be totally destroyed. The 2nd Marine Division played a major role repelling the attempted Iraqi invasion of Saudi Arabia which is known as the Battle of Khafji. The 2nd Marine Division also faced heavy resistance during the Battle of Kuwait International Airport. The battle featured the "Reveille Engagement" which went on to become the largest tank battle in United States Marine Corps' entire history. Marine Reserve unit Bravo Company, 4th Tank Battalion, 4th Marine division was assigned to the 2nd Marine Division. Bravo Company destroyed a total of 119 enemy vehicles and took over 800 POWs by the end of combat operations. The 1st Tank Battalion claimed 50 Iraqi T-55 and T-62 tanks and 25 APCs. The 3rd Battalion claimed 57 T-55s and T-62s along with 5 T-72s, 7 APCs, and 10 trucks. The 8th Battalion destroyed more than three dozen tanks and a number of other vehicles. U.S. Marine Corps armor units would destroy hundreds of Iraqi tanks by the end of combat operations. U.S. Marine Corps tank losses would be light as they suffered the loss of ten M-60 tanks during combat operations.

British Challenger 1 tanks during the Gulf War. The British Challenger tank was the most efficient tank of the Gulf War, suffering no losses while destroying approximately 300 Iraqi tanks during combat operations.

The United Kingdom was represented by its 1st Armoured Division known as the Desert Rats. The British 1st Armoured Division fielded approximately 176 Challenger 1 tanks. British infantry rode into battle on the Warrior tracked armoured vehicle. It had reasonable armour protection and a 30mm gun. Modified versions of the vehicle included mortar carriers, MILAN antitank systems, and command and control vehicles; and the British possessed a variety of excellent light armoured vehicles built on their FV101 Scorpion chassis. British artillery was primarily American made M109 howitzers (155mm), M110 howitzers (203mm), and M270 MLRS which were compatible with American systems. Their air support consisted of Gazelle helicopters, used for reconnaissance, and the Lynx helicopter which was comparable to the American AH-1 Cobra. The British had their full contingent of engineer, logistics, and medical units.

The British 1st Armoured Division was responsible for protecting the right flank of VII Corps. It was assumed by the Corps' planners the Iraqi 52nd Armored Division would counterattack VII Corps once their penetration into Iraqi defenses was discovered. The British 1st Armoured Division had two brigades (the 4th and 7th) which participated in Operation Granby, the name given to the British military operations during the 1991 Gulf War. The British 1st Armoured Division had traveled 217 miles in 97 hours. The British 1st Armored Division had captured or destroyed about 300 Iraqi tanks and a very large number of armored personnel carriers, trucks, reconnaissance vehicles, etc. The Desert Rats also destroyed multiple Iraqi artillery positions. The division also took over 7,000 Iraqi prisoners of war including two division commanders and two other general officers. The British 1st Armoured Division destroyed or isolated four Iraqi infantry divisions (the 26th, 48th, 31st, and 25th) and overran the Iraqi 52nd Armored Division in several sharp engagements. The Iraqi 80th Armored Brigade would also fall victim to the British 1st Armoured Division.

Iraq was represented mostly by its own VII Corps and its Jihad Corps. Its most notable participants were its elite Republican Guard Divisions Tawakalna, Medina, Hammurabi, and Adnan. The first three of these had a strength of over 660 tanks, 660 infantry fighting vehicles, and thousands of antitank weapons, self propelled artillery, and other combat systems. The Tawakalna Republican Guard Division was Iraq's most powerful division which included approximately 14,000 soldiers, 220 T-72 tanks, 284 infantry fighting vehicles, 126 artillery pieces, and 18 MLRS. The Iraqi 52nd Armored Division was also a primary participant. It was a powerful division consisting of 245 tanks and 195 armored fighting vehicles. The Iraqi 10th and 12th Armored Divisions were also present. The two divisions formed the foundation of the Jihad Corps. The Iraqi 10th Armored Division was considered the best regular division in the Iraqi Army. It had more modern equipment than the other regular Iraqi units. It was equipped with T-72 and T-62 tanks. The T-62 tank being its primary system. Overall the primary tank of the Iraqi forces was the T-55 tank. The Iraqis fielded them in great numbers. The Iraqis also had elements of two other independent armored brigades in theatre, those being the 50th and 29th Armored Brigades. Iraq would also field multiple Infantry Divisions.

The Iraqis suffered the loss of over 3,000 tanks and over 2,000 other combat vehicles during these battles against the American-led coalition. It is estimated that Iraqi forces suffered 20,000–50,000 troops killed during combat operations. It is also estimated that over 75,000 Iraqi soldiers were wounded. Between 80,000 and 175,000 Iraqi troops were taken prisoner. Iraqi forces inflicted very minimal damage on Coalition forces.

Liberation of Kuwait

Main article: Liberation of Kuwait campaign See also: Order of battle of the Gulf War ground campaign
US M1A1 Abrams tanks from the 3rd Armored Division along the Line of Departure

US decoy attacks by air attacks and naval gunfire the night before Kuwait's liberation were designed to make the Iraqis believe the main coalition ground attack would focus on central Kuwait. For months, American units in Saudi Arabia had been under almost constant Iraqi artillery fire, as well as threats from Scud missiles and chemical attacks. On 24 February 1991, the 1st and 2nd Marine Divisions and the 1st Light Armored Infantry Battalion crossed into Kuwait and headed toward Kuwait City. They encountered trenches, barbed wire, and minefields. However, these positions were poorly defended, and were overrun in the first few hours. Several tank battles took place, but otherwise coalition troops encountered minimal resistance, as most Iraqi troops surrendered. The general pattern was that the Iraqis would put up a short fight before surrendering. However, Iraqi air defenses shot down nine US aircraft. Meanwhile, forces from Arab states advanced into Kuwait from the east, encountering little resistance and suffering few casualties.

Despite the successes of coalition forces, it was feared that the Iraqi Republican Guard would escape into Iraq before it could be destroyed. It was decided to send British armored forces into Kuwait 15 hours ahead of schedule, and to send US forces after the Republican Guard. The coalition advance was preceded by a heavy artillery and rocket barrage, after which 150,000 troops and 1,500 tanks began their advance. Iraqi forces in Kuwait counterattacked against US troops, acting on a direct order from Saddam Hussein himself. Despite the intense combat, the Americans repulsed the Iraqis and continued to advance towards Kuwait City.

Kuwaiti forces were tasked with liberating the city. Iraqi troops offered only light resistance. The Kuwaitis quickly liberated the city despite losing one soldier and having one plane shot down. On 27 February, Saddam ordered a retreat from Kuwait, and President Bush declared it liberated. However, an Iraqi unit at Kuwait International Airport appeared not to have received the message and fiercely resisted. US Marines had to fight for hours before securing the airport, after which Kuwait was declared secure. After four days of fighting, Iraqi forces were expelled from Kuwait. As part of a scorched earth policy, they set fire to nearly 700 oil wells and placed land mines around the wells to make extinguishing the fires more difficult.

Initial moves into Iraq

Ground troop movements 24–28 February 1991 during Operation Desert Storm

The war's ground phase was officially designated Operation Desert Saber. The first units to move into Iraq were three patrols of the British Special Air Service's B squadron, call signs Bravo One Zero, Bravo Two Zero, and Bravo Three Zero, in late January. These eight-man patrols landed behind Iraqi lines to gather intelligence on the movements of Scud mobile missile launchers, which could not be detected from the air, as they were hidden under bridges and camouflage netting during the day. Other objectives included the destruction of the launchers and their fiber-optic communications arrays that lay in pipelines and relayed coordinates to the TEL operators launching attacks against Israel. The operations were designed to prevent any possible Israeli intervention. Due to lack of sufficient ground cover to carry out their assignment, One Zero and Three Zero abandoned their operations, while Two Zero remained, and was later compromised, with only Sergeant Chris Ryan escaping to Syria.

Elements of the 2nd Brigade, 1st Battalion 5th Cavalry of the 1st Cavalry Division of the US Army performed a direct attack into Iraq on 15 February 1991, followed by one in force on 20 February that led directly through seven Iraqi divisions which were caught off guard. On 17 January 1991 the 101st Airborne Division Aviation Regiment fired the first shots of the war when eight AH-64 helicopters successfully destroyed two Iraqi early warning radar sites. From 15 to 20 February, the Battle of Wadi al-Batin took place inside Iraq; this was the first of two attacks by 1 Battalion 5th Cavalry of the 1st Cavalry Division. It was a feint attack, designed to make the Iraqis think that a coalition invasion would take place from the south. The Iraqis fiercely resisted, and the Americans eventually withdrew as planned back into the Wadi al-Batin. Three US soldiers were killed and nine wounded, with one M2 Bradley IFV turret destroyed, but they had taken 40 prisoners and destroyed five tanks, and successfully deceived the Iraqis. This attack led the way for the XVIII Airborne Corps to sweep around behind the 1st Cav and attack Iraqi forces to the west. On 22 February 1991, Iraq agreed to a Soviet-proposed ceasefire agreement. The agreement called for Iraq to withdraw troops to pre-invasion positions within six weeks following a total ceasefire, and called for monitoring of the ceasefire and withdrawal to be overseen by the UN Security Council.

The coalition rejected the proposal, but said that retreating Iraqi forces would not be attacked, and gave 24 hours for Iraq to withdraw its forces. On 23 February, fighting resulted in the capture of 500 Iraqi soldiers. On 24 February, British and American armored forces crossed the Iraq–Kuwait border and entered Iraq in large numbers, taking hundreds of prisoners. Iraqi resistance was light, and four Americans were killed.

Coalition forces enter Iraq

Aerial view of destroyed Iraqi T-72 tank, BMP-1 and Type 63 armored personnel carriers and trucks on Highway 8 in March 1991

Shortly afterwards, the US VII Corps, in full strength and spearheaded by the 2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment, launched an armored attack into Iraq early on 24 February, just to the west of Kuwait, surprising Iraqi forces. Simultaneously, the US XVIII Airborne Corps launched a sweeping "left-hook" attack across southern Iraq's largely undefended desert, led by the US 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment and the 24th Infantry Division (Mechanized). This movement's left flank was protected by the French Division Daguet. The 101st Airborne Division conducted a combat air assault into enemy territory. The 101st Airborne Division had struck 249 km (155 mi) behind enemy lines. It was the deepest air assault operation in history. Approximately 400 helicopters transported 2,000 soldiers into Iraq where they destroyed Iraqi columns trying to flee westward and prevented the escape of Iraqi forces. The 101st Airborne Division travelled a further 80 to 100 km (50 to 60 mi) into Iraq. By nightfall, the 101st cut off Highway 8 which was a vital supply line running between Basra and the Iraqi forces. The 101st had lost 16 soldiers in action during the 100-hour war and captured thousands of enemy prisoners of war.

The French force quickly overcame Iraq's 45th Infantry Division, suffering light casualties and taking a large number of prisoners, and took up blocking positions to prevent an Iraqi counterattack on the coalition's flank. The movement's right flank was protected by the United Kingdom's 1st Armoured Division. Once the allies had penetrated deep into Iraqi territory, they turned eastward, launching a flank attack against the elite Republican Guard before it could escape. The Iraqis resisted fiercely from dug-in positions and stationary vehicles, and even mounted armored charges.

Unlike many previous engagements, the destruction of the first Iraqi tanks did not result in a mass surrender. The Iraqis suffered massive losses and lost dozens of tanks and vehicles, while US casualties were comparatively low, with a single Bradley knocked out. Coalition forces pressed another 10 km (6.2 mi) into Iraqi territory, and captured their objective within three hours. They took 500 prisoners and inflicted heavy losses, defeating Iraq's 26th Infantry Division. A US soldier was killed by an Iraqi land mine, another five by friendly fire, and 30 wounded during the battle. Meanwhile, British forces attacked Iraq's Medina Division and a major Republican Guard logistics base. In nearly two days of some of the war's most intense fighting, the British destroyed 40 enemy tanks and captured a division commander.

Meanwhile, US forces attacked the village of Al Busayyah, meeting fierce resistance. The US force destroyed military hardware and took prisoners, while suffering no casualties.

On 25 February 1991, Iraqi forces fired a Scud missile at an American barracks in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. The missile attack killed 28 US military personnel.

The coalition's advance was much swifter than US generals had expected. On 26 February, Iraqi troops began retreating from Kuwait, after they had set 737 of its oil wells on fire. A long convoy of retreating Iraqi troops formed along the main Iraq–Kuwait highway. Although they were retreating, this convoy was bombed so extensively by coalition air forces that it came to be known as the Highway of Death. Thousands of Iraqi troops were killed. American, British, and French forces continued to pursue retreating Iraqi forces over the border and back into Iraq, eventually moving to within 240 km (150 mi) of Baghdad, before withdrawing back to Iraq's border with Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.

End of active hostilities

Main article: 1991 Iraqi uprisings
Civilians and coalition military forces wave Kuwaiti and Saudi Arabian flags as they celebrate the retreat of Iraqi forces from Kuwait.

In coalition-occupied Iraqi territory, a peace conference was held where a ceasefire agreement was negotiated and signed by both sides. At the conference, Iraq was authorized to fly armed helicopters on their side of the temporary border, ostensibly for government transit due to the damage done to civilian infrastructure. Soon after, these helicopters and much of Iraq's military were used to fight an uprising in the south. On March 1, 1991, one day after the Gulf War ceasefire, a revolt broke out in Basra against the Iraqi government. The uprising spread within days to all of the largest Shia cities in southern Iraq: Najaf, Amarah, Diwaniya, Hilla, Karbala, Kut, Nasiriyah and Samawah. The rebellions were encouraged by an airing of "The Voice of Free Iraq" on 24 February 1991, which was broadcast from a CIA-run radio station out of Saudi Arabia. The Arabic service of the Voice of America supported the uprising by stating that the rebellion was well supported, and that they would soon be liberated from Saddam.

In the North, Kurdish leaders took American statements that they would support an uprising to heart, and began fighting, hoping to trigger a coup d'état. However, when no US support came, Iraqi generals remained loyal to Saddam and brutally crushed the Kurdish uprising and the uprising in the south. Millions of Kurds fled across the mountains to Turkey and Kurdish areas of Iran. On April 5, the Iraqi government announced "the complete crushing of acts of sedition, sabotage and rioting in all towns of Iraq." An estimated 25,000 to 100,000 Iraqis were killed in the uprisings. These events later resulted in no-fly zones being established in northern and southern Iraq.

In Kuwait, the Emir was restored, and suspected Iraqi collaborators were repressed. Eventually, over 400,000 people were expelled from the country, including a large number of Palestinians, because of PLO support of Saddam. Yasser Arafat did not apologize for his support of Iraq, but after his death Mahmoud Abbas formally apologized in 2004 on behalf of the PLO. This came after the Kuwaiti government formally forgave the group.

There was some criticism of the Bush administration, as they chose to allow Saddam to remain in power instead of pushing on to capture Baghdad and overthrowing his government. In their co-written 1998 book, A World Transformed, Bush and Brent Scowcroft argued that such a course would have fractured the alliance, and would have had many unnecessary political and human costs associated with it.

In 1992, the US Defense Secretary during the war, Dick Cheney, made the same point:

I would guess if we had gone in there, we would still have forces in Baghdad today. We'd be running the country. We would not have been able to get everybody out and bring everybody home.

And the final point that I think needs to be made is this question of casualties. I don't think you could have done all of that without significant additional US casualties, and while everybody was tremendously impressed with the low cost of the (1991) conflict, for the 146 Americans who were killed in action and for their families, it wasn't a cheap war.

And the question in my mind is, how many additional American casualties is Saddam worth? And the answer is, not that damned many. So, I think we got it right, both when we decided to expel him from Kuwait, but also when the President made the decision that we'd achieved our objectives and we were not going to go get bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq.

On 10 March 1991, 540,000 US troops began moving out of the Persian Gulf.

On 15 March 1991, Sheikh Jaber al-Ahmad al-Sabah returned to Kuwait, staying at the private home of a wealthy Kuwaiti as his own palace had been destroyed. He was met with a symbolic arrival with several dozens cars filled with people honking their horns and waving Kuwaiti flags who tried to follow the Emir's convoy. According to The New York Times, he faced a population divided between those who stayed and those who fled, a government straining to reassert control and a rejuvenated opposition that is pressing for greater democracy and other postwar changes, including voting rights for women. Democracy advocates had been calling for restoration of Parliament that the Emir had suspended in 1986.

Coalition involvement

Main article: Coalition of the Gulf War
Coalition troops from Egypt, Syria, Oman, France, and Kuwait during Operation Desert Storm

Coalition members included Argentina, Australia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Egypt, France, Germany, Greece, Honduras, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Kuwait, Luxembourg, Morocco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, the Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Syria, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States. The United States had 700,000 troops.

Germany and Japan provided financial assistance and donated military hardware, although they did not send direct military assistance. This later became known as checkbook diplomacy.

Australia

Main article: Australian contribution to the 1991 Gulf War

Australia contributed a Naval Task Group, which formed part of the multi-national fleet in the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman, under Operation Damask. In addition, medical teams were deployed aboard a US hospital ship, and a naval clearance diving team took part in de-mining Kuwait's port facilities following the end of combat operations. Australian forces experienced a number of incidents in the first number of weeks of the Desert Storm Campaign including the detection of significant air threats from Iraq as a part of the outer perimeter of Battle Force Zulu; the detection of free sea floating mines and assistance to the aircraft carrier USS Midway. The Australian Task Force was also placed at great risk with regard to the sea mine threat, with HMAS Brisbane narrowly avoiding a mine. The Australians played a significant role in enforcing the sanctions put in place against Iraq following Kuwait's invasion. Following the war's end, Australia deployed a medical unit on Operation Habitat to northern Iraq as part of Operation Provide Comfort.

Argentina

Main article: Operativo Alfil
Argentine Navy Alouette III helicopter on board USNS Comfort, February 1991

Argentina was the only South American country to participate in the 1991 Gulf War. It sent a destroyer, ARA Almirante Brown (D-10), a corvette, ARA Spiro (P-43) (later replaced by another corvette, ARA Rosales (P-42)) and a supply ship, ARA Bahía San Blas (B-4) to participate on the United Nations blockade and sea control effort of the Persian Gulf. The success of "Operación Alfil" (English: "Operation Bishop") with more than 700 interceptions and 25,000 nautical miles (46,000 km) sailed in the theatre of operations helped to overcome the so-called "Malvinas syndrome".

Argentina was later classified by the US as a major non-NATO ally due to its contributions during the war.

Canada

Main article: Operation Friction

Canada was one of the first countries to condemn Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, and it quickly agreed to join the US-led coalition. In August 1990, Prime Minister Brian Mulroney committed the Canadian Forces to deploy a Naval Task Group. The destroyers HMCS Terra Nova and HMCS Athabaskan joined the maritime interdiction force supported by the supply ship HMCS Protecteur in Operation Friction. The Canadian Task Group led the coalition's maritime logistics forces in the Persian Gulf. A fourth ship, HMCS Huron, arrived in-theater after hostilities had ceased and was the first allied ship to visit Kuwait.

Following the UN-authorized use of force against Iraq, the Canadian Forces deployed a CF-18 Hornet and CH-124 Sea King squadron with support personnel, as well as a field hospital to deal with casualties from the ground war. When the air war began, the CF-18s were integrated into the coalition force and were tasked with providing air cover and attacking ground targets. This was the first time since the Korean War that Canada's military had participated in offensive combat operations. The only CF-18 Hornet to record an official victory during the conflict was an aircraft involved in the beginning of the Battle of Bubiyan against the Iraqi Navy.

France

Main article: Opération Daguet
French and American soldiers inspecting an Iraqi Type 69 tank destroyed by the French Division Daguet during Operation Desert Storm

The second largest European contingent was from France, which committed 18,000 troops. Operating on the left flank of the US XVIII Airborne Corps, the French Army force was the Division Daguet, including troops from the French Foreign Legion. Initially, the French operated independently under national command and control, but coordinated closely with the Americans (via CENTCOM) and Saudis. In January, the Division was placed under the tactical control of the XVIII Airborne Corps. France also deployed several combat aircraft and naval units. The French called their contribution Opération Daguet.

Italy

Main article: Operazione Locusta

Following the invasion and annexation of Kuwait by Iraq, on September 25, 1990, the Italian Government sent eight multirole fighter bombers Tornado IDS (plus two spare) in the Persian Gulf, belonging to the , 36º and 50º Stormo, which were deployed at the Al Dhafra Air Base, near Abu Dhabi, in the United Arab Emirates. During the 42 days of war, Italian fighters made 226 sorties for a total of 589 flight hours. The Italian Air Force recorded the loss of a single aircraft in the Gulf War. The use of Italian aircraft as part of the Desert Storm operation represented the first operational employment in combat missions of Italian Air Force aircraft since the end of World War II.

United Kingdom

Main article: Operation Granby
British Army convoy during the Gulf War

The United Kingdom committed the largest contingent of any European state that participated in the war's combat operations. Operation Granby was the code name for the operations in the Persian Gulf. British Army regiments (mainly with the 1st Armoured Division), Royal Air Force, Naval Air Squadrons and Royal Navy vessels were mobilized in the Persian Gulf. Both Royal Air Force and Naval Air Squadrons, using various aircraft, operated from airbases in Saudi Arabia and Naval Air Squadrons from various vessels in the Persian Gulf. The United Kingdom played a major role in the Battle of Norfolk, where its forces destroyed over 200 Iraqi tanks and a large quantity of other vehicles. After 48 hours of combat the British 1st Armoured Division destroyed or isolated four Iraqi infantry divisions (the 26th, 48th, 31st, and 25th) and overran the Iraqi 52nd Armored Division in several sharp engagements.

Chief Royal Navy vessels deployed to the Persian Gulf included Broadsword-class frigates, and Sheffield-class destroyers; other R.N. and RFA ships were also deployed. The light aircraft carrier HMS Ark Royal was deployed to the Mediterranean Sea.

Several SAS squadrons were deployed.

A British Challenger 1 achieved the longest range confirmed tank kill of the war, destroying an Iraqi tank with an armour-piercing fin-stabilized discarding-sabot (APFSDS) round fired over 4,700 metres (2.9 mi)—the longest tank-on-tank kill shot recorded.

Casualties

Civilian

Iraqi Kurds fleeing to Turkey shortly after the war

Over 1,000 Kuwaiti civilians were killed by Iraqis. More than 600 Kuwaitis went missing during Iraq's occupation, and approximately 375 remains were found in mass graves in Iraq. The increased importance of air attacks from both coalition warplanes and cruise missiles led to controversy over the number of civilian deaths caused during Desert Storm's initial stages. Within Desert Storm's first 24 hours, more than 1,000 sorties were flown, many against targets in Baghdad. The city was the target of heavy bombing, as it was the seat of power for Saddam and the Iraqi forces' command and control. This ultimately led to civilian casualties.

In one noted incident, two USAF stealth planes bombed a bunker in Amiriyah, causing the deaths of 408 Iraqi civilians in the shelter. Scenes of burned and mutilated bodies were subsequently broadcast, and controversy arose over the bunker's status, with some stating that it was a civilian shelter, while others contended that it was a center of Iraqi military operations, and that the civilians had been deliberately moved there to act as human shields.

Saddam's government gave high civilian casualty to draw support from Islamic countries. The Iraqi government claimed that 2,300 civilians died during the air campaign. According to the Project on Defense Alternatives study, 3,664 Iraqi civilians were killed in the conflict.

During the nationwide uprisings against the Ba'athist Iraqi government that directly followed the end of the Gulf War in March and April, an estimated 25,000 to 100,000 Iraqis were killed, overwhelmingly civilians.

A Harvard University study released in June 1991 predicted that there would be tens of thousands of additional Iraqi civilian deaths by the end of 1991 due to the "public health catastrophe" caused by the destruction of the country's electrical generating capacity. "Without electricity, hospitals cannot function, perishable medicines spoil, water cannot be purified and raw sewage cannot be processed,". The US government refused to release its own study of the effects of the Iraqi public health crisis.

An investigation in 1992 by Beth Osborne Daponte estimated about 13,000 civilians were directly killed in the war, while another 70,000 died indirectly from the war's other effects. According to a 1992 study published in The New England Journal of Medicine by researchers known as the International Study Team (IST), child mortality increased threefold as a result of the war, with 46,900 children under the age of 5 dying between January and August 1991. However, these figures have been challenged by a 2017 study published in The BMJ, which stated that the "IST survey probably understated the level of child mortality that prevailed during 1985–1990 and overstated the level during 1991." According to this study, "there was no major rise in child mortality in Iraq after 1990". A report published in 2002 by Medact estimated the total number of Iraqi deaths caused directly and indirectly by the Gulf War to be between 142,500 and 206,000, including 100,000–120,000 military deaths, and 20,000–35,000 civilian deaths in the civil war and 15,000–30,000 refugee deaths after the end of the Gulf war.

Iraq also launched numerous attacks on civilian targets in Israel and Saudi Arabia. A 1991 report by Middle East Watch said that at least one Saudi civilian was killed after they were hit by Iraqi shelling in Riyadh. A disputed number of people were also killed during the Iraqi rocket attacks on Israel.

Iraqi

A United Nations report in March 1991 described the effect on Iraq of the US-led bombing campaign as "near apocalyptic", bringing back Iraq to the "pre-industrial age." The exact number of Iraqi combat casualties is unknown, but is believed to have been heavy. Some estimate that Iraq sustained between 20,000 and 35,000 fatalities. A report commissioned by the US Air Force estimated 10,000–12,000 Iraqi combat deaths in the air campaign, and as many as 10,000 casualties in the ground war. This analysis is based on Iraqi prisoner of war reports.

According to the Project on Defense Alternatives study, between 20,000 and 26,000 Iraqi military personnel were killed in the conflict while 75,000 others were wounded.

According to Kanan Makiya, "For the Iraqi people, the cost of enforcing the will of the United Nations has been grotesque." General Schwarzkopf talked about "a very, very large number of dead in these units, a very, very large number indeed." The chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Les Aspin, estimated that "at least 65,000 Iraqi soldiers were killed". A figure was supported by Israeli sources who speak of "one to two hundred thousand Iraqi casualties." Most of the killing "took place during the ground war. Fleeing soldiers were bombed with a device known as a 'fuel-air explosive.'"

Coalition

Coalition troops killed by country
Country Total Enemy
action
Accident Friendly
fire
Ref
 United States 148 113 35 35
 Senegal 92 92
 United Kingdom 47 38 1 9
 Saudi Arabia 24 18 6
 Egypt 11 5
 France 9 2
 United Arab Emirates 6 6
 Qatar 3 3
Syria 2
 Spain 2 2
 Kuwait 1 1
 Italy 1 1
 Czechoslovakia 1 1
Sailors from a US Navy honor guard carry Navy pilot Scott Speicher's remains.

The US Department of Defense reports that US forces suffered 148 battle-related deaths (35 to friendly fire), with one pilot listed as MIA (his remains were found and identified in August 2009). A further 145 Americans died in non-combat accidents. The UK suffered 47 deaths (nine to friendly fire, all by US forces), France nine, and the other countries, not including Kuwait, suffered 37 deaths (18 Saudis, one Egyptian, six UAE and three Qataris). At least 605 Kuwaiti soldiers were still missing 10 years after their capture.

The largest single loss of life among coalition forces happened on 25 February 1991, when an Iraqi Al Hussein missile hit a US military barrack in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, killing 28 US Army Reservists from Pennsylvania. In all, 190 coalition troops were killed by Iraqi fire during the war, 113 of whom were American, out of 358 coalition deaths. Another 44 soldiers were killed and 57 wounded by friendly fire. 145 soldiers died of exploding munitions or non-combat accidents.

The largest accident among coalition forces happened on 21 March 1991, when a Royal Saudi Air Force C-130H crashed in heavy smoke on approach to Ras Al-Mishab Airport, Saudi Arabia. 92 Senegalese soldiers and six Saudi crew members were killed.

The number of coalition wounded in combat was 776, including 458 Americans.

190 coalition troops were killed by Iraqi combatants, the rest of the 379 coalition deaths were from friendly fire or accidents. This number was much lower than expected. Among the American combat dead were four female soldiers.

Friendly fire

While the death toll among coalition forces engaging Iraqi combatants was very low, a substantial number of deaths were caused by accidental attacks from other Allied units. Of the 148 US troops who died in battle, 24% were killed by friendly fire, a total of 35 service personnel. A further 11 died in detonations of coalition munitions. Nine British military personnel were killed in a friendly fire incident when a USAF A-10 Thunderbolt II destroyed a group of two Warrior IFVs.

Aftermath

Main article: Aftermath of the Gulf War

Gulf War illness

Main article: Gulf War syndrome

Many returning coalition soldiers reported illnesses following their action in the war, a phenomenon known as Gulf War syndrome (GWS) or Gulf War illness (GWI). Common symptoms reported are chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia, and gastrointestinal disorder. There has been widespread speculation and disagreement about the causes of the illness and the possibly related birth defects. Researchers found that infants born to male veterans of the 1991 war had higher rates of two types of heart valve defects. Some children born after the war to Gulf War veterans had a certain kidney defect that was not found in Gulf War veterans' children born before the war. Researchers have said that they did not have enough information to link birth defects with exposure to toxic substances.

In 1994, the US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs with Respect to Export Administration published a report entitled, "U.S. Chemical and Biological Warfare-Related Dual Use Exports to Iraq and their Possible Impact on the Health Consequences of the Gulf War". This publication, called the Riegle Report, summarized testimony this committee had received establishing that the U.S. had in the 1980s supplied Saddam Hussein with chemical and biological warfare technology, that Saddam had used such chemical weapons against Iran and his own native Kurds, and possibly against U.S. soldiers as well, plausibly contributing to the GWS.

A 2022 study by Dr. Robert W. Haley of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, et al., of 1,016 U.S. Gulf War veterans found evidence of a causal link between GWS and exposure to low levels of the nerve agent sarin, which was released into the air by coalition bombing of Iraqi chemical weapons facilities. Significantly, the study found an increased incidence of GWS not only among veterans who recounted hearing nerve agent alarms, but also among veterans with the RR or QR (as opposed to the QQ) forms of the PON1 gene, which produces an enzyme that deactivates organophosphates (including sarin) through hydrolysis. By contrast, GWS was inversely associated with higher levels of the type Q isozyme, which is more efficient at breaking down sarin than its type R counterpart. The authors "found that the PON1 genotype and hearing nerve agent alarms were independent and the findings robust to both measured and unmeasured confounding, supporting a mechanistic interaction. ... Moreover, the change in the combined effect from one category to the next was significantly greater than the sum of the independent effects of the environmental exposure and the genotype".

Effects of depleted uranium

Main article: Depleted uranium § Health considerations
Approximate area and major clashes in which DU rounds were used

The US military used depleted uranium in tank kinetic energy penetrators and 20–30 mm (0.79–1.18 in) cannon ordnance. Significant controversy regarding the long term safety of depleted uranium exists, including claims of pyrophoric, genotoxic, and teratogenic heavy metal effects. Many have cited its use during the war as a contributing factor to a number of major health issues in veterans and in surrounding civilian populations, including in birth defects and child cancer rates. Scientific opinion on the risk is mixed. In 2004, Iraq had the highest mortality rate due to leukemia of any country.

Depleted uranium has 40% less radioactivity than natural uranium, but the negative effects should not be overlooked. Depleted uranium is not a significant health hazard unless it is taken into the body. External exposure to radiation from depleted uranium is generally not a major concern because the alpha particles emitted by its isotopes travel only a few centimeters in air or can be stopped by a sheet of paper. Also, the uranium-235 that remains in depleted uranium emits only a small amount of low-energy gamma radiation. However, if allowed to enter the body, depleted uranium, like natural uranium, has the potential for both chemical and radiological toxicity with the two important target organs being the kidneys and the lungs.

Highway of Death

Main article: Highway of Death
Destroyed Iraqi civilian and military vehicles on the Highway of Death

In the night of 26–27 February 1991, some Iraqi forces began leaving Kuwait on the main highway north of Al Jahra in a column of some 1,400 vehicles. A patrolling E-8 Joint STARS aircraft observed the retreating forces and relayed the information to the DDM-8 air operations center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. These vehicles and the retreating soldiers were subsequently attacked by two A-10 aircraft, resulting in a 60 kilometres (37 mi) stretch of highway strewn with debris—the Highway of Death. New York Times reporter Maureen Dowd wrote, "With the Iraqi leader facing military defeat, Mr. Bush decided that he would rather gamble on a violent and potentially unpopular ground war than risk the alternative: an imperfect settlement hammered out by the Soviets and Iraqis that world opinion might accept as tolerable."

Chuck Horner, Commander of US and allied air operations, has written:

, the Iraqis totally lost heart and started to evacuate occupied Kuwait, but airpower halted the caravan of Iraqi Army and plunderers fleeing toward Basra. This event was later called by the media "The Highway of Death." There were certainly a lot of dead vehicles, but not so many dead Iraqis. They'd already learned to scamper off into the desert when our aircraft started to attack. Nevertheless, some people back home wrongly chose to believe we were cruelly and unusually punishing our already whipped foes.

...

By February 27, talk had turned toward terminating the hostilities. Kuwait was free. We were not interested in governing Iraq. So the question became "How do we stop the killing."

Bulldozer assault

An armored bulldozer similar to the ones used in the attack

Another incident during the war highlighted the question of large-scale Iraqi combat deaths. This was the "bulldozer assault", wherein two brigades from the US 1st Infantry Division (Mechanized) were faced with a large and complex trench network, as part of the heavily fortified "Saddam Hussein Line". After some deliberation, they opted to use anti-mine plows mounted on tanks and combat earthmovers to simply plow over and bury alive the defending Iraqi soldiers. Not a single American was killed during the attack. Reporters were banned from witnessing the attack, near the neutral zone that touches the border between Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Every American in the assault was inside an armored vehicle.

Patrick Day Sloyan of Newsday reported, "Bradley Fighting Vehicles and Vulcan armored carriers straddled the trench lines and fired into the Iraqi soldiers as the tanks covered them with mounds of sand. 'I came through right after the lead company,' Moreno said. 'What you saw was a bunch of buried trenches with peoples' arms and things sticking out of them.'" However, after the war, the Iraqi government said that only 44 bodies were found. In his book The Wars Against Saddam, John Simpson alleges that US forces attempted to cover up the incident. After the incident, the commander of the 1st Brigade said: "I know burying people like that sounds pretty nasty, but it would be even nastier if we had to put our troops in the trenches and clean them out with bayonets." Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney did not mention the First Division's tactics in an interim report to Congress on Operation Desert Storm. In the report, Cheney acknowledged that 457 enemy soldiers were buried during the ground war.

Palestinian exodus from Kuwait

Main article: Palestinian exodus from Kuwait (1990–91)

A Palestinian exodus from Kuwait took place during and after the Gulf War. During the Gulf War, more than 200,000 Palestinians fled Kuwait during the Iraqi occupation of Kuwait due to harassment and intimidation by Iraqi security forces, in addition to getting fired from work by Iraqi authority figures in Kuwait. After the Gulf War, the Kuwaiti authorities forcibly pressured nearly 200,000 Palestinians to leave Kuwait in 1991. Kuwait's policy, which led to this exodus, was a response to alignment of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and the PLO with Saddam Hussein.

The Palestinians who fled Kuwait were Jordanian citizens. In 2013, 280,000 Jordanian citizens of Palestinian origin lived in Kuwait. In 2012, 80,000 Palestinians (without Jordanian citizenship) lived in Kuwait.

Saudi Arabia expelled Yemeni workers after Yemen supported Saddam during the Gulf War.

Coalition bombing of Iraq's civilian infrastructure

In the 23 June 1991 edition of The Washington Post, reporter Bart Gellman wrote:

Many of the targets were chosen only secondarily to contribute to the military defeat of Iraq ... Military planners hoped the bombing would amplify the economic and psychological impact of international sanctions on Iraqi society ... They deliberately did great harm to Iraq's ability to support itself as an industrial society ...

In the Jan/Feb 1995 edition of Foreign Affairs, French diplomat Eric Rouleau wrote:

he Iraqi people, who were not consulted about the invasion, have paid the price for their government's madness ... Iraqis understood the legitimacy of a military action to drive their army from Kuwait, but they have had difficulty comprehending the Allied rationale for using air power to systematically destroy or cripple Iraqi infrastructure and industry: electric power stations (92 percent of installed capacity destroyed), refineries (80 percent of production capacity), petrochemical complexes, telecommunications centers (including 135 telephone networks), bridges (more than 100), roads, highways, railroads, hundreds of locomotives and boxcars full of goods, radio and television broadcasting stations, cement plants, and factories producing aluminum, textiles, electric cables, and medical supplies.

However, the UN subsequently spent billions rebuilding hospitals, schools, and water purification facilities throughout the country.

Abuse of Coalition POWs

During the conflict, coalition aircrew shot down over Iraq were displayed as prisoners of war on TV, most with visible signs of abuse. Amongst several testimonies to poor treatment, USAF Captain Richard Storr was allegedly tortured by Iraqis during the Persian Gulf War. Iraqi secret police broke his nose, dislocated his shoulder and punctured his eardrum. Royal Air Force Tornado crew John Nichol and John Peters have both alleged that they were tortured during this time. Nichol and Peters were forced to make statements against the war on television. Members of British Special Air Service Bravo Two Zero were captured while providing information about an Iraqi supply line of Scud missiles to coalition forces. Only one, Chris Ryan, evaded capture while the group's other surviving members were violently tortured. Flight surgeon (later General) Rhonda Cornum was sexually assaulted by one of her captors after the Black Hawk helicopter in which she was riding was shot down while searching for a downed F-16 pilot.

Operation Southern Watch

Main article: Operation Southern Watch

Since the war, the US has had a continued presence of 5,000 troops stationed in Saudi Arabia – a figure that rose to 10,000 during the 2003 conflict in Iraq. Operation Southern Watch enforced the no-fly zones over southern Iraq set up after 1991; oil exports through the Persian Gulf's shipping lanes were protected by the Bahrain-based US Fifth Fleet.

Since Saudi Arabia houses Mecca and Medina, Islam's holiest sites, many Muslims were upset at the permanent military presence. The continued presence of U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia after the war was one of the stated motivations behind the 11 September terrorist attacks, the Khobar Towers bombing, and the date chosen for the 1998 US embassy bombings (7 August), which was eight years to the day that US troops were sent to Saudi Arabia. Osama bin Laden interpreted the Islamic prophet Muhammad as banning the "permanent presence of infidels in Arabia". In 1996, bin Laden issued a fatwa, calling for US troops to leave Saudi Arabia. In a December 1999 interview with Rahimullah Yusufzai, bin Laden said he felt that Americans were "too near to Mecca" and considered this a provocation to the entire Islamic world.

Sanctions

Main articles: United Nations Security Council Resolution 661 and Sanctions against Iraq

On 6 August 1990, after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 661 which imposed economic sanctions on Iraq, providing for a full trade embargo, excluding medical supplies, food and other items of humanitarian necessity, these to be determined by the council's sanctions committee. From 1991 until 2003, the effects of government policy and sanctions regime led to hyperinflation, widespread poverty and malnutrition.

During the late 1990s, the UN considered relaxing the sanctions imposed because of the hardships suffered by ordinary Iraqis. Studies dispute the number of people who died in south and central Iraq during the years of the sanctions.

Draining of the Qurna Marshes

Main article: Draining of the Mesopotamian Marshes

The draining of the Qurna Marshes was an irrigation project in Iraq during and immediately after the war, to drain a large area of marshes in the Tigris–Euphrates river system. Formerly covering an area of around 3,000 km (1,200 sq mi), the large complex of wetlands were nearly emptied of water, and the local Shi'ite population relocated, following the war and 1991 uprisings. By 2000, the United Nations Environment Programme estimated that 90% of the marshlands had disappeared, causing desertification of over 7,500 square miles (19,000 km).

The draining occurred in Iraq and to a smaller degree in Iran between the 1950s and 1990s to clear large areas of the marshes. Formerly covering an area of around 20,000 km (7,700 sq mi), the large complex of wetlands was 90% drained before the 2003 Invasion of Iraq. The marshes are typically divided into three main sub-marshes, the Hawizeh, Central, and Hammar Marshes and all three were drained at different times for different reasons. Initial draining of the Central Marshes was intended to reclaim land for agriculture but later all three marshes would become a tool of war and revenge.

Many international organizations such as the UN Human Rights Commission, the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, the Wetlands International, and Middle East Watch have described the project as a political attempt to force the Marsh Arabs out of the area through water diversion tactics.

Oil spill

Main article: Gulf War oil spill

On 23 January, Iraq dumped 400 million US gallons (1,500,000 m) of crude oil into the Persian Gulf, causing the largest offshore oil spill in history at that time. It was reported as a deliberate natural resources attack to keep US Marines from coming ashore (Missouri and Wisconsin had shelled Failaka Island during the war to reinforce the idea that there would be an amphibious assault attempt). About 30–40% of this came from allied raids on Iraqi coastal targets.

Kuwaiti oil fires

Main article: Kuwaiti oil fires See also: Environmental impact of war
Oil well fires rage outside Kuwait City in 1991.

The Kuwaiti oil fires were caused by the Iraqi military setting fire to 700 oil wells as part of a scorched earth policy while retreating from Kuwait in 1991 after conquering the country but being driven out by coalition forces. The fires started in January and February 1991, and the last one was extinguished by November.

The resulting fires burned uncontrollably because of the dangers of sending in firefighting crews. Land mines had been placed in areas around the oil wells, and a military cleaning of the areas was necessary before the fires could be put out. Somewhere around 6 million barrels (950,000 m) of oil were lost each day. Eventually, privately contracted crews extinguished the fires, at a total cost of US$1.5 billion to Kuwait. By that time, however, the fires had burned for approximately 10 months, causing widespread pollution.

Cost

A sentry patrols along a line-up of OH-58 Kiowa helicopters

The cost of the war to the United States was calculated by the US Congress in April 1992 to be $61.1 billion (equivalent to $119 billion in 2023). About $52 billion of that amount was paid by other countries: $36 billion by Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and other Arab states of the Persian Gulf; $16 billion by Germany and Japan (which sent no combat forces due to their constitutions). About 25% of Saudi Arabia's contribution was paid with in-kind services to the troops, such as food and transportation. US troops represented about 74% of the combined force, and the global cost was therefore higher.

Effect on developing countries

Apart from the impact on Arab States of the Persian Gulf, the resulting economic disruptions after the crisis affected many states. The Overseas Development Institute (ODI) undertook a study in 1991 to assess the effects on developing states and the international community's response. A briefing paper finalized on the day that the conflict ended draws on their findings which had two main conclusions: Many developing states were severely affected and while there has been a considerable response to the crisis, the distribution of assistance was highly selective.

The ODI factored in elements of "cost" which included oil imports, remittance flows, re-settlement costs, loss of export earnings and tourism. For Egypt, the cost totaled $1 billion, 3% of GDP. Yemen had a cost of $830 million, 10% of GDP, while it cost Jordan $1.8 billion, 32% of GDP.

International response to the crisis on developing states came with the channeling of aid through The Gulf Crisis Financial Co-ordination Group. They were 24 states, comprising most of the OECD countries plus some Gulf states: Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Kuwait. The members of this group agreed to disperse $14 billion in development assistance.

The World Bank responded by speeding up the disbursement of existing project and adjustment loans. The International Monetary Fund adopted two lending facilities – the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility (ESAF) and the Compensatory & Contingency Financing Facility (CCFF). The European Community offered $2 billion in assistance.

Media coverage

Main article: Media coverage of the Gulf War
Globe icon.The examples and perspective in this section may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this section, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new section, as appropriate. (January 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

US policy regarding media freedom was much more restrictive than in the Vietnam War. The policy had been spelled out in a Pentagon document entitled Annex Foxtrot. Most of the press information came from briefings organized by the military. Only selected journalists were allowed to visit the front lines or conduct interviews with soldiers. Those visits were always conducted in the presence of officers, and were subject to both prior approval by the military and censorship afterward. This was ostensibly to protect sensitive information from being revealed to Iraq. This policy was heavily influenced by the military's experience with the Vietnam War, in which public opposition within the US grew throughout the war's course. It was not only the limitation of information in the Middle East; media were also restricting what was shown about the war with more graphic depictions like Ken Jarecke's image of a burnt Iraqi soldier being pulled from the American AP wire whereas in Europe it was given extensive coverage.

Two BBC journalists, John Simpson and Bob Simpson (no relation), defied their editors and remained in Baghdad to report on the war's progress. They were responsible for a report which included an "infamous cruise missile that travelled down a street and turned left at a traffic light."

Alternative media outlets provided views opposing the war. Deep Dish Television compiled segments from independent producers in the US and abroad, and produced a 10-hour series that was distributed internationally, called The Gulf Crisis TV Project. The series' first program War, Oil and Power was compiled and released in 1990, before the war broke out. News World Order was the title of another program in the series; it focused on the media's complicity in promoting the war, as well as Americans' reactions to the media coverage.

Media watchdog group Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) critically analyzed media coverage during the war in various articles and books, such as the 1991 Gulf War Coverage: The Worst Censorship was at Home.

Technology

Further information: List of Gulf War military equipment
USS Missouri launching a Tomahawk missile. The Gulf War was the last conflict in which battleships were deployed in a combat role.

Precision-guided munitions were heralded as key in allowing military strikes to be made with a minimum of civilian casualties compared to previous wars, although they were not used as often as more traditional, less accurate bombs. Specific buildings in downtown Baghdad could be bombed while journalists in their hotels watched cruise missiles fly by.

Precision-guided munitions amounted to approximately 7.4% of all bombs dropped by the coalition. Other bombs included cluster bombs, which disperse numerous submunitions, and daisy cutters, 15,000-pound bombs which can disintegrate everything within hundreds of yards.

Global Positioning System (GPS) units were relatively new at the time and were important in enabling coalition units to easily navigate across the desert. Since military GPS receivers were not available for most troops, many used commercially available units. To permit these to be used to best effect, the "selective availability" feature of the GPS system was turned off for the duration of Desert Storm, allowing these commercial receivers to provide the same precision as the military equipment.

Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) and satellite communication systems were also important. Two examples of this are the US Navy's Grumman E-2 Hawkeye and the US Air Force's Boeing E-3 Sentry. Both were used in command and control area of operations. These systems provided essential communications links between air, ground, and naval forces. It is one of several reasons coalition forces dominated the air war.

American-made color photocopiers were used to produce some of Iraq's battle plans. Some of the copiers contained concealed high-tech transmitters that revealed their positions to American electronic warfare aircraft, leading to more precise bombings.

Scud and Patriot missiles

Military personnel examine the remains of a Scud.

The role of Iraq's Scud missiles featured prominently in the war. Scud is a tactical ballistic missile that the Soviet Union developed and deployed among the forward deployed Soviet Army divisions in East Germany.

Scud missiles utilize inertial guidance which operates for the duration that the engines operate. Iraq used Scud missiles, launching them into both Saudi Arabia and Israel. Some missiles caused extensive casualties, while others caused little damage.

The US Patriot missile was used in combat for the first time. The US military claimed a high effectiveness against Scuds at the time, but later analysis gives figures as low as 9%, with 45% of the 158 Patriot launches being against debris or false targets. The Dutch Ministry of Defense, which also sent Patriot missiles to protect civilians in Israel and Turkey, later disputed the higher claim. Further, there is at least one incident of a software error causing a Patriot missile's failure to engage an incoming Scud, resulting in deaths. Both the US Army and the missile manufacturers maintained the Patriot delivered a "miracle performance" in the Gulf War.

Popular culture

The Gulf War has been the subject of several video games including Conflict: Desert Storm, Conflict: Desert Storm II, Gulf War: Operation Desert Hammer, and Call of Duty: Black Ops 6. There have also been numerous depictions in film including Jarhead (2005), which is based on US Marine Anthony Swofford's 2003 memoir of the same name. The 2016 Bollywood movie Airlift is based on 1990 airlift of Indians from Kuwait, the evacuation of Indian citizens stranded in Kuwait during the Gulf War.

See also

Notes

  1. Including 100–120,000 military deaths, 3–15,000 civilian deaths during the war, 4–6,000 civilian deaths up to April 1991, and 35–65,000 civilian deaths from the Iraqi uprisings after the end of the Gulf War.
  2. The numbering of Persian Gulf conflicts depends on whether the Iran–Iraq War (1980–1988) is referred to as the First (Persian) Gulf War (English language sources prior to the start of the Kuwait war in 1990 usually called it the Gulf War), which would make the 1990 war the Second (Persian) Gulf War. Different sources may call the conflicts by different names. The name 'Persian Gulf' is itself a subject of dispute. The start date of the Kuwait War can also be seen as either August 1990 (when Iraq's Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait) or as January 1991 (the start of Operation Desert Storm, when the US-led coalition forced Iraq out of Kuwait), so that the war is also often called the 1991 Gulf War, the 1990–1991 Gulf War, the 1990s Gulf War, etc ... This dating is also used to distinguish it from the other two 'Gulf Wars'.
  3. Since 1988 the PLO had assumed, for Arab League purposes, the seat for the State of Palestine.

References

  1. ^ "Desert Shield And Desert Storm: A Chronology And Troop List for the 1990–1991 Persian Gulf Crisis" (PDF). apps.dtic.mil. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 April 2019. Retrieved 18 December 2018.
  2. Persian Gulf War, the Sandhurst-trained Prince
    Khaled bin Sultan al-Saud was co-commander with General Norman Schwarzkopf
    www.casi.org.uk/discuss Archived 3 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine
  3. General Khaled was Co-Commander, with US General Norman Schwarzkopf, of the allied coalition that liberated Kuwait www.thefreelibrary.com Archived 30 April 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  4. ^ Knights, Michael (2005). Cradle of Conflict: Iraq and the Birth of Modern U.S. Military Power. United States Naval Institute. p. 20. ISBN 978-1-59114-444-1.
  5. ^ "Persian Gulf War". MSN Encarta. Archived from the original on 1 November 2009.
  6. 18 M1 Abrams, 11 M60, 2 AMX-30
  7. CheckPoint, Ludovic Monnerat. "Guerre du Golfe: le dernier combat de la division Tawakalna".
  8. Scales, Brig. Gen. Robert H.: Certain Victory. Brassey's, 1994, p. 279.
  9. Halberstadt 1991. p. 35
  10. Atkinson, Rick. Crusade, The untold story of the Persian Gulf War. Houghton Mifflin Company, 1993. pp. 332–3
  11. Captain Todd A. Buchs, B. Co. Commander, Knights in the Desert. Publisher/Editor Unknown. p. 111.
  12. Malory, Marcia. "Tanks During the First Gulf War – Tank History". Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 5 July 2016.
  13. M60 vs T-62 Cold War Combatants 1956–92 by Lon Nordeen & David Isby
  14. "TAB H – Friendly-fire Incidents". Archived from the original on 1 June 2013. Retrieved 5 July 2016.
  15. NSIAD-92-94, "Operation Desert Storm: Early Performance Assessment of Bradley and Abrams". Archived 21 February 2014 at the Wayback Machine US General Accounting Office, 10 January 1992. Quote: "According to information provided by the Army's Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations and Plans, 20 Bradleys were destroyed during the Gulf war. Another 12 Bradleys were damaged, but four of these were quickly repaired. Friendly fire accounted for 17 of the destroyed Bradleys and three of the damaged ones
  16. Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait; 1990 (Air War) Archived 6 October 2014 at the Wayback Machine. Acig.org. Retrieved on 12 June 2011
  17. ^ Bourque (2001), p. 455.
  18. "Appendix – Iraqi Death Toll | The Gulf War | FRONTLINE | PBS". www.pbs.org. Retrieved 24 July 2021.
  19. ^ Tucker-Jones, Anthony (31 May 2014). The Gulf War: Operation Desert Storm 1990–1991. Pen and Sword. ISBN 978-1-4738-3730-0. Archived from the original on 5 December 2022. Retrieved 22 April 2022.
  20. ^ "Human Rights Watch". Archived from the original on 22 April 2022. Retrieved 22 April 2022.
  21. "Appendix A: Chronology – February 1991". Naval History and Heritage Command. Retrieved 4 February 2024.
  22. "Iraq air force wants Iran to give back its planes". Reuters. 10 August 2007.
  23. "The Use of Terror during Iraq's invasion of Kuwait". The Jewish Agency for Israel. Archived from the original on 24 January 2005. Retrieved 22 June 2010.
  24. "Kuwait: missing people: a step in the right direction". Red Cross. Archived from the original on 7 March 2016. Retrieved 5 March 2014.
  25. "The Wages of War: Iraqi Combatant and Noncombatant Fatalities in the 2003 Conflict". Project on Defense Alternatives. Retrieved 9 May 2009.
  26. ^ Collateral damage: The health and environmental costs of war on Iraq Archived 19 July 2020 at the Wayback Machine, Medact
  27. "Research: Second Gulf War". Veterans Museum at Balboa Park. Retrieved 12 November 2024.
  28. "Frontline Chronology". Public Broadcasting Service. Retrieved 20 March 2007.
  29. "Tenth anniversary of the Gulf War: A look back". CNN. 16 January 2001. Archived from the original on 22 October 2007. Retrieved 6 June 2007.
  30. Kenneth Estes. "ISN: The Second Gulf War (1990–1991) – Council on Foreign Relations". Cfr.org. Archived from the original on 2 January 2011. Retrieved 18 March 2010.
  31. Operation Iraqi Freedom: Strategies, Approaches, Results, and Issues for Congress Archived 5 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine. (PDF). Retrieved on 2014-05-24.
  32. "A 1991 Dossier on the Role of the Iraqi Air Force in the Gulf War" (PDF). 5 November 1991. SH-AADF-D-000-396.
  33. Stoker, Donald (2024). "16: The Gulf War, or First Iraq War, 1990-1991". Purpose and Power. Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8EA, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 537–559. ISBN 978-1-009-25727-5. LCCN 2022040999.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  34. Iraq and the Second Gulf War: State Building and Regime Security, Mohammad-Mahmoud Mohamedou, 1997
  35. "Operation DESERT STORM". U.S. Army Center of Military History. Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  36. Defence, National (11 December 2018). "Gulf War – FRICTION". www.canada.ca. Retrieved 21 November 2023.
  37. "Gulf War – Op Granby | Royal Signals Museum". Retrieved 21 November 2023.
  38. Sciolino, Elaine (1991). The Outlaw State: Saddam Hussein's Quest for Power and the Gulf Crisis. John Wiley & Sons. p. 160. ISBN 978-0-471-54299-5.
  39. Sciolino, Elaine (1991). The Outlaw State: Saddam Hussein's Quest for Power and the Gulf Crisis. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 161-162. ISBN 978-0-471-54299-5.
  40. ^ Stork, Joe; Lesch, Ann M. (1990). "Background to the Crisis: Why War?". Middle East Report (167, November–December 1990). Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP): 11–18. doi:10.2307/3012998. ISSN 0899-2851. JSTOR 3012998. (subscription required)
  41. Sciolino, Elaine (1991). The Outlaw State: Saddam Hussein's Quest for Power and the Gulf Crisis. John Wiley & Sons. p. 163. ISBN 978-0-471-54299-5.
  42. Douglas A. Borer (2003). "Inverse Engagement: Lessons from U.S.-Iraq Relations, 1982–1990". U.S. Army Professional Writing Collection. US Army. Archived from the original on 11 October 2006. Retrieved 12 October 2006.
  43. Sciolino, Elaine (1991). The Outlaw State: Saddam Hussein's Quest for Power and the Gulf Crisis. John Wiley & Sons. p. 164. ISBN 978-0-471-54299-5.
  44. Simons (2004), p. 333.
  45. ^ Simons (2004), pp. 341–342.
  46. "On this day in 1990: The world decides to stop Saddam Hussein's forces marauding around Kuwait". The Daily Telegraph. 30 November 2017. Archived from the original on 10 January 2022.
  47. Cooper, Tom; Sadik, Ahmad (6 August 2007). "Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait; 1990". Air Combat Information Group Journal. Archived from the original on 6 July 2013. Retrieved 27 October 2016.
  48. ^ Simons (2004), pp. 343–344.
  49. "OPEC pressures Kuwait to moderate quota demand", New Straits Times, 7 June 1989
  50. Simons (2004), pp. 339–340.
  51. ^ Simons (2004), p. 341.
  52. Cleveland, William L. A History of the Modern Middle East. 2nd Ed pg. 464
  53. Hayes, Thomas C. (3 September 1990). "Confrontation in the Gulf; The Oilfield Lying Below the Iraq-Kuwait Dispute". The New York Times. Oil formations frequently run beneath political boundaries, whether they involve unfriendly leaseholders in West Texas or neighboring Arab states, and procedures have existed for years to settle disputes that arise. Typically, participants in the same field share both production costs and revenues, using a formula that sets percentages of ownership. But Iraq refused to negotiate with Kuwait on such an agreement. So Kuwait produced oil from Rumaila without any agreement, and then adopted a policy of producing far more oil than it was allowed under the quota system of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries. ... But during the Iraq mined its giant share of the Rumaila field to keep it from falling into Iranian hands, Western political experts say. Kuwait stepped up its total oil production, capturing some of Iraq's customers and pumping millions of barrels from the Rumaila field. ... Some Iraqi officials have accused Kuwait in the past of using advanced drilling techniques developed by American oilfield specialists to siphon oil from the Rumaila field, a charge that American drillers deny, noting that the oil flows easily from the Rumaila field without any need for these techniques. ... W. C. Goins, senior vice president of OGE Drilling Inc., a Houston company that provided oilfield supervisors and workers for Kuwait in the same area, said he was 'positive' all of the wells his employees drilled and operated ran vertically down to the Rumaila pay zone. 'That field crosses the border in north Kuwait,' he added. 'Iraqis were drilling on one side, and Kuwaitis on the other side.'
  54. ^ Simons (2004), p. 334.
  55. Simons (2004), p. 335.
  56. Simons (2004), p. 336.
  57. Simons (2004), pp. 337–338.
  58. Simons (2004), p. 338.
  59. ^ Simons (2004), p. 343.
  60. Yousseff M. Ibrahim, "Iraq Threatens Emirates And Kuwait on Oil Glut" Archived 30 June 2017 at the Wayback Machine New York Times, 18 July 1990
  61. Michael R. Gordon, "U.S. Deploys Air and Sea Forces After Iraq Threatens 2 Neighbors" Archived 30 June 2017 at the Wayback Machine New York Times, 25 July 1990
  62. ^ Finlan (2003), pp. 25–26.
  63. "Interrogator Shares Saddam's Confessions". cbsnews.com. 24 January 2008.
  64. ^ "CONFRONTATION IN THE GULF; Excerpts From Iraqi Document on Meeting With U.S. Envoy" Archived 11 January 2017 at the Wayback Machine New York Times, 23 September 1990
  65. Ibrahim, Youssef M. (26 July 1990). "Iraq Said to Prevail in Oil Dispute With Kuwait and Arab Emirates". The New York Times.
  66. ^ "The Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm Timeline". Archived from the original on 26 May 2008. Retrieved 30 June 2010.
  67. ^ Finlan (2003), p. 26.
  68. Abulhasan, Mohammad A. (2 August 1990). "Letter dated 2 August 1990 from the Permanent Representative of Kuwait to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council" (PDF). S/21423. United Nations OFFICIAL DOCUMENT SYSTEM. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 March 2023. Retrieved 7 March 2023.
  69. ^ "Kuwait: Organization and Mission of the Forces". Library of Congress Country Studies. Retrieved 14 April 2012.
  70. Finlan (2003), p. 25.
  71. Childs, John; Corvisier, André (1994). A Dictionary of Military History and the Art of War. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 403. ISBN 978-0-631-16848-5.
  72. Dan Vaught. "Eyewitness, Col. Fred Hart 1". Users.lighthouse.net. Archived from the original on 18 August 2009. Retrieved 1 February 2011.
  73. Cooper, Tom; Sadik, Ahmad (16 September 2003). "Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait; 1990". Air Combat Information Group. Archived from the original on 6 October 2014. Retrieved 17 April 2010.
  74. "Iraqis loot Kuwait's central bank of gold, cash". UPI.
  75. "The Stolen Dinars of Kuwait – PMG". www.pmgnotes.com.
  76. "Iran, Israel and the Shi'ite Crescent" (PDF). S. Daniel Abraham Center for Strategic Dialogue. pp. 14–15. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 November 2014. Retrieved 5 March 2014.
  77. Al-Marashi, Ibrahim (Winter 2003). "Saddam's Security Apparatus During the Invasion of Kuwait and the Kuwaiti Resistance". The Journal of Intelligence History. 3 (2): 74–75. doi:10.1080/16161262.2003.10555087. S2CID 157844796.
  78. "Two ethnicities, three generations: Phonological variation and change in Kuwait" (PDF). Newcastle University. 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 October 2013. Retrieved 5 March 2014.
  79. ^ Levins, John M. (March 1995). "The Kuwaiti Resistance". Middle East Forum.
  80. "Presentation on Gulf Oil Disruption" (PDF). wpainc.com. 22 May 1984. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 17 January 2017.
  81. ^ Finlan (2003), p. 29.
  82. "DRAFT RESOLUTION /CANADA, COLOMBIA, CÔTE D'IVOIRE, ETHIOPIA, FINLAND, FRANCE, MALAYSIA, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" (PDF). S/21425. United Nations OFFICIAL DOCUMENT SYSTEM. 2 August 1990. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 March 2023. Retrieved 7 March 2023.
  83. ^ "Report of the Security Council: 16 June 1990 – 15 June 1991". Report of the Security Council (digital document). New York: United Nations: 30. 1993. ISSN 0082-8238.
  84. "Myths & Facts – The Gulf Wars". Jewish Virtual Library. Retrieved 13 May 2011.
  85. ^ Ziad Swaidan; Mihai Nica (June 2002). "The 1991 Gulf War And Jordan's Economy". Middle East Review of International Affairs. 6 (2). Archived from the original on 4 August 2002.
  86. Deese, David A. "Persian Gulf War, Desert Storm – War with Iraqi". The History Professor. Concord Learning Systems. Archived from the original on 14 January 2005.
  87. "Report of the Security Council: 16 June 1990 – 15 June 1991". Report of the Security Council. New York: United Nations: 33–35. 1993. ISSN 0082-8238.
  88. "Resolution 661 (1990)". United Nations. Retrieved 13 April 2012.
  89. "Report of the Security Council: 16 June 1990 – 15 June 1991". Report of the Security Council. New York: United Nations: 52–53. 1993. ISSN 0082-8238.
  90. Lori Fisler Damrosch, International Law, Cases and Materials, West Group, 2001
  91. ^ "George Bush (Sr) Library – Margaret Thatcher Foundation". www.margaretthatcher.org.
  92. ^ Friedman, Thomas L. (22 August 1990). "Confrontation in the Gulf: Behind Bush's Hard Line; Washington Considers a Clear Iraqi Defeat To Be Necessary to Bolster Its Arab Allies". The New York Times. New York. pp. A1. Retrieved 16 September 2010.
  93. "Confrontation in the Gulf; Proposals by Iraqi President: Excerpts From His Address". The New York Times. New York. 13 August 1990. pp. A8. Retrieved 17 October 2010.
  94. ^ Waldman, Shmuel (2005). Beyond a Reasonable Doubt. Feldheim Publishers, p. 179. ISBN 978-1-58330-806-6
  95. BBC News. "1990: Outrage at Iraqi TV hostage show Archived 1 February 2008 at the Wayback Machine". Retrieved 2 September 2007.
  96. Royce, Knut (29 August 1990). "MIDDLE EAST CRISIS Secret Offer Iraq Sent Pullout Deal to U.S". Newsday. New York. Retrieved 17 October 2010.
  97. Royce, Knut (3 January 1991). "Iraq Offers Deal to Quit Kuwait U.S. rejects it, but stays 'interested'". Newsday Washington Bureau. Long Island, N.Y. p. 5. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  98. Tyler, Patrick E. (3 January 1991). "CONFRONTATION IN THE GULF; Arafat Eases Stand on Kuwait-Palestine Link". The New York Times. New York. Retrieved 17 October 2010.
  99. Friedman, Thomas L. (11 January 1991). "CONFRONTATION IN THE GULF; As U.S. Officials See It, Hands of Aziz Were Tied". The New York Times. pp. A10. Retrieved 30 September 2010.
  100. See Paul Lewis, "Confrontation in the Gulf: The U.N.; France and 3 Arab States Issue an Appeal to Hussein," New York Times, 15 January 1991, p. A12
  101. Michael Kranish et al., "World waits on brink of war: Late effort at diplomacy in gulf fails," Boston Globe, 16 January 1991, p. 1
  102. Ellen Nimmons, A.P., "Last-ditch pitches for peace; But U.S. claims Iraqis hold key," Houston Chronicle, 15 January 1991, p. 1
  103. Alan Riding, "CONFRONTATION IN THE GULF: France; Paris Says Its Last-Ditch Peace Effort Has Failed" Archived 26 October 2016 at the Wayback Machine New York Times 16 January 1991
  104. Gilles Kepel Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam.
  105. "15 Years After Desert Storm, U.S. Commitment to Region Continues". Archived from the original on 8 June 2011. Retrieved 29 March 2007.
  106. "U.S., Saudi Forces Start 'Imminent Thunder' Exercise in Gulf". AP NEWS. Retrieved 20 May 2021.
  107. Gen. Schwarzkopf's Famed News Conference. 29 December 2012. Archived from the original on 1 September 2021. Retrieved 20 May 2021 – via YouTube.
  108. "UN Security Council Resolution 678, Iraq / Kuwait". Council on Foreign Relations. 29 November 1990. Archived from the original on 14 June 2009.
  109. New York Times, 10 Apr. 1991, "Egypt's 'Reward': Forgiven Debt Archived 18 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine
  110. ^ New Statesman, 23 September 2002, "John Pilger Reveals How the Bushes Bribe the World, from Russia to Iran Archived 18 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine"
  111. Baker, James Addison, and Thomas M. DeFrank. The Politics of Diplomacy: Revolution, War, and Peace, 1989–1992. New York: Putnam, 1995.
  112. Haberman, Clyde (20 January 1991). "WAR IN THE GULF: Turkey; Turkey's Role in Air Assault Sets Off Fear of Retaliation (Published 1991)". The New York Times.
  113. "Gulf war fast facts". CNN Editorial Research. 2020. Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 15 December 2020.
  114. "The Unfinished War: A Decade Since Desert Storm". CNN In-Depth Specials. 2001. Archived from the original on 17 March 2008. Retrieved 5 April 2008.
  115. "DESERT SHIELD AND DESERT STORM A CHRONOLOGY AND TROOP LIST FOR THE 1990–1991 PERSIAN GULF CRISIS" (PDF). apps.dtic.mil. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 April 2019. Retrieved 18 December 2018.
  116. "The Gulf War: Moscow's role". CNN. 2001. Retrieved 18 October 2020.
  117. "Luxembourg (09/06)". U.S. Department of State. Retrieved 4 August 2023.
  118. Freedman, Lawrence, and Efraim Karsh. The Gulf Conflict 1990–1991: Diplomacy and War in the New World Order. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1993. Print.
  119. Lynch, Colum (1 November 2006). "Security Council Seat Tied to Aid". The Washington Post. Retrieved 18 March 2010.
  120. Bush, George H. W. (11 September 1990). "Address Before a Joint Session of Congress". Miller Center of Public Affairs. Archived from the original on 16 January 2011. Retrieved 1 February 2011.
  121. Heller, Jean (6 January 1991). "Photos don't show buildup". St. Petersburg Times. Archived from the original on 4 February 2013. Retrieved 13 January 2012.
  122. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Volume 59, page 33, Educational Foundation for Nuclear Science (Chicago, Ill.), Atomic Scientists of Chicago, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (Organization), 2003.
  123. Chardell, Daniel (29 June 2023). "The Origins of the Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait Reconsidered". Texas National Security Review.
  124. "How PR Sold the War in the Persian Gulf | Center for Media and Democracy". Prwatch.org. 28 October 2004. Retrieved 1 February 2011.
  125. ^ Arthur E. (Ted) Rowse (September 1992). "Kuwaitgate - killing of Kuwaiti babies by Iraqi soldiers exaggerated". Washington Monthly. ISSN 0043-0633. Wikidata Q123698876.
  126. John R. MacArthur, Second Front: Censorship and Propaganda in the Gulf War (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1992)
  127. Makiya (1993), p. 40.
  128. Makiya (1993), pp. 31–33.
  129. Makiya (1993), p. 32.
  130. New York Times, 24 Oct. 1990, "Mideast Tensions; No Compromise on Kuwait, Bush Says Archived 12 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine"
  131. Edwin E. Moïse. "Limited War: The Stereotypes". Clemson University. Retrieved 2 July 2010.
  132. "CNN.com In-depth specials — Gulf War (via Internet Archive)". CNN. 2001. Archived from the original on 12 June 2008. Retrieved 23 March 2008.
  133. Lee, Robin J. (2002). "Fixed-Wing Combat Aircraft Attrition in Desert Storm". Retrieved 30 January 2012. Sources: Gulf War Airpower Survey, Vol. 5; Norman Friedman, Desert Victory; World Air Power Journal. Additionally, Mark Bovankovich and LT Chuck Chase offered corrections and several intriguing details on these incidents. All errors, however, remain entirely mine.
  134. Atkinson, Rick (1994). Crusade: The Untold Story of the Persian Gulf War. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, p. 47. ISBN 978-0-395-71083-8
  135. Lawrence Freedman and Efraim Karsh, The Gulf Conflict: Diplomacy and War in the New World Order, 1990–1991 (Princeton, 1993), 332.
  136. "Geneva Meeting on Persian Gulf Crisis". C-SPAN. 9 January 1991. Archived from the original on 1 May 2011. Retrieved 18 March 2010.
  137. Rostker, Bernard (2000). "Information Paper: Iraq's Scud Ballistic Missiles". Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control from 2000 to 2006. Archived from the original on 14 May 2011. Retrieved 21 May 2009.
  138. Lawrence Freedman and Efraim Karsh, The Gulf Conflict: Diplomacy and War in the New World Order, 1990–1991 (Princeton, 1993), 331–41.
  139. Thomas, Gordon, Gideon's Spies: The Secret History of the Mossad
  140. ^ "The day Israel's wars changed forever". The Jerusalem Post | Jpost.com. Retrieved 1 March 2022.
  141. Fetter, Steve; Lewis, George N.; Gronlund, Lisbeth (28 January 1993). "Why were Casualties so low?" (PDF). Nature. 361 (6410). London: Nature Publishing Group: 293–296. doi:10.1038/361293a0. hdl:1903/4282. S2CID 4343235.
  142. "The Gulf War (1991)". Retrieved 5 July 2016.
  143. Fetter, Steve; Lewis, George N.; Gronlund, Lisbeth (28 January 1993). "Why were Casualties so low?" (PDF). Nature. 361 (6410). London: 293–296. doi:10.1038/361293a0. hdl:1903/4282. S2CID 4343235.
  144. "Three Israelis killed as Scuds hit Tel Aviv". The Tech. 1991. Archived from the original on 28 December 2008. Retrieved 11 January 2009.
  145. ^ "Betrokkenheid van Nederland" (in Dutch). Ministerie van Defensie. 2009. Archived from the original on 28 April 2011. Retrieved 11 January 2009.
  146. Kifner, John (23 January 1991). "WAR IN THE GULF: TEL AVIV; 3 DIE 96 ARE HURT IN ISRAELI SUBURB". The New York Times.
  147. Atkinson, Rick; Balz, Dan (23 January 1991). "Scud Hits Tel Aviv, Leaving 3 Dead, 96 Hurt". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2 June 2013.
  148. Cheney, Richard: In My Time: A Personal and Political Memoir
  149. Ottaway, David B. (31 August 1990). "SAUDI KING FAHD ORDERS GAS MASKS FOR EVERYONE". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
  150. "DOD: Information Paper- Iraq's Scud Ballistic Missiles". Iraqwatch.org. Archived from the original on 14 May 2011. Retrieved 18 March 2010.
  151. U. S. Government Accountability Office. "Patriot Missile Defense: Software Problem Led to System Failure at Dhahran, Saudi Arabia". www.gao.gov. Retrieved 25 January 2022.
  152. "Washingtonpost.com: Fog of War – Post Archive". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
  153. Wilkinson, Jeff (29 May 2016). "25 years ago, this University of South Carolina graduate gave his life in Desert Storm". The State. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
  154. AirLand Reversal Archived 19 February 2014 at the Wayback Machine. Air Force Magazine. 1 February 2014.
  155. ^ Desert Storm/Shield Valorous Unit Award Citations.
  156. Hillman (1993), p. 6.
  157. Bourque (2001), p. 95.
  158. Bourque (2001), p. 96.
  159. Bourque (2001), p. 98.
  160. ^ Bourque (2001), p. 99.
  161. Bourque (2001), p. 102.
  162. Bourque (2001), p. 103.
  163. ^ Bourque (2001), p. 159.
  164. ^ Bourque (2001), p. 160.
  165. Bourque (2001), pp. 159–160.
  166. Bourque (2001), p. 164.
  167. ^ Bourque (2001), p. 161.
  168. ^ "The Gulf War and "European Artillery" – The Campaign for the National Museum of the United States Army". 20 January 2015.
  169. Bourque (2001), p. 163.
  170. Bourque (2001), p. 201.
  171. Bourque (2001), pp. 156–157.
  172. ^ Bourque (2001), p. 206.
  173. ^ Bourque (2001), p. 207.
  174. ^ Bourque (2001), p. 225.
  175. Bourque (2001), pp. 113–133.
  176. ^ Bourque (2001), p. 259.
  177. "CORRECTING MYTHS ABOUT THE PERSIAN GULF WAR: THE LAST STAND OF THE TAWAKALNA". 30 April 2015.
  178. Bourque (2001), p. 194.
  179. Lingamfelter P.190-191
  180. ^ "These were the 6 most massive tank battles in US history". 24 March 2016.
  181. ^ Chenoweth, H. Avery (2005). Semper Fi: The Definitive Illustrated History of the U.S. Marines. p. 408.
  182. ^ Logan Nye (16 April 2021). "These were the 6 most massive tank battles in US history". We Are The Mighty. Retrieved 20 November 2021.
  183. "VII Corps leads armored surge into Iraq WAR IN THE GULF". 26 February 1991.
  184. Bourque (2001), p. 90.
  185. Bourque (2001), p. 473.
  186. Dinackus (2000), p. 4–10.
  187. "Operations DESERT SHIELD and DESERT STORM: Valorous Unit Award Citations | Unit Award Orders & Citations | U.S. Army Center of Military History".
  188. Bourque & Burdan (2007), p. 275.
  189. Bourque & Burdan (2007), p. 377.
  190. Logan Nye (22 April 2022). "These were the 6 most massive tank battles in US history". We Are The Mighty. Retrieved 9 May 2022.
  191. "Jayhawk Goes to War: VII Corps in Operation DESERT STORM – The Campaign for the National Museum of the United States Army". Armyhistory.org. 30 April 2016. Retrieved 20 November 2021.
  192. Bourque (2001), pp. 75, 92.
  193. ^ Bourque (2001), p. 107.
  194. ^ Bourque (2001), p. 244.
  195. ^ Paul W. Westermeyer (28 January – 1 February 1991). "The Battle of al-Khafji" (PDF). U.S. Marines in Battle.
  196. Blitzkrieg in the Gulf by Yves Debay
  197. U.S. Marines in the Persian Gulf, 1990–1991 With the 1st U.S. Marine Division in Desert Shield and Desert Storm. pp.92–93.
  198. Nordeen & Isby (2010), p. 66.
  199. ^ Nordeen & Isby (2010), p. 73.
  200. U.S. Marines in the Persian Gulf, 1990–1991 With the 1st U.S. Marine Division in Desert Shield and Desert Storm Cureton P.94
  201. Col H. Avery Chenoweth (2005) Semper Fi: The Definitive Illustrated History of the U.S. Marines
  202. ^ "History of Bravo Company, 4th Tank Battalion in Desert Storm 1991". Archived from the original on 9 January 2016. Retrieved 5 January 2019.
  203. M60 vs T-62 Cold War Combatants 1956–92, Nordeen & Isby, p.73
  204. "M60: This Old Tank Crushed Saddam Hussein During the First Gulf War". 22 April 2020.
  205. Nordeen & Isby (2010), p. 74.
  206. "The British Challenger 1 Main Battle Tank".
  207. Dunstan P.8
  208. Bourque (2001), p. 260.
  209. ^ Bourque (2001), p. 275.
  210. ^ Bourque (2001), p. 377.
  211. Halberstadt P.117, 121
  212. Bourque (2001), p. 319.
  213. Bourque (2001), p. 265.
  214. Bourque (2001), p. 43.
  215. Bourque (2001), p. 350.
  216. Bourque (2001), p. 324.
  217. Bourque (2001), p. 185.
  218. ^ Bourque (2001), p. 243.
  219. ^ Bourque (2001), p. 19.
  220. Bourque (2001), pp. 333–337.
  221. U.S. Marines in the Persian Gulf, 1990–1991 With the 1st U.S. Marine Division in Desert Shield and Desert Storm Cureton P.97
  222. "Persian Gulf War". MSN Encarta. Archived from the original on 1 November 2009.
  223. Bourque (2001), p. 471.
  224. Carhart, Tom (1994). Iron Soldiers: How America's 1st Armored Division Crushed Iraq's Elite Republican Guard. New York: Random House. p.323 ISBN 0671791656
  225. Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 December 2016. Retrieved 28 October 2017.
  226. Bourque (2001), p. 375.
  227. Rosenthal, Andrew (28 February 1991). "War in the Gulf: Bush Halts Offensive Combat; Kuwait Freed, Iraqis Crushed". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 26 February 2023.
  228. International, Radio Canada (6 November 2015). "History: November 6, 1991 Canadians cap the last oil fire in the Gulf War". RCI | English. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
  229. Riley (2010), p. 207.
  230. ^ Screaming Eagles 101st Airborne Division by Russ & Susan Bryant P.85
  231. Andrew Leydon. "Carriers in the Persian Gulf War". Leyden.com. Retrieved 18 March 2010.
  232. Screaming Eagles: The 101st Airborne Division from D-Day to Desert Storm by Christopher J Anderson P.8
  233. Twentieth Century Battlefields, "The Gulf War".
  234. Holsti, Ole R. (7 November 2011). "The United States and Iraq before the Iraq War". American Public Opinion on the Iraq War. University of Michigan Press. p. 20. ISBN 978-0-472-03480-2. Air attacks inflicted heavy casualties on retreatng forces along what became known as 'the highway of death.' American, British, and French units pursued the Iraqis to within 150 miles of Baghdad.
  235. Fisk, Robert. The Great War for Civilisation, Vintage (2007 reprint), at p. 646.
  236. "Flashback: the 1991 Iraqi revolt". 21 August 2007. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
  237. ^ "ENDLESS TORMENT, The 1991 Uprising in Iraq And Its Aftermath". Hrw.org. Archived from the original on 15 June 2010. Retrieved 25 September 2009.
  238. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. "Refworld | Human Rights Watch World Report 1992 – Iraq and Occupied Kuwait". UNHCR. Retrieved 14 August 2013.
  239. "Abbas apology to Kuwait over Iraq". BBC News. 12 December 2004.
  240. ""Cheney changed his view on Iraq", by Charles Pope, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 29 September 2004". 28 September 2004. Retrieved 7 January 2005.
  241. New York Times, 15 Mar. 1991, "After the War: Kuwait: Kuwaiti Emir, Tired and Tearful, Returns to His Devastated Land Archived 12 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine"
  242. "Den 1. Golfkrig". Forsvaret.dk. 24 September 2010. Archived from the original on 12 January 2011. Retrieved 1 February 2011.
  243. Alexandrescu, Grigore; Băhnăreanu, Cristian (2007). Operații militare expediționare (PDF) (in Romanian). Bucharest: Editura Universității Naționale de Apărare "Carol I". p. 33. ISBN 978-973-663-499-4.
  244. ^ Crocker III, H. W. (2006). Don't Tread on Me. New York: Crown Forum. p. 384. ISBN 978-1-4000-5363-6.
  245. Gulf War coalition forces (latest available) by country "www.nationmaster.com". Archived from the original on 5 November 2013. Retrieved 13 September 2007.
  246. Hersh, Seymour (2005). Chain of Command. Penguin Books. p. 181.
  247. "Splitting the Check: When Allies Helped Pay for Middle East War". NBC News. 16 September 2014. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
  248. Odgers 1999, pp. 356–371.
  249. "La Armada Argentina en el Golfo" [The Argentine Armed Forces in the Gulf] (in Spanish). Fuerzas Navales Magazine. Archived from the original on 24 June 2018. Retrieved 14 January 2020.
  250. "Overview of U.S. Policy Toward South America and the President's Upcoming Trip to the Region". Retrieved 14 January 2020.
  251. Morin, Jean H.; Gimblett, Richard Howard (1997). Operation Friction, 1990–1991: The Canadian Forces in the Persian Gulf. Dundurn Press. p. 170. ISBN 978-1-55002-257-5. The Canadian Commander in the Middle East was Commodore Kenneth J. Summers.
  252. "25 years from the "Locust" operation". 25 September 2015.
  253. "Iraq (1990)". Minestero Della Difesa (in Italian).
  254. "Celebrato il 93° Anniversario dell'Aeronautica Militare – Aviation Report" (in Italian). Retrieved 1 February 2018.
  255. "Desert Storm Part 22: Charge of the Heavy Brigade". British Army Official Blog. 28 February 2016. Retrieved 27 December 2016.
  256. "Desert Storm Part 24: Back to Germany". British Army Official Blog. 11 March 2016. Retrieved 27 December 2016.
  257. "The Use of Terror During Iraq's Invasion of Kuwait". The Jewish Agency. 22 August 2007. Archived from the original on 20 September 2016. Retrieved 2 May 2016.
  258. "Iraq and Kuwait Discuss Fate of 600 Missing Since Gulf War". Los Angeles Times. 9 January 2003. Archived from the original on 10 October 2017.
  259. Scott Peterson, "'Smarter' bombs still hit civilians", Christian Science Monitor, 22 October 2002. Archived 9 July 2009 at the Wayback Machine.
  260. Tucker (2010), p. 265.
  261. ^ Conetta, Carl (20 October 2003). "Wages of War – Appendix 2: Iraqi Combatant and Noncombatant Fatalities in the 1991 Gulf War". The Commonwealth Institute and the Project on Defense Alternatives. Retrieved 1 February 2011.
  262. Tyler, Patrick E. (3 June 1991). "U.S. Officials Believe Iraq Will Take Years to Rebuild". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 18 November 2018.
  263. ^ Robert Fisk, The Great War For Civilisation; The Conquest of the Middle East (Fourth Estate, 2005), p.853.
  264. "Toting the Casualties of War". Businessweek. 6 February 2003. Archived from the original on 19 February 2003.
  265. Ford, Peter (9 April 2003). "Bid to stem civilian deaths tested". Christian Science Monitor.
  266. Ascherio, A.; Chase, R.; Coté, T.; Dehaes, G.; Hoskins, E.; Laaouej, J.; Passey, M.; Qaderi, S.; Shuqaidef, S.; Smith, M. C. (1992). "Effect of the Gulf War on infant and child mortality in Iraq". The New England Journal of Medicine. 327 (13): 931–936. doi:10.1056/NEJM199209243271306. PMID 1513350.
  267. Dyson, Tim; Cetorelli, Valeria (1 July 2017). "Changing views on child mortality and economic sanctions in Iraq: a history of lies, damned lies and statistics". BMJ Global Health. 2 (2): e000311. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000311. ISSN 2059-7908. PMC 5717930. PMID 29225933.
  268. "9". www.hrw.org. Retrieved 6 May 2022.
  269. New York Times, 22 March 1991 "After the War; U.N. Survey Calls Iraq's War Damage Near-Apocalyptic Archived 18 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine"
  270. Keaney, Thomas; Eliot A. Cohen (1993). Gulf War Air Power Survey. United States Dept. of the Air Force. ISBN 978-0-16-041950-8.
  271. al-Khalil, Samir (11 April 1991). "Iraq and Its Future | by Samir al-Khalil | The New York Review of Books". www.nybooks.com.
  272. ^ al-Khalil (1991).
  273. ^ "In-Depth Specials – Gulf War". CNN. 2001. Archived from the original on 10 May 2007.
  274. Ranter, Harro. "ASN Aircraft accident Lockheed C-130H Hercules 469 Rash Mishab". Retrieved 5 July 2016.
  275. "Roll of Honour". Britains-smallwars.com. Archived from the original on 1 May 2011. Retrieved 13 May 2011.
  276. "Saudi Arabia – Persian Gulf War, 1991". Country-data.com. Retrieved 1 February 2011.
  277. ^ Schmitt, Eric (22 March 1991). "After the War" Archived 20 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine. The New York Times.
  278. "Soldier Reported Dead Shows Up at Parents' Doorstep" Archived 3 February 2014 at the Wayback Machine. Associated Press. 22 March 1991.
  279. "The Role of the United Arab Emirates in the Iran-Iraq War and the Persian Gulf War". Country-data.com. Retrieved 1 February 2011.
  280. Miller, Judith. "Syria Plans to Double Gulf Force." The New York Times, 27 March 1991.
  281. "Muere en accidente de tráfico en Abu Dabi un cabo de la fragata 'Victoria'" [Corporal of the frigate "Victoria" dies in traffic accident in Abu Dhabi]. El País (in Spanish). 14 March 1991. Retrieved 13 July 2022.
  282. "Role of Kuwaiti Armed Forces in the Persian Gulf War". Country-data.com. 24 February 1991. Retrieved 1 February 2011.
  283. "FESTA, LACRIME E AMAREZZA PER I MARO' RIENTRATI DAL GOLFO". la Repubblica (in Italian). Taranto. 2 March 1991. Retrieved 13 July 2022.
  284. "podporučík in memoriam Petr ŠIMONKA | inmemoriam.army.cz". inmemoriam.army.cz. Retrieved 19 April 2022.
  285. Sornas, Ladislav (15 July 2021). "Střelecká soutěž – Memoriál ppor. Petra Šimonky". Sdružení válečných veteránů ČR (in Czech). Retrieved 19 April 2022.
  286. Tucker (2010), p. 470.
  287. Blanford, Nicholas (2001). "Kuwait hopes for answers on its Gulf War POWs". Christian Science Monitor.
  288. Tucker (2010), p. 264.
  289. Persian Gulf War – MSN Encarta. Archived from the original on 21 October 2009.
  290. "The Cost of Women in Combat". ABC News. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
  291. Tucker (2010), p. 207.
  292. "Gulf War Veterans' Medically Unexplained Illnesses". U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Retrieved 25 February 2014.
  293. "Gulf war syndrome; higher rates of specific birth defects in gulf war veterans' children". Medical Letter on the CDC & FDA: 14. 29 June 2003. ProQuest 211397084.
  294. Haley, Robert W.; Kramer, Gerald; Xiao, Junhui; Dever, Jill A.; Teiber, John F. (11 May 2022). "Evaluation of a Gene–Environment Interaction of PON1 and Low-Level Nerve Agent Exposure with Gulf War Illness: A Prevalence Case–Control Study Drawn from the U.S. Military Health Survey's National Population Sample". Environmental Health Perspectives. 130 (5). National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences: 57001. Bibcode:2022EnvHP.130e7001H. doi:10.1289/EHP9009. PMC 9093163. PMID 35543525. S2CID 248694742. cf. "UTSW genetic study confirms sarin nerve gas as cause of Gulf War illness". University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. 11 May 2022. Retrieved 11 May 2022. For Gulf War veterans with the QQ genotype, hearing nerve agent alarms—a proxy for chemical exposure—raised their chance of developing GWI by 3.75 times. For those with the QR genotype, the alarms raised their chance of GWI by 4.43 times. And for those with two copies of the R gene, inefficient at breaking down sarin, the chance of GWI increased by 8.91 times. Those soldiers with both the RR genotype and low-level sarin exposure were over seven times more likely to get GWI due to the interaction per se, over and above the increase in risk from both risk factors acting alone. For genetic epidemiologists, this number leads to a high degree of confidence that sarin is a causative agent of GWI.
  295. Elizabeth Neuffer Iraqis Trace Surge in Cancer to US Bombings Archived 2 September 2013 at the Wayback Machine Boston Globe 26 January 2003, Page: A11 Section: National/Foreign
  296. Larry Johnson Iraqi cancers, birth defects blamed on U.S. depleted uranium Archived 20 November 2008 at the Wayback Machine Seattle Post-Intelligencer 12 November 2002. Retrieved 25 January 2009.
  297. Ron McKay (14 January 2001). "Depleted Uranium: The Horrific Legacy of Basra". Sunday Herald. Scotland. Archived from the original on 27 May 2013. Retrieved 15 February 2013.
  298. "WHO Data, 2004". Retrieved 4 September 2013.
  299. "Doctor's Gulf War Studies Link Cancer to Depleted Uranium". The New York Times. 29 January 2001.
  300. Hindin R.; et al. (2005). "Teratogenicity of depleted uranium aerosols: A review from an epidemiological perspective". Environmental Health. 4 (1): 17. Bibcode:2005EnvHe...4...17H. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-4-17. PMC 1242351. PMID 16124873.
  301. Marshall, AC (2005). "An Analysis of Uranium Dispersal and Health Effects Using a Gulf War Case Study" (PDF). Sandia National Laboratories. Retrieved 16 July 2012.
  302. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration. "Depleted Uranium – Public Health". www.publichealth.va.gov.
  303. "Depleted Uranium Health Effects". ead.anl.gov. Archived from the original on 6 April 2013. Retrieved 24 May 2014.
  304. Chediac, Joyce. "The massacre of withdrawing Soldiers on the highway of death". Archived from the original on 14 August 2014.
  305. Clancy & Horner 1999, pp. 499–500.
  306. ^ Sloyan, Patrick. "Iraqis Buried Alive – U.S. Attacked With Bulldozers During War Ground Attack" . The Seattle Times. 12 September 1991. Retrieved 4 March 2014.
  307. ^ Sloyan, Patrick Day (12 September 1991), "Buried Alive: U.S. Tanks Used Plows To Kill Thousands in Gulf War Trenches", Newsday, New York, p. 1
  308. "The gulf war: appendix: Iraqi death toll". Frontline. Retrieved 4 December 2005.
  309. Simpson, John (2003), The Wars Against Saddam, Basingstoke: MacMillan
  310. ^ Shafeeq Ghabra (8 May 1991). "The PLO in Kuwait". Archived from the original on 7 March 2023. Retrieved 2 September 2013.
  311. Yann Le Troquer; Rozenn Hommery al-Oudat (Spring 1999). "From Kuwait to Jordan: The Palestinians' Third Exodus". Journal of Palestine Studies. 28 (3): 37–51. doi:10.2307/2538306. JSTOR 2538306.
  312. "Jordanians of Kuwait". Joshua Project. 2013.
  313. "Palestinians Open Kuwaiti Embassy". Al Monitor. 23 May 2013. Archived from the original on 22 May 2013.
  314. "Yemen's president flees for medical treatment as search for new leader begins Archived 22 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine". The Daily Telegraph. 5 June 2011
  315. 23 June 1991, Washington Post, Bart Gellman
  316. "The View From France: America's Unyielding Policy toward Iraq," Foreign Affairs, Vol. 74, No. 1, January/February 1995, pp.61–62
  317. Rubin, Michael (December 2001). "Sanctions on Iraq: A Valid Anti-American Grievance?" (PDF). Middle East Review of International Affairs. 5 (4): 100–115. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 September 2006. Retrieved 24 May 2017.
  318. "Frontline: War Stories". Pbs.org. Retrieved 1 February 2011.
  319. Patrice O'Shaughness. "Gulf War POW denounces abuse of Iraqi detainees". New York Daily News. 12 May 2004.
  320. "The Flight That Changed My Life". Johnnichol.com. Archived from the original on 29 April 2011. Retrieved 1 February 2011.
  321. "War Story:John Peters". Pbs.org. Retrieved 1 February 2011.
  322. The One that Got Away by Chris Ryan & Bravo Two Zero by Andy McNab
  323. "A Woman's Burden". Time. 28 March 2003. Archived from the original on 4 April 2003.
  324. ^ "US pulls out of Saudi Arabia". BBC News. 29 April 2003. Retrieved 29 November 2009.
  325. Plotz, David (2001) What Does Osama Bin Laden Want? Archived 10 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Slate
  326. Bergen, Peter L. (2001). Holy War Inc. Simon & Schuster. p. 3.
  327. Yusufzai, Rahimullah (26 September 2001). "Face to face with Osama". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 19 January 2008. Retrieved 30 June 2010.
  328. "Iraq surveys show 'humanitarian emergency'". UNICEF. 12 August 1999. Archived from the original on 6 August 2009. Retrieved 29 November 2009.
  329. Spagat, Michael (September 2010). "Truth and death in Iraq under sanctions" (PDF). Significance. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 July 2018. Retrieved 21 December 2012.
  330. Rubin, Michael (December 2001). "Sanctions on Iraq: A Valid Anti-American Grievance?". Middle East Review of International Affairs. 5 (4): 100–115. Archived from the original on 28 October 2012.
  331. Dyson, Tim; Cetorelli, Valeria (1 July 2017). "Changing views on child mortality and economic sanctions in Iraq: a history of lies, damned lies and statistics". BMJ Global Health. 2 (2): e000311. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000311. ISSN 2059-7908. PMC 5717930. PMID 29225933.
  332. ^ "Marsh Arabs". American University School of International Service. Archived from the original on 27 June 2010. Retrieved 1 August 2010.
  333. ^ Jeffrey Pollack (March–April 2003). "Duke Magazine-Oil Spill-After the Deluge". Duke Magazine. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010. Retrieved 1 February 2011.
  334. Note: The cited supporting source uses the term Arabian Gulf to name this body of water. This article uses the proper name Persian Gulf. For more information, see the Persian Gulf naming dispute article.
  335. "V: "Thunder And Lightning"- The War With Iraq (Subsection:The War at Sea)". The United States Navy in "Desert Shield" / "Desert Storm". United States Navy. Archived from the original on 5 December 2006. Retrieved 26 November 2006.
  336. Leckie, Robert (1998). The Wars of America. Castle Books. ISBN 978-0-7858-0914-2.
  337. Wellman, Robert Campbell (14 February 1999). ""Iraq and Kuwait: 1972, 1990, 1991, 1997." Earthshots: Satellite Images of Environmental Change". U.S. Geological Survey. Archived from the original on 28 October 2002. Retrieved 27 July 2010.
  338. Husain, T. (1995). Kuwaiti Oil Fires: Regional Environmental Perspectives. Oxford: BPC Wheatons Ltd. p. 68.
  339. ^ "How much did the Gulf War cost the US?". People.psych.cornell.edu. 20 May 1997. Archived from the original on 21 August 2010. Retrieved 1 February 2011.
  340. Johnston, Louis; Williamson, Samuel H. (2023). "What Was the U.S. GDP Then?". MeasuringWorth. Retrieved 30 November 2023. United States Gross Domestic Product deflator figures follow the MeasuringWorth series.
  341. ^ "The Impact of the Gulf Crisis on Developing Countries". ODI Briefing Paper. March 1991. Archived from the original on 3 August 2012. Retrieved 29 June 2011.
  342. Peters, John E; Deshong, Howard (1995). Out of Area or Out of Reach? European Military Support for Operations in Southwest Asia (PDF). RAND Corporation. ISBN 978-0-8330-2329-2.
  343. Guerra/Terrorismo – O maior bombardeio da história Archived 26 April 2012 at the Wayback Machine, access on 27 November 2011.
  344. Lori Robertson (2007). "Images of War". AJR. Archived from the original on 24 July 2013. Retrieved 20 July 2007.
  345. Ken Jarecke's account to the BBC World Service programme (9 May 2005). "Picture power: Death of an Iraqi soldier". BBC News. Retrieved 14 October 2010.
  346. Lucas, Dean (2007). "Famous Pictures Magazine – Iraqi Soldier". Famous Pictures Magazine. Retrieved 23 May 2013.
  347. Peter Ruff (31 July 2006). "Obituary: Bob Simpson". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 4 September 2011.
  348. "Memória Globo". Archived from the original on 25 July 2011. Retrieved 26 March 2017., access on 29 March 2011.
  349. "Livraria da Folha – Livro conta como Guerra do Golfo colocou a CNN no foco internacional – 08/09/2010". .folha.uol.com.br. Retrieved 13 May 2011.
  350. A Guerra do Golfo Archived 4 February 2013 at the Wayback Machine, accessed on 29 March 2011
  351. "Series (The Gulf Crisis TV Project)". 11 July 2010. Archived from the original on 11 July 2010. Retrieved 17 January 2017.
  352. "War, Oil and Power". Retrieved 17 January 2017 – via Internet Archive.
  353. "News World Order". Retrieved 17 January 2017 – via Internet Archive.
  354. Naureckas, Jim (April 1991). "Gulf War Coverage: The Worst Censorship Was at Home". Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR). Archived from the original on 6 April 2016. Retrieved 14 October 2010.
  355. "Dumb Bombs". Fas.org. Archived from the original on 28 March 2010. Retrieved 18 March 2010.
  356. McNamara, Joel (2007). GPS for Dummies. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-19923-7.
  357. "Something wrong with our **** chips today". The Economist. 7 April 2011. Retrieved 13 June 2011.
  358. ^ Cirincione, Joseph (October 1992). "The Performance of the Patriot Missile in the war" (PDF). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 December 2003. Retrieved 4 December 2005.
  359. "The Patriot Missile Failure". Ima.umn.edu. Retrieved 1 February 2011.
  360. Adams, Tim (23 March 2003). "Observer review: Jarhead by Anthony Swofford". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 13 June 2018.
  361. "Pics: From Kuwait airlift in 1990 to operation Ganga in 2022, here are a few evacuation missions by India". 27 February 2022.

Works cited

  • Bourque, Stephen A. (2001). Jayhawk! The 7th Corps in the Persian Gulf War. Center of Military History, United States Army. LCCN 2001028533. OCLC 51313637.
  • Bourque, Stephen A.; Burdan, John (2007). The road to Safwan the 1st Squadron, 4th Cavalry in the 1991 Persian Gulf War. Denton, TX: University of North Texas Press. ISBN 978-1-57441-232-1.
  • Hillman, James L. (1993). "Task Force 1-41 Infantry: The Fratricide Experience in Southwest Asia" (PDF). Carlisle Barracks, PA: US Army War College. OCLC 28169776. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 December 2014. Retrieved 26 December 2014.
  • Desert Storm: Ground War by Hans Halberstadt
  • Challenger Squadron by Simon Dunstan
  • Desert Rats:The British 4 and 7 Armoured Brigades, WW2 to Today by Hans Halberstadt
  • Dinackus, Thomas D. (2000). Order of Battle: Allied Ground Forces of Operation Desert Storm. Central Point, Oregon: Hellgate Press. ISBN 978-1-55571-493-2.
  • Burton, James G. The Pentagon Wars: Reformers Challenge the Old Guard, Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 1993. ISBN 978-1-55750-081-6.
  • Blitzkrieg in the Gulf: Armor of the 100 Hour war by Yves Debay
  • Desert Redleg: Artillery Warfare in the First Gulf War by Col. L. Scott Lingamfelter
  • Nordeen, Lon; Isby, David (2010). M60 vs T-62: Cold War Combatants 1956–92. Dual. Illustrated by Richard Chasemore. Oxford, UK: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84603-694-1. LCCN 2010525413. OCLC 495780787.

Bibliography

Films

Novels

External links

Links to related articles
Gulf War
Participants
Background
Invasion of Kuwait
Coalition intervention
Battles
Air campaign
Impact on Israel
Aftermath
Memorials
Military technology
List of modern conflicts in the Middle East
1910s
1920s
1930s
1940s
1950s
1960s
1970s
1980s
1990s
2000s
2010s
2020s
This list includes World War I and later conflicts (after 1914) of at least 100 fatalities each
Prolonged conflicts are listed in the decade when initiated; ongoing conflicts are marked italic, and conflicts with +100,000 killed with bold.
Armed conflicts involving the Armed Forces of the United States
Listed chronologically
Domestic
Foreign
Related
George H. W. Bush
Presidency

Life
Speeches
Elections
U.S. Senate
U.S. House
Vice Presidential
Presidential
Public image
Books
Legacy
Family
Saddam Hussein
Biography Saddam Hussein
Books
Propaganda
Family
Media
Category:Saddam Hussein
Iraq Iraq topics
History
Chronology
638–1958
Republic
Geography
Politics
Economy
Society
Demographics
General
History of the United States
Events
Pre-Colonial
Colonial
1776–1789
1789–1815
1815–1849
1849–1865
1865–1917
1917–1945
1945–1964
1964–1980
1980–1991
1991–2008
2008–present
Topics
Groups
Places
Territorial evolution
Regions
States
Federal DistrictWashington, D.C.
Insular areas
Outlying islands
Cities
Cold War
1940s
1950s
1960s
1970s
1980s
1990s
Frozen conflicts
Foreign policy
Ideologies
Capitalism
Socialism
Other
Organizations
Propaganda
Pro-communist
Pro-Western
Technological
competition
Historians
Espionage and
intelligence
See also
Gulf Cooperation Council
Member states Flag of the Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the (Persian) Gulf
Economy
Geopolitical history
Sport
Category:Gulf Cooperation Council
Portals: Categories: