| Revision as of 00:10, 29 March 2006 editPoolGuy (talk | contribs)308 edits Unblock Request← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:45, 6 November 2007 edit undoLiving Concrete (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers4,852 edits Redirect. | ||
| (129 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| Hello, ] to Misplaced Pages. Here's some tips: | |||
| *If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in ]. | |||
| *You can sign your name using three tildes, like <nowiki>~~~</nowiki>. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. | |||
| *If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the ] page. There is also a ] page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted. | |||
| *If you have any questions, see the ], add a question to the ] or ask me on ]. | |||
| Other useful pages are: ], ], ], ] and the ]. | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! ]] 07:04, Feb 3, 2004 (UTC) | |||
| ==Pet Peeve== | |||
| *Please see ] before reverting again. ] ] 06:48, 13 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Re-insertion of indiscriminate list at ]== | |||
| Thanks for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use ] for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the ] if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. <!-- from Template:Test --> <b><font face="Arial" color="#D47C14">]</font><font color="#7D4C0C">]</font>]</b> 22:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : You'll notice from ] that I'm not the only one who thinks that the list is unencyclopedia and a violation of ]. If you'd like to file a ] on the matter, go for it. Also, please do not delete legitimate comments from other users; doing so is considered to be vandalism. <b><font face="Arial" color="#D47C14">]</font><font color="#7D4C0C">]</font>]</b> 16:18, 14 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Misplaced Pages has a policy against ]. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be ] from editing by admins or ] by the ]. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please ] appropriately. Thank you. <!-- Template:Attack --> --] (]) 16:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Please note that calling someone else a "vandal" for good-faith edits is a personal attack. If you disagree, ], don't revert. Also note the ]. ]] 17:35, 14 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :You said: ''I am, of course, reverting the blanking done by one user who is blanking without discussion''. You appear to be ignoring the discussion that started at ] and here on your own talk page. Removal of content is ''not'' an act of vandalism when it is supported by many on the talk page and when the content is unsourced. ]] 17:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I have blocked you for 24 hours for violating the ] on ]. ]] 18:30, 14 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Removing warning notices from your talk page is prohibited, per ]. Please don't do this again. -] 15:26, 22 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == arbitration == | |||
| i'm filin an arbitration against jiang and Nlu. if you have ever been treated with hostility by either one of them . please show your support on my talk page. oh yeah and write down the way Nlu treat you on the arbitration page. thnx a lot, man.--] 06:23, 24 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == 1 week block == | |||
| You have been blocked for 1 week for abusive use of sock puppets. --] (]) 22:05, 28 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Unblock Request== | |||
| {{unblock}} | |||
| Admin Nlu has been pursuing punitive action against this account without basis. Admin Nlu has failed to ] even one reason for their pursuits despite overwhelming references presenting how no policy violation has occurred. Nlu's actions appear to be on the basis of trying to purge sockpuppets. None of the sockpuppets has done anything abusive. Nlu fails to recognize that the mere presence of a ] is not a violation of Misplaced Pages Policy. Nlu's blocking has restricted the ability to communicate on Misplaced Pages and obtain a researched and referenced evaluation of whether a policy violation ever occurred in the first place (none had). | |||
| An unblock of this account is respectfully requested on the basis that no violation of policy has occured to warrant the block. I apologize for the complexity of research for this request. It would have been contained at ] and ] if it were not for ] overzealous page protecting and account blocking. | |||
| I can direct you to other reference points if you need more info beyond these two, however they should be a good start. ] 00:10, 29 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:45, 6 November 2007
Redirect to: