Misplaced Pages

The Uses of Enchantment: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:43, 11 November 2011 editChris the speller (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers866,910 editsm Typo fixing per WP:HYPHEN, sub-subsection 3, points 3,4,5, replaced: socially- → socially using AWB (7852)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:36, 2 November 2024 edit undoJJMC89 bot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Administrators3,671,075 editsm Moving Category:National Book Critics Circle Award-winning works to Category:National Book Critics Circle Award–winning works per Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Speedy 
(160 intermediate revisions by 66 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|1976 book by Bruno Bettelheim}}
⚫ {{Infobox Book | <!--See Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Novels or Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Books -->
{{For|the 2003 ] storyline|Aria: The Uses of Enchantment}}
⚫ {{Infobox book | <!--See Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Novels or Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Books -->
|name = The Uses of Enchantment |name = The Uses of Enchantment
|image = File:The Uses of Enchantment.jpg
|caption = Cover of the first edition
|author = ] |author = ]
|country = ] |country = United States
|language = ] |language = English
| publisher = |subject = ]
| pub_date = 1976 |publisher = ]
| pages = 352 |pub_date = 1976
|media_type = Print (] and ])
| isbn = 978-0140137279
| dewey = 398.45 |pages = 352
| congress = GR550 .B47 |isbn = 978-0-14-013727-9
|dewey = 398.45
|congress = GR550 .B47
}} }}
'''''The Uses of Enchantment: The Meaning and Importance of Fairy Tales''''' is a 1976 work by ] in which the author analyses ]s in terms of ] psychology. '''''The Uses of Enchantment: The Meaning and Importance of Fairy Tales''''' is a 1976 book by ], in which the author analyzes ]s in terms of ] ]. The book has been a subject of controversy regarding possible plagiarism.<ref name=Journal-of-American-Folklore-Winter-1991/><ref name=Los-Angeles-Times-February-7-1991/>

In the book, Bettelheim discusses the emotional and symbolic importance of fairy tales for children, including traditional tales at one time considered too dark, such as those collected and published by the ]. Bettelheim suggested that traditional fairy tales, with the darkness of abandonment, death, witches, and injuries, allowed children to grapple with their fears in remote, ] terms. If they could read and interpret these fairy tales in their own way, he believed, they would get a greater sense of meaning and purpose. Bettelheim thought that by engaging with these ] stories, children would go through emotional growth that would better prepare them for their own futures.


==Structure and contents== ==Structure and contents==
The book is divided into two main sections. The first, "A Pocketful of Magic," outlines Bettelheim's thoughts on the value of fairy tales for children. The second part, "In Fairy Land," presents psychoanalytical readings of several popular fairy tales, specifically: The book is divided into two main sections. The first, "A Pocketful of Magic," outlines Bettelheim's thoughts on the value of fairy tales for children. The second part, "In Fairy Land," presents psychoanalytical readings of several popular fairy tales, specifically:
*] *"]"
*] *"]"
*] *"]"
*] *"]"
*] *"]"
*] *"]"
*] *"]"
*The "animal groom" cycle of fairy tales, including ], ] and ]. *The "]" cycle of fairy tales, including "]", "]" and "]".


Bettelheim presents a case that fairy tales help children solve certain existential problems such as separation anxiety, oedipal conflict, and sibling rivalries. The extreme violence and ugly emotions of many fairy tales serve to deflect what may well be going on in the child's mind anyway. A child's unrealistic fears often require unrealistic hopes. And furthermore, "The Frog King" may be superior to modern sex education in that it acknowledges that a child may find sex disgusting, and this may serve a protective function for the child.<ref name=New-York-Times-book-review-May-5-1976>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1976/05/05/archives/books-of-the-times-frog-king-as-sex-education-by-christopher.html|title=Books of the Times: Frog King as Sex Education|work=]|first=Christopher|last=Lehiyiann-Haltpt|date=May 5, 1976}}</ref>
==Awards==
The book won the U.S. ] for criticism in 1976 and the ] in the category of Contemporary Thought in 1977.


In his introduction, Bettelheim stated that he was writing the book as "an educator and therapist of severely disturbed children."<ref name="The Uses of Enchantment, Bruno Bettelheim, 1975, 1976">, Bruno Bettelheim, New York: Vintage Books (Random House), 1975, 1976. "Portions of this book originally appeared in ''The New Yorker''."</ref>
==In popular culture==
However, after his death, his credentials in those fields were found to be faked, and Bettelheim had only taken three introductory classes in psychology.<ref name="The Independent December 9, 1995">, ''The Independent'' , Nicholas Tucker, 8 December 1995.</ref><ref name="New York Times, Book Review, January 13, 1997">, ''New York Times'', Christopher Lehmann-Haupt, book review of ''The Creation of Dr. B'' by Richard Pollak, Jan. 13, 1997.</ref><ref name="Chicago Tribune, January 23, 1997">, ''Chicago Tribune'', Ron Grossman, January 23, 1997.</ref>
''The Uses of Enchantment'' has been cited as an influence in many subsequent works that utilise fairy tales in adult terms, including the 1986 ] ] '']'' and the 2011 ] film '']''.


==Reception and influence==
''The Uses of Enchantment'' has also been used as the title of a novel by ] and an ] comic by ] and Jay Anacleto.
In the U.S., Bettelheim and ''The Uses of Enchantment'' won the 1976 ]<ref name=nbcc>. ]. Retrieved 2012-03-09.</ref> and the 1977 ] in ].<ref name=nba1977>
. ]. Retrieved 2012-03-09. <br/>There was a "Contemporary" or "Current" award category from 1972 to 1980.</ref>

Robert A. Segal writes, "It is the disjunction between Bettelheim's up-to-date approach to fairy tales and his old-fashioned approach to myths that is striking."<ref name=Theorizing-About-Myth-Robert-Segal-1999>, Robert Alan Segal, University of Massachusetts Press, 1999, page 61.</ref>

''The Uses of Enchantment'' has been cited as an influence in many subsequent works that utilize fairy tales in adult terms, including the 1987 film '']'',<ref>{{cite book |last=Gallagher |first=John Andrew |chapter=Stuart Gordon |title=Film Directors on Directing |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group |year=1989 |pages=96–97 |isbn=9780275932725 |chapter-url-access=registration |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/filmdirectorsond00gall/page/92}}</ref> the 2011 ] film '']'' and the 2014 fantasy horror film '']''.

==Plagiarism==

In the Winter 1991 edition of the peer-reviewed '']'', ], then a 28-year veteran in the anthropology department at the University of California, Berkeley, presented a case that Bettelheim had copied key passages from ''A Psychiatric Study of Myths and Fairy Tales: Their Origin, Meaning, and Usefulness'' (1963, 1974 rev. ed.) by Julius Heuscher without giving appropriate credit, as well as unacknowledged borrowing from other sources.<ref name=Journal-of-American-Folklore-Winter-1991>Dundes, Alan: . ''The Journal of American Folklore'', Vol. 104, N0. 411. (Winter, 1991): pages 74–83.</ref><ref name=Los-Angeles-Times-February-7-1991/><ref name=A-Psychiatric-Study-Of-Fairy-Tales-Julius-Heuscher>, Julius E. Heuscher, illus. by Melba Bennett, Springfield, Illinois: Thomas pub., 1963, 224 pages. See also , Julius E. Heuscher, Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, publisher, April 1974, 422 pages.</ref><ref name=Chicago-Tribune-February-7-1991/>

Dundes states that Bettelheim engaged in "wholesale borrowing" of both "random passages" and "key ideas," primarily from Heuscher's book, but also from other sources. Robert A. Georges, a professor of folklore at UCLA, states "it is clear he didn't do his homework."<ref name=Los-Angeles-Times-February-7-1991>, ''Los Angeles Times'', Anne C. Roark, Feb. 7, 1991.</ref>

Heuscher himself did not consider it a big deal. He said, "We all plagiarize. I plagiarize. Many times, I am not sure whether it came out of my own brain or if it came from somewhere else … I'm only happy that I would have influenced Bruno Bettelheim. I did not always agree with him. But that does not matter. Poor Bruno Bettelheim. I would not want to disturb his eternal sleep with this ."<ref name=Los-Angeles-Times-February-7-1991/>

Dundes also states that his own 1967 article on Cinderella was copied by Bettelheim. Jacquelyn Sanders, who knew Bettelheim and later served the same position as director of the Orthogenic School at the University of Chicago, said she did not believe many people would agree with Dundes's accusations. She stated in 1991, "I would not call that plagiarism. I think the article is a reasonable scholarly endeavor, and calling it scholarly etiquette is appropriate. It is appropriate that this man deserved to be acknowledged and Bettelheim didn't … But I would not fail a student for doing that, and I don't know anybody who would ."<ref name=Chicago-Tribune-February-7-1991>{{Cite news
| author = Sharman Stein
| title = Bettelheim Accused Of Plagiarizing Book
| publisher = Chicago Tribune
| date = February 7, 1991
| url = https://www.chicagotribune.com/1991/02/07/bettelheim-accused-of-plagiarizing-book/
}}</ref>

In reviewing a biography of Bettelheim by ] in 1997, Sarah Boxer of the ''New York Times'' wrote, "Mr. Pollak gives a damning passage-for-passage comparison of the two ."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/books/97/01/26/reviews/970126.boxer.html|title=Books: The Man He Always Wanted to Be|work=]|first=Sarah|last=Boxer|date=January 26, 1997}}</ref>

And as early as 1991, the '']'' compared what Heuscher had written: "While one must never ‘explain’ the fairy tales to the child, the narrator’s understanding of their meaning is very important. It furthers the sensitivity for selecting those stories which are most appropriate in various phases of children’s development and for stressing those themes which may be therapeutic for specific psychological difficulties."<ref name=Los-Angeles-Times-February-7-1991/>

And what Bettelheim later wrote: "One must never ‘explain’ to the child the meaning of fairy tales. However, the narrator’s understanding of the fairy tale’s message to the child’s preconscious mind is important. . . . It furthers the adult’s sensitivity to selection of those stories which are most appropriate to the child’s state of development and to the specific psychological difficulties he is confronted with at the moment ."<ref name=Los-Angeles-Times-February-7-1991/>

==References==
{{reflist}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Uses of Enchantment, The}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Uses of Enchantment, The}}
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]

]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 19:36, 2 November 2024

1976 book by Bruno Bettelheim For the 2003 Aria storyline, see Aria: The Uses of Enchantment.
The Uses of Enchantment
Cover of the first edition
AuthorBruno Bettelheim
LanguageEnglish
SubjectFairy tales
PublisherThames & Hudson
Publication date1976
Publication placeUnited States
Media typePrint (Hardcover and Paperback)
Pages352
ISBN978-0-14-013727-9
Dewey Decimal398.45
LC ClassGR550 .B47

The Uses of Enchantment: The Meaning and Importance of Fairy Tales is a 1976 book by Bruno Bettelheim, in which the author analyzes fairy tales in terms of Freudian psychoanalysis. The book has been a subject of controversy regarding possible plagiarism.

Structure and contents

The book is divided into two main sections. The first, "A Pocketful of Magic," outlines Bettelheim's thoughts on the value of fairy tales for children. The second part, "In Fairy Land," presents psychoanalytical readings of several popular fairy tales, specifically:

Bettelheim presents a case that fairy tales help children solve certain existential problems such as separation anxiety, oedipal conflict, and sibling rivalries. The extreme violence and ugly emotions of many fairy tales serve to deflect what may well be going on in the child's mind anyway. A child's unrealistic fears often require unrealistic hopes. And furthermore, "The Frog King" may be superior to modern sex education in that it acknowledges that a child may find sex disgusting, and this may serve a protective function for the child.

In his introduction, Bettelheim stated that he was writing the book as "an educator and therapist of severely disturbed children." However, after his death, his credentials in those fields were found to be faked, and Bettelheim had only taken three introductory classes in psychology.

Reception and influence

In the U.S., Bettelheim and The Uses of Enchantment won the 1976 National Book Critics Circle Award for Criticism and the 1977 National Book Award in category Contemporary Thought.

Robert A. Segal writes, "It is the disjunction between Bettelheim's up-to-date approach to fairy tales and his old-fashioned approach to myths that is striking."

The Uses of Enchantment has been cited as an influence in many subsequent works that utilize fairy tales in adult terms, including the 1987 film Dolls, the 2011 Catherine Hardwicke film Red Riding Hood and the 2014 fantasy horror film Red Kingdom Rising.

Plagiarism

In the Winter 1991 edition of the peer-reviewed Journal of American Folklore, Alan Dundes, then a 28-year veteran in the anthropology department at the University of California, Berkeley, presented a case that Bettelheim had copied key passages from A Psychiatric Study of Myths and Fairy Tales: Their Origin, Meaning, and Usefulness (1963, 1974 rev. ed.) by Julius Heuscher without giving appropriate credit, as well as unacknowledged borrowing from other sources.

Dundes states that Bettelheim engaged in "wholesale borrowing" of both "random passages" and "key ideas," primarily from Heuscher's book, but also from other sources. Robert A. Georges, a professor of folklore at UCLA, states "it is clear he didn't do his homework."

Heuscher himself did not consider it a big deal. He said, "We all plagiarize. I plagiarize. Many times, I am not sure whether it came out of my own brain or if it came from somewhere else … I'm only happy that I would have influenced Bruno Bettelheim. I did not always agree with him. But that does not matter. Poor Bruno Bettelheim. I would not want to disturb his eternal sleep with this ."

Dundes also states that his own 1967 article on Cinderella was copied by Bettelheim. Jacquelyn Sanders, who knew Bettelheim and later served the same position as director of the Orthogenic School at the University of Chicago, said she did not believe many people would agree with Dundes's accusations. She stated in 1991, "I would not call that plagiarism. I think the article is a reasonable scholarly endeavor, and calling it scholarly etiquette is appropriate. It is appropriate that this man deserved to be acknowledged and Bettelheim didn't … But I would not fail a student for doing that, and I don't know anybody who would ."

In reviewing a biography of Bettelheim by Richard Pollak in 1997, Sarah Boxer of the New York Times wrote, "Mr. Pollak gives a damning passage-for-passage comparison of the two ."

And as early as 1991, the Los Angeles Times compared what Heuscher had written: "While one must never ‘explain’ the fairy tales to the child, the narrator’s understanding of their meaning is very important. It furthers the sensitivity for selecting those stories which are most appropriate in various phases of children’s development and for stressing those themes which may be therapeutic for specific psychological difficulties."

And what Bettelheim later wrote: "One must never ‘explain’ to the child the meaning of fairy tales. However, the narrator’s understanding of the fairy tale’s message to the child’s preconscious mind is important. . . . It furthers the adult’s sensitivity to selection of those stories which are most appropriate to the child’s state of development and to the specific psychological difficulties he is confronted with at the moment ."

References

  1. ^ Dundes, Alan: "Bruno Bettelheim's Uses of Enchantment and Abuses of Scholarship". The Journal of American Folklore, Vol. 104, N0. 411. (Winter, 1991): pages 74–83.
  2. ^ Bettelheim Plagiarized Book Ideas, Scholar Says : Authors: The late child psychologist is accused of 'wholesale borrowing' for study of fairy tales, Los Angeles Times, Anne C. Roark, Feb. 7, 1991.
  3. Lehiyiann-Haltpt, Christopher (May 5, 1976). "Books of the Times: Frog King as Sex Education". The New York Times.
  4. The Uses of Enchantment: The Meaning and Importance of Fairy Tales, Bruno Bettelheim, New York: Vintage Books (Random House), 1975, 1976. "Portions of this book originally appeared in The New Yorker."
  5. Turbulent dreams of a damaged saint, The Independent , Nicholas Tucker, 8 December 1995.
  6. An Icon of Psychology Falls From His Pedestal, New York Times, Christopher Lehmann-Haupt, book review of The Creation of Dr. B by Richard Pollak, Jan. 13, 1997.
  7. Genius Or Fraud? Bettelheim's Biographers Can't Seem To Decide, Chicago Tribune, Ron Grossman, January 23, 1997.
  8. "All Past National Book Critics Circle Award Winners and Finalists". National Book Critics Circle. Retrieved 2012-03-09.
  9. "National Book Awards – 1977". National Book Foundation. Retrieved 2012-03-09.
    There was a "Contemporary" or "Current" award category from 1972 to 1980.
  10. Theorizing About Myth, Robert Alan Segal, University of Massachusetts Press, 1999, page 61.
  11. Gallagher, John Andrew (1989). "Stuart Gordon". Film Directors on Directing. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 96–97. ISBN 9780275932725.
  12. A Psychiatric Study of Fairy Tales: Their Origin, Meaning and Usefulness, Julius E. Heuscher, illus. by Melba Bennett, Springfield, Illinois: Thomas pub., 1963, 224 pages. See also A Psychiatric Study of Fairy Tales: Their Origin, Meaning and Usefulness; an enlarged and thoroughly revised second edition, Julius E. Heuscher, Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, publisher, April 1974, 422 pages.
  13. ^ Sharman Stein (February 7, 1991). "Bettelheim Accused Of Plagiarizing Book". Chicago Tribune.
  14. Boxer, Sarah (January 26, 1997). "Books: The Man He Always Wanted to Be". The New York Times.
Categories: