Revision as of 17:00, 17 November 2011 editMarkhowell1688 (talk | contribs)23 edits →Second theatre: 1674← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:55, 19 December 2024 edit undoCytkory (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users31,327 editsNo edit summary | ||
(584 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|West End theatre in Covent Garden, London}} | |||
{{Use British English|date=February 2012}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2024}} | |||
{{Featured article}} | {{Featured article}} | ||
{{Infobox Theatre | {{Infobox Theatre | ||
|name = Theatre Royal, Drury Lane | |name = Theatre Royal, Drury Lane | ||
|image = Theatre Royal, Drury Lane 20130408 022.jpg | |||
|current production = Oliver! (From December 12) | |||
|caption = Exterior of venue during a production of '']'' | |||
|image = Drury lane interior 1808.jpg | |||
|caption = The interior of the third and largest theatre to stand at Drury Lane, c. 1808 | |||
|address = Catherine Street | |address = Catherine Street | ||
|city = ] |
|city = ], ] | ||
|country = | |country = England | ||
|publictransit = {{rint|london|underground}} {{lus|Covent Garden}} | |||
|designation = ] | |designation = ] | ||
|coordinates = {{coord|51|30|47|N|00|07|13|W|type:landmark |display=inline,title}} | |||
|latitude = 51.512778 | |||
|owner = ] | |||
|longitude = -0.120556 | |||
| |
|capacity = 1,996 (4 levels) | ||
|production = '']'' | |||
|owner = ] | |||
|opened = {{Start date and age|1663|df=yes}} (original structure) | |||
|capacity = 2,196 (4 levels) | |||
| |
|closed = | ||
| |
|rebuilt = {{Plainlist| | ||
*1674 | |||
|yearsactive = | |||
*1794 (]) | |||
*1812 (]) | |||
|closed = | |||
}} | |||
|othernames = Theatre Royal, Bridges St | |||
|website = {{official URL}} | |||
|production = ] | |||
|website = www.rutheatres.com/venueinfo/dru.htm | |||
}} | }} | ||
The '''Theatre Royal, Drury Lane''' is a ] |
The '''Theatre Royal, Drury Lane''', commonly known as '''Drury Lane''', is a ] and ] in ], ], ]. The building faces ] (earlier named Bridges or Brydges Street) and backs onto ]. The present building, opened in 1812, is the most recent of four theatres that stood at the location since 1663, making it the oldest theatre site in London still in use.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.victorianweb.org/mt/theaters/pva234.html |title=Information from |publisher=Victorian Web |date=9 May 2007 |access-date=20 March 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120415043316/http://www.victorianweb.org/mt/theaters/pva234.html |archive-date=15 April 2012}}</ref> According to the author Peter Thomson, for its first two centuries, Drury Lane could "reasonably have claimed to be London's leading theatre".<ref>{{harvnb|Thomson|1995|p=309}}</ref> For most of that time, it was one of a handful of ]s, granted monopoly rights to the production of ] ] (meaning spoken plays, rather than opera, dance, concerts, or plays with music). | ||
The first theatre on the |
The first theatre on the site was built at the behest of ] in the early 1660s, when theatres were allowed to reopen during the ]. Initially known as "Theatre Royal in Bridges Street", the theatre's proprietors hired prominent actors who performed at the theatre on a regular basis, including ] and ]. In 1672, the theatre caught fire and Killigrew built a larger theatre on the same plot, renamed the "Theatre Royal in Drury Lane"; it opened in 1674. This building lasted nearly 120 years, under the leaderships of ], ] and ], the last of whom employed ] as the theatre's resident Clown. | ||
In 1791, under Sheridan's management, the building was demolished to make way for a larger theatre which opened in 1794. This new Drury Lane survived for 15 years before burning down in 1809. The building that stands today opened in 1812. It has been the residency of well known actors including ], comedian ] and the musical composer and performer ]. From the ], the theatre has primarily hosted long runs of musicals, including '']'', '']'', '']'' and '']'', the theatre's longest-running show.<ref name=DLHistory /> The theatre is owned by the composer ]. Since January 2019, the venue has had ongoing renovations, and in July 2021, the theatre reopened after over two years' of extensive work and closures related to the ]. Disney's ] made its ] debut at Drury Lane on 27 August, with general shows starting from 8 September 2021. | |||
== First theatre: 1663 == | |||
] as he appeared in 1650]] | |||
After the eleven year long ], which had seen the banning of pastimes regarded as frivolous, such as theatre, the English monarchy was ] to the throne with the return of ] in 1660. Soon after, Charles issued ] to two parties licensing the formation of new acting companies. One of these went to ], whose company became known as the ], and who built a new theatre in Drury Lane. The Letters Patent also granted the two companies a shared monopoly on the public performance of legitimate drama in London; this monopoly was challenged in the 18th century by new venues and by a certain slipperiness in the definition of "legitimate drama," but remained legally in place until 1843. The new playhouse, architect unknown, opened on 7 May 1663 and was known from the placement of the entrance as the "Theatre Royal in Bridges Street."<ref>The single roadway now named Catherine Street was for most of its history named Catherine Street in its southern portion and Bridges (or Brydges) street in its northern.</ref> It went by other names as well, including the "King's Playhouse." The building was a three-tiered wooden structure, {{convert|112|ft|m}} long and {{convert|59|ft|m}} wide; it could hold an audience of 700.<ref>{{cite book|author=Beauclerk, Charles|title=Nell Gwyn: Mistress to a King|year=2005|publisher=Atlantic Monthly Press|isbn=0-87113-926-X}} pp 59–60.</ref> Set well back from the broader streets, the theatre was accessed by narrow passages between surrounding buildings.<ref>Hartnoll. See also this , crediting Richard Leacroft, ''The Development of the English Playhouse'', Eyre Methuen Ltd 1973, p.83.</ref> | |||
== First theatre: Theatre Royal, Bridges Street (1663) == | |||
The King himself was a not infrequent attendee of the theatre's productions, as was ], whose private diaries provide much of what we know of London theatre-going in the 1660s. The day after the Theatre Royal opened, Pepys attended a performance of ] and ]'s '']''. He has this to say in his diary: | |||
] as he appeared in 1650]] | |||
A playhouse known as the ] used by ] on Drury Lane was targeted by rioting apprentices on 4 March 1617.<ref>Elizabeth McClure Thomson, ''The Chamberlain Letters'' (London, 1966), p. 140.</ref> After the eleven-year-long ], which had seen the banning of pastimes regarded as frivolous, such as theatre, the English monarchy was ] to the throne with the return of ] in 1660. Soon after, Charles issued ] to two parties licensing the formation of new acting companies. One of these went to ], whose company became known as the ], and who built a new theatre in Drury Lane. The Letters Patent also granted the two companies a shared monopoly on the public performance of legitimate drama in London; this monopoly was challenged in the 18th century by new venues and by a certain slipperiness in the definition of "legitimate drama," but remained legally in place until 1843.<ref>{{harvnb|Milhous|1979|pp=4–7}}</ref> The new playhouse, architect unknown, opened on 7 May 1663 and was known from the placement of the entrance as the "Theatre Royal in Bridges Street."{{efn|The single roadway now named Catherine Street was for most of its history named Catherine Street in its southern portion and Bridges (or Brydges) street in its northern.}} It went by other names as well, including the "King's Playhouse." The building was a three-tiered wooden structure, {{cvt|112|ft|m}} long and {{cvt|59|ft|m}} wide; it could hold an audience of 700.<ref name=Beauclerk>{{harvnb|Beauclerk|2005|pp=59–60}}</ref> Set well back from the broader streets, the theatre was accessed by narrow passages between surrounding buildings.<ref>{{harvnb|Hartnoll|1983}}. See also this , crediting Richard Leacroft, ''The Development of the English Playhouse'', Eyre Methuen Ltd 1973, p. 83.</ref> | |||
The King's Company was forced to commission the technically advanced and expensive Theatre Royal playhouse by the success of the rival ], which was drawing fascinated crowds with their "moveable" or "changeable" ] and visually gorgeous productions at the former ] at ].<ref>{{harvnb|Dobbs|1972|pp=26–28}}</ref><ref>Langhans, p. 16</ref> Imitating the innovations at Lincoln's Inn Fields, the Theatre Royal also featured moveable scenery with ] or ''shutters'' that could be smoothly changed between or even within acts. When not in use, the shutters rested out of sight behind the sides of the ], which also served as a visual frame for the on-stage happenings.<ref>{{harvnb|Dobbs|1972|p=41}}</ref> The picture-frame-like separation between audience and performance was a new phenomenon in English theatre, though it had been found on the Continent earlier. Theatre design in London remained ambivalent about the merits of the "picture-box" stage, and for many decades to come, London theatres including Drury Lane had large forestages protruding beyond the arch,<ref>{{harvnb|Kliman|2008|p=xvii}}</ref> often including the ]s found in the ]. The players could still step forward and bridge the distance between performer and audience, and in addition, it was not unusual for audience members to mount the stage themselves.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150310115711/http://www.vam.ac.uk/content/articles/a/a-history-of-a-night-at-the-theatre/ |date=10 March 2015 }}, ] website, retrieved 14 March 2015</ref> | |||
{{cquote|The house is made with extraordinary good contrivance, and yet hath some faults, as the narrowness of the passages in and out of the Pitt, and the distance from the stage to the boxes, which I am confident cannot hear; but for all other things it is well, only, above all, the musique being below, and most of it sounding under the very stage, there is no hearing of the bases at all, nor very well of the trebles, which sure must be mended.<ref>. From www.pepys.info.</ref>}} | |||
Killigrew's investment in the new playhouse put the two companies on a level as far as technical resources were concerned, but the offerings at the Theatre Royal nevertheless continued to be dominated by actor-driven "talk" drama, contrasting with ]'s baroque ] and operas at ].<ref>{{harvnb|Milhous|1979|pp=15–26}}</ref> Internal power structures were the main reason for this difference: while Davenant skilfully commanded a docile young troupe, Killigrew's authority over his veteran actors was far from absolute.<ref>"Apparently the King's Company had no strong, centralized management ... Of course Killigrew would have had trouble getting Mohun's troupe to accept the kind of absolute control Davenant was able to impose upon his fledglings. But squabbles over management and shares were to characterize the King's Company throughout its stormy career, and ultimately they led to its downfall".{{harvnb|Milhous|1979|p=12}}</ref> Experienced actors ] (who Pepys called "the best actor in the world"<ref>{{harvnb|Dobbs|1972|p=26}}</ref>) and Charles Hart held out for shares and good contracts in the King's Company. Such a division of power between the patentee, Killigrew, and his chief actors led to frequent conflicts that hampered the Theatre Royal as a business venture.<ref>{{harvnb|Dobbs|1972|pp=52–54, 58}}</ref> Nevertheless, it was mostly at the struggling Theatre Royal, rather than at the efficiently run Lincoln's Inn Fields, that the plays were acted that are classics today. This applies especially to the new form ], dominated in the 1660s by ] and the Theatre Royal's house dramatist ]. Actors such as Hart and Charles II's mistress ] developed and refined the famous scenes of repartee, banter and flirtation in Dryden's and Wycherley's comedies.<ref>{{harvnb|Dobbs|1972|pp=38–42}}</ref> With the appearance of actresses for the first time at Drury Lane and Lincoln's Inn Fields in the 1660s,<ref>{{harvnb|Dobbs|1972|p=27}}</ref> British playwrights wrote parts for outspoken female characters, daring love scenes and provocative ]s.<ref name=Beauclerk /><ref>Byrd, Ann Marie. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160602213630/https://books.google.com/books?id=i3tECgAAQBAJ&pg=PT71 |date=2 June 2016 }} in Greenfield (2015), p. 69</ref> In any case, the competition between the King's Company and the Duke's was good for the rebirth and development of English drama.<ref>{{harvnb|Hume|1976|pp=19–21}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Milhous|1979|p=ix}}</ref> | |||
Performances usually began at 3 p.m. to take advantage of the daylight: the main floor for the audience, the pit, had no roof in order to let in the light. A glazed dome was built over the opening, but judging from another one of Pepys' diary entries, the dome was not entirely effective at keeping out the elements: he and his wife were forced to leave the theatre to take refuge from a hail storm.<ref>Beauclerk p. 60.</ref> | |||
The King himself frequently attended the theatre's productions, as did ], whose private diaries provide much of what we know of London theatre-going in the 1660s. The day after the Theatre Royal opened, Pepys attended a performance of ] and ]'s '']''. He has this to say in his diary: | |||
{{quote|The house is made with extraordinary good contrivance, and yet hath some faults, as the narrowness of the passages in and out of the Pitt, and the distance from the stage to the boxes, which I am confident cannot hear; but for all other things it is well, only, above all, the musique being below, and most of it sounding under the very stage, there is no hearing of the bases at all, nor very well of the trebles, which sure must be mended.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140104213709/http://www.pepys.info/1663/1663may.html |date=4 January 2014 }}. From www.pepys.info.</ref>}} | |||
] | |||
Green ] cloth covered the benches in the pit and served to decorate the boxes, additionally ornamented with gold-tooled leather, and even the stage itself.<ref>Spiers, .</ref> | |||
The backless green benches in the pit were in a semicircular arrangement facing the stage, according to a May 1663 letter from one Monsieur de Maonconys: "All benches of the pit, where people of rank also sit, are shaped in a semi-circle, each row higher than the next."<ref>Spiers, , citing {{cite book|author=Thomas, David|title=Restoration and Georgian England 1660–1788 (Theatre in Europe: A Documentary History)|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1989|page=66}}</ref> The three galleries formed a semicircle around the floor seats; both the first and second galleries were divided up into boxes. | |||
] | |||
The King's Company was forced with some reluctance to commission the technically advanced and expensive Theatre Royal playhouse by the success of the rival ], which was drawing fascinated crowds with their "moveable" or "changeable" ] and visually gorgeous productions at ]. Imitating the innovations at Lincoln's Inn Fields, the Theatre Royal also featured moveable scenery with ] or ''shutters'' that could be smoothly changed between or even within acts. When not in use, the shutters rested out of sight behind the sides of the ], which also served as a visual frame for the on-stage happenings. The picture-frame-like separation between audience and performance was a new phenomenon in English theatre, though it had been found on the Continent earlier. However, theatre design in London remained ambivalent about the merits of the "picture-box" stage, and for many decades to come, London theatres including Drury Lane had large forestages protruding beyond the arch, often including the ]s found in the ]. The players could still step forward and bridge the distance between performer and audience, and in addition, it was not unusual for audience members to mount the stage themselves. | |||
Performances usually began at 3 pm to take advantage of the daylight: the main floor for the audience, the pit, had no roof in order to let in the light. A glazed dome was built over the opening, but according to one of Pepys' diary entries, the dome was not entirely effective at keeping out the elements: he and his wife were forced to leave the theatre to take refuge from a hail storm.<ref>{{harvnb|Beauclerk|2005|p=60}}</ref> Green ] cloth covered the benches in the pit and served to decorate the boxes (additionally ornamented with gold-tooled leather) and even the stage itself.<ref>Spiers, .</ref> The backless green benches in the pit were in a semicircular arrangement facing the stage, according to a May 1663 letter from one Monsieur de Maonconys: "All benches of the pit, where people of rank also sit, are shaped in a semi-circle, each row higher than the next."<ref>Spiers, , citing {{cite book |author=Thomas, David |title=Restoration and Georgian England 1660–1788 (Theatre in Europe: A Documentary History) |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1989 |page=66}}</ref> The three galleries formed a semicircle around the floor seats; both the first and second galleries were divided up into boxes.<ref>{{harvnb|MacQueen-Pope|1945|p=33}}</ref> | |||
Killigrew's investment in the new playhouse put the two companies on a level as far as technical resources were concerned, but the offerings at the Theatre Royal nevertheless continued to be dominated by actor-driven "talk" drama, contrasting with ]'s baroque ] and operas at ].<ref>Milhous pp. 15–26.</ref> Internal power structures were the main reason for this difference: while Davenant skilfully commanded a docile young troupe, Killigrew's authority over his veteran actors was far from absolute.<ref>"Apparently the King's Company had no strong, centralized management ... Of course Killigrew would have had trouble getting Mohun's troupe to accept the kind of absolute control Davenant was able to impose upon his fledglings. But squabbles over management and shares were to characterize the King's Company throughout its stormy career, and ultimately they led to its downfall" (Milhous p. 12).</ref> Experienced actors ] (who Pepys called "the best actor in the world") and Charles Hart held out for shares and good contracts in the King's Company, and they despised baroque spectacle. Such a division of power between the patentee Killigrew and his chief actors led to frequent conflicts. These were bad for the Theatre Royal as a business venture; but on the other hand, its strong and confident actors and their insistence on dialogue and literary quality over ornament and visual effects were good for the rebirth of English drama. It was mostly at struggling Theatre Royal, rather than at efficiently run Lincoln's Inn Fields, that the plays were acted that are classics today. This applies especially to the new form ], dominated in the 1660s by ] and the Theatre Royal's house dramatist ]. Actors such as Hart and Charles II's mistress ] developed and refined the famous scenes of repartee, banter, and flirtation in Dryden's and Wycherley's comedies, and these actors made a creative contribution which John Harrington Smith has claimed was almost on a level with that of the dramatists. Another factor in the direction the drama took at this time was the appearance of actresses for the first time on the British stage. Their presence encouraged playwrights to focus on outspoken female characters, daring love scenes, and provocative ]s. | |||
The ] struck in the summer of 1665, and the Theatre Royal, along with all other public entertainment, was shut down by order of the Crown on 5 June. It remained closed for 18 months until the autumn of 1666, during which time it received at least a little interior renovation, including widening of the stage.<ref>Pepys' March |
The ] struck in the summer of 1665, and the Theatre Royal, along with all other public entertainment, was shut down by order of the Crown on 5 June. It remained closed for 18 months until the autumn of 1666, during which time it received at least a little interior renovation, including widening of the stage.<ref>Pepys' 19 March 1666 ] describes a visit to the play house during the renovations, noting "God knows when they will begin to act again." For the royal order closing the playhouses see Latham & Matthews 'Diary of Samuel Pepys,' vol vii (1666), p. 76 note 5.</ref> Located well to the west of the City boundary, the theatre was unaffected by the ], which raged through the City in September 1666, but it burned down six years later on 25 January 1672.<ref>{{harvnb|Dobbs|1972|p=51}}</ref> | ||
== Second theatre: 1674 == | == Second theatre: Theatre Royal, Drury Lane (1674) == | ||
] showing a design attributed to ]. '''1''': ]. '''2''': Four pairs of shutters across the stage. '''3''': Pit. '''4''': Galleries. '''5''': Boxes.]] | |||
] | |||
During the 20th century, one illustration was repeatedly – and wrongly – published as "Christopher Wren, design for the Theatre Royal Drury Lane, 1674".<ref>It was published by Hamilton Bell, "Contributions to the History of the English Playhouse," '']'' XXXIII (1913) in plate 5a in Volume 35 of '']''; Peter Holland, ''The Ornament of Action'' (1979), 30; J. L. Styan, ''Restoration Comedy in Performance'' 1986, 20; and Richard Leacroft, ''The Development of the English Playhouse'' (1970). David Wilmore (Theatresearch) and Professor David Thomas recorded a television programme, from inside the current Drury Lane auditorium, claiming to show how the Theatre Royal might have looked upon its opening in 1674, based on the drawing. During the programme, Thomas repeatedly described this drawing as "by Wren", without noting that Wren's signature does not appear on the drawing. Most recently, for example, supervisors of Graduate College of ] allowed Hope Celeste Bernar to inadvertently reproduce it on page 108 of her "Playing (with) Space in the Author on the Wheel." Diss. PhD. May 2009 as "Wren's drawing provides detailed evidence of Theatre Royal Drury Lane's design.</ref> Since 1964, this presumption has been disputed by scholars.<ref>E. A. Langhans "Wren's Restoration Playhouse", ''Theatre Notebook'' 18 (1964), 98; Graham Barlow "From Tennis Courts to Opera House", PhD thesis, 1983, ], 100; Mark A. Howell "On proscenium doors", ''Theatre Notebook'' 49.1 (1995), 52–3; Robert D. Hume (]), 2007; Tim Keenan '"Scaenes With Four Doors": Real And Virtual Doors On Early Restoration Stages', ''Theatre Notebook'', 65.2, (2011), 62–81 have each separately weighed the evidence, concluding that the theatre shown in the drawing was probably never built.</ref> Careful inspection of the drawing at ] Library shows that it has one pencil inscription: "Play house" {{sic}}, which may have been added by a librarian or by anyone else. No sign of a signature (by Wren or anyone else) or a date appears anywhere on the drawing.<ref name=HM1>Howell-Meri, Mark. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151123183301/http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=5572368&fileId=S0266464X09000244 |date=23 November 2015 }}, ''New Theatre Quarterly'', Vol. 25, Issue 2, May 2009, pp. 148–158</ref> Robert D. Hume of ] explained that use of the drawing "rests almost entirely on the ''supposition'' that the so-called "Wren section" at All Souls represents this theatre. It could just as easily be a discarded sketch unconnected to Drury Lane in any way."<ref>Hume, Robert D. "Theatre History 1660–1800: Aims, Materials, Methodology", in ''Players, Playwrights, Playhouses: Investigating Performance, 1660–1800'', ed. Michael Cordner and Peter Holland, Palgrave Macmillan (2007), p. 23</ref> | |||
Very little is known about the structure of the Theatre Royal Drury Lane after 1674, because no reliable illustrations survive. | |||
Comparative evidence for Drury Lane's 1674 design can be found in the ], built in 1766, whose design was modelled, in part, on Drury Lane's.<ref name=HM1 /><ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151125073446/http://www.british-history.ac.uk/survey-london/vol35/pp40-70 |date=25 November 2015 }}, in ''Survey of London: Vol. 35, the Theatre Royal, Drury Lane, and the Royal Opera House, Covent Garden'', ed. F H W Sheppard (London, 1970), pp. 40–70. ''See also'' Leacroft (1973), p. 95; Kathleen Barker, ''The Theatre Royal Bristol, 1766–1966: Two Centuries of Stage History'' (Society for Theatre Research, 1976), 8; and Mark A. Howell, "Planning Provincial Theatres Under the 1737 Stage Licensing Act", ''Theatre Notebook'' 43 (1989), pp. 104–119.</ref> The site measured {{cvt|112|ft|m}} east-west and {{cvt|59|ft|m}} north-south. The building was smaller than this, as reliable surveys and maps of the period show three passageways measuring between {{cvt|5|and|10|ft|m}} wide surrounding the Theatre Royal on three sides. The building probably measured between {{cvt|40|and|50|ft|m}} wide (the average width of all "Restoration" Theatres) and between {{cvt|90|and|100|ft|m}} long. Architect ] designed Drury Lane's 1674 interior. The theatre was managed, from 1747 to Adam's retirement in the 1770s, by ].<ref name=HM1 /> | |||
During the 20th century, one illustration has been repeatedly published as "Christopher Wren, design for the Theatre Royal Drury Lane, 1674" (See illustration here.)<ref> First published by Hamilton Bell "Contributions to the History of the English Playhouse," ''Architectural Record'' XXXIII (I913, it has been unquestionably accepted as an accurate representation of Drury Lane in 1674 on no more than a ''presumption'' in plate 5a in Volume 35 of ''The Survey of London''; Peter Holland, ''The Ornament of Action'' (1979), 30; J. L. Styan, ''Restoration Comedy in Performance'' 1986, 20; Richard Leacroft, ''The Development of the English Playhouse'' (1970). Most recently, for example, supervisors of Graduate College of Bowling Green State University allowed Hope Celeste Bernar to inadvertently reproduce it on page 108 of her “Playing (with) Space in the Author on the Wheel.” Diss. PhD. May 2009 as “Wren’s drawing provides detailed evidence of Theatre Royal Drury Lane’s design.</ref> | |||
The King's Company never recovered financially from the loss of the old Theatre Royal Bridges Street. The cost of constructing the new theatre, replacing their costumes and scenery lost in the fire and competitive pressure from the rival Duke's Company contributed to its decline. Eventually, in 1682, the King's Company merged with the Duke's.<ref>{{cite ODNB |first=David |last=Kathman |title=Hart, Charles (bap. 1625, d. 1683) |date=January 2008 |edition=online |url=http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/12473 |access-date=20 November 2015 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151120221232/http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/12473 |archive-date=20 November 2015 |doi=10.1093/ref:odnb/12473}}</ref> The 1674 Theatre Royal building contained a warren of rooms, including storage space and dressing rooms used by the management and performers, nearly seventy people in total, as well as some fifty technical staff members.<ref name="Stone">{{harvnb|Stone|Kahrl|1979|p=82}}</ref> Additionally three rooms were provided for scripts, including a library for their storage, a separate room for copying actors' parts and a special library for the theatre's account books, ledger books and music scores. This jumble of rooms often made communication among various departments difficult, a problem that Garrick corrected during his tenure as manager. The entire complex occupied {{cvt|13134|sqft|m2|0}} bounded by Drury Lane (east), Brydges Street (west), Great Russell Street (north) and Little Russell Street (south).<ref>{{harvnb|Stone|Kahrl|1979|p=80}}</ref> | |||
Since 1995, other scholars have questioned this presumption, including: Professor Robert Hume (Penn State University) in 2007, Dr. Tim Keenan (Queensland University) in 2011, the late Dr. Graham Barlow (University of Glasgow Theatre Dept.) in 1984) and Mark A. Howell in 1995. ”</ref> E. A. Langhans ''Theatre Notebook'' 18 (1964), 98, Mark A. Howell, ''Theatre Notebook'' 49.1 (1995), 52-3 and 49.2-3), Graham Barlow ("From Tennis Courts to Opera House", Phd. Diss.I, 99 submitted 1984 to University of Glasgow", 100; Dr. Tim Keenan ‘The Early Restoration Stage Re-anatomised: The Adventures of Five Hours at Lincoln’s Inn Fields 1663’, ''Theatre Notebook'', 61.1, (2007), 12-31 have each separately weighed up different types of evidence to agree that the safest conclusion is that the theatre shown in this sectional drawing was probably never built. On balance, and when considered together, their views strongly suggest the drawing shows a theatre that was, in all probability, never built. Professor Robert Hume has the final word (''Players, Playwrights, Playhouses: Investigating Performance, 1660–1800'', ed. Michael Cordner and Peter Holland (Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), 23), explaining that any description of the Theatre Royal, Drury Lane, from 1674 to 1775 "rests almost entirely on the ''supposition'' that the so-called "Wren section" at All Souls represents this theatre. It could just as easily be a discarded sketch unconnected to Drury Lane in any way." Tim Keenan's 2011 detailed analysis of late seventeenth-century play performances concludes that no more than two doors - one on either side of the stage front - were needed for the performance of any play staged at Theatre Royal Drury Lane during the so-called "Restoration" period. The fact that this drawing shows ''four'' doors on the stage front. also suggests it shows a theatre that was never built. | |||
From 1674, theatregoers accessed the Drury Lane via a long ten-foot-wide passageway from Bridges Street. The passageway opened onto a yard (previously a "Riding Yard"<ref>''The Survey of London'', Volume 35, London: Athlone Press, University of London (1970), p. 30</ref>) in which the theatre stood. It is likely that the yard remained open to the sky at this date, on three sides of the Theatre Royal walls. Henri Misson, a visitor from France, offers a description of the theatre in 1698: his use of the word "amphitheatre" supports the view that Drury Lane had a circular line of boxes surrounding its pit: | |||
Careful inspection of the drawing at All Soul's Library shows it has one pencil inscription: "Play house" , which may have been added by a librarian or by anyone else. No sign of a signature or a date appears anywhere on the drawing. Despite this, in the twentieth century nearly every theatre historian writing about play performance and theatres in the cities of Westminster and London wrongly ''supposed'' this undated, anonymous and untitled section was drawn by Wren in 1674.<ref> This illustration erroneously appears everywhere under the title "Wren's design of the Theatre Royal, Drury Lane, 1674". David Wilmore (Theatresearch) and Professor David Thomas went further. They jointly recorded a television programme, from inside the current Drury Lane auditorium, showing how the Theatre Royal might have looked in 1674 using this anonymous drawing. During the programme, Professor Thomas repeatedly described this drawing as "by Wren", forgetting that Wren's signature is missing from the drawing. | |||
{{quote|The Pit is an Amphitheatre, fill'd with Benches without Backboards, and adorn'd and cover'd with green Cloth. Men of Quality, particularly the younger Sort, some Ladies of Reputation and Virtue, and abundance of Damsels that haunt for Prey, sit all together in this Place, Higgledy-piggledy, chatter, toy, play, hear, hear not. Farther up, against the Wall, under the first Gallery and just opposite to the Stage, rises another Amphitheatre, which is taken by persons of the best Quality, among whom are generally very few Men. The Galleries, whereof there are only two Rows, are fill'd with none but ordinary People, particularly the Upper one.<ref>{{harvnb|Nagler|1959|p=208}}</ref>}} | |||
As Misson points out, the seating was divided by ], and tickets were priced accordingly. Box seats, used by the nobility and wealthy gentry, cost 5 ]s; the benches in the pit where some gentry sat, but also critics and scholars, cost 3 shillings; tradesmen and professionals occupied the first gallery with seats costing 2 shillings, while servants and other "ordinary people", as Misson refers to them, occupied the 1 shilling seats of the upper gallery. Seats were not numbered and were offered on a "first come, first served" basis, leading many members of the gentry to send servants to reserve seats well ahead of performances.<ref name="Stone" /> The stage was {{cvt|45|ft|m}} wide and {{cvt|30|ft|m}} deep with a ] from the footlights to the backdrop. The angle of the rake rose one inch for every {{cvt|24|in|mm}} of horizontal stage. The stage floor included grooves for wings and flats in addition to trap doors in the floor. The proscenium arch covered the stage equipment above the stage that included a pair of girondels – large wheels holding many candles used to counteract the light from the footlights. Towards the latter part of the 18th century, doors were placed on either side of the stage, and a series of small spikes traced the edge of the stage apron to prevent audiences from climbing onto the stage. At the very back of the stage, a wide door opened to reveal Drury Lane.<ref>{{harvnb|Stone|Kahrl|1979|pp=80–81}}</ref> | |||
Several good reasons exist for excluding this drawing from all considerations of how the Theatre Royal Drury Lane used for the first performances of plays by Dryden, Wycherley, Farquhar, Centlivre, Garrick and Macklin: | |||
1. The drawing's un-numbered scale suggest the theatre shown in the drawing would not fit the site dimensions for the Theatre Royal Drury Lane. This theatre "appears" to scale at {{convert|112|ft|m|abbr=on}} - the known east-west total length of the site, surveyor maps of the period. But, surveys from the period clearly indicate passageways measuring at least 5–10ft wide Drury Lane Theatre Royal surrounded its south, west and east walls. ; | |||
2. The original manuscript has been torn twice across as if at first discarded; | |||
3. No signature by Wren; | |||
4. No title mentioning "Drury Lane" or "Theatre Royal"; | |||
5. No date. | |||
An added difficulty for Killigrew and his sons Thomas and Charles was the political unrest of 1678–1684 with the ] and the ] crisis distracting potential audiences from things theatrical. This affected both the King's and the Duke's companies, but most of all the King's which had no profit margin to carry them through the lean years. In 1682, the companies merged, or rather, the King's was absorbed by the Duke's. Led at the time by ], the United Company, as it was now called, chose Drury Lane as their production house, leaving the Duke's Company's theatre in ] closed for a time. In 1688, Betterton was removed from managerial control by Alexander Davenant, son of ], the original patent holder for the Duke's Company. Davenant's management (with Charles Killigrew) proved brief and disastrous, and by 1693 he was fleeing to the ] in the wake of embezzlement charges. The Theatre Royal found itself in the hands of lawyer ] for the next 16 years.<ref>Spiers, .</ref> | |||
Only one reference identifies ] as the architect for the 1674 Drury Lane - the theatre manager Colley Cibber ("An apology for the life of Mr. Colley Cibber, comedian, and late patentee of the Theatre-Royal: With an historical view of the stage during his own time" 1750 ed., 81). Cibber's claim is questionable because he wrote it in 1740. | |||
Neither Davenant's nor Killigrew's sons were much better than crooks,<ref>{{harvnb|Milhous|1979|pp=37–40, 56–57}}</ref> and Rich attempted to recoup their depredations of the company's resources by cost-cutting tyranny, pitting actor against actor and slashing salaries. By 1695, the actors, including day-to-day manager and acting legend Thomas Betterton, were alienated and humiliated enough to walk out and set up a cooperative company of their own. Nine men and six women departed, all of them established professional performers, including such draws as tragedian ] and comedian ], leaving the United Company – henceforth known as the "Patent Company" – in "a very despicable condition," according to an anonymous contemporary pamphlet: | |||
The known Theatre Royal Drury Lane 1674 site measured {{convert|112|ft|m|abbr=on}} east-west and {{convert|59|ft|m|abbr=on}} north-south. The building was smaller than this, because reliable surveys and maps of the period show three passageways measuring between 5ft-10ft surrounding the Theatre Royal on three sides. The building therefore probably measured between 40ft and 50ft wide (the known average width of all "Restoration" Theatres) and between 90ft and 100|ft long. These dimensions compare well with those of the surviving theatre at Bristol - England's oldest working playhouse (known as Theatre Royal from 1778 and Bristol Old Vic from 1946). The Bristol Theatre (1766) probably gives us the best indication of the Drury Lane Theatre Royal between 1674 and 1775. Managed by David Garrick. Garrick's carpenter, James Saunders, provided the architectural drawings for the Theatre Royal, Richmond, Surrey in 1765. The previous year, the Minutes for the Proprietors of the Theatre at Bristol record him providing "an elevation, Ground Plan and Section of a Theatre" (sectional drawing, plan and elevation) in 1765.<ref>15. See Kathleen Barker, The Theatre Royal Bristol, 1766-1966: Two Centuries of Stage History (Society for Theatre Research, 1976), Mark A. Howell, “Planning Provincial Theatres Under the 1737 Stage Licensing Act", ''Theatre Notebook'' 43 (1989), 104-119, and Walter Ison, The Georgian Buildings of Bristol. An extensive archive on its surviving Theatre Royal exists at Bristol Records Office, Bristol Reference Library and Bristol University Theatre Collection .</ref> | |||
{{quote|The disproportion was so great at parting, that it was almost impossible, in Drury Lane, to muster up a sufficient number to take in all the parts of any play; and of them so few were tolerable, that a play must of necessity be damned, that had not extraordinary favour from the audience. No fewer than sixteen (most of the old standing) went away; and with them the very beauty and vigour of the stage; they who were left being for the most part learners, boys and girls, a very unequal match for them that revolted.<ref>{{cite book |last=Gildon |first=Charles |year=1702 |title=A Comparison Between the Two Stages}} quoted by {{harvnb|Milhous|1979|p=82}}</ref>}} | |||
The King's Company never recovered financially from the loss of the theatre in Bridges Street. The competitive pressure from the Duke's Company forced them to keep investing, however, and construction work began immediately on an even larger and more luxurious theatre which housed an audience of 2,000. The new Theatre Royal Drury Lane opened on 26 March 1674. The new house was financed through selling more company shares, which meant that yet more money had now to be made from ticket sales. | |||
], the theatre manager 1747–1776, is portrayed in the title role of '']'' in this painting by ].]] | |||
The 1674 theatre contained a warren of offices, practice rooms, storage space and dressing rooms used by the theatre management and performers, nearly seventy people total, as well as some fifty technical staff members.<ref>Stone, p. 82.</ref> Additionally three rooms were provided for scripts, including a library for their storage, a separate room for copying actor's parts and a special library for the theatre's account books, ledger books and music scores. This jumble of rooms often made communication among various departments difficult, a problem that David Garrick corrected during his tenure as manager. The entire complex occupied {{convert|13134|sqft|m2}} bounded by Drury Lane (east), Brydges Street (west), Great Russell Street (north) and Little Russell Street (south).<ref>Stone, p. 80.</ref> | |||
A private letter from 19 November 1696 reported that Drury Lane "has no company at all, and unless a new play comes out on Saturday revives their reputation, they must break."<ref>{{harvnb|Milhous|1979|p=82}}</ref> The new play is assumed to have been ]'s '']'', and it turned out the success the company needed. Christopher Rich continued as its head until 1709, when the patent in question was actually revoked amid a complex tangle of political machinations. A lawyer named William Collier was briefly given the right to mount productions in Drury Lane, but by 1710 the troupe was in the hands of the actors ], ], and ] – a triumvirate that eventually found themselves sharply satirised in ]'s '']''.<ref>{{cite web |title=Theatre Royal Drury Lane |url=http://britishtheatre.com/venue/theatre-royal-drury-lane/ |publisher=britishtheatre.com |access-date=9 December 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141213095955/http://britishtheatre.com/venue/theatre-royal-drury-lane/ |archive-date=13 December 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref> In 1713, ] replaced Doggett.<ref>{{harvnb|Dobbs|1972|pp=62, 74, 79–85}}</ref> On 2 March 1717 was the premiere of the ballet ] choreographed by ], and was the first ballet to be performed in England. | |||
Entering the theatre from Drury Lane, theatre-goers navigated {{convert|10|ft|m|abbr=on}} wide narrow passages that led under over-hanging apartments to entrances for the various lobbies; one for each of the three main sections of the theatre: the pit, gallery and boxes. The new theatre interior retained the green cloth of the first, but seems to have been built according to a more rectilinear plan. Henri Misson, a visitor from France, offers a description of the theatre in 1698: | |||
Cibber was the ''de facto'' leader of the triumvirate, and he led the theatre through a controversial but generally successful period until 1733, when he sold his controlling interest to John Highmore. It is likely that the sale was at a vastly inflated price and that Colley's goal was simply to get out of debts and make a profit (see Robert Lowe in his edition of Cibber's ''Apology''). Members of the troupe at the time were most displeased; an actor's revolt was organised and executed; ] came to control the theatre. Fleetwood's tenure was tumultuous; his abolition of the practice of allowing ] free access to the upper gallery led to riots in 1737, and Fleetwood's gambling problems entangled the theatre in his own financial difficulties.<ref name="Hartnoll">{{harvnb|Hartnoll|1983}}</ref> It was during this period that actor ] (a native of ] in ] in ]) rose to fame, propelled by a singular performance as ] in an early 1741 production of '']'', in which he introduced a realistic, naturalistic style of acting, abandoning the artificial bombast typical of dramatic roles prior.<ref name="Hartnoll" /> | |||
{{cquote|The Pit is an Amphitheatre, fill'd with Benches without Backboards, and adorn'd and cover'd with green Cloth. Men of Quality, particularly the younger Sort, some Ladies of Reputation and Virtue, and abundance of Damsels that haunt for Prey, sit all together in this Place, Higgledy-piggledy, chatter, toy, play, hear, hear not. Farther up, against the Wall, under the first Gallery and just opposite to the Stage, rises another Amphitheatre, which is taken by persons of the best Quality, among whom are generally very few Men. The Galleries, whereof there are only two Rows, are fill'd with none but ordinary People, particularly the Upper one.<ref>Nagler p. 208.</ref>}} | |||
] | |||
As Misson points out, the seating was divided by ], and tickets were priced accordingly. Box seats, used by the nobility and wealthy gentry, cost 5 ]s; the benches in the pit which often sat some gentry, but also critics and scholars, cost 3 shillings; tradesmen and professionals occupied the first gallery with seats costing 2 shillings, while servants and other "ordinary people," as Misson refers to them, occupied the 1 shilling seats of the upper gallery. Seats were not numbered and offered on a "first come, first served" basis, leading many members of the gentry to send servants to reserve seats well ahead of performances.<ref>Stone, p.82.</ref> | |||
In 1747, Fleetwood's playhouse patent expired. The theatre and a patent renewal were purchased by actor ] (who had trained under Macklin earlier) and partner ]. Garrick served as manager and lead actor of the theatre until roughly 1766 and continued on in the management role for another ten years after that. He is remembered as one of the great stage actors and is especially associated with advancing the ] tradition in English theatre – during his time at Drury Lane, the company mounted at least 24 of Shakespeare's plays.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060329201433/http://www.theatrehistory.com/british/garrick001.html |date=29 March 2006 }}.</ref> Some of Shakespeare's surge in popularity during this period can be traced to the ], which mandated governmental approval of any play before it could be performed and thereby created something of a vacuum of new material to perform. Garrick shared the stage with company including ], ], ], ], ], ], and Ned Shuter. It was under Garrick's management that spectators were for the first time barred from the stage itself.<ref>{{harvnb|Mackintosh|1993|p=20}}</ref> | |||
Towards the latter part of the 18th century, doors were placed on either side of the stage, and a series of small spikes traced the edge of the stage apron to prevent audiences from climbing onto the stage. At the very back of the stage, scholars have presumed a wide door measuring roughly {{convert|20|ft|m|abbr=on}} wide, which Richard Southern called a "scenic vista," opened to reveal an extension to the scenic stage for specially scenic performances of opera, for example. There is little or no evidence to show this was ever employed for eighteenth-century plays, however. Indeed, evidence about Bristol suggests it didn't come into existence there till the mid-nineteenth century, and then only for entertainments or operas.<ref>''The Georgian Playhouse'' (1948). Stone, pp. 80–81.</ref> | |||
Garrick commissioned ] and his brother ] to renovate the theatre's interior, which they did in 1775. Their additions included an ornate ceiling and a ] facade facing Bridges Street. This facade was the first time any structure that might be considered part of the theatre proper actually abutted the street: the building, like the 1663 original, had been built in the centre of the block, hemmed in by other structures. The narrow passage from Bridges street to the theatre now became an interior hallway; some theatre office space also went up behind the new facade.<ref>{{cite book |author=King, David |title=Complete Works of Robert and James Adam and Unbuilt Adam |publisher=Architectural Press |year=2001 |isbn=978-0-7506-4468-6 |pages=50–51}}</ref> | |||
An added difficulty for Killigrew and his sons Thomas and Charles was the political unrest of 1678–1684 with the ] and the ] crisis distracting potential audiences from things theatrical. This affected both the King's and the Duke's companies, but most of all the King's which had no profit margin to carry them through the lean years. In 1682 the companies merged, or rather, the King's was absorbed by the Duke's. Led at the time by ], the United Company, as it was now called, chose Drury Lane as their production house, leaving the Duke's Company's theatre in ] closed for a time. In 1688 Betterton was removed from managerial control by ], son of ], the original patent holder for the Duke's Company. Davenant's management (with Charles Killigrew) proved brief and disastrous, and by 1693 he was fleeing to the ] in the wake of embezzlement charges. The Theatre Royal found itself in the hands of lawyer ] for the next 16 years.<ref>Spiers, {{dead link|date=August 2011}}.</ref> | |||
] | |||
Neither Davenant's nor Killigrew's sons were much better than crooks,<ref>Milhous pp. 37–40, 56–57.</ref> and Rich attempted to recoup their depredations of the company's resources by cost-cutting tyranny, pitting actor against actor and slashing salaries. By 1695 the actors, including day-to-day manager and acting legend Thomas Betterton, were alienated and humiliated enough to walk out and set up a cooperative company of their own. Nine men and six women departed, all of them established professional performers, including such draws as tragedienne ] and comedienne ], leaving the United Company — henceforth known as the "Patent Company" — in "a very despicable condition," according to an anonymous contemporary pamphlet: | |||
{{cquote|The disproportion was so great at parting, that it was almost impossible, in Drury Lane, to muster up a sufficient number to take in all the parts of any play; and of them so few were tolerable, that a play must of necessity be damned, that had not extraordinary favour from the audience. No fewer than sixteen (most of the old standing) went away; and with them the very beauty and vigour of the stage; they who were left being for the most part learners, boys and girls, a very unequal match for them that revolted.<ref>''A Comparison Between the Two Stages'', 1702, quoted by Milhous, 82.</ref>}} | |||
With a series of farewell performances, Garrick left the stage in 1776 and sold his shares in the theatre to the Irish playwright ]. Sheridan and his partners, ] and Doctor James Ford (court physician to ]<ref name=Church>{{cite web |url=http://www.stgite.org.uk/media/judges.html |title=Local judges |publisher=St George-in-the-East Church |access-date=2 January 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150102165739/http://www.stgite.org.uk/media/judges.html |archive-date=2 January 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref>), completed their purchase of Drury Lane two years later, and Sheridan owned it until 1809.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080228212338/http://www.theatrehistory.com/irish/sheridan001.html |date=28 February 2008 }}.</ref> Sheridan premiered his own ] '']'' in 1777. Active management of the theatre was carried out by several parties during Sheridan's ownership, including himself, his father ], and, from 1788 to 1796 and 1800 to 1802, the popular actor ].<ref>{{harvnb|Auburn|1995|p=42}}</ref> Linley took up the post of Musical Director at the theatre, receiving a retainer of £500 per annum.<ref>{{cite ODNB |first=Suzanne |last=Aspden |chapter=Linley, Thomas (1733–1795) |title=Oxford Dictionary of National Biography |year=2004 |chapter-url=http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/16737 |access-date=28 December 2014 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140819090756/http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/16737 |archive-date=19 August 2014 |doi=10.1093/ref:odnb/16737}}</ref> | |||
A private letter from 19 November 1696 reported that Drury Lane "has no company at all, and unless a new play comes out on Saturday revives their reputation, they must break."<ref>Milhous p. 82.</ref> The new play, Rich's last hope, is assumed to have been ]'s '']'', and it turned out the success the company needed. Christopher Rich continued as its head until 1709, when the patent in question was actually revoked amid a complex tangle of political machinations. A lawyer named William Collier was briefly given the right to mount productions in Drury Lane, but by 1710 the troupe was in the hands of the actors ], ], and ] — a triumvirate that eventually found themselves sharply satirised in ]'s '']''. In 1713 ] replaced Doggett. | |||
Sheridan employed dozens of children as extras at Drury Lane including ] who made his stage debut at the theatre in 1780.<ref>{{harvnb|McConnell Stott|2009|pp=45–46}}</ref> Grimaldi became best known for his development of the modern day white-face ] and popularised the role of Clown in many ]s and ]s.<ref>{{harvnb|McConnell Stott|2009|pp=117–118}}</ref> Towards the end of the 1790s, Grimaldi starred in '']'', which confirmed him as a key Christmas pantomime performer. Many pantomimes followed, but his career at Drury Lane became turbulent, and he left the theatre for good in 1806.<ref>Grimaldi (Boz edition), pp. 117–119.</ref> | |||
], the theatre manager 1747–1776, is portrayed in the title role of '']'' in this painting by ].]] Cibber was the ''de facto'' leader of the triumvirate, and he led the theatre through a controversial but generally successful period until 1733, when he sold his controlling interest to ]. It is likely that the sale was at a vastly inflated price and that Colley's goal was simply to get out of debts and make a profit (see Robert Lowe in his edition of Cibber's ''Apology''). Members of the troupe at the time were most displeased; an actor's revolt was organised and executed; ] came to control the theatre. Fleetwood's tenure was tumultuous; his abolition of the practice of allowing ] free access to the upper gallery led to riots in 1737, and Fleetwood's gambling problems entangled the theatre in his own financial difficulties.<ref name="Hartnoll">Hartnoll.</ref> It was during this period that actor ] (a native of ] in ]) rose to fame, propelled by a singular performance as ] in an early 1741 production of '']'', in which he introduced a realistic, naturalistic style of acting, abandoning the artificial bombast typical to dramatic roles prior.<ref name="Hartnoll"/> | |||
{{Clear}} | |||
== Third theatre (1794) == | |||
] | |||
In 1747 Fleetwood's playhouse patent expired. The theatre and a patent renewal were purchased by actor ] (who had trained under Macklin earlier) and partner ]. Garrick served as manager and lead actor of the theatre until roughly 1766, and continued on in the management role for another ten years after that. He is remembered as one of the great stage actors and is especially associated with advancing the ] tradition in English theatre — during his time at Drury Lane, the company mounted at least 24 of Shakespeare's plays.<ref>.</ref> Some of Shakespeare's surge in popularity during this period can be traced to the ] of 1737, which mandated governmental approval of any play before it could be performed and thereby created something of a vacuum of new material to perform. Garrick shared the stage with company including ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]. It was under Garrick's management that spectators were for the first time barred from the stage itself.<ref>Mackintosh p. 20.</ref> | |||
] | |||
Garrick commissioned ] and his brother ] to renovate the theatre's interior, which they did in 1775. Their additions included an ornate ceiling and a ] facade facing Bridges Street. This facade was the first time any structure that might be considered part of the theatre proper actually abutted the street: the building, like the 1663 original, had been built in the centre of the block, hemmed in by other structures. The narrow passage from Bridges street to the theatre now became an interior hallway; some theatre office space also went up behind the new facade.<ref>{{cite book|author=King, David| title=Complete Works of Robert and James Adam and Unbuilt Adam|publisher=Architectural Press|year=2001|isbn=0-7506-4468-0|pages=50–51}}</ref> | |||
The theatre was in need of updating by the end of the 18th century and was demolished in 1791, with the company moving temporarily to the new ], in the ]. A third theatre was designed by ] and opened on 12 March 1794. In the design of the theatre boxes, Henry Holland asked ] for assistance. The designs by Linnell survive in the ] ] – there are also designs by Henry Holland and ] who were involved in the design process. This was a cavernous theatre, accommodating more than 3,600 spectators.<ref>{{harvnb|Thomson|1995|p=310}} specifies 3611.</ref> The motivation behind building on such a large scale? In the words of one owner: | |||
With a series of farewell performances, Garrick left the stage in 1776 and sold his shares in the theatre to the Irish playwright ]. Sheridan and his partners completed their purchase of Drury Lane two years later, and Sheridan owned it until 1809.<ref>.</ref> Sheridan premiered his own ] '']'' in 1777. Active management of the theatre was carried out by a number of parties during Sheridan's ownership, including himself, his father ], and, from 1788 to 1796 and 1800 to 1802, the popular actor ].<ref>Auburn p. 42.</ref> | |||
{{quote|I was aware of the very popular notion that our theatres ought to be very small; but it appeared to me that if that very popular notion should be suffered to proceed too far it would in every way deteriorate our dramatic performances depriving the proprietors of that revenue which is indispensable to defray the heavy expenses of such a concern.<ref name="Mackintosh-34">{{harvnb|Mackintosh|1993|p=34}}</ref>}} | |||
== Third theatre: 1794 == | |||
] | |||
The theatre was in need of updating by the end of the 18th century and was demolished in 1791, with the company moving temporarily to the new ], in the ]. A third theatre was designed by ] and opened on 12 March 1794. In the design of the theatre boxes, Henry Holland asked ] for assistance. The designs by Linnell survive in the V&A Print Room - there are also designs by Henry Holland and ] who were involved in the design process. This was a cavernous theatre, accommodating more than 3,600 spectators.<ref>Thomson p. 310 specifies 3611.</ref> The motivation behind building on such a large scale? In the words of one owner: | |||
New technology facilitated the expansion: iron columns replaced bulky wood, supporting five tiers of galleries. The stage was large, too: {{cvt|83|ft|m}} wide and {{cvt|92|ft|m}} deep. Holland, the architect, said it was "on a larger scale than any other theatre in Europe." Except for churches, it was the tallest building in London.<ref name="Mackintosh-34" /> | |||
{{cquote|I was aware of the very popular notion that our theatres ought to be very small; but it appeared to me that if that very popular notion should be suffered to proceed too far it would in every way deteriorate our dramatic performances depriving the proprietors of that revenue which is indispensable to defray the heavy expenses of such a concern.<ref name="Mackintosh-34">Mackintosh p. 34.</ref>}} | |||
The "very popular notion that our theatres ought to be very small" proved hard to overcome. Various accounts from the period bemoan the mammoth size of the new theatre, longing for the "warm close observant seats of Old Drury," as one May 1794 theatregoer put it.{{efn|John Byng, later Viscount Torrington.<ref>{{harvnb|Mackintosh|1993|p=35}}</ref>}} Actress ], then part of the Drury Lane company, called it "a wilderness of a place" (and left Drury Lane along with her brother ] in 1803). Not only was any sense of intimacy and connection to the company on stage lost, but the very size of the theatre put a great deal of the audience at such a distance from the stage so as to make hearing a player's voice quite difficult. To compensate, the productions mounted in the new theatre tended more toward spectacle than the spoken word.<ref name="Mackintosh-34" /> An example of such a spectacle is a 1794 production that featured real water flowing down a rocky stream into a lake large enough on which to row a boat. This water issued from tanks in the attics above the house, which were installed – along with a much-touted iron ] – as proof against fire.<ref>{{harvnb|Bradby|James|Sharratt|1981|p=92}}</ref> | |||
New technology facilitated the expansion: ] columns replaced bulky wood, supporting five tiers of galleries. The stage was large, too: {{convert|83|ft|m}} wide and {{convert|92|ft|m}} deep. Holland, the architect, said it was "on a larger scale than any other theatre in Europe." Except for ], it was the tallest building in London.<ref name="Mackintosh-34"/> | |||
].]] | |||
The "very popular notion that our theatres ought to be very small" proved hard to overcome, however. Various accounts from the period bemoan the mammoth size of the new theatre, longing for the "warm close observant seats of Old Drury," as one May 1794 theatre-goer put it.<ref>John Byng, later Viscount Torrington. (Mackintosh p. 35.)</ref> Actress ], then part of the Drury Lane company, called it "a wilderness of a place" (and left Drury Lane along with her brother ] in 1803). Not only was any sense of intimacy and connection to the company on stage lost, but the very size of the theatre put a great deal of the audience at such a distance from the stage so as to make hearing a player's voice quite difficult. To compensate, the productions mounted in the new theatre tended more toward spectacle than the spoken word.<ref name="Mackintosh-34"/> An example of such a spectacle is a 1794 production that featured real water flowing down a rocky stream into a lake large enough on which to row a boat. This water issued from tanks in the attics above the house, which were installed — along with a much-touted iron ] — as proof against fire.<ref>Bradby et al. p. 92.</ref> | |||
Richard Sheridan continued as theatre owner during the entire lifetime of this third building. He had grown in stature as a statesman during this time, but troubled finances were to be his undoing. The 1794 rebuilding had cost double the original estimate of £80,000, and Sheridan bore the entirety of the debt. Productions were more expensive to mount in the larger structure, and increased audience revenues failed to make up the difference.<ref>{{harvnb|Auburn|1995|p=44}}</ref> | |||
].]] | |||
Richard Sheridan continued as theatre owner during the entire lifetime of this third building. He had grown in stature as a statesman during this time, but troubled finances were to be his undoing. The 1794 rebuilding had cost double the original estimate of £80,000, and Sheridan bore the entirety of the debt. Productions were more expensive to mount in the larger structure, and increased audience revenues failed to make up the difference.<ref>Auburn p. 44.</ref> | |||
An |
An assassination attempt against ] took place at the theatre on 15 May 1800. ] fired two pistol shots from the pit toward the King, sitting in the royal box. The shots missed by inches, Hadfield having been jostled by a ].<ref>{{cite web |title=This day, May 15, in Jewish history |url=http://www.clevelandjewishnews.com/cjnconnect/blogs/article_057a78b4-3f44-5375-a20d-a850a62b2194.html |publisher=Cleveland Jewish News |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140519165352/http://www.clevelandjewishnews.com/cjnconnect/blogs/article_057a78b4-3f44-5375-a20d-a850a62b2194.html |archive-date=19 May 2014}}</ref> Hadfield was quickly subdued, and George, apparently unruffled, ordered the performance to continue.<ref>{{cite book |author=Fraser, Antonia |title=The Lives of the Kings and Queens of England |publisher=University of California Press |year=2000 |isbn=978-0-520-22460-5 |page=287}}</ref> | ||
On 24 February 1809, despite the previously mentioned fire safety precautions, the theatre burned down. On being encountered drinking a glass of wine in the street while watching the fire, Sheridan was famously reported to have said: "A man may surely be allowed to take a glass of wine by his own fireside."<ref>The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations, OUP (1999)</ref> Already on the shakiest financial ground, Sheridan was ruined entirely by the loss of the building. He turned to brewer ], an old friend, for help. Whitbread agreed to head a committee that would manage the company and oversee the rebuilding of the theatre, but asked Sheridan to withdraw from management himself, which he did entirely by 1811.<ref>Auburn |
The comedy actor ] became acting manager in 1802. With Sheridan's son ], and in the circle of ] (stage-manager), ], ], ] and their likes, he helped to see the Theatre Royal through its next catastrophe.<ref>H. van Thal (ed), ''Solo Recital: The Reminiscences of Michael Kelly'', abridged with a Biographical Index (Folio Society, London 1972), pp. 282–288.</ref> On 24 February 1809, despite the previously mentioned fire safety precautions, the theatre burned down.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Wright |first1=Patrick |title=Iron Curtain: From Stage to Cold War |date=28 October 2009 |publisher=OUP Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-162284-7 |page=65 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ps5wZUFnE7IC |language=en}}</ref> On being encountered drinking a glass of wine in the street while watching the fire, R.B. Sheridan was famously reported to have said: "A man may surely be allowed to take a glass of wine by his own fireside."<ref>The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations, OUP (1999). Michael Kelly (''Memoirs'', ed. van Thal 1972, p. 283) states that Sheridan was engaged in a debate in the House when the news of the fire came, but although on his behalf it was moved that the House should adjourn, he insisted that 'Public duty ought to precede all private interest' and remained there with Roman fortitude while his theatre burned.</ref> Already on the shakiest financial ground, Sheridan was ruined entirely by the loss of the building. He turned to brewer ], an old friend, for help.<ref>'']'', 7 July 1815.</ref> As well as investing strongly in the project, Whitbread agreed to head a committee that would manage the company and oversee the rebuilding of the theatre, but asked Sheridan to withdraw from management himself, which he did entirely by 1811.<ref>{{harvnb|Auburn|1995|p=45}}</ref> | ||
{{Clear}} | |||
== Modern theatre |
== Modern theatre (1812–present) == | ||
] | ] | ||
The present Theatre Royal in Drury Lane, designed by ] on behalf of the committee led by Whitbread, opened on 10 October 1812 with a production of '']'' featuring ] in the title role. The new theatre made some concessions toward intimacy, seating 3,060 people, about 550 fewer than the earlier building (though this size is still considered an extremely large theatre). In 1820 the ] that still stands at the theatre's front entrance on Catherine Street was added, and in 1822, five years after ] was installed, the interior underwent a significant remodelling. The ] running down the Russell Street side of the building was added in 1831.<ref>All details in this paragraph are from Thomson p. 310.</ref> | |||
The present Theatre Royal in Drury Lane, designed by ] on behalf of the committee led by Whitbread, opened on 10 October 1812 with a production of '']'' featuring ] in the title role. The new theatre made some concessions toward intimacy, seating 3,060 people, about 550 fewer than the earlier building (though this size is still considered an extremely large theatre). On 6 September 1817, ] was extended from the audience area to the stage, making it the first British theatre to be gaslit throughout.<ref>{{cite web |title=Theatres Compete in Race to Install Gas Illumination – 1817 |url=http://www.overthefootlights.co.uk/1817-18.pdf |work=Over The Footlights |access-date=20 May 2014 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140520220337/http://www.overthefootlights.co.uk/1817-18.pdf |archive-date=20 May 2014}}</ref> In 1820, the ] that still stands at the theatre's front entrance on Catherine Street was added, and in 1822 the interior underwent a significant remodelling. The ] running down the Russell Street side of the building was added in 1831.<ref>Details in this paragraph from {{harvnb|Thomson|1995|p=310}}</ref> | |||
Productions relying more on scenery and effects than on dialogue and acting remained commonplace in the new facility. The 1823 production of ''Cataract of the Ganges'' had a finale featuring a horseback escape up a flowing cataract "with fire raging all around."<ref>Bradby et al. pp. 103–104.</ref> Effects for an 1829 production were produced by ] apparatus that reportedly could discharge 39 tons of water.<ref>Bradby et al. p. 103.</ref> | |||
Productions relying more on scenery and effects than on dialogue and acting remained commonplace in the new facility. The 1823 production of ''Cataract of the Ganges'' had a finale featuring a horseback escape up a flowing cataract "with fire raging all around."<ref>{{harvnb|Bradby|James|Sharratt|1981|pp=103–104}}</ref> Effects for an 1829 production were produced by ] apparatus that reportedly could discharge 39 tons of water.<ref>{{harvnb|Bradby|James|Sharratt|1981|p=103}}</ref> | |||
There were those concerned that the theatre was failing in its role as one of the very few permitted to show legitimate drama. Management of the theatre after it reopened in 1813 fell to ], overseen by an amateur board of directors and a subcommittee focusing on the theatre as a centre for national culture. (] was briefly on this subcommittee, from June 1815 until leaving England in April 1816.)<ref>{{cite book|title=The Cambridge Companion to Byron|author=Bone, Drummond ed.|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2004|id=|ISBN =0-521-78676-2|page=135}}</ref> Actor ] was the on-stage highlight; like Macklin before him, he made his reputation as ], premiering in the role in 1814. Kean remained until 1820 through praise and notorious disputes with local playwrights such as ],<ref></ref> but despite his popularity, the committee-led efforts to appeal to culture yet still turn a profit eventually proved a failure, and in 1819 the theatre and all its accompanying rights were leased to Robert Elliston. | |||
There were those concerned that the theatre was failing in its role as one of the very few permitted to show legitimate drama. Management of the theatre after it reopened in 1813 fell to ], overseen by an amateur board of directors and a subcommittee focusing on the theatre as a centre for national culture. (] was briefly on this subcommittee, from June 1815 until leaving England in April 1816.)<ref>{{cite book |title=The Cambridge Companion to Byron |editor=Bone, Drummond |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-521-78676-8 |page=135}}</ref> Actor ] was the on-stage highlight; like Macklin before him, he made his reputation as ], premiering in the role in 1814. Kean remained until 1820 through praise and notorious disputes with local playwrights such as ].<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140705101750/http://books.google.com/books?id=nkQ4AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA202 |date=5 July 2014 }}</ref> | |||
Elliston went bankrupt and was unable to renew his lease in 1826. An American, Stephen Price, followed (1826–1830); then through most of the remainder of the 19th century, Drury Lane passed quickly from one set of hands to another. A ] was added to the Russell Street frontage, in 1831, by architect ].<ref>Earl and Sell, pp. 268 (2000)</ref> In 1833, ] gained control of both Drury Lane and Covent Garden, managing the former from 1833 to 1839, and again from 1843 to 1850. Following the lead of the ], Bunn championed English opera, rather than the Italian operas that had played earlier at the theatre. These included ''Fair Rosamond'' and ''Farinelli'' by ]; a series of twelve operas by ] including '']'' and the '']''; '']'' and others by ] and several by ].<ref name=Ivanhoe>Gordon-Powell, Robin. ''Ivanhoe'', full score, Introduction, vol. I, p. VII, 2008, The Amber Ring</ref> In 1837, actor-manager ] (1804–1878) joined the company at Drury Lane, appearing with ], the gifted actor-manager in a number of Shakespeare plays. He also created the role of Captain Channel in ]'s ], ''The Prisoner of War'' (1842), and of Lord Tresham in ]'s ''A Blot in the 'Scutcheon'' (1843).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.victorianweb.org/mt/theaters/pva234.html |title=Profile of the theatre from |publisher=Victorian Web |date=2007-05-09 |accessdate=2010-03-20}}</ref> Macready was briefly manager in 1841–1843, putting significant reforms in place. Nevertheless, most productions there were financial disasters.<ref>Thomson p. 310.</ref> | |||
]'s '']'' at the theatre, as depicted in the '']'' |
]'s '']'' at the theatre, as depicted in the '']'']] | ||
The theatrical monopoly first bestowed by Royal Letters Patent 183 years earlier was abolished by the ], but the patent had been largely toothless for decades and this had little immediate effect. On the other hand, other theatres, used to presenting musical entertainments, continued to do so, and Drury Lane continued as one of the most accepted venues for legitimate theatre. The 19th-century run of financial and artistic failures at Drury Lane was interrupted by four plays produced over a twenty-five-year period by the actor-playwright ]: ''The Queen of Spades'' (1851), ''Eugenie'' (1855), ''Formosa'' (1869), and '']'' (1875). But this period of general decline culminated with F. B. Chatterton's 1878 resignation; in his words, "Shakespeare spells ruin, and Byron bankruptcy."<ref name="Hartnoll"/> During the 19th century, Drury Lane staged ] as well, with performers including Italy's ].<ref>{{cite book|author=Pasi, Mario et al.|editor=Aguilar|title=El Ballet Enciclopedia del Arte Coreográfico|publisher=Aguilar|year=1980}}</ref> | |||
Elliston leased the theatre from 1819 until he went bankrupt in 1826. An American, ] of New York City's ], followed from 1826 to 1830. | |||
One famous musical director of Drury Lane was the eccentric French conductor and composer of light music ] (1812–1860), who successfully invited ] to visit London and give concerts in the Theatre.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://louisjullien.site.voila.fr |title=Jullien biographical site |publisher=Louisjullien.site.voila.fr |date= |accessdate=2010-03-20}}</ref> | |||
Through most of the remainder of the 19th century, Drury Lane passed quickly from one proprietor to another. A ] was added to the Russell Street frontage, in 1831, by architect ].<ref>{{harvnb|Earl|Sell|2000|p=268}}</ref> In 1833, ] gained control of both Drury Lane and Covent Garden, managing the former from 1833 to 1839, and again from 1843 to 1850. Following the lead of the ], Bunn championed English opera, rather than the Italian operas that had played earlier at the theatre. These included ''Fair Rosamond'' and ''Farinelli'' by ]; a series of twelve operas by ] including '']'' and '']''; '']'' and others by ] and several by ].<ref name=Ivanhoe>Gordon-Powell, Robin. ''Ivanhoe'', full score, Introduction, vol. I, p. VII, 2008, The Amber Ring</ref> In 1837, actor-manager ] (1804–1878) joined the company at Drury Lane, appearing with ], the gifted actor-manager in several Shakespeare plays. He also created the role of Captain Channel in ]'s ], ''The Prisoner of War'' (1842), and of Lord Tresham in ]'s ''A Blot in the 'Scutcheon'' (1843).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.victorianweb.org/mt/theaters/pva234.html |title=Profile of the theatre from |publisher=Victorian Web |date=9 May 2007 |access-date=20 March 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120415043316/http://www.victorianweb.org/mt/theaters/pva234.html |archive-date=15 April 2012}}</ref> Macready was briefly manager in 1841–1843, putting significant reforms in place. Nevertheless, most productions there were financial disasters.<ref>{{harvnb|Thomson|1995|p=310}}</ref> | |||
]'' faces ]; the front entrance is through the ] facing Catherine Street on the right.]] | |||
] era including ], ] and ] by ]]] | |||
The house's fortunes rose again under the management of ] from 1879. In the 1880s and 1890s, the theatre hosted many of the productions of the ]. Productions relying on spectacle became even more the norm at Drury Lane in the later parts of the century, under the managements first of ] (1879–1896) and then of ] (1896–1923).<ref name="Hartnoll"/> Examples include the successful 1909 '']'', which featured not only a train crash complete with hissing steam, but also a horserace: twelve real horses jockeying on an on-stage treadmill. Harris instituted an annual ] in 1889; starring the already well-known comedian ] and choreographed by the theatre's dance master, ], the performances were a major success. Many of the designs under Harris were created by the imaginative designer ], including the spectacular drama, ''Armada'' (1888), and many pantomimes.<ref>"Mr. Pitcher's Art" - Obituary '']'' 3 March 1925</ref> | |||
The theatrical monopoly first bestowed by Royal Letters Patent 183 years earlier was abolished by the ], but the patent had been largely toothless for decades and this had little immediate effect. On the other hand, other theatres, used to presenting musical entertainments, continued to do so, and Drury Lane continued as one of the most accepted venues for legitimate theatre. The 19th-century run of financial and artistic failures at Drury Lane was interrupted by four plays produced over a twenty-five-year period by the actor-playwright ]: ''The Queen of Spades'' (1851), ''Eugenie'' (1855), ''Formosa'' (1869), and '']'' (1875). But this period of general decline culminated with ]'s 1878 resignation; in his words, "Shakespeare spells ruin, and Byron bankruptcy."<ref name="Hartnoll" /> During the 19th century, Drury Lane staged ballet as well, with performers including Italy's ].<ref>{{cite book |author=Pasi, Mario |editor=Aguilar |title=El Ballet Enciclopedia del Arte Coreográfico |publisher=Aguilar |year=1980 |display-authors=etal}}</ref> | |||
The last major interior renovation was in 1922 under the ownership of managing director ], leaving a four-tiered theatre able to seat between 2,200 and 2,300 people.<ref>, from show-and-stay.co.uk. Retrieved 28 April 2006.</ref> It was decorated with one of the most notable interiors produced by the specialist ornamental plasterwork company of ].<ref>, Friends of ]</ref> Composer and performer ], immensely popular in his time though little-remembered today, presented his musicals in Drury Lane from 1931 until the theatre was closed in 1939 because of ]. During the war the theatre served as the headquarters for the ]; it sustained some minor bomb damage as well. The theatre reopened with ]'s ''Pacific 1860'' in 1946.<ref name="Hartnoll"/> | |||
] bill board at the theatre in 2009.]] | |||
In the post-war years, a number of ] ] made their London debuts in Drury Lane, including '']'' (1946), '']'' (1951) and '']'' (1953). American imports also included ]'s '']'', which began a five-year run in 1958.<ref name="Hartnoll"/> Comedy troupe ] also performed ] here. Today, the theatre is part of the ] scene, still generally staging popular musical productions. It is owned and managed by Really Useful Theatres, a division of ]'s ]. The seating plan for the theatre remains very much the same, and the auditorium is still one of the largest in London's West End. The seating plan offers seats at various prices, with premium seats in the front of the stalls and front of the Dress Circle.<ref>, retrieved 10 November 2011.</ref> Long-running recent productions include '']'' (1984–89) and '']'' (1989–1999). A staging of ]' musical '']'', closed in January 2007. The theatre then hosted a musical adaptation of '']'' from May 2007 through July 2008. Then ]'s new production of '']'' began in December 2008. It starred the winners of the reality show, '']''. Laurence Jeffcoate, ] and Gwion Wyn Jones shared the role of Oliver. It also featured ], who won the role of Nancy. The musical continued to play at the theatre until January 2011. '']'' then began performances May 2011.<ref></ref><ref> playbill.com</ref> | |||
One famous musical director of Drury Lane was the eccentric French conductor and composer of light music ] (1812–1860), who successfully invited ] to visit London and give concerts in the Theatre.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://louisjullien.site.voila.fr |title=Jullien biographical site |publisher=Louisjullien.site.voila.fr |access-date=20 March 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100111101604/http://louisjullien.site.voila.fr/ |archive-date=11 January 2010}}</ref> | |||
The present building was ] by ] in February 1958.<ref>. Retrieved 28 April 2007. {{Wayback|url=http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/details/default.aspx?pid=2&id=209014|date =20071030040857|bot=DASHBot}}</ref> | |||
The house's fortunes rose again under the management of ] from 1879. In the 1880s and 1890s, the theatre hosted many of the productions of the ]. Harris focused increased resources on the theatre's annual ], beginning at Christmas 1888, adding a well-known comedian, ]. These spectacular Christmas shows were a major success, often playing into March. They were choreographed by the theatre's dance master, ]. Many of the designs under Harris were created by the imaginative designer ], including the spectacular drama, ''Armada'' (1888), and many of the pantomimes.<ref>"Mr. Pitcher's Art" – Obituary, '']'', 3 March 1925</ref> Productions relying on spectacle became the norm at Drury Lane under the managements first of Harris, from 1879 to 1896, and then of ] from 1896 to 1923.<ref name="Hartnoll" /> Examples include the 1909 play, '']'', which featured not only a train crash, but also twelve horses recreating the ] on an on-stage treadmill.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150910151350/http://www.vam.ac.uk/users/node/8606 |date=10 September 2015 }}, Victoria and Albert Museum, 2012, accessed 24 September 2014</ref> ], Director of Music from 1893 to 1923, was a significant figure at the theatre during the Collins years and wrote books which record much more than its musical life.<ref>Peter Gammond, ed., ''The Oxford Companion to Popular Music'' (Oxford University Press, 1991), p. 228</ref> | |||
== Drury Lane Theatre Royal Ghosts == | |||
Drury Lane has been called one of the world's most haunted theatres.<ref>All haunting details from {{cite book|title=The Complete Idiot's Guide to Ghosts and Hauntings|author=Ogden, Tom|year=1999|publisher=Alpha Books|isbn=0-02-863659-7|pages=232–233}}</ref> The appearance of almost any one of the handful of ]s that are said to frequent the theatre signals good luck for an actor or production. The most famous ghost is the "Man in Grey", who appears dressed as a nobleman of the late 18th century: powdered hair beneath a ] hat, a dress jacket and cloak or cape, riding boots and a sword. Legend says that the Man in Grey is the ghost of a knife-stabbed man whose skeletal remains were found within a walled-up side passage in 1848.<ref>Morley, Sheridan ''Theatre's Stranges Acts'' Robson Books 2006 ISBN 978-1-86105-674-0 p.26 </ref> | |||
]'' billboard at the theatre in 2009]] | |||
The ghosts of actor ] and clown ] are supposed to haunt the theatre. Macklin appears backstage, wandering the corridor which now stands in the spot where, in 1735, he killed his fellow actor Thomas Hallam in an argument over a wig. ("Goddamn you for a blackguard, scrub, rascal!" he shouted, thrusting a cane into Hallam's face and piercing his left eye.<ref>From the testimony of witness Thomas Arne, reported in 1847's ''Celebrated Trials of All Countries, and Remarkable Cases of Criminal Jurisprudence'', J. Harding. p. 441 .</ref> Joe Grimaldi is a helpful apparition, purportedly guiding nervous actors skillfully about the stage on more than one occasion. ] claimed to have seen the ghost of ] in a dressing room.<ref>Donati, William ''Ida Lupino'' University Press of Kentucky 2000 ISBN 978-0-8131-0982-4 p.10 </ref> | |||
=== Interior renovation (1922) === | |||
==See also== | |||
In 1922, under the ownership of managing director ], the theatre underwent its last major interior renovation of the 20th century.<ref name="Survey" /> At a cost of £150,000,<ref name="Survey">'The Theatre Royal: Management', ''Survey of London: volume 35: The Theatre Royal, Drury Lane, and the Royal Opera House, Covent Garden'' (1970), pp. 9–29. URL: {{cite web |url=http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=100227 |title=The Theatre Royal: Management | British History Online |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140223034224/http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=100227 |archive-date=23 February 2014 |access-date=15 March 2015}}</ref> it became a four-tiered theatre able to seat just over 2,000 people.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140301201357/http://www.dorothearestorations.com/case-studies/londons-royal-theatre-drury-lane |date=1 March 2014 }}, Dorothea Restorations. Retrieved 22 February 2014.</ref> It was decorated with one of the most notable interiors produced by the specialist ornamental plasterwork company of ].<ref> {{Webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927225224/http://www.fownc.org/newsletters/no45.shtml |date=27 September 2007}}, Friends of ].</ref> Composer and performer ], immensely popular in his time though little-remembered today, presented his musicals in Drury Lane from 1931 to 1939. | |||
* ] | |||
The theatre was closed in 1939 because of the outbreak of the ]. During the war, it served as the headquarters for the ], sustaining some minor bomb damage. It reopened in 1946 with ]'s '']''.<ref name="Hartnoll" /> | |||
The building was ] in February 1958.<ref>, ], accessed 10 July 2015.</ref> | |||
In 2000, Theatre Royal Drury Lane was purchased by ].<ref name=NYT2000>{{cite news |title=A Major New Role As Theater Mogul For Lloyd Webber |first=Warren |last=Hogejan |date=10 January 2000 |newspaper=The New York Times |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2000/01/10/arts/a-major-new-role-as-theater-mogul-for-lloyd-webber.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180204200952/http://www.nytimes.com/2000/01/10/arts/a-major-new-role-as-theater-mogul-for-lloyd-webber.html |archive-date=4 February 2018}}</ref> {{As of|since=y|2014}}, it has been owned and managed by LW Theatres, Lloyd Webber's management company.<ref>Dennys, Harriet. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141007094622/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/10718055/Lord-Lloyd-Webber-splits-theatre-group-to-expand-on-a-global-stage.html |date=7 October 2014}}, ''The Telegraph'', 24 March 2014</ref> The seating plan for the theatre remains the same and the auditorium is still one of the largest in ]. It is one of the 40 theatres featured in the 2012 DVD documentary series '']'', presented by ].<ref>Fisher, Philip. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131016110406/http://www.britishtheatreguide.info/reviews/great-west-end-7230 |date=16 October 2013}}, ''British Theatre Guide'', 19 February 2012</ref> | |||
=== 350th anniversary renovation (2013) === | |||
On 15 May 2013, Lloyd Webber revealed a £4 million restoration of the theatre to mark its 350th anniversary.<ref name=Everett2013/> Using a team of specialists,<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140322001555/http://www.specfinish.co.uk/latest-news/locker-riley-complete-restoration-at-drury-lane/ |date=22 March 2014 }}, ''SpecFinish Magazine'', retrieved 14 March 2015</ref> the detailed restoration has returned the public areas of the Rotunda, Royal Staircases and Grand Saloon, all of which were part of the 1810 theatre, to their original ].<ref name=Everett2013>Everett, Lucinda. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140501043800/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/theatre/theatre-news/10059884/Lord-Andrew-Lloyd-Webber-reveals-4m-restoration-of-The-Theatre-Royal-Drury-Lane.html |date=1 May 2014 }}, ''The Telegraph'', 15 May 2013, retrieved 22 September 2014.</ref> | |||
== Major productions of the 20th and 21st centuries == | |||
Four of ]'s musicals made their London debuts in Drury Lane, holding the stage almost continuously for nearly a decade, including '']'' (1947–1950),<ref name=Ellacott>The show transferred in 1950 to the Stoll Theatre to finish its long run. {{cite web |last=Ellacott |first=Vivyan |url=http://www.overthefootlights.co.uk/London%20Musicals%201945-1949.pub.pdf |title=London Musicals 1945–1949: ''Oklahoma!'' |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140313211232/http://www.overthefootlights.co.uk/London%20Musicals%201945-1949.pub.pdf |archive-date=13 March 2014 |website=Over the Footlights |access-date=24 September 2014}}</ref> '']'' (1950–1951),<ref name=DLHistory /> '']'' (1951–1953) and '']'' (1953–1956).<ref name=Hischak-150-263>{{harvnb|Hischak|2007|pp=150, 263}}</ref> American imports also included ]'s '']'', which began a five-year run in 1958.<ref name="Hartnoll" /> Productions in the 1960s included '']'' (1964–1965), '']'' (1965–1967) and '']'' (1970–1972).<ref name=DLHistory /> In 1974, ] recorded an album at the theatre, '']''.<ref name=Palin>{{cite book |last=Palin |first=Michael |title=Diaries 1969–1979: The Python Years |page=178}}</ref> | |||
Later long runs at the theatre include productions of '']'' (1976–1979), '']'' (1984–1989), '']'' (1989–1999, the theatre's longest-running show),<ref name=DLHistory /> '']'' (2004–2007),<ref name=Producers /> '']'' (2007–2008),<ref name=LOTR /> '']'' (2009–2011),<ref name=Paddock /> '']'' (2011–2013),<ref name=Paddock-Shrek /> '']'' (2013–2017),<ref name=Porteous /> and '']'' (2021–2024).<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-01-22 |title=Frozen sets closing date and final extension |url=https://www.whatsonstage.com/news/frozen-sets-closing-date-and-final-extension_1565040/ |access-date=2024-06-24}}</ref> | |||
Notable productions since 1919 have included:<ref name=DruryTimeline>{{cite web |title=Theatre Royal Drury Lane History and Timeline |website=London Theatres |location=London |url=http://www.londontheatres.co.uk/theatre-royal-drury-lane/history/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190318200905/http://www.londontheatres.co.uk/theatre-royal-drury-lane/history/ |archive-date=18 March 2019}}</ref> | |||
{{Div col|colwidth=25em|content= | |||
*''Cinderella'' (1919) | |||
*'']'' (1924–1927) | |||
*'']'' (1928–1929) | |||
*'']'' (1931–1932) | |||
*'']'' (1934) | |||
*'']'' (1947–1950)<ref name=Ellacott /> | |||
*'']'' (1950–1951)<ref name=DLHistory>{{cite web |last=Fox |first=Mark |title=Theatre Royal, Drury Lane: History |website=The Really Useful Group |url=http://www.reallyuseful.com/theatres/theatre-royal-drury-lane/history/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140917080448/http://www.reallyuseful.com/theatres/theatre-royal-drury-lane/history/ |archive-date=17 September 2014 |access-date=24 September 2014}}</ref> | |||
*'']'' (1951–1953)<ref name=Hischak-150-263 /> | |||
*'']'' (1953–1956)<ref name=Hischak-150-263 /> | |||
*'']'' (1958–1963)<ref name="Hartnoll" /> | |||
*'']'' (1964–1965)<ref name=DLHistory /> | |||
*'']'' (1965–1967)<ref name=DLHistory /> | |||
*'']'' (1969–1970) | |||
*'']'' (1970–1972)<ref name=DLHistory /> | |||
*'']'' (1972–1973) | |||
*'']'' (1974–1976) | |||
*'']'' (1976–1979) | |||
*'']'' (1980) | |||
*'']'' (1981–1983) | |||
*'']'' (1984–1989) | |||
*'']'' (1989–1999) | |||
*'']'' (2000-2001) | |||
*'']'' (revival) (2001–2003) | |||
*'']'' (revival) (2003–2004) | |||
*'']'' (2004–2007)<ref name=Producers>{{cite web |title=''The Producers'' at Theatre Royal, Drury Lane, 2004–2007 |website=Thisistheatre.com |url=http://www.thisistheatre.com/londonshows/producers.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110717050900/http://www.thisistheatre.com/londonshows/producers.html |archive-date=17 July 2011 |access-date=24 September 2014}}</ref> | |||
*'']'' (2007–2008)<ref name=LOTR>{{cite news |title=''Lord of the Rings'' musical to close |url=http://www.metro.co.uk/showbiz/118517-lord-of-the-rings-musical-to-close |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100520111252/http://www.metro.co.uk/showbiz/118517-lord-of-the-rings-musical-to-close |archive-date=20 May 2010 |newspaper=] |date=14 March 2008 |access-date=24 September 2014}}</ref> | |||
*'']'' (revival) (2009–2011)<ref name=Paddock>{{cite web |last=Paddock |first=Terri |title=''Oliver!'' Closes at Drury Lane 8 Jan, Moody Guests |url=http://www.whatsonstage.com/west-end-theatre/news/06-2010/oliver-closes-at-drury-lane-8-jan-moody-guests_12933.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150811061131/http://www.whatsonstage.com/west-end-theatre/news/06-2010/oliver-closes-at-drury-lane-8-jan-moody-guests_12933.html |archive-date=11 August 2015 |website=Whatsonstage.com |date=23 June 2010 |access-date=24 September 2014}}</ref> | |||
*'']'' (2011–2013)<ref name=Paddock-Shrek>{{cite web |last=Paddock |first=Terri |url=http://www.whatsonstage.com/west-end-theatre/news/08-2012/shrek-closes-on-24-feb-charlie-moves-chocolate-fac_2903.html |title=''Shrek'' closes on 24 Feb, Charlie moves Chocolate Factory to Drury Lane |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150811061137/http://www.whatsonstage.com/west-end-theatre/news/08-2012/shrek-closes-on-24-feb-charlie-moves-chocolate-fac_2903.html |archive-date=11 August 2015 |date=31 August 2012 |access-date=24 September 2014}}</ref> | |||
*'']'' (2013–2017)<ref name=Porteous>{{cite web |url=https://www.londontheatredirect.com/news/1715/Charlie-And-The-Chocolate-Factory-Celebrates-1000th-Performance--Extends-Booking-Period.aspx |title=Charlie And The Chocolate Factory Celebrates 1000th Performance, Extends Booking Period |access-date=17 October 2015 |date=13 October 2015 |last=Porteous |first=Jacob |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304100339/https://www.londontheatredirect.com/news/1715/Charlie-And-The-Chocolate-Factory-Celebrates-1000th-Performance--Extends-Booking-Period.aspx |archive-date=4 March 2016}}</ref> | |||
*'']'' (revival) (2017–2019)<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Wood |first1=Alex |last2=Hewis |first2=Ben |date=13 July 2018 |url=https://www.whatsonstage.com/west-end-theatre/news/42nd-street-cast-bonnie-langford-closing-date_47098.html |title=Bonnie Langford joins cast of 42nd Street and closing date announced |website=Whatsonstage.com |access-date=24 October 2021 |archive-date=24 October 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211024173237/https://www.whatsonstage.com/west-end-theatre/news/42nd-street-cast-bonnie-langford-closing-date_47098.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
*'']'' (2021–2024)<ref>{{Cite web |title=Frozen confirms new opening plans from August 2021 |url=https://www.whatsonstage.com/london-theatre/news/frozen-confirms-reopening-plans-from-august-2021_53537.html |access-date=24 October 2021 |website=www.whatsonstage.com |date=10 March 2021 |archive-date=24 October 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211024172526/https://www.whatsonstage.com/london-theatre/news/frozen-confirms-reopening-plans-from-august-2021_53537.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
*'']'' (2024–2025)<ref name="Deadline-Shakesphere">{{Cite web |last=Bamigboye |first=Baz |date=2024-07-30 |title=Breaking Baz: Sigourney Weaver Conjures Spells For West End Debut As Prospero, Joining Tom Hiddleston & Hayley Atwell In A Season Of Shakespeare Directed By 'Sunset Boulevard's' Jamie Lloyd At Theatre Royal Drury Lane This Winter |url=https://deadline.com/2024/07/sigourney-weaver-west-end-tempest-1236026153/ |access-date=2024-07-30 |website=Deadline |language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
*'']'' (2025)<ref name="Deadline-Shakesphere"/> | |||
*'']'' (2025)<ref>{{cite web |author=Logan Culwell-Block |url=https://playbill.com/article/disneys-hercules-will-play-londons-west-end |title=Disney's Hercules Will Play London's West End |website=Playbill |date=June 24, 2024 |access-date=June 24, 2024 }}</ref> | |||
}} | |||
== Hauntings == | |||
The author Tom Ogden calls the Theatre Royal one of the world's most haunted theatres.<ref>All haunting details from {{cite book |title=The Complete Idiot's Guide to Ghosts and Hauntings |author=Ogden, Tom |year=1999 |publisher=Alpha Books |isbn=978-0-02-863659-7 |pages=232–233}}</ref> The appearance of almost any one of the handful of ghosts that are said to frequent the theatre signals good luck for an actor or production. The most famous ghost is the "Man in Grey", who appears dressed as a nobleman of the late 18th century: powdered hair beneath a ] hat, a dress jacket and cloak or cape, riding boots and a sword. Legend says that the Man in Grey is the ghost of a knife-stabbed man whose skeletal remains were found within a walled-up side passage in 1848.<ref>Morley, Sheridan ''Theatre's Stranges Acts'' Robson Books 2006 {{ISBN|978-1-86105-674-0}} p.26 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180223113811/https://books.google.com/books?id=I7M7PCKzTTIC&pg=PA27&dq=Dan+leno+ghost+drury+lane&num=100 |date=23 February 2018 }}</ref> Various people have reported seeing the ghost, including ], who described its usual path as starting at the end of the fourth row in the upper circle and then proceeding via the rear gangway to the wall near the royal box, where the remains were found.<ref>{{harvnb|Underwood|2013|pp=55–56}}</ref> | |||
The ghosts of actor ] and clown ] are also supposed to haunt the theatre. Macklin appears backstage, wandering the corridor which now stands in the spot where, in 1735, he killed fellow actor ] in an argument over a wig ("Goddamn you for a blackguard, scrub, rascal!" he shouted, thrusting a cane into Hallam's face and piercing his left eye).<ref>From the testimony of witness Thomas Arne, reported in 1847's ''Celebrated Trials of All Countries, and Remarkable Cases of Criminal Jurisprudence'', J. Harding. p. 441 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140705101719/http://books.google.com/books?vid=LCCN09019898&id=pj3FyXaS91YC&pg=PA441 |date=5 July 2014 }}.</ref> Grimaldi is reported to be a helpful apparition, purportedly guiding nervous actors skillfully about the stage on more than one occasion. The comedian ] said he had seen the ghost of ] in a dressing room.<ref>Donati, William ''Ida Lupino'' University Press of Kentucky 2000 {{ISBN|978-0-8131-0982-4}} p.10 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180223113811/https://books.google.com/books?id=sJKbw1wbVd0C&pg=PA9 |date=23 February 2018 }}</ref> | |||
== See also == | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
===Notes=== | |||
* {{cite book|title=Sheridan Studies|chapter=Theatre in the age of Garrick and Sheridan|author=Auburn, Mark S.|editor=James Morwood, David Crane eds.|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1995|isbn=0-521-46466-8|pages=7–46}} | |||
{{Reflist|group=lower-alpha}} | |||
* {{cite book|author=Bradby, David; Jame, Louis; Sharratt, Bernard|title=Performance and Politics in Popular Drama|year=1981|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=0-521-28524-0}} | |||
* Earl, John and Sell, Michael ''Guide to British Theatres 1750-1950'', pp. 107–8 (Theatres Trust, 2000) ISBN 0-7136-5688-3 | |||
===Citations=== | |||
* {{cite book|author=Faul, Michel|title=Louis Jullien: musique, spectacle et folie au XIXe siècle|publisher=Atlantica|year=2006|isbn=2-35165-038-7}} | |||
{{Reflist}} | |||
* {{cite book|author=Hartnoll, Phyllis, ed.|title=The Oxford Companion to the Theatre|edition=4th edition|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=London|year=1983|pages=230–232|isbn=0-19-211546-4}} | |||
* {{cite book|author=Mackintosh, Iain|title=Architecture, Actor and Audience|year=1993|publisher=Routledge UK|isbn=0-415-03183-4}} | |||
* {{cite book|author=Milhous, Judith|year=1979|title=Thomas Betterton and the Management of Lincoln's Inn Fields 1695–1708|location=Carbondale, Illinois|publisher=Southern Illinois University Press|isbn=0-8093-0906-8}} | |||
* {{cite book|author=Nagler, Alois M|title=A Source Book in Theatrical History|publisher=Courier Dover|year=1959|isbn=0-486-20515-0}} | |||
* {{cite book|author=Smith, John Harrington|year=1948|title=The Gay Couple in Restoration Comedy|location=Cambridge|publisher=Harvard University Press}} | |||
* {{cite web|author=Spiers, Rupert|year=2002|url=http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_se/murray/Restoration/Front.html|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20080105075223/http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_se/murray/Restoration/Front.html|archivedate=2008-01-05| title=Restoration Theatre|accessdate=13 April 2006}} | |||
* {{cite book|author=Stone, George Winchester and George M. Kahrl|year=1979|title=David Garrick: A Critical Biography|location=Carbondale, Illinois|publisher=Southern Illinois University Press}} | |||
* {{cite book|author=Thomson, Peter|editor=Banham, Martin|title=The Cambridge Guide to Theatre|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1995|isbn=0-521-43437-8|chapter=Drury Lane, Theatre Royal|pages=309–311}} | |||
== |
== Bibliography == | ||
*{{cite book |title=Sheridan Studies |chapter=Theatre in the age of Garrick and Sheridan |last=Auburn |first=Mark S. |editor-first1=James |editor-last1=Morwood |editor-first2=David |editor-last2=Crane |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1995 |isbn=978-0-521-46466-6 |pages=7–46}} | |||
{{Reflist|2}} | |||
*{{cite book |last=Beauclerk |first=Charles |title=Nell Gwyn: Mistress to a King |year=2005 |publisher=Atlantic Monthly Press |isbn=978-0-87113-926-9 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/nellgwynmistress0000beau}} | |||
*{{cite book |editor-last1=Bradby |editor-first1=David |editor-last2=James |editor-first2=Louis |editor-last3=Sharratt |editor-first3=Bernard |title=Performance and Politics in Popular Drama |year=1981 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-28524-7 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/performancepolit0000unse}} | |||
*{{cite book |last=Dobbs |first=Brian |title=Drury Lane: Three Centuries of the Theatre Royal, 1663–1971 |publisher=Cassell |year=1972}} | |||
*{{cite book |last1=Earl |first1=John |last2=Sell |first2=Michael |title=Guide to British Theatres 1750–1950 |pages=107–8 |publisher=Theatres Trust |year=2000 |isbn=978-0-7136-5688-6}} | |||
*{{cite book |author=Faul, Michel |title=Louis Jullien: musique, spectacle et folie au XIXe siècle |publisher=Atlantica |year=2006 |isbn=978-2-35165-038-7 |language=fr}} | |||
*{{cite book |editor=Greenfield, Anne Leah |title=Interpreting Sexual Violence, 1660–1800 |publisher=Routledge |year=2015 |isbn=978-1-317-31884-2}} | |||
*{{cite book |editor-last=Hartnoll |editor-first=Phyllis |title=The Oxford Companion to the Theatre |edition=4th |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=London |year=1983 |pages= |isbn=978-0-19-211546-1 |url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordcompaniont0000unse_x9q5/page/230}} | |||
*{{cite book |last=Hischak |first=Thomas S. |title=The Rodgers and Hammerstein Encyclopedia |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group |location=Westport, Conn. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CsbEP_Mu50EC&pg=PA150 |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-313-34140-3}} | |||
*{{cite book |last=Hume |first=Robert D. |title=The Development of English Drama in the Late Seventeenth Century |publisher=Clarendon Press |url=https://archive.org/details/developmentofeng0000hume |url-access=registration |year=1976 |edition=1990 |isbn=978-0-19-811799-5}} | |||
*{{cite book |last=Kliman |first=Bernice W. |year=2008 |title=Tragedy of Hamlet of Denmark |location=Indiana |publisher=Focus Publishing |isbn=978-1-58510-513-7}} | |||
*{{cite book |last=Leacroft |first=Richard |year=1973 |title=The Development of the English Playhouse |publisher=Cornell University Press |isbn=978-0-8014-0750-5 |url=https://archive.org/details/developmentofeng0000leac_m0k4}} | |||
*{{cite book |last=Mackintosh |first=Iain |title=Architecture, Actor and Audience |year=1993 |publisher=Routledge UK |isbn=978-0-415-03183-7}} | |||
*{{cite book |last=McConnell Stott |first=Andrew |year=2009 |title=The Pantomime Life of Joseph Grimaldi |location=Edinburgh |publisher=Canongate Books |isbn=978-1-84767-761-7}} | |||
*{{cite book |last=MacQueen-Pope |first=Walter |author-link=W. J. MacQueen-Pope |year=1945 |title=Theatre Royal, Drury Lane |url=https://archive.org/details/theatreroyaldrur0000macq| url-access= registration |publisher=W. H. Allen & Co}} | |||
*{{cite book |last=Milhous |first=Judith |year=1979 |title=Thomas Betterton and the Management of Lincoln's Inn Fields 1695–1708 |url=https://archive.org/details/thomasbettertonm0000milh |url-access=registration |location=Carbondale, Illinois |publisher=Southern Illinois University Press |isbn=978-0-8093-0906-1}} | |||
*{{cite book |last=Nagler |first=Alois M. |title=A Source Book in Theatrical History |publisher=Courier Dover |year=1959 |isbn=978-0-486-20515-1 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/sourcebookinthea0000nagl_s1y9}} | |||
*{{cite book |author=Smith, John Harrington |year=1948 |title=The Gay Couple in Restoration Comedy |location=Cambridge |publisher=Harvard University Press}} | |||
*{{cite web |author=Spiers, Rupert |year=2002 |url=http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~rtheatre/Front.html |title=Restoration Theatre |access-date=2 March 2014 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080901225204/http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~rtheatre/Front.html |archive-date=1 September 2008}} | |||
*{{cite book |last1=Stone |first1=George Winchester |last2=Kahrl |first2=George M. |year=1979 |title=David Garrick: A Critical Biography |url=https://archive.org/details/davidgarrickcrit0000ston |url-access=registration |location=Carbondale, Illinois |publisher=Southern Illinois University Press |isbn=978-0-8093-0931-3}} | |||
*{{cite book |last=Thomson |first=Peter |editor-last=Banham |editor-first=Martin |title=The Cambridge Guide to Theatre |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1995 |isbn=978-0-521-43437-9 |chapter=Drury Lane, Theatre Royal |pages=|chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/cambridgeguideto0000banh/page/309}} | |||
*{{cite book |last=Underwood |first=Peter |title=Haunted London |publisher=Amberley |year=2013 |isbn=978-1-4456-2859-2 |pages=55–61 |chapter=Theatre Royal, Drury Lane}} | |||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
{{ |
{{Commons category|Theatre Royal, Drury Lane}} | ||
*{{Official website|lwtheatres.co.uk/theatres/theatre-royal-drury-lane}} | |||
* Including many pictures not seen elsewhere. | |||
*{{Cite NIE |wstitle=Drury Lane Theatre |year=1905 |short=x}} | |||
* | |||
{{Theatres in London}} | {{Theatres in London}} | ||
{{Richard Brinsley Sheridan}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
{{Link FA|pl}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 23:55, 19 December 2024
West End theatre in Covent Garden, London
Exterior of venue during a production of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory | |
Address | Catherine Street London, WC2 England |
---|---|
Coordinates | 51°30′47″N 00°07′13″W / 51.51306°N 0.12028°W / 51.51306; -0.12028 |
Public transit | Covent Garden |
Owner | LW Theatres |
Designation | Grade I listed |
Capacity | 1,996 (4 levels) |
Production | The Tempest |
Construction | |
Opened | 1663; 361 years ago (1663) (original structure) |
Rebuilt |
|
Website | |
lwtheatres |
The Theatre Royal, Drury Lane, commonly known as Drury Lane, is a West End theatre and Grade I listed building in Covent Garden, London, England. The building faces Catherine Street (earlier named Bridges or Brydges Street) and backs onto Drury Lane. The present building, opened in 1812, is the most recent of four theatres that stood at the location since 1663, making it the oldest theatre site in London still in use. According to the author Peter Thomson, for its first two centuries, Drury Lane could "reasonably have claimed to be London's leading theatre". For most of that time, it was one of a handful of patent theatres, granted monopoly rights to the production of "legitimate" drama in London (meaning spoken plays, rather than opera, dance, concerts, or plays with music).
The first theatre on the site was built at the behest of Thomas Killigrew in the early 1660s, when theatres were allowed to reopen during the English Restoration. Initially known as "Theatre Royal in Bridges Street", the theatre's proprietors hired prominent actors who performed at the theatre on a regular basis, including Nell Gwyn and Charles Hart. In 1672, the theatre caught fire and Killigrew built a larger theatre on the same plot, renamed the "Theatre Royal in Drury Lane"; it opened in 1674. This building lasted nearly 120 years, under the leaderships of Colley Cibber, David Garrick and Richard Brinsley Sheridan, the last of whom employed Joseph Grimaldi as the theatre's resident Clown.
In 1791, under Sheridan's management, the building was demolished to make way for a larger theatre which opened in 1794. This new Drury Lane survived for 15 years before burning down in 1809. The building that stands today opened in 1812. It has been the residency of well known actors including Edmund Kean, comedian Dan Leno and the musical composer and performer Ivor Novello. From the Second World War, the theatre has primarily hosted long runs of musicals, including Oklahoma!, My Fair Lady, 42nd Street and Miss Saigon, the theatre's longest-running show. The theatre is owned by the composer Andrew Lloyd Webber. Since January 2019, the venue has had ongoing renovations, and in July 2021, the theatre reopened after over two years' of extensive work and closures related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Disney's Frozen made its West End debut at Drury Lane on 27 August, with general shows starting from 8 September 2021.
First theatre: Theatre Royal, Bridges Street (1663)
A playhouse known as the Cockpit Theatre used by Queen Anne's Men on Drury Lane was targeted by rioting apprentices on 4 March 1617. After the eleven-year-long Puritan Interregnum, which had seen the banning of pastimes regarded as frivolous, such as theatre, the English monarchy was restored to the throne with the return of Charles II in 1660. Soon after, Charles issued Letters Patent to two parties licensing the formation of new acting companies. One of these went to Thomas Killigrew, whose company became known as the King's Company, and who built a new theatre in Drury Lane. The Letters Patent also granted the two companies a shared monopoly on the public performance of legitimate drama in London; this monopoly was challenged in the 18th century by new venues and by a certain slipperiness in the definition of "legitimate drama," but remained legally in place until 1843. The new playhouse, architect unknown, opened on 7 May 1663 and was known from the placement of the entrance as the "Theatre Royal in Bridges Street." It went by other names as well, including the "King's Playhouse." The building was a three-tiered wooden structure, 112 ft (34 m) long and 59 ft (18 m) wide; it could hold an audience of 700. Set well back from the broader streets, the theatre was accessed by narrow passages between surrounding buildings.
The King's Company was forced to commission the technically advanced and expensive Theatre Royal playhouse by the success of the rival Duke's Company, which was drawing fascinated crowds with their "moveable" or "changeable" scenery and visually gorgeous productions at the former Lisle's Tennis Court at Lincoln's Inn Fields. Imitating the innovations at Lincoln's Inn Fields, the Theatre Royal also featured moveable scenery with wings or shutters that could be smoothly changed between or even within acts. When not in use, the shutters rested out of sight behind the sides of the proscenium arch, which also served as a visual frame for the on-stage happenings. The picture-frame-like separation between audience and performance was a new phenomenon in English theatre, though it had been found on the Continent earlier. Theatre design in London remained ambivalent about the merits of the "picture-box" stage, and for many decades to come, London theatres including Drury Lane had large forestages protruding beyond the arch, often including the thrust stages found in the Elizabethan theatres. The players could still step forward and bridge the distance between performer and audience, and in addition, it was not unusual for audience members to mount the stage themselves.
Killigrew's investment in the new playhouse put the two companies on a level as far as technical resources were concerned, but the offerings at the Theatre Royal nevertheless continued to be dominated by actor-driven "talk" drama, contrasting with William Davenant's baroque spectacles and operas at Lincoln's Inn Fields. Internal power structures were the main reason for this difference: while Davenant skilfully commanded a docile young troupe, Killigrew's authority over his veteran actors was far from absolute. Experienced actors Michael Mohun (who Pepys called "the best actor in the world") and Charles Hart held out for shares and good contracts in the King's Company. Such a division of power between the patentee, Killigrew, and his chief actors led to frequent conflicts that hampered the Theatre Royal as a business venture. Nevertheless, it was mostly at the struggling Theatre Royal, rather than at the efficiently run Lincoln's Inn Fields, that the plays were acted that are classics today. This applies especially to the new form Restoration comedy, dominated in the 1660s by William Wycherley and the Theatre Royal's house dramatist John Dryden. Actors such as Hart and Charles II's mistress Nell Gwyn developed and refined the famous scenes of repartee, banter and flirtation in Dryden's and Wycherley's comedies. With the appearance of actresses for the first time at Drury Lane and Lincoln's Inn Fields in the 1660s, British playwrights wrote parts for outspoken female characters, daring love scenes and provocative breeches roles. In any case, the competition between the King's Company and the Duke's was good for the rebirth and development of English drama. The King himself frequently attended the theatre's productions, as did Samuel Pepys, whose private diaries provide much of what we know of London theatre-going in the 1660s. The day after the Theatre Royal opened, Pepys attended a performance of Francis Beaumont and John Fletcher's The Humorous Lieutenant. He has this to say in his diary:
The house is made with extraordinary good contrivance, and yet hath some faults, as the narrowness of the passages in and out of the Pitt, and the distance from the stage to the boxes, which I am confident cannot hear; but for all other things it is well, only, above all, the musique being below, and most of it sounding under the very stage, there is no hearing of the bases at all, nor very well of the trebles, which sure must be mended.
Performances usually began at 3 pm to take advantage of the daylight: the main floor for the audience, the pit, had no roof in order to let in the light. A glazed dome was built over the opening, but according to one of Pepys' diary entries, the dome was not entirely effective at keeping out the elements: he and his wife were forced to leave the theatre to take refuge from a hail storm. Green baize cloth covered the benches in the pit and served to decorate the boxes (additionally ornamented with gold-tooled leather) and even the stage itself. The backless green benches in the pit were in a semicircular arrangement facing the stage, according to a May 1663 letter from one Monsieur de Maonconys: "All benches of the pit, where people of rank also sit, are shaped in a semi-circle, each row higher than the next." The three galleries formed a semicircle around the floor seats; both the first and second galleries were divided up into boxes.
The Great Plague of London struck in the summer of 1665, and the Theatre Royal, along with all other public entertainment, was shut down by order of the Crown on 5 June. It remained closed for 18 months until the autumn of 1666, during which time it received at least a little interior renovation, including widening of the stage. Located well to the west of the City boundary, the theatre was unaffected by the Great Fire of London, which raged through the City in September 1666, but it burned down six years later on 25 January 1672.
Second theatre: Theatre Royal, Drury Lane (1674)
During the 20th century, one illustration was repeatedly – and wrongly – published as "Christopher Wren, design for the Theatre Royal Drury Lane, 1674". Since 1964, this presumption has been disputed by scholars. Careful inspection of the drawing at All Souls' College, Oxford Library shows that it has one pencil inscription: "Play house" [sic], which may have been added by a librarian or by anyone else. No sign of a signature (by Wren or anyone else) or a date appears anywhere on the drawing. Robert D. Hume of Penn State University explained that use of the drawing "rests almost entirely on the supposition that the so-called "Wren section" at All Souls represents this theatre. It could just as easily be a discarded sketch unconnected to Drury Lane in any way."
Comparative evidence for Drury Lane's 1674 design can be found in the Theatre Royal, Bristol, built in 1766, whose design was modelled, in part, on Drury Lane's. The site measured 112 ft (34 m) east-west and 59 ft (18 m) north-south. The building was smaller than this, as reliable surveys and maps of the period show three passageways measuring between 5 and 10 ft (1.5 and 3.0 m) wide surrounding the Theatre Royal on three sides. The building probably measured between 40 and 50 ft (12 and 15 m) wide (the average width of all "Restoration" Theatres) and between 90 and 100 ft (27 and 30 m) long. Architect Robert Adam designed Drury Lane's 1674 interior. The theatre was managed, from 1747 to Adam's retirement in the 1770s, by David Garrick.
The King's Company never recovered financially from the loss of the old Theatre Royal Bridges Street. The cost of constructing the new theatre, replacing their costumes and scenery lost in the fire and competitive pressure from the rival Duke's Company contributed to its decline. Eventually, in 1682, the King's Company merged with the Duke's. The 1674 Theatre Royal building contained a warren of rooms, including storage space and dressing rooms used by the management and performers, nearly seventy people in total, as well as some fifty technical staff members. Additionally three rooms were provided for scripts, including a library for their storage, a separate room for copying actors' parts and a special library for the theatre's account books, ledger books and music scores. This jumble of rooms often made communication among various departments difficult, a problem that Garrick corrected during his tenure as manager. The entire complex occupied 13,134 sq ft (1,220 m) bounded by Drury Lane (east), Brydges Street (west), Great Russell Street (north) and Little Russell Street (south).
From 1674, theatregoers accessed the Drury Lane via a long ten-foot-wide passageway from Bridges Street. The passageway opened onto a yard (previously a "Riding Yard") in which the theatre stood. It is likely that the yard remained open to the sky at this date, on three sides of the Theatre Royal walls. Henri Misson, a visitor from France, offers a description of the theatre in 1698: his use of the word "amphitheatre" supports the view that Drury Lane had a circular line of boxes surrounding its pit:
The Pit is an Amphitheatre, fill'd with Benches without Backboards, and adorn'd and cover'd with green Cloth. Men of Quality, particularly the younger Sort, some Ladies of Reputation and Virtue, and abundance of Damsels that haunt for Prey, sit all together in this Place, Higgledy-piggledy, chatter, toy, play, hear, hear not. Farther up, against the Wall, under the first Gallery and just opposite to the Stage, rises another Amphitheatre, which is taken by persons of the best Quality, among whom are generally very few Men. The Galleries, whereof there are only two Rows, are fill'd with none but ordinary People, particularly the Upper one.
As Misson points out, the seating was divided by class, and tickets were priced accordingly. Box seats, used by the nobility and wealthy gentry, cost 5 shillings; the benches in the pit where some gentry sat, but also critics and scholars, cost 3 shillings; tradesmen and professionals occupied the first gallery with seats costing 2 shillings, while servants and other "ordinary people", as Misson refers to them, occupied the 1 shilling seats of the upper gallery. Seats were not numbered and were offered on a "first come, first served" basis, leading many members of the gentry to send servants to reserve seats well ahead of performances. The stage was 45 ft (14 m) wide and 30 ft (9.1 m) deep with a raked floor from the footlights to the backdrop. The angle of the rake rose one inch for every 24 in (610 mm) of horizontal stage. The stage floor included grooves for wings and flats in addition to trap doors in the floor. The proscenium arch covered the stage equipment above the stage that included a pair of girondels – large wheels holding many candles used to counteract the light from the footlights. Towards the latter part of the 18th century, doors were placed on either side of the stage, and a series of small spikes traced the edge of the stage apron to prevent audiences from climbing onto the stage. At the very back of the stage, a wide door opened to reveal Drury Lane.
An added difficulty for Killigrew and his sons Thomas and Charles was the political unrest of 1678–1684 with the Popish Plot and the Exclusion Bill crisis distracting potential audiences from things theatrical. This affected both the King's and the Duke's companies, but most of all the King's which had no profit margin to carry them through the lean years. In 1682, the companies merged, or rather, the King's was absorbed by the Duke's. Led at the time by Thomas Betterton, the United Company, as it was now called, chose Drury Lane as their production house, leaving the Duke's Company's theatre in Dorset Garden closed for a time. In 1688, Betterton was removed from managerial control by Alexander Davenant, son of William Davenant, the original patent holder for the Duke's Company. Davenant's management (with Charles Killigrew) proved brief and disastrous, and by 1693 he was fleeing to the Canary Islands in the wake of embezzlement charges. The Theatre Royal found itself in the hands of lawyer Christopher Rich for the next 16 years.
Neither Davenant's nor Killigrew's sons were much better than crooks, and Rich attempted to recoup their depredations of the company's resources by cost-cutting tyranny, pitting actor against actor and slashing salaries. By 1695, the actors, including day-to-day manager and acting legend Thomas Betterton, were alienated and humiliated enough to walk out and set up a cooperative company of their own. Nine men and six women departed, all of them established professional performers, including such draws as tragedian Elizabeth Barry and comedian Anne Bracegirdle, leaving the United Company – henceforth known as the "Patent Company" – in "a very despicable condition," according to an anonymous contemporary pamphlet:
The disproportion was so great at parting, that it was almost impossible, in Drury Lane, to muster up a sufficient number to take in all the parts of any play; and of them so few were tolerable, that a play must of necessity be damned, that had not extraordinary favour from the audience. No fewer than sixteen (most of the old standing) went away; and with them the very beauty and vigour of the stage; they who were left being for the most part learners, boys and girls, a very unequal match for them that revolted.
A private letter from 19 November 1696 reported that Drury Lane "has no company at all, and unless a new play comes out on Saturday revives their reputation, they must break." The new play is assumed to have been John Vanbrugh's The Relapse, and it turned out the success the company needed. Christopher Rich continued as its head until 1709, when the patent in question was actually revoked amid a complex tangle of political machinations. A lawyer named William Collier was briefly given the right to mount productions in Drury Lane, but by 1710 the troupe was in the hands of the actors Colley Cibber, Robert Wilks, and Thomas Doggett – a triumvirate that eventually found themselves sharply satirised in Alexander Pope's Dunciad. In 1713, Barton Booth replaced Doggett. On 2 March 1717 was the premiere of the ballet The Loves of Mars and Venus choreographed by John Weaver, and was the first ballet to be performed in England.
Cibber was the de facto leader of the triumvirate, and he led the theatre through a controversial but generally successful period until 1733, when he sold his controlling interest to John Highmore. It is likely that the sale was at a vastly inflated price and that Colley's goal was simply to get out of debts and make a profit (see Robert Lowe in his edition of Cibber's Apology). Members of the troupe at the time were most displeased; an actor's revolt was organised and executed; Charles Fleetwood came to control the theatre. Fleetwood's tenure was tumultuous; his abolition of the practice of allowing footmen free access to the upper gallery led to riots in 1737, and Fleetwood's gambling problems entangled the theatre in his own financial difficulties. It was during this period that actor Charles Macklin (a native of Inishowen in County Donegal in Ulster) rose to fame, propelled by a singular performance as Shylock in an early 1741 production of The Merchant of Venice, in which he introduced a realistic, naturalistic style of acting, abandoning the artificial bombast typical of dramatic roles prior.
In 1747, Fleetwood's playhouse patent expired. The theatre and a patent renewal were purchased by actor David Garrick (who had trained under Macklin earlier) and partner James Lacy. Garrick served as manager and lead actor of the theatre until roughly 1766 and continued on in the management role for another ten years after that. He is remembered as one of the great stage actors and is especially associated with advancing the Shakespearean tradition in English theatre – during his time at Drury Lane, the company mounted at least 24 of Shakespeare's plays. Some of Shakespeare's surge in popularity during this period can be traced to the Licensing Act of 1737, which mandated governmental approval of any play before it could be performed and thereby created something of a vacuum of new material to perform. Garrick shared the stage with company including Peg Woffington, Susannah Cibber, Hannah Pritchard, Kitty Clive, Spranger Barry, Richard Yates, and Ned Shuter. It was under Garrick's management that spectators were for the first time barred from the stage itself.
Garrick commissioned Robert Adam and his brother James to renovate the theatre's interior, which they did in 1775. Their additions included an ornate ceiling and a stucco facade facing Bridges Street. This facade was the first time any structure that might be considered part of the theatre proper actually abutted the street: the building, like the 1663 original, had been built in the centre of the block, hemmed in by other structures. The narrow passage from Bridges street to the theatre now became an interior hallway; some theatre office space also went up behind the new facade.
With a series of farewell performances, Garrick left the stage in 1776 and sold his shares in the theatre to the Irish playwright Richard Brinsley Sheridan. Sheridan and his partners, Thomas Linley the elder and Doctor James Ford (court physician to King George III), completed their purchase of Drury Lane two years later, and Sheridan owned it until 1809. Sheridan premiered his own comedy of manners The School for Scandal in 1777. Active management of the theatre was carried out by several parties during Sheridan's ownership, including himself, his father Thomas, and, from 1788 to 1796 and 1800 to 1802, the popular actor John Philip Kemble. Linley took up the post of Musical Director at the theatre, receiving a retainer of £500 per annum.
Sheridan employed dozens of children as extras at Drury Lane including Joseph Grimaldi who made his stage debut at the theatre in 1780. Grimaldi became best known for his development of the modern day white-face clown and popularised the role of Clown in many Pantomimes and Harlequinades. Towards the end of the 1790s, Grimaldi starred in Robinson Crusoe, which confirmed him as a key Christmas pantomime performer. Many pantomimes followed, but his career at Drury Lane became turbulent, and he left the theatre for good in 1806.
Third theatre (1794)
The theatre was in need of updating by the end of the 18th century and was demolished in 1791, with the company moving temporarily to the new King's Theatre, in the Haymarket. A third theatre was designed by Henry Holland and opened on 12 March 1794. In the design of the theatre boxes, Henry Holland asked John Linnell for assistance. The designs by Linnell survive in the V&A Print Room – there are also designs by Henry Holland and Charles Heathcote Tatham who were involved in the design process. This was a cavernous theatre, accommodating more than 3,600 spectators. The motivation behind building on such a large scale? In the words of one owner:
I was aware of the very popular notion that our theatres ought to be very small; but it appeared to me that if that very popular notion should be suffered to proceed too far it would in every way deteriorate our dramatic performances depriving the proprietors of that revenue which is indispensable to defray the heavy expenses of such a concern.
New technology facilitated the expansion: iron columns replaced bulky wood, supporting five tiers of galleries. The stage was large, too: 83 ft (25 m) wide and 92 ft (28 m) deep. Holland, the architect, said it was "on a larger scale than any other theatre in Europe." Except for churches, it was the tallest building in London.
The "very popular notion that our theatres ought to be very small" proved hard to overcome. Various accounts from the period bemoan the mammoth size of the new theatre, longing for the "warm close observant seats of Old Drury," as one May 1794 theatregoer put it. Actress Sarah Siddons, then part of the Drury Lane company, called it "a wilderness of a place" (and left Drury Lane along with her brother John Philip Kemble in 1803). Not only was any sense of intimacy and connection to the company on stage lost, but the very size of the theatre put a great deal of the audience at such a distance from the stage so as to make hearing a player's voice quite difficult. To compensate, the productions mounted in the new theatre tended more toward spectacle than the spoken word. An example of such a spectacle is a 1794 production that featured real water flowing down a rocky stream into a lake large enough on which to row a boat. This water issued from tanks in the attics above the house, which were installed – along with a much-touted iron safety curtain – as proof against fire.
Richard Sheridan continued as theatre owner during the entire lifetime of this third building. He had grown in stature as a statesman during this time, but troubled finances were to be his undoing. The 1794 rebuilding had cost double the original estimate of £80,000, and Sheridan bore the entirety of the debt. Productions were more expensive to mount in the larger structure, and increased audience revenues failed to make up the difference.
An assassination attempt against King George III took place at the theatre on 15 May 1800. James Hadfield fired two pistol shots from the pit toward the King, sitting in the royal box. The shots missed by inches, Hadfield having been jostled by a Mr Dyte. Hadfield was quickly subdued, and George, apparently unruffled, ordered the performance to continue.
The comedy actor John Bannister became acting manager in 1802. With Sheridan's son Tom, and in the circle of Richard Wroughton (stage-manager), William Dowton, Michael Kelly, Tom Dibdin and their likes, he helped to see the Theatre Royal through its next catastrophe. On 24 February 1809, despite the previously mentioned fire safety precautions, the theatre burned down. On being encountered drinking a glass of wine in the street while watching the fire, R.B. Sheridan was famously reported to have said: "A man may surely be allowed to take a glass of wine by his own fireside." Already on the shakiest financial ground, Sheridan was ruined entirely by the loss of the building. He turned to brewer Samuel Whitbread, an old friend, for help. As well as investing strongly in the project, Whitbread agreed to head a committee that would manage the company and oversee the rebuilding of the theatre, but asked Sheridan to withdraw from management himself, which he did entirely by 1811.
Modern theatre (1812–present)
The present Theatre Royal in Drury Lane, designed by Benjamin Dean Wyatt on behalf of the committee led by Whitbread, opened on 10 October 1812 with a production of Hamlet featuring Robert Elliston in the title role. The new theatre made some concessions toward intimacy, seating 3,060 people, about 550 fewer than the earlier building (though this size is still considered an extremely large theatre). On 6 September 1817, gas lighting was extended from the audience area to the stage, making it the first British theatre to be gaslit throughout. In 1820, the portico that still stands at the theatre's front entrance on Catherine Street was added, and in 1822 the interior underwent a significant remodelling. The colonnade running down the Russell Street side of the building was added in 1831.
Productions relying more on scenery and effects than on dialogue and acting remained commonplace in the new facility. The 1823 production of Cataract of the Ganges had a finale featuring a horseback escape up a flowing cataract "with fire raging all around." Effects for an 1829 production were produced by hydraulic apparatus that reportedly could discharge 39 tons of water.
There were those concerned that the theatre was failing in its role as one of the very few permitted to show legitimate drama. Management of the theatre after it reopened in 1813 fell to Samuel James Arnold, overseen by an amateur board of directors and a subcommittee focusing on the theatre as a centre for national culture. (Lord Byron was briefly on this subcommittee, from June 1815 until leaving England in April 1816.) Actor Edmund Kean was the on-stage highlight; like Macklin before him, he made his reputation as Shylock, premiering in the role in 1814. Kean remained until 1820 through praise and notorious disputes with local playwrights such as Charles Bucke.
Elliston leased the theatre from 1819 until he went bankrupt in 1826. An American, Stephen Price of New York City's Park Theatre, followed from 1826 to 1830.
Through most of the remainder of the 19th century, Drury Lane passed quickly from one proprietor to another. A colonnade was added to the Russell Street frontage, in 1831, by architect Samuel Beazley. In 1833, Alfred Bunn gained control of both Drury Lane and Covent Garden, managing the former from 1833 to 1839, and again from 1843 to 1850. Following the lead of the Lyceum Theatre, London, Bunn championed English opera, rather than the Italian operas that had played earlier at the theatre. These included Fair Rosamond and Farinelli by John Barnett; a series of twelve operas by Michael Balfe including The Maid of Artois and The Bohemian Girl; Maritana and others by William Vincent Wallace and several by Julius Benedict. In 1837, actor-manager Samuel Phelps (1804–1878) joined the company at Drury Lane, appearing with William Charles Macready, the gifted actor-manager in several Shakespeare plays. He also created the role of Captain Channel in Douglas Jerrold's melodrama, The Prisoner of War (1842), and of Lord Tresham in Robert Browning's A Blot in the 'Scutcheon (1843). Macready was briefly manager in 1841–1843, putting significant reforms in place. Nevertheless, most productions there were financial disasters.
The theatrical monopoly first bestowed by Royal Letters Patent 183 years earlier was abolished by the Theatres Act 1843, but the patent had been largely toothless for decades and this had little immediate effect. On the other hand, other theatres, used to presenting musical entertainments, continued to do so, and Drury Lane continued as one of the most accepted venues for legitimate theatre. The 19th-century run of financial and artistic failures at Drury Lane was interrupted by four plays produced over a twenty-five-year period by the actor-playwright Dion Boucicault: The Queen of Spades (1851), Eugenie (1855), Formosa (1869), and The Shaughraun (1875). But this period of general decline culminated with F. B. Chatterton's 1878 resignation; in his words, "Shakespeare spells ruin, and Byron bankruptcy." During the 19th century, Drury Lane staged ballet as well, with performers including Italy's Carlotta Grisi.
One famous musical director of Drury Lane was the eccentric French conductor and composer of light music Louis-Antoine Jullien (1812–1860), who successfully invited Berlioz to visit London and give concerts in the Theatre.
The house's fortunes rose again under the management of Augustus Harris from 1879. In the 1880s and 1890s, the theatre hosted many of the productions of the Carl Rosa Opera Company. Harris focused increased resources on the theatre's annual pantomime, beginning at Christmas 1888, adding a well-known comedian, Dan Leno. These spectacular Christmas shows were a major success, often playing into March. They were choreographed by the theatre's dance master, John D'Auban. Many of the designs under Harris were created by the imaginative designer C. Wilhelm, including the spectacular drama, Armada (1888), and many of the pantomimes. Productions relying on spectacle became the norm at Drury Lane under the managements first of Harris, from 1879 to 1896, and then of Arthur Collins from 1896 to 1923. Examples include the 1909 play, The Whip, which featured not only a train crash, but also twelve horses recreating the 2,000 Guineas Stakes on an on-stage treadmill. Jimmy Glover, Director of Music from 1893 to 1923, was a significant figure at the theatre during the Collins years and wrote books which record much more than its musical life.
Interior renovation (1922)
In 1922, under the ownership of managing director Sir Alfred Butt, the theatre underwent its last major interior renovation of the 20th century. At a cost of £150,000, it became a four-tiered theatre able to seat just over 2,000 people. It was decorated with one of the most notable interiors produced by the specialist ornamental plasterwork company of Clark and Fenn. Composer and performer Ivor Novello, immensely popular in his time though little-remembered today, presented his musicals in Drury Lane from 1931 to 1939.
The theatre was closed in 1939 because of the outbreak of the Second World War. During the war, it served as the headquarters for the Entertainments National Service Association, sustaining some minor bomb damage. It reopened in 1946 with Noël Coward's Pacific 1860.
The building was Grade I listed in February 1958.
In 2000, Theatre Royal Drury Lane was purchased by Andrew Lloyd Webber. Since 2014, it has been owned and managed by LW Theatres, Lloyd Webber's management company. The seating plan for the theatre remains the same and the auditorium is still one of the largest in London's West End. It is one of the 40 theatres featured in the 2012 DVD documentary series Great West End Theatres, presented by Donald Sinden.
350th anniversary renovation (2013)
On 15 May 2013, Lloyd Webber revealed a £4 million restoration of the theatre to mark its 350th anniversary. Using a team of specialists, the detailed restoration has returned the public areas of the Rotunda, Royal Staircases and Grand Saloon, all of which were part of the 1810 theatre, to their original Regency style.
Major productions of the 20th and 21st centuries
Four of Rodgers and Hammerstein's musicals made their London debuts in Drury Lane, holding the stage almost continuously for nearly a decade, including Oklahoma! (1947–1950), Carousel (1950–1951), South Pacific (1951–1953) and The King and I (1953–1956). American imports also included Lerner and Loewe's My Fair Lady, which began a five-year run in 1958. Productions in the 1960s included Camelot (1964–1965), Hello, Dolly! (1965–1967) and The Great Waltz (1970–1972). In 1974, Monty Python recorded an album at the theatre, Live at Drury Lane.
Later long runs at the theatre include productions of A Chorus Line (1976–1979), 42nd Street (1984–1989), Miss Saigon (1989–1999, the theatre's longest-running show), The Producers (2004–2007), The Lord of the Rings (2007–2008), Oliver! (2009–2011), Shrek The Musical (2011–2013), Charlie and the Chocolate Factory the Musical (2013–2017), and Frozen (2021–2024).
Notable productions since 1919 have included:
- Cinderella (1919)
- Rose Marie (1924–1927)
- Showboat (1928–1929)
- Cavalcade (1931–1932)
- Three Sisters (1934)
- Oklahoma! (1947–1950)
- Carousel (1950–1951)
- South Pacific (1951–1953)
- The King and I (1953–1956)
- My Fair Lady (1958–1963)
- Camelot (1964–1965)
- Hello Dolly! (1965–1967)
- Mame (1969–1970)
- The Great Waltz (1970–1972)
- Gone with the Wind (1972–1973)
- Billy (1974–1976)
- A Chorus Line (1976–1979)
- Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (1980)
- The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas (1981–1983)
- 42nd Street (1984–1989)
- Miss Saigon (1989–1999)
- The Witches of Eastwick (2000-2001)
- My Fair Lady (revival) (2001–2003)
- Anything Goes (revival) (2003–2004)
- The Producers (2004–2007)
- The Lord of the Rings: The Musical (2007–2008)
- Oliver! (revival) (2009–2011)
- Shrek The Musical (2011–2013)
- Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (2013–2017)
- 42nd Street (revival) (2017–2019)
- Frozen (2021–2024)
- The Tempest (2024–2025)
- Much Ado About Nothing (2025)
- Hercules (2025)
Hauntings
The author Tom Ogden calls the Theatre Royal one of the world's most haunted theatres. The appearance of almost any one of the handful of ghosts that are said to frequent the theatre signals good luck for an actor or production. The most famous ghost is the "Man in Grey", who appears dressed as a nobleman of the late 18th century: powdered hair beneath a tricorne hat, a dress jacket and cloak or cape, riding boots and a sword. Legend says that the Man in Grey is the ghost of a knife-stabbed man whose skeletal remains were found within a walled-up side passage in 1848. Various people have reported seeing the ghost, including W. J. MacQueen-Pope, who described its usual path as starting at the end of the fourth row in the upper circle and then proceeding via the rear gangway to the wall near the royal box, where the remains were found.
The ghosts of actor Charles Macklin and clown Joseph Grimaldi are also supposed to haunt the theatre. Macklin appears backstage, wandering the corridor which now stands in the spot where, in 1735, he killed fellow actor Thomas Hallam in an argument over a wig ("Goddamn you for a blackguard, scrub, rascal!" he shouted, thrusting a cane into Hallam's face and piercing his left eye). Grimaldi is reported to be a helpful apparition, purportedly guiding nervous actors skillfully about the stage on more than one occasion. The comedian Stanley Lupino said he had seen the ghost of Dan Leno in a dressing room.
See also
References
Notes
- The single roadway now named Catherine Street was for most of its history named Catherine Street in its southern portion and Bridges (or Brydges) street in its northern.
- John Byng, later Viscount Torrington.
Citations
- "Information from". Victorian Web. 9 May 2007. Archived from the original on 15 April 2012. Retrieved 20 March 2010.
- Thomson 1995, p. 309
- ^ Fox, Mark. "Theatre Royal, Drury Lane: History". The Really Useful Group. Archived from the original on 17 September 2014. Retrieved 24 September 2014.
- Elizabeth McClure Thomson, The Chamberlain Letters (London, 1966), p. 140.
- Milhous 1979, pp. 4–7
- ^ Beauclerk 2005, pp. 59–60
- Hartnoll 1983. See also this scale reconstruction, crediting Richard Leacroft, The Development of the English Playhouse, Eyre Methuen Ltd 1973, p. 83.
- Dobbs 1972, pp. 26–28
- Langhans, p. 16
- Dobbs 1972, p. 41
- Kliman 2008, p. xvii
- "A History of a Night at the Theatre" Archived 10 March 2015 at the Wayback Machine, Victoria and Albert Museum website, retrieved 14 March 2015
- Milhous 1979, pp. 15–26
- "Apparently the King's Company had no strong, centralized management ... Of course Killigrew would have had trouble getting Mohun's troupe to accept the kind of absolute control Davenant was able to impose upon his fledglings. But squabbles over management and shares were to characterize the King's Company throughout its stormy career, and ultimately they led to its downfall".Milhous 1979, p. 12
- Dobbs 1972, p. 26
- Dobbs 1972, pp. 52–54, 58
- Dobbs 1972, pp. 38–42
- Dobbs 1972, p. 27
- Byrd, Ann Marie. "Violently Erotic: Representing Rape in Restoration Drama" Archived 2 June 2016 at the Wayback Machine in Greenfield (2015), p. 69
- Hume 1976, pp. 19–21
- Milhous 1979, p. ix
- Pepys diary for May 1663 Archived 4 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine. From www.pepys.info.
- Beauclerk 2005, p. 60
- Spiers, Theatres.
- Spiers, Theatres, citing Thomas, David (1989). Restoration and Georgian England 1660–1788 (Theatre in Europe: A Documentary History). Cambridge University Press. p. 66.
- MacQueen-Pope 1945, p. 33
- Pepys' 19 March 1666 s:Diary of Samuel Pepys/1666/March#19th describes a visit to the play house during the renovations, noting "God knows when they will begin to act again." For the royal order closing the playhouses see Latham & Matthews 'Diary of Samuel Pepys,' vol vii (1666), p. 76 note 5.
- Dobbs 1972, p. 51
- It was published by Hamilton Bell, "Contributions to the History of the English Playhouse," Architectural Record XXXIII (1913) in plate 5a in Volume 35 of The Survey of London; Peter Holland, The Ornament of Action (1979), 30; J. L. Styan, Restoration Comedy in Performance 1986, 20; and Richard Leacroft, The Development of the English Playhouse (1970). David Wilmore (Theatresearch) and Professor David Thomas recorded a television programme, from inside the current Drury Lane auditorium, claiming to show how the Theatre Royal might have looked upon its opening in 1674, based on the drawing. During the programme, Thomas repeatedly described this drawing as "by Wren", without noting that Wren's signature does not appear on the drawing. Most recently, for example, supervisors of Graduate College of Bowling Green State University allowed Hope Celeste Bernar to inadvertently reproduce it on page 108 of her "Playing (with) Space in the Author on the Wheel." Diss. PhD. May 2009 as "Wren's drawing provides detailed evidence of Theatre Royal Drury Lane's design.
- E. A. Langhans "Wren's Restoration Playhouse", Theatre Notebook 18 (1964), 98; Graham Barlow "From Tennis Courts to Opera House", PhD thesis, 1983, University of Glasgow, 100; Mark A. Howell "On proscenium doors", Theatre Notebook 49.1 (1995), 52–3; Robert D. Hume (Penn State University), 2007; Tim Keenan '"Scaenes With Four Doors": Real And Virtual Doors On Early Restoration Stages', Theatre Notebook, 65.2, (2011), 62–81 have each separately weighed the evidence, concluding that the theatre shown in the drawing was probably never built.
- ^ Howell-Meri, Mark. "Acting Spaces and Carpenters' Tools: from the Fortune to the Theatre Royal, Bristol" Archived 23 November 2015 at the Wayback Machine, New Theatre Quarterly, Vol. 25, Issue 2, May 2009, pp. 148–158
- Hume, Robert D. "Theatre History 1660–1800: Aims, Materials, Methodology", in Players, Playwrights, Playhouses: Investigating Performance, 1660–1800, ed. Michael Cordner and Peter Holland, Palgrave Macmillan (2007), p. 23
- "Chapter IV. The Theatre Royal, Drury Lane: The Buildings" Archived 25 November 2015 at the Wayback Machine, in Survey of London: Vol. 35, the Theatre Royal, Drury Lane, and the Royal Opera House, Covent Garden, ed. F H W Sheppard (London, 1970), pp. 40–70. See also Leacroft (1973), p. 95; Kathleen Barker, The Theatre Royal Bristol, 1766–1966: Two Centuries of Stage History (Society for Theatre Research, 1976), 8; and Mark A. Howell, "Planning Provincial Theatres Under the 1737 Stage Licensing Act", Theatre Notebook 43 (1989), pp. 104–119.
- Kathman, David (January 2008). "Hart, Charles (bap. 1625, d. 1683)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/12473. Archived from the original on 20 November 2015. Retrieved 20 November 2015. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
- ^ Stone & Kahrl 1979, p. 82
- Stone & Kahrl 1979, p. 80
- The Survey of London, Volume 35, London: Athlone Press, University of London (1970), p. 30
- Nagler 1959, p. 208
- Stone & Kahrl 1979, pp. 80–81
- Spiers, Companies.
- Milhous 1979, pp. 37–40, 56–57
- Gildon, Charles (1702). A Comparison Between the Two Stages. quoted by Milhous 1979, p. 82
- Milhous 1979, p. 82
- "Theatre Royal Drury Lane". britishtheatre.com. Archived from the original on 13 December 2014. Retrieved 9 December 2014.
- Dobbs 1972, pp. 62, 74, 79–85
- ^ Hartnoll 1983
- Encyclopædia Britannica, Eleventh Edition Archived 29 March 2006 at the Wayback Machine.
- Mackintosh 1993, p. 20
- King, David (2001). Complete Works of Robert and James Adam and Unbuilt Adam. Architectural Press. pp. 50–51. ISBN 978-0-7506-4468-6.
- "Local judges". St George-in-the-East Church. Archived from the original on 2 January 2015. Retrieved 2 January 2015.
- Encyclopædia Britannica, Eleventh Edition Archived 28 February 2008 at the Wayback Machine.
- Auburn 1995, p. 42
- Aspden, Suzanne (2004). "Linley, Thomas (1733–1795)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/16737. Archived from the original on 19 August 2014. Retrieved 28 December 2014. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
- McConnell Stott 2009, pp. 45–46
- McConnell Stott 2009, pp. 117–118
- Grimaldi (Boz edition), pp. 117–119.
- Thomson 1995, p. 310 specifies 3611.
- ^ Mackintosh 1993, p. 34
- Mackintosh 1993, p. 35
- Bradby, James & Sharratt 1981, p. 92
- Auburn 1995, p. 44
- "This day, May 15, in Jewish history". Cleveland Jewish News. Archived from the original on 19 May 2014.
- Fraser, Antonia (2000). The Lives of the Kings and Queens of England. University of California Press. p. 287. ISBN 978-0-520-22460-5.
- H. van Thal (ed), Solo Recital: The Reminiscences of Michael Kelly, abridged with a Biographical Index (Folio Society, London 1972), pp. 282–288.
- Wright, Patrick (28 October 2009). Iron Curtain: From Stage to Cold War. OUP Oxford. p. 65. ISBN 978-0-19-162284-7.
- The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations, OUP (1999). Michael Kelly (Memoirs, ed. van Thal 1972, p. 283) states that Sheridan was engaged in a debate in the House when the news of the fire came, but although on his behalf it was moved that the House should adjourn, he insisted that 'Public duty ought to precede all private interest' and remained there with Roman fortitude while his theatre burned.
- Morning Chronicle, 7 July 1815.
- Auburn 1995, p. 45
- "Theatres Compete in Race to Install Gas Illumination – 1817" (PDF). Over The Footlights. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 May 2014. Retrieved 20 May 2014.
- Details in this paragraph from Thomson 1995, p. 310
- Bradby, James & Sharratt 1981, pp. 103–104
- Bradby, James & Sharratt 1981, p. 103
- Bone, Drummond, ed. (2004). The Cambridge Companion to Byron. Cambridge University Press. p. 135. ISBN 978-0-521-78676-8.
- The Works of Lord Byron, footnote p. 202 Archived 5 July 2014 at the Wayback Machine
- Earl & Sell 2000, p. 268
- Gordon-Powell, Robin. Ivanhoe, full score, Introduction, vol. I, p. VII, 2008, The Amber Ring
- "Profile of the theatre from". Victorian Web. 9 May 2007. Archived from the original on 15 April 2012. Retrieved 20 March 2010.
- Thomson 1995, p. 310
- Pasi, Mario; et al. (1980). Aguilar (ed.). El Ballet Enciclopedia del Arte Coreográfico. Aguilar.
- "Jullien biographical site". Louisjullien.site.voila.fr. Archived from the original on 11 January 2010. Retrieved 20 March 2010.
- "Mr. Pitcher's Art" – Obituary, The Times, 3 March 1925
- "19th century spectacle" Archived 10 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine, Victoria and Albert Museum, 2012, accessed 24 September 2014
- Peter Gammond, ed., The Oxford Companion to Popular Music (Oxford University Press, 1991), p. 228
- ^ 'The Theatre Royal: Management', Survey of London: volume 35: The Theatre Royal, Drury Lane, and the Royal Opera House, Covent Garden (1970), pp. 9–29. URL: "The Theatre Royal: Management | British History Online". Archived from the original on 23 February 2014. Retrieved 15 March 2015.
- Historic Machinery Restorations at London's Royal Theatre in Drury Lane Archived 1 March 2014 at the Wayback Machine, Dorothea Restorations. Retrieved 22 February 2014.
- Joseph Bernard Clark (1868–1940) – Master Plasterer Archived 27 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine, Friends of West Norwood Cemetery.
- Images of England: Theatre Royal, Drury Lane, Historic England, accessed 10 July 2015.
- Hogejan, Warren (10 January 2000). "A Major New Role As Theater Mogul For Lloyd Webber". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 4 February 2018.
- Dennys, Harriet. "Lord Lloyd-Webber splits theatre group to expand on a global stage" Archived 7 October 2014 at the Wayback Machine, The Telegraph, 24 March 2014
- Fisher, Philip. "Great West End Theatres" Archived 16 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine, British Theatre Guide, 19 February 2012
- ^ Everett, Lucinda. "Andrew Lloyd Webber reveals £4m restoration of Drury Lane's Theatre Royal" Archived 1 May 2014 at the Wayback Machine, The Telegraph, 15 May 2013, retrieved 22 September 2014.
- Locker & Riley complete restoration at Drury Lane Archived 22 March 2014 at the Wayback Machine, SpecFinish Magazine, retrieved 14 March 2015
- ^ The show transferred in 1950 to the Stoll Theatre to finish its long run. Ellacott, Vivyan. "London Musicals 1945–1949: Oklahoma!" (PDF). Over the Footlights. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 March 2014. Retrieved 24 September 2014.
- ^ Hischak 2007, pp. 150, 263
- Palin, Michael. Diaries 1969–1979: The Python Years. p. 178.
- ^ "The Producers at Theatre Royal, Drury Lane, 2004–2007". Thisistheatre.com. Archived from the original on 17 July 2011. Retrieved 24 September 2014.
- ^ "Lord of the Rings musical to close". Metro. 14 March 2008. Archived from the original on 20 May 2010. Retrieved 24 September 2014.
- ^ Paddock, Terri (23 June 2010). "Oliver! Closes at Drury Lane 8 Jan, Moody Guests". Whatsonstage.com. Archived from the original on 11 August 2015. Retrieved 24 September 2014.
- ^ Paddock, Terri (31 August 2012). "Shrek closes on 24 Feb, Charlie moves Chocolate Factory to Drury Lane". Archived from the original on 11 August 2015. Retrieved 24 September 2014.
- ^ Porteous, Jacob (13 October 2015). "Charlie And The Chocolate Factory Celebrates 1000th Performance, Extends Booking Period". Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 17 October 2015.
- "Frozen sets closing date and final extension". 22 January 2024. Retrieved 24 June 2024.
- "Theatre Royal Drury Lane History and Timeline". London Theatres. London. Archived from the original on 18 March 2019.
- Wood, Alex; Hewis, Ben (13 July 2018). "Bonnie Langford joins cast of 42nd Street and closing date announced". Whatsonstage.com. Archived from the original on 24 October 2021. Retrieved 24 October 2021.
- "Frozen confirms new opening plans from August 2021". www.whatsonstage.com. 10 March 2021. Archived from the original on 24 October 2021. Retrieved 24 October 2021.
- ^ Bamigboye, Baz (30 July 2024). "Breaking Baz: Sigourney Weaver Conjures Spells For West End Debut As Prospero, Joining Tom Hiddleston & Hayley Atwell In A Season Of Shakespeare Directed By 'Sunset Boulevard's' Jamie Lloyd At Theatre Royal Drury Lane This Winter". Deadline. Retrieved 30 July 2024.
- Logan Culwell-Block (24 June 2024). "Disney's Hercules Will Play London's West End". Playbill. Retrieved 24 June 2024.
- All haunting details from Ogden, Tom (1999). The Complete Idiot's Guide to Ghosts and Hauntings. Alpha Books. pp. 232–233. ISBN 978-0-02-863659-7.
- Morley, Sheridan Theatre's Stranges Acts Robson Books 2006 ISBN 978-1-86105-674-0 p.26 Google Books Archived 23 February 2018 at the Wayback Machine
- Underwood 2013, pp. 55–56
- From the testimony of witness Thomas Arne, reported in 1847's Celebrated Trials of All Countries, and Remarkable Cases of Criminal Jurisprudence, J. Harding. p. 441 Google Books Archived 5 July 2014 at the Wayback Machine.
- Donati, William Ida Lupino University Press of Kentucky 2000 ISBN 978-0-8131-0982-4 p.10 Google Books Archived 23 February 2018 at the Wayback Machine
Bibliography
- Auburn, Mark S. (1995). "Theatre in the age of Garrick and Sheridan". In Morwood, James; Crane, David (eds.). Sheridan Studies. Cambridge University Press. pp. 7–46. ISBN 978-0-521-46466-6.
- Beauclerk, Charles (2005). Nell Gwyn: Mistress to a King. Atlantic Monthly Press. ISBN 978-0-87113-926-9.
- Bradby, David; James, Louis; Sharratt, Bernard, eds. (1981). Performance and Politics in Popular Drama. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-28524-7.
- Dobbs, Brian (1972). Drury Lane: Three Centuries of the Theatre Royal, 1663–1971. Cassell.
- Earl, John; Sell, Michael (2000). Guide to British Theatres 1750–1950. Theatres Trust. pp. 107–8. ISBN 978-0-7136-5688-6.
- Faul, Michel (2006). Louis Jullien: musique, spectacle et folie au XIXe siècle (in French). Atlantica. ISBN 978-2-35165-038-7.
- Greenfield, Anne Leah, ed. (2015). Interpreting Sexual Violence, 1660–1800. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-31884-2.
- Hartnoll, Phyllis, ed. (1983). The Oxford Companion to the Theatre (4th ed.). London: Oxford University Press. pp. 230–232. ISBN 978-0-19-211546-1.
- Hischak, Thomas S. (2007). The Rodgers and Hammerstein Encyclopedia. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-313-34140-3.
- Hume, Robert D. (1976). The Development of English Drama in the Late Seventeenth Century (1990 ed.). Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-811799-5.
- Kliman, Bernice W. (2008). Tragedy of Hamlet of Denmark. Indiana: Focus Publishing. ISBN 978-1-58510-513-7.
- Leacroft, Richard (1973). The Development of the English Playhouse. Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-0750-5.
- Mackintosh, Iain (1993). Architecture, Actor and Audience. Routledge UK. ISBN 978-0-415-03183-7.
- McConnell Stott, Andrew (2009). The Pantomime Life of Joseph Grimaldi. Edinburgh: Canongate Books. ISBN 978-1-84767-761-7.
- MacQueen-Pope, Walter (1945). Theatre Royal, Drury Lane. W. H. Allen & Co.
- Milhous, Judith (1979). Thomas Betterton and the Management of Lincoln's Inn Fields 1695–1708. Carbondale, Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press. ISBN 978-0-8093-0906-1.
- Nagler, Alois M. (1959). A Source Book in Theatrical History. Courier Dover. ISBN 978-0-486-20515-1.
- Smith, John Harrington (1948). The Gay Couple in Restoration Comedy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Spiers, Rupert (2002). "Restoration Theatre". Archived from the original on 1 September 2008. Retrieved 2 March 2014.
- Stone, George Winchester; Kahrl, George M. (1979). David Garrick: A Critical Biography. Carbondale, Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press. ISBN 978-0-8093-0931-3.
- Thomson, Peter (1995). "Drury Lane, Theatre Royal". In Banham, Martin (ed.). The Cambridge Guide to Theatre. Cambridge University Press. pp. 309–311. ISBN 978-0-521-43437-9.
- Underwood, Peter (2013). "Theatre Royal, Drury Lane". Haunted London. Amberley. pp. 55–61. ISBN 978-1-4456-2859-2.
External links
Plays by Richard Brinsley Sheridan | |
---|---|
Plays |
|
Related |
- West End theatres
- 1663 establishments in England
- Buildings and structures demolished in 1791
- Commercial buildings completed in 1812
- Christopher Wren buildings in London
- Grade I listed buildings in the City of Westminster
- Grade I listed theatres
- Theatres in the City of Westminster
- Reportedly haunted locations in London
- Covent Garden
- Georgian architecture in the City of Westminster
- Theatres completed in 1663
- Theatres completed in 1674
- Theatres completed in 1794
- Theatres completed in 1812
- Rebuilt buildings and structures in the United Kingdom
- West End theatre
- Leisure companies of the United Kingdom
- Companies based in the City of Westminster