Revision as of 03:19, 21 November 2011 editThat132IP (talk | contribs)25 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:08, 21 November 2011 edit undoTimotheus Canens (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators38,430 editsm You are suspected of being a sockpuppet of Lutrinae and have been blocked indefinitely. | ||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I removed an editor's wish to bomb an American military base because one of its computers was being used to edit WP. | I removed an editor's wish to bomb an American military base because one of its computers was being used to edit WP. | ||
I'm not usually offended by anything and support a no-cencure policy. I understand the 3rr rule. The rule doesn't apply to content that violates ] and ]. ] (]) 03:11, 21 November 2011 (UTC) | I'm not usually offended by anything and support a no-cencure policy. I understand the 3rr rule. The rule doesn't apply to content that violates ] and ]. ] (]) 03:11, 21 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
{{tmbox | |||
| style = background: #f8eaba; | |||
| image = ] | |||
| text = '''''This account has been ] indefinitely''''' as a ] of {{user19|Lutrinae}} that was created to violate Misplaced Pages policy. Note that multiple accounts are ], ''but'' using them for ] reasons '''is not'''. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the ] first. <!-- Template:SockBlock --> | |||
}} ] (]) 12:08, 21 November 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 12:08, 21 November 2011
November 2011
Your recent editing history at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 02:55, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
I removed an editor's wish to bomb an American military base because one of its computers was being used to edit WP.
I'm not usually offended by anything and support a no-cencure policy. I understand the 3rr rule. The rule doesn't apply to content that violates WP:PA and WP:NICE. That132IP (talk) 03:11, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Lutrinae (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Misplaced Pages policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. |