| Revision as of 16:50, 27 November 2011 editYoureallycan (talk | contribs)12,095 edits →You and welcome templates← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:43, 20 December 2024 edit undoCarlesFort (talk | contribs)22 edits →Edit page - Legatum Institute: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| * }} | * }} | ||
| == Stirling University == | |||
| ⚫ | == Notice == | ||
| Are you aware that your insertion about a tribunal case in Stirling University has been removed? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:49, 10 October 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
| == Au contraire! ;~) == | |||
| You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
| <blockquote>'''3RR exemptions'''<p>]<br>The following actions are ''not'' counted as reverts for the purposes of 3RR: ... ... *Removal of libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced contentious material that violates the policy on ] (BLP). What counts as exempt under BLP can be controversial. Consider reporting to the ] instead of relying on this exemption. ... If you are claiming an exemption, make sure there is a clearly visible edit summary or separate section of the talk page that explains the exemption. When in doubt, do not revert. Instead, engage in ], and in particular ask for help at ] such as the ].</blockquote>--] (]) 19:09, 29 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh dear -- if you think you can wave "BLP" around and be exempt from 3RR, you might have a rude awakening. My own edits (in my view of course) more closely conform with ]. ] (]) 19:17, 29 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
| == Concrete proposal == | |||
| }}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
| Someone did make one: ]. ] (]) 13:28, 4 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
| == Thoughts? == | |||
| To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{tlx|Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
| Can I ask your opinion about this? ] --] (]) 14:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| }}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
| Please avoid edit comments such as this and this | |||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| == Arbitration Enforcement notice == | |||
| I haven't followed this info, but should we specify which police department said that? And whom? Who did McQueary say he reported it to. "Police" is vague. The police rebuttal is specific. ] (]) 17:11, 17 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :I can see why this would be desirable. It would also be possible to provide so much detail that the article becomes difficult to read. So it would be a question of balance, and at this point I would lean against significant addition of detail. ] (]) 17:25, 17 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
| == You and welcome templates == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| Don't follow me round - it is because of you and others like you that I have moved along so I don't want or need your welcome templates. Your posting of was just taking the piss and childish. Stay off any talkpage that I label as mine. ] (]) 16:50, 27 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
| You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
| The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
| Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| ] | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins&oldid=27650229 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 --> | |||
| == Edit page - Legatum Institute == | |||
| ] | |||
| Good morning, colleague, | |||
| I noticed that you reverted my contributions with a "''whose sock are you?''" in the edit summary. I would like to have a constructive and respectful discussion, and I believe we could talk on the article's discussion page about how we can improve it. | |||
| I think Misplaced Pages is a space for respect and community building. Therefore, I would appreciate it if, instead of reverting my changes, we could talk about them. | |||
| Thank you very much. | |||
| <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> ] (]) 09:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:43, 20 December 2024
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Please avoid edit comments such as this and this
Arbitration Enforcement notice
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Edit page - Legatum Institute
Good morning, colleague,
I noticed that you reverted my contributions with a "whose sock are you?" in the edit summary. I would like to have a constructive and respectful discussion, and I believe we could talk on the article's discussion page about how we can improve it.
I think Misplaced Pages is a space for respect and community building. Therefore, I would appreciate it if, instead of reverting my changes, we could talk about them.
Thank you very much.