| Revision as of 20:25, 31 March 2006 editAndres C. (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,394 edits Paquisha incident← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 04:01, 27 December 2024 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,667,802 edits Maintenance. |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
<noinclude> |
|
{{shortcut|]}} |
|
|
|
{{rfclistintro}} |
|
{{RFCheader|History and geography}} |
|
|
|
</noinclude> |
|
<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> |
|
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
* '''Result on RFC to change infobox picture''': unanimous ''oppose'' and withdrawal of RFC by proposer |
|
|
* '''Result on RFC to change infobox caption''': discussion underway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
''' Picture ''' |
|
*] Shouldn't articles about battles and/or disputed military outposts be allowed to included the names by which both sides referred to it? Thanks. 20:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC)~ |
|
|
*] Should it also mention the name "Arabian gulf"? 10:57, 31 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] A long argument about the oportunity to rename ] into ] and so on until ] into ] (and to keep ] as a redirect to ]). ] 08:35, 27 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] It is an arguement whether he should be considered a ] or a ]. --] 16:16, 25 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] There is an unresolved dispute as to which reference to use for this list/ranking. The choice is between the UN urban agglomerations list and the list by the website citypopulation.de. 20:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] whilst everyone seems to agree that the anceint Scots Gaelic etymology of the name should be included in the article, should the Gaelic name of this Lowland Scots town (unused locally) been given equal prominence in an infobox. --15:33, 23 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
** There is a general discussion about the matter ] - '''] ('']'')''' 15:41, 23 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] In the introductive paragraph of that article, the asserted "brief period of independence (1917-1921)" is based on ] (the kind hypothetical reader may take a look on ] and the quoted sources in ]). 16:43, 22 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* ] Question over primary source as an encyclopedic reference. 21:54, 20 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute and possible edit war has gotten out of hand, with constant POV pushing and no cooperation, could soon extend into flaming and personal attacks. Misplaced Pages policy and verifiability of article has been compromised, and all attempts to solve the problems ends in revert. |
|
|
--04:59, 20 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute and increasingly edit war over the inclusion of ''Islas Malvinas'' in the first line of the article. I would tentatively say that most people have accepted it being there, the remaining question is whether the Malvinas should have some kind of note that it is not the official name, nor the direct translation, something along the lines of ''commonly known in Spanish speaking countries as...'', ''alternative Spanish name...'' and others at the ]. ] 00:55, 17 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute on whether this should be an article or a disambig page (see also ] and its history), and whether it is a ] of ] (see also ]). 01:16, 16 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]:There has been a serious edit war over the accuracy and neutrality of information added to the article, with personal attacks and accussations. One of the involved editors asked for Full Protection (granted) and put the case before the Mediation Committee, which was not accepted by the other editor, who seems to prefer instead to have other fellow countrymen as mediators.15:06, 14 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]: Months-long edit war over the validity of a view that Paris' commuter belt should seem as the city itself; predjudiced (and constant) reverts and other bad editing habits. 09:04, 11 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]: There already exist more accurate exit lists on several articles such as ], and thus the page was edited to link to those to avoid a ]. Several editors are reverting this for no apparent reason. 07:47, 10 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute whether to include the ] and the ], both targets of revisionism, in the article. 18:13, 9 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute over whether al-Khwarimzi was an Arab or a Persian. 14:43, 9 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute over what should and what should not be in the article. 10:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute over inclusion of disputed material. 04:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] and ]: There are four sections of one road, Queen's Road East, Queensway, Queen's Road Central, Queen's Road West. Should the stub article Queensway, be merged into the article Queen's Road? 22:27, 3 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]; dispute over two versions (other at ]). 11:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - There is a dispute over how to identify the nationality of the subject. "Polish", "Polish of German Ancestry", "Prussian", "European", etc. -20:44, 21 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* ] - There has been a lot of trouble in coming to consensus over how the introduction should be worded. I think some fresh points of view will hopefully help resolve this. ] - 18:18, 21 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* ] - ] has repeatedly deleted referenced text on ]. . The text deleted can be seen and on the ]. The user is biased on this issue as can be seen by reading the talk pages on ] articles. He deleted referenced material on Indian civilians that lost their lives due to terrorists, on the terrorist camps in ] and ], on terrorist groups and on Hindus and Sikhs displaced from Kashmir due to terrorists. Deletion of referenced material need valid reasons. He deletes all the different changes by claiming that they're pro-India and pov. The editor who added the changes the Misplaced Pages project as a consequence. --10:27, 20 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* ] - Comments are requested as to how best to name articles to distinguish between the different meanings of the term ] -- How can the articles be named to make it clear whether the term is referring to the medieval order during the Crusades, or the modern Freemason degree. 19:38, 18 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{cot|title=RFC on picture change unanimously opposed and withdrawn by proposer}} |
|
<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> |
|
|
|
i suggest the current image be replaced by this https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/File:Jesus_de_Nazare.jpg it's clearer, and is easier to look at. ] (]) 15:10, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
] |
|
|
|
''']''' |
|
] |
|
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
] |
|
|
|
I'd like to understand why we don't keep than the image montage in the article at the moment. The is obviously better in terms of framing and resolution, as well as showing the exact moment when the second plane crashed into the WTC. ] (]) 21:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the article’s infobox reflect EF2/T4 or F3/T5-6? This question stems from the fact the infobox inputs can only accept a single set of values (i.e. EF2/T4 or F3/T5-6, not both). The EF2/T4 rating comes from a peer reviewed paper by ] and Stuart Robinson with the Haag Engineering Co. in the ] in August 2006. The F3/T5-6 rating comes from the ] (TORRO), the creators of the ], T-scale, . |
|
|
|
|
|
Since the infobox can only contain one set of the ratings, this discussion more or less needs to determine which source (Haag Engineering Co. or TORRO) should be the infobox source. |
|
|
*'''Option 1''' — EF2/T4 using the Haag Engineering Co. paper. |
|
|
*'''Option 2''' — F3/T5-6 using the ] paper. |
|
|
|
|
|
'''The ]''' (] 03:20, 20 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
What should the infobox indicate as the location of the hostilities? |
|
|
|
|
|
*'''Option 1''' - ] and ], ] |
|
|
*'''Option 2''' - ] |
|
|
|
|
|
Please enter Option 1 or Option 2, followed by a brief statement, in the Survey. Do not reply to other users in the Survey. Back-and-forth discussion may be conducted in the Discussion section. ]] 16:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the this Misplaced Pages page contain the section begining: article in the newspaper '']'', headlined "The Secret of Sabiha Hatun"? ] (]) 09:27, 15 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
The RfC is whether to retain or remove Syrian mercenaries from the belligerents section of the infobox. ] (]) 02:58, 10 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
I'm opening a new RfC in an attempt to permanently solve this dispute. Should the Estado Novo regime be considered fascist? -- ] (]) 23:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
{{RFC list footer|hist|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }} |
_-_B6019~11.jpg){kind=link}