| Revision as of 03:56, 13 April 2006 editRenamedUser jaskldjslak904 (talk | contribs)24,239 edits Removing and archiving older RFCs← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:08, 25 July 2022 edit undoDwaipayanc (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,440 editsm Reverted edits by 5.245.241.17 (talk) to last version by Ed6767Tag: Rollback | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{short description|historical document}} | |||
| {{shortcut|] or ]}} | |||
| {{selfref|WP:RFC/U redirects here. You may be looking for ] (formerly WP:RFCU) or for ] (])}} | |||
| ==Comments about individual users== | |||
| {{historical|type=woundup|comment=<br>'''The RFC/U process has been discontinued as a result of ].'''<br>'''Other ] processes should be used for conduct issues.|brief=yes}} | |||
| This section is for discussing specific users who have violated ]. In order to request comments on a user's actions, follow the instructions to create a subpage in the section below. Disputes over the writing of articles, including disputes over how best to follow the ] policy, belong in the '''Article content disputes''' section above. | |||
| {{info|Prior to ] at the ] that was closed in December 2014, ] on user conduct (RfC/Us) were used to discuss the problematic behaviour of specific Misplaced Pages editors, as part of the ]. RfC/Us were an informal, non-binding process. According to the discussion's closing statement, many editors found the RfC/U process ineffectual. As a result, it was closed down on 7 December 2014. | |||
| ⚫ | Old RfC/Us can be found in ]. | ||
| ===Deleting uncertified user RfCs=== | |||
| }} | |||
| Requests for comment which do not meet the minimum requirements 48 hours after creation are considered "uncertified" and will be de-listed. See ] for the minimum requirements. The subject RFC page will also be deleted, unless the subject has explicitly requested it to be retained. | |||
| ===Archives=== | |||
| ⚫ | Old |
||
| ===General user conduct=== | |||
| <inputbox> | |||
| type=create | |||
| preload=Template:RfCsubst | |||
| default=Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/USERNAME | |||
| buttonlabel=User conduct | |||
| bgcolor=#eeeeff | |||
| width=50 | |||
| </inputbox> | |||
| Discussions about user conduct should be listed in this section unless the complaint is specifically about the use of admin privileges or the choice of username. To list a user conduct dispute, please create a subpage using ] as a template, and then list it as follows: | |||
| *] – {''one or two'' short sentences giving the dry facts} <nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki> | |||
| '''Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold'''<br/> | |||
| ''List newer entries on top'' | |||
| *] refuses to discuss controversial edits and no has started making accusations and personal attacks on ].--] ] 03:39, 13 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ** I am pretty sure this '''has not''' met the 2 person threshold. ] 03:49, 13 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| '''Approved pages - have met the two person threshold'''<br/> | |||
| ''List newer entries on top'' | |||
| *] Refusing to accept consensus at ] and other policy pages and attempting to force the issue. Multiple accounts. | |||
| *] | |||
| *] – Consistently violates ] and brings his own personal/political agenda into discussions and edits. Is the cause of a number of edit wars and continuously violates ] by attacking my character. ] 04:05, 5 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] - Unwilling to take wikiquette criticisms seriously. --] 06:39, 7 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] - When he is in a dispute and outnumber by consensus (], ], ]), he reverts without discussion (or very little of it) and fails to ] and makes some uncivil comments. -- ]''']''' 17:40, 4 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] - widespread flounting of consensus at math articles. -] <sup>] </sup> 01:17, 4 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] - Extensive disruptive behavior in violation of the terms of his probation. --] 02:07, 31 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Civility, POV, sockpuppetry, 3RR, block evasion on Ireland-related articles. 20:17, 28 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Civility, AGF violations, accusations of sockpuppetry and more. --''']</font>'''<sup>]</font></sup> ] 18:52, 29 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Civility and pov concerns on a number of articles. Systematic bias may also be observed. <small>]<sup>]|]</sup></small> 00:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Civility and pov concerns on a number of articles. Systematic bias may also be observed. <small>]<sup>]|]</sup></small> 00:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Civility and pov concerns on a number of articles. Systematic bias may also be observed. <small>]<sup>]|]</sup></small> 00:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] for excessive Personal insults in my direction, lack of wikiettiquette (title ''one contributor'') and on ] which was reverted back and forth over 50 times since December, and was locked twice as a result. Rydel refused any discussions or medition proposals.--] 18:22, 24 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Continued placement of POV material on page ]. 17:08, 23 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *]: Has afd'd over 35 articles in 2 weeks, all created by me.--] 00:08, 20 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] : This user has been unilaterally editing sensitive history related articles to conform to his POV. | |||
| *] – vandalism, trolling and personal attacks; reoffending after several blocks. ] <sub>(])</sub><sup>]</sup> ''20:09, 14 March 2006'' | |||
| *] -- ] is editing articles related to ]s to express his original research and his opinions, and retaliates against editors who revert or question his contributions with personal attacks, personal threats, and requests for payment for wasting his time. ] / ] 05:13, 11 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Chronic violator of the 3rr, engages in personal attacks (]), ignores consensus (]), possibly part of a Zionist movement, hijacks one or two pages by repeatedly reverting, using banners and excessive texts in the discussion page, incivil behavior (]), gaming the system (]), assuming bad faith(]), harassment (]), and engages in personal attacks (]). | |||
| *] – keeps changing the article on the ] to claim they were Turkic, even though we've worked hard to make this page show all sides of the issue; the exact ethnic identity of the Huns is disputed, and we want the page to reflect that. Nonetheless, Hakozen keeps changing all NPOV mentions of "uncertain" etc. to "Turkic" and no longer participates on the Talk page. After I contacted him on his user page, he claimed I and the other level-headed editors were anti-Turk racists serving Greek and Armenian masters. ] 01:58, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Many violations of ] He has received three formal warnings, several informal warnings but continues to attack. Edits include obscenity and vandalism. Revision by other editors of vandalism and POV posts are met with bad-faith accusations. | |||
| *] Insistence on adding despite numerous efforts on talk page to work out solution; 3RR violations; deceptive edit summaries, impersonation, and sockpuppetry. <b><font face="Arial" color="#D47C14">]</font><font color="#7D4C0C">]</font>]</b> 01:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * <!-- delisting pending resolution of arbcomm matter ] - User has been | |||
| * ], POV-pushing, revert warring by United States congressional staffers, failure to work with the community, constant vandalism. ] (]) 08:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| === Use of administrator privileges === | |||
| This section is only for discussions specifically related to the use of sysop rights by ]. This includes the actions of protecting or unprotecting pages, deleting or undeleting pages, and blocking or unblocking users. If the dispute is over an admin's actions as an editor, it should be listed under the '''General user conduct''' section above. To list a dispute, create a subpage using the following sample as a template: | |||
| *] - Allegations: {''one or two'' short sentences giving the dry facts} <nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki> | |||
| As with disputes over general user conduct, '''at least two people''' must certify that they believe there is a legitimate basis for the complaint. If the listing is not certified within 48 hours of listing, it will be deleted. | |||
| '''Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold''' | |||
| '''Approved pages - have met the two person threshold''' | |||
| *] - reversing username blocks set by other administrators, with no prior discussion. 14:32, 12 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] – out-of-process deletions of images that were tagged as "fair use" but believed not to be. 22:51, 27 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] – Both admins were involved in a mass speedy deletion of userboxes this past weekend, and it appears they have only added fuel to the fire. | |||
| *] (3rd RfC) - violations of blocking and deletion policies | |||
| ''List newer entries on top'' | |||
| ]--> | |||
Latest revision as of 04:08, 25 July 2022
historical document WP:RFC/U redirects here. You may be looking for Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations (formerly WP:RFCU) or for Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User names (WP:RFC/NAME) | This page has been closed down by community consensus, and is retained only for historical reference. If you wish to restart discussion on the status of this page, seek community input at a forum such as the village pump. The RFC/U process has been discontinued as a result of this discussion. Other dispute resolution processes should be used for conduct issues. |
 | Prior to a discussion at the Village Pump that was closed in December 2014, requests for comment on user conduct (RfC/Us) were used to discuss the problematic behaviour of specific Misplaced Pages editors, as part of the dispute resolution process. RfC/Us were an informal, non-binding process. According to the discussion's closing statement, many editors found the RfC/U process ineffectual. As a result, it was closed down on 7 December 2014. Old RfC/Us can be found in Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct/Archive. |