Misplaced Pages

User talk:Hipocrite: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:34, 20 March 2012 editFerahgo the Assassin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,664 edits →Arbitration Committee Review← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:28, 6 May 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,372,979 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Hipocrite/05/2024. (BOT)Tag: Manual revert 
(919 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:


<div style="background-color: #BBDDFF; border: #4169E1 1px solid; margin: 2em 0 1em; padding: 0.5em 1em; font-weight: bold; vertical-align: middle;"> <div style="background-color: #BBDDFF; border: #4169E1 1px solid; margin: 2em 0 1em; padding: 0.5em 1em; font-weight: bold; vertical-align: middle;">
]Hello, {{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}|1}}. Your no-talkback edit notice is constantly ignored.{{facepalm}}<br /> ]Hello, {{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}|1}}. Your no-talkback edit notice is constantly ignored.{{facepalm}}<br />
{{No talkback}}

I do check my Misplaced Pages-related email, to those who ask. I don't typically do what emailers want.



<span class="plainlinks" style="font-size: 88%; font-weight: normal;"> You will every time by removing the {{tl|Talkback}} or {{tl|Tb}} template. They will never stop. </span></div> <span class="plainlinks" style="font-size: 88%; font-weight: normal;"> You will every time by removing the {{tl|Talkback}} or {{tl|Tb}} template. They will never stop. </span></div>


{{Archive box|image=] {{Archive box|image=]|auto=no
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
|archiveprefix=User talk:Hipocrite/ |archiveprefix=User talk:Hipocrite/
Line 12: Line 18:
}} }}
}} }}

== Arbitration Committee Review ==

Please be advised that the Arbitration Committee has now opened a ] of the background relating to the Request for Amendment at which you submitted a statement. A Review is a streamlined version of case, with a short window for presenting evidence.

The Committee invites any evidence you may wish to give ''directly related'' to any of the following matters:

# Is Mathsci engaging in improper conduct in respect of Ferahgo the Assassin?
# Is Mathsci being harassed by socks?
# Should Mathsci be pursuing socks in the R&I topic?
# Are the contributions of Ferahgo the Assassin and Captain Occam, outside of article space, functionally indistinguishable?
# Should Ferahgo the Assassin be site-banned coterminously with Captain Occam per WP:SHARE?

Evidence should be presented on the ] and should be posted by 26 March 2012 at the very latest.

For the Arbitration Committee

] <small>(])</small> 16:45, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your input, I have caped your comments as they are outside of the reviews scope. If you would like to address the questions asked in the review, please feel free to do so.<br /> ] <small>(])</small> 16:54, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

: I disagree. Evidence of meatpuppetry goes directly to Qs 1, 2, and 3. Did a member of arbitration committee ask you to hat my comments? If so, who? Was the entire committee aware of this request? ] (]) 17:31, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

:: To clarify this, what we are looking for is specific evidence of harassment against Mathsci, which would obviously include diffs showing those who are engaged in it. In any event, you have not produced evidence of harassment, nor of meatpuppetry, just evidence that people may know each other off-wiki. &nbsp;] <sup>]</sup> 11:16, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

::: So, I do a lot of work in statistics. What do you think the chances are that two people who are dinosaur picture friends just happen to show up at wikipedia and be Racist friends as well, after one of those two people gets banned? ] (]) 11:29, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

::: Further, are you speaking for you, or for more than you? ] (]) 11:29, 19 Marh 2012 (UTC)

::::Isn't this putting the cart before the horse? Surely establishing whether harassment has taken place is an essential step before deciding what to do about it? And, in any event, on-wiki activity (ie harassment and hounding) is a lot easier for the committee to determine and deal with than less tangible material about off-wiki activity/relationships (and what X might have said to Y). After all, if the facts were as compelling as you suggest, then this would/could have been dealt with at WP:SPI or WP:AE long ago. The reality is that every discussion involving these three editors gets bogged down with a mass of allegations and counter-allegations, at the expense of the core issues. That's what we (and by we I mean the committee, see the motion discussion for details) is explicitly trying to do here. So, if there is evidence of harassment, I'd very much like to see. &nbsp;] <sup>]</sup> 11:50, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

::::: I understand your request for evidence. Do you understand my question about the chances that dinosaur picture friends show up to be racist friends, or my question about who, exactly, you are speaking for? ] (]) 11:55, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
::::::I am not a racist, and nothing I have ever said or done - on wiki or off - warrants that personal attack. Please redact it. -] (]) 02:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
::::::: Are you denying that some of your friends are unabashed racists? I have links for you - you, of course, already have them. ] (]) 09:21, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
::::::::I'm not talking about my friends, just what you said about me. You said that I and TrevelyanL85A2 are "racist friends". Support it or redact it. And you don't have permission to link to off-wiki information about me that I haven't linked to myself. -] (]) 11:34, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

==Please comment on ]==
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 06:16, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

==Please comment on ]==
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 07:15, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:28, 6 May 2024


Hello, Hipocrite. Your no-talkback edit notice is constantly ignored.Facepalm Facepalm

This user has opted out of talkbacks

I do check my Misplaced Pages-related email, to those who ask. I don't typically do what emailers want.


You will remove talkback notices every time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. They will never stop.

Archives

Index 1


This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III.