Misplaced Pages

New antisemitism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:21, 13 April 2006 view sourceSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 edits rv to last version by Pecher← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:21, 22 December 2024 view source GreenC bot (talk | contribs)Bots2,547,810 edits Reformat 1 archive link. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:USURPURL and JUDI batch #20 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{pp|small=yes}}
], ] anti-war rally in ] ]]
{{Short description|none}}
{{Antisemitism |expanded=Manifestations}}


'''New antisemitism''' is the concept that a new form of ] developed in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, typically manifesting itself as ].<ref name="Fastenbauer 2020">{{cite book |author-last=Fastenbauer |author-first=Raimund |year=2020 |editor1-last=Lange |editor1-first=Armin |editor2-last=Mayerhofer |editor2-first=Kerstin |editor3-last=Porat |editor3-first=Dina |editor4-last=Schiffman |editor4-first=Lawrence H. |title=An End to Antisemitism! – Volume 2: Confronting Antisemitism from the Perspectives of Christianity, Islam, and Judaism |chapter=Islamic Antisemitism: Jews in the Qur’an, Reflections of European Antisemitism, Political Anti-Zionism: Common Codes and Differences |location=] and ] |publisher=] |pages=279–300 |doi=10.1515/9783110671773-018 |doi-access=free |isbn=9783110671773}}</ref>{{rp|296–297}} The concept is included in some definitions of antisemitism, such as the ] and the ]. The concept dates to the early 1970s.<ref>{{cite book |last=Berkman |first=Matthew |url=https://www.academia.edu/89802558 |title=Routledge Companion to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict |publisher=Taylor & Francis |year=2022 |isbn=978-0-429-64861-8 |editor=A. Siniver |page=522 |chapter= The Conflict on Campus|quote=Attempts to rearticulate antisemitism to encompass opposition to Israel's "right to exist" or its character as a Jewish state date back to the 1970s, when the Anti-Defamation League first popularized a discourse on "the new antisemitism" (see Forster and Epstein 1974; on the subsequent development of that discourse see Judaken 2008). The identification of anti-Zionism with antisemitism has long been de rigueur in Jewish communal and broader pro-Israel circles, but only in the last two decades have Israel advocacy groups endeavoured to establish it as a principle of United States anti-discrimination law. The earliest step in this direction was taken in 2004, when Kenneth L. Marcus, the Assistant Secretary of Education for the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) under President George W. Bush, issued a game-changing policy guidance letter empowering OCR staff, for the first time, to investigate complaints under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act alleging pervasive antisemitism on college campuses. |access-date=2023-05-21}}</ref>
The term '''new anti-Semitism''' refers to the contemporary international resurgence of anti-]ish incidents and attacks on ], as well as the acceptance of ] beliefs and their expression in public discourse.


Proponents of the concept generally posit that in the late 20th and early 21st centuries much of what is purported to be ] is in fact tantamount to ], and that together with evidence of a resurgence of antisemitic attacks on ],<ref name="USCIRF 2020">{{cite web |url=https://www.uscirf.gov/sites/default/files/USCIRF%202020%20Annual%20Report_42720_new_0.pdf |title=USCIRF 2020 Annual Report: "Rising Anti-Semitism in Europe and Elsewhere" |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=April 2020 |website=Uscirf.gov |location=] |publisher=] |pages=87–88 |access-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200428174043/https://www.uscirf.gov/sites/default/files/USCIRF%202020%20Annual%20Report_42720_new_0.pdf |archive-date=28 April 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> desecration of ] and ],<ref name="USCIRF 2020" /> ],<ref name="USCIRF 2020" /> and an increased acceptance of antisemitic beliefs in public discourse and ],<ref name="USCIRF 2020" /> such demonization represents an evolution in the appearance of antisemitic beliefs.<ref>Manfred Gerstenfeld, . ''Jewish Political Studies Review'' 17:1–2 Spring 2005</ref> Proponents argue that anti-Zionism and demonization of ], or ]s applied to its conduct (some also include ], ], and ]) may be linked to antisemitism, or constitute disguised antisemitism, particularly when emanating simultaneously from the ], ], and the ].<ref name="Fastenbauer 2020"/>{{rp|296–297}}<ref name=Taguieff>Taguieff, Pierre-André. ''Rising From the Muck: The New Anti-Semitism in Europe''. Ivan R. Dee, 2004.</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=o846LgEACAAJ&q=The+New+Anti-Semitism|title=The New Anti-Semitism Israel Model: Empirical Tests|last=Cohen|first=Florette|date=September 2011|publisher=BiblioBazaar|isbn=978-1-243-56139-8}}</ref>
The term, which first came into general use in the early 1970s, is used to distinguish a form of anti-Semitism regarded as differing in its ], its professed purpose, and its place on the political spectrum from the old anti-Semitism, which is associated with the ] and is motivated by ] theory, ], or ]. The new anti-Semitism is closely associated with the ] and its opposition to ], and to the existence of the state of ] as a ]. <ref name=Chesler>]. ''The New Anti-Semitism: The Current Crisis and What We Must Do About It'', Jossey-Bass, 2003, pp. 158-159, 181</ref> <ref name=Kinsella>]. , accessed March 5, 2006</ref> <ref name=Gable>, '']'', August 8, 2004.</ref> <ref name=Endelman>Endelman, Todd M. "Antisemitism in Western Europe Today" in ''Contemporary Antisemitism: Canada and the World''. University of Toronto Press, 2005, pp. 65-79</ref>


Critics of the concept argue that it is used in practice to ] in order to silence political debate and ] regarding the ongoing ], by conflating political anti-Zionism and criticism of the Israeli government with racism, condoning violence against Jews or ]. Such arguments have in turn been criticized as antisemitic and rhetorically irrelevant to the contested reality of new antisemitism.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last=Hirsh |first=David |date=January 2010 |title=Accusations of malicious intent in debates about the Palestine-Israel conflict and about antisemitism: The Livingstone Formulation, 'playing the antisemitism card' and contesting the boundaries of antiracist discourse |url=https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/7144/1/hirsh_transversal_2010.pdf |journal=Transversal |pages=47–77}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Citation |last=Klaff |first=Lesley |title=Holocaust inversion in British politics : the case of David Ward |date=2016-12-01 |url=http://www.nebraskapress.unl.edu/product/Anti-Judaism-Antisemitism-and-Delegitimizing-Isr,677309.aspx |pages=185–196 |editor-last=Wistrich |editor-first=Robert S. |access-date=2024-01-09 |publisher=University of Nebraska Press |language=en |isbn=978-0-8032-9671-8}}</ref> Further critical arguments include that the concept defines legitimate criticism of Israel too narrowly and demonization too broadly, and that it trivializes the meaning of antisemitism.<ref>]. . '']'', posted January 15, 2004 (February 2, 2004 issue), accessed January 9, 2006; and ]. , posted February 5, 2007, accessed February 6, 2007.</ref><ref>Steven Beller, ], Vol. 41, No. 2, 2007 pp.215-238, 223:' The idea that there has been an explosion of antisemitic sentiment in Europe has more to do with American, Israeli and Zionist discomfort with strong European criticism of Israeli policy than it has with actual antisemitism.'</ref><ref>Scott Ury, ], October 2018, vol. 123, 4 pp. 1151-1171, p.1552: 'One of the biggest problems facing the study of anti-Semitism today: its ongoing, seemingly inescapable connection to public affairs and the extent to which contemporary political concerns, in particular those regarding Zionism and the State of Israel, influence and shape the way that many scholars frame, interpret, and research anti-Semitism.'</ref>
Controversy regarding new anti-Semitism centers on whether opposition to the state of ] expresses anti-Semitism only as a symptom or by-product, or whether it is more closely linked to, and supported by, more general anti-Semitic beliefs. Critics of the concept contend that it serves only to equate legitimate criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism.


== The nature of the new anti-Semitism == == History of the concept ==
]ian newspaper ''Ad-Dustour'' on ], ] merged the ] with the ].]]


=== 1960s: origins ===
The charge of new anti-Semitism is primarily applied to groups on the Left, and is described as drawing its ] and ] from an opposition to ] and to the state of ]. <ref name=Chesler>''The New Anti-Semitism: The Current Crisis and What We Must Do About It'', ], Jossey-Bass, 2003, pp. 158-159, 181</ref> <ref name=Kinsella>"The New anti-Semitism", ], http://www.warrenkinsella.com/words_extremism_nas.htm, accessed March 5, 2006</ref> ], publisher of the anti-fascist '']'' has said that "a lot of anti-semitism is driven by the left. There are elements who take up a position on Israel and Palestine which in reality puts them in league with anti-Semites. It's becoming more pervasive. A lot of hatred is being built up by people who really should know better." <ref name=Gable/>
French philosopher ] argues that the first wave of "''la nouvelle judéophobie''" emerged in the Arab-Muslim world and the ] following the 1967 ]. He cites papers by Jacques Givet (1968) and historian ] (1969) discussing the idea of a new antisemitism rooted in anti-Zionism.<ref>] cites the following early works on the new antisemitism: Jacques Givet, ''La Gauche contre Israel? Essai sur le néo-antisémitisme, Paris 1968; idem, "Contre une certain gauche," ''Les Nouveaux Cahiers'', No. 13-14, Spring-Summer 1968, pp. 116–119; Léon Poliakov, ''De l'antisionisme a l'antisémitisme, Paris 1969; Shmuel Ettinger, "Le caractère de l'antisémitisme contemporain," ''Dispersion et Unité'', No. 14, 1975, pp. 141–157; and Michael Curtis, ed., ''Antisemitism in the Modern World, Boulder, 1986. All cited in ]. ''Rising from the Muck: The New Anti-Semitism in Europe''. Ivan R. Dee, 2004, p. 159-160, footnote 1.</ref> He argues that anti-Jewish themes centered on the demonical figures of Israel and what he calls "fantasy-world Zionism": that ], seek to conquer the world, and are imperialistic and bloodthirsty, which gave rise to the reactivation of stories about ritual murder and the poisoning of food and water supplies.<ref name=Taguieff62>]. ''Rising from the Muck: The New Anti-Semitism in Europe''. Ivan R. Dee, 2004, p. 62.</ref>


=== 1970s: early debates ===
Proponents of this model argue that ] may function as a ] for traditional anti-Semitism, thereby allowing anti-Semites to espouse a socially acceptable opposition to the Israeli state and its ], rather than a socially unacceptable ] or ] hatred. Proponents further argue that some grievances against Israel, stemming from the ], have become anti-Semitic in character and are manifested by hostility toward Jews in general. As Daniel Lazare has commented, in a paraphrase of ]: "Anti-Semitism is the anti-Zionism of fools…"<ref>Lazare, Daniel. , '']'', December 19, 2005, p.36. Accessed 8 Jan 2005. This is an allusion to ]'s famous remark, "Anti-Semitism is the socialism of fools."</ref>
Writing in the ]' '']'' in 1973, the ] ] identified ] as "the new anti-Semitism", saying:<ref>''Congress Bi-weekly'', American Jewish Congress, Vol. 40, Issues 2-14, 1973, p. xxv</ref>
<blockquote>ecently we have witnessed the rise of the new left which identifies Israel with the establishment, with acquisition, with smug satisfaction, with, in fact, all the basic enemies ... Let there be no mistake: the new left is the author and the progenitor of the new anti-Semitism. One of the chief tasks of any dialogue with the Gentile world is to prove that the distinction between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism is not a distinction at all. Anti-Zionism is merely the new anti-Semitism. The old classic anti-Semitism declared that equal rights belong to all individuals within the society, except the Jews. The new anti-Semitism says that the right to establish and maintain an independent national sovereign state is the prerogative of all nations, so long as they happen not to be Jewish. And when this right is exercised not by the Maldive Islands, not by the state of Gabon, not by Barbados ... but by the oldest and most authentic of all nationhoods, then this is said to be exclusivism, particularism, and a flight of the Jewish people from its universal mission.</blockquote>


In 1974, ] and ] of the ] published the book ''The New anti-Semitism''. They expressed concern about what they described as new manifestations of antisemitism coming from radical left, radical right, and pro-Arab figures in the U.S.<ref>Forster, Arnold & Epstein, Benjamin, ''The New Anti-Semitism''. McGraw-Hill 1974, p.165. See for instance chapters entitled "]'s Road" (19–48), "The Radical Right" (285–296), "Arabs and Pro-Arabs" (155–174), "The Radical Left" (125–154)</ref> Forster and Epstein argued that it took the form of indifference to the fears of the Jewish people, apathy in dealing with anti-Jewish bias, and an inability to understand the importance of Israel to Jewish survival.<ref name=ForsterEpstein324>Forster, Arnold & Epstein, Benjamin, ''The New Anti-Semitism''. McGraw-Hill 1974, p. 324.</ref>
Britain's ] ] expressed this view when he argued that "the new antisemitism &mdash; and it is new &mdash; is a global ] conveyed by Internet, e-mail, television and video, and we do not yet know how the new communications ] will affect its spread. … It is coming simultaneously from three different directions: first, a radicalized ] youth inflamed by extremist ]; second, a left-wing ] cognitive élite with strong representation in the European media; third, a resurgent ], as anti-] as it is anti-Jewish. <ref>]. "A New Antisemitism?" ''The Forward'', June 2002. . Accessed ] ].</ref>


], on January 10, 2009 ]]
In ''The Case for Israel'', ] describes a definition of anti-Semitism as "taking a trait or an action that is widespread, if not universal, and blaming ''only'' the Jews for it. That is what ] and ] did, and that is what former ] president ] did in the 1920s when he tried to limit the number of Jews admitted to Harvard because 'Jews cheat.' When a distinguished alumnus objected on the grounds that non-Jews also cheat, Lowell replied, 'You're changing the subject. I'm talking about Jews.' So, too, when those who single out only the Jewish nation for criticism are asked why they don't criticize Israel's enemies, they respond, 'You're changing the subject. We're talking about Israel.'"<ref>]. ''The Case For Israel'', John Wiley & Sons, 2003, ISBN 0471679526, p. 2</ref>
Reviewing Forster and Epstein's work in '']'', Earl Raab, founding director of the Nathan Perlmutter Institute for Jewish Advocacy at ], argued that a "new anti-Semitism" was indeed emerging in America, in the form of opposition to the collective rights of the Jewish people, but he criticized Forster and Epstein for conflating it with anti-Israel bias.<ref>Raab, Earl. "Is there a New Anti-Semitism?", ''Commentary'', May 1974, pp. 53–54.</ref> Allan Brownfeld writes that Forster and Epstein's new definition of antisemitism trivialized the concept by turning it into "a form of political blackmail" and "a weapon with which to silence any criticism of either Israel or U.S. policy in the Middle East,"<ref>{{cite journal
|title = Anti-Semitism: Its Changing Meaning
|last = Brownfeld
|first = Allan
|journal = ]
|publisher = ]
|issn = 1533-8614
|volume = 16
|issue = 3
|year = 1987
|pages = 53–67
|doi = 10.2307/2536789
|jstor = 2536789
}}</ref> while Edward S. Shapiro, in ''A Time for Healing: American Jewry Since World War II'', has written that "Forster and Epstein implied that the new anti-Semitism was the inability of Gentiles to love Jews and Israel enough."<ref>Edward S. Shapiro. ''A Time for Healing: American Jewry Since World War II''. Johns Hopkins University Press. 1992. {{ISBN|0-8018-4347-2}}. Page 47.</ref>


=== 1980s–present day: continued debate ===
That attacks on Israel may serve as a cover for anti-Semitism has been accepted by official governmental bodies in Europe and the United States. For example, in 2005, the ] (EUMC), part of the ], tried to define more clearly the relationship between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism as part of a general effort to track anti-Semitism. The EUMC developed a working definition of anti-Semitism that defined ways in which attacking Israel or Zionism could be anti-Semitic, the definition states:
], 2003]]
Historian ] addressed the issue in a 1984 lecture delivered in the home of ] ], in which he argued that a "new anti-Semitic anti-Zionism" was emerging, distinguishing features of which were the equation of Zionism with ] and the belief that Zionists had actively collaborated with Nazis during ]. He argued that such claims were prevalent in the Soviet Union, but added that similar rhetoric had been taken up by a part of the radical Left, particularly ] groups in Western Europe and America.<ref name=Wistrich1984>]. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170512173240/http://sicsa.huji.ac.il/Antizionism.htm |date=2017-05-12 }}, lecture delivered to the Study Circle on World Jewry in the home of the ], December 10, 1984.</ref>


When asked in 2014 if "anti-Zionism is the new anti-Semitism", ] stated:<ref>{{cite web|last1=Chomsky|first1=Noam|title=TRANSCRIPT of Amy Goodman interview of Noam Chomsky|website=]|url=http://www.democracynow.org/2014/11/27/noam_chomsky_at_united_nations_it|access-date=19 May 2016}}</ref>
<blockquote>"Examples of the ways in which anti-Semitism manifests itself with regard to the State of Israel taking into account the overall context could include:
<blockquote>Actually, the locus classicus, the best formulation of this, was by an ambassador to the United Nations, ], ... He advised the American Jewish community that they had two tasks to perform. One task was to show that criticism of the policy, what he called anti-Zionism{{spaced ndash}} that means actually criticisms of the policy of the state of Israel{{spaced ndash}} were anti-Semitism. That's the first task. Second task, if the criticism was made by Jews, their task was to show that it's neurotic self-hatred, needs psychiatric treatment. Then he gave two examples of the latter category. One was ]. The other was me. So, we have to be treated for our psychiatric disorders, and non-Jews have to be condemned for anti-Semitism, if they're critical of the state of Israel. That's understandable why Israeli propaganda would take this position. I don't particularly blame Abba Eban for doing what ambassadors are sometimes supposed to do. But we ought to understand that there is no sensible charge. No sensible charge. There's nothing to respond to. It's not a form of anti-Semitism. It's simply criticism of the criminal actions of a state, period.
:* Denying the Jewish people right to self-determination, e.g. by claiming that the existence of a state of Israel is a racist endeavor.
</blockquote>
:* Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
:* Using the symbols and images associated with classic anti-Semitism (e.g. claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
:* Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
:* Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the State of Israel.
However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as anti-Semitic."<ref> (]), European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC). Accessed ] ].</ref></blockquote>


== Definitions and arguments for and against the concept ==
In his article "Human Rights and the New Anti-Jewishness", ], ]'s ], writes that "classical or traditional anti-Semitism is the ] against, or denial of, the right of Jews to live as equal members of a free society; the new anti-Semitism — incompletely, or incorrectly, as "]"... — involves the discrimination against, denial of, or assault upon the right of the Jewish people to live as an equal member of the family of nations. What is intrinsic to each form of anti-Semitism — and common to both — is discrimination. All that has happened is that it has moved from discrimination against Jews as individuals — a classical anti-Semitism for which there are indices of measurement (e.g., discrimination against Jews in ], ], or ]) — to discrimination against Jews as people — a new anti-Semitism — for which one has yet to develop indices of ].
<ref>]. , FrontPageMagazine.com, ], ]. Accessed ] ].</ref>


=== A new phenomenon ===
Cotler identifies distinct categories to illustrate the scope, character and specific instances of the new anti-Semitism. He describes them as ''Genocidal'', ''Political'', ''Theological'', ''Cultural'', ''Anti-Israel'', ''Economic'' and ''State-sanctioned''. Broadly, he asserts that anti-Semitism has expanded from the hatred of Jews to include hatred of Jewish national aspirations, the hatred of Israel's status as a sovereign nation, and the denial of its right to an equal role in the global community of nations. Cotler identifies distinct indices by which this prejudice may be manifested, ranging from the state-sanctioned theological anti-Semitism of some Islamic governments to the ''Cultural anti-Semitism'' which he perceives in the European elite. He also stressed that such prejudice may be overtly manifested (in the case of anti-Semitic rhetoric) or subtly manifested through diplomatic pressure, or by the economic boycott of Israeli businesses and their trade partners.
], Professor of Law at ] and a scholar of human rights, has identified nine aspects of what he considers to constitute the "new anti-Semitism":<ref>] cited ]. ''The Case For Israel''. ], 2003, p. 210-211.</ref>
* Genocidal antisemitism: ] and/or the Jewish people.
* Political antisemitism: denial of the Jewish people's right to ], ] as a state, attributions to Israel of all the world's evils.
* Ideological antisemitism: "Nazifying" Israel by comparing ] and racism.
* Theological antisemitism: convergence of ] and Christian ], drawing on the classical hatred of Jews.
* Cultural antisemitism: the emergence of anti-Israel attitudes, sentiments, and discourse in "fashionable" salon intellectuals.{{vague|date=January 2014}}
* Economic antisemitism: ] and the ] application of ] against countries trading with Israel.
* Holocaust denial.
* Anti-Jewish racist terrorism.
* International legal discrimination ("Denial to Israel of equality before the law in the international arena").


Cotler defines "classical or traditional anti-Semitism" as "the discrimination against, denial of or assault upon the rights of Jews to live as equal members of whatever host society they inhabit" and "new anti-Semitism" as "discrimination against the right of the Jewish people to live as an equal member of the family of nations{{spaced ndash}}the denial of and assault upon the Jewish people's right even to live{{spaced ndash}}with Israel as the "collective Jew among the nations."<ref name="Judenstaatrein">Irwin Cotler, {{dead link|date=February 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, '']'', February 22, 2009.</ref>
==State of the controversy==
:''For detailed contentions, see section ].''


Cotler elaborated on this position in a June 2011 interview for Israeli television. He re-iterated his view that the world is "witnessing a new and escalating ... and even lethal anti-Semitism" focused on hatred of Israel, but cautioned that this type of antisemitism should not be defined in a way that precludes "free speech" and "rigorous debate" about Israel's activities. Cotler said that it is "too simplistic to say that anti-Zionism, ''per se'', is anti-Semitic" and argued that ], while in his view "distasteful", is "still within the boundaries of argument" and not inherently antisemitic. He continued: "It's you say, because it's an apartheid state, it has to be dismantled{{spaced ndash}}then crossed the line into a racist argument, or an anti-Jewish argument."<ref>], , ''Haaretz'', 1 July 2011. Accessed 7 July 2011.</ref>
===Opponents===
Opponents of the concept of ''New anti-Semitism'' assert that:
* Antipathy toward Israel's policies, its character as a ], or even its existence, does not necessarily amount to anti-Semitism.
** People may have legitimate reasons to criticize or condemn the actions of any state, and Israel is as subject to this as any other.
** There are Jewish groups and Jewish individuals who hold views critical of Israeli policy; some of these (though far fewer) even question the legitimacy of Israel's character as a Jewish state. Some '']'' groups regard the state of Israel and Zionism as ]ist ], and a few fringe organizations, most notably ], have called for the creation of a unitary state of ] in the region. A minority of ] and non-''Haredi'' Jews also oppose the state of Israel and/or ] from a standpoint of ]. Former ] member ] is one such figure, while prominent Jewish ]s such as ] and ] articulated similar views in the mid-twentieth century.
** Many left-wing groups within mainstream Israeli politics hold views regarding some Israeli government policies similar to those criticized as anti-Semitic when expressed by left-wing groups outside Israel.
* A frequent target for accusations of new anti-Semitism &mdash; the ] Left &mdash; maintains a principled stand against any form of ].
* Accusations of anti-Semitism may be used to discredit those who criticize the actions of the Israeli government.
* Comparing Israel with ]s known for ] policies is commonplace within Israeli politics as well, with right-wing Zionists comparing ], ], and ] to ].
* Palestinians and their ] have reasons to oppose Israel independently of its connection to the Jewish people. Some of these sympathizers bear ill will toward the Jewish people, while others do not.
* Frivolous accusations of anti-Semitism could undermine the struggle against more serious examples of it.


], former chair of history at ], writes that new antisemitism is a new phenomenon stemming from a coalition of "leftists, vociferously opposed to the policies of Israel, and right-wing antisemites, committed to the destruction of Israel, were joined by millions of Muslims, including Arabs, who immigrated to Europe... and who brought with them their hatred of Israel in particular and of Jews in general." It is this new political alignment, he argues, that makes new antisemitism unique.<ref name="Fischel">Fischel, Jack R. , ''The Virginia Quarterly Review'', Summer 2005, pp. 225–234.</ref> ] of '']'' links new antisemitism to ], describing it as "the medieval image of the "Christ-killing" Jew resurrected on the editorial pages of cosmopolitan European newspapers."<ref name="Strauss2009">{{Cite web |last=Strauss |first=Mark |date=2009-11-02 |title=Anti-globalism's Jewish Problem |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/11/02/anti-globalisms-jewish-problem/ |access-date=2023-09-26 |website=Foreign Policy |language=en-US}}</ref>
===Proponents===
Proponents of the concept of the new anti-Semitism respond to these objections as follows:
* It is no coincidence that criticism against Israel is:
** Out of any proportion to the size of the ], whether measured in number of individuals affected, the size of the territory in dispute, or by the magnitude of alleged transgressions;
** Characterized by a ], in which Israel is held to a higher standard than any other state in a comparable situation;
** Replete with persistent ]s, ]s and outright falsehoods.
* While it is certainly possible to criticize Israel without harboring anti-Semitic motivations, it is reasonable to assume that those who hate Jews also hate Israel.
* Whether or not anti-Zionists harbor anti-Semitic attitudes, they should still be held responsible for promoting anti-Semitic ].
* The fact that some Jews are anti-Zionists does not provide ] against anti-Semitism.
** Religious anti-Zionists base their opposition on ]s that ultimately call for the return of Jews to ].
** Just as all those who are critical of Israel aren't anti-Semitic, Jews who are critical of Israel have different reasons for their views.
** Even so, Jews are not exempt from misguided attitudes and ] ].
* Vocal elements within both the secular and religious Arab world employ anti-Semitic images, ]s, and ]s for political purposes.
* The left wing is no more immune from ] than any other group.
* There is ample evidence that the hostile popular opinion against Israel is correlated with blatant anti-Semitic acts.


Rajesh Krishnamachari, researcher with the ], analyzed antisemitism in Iran, Turkey, Palestine, Pakistan, Malaysia, Bangladesh and Saudi Arabia and posited that the recent surge in antisemitism across the Muslim world should be attributed to political expediency of the local elite in these countries rather than to any theological imperative.<ref name="rajeshPaper">Tembarai Krishnamachari, Rajesh. {{usurped|1=}} in South Asia Analysis Group, Paper 5907, April 2015.</ref>
=== Anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism ===
''Related articles: ], ]''


{{rquote|left|It is the ]. ... It is ] donning checkered Palestinian ]s and Palestinians lining up to buy copies of '']''.
Anti-Zionism is a term that has been used to describe several very different political and religious points of view (both historically and in current debates), all expressing some form of opposition to ]. Many commentators, particularly those supportive of Israel, believe that criticisms of Israel and Zionism are often disproportionate in degree and unique in kind, and attribute this to anti-Semitism. In turn, critics of this view believe that associating anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism is intended to stifle debate, deflect attention from valid criticisms, and taint anyone opposed to Israeli actions and policies. They point out that, during debate over the establishment of the State of Israel, most notably, many ]ic Jews considered this manifestation of Zionism ]. Today, the number of anti-Zionist Jewish groups worldwide is small.
—]<ref name="Strauss2009" />}}


The French philosopher ] argues that antisemitism based on racism and ] has been replaced by a new form based on ] and ]. He identifies some of its main features as the identification of Zionism with racism; the use of material related to ] (such as doubts about the number of victims and allegations that there is a "]"); a discourse borrowed from ], ], ], ] and ]; and the dissemination of what he calls the "myth" of the "intrinsically good Palestinian{{spaced ndash}}the innocent victim ''par excellence''."<ref name=Taguieff67>Taguieff, Pierre-André. ''Rising From the Muck: The New Anti-Semitism in Europe''. Ivan R. Dee, 2004, pp. 67–68.</ref>
There are examples of leading Zionists, while stating that criticism of Israel is not anti-Semitism, conflate anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism. ] of the ] (ADL) is on the record saying "The harsh but un-deniable truth is this: what some like to call anti-Zionism is, in reality, anti-Semitism &mdash; always, everywhere, and for all time... Therefore, anti-Zionism is not a politically legitimate point of view but rather an expression of bigotry and hatred."<ref name=Klug>Klug, Brian. . '']'', posted January 15, 2004 (February 2, 2004 issue). Accessed 9 Jan 2006.</ref> Foxman believes that it is Anti-Semitic to criticize ''"]"'' if one does not also criticize the ''"Indian Hindus and their occupation of Muslim ]"'', or similar ]s. <ref>] . Speech given before the ] Executive Committee, Palm Beach, Florida, February 8, ]. Accessed ] ].</ref> The ] looks at the dictionary definitions of ] and ] and concludes that "According to these definitions it seems that anti-Zionism is Antisemitism". <ref>], . Accessed ] ].</ref> Nevertheless, it distinguishes between opposition to Israeli policy and anti-Zionism: "Can a person oppose the actions of the State of Israel, without denying its right to exist? The answer appears to be clearly yes."


In early 2009, 125 parliamentarians from various countries gathered in ] for the founding conference of a group called the "Interparliamentary Coalition for Combating Anti-Semitism" (ICCA). They suggest that while classical antisemitism "overlaps" modern antisemitism, it is a different phenomenon and a more dangerous one for Jews.<ref name="Judenstaatrein" />
] has suggested that anti-Semitism masquerading as anti-Zionism can be distinguished from legitimate criticism of Israel if it fails the "3D" test. In Sharansky's words:<ref>]. , '']'', February 23,2004. Reprinted on the site of ]. Accessed 9 Jan 2006.</ref>
* "The first D is the test of demonization. …Jews were demonized for centuries as the embodiment of evil. Therefore, today we must be wary of whether the Jewish state is being demonized by having its actions blown out of all sensible proportion. For example, the comparisons of Israelis to Nazis and of the Palestinian refugee camps to ]… can only be considered anti-Semitic…"
* "The second D is the test of double standards. For thousands of years a clear sign of anti-Semitism was treating Jews differently than other peoples, from the discriminatory laws many nations enacted against them to the tendency to judge their behavior by a different yardstick. Similarly, today we must ask whether criticism of Israel is being applied selectively… It is anti-Semitism, for instance, when Israel is singled out by the United Nations for human rights abuses while tried and true abusers like China, Iran, ], and ] are ignored. Likewise, it is anti-Semitism when Israel's ], alone among the world's ambulance services, is denied admission to the ]."
* "The third D is the test of delegitimation. In the past, anti-Semites tried to deny the legitimacy of the ], the ], or both. Today, they are trying to deny the legitimacy of the Jewish state, presenting it, among other things, as the last vestige of colonialism. While criticism of an Israeli policy may not be anti-Semitic, the denial of Israel's right to exist is always anti-Semitic. If other peoples have a right to live securely in their homelands, then the Jewish people have a right to live securely in their homeland…"


=== A new phenomenon, but not antisemitism ===
Despite some acceptance of the general principle that anti-Zionism may be used as a proxy for anti-Semitism, descriptions of specific political groups as examples of the new anti-Semitism have been challenged by critics. {{fact}} Although it is usually conceded that right-wing anti-Semites have latched onto aspects of the ], and that Arab ] has led to a growth of anti-Jewish as well as anti-Israeli sentiment in the Arab world, critics argue that claims of a new anti-Semitism have largely, or even primarily, been used to deflect legitimate criticism of Zionism, of Israel, or of the Israeli government. {{fact}}
] argues that the new prejudice is not antisemitism, new or old, nor a mutation of an existing virus, but "a brand new 'bug{{'"}}.<ref name="KlugCatalyst">]. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927143329/http://www.catalystmagazine.org.uk/Default.aspx.LocID-0hgnew0bv.RefLocID-0hg01b00100600f009.Lang-EN.htm|date=2007-09-27}}, ], March 17, 2006.</ref>]]
], senior research fellow in philosophy at ]{{spaced ndash}}who gave expert testimony in February 2006 to a British parliamentary inquiry into antisemitism in the UK, and in November 2004 to the Hearing on Anti-Semitism at the German ]{{spaced ndash}}argues against the idea that there is a "single, unified phenomenon" that could be called "new" antisemitism. He accepts that there is reason for the Jewish community to be concerned, but argues that any increase in antisemitic incidents is attributable to classical antisemitism. Proponents of the new antisemitism concept, he writes, see an organizing principle that allows them to formulate a new concept, but it is only in terms of this concept that many of the examples cited in evidence of it count as examples in the first place.<ref name=Klug>]. {{Webarchive|url=http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20090701082702/http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040202&s=klug |date=2009-07-01 }}. '']'', February 2, 2004, accessed January 9, 2006</ref> That is, the creation of the concept may be based on a circular argument or ]. He argues that it is an unhelpful concept, because it devalues the term "antisemitism," leading to widespread cynicism about the use of it. People of goodwill who support the Palestinians resent being falsely accused of antisemitism.<ref name="KlugCatalyst" />


Klug defines classical antisemitism as "an ingrained European fantasy about Jews as Jews," arguing that whether Jews are seen as a race, religion, or ethnicity, and whether antisemitism comes from the right or the left, the antisemite's image of the Jew is always as "a people set apart, not merely by their customs but by their collective character. They are arrogant, secretive, cunning, always looking to turn a profit. Loyal only to their own, wherever they go they form a state within a state, preying upon the societies in whose midst they dwell. Mysteriously powerful, their hidden hand controls the banks and the media. They will even drag governments into war if this suits their purposes. Such is the figure of 'the Jew,' transmitted from generation to generation."<ref name=KlugRedPepper>]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061023055516/http://www.jfjfp.org/BackgroundJ/klug_redpepper_2006.htm |date=2006-10-23 }}, ''Red Pepper'', November 24, 2005.</ref>
== Manifestations of the new anti-Semitism ==
{{rquote|left|hen anti-Semitism is everywhere, it is nowhere. And when every anti-Zionist is an anti-Semite, we no longer know how to recognize the real thing—the concept of anti-Semitism loses its significance.
=== False allegations about Israel and Jews===
—]<ref name=Klug />}}
Proponents of the new anti-Semitism say that one of its manifestations involves false allegations made about Israel and Jews, with the intent of stirring up hatred against them. This section lists examples used to support that claim.


He argues that although it is true that the new antisemitism incorporates the idea that antisemitism is hostility to Jews as Jews, the source of the hostility has changed; therefore, to continue using the same expression for it{{spaced ndash}}antisemitism{{spaced ndash}}causes confusion. Today's hostility to Jews as Jews is based on the ], not on ancient European fantasies. Israel proclaims itself as the state of the Jewish people, and many Jews align themselves with Israel for that very reason. It is out of this alignment that the hostility to Jews as Jews arises, rather than hostility to Israelis or to Zionists. Klug agrees that it is a prejudice, because it is a generalization about individuals; nevertheless, he argues, it is "not rooted in the ideology of 'the Jew'," and is therefore a different phenomenon from antisemitism.<ref name=KlugCatalyst />
Perhaps the most notable case was the so called "]" allegation, in which it was claimed that in ] in 2002, ] committed atrocities "horrific beyond belief," according to ] special envoy ] <ref name="bbc-evidence"> ] 18 April, 2002. Accessed 7 Jan 2005.]</ref>, and "massacred" 500&ndash;3000 innocent Palestinians during ]. Two weeks after the press promoted the Jenin massacre allegation, international reporters uncovered that no massacre had taken place in Jenin. ] lowered its estimate of the death toll to 56 people, the majority of whom were combatants, as were the 23 IDF soldiers killed during the battle. The "Jenin massacre" story sparked waves of anti-Israeli protests and violent attacks against Jews in Europe.


In 2006, ] argued that there has been no significant rise in antisemitism: "What does the evidence show? There has been good investigation done, serious investigation. All the evidence shows there's no evidence at all for a rise of a new anti-Semitism, whether in Europe or in North America. The evidence is zero. And, in fact, there's a new book put out by an Israel stalwart. His name is ], a very prominent scholar. It's called ''The Changing Face of Anti-Semitism''. It just came out, 2006, from ]. He looks at the evidence, and he says no. There's some in Europe among the Muslim community, there's some anti-Semitism, but the notion that in the heart of European society or North American society there's anti-Semitism is preposterous. And in fact{{spaced ndash}}or no, a significant rise in anti-Semitism is preposterous."<ref>Goodman, Amy. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061115192616/http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/article.php?pg=11&ar=479 |date=2006-11-15 }}, interview with Norman Finkelstein, August 29, 2006.</ref>
The role of the media in reporting these events was highly controversial. Many Western media outlets were criticized as having deliberately misled their readers, and some reporters were accused of fabricating information to demonize Israel. However, reports by the Western media of a "massacre" in Jenin were generally presented as eyewitness accounts, and not as undisputed facts. The ], for instance, conveyed reports of a "massacre" from some international observers, but did not take a position as to whether or not such events had occurred.<ref name="bbc-evidence" /> Some reporters noted that it was difficult to ascertain what had actually happened in Jenin following the end of Israeli military operations there, as foreign observers were not initially given access to the city.


In 2023, according to the ], antisemitic hate crimes in the United States surged 63 percent to 1,832 recorded incidents, the highest on record.<ref name="g393">{{cite web |date=2024-09-23 |title=FBI Releases 2023 Crime in the Nation Statistics |url=https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/fbi-releases-2023-crime-in-the-nation-statistics |access-date=2024-11-16 |website=Federal Bureau of Investigation}}</ref>  Antisemitic incidents represented 15% of all hate crimes and 68% of all religion-based hate crimes, though Jews only make up about 2% of the population.<ref name="r933">{{cite web |last=Kirsh |first=Elana |last2=Fabian |first2=Emanuel |last3=Lehmann |first3=Noam |date=2024-09-23 |title=Antisemitic hate crimes in US surged 63% in 2023, to all-time high of 1,832 – FBI |url=https://www.timesofisrael.com/antisemitic-hate-crimes-in-us-surged-63-in-2023-to-all-time-high-of-1832-fbi/ |access-date=2024-11-16 |website=The Times of Israel}}</ref> In 2024, reports of bomb threats to synagogues, antisemitic harassment, vandalism and assault reached record-high numbers in four of the past six years in the United States.<ref name="NYT 2024">{{cite web |last=Diaz |first=Johnny |date=2024-10-06 |title=Antisemitic Incidents Reach New High in the U.S., Report Finds |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/06/us/antisemitic-incidents-us-adl-report.html |access-date=2024-11-17 |website=The New York Times}}</ref><ref name="q917">{{cite web |last=Barber |first=Rachel |date=2024-04-16 |title=Record number of antisemitic incidents hit US amid Israel-Hamas war |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2024/04/16/record-number-antisemitic-incidents-2023/73332503007/ |access-date=2024-11-17 |website=USA TODAY}}</ref>
In the ], ] involving Jews abound. '']'', a text debunked many years ago as a fraud perpetrated by ] intelligence agents, continued to appear in the Middle East media, quoted not as a ] but as a factual source. In 2002 and 2003, two television series appeared that dramatized the events of ''The Protocols''. One was a Syrian production, sponsored in part by the government of Syria, that aired on Hezbollah satellite television in Lebanon and throughout the Middle East; the other, a 41-part series, was produced and aired in Egypt. The presentations emphasized blood libel and the alleged control by the Jewish community of international finance. The clear purpose of the programs was to incite hatred of Jews and of Israel. Copies of the Protocols and other similar anti-Semitic forgeries were readily available in Middle Eastern countries, former ] republics and elsewhere.


=== Criticism of Israel is not always antisemitism ===
Another widely disseminated conspiracy theory holds that Jews were behind the ]. This accusation is usually supported by the false ] on the day of the attacks, supposedly a sign that they were warned by a complicit Israeli intelligence agency. <ref name="State-1">, excerpted from a longer piece, and covering the period of July 1, 2003 &ndash; December 15, 2004. Accessed 6 Jan 2005.</ref> (See also ].) These allegations were renewed after the October 2005 bombings in Amman, Jordan, when it was revealed that the Israeli government had issued a routine warning to its citizens in Amman before the bombings took place.
The ] is a set of criteria put forth by ] to distinguish legitimate criticism of Israel from antisemitism. The three Ds stand for ], Demonization of Israel, and subjecting Israel to Double standards, each of which, according to the test, indicates antisemitism.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://umdrive.memphis.edu/jjudaken/public/publications/PoP%20New%20Antisemitism.pdf?uniq=-5aa3|title=So What's New? Rethinking the 'New Antisemitism' in a Global Age|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130327165258/https://umdrive.memphis.edu/jjudaken/public/publications/PoP%20New%20Antisemitism.pdf?uniq=-5aa3|archive-date=2013-03-27|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/rm/2011/178448.htm|title=Remarks at the 2011 B'nai B'rith International Policy Conference|date=2012-12-02|access-date=2018-06-11}}</ref> The test is intended to draw the line between legitimate criticism towards the State of ], its actions and policies, and non-legitimate criticism that becomes antisemitic.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=o846LgEACAAJ&q=The+New+Anti-Semitism|title=The New Anti-Semitism Israel Model: Empirical Tests|last=Cohen|first=Florette|date=September 2011|publisher=BiblioBazaar|isbn=978-1-243-56139-8}}</ref>


] writes that "here is a new surge of antisemitism in the world, and much prejudice against Israel is driven by such antisemitism," but argues that charges of antisemitism based on anti-Israel opinions generally lack credibility. He writes that "a grave educational misdirection is imbedded in formulations suggesting that if we somehow get rid of antisemitism, we will get rid of anti-Israelism. This reduces the problems of prejudice against Israel to cartoon proportions." Raab describes prejudice against Israel as a "serious breach of morality and good sense," and argues that it is often a bridge to antisemitism, but distinguishes it from antisemitism as such.<ref>Raab, Earl. , ''Judaism'', Fall 2002.</ref>
Such media channels often broadcast globally and incite attacks against Jews. On ] ], the ] court banned ]'s TV channel ] after repeated anti-Semitic attacks and allegations such as "Zionist attempts to transmit ] to Arab countries." <ref>. ], 14 December 2004. Accessed 6 Jan 2006.</ref>


Steven Zipperstein, professor of Jewish Culture and History at ], argues that a belief in the State of Israel's responsibility for the Arab-Israeli conflict is considered "part of what a reasonably informed, progressive, decent person thinks." He argues that Jews have a tendency to see the State of Israel as a victim because they were very recently themselves "the quintessential victims".<ref name=zipperstein61>Zipperstein, Steven. "Historical Reflections of Contemporary Antisemitism" in Derek J. Penslar et al., ed., ''Contemporary Antisemitism: Canada and the World'', Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2005, p. 61.</ref>
=== Straw-man anti-Semitism ===
One claim made by some opponents of Israel and/or the notion of a new anti-Semitism is that defenders of Israel describe any criticism of the State of Israel as anti-Semitism. This claim is then used to criticize defenders of Israel as unreasonable, or attempting to stifle legitimate debate.


=== Accusations of misuse of the term to stifle criticism of Israel ===
However, proponents of the view that there is a New anti-Semitism point out that no groups supportive of Israel officially hold, or have ever held, such a position. One popular understanding of this issue can be found in a statement by the Anti-Defamation League:
{{main|Weaponization of antisemitism}}
:"Criticism of particular Israeli actions or policies in and of itself does not constitute anti-Semitism. Certainly the sovereign State of Israel can be legitimately criticized just like any other country in the world. However, it is undeniable that there are those whose criticism of Israel or of "Zionism" is used to mask anti-Semitism." (Anti-Defamation League website.)
] argues that organizations such as the ] have brought forward charges of new antisemitism at various intervals since the 1970s, "not to fight antisemitism but rather to exploit the historical suffering of Jews in order to immunize Israel against criticism".<ref name=Finkelstein21>Finkelstein, Norman. ''Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History'', University of California Press, 2005, pp. 21–22.</ref> He writes that most evidence purporting to show a new antisemitism has been taken from organizations that are linked in some way to Israel, or that have "a material stake in inflating the findings of anti-Semitism," and that some antisemitic incidents reported in recent years either did not occur or were misidentified.<ref name="Finkelstein66/68">Finkelstein, Norman. ''Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History'', University of California Press, 2005, p.&nbsp;66–71.</ref> As an example of the misuse of the term "antisemitism," he cites the ]'s 2003 report, which included displays of the ], support for the ], and the ] in its list of antisemitic activities and beliefs.<ref name=Finkelstein37>Finkelstein, Norman. ''Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History'', University of California Press, 2005, p. 37.</ref>


] writes that anger at what he calls "Israel's brutal occupation has undoubtedly slipped over to an animus against Jews generally", which he describes as "lamentable" but "hardly cause for wonder".<ref name=Finkelstein81>]. ''Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History'', University of California Press, 2005, p. 81.</ref>]]
In his speech given at the ] on ], ], Law Professor at ] ] said, in particular: "Show me a single instance where a major Jewish leader or Israeli leader has ever said that criticizing a particular policy of Israeli government is anti-Semitic. That's just something made up by Israel's enemies."<ref>]. , FrontPage magazine, June 1, 2004. Accessed 6 Jan 2006.</ref>
He writes that what is called the new antisemitism consists of three components: (i) "exaggeration and fabrication"; (ii) "mislabeling legitimate criticism of Israeli policy"; and (iii) "the unjustified yet predictable spillover from criticism of Israel to Jews generally."<ref name=Finkelstein66>Finkelstein, Norman. ''Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History'', University of California Press, 2005, p. 66.</ref> He argues that Israel's apologists have denied a causal relationship between Israeli policies and hostility toward Jews, since "if Israeli policies, and widespread Jewish support for them, evoke hostility toward Jews, it means that Israel and its Jewish supporters might themselves be causing anti-Semitism; and it might be doing so because Israel and its Jewish supporters are ''in the wrong''".<ref name=Finkelstein78>Finkelstein, Norman. ''Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History'', University of California Press, 2005, pp. 78–79.</ref>


], a British-Pakistani historian and political activist, argues that the concept of new antisemitism amounts to an attempt to subvert the language in the interests of the State of Israel. He writes that the campaign against "the supposed new 'anti-semitism{{'"}} in modern Europe is a "cynical ploy on the part of the Israeli Government to seal off the Zionist state from any criticism of its regular and consistent brutality against the Palestinians.... Criticism of Israel can not and should not be equated with anti-semitism." He argues that most pro-Palestinian, anti-Zionist groups that emerged after the ] were careful to observe the distinction between anti-Zionism and antisemitism.<ref>{{cite book|first1=Tariq|last1=Ali|title=Street Fighting Years: An Autobiography of the Sixties|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xZsoDwAAQBAJ|publisher=Verso Books|date=1 May 2018|isbn=978-1-78663-602-7|via=Google Books|page=43}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|first1=Anthony|last1=Julius|title=Trials of the Diaspora: A History of Anti-Semitism in England|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sHAVDAAAQBAJ|publisher=Oxford University Press|date=9 February 2012|isbn=978-0-19-960072-4|via=Google Books|page=525}}</ref>{{undue weight inline|reason=not an authority on this topic in any way - this is just a passing comment in his autobiography|date=January 2022}}
=== Cartoons described as anti-Semitic ===
The ''U.S. State Department report on Global Anti-Semitism''<ref name="State-1" /> describes the rise of anti-Semitic ]s in the Arab press and other media sources as a symptom of growing antisemitism: ], a ]ist associated with left-wing groups such as ] and ]. This work, published in one of Indymedia's websites, depicts a Jewish religious soldier as eager to "kill Palestinian kids for fun in the name of God".]]
<blockquote> Critics of Israel frequently use anti-Semitic cartoons depicting anti-Jewish images and caricatures to attack the State of Israel and its policies, as well as Jewish communities and others who support Israel. These media attacks can lack any pretext of balance or even factual basis and focus on the demonization of Israel. The United States is frequently included as a target of such attacks, which often assert that U.S. foreign policy is made in Israel or that Jews control the media and financial markets in the United States and the rest of the world. During the 2004 United States presidential campaign, the Arab press ran numerous cartoons closely identifying both of the major American political parties with Israel and with Israeli Prime Minister Sharon. </blockquote>


=== A third wave ===
One controversial cartoon was in the British daily, '']'', and depicted the ] ] sitting among bombed houses eating a baby while helicopters and tanks buzzed 'Vote Sharon'. The cartoon <ref> of the Dave Brown cartoon of Ariel Sharon as '']''. Accessed 7 Jan 2006.</ref>, drawn by Dave Brown and based on the painting '']'' by ], appeared whilst Sharon was seeking re-election in Israel and sparked a wave of protests from the Israeli embassy and Jewish human rights groups. Critics accused the cartoonist of incitement and anti-Semitism. "This cartoon conjures up the horrific medieval anti-Semitic ] and is more in keeping with the tradition of the Nazi paper ']'," lamented Rabbi Abraham Cooper, Associate Dean of the ]. <ref>]. ]' and Conjures Up 'Blood Libel' Canard"]. January 30, 2003. Accessed 9 Jan 2006.</ref> The ''Independent'''s editor and the cartoonist denied that the cartoon was anti-Semitic and claimed it was just "anti-Sharon", and the British ] ruled against the complaints, pointing to the fact that the same Goya painting had also been adapted to attack non-Jewish politicians.<ref>Byrne, Ciar. . May 22, 2003. Accessed 7 Jan 2006.</ref> The cartoon was selected as Cartoon Of The Year 2003 by the Political Cartoon Society.<ref>, Indymedia UK, 27 November 2003. Accessed 7 Jan 2006.</ref>
] argues that the new antisemitism{{spaced ndash}}what he calls "ideological antisemitism"{{spaced ndash}}has mutated out of religious and racial antisemitism.]]
Historian ] argues that the new antisemitism represents the third, or ideological, wave of antisemitism, the first two waves being ] and racial antisemitism.<ref name=LewisBrandeis>]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110908010822/http://hnn.us/blogs/entries/21832.html |date=2011-09-08 }}, ''The American Scholar'', Volume 75 No. 1, Winter 2006, pp. 25–36 The paper is based on a lecture delivered at ] on March 24, 2004.</ref>


Lewis defines antisemitism as a special case of prejudice, hatred, or persecution directed against people who are in some way different from the rest. According to Lewis, antisemitism is marked by two distinct features: Jews are judged according to a standard different from that applied to others, and they are accused of cosmic evil. He writes that what he calls the first wave of antisemitism arose with the advent of ] because of the Jews' rejection of ] as ]. The second wave, racial antisemitism, emerged in Spain when large numbers of Jews were forcibly ], and doubts about the sincerity of the converts led to ideas about the importance of "''la limpieza de sangre''", purity of blood.<ref name=LewisBrandeis />
== Reactions and responses ==
=== Position of the United States ===
On ], 2004, the US ] published its annual ''Report on Global Anti-Semitism''<ref name="State-1"/>, in accordance with Section 4 of PL 108-332. The report's summary says: "The increasing frequency and severity of anti-Semitic incidents since the start of the 21st century, particularly in Europe, has compelled the international community to focus on anti-Semitism with renewed vigor." "Four main sources" of the phenomenon were identified:
* "Traditional anti-Jewish prejudice that has pervaded Europe and some countries in other parts of the world for centuries. This includes ultra-nationalists and others who assert that the Jewish community controls governments, the media, international business, and the financial world."
* "Strong anti-Israel sentiment that crosses the line between objective criticism of Israeli policies and anti-Semitism."
* "Anti-Jewish sentiment expressed by some in Europe's growing Muslim population, based on longstanding antipathy toward both Israel and Jews, as well as Muslim opposition to developments in Israel and the occupied territories, and more recently in Iraq."
* "Criticism of both the United States and globalization that spills over to Israel, and to Jews in general who are identified with both."


He associates the third wave with the ] and writes that it arose only in part because of the establishment of the State of Israel. Until the 19th century, ]s had regarded Jews with what Lewis calls "amused, tolerant superiority{{spaced ndash}}they were seen as physically weak, cowardly and unmilitary{{spaced ndash}}and although Jews living in Muslim countries were not treated as equals, they were shown a certain amount of respect. The Western form of antisemitism{{spaced ndash}}what Lewis calls "the cosmic, ]ic version of Jew hatred{{spaced ndash}}arrived in the Middle East in several stages, beginning with ] in the 19th century and continued to grow slowly into the 20th century up to the establishment of the ]. He writes that it increased because of the humiliation of the Israeli military victories of ] and ].<ref name=LewisBrandeis />
The report contains major incidents, trends and actions taken around the world in the period between ], 2003 and ], 2004.


Into this mix entered the ]. Lewis argues that the international public response and the United Nations' handling of the 1948 refugee situation convinced the Arab world that discrimination against Jews was acceptable. When the ancient Jewish community in ] was ], they were offered no help. Similarly, when Jewish refugees ], no help was offered, but elaborate arrangements were made for Arabs who fled or were driven out of the area that became Israel. All the Arab governments involved in the conflict announced that they would not admit Israelis of any religion into their territories, and that they would not give visas to Jews, no matter which country they were citizens of. Lewis argues that the failure of the United Nations to protest sent a clear message to the Arab world.<ref name=LewisBrandeis />
On ], 2004, at the OSCE Conference on Anti-Semitism in Berlin, then ] ] explained, "It is not anti-Semitic to criticize the policies of the state of Israel, but the line is crossed when Israel or its leaders are demonized or vilified, for example by the use of Nazi symbols and racist caricatures." <ref>, posted April 29, 2004. U.S. Department of State. Accessed 9 Jan 2006.</ref>


He writes that this third wave of antisemitism has in common with the first wave that Jews are able to be part of it. With religious antisemitism, Jews were able to distance themselves from Judaism, and Lewis writes that some even reached high rank within the church and the ]. With racial antisemitism, this was not possible, but with the new, ideological, antisemitism, Jews are once again able to join the critics. The new antisemitism also allows non-Jews, he argues, to criticize or attack Jews without feeling overshadowed by the crimes of the Nazis.<ref name=LewisBrandeis />
On September 13, 2004, the ]'s ] (OCR) established for the first time that it is the policy of OCR to investigate claims of anti-Semitic harassment at institutions that receive federal educational funding. <ref>. Letter of Deputy Assistant Secretary of Education for Enforcement Kenneth L. Marcus, Delegated the Authority of ], September 13, 2004. Accessed March 6 2006.</ref> OCR continued to clarify and publicize this new approach throughout 2004. <ref> . Accessed March 6, 2006.</ref>


=== Position of the European Union === === Antisemitism, but not a new phenomenon ===
] argues that "new" antisemitism is not actually new.]]
Groups monitoring ] and violence in the ] have noted an upswing in attacks on Jewish people and Jewish institutions in many European countries.<ref name="State-1"/> The Interior Minister of ] has announced that the number of ] attacks in France in ] is more than double that of the same period in ].<ref name="Bryant">Bryant, Elizabeth. , Religion News Service. Accessed March 6, 2006.</ref>
], professor of ] at the ], considers the concept "new antisemitism" false, describing the phenomenon as old, latent antisemitism that recurs when triggered. In his view, the current trigger is the Israeli situation, and if a compromise were achieved there antisemitism would decline but not disappear.<ref name="HatesRevival">{{cite journal
|url=http://www.aijac.org.au/news/article/hate-s-revival
|journal=Australia/Israel Review
|publisher=]
|date=May 2007
|title=Hate's Revival
|author=Tzvi Fleischer
}}</ref>


Dina Porat, professor at ] says that, while in principle there is no new antisemitism, we can speak of antisemitism in a new envelope. Otherwise Porat speaks of a new and violent form of antisemitism in Western Europe starting after the ].<ref name="HatesRevival" />
In September ], The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance, a part of the ], called on its member nations to "ensure that criminal law in the field of combating racism covers anti-Semitism" and to penalize intentional acts of public incitement to violence, hatred or discrimination, public insults and defamation, threats against a person or group, and the expression of anti-Semitic ideologies. It urged member nations to "prosecute people who deny, trivialize or justify the Holocaust". The report said it was Europe's "duty to remember the past by remaining vigilant and actively opposing any manifestations of racism, ], anti-Semitism and intolerance... Anti-Semitism is not a phenomenon of the past and... the slogan 'never again' is as relevant today as it was 60 years ago."


], a British novelist and journalist, calls this phenomenon "Jew-hating pure and simple, the Jew-hating which many of us have always suspected was the only explanation for the disgust that contorts and disfigures faces when the mere word Israel crops up in conversation."<ref>{{cite web| last = Fulford| first = Robert| title = When criticizing Israel becomes ritual| publisher = nationalpost.com| date = 2009-08-15| url = https://nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=686c1928-3518-472c-b2d6-60e15f81e140| archive-url = https://archive.today/20120912182353/http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=686c1928-3518-472c-b2d6-60e15f81e140| url-status = dead| archive-date = 2012-09-12| access-date = 2009-08-15}}</ref>
=== Position of the United Nations ===
A number of groups and writers have expressed the view that the ] has condoned and encouraged anti-Semitism. <ref>, UN Watch, February 1998 (originally published December 1997). Accessed March 6, 2005.</ref>


=== An inappropriate redefinition ===
], a ] human rights activist, addressed the UN specifically on this matter in her capacity as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists:
], writing in the Israeli newspaper '']'' in September 2008, argues that the concept of a "new antisemitism" has brought about "a revolutionary change in the discourse about anti-Semitism". He writes that most contemporary discussions concerning antisemitism have become focused on issues concerning Israel and Zionism, and that the equation of anti-Zionism with antisemitism has become for many a "new orthodoxy". He adds that this redefinition has often resulted in "Jews attacking other Jews for their alleged anti-Semitic anti-Zionism". While Lerman accepts that exposing alleged Jewish antisemitism is "legitimate in principle", he adds that the growing literature in this field "exceeds all reason"; the attacks are often vitriolic, and encompass views that are not inherently anti-Zionist.


Lerman argues that this redefinition has had unfortunate repercussions. He writes that serious scholarly research into contemporary antisemitism has become "virtually non-existent", and that the subject is now most frequently studied and analyzed by "people lacking any serious expertise in the subject, whose principal aim is to excoriate Jewish critics of Israel and to promote the "anti-Zionism = anti-Semitism" equation. Lerman concludes that this redefinition has ultimately served to stifle legitimate discussion, and that it cannot create a basis on which to fight antisemitism.<ref>, ''Ha'aretz'', 12 September 2008, accessed 13 September 2008.</ref>
<blockquote>At the U.N., the language of human rights is hijacked not only to discriminate but to demonize the Jewish target. More than one quarter of the resolutions condemning a state's human rights violations adopted by the commission over 40 years have been directed at Israel. But there has never been a single resolution about the decades-long repression of the civil and political rights of 1.3 billion people in ], or the million female migrant workers in ] kept as virtual slaves, or the virulent racism which has brought 600,000 people to the brink of starvation in ]. Every year, U.N. bodies are required to produce at least 25 reports on alleged human rights violations by Israel, but not one on an ]ian criminal justice system which mandates punishments like ], ] and ] of right hand and left foot. This is not legitimate critique of states with equal or worse human rights records. It is demonization of the Jewish state... <ref>]. , '']'', June 21, 2004. Accessed 9 Jan 2006.</ref></blockquote>


Peter Beaumont, writing in '']'', agrees that proponents of the concept of "new antisemitism" have attempted to co-opt anti-Jewish sentiment and attacks by some European Muslims as a way to silence opposition to the policies of the Israeli government. "riticise Israel," he writes, "and you are an anti-Semite just as surely as if you were throwing paint at a ] in ]."<ref name=beaumont>Beaumont, Peter. , ''The Observer'', February 17, 2002.</ref>
According to ], the president of ], "The United Nations-sponsored World Conference on Racism &mdash; while failing to mention human rights abuses in China, ], or anyplace in the ] world &mdash; spoke of Israel's policies prior to recent struggles under the ] government as constituting ] and ]. The NGO declaration at the same conference was even more virulent." <ref>] , September 17, 2002. On the site of ]. Accessed 9 Jan 2006.</ref>


=== Antisemitic anti-Zionism ===
David Matas, senior counsel to ], has argued that "ather than being a haven from antisemitism, the United Nations has become a forum for antisemitism" and that "or many organs of the United Nations, anti-Israel denunciation has become the principle item of business." <ref name=Matas>Matas, David. ''Anti-Zionism and Anti-Semitism''. Dundurn Press, Toronto, 2005, pp. 129-144. ISBN 1550025538</ref>
Scholars including ], ], ], ] and ] have described a distinctively 21st century form of antisemitic anti-Zionism characterized by left-wing hostility to Jews.<ref name="Bergmann">{{cite book|last1=Pelinka|first1=Anton|title=Handbook of Prejudice. Chapter on Anti-Semitism by Werner Bergmann|date=2009|publisher=Cambria Press|isbn=978-1-60497-627-4|page=56|display-authors=etal}}</ref><ref name="Schama">{{cite news|last1=Schama|first1=Simon|title=The left's problem with Jews has a long and miserable history|url=http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/d6a75c3c-d6f3-11e5-829b-8564e7528e54.html#axzz41CoraTzu|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221211141210/https://www.ft.com/content/d6a75c3c-d6f3-11e5-829b-8564e7528e54#axzz41CoraTzu|archive-date=11 December 2022|url-access=subscription|access-date=26 February 2016|work=]|date=19 February 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="HirshEmbracingPrejudice">{{cite news|last1=Hirsh|first1=David|title=Openly Embraing Prejudice|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2006/nov/30/anewmenacingcurrentisappe|access-date=6 March 2016|work=]|date=30 November 2006}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Julius|first1=Anthony| author-link = Anthony Julius |title=Trials of the Diaspora: A History of Anti-Semitism in England|title-link=Trials of the Diaspora: A History of Anti-Semitism in England|date=2010|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-929705-4|page=476}}</ref><ref name="Johnson">{{cite news|last1=Johnson|first1=Alan|author-link1=Alan Johnson (political theorist)|title=The Left and the Jews: Time for a Rethink|url=http://fathomjournal.org/the-left-and-the-jews-time-for-a-rethink/|access-date=26 February 2016|work=Fathom|date=Fall 2015}}</ref> According to historian ], opposition to Zionism (being against a Jewish state) can be legitimately described as racist in essence.<ref>{{cite news|last=Alderman|first=Geoffrey|author-link=Geoffrey Alderman|url=http://www.thejc.com/comment-and-debate/columnists/90023/why-anti-zionists-are-racists|title=Why anti-Zionists are racists|work=]|date=November 8, 2012|access-date=June 8, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160705045947/http://www.thejc.com/comment-and-debate/columnists/90023/why-anti-zionists-are-racists|archive-date=July 5, 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.jewishjournal.com/opinion/article/formula_could_combat_campus_racism_20050610 |title=Formula Could Combat Campus Racism |work=Jewish Weekly |date=June 5, 2005 |access-date=June 8, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160829030800/http://www.jewishjournal.com/opinion/article/formula_could_combat_campus_racism_20050610 |archive-date=August 29, 2016 |url-status=live }}</ref>


] describes the ] movement as failing all of ]'s 3D's, since the movement delegitimizes Israel, demonizes Israel, and applies double standards for criticizing Israel out of proportion to other nations, ignoring other countries' misdeeds.<ref name="Saying no to Hate">{{cite book |last=Finkelstein |first=Norman H. |title=Saying No to Hate |date=2024 |publisher=U of Nebraska Press |isbn=978-0-8276-1523-6 |page=199}}</ref>
While in the early years of its existence, the ] focused only on themes, once it shifted its focus to countries, it targeted only ] and Israel, and for six years, from 1969 until 1975 when ] was added, those two countries were the only two the Commission would consider. For the last 40 years, almost 30 percent of country-specific resolutions and 15 percent of the Commission's time has been directed against Israel. <ref>]. "The UN and the Jews", ''Commentary Magazine'', February 2004 </ref> During its annual six-week session in 2002, the Commission spent half its time on Israel, more than it spent on all the other countries in the world combined. <ref name=Matas/>


In 2024, over 1000 entertainers, authors and artists signed an open letter, released by the non-profit Creative Community for Peace (CCFP), opposing boycotts of Israeli and Jewish authors and literary institutions. The letter decried efforts to "demonize and ostracize Jewish authors across the globe".<ref name="y441">{{cite web |last=Kaloi |first=Stephanie |date=2024-10-31 |title=David Mamet, Diane Warren and Debra Messing Among 1000+ Entertainers and Artists to Oppose Israel Boycotts in Open Letter |url=https://www.thewrap.com/david-mamet-diane-warren-and-debra-messing-among-oppose-israel-boycotts-in-open-letter/ |access-date=2024-11-14 |website=TheWrap}}</ref>
Matas argues that the "invective against Israel by far exceeds the language used against other countries with much worse violations." <ref name=Matas/> For example, in 1989, a Commission resolution about alleged human-rights abuses in Israel "noted with several disapproval," using phrases like "strongly condemns," "deplores," "inhuman treatment," "terror," and "flagrant violation of human rights," while in the same year, a resolution against ], at the height of its civil war when disappearance and arbitrary execution were common, noted only that the Commission was "seriously concerned," and one against ], also in 1989 during the reign of the ], warranted only "deep concern." <ref name=Matas/>


In fall 2024, campus protests using chants such as "Divest!" and "Ceasefire now!" reportedly evolved in a direction more explicitly endorsing Hamas, Hezbollah, and Houthis.<ref name="v962">{{cite web |last=Otterman |first=Sharon |date=2024-10-09 |title=Pro-Palestinian Group at Columbia Now Backs ‘Armed Resistance’ by Hamas |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/09/nyregion/columbia-pro-palestinian-group-hamas.html |access-date=2024-11-17 |website=The New York Times}}</ref> Some protesters used slogans such as "Glory to the resistance!", called the October 7 attacks "Al-Aqsa flood", celebrated ], and used the Hamas inverted red triangle.<ref name="b616">{{cite web |last=Meckler |first=Laura |last2=Svrluga |first2=Susan |date=2024-11-10 |title=Pro-Hamas messages intensify on college campuses |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2024/11/10/pro-hamas-protesters-college-campuses/ |access-date=2024-11-17 |website=Washington Post}}</ref> Jewish students were called "baby killers" and "terrorists", according to a Baruch College student.<ref name="b616" />
According to Matas, "tatements are made within UN precincts that would not have been tolerated within any democratic parliament," citing the example of the Palestinian representative to the Commission who, in an echo of the traditional ], claimed in 1997 that Israeli doctors had injected Palestinian children with the ] virus. <ref name=Matas/> Congressman ] told the ] in 2005 that " took several months to correct in its record a statement by the ]n ambassador that Jews allegedly had killed non-Jewish children to make ] for ]. <ref>, June 17, 2005. Accessed March 6, 2006.</ref>


In November 2024, hundreds of posters depicting Jewish faculty members as "wanted" were spread across the ] campus. The posters accused Jewish faculty members of ethnic cleansing, racism, hate speech, and intimidation. University President Sarah Mangelsdorf called the incident an act of antisemitism.<ref name="k874">{{cite web |last=Marbury |first=Justice |last2=Nguyen |first2=Thao |date=2024-11-14 |title='Wanted' posters target Jewish faculty at University of Rochester |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/11/13/posters-university-of-rochester-jewish-faculty/76268943007/ |access-date=2024-11-17 |website=USA TODAY}}</ref>
The General Assembly is also criticized for its focus on Israel. There are currently around 250 Security Council resolutions and 1,000 General Assembly resolutions on Israel. Of the ten emergency special sessions the Assembly has held, six have been about Israel, and the tenth session, opened in 1997, was reconvened 13 times between then and August 2004.


== International perspectives ==
United Nations Secretary General ] himself has said that "t sometimes seems as if the United Nations serves all the world's peoples but one: the Jews." <ref>"Actually the world is wrong," ''National Post'', April 11, 2002</ref> He has called the 1975 General Assembly resolution equating Zionism with racism, not repealed until 1991, "lamentable," saying that "its negative resonance even today is difficult to overestimate." <ref name=Matas/>
{{Globalize|date=November 2012}}


=== Europe ===
On ], ], Annan told a seminar on anti-Semitism: "It is hard to believe that 60 years after the tragedy of the Holocaust, anti-Semitism is once again rearing its head. But it is clear that we are witnessing an alarming resurgence of these phenomena in new forms and manifestations. This time the world must not, cannot, be silent." He asked UN member states to adopt a resolution to fight anti-Semitism, and stated that the Commission on Human Rights must study and expose anti-Semitism in the same way that it fights bias against ]. Annan asked: "Are not Jews entitled to the same degree of concern and protection?" <ref name="Annan">]. , ''The UN Chronicle''. Accessed Mar 6, 2006.</ref>
The European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) (superseded in 2007 by the ]) noted an upswing in antisemitic incidents in France, Germany, Austria, Sweden, the United Kingdom, Belgium, and The Netherlands between July 2003 and December 2004.<ref name=State>"(U.S.) State Department report on Anti-Semitism: Europe and Eurasia" excerpted from a longer piece, and covering the period of July 1, 2003 – December 15, 2004.</ref> In September 2004, the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance, a part of the ], called on its member nations to ensure that anti-racist criminal law covers antisemitism, and in 2005, the EUMC offered a discussion paper on a ] in an attempt to enable a standard definition to be used for data collection:<ref>Whine, Michael. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220226131202/https://www.jcpa.org/phas/phas-041-whine.htm |date=2022-02-26 }}, ''Post-Holocaust and Anti-Semitism'', Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, February 1, 2006.</ref> It defined antisemitism as "a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred towards Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed towards Jews and non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, towards Jewish community institutions and religious facilities." The paper's “Examples of the ways in which anti-Semitism manifests itself with regard to the state of Israel taking into account the overall context could include":
* Denying the Jewish people the right to self-determination, e.g. by claiming that the existence of a state of Israel is a racist endeavor;
* Applying double standards by requiring of Israel a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation;
* Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g. claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis;
* Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
* Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the State of Israel.<ref name=workingdef> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110125001633/http://fra.europa.eu/fraWebsite/material/pub/AS/AS-WorkingDefinition-draft.pdf |date=2011-01-25 }}, EUMC.</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Working Definition of Antisemitism |url=http://fra.europa.eu/fraWebsite/material/pub/AS/AS-WorkingDefinition-draft.pdf |publisher=European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights |access-date=23 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110304162430/http://www.fra.europa.eu/fraWebsite/material/pub/AS/AS-WorkingDefinition-draft.pdf |archive-date=4 March 2011 |url-status=dead }}</ref>


The EUMC added that criticism of Israel cannot be regarded as antisemitism so long as it is "similar to that leveled against any other country."<ref name=workingdef />
In 2005, the ] passed, by a vote of 405 to 2, the United Nations Reform Act of 2005, <ref>, Library of Congress. Accessed March 6, 2006</ref> which insists that the United Nations must:
* require all employees of the United Nations and its specialized agencies to officially and publicly condemn anti-Semitic statements made at any session of the United Nations or its specialized agencies, or at any other session sponsored by the United Nations;
* require employees of the United Nations and its specialized agencies to be subject to punitive action, including immediate dismissal, for making anti-Semitic statements or references;
* propose specific recommendations to the General Assembly for the establishment of mechanisms to hold accountable employees and officials of the United Nations and its specialized agencies, or Member States, that make such anti-Semitic statements or references in any forum of the United Nations or of its specialized agencies; and
*develop and implement education awareness programs about the Holocaust and anti-Semitism throughout the world, as part of an effort to combat intolerance and hatred.


The discussion paper was never adopted by the EU as a working definition, although it was posted on the EUMC website until 2013 when it was removed during a clear-out of non-official documents.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wiesenthal.com/site/apps/nlnet/content.aspx?c=lsKWLbPJLnF&b=8776547&ct=13381863 |title=SWC to EU Baroness Ashton: "Return Anti-Semitism Definition Document to EU Fundamental Rights Agency Website" &#124; Simon Wiesenthal Center |website=Wiesenthal.com |date=2013-11-06 |access-date=2016-02-17 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160301080434/http://www.wiesenthal.com/site/apps/nlnet/content.aspx?c=lsKWLbPJLnF&b=8776547&ct=13381863 |archive-date=2016-03-01 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name=ToI>{{cite news|title=EU drops its 'working definition' of anti-Semitism|url=http://www.timesofisrael.com/eu-drops-its-working-definition-of-anti-semitism/|access-date=2014-01-24|newspaper=Times of Israel}}</ref>
==Country-specific incidents==
=== Incidents in the United Kingdom ===
Since 2001, the ], an organization that records anti-Semitic attacks in ], has recorded a sharp increase in incidents. <ref>2004 Community Security Trust Antisemitic Incidents Report.</ref> The 532 incidents recorded in 2004 include verbal abuse, vandalism, desecration of property, including synagogues and cemeteries, abusive literature, threats, and physical violence. Police believe this mostly reflects improved reporting of incidents. <ref name="BBC-crime"> , BBC News, 11 February 2005. Accessed 7 Jan 2006.</ref> The CST say around 120 of these attacks were directly linked to tension in the Israel-Palestine conflict <ref name="BBC-crime" /> with peaks noted, for example, at the time the ] were involved in battles in the ] refugee camp.


==== France ====
One hundred synagogues have been desecrated, including set on fire, since 2000; 68 gravestones were desecrated in the Jewish section of a cemetery in Middlesbrough; and there has been a rise in the number of Islamic bookshops selling anti-Semitic books, such as ''Mein Kampf''. <ref name=Gable/>
{{Main|Antisemitism in 21st-century France}}


In France, Interior Minister ] commissioned a report on racism and antisemitism from ], president of ] and former vice-president of ], in which Rufin challenges the perception that the new antisemitism in France comes exclusively from ]n immigrant communities and the ].<ref name=BBCnas>, BBC News, October 2004.</ref><ref name=statefrance>, U.S. Department of State.</ref>
Attacks on Jewish and Israeli students were also recorded. Jewish organizations say that ] groups are active on university campuses, where militant Muslim students arrange conferences and protests against Israeli and Jewish organizations.


Reporting in October 2004, Rufin writes that "he new anti-Semitism appears more heterogeneous," and identifies what he calls a new and "subtle" form of antisemitism in "radical anti-Zionism" as expressed by far-left and anti-globalization groups, in which criticism of Jews and Israel is used as a pretext to "legitimize the armed Palestinian conflict."<ref name=Rufin>]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090327180811/http://lesrapports.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/BRP/044000500/0000.pdf |date=2009-03-27 }}, presented to the French Ministry of the Interior, October 19, 2004.</ref><ref name=bryant>Bryant, Elizabeth. "," United Press International, October 20, 2004.</ref>
;National Union of Students


==== United Kingdom ====
There are concerns that the support for ] within some left-wing students' and academic unions may enable anti-Semitism to pass unchallenged. Luciana Berger, a ] student, former ] (NUS) National Executive Committee member, and co-convener of the NUS Anti-Racism/ Anti-Fascism Campaign, resigned from her post along with two other NUS officials after anti-Semitic leaflets were distributed at NUS conference.<ref>Curtis, Polly. , '']'', April 12, 2005. Accessed 7 Jan 2006.</ref> She told ''The Guardian'':
In June 2011, Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom, ] (Lord Sacks), said that the basis for the new antisemitism was the 2001 ]. Rabbi Sacks also said that the new antisemitism "unites radical Islamists with human-rights NGOs{{spaced ndash}}the right wing and the left wing{{spaced ndash}}against a common enemy, the State of Israel."<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.jewishjournal.com/at_home_abroad/item/uk_chief_rabbi_jonathan_sacks_the_new_anti-semitism_is_a_virus_20110622/|title=UK Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks: "The New Anti-Semitism is a Virus"}}</ref>


In September 2006, the ] of the ] published the Report of the All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Antisemitism, the result of an investigation into whether the belief that the "prevailing opinion both within the Jewish community and beyond" that antisemitism had "receded to the point that it existed only on the margins of society." was correct. It concluded that "the evidence we received indicates that there has been a reversal of this progress since the year 2000". In defining antisemitism, the Group wrote that it took into account the view of racism expressed by the MacPherson report, which was published after the murder of ], that, for the purpose of investigating and recording complaints of crime by the police, an act must be recorded by the police as racist if it is defined as such by its victim. It formed the view that, broadly, "any remark, insult or act the purpose or effect of which is to violate a Jewish person's dignity or create an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for him is antisemitic" and concluded that, given that, "it is the Jewish community itself that is best qualified to determine what does and does not constitute antisemitism."<ref name=APP1> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130822190807/http://www.antisemitism.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/All-Party-Parliamentary-Inquiry-into-Antisemitism-REPORT.pdf |date=2013-08-22 }}, September 2006, p. 1.</ref>
<blockquote>Almost half a year ago, serious complaints were lodged about anti-semitic comments made by an NUS member in a public meeting. These complaints were ignored, with no official response or action. A few months ago, when it was (incorrectly) rumoured that I, a Jewish student, was standing for the NUS presidency, anti-semitic whispers rocked the NUS. And ] members failed to condemn a comment made recently at the SOAS Students' Union in London that burning down a synagogue is a rational act.<ref>Berger, Luciana. . '']'', April 15, 2005. Accessed 7 Jan 2006.</ref></blockquote>


The report states that some left-wing activists and Muslim extremists are using criticism of Israel as a "pretext" for antisemitism,<ref name=Temko>Temko, Ned. , ''The Observer'', February 3, 2006.</ref> and that the "most worrying discovery" is that antisemitism appears to be entering the mainstream.<ref name=BBCreport>, BBC News, September 6, 2006.</ref> It argues that anti-Zionism may become antisemitic when it adopts a view of Zionism as a "global force of unlimited power and malevolence throughout history," a definition that "bears no relation to the understanding that most Jews have of the concept: that is, a movement of Jewish national liberation ..." Having re-defined Zionism, the report states, traditional antisemitic motifs of Jewish "conspiratorial power, manipulation and subversion" are often transferred from Jews onto Zionism. The report notes that this is "at the core of the 'New Antisemitism', on which so much has been written," adding that many of those who gave evidence called anti-Zionism "the '']'' of antisemitic movements."<ref name=APP22> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130822190807/http://www.antisemitism.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/All-Party-Parliamentary-Inquiry-into-Antisemitism-REPORT.pdf |date=2013-08-22 }}, September 2006, p. 22.</ref>
In September 2005 an independent report commissioned in the wake of the resignations<ref>Curtis, Polly. . '']'', May 20, 2005. Accessed 7 Jan 2006.</ref> after having cleared the NUS of allegations of anti-semitism concluded ''"Having looked at the background to the incidents there were clearly occasions when matters could have been dealt with more quickly, or more efficiently, but do not demonstrate apathy to anti-semitism."'' The report from ] consultant Marco Henry criticized NUS as being slow to react to criticism and also that it should develop procedures for dealing with allegations of discrimination.<ref>Curtis, Polly. . '']'', September 20, 2005. Accessed 7 Jan 2006.</ref>


=== Israel ===
;Academic Boycott of Israel
In November 2001 according to the Israeli Ministry of Diaspora Affairs, in response to an Abu-Dhabi television broadcast depicting ] drinking the blood of Palestinian children, the ] set up the "Coordinating Forum for Countering Antisemitism", headed by Deputy Foreign Minister Rabbi ]. According to Melchior, "in each and every generation antisemitism tries to hide its ugly face behind various disguises{{spaced ndash}}and hatred of the State of Israel is its current disguise." He added that, "hate against Israel has crossed the red line, having gone from criticism to unbridled antisemitic venom, which is a precise translation of classical antisemitism whose past results are all too familiar to the entire world."<ref>, November 18, 2001.</ref>


=== United Nations ===
At the same time that the above allegations about NUS were made, some Israeli academics were facing a boycott by the ] <ref>, BBC News, 22 April 2005. Accessed 7 Jan 2006.</ref><ref>Curtis, Polly & Taylor, Matthew. . '']'', May 24, 2005. Accessed 7 Jan 2006.</ref> The academic boycott was at the behest of nearly sixty Palestinian groups <ref>, on the site of the British Committee for the Universities of Palestine. Accessed 7 Jan 2006.</ref> and, in line with that call, contained an exemption for "any conscientious Israeli academics and intellectuals opposed to their state's colonial and racist policies". The motions passed at AUT conference called for a boycott of the universities of ] (due to alleged mistreatment of ]) and ] (for awarding degrees to students from the ], based in the ] ]). This was seen by many on both sides as the first step to a wider boycott being pushed by the proponents <ref name="kidz">]. , '']'', 1 May 2005. Accessed 7 Jan 2006.</ref>
{{See also|Israel and the United Nations}}
A number of commentators argue that the ] has condoned antisemitism. ], then-president of ], wrote that the UN's World Conference on Racism failed to condemn human rights abuses in China, Rwanda, or anywhere in the Arab world, while raising Israel's alleged ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.<ref>] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041010174207/http://president.harvard.edu/speeches/2002/morningprayers.html |date=2004-10-10 }}, September 17, 2002. On the site of ], accessed January 9, 2006.</ref>


], senior counsel to ] Canada, has written that the UN is a forum for antisemitism, citing the example of the Palestinian representative to the UN ] who claimed in 1997 that Israeli doctors had injected Palestinian children with the ] virus.<ref name=Matas>Matas, David. ''Anti-Zionism and Anti-Semitism''. Dundurn Press, Toronto, 2005, pp. 129–144.</ref> Congressman ] told the U.S. ] in 2005 that the commission took "several months to correct in its record a statement by the ]n ambassador that Jews allegedly had killed non-Jewish children to make ] for ].<ref>, June 17, 2005. Accessed March 6, 2006.</ref>
The boycott was overturned at an emergency conference held on ] ]. Reasons cited for the decision were: the damage to academic freedom, the hampering of dialogue and peace effort between Israelis and Palestinian, and that boycotting Israel alone would be bigotry. The boycott was described as antisemitic by some groups and individuals <ref name="kidz"/>, most prominently the ''Engage'' group <ref>, Engage on line, accessed 7 Jan 2006.</ref> while there was also much opposition to the boycott on other grounds such as damaging academic freedom or being counterproductive <ref>]. , '']'', 17 May 2005. Accessed 7 Jan 2006.</ref>. Others defended the boycott and rejected accusations of anti-Semitism.<ref>, attributed to "Yehudith Harel and an Israeli lawyer". ''Occupation'' magazine, 17 June 2005. Accessed 7 Jan 2006. An abbreviated and edited version of the article appeared in the '']''.</ref><ref>Blackwell, Sue. (]), ''The Muslim News'', 24 June 2005. Accessed 7 Jan 2006.</ref>


], a Canadian legal scholar who addressed the UN about its treatment of Israel, argues that the UN hijacks the language of human rights to discriminate and demonize Jews. She writes that over one quarter of the resolutions condemning a state's human rights violations have been directed at Israel. "But there has never been a single resolution about the decades-long repression of the civil and political rights of 1.3 billion people in ], or the million female migrant workers in ] kept as virtual slaves, or the virulent racism which has brought 600,000 people to the brink of starvation in ]."<ref>]. , '']'' ], June 21, 2004, accessed January 9, 2006.</ref>
;Ken Livingstone


In a 2008 report on antisemitism from the ] to the US Congress,<ref>{{cite web| last = Rickman| first = Gregg J.| title = Contemporary global anti-semitism| publisher = USDOS| year = 2008| url = https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/102301.pdf| access-date = 2008-03-27}}</ref>
Journalists and Jewish groups also protested against ]'s controversial mayor ] for meeting with controversial Muslim scholar and preacher ], who has supported Palestinian ]s against Israeli military targets.<ref>, ], 11 January 2005. Accessed 8 Jan 2006.</ref><ref>, Islam Online, January 11, 2005. Accessed 8 Jan 2006.</ref><ref> , ], 8 July 2004. Accessed 8 Jan 2006.</ref>
<blockquote>Motives for criticizing Israel in the UN may stem from legitimate concerns over policy or from illegitimate prejudices. ... However, regardless of the intent, disproportionate criticism of Israel as barbaric and unprincipled, and corresponding discriminatory measures adopted in the UN against Israel, have the effect of causing audiences to associate negative attributes with Jews in general, thus fueling anti-Semitism.</blockquote>


=== United States ===
;George Galloway
]


In September 2006, ] announced that it had established ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://isgap.org/|title=ISGAP|website=isgap.org}}</ref> the first university-based institute in North America dedicated to the study of antisemitism. Charles Small, head of the institute, said in a press release that antisemitism has "reemerged internationally in a manner that many leading scholars and policy makers take seriously ... Increasingly, Jewish communities around the world feel under threat. It's almost like going back into the lab. I think we need to understand the current manifestation of this disease."<ref>, ''Associated Press'', September 19, 2006; also see ] & ] "Anti-Israel sentiment predicts anti-Semitism in Europe," ''Journal of Conflict Resolution'', Vol 50, No. 4, 548–561, August 2006.</ref>
Also, during the ], the election for the constituency of ] in ]'s most heavily ] district was tainted by incidents of tyre-slashing and vicious verbal assaults on the incumbent ] candidate ], who is half ] (from a U.S. emigrant) and half-Jewish. King's support for the war in Iraq, which was unpopular with many British voters and with Muslims in particular, may also have been instrumental in her unseating by ], candidate for the new, anti-war ] Party. According to BBC News online "Ms King ratcheted up the tension when she accused Mr Galloway's supporters of anti-Semitism following an egg-throwing at a memorial to Jewish war dead". Former Labour MP ] accused Galloway of exploiting racial politics to win the seat, which Galloway denied (although he stood by a statement he had made during the campaign that King "had been responsible for the deaths of many people in Iraq with blacker faces than hers".<ref>, ], 6 May 2005. Accessed 9 Jan 2006.</ref>
YIISA has presented several seminars and working papers on the topic, for instance "The Academic and Public Debate Over the Meaning of the 'New Antisemitism{{'"}}.<ref>.</ref>


In July 2006, the ] issued a Campus Antisemitism report that declared that "Anti-Semitic bigotry is no less morally deplorable when camouflaged as anti-Israelism or anti-Zionism."<ref>U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Campus Anti-Semitism (2006) at 72.</ref> At the time, the commission also announced that antisemitism is a "serious problem" on many campuses throughout the United States.<ref>''Id.''</ref>
=== Incidents in France ===
In October ] there was a dramatic increase of antisemitic attacks and incitement against Jews in ]. The French police and Jewish community organizations recorded hundreds of antisemitic incidents in Fall 2000 compared to less then ten per month during the late 90's. Even though the number of incidents decreased in the first half of 2001, the number of antisemitic remained very high compared to previous years. The records show especially high numbers of incidents in April 2002, in March/April 2003 and, to a lesser extent, in September/October 2001. These incidents seem to be in part a reaction to international events such as the beginning of the ], the war against the ] in ], the upcoming war in ] and different events of the ], the later refuted allegation of the ] in April 2002. Nevertheless, the attacks against Jews in France seem to have become more and more 'independent' from current international events suggesting domestic roots of antisemitic sentiments. The majority of antisemitic incidents were recorded in the suburban ] and poor inner-city neighborhoods of major cities such as Paris, Lyon and Marseille.<ref name="State-1"/>
<!--]-->
Manifestations of hatred toward Israelis and Jews could be found among radical Islamists taking part in ] in ], which were often used as a stage for burning ] and chanting anti-Israeli and anti-Jewish slogans. While only a minority of protesters engaged in such activities, they were well-publicized. In one event, several activists from the Zionist-socialist ] ] were attacked by the protesters, promoting harsh criticism from ], who said to '']''
<blockquote>I felt we should stop putting our head in the sand, saying that these are only fringe effects and therefore 'none of our concern', which leads us to just condemn them and do nothing more... They explained to me that the slogan 'Bush and Sharon are murderers' is not antisemitism but anti-Zionism. But for me, when you burn the flag of Israel, it is antisemitism. The meaning is the delegitimation of Israel's right to exist<ref>Handler, Sefi. , '']'', 18 April 2003. Accessed 9 Jan 2006. Partially translated at http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Left-wing_politics/Archive3. <!--Someone who knows Hebrew needs to flesh out, and verify, this citation. In particular, please add article title in Hebrew. --></ref> </blockquote>
She later wrote an article to '']'', blaming the French left-wing for turning a blind eye to anti-Semitism that seem to plague their own camp.


The U.S. State Department's 2004 ''Report on Global Anti-Semitism'' identified four sources of rising antisemitism, particularly in Europe:
In the ], crime and insecurity were the leading topic and the media focused on a number of incidents, especially those where youth from Muslim immigrant communities were involved. Anti-semitic crime was brought to attention as part of a general perceived or real inflation of crimes committed by such youth.
* "Traditional anti-Jewish prejudice... This includes ultra-nationalists and others who assert that the Jewish community controls governments, the media, international business, and the financial world."
* "Strong anti-Israel sentiment that crosses the line between objective criticism of Israeli policies and anti-Semitism."
* "Anti-Jewish sentiment expressed by some in Europe's growing Muslim population, based on longstanding antipathy toward both Israel and Jews, as well as Muslim opposition to developments in Israel and the occupied territories, and more recently in Iraq."
* "Criticism of both the United States and globalization that spills over to Israel, and to Jews in general who are identified with both."<ref name=State />


== Anti-globalization movement ==
Though the French authorities vocally condemned antisemitism and took measures to combat the phenomenon, the number of attacks only increased. According to the ], there were 970 antisemitic incidents in ], as compared to 601 incidents in ].<ref> <span dir="ltr">21</span> March 2005. Accessed 9 March 2006. <!--http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART/886/208.htmlדוח: צרפת - חממה לאנטישמיות ושנאת זרים Someone who knows Hebrew needs to flesh out, and verify, this citation. In particular, please verify article title in Hebrew, provide an English translation, and indicate what publication this comes from. --></ref>
The anti-globalization movement of the late 1990s and early 2000s was accused by writers and researchers such as ], ], and ] of displaying elements of new antisemitism. Critics of the Laqueur–Berman–Strauss view argue that the allegation is either unfounded or exaggerated, intended to discredit legitimate ] and of ] economic policies.{{citation needed|date=July 2021}}


=== Mark Strauss's allegations ===
In May 2005, the Versailles court found three guest editorialists for '']'', as well as the newspaper's editor (''directeur de la publication''), guilty of "racist defamation" against Israel and the Jewish people. The writers of the article ''"Israel-Palestine: The Cancer"'' (published in 2002) ] (a well-known Jewish sociologist), Danièle Sallenave (a senior lecturer at Paris-X Nanterre University) and ] (a member of the ]), as well as Le Monde's editor, ], were ordered to pay symbolic damages of one ] to the Franco-Israeli association and to Avocats sans frontières.<ref name=Gross>"J'Accuse: Anti-Semitism at '']'' and beyond", ''The Wall Street Journal'', June 2, 2005, http://www.tomgrossmedia.com/LeMonde.htm</ref>
] of '']'' argues that globalization has stirred anxieties about "outside forces", and that with "familiar anxieties come familiar scapegoats."<ref name=Strauss>{{cite news |last1=Strauss |first1=Mark |author-link1=Mark Strauss (journalist) |title=Antiglobalism's Jewish Problem |url=https://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/antiglobalisms-jewish-problem |work=Foreign Policy |date=November 12, 2003 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130312085916/http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/antiglobalisms-jewish-problem |archive-date=March 12, 2013 |url-status=dead}}</ref> He writes that what he calls the "backlash against globalization" has united a variety of political elements, from the left to the far-right, via a common cause, and that in so doing it has "foster a common enemy." He quotes the French Jewish leader Roger Cukierman who identifies the ] as "an anti-Semitic ]", which includes ultra-nationalists, Islamists, and communists.<ref name=Strauss />
*


Strauss cites ] of the far-right ] and ] of France's ] as examples of the far right exploiting their electorate's concerns about globalization. The fringe ] in ] identifies globalization as an "instrument in the hands of international Zionism" according to Strauss, while in Eastern Europe ultranationalists and communists have united against foreign investors and multinationals, identifying Jews as a common enemy.<ref name=Strauss />
=== Incidents in the United States===
] resurrects the ] myth: "Palestinian Children Meat", "Made in Israel", "slaughtered according to Jewish Rites under American license."]]
Incidents described as representative of the new anti-Semitism, where the line between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism has been blurred, have been recorded by the Anti-Defamation League on college campuses across the U.S.<ref>], . Dated May 14, 2002, but includes information as late as June 4, 2002. Accessed 9 Jan 2006.</ref> The organisation asserts that an ] ] rally by the Muslim Student Association at ] resurrected the ] myth. <ref>, July 25, 2002. On the SFSU site. Accessed 9 Jan 2006.</ref><ref>Richman, Josh. . '']'', April 4, 2003. Accessed 9 Jan 2006.</ref> The pro-Palestinian rally featured posters bearing a picture of soup cans reading "Made in Israel" on the label and listing the contents as "Palestinian Children Meat," and Prime Minister Ariel Sharon as the manufacturer. A photo of a baby, with its stomach sliced open, was also on the can, following the words "slaughtered according to Jewish Rites under American license." A month later, on ] SFSU-authorized pro-Israel rally was held by 30 Jewish students. During the rally, the pro-Israeli demonstrators clashed with about 60 pro-Palestinian students, who are alleged by the Jewish students to have screamed racist insults and used physical violence against them. The conflict continued for about 20 minutes until campus police arrived. Soon after, a cinder block was thrown through the glass doors of UC Berkeley's Hillel building on Passover. Around the same time, two Orthodox Jews were beaten one block from the UC Berkeley campus, and anti-Zionist graffiti appeared on the sidewalks, garbage cans and buildings near the school. <ref>, on the site of the Jewish Federation of Northeastern Pennsylvania. dates it as August 1, 2002. Accessed 9 Jan 2006.</ref> In covering the story about the campus unrest at SFSU, journalist Camille T. Taiara, a writer for the '']'', disputed these reports of the attacks and blamed pro-Israeli demonstrators for trying to suppress opposition to the policies of the Israeli government.<ref>Taiara, Camille T. . ''San Francisco Bay Guardian'', July 10, 2002. Accessed 9 Jan 2006.</ref>


], an American ] of the ], stated of the ] that they were "incredibly successful from the point of view of the rioters as well as our Church. They helped shut down talks of the Jew World Order WTO and helped make a mockery of the Jewish Occupational Government around the world. Bravo."<ref name=Strauss /> Strauss also cites the ], a ] party which set up a website called the ''Anti-Globalism Action Network'' in order to "broaden ... the anti-globalism movement to include divergent and marginalized voices."<ref name=Strauss />
In February 2006, also at UC Berkeley, anti-Semitic graffiti was sprayed on the house of the Berkeley chapter of Alpha Epsilon Pi, a Jewish fraternity.


Strauss writes that, as a result of far-right involvement, a "bizarre ideological turf war has broken out", whereby anti-globalization activists are fighting a "two-front battle," one against the ], ], and ], the other against the extremists who turn up at their rallies.<ref name=Strauss /> He points to an anti-globalization march in ], Brazil, at which he says some marchers displayed ]s and that Jewish peace activists were assaulted. He wrote:
==Criticism==
<blockquote>"Held two months prior to the U.S.-led attack on Iraq, this year's conference{{spaced ndash}} an annual grassroots riposte to the well-heeled World Economic Forum in Davos{{spaced ndash}} had the theme, 'Another World is Possible.' But the more appropriate theme might have been 'Yesterday's World is Back.' Marchers among the 20,000 activists from 120 countries carried signs reading 'Nazis, Yankees, and Jews: No More Chosen Peoples!' Some wore T-shirts with the ] twisted into Nazi swastikas. Members of a Palestinian organization pilloried Jews as the 'true fundamentalists who control United States capitalism.' Jewish delegates carrying banners declaring 'Two peoples – Two states: Peace in the Middle East' were assaulted.<ref name=Strauss /></blockquote>
Many writers have questioned whether there really is any new anti-Semitism. They see the talk of the new anti-Semitism as merely a ploy to deflect or stifle legitimate criticism of Israel.


Strauss argues that the anti-globalization movement is not itself antisemitic but that it "helps enable anti-Semitism by peddling conspiracy theories."<ref name=Strauss /> Strauss's arguments have been met with strong criticism from many in the anti-globalization movement. Oded Grajew, one of the founders of the ], has written that the WSF "is not anti-Semitic, anti-American, or even anti-socially-responsible capitalism". He claims that some fringe parties have attempted to infiltrate the WSF's demonstrations and promote demonstrations of their own, but adds that "he success of the WSF ... is a threat to political extremist groups that resort to violence and hatred". Grajew has also written that, to his knowledge, Strauss's claim of Nazi symbols being displayed at an anti-globalization demonstration in Porto Alegre, Brazil is false.<ref>Oded Grajew, "Debating Anti-Semitism" , ''Foreign Policy'', 1 March 2004, p. 4.</ref>
===Norman Finkelstein===
] dedicates the first half of his book '']'' to discussing claims of new anti-Semitism, arguing that they simply provide political cover to supporters of Israel. He asserts that every couple of decades Jewish leaders claim there is a new wave of anti-Semitism on the basis of what he considers scanty evidence. He advances similar arguments in '']'' and other books.


===Noam Chomsky=== === Response to Strauss ===
], national chairperson of the ], argues that Strauss has "inflamed, not enlightened" the debate over globalization by making "no distinction between the far right's critique of globalization and that of the global social justice movement", which is premised on "respect for human rights and cultural diversity". She notes that the Council of Canadians has condemned antisemitism, and that it expelled some individuals who tried to organize a ] tour under its auspices.<ref>Maude Barlow, "Debating Anti-Semitism" , ''Foreign Policy'', 1 March 2004, p. 4.</ref> John Cavanagh of the International Policy Centre has also criticized Strauss for using unproven allegations of antisemitism to criticize the entire anti-globalization movement, and for failing to research the movement's core beliefs.<ref>John Cavanagh, "Debating Anti-Semitism" , ''Foreign Policy'', 1 March 2004, p. 4.</ref>
Perhaps the best known proponent of such views is the ]ish ]/] ]. He maintains that the ] and other Jewish groups see legitimate criticism of Israeli policies as examples of new anti-Semitism while turning a blind eye to blatant examples of traditional anti-Semitism.


In response to these criticisms, Strauss has written that antisemitic views "might not reflect the core values of the ] or its leading figures, yet they are facts of life in an amorphous, grassroots movement where any number of individuals or organizations express their opinions or seek to set the agenda". He has also reiterated his concern that "anti-capitalist rhetoric provides intellectual fodder for far right groups".<ref>Mark Strauss, "Debating Anti-Semitism" , ''Foreign Policy'', 1 March 2004, p. 4.</ref>
In ], there was much publicity when it was discovered that there were several known anti-Semites in high positions in the ]. '']'' argued in an editorial that the discovery of "seven aging ]an ]s in the Republican apparatus" really wasn't the threat it was made out to be. Their form of anti-Semitism was merely traditional bigotry without an agenda. ''The New Republic'' saw a greater threat in the anti-Semitism of the left, which had a salient agenda: "the delegitimization of the Jewish national movement".


=== Other views ===
In his book ''Necessary Illusions''<ref>]. ''Necessary Illusions''. . Accessed 9 Jan 2006.</ref> and subsequent writings, Chomsky saw this as an example of how the real anti-Semitism was ignored while criticism of Israel was vilified. This was his conclusion:
] describes this phenomenon:<ref>] (2006): ''The Changing Face of Anti-Semitism: From Ancient Times to the Present Day''. Oxford University Press, 2006 {{ISBN|0-19-530429-2}} p.186</ref>
<blockquote>Although traditional Trotskyite ideology is in no way close to radical Islamic teachings and the shariah, since the radical Islamists also subscribed to anticapitalism, antiglobalism, and anti-Americanism, there seemed to be sufficient common ground for an alliance. Thus, the militants of the far left began to march side by side with the radical Islamists in demonstrations, denouncing American aggression and Israeli crimes. ... And it was only natural that in protest demonstrations militants from the far right would join in, antisemitic banners would be displayed, anti-Jewish literature such as the '']'' would be sold. </blockquote>


], then president of Harvard University, also stated that "erious and thoughtful people are advocating and taking actions that are anti-Semitic in their effect if not their intent. For example ... t the same rallies where protesters, many of them university students, condemn the IMF and global capitalism and raise questions about globalization, it is becoming increasingly common to also lash out at Israel. Indeed, at the anti-IMF rallies last spring, chants were heard equating ] and ]."<ref name=Summers>]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110812001233/http://president.harvard.edu/speeches/summers_2002/morningprayers.php |date=2011-08-12 }}, Office of the President, Harvard University, September 17, 2002.</ref>
<blockquote> Thus for ''The New Republic'', the discovery of unreconstructed Nazis in high places in a Republican Party that was then considered to "support Israel" was a minor matter; ], ], hatred of Jews are only "antique and anemic forms of anti-Semitism," ''The New Republic'' explained, in contrast to the serious stuff: the "Jew-hatred" in the ] <ref>]. , letter. March 31, 1992. Accessed 9 Jan 2006.</ref></blockquote>


A March 2003 report on antisemitism in the ] by ] and ] of the ] identifies anti-globalization rallies as one of the sources of antisemitism on the left.<ref>Bergmann, Werner & Wetzel, Juliane. ])}}, Center for Research on Antisemitism, Technische Universitaet Berlin, March 2003.</ref>
===Brian Klug===
<blockquote>In the extreme left-wing scene, anti-Semitic remarks were to be found mainly in the context of pro-Palestinian and anti-globalisation rallies and in newspaper articles using anti-Semitic stereotypes in their criticism of Israel. Often this generated a combination of anti-Zionist and anti-American views that formed an important element in the emergence of an anti-Semitic mood in Europe.<ref name=Bergmann />
Brian Klug, in an article written for '']'' in ], <ref name=Klug/> argues that while we should be concerned with the recent rise in anti-Semitic events including violence against ]s, anti-Jewish graffiti, and talk of Jewish led conspiracy plots, these do not as a whole represent some new or more virulent form of anti-Semitism but simply a revival of the old ]. He believes that in reality, the claim of there being a ''new'' anti-Semitism is really a code-word for including ] in anti-Semitism; he argues that anti-Zionism is not necessarily anti-Semitic. He notes that ] of the ] has stated "The harsh but undeniable truth is this: what some like to call anti-Zionism is, in reality, anti-Semitism&mdash;always, everywhere, and for all time....Therefore, anti-Zionism is not a politically legitimate point of view but rather an expression of bigotry and hatred", and argues that supporters of this comparison, such as Foxman and ] ], are making a false claim that all Jews are Zionists and thus unfairly linking all forms of anti-Zionism as automatically anti-Semitic. He goes on to suggest that the concept of new anti-Semitism is being used by some to unfairly silence many legitimate critics of ]. He suggests that line between legitimate and anti-Semitic criticism of Israel is being drawn by many supporters of Israel in such a way as to rule out any criticism beyond a rap across the Israeli government's knuckles or a finger wagging at the laws of its land. Thus, in his view, criticisms of Israel are too often labeled anti-Semitic without regard to the true motivations of the critic or whether the facts support the critics claims. He says that to argue that hostility towards Israel and hostility towards Jews as being one and the same is equating Israel with Jewry, an equation he rejects. He does not claim there is never a connection between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism but that it is usually only one potential ingredient in a complex situation and not the engine that drives most anti-Zionism. He takes issue with the claim by some supporters of Israel that criticism of Israel that is unbalanced and intemperate is automatically anti-Semitic. He argues that the ] is a bitter struggle with complex issues, inflamed passions, and suffering on both sides. Thus, partisans on both sides are liable to cross the line at times. He says that one cannot assume that when either side crosses the line that it is necessarily motivated by anti-Semitism, ], or ], though for some that may indeed be the case.
</blockquote>


], then U.S. Acting Assistant Secretary for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, told reporters in 2005 that people within the anti-globalization movement have conflated their legitimate concerns "with this idea that Jews run the world and globalization is the fault of Jews."<ref name=Kozak>, U.S. Department of State, January 5, 2005.</ref> He said:<ref name="Kozak" />
===Michael Neumann===
<blockquote>I think one of the disturbing things is that you're starting to see this in some{{spaced ndash}} you know, it's not just sort of right-wing ultranationalist skinhead types. It's now you're getting some fairly otherwise respectable intellectuals that are left of center who are anti-globalization who are starting to let this stuff creep into their rhetoric.</blockquote>
Michael Neumann, a ]ish professor of ] at ] in ], shared similar views in his '']'' article "Criticism of Israel is not Anti-Semitism." <ref>Neumann, Michael. , '']'', December 30, 2003. Accessed 9 Jan 2006.</ref> He is critical of how the term ] is applied, and says that too often criticism of ] is wrongly labeled anti-Semitic. He believes anti-Semitism should be defined as hatred of Jews for what they are and not what they do. Thus criticizing Jews for simply being a Jew or applying anti-Semitic stereotypes to them would be anti-Semitic but not, say, criticizing the Jewish community for failing to hold ] accountable for its actions. He believes it is important to separate the Israeli government from the Israeli people and the Jewish Israelis from Jews as a whole, since Israel does not represent all Jews and the Israeli government does not represent the views of all Israelis. Thus criticism of the Israeli government and its actions is never the same as criticizing all Jews or even simply all Israelis.
<blockquote>And that's disturbing because it starts to{{spaced ndash}} it starts to take what is a legitimate issue for debate, anti-globalization or the war in Iraq or any other issue, and when you start turning that into an excuse for saying therefore we should hate Jews, that's where you cross the line, in my view. It's not that you're not entitled to question all those other issues. Of course, those are fair game. But it's the same as saying, you know, you start hating all Muslims because of some policy you don't like by one Muslim country or something.</blockquote>


=== Conflation of globalization, Jews and Israel ===
===Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions===
]
Another area of activity condemned as anti-Semitic is the boycotting of Israeli companies or companies that profit from dealing with Israel. The ] has stated that they "…absolutely reject the accusation that general divestment or boycott campaigns are inherently anti-Semitic. The Israeli government is a government like any other, and condemning its abuse of state power, as many of its own citizens do quite vigorously, is in no way the same as attacking the Jewish people."<ref>ICAHD, . January 27, 2005. Accessed 9 Jan 2006.</ref>
], Professor of European and Jewish History at the ], told ] that globalization has given rise to an ] left that is "viscerally anti-American, anti-capitalist, and hostile to world Jewry."<ref name=Wistrich>]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111128132255/http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.asp?DRIT=3&DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=111&FID=624&PID=0&IID=636&TTL= |date=2011-11-28 }}, ''Post-Holocaust and Anti-Semitism'', at the ], October 1, 2004.</ref> He argues that the decade that preceded the current increase in antisemitism was one that saw accelerated globalization of the world economy, a process in which the losers included the Arab and Muslim worlds, and who are now the "major consumers of anti-Jewish poison and conspiracy theories that blame everyone except themselves. Israel is only one piece on this chessboard, but it has assumed such inflated importance because it serves a classic anti-Semitic function of being an ']'."<ref name=Wistrich />
<!-- Image with inadequate rationale removed: ]'' depicting image of the "]" on cover]] -->
As an example of the alleged ] of globalization, the U.S. and Israel, ], editor and publisher of '']'' and adjunct professor at ], cited ], a French anti-globalization activist and leader of the ''Confédération Paysanne''.<ref name=RothFrance> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121119110757/http://www.tau.ac.il/Anti-Semitism/asw2002-3/france.htm |date=2012-11-19 }}, The Stephen Roth Institute for the Study of Antisemitism and Racism, Tel Aviv University, 2003.</ref> Bové led what Joffe calls a "deconstructionist mob" against ] to protest against its effects on French cuisine, later turning up in ] to denounce Israel and announce his support for ]. "Arafat's cause was Bové's cause ... here was a spokesman for the anti-globalization movement who was conflating globalization with ] and extending his loathing of both to Israel."<ref name=Joffe9>]. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060909045833/http://sicsa.huji.ac.il/ppjoffe.pdf |date=2006-09-09 }}, Posen Papers in Contemporary Antisemitism, No.1, Vidal Sassoon Center for the Study of Antisemitism, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2004, p.9.</ref> Joffe argues that ''Kapitalismuskritik'' is a "mainstay of the antisemitic faith, a charge that has passed smoothly from Jews to America. Like Jews, Americans are money-grubbers who know only the value of money, and the worth of nothing. Like Jews, they seek to reduce all relationships to exchange and money. Like them, Americans are motivated only by profit, and so they respect no tradition."<ref name=Joffe12>]. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060909045833/http://sicsa.huji.ac.il/ppjoffe.pdf |date=2006-09-09 }}, Posen Papers in Contemporary Antisemitism, No.1, Vidal Sassoon Center for the Study of Antisemitism, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2004, p.12.</ref>


], writing in '']'', argues against this that "instances of anti-capitalism spilling into 'rich Jew' bigotry are ... well documented" but "stand out precisely because they conflict so sharply with the Left's universalism and its opposition to ethnic discrimination".<ref name=Clark>]. , ''The Guardian'', March 6, 2006.</ref>
==See also==
*]
*], ]
*], ]
*]
*]
*] (section of ]).


In early 2004, ], author of "Culture Jam" and founder of '']'', two influential and widely read anti-globalization texts, generated controversy when he wrote an editorial entitled "Why won't anyone say they are Jewish?".<ref name=Lasn>]. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090614072646/http://canadiancoalition.com/adbusters01/ |date=2009-06-14 }} ] Magazine, March/April 2004</ref> In it he stated "Drawing attention to the Jewishness of the neocons is a tricky game. Anyone who does so can count on automatically being smeared as an anti-Semite. But the point is not that Jews (who make up less than 2 percent of the American population) have a monolithic perspective. Indeed, American Jews overwhelmingly vote Democrat and many of them disagree strongly with Ariel Sharon's policies and Bush's aggression in Iraq. The point is simply that the neocons seem to have a special affinity for Israel that influences their political thinking and consequently American foreign policy in the Middle East."<ref name=Lasn /> The editorial suggested that Jews represent a disproportionately high percentage of the ] who control American foreign policy, and that this may affect policy with respect to Israel.<ref name="Raynes=Goldie">Raynes-Goldie, Kate. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071018003106/http://nowtoronto.com/issues/2004-03-18/news_story6.php |date=2007-10-18 }}, ''Nowtoronto.com'', March 18, 2004 – March 24, 2004.</ref> Lasn included a list of influential neo-conservatives, with dots next to the names of those who were Jewish.<ref name=Lasn />
==Notes==
<references />


Lasn was criticized by a number of anti-globalization activists. Klaus Jahn, professor of the philosophy of history at the ] condemned Lasn's article stating "Whether listing physicians who perform abortions in ] tracts, gays and lesbians in office memos, Communists in government and the entertainment industry ], Jews in Central Europe under Nazism and so on, such list-making has always produced pernicious consequences."<ref name=RaynesGoldie>Raynes-Goldie, Kate, " {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071018003106/http://nowtoronto.com/issues/2004-03-18/news_story6.php |date=2007-10-18 }}", '']'', March 18024, 2004</ref>
==References==
* ''The Case For Israel'', Alan Dershowitz, John Wiley & Sons, 2003, paperback 2004 ISBN 0471679526
* ''The New Anti-Semitism: The Current Crisis and What We Must Do About It'', Phyllis Chesler, Jossey-Bass, 2003
*''Never Again? The Threat of the New Anti-Semitism'' by Abraham Foxman, HarperSanFrancisco, 2003
* ''A New Antisemitism? Debating Judeophobia in 21st Century Britain'', Ed. Paul Iganski and Barry Kosmin. Profile Books, 2003
* ''Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory'' Deborah Lipstadt, 1994, Penguin
*''The Return of Anti-Semitism'', Gabriel Schoenfeld, Encounter Books, 2003
* ''Why the Jews? The Reasons for Antisemitism'' Revised Edition. ] and Joseph Telushkin, Simon & Schuster, 2003
* ''Antisemitism: The Longest Hatred'', Robert S. Wistrich. Pantheon Books, 1992.
* (]). European Union. <!-- This provides a partial reference for the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance report alluded to. Does anyone have a source for the report itself? -->


Meredith Warren, a Montreal anti-globalization activist responded to the article by saying "The U.S. government has only an economic interest in having control over that region. It wants oil and stability – it has nothing to do with Jews or Judaism. Pointing out the various religious stances of those in power totally misses the point of the U.S. government's interest in Israel."<ref name=RaynesGoldie />
==Further reading==
===Books===
*Rosenbaum, Ron. Editor. (2004). ''Those Who Forget the Past: The Question of Anti-Semitism''. Random House. ISBN 0812972031
*Taguieff, Pierre-André. (2002). ''La nouvelle judéophobie'' (Editions mille et une nuits) ISBN 2842056507. Translated in English as:''Rising From the Muck : The New Anti-Semitism in Europe''. Ivan R. Dee. ISBN 1566635713
*Taguieff, Pierre-André. (2001). ''The force of prejudice: on racism and its doubles''. University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 0816623724
===Articles===
*Greenspan, Miriam. (Nov-Dec 2003). "The New Anti-Semitism". '']'' '''18''':6. p. 33.


=== Controversy over alleged antisemitism within the French movement ===
== External links ==
{{See also|Red–green–brown alliance}}
===Reports===
According to a report by the ], a major event for the anti-globalization movement in France was the European Social Forum (ESF) in Paris in November 2003. The organizers allegedly included a number of Islamic groups, such as ''Présence Musulmane'', ''Secours Islamique'', and ''Collectif des Musulmans de France''. ], the grandson of ], the Egyptian founder of the ], also attended meetings. A few weeks earlier, Ramadan had published a controversial article on a website{{spaced ndash}} after ''Le Monde'' and ''Le Figaro'' refused to publish it{{spaced ndash}} criticizing several French intellectuals, who according to the institute, were either Jewish or "others he mistakenly thought were Jewish," for having "supposedly betrayed their universalist beliefs in favor of unconditional support for Zionism and Israel."<ref name=RothFrance />
* , excerpted from a longer piece, and covering the period of July 1, 2003 &ndash; December 15, 2004].
* (pdf) Unpublished EU report from 2003
*
*
*
*


], one of the intellectuals who was criticized, called on the French anti-globalization movement to distance itself from Ramadan. In an interview with ''Le Monde'', Lévy said: "Mr. Ramadan, dear anti-globalizationist friends, is not and cannot be one of yours. ... I call you on you quickly to distance yourselves from this character who, in crediting the idea of an elitist conspiracy under the control of Zionism, is only inflaming people's thoughts and opening the way to the worst."<ref name=Monnot>Monnot, Caroline & Ternisien, Xavier. Caroline Monnot and Xavier Ternisien. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081005200850/http://watch.windsofchange.net/themes_67.htm |date=2008-10-05 }}, ''Le Monde'', October 10, 2003.</ref>
===Organizations and forums whose stated aim is to fight anti-Semitism===
*
* (Jewish Human Right organization which combat antisemitism, founded by ])
*
*
*
*
*


''Le Monde'' reported that many members of the anti-globalization movement in France agreed that Ramadan's article "has no place on a European Social Forum mailing list."<ref name=Monnot />
===Articles about the new anti-Semitism===
* by ]
* by ]
* , article by ]
*
* By Abraham H. Foxman, National Director of the ], Ha'aretz, April 4, 2004
* , by Dr. ], Director for International Liaison, ]-]
*
*
* , by ], originally published in '']'', November 2003
* , Natan Sharansky (], ])
*
* The at
* by ] (], ])
* by Professor Jonathan Sacks, Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth, June 2002
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* by Chris McGreal, ''The Guardian'', November 25, 2003
* by Peter Beaumont, ''The Observer'', February 17, 2002
* by ], ''The Guardian'', December 6, 2003
* by Jamie Glazov, ''FrontPageMagazine.com'', September 19, 2003
* by Mark Strauss, ''Foreign Policy'', November-December 2003, on ''YaleGlobal Online'', ]
* (pdf) by Werner Bergmann and Juliane Wetzel, Berlin Research Centre on Anti-Semitism, Berlin Technical University
*, Ben Dror Yemini, ] writer (some in ] and some in ])
* by Nick Cohen, ''The Observer'', April 17, 2005
* by Maurice Chittenden, ''The Sunday Times'', April 17, 2005
* Melissa Kite, ''The Telegraph'', April 17, 2005
* Lewis Smith, ''The Times'', April 18, 2005
* by Lucian Berger, ''The Guardian'' , April 15, 2005
*, Sergio I. Minerbi, ], Fall 2003.


Other activists defended Ramadan. One activist told the newspaper that "ne of the characteristics of the European Social Forum is the stark rise in immigrant and Muslim organizations. It is an important phenomenon and a positive one in many ways."<ref name=Monnot /> Another activist, Peter Khalfa, said: "Ramadan's essay is not anti-Semitic. It is dangerous to wave the red flag of anti-Semitism at any moment. However, it is a text marked partly by Ramadan's communitarian thought and which communicates his view of the world to others."<ref name=Monnot /> One of the leaders of the anti-globalization movement in France, José Bové of the ''Confédération Paysanne'', told ''Le Monde'': "The anti-globalization movement defends universalist points of view which are therefore necessarily secular in their political expression. That there should be people of different cultures and religions is only natural. The whole effort is to escape such determinisms."<ref name=Monnot />
===Miscellaneous===

*, ] (])
=== Concern within the political left ===
*: Activist research project by April Rosenblum on progressive movements' responses to antisemitism
], a Jewish Canadian writer and activist in the anti-globalization movement, expressed concern in 2002 at finding antisemitic rhetoric on some activist websites that she had visited: "I couldn't help thinking about all the recent events I've been to where ] violence was rightly condemned, but no mention was made of attacks on Jewish synagogues, cemeteries, and community centers."<ref name=Klein>{{cite news |last1=Klein |first1=Naomi |title=Sharon's Best Weapon: The left must confront anti-Semitism head-on |url=http://www.inthesetimes.com/issue/26/13/feature2.shtml |date=April 26, 2002 |work=In These Times |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060822075533/https://inthesetimes.com/issue/26/13/feature2.shtml |archive-date=August 22, 2006}}</ref> Klein urged activists to confront antisemitism as part of their work for social justice. She also suggested that allegations of antisemitism can be often politically motivated, and that activists should avoid political simplifications that could be perceived as antisemitic:<ref name="Klein" />
*, Anti-Defamation League
<blockquote>The globalization movement isn't anti-Semitic, it just hasn't fully confronted the implications of diving into the ] conflict. Most people on the left are simply choosing sides. In the Middle East, where one side is under occupation and the other has the U.S. military behind it, the choice seems clear. But it is possible to criticize Israel while forcefully condemning the rise of anti-Semitism. And it is equally possible to be pro-Palestinian independence without adopting a simplistic pro-Palestinian/anti-Israel dichotomy, a mirror image of the ] equations so beloved by President ].
*, Anti-Defamation League, July 11, 2002
</blockquote>
* based on a

In October 2004, the '']'' magazine published a special issue covering the insertion of antisemitic rhetoric into some progressive debates.<ref name=internationalist>, ''New Internationalist'', October 2004.</ref> Adam Ma'anit wrote:<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Ma'anit |first=Adam |title=A human balance |url=http://newint.org/features/2004/10/01/keynote/ |date=October 2004 |magazine=New Internationalist |issue=372 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150502022403/http://newint.org/features/2004/10/01/keynote/ |archive-date=May 2, 2015}}</ref>
<blockquote>Take ''Adbusters'' magazine's founder Kalle Lasn's recent editorial rant against Jewish neoconservatives.{{nbsp}}... The article includes a self-selected 'well-researched list' of 50 of the supposedly most influential 'neocons' with little black dots next to all those who are Jewish.{{nbsp}}... If it's not the neocons then it's the all-powerful 'Jewish lobby' which holds governments to ransom all over the world (because Jews control the global economy of course) to do their bidding. Meanwhile, rightwing Judeophobes often talk of a leftist Jewish conspiracy to promote equality and human rights through a new internationalism embodied in the UN in order to control governments and suppress national sovereignty. They call it the 'New World Order' or the 'Jew World Order'. They make similar lists to Lasn's of prominent Jews in the global justice movement (Noam Chomsky, Naomi Klein, etc.) to argue their case.</blockquote>

The issue observes, however, that "While antisemitism is rife in the Arab World, the Israeli Government often uses it as moral justification for its policies."<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Agbarieh |first=Asma |title=Spreading the Stain |url=http://newint.org/features/2004/10/01/arab-antisemitism/ |date=October 2004 |magazine=] |issue=372 }}</ref>

'''<big>Antisemitism during the Israel-Hamas War</big>'''

] increased significantly around the world.<ref name="i380">{{cite web |last=Farivar |first=Masood |date=2023-10-11 |title=Antisemitism Surges Around World as Israel, Hamas Clash |url=https://www.voanews.com/a/antisemitism-surges-around-world-as-israel-hamas-clash/7306956.html |access-date=2024-11-17 |website=Voice of America}}</ref><ref name="i731">{{cite web |date=2023-10-15 |title=Israel-Hamas war unleashes wave of antisemitism in Europe |url=https://www.ft.com/content/ed744535-d04f-4519-ac27-2be077cac912 |access-date=2024-11-17 |website=Financial Times}}</ref><ref name="h429">{{cite web |last=Chrisafis |first=Angelique |last2=Kassam |first2=Ashifa |last3=Connolly |first3=Kate |last4=Giuffrida |first4=Angela |date=2023-10-20 |title=‘A lot of pain’: Europe’s Jews fear rising antisemitism after Hamas attack |url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/2023/oct/20/a-lot-of-pain-europes-jews-fear-rising-antisemitism-after-hamas-attack |access-date=2024-11-17 |website=the Guardian}}</ref>

== See also ==

* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]

== Notes ==
{{reflist|30em}}

== References ==
{{refbegin|2}}
* Asserson, Trevor & Williams, Cassie. , BBC Watch, retrieved August 20, 2006.
* Barkun, Michael. ''A Culture of Conspiracy'', University of California Press, 2003; this edition 2006
* ]. {{Cite web |url=http://humanities.ucsc.edu/JewishStudies/docs/YBauerLecture.pdf |title=Problems of Contemporary Anti-Semitism |access-date=January 11, 2008 |archive-date=July 5, 2003 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030705131522/http://humanities.ucsc.edu/JewishStudies/docs/YBauerLecture.pdf |url-status=dead }}, lecture to the Jewish Studies Dept of the ], 2003, retrieved April 22, 2006.
* Baxter, Sarah. {{dead link|date=September 2024|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}, ''The Sunday Times'', August 13, 2006, retrieved January 13, 2008.
* ]. , '']'', June 21, 2004, retrieved January 9, 2006.
* Beaumont, Peter. , '"The Observer, February 17, 2002, retrieved January 13, 2008.
* ]. , ''New Internationalist'', October 2004.
* ]. , ''Publiceye.org'', December 20, 1990; revised February 22, 1994, revised again 1999.
* Booth, Jenny. , ''The Times'', May 11, 2005.
* {{cite journal
|title = Anti-Semitism: Its Changing Meaning
|last = Brownfeld
|first = Allan
|journal = ]
|publisher = ]
|issn = 1533-8614
|volume = 16
|issue = 3
|year = 1987
|pages = 53–67
|doi = 10.2307/2536789
|jstor = 2536789
}}
* Bryant, Elizabeth. "France stung by new report on anti-Semitism," United Press International, October 20, 2004.
* Chanes, Jerome. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111128080506/http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.asp?DRIT=5&DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=111&FID=624&PID=0&IID=1094&TTL=Review_Essay%3A_What%27s_ |date=2011-11-28 }}, ''Jewish Political Studies Review'' 16:1–2 (Spring 2004).
* ] ''The New Anti-Semitism: The Current Crisis and What We Must Do About It'', Jossey-Bass, 2003. {{ISBN|0-7879-7803-5}}
* Conger, George. {{dead link|date=December 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, ''The Jerusalem Post'', September 5, 2006.
* Curtis, Polly. , '']'', April 12, 2005.
* ]. ''The Case For Israel'', John Wiley & Sons, 2003, paperback 2004. {{ISBN|0-471-67952-6}}
* Doward, Jamie. , ''The Guardian'', August 8, 2004.
* Dickter, Adam. , ''World Jewish Review'', July 2002.
* ]. "Antisemitism in Western Europe Today" in ''Contemporary Antisemitism: Canada and the World''. University of Toronto Press, 2005.
* ]. ''Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History''. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2005.
* ]. , ''The Virginia Quarterly Review'', Summer 2005, pp.&nbsp;225–234.
* ]. ''Antisemitism resurfaces'', ''Midstream'', February 1, 2004.
* ]. , ''The Forward'', March 29, 2002.
* Forster, Arnold & Epstein, Benjamin, ''The New Anti-Semitism''. McGraw-Hill 1974. {{ISBN|0-07-021615-0}}
* ] ''Never Again? The Threat of the New Anti-Semitism''. New York: HarperSanFrancisco (an imprint of ]), 2003. {{ISBN|0-06-054246-2}} (10); {{ISBN|978-0-06-054246-7}} (13).
* Goodman, Amy. , interview with Norman Finkelstein, August 29, 2006.
* Harrison, Bernard. ''The Resurgence of Anti-Semitism: Jews, Israel, and Liberal Opinion''. Rowman & Littlefield, 2006. 0742552276
* HaLevi, Ezra. , ''Arutz Sheva'', November 29, 2005; see clip of .
* ]. "The Return of Anti-Semitism," ''Commentary'', February 2002
* Hodgson, Jessica. , ''The Guardian'', February 7, 2002.
* Ioanid, Radu. Foreword in ]. ''Rising from the Muck: The New Anti-Semitism in Europe''. Ivan R. Dee, 2004.
* Jaffe, Ben-Zion. , ''] Blog Central'', December 11, 2005.
* ] & ] "Anti-Israel sentiment predicts anti-Semitism in Europe," ''Journal of Conflict Resolution'', Vol 50, No. 4, 548–561, August 2006.
* ]. , retrieved March 5, 2006.
* ]. {{Webarchive|url=http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20090701082702/http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040202&s=klug |date=2009-07-01 }}. '']'', posted January 15, 2004; February 2, 2004 issue.
* ]. , ''Red Pepper'', November 24, 2005.
* ]. , ], March 17, 2006.
* ]. , Augean Stables, February 5, 2007.
* Lazare, Daniel. , ''The Nation'', December 19, 2005.
* Lerman, Tony. , ''The Guardian: Comment is Free'', February 6, 2007, retrieved August 11, 2007.
* ]. , posted February 5, 2007, retrieved February 6, 2007.
* ]. , ''The American Scholar'', Volume 75 No. 1, Winter 2006, pp.&nbsp;25–36. The paper is based on a lecture delivered at ] on March 24, 2004.
* ]. , ''The Guardian'', July 17, 2002.
* ]. ''Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory''. Penguin 1994.
* ], ''Jurisprudence of the New Anti-Semitism,'' Wake Forest Law Review, Vol. 44, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1376592
* Matas, David. ''Anti-Zionism and Anti-Semitism''. Dundurn Press, Toronto, 2005. {{ISBN|1-55002-553-8}}
* ] & ]. ''Why the Jews? The Reasons for Antisemitism''. Simon & Schuster, 2003.
* ]. ''The Enemy of my Enemy: The Alarming Convergence of Militant Islam and the Extreme Right''. University Press of Kansas, 2006. {{ISBN|0-7006-1444-3}}
* Moormeister, Robyn. , '']'', May 2, 2003.
* Morse, Jane A. , September 14, 2001.
* Paz, Reuven. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071209053826/http://ict.org.il/articles/hamas_holocaust.htm |date=2007-12-09 }}, Washington Institute Peace Watch, No. 255, April 21, 2000.
* Raab, Earl. "Is there a New Anti-Semitism?", ''Commentary'', May 1974, pp.&nbsp;53–54.
* Raab, Earl. , ''Judaism'', Fall 2002.
* Radler, Melissa. "Anti-Semitic riot at San Francisco State University," ''The Jerusalem Post'', May 16, 2002.
* Reeves, Phil. "Amid the ruins, the grisly evidence of a war crime," ''The Independent'', April 16, 2002.
* ] & Simmonds, Florence. ''Orpheus: A General History of Religions'', G. P. Putnam & Sons, 1909.
* Rosenbaum, Ron. (ed) ''Those Who Forget the Past: The Question of Anti-Semitism''. Random House, 2004. {{ISBN|0-8129-7203-1}}
* Rubin, Daniel. (ed.) ''Anti-Semitism and Zionism: Selected Marxist Writings''. International Publishers, 1987, p.&nbsp;35.
* ]. ''Chantier sur la lutte contre le racisms et l'antisemitisme'', Ministry of the Interior, France. October 19, 2004.
* ]. , ''Ha'aretz'', September 6, 2002.
* ]. "A Desolation and They Called It Peace," in Rosenbaum, Ron. ''Those Who Forget the Past: The Question of Anti-Semitism''. Random House, 2004.
* Schoenfeld, Gabriel. ''The Return of Anti-Semitism''. Encounter Books, 2004.
* Sewell, Dennis. , ''New Statesman'', January 14, 2002.
* ]. in Rosenbaum, Ron (ed). ''Those who forget the past: The Question of Anti-Semitism'', Random House 2004.
* Stillwell, Cinnamon. , ''San Francisco Chronicle'', December 14, 2004, retrieved January 12, 2008.
* Strauss, Mark. in Rosenbaum, Ron (ed). ''Those who forget the past: The Question of Anti-Semitism'', Random House 2004.
* ] , September 17, 2002, retrieved January 9, 2006.
* ]. ''Rising From the Muck : The New Anti-Semitism in Europe''. Ivan R. Dee, 2002. {{ISBN|1-56663-571-3}} (published in France as ''La nouvelle judéophobie''. Editions mille et une nuits. {{ISBN|2-84205-650-7}}).
* Temko, Ned. , ''The Observer'', February 3, 2006.
* Whine, Michael. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220226131202/https://www.jcpa.org/phas/phas-041-whine.htm |date=2022-02-26 }}, ''Post-Holocaust and Anti-Semitism'', Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, February 1, 2006.
* Wiener, Jon. , ''The Nation'', July 11, 2005.
* Wilby, Peter. ''The New Statesman.'' February 11, 2002, retrieved February 8, 2008.
* ]. , lecture delivered to the Study Circle on World Jewry in the home of the ], December 10, 1984.
* Wurmbrand, Max & ]. ''The Jewish People: 4000 Years of Survival'', p.&nbsp;403 and ''passim''. Massadah-P. E. C. Press, 1966.
* Zipperstein, Steven J. "Historical Reflections on Contemporary Antisemitism", in Derek J. Penslar et al., ed., ''Contemporary Antisemitism: Canada and the World''. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2005.
* Zoloth, Laurie. "Fear and Loathing at San Francisco State" in Rosenbaum, Ron. ''Those who forget the past''. Random House, 2004.
* Zuckerman, Mortimer B. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220523084726/https://www.jewishworldreview.com/mort/zuckerman_new_anti_sem.php3 |date=2022-05-23 }}, ''U.S. News & World Report''. March 11, 2003, retrieved January 12, 2008.
* Zwartz, Barney & Morton, Adam. , ''The Age'', September 4, 2006.
* , European Union, 2004.
* 2004 ] Antisemitic Incidents Report.
* , BBC News, December 14, 2004.
* , posted April 29, 2004. U.S. Department of State.
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080420164234/http://eustonmanifesto.org/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12&Itemid=41 |date=2008-04-20 }}, London, March 29, 2006.
* , interview with ] on Syrian television, the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), November 25, 2005. Clip of the interview and of Duke's speech to a Syrian rally can be viewed here .
* "The Architecture of Bigotry," ''Policy Dispatch'', no. 80, Institute of the World Jewish Congress, June 2002.
* , CAMERA, July 26, 2004.
* {{usurped|1=}}, September 7, 2006.
* , ''Watch'', retrieved August 27, 2006.
* , ''BackSpin Weblog of ]'', December 4, 2003.
* , November 10, 1975, retrieved January 13, 2008.
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080420164234/http://eustonmanifesto.org/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12&Itemid=41 |date=2008-04-20 }}, March 29, 2006.
* "(U.S.) State Department report on Anti-Semitism: Europe and Eurasia," December 15, 2004; see Global Anti-Semitism Review Act of 2004.
* , BBC News, October 2004.
* , BBC News, September 6, 2006.
* , June 17, 2005, retrieved March 6, 2006.
* , EUMC.
* , ], May 2006.
* , ''Associated Press'', September 19, 2006.
* Arnold Forster & Benjamin Epstein, ''The New Anti-Semitism''. McGraw-Hill 1974, p.&nbsp;165. See for instance chapters entitled "]'s Road" (19–48), "The Radical Right" (285–296), "Arabs and Pro-Arabs" (155–174), "The Radical Left" (125–154).
* ]. , lecture delivered to the Study Circle on World Jewry in the home of the ], December&nbsp; 10, 1984.
* ]. ''The New Anti-Semitism: The Current Crisis and What We Must Do About It'', Jossey-Bass, 2003, pp.&nbsp;158–159, 181.
* Doward, Jamie. , '']'', August 8, 2004.
* ]. , accessed March 5, 2006.
* ]. , Ha'aretz, September 6, 2002, retrieved on January 10, 2007.
* ]. in Rosenbaum, Ron (ed). ''Those who forget the past: The Question of Anti-Semitism'', Random House 2004, p&nbsp;272.
* ]. "Antisemitism in Western Europe Today" in ''Contemporary Antisemitism: Canada and the World''. University of Toronto Press, 2005, pp.&nbsp;65–79.
* Rosenbaum, Ron. ''Those who forget the past''. Random House, 2004.
* Taguieff, Pierre-André. ''Rising From the Muck: The New Anti-Semitism in Europe''. Ivan R. Dee, 2004.
{{refend}}

== Further reading ==
{{refbegin|2}}
* ]. , ''The Observer'', June 22, 2003.
* Abram, Morris B.
* Arenson, David & Grynberg, Simon. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040726081359/http://www.aish.com/jewishissues/middleeast/Anti-Globalization_The_New_Anti-Semitism.asp |date=2004-07-26 }}.
* ]. , ''Gush Shalom''.
* ]. "The UN and the Jews", ''Commentary Magazine'', February 2004.
* ]. , ''The Guardian'', April 15, 2005
* Bergmann, Werner & Wetzel, Julie. {{cite web |url=http://eumc.eu.int/eumc/material/pub/FT/Draft_anti-Semitism_report-web.pdf |title=Manifestations of Anti-Semitism in the European Union |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050415100309/http://eumc.eu.int/eumc/material/pub/FT/Draft_anti-Semitism_report-web.pdf |archive-date=2005-04-15 }}&nbsp;{{small|(751&nbsp;KB)}}, Berlin Research Centre on Anti-Semitism, Technische Universität Berlin.
* Bourne, Jenny. , ''Race and Class'', Vol. 46, 2004.
* ]. , ''The Guardian'', December 6, 2003.
* Chittenden, Maurice. , ''The Sunday Times'', April 17, 2005
* ]. {{Cite web |url=http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/ni/ni-contents.html |title=''Necessary Illusions'' |access-date=January 9, 2006 |archive-date=September 13, 2002 |archive-url=http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20020913220833/http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/ni/ni-contents.html |url-status=bot: unknown }}, accessed January 9, 2006.
* ]. ''Jewish Political Studies Review'' 16:3–4 via the ], Fall 2004.
* ]. ''New Statesman'', October 10, 2005.
* ]. , ''The Observer'', April 17, 2005.
* Cooper, Abraham. , January 30, 2003.
* ]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060825093810/http://www.aish.com/jewishissues/jewishsociety/Identifying_the_New_Anti-Semitism.asp |date=2006-08-25 }}, Jewish People Policy Planning Institute, November 2002.
* ].
* Curthoys, Ned. "A new anti-Semitism: American discourse since September 11 has seen a reinvention of the eternal anti-semitism thesis applied to critics of Israel," ''Arena Magazine'', April 1, 2004.
* ]. "Is There a New Anti-Semitism in the United States?" ''Society'', 41 (January/February 2004), 53–58.
* ]. "Antisemitism in Western Europe Today" in ''Contemporary Antisemitism: Canada and the World''. University of Toronto Press, 2005.
* ]. "The View from Ground Zero," in Rosenbaum, Ron (ed). ''Those who forget the past: The Question of Anti-Semitism'', Random House 2004.
* ]. , ''Ha'aretz'', April 4, 2004.
* ]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929091738/http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.asp?DRIT=3&DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=111&FID=388&PID=1666&IID=1673&TTL=Anti-Israelism_and_Anti-Semitism:_Common_Characteristics_and_Motifs |date=2007-09-29 }}''Jewish Political Studies Review 19:1–2'' ], March 1, 2007.
* ]. , an interview with ], October 1, 2004.
* ]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929090309/http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.asp?DRIT=3&DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=111&FID=253&PID=0&IID=644&TTL=Major_Anti-Semitic_Motifs_in_Arab_Cartoons |date=2007-09-29 }}, ''Post-Holocaust and Anti-Semitism'', No. 21, ], June 1, 2004.
* ]. ''Europe’s Crumbling Myths: The Post-Holocaust Origins of Today’s Anti-Semitism'', ]/]/], 2003. {{ISBN|965-218-045-9}}.
* ]. , ''Jewish Political Studies Review'' 15:3–4 (Fall 2003).
* ]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070926214829/http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.asp?DRIT=3&DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=111&FID=253&PID=0&IID=648&TTL=Anti-Semitic_Motifs_in_Anti-Israelism |date=2007-09-26 }} ''Post-Holocaust and Anti-Semitism'', no. 2, 1 November 2002.
* ]. "The Rough Beast Returns" in Rosenbaum, Ron. ''Those who forget the past''. Random House, 2004.
* Goldberg, Sol & Ury, Scott & Weiser, Kalman, eds., Palgrave-Macmillan, 2021. {{ISBN|978-3-030-51658-1}}
* Goldenberg, Suzanne. , ''The Guardian'', July 8, 2002.
* Gordon, Neve. "Seeing through the 'new anti-Semitism': Norman Finkelstein critiques Israel's human rights record and Alan Dershowitz's defense of it," ''National Catholic Reporter'', October 14, 2005.
* Grant, Linda. , ''The Guardian'', December 18, 2001.
* Greenspan, Miriam. (Nov–Dec 2003). "The New Anti-Semitism". '']'' '''18''':6. p.&nbsp;33.
* Gross, Tom. "Jeningrad: What the British Media Said," in Rosenbaum, Ron (ed). ''Those who forget the past: The Question of Anti-Semitism'', Random House 2004.
* Harris, Ben. , JTA, January 23, 2006.
* Horowitz, Craig. , ''New York Magazine''.
*
* Iganski, Paul & Kosmin, Barry. (eds) ''New European Extremism: Hating America, Israel and the Jews''. Profile Books Limited, 2006. {{ISBN|1-86197-792-1}}
* Iganski, Paul & Kosmin, Barry. (eds) ''A New Antisemitism? Debating Judeophobia in 21st Century Britain'', Profile Books Limited, 2003. {{ISBN|1-86197-651-8}}
* ]. , ''National Post'', October 27, 2003.
* ]. , Posen Papers in Contemporary Antisemitism, No.1, Vidal Sassoon Center for the Study of Antisemitism, 2004.
* Kaye/Kantrowitz, Melanie. , '']'', March 2007.
* Kite, Melissa. , ''The Telegraph'', April 17, 2005.
* ]. "The collective Jew: Israel and the new antisemitism," used as a resource by the EUMC in their report ''Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002–2003'', Vienna, March 2004. See especially pp.&nbsp;12–13, 225–241.
* ] & ] , International Center for the Study of Anti-Semitism, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, retrieved September 8, 2006.
* ]. "Muslim Anti-Semitism" in Rosenbaum, Ron. ''Those who forget the past'', Random House, 2003. pp.&nbsp;549–62.
* Kuruvila, Matthai Chakko. , ''San Francisco Chronicle'', January 27, 2007.
* Lappin, Shalom. '''The New Antisemitism''': The Resurgence of an Ancient Hatred in the Modern World, Cambridge : Polity Press, 2024, ISBN 9781509558568.
* Lopez, Kathryn Jean. , ''National Review Online'', November 25, 2003.
* ]. , ''The Guardian'', September 7, 2006.
* McGeal, Chris. , ''The Guardian'', November 25, 2003
* Minerbi, Sergio I. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060614043720/http://www.jcpa.org/phas/phas-minerbi-f03.htm |date=2006-06-14 }}, Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, Fall 2003.
* Nirenstein, Fiamma. ''Terror: The New Anti-Semitism And The War Against The West'', 2005. {{ISBN|1-57525-377-1}}
* ]. , '']'', March 15, 2009.
* Pfeifer, Karl. , Scholars for Peace in the Middle East.
* ]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040603172154/http://www.freeman.org/m_online/jan98/pipes.htm |date=2004-06-03 }}.
* ] '']''
* Rosenblum, April. .
* {{cite book |editor-last=Rosenfeld |editor-first=Alvin H. |editor-link=Alvin Hirsch Rosenfeld |title=Deciphering the New Antisemitism |date=2015 |publisher=] |location=Bloomington, Indianapolis |isbn=9780253018694 |oclc=928716737}} {{Project MUSE|43135}}
* Rosenthal, John. , ''Policy Review Online'', retrieved August 29, 2006.
* ]. , June 2002.
* ]. .
* ]. , '']'', November 2003.
* ]. , January 1, 2002.
* Smith, Lewis. , ''The Times'', April 18, 2005
* Ury, Scott.
* Whine, Michael. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080407072742/http://www.thecst.org.uk/docs/RUSI%20Homeland%20Security.doc |date=2008-04-07 }} (DOC file), Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies.
* {{Interlanguage link|Guillaume Weill-Raynal|fr|3=Guillaume Weill-Raynal|lt=Weill-Raynal, Guillaume|vertical-align=sup}}, ''Une haine imaginaire : contre-enquête sur le nouvel antisémitisme'' (An imaginary hatred: investigation about the new antisemitism), Paris, Armand Colin, 2005, {{ISBN|2-200-26912-9}}.
* ] ''Antisemitism: The Longest Hatred''. Pantheon Books, 1992.
* ] , '']'', Number 72, Summer 2003.
* ] , American Jewish Committee, 2005.
* ] "From Ambivalence to Betrayal: The Left, the Jews, and Israel (Studies in Antisemitism)". University of Nebraska Press, 2012
* ] , ''U.S. News & World Report'', March 11, 2003.
* , "Make your point", Haaretz, July 18, 2004.
* , American Jewish Committee.
* , Christian Action for Israel.
* , CTV News, March 6, 2003.
* , BeitShalom.org
* , ], retrieved September 7, 2006.
*
* , Department for Jewish Zionist Education, The Jewish Agency for Israel.

'''Reports'''
* From government and inter-governmental sources
** , excerpted from a longer piece, and covering the period of July 1, 2003 – December 15, 2004].
** {{cite web |url=http://eumc.eu.int/eumc/material/pub/FT/Draft_anti-Semitism_report-web.pdf |title=Manifestations of Anti-Semitism in the European Union |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050415100309/http://eumc.eu.int/eumc/material/pub/FT/Draft_anti-Semitism_report-web.pdf |archive-date=2005-04-15 }}&nbsp;{{small|(751&nbsp;KB)}} Unpublished EU report from 2003
** {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060512013120/http://lesrapports.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/BRP/054000193/0000.pdf |date=2006-05-12 }}
* From the ]
** , Anti-Defamation League, July 11, 2002
** based on a .
** .
** , ], August 22, 2006.
** , ], January 28, 2003.
* From the ]
** December 21, 2003
** , December 2006
** , June 2006
{{refend}}

== External links ==
* an online lecture by Professor David Bankier of ]
* from the
*
* {{Internet Archive film clip|id=openmind_ep399|description="The Open Mind – Anti-Semitism, Part I (1981)"}}
* {{Internet Archive film clip|id=openmind_ep400|description="The Open Mind – Anti-Semitism, Part II (1981)"}}


{{Antisemitism topics}}
]
{{World topic| prefix= Fascism in |title= ]|noredlinks=yes}}
{{Authority control}}


]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 02:21, 22 December 2024

Part of a series on
Antisemitism
Definitions
Geography
Manifestations
Antisemitic tropes
Antisemitic publications
Persecution
Antisemitism on the Internet
Opposition
Category

New antisemitism is the concept that a new form of antisemitism developed in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, typically manifesting itself as anti-Zionism. The concept is included in some definitions of antisemitism, such as the working definition of antisemitism and the 3D test of antisemitism. The concept dates to the early 1970s.

Proponents of the concept generally posit that in the late 20th and early 21st centuries much of what is purported to be criticism of Israel is in fact tantamount to demonization, and that together with evidence of a resurgence of antisemitic attacks on Jews, desecration of Jewish symbols and Judaism, Holocaust denial, and an increased acceptance of antisemitic beliefs in public discourse and online hate speech, such demonization represents an evolution in the appearance of antisemitic beliefs. Proponents argue that anti-Zionism and demonization of Israel, or double standards applied to its conduct (some also include anti-Americanism, anti-globalization, and Third-Worldism) may be linked to antisemitism, or constitute disguised antisemitism, particularly when emanating simultaneously from the far-left, Islamism, and the far-right.

Critics of the concept argue that it is used in practice to weaponize antisemitism in order to silence political debate and freedom of speech regarding the ongoing Israeli–Palestinian conflict, by conflating political anti-Zionism and criticism of the Israeli government with racism, condoning violence against Jews or likening the Israeli government's actions to the Holocaust. Such arguments have in turn been criticized as antisemitic and rhetorically irrelevant to the contested reality of new antisemitism. Further critical arguments include that the concept defines legitimate criticism of Israel too narrowly and demonization too broadly, and that it trivializes the meaning of antisemitism.

History of the concept

1960s: origins

French philosopher Pierre-André Taguieff argues that the first wave of "la nouvelle judéophobie" emerged in the Arab-Muslim world and the Soviet sphere following the 1967 Six-Day War. He cites papers by Jacques Givet (1968) and historian Léon Poliakov (1969) discussing the idea of a new antisemitism rooted in anti-Zionism. He argues that anti-Jewish themes centered on the demonical figures of Israel and what he calls "fantasy-world Zionism": that Jews plot together, seek to conquer the world, and are imperialistic and bloodthirsty, which gave rise to the reactivation of stories about ritual murder and the poisoning of food and water supplies.

1970s: early debates

Writing in the American Jewish Congress' Congress Bi-Weekly in 1973, the Foreign Minister of Israel Abba Eban identified anti-Zionism as "the new anti-Semitism", saying:

ecently we have witnessed the rise of the new left which identifies Israel with the establishment, with acquisition, with smug satisfaction, with, in fact, all the basic enemies ... Let there be no mistake: the new left is the author and the progenitor of the new anti-Semitism. One of the chief tasks of any dialogue with the Gentile world is to prove that the distinction between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism is not a distinction at all. Anti-Zionism is merely the new anti-Semitism. The old classic anti-Semitism declared that equal rights belong to all individuals within the society, except the Jews. The new anti-Semitism says that the right to establish and maintain an independent national sovereign state is the prerogative of all nations, so long as they happen not to be Jewish. And when this right is exercised not by the Maldive Islands, not by the state of Gabon, not by Barbados ... but by the oldest and most authentic of all nationhoods, then this is said to be exclusivism, particularism, and a flight of the Jewish people from its universal mission.

In 1974, Arnold Forster and Benjamin Epstein of the Anti-Defamation League published the book The New anti-Semitism. They expressed concern about what they described as new manifestations of antisemitism coming from radical left, radical right, and pro-Arab figures in the U.S. Forster and Epstein argued that it took the form of indifference to the fears of the Jewish people, apathy in dealing with anti-Jewish bias, and an inability to understand the importance of Israel to Jewish survival.

A sign held at a protest in Edinburgh, Scotland, on January 10, 2009

Reviewing Forster and Epstein's work in Commentary, Earl Raab, founding director of the Nathan Perlmutter Institute for Jewish Advocacy at Brandeis University, argued that a "new anti-Semitism" was indeed emerging in America, in the form of opposition to the collective rights of the Jewish people, but he criticized Forster and Epstein for conflating it with anti-Israel bias. Allan Brownfeld writes that Forster and Epstein's new definition of antisemitism trivialized the concept by turning it into "a form of political blackmail" and "a weapon with which to silence any criticism of either Israel or U.S. policy in the Middle East," while Edward S. Shapiro, in A Time for Healing: American Jewry Since World War II, has written that "Forster and Epstein implied that the new anti-Semitism was the inability of Gentiles to love Jews and Israel enough."

1980s–present day: continued debate

Graffiti in Madrid, 2003

Historian Robert Wistrich addressed the issue in a 1984 lecture delivered in the home of Israeli President Chaim Herzog, in which he argued that a "new anti-Semitic anti-Zionism" was emerging, distinguishing features of which were the equation of Zionism with Nazism and the belief that Zionists had actively collaborated with Nazis during World War II. He argued that such claims were prevalent in the Soviet Union, but added that similar rhetoric had been taken up by a part of the radical Left, particularly Trotskyist groups in Western Europe and America.

When asked in 2014 if "anti-Zionism is the new anti-Semitism", Noam Chomsky stated:

Actually, the locus classicus, the best formulation of this, was by an ambassador to the United Nations, Abba Eban, ... He advised the American Jewish community that they had two tasks to perform. One task was to show that criticism of the policy, what he called anti-Zionism – that means actually criticisms of the policy of the state of Israel – were anti-Semitism. That's the first task. Second task, if the criticism was made by Jews, their task was to show that it's neurotic self-hatred, needs psychiatric treatment. Then he gave two examples of the latter category. One was I.F. Stone. The other was me. So, we have to be treated for our psychiatric disorders, and non-Jews have to be condemned for anti-Semitism, if they're critical of the state of Israel. That's understandable why Israeli propaganda would take this position. I don't particularly blame Abba Eban for doing what ambassadors are sometimes supposed to do. But we ought to understand that there is no sensible charge. No sensible charge. There's nothing to respond to. It's not a form of anti-Semitism. It's simply criticism of the criminal actions of a state, period.

Definitions and arguments for and against the concept

A new phenomenon

Irwin Cotler, Professor of Law at McGill University and a scholar of human rights, has identified nine aspects of what he considers to constitute the "new anti-Semitism":

Cotler defines "classical or traditional anti-Semitism" as "the discrimination against, denial of or assault upon the rights of Jews to live as equal members of whatever host society they inhabit" and "new anti-Semitism" as "discrimination against the right of the Jewish people to live as an equal member of the family of nations – the denial of and assault upon the Jewish people's right even to live – with Israel as the "collective Jew among the nations."

Cotler elaborated on this position in a June 2011 interview for Israeli television. He re-iterated his view that the world is "witnessing a new and escalating ... and even lethal anti-Semitism" focused on hatred of Israel, but cautioned that this type of antisemitism should not be defined in a way that precludes "free speech" and "rigorous debate" about Israel's activities. Cotler said that it is "too simplistic to say that anti-Zionism, per se, is anti-Semitic" and argued that labelling Israel as an apartheid state, while in his view "distasteful", is "still within the boundaries of argument" and not inherently antisemitic. He continued: "It's you say, because it's an apartheid state, it has to be dismantled – then crossed the line into a racist argument, or an anti-Jewish argument."

Jack Fischel, former chair of history at Millersville University of Pennsylvania, writes that new antisemitism is a new phenomenon stemming from a coalition of "leftists, vociferously opposed to the policies of Israel, and right-wing antisemites, committed to the destruction of Israel, were joined by millions of Muslims, including Arabs, who immigrated to Europe... and who brought with them their hatred of Israel in particular and of Jews in general." It is this new political alignment, he argues, that makes new antisemitism unique. Mark Strauss of Foreign Policy links new antisemitism to anti-globalism, describing it as "the medieval image of the "Christ-killing" Jew resurrected on the editorial pages of cosmopolitan European newspapers."

Rajesh Krishnamachari, researcher with the South Asia Analysis Group, analyzed antisemitism in Iran, Turkey, Palestine, Pakistan, Malaysia, Bangladesh and Saudi Arabia and posited that the recent surge in antisemitism across the Muslim world should be attributed to political expediency of the local elite in these countries rather than to any theological imperative.

It is the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement refusing to put the Star of David on their ambulances. ... It is neo-Nazis donning checkered Palestinian kaffiyehs and Palestinians lining up to buy copies of Mein Kampf. —Mark Strauss

The French philosopher Pierre-André Taguieff argues that antisemitism based on racism and nationalism has been replaced by a new form based on anti-racism and anti-nationalism. He identifies some of its main features as the identification of Zionism with racism; the use of material related to Holocaust denial (such as doubts about the number of victims and allegations that there is a "Holocaust industry"); a discourse borrowed from third worldism, anti-imperialism, anti-colonialism, anti-Americanism and anti-globalization; and the dissemination of what he calls the "myth" of the "intrinsically good Palestinian – the innocent victim par excellence."

In early 2009, 125 parliamentarians from various countries gathered in London for the founding conference of a group called the "Interparliamentary Coalition for Combating Anti-Semitism" (ICCA). They suggest that while classical antisemitism "overlaps" modern antisemitism, it is a different phenomenon and a more dangerous one for Jews.

A new phenomenon, but not antisemitism

Brian Klug argues that the new prejudice is not antisemitism, new or old, nor a mutation of an existing virus, but "a brand new 'bug'".

Brian Klug, senior research fellow in philosophy at St Benet's Hall, Oxford – who gave expert testimony in February 2006 to a British parliamentary inquiry into antisemitism in the UK, and in November 2004 to the Hearing on Anti-Semitism at the German Bundestag – argues against the idea that there is a "single, unified phenomenon" that could be called "new" antisemitism. He accepts that there is reason for the Jewish community to be concerned, but argues that any increase in antisemitic incidents is attributable to classical antisemitism. Proponents of the new antisemitism concept, he writes, see an organizing principle that allows them to formulate a new concept, but it is only in terms of this concept that many of the examples cited in evidence of it count as examples in the first place. That is, the creation of the concept may be based on a circular argument or tautology. He argues that it is an unhelpful concept, because it devalues the term "antisemitism," leading to widespread cynicism about the use of it. People of goodwill who support the Palestinians resent being falsely accused of antisemitism.

Klug defines classical antisemitism as "an ingrained European fantasy about Jews as Jews," arguing that whether Jews are seen as a race, religion, or ethnicity, and whether antisemitism comes from the right or the left, the antisemite's image of the Jew is always as "a people set apart, not merely by their customs but by their collective character. They are arrogant, secretive, cunning, always looking to turn a profit. Loyal only to their own, wherever they go they form a state within a state, preying upon the societies in whose midst they dwell. Mysteriously powerful, their hidden hand controls the banks and the media. They will even drag governments into war if this suits their purposes. Such is the figure of 'the Jew,' transmitted from generation to generation."

hen anti-Semitism is everywhere, it is nowhere. And when every anti-Zionist is an anti-Semite, we no longer know how to recognize the real thing—the concept of anti-Semitism loses its significance. —Brian Klug

He argues that although it is true that the new antisemitism incorporates the idea that antisemitism is hostility to Jews as Jews, the source of the hostility has changed; therefore, to continue using the same expression for it – antisemitism – causes confusion. Today's hostility to Jews as Jews is based on the Arab–Israeli conflict, not on ancient European fantasies. Israel proclaims itself as the state of the Jewish people, and many Jews align themselves with Israel for that very reason. It is out of this alignment that the hostility to Jews as Jews arises, rather than hostility to Israelis or to Zionists. Klug agrees that it is a prejudice, because it is a generalization about individuals; nevertheless, he argues, it is "not rooted in the ideology of 'the Jew'," and is therefore a different phenomenon from antisemitism.

In 2006, Norman Finkelstein argued that there has been no significant rise in antisemitism: "What does the evidence show? There has been good investigation done, serious investigation. All the evidence shows there's no evidence at all for a rise of a new anti-Semitism, whether in Europe or in North America. The evidence is zero. And, in fact, there's a new book put out by an Israel stalwart. His name is Walter Laqueur, a very prominent scholar. It's called The Changing Face of Anti-Semitism. It just came out, 2006, from Oxford University Press. He looks at the evidence, and he says no. There's some in Europe among the Muslim community, there's some anti-Semitism, but the notion that in the heart of European society or North American society there's anti-Semitism is preposterous. And in fact – or no, a significant rise in anti-Semitism is preposterous."

In 2023, according to the FBI, antisemitic hate crimes in the United States surged 63 percent to 1,832 recorded incidents, the highest on record.  Antisemitic incidents represented 15% of all hate crimes and 68% of all religion-based hate crimes, though Jews only make up about 2% of the population. In 2024, reports of bomb threats to synagogues, antisemitic harassment, vandalism and assault reached record-high numbers in four of the past six years in the United States.

Criticism of Israel is not always antisemitism

The 3D Test of Antisemitism is a set of criteria put forth by Natan Sharansky to distinguish legitimate criticism of Israel from antisemitism. The three Ds stand for Delegitimization of Israel, Demonization of Israel, and subjecting Israel to Double standards, each of which, according to the test, indicates antisemitism. The test is intended to draw the line between legitimate criticism towards the State of Israel, its actions and policies, and non-legitimate criticism that becomes antisemitic.

Earl Raab writes that "here is a new surge of antisemitism in the world, and much prejudice against Israel is driven by such antisemitism," but argues that charges of antisemitism based on anti-Israel opinions generally lack credibility. He writes that "a grave educational misdirection is imbedded in formulations suggesting that if we somehow get rid of antisemitism, we will get rid of anti-Israelism. This reduces the problems of prejudice against Israel to cartoon proportions." Raab describes prejudice against Israel as a "serious breach of morality and good sense," and argues that it is often a bridge to antisemitism, but distinguishes it from antisemitism as such.

Steven Zipperstein, professor of Jewish Culture and History at Stanford University, argues that a belief in the State of Israel's responsibility for the Arab-Israeli conflict is considered "part of what a reasonably informed, progressive, decent person thinks." He argues that Jews have a tendency to see the State of Israel as a victim because they were very recently themselves "the quintessential victims".

Accusations of misuse of the term to stifle criticism of Israel

Main article: Weaponization of antisemitism

Norman Finkelstein argues that organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League have brought forward charges of new antisemitism at various intervals since the 1970s, "not to fight antisemitism but rather to exploit the historical suffering of Jews in order to immunize Israel against criticism". He writes that most evidence purporting to show a new antisemitism has been taken from organizations that are linked in some way to Israel, or that have "a material stake in inflating the findings of anti-Semitism," and that some antisemitic incidents reported in recent years either did not occur or were misidentified. As an example of the misuse of the term "antisemitism," he cites the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia's 2003 report, which included displays of the Palestinian flag, support for the PLO, and the comparisons between Israel and apartheid-era South Africa in its list of antisemitic activities and beliefs.

Norman Finkelstein writes that anger at what he calls "Israel's brutal occupation has undoubtedly slipped over to an animus against Jews generally", which he describes as "lamentable" but "hardly cause for wonder".

He writes that what is called the new antisemitism consists of three components: (i) "exaggeration and fabrication"; (ii) "mislabeling legitimate criticism of Israeli policy"; and (iii) "the unjustified yet predictable spillover from criticism of Israel to Jews generally." He argues that Israel's apologists have denied a causal relationship between Israeli policies and hostility toward Jews, since "if Israeli policies, and widespread Jewish support for them, evoke hostility toward Jews, it means that Israel and its Jewish supporters might themselves be causing anti-Semitism; and it might be doing so because Israel and its Jewish supporters are in the wrong".

Tariq Ali, a British-Pakistani historian and political activist, argues that the concept of new antisemitism amounts to an attempt to subvert the language in the interests of the State of Israel. He writes that the campaign against "the supposed new 'anti-semitism'" in modern Europe is a "cynical ploy on the part of the Israeli Government to seal off the Zionist state from any criticism of its regular and consistent brutality against the Palestinians.... Criticism of Israel can not and should not be equated with anti-semitism." He argues that most pro-Palestinian, anti-Zionist groups that emerged after the Six-Day War were careful to observe the distinction between anti-Zionism and antisemitism.

A third wave

Bernard Lewis argues that the new antisemitism – what he calls "ideological antisemitism" – has mutated out of religious and racial antisemitism.

Historian Bernard Lewis argues that the new antisemitism represents the third, or ideological, wave of antisemitism, the first two waves being religious and racial antisemitism.

Lewis defines antisemitism as a special case of prejudice, hatred, or persecution directed against people who are in some way different from the rest. According to Lewis, antisemitism is marked by two distinct features: Jews are judged according to a standard different from that applied to others, and they are accused of cosmic evil. He writes that what he calls the first wave of antisemitism arose with the advent of Christianity because of the Jews' rejection of Jesus as Messiah. The second wave, racial antisemitism, emerged in Spain when large numbers of Jews were forcibly converted, and doubts about the sincerity of the converts led to ideas about the importance of "la limpieza de sangre", purity of blood.

He associates the third wave with the Arabs and writes that it arose only in part because of the establishment of the State of Israel. Until the 19th century, Muslims had regarded Jews with what Lewis calls "amused, tolerant superiority – they were seen as physically weak, cowardly and unmilitary – and although Jews living in Muslim countries were not treated as equals, they were shown a certain amount of respect. The Western form of antisemitism – what Lewis calls "the cosmic, satanic version of Jew hatred – arrived in the Middle East in several stages, beginning with Christian missionaries in the 19th century and continued to grow slowly into the 20th century up to the establishment of the Third Reich. He writes that it increased because of the humiliation of the Israeli military victories of 1948 and 1967.

Into this mix entered the United Nations. Lewis argues that the international public response and the United Nations' handling of the 1948 refugee situation convinced the Arab world that discrimination against Jews was acceptable. When the ancient Jewish community in East Jerusalem was evicted and its monuments desecrated or destroyed, they were offered no help. Similarly, when Jewish refugees fled or were driven out of Arab countries, no help was offered, but elaborate arrangements were made for Arabs who fled or were driven out of the area that became Israel. All the Arab governments involved in the conflict announced that they would not admit Israelis of any religion into their territories, and that they would not give visas to Jews, no matter which country they were citizens of. Lewis argues that the failure of the United Nations to protest sent a clear message to the Arab world.

He writes that this third wave of antisemitism has in common with the first wave that Jews are able to be part of it. With religious antisemitism, Jews were able to distance themselves from Judaism, and Lewis writes that some even reached high rank within the church and the Inquisition. With racial antisemitism, this was not possible, but with the new, ideological, antisemitism, Jews are once again able to join the critics. The new antisemitism also allows non-Jews, he argues, to criticize or attack Jews without feeling overshadowed by the crimes of the Nazis.

Antisemitism, but not a new phenomenon

Yehuda Bauer argues that "new" antisemitism is not actually new.

Yehuda Bauer, professor of Holocaust studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, considers the concept "new antisemitism" false, describing the phenomenon as old, latent antisemitism that recurs when triggered. In his view, the current trigger is the Israeli situation, and if a compromise were achieved there antisemitism would decline but not disappear.

Dina Porat, professor at Tel Aviv University says that, while in principle there is no new antisemitism, we can speak of antisemitism in a new envelope. Otherwise Porat speaks of a new and violent form of antisemitism in Western Europe starting after the Second Intifada.

Howard Jacobson, a British novelist and journalist, calls this phenomenon "Jew-hating pure and simple, the Jew-hating which many of us have always suspected was the only explanation for the disgust that contorts and disfigures faces when the mere word Israel crops up in conversation."

An inappropriate redefinition

Antony Lerman, writing in the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz in September 2008, argues that the concept of a "new antisemitism" has brought about "a revolutionary change in the discourse about anti-Semitism". He writes that most contemporary discussions concerning antisemitism have become focused on issues concerning Israel and Zionism, and that the equation of anti-Zionism with antisemitism has become for many a "new orthodoxy". He adds that this redefinition has often resulted in "Jews attacking other Jews for their alleged anti-Semitic anti-Zionism". While Lerman accepts that exposing alleged Jewish antisemitism is "legitimate in principle", he adds that the growing literature in this field "exceeds all reason"; the attacks are often vitriolic, and encompass views that are not inherently anti-Zionist.

Lerman argues that this redefinition has had unfortunate repercussions. He writes that serious scholarly research into contemporary antisemitism has become "virtually non-existent", and that the subject is now most frequently studied and analyzed by "people lacking any serious expertise in the subject, whose principal aim is to excoriate Jewish critics of Israel and to promote the "anti-Zionism = anti-Semitism" equation. Lerman concludes that this redefinition has ultimately served to stifle legitimate discussion, and that it cannot create a basis on which to fight antisemitism.

Peter Beaumont, writing in The Observer, agrees that proponents of the concept of "new antisemitism" have attempted to co-opt anti-Jewish sentiment and attacks by some European Muslims as a way to silence opposition to the policies of the Israeli government. "riticise Israel," he writes, "and you are an anti-Semite just as surely as if you were throwing paint at a synagogue in Paris."

Antisemitic anti-Zionism

Scholars including Werner Bergmann, Simon Schama, Alan Johnson, David Hirsh and Anthony Julius have described a distinctively 21st century form of antisemitic anti-Zionism characterized by left-wing hostility to Jews. According to historian Geoffrey Alderman, opposition to Zionism (being against a Jewish state) can be legitimately described as racist in essence.

Norman H. Finkelstein describes the BDS movement as failing all of Natan Sharansky's 3D's, since the movement delegitimizes Israel, demonizes Israel, and applies double standards for criticizing Israel out of proportion to other nations, ignoring other countries' misdeeds.

In 2024, over 1000 entertainers, authors and artists signed an open letter, released by the non-profit Creative Community for Peace (CCFP), opposing boycotts of Israeli and Jewish authors and literary institutions. The letter decried efforts to "demonize and ostracize Jewish authors across the globe".

In fall 2024, campus protests using chants such as "Divest!" and "Ceasefire now!" reportedly evolved in a direction more explicitly endorsing Hamas, Hezbollah, and Houthis. Some protesters used slogans such as "Glory to the resistance!", called the October 7 attacks "Al-Aqsa flood", celebrated Yahya Sinwar, and used the Hamas inverted red triangle. Jewish students were called "baby killers" and "terrorists", according to a Baruch College student.

In November 2024, hundreds of posters depicting Jewish faculty members as "wanted" were spread across the University of Rochester campus. The posters accused Jewish faculty members of ethnic cleansing, racism, hate speech, and intimidation. University President Sarah Mangelsdorf called the incident an act of antisemitism.

International perspectives

Globe icon.The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate. (November 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Europe

The European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) (superseded in 2007 by the Fundamental Rights Agency) noted an upswing in antisemitic incidents in France, Germany, Austria, Sweden, the United Kingdom, Belgium, and The Netherlands between July 2003 and December 2004. In September 2004, the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance, a part of the Council of Europe, called on its member nations to ensure that anti-racist criminal law covers antisemitism, and in 2005, the EUMC offered a discussion paper on a working definition of antisemitism in an attempt to enable a standard definition to be used for data collection: It defined antisemitism as "a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred towards Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed towards Jews and non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, towards Jewish community institutions and religious facilities." The paper's “Examples of the ways in which anti-Semitism manifests itself with regard to the state of Israel taking into account the overall context could include":

  • Denying the Jewish people the right to self-determination, e.g. by claiming that the existence of a state of Israel is a racist endeavor;
  • Applying double standards by requiring of Israel a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation;
  • Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g. claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis;
  • Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
  • Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the State of Israel.

The EUMC added that criticism of Israel cannot be regarded as antisemitism so long as it is "similar to that leveled against any other country."

The discussion paper was never adopted by the EU as a working definition, although it was posted on the EUMC website until 2013 when it was removed during a clear-out of non-official documents.

France

Main article: Antisemitism in 21st-century France

In France, Interior Minister Dominique de Villepin commissioned a report on racism and antisemitism from Jean-Christophe Rufin, president of Action Against Hunger and former vice-president of Médecins Sans Frontières, in which Rufin challenges the perception that the new antisemitism in France comes exclusively from North African immigrant communities and the far right.

Reporting in October 2004, Rufin writes that "he new anti-Semitism appears more heterogeneous," and identifies what he calls a new and "subtle" form of antisemitism in "radical anti-Zionism" as expressed by far-left and anti-globalization groups, in which criticism of Jews and Israel is used as a pretext to "legitimize the armed Palestinian conflict."

United Kingdom

In June 2011, Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom, Jonathan Sacks (Lord Sacks), said that the basis for the new antisemitism was the 2001 Durban Conference. Rabbi Sacks also said that the new antisemitism "unites radical Islamists with human-rights NGOs – the right wing and the left wing – against a common enemy, the State of Israel."

In September 2006, the All-Party Parliamentary Group against Anti-Semitism of the British parliament published the Report of the All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Antisemitism, the result of an investigation into whether the belief that the "prevailing opinion both within the Jewish community and beyond" that antisemitism had "receded to the point that it existed only on the margins of society." was correct. It concluded that "the evidence we received indicates that there has been a reversal of this progress since the year 2000". In defining antisemitism, the Group wrote that it took into account the view of racism expressed by the MacPherson report, which was published after the murder of Stephen Lawrence, that, for the purpose of investigating and recording complaints of crime by the police, an act must be recorded by the police as racist if it is defined as such by its victim. It formed the view that, broadly, "any remark, insult or act the purpose or effect of which is to violate a Jewish person's dignity or create an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for him is antisemitic" and concluded that, given that, "it is the Jewish community itself that is best qualified to determine what does and does not constitute antisemitism."

The report states that some left-wing activists and Muslim extremists are using criticism of Israel as a "pretext" for antisemitism, and that the "most worrying discovery" is that antisemitism appears to be entering the mainstream. It argues that anti-Zionism may become antisemitic when it adopts a view of Zionism as a "global force of unlimited power and malevolence throughout history," a definition that "bears no relation to the understanding that most Jews have of the concept: that is, a movement of Jewish national liberation ..." Having re-defined Zionism, the report states, traditional antisemitic motifs of Jewish "conspiratorial power, manipulation and subversion" are often transferred from Jews onto Zionism. The report notes that this is "at the core of the 'New Antisemitism', on which so much has been written," adding that many of those who gave evidence called anti-Zionism "the lingua franca of antisemitic movements."

Israel

In November 2001 according to the Israeli Ministry of Diaspora Affairs, in response to an Abu-Dhabi television broadcast depicting Ariel Sharon drinking the blood of Palestinian children, the Israeli government set up the "Coordinating Forum for Countering Antisemitism", headed by Deputy Foreign Minister Rabbi Michael Melchior. According to Melchior, "in each and every generation antisemitism tries to hide its ugly face behind various disguises – and hatred of the State of Israel is its current disguise." He added that, "hate against Israel has crossed the red line, having gone from criticism to unbridled antisemitic venom, which is a precise translation of classical antisemitism whose past results are all too familiar to the entire world."

United Nations

See also: Israel and the United Nations

A number of commentators argue that the United Nations has condoned antisemitism. Lawrence Summers, then-president of Harvard University, wrote that the UN's World Conference on Racism failed to condemn human rights abuses in China, Rwanda, or anywhere in the Arab world, while raising Israel's alleged ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.

David Matas, senior counsel to B'nai B'rith Canada, has written that the UN is a forum for antisemitism, citing the example of the Palestinian representative to the UN Human Rights Commission who claimed in 1997 that Israeli doctors had injected Palestinian children with the AIDS virus. Congressman Steve Chabot told the U.S. House of Representatives in 2005 that the commission took "several months to correct in its record a statement by the Syrian ambassador that Jews allegedly had killed non-Jewish children to make unleavened bread for Passover.

Anne Bayefsky, a Canadian legal scholar who addressed the UN about its treatment of Israel, argues that the UN hijacks the language of human rights to discriminate and demonize Jews. She writes that over one quarter of the resolutions condemning a state's human rights violations have been directed at Israel. "But there has never been a single resolution about the decades-long repression of the civil and political rights of 1.3 billion people in China, or the million female migrant workers in Saudi Arabia kept as virtual slaves, or the virulent racism which has brought 600,000 people to the brink of starvation in Zimbabwe."

In a 2008 report on antisemitism from the United States Department of State to the US Congress,

Motives for criticizing Israel in the UN may stem from legitimate concerns over policy or from illegitimate prejudices. ... However, regardless of the intent, disproportionate criticism of Israel as barbaric and unprincipled, and corresponding discriminatory measures adopted in the UN against Israel, have the effect of causing audiences to associate negative attributes with Jews in general, thus fueling anti-Semitism.

United States

Poster held by a protester at an anti-war rally in San Francisco on February 16, 2003

In September 2006, Yale University announced that it had established the Yale Initiative for the Interdisciplinary Study of Anti-Semitism, the first university-based institute in North America dedicated to the study of antisemitism. Charles Small, head of the institute, said in a press release that antisemitism has "reemerged internationally in a manner that many leading scholars and policy makers take seriously ... Increasingly, Jewish communities around the world feel under threat. It's almost like going back into the lab. I think we need to understand the current manifestation of this disease." YIISA has presented several seminars and working papers on the topic, for instance "The Academic and Public Debate Over the Meaning of the 'New Antisemitism'".

In July 2006, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights issued a Campus Antisemitism report that declared that "Anti-Semitic bigotry is no less morally deplorable when camouflaged as anti-Israelism or anti-Zionism." At the time, the commission also announced that antisemitism is a "serious problem" on many campuses throughout the United States.

The U.S. State Department's 2004 Report on Global Anti-Semitism identified four sources of rising antisemitism, particularly in Europe:

  • "Traditional anti-Jewish prejudice... This includes ultra-nationalists and others who assert that the Jewish community controls governments, the media, international business, and the financial world."
  • "Strong anti-Israel sentiment that crosses the line between objective criticism of Israeli policies and anti-Semitism."
  • "Anti-Jewish sentiment expressed by some in Europe's growing Muslim population, based on longstanding antipathy toward both Israel and Jews, as well as Muslim opposition to developments in Israel and the occupied territories, and more recently in Iraq."
  • "Criticism of both the United States and globalization that spills over to Israel, and to Jews in general who are identified with both."

Anti-globalization movement

The anti-globalization movement of the late 1990s and early 2000s was accused by writers and researchers such as Walter Laqueur, Paul Berman, and Mark Strauss of displaying elements of new antisemitism. Critics of the Laqueur–Berman–Strauss view argue that the allegation is either unfounded or exaggerated, intended to discredit legitimate criticism of globalization and of free trade economic policies.

Mark Strauss's allegations

Mark Strauss of Foreign Policy argues that globalization has stirred anxieties about "outside forces", and that with "familiar anxieties come familiar scapegoats." He writes that what he calls the "backlash against globalization" has united a variety of political elements, from the left to the far-right, via a common cause, and that in so doing it has "foster a common enemy." He quotes the French Jewish leader Roger Cukierman who identifies the anti-globalization movement as "an anti-Semitic brown-green-red alliance", which includes ultra-nationalists, Islamists, and communists.

Strauss cites Jörg Haider of the far-right Freedom Party of Austria and Jean-Marie Le Pen of France's National Front as examples of the far right exploiting their electorate's concerns about globalization. The fringe Fascism and Freedom Movement in Italy identifies globalization as an "instrument in the hands of international Zionism" according to Strauss, while in Eastern Europe ultranationalists and communists have united against foreign investors and multinationals, identifying Jews as a common enemy.

Matthew F. Hale, an American white nationalist of the World Church of the Creator, stated of the 1999 protests in Seattle that they were "incredibly successful from the point of view of the rioters as well as our Church. They helped shut down talks of the Jew World Order WTO and helped make a mockery of the Jewish Occupational Government around the world. Bravo." Strauss also cites the National Alliance, a neo-Nazi party which set up a website called the Anti-Globalism Action Network in order to "broaden ... the anti-globalism movement to include divergent and marginalized voices."

Strauss writes that, as a result of far-right involvement, a "bizarre ideological turf war has broken out", whereby anti-globalization activists are fighting a "two-front battle," one against the World Trade Organization, International Monetary Fund, and World Bank, the other against the extremists who turn up at their rallies. He points to an anti-globalization march in Porto Alegre, Brazil, at which he says some marchers displayed swastikas and that Jewish peace activists were assaulted. He wrote:

"Held two months prior to the U.S.-led attack on Iraq, this year's conference – an annual grassroots riposte to the well-heeled World Economic Forum in Davos – had the theme, 'Another World is Possible.' But the more appropriate theme might have been 'Yesterday's World is Back.' Marchers among the 20,000 activists from 120 countries carried signs reading 'Nazis, Yankees, and Jews: No More Chosen Peoples!' Some wore T-shirts with the Star of David twisted into Nazi swastikas. Members of a Palestinian organization pilloried Jews as the 'true fundamentalists who control United States capitalism.' Jewish delegates carrying banners declaring 'Two peoples – Two states: Peace in the Middle East' were assaulted.

Strauss argues that the anti-globalization movement is not itself antisemitic but that it "helps enable anti-Semitism by peddling conspiracy theories." Strauss's arguments have been met with strong criticism from many in the anti-globalization movement. Oded Grajew, one of the founders of the World Social Forum, has written that the WSF "is not anti-Semitic, anti-American, or even anti-socially-responsible capitalism". He claims that some fringe parties have attempted to infiltrate the WSF's demonstrations and promote demonstrations of their own, but adds that "he success of the WSF ... is a threat to political extremist groups that resort to violence and hatred". Grajew has also written that, to his knowledge, Strauss's claim of Nazi symbols being displayed at an anti-globalization demonstration in Porto Alegre, Brazil is false.

Response to Strauss

Maude Barlow, national chairperson of the Council of Canadians, argues that Strauss has "inflamed, not enlightened" the debate over globalization by making "no distinction between the far right's critique of globalization and that of the global social justice movement", which is premised on "respect for human rights and cultural diversity". She notes that the Council of Canadians has condemned antisemitism, and that it expelled some individuals who tried to organize a David Icke tour under its auspices. John Cavanagh of the International Policy Centre has also criticized Strauss for using unproven allegations of antisemitism to criticize the entire anti-globalization movement, and for failing to research the movement's core beliefs.

In response to these criticisms, Strauss has written that antisemitic views "might not reflect the core values of the Global Justice Movement or its leading figures, yet they are facts of life in an amorphous, grassroots movement where any number of individuals or organizations express their opinions or seek to set the agenda". He has also reiterated his concern that "anti-capitalist rhetoric provides intellectual fodder for far right groups".

Other views

Walter Laqueur describes this phenomenon:

Although traditional Trotskyite ideology is in no way close to radical Islamic teachings and the shariah, since the radical Islamists also subscribed to anticapitalism, antiglobalism, and anti-Americanism, there seemed to be sufficient common ground for an alliance. Thus, the militants of the far left began to march side by side with the radical Islamists in demonstrations, denouncing American aggression and Israeli crimes. ... And it was only natural that in protest demonstrations militants from the far right would join in, antisemitic banners would be displayed, anti-Jewish literature such as the Protocols would be sold.

Lawrence Summers, then president of Harvard University, also stated that "erious and thoughtful people are advocating and taking actions that are anti-Semitic in their effect if not their intent. For example ... t the same rallies where protesters, many of them university students, condemn the IMF and global capitalism and raise questions about globalization, it is becoming increasingly common to also lash out at Israel. Indeed, at the anti-IMF rallies last spring, chants were heard equating Hitler and Sharon."

A March 2003 report on antisemitism in the European Union by Werner Bergmann and Juliane Wetzel of the Berlin Research Centre on Anti-Semitism identifies anti-globalization rallies as one of the sources of antisemitism on the left.

In the extreme left-wing scene, anti-Semitic remarks were to be found mainly in the context of pro-Palestinian and anti-globalisation rallies and in newspaper articles using anti-Semitic stereotypes in their criticism of Israel. Often this generated a combination of anti-Zionist and anti-American views that formed an important element in the emergence of an anti-Semitic mood in Europe.

Michael Kozak, then U.S. Acting Assistant Secretary for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, told reporters in 2005 that people within the anti-globalization movement have conflated their legitimate concerns "with this idea that Jews run the world and globalization is the fault of Jews." He said:

I think one of the disturbing things is that you're starting to see this in some – you know, it's not just sort of right-wing ultranationalist skinhead types. It's now you're getting some fairly otherwise respectable intellectuals that are left of center who are anti-globalization who are starting to let this stuff creep into their rhetoric.

And that's disturbing because it starts to – it starts to take what is a legitimate issue for debate, anti-globalization or the war in Iraq or any other issue, and when you start turning that into an excuse for saying therefore we should hate Jews, that's where you cross the line, in my view. It's not that you're not entitled to question all those other issues. Of course, those are fair game. But it's the same as saying, you know, you start hating all Muslims because of some policy you don't like by one Muslim country or something.

Conflation of globalization, Jews and Israel

Demonstration against Israel in Seattle, 2009

Robert Wistrich, Professor of European and Jewish History at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, told Manfred Gerstenfeld that globalization has given rise to an anti-globalist left that is "viscerally anti-American, anti-capitalist, and hostile to world Jewry." He argues that the decade that preceded the current increase in antisemitism was one that saw accelerated globalization of the world economy, a process in which the losers included the Arab and Muslim worlds, and who are now the "major consumers of anti-Jewish poison and conspiracy theories that blame everyone except themselves. Israel is only one piece on this chessboard, but it has assumed such inflated importance because it serves a classic anti-Semitic function of being an 'opium for the masses'." As an example of the alleged conflation of globalization, the U.S. and Israel, Josef Joffe, editor and publisher of Die Zeit and adjunct professor at Stanford University, cited José Bové, a French anti-globalization activist and leader of the Confédération Paysanne. Bové led what Joffe calls a "deconstructionist mob" against McDonald's to protest against its effects on French cuisine, later turning up in Ramallah to denounce Israel and announce his support for Yasser Arafat. "Arafat's cause was Bové's cause ... here was a spokesman for the anti-globalization movement who was conflating globalization with Americanization and extending his loathing of both to Israel." Joffe argues that Kapitalismuskritik is a "mainstay of the antisemitic faith, a charge that has passed smoothly from Jews to America. Like Jews, Americans are money-grubbers who know only the value of money, and the worth of nothing. Like Jews, they seek to reduce all relationships to exchange and money. Like them, Americans are motivated only by profit, and so they respect no tradition."

David Clark, writing in The Guardian, argues against this that "instances of anti-capitalism spilling into 'rich Jew' bigotry are ... well documented" but "stand out precisely because they conflict so sharply with the Left's universalism and its opposition to ethnic discrimination".

In early 2004, Kalle Lasn, author of "Culture Jam" and founder of Adbusters, two influential and widely read anti-globalization texts, generated controversy when he wrote an editorial entitled "Why won't anyone say they are Jewish?". In it he stated "Drawing attention to the Jewishness of the neocons is a tricky game. Anyone who does so can count on automatically being smeared as an anti-Semite. But the point is not that Jews (who make up less than 2 percent of the American population) have a monolithic perspective. Indeed, American Jews overwhelmingly vote Democrat and many of them disagree strongly with Ariel Sharon's policies and Bush's aggression in Iraq. The point is simply that the neocons seem to have a special affinity for Israel that influences their political thinking and consequently American foreign policy in the Middle East." The editorial suggested that Jews represent a disproportionately high percentage of the neo-conservatives who control American foreign policy, and that this may affect policy with respect to Israel. Lasn included a list of influential neo-conservatives, with dots next to the names of those who were Jewish.

Lasn was criticized by a number of anti-globalization activists. Klaus Jahn, professor of the philosophy of history at the University of Toronto condemned Lasn's article stating "Whether listing physicians who perform abortions in anti-abortion tracts, gays and lesbians in office memos, Communists in government and the entertainment industry under McCarthy, Jews in Central Europe under Nazism and so on, such list-making has always produced pernicious consequences."

Meredith Warren, a Montreal anti-globalization activist responded to the article by saying "The U.S. government has only an economic interest in having control over that region. It wants oil and stability – it has nothing to do with Jews or Judaism. Pointing out the various religious stances of those in power totally misses the point of the U.S. government's interest in Israel."

Controversy over alleged antisemitism within the French movement

See also: Red–green–brown alliance

According to a report by the Stephen Roth Institute for the Study of Antisemitism, a major event for the anti-globalization movement in France was the European Social Forum (ESF) in Paris in November 2003. The organizers allegedly included a number of Islamic groups, such as Présence Musulmane, Secours Islamique, and Collectif des Musulmans de France. Tariq Ramadan, the grandson of Hassan al-Banna, the Egyptian founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, also attended meetings. A few weeks earlier, Ramadan had published a controversial article on a website – after Le Monde and Le Figaro refused to publish it – criticizing several French intellectuals, who according to the institute, were either Jewish or "others he mistakenly thought were Jewish," for having "supposedly betrayed their universalist beliefs in favor of unconditional support for Zionism and Israel."

Bernard-Henri Lévy, one of the intellectuals who was criticized, called on the French anti-globalization movement to distance itself from Ramadan. In an interview with Le Monde, Lévy said: "Mr. Ramadan, dear anti-globalizationist friends, is not and cannot be one of yours. ... I call you on you quickly to distance yourselves from this character who, in crediting the idea of an elitist conspiracy under the control of Zionism, is only inflaming people's thoughts and opening the way to the worst."

Le Monde reported that many members of the anti-globalization movement in France agreed that Ramadan's article "has no place on a European Social Forum mailing list."

Other activists defended Ramadan. One activist told the newspaper that "ne of the characteristics of the European Social Forum is the stark rise in immigrant and Muslim organizations. It is an important phenomenon and a positive one in many ways." Another activist, Peter Khalfa, said: "Ramadan's essay is not anti-Semitic. It is dangerous to wave the red flag of anti-Semitism at any moment. However, it is a text marked partly by Ramadan's communitarian thought and which communicates his view of the world to others." One of the leaders of the anti-globalization movement in France, José Bové of the Confédération Paysanne, told Le Monde: "The anti-globalization movement defends universalist points of view which are therefore necessarily secular in their political expression. That there should be people of different cultures and religions is only natural. The whole effort is to escape such determinisms."

Concern within the political left

Naomi Klein, a Jewish Canadian writer and activist in the anti-globalization movement, expressed concern in 2002 at finding antisemitic rhetoric on some activist websites that she had visited: "I couldn't help thinking about all the recent events I've been to where anti-Muslim violence was rightly condemned, but no mention was made of attacks on Jewish synagogues, cemeteries, and community centers." Klein urged activists to confront antisemitism as part of their work for social justice. She also suggested that allegations of antisemitism can be often politically motivated, and that activists should avoid political simplifications that could be perceived as antisemitic:

The globalization movement isn't anti-Semitic, it just hasn't fully confronted the implications of diving into the Middle East conflict. Most people on the left are simply choosing sides. In the Middle East, where one side is under occupation and the other has the U.S. military behind it, the choice seems clear. But it is possible to criticize Israel while forcefully condemning the rise of anti-Semitism. And it is equally possible to be pro-Palestinian independence without adopting a simplistic pro-Palestinian/anti-Israel dichotomy, a mirror image of the good versus evil equations so beloved by President George W. Bush.

In October 2004, the New Internationalist magazine published a special issue covering the insertion of antisemitic rhetoric into some progressive debates. Adam Ma'anit wrote:

Take Adbusters magazine's founder Kalle Lasn's recent editorial rant against Jewish neoconservatives. ... The article includes a self-selected 'well-researched list' of 50 of the supposedly most influential 'neocons' with little black dots next to all those who are Jewish. ... If it's not the neocons then it's the all-powerful 'Jewish lobby' which holds governments to ransom all over the world (because Jews control the global economy of course) to do their bidding. Meanwhile, rightwing Judeophobes often talk of a leftist Jewish conspiracy to promote equality and human rights through a new internationalism embodied in the UN in order to control governments and suppress national sovereignty. They call it the 'New World Order' or the 'Jew World Order'. They make similar lists to Lasn's of prominent Jews in the global justice movement (Noam Chomsky, Naomi Klein, etc.) to argue their case.

The issue observes, however, that "While antisemitism is rife in the Arab World, the Israeli Government often uses it as moral justification for its policies."

Antisemitism during the Israel-Hamas War

Antisemitism during the Israel-Hamas war increased significantly around the world.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Fastenbauer, Raimund (2020). "Islamic Antisemitism: Jews in the Qur'an, Reflections of European Antisemitism, Political Anti-Zionism: Common Codes and Differences". In Lange, Armin; Mayerhofer, Kerstin; Porat, Dina; Schiffman, Lawrence H. (eds.). An End to Antisemitism! – Volume 2: Confronting Antisemitism from the Perspectives of Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 279–300. doi:10.1515/9783110671773-018. ISBN 9783110671773.
  2. Berkman, Matthew (2022). "The Conflict on Campus". In A. Siniver (ed.). Routledge Companion to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Taylor & Francis. p. 522. ISBN 978-0-429-64861-8. Retrieved 2023-05-21. Attempts to rearticulate antisemitism to encompass opposition to Israel's "right to exist" or its character as a Jewish state date back to the 1970s, when the Anti-Defamation League first popularized a discourse on "the new antisemitism" (see Forster and Epstein 1974; on the subsequent development of that discourse see Judaken 2008). The identification of anti-Zionism with antisemitism has long been de rigueur in Jewish communal and broader pro-Israel circles, but only in the last two decades have Israel advocacy groups endeavoured to establish it as a principle of United States anti-discrimination law. The earliest step in this direction was taken in 2004, when Kenneth L. Marcus, the Assistant Secretary of Education for the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) under President George W. Bush, issued a game-changing policy guidance letter empowering OCR staff, for the first time, to investigate complaints under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act alleging pervasive antisemitism on college campuses.
  3. ^ "USCIRF 2020 Annual Report: "Rising Anti-Semitism in Europe and Elsewhere"" (PDF). Uscirf.gov. Washington, D.C.: United States Commission on International Religious Freedom. April 2020. pp. 87–88. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 April 2020. Retrieved 30 September 2020.
  4. Manfred Gerstenfeld, The Deep Roots of Anti-Semitism in European Society. Jewish Political Studies Review 17:1–2 Spring 2005
  5. Taguieff, Pierre-André. Rising From the Muck: The New Anti-Semitism in Europe. Ivan R. Dee, 2004.
  6. Cohen, Florette (September 2011). The New Anti-Semitism Israel Model: Empirical Tests. BiblioBazaar. ISBN 978-1-243-56139-8.
  7. Hirsh, David (January 2010). "Accusations of malicious intent in debates about the Palestine-Israel conflict and about antisemitism: The Livingstone Formulation, 'playing the antisemitism card' and contesting the boundaries of antiracist discourse" (PDF). Transversal: 47–77.
  8. Klaff, Lesley (2016-12-01), Wistrich, Robert S. (ed.), Holocaust inversion in British politics : the case of David Ward, University of Nebraska Press, pp. 185–196, ISBN 978-0-8032-9671-8, retrieved 2024-01-09
  9. Klug, Brian. The Myth of the New Anti-Semitism. The Nation, posted January 15, 2004 (February 2, 2004 issue), accessed January 9, 2006; and Lerner, Michael. There Is No New Anti-Semitism, posted February 5, 2007, accessed February 6, 2007.
  10. Steven Beller, 'In Zion’s hall of mirrors: a comment on Neuer Antisemitismus?,' Patterns of Prejudice, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2007 pp.215-238, 223:' The idea that there has been an explosion of antisemitic sentiment in Europe has more to do with American, Israeli and Zionist discomfort with strong European criticism of Israeli policy than it has with actual antisemitism.'
  11. Scott Ury, 'Strange Bedfellows? Anti-Semitism, Zionism, and the Fate of “the Jews”,' American Historical Review, October 2018, vol. 123, 4 pp. 1151-1171, p.1552: 'One of the biggest problems facing the study of anti-Semitism today: its ongoing, seemingly inescapable connection to public affairs and the extent to which contemporary political concerns, in particular those regarding Zionism and the State of Israel, influence and shape the way that many scholars frame, interpret, and research anti-Semitism.'
  12. Pierre-André Taguieff cites the following early works on the new antisemitism: Jacques Givet, La Gauche contre Israel? Essai sur le néo-antisémitisme, Paris 1968; idem, "Contre une certain gauche," Les Nouveaux Cahiers, No. 13-14, Spring-Summer 1968, pp. 116–119; Léon Poliakov, De l'antisionisme a l'antisémitisme, Paris 1969; Shmuel Ettinger, "Le caractère de l'antisémitisme contemporain," Dispersion et Unité, No. 14, 1975, pp. 141–157; and Michael Curtis, ed., Antisemitism in the Modern World, Boulder, 1986. All cited in Pierre-André Taguieff. Rising from the Muck: The New Anti-Semitism in Europe. Ivan R. Dee, 2004, p. 159-160, footnote 1.
  13. Taguieff, Pierre André. Rising from the Muck: The New Anti-Semitism in Europe. Ivan R. Dee, 2004, p. 62.
  14. Congress Bi-weekly, American Jewish Congress, Vol. 40, Issues 2-14, 1973, p. xxv
  15. Forster, Arnold & Epstein, Benjamin, The New Anti-Semitism. McGraw-Hill 1974, p.165. See for instance chapters entitled "Gerald Smith's Road" (19–48), "The Radical Right" (285–296), "Arabs and Pro-Arabs" (155–174), "The Radical Left" (125–154)
  16. Forster, Arnold & Epstein, Benjamin, The New Anti-Semitism. McGraw-Hill 1974, p. 324.
  17. Raab, Earl. "Is there a New Anti-Semitism?", Commentary, May 1974, pp. 53–54.
  18. Brownfeld, Allan (1987). "Anti-Semitism: Its Changing Meaning". Journal of Palestine Studies. 16 (3). Institute for Palestine Studies: 53–67. doi:10.2307/2536789. ISSN 1533-8614. JSTOR 2536789.
  19. Edward S. Shapiro. A Time for Healing: American Jewry Since World War II. Johns Hopkins University Press. 1992. ISBN 0-8018-4347-2. Page 47.
  20. Wistrich, Robert. "Anti-zionism as an Expression of Anti-Semitism in Recent Years" Archived 2017-05-12 at the Wayback Machine, lecture delivered to the Study Circle on World Jewry in the home of the President of Israel, December 10, 1984.
  21. Chomsky, Noam. "TRANSCRIPT of Amy Goodman interview of Noam Chomsky". Democracy Now!. Retrieved 19 May 2016.
  22. Irwin Cotler cited Dershowitz, Alan. The Case For Israel. John Wiley and Sons, 2003, p. 210-211.
  23. ^ Irwin Cotler, Making the world 'Judenstaatrein', The Jerusalem Post, February 22, 2009.
  24. David Sheen, "Canadian MP Cotler: Calling Israel an apartheid state can be legitimate free speech", Haaretz, 1 July 2011. Accessed 7 July 2011.
  25. Fischel, Jack R. "The New Anti-Semitism", The Virginia Quarterly Review, Summer 2005, pp. 225–234.
  26. ^ Strauss, Mark (2009-11-02). "Anti-globalism's Jewish Problem". Foreign Policy. Retrieved 2023-09-26.
  27. Tembarai Krishnamachari, Rajesh. "Localized motivations for antisemitism within the Ummah" in South Asia Analysis Group, Paper 5907, April 2015.
  28. Taguieff, Pierre-André. Rising From the Muck: The New Anti-Semitism in Europe. Ivan R. Dee, 2004, pp. 67–68.
  29. ^ Klug, Brian. "In search of clarity" Archived 2007-09-27 at the Wayback Machine, Catalyst, March 17, 2006.
  30. ^ Klug, Brian. The Myth of the New Anti-Semitism Archived 2009-07-01 at the Portuguese Web Archive. The Nation, February 2, 2004, accessed January 9, 2006
  31. Klug, Brian. Israel, Antisemitism and the left Archived 2006-10-23 at the Wayback Machine, Red Pepper, November 24, 2005.
  32. Goodman, Amy. "Finkelstein on DN! No New Antisemitism" Archived 2006-11-15 at the Wayback Machine, interview with Norman Finkelstein, August 29, 2006.
  33. "FBI Releases 2023 Crime in the Nation Statistics". Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2024-09-23. Retrieved 2024-11-16.
  34. Kirsh, Elana; Fabian, Emanuel; Lehmann, Noam (2024-09-23). "Antisemitic hate crimes in US surged 63% in 2023, to all-time high of 1,832 – FBI". The Times of Israel. Retrieved 2024-11-16.
  35. Diaz, Johnny (2024-10-06). "Antisemitic Incidents Reach New High in the U.S., Report Finds". The New York Times. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
  36. Barber, Rachel (2024-04-16). "Record number of antisemitic incidents hit US amid Israel-Hamas war". USA TODAY. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
  37. "So What's New? Rethinking the 'New Antisemitism' in a Global Age" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-03-27.
  38. "Remarks at the 2011 B'nai B'rith International Policy Conference". 2012-12-02. Retrieved 2018-06-11.
  39. Cohen, Florette (September 2011). The New Anti-Semitism Israel Model: Empirical Tests. BiblioBazaar. ISBN 978-1-243-56139-8.
  40. Raab, Earl. "Antisemitism, anti-Israelism, anti-Americanism", Judaism, Fall 2002.
  41. Zipperstein, Steven. "Historical Reflections of Contemporary Antisemitism" in Derek J. Penslar et al., ed., Contemporary Antisemitism: Canada and the World, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2005, p. 61.
  42. Finkelstein, Norman. Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History, University of California Press, 2005, pp. 21–22.
  43. Finkelstein, Norman. Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History, University of California Press, 2005, p. 66–71.
  44. Finkelstein, Norman. Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History, University of California Press, 2005, p. 37.
  45. Finkelstein, Norman. Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History, University of California Press, 2005, p. 81.
  46. Finkelstein, Norman. Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History, University of California Press, 2005, p. 66.
  47. Finkelstein, Norman. Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History, University of California Press, 2005, pp. 78–79.
  48. Ali, Tariq (1 May 2018). Street Fighting Years: An Autobiography of the Sixties. Verso Books. p. 43. ISBN 978-1-78663-602-7 – via Google Books.
  49. Julius, Anthony (9 February 2012). Trials of the Diaspora: A History of Anti-Semitism in England. Oxford University Press. p. 525. ISBN 978-0-19-960072-4 – via Google Books.
  50. ^ Lewis, Bernard. "The New Anti-Semitism" Archived 2011-09-08 at the Wayback Machine, The American Scholar, Volume 75 No. 1, Winter 2006, pp. 25–36 The paper is based on a lecture delivered at Brandeis University on March 24, 2004.
  51. ^ Tzvi Fleischer (May 2007). "Hate's Revival". Australia/Israel Review. AIJAC.
  52. Fulford, Robert (2009-08-15). "When criticizing Israel becomes ritual". nationalpost.com. Archived from the original on 2012-09-12. Retrieved 2009-08-15.
  53. Antony Lerman, "Jews attacking Jews", Ha'aretz, 12 September 2008, accessed 13 September 2008.
  54. Beaumont, Peter. "The new anti-semitism?", The Observer, February 17, 2002.
  55. ^ Pelinka, Anton; et al. (2009). Handbook of Prejudice. Chapter on Anti-Semitism by Werner Bergmann. Cambria Press. p. 56. ISBN 978-1-60497-627-4.
  56. Schama, Simon (19 February 2016). "The left's problem with Jews has a long and miserable history". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 11 December 2022. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
  57. Hirsh, David (30 November 2006). "Openly Embraing Prejudice". The Guardian. Retrieved 6 March 2016.
  58. Julius, Anthony (2010). Trials of the Diaspora: A History of Anti-Semitism in England. Oxford University Press. p. 476. ISBN 978-0-19-929705-4.
  59. Johnson, Alan (Fall 2015). "The Left and the Jews: Time for a Rethink". Fathom. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
  60. Alderman, Geoffrey (November 8, 2012). "Why anti-Zionists are racists". The Jewish Chronicle. Archived from the original on July 5, 2016. Retrieved June 8, 2016.
  61. "Formula Could Combat Campus Racism". Jewish Weekly. June 5, 2005. Archived from the original on August 29, 2016. Retrieved June 8, 2016.
  62. Finkelstein, Norman H. (2024). Saying No to Hate. U of Nebraska Press. p. 199. ISBN 978-0-8276-1523-6.
  63. Kaloi, Stephanie (2024-10-31). "David Mamet, Diane Warren and Debra Messing Among 1000+ Entertainers and Artists to Oppose Israel Boycotts in Open Letter". TheWrap. Retrieved 2024-11-14.
  64. Otterman, Sharon (2024-10-09). "Pro-Palestinian Group at Columbia Now Backs 'Armed Resistance' by Hamas". The New York Times. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
  65. ^ Meckler, Laura; Svrluga, Susan (2024-11-10). "Pro-Hamas messages intensify on college campuses". Washington Post. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
  66. Marbury, Justice; Nguyen, Thao (2024-11-14). "'Wanted' posters target Jewish faculty at University of Rochester". USA TODAY. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
  67. ^ "(U.S.) State Department report on Anti-Semitism: Europe and Eurasia" excerpted from a longer piece, and covering the period of July 1, 2003 – December 15, 2004.
  68. Whine, Michael. "Progress in the Struggle Against Anti-Semitism in Europe: The Berlin Declaration and the European Union Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia's Working Definition of Anti-Semitism" Archived 2022-02-26 at the Wayback Machine, Post-Holocaust and Anti-Semitism, Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, February 1, 2006.
  69. ^ tp://eumc.eu.int/eumc/material/pub/AS/AS-WorkingDefinition-draft.pdf "Working definition of antisemitism" Archived 2011-01-25 at the Wayback Machine, EUMC.
  70. "Working Definition of Antisemitism" (PDF). European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2011. Retrieved 23 July 2017.
  71. "SWC to EU Baroness Ashton: "Return Anti-Semitism Definition Document to EU Fundamental Rights Agency Website" | Simon Wiesenthal Center". Wiesenthal.com. 2013-11-06. Archived from the original on 2016-03-01. Retrieved 2016-02-17.
  72. "EU drops its 'working definition' of anti-Semitism". Times of Israel. Retrieved 2014-01-24.
  73. "French concern about race attacks", BBC News, October 2004.
  74. "France: International Religious Freedom Report 2005", U.S. Department of State.
  75. Rufin, Jean-Christophe. "Chantier sur la lutte contre le racisme et l'antisémitisme" Archived 2009-03-27 at the Wayback Machine, presented to the French Ministry of the Interior, October 19, 2004.
  76. Bryant, Elizabeth. "France stung by new report on anti-Semitism," United Press International, October 20, 2004.
  77. "UK Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks: "The New Anti-Semitism is a Virus"".
  78. "Report of the All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Anti-Semitism" Archived 2013-08-22 at the Wayback Machine, September 2006, p. 1.
  79. Temko, Ned. "Critics of Israel 'fuelling hatred of British Jews'", The Observer, February 3, 2006.
  80. MPs deliver anti-Semitism report, BBC News, September 6, 2006.
  81. "Report of the All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Anti-Semitism" Archived 2013-08-22 at the Wayback Machine, September 2006, p. 22.
  82. Announcement by the Forum, November 18, 2001.
  83. Summers, Lawrence H. Address at morning prayers Archived 2004-10-10 at the Wayback Machine, September 17, 2002. On the site of Harvard University, accessed January 9, 2006.
  84. Matas, David. Anti-Zionism and Anti-Semitism. Dundurn Press, Toronto, 2005, pp. 129–144.
  85. House Passes Chabot’s Bipartisan United Nations Reform Amendment, June 17, 2005. Accessed March 6, 2006.
  86. Bayefsky, Anne. One Small Step, Wall Street Journal opinion article, June 21, 2004, accessed January 9, 2006.
  87. Rickman, Gregg J. (2008). "Contemporary global anti-semitism" (PDF). USDOS. Retrieved 2008-03-27.
  88. "ISGAP". isgap.org.
  89. "Yale Creates Center to Study Antisemitism", Associated Press, September 19, 2006; also see Kaplan, Edward H. & Small, Charles A. "Anti-Israel sentiment predicts anti-Semitism in Europe," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol 50, No. 4, 548–561, August 2006.
  90. "The Academic and Public Debate Over the Meaning of the 'New Antisemitism'".
  91. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Campus Anti-Semitism (2006) at 72.
  92. Id.
  93. ^ Strauss, Mark (November 12, 2003). "Antiglobalism's Jewish Problem". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on March 12, 2013.
  94. Oded Grajew, "Debating Anti-Semitism" , Foreign Policy, 1 March 2004, p. 4.
  95. Maude Barlow, "Debating Anti-Semitism" , Foreign Policy, 1 March 2004, p. 4.
  96. John Cavanagh, "Debating Anti-Semitism" , Foreign Policy, 1 March 2004, p. 4.
  97. Mark Strauss, "Debating Anti-Semitism" , Foreign Policy, 1 March 2004, p. 4.
  98. Walter Laqueur (2006): The Changing Face of Anti-Semitism: From Ancient Times to the Present Day. Oxford University Press, 2006 ISBN 0-19-530429-2 p.186
  99. Summers, Lawrence. "Address at morning prayers" Archived 2011-08-12 at the Wayback Machine, Office of the President, Harvard University, September 17, 2002.
  100. Bergmann, Werner & Wetzel, Juliane. ["Manifestations of anti-Semitism in the European Union" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2005-04-15. (751 KiB), Center for Research on Antisemitism, Technische Universitaet Berlin, March 2003.
  101. ^ "Global Anti-Semitism Report", U.S. Department of State, January 5, 2005.
  102. ^ Gerstenfeld, Manfred. "Something is Rotten in the State of Europe": Anti-Semitism as a Civilizational Pathology. An Interview with Robert Wistrich" Archived 2011-11-28 at the Wayback Machine, Post-Holocaust and Anti-Semitism, Institute for Global Jewish Affairs at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, October 1, 2004.
  103. ^ "France" Archived 2012-11-19 at the Wayback Machine, The Stephen Roth Institute for the Study of Antisemitism and Racism, Tel Aviv University, 2003.
  104. Joffe, Josef. "Nations we love to hate: Israel, America and the New Anti-Semitism" Archived 2006-09-09 at the Wayback Machine, Posen Papers in Contemporary Antisemitism, No.1, Vidal Sassoon Center for the Study of Antisemitism, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2004, p.9.
  105. Joffe, Josef. "Nations we love to hate: Israel, America and the New Anti-Semitism" Archived 2006-09-09 at the Wayback Machine, Posen Papers in Contemporary Antisemitism, No.1, Vidal Sassoon Center for the Study of Antisemitism, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2004, p.12.
  106. Clark, David. "Accusations of anti-semitic chic are poisonous intellectual thuggery", The Guardian, March 6, 2006.
  107. ^ Lasn, Kalle. "Why Won't Anyone Say They are Jewish?" Archived 2009-06-14 at the Wayback Machine Adbusters Magazine, March/April 2004
  108. Raynes-Goldie, Kate. "Race Baiting: Adbusters' listing of Jewish neo-cons the latest wacko twist in left mag's remake" Archived 2007-10-18 at the Wayback Machine, Nowtoronto.com, March 18, 2004 – March 24, 2004.
  109. ^ Raynes-Goldie, Kate, "Race baiting Archived 2007-10-18 at the Wayback Machine", Now Magazine, March 18024, 2004
  110. ^ Monnot, Caroline & Ternisien, Xavier. Caroline Monnot and Xavier Ternisien. "Tariq Ramadan accusé d'antisémitisme" Archived 2008-10-05 at the Wayback Machine, Le Monde, October 10, 2003.
  111. ^ Klein, Naomi (April 26, 2002). "Sharon's Best Weapon: The left must confront anti-Semitism head-on". In These Times. Archived from the original on August 22, 2006.
  112. "Judeophobia", New Internationalist, October 2004.
  113. Ma'anit, Adam (October 2004). "A human balance". New Internationalist. No. 372. Archived from the original on May 2, 2015.
  114. Agbarieh, Asma (October 2004). "Spreading the Stain". New Internationalist. No. 372.
  115. Farivar, Masood (2023-10-11). "Antisemitism Surges Around World as Israel, Hamas Clash". Voice of America. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
  116. "Israel-Hamas war unleashes wave of antisemitism in Europe". Financial Times. 2023-10-15. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
  117. Chrisafis, Angelique; Kassam, Ashifa; Connolly, Kate; Giuffrida, Angela (2023-10-20). "'A lot of pain': Europe's Jews fear rising antisemitism after Hamas attack". the Guardian. Retrieved 2024-11-17.

References

Further reading

Reports

External links

Antisemitism
Core topics
Antisemitism and
Related topics
Religious antisemitism
Antisemitic laws, policies
and government actions
Antisemitism on the internet
Persecution
Organizations working
against antisemitism
By region
List of fascist movements by country
  • Argentina
  • Australia
  • Bolivia
  • Brazil
  • Bulgaria
  • Canada
  • Chile
  • China
  • Colombia
  • Costa Rica
  • Croatia
  • Cuba
  • Ecuador
  • Finland
  • France
  • India
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • Italy
  • Japan
  • Lebanon
  • Malaysia
  • Mexico
  • Netherlands
  • New Zealand
  • North Korea
  • Pakistan
  • Peru
  • Poland
  • Russia
  • Slovenia
  • South Korea
  • Spain
  • Switzerland
  • Syria
  • Ukraine
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • Uruguay
  • Categories: