Revision as of 12:14, 26 March 2012 editDharmadhyaksha (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users47,968 edits →Recent G12 deletes: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:07, 3 January 2025 edit undoJimfbleak (talk | contribs)Administrators174,592 edits →Nemanthus californicus: + | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:'''<span style="font-family:Century Gothic;color:gray"> <sup><small>''User talk:''</small></sup></span><span style="font-family:Brush Script MT;color:red">Jimfbleak</span>'''}} | |||
<div style="padding-top:5px; padding-bottom:5px; padding-left:5px; padding-right:5px; background:#cef2e0; border:5px solid green; border-radius: 12px; "> | |||
{{User:Jimfbleak/Header}}<br> | |||
{{User:Jimfbleak/Talkheader}}<br> | |||
__NOTOC__ <!-- please don't remove this, add new messages and new replies at the bottom of this page, NOT HERE --> | |||
==Request== | |||
<div style="float; padding-top:5px; padding-bottom:5px; padding-left:5px; padding-right:5px; background:#cef2e0; border:2px solid black"><div style="font-family:sans-serif; color:black"> | |||
<div class="plainlinks"> | |||
{| align="center" style="background:#cedff2; border: #4E78A0 solid 1px; -moz-border-radius-topleft:7px; -moz-border-radius-topright:7px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:7px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:7px; text-align:center;" | |||
{| width="100%" | |||
|- | |||
| width="10%" align="center" |{{User:Malcolm/Clickthru/3|link=http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Jimfbleak|image=Crystal personal.png|width=52px|height=4em|title=Jim}} | |||
| width="10%" align="center" |{{User:Malcolm/Clickthru/3|link=http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Jimfbleak|image=Crystal filetypes.png|width=52px|height=4em|title=Talk}} | |||
| width="10%" align="center" |{{User:Malcolm/Clickthru/3|link=http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Jimfbleak|image=Crystal kdict.png|width=52px|height=4em|title=Contribs}} | |||
| width="10%" align="center" |{{User:Malcolm/Clickthru/3|link=http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Jimfbleak/sandbox|image=Crystal package settings.png|width=52px|height=4em|title=Sandbox}} | |||
| width="10%" align="center" | | |||
{{User:Malcolm/Clickthru/3|link=http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=Jimfbleak&page=|image=Vista-mouse.png|width=52px|height=4em|title=Logs}} | |||
| width="9%" align="center" |{{User:Malcolm/Clickthru/3|link=http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=Jimfbleak&page=|image=Crystal Clear app cervisia.png|width=52px|height=4em|title=Blocks}} | |||
| width="9%" align="center" |{{User:Malcolm/Clickthru/3|link=http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=Jimfbleak&page=|image=Vista-trashcan empty-alt.png|width=52px|height=4em|title=Deletions}} | |||
| width="9%" align="center" |{{User:Malcolm/Clickthru/3|link=http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special%3ALog&type=protect&user=Jimfbleak&page=|image=Vista-password.png|width=52px|height=4em|title=Protections}} | |||
| width="9%" align="center" |{{User:Malcolm/Clickthru/3|link=http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:EmailUser/Jimfbleak |image=Nuvola apps krfb.png|width=52px|height=4em|title= Email}} | |||
| width="9%" align="center" |{{User:Malcolm/Clickthru/3|link=http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special%3ALog&type=upload&user=Jimfbleak&page=|image=Crystal Clear device camera.png|width=52px|height=4em|title=Uploads}} | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" |] | |||
| align="center" |] | |||
| align="center" |] | |||
| align="center" |] | |||
| align="center" | | |||
| align="center" | | |||
| align="center" | | |||
| align="center" | | |||
| align="center" | | |||
| align="center" | | |||
|} | |||
</div> | |||
<div style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0.3em; border: #4E78A0 solid 1px; background: #cedff2; -moz-border-radius: 8px; padding: 5px;"><big>Welcome to my talk page: please add your message to the '''bottom''' of the page.<br> I'll reply to messages posted here on '''''your''''' talk page<br>I'll reply to emails on '''your talk page''' too, so please provide a link.<font color="red"></font></big></div> | |||
__NOTOC__ | |||
== University of Birmingham Liberal Democrat Society== | |||
Request to undelete the page of Anton Bantock. | |||
Jim, | |||
He was a respected educator and artist in Bristol, so much so that a road was named after him. I'm not sure what else I can do to prove his worthyness. | |||
] (]) 14:28, 30 December 2024 (UTC) LisaCole | |||
:Replied on user talk page ] - ] 16:08, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Restore deleted page: Draft:6ense == | |||
As you have correctly pointed out the page is a University club, its notability comes in the form that it dates back to nearly a century and that there are over one-hundred members of the club. It plays an important role in the formation of the University of Birmingham which, obviously, had dramatic historical implications for the city of Birmingham as a whole. I find it somewhat pedantic of you to neglect this as notable, the Society itself IS historical and other if universities, whose clubs date to a similar time, are allowed to have Misplaced Pages pages then I simply don't understand why ours is discriminated against. I do, of course, have a claim to interest; being the alumnus of said University and Society. | |||
Hi Jimfbleak, Thanks for the help earlier. Can you also help me restore the deleted page Draft:6ENSE to my user page? Before it was deleted, I have added new citations and sources needed to meet ] and ]. Re: The group debuted in April 2024, which is relatively new and is fine but the group does not meet ] and ] at the moment. The only news announcement of the group's debut was from ''RepublicAsia''.</nowiki>] | |||
There is plenty of scholarly work written on the society, not least in Ives, E. The First Civic University: Birmingham, 1880-1980 - An Introductory History (Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press) and several articles written by Birmingham historian Carl Chinn, which I urge you to consult before you dismiss such a page on, what seems to be, a claim which is unfounded and belied by your lack of knowledge of the subject. Of course this is esoteric knowledge but enough people belong to the society for it to be considered 'notable' and this is a point which is concurred by the fact that there are several, similar sized, institutions, societies and clubs listed on Misplaced Pages. | |||
I urge you to either reconsider your decision, apply the same punitive measures to other, similar, university societies or to enlighten yourself as to the importance of the society through the consulting of said titles. | |||
Thanks in advance. ] (]) 12:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
I am new to the Misplaced Pages editing community and, so far, I have found it a most excruciatingly aloof affair. I did not expect the editorial and administrative community to be this abrupt. The lack of help in an accessible medium, I fear, also precludes the vast majority of people from submitting their own, important, contributions; thus ameliorating the actual mission of the website and inhibiting the free and undeterred access to and propagation of knowledge. | |||
:] you have not responded to the COI messages as required. Also, I'm not sure why you want restoration when you accept it's at best ] ] - ] 14:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
] (]) 13:28, 18 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Edit to ] == | |||
== open protection page : Airpaz == | |||
Hi, I have ] on my watchlist and noticed you an edit made by an IP this afternoon. I had checked the edit earlier and it looked to me like a good-faith attempt to source an unreferenced passage. On closer inspection I see that it was incorrectly formatted but in my opinion an improvement, since the original didn't cite anything. I thought I'd check with you before I add it back in and clean up the formatting, to make sure you didn't have another reason for reverting. Thanks! ~ ] ] 23:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
Hi Jimfbleak, you have deleted page ], could you give the step what should I do to restore the page ? should I create the proper article first ? thanks <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:These numbers are being slowly modified and has been recognized as a form of surreptitious vandalism - see ], ] etc. for recent discussions. These are best reverted as discussed in the past on sight as they are all deliberate mis-citations. ] (]) 04:33, 20 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
::Exactly, a previous incarnation added plausible but unsourced items to the prey list of dozens of birds. It's a subtle but persistent form of vandalism. The editor concerned never responds to comments on his talk page, and even when blocked (several times now) just continues from another IP <font face="chiller"><font color="red"><b>] - </b></font></font><font face="arial"><font color="green">]</font></font> 06:47, 20 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::Thank you both, I'm glad I asked. I'm using ]'s program, would it help if I follow these IPs around or shall I leave you guys to it? <font color="#006A4E">~</font> ] ] 12:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::If it can be automated, do keep an eye on that IP range. Several other similar IP editors around in any case. (]) ] (]) 15:18, 20 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::::I can watch all edits by individual accounts or IPs, but it's not sophisticated enough (yet?) to track IP ranges. I assume it's not possible / ethical to block a whole range? What a nuisance. <font color="#006A4E">~</font> ] ] 15:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
:Replied on user talk page ] - ] 06:43, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== ] -- please revert deletion if possible == | |||
== Kind Request == | |||
So I don't go on very often, which is why it took me almost a year to respond, but I simply don't understand. Major artist (] - if you listen to house music even casually, chances are you've heard of him) releases his only LP thus far (a Big deal for any artist) on one of the most famous (and exclusive) record labels in all of electronica (mau5trap records). Any release on mau5trap should have a wiki entry as it is, let alone the only LP of a '''major artist'''. | |||
Dear Jim, | |||
I don't even think the album's that great, but it's a big deal. And having to go to discogs.com to look at the album's tracklist is annoying considering the best source of information the world will ever know should have that information as well. | |||
I hope this message finds you well. I noticed that my Misplaced Pages page was recently deleted, and I would like to kindly request a reconsideration of its deletion. | |||
:To Expand: http://www.sputnikmusic.com/review/41008/Feed-Me-Feed-Mes-Big-Adventure/ is a review of the album from a major music website. http://www.ministryofsound.com/lifestyle/blog/761/interview-feed-me/ is an interview with Feed Me by Ministry of Sound during which he says "You've already achieved so much in your music career - what goals do you still have left that you want to achieve? Complete an album". This was that album. Directing me to general notability websites and saying that creating a wiki would serve to promote (http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:NOTADVERTISING#ADVERTISING - which of these points applies?) doesn't help my confusion as to why an indisputably major artist releasing his first lp doesn't qualify as notable. I don't even like Feed Me that much, I'm still just upset that his lp doesn't have a wiki . ] (]) 07:08, 20 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
I have carefully crafted the content based on my personal achievements, career, and philosophy, and I made sure to adhere to Misplaced Pages’s guidelines to the best of my understanding. I also included a declaration at the end of the article affirming that all information presented is accurate and written by me. | |||
:: Haha -- wikipedia personalities are incorrigible. It's so hard to make yourself heard as an outsider, and while it's possible (somehow, even though I still don't see it at all) that this doesn't meet the notability requirements, having that album as an entry with a tracklisting is definitely not advertising ... at all. If it had had a pitchfork or RA review in addition to the sputnikmusic one would that have been enough? ] (]) 12:11, 20 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity of the platform, and I am more than willing to address any concerns or make any necessary revisions to ensure that my article meets the required standards. If you could kindly guide me on the areas that need improvement, I would greatly appreciate it. | |||
== ''The Signpost'': 19 March 2012 == | |||
Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your guidance on how to proceed. | |||
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2012-03-19}} | |||
</div><!--Volume 8, Issue 12--> | |||
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> | |||
* ''']''' | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] (]) 13:49, 20 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0249 --> | |||
Best regards, | |||
== Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey! == | |||
Praneeth Roy | |||
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at ] would like your feedback! We have created a brief meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Misplaced Pages. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse ] or ] page. | |||
'''Click to be taken to the survey site.''' | |||
<nowiki>Thanks in advance, and wish you a Happy and prosperous New Year! ~~~~ Praneeth Roy</nowiki> ] (]) 13:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse! | |||
:Replied on user talk page, unreferenced self-promotion ] - ] 14:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Happy editing, | |||
::hey Jim, I would like to know what were things you think were unreferenced areas, so that I would address them. And Jim, it may seem self promotion, but all of it is nothing but truth, and there's nothing wrong with displaying facts in Wiki, and even I have declared explicitly... so Jim please reconsider my request ] (]) 16:30, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::you said ''If you are writing about ], or someone you know as a friend, colleague, client, employer or relative, you have a ], and you '''must''' disclose the nature of that COI,'' so that give me an opportunity to disclose my COI please. ] (]) 17:23, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::] Please read what I've already posted on your talk page. '''None''' of your text had a reference to independently confirm what you claim. It ''is'' self-promotion, much of your text is your own glowing opinions of your talents, the definition of self-promotion. This isn't social media, nobody cares what you have to say about yourself here. If you really think you meet the notability criteria I linked, find ] as described in my reply so we can verify that. If you really only want to tell the world how gifted you are, do it on Facebook, this is an encyclopaedia. We are not looking for your version of the truth, we are looking for what we can independently verify. ] - ] | |||
], Teahouse host, 15:37, 20 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::] the usual place to diclose a COI is your user page ] ] - ] 19:31, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Message sent with ]. | |||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0173 --> | |||
== |
== Nemanthus californicus == | ||
Hello Jim. Yesterday and today, you deleted this article as {{tl|db-g11}} without a single word of explanation to the creator. It ''was not'' nominated for deletion. Does that mean that you delete articles arbitrarily? I don't think it was ''blatant'' promotion, but it is of course a matter of opinion. However, I believe that new editors deserve at least a courtesy note explaining why their work is deleted. Thanks for any answer. Best regards. ] (] | ]) 10:05, 23 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
:Thank you for the explanation. I'm an admin, but when I find an article suitable for speedy deletion, I immediatelly delete ''only'' blatant attack pages/serious BLP violations. As for the other cases, I ''nominate'' and wait for checking and decision of an independent reviewer. I think that double-checking makes our CSD process less flawed. But I can understand that the habits of editors and admins differ. Thanks for restoring the page. I'll go back to it and look for better sources, the topic seems to be notable and interesting. --] (] | ]) 11:56, 23 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
I think the article ] is ready to be published now because it is: | |||
== ] == | |||
*categorised | |||
*it has more than one sources | |||
*articles of equal importance are already published (] and ]) | |||
] (]) ] (]) 15:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:] I don't usually review articles myself. Add <nowiki>{{subst:submit}}</nowiki> as you see it here to the top of the page and save, that will create a yellow review waiting box. Given that the article is pretty straightforward, you shouldn't have to wait long, good luck ] - ] 16:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Jim, you have deleted OT (Operational Technology) article, can you please let me know what should I add/modify to the article to have it approved? I put links to the Gartner articles where OT is mentioned/described. To be honest I have no idea why Operational Technology has no wiki article to this very moment as it is widely used almost everywhere now. Anyway let me know what your thoughts on this, thanks! </div> <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:38, 25 March 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== ]: ] == | |||
Thanks for your comments. Have addressed some of them. --] <sup> ] </sup> 18:46, 25 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Recent G12 deletes == | |||
Hello! <br> This is in ref with the recent G12 tags and deletion of ] and ]. I noticed that both these pages were by ]. Also came across three more pages which redirect to these deleted articles. Should these pages also be deleted then? ], ] and ]. Can you please look into this also? -] (]) 12:14, 26 March 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:07, 3 January 2025
Jim | Talk | Contribs | Sandbox | Logs | Blocks | Deletions | Protections | Scripts | Bird talk | Commons |
Please add your message to the bottom of this page, give it a heading and sign it using four tildes ~~~~.
Request
Request to undelete the page of Anton Bantock. He was a respected educator and artist in Bristol, so much so that a road was named after him. I'm not sure what else I can do to prove his worthyness. Lisacole (talk) 14:28, 30 December 2024 (UTC) LisaCole
- Replied on user talk page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:08, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Restore deleted page: Draft:6ense
Hi Jimfbleak, Thanks for the help earlier. Can you also help me restore the deleted page Draft:6ENSE to my user page? Before it was deleted, I have added new citations and sources needed to meet WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Re: The group debuted in April 2024, which is relatively new and is fine but the group does not meet WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV at the moment. The only news announcement of the group's debut was from RepublicAsia.
Thanks in advance. TypeFG (talk) 12:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- TypeFG you have not responded to the COI messages as required. Also, I'm not sure why you want restoration when you accept it's at best too soon Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
open protection page : Airpaz
Hi Jimfbleak, you have deleted page airpaz, could you give the step what should I do to restore the page ? should I create the proper article first ? thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jodysetiawan23 (talk • contribs) 03:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Replied on user talk page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:43, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Kind Request
Dear Jim,
I hope this message finds you well. I noticed that my Misplaced Pages page was recently deleted, and I would like to kindly request a reconsideration of its deletion.
I have carefully crafted the content based on my personal achievements, career, and philosophy, and I made sure to adhere to Misplaced Pages’s guidelines to the best of my understanding. I also included a declaration at the end of the article affirming that all information presented is accurate and written by me.
I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity of the platform, and I am more than willing to address any concerns or make any necessary revisions to ensure that my article meets the required standards. If you could kindly guide me on the areas that need improvement, I would greatly appreciate it.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your guidance on how to proceed.
Best regards,
Praneeth Roy
Thanks in advance, and wish you a Happy and prosperous New Year! ~~~~ Praneeth Roy Ganeshpraneethroy (talk) 13:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Replied on user talk page, unreferenced self-promotion Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- hey Jim, I would like to know what were things you think were unreferenced areas, so that I would address them. And Jim, it may seem self promotion, but all of it is nothing but truth, and there's nothing wrong with displaying facts in Wiki, and even I have declared explicitly... so Jim please reconsider my request Ganeshpraneethroy (talk) 16:30, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- you said If you are writing about yourself, or someone you know as a friend, colleague, client, employer or relative, you have a conflict of interest, and you must disclose the nature of that COI, so that give me an opportunity to disclose my COI please. Ganeshpraneethroy (talk) 17:23, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ganeshpraneethroy Please read what I've already posted on your talk page. None of your text had a reference to independently confirm what you claim. It is self-promotion, much of your text is your own glowing opinions of your talents, the definition of self-promotion. This isn't social media, nobody cares what you have to say about yourself here. If you really think you meet the notability criteria I linked, find reputable independent third-party sources as described in my reply so we can verify that. If you really only want to tell the world how gifted you are, do it on Facebook, this is an encyclopaedia. We are not looking for your version of the truth, we are looking for what we can independently verify. Jimfbleak - talk to me?
- Ganeshpraneethroy the usual place to diclose a COI is your user page User:Ganeshpraneethroy Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:31, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Nemanthus californicus
I think the article Nemanthus californicus is ready to be published now because it is:
- categorised
- it has more than one sources
- articles of equal importance are already published (Nemanthus annamensis and Nemanthus nitidus)
TrueMoriarty (talk) TrueMoriarty (talk) 15:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- TrueMoriarty I don't usually review articles myself. Add {{subst:submit}} as you see it here to the top of the page and save, that will create a yellow review waiting box. Given that the article is pretty straightforward, you shouldn't have to wait long, good luck Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)