User talk:Heah: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:48, 15 April 2006 editMackensen (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators125,054 edits →Welcome to adminship ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 03:29, 8 March 2023 edit undoYedaman54 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users13,565 editsNo edit summaryTag: 2017 wikitext editor
(197 intermediate revisions by 100 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{not around\|3=January 2018}}
	{{Usertalk-sprotect}}

	{\| class="messagebox standard-talk"		{\| class="messagebox standard-talk"
	\|-		\|-
	\|]		\|]
			\|''']''' really isn't around much these days for various reasons, so he apologizes if messages are not responded to in a timely fashion.
	\|''']''' is currently busy in ] and will not be around wikipedia before 12 am ] for the next few weeks, because he has to read ] and write a thesis. If you see him here before then, tell him to get back to work.
	\|}		\|}
	<!---If anyone can find a better picture, please do so!--->


			<div style='text-align: center;'>
	The ''']''' is up, check it out if you are interested!
	*]		]
			</div>
	*]

			== Proposed move of ] to ] ==
	== ] ==
	I've just uploaded the book cover about Mr. Mystery. Thus, I can already prove evidence that it does exist. Check out the article for more details. If there's anything wrong, pls. reply on my talk page. --] 05:45, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

			As a significant contributor to this article, you may wish to comment
	P.S. The previous Mr. Mystery article that got deleted was stubbed.
			]. ] (]) 09:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

			==Redirect of ]==
			]Hello, this is a message from ]. A tag has been placed on ], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}\|1\|] (] '''·''' ]),}} another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because ] is a redirect to a non-existent page (]). <br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting ], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at ]. Feel free to contact the ] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click ''' ] (]) 19:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

	== ~~Delete~~ ==		== Francis Lucille ==

			Hi,
	I know that you has to delete because it contained text from a pdf. Please could you leave a note on my talk page next time you want to delete something from me? <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) {{{2\|}}}.</small><!-- -->
			I have found your username from the spirituality section.
			I need your help and suggestion.
			I am trying to add an article on one of the Living spiritual teacher.
			but,I am facing an problem.

			The editors who have visited this page don't understand spirituality and they have tagged it for deletion.
	== Aya-*.jpg ==
			i need your help urgently.
			so they are trying to compare it with other biographies in the field of sports etc.
			As you know,the field the spirituality is not very commercial. so I am having a hard time convincing them.
			could you please help amd and take a look at article.
			http://en.wikipedia.org/Francis_Lucille
			http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Francis_Lucille.

			Appreciate all your help.
	Those are wonderful photographs. Thank you for contributing them.

	What was the experience like? Do you have a journal or blog entry about it? How did you arrange to be involved with the cooking? Do you have any photos of the finished tea?
	— ] 04:40, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

			Thanks
	== ] ==
			Amarhindustani
			] (]) 15:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

			==Unreferenced BLPs==
	Hi there, I am pleased to hear of your new promotion.
			] Hello Heah! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''1''' of the articles that you created is tagged as an]. The ] policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure ], all biographies should be based on ]. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl\|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

			# ] - <small>{{findsources\|J. P. Otto}}</small>
	I was having a major argument with myself over how to go about
			Thanks!--] (]) 05:21, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
	doing something, and so far, You are the person I've gotten to know
	and like around, So I thought I would ask your opinion on it.

			== A breath... ==

			<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]
	The general idea has become (Since I didn't get a Wikicity, which would have made this enormously easier) To write a book whose title
	would be "How to generate an Doctorate level Interdisciplinary program on WikiBooks". This is actually something of a digression
	from what I really wanted to do do to get a lot of people in the
	area. I figured i'd start the WikiCity just post some StarShips, and
	I'd have people showing up to oooh and ahhh over the art. I can't go that route on Wikibooks for obvious reasons.

			'''Hello Heah''', Sud Ram has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the ] by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! <br /> <small>''Smile at others by adding {{tls\|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.''</small>
	Instead, i'm forced to get things to the point of having sufficient
			</div><!-- Template:Smile -->
	content to attract more people. This is the main issue.
	I just got done counting my Subdepartments. Theres 345 of them. I'm not going to be able to single handedly do more than create them all
	as pages with links, references, Socratic Method, and Table of Contents. In other words, I'll end up with 345 pages each of Which is
	full of red links to doors for somebody else to open.

			== ] nomination of ] ==
	My (first) question is, should i just work on only the Main Departments?
	Is there a process one would go through to get help with simple
	basic but annoyingly boring and time consuming tasks like searching
	Misplaced Pages for its relevant articles? I'm sepnding most of my time
	nowadays just running the search engine for 5 minutes to find one
	link. If I could somehow talk 10 Wikifolks into helping me, it would
	really make a difference. There are a variety of related questions.
	I have considered folding my subdepartments back into the main departmens- merging. The problem with this is the whole point of the whole thing is to create the meta structure that shows how it would be done, and taking out the sub-departments both removes what would become an important feature, but invites chaos when somebody adds details. (Sort of the worst problem i normally encounter with Misplaced Pages. Navigating between articles and concepts.)

			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] (]) 10:25, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
	I'm trying to visualize a realistic growth process considering that
	this isn't a Wikicity. The more i look at it, the more depressing it
	becomes. Maybe you have some ideas on how to increase the rate of that process. I went and asked for a bot, for instance. Not anything
	for a reply. You'd think by now that they would have worked out a way
	for a bot to populate a new child network with the links that are relative to say for instance, a set of keywords. I have also been
	working a bit on yahoo groups, but honestly, I don't feel comfortable
	drawing people in yet from outside the organization, there isn't enough done yet.
	Should I just give up alltogether on filling out the references and
	leave that to some future wave of Wikipedians? The idea there was to
	avoid mirroring or redundancy by linking to whats allready been done.
	(as well as build the knowledge base as quickly aspossible to move on into the level of expert.)

			==] nomination of ]==
	Another part of me is just sort of screaming out; "Just go do the
			] A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages for multiple reasons. '''Please visit the article for details'''.
	Psychonautics book!" This makes some sense because it would function
			{{Quote box
	as a template for what a finished THINKSTARSHIP first edition Departmental Text would look like. It also seems like a bad idea because it might feel like something of a bait and switch to some
			\| quote = You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the ].
	people. (I'm particularly concerned with other WikiBookians. The way
			\| source = Thank you.
	people get welcomed in on these things could use some work. Posting a big fat graphic telling me I'm not up to snuff doesn't seem sensible or fair considering i just started, and the ketch 22 is,
			\| width = 20%
	I tried to keep the book cloaked, but somebody wasn't down with that,
			\| align = right
	and put up a big fat graphic asking me to place the book. I imagine with 101 people that are flybys for every 1 that is on it, they have
			}}
	their stress 2, and I suppose thus it all comes down to prooving myself.) I'm sure any author feels overwhelmed when they look at a table of contents, but this is another order of magnitude of overwhelmed; I wouldn't be able to finish this alone in my lifetime.
			Under the ], articles that do not meet basic Misplaced Pages criteria may be deleted at any time. Please ], and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add <code>{{tl\|hangon}}</code> on the top of the page and leave a note on ] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

			For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria ], ], ], or ]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn-multiple--> ] (]) 07:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
	Anyways, thanks for your thoughts, time, and energy,
	Sincerely
	Prometheuspan
	] 02:55, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

			==] nomination of ]==
	Mr Heah does a lot to share knowledge with others who want to learn, through his inumerous contributions
			] A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages for multiple reasons. '''Please visit the article for details'''.
			{{Quote box
			\| quote = You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the ].
			\| source = Thank you.
			\| width = 20%
			\| align = right
			}}
			Under the ], articles that do not meet basic Misplaced Pages criteria may be deleted at any time. Please ], and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add <code>{{tl\|hangon}}</code> on the top of the page and leave a note on ] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

			For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria ], ], ], or ]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn-multiple--> ] (]) 07:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
	Knowledge as it should always be- Free!

			==] of ]==
	Congratulations
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	] 19:48, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
			:'''Non-Notable student record label. unreferenced.'''

			While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].
	== Mr Heah, ==

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl\|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	Mr Heah does a lot to share knowledge with others who want to learn, through his inumerous contributions

			Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl\|dated prod}}</code> will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 09:17, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
	Knowledge as it should always be- Free!

			== ] nomination of ] ==
	Congratulations

			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning -->   — <span style="font-size:large;">] ]</span> 15:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
	] 19:49, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

			==] of ]==
	== Your RfA ==
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	I have added some questions to your RFA. If you have a minute, I'd appreciate if you took a look at them. Thanks. ] 21:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
			:'''Fails ].'''

			While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].
	Sorry, one last questiony thing, 4a. ] 04:46, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl\|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	Btw, I don't know if you've noticed but someone else has added another question. ] 19:49, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

			Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl\|dated prod}}</code> will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 14:11, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
	== Hello ==

			== Happy Adminship Anniversary ==
	Hi, thanks for welcoming me and notifying me that I'd spelt my web address wrong (oops).

			<div style="align: upperright; padding: 1em; border: solid 3px #2B547E; background-color: #E6E6FA;">] Wishing <b>]</b> a very '''happy adminship anniversary''' on behalf of the ''']'''! ] ]] 23:53, 7 April 2012 (UTC)</div>
	==Could you weigh in on the infobox at ]==
	I say it is inapropriate and inaccurate, Rory069 insists it should be there, and reverts my attempts to remove it. Discussion is ]. Could you please weigh in. -SM 11:52, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

			==Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity==
	== RfA ==
			] Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> ] (]) 18:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
			:''N.B.'': I apologize if you have received any duplicate e-mail messages pursuant to this notification; this may have been due to technical difficulties on the Toolserver. Thanks, — <strong><span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">]</span></strong> 18:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

			==Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity==
	Congratulations! Consensus having been reached, it is my pleasure to inform you that you are now an ] on the English Misplaced Pages. Please take a moment to review the ] and the ] before using any of your shiny new buttons. <tt>:-)</tt> If you need assistance or advice, please feel free to request help from other administrators at the ] and ], or to leave a talk page message for me or any other admin. Again, congratulations! <font color=#696969>] <sup>] • ]</sup></font> 21:26, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
			] Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> ] (]) 02:00, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

			==Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity==
	* Congraulations on your new mop and bucket! :) - ''Cheers'', ] 02:33, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
			]
			Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --><strong style="font-variant:small-caps">] ]</strong> 23:45, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

			==Notice of change==
	Congrats! You deserved. it. ] ] 07:08, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
			Hello. You are receiving this message because of a to the ] that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the ]. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through ]. Thank you. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

			== ] ==
	Congratulations! I have no doubt that you will make a very good admin. Cheers ] 12:44, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

			{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
	Congrats! You deserve this and good luck for the future! --<font style="background:gold">]]</font><sup><font style="background:yellow">]</font></sup> 14:50, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691988767 -->
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	{\|cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" style="border:1px solid black; background-color:#e6e9ff; margin-bottom:.5em" width=100%
	\|style="text-align:center;"\| '''Congratulations'''. Here are what pass for words of wisdom from the puppy:
	\|-
	\|style="text-align:left;"\|
	# Remember you will always protect the ].
	# Remember you must always follow the ], except for when you ] them. You will always pick the wrong one to do. (See #5)
	# Remember to ] and not ]. Remember that when you are applying these principles most diligently, you are probably dealing with a ].
	# Use the ] ability sparingly. Enjoy the insults you receive when you do block.
	# Remember when you make these errors, someone will be more than happy to point them out to you in dazzling clarity and ].
	# and finally, Remember to contact me if you ever need assistance, and I will do what I am able.
	::]<sup>]</sup> 12:45, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
	\|-
	\|style="text-align:center;"\|<small>DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Misplaced Pages, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales. All rights released under GFDL.
	\|}

	Best wish for your adminship.--] 16:44, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

	Congratulations. Remember to affix your anti-troll armor and de-fanaticization helmet. You're gonna need 'em. —] 21:53, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

	== ] ==

	Your use of the rollback against another administrator was grossly inappropriate. I recognize that this is your first day on the job, as it were, but that's little excuse given the very public debates over this matter. TfD is not and has never been the proper location for a speedy candidate any more than AfD (and VfD before it) were the proper locations for article speedy candidates. Please consider your actions more carefully in the future. Best, ] ] 20:52, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

	:''re: at ]'' --]:] 22:16, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

	::That's fair. I've no problem with it being listed at WP:DRV, if someone really wants to. To me, it was an obvious case of T1, especially given the opposite version (which was speedied at the same time). ] ] 22:25, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

	== Dealing with Copyvios ==

	That log is actually automatically generated by a bot. It lists the by day pages so that someone can easily look at the history of any one of them should they need to see what happened to a particular page. The log is there so that we can remove those pages from the main page and keep it from getting cluttered/loading slowly. So yes, you're correct, just remove the entry when you're done :) .:.].:. <sup>]</sup> 16:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

	==Washington hwys cat==
	I suppose SPUI's changing the page into a redirect isn't allowed either? --'''] (] - ]) ''' 04:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
	:It's completely redundant, as I have explained. Everything that had been it is a ] - a highway maintained by the state. --] (] - ] - ]) 04:39, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
	::First off, in the absence of any decision on this matter, and in light of the fact that (at least two) people are clearly not agreeing on what should be done, i really don't think that revert warring and nominating things for speedy deletion is the correct way to be dealing with this . . .
	::As for my own take on what the category scheme should be, as SPUI seems to want to talk about that rather than how to resolve this dispute . . . while interstates etc may be maintained by the state, if we are going to be consistent in our use of terms on wikipedia-
	:::''In the United States, a state highway, state route, or state road (depending on the state) is a highway which is part of a state-wide numbering scheme. In this they are distinct from United States Numbered Highways and Interstate Highways, however these three categories of highways are all owned and constructed by the state in which they are located. State highways which are part of the National Highway System receive substantial federal financing while the remainder are primarily financed by the individual states.'' ]
	::So they don't seem simply redundant; as interstates and US highways are ''not'' state highways according to the wikipedia article on state highways, SPUI's argument seems based on a mistaken premise. And i'm not sure why SPUI objects to having an umbrella cat (washington highways) containing state routes, interstates, and US highways. As it stands, ] contains all of the state routes, (which also suggests that ''this'' is what this category is for); why should the umbrella cat also be the place for state routes? That doesn't seem to make sense, as presumably state routes are a distinct thing deserving of their own category.
	::With all that said, why is this not being worked out at the talk page of ]? It would seem the proper place to come to such decisions . . .
	::so that's my two cents. --]:] 05:09, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
	:::Actually that part of the ] article is incorrect - I need to fix it. In Washington, and in many states, a state highway is simply a state-maintained road. --] (] - ] - ]) 06:17, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
	::::It basicly ''is'' the article, SPUI . . . Didn't you write a lot of it? It does say that many states use this term differently. But what you've got in Washington is three different sets of highways that all deserve their own category, with an umbrella on top to keep of the rain . . . --]:] 08:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
	:::::They all have their own category - it's just that the state highway category also applies to the other two, so they go underneath it. --] (] - ] - ]) 09:01, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

	== Eastern Cougar ==

	I've been trying to contact the people about the Eastern Cougar article, but it's been a real problem, considering that (a) my email address has been really wierd lately and (b) they haven't responded to my messages. I'm doing my best, though.--]] 16:51, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

	==Can't sleep, clown will eat me RFA 33⅓==
	Thank you for your early support during ]. The self-nomination was successful, with an unexpected number of participants from all over. If you ever need anything, are feeling snackish, or would just like to chat, please feel free to visit me on my talk page; I never sleep (much). 8-) ] 19:55, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

	==The Psycho==
	Thanks for giving us a day's breathing space on this user...problems with him have lasted weeks now and no one is jumping into to stop him. Discouraging.

	Just a note on this though, we're pretty sure this is someone who does this as a sockpuppet and if nameblocked will likely return as a different user in short order. I don't know if you have the ability to watch for his IP address, but I thought I'd give you a headsup anyway. --<span style="background: #CCEECC;">]</span>-<span style="background: #CCCCEE;">]</span>-<span style="background: #EECCEE;">]</span> 23:08, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
	: sigh (by AncorZonr), and now I've got attacks on my own talk page (by Easteregg) --<span style="background: #CCEECC;">]</span>-<span style="background: #CCCCEE;">]</span>-<span style="background: #EECCEE;">]</span> 23:13, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
	: And another one here (Boatfarm), who AncrZonr claims is a sockpuppet of me. ] --<span style="background: #CCEECC;">]</span>-<span style="background: #CCCCEE;">]</span>-<span style="background: #EECCEE;">]</span> 23:52, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
	: And he just added a previously deleted redirect from ], and sounds like he's probably the IP address --<span style="background: #CCEECC;">]</span>-<span style="background: #CCCCEE;">]</span>-<span style="background: #EECCEE;">]</span> 23:55, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
	:I suspect he's back as a different sockpuppet --<span style="background: #CCEECC;">]</span>-<span style="background: #CCCCEE;">]</span>-<span style="background: #EECCEE;">]</span> 00:13, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
	:I could use a second opinion on , which I believe to be the same user. I remove the link to avoid giving the site bonus search engine ranking, without really altering the comment's text or quality. This user didn't appreciate. --<span style="background: #CCEECC;">]</span>-<span style="background: #CCCCEE;">]</span>-<span style="background: #EECCEE;">]</span> 21:37, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
	::FYI, he's apparently going back to re-add a bunch of things that were removed after his previous edits prior to his block (see the photo added to ]) --<span style="background: #CCEECC;">]</span>-<span style="background: #CCCCEE;">]</span>-<span style="background: #EECCEE;">]</span> 21:42, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
	Π

	==Remove Page Protection on Bernie Sanders==

	What you've done is block me from restoring information added to the page, which was then vandalized by Bkwillwm, with no discussion! Remove this block now. If not, remove all my contributions going all the way back to when I first made them. I'd rather have that than have them twisted. ] 04:09, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

	There was no violation of the three revert rule, as Bkwillwm well knows, reversion of vandalism does not count toward 3RR, explicitly. I have addressed his complaint, several times. I found his complaint to be without merit, as he seems to feel that POV rule says that no comment which contains both sides of a dispute, when it relates to George Bush, is acceptible. This is not a violation of the POV rule, it is POV. Since ,User:Heah, you admit that you have not looked into this, a semi-protect that blocks me, but not Bkwillwm, is an abuse of admin power, and will be reported unless immediately removed. ] 16:10, 12 April 2006 (UTC)


	== :P ==

	Well, usually I don't interfere on enWiki but I've just seen a so interesting remark put by you on Space Cadet's talk page... :] Please, don't say ''your patience is waning'' in this way - Space Cadet is a Wikimedian far longer than you are. ^^

	I'd like to ask you to consider this point: politeness is important but not as much as the truth on Wiki. I know "fighters" are quite tiring - but pretty many of them is simply right. And to say which ones you really have to put your effort - but it's really worth of it in the world of biased, anglo-centric and spoiled by unfair edit wars and groups of interest enWiki. Has any of you really crtically checked all the given sources and is sure who is right?

	Polish-Russian dispute on enWiki is some proof how more numerous and backed by their state group wins their point. Unfortunately, these disputes are on this Wiki countless - and that is why why it's such a mess despite (or maybe because of) so many contributors.

	Best regards, :) <br>
	] ] 09:23, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

	:No problem, mate, we all try to be kinder, although vandalisms, errors and hostile/uneducated/biased/... people are so numerous and we are so few and sometimes we all simply lack patience and energy to do everything fine. That's why also I don't involve too much on enWiki - we have already enough biased users on pl and work to do over there, and countless disputes with some users here (like Australian guy stating he knows history of central Europe better than anyone else, no matter Polish, Czech or Russian and pushing hard his opinions or some Russians rewriting sentences from old soviet propaganda books (in fact there were very few non-propaganda ones) like Great Soviet Encyclopedia).
	:Add to that bullies, opportunism and double standards of some users (politeness expressed in front of whole community or sysops combined with harsh personal attacks, malicious edits and even attacking other cultures like one of sysops here - guy probably does not have balls to say anything like that in real life as he'd be sued in a minute - I don't want to look for a link). Not to forget anglo-centrism and ignorance and we know why actually experts and not only them often run away from Misplaced Pages. Unfortunately, it's much harder to examine whether an article is true than if a piece of software works.
	:So, as sour it sounds, keep rockin' :) 'cause there's a lotta work to do! Somebody has to do that and hopefully there will be Misplaced Pages 1.0+ when someone comes after us and corrects everything. If not, well, sadly we will just enforce some stereotypes, urban legends and unproven facts.
	:Greets, ] ] 11:31, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
	:P.S. And good luck with your thesis! I have to write one right now as well. :]

	==Jim Heller==


	Heah,

	This is Jim Heller, the person you blocked for supposedly violating the three-revert rule on the Ron Geaves article. I believe that the violator in that situation was Jossi Fresco not me. Indeed, I believe that Jossi Fresco was vandalizing the article, taking out all the text that I contributed on a new subject within the Geaves article, but that once I began reversing his vandalism he began to accuse me of "reverting". I would like to discuss this with you further. Is this the appropriate place? Thanks--] 13:56, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

	In fact, rather than wait, here's my complaint:

	To whom it may concern,

	Hi. My name's Jim Heller and I'm currently and for some time now caught up in a series of edit wars with Jossi Fresco. The background is this. I am a former follower of Prem Rawat, a/k/a Maharaji, a person I believe is a nefarious cult leader. Fresco, on the other hand, is a current follower and, needless to say, of a different mind altogether.

	For some years now, ever since the advent of the internet, Rawat and his followers have engaged in a long-standing campaign to whitewash Rawat's past and somehow protect him from the harsh light of history. The latest flashpoint arose just today when I tried to edit a Misplaced Pages article of another of Rawat's current followers, a religious studies professor in fact, Ron Geaves (who, by the way, just shot to flashpan infamy as the English academic who opined that the July 7th bombers were "demonstrators", not "terrorists".

	Please excuse the fact that, to explain the problem in any meaningful way, I have to flesh out the context somewhat. My edit concerned an academic (not Misplaced Pages) article Geaves had written where, discussing a program Rawat held in 1973, he wrote that:
	''In November 1973, Divine Light Mission had booked the Houston Astrodome, a large sports stadium with a capacity of 90,000. The event had taken on millenial expectations in the U.S. with devotees announcing and advertising Maharaji's appearance at the stadium as a second-coming, complete with angelic and alien visitors. Only 20,000 attended the event and '''Maharaji did not appear to have any knowledge of his American followers' expectations'''. He spoke as he usually does at such gatherings with no hint of messianic promises.''
	(My emphasis here and below)

	In fact, in a widely-disseminated invitation to that same 1973 program, Maharaji himself not only demonstrated knowledge of the "millenial expectations" but fanned the flames substantially. Thus, he declared the program the "most Holy and significant event in human history" and even hinted that it might have intergalactic significance:

	::''A LETTER FROM GURU MAHARAJ JI

	::''Bonn, Germany''

	::''September 31, 1973''

	::''Dear premies,''

	::''First of all, I would like to tell you about something of great importance to all of us. Because we have realized this beautiful Knowledge which is of great bliss to us all, it is our duty to propagate it to the human race. For it is something they really need.''

	::''In the world there is suffering, hatred and dissatisfaction. That fact does not need proof. It is understood by all that the world is passing through a great moment. No one has satisfaction of mind nor can they find the solution to this. '''The world is looking for the Perfect Master to come and reveal the Perfect Knowledge of God'''. There is a supreme energy constantly vibrating in everything making it survive and all the Perfect Masters coem to reveal this Knowledge to people. We can attain all materialistic things and still not have peace, for peace lies inside not outside in materialism.''

	::''As you all know Millenium '73 is being prepared for now. This festival has been organized by Divine Light Mission each year since 1967, in the memory of the late Satgurudev Shri Hans Ji Maharaji on His birthday. '''This year the most Holy and significant event in human history will take place in America.'''''

	::''I think that Millenium '73 is a point where we can really get together and enjoy the bliss bliss with all of our brothers and sisters who are premies; and also tell the world that we have received and realized the permanent service of Truth, Consciousness and Bliss which all the world is looking for in one way or manner.''

	::''To do this I really need your help. I really need the help of all the premies in all respects; physically, financially and all other ways to make Millenium '73 come off. '''This is a festival not for you or me. It is for the whole world and maybe the whole universe'''.''

	::''I hereby invite you to this Divine Festival of Peace, Millenium '73 and request all premies to help me financially, physically and spiritually to make the program manifest for all seekers of Truth.''

	::'''''Isn't it about time you all get together and help me bring peace to this Earth?'''''

	::''Blessings to you all,

	::''''''

	It is clear, when you contrast Geaves' claim with the documentary evidence, that Geaves, bless his heart, is playing the role of the typical cult apologist, lying about his leader and blaming the followers, the press, anyone at all, for the inexcusable, laughable excesses of the cult. What's particularly worrying about Geaves, I'm sure you can appreciate, is that, as a religious studies professor, he's imbued with a certain authority that makes him an especially effective, if unscrupulous, propagandist. It's one thing when he makes silly comments about the July 7 bombers being "demonstrators" not terrorists. No one would ever take him seriously on that score. But it's another altogether when he publishes supposedly-scholarly works about his cult leader (without ever disclosing that he's a follower, by the way) which completely distort the historical record.

	With these concerns in mind, I wrote the following additional comment for Geaves' Misplaced Pages article:

	:''Geaves has written a couple of articles about Prem Rawat, his guru, for various scholarly journals without publically disclosing in those pieces that he is a follower of Rawat (a/k/a Maharaji). Critics of Geaves allege that these works are dissembling, revisionist propaganda and far too biased and inaccurate for proper scholarship. For instance, in a 2006 article, Geaves commented on the "Millenium" festival Rawat held in Houston in 1973, noting that "The event had taken on millenial expectations in the U.S. with devotees announcing and advertising Maharaji's appearance at the stadium as a second-coming, complete with angelic and alien visitors. Only 20,000 attended the event and Maharaji did not appear to have any knowledge of his American followers' expectations. He spoke as he usually does at such gatherings with no hint of messianic promises." However, in a letter that Rawat himself wrote inviting followers to the festival, he called it "the most Holy and significant event in human history". And later, "This is a festival not for you or me. It is for the whole world and maybe the whole universe."''

	Now you may think that this isn't quite NPOV enough. You may think it requires more specific attributions. You may even think it isn't particularly well-written. But these are all matters which can be discussed and worked on in a Wikipedian collaborative spirit. Instead, what happened was Jossi Fresco, a paid web tech for Rawat (Maharaji), who stands guard dog over the Rawat articles for his master, anonymously began deleting my text and inserting, instead, this:

	:''Dr. Geaves has also written a number of papers related to Maharaji and affiliated organizations to combine his first hand knowledge of the subject (Geaves is a student of Maharaji) with his academic training to provide insights into this movement ''

	As indicated on the Talk: Ron Geaves page, eventually Fresco admitted that he was the deleter. We then got into a big tug-o-war wherein I would reinsert my text and warn him to quit reverting and he would then blame me for reverting in contravention of the Wiki excessive reversion rule. At one point he siezed on the fact that I posted without remembering to log in (I'm a bit new at this), accusing me of trying to sneak in via a sockpuppet or whatever you call them. Hardly. I've never denied my identity which has been apparent to Fresco all along. Like I said, he was the one who started the anonymous vandalism of my edit before finally coming out of the shadows.

	After all this, though, the nub of the issue is this: who was the original editor here and who was performing the illicit reversions? How can I be fairly accused of too many reversions for simply trying to protect my own original edit against his vandalism? Believe me, Jossi Fresco is the first to complain when the shoe's on the other foot, namely when someone changes some text this way. So how can he have it both ways?

	I know that Fresco has wormed his way into some sort of admin position with Misplaced Pages but that's just a potential embarrassment for this institution. This is just one example but things like this happen all the time with him. That's why the Prem Rawat articles are so terrible, really. They have very little substance, their focus is all off and, frankly, they're just boring, whitewashed advertisements for this cult. And Fresco's largely responsible.

	I look forward to your considered reply.

	Sincerely,

	Jim Heller--] 13:59, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

	:I would suggest that you tone down your rethoric and your language in particular as you have already been blocked for violating the ] policy in a recent exchange with me. For your information, no one can "worm his way" into adminship. The community of Misplaced Pages has a process of nominating editors for the role of sysop that has worked remarkably well so far. If you have''any'' concerns about my behavior, and as I told you numerous times in the recent weeks, you can report it at ]. ] <small>] • ]</small> 08:03, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
	::Jossi, I wrongly accused you of committing all the deletion/reversions/vandalism of my text. It turns out it wasn't just you although why you didn't say so is beyond me. But I will never agree that your work on the Rawat or related articles is done in good faith.--] 17:12, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

	BTW, Heah, I've replied to you further on my own talk page.--] 18:24, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

	== Unprotection ==

	It is annoying to block the one page this user specifically signed up for. Especially when it wasn't discussed on the talk page, and there really wasn't any trying to solve the dispute without protecting the page, like you are supposed to. Look at this link about ]. Though I am not an admin, many others are, and they also have the power to revert and unprotect pages. I am requesting ], on the page, ]. I have already notified another admin, ]. If you would rather not unprotect, please leave your reasons on ].

	Thanks!

	--<font color="00FF00">]</font><font color="6699FF">''']'''</font><font color="00FF99">]</font><font color="66FFFF">]</font><font color="6699FF">]</font><font color="66CC00">]</font><font color="6633FF">]</font><font color="66CCFF">]</font> 01:59, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 16:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
	:Yes, I did my research. I knew it was already protected, just wanted to see why :-)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	--<font color="00FF00">]</font><font color="6699FF">''']'''</font><font color="00FF99">]</font><font color="66FFFF">]</font><font color="6699FF">]</font><font color="66CC00">]</font><font color="6633FF">]</font><font color="66CCFF">]</font> 03:22, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 23:07, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
	== ] ==

			== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==
	I'm not sure that Straightinfo fully appreciates what NPOV means, as exampled :<blockquote>What this comes down to is Bkwillwm feels any comment which might make Sanders "look bad", is POV, even though the intent of the information is to present neutrality by giveng both sides at once. ] 23:16, 14 April 2006 (UTC)</blockquote>It isn't about reproducing two opposite pointed views, but instead giving all the pertinant information and letting the reader draw their own conclusions. The user removed the POV flag without any consensus with other users and then dropped a few weasel wordings into the Bernie Sanders article. Advice and guidence would be very appreciated. --] 23:43, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

			{{Ivmbox\|Hello, Heah. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
	== Thank you ==

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	Thank you for taking the appropriate actions regarding {{vandal\|Rcox1963}}. I have no idea what his intentions are, as his edits seem to make the Keith Olbermann biographies more biased. Hopefully, your block will straighten out his 'tude. Thanks again! --]-] <sup>] ]</sup> 11:31, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

			If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
	== Welcome to adminship ==
			\|Scale of justice 2.svg\|imagesize=40px}}
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/05&oldid=866998124 -->
			== Nomination for deletion of ] ==
			]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 07:32, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="afd-notice">
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	Dude... I think you got called a "waffle iron". Welcome to adminship. The first couple weeks can be stressful; your user page might end up, ahem, ''thoughtfully rearranged'' more than you're used to. But it's for a good cause, right? ;) Gimme a holler if you want a second admin opinion about anything, or just wanna say "'sup." Cheers, ]]] ] 23:11, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
	:Second that. The real fun is when you get hate email from blocked users. Their grasp of the language is...not so good. Let me know if someone needs a larting. ] ] 23:48, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
			<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 12:59, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:29, 8 March 2023

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Heah has not edited Misplaced Pages since January 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Heah really isn't around much these days for various reasons, so he apologizes if messages are not responded to in a timely fashion.

Proposed move of Novelty theory to Timewave zero

As a significant contributor to this article, you may wish to comment here. Cardamon (talk) 09:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Redirect of Stockyard Stoics

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Stockyard Stoics, by another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Stockyard Stoics is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Stockyard Stoics, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Francis Lucille

Hi, I have found your username from the spirituality section. I need your help and suggestion. I am trying to add an article on one of the Living spiritual teacher. but,I am facing an problem.

The editors who have visited this page don't understand spirituality and they have tagged it for deletion. i need your help urgently. so they are trying to compare it with other biographies in the field of sports etc. As you know,the field the spirituality is not very commercial. so I am having a hard time convincing them. could you please help amd and take a look at article. http://en.wikipedia.org/Francis_Lucille http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Francis_Lucille.

Appreciate all your help.

Thanks Amarhindustani Amarhindustani (talk) 15:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Heah! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

J. P. Otto - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:21, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

A breath...

Hello Heah, Sud Ram has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Articles for deletion nomination of Jump Start Records

I have nominated Jump Start Records, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jump Start Records. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Codf1977 (talk) 10:25, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stubborn Records

A tag has been placed on Stubborn Records, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages for multiple reasons. Please visit the article for details.

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Misplaced Pages criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Codf1977 (talk) 07:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Purchase Records

A tag has been placed on Purchase Records, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages for multiple reasons. Please visit the article for details.

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

Proposed deletion of Purchase Records

The article Purchase Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-Notable student record label. unreferenced.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 09:17, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Purchase Records

I have nominated Purchase Records, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Purchase Records. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Jeff G. ツ 15:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of J. P. Otto

The article J. P. Otto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:MUSICBIO.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Happy Adminship Anniversary

Wishing Heah a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee! Armbrust, B.Ed. _{about my edits?} 23:53, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 18:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

N.B.: I apologize if you have received any duplicate e-mail messages pursuant to this notification; this may have been due to technical difficulties on the Toolserver. Thanks, — madman 18:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 02:00, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 23:45, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Peter Gorman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Gorman is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Peter Gorman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Coretheapple (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Trachtenburg Family Slideshow Players for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trachtenburg Family Slideshow Players is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Trachtenburg Family Slideshow Players until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Heah. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hallucinogentasks

Template:Hallucinogentasks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:32, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of The Woes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Woes is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The Woes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 12:59, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Categories: