| Revision as of 07:42, 12 April 2012 editMiszaBot II (talk | contribs)259,776 editsm Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 14d) to Misplaced Pages talk:Today's featured article/requests/Archive 13.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:56, 9 November 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,502 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:Today's featured article/requests/Archive 18) (bot | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/requests/pending|style=width:23em; font-size:88%;}} | |||
| {{shortcut|WT:TFAR}} | {{shortcut|WT:TFAR}} | ||
| {{See also|Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2008-08-18/Dispatches{{!}}the 2008 Signpost article (updated 2016) "Choosing Today's Featured Article"|Template:TFA-editnotice{{!}}the editnotice for TFAs|Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/emergency{{!}}the blurbs that can be used in the event of a TFA emergency}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 200K | |||
| |counter = 18 | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 2 | |||
| |algo = old(35d) | |||
| |archive = Misplaced Pages talk:Today's featured article/requests/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| {{Archive box | {{Archive box | ||
| |style = font-size:88%; width:23em; | |style = font-size:88%; width:23em; | ||
| |auto = long | |auto = long | ||
| |search = yes | |search = yes | ||
| | |
|searchprefix = Misplaced Pages talk:Today's featured article/requests/ | ||
| |bot=MiszaBot | |bot=MiszaBot II | ||
| |age=14 | |age=14 | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| __TOC__ | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/requests/pending|style=float:none; clear:none; margin:auto;}} | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 200K | |||
| |counter = 13 | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 2 | |||
| |algo = old(14d) | |||
| |archive = Misplaced Pages talk:Today's featured article/requests/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| {{for|the Signpost article, Choosing Today's Featured Article|Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2008-08-18/Dispatches}} | |||
| {{for|helpful hints relating to requests|User:Raul654/Featured article thoughts}} | |||
| {{for|the editnotice template to be used for the TFA editnotice|Template:TFA-editnotice}} | |||
| {{for|the emergency blurbs to be used in the event no TFA is selected in time|Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/emergency}} | |||
| == April Fools suggestions == | |||
| I guess it's that time of year again when I begin soliciting suggested blurbs for April Fools. So, write up your suggestions and post them here I can judge them. The goal is to fool people into dismissing the article as an obvious hoax when in fact it is completely true. Bonus points for funny or weird subject matter. ] (]) 18:28, 19 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :How about ]? ] (] • ]) 18:33, 19 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Right now, I'd say that's the top of my list (It's very, very much in line with what I'm looking for) :) ] (]) 18:35, 19 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Discussion has been going on ] for a long time now. Basically everyone that has commented there feels ] is one of if not the best choice. Only other suggestions that are already FAs are ] and ].--] (]) 18:52, 19 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Pigeon Photography looks very good: is there a proposal for what the actual extract will be. I would prefer as little change as possible. ] (]) 19:47, 19 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::::A blurb which skirts around the actual application of pigeon photography might be best, leaving a reader to wonder "and just what are these pigeons taking pictures of?" without needing too much re-writing. I'm all in favour of misdirection, but that which uses as little actual change as possible is always the most effective. ] ] 20:46, 19 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Support Pigeon Photography. Would very much prefer not to see ] run on April Fools Day. Thanks. ] (]) 23:36, 19 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I can't understand why Olivia might even have been suggested as an April 1 candidate. ] ] 00:08, 20 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::::: '''Support''' Pigeon Photography My third year in nominating it--] (]) 03:14, 27 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="width:55%; background-color:#f5fffa; border:1px solid #cef2e0;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em; color: black"> | |||
| <div style="float:left;margin:0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0;">]</div> | |||
| <div> | |||
| ''']''' was a military ] technique invented in 1907 by the German apothecary ], who also trained ] to deliver medications. A ] was fitted with an aluminium breast harness to which a lightweight miniature camera could be attached for operation during flight. The pigeon photographers' indifference to explosions made them ideal for military applications, and they served with distinction during the ], both as photographers and messengers. The reckless over-deployment of pigeon volunteers at ] and ] induced severe ] among Neubronner's charges, which forced him to abandon his experiments. The French and German militaries both attempted to persuade the photographers to return to the field during the ], but failed to do so. Pigeons in the United States were later drafted for espionage photography duty by the ] (CIA). The technique was adapted for civilian use by the ] (BBC), which soon expanded its photographer ranks far beyond pigeons. Animals such as falcons, cats and dogs were accepted as BBC photographers as late as 2004. (]) | |||
| </div></div> | |||
| :Too silly? <b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">—] ]</b> 22:44, 19 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Don't think we can really justify the designation as ''volunteers'', nor do I see what would amount to avian stress disorder. The dog and cat camera pieces have nothing to do with the BBC. ] (]) 23:00, 19 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::The references to "volunteers" and "stress disorder" were just supposed to be a joke, but okay then. I take your point about the cats and the dogs, that was just me trying to streamline, assuming for April Fool's Day it didn't really matter. More Fool me! <b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">—] ]</b> 23:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :] looks perfect but ''please'' keep jokes and misleading text out of the write-up; the very concept sounds bizarre enough. --] (]) 23:59, 19 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :: Ditto. The whole idea is to have a completely serious caption. --''']''' 08:54, 20 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :That blurb needs some work I think, but it's probably basically on the right lines. ] ] 00:12, 20 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| If people feel a need to make the blurb funnier, let's at least do it in style and stay with the truth. Maybe something like the following? (Some of the information is taken from the ] article.) | |||
| <div style="width:55%; background-color:#f5fffa; border:1px solid #cef2e0;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em; color: black"> | |||
| <div style="float:left;margin:0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0;">]</div> | |||
| <div> | |||
| ''']''' was an ] technique originally invented in 1907 by ], German film amateur and court apothecary of ]. Neubronner, who had been using pigeons for medicine delivery and film special effects<!--stage magic, see YouTube film "Julius Neubronner zaubert", 1904-->, came up with the idea after one of them absented iself for four unexplained weeks. Notable later refinements of the method include the use of clockworks by a Swiss clockmaker, batteries by the ], and falcons by the ]. After experimental deployment of the method in the ], it was used again in a military context by the Germans in the ] and later by the United States. Neubronner's house in ] near ], the ''Streitkirche'', was originally built by the protestant citizens as a catholic church, so there was plenty of space for the inventor's family, pharmacy, and experiments. Neubronner's paper tape factory<!-- Neubronner GmbH & Co KG --> is still in business, his films have recently been restored and published on ], and his house still holds the pharmacy (as well as a museum). But the art of pigeon photography today is relegated to enthusiasts such as the prince in a recent film version of ]. (]) | |||
| </div></div> | |||
| This may be a bit too extreme. I guess halfway between this and the original lead is ideal, but I wanted to present all the material that we can work with. ] 12:30, 20 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Right now, it reads too much like a biography of Neubronner... ] (] • ]) 16:25, 21 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::I agree, that's a problem. Maybe it's best to just use the existing lead, and maybe just work a little bit too hard obviously trying to make it sound plausible... ] 18:30, 23 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| I've done a more-or-less verbatim write-up from the article itself. Others are welcome to change it, but I'll revert if the changes are too silly or over-the-top. Remember, the key here is to be completely true, but with the goal that someone reading it on April 1 won't be able to tell if it's a hoax or not. ] (]) 00:27, 28 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I in Revert, as inapplicable! —] (]) 13:16, 28 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Sorry, I had to revert. When you rewrite a text for style, make sure that you keep the meaning or only change it when you know what you are doing. Perhaps most importantly, there is nothing in the sources to support the claim that the technique "stalled" (whatever that means) ''in'' the First World War, as opposed to the military losing interest afterwards. But there were also several other inaccuracies, so that I felt it better to revert wholesale than to fix everything individually. ] 16:14, 28 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::''@Hans:'' Point taken. With the benefit of hindsight, I probably should have started my preliminary work in a sandbox before introducing suggestions step by step. | |||
| :::What I've done for the moment is: | |||
| :::1) to save () the version I was working on, which I realize had become over-egged and overlong; | |||
| :::2) submit () to you, and any other interested parties, a few changes which I feel may be good. | |||
| :::(Fyi, I realized that the WWI sentence needed attention and was working on it; "stalled was used in the sense of .) —] (]) 17:38, 28 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Sorry for my earlier grumpiness. I have now gone over the World War I information in the lead once more. ] 17:28, 31 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::::No need to apologise. I'd let myself get carried away with the fun. As an outsider, so to speak, I think inclusion of material on WWI is good for the lede as a whole. For April Fools Day only, I quite liked the idea of working in lipstick-sized cameras towards the end. Best, —] (]) 18:00, 31 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia == | |||
| May 17th is ]. I think an article fitting that theme would be nice. I have found the article ], which is a lesbian themed novel that was subject to censorship and trial. I think it would have 3 points total. Can anyone think of an article that might be a better choice or have more points? --] (]) 05:21, 28 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :That is perhaps the best choice. Other options would be biography articles on an LGBT person. ], ], ], ] and ] (who also helped decriminalise homosexuality in South Australia) are the available LGBT biographies. ''']'''] 07:32, 28 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks. I wanted to check to see if there was a better article that I had missed. --] (]) 11:53, 3 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Remove Tiananmen Square self immolation page == | |||
| I edit and watch in the Falun Gong space of articles. '''I strongly suggest that the ] page be removed from the main page.''' It is currently subject to intensive, controversial editing and to some degree edit warring. The tenor of the page has changed dramatically in the last 48-72 hours, with upwards of 60 edits that quickly changed important parts of the article. I am about to submit a note for its Featured Article status to be reconsidered, with a view to rescinding that status, because of this. The page is not stable and currently suffers neutrality issues. | |||
| '''Background to this note:''' | |||
| The article was promoted to FA status in 2009; editor ] was the lead editor at the time. He put tremendous effort into seeing the page reach FA status. The page was revisited in 2011 by a group of editors who discussed major changes quite exhaustively (lead by several editors who are more sympathetic to ]). At that time, editor ] wrote that ''"I think there is some editing to do to get this article fair and balanced, and with the appropriate amount of information. However, I am very much encouraged by what I have seen so far. I think people are on the whole working well, and listening to each other. Well done."''--a lot of the changes that occurred were discussed extensively. Consensus was reached. That was early 2011. | |||
| Ohconfucius re-appeared a couple of days ago and made a flurry of changes, apparently in an attempt to return the page, in whole or part, to how it was in 2009, when he edited it. He ignored the interim discussion. The changes made in 2011 identified and resolved misrepresentation, omissions, original syntheses, and failure to cogently present the views of Falun Gong or third parties in a manner commensurate with their notability, etc. Ohconfucius preceded to edit, apparently bringing the page back to how it was in 2009, without discussion or any attempt to form consensus. An example: the 2009 version did not say that the use of torture on Falun Gong practitioners increased in the wake of the immolation; that was added to the page in the 2011 version; Ohconfucius deleted that piece of information when he started editing the page again. Ohconfucius has made around 60+ edits, judging by the history. Most of those edits, many of them controversial, were not discussed. He was asked on his talk page and on the immolation talk page, and for the most part failed to do so while continuing to make make changes that changed the tenor of the article. His peers have expressed exasperation at this behavior. | |||
| This is obviously a sensitive topic. The incident led to people being tortured and killed. It thus deserves to be treated with circumspection and caution. That caution has not been forthcoming, and I think it would be valuable if an administrator would intercede and monitor the discussion, because attempts for other editors to discuss it with Ohconfucius have not been effective. There is a behavioral problem when an editor makes that many changes unilaterally while ignoring the discussions, particularly when it's a featured article under ArbCom sanctions. He has been politely and repeatedly asked not to make substantial changes, including those that misrepresent sources--which he's done more than once--or change the balance of the page without discussing, but has not done so. It is difficult to know what to do, except find some time to breathe. | |||
| Thus, I am '''strongly urging''' that the page be removed from the front page as a featured article. I am also entering a request for the page's feature status to be reconsidered. And I am initiating a mediation request so that an uninvolved editor can step in between Ohconfucius, the page, and other editors, to make sure that proper process is being followed on this important and contentious topic. | |||
| Further notes: I have made a decision not to edit the page amidst the current strong dispute. Ohconfucius has an open opposition and animus toward Falun Gong. I have said to Ohconfucius that it is my opinion that he is too close and invested in the topic, and should stick to the voluntary self-ban he initiated some time ago. ] (]) 02:34, 3 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Categories== | |||
| == General Relativity on April 18th == | |||
| Literally every month without fail, at some point during the month a run of ] suddenly throws up a redlinked category of the "Misplaced Pages Today's featured article nominations from " variety (e.g. {{cl|Category:Misplaced Pages Today's featured article nominations from July 2024}}) which I end up having to create on your behalf, even though I'm not normally involved in this project, because of the rule around not leaving stuff in redlinked categories. So if such categories are routinely expected to exist, then would it be possible for this project to take steps to ensure that they get created either by a project member as soon as they're needed, or automatically by a bot at the beginning of the month, before they turn into work for other projects to clean up? ] (]) 20:46, 28 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I |
:I have no idea. I've been a coordinator for seven years and I have no idea what this is. At a guess, I'd say it's something produced by the template when TFA/R nominations are created. ] (]) 21:37, 28 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::{{replyto|Bearcat|Wehwalt}} these categories are a direct effect of a TFAR being accepted and scheduled. See for example {{cl|Misplaced Pages Today's featured article nominations from October 2024}} where all of the five TFAs were placed in the monthly category by edits {{diff|Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/requests/Battle of Cane Hill|prev|1250941534|like this}}, made either by {{user|Gog the Mild}} or by {{user|SchroCat}}, who used {{tlxs|TFAR top|2=monthyear=October 2024|3=passed=y|4=date=November 28, 2024}} (or something similar). So I think that it's up to these people to notice the redlink that may appear in the category box following an edit like that, and to create the category page to suit. --] 🌹 (]) 20:12, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :We had ] as ] (the 55th anniversary of Einstein's death), so it is likely too soon to feature the ] article. ''']'''] 12:00, 3 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :: |
:::Sure, except they very routinely ''don't'', because it always, every month without fail, gets picked up by the WantedCategories report and thus always, every month without fail, ends up becoming ''my'' job. ] (]) 20:14, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::: |
::::I guess the two obvious questions I have are, is it worth having categories like this, and in either case, what's the most efficient course of action? ] (]) 20:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :::::Having read the discussion to this point three times I have no idea what it is about, what if anything I am doing wrong, or how if at all I need to amend my practices. Would it be possible for someone to talk it through a level or two down? Thanks. ] (]) 20:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::{{replyto|Gog the Mild}} OK. When SchroCat made {{diff|Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/requests/Wells Cathedral 1|prev|1249097118|this edit}} on 3 October 2024 (and I'm sure that it was a correct action), it put ] into {{cl|Misplaced Pages Today's featured article nominations from October 2024}}, but the category page didn't exist at the time - Bearcat had to create it themselves the following day after being alerted by the presence of that cat in ]. It's something that they have been going on about at VPT and other places for ''months'', if not years. --] 🌹 (]) 20:56, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::I see, I think. Is there a way to automate the creation so we are sure not to cause you any further problems? ] (]) 21:09, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::Or, alternatively, to alter the code so that this is no longer created? Because I suspect it gets next to no page views. As you saw by my initial reaction, it's not something useful in TFA land.] (]) 21:10, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::Agree. Is there a point to {{c|Category:Misplaced Pages Today's featured article nominations from October 2024}}? I'm new to scheduling and it's already an involved multi-step process, so not adding yet another step would be the better pathway. - ] (]) 04:52, 15 October 2024 (UTC) - ] (]) 04:49, 15 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::The categorisation was added to ] by {{user|Bencherlite}}, the template's creator. Why it was done, or if it is necessary, I don't know; but Bencherlite is ] so can't be asked. --] 🌹 (]) 07:40, 15 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::: - to me at least. There's also nothing in the archives of this page or of Bench's talk page where there was a discussion that led to it. It seems superfluous to requirements. - ] (]) 09:11, 15 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::::I agree. Simply remove the code that produces this and no more problem, and we don't get talked about on VPT, wherever that is, and elsewhere. Can we agree to do this? ] (]) 16:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::::VPT = ]. --] 🌹 (]) 16:48, 15 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== December nominations == | ||
| As scheduling coordinator for December, I announce that nominations for any date through 31 December may now be made. ] (]) 12:32, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| These are just a few suggestions I've thought up. | |||
| The December schedule will be found ]. Nominations are still welcome and we'll adjust as need be.--] (]) 13:22, 31 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| 1. The ] article needs to be more prominently listed. It should be accessible from all the FA related pages. | |||
| 2. The list perhaps could be re-organized as a table or series of tables. It would include extra information that might make easier to use in selecting articles. This can include: | |||
| *Age | |||
| *Broad category and specific category (eg. "Physics" and "Physics biography") | |||
| *Whether it's a vital topic, underrepresented, or a core topic | |||
| *Dates that might be of interest if relevant (death, birth, discovery, etc) | |||
| *Current total points of the article. This would have to be maintained by a bot, and would be more complex than the others and is not essential. | |||
| 3. Increase the request slots. Non-date specific should be increased to three, and date specific should be increased to 7. The reason is that an article can be nominated a long time before it is set to run, and it can sit and eat up space on the request board for almost a month. --] (]) 03:55, 12 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:56, 9 November 2024
Shortcut See also: the 2008 Signpost article (updated 2016) "Choosing Today's Featured Article", the editnotice for TFAs, and the blurbs that can be used in the event of a TFA emergency
 Archives | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 35 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
| Shortcuts The TFAR requests page is currently accepting nominations from February 1 to March 3. Articles for dates beyond then can be listed here, but please note that doing so does not count as a nomination and does not guarantee selection. Before listing here, please check for dead links using checklinks or otherwise, and make sure all statements have good references. This is particularly important for older FAs and reruns. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date | Article | Reason | Primary author(s) | Added by (if different) | |
| 2025: | |||||
| February 9 | Japanese battleship Tosa | Why | The ed17 | ||
| March 1 | Meurig ab Arthfael | Why | Dudley Miles | Sheila1988 | |
| March 10 | Hotline Miami 2: Wrong Number | Why | NegativeMP1 | ||
| March 12 | 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season | Why | SounderBruce | ||
| March 18 | Edward the Martyr | Why | Amitchell125 | Sheila1988 | |
| March 26 | Pierre Boulez | Why | Dmass | Sheila1988 | |
| April 12 | Dolly de Leon | Why | Pseud 14 | ||
| April 15 | Lady Blue (TV series) | Why | Aoba47 | Harizotoh9 | |
| April 18 | Battle of Poison Spring | Why | HF | ||
| April 24 | "I'm God" | Why | Skyshifter | ||
| April 25 | 1925 FA Cup final | Why | Kosack | Dank | |
| May | 21st Waffen Mountain Division of the SS Skanderbeg (re-run, first TFA was May 14, 2015) | Why | Peacemaker67 | ||
| May 6 | Kingdom Hearts: Chain of Memories | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
| May 10 | Ben&Ben | Why | Pseud 14 | ||
| May 11 | Valley Parade | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
| May 11 | Mother (Meghan Trainor song) | Why | MaranoFan | ||
| May 17 | Bad Blood (Taylor Swift song) | Why | Ippantekina | Jlwoodwa | |
| June | The Combat: Woman Pleading for the Vanquished | Why | iridescent | Harizotoh9 | |
| June 1 | Namco | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
| June 3 | David Evans (RAAF officer) | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
| June 5 | Jaws (film) | Why | 750h+ | ||
| June 6 | American logistics in the Northern France campaign | Why | Hawkeye7 | Sheila1988 | |
| June 8 | Barbara Bush | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
| June 23 | Battle of Groix | Why | Jackyd101 | Jlwoodwa | |
| June 26 | Donkey Kong Land | Why | TheJoebro64 | Jlwoodwa | |
| July 1 | Maple syrup | Why | Nikkimaria | Dank | |
| July 7 | Gustav Mahler | Why | Brianboulton | Dank | |
| July 14 | William Hanna | Why | Rlevse | Dank | |
| July 26 | Liz Truss | Why | Tim O'Doherty | Tim O'Doherty and Dank | |
| July 29 | Tiger | Why | LittleJerry | ||
| July 31 | Battle of Warsaw (1705) | Why | Imonoz | Harizotoh9 | |
| August 4 | Death of Ms Dhu | Why | Freikorp | AirshipJungleman29 | |
| August 23 | Yugoslav torpedo boat T3 | Why | Peacemaker67 | ||
| August 25 | Born to Run | Why | Zmbro | Jlwoodwa | |
| August 30 | Late Registration | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
| September 2 | 1905–06 New Brompton F.C. season | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
| September 6 | Hurricane Ophelia (2005) | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
| September 20 | Myst V: End of Ages | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
| September 30 or October 1 | Hoover Dam | Why | NortyNort, Wehwalt | Dank | |
| October 1 | Yugoslav torpedo boat T4 | Why | Peacemaker67 | ||
| October 3 | Spaghetti House siege | Why | SchroCat | Dank | |
| October 10 | Tragic Kingdom | Why | EA Swyer | Harizotoh9 | |
| October 16 | Angela Lansbury | Why | Midnightblueowl | MisawaSakura | |
| October 18 | Royal Artillery Memorial | Why | HJ Mitchell | Ham II | |
| November 1 | Matanikau Offensive | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
| November 19 | Water Under the Bridge | Why | MaranoFan | ||
| November 20 | Nuremberg trials | Why | buidhe | harizotoh9 | |
| November 21 | Canoe River train crash | Why | Wehwalt | ||
| December 25 | Marcus Trescothick | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
| December 30 | William Anderson (RAAF officer) | Why | Ian Rose | Jlwoodwa | |
| 2026: | |||||
| January 27 | History of the Jews in Dęblin and Irena during World War II | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
| February 27 | Raichu | Why | Kung Fu Man | ||
| March 13 | Swift Justice | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
| May 5 | Me Too (Meghan Trainor song) | Why | MaranoFan | ||
| June 1 | Rhine campaign of 1796 | Why | harizotoh9 | ||
| June 8 | Types Riot | Why | Z1720 | ||
| July 23 | Veronica Clare | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
| September 6 | Assassination of William McKinley | Why | Wehwalt | czar | |
| September 20 | Persona (series) | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
| November | The Story of Miss Moppet | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
| November 11 | U.S. Route 101 | Why | SounderBruce | ||
| October 15 | Easy on Me | Why | MaranoFan | ||
| November 20 | Tôn Thất Đính | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
| December 21 | Fredonian Rebellion | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
| December 22 | Title (song) | Why | MaranoFan | ||
| 2027: | |||||
| June | 1987 (What the Fuck Is Going On?) | Why | |||
| August 25 | Genghis Khan | Why | AirshipJungleman29 | ||
| October 15 | The Motherland Calls | Why | Joeyquism | ||
Categories
Literally every month without fail, at some point during the month a run of Special:WantedCategories suddenly throws up a redlinked category of the "Misplaced Pages Today's featured article nominations from " variety (e.g. Category:Misplaced Pages Today's featured article nominations from July 2024) which I end up having to create on your behalf, even though I'm not normally involved in this project, because of the rule around not leaving stuff in redlinked categories. So if such categories are routinely expected to exist, then would it be possible for this project to take steps to ensure that they get created either by a project member as soon as they're needed, or automatically by a bot at the beginning of the month, before they turn into work for other projects to clean up? Bearcat (talk) 20:46, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- I have no idea. I've been a coordinator for seven years and I have no idea what this is. At a guess, I'd say it's something produced by the template when TFA/R nominations are created. Wehwalt (talk) 21:37, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Bearcat and Wehwalt: these categories are a direct effect of a TFAR being accepted and scheduled. See for example Category:Misplaced Pages Today's featured article nominations from October 2024 where all of the five TFAs were placed in the monthly category by edits like this, made either by Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) or by SchroCat (talk · contribs), who used
{{subst:TFAR top|monthyear=October 2024|passed=y|date=November 28, 2024}}(or something similar). So I think that it's up to these people to notice the redlink that may appear in the category box following an edit like that, and to create the category page to suit. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:12, 14 October 2024 (UTC)- Sure, except they very routinely don't, because it always, every month without fail, gets picked up by the WantedCategories report and thus always, every month without fail, ends up becoming my job. Bearcat (talk) 20:14, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- I guess the two obvious questions I have are, is it worth having categories like this, and in either case, what's the most efficient course of action? Wehwalt (talk) 20:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Having read the discussion to this point three times I have no idea what it is about, what if anything I am doing wrong, or how if at all I need to amend my practices. Would it be possible for someone to talk it through a level or two down? Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Gog the Mild: OK. When SchroCat made this edit on 3 October 2024 (and I'm sure that it was a correct action), it put Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/requests/Wells Cathedral 1 into Category:Misplaced Pages Today's featured article nominations from October 2024, but the category page didn't exist at the time - Bearcat had to create it themselves the following day after being alerted by the presence of that cat in Special:WantedCategories. It's something that they have been going on about at VPT and other places for months, if not years. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:56, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- I see, I think. Is there a way to automate the creation so we are sure not to cause you any further problems? Wehwalt (talk) 21:09, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Or, alternatively, to alter the code so that this is no longer created? Because I suspect it gets next to no page views. As you saw by my initial reaction, it's not something useful in TFA land.Wehwalt (talk) 21:10, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Agree. Is there a point to Misplaced Pages Today's featured article nominations from October 2024? I'm new to scheduling and it's already an involved multi-step process, so not adding yet another step would be the better pathway. - SchroCat (talk) 04:52, 15 October 2024 (UTC) - SchroCat (talk) 04:49, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- The categorisation was added to Template:TFAR top by Bencherlite (talk · contribs), the template's creator. Why it was done, or if it is necessary, I don't know; but Bencherlite is WP:MIA so can't be asked. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:40, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- They don't look terribly high traffic or useful - to me at least. There's also nothing in the archives of this page or of Bench's talk page where there was a discussion that led to it. It seems superfluous to requirements. - SchroCat (talk) 09:11, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. Simply remove the code that produces this and no more problem, and we don't get talked about on VPT, wherever that is, and elsewhere. Can we agree to do this? Wehwalt (talk) 16:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- VPT = WP:VPT. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:48, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. Simply remove the code that produces this and no more problem, and we don't get talked about on VPT, wherever that is, and elsewhere. Can we agree to do this? Wehwalt (talk) 16:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- They don't look terribly high traffic or useful - to me at least. There's also nothing in the archives of this page or of Bench's talk page where there was a discussion that led to it. It seems superfluous to requirements. - SchroCat (talk) 09:11, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- The categorisation was added to Template:TFAR top by Bencherlite (talk · contribs), the template's creator. Why it was done, or if it is necessary, I don't know; but Bencherlite is WP:MIA so can't be asked. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:40, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- I see, I think. Is there a way to automate the creation so we are sure not to cause you any further problems? Wehwalt (talk) 21:09, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Gog the Mild: OK. When SchroCat made this edit on 3 October 2024 (and I'm sure that it was a correct action), it put Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/requests/Wells Cathedral 1 into Category:Misplaced Pages Today's featured article nominations from October 2024, but the category page didn't exist at the time - Bearcat had to create it themselves the following day after being alerted by the presence of that cat in Special:WantedCategories. It's something that they have been going on about at VPT and other places for months, if not years. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:56, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Having read the discussion to this point three times I have no idea what it is about, what if anything I am doing wrong, or how if at all I need to amend my practices. Would it be possible for someone to talk it through a level or two down? Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- I guess the two obvious questions I have are, is it worth having categories like this, and in either case, what's the most efficient course of action? Wehwalt (talk) 20:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, except they very routinely don't, because it always, every month without fail, gets picked up by the WantedCategories report and thus always, every month without fail, ends up becoming my job. Bearcat (talk) 20:14, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Bearcat and Wehwalt: these categories are a direct effect of a TFAR being accepted and scheduled. See for example Category:Misplaced Pages Today's featured article nominations from October 2024 where all of the five TFAs were placed in the monthly category by edits like this, made either by Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) or by SchroCat (talk · contribs), who used
December nominations
As scheduling coordinator for December, I announce that nominations for any date through 31 December may now be made. Wehwalt (talk) 12:32, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
The December schedule will be found here. Nominations are still welcome and we'll adjust as need be.--Wehwalt (talk) 13:22, 31 October 2024 (UTC)