| Revision as of 20:35, 17 April 2006 editKaid100 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,059 edits decided one comment was personal and removed← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 19:01, 27 December 2024 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,668,295 edits Removed: Talk:Jesus. |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
<noinclude> |
|
{{shortcut|]}} |
|
|
|
{{rfclistintro}} |
|
{{RFCheader|History and geography}} |
|
|
|
</noinclude> |
|
<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> |
|
|
|
''']''' |
|
*]:dispute over biblical reference to Isles of Elishah. One user claims this is reference to Britain or the British Isles, others can find no evidence. 20:29, 17 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
*]: dispute over relevance and interpretation (original research?) of two events. ] 13:28, 17 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
I'd like to understand why we don't keep than the image montage in the article at the moment. The is obviously better in terms of framing and resolution, as well as showing the exact moment when the second plane crashed into the WTC. ] (]) 21:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
*]: No dispute, just looking for input on the use of "Flemish". 17:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
''']''' |
|
*]: Whether or not it is valid to erase other culural viewpoints of Carthaginian society, rather than explain or moderate them. Whether it is valid to remove unsubstantiated, but common, stories (in this case the alleged pratice of child sacrifice) from the article completely, rather than mentioning it, and explaining that it could be case of ] by Roman and Greek historians. Whether it is acceptable to remove sources from the Bibliography used to "support" some of the "objectional points". Whether or not a disambigation link at the beginning of an article should be removed. - 01:55, 13 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
* ] — There is a dispute on how to apply ].... Should "East Sea" redirect to ] first or disambiguate first?12:36, 15 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
Should the article’s infobox reflect EF2/T4 or F3/T5-6? This question stems from the fact the infobox inputs can only accept a single set of values (i.e. EF2/T4 or F3/T5-6, not both). The EF2/T4 rating comes from a peer reviewed paper by ] and Stuart Robinson with the Haag Engineering Co. in the ] in August 2006. The F3/T5-6 rating comes from the ] (TORRO), the creators of the ], T-scale, . |
|
*] - whether "East Sea" is English or Korean local language term ] 01:54, 13 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - edit war over the inclusion/exclusion of certain external links, and also over other wording, all of which I feel completely lost about, but I want to see some neutral editors with some expertise involved to evaluate the situation. --] (]) 05:19, 9 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - Discussions of race - are Persians "descendants of Aryans"? 19:48, 8 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - Khomeini's views on non-Muslims. 19:48, 8 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - Can Rudolf Virchow be listed as a Freemason? 07:30, 8 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - Accuracy dispute over quotes in ] and appropriateness of quote in ]. 01:07, 8 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - there is a debate over whether goldcoastaustralia.com meets the guidelines for being an external link from the ] article. See also ]. 07:15, 6 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - re Eire's refugee policies during WWII, and general military options from WWII, which users Demiurge and Jtdirl insist on imposing their own opinions without sources or citations and neither is qualified as a military historian. They are censors not historians, and refuse to engage in conversation on discussion page or provide any reason other than boilerplate nonsense ("sockpuppet vandal") to censor anything they do not agree with. 14:27, 6 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*], Which countries are part of Scandinavia? 00:36, 5 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* Should ] point to the Philosopher, or a disambiguation page? Your thoughts welcome at ]. 19:36, 4 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - Long edit war about the numbers in a chart about casualities during World War II along with some other issues. It was protected for 2 1/2 months...unprotected with no agreements made. It's been unprotected for 3 days and things are right back to where they were, including users accusing others of vandalism. Neutral voices would be very welcome. 17:18, 4 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] How should English Misplaced Pages articles spell the name of the two Aztec emperors? Montezuma, Moctezuma or Moteuczoma? 07:49, 3 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Shouldn't articles about battles and/or disputed military outposts be allowed to included the names by which both sides referred to them? Thanks. 20:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Should it also mention the name "Arabian gulf"? 10:57, 31 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] A long argument about the oportunity to rename ] into ] and so on until ] into ] (and to keep ] as a redirect to ]). ] 08:35, 27 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] It is an arguement whether he should be considered a ] or a ]. --] 16:16, 25 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] There is an unresolved dispute as to which reference to use for this list/ranking. The choice is between the UN urban agglomerations list and the list by the website citypopulation.de. 20:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] whilst everyone seems to agree that the anceint Scots Gaelic etymology of the name should be included in the article, should the Gaelic name of this Lowland Scots town (unused locally) been given equal prominence in an infobox. --15:33, 23 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
** There is a general discussion about the matter ] - '''] ('']'')''' 15:41, 23 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] In the introductive paragraph of that article, the asserted "brief period of independence (1917-1921)" is based on ] (the kind hypothetical reader may take a look on ] and the quoted sources in ]). 16:43, 22 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* ] Question over primary source as an encyclopedic reference. 21:54, 20 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute and possible edit war has gotten out of hand, with constant POV pushing and no cooperation, could soon extend into flaming and personal attacks. Misplaced Pages policy and verifiability of article has been compromised, and all attempts to solve the problems ends in revert. |
|
|
--04:59, 20 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute and increasingly edit war over the inclusion of ''Islas Malvinas'' in the first line of the article. I would tentatively say that most people have accepted it being there, the remaining question is whether the Malvinas should have some kind of note that it is not the official name, nor the direct translation, something along the lines of ''commonly known in Spanish speaking countries as...'', ''alternative Spanish name...'' and others at the ]. ] 00:55, 17 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute on whether this should be an article or a disambig page (see also ] and its history), and whether it is a ] of ] (see also ]). 01:16, 16 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]:There has been a serious edit war over the accuracy and neutrality of information added to the article, with personal attacks and accussations. One of the involved editors asked for Full Protection (granted) and put the case before the Mediation Committee, which was not accepted by the other editor, who seems to prefer instead to have other fellow countrymen as mediators.15:06, 14 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]: Months-long edit war over the validity of a view that Paris' commuter belt should seem as the city itself; predjudiced (and constant) reverts and other bad editing habits. 09:04, 11 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]: There already exist more accurate exit lists on several articles such as ], and thus the page was edited to link to those to avoid a ]. Several editors are reverting this for no apparent reason. 07:47, 10 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute whether to include the ] and the ], both targets of revisionism, in the article. 18:13, 9 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute over whether al-Khwarimzi was an Arab or a Persian. 14:43, 9 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute over what should and what should not be in the article. 10:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute over inclusion of disputed material. 04:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] and ]: There are four sections of one road, Queen's Road East, Queensway, Queen's Road Central, Queen's Road West. Should the stub article Queensway, be merged into the article Queen's Road? 22:27, 3 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since the infobox can only contain one set of the ratings, this discussion more or less needs to determine which source (Haag Engineering Co. or TORRO) should be the infobox source. |
|
] |
|
|
|
*'''Option 1''' — EF2/T4 using the Haag Engineering Co. paper. |
|
] |
|
|
|
*'''Option 2''' — F3/T5-6 using the ] paper. |
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
'''The ]''' (] 03:20, 20 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
What should the infobox indicate as the location of the hostilities? |
|
|
|
|
|
*'''Option 1''' - ] and ], ] |
|
|
*'''Option 2''' - ] |
|
|
|
|
|
Please enter Option 1 or Option 2, followed by a brief statement, in the Survey. Do not reply to other users in the Survey. Back-and-forth discussion may be conducted in the Discussion section. ]] 16:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the this Misplaced Pages page contain the section begining: article in the newspaper '']'', headlined "The Secret of Sabiha Hatun"? ] (]) 09:27, 15 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
The RfC is whether to retain or remove Syrian mercenaries from the belligerents section of the infobox. ] (]) 02:58, 10 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
I'm opening a new RfC in an attempt to permanently solve this dispute. Should the Estado Novo regime be considered fascist? -- ] (]) 23:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
{{RFC list footer|hist|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }} |
_-_B6019~11.jpg){kind=link}