Revision as of 22:49, 22 May 2012 editDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators406,421 edits →Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Avicennasis← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:37, 23 November 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,709 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:It Is Me Here/Archive 7, User talk:It Is Me Here/Archive 8) (bot | ||
(190 intermediate revisions by 64 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOINDEX__ | __NOINDEX__ | ||
{{YesAutosign}} | |||
{{NoACEMM}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|maxarchivesize = |
|maxarchivesize = 32K | ||
|counter = |
|counter = 8 | ||
|minthreadsleft = |
|minthreadsleft = 1 | ||
|algo = old( |
|algo = old(30d) | ||
|archive = User talk:It Is Me Here/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:It Is Me Here/Archive %(counter)d | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{archivebox|auto=yes}} | {{archivebox|search=no|auto=yes}} | ||
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} | |||
== New Page Patrol survey == | |||
{| style="background-color: #dfeff3; border: 4px solid #bddff2; width:100%" cellpadding="5" | |||
| ] | |||
<big>'''New page patrol – ''Survey Invitation'''''</big> | |||
---- | |||
Hello {{PAGENAME}}! The ] is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. | |||
*If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. | |||
*If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. | |||
'''Please click to take part.'''<br> | |||
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. | |||
---- | |||
<small>You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see ]</small> | |||
|} | |||
== Archiving WT:BADIMAGE == | |||
{{talkback|Thryduulf}} | |||
== Template or markup for scansion? == | |||
Hello, IIMH. Because of ] I've begun thinking about how verse scansion on Misplaced Pages might be improved. One possibility is implementing the scansion within a template or markup. (This has to do with requiring monospace, but <nowiki><tt></tt></nowiki> seemingly not working properly with line-initial spaces, plus an aesthetic dislike by some for the gray-box formatting.) My sense is that the line-initial-space style (as I used in the discussion) may well be the easiest and best method, but I don't want to ignore other possibilities (and maybe there are others existing that I'm not aware of). Might you (or someone you know) be willing to discuss pros, cons, abilities, limitations with me in the future? This is certainly not in a "work order" phase yet... just spitballing. Thanks much. ] (]) 22:02, 2 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
:Er I'm not sure I can really help you, being neither a template expert nor an English Literature expert. I was just looking for an automated solution from ] (to save having to do it myself) to change the markup of sonnets as a whole; I don't really know anything about syllable marks. If you are looking for a technically-minded Wikipedian, {{user|Anomie}} is one of the best I've encountered personally; or you could look in ], ] (and up to <code>-5</code>), or similar. For English Lit experts, I suggest searching WikiProject member lists. Sorry! ''']''' <sup>'''] / ]</sup>''' 12:59, 3 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks. ] (]) 01:27, 4 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Your ] == | |||
== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == | |||
{{talkback|Misplaced Pages:Bot requests|Changing .3Cbr.2F.3E to .3Cpoem.3E on Sonnet pages|ts=19:49, 10 May 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
== Muhammad GAR == | |||
Hello, | |||
FYI: ]. Cheers, --'''<font color="#0000FF">]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">]</font><font color="#0000FF">]</font>''' 10:38, 12 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Talkback! == | |||
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. | |||
{{talkback|Avicennasis|Want to run for RFA?|ts=05:44, 18 May 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
<sup>]</sup>]</sub> @ 05:44, 26 Iyar 5772 / 05:44, 18 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
Take the survey ''''''. | |||
== A barnstar for you! == | |||
Kind Regards, | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Special Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks for your contributions. ] ] 00:10, 20 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
] | |||
== ] == | |||
<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
It has been pointed out in the !votes and I had a similar thought when I read it, that your nomination statement is a bit misleading. Your statement makes it appear that Avicennasis has been actively editing since 2006; however, active edits did not begin until 2010. Would you care to discuss it with Avicennasis and strike/modify your nomination accordingly?<tt> </tt>] ] ] 19:03, 21 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 --> | |||
:Oh, sorry; that's what you get for doing research with ], I suppose! Is the etiquette normally to edit the nomination like you would an article, or to leave the old wording there, but struck through? ''']''' <sup>'''] / ]</sup>''' 22:37, 21 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
::I haven't seen a similar event, but I am almost certain that striking would be uncontroversial while replacing the text would cause some problems. If you did just replace it, editors who already commented on it would cause confusion. Personally I would leave a note using {{code|<small></small>}} right after the sentence about when editing began, clearing the issue up.<tt> </tt>] ] ] 22:48, 21 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
*Odd--you don't know how to read someone's edit history or how to start an RfA, but you're really good at getting a request for arbitration going. Great work. ] (]) 22:25, 22 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
::Drmies, it makes sense to focus on recent edit history rather than the earliest and I think your comment was unnecessary. Lets let this entire thing drop now.<tt> </tt>] ] ] 22:31, 22 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::Recent edit history is that MF is gone. So I don't think my comment was unnecessary, no. We have an administrator here with less than 10,000 edits assisting in driving away an editor who has done ten times that. Why would I drop this? We have hypocrisy all around (, anyone?), at least two admins starting ANI and AE threads, and for what? "Disruption"? That was not disruption. It is me here, you have done us all a disservice. ] (]) 22:40, 22 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::Malleus will be back, pointing fingers solves no problems. The ANI thread has been closed, and I don't think the AE thread will come to much.<tt> </tt>] ] ] 22:45, 22 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::::So you say. And in the meantime we all look like morons, esp. the three admins who are pushing that AE, but by extension me too. ] (]) 22:49, 22 May 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:37, 23 November 2024
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,