| Revision as of 22:37, 23 May 2012 view sourceFæ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers83,148 edits →Randy Bott: c← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:16, 27 December 2024 view source Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,296,800 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Fæ/2024) (bot | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |archiveheader = {{aan}} | |archiveheader = {{aan}} | ||
| |minthreadsleft = |
|minthreadsleft = 2 | ||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
| |algo = old( |
|algo = old(7d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Fæ/%(year)d | |archive = User talk:Fæ/%(year)d | ||
| }}{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}{{archivebox|{{center|]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]}}|search=no|bot=}} | |||
| }}{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}{{/head}} | |||
| {{notice|image=Faebot logo.png|When I do reply it may be from a mobile phone or by email. {{=)}} Due to routinely using public wifi, my edits will normally be via ToR to avoid browser hijacking.}} | |||
| {{archives|{{center|]<br/>]<br/>]}}|search=yes|bot=MiszaBot}} | |||
| {{Off and On WikiBreak}} | |||
| {{User:Fæ/WMUK disclaimer}} | |||
| __TOC__ | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| == Let's make this an opportunity to unhate! == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| <!-- ] 23:05, 22 June 2012 (UTC) --> | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Fæ classy in crisis LGBT ally Barnstar!''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Because we need to show our overwhelming support of what people hate on to create unhate whenever it shows up. I compel everyone that supports unhate to repost this on their user page or talk page and especially on any page that has been the location of LGBT harassment or ignorance, that way the haters will know the only consequence of their hate will be more gayness and education and community. ] (]) 23:33, 23 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :Thanks, I'm all for confronting haters back with a big dose of gayness and gay love. Cheers --] (]) 23:44, 23 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::You must have missed that Russavia got one also. Right above the discussion on Polandballs :) --] (]) 22:55, 24 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I was in a talk today with Bishop ] who has his own (severe) personal experiences of harassment and death threats over the last few years, for . His view was that the opposite of love is fear, not hate. It's quite a well thought out point with regard to homophobic attacks and I rather like to think our Wikimedia community could consider a ''positive'' aim of ending fear through knowledge, communication and awareness rather than reacting to hatred. {{=)|9}} --] (]) 23:05, 24 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :: I'm sure some chap in the Bible originated that viewpoint. Something about perfect love casteth out fear...? ] (]) 23:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::: I was using a secondary source in line with ]. {{=)}} --] (]) 23:28, 24 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::: LOL :)] (]) 23:37, 24 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == WikiLove message == | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- ] 23:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC) --> | |||
| Hello, Fæ! , I thought that I'd dedicate the cartoon below to you in honour of your Chairmanship of WMUK, as well as to British scientists elsewhere ;) ] ] 07:09, 27 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| :Thanks for the dedication. I see your have honoured Wikimedia UK by highlighting Britain's wonderful capital, our love of freedom and enterprise, our financial leadership, our world-class innovative blue-skies science programmes and, of course, our love of political parody. Now, back to my tea and biscuitz. Cheers --] (]) 16:50, 28 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| == WQ Transclusion reply == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 22:45, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{Talkback|Varnent}} | |||
| == ANI British Pakistanis closed with no action == | |||
| To prevent any action, the ANI incident was closed by ] at 13:44, 19 May 2012 (). Meanwhile, I was posting my !votes to that thread (), and those 2nd carefully considered comments were reverted (and thrown away), rather than re-closing the thread 20 minutes later. Sorry for all the wasted effort (and it was also a ''huge'' waste of time on my part). I suspect that many ANI threads are closed-no-action to reduce the size of the ANI page. Bwilkins suggested to perhaps post to ], which might be the better way to get results, without the pressure to close a detailed thread to make the ANI page smaller. No reply needed, as you have more experience in these matters than I, and you can spend your time working other issues. Thanks. -] 15:00, 19 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == WWI Editathon == | |||
| Hi Fae, | |||
| I don't know if you've decided yet whether or not you'll be attending the ], but if you're still interested, there are definitely places available. | |||
| Just to let you know we've finalised the list of academics who'll be attending the editathon next month, along with their areas of specialisation. If any of these are topics you'd be particularly interested in collaborating on, or you want to suggest articles in those fields that need work, please do make a note on the page - it'd be great if we could have some suggested topics ready in advance. | |||
| Any questions, do let me know... ] (]) 15:15, 22 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Close... == | |||
| Hi Fae! I fully endorse your action at ] - indeed, I was drawn there by the protection request, but decided to edit and discuss the article instead of handling the protection request. But you very slightly missed the point. It's not metric vs. imperial, is metric (m) vs. metric (km) - arguably, even more trivial. | |||
| --] (]) 14:40, 23 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I know that was the main discussion, I was probably over interpreting recent edits that were in the comparison to other measurements section (including miles). I'm happy to let it ride either way, particularly as some folks can't stand the use of the ''convert'' template where it's not really needed. Cheers --] (]) 14:45, 23 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Wikiversity == | |||
| I heard a very good interview on the BBC yesterday about the Monmouth effort (send my kudos along to Ashley!), but I was a bit stunned to hear him bring up Wikiversity (which our mutual good friend Jimbo once described as "the wild west of wikimedia"). Wikiversity is in pretty bad shape (has been for a while), and I ] that you haven't really had any experience there. Wikiversity is badly understaffed, and would definitely benefit if you could spare some "gnome-admin" time. The rules are different there, so I can make you an admin tomorrow as long as you agree to take it slow and allow me to review your button usage. | |||
| Among other things, WV's different rules mean that it could host material about "local celebrities" (I understand you've had an AfD issue?), unsourced stories from the community's elders to capture oral histories (what was it like during WW2? what was it like before automobiles?), and who knows what else... I suppose the possibilities are endless. | |||
| Are you up for a plunge into the waters of the wild west ;-)? --] | <sup>]</sup>✌ 17:46, 23 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == thanks == | |||
| hi thanks for welcome <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:06, 23 May 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ==Request for arbitration == | |||
| You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use— | |||
| * ]; | |||
| * ]. | |||
| Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> | |||
| --] | ] 22:05, 23 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi Guerillero, can you pass on the fact that I am travelling tomorrow to attend the funeral of my 20 year old niece on Friday. Hopefully others can explain why this Arbitration request suffers from a lack of evidence of any Misplaced Pages dispute resolution raised since his last failed Arbitration request. I do not have time or the inclination to look into the matter this week for obvious reasons. The fact that the person raising this case has written on Wikipediocracy, this month, about his private meeting with Eric Barbour should be of interest to many and appears to directly relate to the nature of his complaints about matters off Misplaced Pages. Thanks --] (]) 22:22, 23 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Randy Bott == | |||
| It is interesting that you do not like to have material deleted, but you are all too willing to delete material of others. If you dispute the material or feel there is inadequate documentation, you may so state, but you choose to wholesale delete because you do not agree with the material posted. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 22:10, 23 May 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :The material you posted was part rant, part copied from other Misplaced Pages articles. It was definitely not appropriate for the ]. <span style="font-family:times; font-size:10.2pt">~]</span> <span style="font-family:times; font-size:7pt">(])</span> 22:19, 23 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I see that Stevezdude1 has been indefinitely blocked, so I see no benefit in replying. --] (]) 22:37, 23 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:16, 27 December 2024
 Archives |
|
/2014 /2015 /2016 /2017 /2018 /2019 /2020 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
 | When I do reply it may be from a mobile phone or by email.  Due to routinely using public wifi, my edits will normally be via ToR to avoid browser hijacking. |
 | Fæ is busy and is going to be on Misplaced Pages in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Nomination of Clare Dimyon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clare Dimyon is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Clare Dimyon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Ynsfial (talk) 16:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for British Library
British Library has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:45, 26 December 2024 (UTC)