| Revision as of 10:15, 21 April 2006 editJzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,070 editsm Reverted edits by Munckin (talk) to last version by JzG← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:52, 29 March 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!-- | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result of the debate was '''Speedy deleted''' by ] due to mass vandalism by sockpuppet accounts. ] 11:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| Previously kept no consensus, but discussion on ] indicates substantial sockpuppetry in the {{vandal|VaughanWatch}} mould. The subject is a failed political candidate whose only real claim to notability appears to be as a "founder member" of ], but this membership was not significant enought to be mentioned in the article for the group itself and there is no indication of how many such there are (and indeed no apparent citation for the claim). For the record I wanted to nominate this myself anyway but was put off by the recent second nom; had I realised at the time that it was a sockfest I'd have done so. | Previously kept no consensus, but discussion on ] indicates substantial sockpuppetry in the {{vandal|VaughanWatch}} mould. The subject is a failed political candidate whose only real claim to notability appears to be as a "founder member" of ], but this membership was not significant enought to be mentioned in the article for the group itself and there is no indication of how many such there are (and indeed no apparent citation for the claim). For the record I wanted to nominate this myself anyway but was put off by the recent second nom; had I realised at the time that it was a sockfest I'd have done so. | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| Relisting, then, for a (hopefully) clean debate. ] 09:54, 21 April 2006 (UTC) | Relisting, then, for a (hopefully) clean debate. ] 09:54, 21 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Which turns out to be a forlorn hope, since the tag has already been removed from the article by one user and two sockpuppets, and this AfD blanked several times. ] 11:01, 21 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> | |||
Latest revision as of 17:52, 29 March 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy deleted by Curps due to mass vandalism by sockpuppet accounts. Just zis Guy you know? 11:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Simon Strelchik
Previously kept no consensus, but discussion on WP:AN/I indicates substantial sockpuppetry in the VaughanWatch (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) mould. The subject is a failed political candidate whose only real claim to notability appears to be as a "founder member" of Free the Children, but this membership was not significant enought to be mentioned in the article for the group itself and there is no indication of how many such there are (and indeed no apparent citation for the claim). For the record I wanted to nominate this myself anyway but was put off by the recent second nom; had I realised at the time that it was a sockfest I'd have done so.
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Simon Strelchik
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Simon Strelchik (second nomination)
Relisting, then, for a (hopefully) clean debate. Just zis Guy you know? 09:54, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- Which turns out to be a forlorn hope, since the tag has already been removed from the article by one user and two sockpuppets, and this AfD blanked several times. Just zis Guy you know? 11:01, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.