User talk:Altetendekrabbe: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 12:23, 19 June 2012 view sourceSineBot (talk \| contribs)Bots2,555,457 editsm Signing comment by Steeringly - "→Ahmadiyya: "← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 04:16, 24 October 2024 view source PARAKANYAA (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers43,865 edits Notification: listing of List of Islamophobic incidents at WP:Articles for deletion.Tag: Twinkle
(252 intermediate revisions by 50 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{retired}}
			notification of
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	{{User:MiszaBot/config
			:'''failure to pass WP:Prof'''
	\|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
	\|maxarchivesize = 100K
	\|counter = 1
	\|minthreadsleft = 0
	\|minthreadstoarchive = 1
	\|algo = old(30d)
	\|archive = User talk:Altetendekrabbe/Archive %(counter)d
	}}

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].
	== Template:Islamophobia ==

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	Please explain why you want to include ] in ] on the talk page.--] (]) 11:46, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

			Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->. ] (]) 09:57, 6 April 2014 (UTC).
	== June 2012 ==

			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
	] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] ] 11:52, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 16:21, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
	Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you.
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''] ]'''</small> 19:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
	<div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a short time for your ] caused by ] and violation of the ]. During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx\|unblock\|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}} below this notice, but you should read the ] first. </div>{{z10}}<!-- Template:uw-3block --> ] ] 12:44, 9 June 2012 (UTC) <br clear="both">
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
	:I do not see any vandalism as claimed in your edit summaries at ]; this appears to be a simple edit war. ] ] 12:44, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
			<div class="afd-notice">
	:: please note users like estlandia. they are tag-teaming to push through their political agenda. if "eurabia" is not an islamophobic conspiracy theory then what is? please, check their edits.--<small><span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;background:blue;">]</span></small> 12:48, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].
	::: Altetendekrabbe - when you get into an edit war, it is best to use the talk page to explain your edits. When you do this, you find that other people agree with you.--] (]) 12:56, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
	:::: i agree, but i lose my patience with certain editors here on wiki who are tag-teaming. please keep an eye on pages like eurabia, islamophobia and so on.--<small><span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;background:blue;">]</span></small> 13:02, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
	:::::I am not tag-teaming with anyone, I'd never ever met the other users who reverted you.] ] 13:05, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

			The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	I have partially reverted your edit to the article on ]. If you feel that your exact wording is best, please argue the case in the talk page.--] (]) 13:15, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
	: why did you do that? it was not my wording to begin with. check the edit history. the academic sources are clear: eurabia is an islamophobic conspiracy theory. suggest you revert back to the original version i.e. the version that existed before the edit war. i am blocked and cannot argue on the talk page.--<small><span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;background:blue;">]</span></small> 13:28, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
	:::Because I look for compromise in these situations. I do not know whether you are 100% right or not on this subject; but edit warring does not work in these situations. Discussion and compromise do work.--] (]) 17:03, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 04:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
	Would you like to strike the above violation of ]? If not, I will have no choice but to extend this block further (]<span style="border:1px solid black;">''' ] '''</span>]) 13:35, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

	== Revert ==

	I saw revert here. I definitely agree with your revert, but I think you should leave a message behind on the talk page (esp. cause you said "see talk"). Even if you feel your message would be redundant, you should still leave a message. Discussion is how disputes are solved. Takk! :-) ''']''' <sub>]</sub> 00:07, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

	== Blind reverts ==

	Why did you remove the context which clarified the comment by Bernard Lewis? Your use of nasty language and blind reverts is unacceptable. ] (]) 17:59, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
	: i don't trust you. you continued the edits of a banned racist editor.--<small><span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;background:blue;">]</span></small> 18:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
	Do you understand what I am saying? I didnt want to hear about your odd feelings, I wanted to hear about why you remove the context that I added to the comment by Bernard Lewis. -- ] (]) 18:07, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
	Also why did you claimj that I reverted the article? I assume that you don't even read the changes that you revert?
	: you're either a sock or a stalker. period. your attempt to make a wp:point by continuing the edit war of a banned racist user is unacceptable.--<small><span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;background:blue;">]</span></small> 18:13, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
	:: Why dont you contribute beyond attacking me personally? Is that too hard for you? -- ] (]) 16:48, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

	== SPI ==

	As noted in ], the case has been renamed to ], so your evidence has been moved accordingly. Please submit any future evidence or comments at the new location. Thank you —] (]) 19:04, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

	== Edit war over Eurabia ==

	Your resumption of the edit war over ] has been reported at ].--] (]) 19:32, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

	== Edits at Dhimmitude ==

	Your edits to ] were reverted because the essay from Bernard Lewis that you cite is essentially irrelevant to the article. Lewis was talking about dhimmitude in the past, not as it occurs today. Please do not reintroduce Lewis's essay to the article. ] (]) 07:36, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

	== Beer accepted ==

	Best that a good head of beer spill over than disputes spill over. :-) ]<small> ►]</small> 18:51, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

	== Talkback ==

	{{talkback\|Elockid\|ts=14:51, 15 June 2012 (UTC)}}
	] (]) 14:51, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

	== Ahmadiyya ==

	3RR now, please stop, I'm reporting the editor who seems to be new. ] (]) 11:23, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
	:ok, thanks.--<small><span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;background:blue;">]</span></small> 11:27, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

	I've added another message or two. Kind regards <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 12:22, 19 June 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

	== Talkback ==

	{{talkback\|Solarra\|ts=13:27, 17 June 2012 (UTC)}}
	] <sup>]</sup> ߷ <sub>]</sub> 13:27, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

	Hello, I was hoping you would pass comment on my suggested amendment to the article Ahmadiyya. Kind regards (] (]) 09:42, 19 June 2012 (UTC))

Latest revision as of 04:16, 24 October 2024

Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.

notification of

Proposed deletion of Naveed Zaidi

The article Naveed Zaidi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

failure to pass WP:Prof

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:57, 6 April 2014 (UTC).

Nomination of Naveed Zaidi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naveed Zaidi is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Naveed Zaidi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SummerPhD (talk) 16:21, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Mohammad Aslam Khan Khalil for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammad Aslam Khan Khalil is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Aslam Khan Khalil until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Nomination of List of Islamophobic incidents for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Islamophobic incidents is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of Islamophobic incidents until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)