Revision as of 18:26, 4 July 2012 editThe Blade of the Northern Lights (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators55,775 edits →AE: Re← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:02, 19 April 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,502 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:TheShadowCrow/Archive 3) (bot | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} | |||
== All good == | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
No problem mate, yeah absolutely excited for Vic's fight, with Alvarez-Cintron, Wlodarczyk-Green, Darchinyan-Moreno, Agbeko-Mares 2, Cotto-Margarito 2, Klitschko-Mormeck and Froch-Ward comming up, i can't remember a end of year program being topped off with so many consistently good fights on a weekly basis, soooo pumped!! <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:17, 17 November 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | |||
|maxarchivesize = 200K | |||
|counter = 3 | |||
|minthreadsleft = 5 | |||
|minthreadstoarchive = 2 | |||
|algo = old(14d) | |||
|archive = User talk:TheShadowCrow/Archive %(counter)d | |||
}} | |||
==Collage== | |||
Alvarez by TKO I'm really getting the bandwagon with him since his last few fights, Green by decision in a epic war. Darchinyan by a wide points decision, as good as Moreno is, he's struggled with Monshipour and Cermeno so i figure Vic can go one better than them. Mares all the way, Agbeko is tuff but i get a feeling Mares is on the way up and Agbeko is one the way out. I'm pulling for Cotto but i'm worried me may not be able to hold off Margarito's aggression, if he boxes a disciplined fight and only occasional exchanges with him, then he can get revenge. Klitschko maybe gets easiest win of the last 5 years. And Froch-Ward, i keep going back and forth. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:13, 19 November 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
Dear TheShadowCrow | |||
I made the collage using '''Photoshop''' (Adobe), but if you do not have this program installed, I can also recommend the program '''Paint'''. You need to copy all the people you wish to include from Wikimedia Commons, but remember to include a reference, otherwise the collage will be deleted after you upload it. Assemble all the people in Paint or Photoshop to make a perfect square. Save it on your desktop. Now go to Wikimedia Commons and click UPLOAD IMAGES/FILES. Choose your collage, fill out necessary information and include a reference, but you have to include a reference of every single person (picture). I also recommend to do no more than 40 people otherwise the square might not work out. Also make sure your images are not pixelated. | |||
== Slight mistake with evander's reign | |||
Evander's longest reign (3 years) was actually his 3rd reign. For that title reign he just had wba, ibf, ring, He had the wbc in his first heavyweight reign, If we applied former titles for multiple reigns the table would be a giant unreadable mess. I could put former ibf if that's puts a but more clarity, no hard feelings, just following the way the table was created. god bless <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
](]) 8:57, 29 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
== September 2011 == | |||
Hi,<br> | |||
] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with <span class="plainlinks"></span> to ], as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or ] to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-blank-1 --><!-- Template:Uw-delete1 --><span style="font-family: Maiandra GD">] ''(])''</span> 22:02, 17 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692239519 --> | |||
== ] == | |||
I wasn't trying to replace it with blank content, I was trying to make the article about the actual fictional character Tommy Gunn so it didn't have to redirect to ]. Can I still do that? I won't accidently erase the page this time. Sorry about that. ] (]) 22:11, 17 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
==File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Vic Darchinyan .jpg== | |||
] | |||
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. However, it currently is missing information on its '''copyright''' status and its '''source'''. Misplaced Pages takes ] very seriously. | |||
Hi. We're into the last five days of the ]. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! | |||
If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the ''']''' to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. The page on ''']''' may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=WiR_list_2&oldid=812113507 --> | |||
==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
] ], a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 22:14, 26 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Please add this information by editing the ]. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 22:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
==Problems with upload of File:Jake lamotta 240x230 021005.jpg== | |||
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Misplaced Pages, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator. | |||
To add this information, click on ], then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on ]. | |||
For more information on using images, see the following pages: | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
Thank you for your cooperation. --] (]) 20:06, 23 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Problems with upload of File:325px-lamotta joey (2).jpg== | |||
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Misplaced Pages, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator. | |||
To add this information, click on ], then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on ]. | |||
For more information on using images, see the following pages: | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
Thank you for your cooperation. --] (]) 20:07, 23 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
==License tagging for File:325px-LaMotta Joey.jpg== | |||
Thanks for uploading ]. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Misplaced Pages uses a set of ] to indicate this information. | |||
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from ], click on ], then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Misplaced Pages. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on ]. Thank you for your cooperation.<!-- User:OrphanBot/untagged-new --> --] (]) 20:07, 23 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification== | |||
Hi. In ], you recently added a link to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>For more information, see the ] or drop a line at the ].</small> | |||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:51, 8 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification== | |||
Hi. In ], you recently added a link to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Assistance == | |||
Hey, can you please delete this:Talk:Tube worm (body plan)? thanks. --] (]) 21:09, 15 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
==File copyright problem with File:Vic Darchinyan .jpg== | |||
] | |||
Thank you for uploading ]. However, it currently is missing information on its '''copyright''' and '''licensing''' status. Misplaced Pages takes ] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the ]. You may refer to the ''']''' to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. The page on ''']''' may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> | |||
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is . | |||
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the ]. Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice --> ] (]) 15:16, 17 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification== | |||
Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification== | |||
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
:] (] | ]) | |||
::added links pointing to ], ], ], ], ] (<- Check disam. later) and ] | |||
:] (] | ]) | |||
::added a link pointing to ] | |||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:56, 29 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
== January 2012 == | |||
] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at ]. Your edits appear to constitute ] and have been ] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning2 --> ''']''' ] 21:42, 1 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification== | |||
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
:] (] | ]) | |||
::added links pointing to ] and ] | |||
:] (] | ]) | |||
::added a link pointing to ] | |||
:] (] | ]) | |||
::added a link pointing to ] | |||
:] (] | ]) | |||
::added a link pointing to ] | |||
:] (] | ]) | |||
::added a link pointing to ] | |||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:51, 5 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
== a note == | |||
Please refrain ] even if the other user is blocked and causing trouble.]. If you can't keep your cool, wait for others to revert for what on the face on it are often style changes, avoiding thus the impression that you're personally out to enforce them. Just an example: Here, you're just reverting thus defending a fluffy and poorly sourced statement with an inappropriate edit summery. Thanks.--] (]) 21:23, 20 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
:Don't think I'm being tricked. He has been edit warring and harassing you so he stays rightly indefinitely ] and may indeed be ] permanently if they don't sop socking. I spent also part of my my time here assuring that. Please check out the relevant terms as you're confusing them. I was just curious if I see a glimmer of reason on their side. | |||
:Anyways and regardless of the quality of your contributions that I do not want to evaluate, but which we certainly don't measure byte by byte, if they're good others will agree. But your rights to edit do not include that to personal attacks in edit summaries. In short, my post above was referring only to you and only for you as I expect you to do better. The next content or style dispute will come up, some troll will show up or find an free IP or open proxy etc.--] (]) 09:04, 21 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
==January 2012== | |||
] Please do not ] other editors, as you did at ]. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. This also applies to comments in the ]<!-- Template:uw-npa2 -->. ] (]) 00:14, 21 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification== | |||
Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification== | |||
Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:00, 31 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
==Caps== | |||
Many edits by UkBoxen change caps in Super Middleweight, etc. I understand that the weight categories should be lowcase, but titles might be capped (?). Is there a guideline on that? Can you link it please? (this will save time later - sorry for asking, overload). ] (]) 00:15, 6 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Jimmy Wilde == | |||
If an article is European we use European dates, 8 February 2012; not February 8, 1912. Thanks. ] (]) 23:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification== | |||
Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification== | |||
Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:53, 17 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Possibly unfree File:Jake lamotta 240x230 021005.jpg == | |||
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the ]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at ] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> ] <sup>]</sup> 02:15, 20 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Possibly unfree File:325px-lamotta joey (2).jpg == | |||
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the ]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at ] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> ] <sup>]</sup> 02:15, 20 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
==] nomination of ]== | |||
] | |||
A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Misplaced Pages (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated. | |||
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit ''']''' to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. <!-- Template:Db-redundantimage-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] <sup>]</sup> 02:16, 20 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
== February 2012 == | |||
] Welcome to Misplaced Pages, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a ] that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in ], makes articles harder to read. Please take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''You were told before that adding flags to acticles is a violation of ]. Arguing that they exist in other pages is not a justification to violate the MOS.''<!-- Template:uw-mos1 --> ].<sup>]</sup> Grammatically incorrect? '''Correct it!''' ] 02:11, 21 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
] Please ] other editors, as you did on ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. ''Warned previously because of the same.''<!-- Template:uw-npa3 --> ].<sup>]</sup> Grammatically incorrect? '''Correct it!''' ] 02:11, 21 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
== No personal attacks == | |||
Hey, | |||
I came to thank you for your valuable edits to ]. And also to remind you that you ] - such as the ''''''. Happy edits, ] (]) 21:42, 21 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
:I am doing nothing wrong. I am just reverting a vandal's work. He is swearing at me and I haven't back. You should be telling me this and banning him. --] (]) 21:45, 21 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
::In fact, you're doing '''everything''' wrong. You're eagerly returning insults. And, by doing this, you are exaggerating suspicions that your referenced edits are not that neutral;) which I believe are. As for the other guy, he's going to be blocked in a matter of hours as a personal-attacking anon. The only question is: will YOU be as well? Stay cool, ] (]) 21:55, 21 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
:On a somewhat related note, I've issued a rangeblock against that the editor said comment was directed at. They're evading a block on an account on a number of IP addresses, so hopefully this will at least slow them down a bit. ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 21:45, 21 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Flag Icons == | |||
Hi. Could you please read; | |||
* ] and why you shouldn't describe edits as vandalism, simply because you don't like them. | |||
* ] and ]. | |||
Then, if you have any thoughts on my edits you can address them constructively and from an informed position. Thanks. --<font color="purple">]</font> <sup>]</sup> 23:42, 21 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
:I see that your use of flags has ] as being in violation of the ]. Perhaps you could explain why it doesn't apply in these cases? --<font color="purple">]</font> <sup>]</sup> 23:46, 21 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
::The problem with the flags is that they are distractive icons that shouldn't be used. Of course people will recognize the Flag of the US or Canada, but would you recognize {{flagicon|FSM}} or {{flagicon|SWZ}}? The flags are unneeded nationalisms that were forbidden from many infoboxes, and at the Infobox boxer or MMA event should apply as well. The "other article has it" argument is vague, it is in another article because somebody believe that it was correct as s/he saw it in another article. A common example is the "" link that appears in many musical-related articles. ] states that these internal links shouldn't be used as the ] exists. The real thing to do is reach a consensus to remove all flags from infoboxes, as boxers aren't national teams or countries, where the flags are more relevant. ].<sup>]</sup> Grammatically incorrect? '''Correct it!''' ] 00:59, 22 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::It is not ''that'' bad. but neither ''that'' OK. The real place where you should be discussing this is either ] or ]. ].<sup>]</sup> Grammatically incorrect? '''Correct it!''' ] 01:27, 22 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Edit warring adn attacks == | |||
You've been warned above again on personal attacks but you also need to refrain form edit warring: An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Ukboxen edits are not exempt because they are not banned but blocked indefinitely and you still revert before accounts are blocked and tagged accordingly. I think I asked you to review ], ] and ] in the past, in any case do so now. | |||
The exceptions would be actions performed by ], their ] and by tagged sockpuppets of ]. This needs to be interpreted in your case narrowly as you feed the fire with your own attacks, underline repeatedly that you haven't been blocked yet and revert other users as well. Here you revert as with the exception of the flagicon.... | |||
In other word, you should not claim exceptions from the three revert rule unless a third party has tagged that account, in which case they will often block and revert. If you continue to do multiple reverts yourself or leash out with attacks before reporting the issue to the relevant boards, you are part of the problem and next time you'll be blocked. | |||
A lot of activity has been gone into keeping that guy off the pages and your back, and I understand that it is frustrating but the page histories for some boxers are now a disgrace, so yes, this is a final warning for you: Do not edit war, do not issue any other attack. Don't even call content edits by a blocked user vandalism. If you can't do that move them from your watch list. Thanks --] (]) 20:48, 22 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification== | |||
Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for March 4== | |||
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
:] (] | ]) | |||
::added links pointing to ] and ] | |||
:] (] | ]) | |||
::added links pointing to ] and ] | |||
:] (] | ]) | |||
::added a link pointing to ] | |||
:] (] | ]) | |||
::added a link pointing to ] | |||
:] (] | ]) | |||
::added a link pointing to ] | |||
:] (] | ]) | |||
::added a link pointing to ] | |||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:17, 4 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Lennox Lewis == | |||
Greetings, | |||
Please discuss the links you added at ]. | |||
Also, regarding your edit summary: don't call people names and make accusinations. Please read ] and assume of good faith.--] (]) 22:44, 9 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
== March 2012 == | |||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for Edit warring with and personal attacks on good-faith editor after final warning as you did at ]. There was even an invitation to the talk page. I also note that you didn't react to above friendly post doing another edit afterwards. As you know, I'm aware of the harassment, but stuff like this must not happen. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you would like to be unblocked earlier, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 23:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> | |||
==Only warning== | |||
If you keep violating policy as you did with to ] it's next stop ANI for you. <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 13:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
== The Klitschko's == | |||
Well, Vitali is gonna retire this year, so i only think he has one or two fights left. So I dont see the sense in making sections all the time. His career is ending soon, so i think it is right to make a final section, just like on Mike Tyson's & and Lennox Lewis' articles. | |||
IF Wladimir wins the WBC, then I agree we have to make an new section called Unidsputed Heavyweight Champion. But his fights in 2012 are not going to be any significant. Fight against Mormeck, rematch vs. Tony Thompsons and then maybe Arreola?. | |||
Well I think it is best it just called After Haye. Because it really tells what happened after his fight with Haye. | |||
Cheers David-golota ] (]) 18:45, 22 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
----- | |||
Well yeah, but just because other P4p boxers have many more sections, dosent make the article look better, only worse. | |||
Look at Mike Tyson article. He dosent have so many articles and is clearly the most infamous boxer ever. | |||
I think it only makes the articles looks worse and ugly with so many sections. | |||
Look at the Sosnowski and Johnso sections. They are so short. It looks stupid. | |||
] (]) 20:00, 23 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Your submission at ] == | |||
<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:0.5em;width:20em;color:black;margin-bottom: 1.5em;margin-left: 1.5em;width: 90%;"> ]Thank you for your recent submission to ]. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.<br> | |||
* If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at ]. | |||
* To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. | |||
* If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the ], via , or on the <span class="noprint plainlinks"></span> | |||
:Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages! <span style="text-shadow:#808080 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em">]]]</span> 06:22, 31 March 2012 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline--> | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for April 4== | |||
Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 15:20, 4 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Your submission at ] == | |||
<div style=" | |||
border:solid 1px #57DB1E; | |||
background:#E6FFE6; | |||
padding:1em; | |||
padding-top:0.5em; | |||
padding-bottom:0.5em; | |||
width:20em; | |||
color:black; | |||
margin-bottom: 1.5em; | |||
margin-left: 1.5em; | |||
width: 90%; | |||
">] '''], which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br> The article has been assessed as '''Stub-Class''', which is recorded on the article's ]. You may like to take a look at the ] to see how you can improve the article. | |||
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to ]. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can ], and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to ]. | |||
* If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the ''']''' | |||
* If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{feedback link | |||
|page=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation |text=leaving us some feedback |plain=yes}}. | |||
Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages! | |||
] (]) 17:46, 6 April 2012 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk--> | |||
== Mike Tyson == | |||
The Manual of Style has guidelines against many of the links you are adding. See: ], specifically:"Generally, a link should appear only once in an article" and "Avoid linking the names of major ... locations." | |||
There are also problems with link specificity (see ]) and unnecessary use of piped links. | |||
Please talk about the changes you want to make and build consensus for them.--] (]) 08:27, 11 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for April 11== | |||
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
:] (] | ]) | |||
::added links pointing to ], ] and ] | |||
:] (] | ]) | |||
::added links pointing to ], ] and ] | |||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
==Haye== | |||
David Haye fills alot. Very much. He brought the exciment and attention back to the heavyweight divison. Media hype and all the old great stuff back. He is Wladimirs rival. And Wladimir never really had an rival like Ali or Tyson had. That is why Haye is so "important". | |||
Cheers mate | |||
] (]) 06:26, 12 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Michael Katsidis == | |||
Could you please provide an edit summary when you've made changes? You've made a lot of minor edits to this article, but at no point have you explained what you've changed, or why. ] (]) 14:40, 14 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Capitalization == | |||
Hi. With regard to the Tyson article, I wanted to ask about this sentence: | |||
"He was the first heavyweight boxer to simultaneously hold and only Heavyweight to individually unify the WBA, WBC and IBF titles." | |||
Why do you have one use of the word "heavyweight" in lowercase and the other capitalized in the same sentence? For a casual reader like me, this just looks odd. -- ] (]) 00:39, 15 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
:Sure thing. Thanks. -- ] (]) 01:38, 15 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Andre Ward == | |||
Dear ], please see the comments I have added on the ] page. I'm not targeting anyone's edits in particular, and certainly not yours. You are welcome to add sources to verify your assessments. But without references, it often happens that opinions and descriptive comments fall short of ] guidelines. In my view (and I'm only one person and I may be wrong) some of this page did that. Please let me quote from those guidelines: | |||
{{policy in a nutshell|Material about living persons added to ''any'' Misplaced Pages page must be written with the greatest care and attention to ], ], and ].}} | |||
If you really want to replace all that commenary, I assure you I won't delete it again. I've never been in an edit war, and I don't want one now. I just encourage the full referencing of articles. By the way, if you were referring to my edits, I can assure you that the lineal stuff is not mine. Regards.] (]) 15:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
: Hi again. The fact that I put "back" then lineal stuff that you hated so much does not mean that I agreed with it either. You and I are not the only editors on that page. Someone else clearly wanted to add that lineal section. As I said above, I don't intend to get into edit wars even with people who make pages worse or violate Misplaced Pages guidelines. Best wishes.] (]) 14:18, 29 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
== AA2 == | |||
Please be aware of ] before making further reverts. Thanks. ]] 18:37, 30 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
:The same is for you, Grandmaster. You're an active part of that editwarring. ] (]) 19:02, 30 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
::The next time you chose to edit war (as you have been doing at ]), please kindly bother to use the talkpage to discuss the issue with other editors. Communicating through edit summaries is hardly efficient. If not, I'll have to start enforcing such discussion with revert paroles and blocks. Thank you. ] (]) 14:57, 31 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
==Azerbaijanis in Armenia== | |||
The information about elderly and ill people of Azeri origin living in Armenia is not something I made up. It is contained in the report of the European Country of Origin Information Network, which reference is provided in the introduction of the article. ] (]) 14:24, 3 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Another editor reverted your edits and made a personal attack against you. I have warned them not to do it again. --] ] 15:19, 20 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Juan Manuel Marquez == | |||
You are certainly welcomed to add in those statements if you have reliable sources to back them up. Please review ]. Otherwise, it's just original research and POV. As a result, I have removed them. ] (]) 17:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
:I undid your edits once again since you failed to take note of the above. I see that you made those edits prior to the below ban so I'll assume this won't happen again. If this occurs again, I won't hesitate to report this as it's now clear that your actions are not in good faith and are in clear disregard to established policy. ] (]) 02:19, 3 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Persistent violations of ] and ] == | |||
It appears you have had many warnings for inappropriate additions to biographies of living persons (BLP) articles. Please review the ] policy in full, which includes the clear statement that '''adding unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material is forbidden'''. This was inappropriate for that reason and other reasons I gave . You have however restored the content with an inappropriate and unhelpful edit summary. I am now removing it again - '''any re-adding of this content or other blatant BLP policy violations will result in the ] of this account. Consider this your final warning.''' | |||
Furthermore, it appears that you have been mass creating talk page threads which are not for discussion on improving the article in violation of ], such as . If you review ] you will find that Misplaced Pages is not a venue for advocacy or testing free speech. '''Use of Misplaced Pages in this way is ] and any further (re-)creations of such threads will also result in a block.''' ]<small><span style="font-weight:bold;"> ·</span> ]</small> 20:44, 23 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
It seems pretty clear to me that you have ignored the warning I gave you about following ] policy when editing BLP articles, as two recent examples demonstrate well: | |||
* , and , in itself grounds for a block. While you did eventually , it was still a violation of BLP policy as | |||
* On ], you have for the apparent purpose of ]. Using Misplaced Pages to advocate that someone is a "terrorist" or "racist" is unacceptable, potentially libellous, and violates both ] and ]. This case is aggravated by the fact you were previously warned for doing just this on ], and I had to ] some of your comments, which should have given you the message. | |||
Given the above edits, your earlier warnings, and the final warning above, I think it is fair to conclude that a block is needed here, therefore: | |||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours''' for persistent violations of the ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ]<small><span style="font-weight:bold;"> ·</span> ]</small> 18:29, 29 June 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> | |||
I seriously considered using ] to restrict your ability to edit BLP articles, but I determined that a block was sufficient for now. This will be reviewed if there any further problems after the block expires. ]<small><span style="font-weight:bold;"> ·</span> ]</small> 18:29, 29 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Hi. Please be aware of this report at WP:AE: . Thanks. ]] 19:08, 29 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
See for the result of the AE thread. ] (]) 03:36, 2 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
:If you seriously can't see the problem with the now-deleted edit at Teimour Radjabov, or how it relates to AA, I feel further vindicated. And if you reread your ban, it's all articles ''and discussions'' relating to AA. ] (]) 21:54, 2 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
::If you want to appeal, there are instructions at the top of AE, so you can go that route if you like. ] (]) 00:40, 3 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::It's in the big red header at the top, last paragraph. ] (]) 18:26, 4 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Further ] violations == | |||
In less than 24 hours after the block expired, and already I am finding issues with your edits to BLPs: | |||
* You added some content to ] relating to drugs without properly citing it, as far as I can see drugs is not mentioned in the source provided and there is no source for the quote either. It should have occurred to you that anything relating to drugs is contentious, and a source '''must''' be provided, particular if you include a quote. | |||
* On ], you without making any attempt to source it, despite being required by ]/]. Given that this was non-contentious and there was already a lot of unsourced information, which might make it look okay, I am letting this one go. | |||
This is the only post-block warning that you are going to receive for violations of ] policy. I will say now now that any further edits like that observed on ], then I will be utilising ] to disallow you from editing BLPs, either indefinitely or for a significant period of time. This may or may not extend to talk pages depending on the circumstances. I am coming to the conclusion given the above and at ] that you simply don't "get it" in regards to BLP policy, and while this would be a broad ban, it would be justified. | |||
On the AA ban you have received, I should point out that you have had more than one "offence" on these articles, with ] being an example. You claim it has not been clearly explained to you what rule you have broken on ]. I actually gave you lengthy explanations on what you were doing wrong on that and other things, but I'm not going to spoon feed you policy - you should read the policies cited to you and from that understand what you are doing wrong. The main problem you seem to have is that you repeatedly add content and make contentious statements which is not supported by the sources, and is frequently just your own personal opinion - just reading the first few paragraph on the ] policy says not to do that, so I'm not buying that excuse and I doubt those who review any appeal will either. It is basic policy on this project that you source content (]) and don't use articles to advocate your own views (]/]), and these rules just become more important on BLPs. ]<small><span style="font-weight:bold;"> ·</span> ]</small> 10:47, 3 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
I have responded to your reply on ]. ]<small><span style="font-weight:bold;"> ·</span> ]</small> 17:22, 3 July 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:02, 19 April 2024
This is TheShadowCrow's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
Collage
Dear TheShadowCrow
I made the collage using Photoshop (Adobe), but if you do not have this program installed, I can also recommend the program Paint. You need to copy all the people you wish to include from Wikimedia Commons, but remember to include a reference, otherwise the collage will be deleted after you upload it. Assemble all the people in Paint or Photoshop to make a perfect square. Save it on your desktop. Now go to Wikimedia Commons and click UPLOAD IMAGES/FILES. Choose your collage, fill out necessary information and include a reference, but you have to include a reference of every single person (picture). I also recommend to do no more than 40 people otherwise the square might not work out. Also make sure your images are not pixelated.
User:Oliszydlowski(talk) 8:57, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
MfD nomination of User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox/Irina Vaganian
User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox/Irina Vaganian, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox/Irina Vaganian (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox/Irina Vaganian during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 22:14, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Artur Khachatryan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artur Khachatryan is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Artur Khachatryan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.