| Revision as of 19:12, 25 April 2006 editJ.smith (talk | contribs)12,359 edits Archiving talk page← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:50, 3 October 2023 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,374,229 editsm Fixing links to archived content. (BOT) | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Not around|||December 2018}} | |||
| ::] - Pre April 25, 2006 | |||
| {| class="messagebox standard-talk" | |||
| |- | |||
| |valign="top"|] | |||
| |<center><b>Please ] with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code> and place <span class="plainlinks"></span> at the bottom of the page. Thanks! <br><br> | |||
| <center>Archives: ], ], ], ], ] & ]</center> | |||
| | valign="center" |] | |||
| |- | |||
| |} | |||
| {{TOCright}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 250K | |||
| |counter = 7 | |||
| |algo = old(7d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:J.smith/Archive0%(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| ⚫ | == Smile == | ||
| :I'd like to request that anyone who uses my talk page sign your message with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. ---] (]|]) 19:12, 25 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| – ]<span style="letter-spacing:0px;font-size:8px"><span style="vertical-align:3px">]|]</span></span> has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing! <br /> <small>''Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.''</small> | |||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| </div><!-- Template:smile --> | |||
| Creating another account for '''useful''' purposes, as encouraged is not really regarded as sockpuppetry. In my opinion it's not encouraging anybody to create another vandal account to evade the block, seeing as it states clearly '''useful contributions'''. — FireFox (]|]) 10:45, 23 April 2006 | |||
| :In most cases, probably yes. But you're forgetting, these users are indefinitely blocked, meaning that they are 99.99% likely never to be unblocked. So if they wish to make useful contributions, creating another account is the only option, and we encourage that. — FireFox (]|]) 10:49, 23 April 2006 | |||
| == Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| ::That's not what I'm trying to say. Yes, anyone who wishes to be unblocked can put the unblock template on their page, but indefinitely blocked users are blocked for a reason and aren't very likely to be unblocked. Users aren't blocked indefinitely always from a community decision. The decision could be made by the ArbCom, or an individual administrator. We are not encouraging vandals to create a new account and continue vandalising, we're encouraging them to create a new account if they wish to make useful contributions. Anyway, there is a 10 user throttle on the number of accounts that can be created from one location. — FireFox (]|]) 11:01, 23 April 2006 | |||
| ] | |||
| Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month. | |||
| Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] 00:10, 1 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| ] | |||
| Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days. | |||
| Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] 00:04, 25 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| ] | |||
| Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed. | |||
| Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at ]. | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 00:31, 1 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ==Merger discussion for ]== | |||
| ] An article that you have been involved in editing—]—has been '''proposed for ]''' with another article. If you are interested, please participate in ]. Thank you. ] (]) 13:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
| =='''Youtube Links''' | |||
| What is the current guidance on Youtube links as the talk about it is now 15 years old? It is rather confusing which guidance was accepted and what was rejected by committee | |||
| Specifically, | |||
| 1. If the link to an audio file has been distributed to Youtube by a record company, can it be OK to link to? | |||
| 2. If the creator of the content posted it to Youtube, can it be OK to link to it? | |||
| 3. If Youtube has a contract with the record company & publishing company of an audio file, with the specific notes in the Details about Use of the recording & composition, is that OK to link to? | |||
| It would seem all of the above have specific copyright OK's to Youtube. | |||
| Thanks!] (]) 18:23, 23 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:50, 3 October 2023
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. J.smith has not edited Misplaced Pages since December 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
|
~~~~ and place new messages at the bottom of the page. Thanks! |
|
Smile
– Elliott(Talk|Cont) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:10, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:04, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux 00:31, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Merger discussion for PerfectWave Technologies
An article that you have been involved in editing—PerfectWave Technologies—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Alan Islas (talk) 13:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
==Youtube Links What is the current guidance on Youtube links as the talk about it is now 15 years old? It is rather confusing which guidance was accepted and what was rejected by committee Specifically, 1. If the link to an audio file has been distributed to Youtube by a record company, can it be OK to link to? 2. If the creator of the content posted it to Youtube, can it be OK to link to it? 3. If Youtube has a contract with the record company & publishing company of an audio file, with the specific notes in the Details about Use of the recording & composition, is that OK to link to? It would seem all of the above have specific copyright OK's to Youtube. Thanks!Waiata1 (talk) 18:23, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Categories: