Misplaced Pages

:Requests for permissions/Rollback: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:28, 8 July 2012 view sourceElectriccatfish2 (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers14,404 edits →{{anchor|rperm-rollback}}Rollback← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:29, 3 January 2025 view source Patrick Welsh (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions5,416 edits request for rollback privileges 
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{Short description|Place to request rollback rights}}
<noinclude>{{pp-semi-indef}}{{pp-move-indef}} {{Requests for permissions}} {{Shortcuts|WP:PERM/R|WP:RFP/R}}</noinclude>
{{pp-semi-indef}}{{pp-move-indef}}{{WP:PERM/Nav}}{{WP:PERM/Backlog}}<!-- do not remove, managed by bot --></noinclude>
⚫ ==={{anchor|rperm-rollback}}Rollback===
:;(<span class="plainlinks"> &#8226; ]</span>)
⚫ <noinclude>{{TOCright}}
]
]
]
]
]
</noinclude>
⚫ <!-- Please do not edit the section above. Thanks. -->


⚫ ===<span id="rperm-rollback"></span>Rollback===
⚫ ====]====
{{WP:PERM/Subpage|shortcut=R|subpage=Rollback|notice=<noinclude>
*<span class="plainlinks">] · (] · ] · ] · ] · · · · · {{plainlink|1={{fullurl:Special:Log|user=Anbu121}} logs}} · · · ''')</span> · · ] · ] · ] · ] · ]) (]) (<sup><small> · · · c</sup></small>)</span>
Please review ''']''' before making a request. Successful applicants will usually have:
:I have been using Twinkle for the past 6 months for undo and rollback. I wish to start using Huggle and hence I request for Rollback rights. ] (]) 14:59, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
# At least {{Misplaced Pages:Rollback/Mainspace count}} ] edits.
::{{nao}} Seems good to me. ] (]) 20:34, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
# At least a month of experience patrolling ].
:::{{nao}} Agree with Dan. ] (]) 22:28, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
# No recent history of ].
# A track record of consistently ] editors when reverting their edits.
The ] is available if you wish to gain experience in handling vandalism.
⚫ </noinclude>}}
⚫ <!--Please do not edit the section above. Place new requests below. Thanks.-->

⚫ ====]====
*{{rfplinks|1=NXcrypto}}
I would like to request rollback rights to combat vandalism more efficiently. I am an experienced recent changes patroller and I understand that the rollback should be used mainly for clear cases of vandalism. I am committed to using this tool responsibly. ] <small><small>]</small></small> 12:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|NXcrypto}}, please undo ] and respond to {{u|Worldbruce}}'s concern. It doesn't look like the worst kind of edit warring I've ever seen, but {{u|Worldbruce}} was concerned about it without being involved in the reverting, so you should probably take a moment to address their concerns instead of throwing them away. The edit summary of ] indicates that their primary concern is you not (yet?) using the article's talk page. If that's true, perhaps change it or announce that you are not longer interested and ] from the conflict. ] (]) 22:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
::Reverted and replied on both venues, talk page and article talk page. Thanks. ] <small><small>]</small></small> 00:18, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

====]====
*{{rfplinks|1=Lemonademan22}}
I asked for rollback rights back in November but was turned down with the reason given was I need more experience first. I'm here two months later to once again ask for rollback rights as it would make what I do a lot easier. Although I don't edit Misplaced Pages purely to revert vandalism, I come across my fair share of it or unsourced claims and stuff to that degree that need reverting. So I am once again asking for rollback rights as I took the previous advice on board. ] (]) 6:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{comment|Automated comment}} This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days (). <!-- mbsig --><span style="font-family:sans-serif">&mdash; <b>] <sup>]</sup></b></span><!-- mbdate --> 10:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
::{{not done}}. Please see the notice at the top of this page. This is not what Rollback is for. Take a moment to read ] and if that's what you would like to do, you can then check out the ] to learn more. Rollback is only for reverting obvious vandalism—unsourced additions should be undone with an edit summary. '''] (])''' 14:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

====]====
*{{rfplinks|1=Patrick_Welsh}}
I edit mostly in academic philosophy and closely adjacent areas. Twinkle is adequate for the vandalism that I encounter in articles on my watchlist. I read Misplaced Pages more broadly, however, and might be more active in assisting with general anti-vandalism efforts with the help of tools such as Huggle that make this easier to do, but which require rollback privileges to use (this would be the case especially if any of them make it easier to do in a responsible way on a tablet, rather than at the desktop I use for regular editing). I've been bitten as a newbie, and am alert lest I do this to anyone else. Misplaced Pages's coverage of the humanities is, to put it generously, uneven. On the few occasions I've encountered someone new with obvious subject-matter expertise who is making problematic, but good-faith edits, I have made a deliberate effort to welcome them, offer information, and protect them from more aggressive defenders of guidelines and policies (who might turn them off Misplaced Pages before they even have a chance to learn the basics, which are in some ways quite at odds with academic norms). This is just to say that I will, of course, use manual reverts with edit descriptions and talk pages, rather than rollback or anything requiring it, except in cases of blatant vandalism or persistent abuse by editors who disregard clear and polite notices of issues with their edits. Thank you for your consideration, ] (]) 03:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:29, 3 January 2025

Place to request rollback rights
Requests for permissions
Common
Uncommon
Logs
Special
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators.
This notice is automatically updated by MusikBot (talk) and will hide when there are fewer than 3 requests and they are all under 7 days old.

Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions. (add request · view requests) Shortcuts Please review Misplaced Pages:Rollback before making a request. Successful applicants will usually have:
  1. At least 200 mainspace edits.
  2. At least a month of experience patrolling Special:RecentChanges.
  3. No recent history of edit warring.
  4. A track record of consistently notifying editors when reverting their edits.
The counter-vandalism training program is available if you wish to gain experience in handling vandalism.

User:NXcrypto

I would like to request rollback rights to combat vandalism more efficiently. I am an experienced recent changes patroller and I understand that the rollback should be used mainly for clear cases of vandalism. I am committed to using this tool responsibly. Nxcrypto Message 12:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi NXcrypto, please undo Special:Diff/1265567139 and respond to Worldbruce's concern. It doesn't look like the worst kind of edit warring I've ever seen, but Worldbruce was concerned about it without being involved in the reverting, so you should probably take a moment to address their concerns instead of throwing them away. The edit summary of Special:Diff/1265564114 indicates that their primary concern is you not (yet?) using the article's talk page. If that's true, perhaps change it or announce that you are not longer interested and disengage from the conflict. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Reverted and replied on both venues, talk page and article talk page. Thanks. Nxcrypto Message 00:18, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Lemonademan22

I previously asked for rollback rights back in November but was turned down with the reason given was I need more experience first. I'm here two months later to once again ask for rollback rights as it would make what I do a lot easier. Although I don't edit Misplaced Pages purely to revert vandalism, I come across my fair share of it or unsourced claims and stuff to that degree that need reverting. So I am once again asking for rollback rights as I took the previous advice on board. Lemonademan22 (talk) 6:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot 10:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
 Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. This is not what Rollback is for. Take a moment to read Misplaced Pages:Rollback and if that's what you would like to do, you can then check out the Counter Vandalism Unit to learn more. Rollback is only for reverting obvious vandalism—unsourced additions should be undone with an edit summary. Malinaccier (talk) 14:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Patrick_Welsh

I edit mostly in academic philosophy and closely adjacent areas. Twinkle is adequate for the vandalism that I encounter in articles on my watchlist. I read Misplaced Pages more broadly, however, and might be more active in assisting with general anti-vandalism efforts with the help of tools such as Huggle that make this easier to do, but which require rollback privileges to use (this would be the case especially if any of them make it easier to do in a responsible way on a tablet, rather than at the desktop I use for regular editing). I've been bitten as a newbie, and am alert lest I do this to anyone else. Misplaced Pages's coverage of the humanities is, to put it generously, uneven. On the few occasions I've encountered someone new with obvious subject-matter expertise who is making problematic, but good-faith edits, I have made a deliberate effort to welcome them, offer information, and protect them from more aggressive defenders of guidelines and policies (who might turn them off Misplaced Pages before they even have a chance to learn the basics, which are in some ways quite at odds with academic norms). This is just to say that I will, of course, use manual reverts with edit descriptions and talk pages, rather than rollback or anything requiring it, except in cases of blatant vandalism or persistent abuse by editors who disregard clear and polite notices of issues with their edits. Thank you for your consideration, Patrick (talk) 03:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Category: