| Revision as of 01:16, 9 July 2012 editJojhutton (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,483 edits →Sigmund Freud: Removing vandal nonsense← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 04:22, 12 November 2024 edit undoDukeOfDelTaco (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,663 edits →top: updated Top 25 Report |
| (65 intermediate revisions by 46 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Talkheader}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
|
|
| algo = old(365d) |
|
|
| archive = Talk:2004 United States presidential election/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
| counter = 6 |
|
|
| maxarchivesize = 150K |
|
|
| archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |
|
|
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|
| minthreadsleft = 2 |
|
⚫ |
}} |
|
|
{{Article history |
|
|action1=FAC |
|
|action1=FAC |
|
|action1date=09:20, 3 July 2005 |
|
|action1date=09:20, 3 July 2005 |
| Line 7: |
Line 16: |
|
|action1oldid=18048120 |
|
|action1oldid=18048120 |
|
|currentstatus=FFAC |
|
|currentstatus=FFAC |
|
|
|
|
|
|itndate=3 March 2004 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{WikiProject United States|class=Start|importance=Low|USPE=Yes|USPE-importance=}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C| |
|
|
{{WikiProject Bush family|importance=High}} |
|
{{U.S. presidential election, yyyy project page link}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Elections and Referendums}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|USPE=Yes|USPE-importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Low|American=yes|American-importance=low}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Top 25 Report|Nov 1 2020 (15th)|Nov 3 2024 (22nd)}} |
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
|target=Talk:United States presidential election, 2004/Archive index |
|
|target=Talk:United States presidential election, 2004/Archive index |
|
|mask=Talk:United States presidential election, 2004/Archive <#> |
|
|mask=Talk:United States presidential election, 2004/Archive <#> |
|
|leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes}} |
|
|leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes}} |
|
{{archives|search=yes}} |
|
|
{{clear}} |
|
{{clear}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Demographics section addition == |
|
== Dick Gephardt == |
|
|
|
|
|
I changed the description of ] in the caption under his picture from former minority leader to former majority leader because even though he was more recently a minority leader, majority leader is a higher position. ] (]) 04:41, 20 April 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Ohio court disclosures == |
|
|
|
|
|
Is this a credible source? If so, it seems the article needs to be updated to cite this source: |
|
|
. ] (]) 16:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Bad data in table of popular vote counts by state == |
|
|
|
|
|
It seems that the data in the by-state tally is incorrect. |
|
|
|
|
|
The button for the link: http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2004/federalelections2004.pdf states: "Note also: Official Federal Election Commission Report, with the latest, most final, and complete vote totals available." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, all. I'm interested in adding demographics information to this election page. To specify, demographics on voter turnout regarding things like gender, age, income, race, etc. I have found a credible source, and was thinking of making fancy pie-charts to add somewhere in the results section. Please let me know if there is any feedback. |
|
For Arkansas, the table lists 573,182 votes for Bush, but the FEC report (p.27) at the link I mention lists |
|
|
572,898 votes for Bush. There are discrepancies for Illinois also. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All the best. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 06:02, 1 December, 2013 (UTC) |
|
Is there an explanation for these apparent errors? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== "This is the most recent presidential election in which neither Joe Biden nor Donald Trump were on the ballot. " == |
|
Thanks.] (]) 02:54, 9 January 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
==File:Al Sharpton by David Shankbone.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion== |
|
|
{| |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| An image used in this article, ], has been nominated for speedy deletion at ] for the following reason: ''Other speedy deletions'' |
|
|
;What should I do? |
|
|
''Don't panic''; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Misplaced Pages. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. |
|
|
* If the image is ] then you may need to upload it to Misplaced Pages (Commons does not allow fair use) |
|
|
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no ] then it cannot be uploaded or used. |
|
|
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try ] |
|
|
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is this sentence really necessary? It seems really Tedious, if a president gets elected for 2 terms and then his/her vice president takes over, chances are it's going be a 12 year + period in which "Neither X nor Y are not on the ballot" You could make the same statement regarding the 1996 election, dating from 1980 to 1992, "This is the first election in which neither Reagan nor a Bush is on the Ballot." You could also make the same statement about various other elections, like the election after FDR, or the election after Nixon, and so forth. I know this was statement made by a Pundit implying that Joe Biden is old, but it's a very poor observation, (Making it seem like Biden's been a dynastic force in American politics). Trump got elected, lost the presidency, then won the nomination again. Not super uncommon in America politics, for someone to be nominated twice, or lose an election, then proceed to win an election (See Nixon, Stevenson, Cleveland, Dewey although different patterns). If Harris wins the election (Likely) and then proceeds to get reelected, are we going state, in 2032, "This is the first election sense 2016 in which Harris has not been on the ballot?", And so forth. It adds virtually no value and it suggests Trump and Biden have been "ruling" American politics which is hardly true. (Trump is not very well liked by his own party but has enough loyal supporters to win the nomination, Biden was largely seen as a compromise candidate and was selected for VP because it was thought he wouldn't run, and when Biden didn't run he passed the torch instead of running for reelection). ] (]) 17:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
''This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image'' --] (]) 01:46, 24 February 2012 (UTC) |
|
| ⚫ |
|} |
|
Hello, all. I'm interested in adding demographics information to this election page. To specify, demographics on voter turnout regarding things like gender, age, income, race, etc. I have found a credible source, and was thinking of making fancy pie-charts to add somewhere in the results section. Please let me know if there is any feedback.
Is this sentence really necessary? It seems really Tedious, if a president gets elected for 2 terms and then his/her vice president takes over, chances are it's going be a 12 year + period in which "Neither X nor Y are not on the ballot" You could make the same statement regarding the 1996 election, dating from 1980 to 1992, "This is the first election in which neither Reagan nor a Bush is on the Ballot." You could also make the same statement about various other elections, like the election after FDR, or the election after Nixon, and so forth. I know this was statement made by a Pundit implying that Joe Biden is old, but it's a very poor observation, (Making it seem like Biden's been a dynastic force in American politics). Trump got elected, lost the presidency, then won the nomination again. Not super uncommon in America politics, for someone to be nominated twice, or lose an election, then proceed to win an election (See Nixon, Stevenson, Cleveland, Dewey although different patterns). If Harris wins the election (Likely) and then proceeds to get reelected, are we going state, in 2032, "This is the first election sense 2016 in which Harris has not been on the ballot?", And so forth. It adds virtually no value and it suggests Trump and Biden have been "ruling" American politics which is hardly true. (Trump is not very well liked by his own party but has enough loyal supporters to win the nomination, Biden was largely seen as a compromise candidate and was selected for VP because it was thought he wouldn't run, and when Biden didn't run he passed the torch instead of running for reelection). 68.189.2.14 (talk) 17:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
