| Revision as of 03:49, 27 April 2006 view sourceCertified Gangsta (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,106 edits →accusation of vandalism← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:21, 28 August 2023 view source Zinnober9 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers51,323 editsm Fixed Lint errors on this page (obsolete tags, Tidy Font errors) | ||
| (18 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| ==Thanks!== | ==Thanks!== | ||
| Many thanks for the speedy vandalism reversion of my userpage. Regards ''''']'']'']''''' 08:03, 6 April 2006 (UTC) | Many thanks for the speedy vandalism reversion of my userpage. Regards ''''']'']'']''''' 08:03, 6 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| I havent been on the wiki for quite some time but i see while i was gone, someone vandalized my talk page and you reverted it. thanks for lookin' out - dave ] 20:20, 12 April 2006 (UTC) | I havent been on the wiki for quite some time but i see while i was gone, someone vandalized my talk page and you reverted it. thanks for lookin' out - dave ] 20:20, 12 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ==Ooh, ta!== | ==Ooh, ta!== | ||
| {{Barnstar|image=Barnstar.png|text=➨ ]<b>< |
{{Barnstar|image=Barnstar.png|text=➨ ]<b>]]]</b>] awards this Barnstar to '''Naconkantari''' for tireless antivandalism and excellent contributions that we all appreciate.}} | ||
| Thanks for undoing the blanking of my talk page! ➨ ]<b>< |
Thanks for undoing the blanking of my talk page! ➨ ]<b>]]]</b>] 20:24, 6 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Esperanza Newsletter, Issue #2 == | == Esperanza Newsletter, Issue #2 == | ||
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
| Hi!!! I presume you are referring to Roger Stone's wikpage. What did I do?? All I did was fix some links and delete vandalism (about an orgy). Check for yourself!! | Hi!!! I presume you are referring to Roger Stone's wikpage. What did I do?? All I did was fix some links and delete vandalism (about an orgy). Check for yourself!! | ||
| ] 00:31, 13 April 2006 (UTC) | ] 00:31, 13 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :I have replied on your talk page. ] ]|]||]|] 00:33, 13 April 2006 (UTC) | :I have replied on your talk page. ] ]|]||]|] 00:33, 13 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
| == More vandal whacking thanks == | == More vandal whacking thanks == | ||
| Hey many thanks for deleting those Squidward revisions on my userpage and usertalk, as always, it is appreciated. Regards -- ''''']'']'']''''' 07:57, 15 April 2006 (UTC) | Hey many thanks for deleting those Squidward revisions on my userpage and usertalk, as always, it is appreciated. Regards -- ''''']'']'']''''' 07:57, 15 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Chad revert== | ==Chad revert== | ||
| Regarding the test on Chad page, if you look at the present location of the two images in the center, the image on the left overlaps on the | Regarding the test on Chad page, if you look at the present location of the two images in the center, the image on the left overlaps on the | ||
| line above atleast it did on my firefox browser, so i changed the image location to the right so the page had both the images in center on the right and no content was added or deleted by me, and it was no test that i was conducting on the wikipedia, frankly speaking you should have looked at the content of the page before sending me such a warning and i think it was nothing more than a gross misuse of administrative power given to you at wikipedia.(] 19:26, 15 April 2006 (UTC)) | line above atleast it did on my firefox browser, so i changed the image location to the right so the page had both the images in center on the right and no content was added or deleted by me, and it was no test that i was conducting on the wikipedia, frankly speaking you should have looked at the content of the page before sending me such a warning and i think it was nothing more than a gross misuse of administrative power given to you at wikipedia.(] 19:26, 15 April 2006 (UTC)) | ||
| :Your removed the end of the article. Also, please mind ]. ] ]|]||]|] 19:27, 15 April 2006 (UTC) | :Your removed the end of the article. Also, please mind ]. ] ]|]||]|] 19:27, 15 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==]== | ==]== | ||
| Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
| == Undeletion of ] == | == Undeletion of ] == | ||
| I have undeleted ] per deletion review debate. Since you were listed as the deleting admin, I am notifying you of my action. If you feel this is incorrect, please notify me. Thanks ] ]|]||]|] 21:14, 4 April 2006 (UTC) | I have undeleted ] per deletion review debate. Since you were listed as the deleting admin, I am notifying you of my action. If you feel this is incorrect, please notify me. Thanks ] ]|]||]|] 21:14, 4 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| : That's fine. But note that you haven't actually undeleted the article. Currently, the history only goes back to April 3, with 134 revisions still deleted. ] | ] 22:29, 4 April 2006 (UTC) | : That's fine. But note that you haven't actually undeleted the article. Currently, the history only goes back to April 3, with 134 revisions still deleted. ] | ] 22:29, 4 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :: So, would you object if I went ahead and actually undeleted that article? ] 20:36, 16 April 2006 (UTC) | :: So, would you object if I went ahead and actually undeleted that article? ] 20:36, 16 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::No, not at all. The reason that I left the old article deleted was because the history was filled with vandalism. If you want to restore the whole history, go ahead. ] ]|]||]|] 20:38, 16 April 2006 (UTC) | :::No, not at all. The reason that I left the old article deleted was because the history was filled with vandalism. If you want to restore the whole history, go ahead. ] ]|]||]|] 20:38, 16 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
| Sorry about the malformed RfA. I fixed it. I found that directions a little confusing. I have ] and I'm only 10. Please change your vote. ] 21:41, 17 April 2006 (UTC) | Sorry about the malformed RfA. I fixed it. I found that directions a little confusing. I have ] and I'm only 10. Please change your vote. ] 21:41, 17 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :I'm sorry, but I don not feel that you are ready to be an administrator. A bureaucrat has removed your nomination from the main page. ] ]|]||]|] 21:42, 17 April 2006 (UTC) | :I'm sorry, but I don not feel that you are ready to be an administrator. A bureaucrat has removed your nomination from the main page. ] ]|]||]|] 21:42, 17 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Master Jay's RfA == | == Master Jay's RfA == | ||
| NK, thank you for your support at my recent ]. If you have any concerns, please leave me a ]. Thanks --] |
NK, thank you for your support at my recent ]. If you have any concerns, please leave me a ]. Thanks --]<b style="background:gold">(])</b> 01:31, 18 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Cuba == | == Cuba == | ||
| If you'd read my own talk page you'd see the discussion about the software bug that caused it - i am not a newbie or a vandal - i've been an administrator for three years and been with the 'pedia for five. ] 02:18, 18 April 2006 (UTC) | If you'd read my own talk page you'd see the discussion about the software bug that caused it - i am not a newbie or a vandal - i've been an administrator for three years and been with the 'pedia for five. ] 02:18, 18 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Ok. However, if your edits continue to cut off the ends of articles, they will be reverted. ] ]|]||]|] 02:20, 18 April 2006 (UTC) | :Ok. However, if your edits continue to cut off the ends of articles, they will be reverted. ] ]|]||]|] 02:20, 18 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::It isn't my fault though - as Redvers said on my talk page it's happened to him too - i shouldn't be blamed for a software bug. ] 02:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC) | ::It isn't my fault though - as Redvers said on my talk page it's happened to him too - i shouldn't be blamed for a software bug. ] 02:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::It most likely isn't your fault, but if you continue to have problems, please post them on or in #wikimedia-tech on . ] ]|]||]|] 02:27, 18 April 2006 (UTC) | :::It most likely isn't your fault, but if you continue to have problems, please post them on or in #wikimedia-tech on . ] ]|]||]|] 02:27, 18 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Request == | == Request == | ||
| Line 149: | Line 149: | ||
| Why did you just edit my usertalk page back? I am trying to get people away from this page, because I have registered as ]] 21:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC) | Why did you just edit my usertalk page back? I am trying to get people away from this page, because I have registered as ]] 21:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :The page belongs to the IP address, and it is possible that other editors may use that IP. ] ]|]||]|] 21:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC) | :The page belongs to the IP address, and it is possible that other editors may use that IP. ] ]|]||]|] 21:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==What the heck== | ==What the heck== | ||
| Who did I attack and how? ] 22:54, 19 April 2006 (UTC) | Who did I attack and how? ] 22:54, 19 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Your here. ] ]|]||]|] 22:54, 19 April 2006 (UTC) | :Your here. ] ]|]||]|] 22:54, 19 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::So, my personal comment on my own talk page that I am archiving is somehow an attack on someone? That's absurd.] 22:56, 19 April 2006 (UTC) | ::So, my personal comment on my own talk page that I am archiving is somehow an attack on someone? That's absurd.] 22:56, 19 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 172: | Line 172: | ||
| <small>Crossposted from talk page on meta</small> | <small>Crossposted from talk page on meta</small> | ||
| Hi Naconkantari. I wanted to ask about meaning of this . Does this mean that this host is not a proxy, or it was offline at the moment of scan? It is important because this IP is involved in ArbCom case on Russian Misplaced Pages. Best regards, ] 09:34, 21 April 2006 (UTC) | Hi Naconkantari. I wanted to ask about meaning of this . Does this mean that this host is not a proxy, or it was offline at the moment of scan? It is important because this IP is involved in ArbCom case on Russian Misplaced Pages. Best regards, ] 09:34, 21 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :On further review, this ip is originating from a web-server, which is a good indication of a proxy server. However, I was unable to connect to Misplaced Pages from the ip. The ip is registered to , so it may also be a user with a web-server on their computer. I would now mark it as being '''inconclusive'''. ] ]|]||]|] 14:44, 21 April 2006 (UTC) | :On further review, this ip is originating from a web-server, which is a good indication of a proxy server. However, I was unable to connect to Misplaced Pages from the ip. The ip is registered to , so it may also be a user with a web-server on their computer. I would now mark it as being '''inconclusive'''. ] ]|]||]|] 14:44, 21 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :: Thanks. ] 14:47, 21 April 2006 (UTC) | :: Thanks. ] 14:47, 21 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == User page vandalism == | == User page vandalism == | ||
| Thank you for reverting my user page vandalism while I was offline. '''] '''<sup> (] • ]) </sup> 17:37, 21 April 2006 (UTC) | Thank you for reverting my user page vandalism while I was offline. '''] '''<sup> (] • ]) </sup> 17:37, 21 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 190: | Line 190: | ||
| == Old Skool Esperanzial note == | == Old Skool Esperanzial note == | ||
| Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that ] are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on ]. Please vote ]. Thanks. --] |
Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that ] are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on ]. Please vote ]. Thanks. --]]] <sup>]</sup> 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Gracias == | == Gracias == | ||
| Line 203: | Line 203: | ||
| <blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| ''«12:43:53» {+Naconkantari} AWB's verification is too easy to defeat<br> | ''«12:43:53» {+Naconkantari} AWB's verification is too easy to defeat''<br> | ||
| </blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| I previously had these up in accordance to ], as the channel you said it in did not have a rule against logging visible on a related website or on ] and related pages. However, despite the fact that the logs were related to a ongoing discussion, and they were trimmed to size, |
I previously had these up in accordance to ], as the channel you said it in did not have a rule against logging visible on a related website or on ] and related pages. However, despite the fact that the logs were related to a ongoing discussion, and they were trimmed to size, an administrator with personal involvement to the issue deleted the content. As such, I am seeking permission of use from every user I am quoted. Your cooperation would be appreciated. | ||
| Thanks, | Thanks, | ||
| '']]]]'' 19:52, 25 April 2006 (UTC) | '']]]]'' 19:52, 25 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Could you please direct me to the content that was deleted? Thanks. ] ]|]||]|] 21:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC) | :Could you please direct me to the content that was deleted? Thanks. ] ]|]||]|] 21:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == May 2 - sandbox? == | == May 2 - sandbox? == | ||
| Line 224: | Line 224: | ||
| Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Timothean_religion" | Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Timothean_religion" | ||
| <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 06:29, 26 April 2006 (UTC)</small> | |||
| {{unsigned2|06:29, 26 April 2006|Profundity06|+8}} | |||
| ==Bah== | ==Bah== | ||
| Please be careful, as a newbie, about the overzealous use of warning templates. It's exceptionally rude to do that to someone who obviously knows what the 3RR is, which is why, you might note, that I haven't broken it. ] 05:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC) | Please be careful, as a newbie, about the overzealous use of warning templates. It's exceptionally rude to do that to someone who obviously knows what the 3RR is, which is why, you might note, that I haven't broken it. ] 05:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :I'm well aware that you haven't broken it, but you ''did'' revert the page three times. ] ]|]||]|] 13:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC) | :I'm well aware that you haven't broken it, but you ''did'' revert the page three times. ] ]|]||]|] 13:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == accusation of vandalism == | == accusation of vandalism == | ||
| okay if you take a look at the history of the article, i simply add the extra information deleted. In addition, if you watch the NBA, you will know the stuff I wrote are, by no means, vandalism. Please stop accusing me of being a vandal. Thanks--] 02:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC) | okay if you take a look at the history of the article, i simply add the extra information deleted. In addition, if you watch the NBA, you will know the stuff I wrote are, by no means, vandalism. Please stop accusing me of being a vandal. Thanks--] 02:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :''He is also known for his ]'' hardly seems like a valid edit. ] ]|]||]|] 02:04, 27 April 2006 (UTC) | :''He is also known for his ]'' hardly seems like a valid edit. ] ]|]||]|] 02:04, 27 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ok maybe we should re-phrase it a little bit.--] 03:49, 27 April 2006 (UTC) | ok maybe we should re-phrase it a little bit.--] 03:49, 27 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :..maybe you should refrain from editing until you can contribute constructively instead of wasting the time of others. Thank you. --] 04:04, 27 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Why?== | ==Why?== | ||
| So I try a post article about Tesia Samara, something that wasn't easy for me to do, and it gets deleted for no reason? You have some kind of problem with Transgender people? Osaria 10:20pm April 26th (of all days to delete a GLBT article) | So I try a post article about Tesia Samara, something that wasn't easy for me to do, and it gets deleted for no reason? You have some kind of problem with Transgender people? Osaria 10:20pm April 26th (of all days to delete a GLBT article) | ||
| :Response posted to ] -- ] |
:Response posted to ] -- ]]] ] 02:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==A landslide victory for ] (aka RFA thanks)== | |||
| {| style="border:7px purple solid;padding:10px" | |||
| |Hey, {{PAGENAME}}, thank you so much for your vote and comments in ], which passed with an overwhelming consensus of 95/2/2. I was very surprised and flattered that the community has entrusted me with these lovely new toys. I ripped open the box and started playing with them as soon as I got them, and I've already had the pleasure of deleting random nonsense/attacks/copyvios tonight.<br>If I ever do anything wrong, or can help in some way, please feel free to drop me a line on my ], and I will do my best to correct my mistake, or whatever...<br>Now, to that bottle of wine waiting for me...<br> | |||
| ] <sup>]</sup> 21:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| |] | |||
| |} | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Sorry about that -- I accidentally reverted a revert of vandalism. Please accept my apologies. ] 02:54, 2 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| First, I want to thank you for reverting the vandalism done to the ] article. Enlight of this I would like you to comment on the discuss I start on the talk pages entitle '''Fully Protected'''. Please read my statements carefully and voice your opinon. Thanks for everything!--(] 01:22, 3 May 2006 (UTC)) | |||
| == WP:POINT == | |||
| Re: Your comments in ]. I think I've finally figured out why you believe my nominations were in violation of ], although no thanks to you. To someone who didn't read the original comment carefully and in context, it might appear that I am nominating all the articles out of spite over the nomination of . | |||
| In the future, I suggest you read discussions carefully and not jump to the conclusion that things are done in bad faith. That is all. <span style="border: 1px; border-style:solid; padding:0px 2px 2px 2px; color:yellow; background-color:maroon; font-weight:bold">Aplomado</span> - 04:14, 3 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:21, 28 August 2023
Thanks!
Many thanks for the speedy vandalism reversion of my userpage. Regards Banez 08:03, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
I havent been on the wiki for quite some time but i see while i was gone, someone vandalized my talk page and you reverted it. thanks for lookin' out - dave Cavebear42 20:20, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for the vandalism on my page! I cannot express appreciation enough! Thank you! -Airridi 02:18, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Ooh, ta!
Thanks for undoing the blanking of my talk page! ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 20:24, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Esperanza Newsletter, Issue #2
|
|
IP address blocks
The IP address block you made to block User:Jacky1234 is the Google web proxy! So you've effectively blocked anyone who is using the Google Web Accelerator! (Oops!) Please undo this block ASAP. See my talk for page for additional information.
NetRange: 64.233.160.0 - 64.233.191.255 CIDR: 64.233.160.0/19 NetName: GOOGLE NetHandle: NET-64-233-160-0-1 Parent: NET-64-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Allocation NameServer: NS1.GOOGLE.COM NameServer: NS2.GOOGLE.COM
--Stephane Charette 07:13, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
A Download Is Now Available
I just wanted to let you know that a download of VandalProof has recently been made available. AmiDaniel (Talk) 09:50, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Can't sleep, clown will eat me RFA 33⅓
Thank you for your early support during my third RFA. The self-nomination was successful, with an unexpected number of participants from all over. If you ever need anything, are feeling snackish, or would just like to chat, please feel free to visit me on my talk page; I never sleep. 8-) Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:47, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Please help
The anon at the Galatasaray page just changed their IP and is now making personal attacks. Can you please semi-protect the page? Thanks. --Khoikhoi 23:48, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Roger Stone
Hi!!! I presume you are referring to Roger Stone's wikpage. What did I do?? All I did was fix some links and delete vandalism (about an orgy). Check for yourself!! 216.194.58.76 00:31, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
- I have replied on your talk page. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 00:33, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Marriage
Hi there. You protected this about two weeks ago. Since WP:SEMI is for dealing with serious, current vandals, I figure it's been more than long enough to unprotect it now. Can I ask you to check your other recent protections and lift them as necessary, also to remember protections in general? CAT:SEMI is nearly 100 items, most of them seem to have been forgotten by the protecting admin. Thanks. -Splash 22:15, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
More vandal whacking thanks
Hey many thanks for deleting those Squidward revisions on my userpage and usertalk, as always, it is appreciated. Regards -- Banez 07:57, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Chad revert
Regarding the test on Chad page, if you look at the present location of the two images in the center, the image on the left overlaps on the line above atleast it did on my firefox browser, so i changed the image location to the right so the page had both the images in center on the right and no content was added or deleted by me, and it was no test that i was conducting on the wikipedia, frankly speaking you should have looked at the content of the page before sending me such a warning and i think it was nothing more than a gross misuse of administrative power given to you at wikipedia.(210.214.11.38 19:26, 15 April 2006 (UTC))
- Your edit removed the end of the article. Also, please mind WP:NPA. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 19:27, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
User:70.95.218.47
I have placed a report on the editing behavior of User:70.95.218.47 at Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:70.95.218.47_and_User:Rob.towers --WikiCats 03:10, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
VandalProof 1.1 is Now Available For Download
Happy Easter to all of you, and I hope that this version may fix your current problems and perhaps provide you with a few useful new tools. You can download version 1.1 at User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof. Let me warn you, however, to please be extremely careful when using the new Rollback All Contributions feature, as, aside from the excessive server lag it would cause if everyone began using it at once, it could seriously aggitate several editors to have their contributions reverted. If you would like to experiment with it, though, I'd be more than happy to use my many sockpuppets to create some "vandalism" for you to revert. If you have any problems downloading, installing, or otherwise, please tell me about them at User:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs and I will do my best to help you. Thanks. AmiDaniel (Talk) 06:48, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Sorry
I'm sorry if you think I'm too new to be an adminship but I've been being a Wikipedian since December, 2003. I just didn't have an account. I know all about Misplaced Pages. I have interviewed many Wikipedians and have even made friends with a few. I WAS a perfect adminship nominee. An old nominee, General Eisenhower 17:25, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Undeletion of Myg0t
I have undeleted Myg0t per this deletion review debate. Since you were listed as the deleting admin, I am notifying you of my action. If you feel this is incorrect, please notify me. Thanks Naconkantari e|t||c|m 21:14, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
- That's fine. But note that you haven't actually undeleted the article. Currently, the history only goes back to April 3, with 134 revisions still deleted. dbenbenn | talk 22:29, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
- So, would you object if I went ahead and actually undeleted that article? User:dbenbenn 20:36, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
- No, not at all. The reason that I left the old article deleted was because the history was filled with vandalism. If you want to restore the whole history, go ahead. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 20:38, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
- So, would you object if I went ahead and actually undeleted that article? User:dbenbenn 20:36, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Sevenlinefeatures
Can you please block this user? I gave him his final vandalism warning and put my complaint on the Admin block page but the guy has gone on a rampage. It's absurd. --Strothra 20:42, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
- Nevermind, Thanks!!--Strothra 20:42, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
My RfA
Sorry about the malformed RfA. I fixed it. I found that directions a little confusing. I have Nonverbal learning disorder and I'm only 10. Please change your vote. Jonathan235 21:41, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I don not feel that you are ready to be an administrator. A bureaucrat has removed your nomination from the main page. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 21:42, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Master Jay's RfA
NK, thank you for your support at my recent RfA. If you have any concerns, please leave me a note. Thanks --Jay(Reply) 01:31, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Cuba
If you'd read my own talk page you'd see the discussion about the software bug that caused it - i am not a newbie or a vandal - i've been an administrator for three years and been with the 'pedia for five. PMA 02:18, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- Ok. However, if your edits continue to cut off the ends of articles, they will be reverted. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 02:20, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- It isn't my fault though - as Redvers said on my talk page it's happened to him too - i shouldn't be blamed for a software bug. PMA 02:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- It most likely isn't your fault, but if you continue to have problems, please post them on Bugzilla or in #wikimedia-tech on . Naconkantari e|t||c|m 02:27, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- It isn't my fault though - as Redvers said on my talk page it's happened to him too - i shouldn't be blamed for a software bug. PMA 02:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Request
Hi, I listed a 3RRvio, but no one replied. Would you be able to do the block? Thanks. —Khoikhoi 03:33, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- Wow, that was fast! Thanks again. —Khoikhoi 03:41, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks.
Thanks you for protect my page from vandalism. You are very good wikipedian as much as famous wikipedian, and I also appreciate that you suggested him or her to stop editing my page. anyways, Thanks a lot. ChineseDan, 19 April 2006, 02:46(UTC).
- Thnx a lot for blocking me. I don't supposed you blocked your buddy Irpen tho either, right?Constantzeanu 18:09, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Editing User_talk:67.177.113.231
Why did you just edit my usertalk page back? I am trying to get people away from this page, because I have registered as Robomaeyhem67.177.113.231 21:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- The page belongs to the IP address, and it is possible that other editors may use that IP. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 21:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
What the heck
Who did I attack and how? AriGold 22:54, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- Your edit summary here. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 22:54, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- So, my personal comment on my own talk page that I am archiving is somehow an attack on someone? That's absurd.AriGold 22:56, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
delete or redirect a template
hey can you delete or redirect this template about Dish Network. http://en.wikipedia.org/Template:Dish_Network
Its not needed since there is already Dish Network page Dish Network
I would do it myself but it says I'm not allowed to. Why?
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 162.83.98.60 (talk • contribs) 19 April 2006 (UTC)
82.196.129.98
Crossposted from talk page on meta
Hi Naconkantari. I wanted to ask about meaning of this "scan failed". Does this mean that this host is not a proxy, or it was offline at the moment of scan? It is important because this IP is involved in ArbCom case on Russian Misplaced Pages. Best regards, MaxSem 09:34, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- On further review, this ip is originating from a web-server, which is a good indication of a proxy server. However, I was unable to connect to Misplaced Pages from the ip. The ip is registered to Centertelecom Service, so it may also be a user with a web-server on their computer. I would now mark it as being inconclusive. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 14:44, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. MaxSem 14:47, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
User page vandalism
Thank you for reverting my user page vandalism while I was offline. TDS 17:37, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Jesse Dangerously vandalism
Thanks for catching this repeatedly. Looks like someone's got too much time on their hands and a personal beef to air out. Tony Fox 00:07, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Blocking
You reccently blocked my ip because of another user, Im not quite sure what to do to undo the block help would be appreciated.--Gw099 01:07, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Old Skool Esperanzial note
Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Celestianpower 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Gracias
Thank you, Naconkantari, for your support in my recent RfA. The community has now entrusted me with admin tools. Let the fun begin. 8)--Rockero 23:38, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry on Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy
Greetings having noticed that you blocked User:Raphael101 for being a sockpuppet of User:Raphael1 I thought you should be aware of this RFCU regarding the two. Thanks! Netscott 01:29, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Permission to use IRC logs.
Hey there, I was wondering if I had your permission to publish some of your IRC chat on Misplaced Pages, specifically:
«12:43:53» {+Naconkantari} AWB's verification is too easy to defeat
I previously had these up in accordance to m:IRC Channels, as the channel you said it in #vandalism-en-wp did not have a rule against logging visible on a related website or on WP:IRC and related pages. However, despite the fact that the logs were related to a ongoing discussion, and they were trimmed to size, an administrator with personal involvement to the issue deleted the content. As such, I am seeking permission of use from every user I am quoted. Your cooperation would be appreciated.
Thanks, Avillia 19:52, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- Could you please direct me to the content that was deleted? Thanks. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 21:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
May 2 - sandbox?
You are persistently reverting my adjustments to the page regarding May 2. Why is this? You talk about experimentation! This is not experimentation! The challenge is the scholarship exam of Westminster School, one of the most important exams in the country, and Alexander Entwistle is going for it. Please stop adjusting this addition! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alexandere111 (talk • contribs) 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Timothean Religion Article
As I said on the talk page at that article,
If only I could have made this up, I'd be on to better and bigger things than Misplaced Pages by now. But that's not the case:- http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1575021501/qid=1146002303/sr=1-8/ref=sr_1_8/104-0106382-2973531?v=glance&s=books
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Timothean_religion"
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Profundity06 (talk • contribs) 06:29, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Bah
Please be careful, as a newbie, about the overzealous use of warning templates. It's exceptionally rude to do that to someone who obviously knows what the 3RR is, which is why, you might note, that I haven't broken it. Ambi 05:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- I'm well aware that you haven't broken it, but you did revert the page three times. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 13:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
accusation of vandalism
okay if you take a look at the history of the article, i simply add the extra information deleted. In addition, if you watch the NBA, you will know the stuff I wrote are, by no means, vandalism. Please stop accusing me of being a vandal. Thanks--Bonafide.hustla 02:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- He is also known for his large moose dick hardly seems like a valid edit. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 02:04, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
ok maybe we should re-phrase it a little bit.--Bonafide.hustla 03:49, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- ..maybe you should refrain from editing until you can contribute constructively instead of wasting the time of others. Thank you. --Downwards 04:04, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Why?
So I try a post article about Tesia Samara, something that wasn't easy for me to do, and it gets deleted for no reason? You have some kind of problem with Transgender people? Osaria 10:20pm April 26th (of all days to delete a GLBT article)
- Response posted to User talk:Osaria -- Francs2000
02:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
A landslide victory for The JPS (aka RFA thanks)
| Hey, Nakon/archive3, thank you so much for your vote and comments in my RfA, which passed with an overwhelming consensus of 95/2/2. I was very surprised and flattered that the community has entrusted me with these lovely new toys. I ripped open the box and started playing with them as soon as I got them, and I've already had the pleasure of deleting random nonsense/attacks/copyvios tonight. If I ever do anything wrong, or can help in some way, please feel free to drop me a line on my talk page, and I will do my best to correct my mistake, or whatever... Now, to that bottle of wine waiting for me... |
|
Nintendo NSider Forums
Sorry about that -- I accidentally reverted a revert of vandalism. Please accept my apologies. TheProject 02:54, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:George Washington
First, I want to thank you for reverting the vandalism done to the George Washington article. Enlight of this I would like you to comment on the discuss I start on the talk pages entitle Fully Protected. Please read my statements carefully and voice your opinon. Thanks for everything!--(Steve 01:22, 3 May 2006 (UTC))
WP:POINT
Re: Your comments in Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Circle_of_Death_(drinking_game). I think I've finally figured out why you believe my nominations were in violation of WP:POINT, although no thanks to you. To someone who didn't read the original comment carefully and in context, it might appear that I am nominating all the articles out of spite over the nomination of Bizu-Bizu.
In the future, I suggest you read discussions carefully and not jump to the conclusion that things are done in bad faith. That is all. Aplomado - UTC 04:14, 3 May 2006 (UTC)