Misplaced Pages

Battle of the Dnieper: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:03, 27 April 2006 editUlritz (talk | contribs)691 editsm Imperial russian/soviet nostalgia has no place in the English Misplaced Pages← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:35, 17 December 2024 edit undoDauzlee (talk | contribs)312 editsNo edit summary 
(729 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|WWII battle}}
{{Infobox Military Conflict
{{Other|Dnieper campaign (disambiguation)}}
|conflict='''Battle of The Lower Dnieper'''
{{more citations needed|date=May 2016}}
|image=]
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2023}}
|caption=] soldiers crossing the ] on self-made ]s.
{{Infobox military conflict
|partof=]
| conflict = Battle of the Dnieper
|place=] river, ]
| partof = the ] of ]
|date=], ] — ], ]
| image = Map of dnieper battle grand.jpg
|result=Decisive Soviet Victory
| image_size = 300
|combatant1=]
| caption = Map of the battle of the Dnieper and linked operations
|combatant2=]
| date = 26 August 1943 – 23 December 1943<br />({{Age in years, months, weeks and days|month1=08|day1=26|year1=1943|month2=12|day2=23|year2=1943}})<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ed9jDwAAQBAJ&dq=%C2%A0Battle+of+the+Dnieper+december+23&pg=PA41 | title=The Eastern Front: The Germans and Soviets at War in World War II | isbn=978-0-8117-6784-2 | last1=Edwards | first1=Robert | date=15 August 2018 | publisher=Rowman & Littlefield }}</ref>
|commander1=]
| place = ], ]
|commander2=],<br> ]
| territory = ] reclaim ], including the city of ] and ]
|strength1=1,250,000 men<br>12,600 guns<br>2,100 tanks<br>2,000 planes
| result = Soviet victory
|strength2=2,650,000 men<br>51,000 guns<br>2,400 tanks<br>2,850 planes
| combatant1 = {{flag|Soviet Union|1936}}
|casualties1=<b>Low est.:</b> 500,000+ killed and wounded<br><b>High est.:</b> 1,250,000 killed and wounded
| combatant2 = {{flagcountry|Nazi Germany}}<br />{{flagcountry|Kingdom of Romania}}
|casualties2=300,000+ killed, 900,000+ wounded
| commander1 = {{flagicon|Soviet Union|1936}} ]<br />{{flagicon|Soviet Union|1936}} ]<br />{{flagicon|Soviet Union|1936}} ]<br />{{flagicon|Soviet Union|1936}} ]<br />{{flagicon|Soviet Union|1936}} ]<br />{{flagicon|Soviet Union|1936}} ]<br />{{nowrap|{{flagicon|Soviet Union|1936}} ]}}
|}}
| commander2 = {{flagicon|Nazi Germany}} ]<br />{{flagicon|Nazi Germany}} ]<br />{{flagicon|Nazi Germany}} ]
{{Campaignbox Axis-Soviet War}}
| units1 = {{flagicon|Soviet Union|1936}} ]<br />{{flagicon|Soviet Union|1936}} ]<br />{{flagicon|Soviet Union|1936}} ]<br />{{flagicon|Soviet Union|1936}} ]<br />{{flagicon|Soviet Union|1936}} ]
| units2 = {{flagicon|Nazi Germany}} ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]<br/>(until 17 September 1943)
{{flagicon|Nazi Germany}} ]
* ]<br/> (re-subordinated from 17 September 1943)<ref>Frieser, Karl-Heinz. The Eastern Front 1943-1944: The War in the East and on the Neighbouring Fronts. Oxford University Press, 2017, p. 356.</ref>
{{flagicon|Nazi Germany}} ]
* ]
| strength1 = '''26 August:'''<br />2,633,000 men (1,450,000 reinforcements){{sfn|Frieser|Schmider|Schönherr|Schreiber|2007|p=343}}<br />51,200 guns and mortars{{sfn|Frieser|Schmider|Schönherr|Schreiber|2007|p=343}}<br />2,400 tanks and assault guns{{sfn|Frieser|Schmider|Schönherr|Schreiber|2007|p=343}}<br />2,850 combat aircraft{{sfn|Frieser|Schmider|Schönherr|Schreiber|2007|p=343}}
| strength2 = {{flagicon|Nazi Germany}}
'''On 1 November 1943''':<ref>OKH Org.Abt. I Nr. I/5645/43 g.Kdos. Iststärke des Feldheeres Stand 1.11.43. NARA T78, R528, F768.
</ref><br>]:<br>- 722,376 personnel;<br>] of ]:<br>- 182,236 personnel;<br>] of ]:<br>- 200,111 personnel;<br>'''Total'''- 1,104,723 personnel.<br/>{{flagicon|Nazi Germany}} Army Group South armoured strength '''as of 10 November 1943''':<ref>Oberkommando des Heeres. Geheime Kommandosache. Panzerlage der Heeresgruppe Süd. Stand am 10 November 1943. Bundesarchiv-Militärarchiv (BA-MA) RH 10/52, fol. 80.
</ref><br/>- 713 operational tanks;<br/>- 271 operational assault guns;<br/>- '''984 operational AFV's in total'''.<br/>In repairs:<br/>- 894 tanks;<br/>- 302 assault guns.<br/>{{flagicon|Nazi Germany}} '''] strength on 10 October 1943''':<ref>Frieser, Karl-Heinz. Germany and the Second World War: Volume VIII: The Eastern Front 1943-1944: The War in the East and on the Neighbouring Fronts. Oxford University Press, 2017, p. 364.</ref><br/>- 793 operational aircraft (all types)<br/>- 1,149 aircraft in total (incl. in repairs)


{{flagicon|Kingdom of Romania}} '''On 1 November 1943''':<ref>OKH Org.Abt. I Nr. I/5645/43 g.Kdos. Iststärke des Feldheeres Stand 1.11.43. NARA T78, R528, F770.
The ] '''Battle of the Lower ]''' of ] is considered to be one of the largest battles in world history, involving almost 4,000,000 men on both sides and stretching on a front 1400 kilometers wide. During a four-month campaign, Soviet troops took the control of the left shore of the ], crossed it in force, and created several ] on the right shore, taking control of ] as well.
</ref><br>- 85,564 personnel.
| casualties1 = Krivosheev: 1,285,977 men<ref>{{cite web |last1=Кривошеев |first1=Г.Ф. |title=Россия и СССР в войнах XX века: Потери вооруженных сил |url=http://lib.ru/MEMUARY/.../1939-1945/KRIWOSHEEW/poteri.txt |publisher=ОЛМА-ПРЕСС |date=2001}}</ref>
:348,815 killed or missing
:937,162 wounded or sick
Frieser:
1,687,164 men{{sfn|Frieser|Schmider|Schönherr|Schreiber|2007|p=379}}
:417,323 killed or missing
:1,269,841 wounded or sick


Forczyk:<ref>Forczyk, Robert. The Dnepr 1943: Hitler's Eastern Rampart Crumbles. Osprey Publishing 2016, p. 91.</ref><br/>- 290,000 killed or missing<br/>- 1,000,000+ in total
It is also considered one of the bloodiest battles, with estimates ranging from 1,700,000 to 2,700,000 casualties on both sides. Since the area involved was huge, some historians do not consider it a discrete "battle," and grant the ] the title of the bloodiest battle in history.
| casualties2 = {{Flagicon|Nazi Germany}} ]<br>Forczyk:<ref>Forczyk, Robert. The Dnepr 1943: Hitler's Eastern Rampart Crumbles. Osprey Publishing 2016, p. 91.</ref><br>- 102,000 killed or missing<br>- 372,000+ in total<br>{{Flagicon|Kingdom of Romania}} ]<br>Unknown
| campaignbox = {{Campaignbox Axis-Soviet War}}
{{Romanian military actions in World War II}}
}}
The '''Battle of the Dnieper''' was a ] that took place in 1943 on the ] of ]. Being one of the largest operations of the war, it involved almost four million troops at one point and stretched over a {{convert|1400|km|mi}} front.
Over four months, the eastern bank of the ] was recovered from ] forces by five of the ]'s ], which conducted several assault river crossings to establish several ]s on the western bank. ] was later liberated in the ]. 2,438 Red Army soldiers were awarded the title ] for their involvement.<ref>{{cite book| title=Military Review | publisher=Command and General Staff School| year=1993 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Yzf4X42RAkUC&pg=RA2-PA75| page=2-PA75}}</ref>
{{TOC limit}}


== Prelude == == Strategic situation ==
After the end of the ], the ] lost all hope of regaining the initiative. Losses were considerable, and, worse, its army as a whole was less experienced than before, as many of its best men had fallen in the ]. Therefore, despite considerable numbers, the Wehrmacht could only react and defend. Following the ], the Wehrmacht{{'}}s ] and supporting '']'' forces in the southern ] were on the defensive in ]. By mid-August, ] understood that the forthcoming Soviet offensive could not be contained on the open steppe and ordered construction of a series of fortifications along the line of the ] river.


On the Soviet side, ] was determined to launch a major offensive in Ukraine. The main thrust of the offensive was in a southwesterly direction; the northern flank being largely stabilized, the southern flank rested on the ].
By mid-August, ] understood that the Soviet offensive could not be contained - at least, not until some internal disagreement broke out within the ]. He decided to buy time by constructing a series of fortifications to slow down the ], and he demanded the Wehrmacht to defend its positions on the ] at all costs.


== Planning ==
On the Soviet side, ] was determined to pursue the retaking control of occupied territories, started at the beginning of the year. The Ukrainian industrial region was the first priority, since it was a densely populated area and its ] mines and other ores would provide precious resource for the Soviet state. Therefore, the main axis of the attack was in a southernly direction; the northern regions would be neglected in this offensive.
=== Soviet planning ===
{{Unreferenced section|date=April 2017}}


{{multiple image
== The Start ==
| align = left
=== German defense setup ===
| direction = horizontal
| width = 120
| image1 = Konstanty Rokossowski, 1945.jpg
| caption1 = Central Front ]
| image2 =
| caption2 = Voronezh Front ]
| image3 = IS Konev 01.jpg
| caption3 = Steppe Front ]
| image4 = Rodion Malinovsky 1.jpg
| caption4 = Southwestern Front ]
| image5 =
| caption5 = Southern Front ]
}}


The operation began on 26 August 1943. Divisions started to move on a 1,400-kilometer front that stretched between ] and the Sea of Azov. Overall, the operation would be executed by 36 Combined Arms, four Tank and five Air Armies. 2,650,000 personnel were brought into the ranks for this massive operation. The operation would use 51,000 guns and mortars, 2,400 tanks and 2,850 planes.
]


The Dnieper is the third largest river in ], behind only the ] and the ]. In its lower part, its width can easily reach three kilometres, and being dammed in several places made it even larger. Moreover, its western shore—the one still to be retaken—was much higher and steeper than the eastern, complicating the offensive even further. In addition, the opposite shore was transformed into a vast complex of defenses and ]s held by the ''Wehrmacht''.
The order to construct the Dnieper defense complex, known as "Eastern Wall", was issued on 11 August 1943 and immediately executed.


Faced with such a situation, the Soviet commanders had two options. The first would be to give themselves time to regroup their forces, find a weak point or two to exploit (not necessarily in the lower part of the Dnieper), stage a ] and encircle the German defenders far in the rear, rendering the defence line unsupplied and next to useless (very much like the German ]s bypassed the ] in 1940). This option was supported by Marshal ] and Deputy Chief of Staff ], who considered the substantial losses after the Battle of Kursk. The second option would be to stage a massive assault without waiting, and force the Dnieper on a broad front. This option left no additional time for the German defenders, but would lead to much larger casualties than would a successful deep operation breakthrough. This second option was backed by Stalin due to the concern that the German "scorched earth" policy might devastate this region if the Red Army did not advance fast enough.
All over Dnieper, fortifications were erected. However, there was no hope to achieve such a huge defense setup in such a short time. Therefore, the "Eastern wall" was not uniform. In areas where Soviet force-crossing was most likely, such as near ], ] and ], the defense was the heaviest, whilst being lighter in other areas.


] (the Soviet high command) chose the second option. Instead of deep penetration and encirclement, the Soviet intended to make full use of partisan activities to intervene and disrupt Germany's supply route so that the Germans could not effectively send reinforcements or take away Soviet industrial facilities in the region. Stavka also paid high attention to the possible scorched earth activities of German forces with a view to preventing them by a rapid advance.
Additionally, on 7 September 1943, the SS forces and the Wehrmacht received an order to thoroughly pillage areas they had to retreat from to slow down the Red Army and to try and create supplies issues for Soviet forces.


The assault was staged on a 300-kilometer front almost simultaneously. All available means of transport were to be used to transport the attackers to the opposite shore, including small fishing boats and improvised rafts of barrels and trees (like the one in the photograph). The preparation of the crossing equipment was further complicated by the German scorched earth strategy with the total destruction of all boats and ] material in the area. The crucial issue would obviously be heavy equipment. Without it, the ]s would not stand for long.
=== Soviet offensive on the left shore ===


==== Soviet organisation ====
''Main article: ]''
* ] (known as the ] after 20 October 1943), commanded by ] and accounted for 579,600 soldiers (took no part in the Dnieper battle after 3 October)
** ], led by ] / ] <small>(since September)</small>
** ], led by Hryhoriy Rudchenko (KIA), Boris Bakharov
** ], led by ]
** ], led by ]
** ], led by ]
** ], led by ]
** ], led by ]
** ], led by ] / Vladimir Sharapov <small>(September – October)</small> / ] <small>(since October)</small>
** ], led by ]
* ] (known as the ] after 20 October 1943), commanded by ] and accounted for 665,500 soldiers
** ], led by ]
** ], led by ]
** ], led by Pavel Poluboyarov
** 1st Guard Cavalry Corps, led by ]
** ], led by ]
** ], led by ] / Aleksei Zygin (KIA) / Ivan Galanin
** ], led by ]
** ], led by ] / ] <small>(since October)</small>
** ], led by Pavel Korzun / ] <small>(September – October)</small> / Vitaliy Polenov <small>(since October)</small>
** ], led by ]
** ], led by ]
** ], led by ]
* ] (known as the ] after 20 October 1943), commanded by ]
* ] (known as the ] after 20 October 1943), commanded by ]
* ] (known as the ] after 20 October 1943), commanded by ]


=== German planning ===
On 24 August 1943, the Soviet divisions started moving on a 1400 kilometer front stretching between ] and the ]. The operation staged was huge, mobilizing 2,650,000 men, 51,000 guns, 2,400 tanks and 2,850 planes, and involving 5 fronts:
{{Main|Panther-Wotan line}}
* ] (starting from ] ], ])
{{multiple image
* ] (starting from ] ], ])
| align = right
* ] (starting from ] ], ])
| direction = horizontal
* ] (starting from ] ], ])
| width = 120
* ] (starting from ] ], ])
| image1 = Bundesarchiv Bild 183-H01757, Erich von Manstein.jpg
| caption1 = Army Group South ]
| image2 =
| caption2 = Army Group A ]
}}
The order to construct the Dnieper defence complex, known as "Ostwall" or "Eastern Wall", was issued on 11 August 1943 and immediately began to be executed.


Fortifications were erected along the length of the Dnieper. However, there was no hope of completing such an extensive defensive line in the short time available. Therefore, the completion of the "Eastern Wall" was not uniform in its density and depth of fortifications. Instead, they were concentrated in areas where a Soviet assault-crossing were most likely to be attempted, such as near ], ] and ].
Overall, the operation was executed by 36 rifle armies, 4 Tank and 5 Air armies.


Additionally, on 7 September 1943, the SS forces and the Wehrmacht received orders to implement a ] policy, by stripping the areas they had to abandon of anything that could be used by the Soviet war effort.
Despite a great superiority in numbers, the offensive was by no means easy. German opposition was ferocious and fight raged for every town and city. One tactic widely used by the Wehrmacht was leaving some troops in each city and on each hill, slowing down the Soviet offensive.


==== German organisation ====
Three weeks after the start of the offensive, and despite heavy losses on the Soviet side, it became all too clear that the Wehrmacht could not possibly hope to contain the Soviet offensive in the flat, open terrain of the steppes, where the Red Army's number strength prevailed. Manstein was forced to ask for as many as 12 new divisions if he could hope to contain the Soviet offensive &ndash; but German reserves were perilously thin. Years later, Manstein wrote in his ]:
* ] <small>(selected units)</small> – ]
* (in Ukraine) ] – ]
** ] – ]
** ] – ]
** ] – ]
** ] – ] (transferred to Army Group A control)
** ] – ] / ] <small>(since September)</small>
* (in Crimea) ] – ]
* ] – ]
** ] – ] (took no part in the Dnieper battle after 3 October)


== Description of the strategic operation ==
''"After analysing this situation, I concluded that we can't keep the Donbass with the forces that we already possess, and that even a greater danger for the whole Eastern Front is being created on the north flank of the group. The 8th and 4th armies won't be able to contain the Soviet offensive for very long".''


=== Initial attack ===
Therefore, on 15 September 1943, Hitler ordered the Group Army South to retreat to the Dnieper defense line.
]
]
Despite a great superiority in numbers, the offensive was by no means easy. German opposition was ferocious and the fighting raged for every town and city. The ''Wehrmacht'' made extensive use of ]s, leaving some troops in each city and on each hill, slowing the Soviet offensive.


=== Progress of the offensive ===
The fight for ] city was especially bitter. The city was heavily fortified and its garrison ready. After a few inconclusive days that greatly slowed down the Soviet offensive, Marshal Konev decided to bypass the city and rush towards the Dnieper. After two days of violent ], Poltava was retaken.
] soldiers crossing the ] on improvised ]s]]
Three weeks after the start of the offensive, and despite heavy losses on the Soviet side, it became clear that the Germans could not hope to contain the Soviet offensive in the flat, open terrain of the steppes, where the Red Army's numerical strength would prevail. Manstein asked for as many as 12 new divisions in the hope of containing the Soviet offensive – but German reserves were perilously thin.


On 15 September 1943, Hitler ordered Army Group South to retreat to the Dnieper defence line. The battle for ] was especially bitter. The city was heavily fortified and its garrison well prepared. After a few inconclusive days that greatly slowed down the Soviet offensive, Marshal Konev decided to bypass the city and rush towards the Dnieper. After two days of violent ], the Poltava garrison was overcome. Towards the end of September 1943, Soviet forces reached the lower part of the Dnieper.
Towards the end of September 1943, Soviet forces more or less finished reaching the Dnieper in its lower part. The hardest part was still to come, though.


=== Dnieper airborne operation === === Dnieper airborne operation ===
{{no footnotes|section|date=September 2022}}
In order to try and soften the defenses on Dnieper's right shore, the Soviet command decided to attempt a paradrop on the right shore. On ] ] the Dnieper airborne operation was launched. The Soviet ]s were supposed to get hold of a ] and retain it until the reinforcements came.
] and other members of his military council on the eve of the Battle of the Dnieper, 1943]]
(The following is, largely, a synopsis of an account by Glantz<ref>The History of Soviet Airborne Forces, Chapter 8, Across The Dnieper (September 1943), by David M. Glantz, Cass, 1994. </ref> with support from an account by Staskov.<ref>1943 Dnepr airborne operation: lessons and conclusions Military Thought, July 2003, by Nikolai Viktorovich Staskov. See ref at ] under 40th Army entry.</ref>){{Verify source|date=April 2017}}


Stavka detached the ]'s ] to the ] to race the weakening Germans to the Dnieper, to save the wheat crop from the German scorched earth policy, and to achieve strategic or operational river bridgeheads before a German defence could stabilize there. The 3rd Tank Army, plunging headlong, reached the river on the night of 21–22 September and, on 23 September, Soviet infantry forces crossed by swimming and by using makeshift rafts to secure small, fragile bridgeheads, opposed only by 120 German Cherkassy flak academy NCO candidates and the hard-pressed 19th Panzer Division Reconnaissance Battalion. Those forces were the only Germans within 60&nbsp;km of the Dnieper loop. Only a heavy German air attack and a lack of bridging equipment kept Soviet heavy weaponry from crossing and expanding the bridgehead.
However, the operation turned out to be a complete failure. Because pilots were completely unfamiliar with the area, the first wave of paratroopers was dropped on Soviet lines or in the Dnieper, and the second wave of 5,000 troops got scattered over several dozen square kilometers. Moreover, because of a poorly performed ] that failed to spot German mechanized forces, most troops, lacking ]s, were killed shortly after their landing. The others, having lost all radio link with their ], tried to attack German ]s or joined the ] forces.


The Soviets, sensing a critical juncture, ordered a hasty airborne corps assault to increase the size of the bridgehead before the Germans could counterattack. On 21 September, the Voronezh Front's 1st, 3rd and 5th Guards ] Brigades got the urgent call to secure, on 23 September, a bridgehead perimeter 15 to 20&nbsp;km wide and 30&nbsp;km deep on the Dnieper loop between Kaniv and Rzhishchev, while Front elements forced the river.
Despite heavy losses, it is estimated that the Dnieper airborne operation, which attracted the attention of a significant number of German mechanized troops, allowed a force-crossing in better conditions. Nevertheless, after the failure of Vyazma and Dnieper paradrops, the ] refused to use massive airborne operations again.


The arrival of personnel at the airfields was slow, necessitating, on 23 September, a one-day delay and omission of 1st Brigade from the plan; consequent mission changes caused near chaos in command channels. Mission change orders finally got down to company commanders, on the 24 September, just 15 minutes before their units, not yet provisioned with spades, anti-tank mines, or ponchos for the autumn night frosts, assembled on airfields. Owing to the weather, not all assigned aircraft had arrived at airfields on time (if at all). Further, most flight safety officers disallowed maximum loading of their aircraft. Given fewer aircraft (and lower than expected capacities), the master loading plan, ruined, was abandoned. Many radios and supplies got left behind. In the best case, it would take three lifts to deliver the two brigades. Units (still arriving by the overtaxed rail system), were loaded piecemeal onto returned aircraft, which were slow to refuel owing to the less-than-expected capacities of fuel trucks. Meanwhile, already-arrived troops changed planes, seeking earlier flights. Urgency and the fuel shortage prevented aerial assembly aloft. Most aircraft, as soon as they were loaded and fueled, flew in single file, instead of line abreast, to the dropping points. Assault waves became as intermingled as the units they carried.
== Force-crossing the Dnieper ==


As corps elements made their flights, troops (half of whom had never jumped, except from training towers) were briefed on drop zones, assembly areas and objectives only poorly understood by platoon commanders still studying new orders. Meanwhile, Soviet aerial photography, suspended for several days by bad weather, had missed the strong reinforcement of the area, early that afternoon. Non-combat cargo pilots ferrying 3rd Brigade through drizzle expected no resistance beyond river pickets but, instead, were met by anti-aircraft fire and flares from the ] (only coincidentally transiting the drop zone, and just one of six divisions and other formations ordered, on the 21st, to fill the gap in front of the 3rd Tank Army). Lead aircraft, disgorging ]s over Dubari at 1930h, came under fire from elements of the 73rd Panzer Grenadier Regiment and division staff of 19th Panzer Division. Some paratroopers began returning fire and throwing grenades even before landing; trailing aircraft accelerated, climbed and evaded, dropping wide. Through the night, some pilots avoided flare-lit drop points entirely, and 13 aircraft returned to airfields without having dropped at all. Intending a 10 by 14&nbsp;km drop over largely undefended terrain, the Soviets instead achieved a 30 by 90&nbsp;km drop over the fastest mobile elements of two German corps.
=== Choosing the scenario ===
Dnieper is the third largest ] in ], second only to ] and ]. In its lower part, its width can easily reach 3 kilometers, and the fact that it was ]med in several places made it even larger. Moreover its right shore &mdash;the one still to be retaken&mdash; was much higher and steeper than the left one, thus complicating the offensive even further. In addition, the opposite shore was transformed into a vast complex of defenses and ]s held by the Wehrmacht.


On the ground, the Germans used white parachutes as beacons to hunt down and kill disorganized groups and to gather and destroy airdropped supplies. Supply bonfires, glowing embers, and multi-color starshells illuminated the battlefield. Captured documents gave the Germans enough knowledge of Soviet objectives to arrive at most of them before the disorganized paratroopers.
In front of such a situation, the Soviet commanders had two options. The first would be to give themselves time to regroup their forces, find a weak point or two to exploit (not necessarily in the lower part of Dnieper), stage a ] and encircle the German defenders, rendering the defense line next to useless (very much like ] ]s bypassed the ] in 1940). This, however, would give Germans time to get more ]s and futhermore, would expose Soviet troops to ] mechanized attacks, every Soviet commander's nightmare since 1941.


Back at the Soviet airfields, the fuel shortage allowed only 298 of 500 planned sorties, leaving corps anti-tank guns and 2,017 paratroops undelivered. Of 4,575 men dropped (seventy percent of the planned number, and just 1,525 from 5th Brigade), some 2,300 eventually assembled into 43 ad hoc groups, with missions abandoned as hopeless, and spent most of their time seeking supplies not yet destroyed by the Germans. Others joined with the nine ] groups operating in the area. About 230 made it over (or out of) the Dnieper to Front units (or were originally dropped there). Most of the rest were captured that first night or killed the next day (although, on that first night, the 3rd Co, 73rd Panzer Grenadier Regiment, suffered heavy losses while annihilating about 150 paratroopers near Grushevo, some 3&nbsp;km west of Dubari).
] on a raft]]


The Germans underestimated that 1,500 to 2,000 had dropped; they recorded 901 paratroops captured and killed in the first 24 hours. Thereafter, they largely ignored the Soviet paratroopers, to counterattack and truncate the Dnieper bridgeheads. The Germans deemed their anti-paratrooper operations completed by the 26th, although a modicum of opportunistic actions against garrisons, rail lines, and columns were conducted by remnants up to early November. For a lack of manpower to clear all areas, fighters in the area's forests would remain a minor threat.
The second option would be to stage a massive assault without waiting, and force the Dnieper on a large front. This option left no additional time for the German defenders, but would lead to much larger casualties. For political reasons (] wanted ] to be retaken on ]), the second option was chosen.


The Germans called the operation a fundamentally sound idea ruined by the dilettantism of planners lacking expert knowledge (but praised individual paratroopers for their tenacity, bayonet skills, and deft use of broken ground in the sparsely wooded northern region). Stavka deemed this second (and, ultimately, last) corps drop a complete failure; lessons they knew they had already learned from their winter offensive corps drop at Viazma had not stuck. They would never trust themselves to try it again.
The assault would be staged on a 300-kilometer front almost simultaneously. All available means of transport would be used to transport the attackers to the opposite shore, including ] boats and home-made ]s of barrels and trees (like the one on the photograph). The crucial issue would obviously be heavy equipment. Without it, the bridgeheads would not stand for long.


Soviet 5th Guards Airborne Brigade commander Sidorchuk, withdrawing to the forests south, eventually amassed a brigade-size command, half paratroops, half partisans; he obtained air supply, and assisted the 2nd Ukrainian Front over the Dnieper near Cherkassy to finally link up with Front forces on 15 November. After 13 more days of combat, the airborne element was evacuated, ending a harrowing two months. More than sixty percent never returned.
=== The crossing ===
]


=== Assaulting the Dnieper ===
The first ] on Dnieper's right shore was established on ] ] at the confluence of Dnieper and ] rivers, in the northern part of the front. On ], another bridgehead was created near ], another on ] near ] and yet another one on ] near Kremenchug. By the end of the month, 23 bridgeheads were created on the right shore, some of them 10 kilometers wide and 1-2 kilometers deep.
]
]
The first bridgehead on the Dnieper's western shore was established on 22 September 1943 at the confluence of the Dnieper and ] rivers, in the northern part of the front. On 24 September, another bridgehead was created near ], another on 25 September near ] and yet another on 28 September near Kremenchuk. By the end of the month, 23 bridgeheads were created on the western side, some of them 10 kilometers wide and 1–2 kilometres deep.


By all accounts, the crossing of the Dnieper can be described as an "attack rage". Soldiers used every available floating device to cross the river, under heavy German fire and taking heavy losses. After that, Soviet troops had to basically dig themselves into the clay ravines composing Dnieper's right shore. The crossing of the Dnieper was extremely difficult. Soldiers used every available floating device to cross the river, under heavy German fire and taking heavy losses. Once across, Soviet troops had to dig themselves into the clay ravines composing the Dnieper's western bank.


=== Securing the bridgeheads === === Securing the lodgements ===
]
German troops soon launched heavy ]s on almost every bridgehead, hoping to annihilate them before heavy equipment could be transported across the river.


For instance, the Borodaevsk lodgement, mentioned by Marshal ] in his memoirs, came under heavy armored attack and air assault. Bombers attacked both the lodgement and the reinforcements crossing the river. Konev complained at once about a lack of organization of Soviet air support, set up air patrols to prevent bombers from approaching the lodgements and ordered forward more artillery to counter tank attacks from the opposite shore. When Soviet aviation became more organized and hundreds of guns and ]s began firing, the situation started to improve and the bridgehead was eventually preserved.
]


Such battles were commonplace on every lodgement. Although all the lodgements were held, losses were terrible – at the beginning of October, most divisions were at only 25 to 50% of their nominal strength.
Obviously, German troops soon launched heavy ]s on almost every ], hoping to annihilate them before heavy equipment could be transported across the river.

For instance, the Borodaevsk bridgehead, mentioned by Marshal ] in his memoires, was under a heavy ] and ] ]. Bombers were everywhere, bombing both the bridgehead and the reinforcements crossing the river. Konev complained at once about a lack of organization of the air support, set up air ]s to prevent bombers from approaching the bridgeheads and ordered to bring more artillery to counter tank attacks from the opposite shore. When Soviet aviation became more organized and hundreds of guns and ]s started firing, the situation started to improve and the bridgehead was eventually preserved.

Such fights were commonplace on every bridgehead. Even if all bridgeheads were preserved, losses were terrific &ndash; at the beginning of October, most divisions were at only 25 to 50% of their nominal strength.

== Right shore campaign == ]


=== Lower Dnieper offensive === === Lower Dnieper offensive ===
By mid-October, the forces accumulated on the lower Dnieper bridgeheads were strong enough to stage a first massive attack to definitely secure the river's western shore in the southern part of the front. Therefore, a vigorous attack was staged on the Kremenchuk-Dnipropetrovsk line. Simultaneously, a major diversion was conducted in the south to draw German forces away both from the Lower Dnieper and from Kiev.


At the end of the offensive, Soviet forces controlled a bridgehead 300 kilometers wide and up to 80 kilometers deep in some places. In the south, the Crimea was now cut off from the rest of the German forces. Any hope of stopping the Red Army on the Dnieper's east bank was lost.
By mid-october, the forces accumulated on the lower Dnieper bridgeheads were important enough to stage a first massive attack to definitely secure Dnieper's right shore in the southern part of the front. Therefore, a massive attack was staged on Kremenchug-] line. Simultaneously, a massive attack was staged in the south to divert as much attention as possible both from Lower Dnieper and from Kiev.


== Outcomes ==
At the end of the offensive, Soviet forces controlled a massive bridgehead 300 kilometers wide and up to 80 kilometers deep in some places. In the south, the Crimea was now cut from the rest of the German forces. Any hope of stopping the Red Army on Dnieper's left shore was lost.
The Battle of the Dnieper was another defeat for the ''Wehrmacht'' that required it to restabilize the front further west. The Red Army, which Hitler hoped to contain at the Dnieper, forced the ''Wehrmacht''{{'}}s defences. Kiev was recaptured and German troops lacked the forces to annihilate Soviet troops on the Lower Dnieper bridgeheads. The west bank was still in German hands for the most part, but both sides knew that it would not last for long.


Additionally, the Battle of the Dnieper demonstrated the strength of the Soviet partisan movement. The ] operation staged during September and October 1943 struck German logistics very hard, creating heavy supply issues.
=== Taking of Kiev ===


Incidentally, between 28 November and 1 December 1943 the ] was held between ], ], and Stalin. The Battle of the Dnieper, along with other major offensives staged in 1943, certainly gave Stalin a dominant position for negotiating with his Allies.
''Main article: ]''


The Soviet success during this battle created the conditions for the follow-up ] on the ], which was launched on 24 December 1943 from a bridgehead west of ] that was secured during this battle.<ref>Грылев А.Н. Днепр-Карпаты-Крым. Освобождение Правобережной Украины и Крыма в 1944 году. Москва: Наука, 1970, p. 19.</ref> The offensive brought the Red Army from the Dnieper all the way to ] (]), ] and ], with ] being split into two parts- north and south of Carpathians.
=== Criticisms ===


==Soviet operational phases==
Stalin's will to retake Kiev before ] have raised quite a few criticisms among historians. It is commonly accepted now that bridgeheads on the Lower Dnieper were deliberately "left alone" in order to draw German forces from Kiev, resulting in heavy losses. While this hypothesis could be true to some extent, one must not forget that the action of establishing a bridgehead alone is dangerous enough and can (and usually does) lead to heavy losses.


From a Soviet operational point of view, the battle was broken down into a number of different phases and offensives.
== Aftermath ==


The first phase of the battle :
The Battle of Dnieper was another stinging defeat for the Wehrmacht. The Red Army, which Hitler hoped to contain at the Dnieper, forced the Wehrmacht's defenses. Kiev was taken and German troops lacked forces to annihilate Soviet troops on Lower Dnieper bridgeheads. The right shore was still in German possession for most part, but both sides knew that it would not last for long.
* ] 26 August 1943 – 30 September 1943 (Central, Voronezh and Steppe fronts)
:] 26 August – 30 September 1943
:] 26 August – 30 September 1943
:] 26 August – 30 September 1943
* ] 13 August – 22 September 1943 (Southwestern and Southern fronts)
* ] 24 September – 24 November 1943


The second phase of the operation includes :
Additionally, the Battle of Dnieper demonstrated the strength of Soviet partisan movement. The "]" operation staged during September and October 1943 struck German logistics very hard, creating heavy supplies issues.
* ] 26 September – 20 December 1943
:] 26 September – 5 November 1943
:] 10–14 October 1943
:] 15 October – 3 November 1943
:] 23 October – 23 December 1943
:] 14–21 November 1943
:] 14 November – 23 December 1943
:] 14 November – 31 December 1943
:] 22 November – 9 December 1943
:] 10–19 December 1943
* Kiev Strategic Offensive Operation (October) (1–24 October 1943)
:Chernobyl-Radomysl Offensive Operation (1–4 October 1943)
:Chernobyl-Gornostaipol Defensive Operation (3–8 October 1943)
:Lyutezh Offensive Operation (11–24 October 1943)
:Bukrin Offensive Operation (12–15 October 1943)
:Bukrin Offensive Operation (21–24 October 1943)
* ] 3–13 November 1943
:Rauss' November 1943 counterattack
* ] 13 November – 22 December 1943


==References==
Incidentally, between ] and ], ] the ] was held between ], ], and Stalin. The battle of Dnieper, along with other major offensives staged in 1943, certainly allowed Stalin to be in a dominant position to negotiate with his Allies.
===Citations===
{{reflist}}


===Bibliography===
== Casualties debate ==
{{More footnotes needed|date=February 2008}}

* {{cite book
Casualties during the Battle of Dnieper are still a subject of a heavy debate. Some sources put very low figures (200,000 to 300,000 total casualties) which is much lower than the ] for instance. However, given the duration of the campaign and the huge area involved, more than one historian argues that the losses involved were huge, easily reaching or even surpassing those at the Battle of Stalingrad, but going "unnoticed" because of the big operation area (and of the aura of fame enveloping the latter). The death toll also depends on the time frame considered. It also depends whether the toll of the 1943 Smolensk battle, which was used as a kind of "]" for the Dnieper battle, is included in the Battle of Dnieper's statistics.
| last1 = Frieser

| first1 = Karl-Heinz
On the subject of Soviet casualties, Nikolaï Shefov in his ''Russian fights'' puts the figure of 373,000 ] and more than 1,500,000 total Soviet casualties.
| author-link1 = Karl-Heinz Frieser
] (a Western historian) in his ''Barbarossa: The Axis and the Allies'', puts a figure of 173,201 USSR KIA, during a time frame from ] to ] 1943, therefore not taking into account the period going from ] to ]. Given the heavy German resistance even before Dnieper force-crossing, this figure seems a low estimate (Soviet sources estimate casualties from the post-Kursk offensive alone at 250,000 killed, wounded and captured), the figure of 300,000+ KIA seems quite correct and acceptable, with the ] number following the 3:1 empiric ratio.
| first2 =Klaus

| last2 = Schmider
German losses, however, are more difficult to evaluate. The simple rule of 3:1 losses during an offensive operation against a heavily defended enemy would lead to a 500,000 casualties toll, reaching the one of Kursk. Shefov and other Soviet/Russian historians quote casualties as high as 1,500,000. Indeed, if one considers the casualties per day ratio of Kursk battle, an operation twice as long under similar conditions would lead to a 1,000,000 toll.
| first3 =Klaus

| last3 = Schönherr
== References ==
| first4 = Gerhard
| last4 = Schreiber
| first5 = Kristián
| last5 = Ungváry
| author-link5 = Krisztián Ungváry
| first6 =Bernd
| last6=Wegner
| series = ] (Germany and the Second World War)
| volume = VIII
| title = Die Ostfront 1943/44 – Der Krieg im Osten und an den Nebenfronten
| trans-title = The Eastern Front 1943–1944: The War in the East and on the Neighbouring Fronts
| publisher = Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt
| location = München
| year = 2007
| isbn = 978-3-421-06235-2
| language = German
}}
* David M. Glantz, ], ''When Titans Clashed: How the Red Army stopped Hitler'', University Press of Kansas, 1995
* Nikolai Shefov, ''Russian fights'', Lib. Military History, Moscow, 2002 * Nikolai Shefov, ''Russian fights'', Lib. Military History, Moscow, 2002
* ''History of Great Patriotic War'', 1941 — 1945. Мoscow, 1963 * ''History of Great Patriotic War'', 1941–1945. Moscow, 1963
* ], ''Barbarossa: The Axis and the Allies'', Edinburgh University Press, 1994 * ], ''Barbarossa: The Axis and the Allies'', Edinburgh University Press, 1994
* Harrison, Richard. (2018) ''The Battle of the Dnepr: The Red Army's Forcing of the East Wall, September–December 1943''. Helion and Company. {{ISBN|978-1912174171}}
* Marshal ], ''Notes of a front commander', Science, Moscow, 1972.
* ], ''Lost Victories'', Мoscow, 1957. * Marshal ], ''Notes of a front commander'', Science, Moscow, 1972.
* ], ''Lost Victories'', Moscow, 1957.

{{coord missing|Ukraine}}
{{World War II}}


] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 12:35, 17 December 2024

WWII battle For other uses, see Dnieper campaign (disambiguation).
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Battle of the Dnieper" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Battle of the Dnieper
Part of the Eastern Front of World War II

Map of the battle of the Dnieper and linked operations
Date26 August 1943 – 23 December 1943
(3 months, 3 weeks and 6 days)
LocationDnieper River, Soviet Union
Result Soviet victory
Territorial
changes
Soviets reclaim left-bank Ukraine, including the city of Kiev and Donets basin
Belligerents
 Soviet Union  Germany
 Romania
Commanders and leaders
Soviet Union Georgy Zhukov
Soviet Union Aleksandr Vasilevsky
Soviet Union Nikolai Vatutin
Soviet Union Ivan Konev
Soviet Union Rodion Malinovsky
Soviet Union Fyodor Tolbukhin
Soviet Union Konstantin Rokossovsky
Nazi Germany Erich von Manstein
Nazi Germany Ewald von Kleist
Nazi Germany Günther von Kluge
Units involved
Soviet Union 1st Ukrainian Front
Soviet Union 2nd Ukrainian Front
Soviet Union 3rd Ukrainian Front
Soviet Union 4th Ukrainian Front
Soviet Union 1st Belorussian Front

Nazi Germany Army Group South

Nazi Germany Army Group A

  • 6th Army
    (re-subordinated from 17 September 1943)

Nazi Germany Army Group Center

Strength
26 August:
2,633,000 men (1,450,000 reinforcements)
51,200 guns and mortars
2,400 tanks and assault guns
2,850 combat aircraft

Nazi Germany On 1 November 1943:
Army Group South:
- 722,376 personnel;
6th Army of Army Group A:
- 182,236 personnel;
2nd Army of Army Group Center:
- 200,111 personnel;
Total- 1,104,723 personnel.
Nazi Germany Army Group South armoured strength as of 10 November 1943:
- 713 operational tanks;
- 271 operational assault guns;
- 984 operational AFV's in total.
In repairs:
- 894 tanks;
- 302 assault guns.
Nazi Germany Luftflotte 4 strength on 10 October 1943:
- 793 operational aircraft (all types)
- 1,149 aircraft in total (incl. in repairs)

Kingdom of Romania On 1 November 1943:
- 85,564 personnel.
Casualties and losses

Krivosheev: 1,285,977 men

348,815 killed or missing
937,162 wounded or sick

Frieser: 1,687,164 men

417,323 killed or missing
1,269,841 wounded or sick
Forczyk:
- 290,000 killed or missing
- 1,000,000+ in total
Nazi Germany Germany
Forczyk:
- 102,000 killed or missing
- 372,000+ in total
Kingdom of Romania Romania
Unknown
Eastern Front
Naval warfare
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
Romanian military actions in World War II
As part of the Axis (1941–1944)
As part of the Allies (1944–1945)

The Battle of the Dnieper was a military campaign that took place in 1943 on the Eastern Front of World War II. Being one of the largest operations of the war, it involved almost four million troops at one point and stretched over a 1,400 kilometres (870 mi) front. Over four months, the eastern bank of the Dnieper was recovered from German forces by five of the Red Army's fronts, which conducted several assault river crossings to establish several lodgements on the western bank. Kiev was later liberated in the Second Battle of Kiev. 2,438 Red Army soldiers were awarded the title Hero of the Soviet Union for their involvement.

Strategic situation

Following the Battle of Kursk, the Wehrmacht's Heer and supporting Luftwaffe forces in the southern Soviet Union were on the defensive in southern Ukraine. By mid-August, Adolf Hitler understood that the forthcoming Soviet offensive could not be contained on the open steppe and ordered construction of a series of fortifications along the line of the Dnieper river.

On the Soviet side, Joseph Stalin was determined to launch a major offensive in Ukraine. The main thrust of the offensive was in a southwesterly direction; the northern flank being largely stabilized, the southern flank rested on the Sea of Azov.

Planning

Soviet planning

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (April 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Central Front Konstantin RokossovskySteppe Front Ivan KonevSouthwestern Front Rodion Malinovsky

The operation began on 26 August 1943. Divisions started to move on a 1,400-kilometer front that stretched between Smolensk and the Sea of Azov. Overall, the operation would be executed by 36 Combined Arms, four Tank and five Air Armies. 2,650,000 personnel were brought into the ranks for this massive operation. The operation would use 51,000 guns and mortars, 2,400 tanks and 2,850 planes.

The Dnieper is the third largest river in Europe, behind only the Volga and the Danube. In its lower part, its width can easily reach three kilometres, and being dammed in several places made it even larger. Moreover, its western shore—the one still to be retaken—was much higher and steeper than the eastern, complicating the offensive even further. In addition, the opposite shore was transformed into a vast complex of defenses and fortifications held by the Wehrmacht.

Faced with such a situation, the Soviet commanders had two options. The first would be to give themselves time to regroup their forces, find a weak point or two to exploit (not necessarily in the lower part of the Dnieper), stage a breakthrough and encircle the German defenders far in the rear, rendering the defence line unsupplied and next to useless (very much like the German Panzers bypassed the Maginot line in 1940). This option was supported by Marshal Georgy Zhukov and Deputy Chief of Staff Aleksei Antonov, who considered the substantial losses after the Battle of Kursk. The second option would be to stage a massive assault without waiting, and force the Dnieper on a broad front. This option left no additional time for the German defenders, but would lead to much larger casualties than would a successful deep operation breakthrough. This second option was backed by Stalin due to the concern that the German "scorched earth" policy might devastate this region if the Red Army did not advance fast enough.

Stavka (the Soviet high command) chose the second option. Instead of deep penetration and encirclement, the Soviet intended to make full use of partisan activities to intervene and disrupt Germany's supply route so that the Germans could not effectively send reinforcements or take away Soviet industrial facilities in the region. Stavka also paid high attention to the possible scorched earth activities of German forces with a view to preventing them by a rapid advance.

The assault was staged on a 300-kilometer front almost simultaneously. All available means of transport were to be used to transport the attackers to the opposite shore, including small fishing boats and improvised rafts of barrels and trees (like the one in the photograph). The preparation of the crossing equipment was further complicated by the German scorched earth strategy with the total destruction of all boats and raft building material in the area. The crucial issue would obviously be heavy equipment. Without it, the bridgeheads would not stand for long.

Soviet organisation

German planning

Main article: Panther-Wotan line Army Group South Erich von Manstein

The order to construct the Dnieper defence complex, known as "Ostwall" or "Eastern Wall", was issued on 11 August 1943 and immediately began to be executed.

Fortifications were erected along the length of the Dnieper. However, there was no hope of completing such an extensive defensive line in the short time available. Therefore, the completion of the "Eastern Wall" was not uniform in its density and depth of fortifications. Instead, they were concentrated in areas where a Soviet assault-crossing were most likely to be attempted, such as near Kremenchuk, Zaporizhia and Nikopol.

Additionally, on 7 September 1943, the SS forces and the Wehrmacht received orders to implement a scorched earth policy, by stripping the areas they had to abandon of anything that could be used by the Soviet war effort.

German organisation

Description of the strategic operation

Initial attack

Battle of the Dnieper
German soldiers manning defensive positions on the Dnieper

Despite a great superiority in numbers, the offensive was by no means easy. German opposition was ferocious and the fighting raged for every town and city. The Wehrmacht made extensive use of rear guards, leaving some troops in each city and on each hill, slowing the Soviet offensive.

Progress of the offensive

Soviet soldiers crossing the Dnieper on improvised rafts

Three weeks after the start of the offensive, and despite heavy losses on the Soviet side, it became clear that the Germans could not hope to contain the Soviet offensive in the flat, open terrain of the steppes, where the Red Army's numerical strength would prevail. Manstein asked for as many as 12 new divisions in the hope of containing the Soviet offensive – but German reserves were perilously thin.

On 15 September 1943, Hitler ordered Army Group South to retreat to the Dnieper defence line. The battle for Poltava was especially bitter. The city was heavily fortified and its garrison well prepared. After a few inconclusive days that greatly slowed down the Soviet offensive, Marshal Konev decided to bypass the city and rush towards the Dnieper. After two days of violent urban warfare, the Poltava garrison was overcome. Towards the end of September 1943, Soviet forces reached the lower part of the Dnieper.

Dnieper airborne operation

This section includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help improve this section by introducing more precise citations. (September 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Ivan Chernyakhovsky and other members of his military council on the eve of the Battle of the Dnieper, 1943

(The following is, largely, a synopsis of an account by Glantz with support from an account by Staskov.)

Stavka detached the Central Front's 3rd Tank Army to the Voronezh Front to race the weakening Germans to the Dnieper, to save the wheat crop from the German scorched earth policy, and to achieve strategic or operational river bridgeheads before a German defence could stabilize there. The 3rd Tank Army, plunging headlong, reached the river on the night of 21–22 September and, on 23 September, Soviet infantry forces crossed by swimming and by using makeshift rafts to secure small, fragile bridgeheads, opposed only by 120 German Cherkassy flak academy NCO candidates and the hard-pressed 19th Panzer Division Reconnaissance Battalion. Those forces were the only Germans within 60 km of the Dnieper loop. Only a heavy German air attack and a lack of bridging equipment kept Soviet heavy weaponry from crossing and expanding the bridgehead.

The Soviets, sensing a critical juncture, ordered a hasty airborne corps assault to increase the size of the bridgehead before the Germans could counterattack. On 21 September, the Voronezh Front's 1st, 3rd and 5th Guards Airborne Brigades got the urgent call to secure, on 23 September, a bridgehead perimeter 15 to 20 km wide and 30 km deep on the Dnieper loop between Kaniv and Rzhishchev, while Front elements forced the river.

The arrival of personnel at the airfields was slow, necessitating, on 23 September, a one-day delay and omission of 1st Brigade from the plan; consequent mission changes caused near chaos in command channels. Mission change orders finally got down to company commanders, on the 24 September, just 15 minutes before their units, not yet provisioned with spades, anti-tank mines, or ponchos for the autumn night frosts, assembled on airfields. Owing to the weather, not all assigned aircraft had arrived at airfields on time (if at all). Further, most flight safety officers disallowed maximum loading of their aircraft. Given fewer aircraft (and lower than expected capacities), the master loading plan, ruined, was abandoned. Many radios and supplies got left behind. In the best case, it would take three lifts to deliver the two brigades. Units (still arriving by the overtaxed rail system), were loaded piecemeal onto returned aircraft, which were slow to refuel owing to the less-than-expected capacities of fuel trucks. Meanwhile, already-arrived troops changed planes, seeking earlier flights. Urgency and the fuel shortage prevented aerial assembly aloft. Most aircraft, as soon as they were loaded and fueled, flew in single file, instead of line abreast, to the dropping points. Assault waves became as intermingled as the units they carried.

As corps elements made their flights, troops (half of whom had never jumped, except from training towers) were briefed on drop zones, assembly areas and objectives only poorly understood by platoon commanders still studying new orders. Meanwhile, Soviet aerial photography, suspended for several days by bad weather, had missed the strong reinforcement of the area, early that afternoon. Non-combat cargo pilots ferrying 3rd Brigade through drizzle expected no resistance beyond river pickets but, instead, were met by anti-aircraft fire and flares from the 19th Panzer Division (only coincidentally transiting the drop zone, and just one of six divisions and other formations ordered, on the 21st, to fill the gap in front of the 3rd Tank Army). Lead aircraft, disgorging paratroopers over Dubari at 1930h, came under fire from elements of the 73rd Panzer Grenadier Regiment and division staff of 19th Panzer Division. Some paratroopers began returning fire and throwing grenades even before landing; trailing aircraft accelerated, climbed and evaded, dropping wide. Through the night, some pilots avoided flare-lit drop points entirely, and 13 aircraft returned to airfields without having dropped at all. Intending a 10 by 14 km drop over largely undefended terrain, the Soviets instead achieved a 30 by 90 km drop over the fastest mobile elements of two German corps.

On the ground, the Germans used white parachutes as beacons to hunt down and kill disorganized groups and to gather and destroy airdropped supplies. Supply bonfires, glowing embers, and multi-color starshells illuminated the battlefield. Captured documents gave the Germans enough knowledge of Soviet objectives to arrive at most of them before the disorganized paratroopers.

Back at the Soviet airfields, the fuel shortage allowed only 298 of 500 planned sorties, leaving corps anti-tank guns and 2,017 paratroops undelivered. Of 4,575 men dropped (seventy percent of the planned number, and just 1,525 from 5th Brigade), some 2,300 eventually assembled into 43 ad hoc groups, with missions abandoned as hopeless, and spent most of their time seeking supplies not yet destroyed by the Germans. Others joined with the nine partisan groups operating in the area. About 230 made it over (or out of) the Dnieper to Front units (or were originally dropped there). Most of the rest were captured that first night or killed the next day (although, on that first night, the 3rd Co, 73rd Panzer Grenadier Regiment, suffered heavy losses while annihilating about 150 paratroopers near Grushevo, some 3 km west of Dubari).

The Germans underestimated that 1,500 to 2,000 had dropped; they recorded 901 paratroops captured and killed in the first 24 hours. Thereafter, they largely ignored the Soviet paratroopers, to counterattack and truncate the Dnieper bridgeheads. The Germans deemed their anti-paratrooper operations completed by the 26th, although a modicum of opportunistic actions against garrisons, rail lines, and columns were conducted by remnants up to early November. For a lack of manpower to clear all areas, fighters in the area's forests would remain a minor threat.

The Germans called the operation a fundamentally sound idea ruined by the dilettantism of planners lacking expert knowledge (but praised individual paratroopers for their tenacity, bayonet skills, and deft use of broken ground in the sparsely wooded northern region). Stavka deemed this second (and, ultimately, last) corps drop a complete failure; lessons they knew they had already learned from their winter offensive corps drop at Viazma had not stuck. They would never trust themselves to try it again.

Soviet 5th Guards Airborne Brigade commander Sidorchuk, withdrawing to the forests south, eventually amassed a brigade-size command, half paratroops, half partisans; he obtained air supply, and assisted the 2nd Ukrainian Front over the Dnieper near Cherkassy to finally link up with Front forces on 15 November. After 13 more days of combat, the airborne element was evacuated, ending a harrowing two months. More than sixty percent never returned.

Assaulting the Dnieper

Soviet soldiers preparing rafts to cross the Dnieper (the sign reads "Onwards to Kiev!")
Soviet trucks crossing the Dnieper on rafts

The first bridgehead on the Dnieper's western shore was established on 22 September 1943 at the confluence of the Dnieper and Pripyat rivers, in the northern part of the front. On 24 September, another bridgehead was created near Dniprodzerzhynsk, another on 25 September near Dnipropetrovsk and yet another on 28 September near Kremenchuk. By the end of the month, 23 bridgeheads were created on the western side, some of them 10 kilometers wide and 1–2 kilometres deep.

The crossing of the Dnieper was extremely difficult. Soldiers used every available floating device to cross the river, under heavy German fire and taking heavy losses. Once across, Soviet troops had to dig themselves into the clay ravines composing the Dnieper's western bank.

Securing the lodgements

Soviet soldiers attacking on a lodgement in October 1943

German troops soon launched heavy counterattacks on almost every bridgehead, hoping to annihilate them before heavy equipment could be transported across the river.

For instance, the Borodaevsk lodgement, mentioned by Marshal Konev in his memoirs, came under heavy armored attack and air assault. Bombers attacked both the lodgement and the reinforcements crossing the river. Konev complained at once about a lack of organization of Soviet air support, set up air patrols to prevent bombers from approaching the lodgements and ordered forward more artillery to counter tank attacks from the opposite shore. When Soviet aviation became more organized and hundreds of guns and Katyusha rocket launchers began firing, the situation started to improve and the bridgehead was eventually preserved.

Such battles were commonplace on every lodgement. Although all the lodgements were held, losses were terrible – at the beginning of October, most divisions were at only 25 to 50% of their nominal strength.

Lower Dnieper offensive

By mid-October, the forces accumulated on the lower Dnieper bridgeheads were strong enough to stage a first massive attack to definitely secure the river's western shore in the southern part of the front. Therefore, a vigorous attack was staged on the Kremenchuk-Dnipropetrovsk line. Simultaneously, a major diversion was conducted in the south to draw German forces away both from the Lower Dnieper and from Kiev.

At the end of the offensive, Soviet forces controlled a bridgehead 300 kilometers wide and up to 80 kilometers deep in some places. In the south, the Crimea was now cut off from the rest of the German forces. Any hope of stopping the Red Army on the Dnieper's east bank was lost.

Outcomes

The Battle of the Dnieper was another defeat for the Wehrmacht that required it to restabilize the front further west. The Red Army, which Hitler hoped to contain at the Dnieper, forced the Wehrmacht's defences. Kiev was recaptured and German troops lacked the forces to annihilate Soviet troops on the Lower Dnieper bridgeheads. The west bank was still in German hands for the most part, but both sides knew that it would not last for long.

Additionally, the Battle of the Dnieper demonstrated the strength of the Soviet partisan movement. The Rail War operation staged during September and October 1943 struck German logistics very hard, creating heavy supply issues.

Incidentally, between 28 November and 1 December 1943 the Tehran conference was held between Winston Churchill, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Stalin. The Battle of the Dnieper, along with other major offensives staged in 1943, certainly gave Stalin a dominant position for negotiating with his Allies.

The Soviet success during this battle created the conditions for the follow-up Dnieper-Carpathian Offensive on the right-bank Ukraine, which was launched on 24 December 1943 from a bridgehead west of Kiev that was secured during this battle. The offensive brought the Red Army from the Dnieper all the way to Galicia (Poland), Carpathian Mountains and Romania, with Army Group South being split into two parts- north and south of Carpathians.

Soviet operational phases

From a Soviet operational point of view, the battle was broken down into a number of different phases and offensives.

The first phase of the battle :

Chernigov-Pripyat Offensive 26 August – 30 September 1943
Sumy–Priluky Offensive 26 August – 30 September 1943
Poltava-Kremenchug Offensive 26 August – 30 September 1943

The second phase of the operation includes :

Melitopol Offensive 26 September – 5 November 1943
Zaporizhia Offensive 10–14 October 1943
Kremenchug-Pyatikhatki Offensive 15 October – 3 November 1943
Dnepropetrovsk Offensive 23 October – 23 December 1943
Krivoi Rog Offensive 14–21 November 1943
Apostolovo Offensive 14 November – 23 December 1943
Nikopol Offensive 14 November – 31 December 1943
Aleksandriia-Znamenka Offensive 22 November – 9 December 1943
Krivoi Rog Offensive 10–19 December 1943
  • Kiev Strategic Offensive Operation (October) (1–24 October 1943)
Chernobyl-Radomysl Offensive Operation (1–4 October 1943)
Chernobyl-Gornostaipol Defensive Operation (3–8 October 1943)
Lyutezh Offensive Operation (11–24 October 1943)
Bukrin Offensive Operation (12–15 October 1943)
Bukrin Offensive Operation (21–24 October 1943)
Rauss' November 1943 counterattack

References

Citations

  1. Edwards, Robert (15 August 2018). The Eastern Front: The Germans and Soviets at War in World War II. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-8117-6784-2.
  2. Frieser, Karl-Heinz. The Eastern Front 1943-1944: The War in the East and on the Neighbouring Fronts. Oxford University Press, 2017, p. 356.
  3. ^ Frieser et al. 2007, p. 343.
  4. OKH Org.Abt. I Nr. I/5645/43 g.Kdos. Iststärke des Feldheeres Stand 1.11.43. NARA T78, R528, F768.
  5. Oberkommando des Heeres. Geheime Kommandosache. Panzerlage der Heeresgruppe Süd. Stand am 10 November 1943. Bundesarchiv-Militärarchiv (BA-MA) RH 10/52, fol. 80.
  6. Frieser, Karl-Heinz. Germany and the Second World War: Volume VIII: The Eastern Front 1943-1944: The War in the East and on the Neighbouring Fronts. Oxford University Press, 2017, p. 364.
  7. OKH Org.Abt. I Nr. I/5645/43 g.Kdos. Iststärke des Feldheeres Stand 1.11.43. NARA T78, R528, F770.
  8. Кривошеев, Г.Ф. (2001). "Россия и СССР в войнах XX века: Потери вооруженных сил". ОЛМА-ПРЕСС.
  9. Frieser et al. 2007, p. 379.
  10. Forczyk, Robert. The Dnepr 1943: Hitler's Eastern Rampart Crumbles. Osprey Publishing 2016, p. 91.
  11. Forczyk, Robert. The Dnepr 1943: Hitler's Eastern Rampart Crumbles. Osprey Publishing 2016, p. 91.
  12. Military Review. Command and General Staff School. 1993. p. 2-PA75.
  13. The History of Soviet Airborne Forces, Chapter 8, Across The Dnieper (September 1943), by David M. Glantz, Cass, 1994. (portions online)
  14. 1943 Dnepr airborne operation: lessons and conclusions Military Thought, July 2003, by Nikolai Viktorovich Staskov. (online) See ref at Army (Soviet Army) under 40th Army entry.
  15. Грылев А.Н. Днепр-Карпаты-Крым. Освобождение Правобережной Украины и Крыма в 1944 году. Москва: Наука, 1970, p. 19.

Bibliography

This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (February 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
  • Frieser, Karl-Heinz; Schmider, Klaus; Schönherr, Klaus; Schreiber, Gerhard; Ungváry, Kristián; Wegner, Bernd (2007). Die Ostfront 1943/44 – Der Krieg im Osten und an den Nebenfronten [The Eastern Front 1943–1944: The War in the East and on the Neighbouring Fronts]. Das Deutsche Reich und der Zweite Weltkrieg (Germany and the Second World War) (in German). Vol. VIII. München: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt. ISBN 978-3-421-06235-2.
  • David M. Glantz, Jonathan M. House, When Titans Clashed: How the Red Army stopped Hitler, University Press of Kansas, 1995
  • Nikolai Shefov, Russian fights, Lib. Military History, Moscow, 2002
  • History of Great Patriotic War, 1941–1945. Moscow, 1963
  • John Erickson, Barbarossa: The Axis and the Allies, Edinburgh University Press, 1994
  • Harrison, Richard. (2018) The Battle of the Dnepr: The Red Army's Forcing of the East Wall, September–December 1943. Helion and Company. ISBN 978-1912174171
  • Marshal Konev, Notes of a front commander, Science, Moscow, 1972.
  • Erich von Manstein, Lost Victories, Moscow, 1957.

World War II
General
Topics
Theaters
Aftermath
War crimes
Participants
Allies
Axis
Neutral
Resistance
POWs
Timeline
Prelude
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
Categories: