Misplaced Pages

User talk:Graham Beards: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:51, 8 August 2012 editCassianto (talk | contribs)37,404 edits →Disruption at FAC: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 08:48, 21 December 2024 edit undoGraham Beards (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators35,514 edits →Merry Christmas!: ReplyTag: Reply 
Line 1: Line 1:
⚫ __NOINDEX__
]
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|algo = old(7d)
|archive = User talk:GrahamColm/Archives/2012
⚫ }}


{{Ds/aware|gg|covid}}
⚫ __NOINDEX__
⚫ {{Archive box|]
⚫ ]
⚫ ]
⚫ ]
⚫ ]
⚫ ]
⚫ ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]}}


⚫ {{Archive box|
<small>
<center>'''2007'''<br /></center>
]
<center>'''2008'''<br /></center>
⚫ ]
⚫ ]
<center>'''2009'''<br /></center>
⚫ ]
<center>'''2010'''<br /></center>
⚫ ]
<center>'''2011'''<br /></center>
⚫ ]
<center>'''2012'''<br /></center>
⚫ ]
</small>
}}


== Kappa Kappa Psi FAC ==


== Bladder cancer ==
The ] has been open for a month now and has two supports and no opposes; the source review and image review are done and all issues fixed. I solicited reviewers on the ] and ] WikiProjects and on the talk pages of a few active WP:FRAT members, but it doesn't seem like there's much interest from any other potential reviewers. Is there anything else that needs to happen before it is promoted or archived? If it's slated to be archived again, I'd like to be notified first so I can try to drum up some interest, but my ''entirely unbiased opinion'' is that it's ready for promotion. ] (]) 05:41, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
:Hi, it's not ready yet. Spotchecks of the sources still need to be done by an independent reviewer. And, two declarations of support aren't quite enough to secure promotion, although this is not a hard-and-fast rule. ] (]) 18:41, 26 July 2012 (UTC)


Hi Graham Beards. I've just finished a first pass at overhauling ], and am hoping to bring it to FAC soon. Any chance you could spare some time to look it over? Any feedback is appreciated. ] (]) 22:05, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
== What happens now? ==


:Yes of course. ] (]) 07:51, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi, thank you very much for promoting ]. As this is my first FA, what happens now? A bot will update the talk page, will it give me a notification on my talk page, like when a DYK appears on the main page? Also, what can I do know a article is FA class, do I have to nominate the article to appear on the main page, or will it appear on it automatically? Thank you very much! — <font color="#0072BB" face="Trebuchet MS">]</font> <small>(]/]) </small> 16:04, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
:{{tps}} You have to nominate it for the main page. No, it will not appear automatically. <font face="Impact">]]]</font> 16:48, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
::You can nominate it ]. A bot run by an extremely helpful editor will update the article's talk page and add the little bronze star. Please do not delete the FAC template on the talk page, as the bot needs to "see" this. ] (]) 17:06, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
::: I think I have nominated it correctly. — <font color="#0072BB" face="Trebuchet MS">]</font> <small>(]/]) </small> 17:26, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
::::It looks OK, but I rarely visit that page :-) Best of luck! ] (]) 17:33, 29 July 2012 (UTC)


== FAC permission == == Thanks for your help ==


Hello,
Hi Graham, I was wondering if I could get permission to have two FACs open at the same time? ] has three supports at the moment and I'd like to get my ] nominated soon if that's alright. Thanks, ] (]) 00:46, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
:Good morning Mark and congratulations on your very successful RfA. Yes, go ahead. I'll look at Clarence this evening when I get home – can you save me a little time and remind when you last had a spotcheck? I've just woken up and my memory hasn't yet :-) Best wishes, Graham. ] (]) 05:24, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
::Alright, thanks, sounds good. My last spotcheck was on June 4, at ] by Ian Rose. Thanks for the support at Rfa, I was quite surprised with how well that went--I kept thinking about some of the horror stories I've heard. ] (]) 05:50, 1 August 2012 (UTC)


I wanted to thank you again for your help on the ], which has finally been promoted to FA. Your interventions really helped making this a reality! So, thank you, and I wish you happy holidays. Let me know if you are ever in need of a review. ] (]) 08:36, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
== The Concert ==


:Thank you and congratulations. ] (]) 09:16, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
hello,


==Merry Christmas!==
please withdraw my nomination as I would like to nominate ] for 9th September. Regards.--] (]) 11:19, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
{| style="border:1px solid 3px; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}}; padding: 5px;"
|rowspan="2" valign="center" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: center; height: 1.1em;" | '''A very happy Christmas and New Year to you!'''
|rowspan="2" valign="centre" padding: 5px;" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|-
|style="vertical-align:top; border-top:1px solid gray"|
<br />
<big>Have a great Christmas, and may 2025 bring you joy, happiness – and no trolls or vandals!</big>
<br />
<br />
<big>Cheers</big>
<br />
<br />
<big>] (]) 08:30, 21 December 2024 (UTC)</big>
⚫ |}


:Thanks x ] (]) 08:48, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
== Multi-Use IP ==

Don't block a multi-use account in educational use. ] (]) 12:06, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

== Disruption at FAC ==

Graham, I am a nominator for ] which is currently at FAC and it has been listed for about a week now. We have six supports and IMO, the article is doing very, very well. Can I bring to your attention ]. {{u|Br'er Rabbit}}, {{u|Wikiwatcher1}} and a host of other pirates are instigating a discussion about an info box which was subject to an RfC and numerous consensus finding discussions on the Sellers talk page. The agreement was that the info box stay but as it '''was''' and to have nothing added or removed. This morning an editor has added some information to it which, quite rightly, was reverted by my co-nominator. The infobox Gestapo have now waded in and are rebuking my co-nom, clearly ignoring discussions which have previously took place.

I have omitted to get involved at this point as, IMO, FAC is far more important. I am going to advice my co-nom to swallow the bitter pill so as not to let these idiots ruin '''another''' FAC (such as they did with ]) My question is, would such discussions on the talk page scupper the FAC chances? -- <span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px Black;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 08:51, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:48, 21 December 2024

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
  • gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them
  • COVID-19, broadly construed
He should not be given alerts for those areas.

Archives

2008 2009 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024



Bladder cancer

Hi Graham Beards. I've just finished a first pass at overhauling bladder cancer, and am hoping to bring it to FAC soon. Any chance you could spare some time to look it over? Any feedback is appreciated. Ajpolino (talk) 22:05, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Yes of course. Graham Beards (talk) 07:51, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your help

Hello,

I wanted to thank you again for your help on the Virgo interferometer, which has finally been promoted to FA. Your interventions really helped making this a reality! So, thank you, and I wish you happy holidays. Let me know if you are ever in need of a review. Thuiop (talk) 08:36, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you and congratulations. Graham Beards (talk) 09:16, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

A very happy Christmas and New Year to you!


Have a great Christmas, and may 2025 bring you joy, happiness – and no trolls or vandals!

Cheers

SchroCat (talk) 08:30, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks x Graham Beards (talk) 08:48, 21 December 2024 (UTC)