Misplaced Pages

User talk:NuclearWarfare: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:49, 9 August 2012 editBr'er Rabbit (talk | contribs)8,858 edits don't be a silly rule monger: fix← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:53, 16 December 2024 edit undoZinnober9 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers51,294 edits Edit request: new sectionTag: New topic 
Line 4: Line 4:
| collapsed = yes | collapsed = yes
| bot = MiszaBot III | bot = MiszaBot III
| age = 3 | age = 90
}} }}
{{search archives | small=yes}} {{archives|banner=yes|list=|small=yes|prefix=|root=}}
<!-- {| class="standard-talk messagebox" <!-- {| class="standard-talk messagebox"
| align="center" style="width:53px;"|] | align="center" style="width:53px;"|]
Line 14: Line 14:
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 125K |maxarchivesize = 125K
|counter = 37 |counter = 41
|minthreadsleft = 0 |minthreadsleft = 0
|algo = old(3d) |algo = old(90d)
|archive = User talk:NuclearWarfare/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:NuclearWarfare/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}
{{clear}} {{clear}}


== comments requested == == The ICC Barnstar ==


{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
] <small>]</small> 15:48, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The International Criminal Court Barnstar of National Merit'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | You deserve it.
|}


== Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder ==
== You have mail ==


]This is a reminder that established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.{{pb}}Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the ].{{pb}}Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;] 00:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
{{you've got mail}}] (]) 20:02, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


== Invitation to participate in a research ==
== Redactions requested ==


Hello,
Please see my comments . Thanks. ] (]) 15:01, 13 July 2012 (UTC)


The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''.
== You have mail ==


You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
{{you've got mail}} ] (]) 23:23, 14 July 2012 (UTC)


The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] .
== AE on Zachariel ==


Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Last year you formally warned ] of discretionary sanctions per ]. I have requested arbitration enforcement due to his persistent disruption. ] (]) 15:33, 16 July 2012 (UTC)


Kind Regards,
== Pointy section ==


]
] is simply pointy and should closed. <small>]</small> 18:30, 17 July 2012 (UTC)


<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
== Asking about use of ArbCom talk page ==
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 -->


== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research ==
Since I'm not a party to the case, what are the rules that I have to follow to provide input there? How can I improve my behavior there? ] (]) 16:44, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
:The rules are set out on the top of the page. Things are generally enforced a little more stringently for non-parties, but in general, I haven't noticed any problems with your behavior thus far. Do you have anything particular in mind? '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 05:12, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
::No, a couple of Arbs separately mentioned there might be a problem. I told one of them I'd check with the clerks to see if I'm mistakenly doing something without knowing. I was warned by SilkTork for the reverting matter separately also. I know why he had to do that and it seems justified to me. Thanks for giving me feedback. ] (]) 12:01, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


Hello,
== ] ==


I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ].
Regarding your close of ], regarding the sentence "I think that as per DRV norms, that means we let the original closure stand?" ] states: <blockquote>If the administrator finds that there is '''no consensus''' in the deletion review, then in most cases this has the same effect as endorsing the decision being appealed. However, in some cases, it may be more appropriate to treat a finding of "no consensus" as equivalent to a "relist"; admins may use their discretion to determine which outcome is more appropriate.</blockquote> Would you rule on whether the closure is endorsed by default (and explain why you chose not to relist) or whether the article is relisted (and explain why you chose not to endorse by default)? Thanks, ] (]) 00:45, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
:I would choose the first one. We have already had quite a wide range of comment on the deletion review. I think that it would be better off if people spent their time on the RFC rather than arguing further on a DRV that doesn't look like it will come to a consensus any time soon.<p>Thanks for the heads up. Do you think I should go back and update my closing rationale? '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 09:20, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
::Yes, would you update your closing rationale? This will provide a measure of finality that the current close does not. Thanks, ] (]) 05:44, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
:::Done. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 08:38, 21 July 2012 (UTC)


Take the survey ''''''.
== PPACA edit ==


Kind Regards,
I don't think symbolic is the right word. Your citation says the votes are about scoring political points. So perhaps the comment is that the votes are politically motivated, but that is obvious, as they are indeed politians. I'm pretty sure that Boehner's motivations include highlighting the continued Democrat resistance to the repeal of this law, which repeal is favored by much of the public. This in turn could help elect Romney and Republican senators. Hardly symbolic if it works. Perhaps you can find a cite that uses "symbolic", but there are probably others that show Boehner's motives to be substantial... Bottom line, TMI for the lead. Regards] (]) 19:55, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
:Symbolic still fits, I think &ndash; Ghandi's march to the sea didn't stop being symbolic just because it helped get the British out of India. But it's not something I care about all too much. Feel free to remove the parenthetical if you wish. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 19:59, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
::There is no realistic expectation by anyone that these votes will result in an actual change to public policy, and thus they're symbolic. That seems obvious, but also not worth arguing about, I suppose. ''']'''&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 20:13, 26 July 2012 (UTC)


]
== PPACA ==


<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
NW, that's now 2 re-reverts on the ] page in the same number of days with no attempt at consensus-building. Please stop ] before you are reported. --] (]) 20:15, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 -->
:Stopping to discuss every little thing makes editing quite cumbersome. One or two reverts isn't the end of the world&mdash;do you actually have any objections to the edits I have made? '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 01:58, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
::Yep. I understand you might find consensus-building cumbersome (don't we all) but it's how things work here. Please delete your additions and state your position on the talk page so that we can hash it out. --] (]) 05:12, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
== AE ==


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <span style="border:3px outset;border-radius:8pt 0;padding:1px 5px;background:linear-gradient(6rad,#86c,#2b9)">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 05:12, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the note about the AE and the advice. Regards. --] (]) 18:28, 2 August 2012 (UTC)


== Troubles AE == == Edit request ==


Hello, Would you be willing to correct a syntax error on your userpage? You have a missing span closing tag with your toolserver link and it's reporting as an HTML misnested tag error. If you'd change<br/>
Hi there. I was impressed (from my position as <s>March the guilty bastard in, Sergeant-Major</s> defendant) with your comments on the 1RR complaint brought against me by ]. He has now raised yet another Troubles-related 1RR, albeit on an article about islamist terrorism in London, and I think that with your existing knowledge of the situation you would be a valuable contributor to this case. Thanks. --FergusM1970<sup>Misplaced Pages policies and procedures should be interpreted with common sense to achieve the purpose of the policy, or help dispute resolution.</sup> 04:29, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
<code><nowiki><span class="plainlinks"></nowiki></code>
<br/>to<br/>
<code><nowiki><span class="plainlinks"></span></nowiki></code>


that will fix it. Thank you and happy holidays! ] (]) 18:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
==Notice of Dispute resolution discussion==
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, and your participation in this discussion may be critical to finding a resolution. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:22, 8 August 2012‎ (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

== don't be a silly rule monger ==

and please leave my post alone. ] (Jack) (]) 03:47, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:53, 16 December 2024

This is NuclearWarfare's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12
Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15
Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18
Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21
Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24
Archive 25Archive 26Archive 27
Archive 28Archive 29Archive 30
Archive 31Archive 32Archive 33
Archive 34Archive 35Archive 36
Archive 37Archive 38Archive 39
Archive 40Archive 41


This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41

The ICC Barnstar

The International Criminal Court Barnstar of National Merit
You deserve it.

Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder

Information iconThis is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of National Association of Colleges and Employers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Association of Colleges and Employers is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/National Association of Colleges and Employers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sdkb05:12, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Edit request

Hello, Would you be willing to correct a syntax error on your userpage? You have a missing span closing tag with your toolserver link and it's reporting as an HTML misnested tag error. If you'd change
<span class="plainlinks">
to
<span class="plainlinks"></span>

that will fix it. Thank you and happy holidays! Zinnober9 (talk) 18:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC)