| Revision as of 20:20, 23 August 2012 editOne Night In Hackney (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,879 edits →Forgetting something?: r← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:27, 21 December 2024 edit undoSchroCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers113,036 edits →Merry Christmas!: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{nobots}} | |||
| ⚫ | ]]]] ]] | ||
| {{busy|image=Information icon4.svg|descriptor=sitting on the dock of the bay}} | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ] | |||
| <center> | |||
| <br> | |||
| <br> | <br> | ||
| ⚫ | ]{{search box}}]]]{{search box}} ]] | ||
| ⚫ | {{divbox| |
||
| ⚫ | ]{{clear}} | ||
| ⚫ | {{quote|I will listen to you, especially when we disagree. |
||
| <br> | |||
| ⚫ | {{divbox|green||'''''Welcome!!! Pull up a chair, let's have a nice chat. I'm glad you called. I'll put the kettle on.'''''<br> ]}} | ||
| ⚫ | {{quote|I will listen to you, especially when we disagree. ]}} | ||
| {{quote|Our text should arise as a summary of the reliable sources, rather than editors first deciding what they want to say and then looking for sources. ] }} | |||
| I am open to recall, using ]'s wording from their ]:<br> "if editors I trust and respect are telling me I should not be an admin, then I would voluntarily resign as an administrator." ] | |||
| </center> | </center> | ||
| {{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 14#Ryl}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 17:08, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == |
==Merry Christmas!== | ||
| {| style="border:1px solid 3px; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}}; padding: 5px;" | |||
| {{cot|Reminders}} | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="center" | ] | |||
| === ] === | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: center; height: 1.1em;" | '''A very happy Christmas and New Year to you!''' | |||
| No one has actually {{em|objected}} to the idea that it's really pointless for ] to contain any style information at all, other than in summary form and citing ], which is where all of ]'s style advice should go, and SAL page should move back to ] with a content guideline tag. Everyone who's commented for 7 months or so has been in favor of it. I'd say we have consensus to start doing it. — <font face="Trebuchet MS">''']''' <span style="white-space:nowrap;">] ɖ∘¿<font color="red">¤</font>þ </span> <small>]</small></font> 13:13, 2 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="centre" padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| :I'll take a look at the page shortly. Thanks for the nudge. ''']''' ''']''' 23:18, 2 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| ::I guess the real question is whether to declare consensus and ] it, or do merge tags and open a merge discussion at ]. I'm all for going with the bold direction, since it seems unlikely to be controversial that the MOS page on lists should actually contain the MOS advice about lists. :-) — <font face="Trebuchet MS">''']''' <span style="white-space:nowrap;">] ɖ∘¿<font color="red">¤</font>þ </span> <small>]</small></font> 23:53, 2 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| :::There's been a deal of activity on the page recently. I've not had a chance to absorb that yet. I may just potter around this evening doing light stuff, then take a closer look over the weekend. ''']''' ''']''' 00:31, 3 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| |style="vertical-align:top; border-top:1px solid gray"| | |||
| ::::No hurry! I meant "bold" not "reckless". :-) — <font face="Trebuchet MS">''']''' <span style="white-space:nowrap;">] ɖ∘¿<font color="red">¤</font>þ </span> <small>]</small></font> 11:56, 3 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| <br /> | |||
| *I still have this in mind - on hold, but not forgotten. ''']''' ''']''' 13:40, 31 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| <big>Have a great Christmas, and may 2025 bring you joy, happiness – and no trolls or vandals!</big> | |||
| <br /> | |||
| {{cob}} | |||
| <br /> | |||
| <big>Cheers</big> | |||
| == Voice recording == | |||
| <br /> | |||
| <br /> | |||
| SilkTork, I'm back. And I've uploaded a file of Thomas reading "and death shall have no dominion" from the sample you found. Will you have a listen and tell me what you think. I've never uploaded a file recording before, and although he sounds like he's reading from a bath tub, it may be better than nothing. Cheers, ] (]) 16:12, 19 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| <big>] (]) 08:27, 21 December 2024 (UTC)</big> | |||
| :Hi. I'm reading through the books I've got from the library. I've glanced now and then at the article and it's developing well. I think that it should pass criteria without too much extra editing. I'm having a thought about the balance between comprehensive (which is a FA criteria) and broad coverage (a GA criteria). I should be ready soon to make a decision regarding referencing and coverage in a day or two. I may do a bit of tidying to bring it into line, but as I say I think not much - if anything - may be needed. ''']''' ''']''' 14:35, 22 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ::Thanks for the update. I think we have most of his life history covered, to one extent or another. Not sure if we should mention Skin Trade or not? ] (]) 20:04, 22 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Forgetting something?== | |||
| ] and that's before we even get to your prior involvement in Troubles disputes at ] (and the talk page) and in particular ]. By the latter alone you've been in a previous dispute with me, therefore your recusal is required. <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 19:27, 22 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't recall those incidents. But I'll pass them by the rest of the Committee to see what they think. ''']''' ''']''' 19:33, 22 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::I've looked at the AfD. You were one of several who disagreed with me. I withdrew the nomination. That is very minor. I sometimes disagree with myself! ''']''' ''']''' 19:38, 22 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I'm also not clear how I have been in dispute with you in regards to ? I was acting as mediator between you and GDD1000, and from reading through the talkpage I don't see any dispute, bad feeling, or major disagreements between us. ''']''' ''']''' 19:50, 22 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I can see from ] that you might feel I was upset by your comments. I don't recall that I was upset, though I wouldn't have been pleased to have someone say those things about me. I will certainly bring the matter to the attention of the Committee. ''']''' ''']''' 19:55, 22 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Consensus is that there is no reason to recuse. I have given it some additional thought, and I'm uncomfortable with the notion that a Committee member should recuse because someone expressed dissatisfaction with some action they made, particularly when it was over three years ago and didn't lead to any dispute. There is a thought that it wouldn't do any personal harm if I recused, and I can see that, but I don't want to set a precedent that a user can get a Committee member to recuse simply by disagreeing with them. ''']''' ''']''' 09:35, 23 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :My comments of to you of "I have zero faith in your competence as an editor. As such I consider you totally unfit to review this article, and I will ignore everything you say from now on" mean we have a clear and indisputable previous history, and therefore you are unfit to take part in any decision relating to me, due to the inherent bias you may have as a result of that. It's that straightforward. There are more than enough arbs to vote on a decision without you whose judgement and neutrality has been called into question, and I don't object to any of them for the record. There is no precedent that "a user can get a Committee member to recuse simply by disagreeing with them", there is the basic fact that we have been involved in major disagreements before therefore your ability to deal with the current matter in a neutral manner has to be called into question and I request that you recuse, since "it wouldn't do any personal harm". <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 20:20, 23 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:27, 21 December 2024
 | This user is sitting on the dock of the bay in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
SilkTork
I will listen to you, especially when we disagree. Barack Obama
Our text should arise as a summary of the reliable sources, rather than editors first deciding what they want to say and then looking for sources. Agricolae
I am open to recall, using Whpq's wording from their RfA:
"if editors I trust and respect are telling me I should not be an admin, then I would voluntarily resign as an administrator."
"Ryl" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Ryl has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 14 § Ryl until a consensus is reached. Thryduulf (talk) 17:08, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
|
A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! | 
|
|
|
|