Misplaced Pages

16:10 aspect ratio: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:05, 26 August 2012 editIndrek (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,958 edits →Industry moves away from 16:10 in 2008 to 16:9: adding back ref that was removed without explanation, formatting another ref← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:32, 19 December 2024 edit undoJohnuniq (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators86,638 editsm Reverted edit by 103.156.103.10 (talk) to last version by DchmelikTag: Rollback 
(392 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Aspect ratio for computer displays}}
⚫ ] with an aspect ratio of 16:10.]]
{{redirect|16/10|the date|October 16}}
⚫ ] with an aspect ratio of 16:10]]


'''16:10''', also known as ''']''', is an ] mostly used for ]s. The width of the display is 1.6 times its height. '''16:10''' (1.6:1), also known as the equivalent '''8:5''', is an ] commonly used for ]s and ]s. It is equal to 8/5, close to the ] (<math>\varphi</math>), which is approximately 1.618. Video editing applications are commonly designed to allow editing of 16:9 content with the editing interface occupying the lower tenth of the display, allowing editing using a single display with the video occupying the full width.

⚫ LCD computer displays using the 16:10 ratio started to appear in the mass market from 2003. By 2008 16:10 had become the most common aspect ratio for ]s and ] displays.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://lowendmac.com/musings/08mm/10-percent-notebook.html |title=With 10% of the US Notebook Market, Where Will Apple Go Next? |last=Knight |first=Dan |date=2008-09-19 }}</ref> Since 2010, however, ] has become the mainstream standard, driven by the 1080p standard for high definition television.<ref name="displaysearch">{{cite web |url=http://www.displaysearch.com/cps/rde/xchg/SID-0A424DE8-28DF6E59/displaysearch/hs.xsl/070108_16by9_PR.asp |title=Product Planners and Marketers Must Act Before 16:9 Panels Replace Mainstream 16:10 Notebook PC and Monitor LCD Panels, New DisplaySearch Topical Report Advises |publisher=DisplaySearch |date=2008-07-01 |accessdate=2011-09-08 }}</ref><ref name="engadget">{{cite web |url=http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/02/widescreen-lcds-going-widescreen-by-2010 |title=Widescreen LCDs going widescreen by 2010 |publisher=Engadget |last=Ricker |first=Thomas |date=2008-07-02 }}</ref>


== History == == History ==
]
=== Computer Displays ===
⚫ ] computer displays with a 16:10 ratio first rose to ] prominence in 2003. By 2008, the 16:10 aspect ratio had become the most common aspect ratio for ]s and ] displays.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://lowendmac.com/musings/08mm/10-percent-notebook.html |title=With 10% of the US Notebook Market, Where Will Apple Go Next? |last=Knight |first=Dan |date=2008-09-19 }}</ref> After 2010, however, ] became the mainstream standard. This shift was driven by lower manufacturing costs and the 16:9 aspect ratio being used as a standard in modern televisions.<ref name="displaysearch">{{cite web |url=http://www.displaysearch.com/cps/rde/xchg/SID-0A424DE8-28DF6E59/displaysearch/hs.xsl/070108_16by9_PR.asp |title=Product Planners and Marketers Must Act Before 16:9 Panels Replace Mainstream 16:10 Notebook PC and Monitor LCD Panels, New DisplaySearch Topical Report Advises |publisher=DisplaySearch |date=2008-07-01 |access-date=2011-09-08 }}</ref><ref name="engadget">{{cite web |url=https://www.engadget.com/2008/07/02/widescreen-lcds-going-widescreen-by-2010 |title=Widescreen LCDs going widescreen by 2010 |publisher=Engadget |last=Ricker |first=Thomas |date=2008-07-02 }}</ref>
==== Industry moves towards 16:10 from 2003 to 2008 ====
⚫ Until about 2003, most computer monitors had a ] ] and some had ]. Between 2003 and 2006, monitors with 16:10 (8:5) aspect ratios became commonly available, first in ]s and later also in standalone monitors. Reasons for this transition were productive uses for such monitors, i.e. besides widescreen movie viewing and computer game play, are the word processor display of two standard letter pages side by side, as well as CAD displays of large-size drawings and CAD application menus at the same time.<ref>NEMATech Computer Display Standards http://www.millertech.com/Technical_Specs.htm</ref><ref>{{cite web |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20070315085244/http://www.necdisplay.com/support/css/monitortechguide/index05.htm |archivedate=2007-03-15 |url=http://www.necdisplay.com/support/css/monitortechguide/index05.htm |title=Introduction--Monitor Technology Guide |publisher=necdisplay.com }} (currently offline)</ref>


=== Rise in popularity from 2003 ===
⚫ In 2005-2008, 16:10 took over the position from 4:3 as the most sold aspect ratio for LCD monitors. At the time, 16:10 also had 90 percent of the notebook market and was the most common used aspect ratio for laptops.<ref name="displaysearch"/> However, 16:10 had a short reign as the most common aspect ratio.
⚫ Until about 2003, most computer monitors had a ] aspect ratio, with some using a ] ratio. Between 2003 and 2006, monitors with 16:10 aspect ratios became commonly available, first in laptops, and later in display monitors. Such displays were considered better suited for word processing and ].<ref>NEMATech Computer Display Standards {{cite web |url=http://www.millertech.com/Technical_Specs.htm |title=NEMA Specifications |access-date=2011-04-29 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120302030131/http://www.millertech.com/Technical_Specs.htm |archive-date=2012-03-02 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070315085244/http://www.necdisplay.com/support/css/monitortechguide/index05.htm |archive-date=2007-03-15 |url=http://www.necdisplay.com/support/css/monitortechguide/index05.htm |title=Introduction--Monitor Technology Guide |publisher=necdisplay.com }} (currently offline)</ref>


⚫ From 2005 to 2008, 16:10 overtook 4:3 as the highest-selling aspect ratio for LCD monitors. At the time, 16:10 made up 90% of the notebook market, and was the most commonly used aspect ratio for laptops.<ref name="displaysearch"/> However, 16:10 had a short reign as the most common aspect ratio.
==== Industry moves away from 16:10 in 2008 to 16:9====
Around 2008-2010, there was a rapid shift by computer display manufacturers to the 16:9 aspect ratio, and by 2011, 16:10 had almost disappeared from new mass market products.


=== Decline from 2008 ===
The primary reason for this move is considered to be production efficiency<ref name="engadget"/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://forwardthinking.pcmag.com/displays/283041-where-displays-are-heading |title=Where Displays Are Heading |publisher=PC Magazine |last=Miller |first=Michael J. |date=2008-03-21 |accessdate=2012-07-09 }}</ref> - since display panels for TVs use the ] aspect ratio, it's more efficient for display manufacturers to produce computer display panels in the same aspect ratio as
Around 2008–2010, computer display manufacturers began a rapid shift to the 16:9 aspect ratio. By 2011, 16:10 had almost disappeared from new mass-market products. By October 2012, the market share of 16:10 displays had dropped to less than 23%, according to ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=17&qpsp=165&qpnp=1&qptimeframe=M |title=Screen Resolutions |publisher=Net Applications |date=October 2012 |access-date=2013-04-20 }}</ref>
⚫ well.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://techreport.com/discussions.x/15046 |title=DisplaySearch: Transition to 16:9 displays is 'unstoppable' |publisher=The Tech Report |last=Kowaliski |first=Cyril |date=2008-07-02 |accessdate=2012-07-09 }}</ref> A 2008 report by DisplaySearch also cited a number of other reasons, including the ability for PC and monitor manufacturers to expand their product ranges by offering products with wider screens and higher resolutions, helping consumers to more easily adopt such products and "stimulating the growth of the notebook PC and LCD monitor market".<ref name="displaysearch"/>


⚫ The primary reason for this move was considered to be production efficiency:<ref name="engadget"/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://forwardthinking.pcmag.com/displays/283041-where-displays-are-heading |title=Where Displays Are Heading |publisher=PC Magazine |last=Miller |first=Michael J. |date=2008-03-21 |access-date=2012-07-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120808005522/http://forwardthinking.pcmag.com/displays/283041-where-displays-are-heading |archive-date=2012-08-08 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Since display panels for TVs use the 16:9 aspect ratio, it became more efficient for display manufacturers to produce computer display panels in the same aspect ratio.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://techreport.com/discussions.x/15046 |title=DisplaySearch: Transition to 16:9 displays is 'unstoppable' |publisher=The Tech Report |last=Kowaliski |first=Cyril |date=2008-07-02 |access-date=2012-07-09 }}</ref> A 2008 report by DisplaySearch also cited several other reasons, including the ability for PC and monitor manufacturers to expand their product ranges by offering products with wider screens and higher ]. This helped consumers adopt such products more easily, "stimulating the growth of the notebook PC and LCD monitor market".<ref name="displaysearch"/>
The shift from 16:10 to 16:9 has been met with a mixed response. The lower cost of 16:9 computer displays, along with their suitability for gaming and movies and the convenience of having the same aspect ratio in different devices, has been seen as a positive.<ref name="engadget"/><ref name="PC Mag">{{cite web |url=http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2328932,00.asp |title=Stop Shrinking My Laptop Screen |publisher=PC Magazine |last=Ulanoff |first=Lance |date=2008-08-27 |accessdate=2012-07-09 }}</ref> On the other hand there has been criticism towards the lack of height primary in 16:9 screens for laptops and standard 16:9 computer displays with the resolution 1920x1080 which according to critics are less suitable for productivity-oriented tasks, such as editing documents or spreadsheets and using design or engineering applications, which are usually designed for taller, rather than wider screens.<ref name="PC Mag"/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1723060/gateways-displays-common-sense |title=Gateway's 16:10 displays show common sense |publisher=The Inquirer |date=2010-07-16 |accessdate=2012-07-09 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/opinion/1652880/time-ditch-awful-hd-1080p-widescreens |title=Time to ditch awful HD 1080p widescreens |publisher=The Inquirer |last=Orion |first=Egan |date=2010-06-11 |accessdate=2012-07-09 }}</ref>


The shift from 16:10 to 16:9 was met with a mixed response. The lower cost of 16:9 computer displays was seen as a positive, along with their suitability for gaming and movies, as well as the convenience of having the same aspect ratio in different devices.<ref name="engadget"/><ref name="PC Mag">{{cite web |url=https://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2328932,00.asp |title=Stop Shrinking My Laptop Screen |publisher=PC Magazine |last=Ulanoff |first=Lance |date=2008-08-27 |access-date=2012-07-09 |archive-date=2017-12-17 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171217033507/https://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2328932,00.asp |url-status=dead }}</ref> On the other hand, there was criticism towards the lack of vertical screen real estate when compared to 16:10 displays of the same screen diagonal.<ref name="PC Mag"/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1723060/gateways-displays-common-sense |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100719192940/http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1723060/gateways-displays-common-sense |url-status=unfit |archive-date=July 19, 2010 |title=Gateway's 16:10 displays show common sense |publisher=The Inquirer |date=2010-07-16 |access-date=2012-07-09 }}</ref> For this reason, some consider 16:9 displays less suitable for productivity-oriented tasks, such as editing documents or spreadsheets and using design or engineering applications, which are mostly designed for taller, rather than wider screens.<ref name="PC Mag"/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/opinion/1652880/time-ditch-awful-hd-1080p-widescreens |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100612120425/http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/opinion/1652880/time-ditch-awful-hd-1080p-widescreens |url-status=unfit |archive-date=June 12, 2010 |title=Time to ditch awful HD 1080p widescreens |publisher=The Inquirer |last=Orion |first=Egan |date=2010-06-11 |access-date=2012-07-09 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://vr-zone.com/articles/monitor-aspect-ratios--beyond-16-9-ipad-to-the-rescue-/13399.html |title=Monitor Aspect Ratios&nbsp;— Beyond 16:9, iPad to the rescue? |publisher=VR-Zone |last=Novakovic |first=Nebojsa |date=2011-08-26 |access-date=2012-07-09 |archive-date=2012-03-07 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120307120758/http://vr-zone.com/articles/monitor-aspect-ratios--beyond-16-9-ipad-to-the-rescue-/13399.html |url-status=dead }}</ref>
=== Tablets ===
] started to enjoy mainstream popularity during the late 2000s. These modern releases were initially offered in a 4:3 format, but later releases saw increasing numbers offered in 16:10.


=== Mobile Phones === === Resurgence from 2020 ===
Throughout the 2010s, virtually all consumer monitors and notebook computers were not using the 16:10 ratio, exceptions for major laptop OEMs being ] (who continued use of 16:10 on their ] lineup) and ] (who adopted the even taller 3:2 ratio for their ] products). In late 2019, ] released an updated convertible model of their popular ] productivity laptop that moved away from the 16:9 aspect ratio to 16:10,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Seifert |first=Dan |date=2019-11-11 |title=Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 review: the XPS 13 to get |url=https://www.theverge.com/2019/11/11/20958296/dell-xps-13-2-in-1-laptop-convertible-intel-ice-lake-review-test-price-specs-features |access-date=2024-11-06 |website=The Verge |language=en}}</ref> using a new display panel developed with ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Resurgence of 16:10 Aspect Ratio Laptop Computers to Occupy 2% Share of Non-Apple Market in 2020, Says TrendForce |url=https://www.witsview.com/2019/11/04/resurgence-of-1610-aspect-ratio-laptop-computers-to-occupy-2-share-of-non-apple-market-in-2020-says-trendforce |access-date=2024-11-06 |website=www.witsview.com}}</ref> Dell also made the change to their standard XPS 13 notebook offering in 2020.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Palladino |first=Valentina |date=2020-01-02 |title=Dell updates popular XPS 13 laptop with 16:10 screen, IR camera |url=https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/01/dell-updates-xps-13-laptop-with-1610-aspect-ratio-screen-ir-camera/ |access-date=2024-11-06 |website=Ars Technica |language=en-US}}</ref>
Towards the end of the 2000s, 16:10 became a feature in certain ]. Recently there has been a shift to 16:9, although some phone manufacturers still produce devices in 16:10.


The XPS 13 influenced a number of other OEMs starting to offer portable computers in 16:10 (or 3:2) ratio as opposed to 16:9 in 2020 and 2021,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Chin |first=Monica |date=2021-01-19 |title=Goodbye and good riddance to the 16:9 aspect ratio |url=https://www.theverge.com/2021/1/19/22238671/16-9-aspect-ratio-hp-elite-folio-dell-latitude-lenovo-thinkbook-plus-legion-7 |access-date=2024-11-06 |website=The Verge |language=en}}</ref> including ] 3, ], Asus ProArt Studiobook,<ref>{{Cite news |date=2020-06-10 |title=Best 16:10 and 3:2 Aspect Ratio Laptops - ThunderboltLaptop |url=https://thunderboltlaptop.com/1610-32-aspect-ratio-laptops/ |access-date=2020-06-23 |work=ThunderboltLaptop |language=en-US}}</ref> HP's 16-inch ],<ref>{{cite web |title=HP Spectre x360 16 finally gives us a webcam and display worthy of a premium 2-in-1 |url=https://www.cnet.com/tech/computing/hp-spectre-x360-16-finally-gives-us-a-webcam-and-display-worthy-of-a-premium-2-in-1/}}</ref> and even gaming computers.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Peters |first=Jay |date=2021-07-15 |title=Valve's gaming handheld is called the Steam Deck and it's shipping in December |url=https://www.theverge.com/2021/7/15/22578783/valve-steam-deck-gaming-handheld-pc |access-date=2021-08-06 |website=The Verge |language=en}}</ref> By 2024, much of the computer industry were once again making use of 16:10 ratio displays.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-10-23 |title=Notebook screen aspect ratio shifting toward 16:10 |url=https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20241023PD200/16_10-aspect-ratio-16_9-2024-demand.html |access-date=2024-11-06 |website=DIGITIMES |language=en}}</ref> In late 2021, Apple's MacBook changed to slightly taller 1.54:1 (16:10.4) and 1.55:1 (16:10.3) ratios for the 14-inch and 16-inch models respectively.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-10-18|title=MacBook Pro 16 vs. MacBook Pro 14: All the Differences|url=https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/macbook-pro-16-inch-vs-macbook-pro-14-inch/|access-date=2021-11-27|website=Digital Trends|language=en}}</ref>
⚫ == Common screen resolutions of 16:10 screens ==


== On tablets ==
⚫ {| class="wikitable"
] started to enjoy mainstream popularity beginning late 2010/early 2011 and remain popular to the present day. Aspect ratios for tablets typically include 16:10, 16:9, and 4:3. Tablets have caused a shift in production away from purely 16:9 aspect ratios and a resurgence of "productivity" aspect ratios (including 16:10 and 4:3) in place of "media" aspect ratios (16:9 and ultra-widescreen formats). The format remains widely popular in the TV and smartphone industries, where it is more suited.{{citation needed|date=May 2023}}

Many ] tablets have a 16:10 aspect ratio, because the 16:10 aspect ratio is suitable for reading books, and ] have an aspect ratio close to 16:10 (e.g., ] papers use the 1:1.414 aspect ratio).<ref>{{Cite web|last=Burnette|first=Ed|title=How to build the perfect Android tablet, part 4: Resolution and aspect ratio|url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/how-to-build-the-perfect-android-tablet-part-4-resolution-and-aspect-ratio/|access-date=2021-10-24|website=ZDNet|language=en}}</ref> Apple's iPad uses a 4:3 aspect ratio for similar reasons. Both formats come significantly closer to emulating the aspect ratio of A4 paper ({{cvt|210| x |297|mm|in|2|disp=or}}) than 16:9.

⚫ == Common resolutions ==
This is a list of common resolutions with the 16:10 aspect ratio:

⚫ {| class="wikitable sortable"
|- |-
! Standard !! Width !! Height
! Name
! Dimensions
! Diagonal screen size
|- |-
| ] || 1280×800 || {{convert|13|-|15|in|cm|abbr=on}} | ] || 1280 || 800
|- |-
| ] || 1440×900 || {{convert|13|-|19|in|cm|abbr=on}} | ] || 1440 || 900
|- |-
| ] || 1680×1050 || {{convert|15|-|22|in|cm|abbr=on}} | ] || 1680 || 1050
|- |-
| ] || 1920×1200 || {{convert|17|-|28|in|cm|abbr=on}} | ] || 1920 || 1200
|- |-
| ] || 2560×1600 || {{convert|30|in|cm|abbr=on}} | ] || 2560 || 1600
|-
| ] || 3840 || 2400
|} |}


==See also== == See also ==
* ] - Different aspect ratios for computer monitors. * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
Line 53: Line 59:
{{reflist}} {{reflist}}


] ]
]

]
]
]

Latest revision as of 02:32, 19 December 2024

Aspect ratio for computer displays "16/10" redirects here. For the date, see October 16.
An LG 19-inch LCD monitor with an aspect ratio of 16:10

16:10 (1.6:1), also known as the equivalent 8:5, is an aspect ratio commonly used for computer displays and tablet computers. It is equal to 8/5, close to the golden ratio ( φ {\displaystyle \varphi } ), which is approximately 1.618. Video editing applications are commonly designed to allow editing of 16:9 content with the editing interface occupying the lower tenth of the display, allowing editing using a single display with the video occupying the full width.

History

Aspect ratio comparison. 16:9 became the HD video standard.

LCD computer displays with a 16:10 ratio first rose to mass market prominence in 2003. By 2008, the 16:10 aspect ratio had become the most common aspect ratio for LCD monitors and laptop displays. After 2010, however, 16:9 became the mainstream standard. This shift was driven by lower manufacturing costs and the 16:9 aspect ratio being used as a standard in modern televisions.

Rise in popularity from 2003

Until about 2003, most computer monitors had a 4:3 aspect ratio, with some using a 5:4 ratio. Between 2003 and 2006, monitors with 16:10 aspect ratios became commonly available, first in laptops, and later in display monitors. Such displays were considered better suited for word processing and computer-aided design.

From 2005 to 2008, 16:10 overtook 4:3 as the highest-selling aspect ratio for LCD monitors. At the time, 16:10 made up 90% of the notebook market, and was the most commonly used aspect ratio for laptops. However, 16:10 had a short reign as the most common aspect ratio.

Decline from 2008

Around 2008–2010, computer display manufacturers began a rapid shift to the 16:9 aspect ratio. By 2011, 16:10 had almost disappeared from new mass-market products. By October 2012, the market share of 16:10 displays had dropped to less than 23%, according to Net Applications.

The primary reason for this move was considered to be production efficiency: Since display panels for TVs use the 16:9 aspect ratio, it became more efficient for display manufacturers to produce computer display panels in the same aspect ratio. A 2008 report by DisplaySearch also cited several other reasons, including the ability for PC and monitor manufacturers to expand their product ranges by offering products with wider screens and higher resolutions. This helped consumers adopt such products more easily, "stimulating the growth of the notebook PC and LCD monitor market".

The shift from 16:10 to 16:9 was met with a mixed response. The lower cost of 16:9 computer displays was seen as a positive, along with their suitability for gaming and movies, as well as the convenience of having the same aspect ratio in different devices. On the other hand, there was criticism towards the lack of vertical screen real estate when compared to 16:10 displays of the same screen diagonal. For this reason, some consider 16:9 displays less suitable for productivity-oriented tasks, such as editing documents or spreadsheets and using design or engineering applications, which are mostly designed for taller, rather than wider screens.

Resurgence from 2020

Throughout the 2010s, virtually all consumer monitors and notebook computers were not using the 16:10 ratio, exceptions for major laptop OEMs being Apple (who continued use of 16:10 on their MacBook lineup) and Microsoft (who adopted the even taller 3:2 ratio for their Surface products). In late 2019, Dell released an updated convertible model of their popular XPS 13 productivity laptop that moved away from the 16:9 aspect ratio to 16:10, using a new display panel developed with Sharp Corporation. Dell also made the change to their standard XPS 13 notebook offering in 2020.

The XPS 13 influenced a number of other OEMs starting to offer portable computers in 16:10 (or 3:2) ratio as opposed to 16:9 in 2020 and 2021, including Acer Swift 3, LG Gram, Asus ProArt Studiobook, HP's 16-inch Spectre x360, and even gaming computers. By 2024, much of the computer industry were once again making use of 16:10 ratio displays. In late 2021, Apple's MacBook changed to slightly taller 1.54:1 (16:10.4) and 1.55:1 (16:10.3) ratios for the 14-inch and 16-inch models respectively.

On tablets

Tablets started to enjoy mainstream popularity beginning late 2010/early 2011 and remain popular to the present day. Aspect ratios for tablets typically include 16:10, 16:9, and 4:3. Tablets have caused a shift in production away from purely 16:9 aspect ratios and a resurgence of "productivity" aspect ratios (including 16:10 and 4:3) in place of "media" aspect ratios (16:9 and ultra-widescreen formats). The format remains widely popular in the TV and smartphone industries, where it is more suited.

Many Android tablets have a 16:10 aspect ratio, because the 16:10 aspect ratio is suitable for reading books, and many papers have an aspect ratio close to 16:10 (e.g., ISO 216 papers use the 1:1.414 aspect ratio). Apple's iPad uses a 4:3 aspect ratio for similar reasons. Both formats come significantly closer to emulating the aspect ratio of A4 paper (210 mm × 297 mm or 8.27 in × 11.69 in) than 16:9.

Common resolutions

This is a list of common resolutions with the 16:10 aspect ratio:

Standard Width Height
WXGA 1280 800
WXGA+ 1440 900
WSXGA+ 1680 1050
WUXGA 1920 1200
WQXGA 2560 1600
WQUXGA 3840 2400

See also

References

  1. Knight, Dan (2008-09-19). "With 10% of the US Notebook Market, Where Will Apple Go Next?".
  2. ^ "Product Planners and Marketers Must Act Before 16:9 Panels Replace Mainstream 16:10 Notebook PC and Monitor LCD Panels, New DisplaySearch Topical Report Advises". DisplaySearch. 2008-07-01. Retrieved 2011-09-08.
  3. ^ Ricker, Thomas (2008-07-02). "Widescreen LCDs going widescreen by 2010". Engadget.
  4. NEMATech Computer Display Standards "NEMA Specifications". Archived from the original on 2012-03-02. Retrieved 2011-04-29.
  5. "Introduction--Monitor Technology Guide". necdisplay.com. Archived from the original on 2007-03-15. (currently offline)
  6. "Screen Resolutions". Net Applications. October 2012. Retrieved 2013-04-20.
  7. Miller, Michael J. (2008-03-21). "Where Displays Are Heading". PC Magazine. Archived from the original on 2012-08-08. Retrieved 2012-07-09.
  8. Kowaliski, Cyril (2008-07-02). "DisplaySearch: Transition to 16:9 displays is 'unstoppable'". The Tech Report. Retrieved 2012-07-09.
  9. ^ Ulanoff, Lance (2008-08-27). "Stop Shrinking My Laptop Screen". PC Magazine. Archived from the original on 2017-12-17. Retrieved 2012-07-09.
  10. "Gateway's 16:10 displays show common sense". The Inquirer. 2010-07-16. Archived from the original on July 19, 2010. Retrieved 2012-07-09.
  11. Orion, Egan (2010-06-11). "Time to ditch awful HD 1080p widescreens". The Inquirer. Archived from the original on June 12, 2010. Retrieved 2012-07-09.
  12. Novakovic, Nebojsa (2011-08-26). "Monitor Aspect Ratios — Beyond 16:9, iPad to the rescue?". VR-Zone. Archived from the original on 2012-03-07. Retrieved 2012-07-09.
  13. Seifert, Dan (2019-11-11). "Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 review: the XPS 13 to get". The Verge. Retrieved 2024-11-06.
  14. "Resurgence of 16:10 Aspect Ratio Laptop Computers to Occupy 2% Share of Non-Apple Market in 2020, Says TrendForce". www.witsview.com. Retrieved 2024-11-06.
  15. Palladino, Valentina (2020-01-02). "Dell updates popular XPS 13 laptop with 16:10 screen, IR camera". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2024-11-06.
  16. Chin, Monica (2021-01-19). "Goodbye and good riddance to the 16:9 aspect ratio". The Verge. Retrieved 2024-11-06.
  17. "Best 16:10 and 3:2 Aspect Ratio Laptops - ThunderboltLaptop". ThunderboltLaptop. 2020-06-10. Retrieved 2020-06-23.
  18. "HP Spectre x360 16 finally gives us a webcam and display worthy of a premium 2-in-1".
  19. Peters, Jay (2021-07-15). "Valve's gaming handheld is called the Steam Deck and it's shipping in December". The Verge. Retrieved 2021-08-06.
  20. "Notebook screen aspect ratio shifting toward 16:10". DIGITIMES. 2024-10-23. Retrieved 2024-11-06.
  21. "MacBook Pro 16 vs. MacBook Pro 14: All the Differences". Digital Trends. 2021-10-18. Retrieved 2021-11-27.
  22. Burnette, Ed. "How to build the perfect Android tablet, part 4: Resolution and aspect ratio". ZDNet. Retrieved 2021-10-24.
Category: