Revision as of 21:23, 27 August 2012 editWidescreen (talk | contribs)993 edits →Criticism: the table was rejected. see discussion ← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:56, 23 December 2024 edit undoL'durre vital (talk | contribs)7 edits Sense | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Set of therapeutic techniques established by Sigmund Freud}} | |||
{{Interventions infobox | |||
{{cs1 config|name-list-style=vanc|display-authors=6}} | |||
| Name = | |||
{{Infobox interventions | |||
| Image = | |||
| |
| Name = | ||
| Image = Words "Die Psychoanalyse" in Sigmund Freud's handwriting, 1938.jpg | |||
| ICD10 = | |||
| Caption = The words {{lang|de|Die Psychoanalyse}} in Sigmund Freud's handwriting, 1938 | |||
| ICD9 = {{ICD9proc|94.31}} | |||
| ICD10 = | |||
| MeshID = D011572 | |||
| ICD9 = {{ICD9proc|94.31}} | |||
| OtherCodes = | |||
| MeshID = D011572 | |||
| OtherCodes = | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Psychoanalysis |Concepts}} | |||
{{psychoanalysis}} | |||
'''Psychoanalysis'''<ref group="lower-roman">From ]: {{tlit|grc|psykhḗ}} 'soul' + {{tlit|grc|análysis}} 'investigate'</ref> is a theory and field of research developed by ]. It describes the human mind as an apparatus that emerged along the path of ] and consists mainly of three instances: a set of innate needs, a consciousness to satisfy them by ruling the muscular apparatus, and a memory for storing experiences that arises during this. Furthermore the theory includes insights into the effects of traumatic education and a technique for bringing ] content back into the consciousness, in particular the diagnostic ].<ref group="lower-roman">"What is psychoanalysis? Of course, one is supposed to answer that it is many things{{snd}}a theory, a research method, a therapy, a body of knowledge. In what might be considered an unfortunately abbreviated description, Freud said that anyone who recognizes transference and resistance is a psychoanalyst, even if he comes to conclusions other than his own... I prefer to think of the analytic situation more broadly, as one in which someone seeking help tries to speak as freely as he can to someone who listens as carefully as he can with the aim of articulating what is going on between them and why. ] (1967a) once defined the analytic situation as carrying the method of interpersonal relationship to its last consequences." Gill, Merton M. 1999. "." ''The Challenge for Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy: Solutions for the Future''. New York: ]. Archived 10 June 2009.</ref><ref group="lower-roman">"All psychoanalytic theories include the idea that unconscious thoughts and feelings are central in mental functioning." Milton, Jane, Caroline Polmear, and Julia Fabricius. 2011. ''A Short Introduction to Psychoanalysis''. SAGE. p. 27.</ref> Overall, psychoanalysis is a method for the examination and treatment of ]s. | |||
Founded in the early 1890s, initially in co-operation with ]'s and others' clinical research,<ref name="Mitchell, Juliet 2000">Mitchell, Juliet. 2000. ''Psychoanalysis and Feminism: A Radical Reassessment of Freudian Psychoanalysis''. London: ]. p. 341.</ref> Freud continued to revise and refine theory and practice of psychoanalysis until his death in 1939. An encyclopaedic article quotes him with following cornerstones of psychoanalysis: | |||
'''Psychoanalysis''' is a ] and ] theory conceived in the late 19th and early 20th centuries by ]n neurologist ]. Psychoanalysis has expanded, been criticized and developed in different directions, mostly by some of Freud's former students, such as ] and ], ] and later by neo-Freudians such as ], ], ] and ]. | |||
* the assumption that there are unconscious mental processes | |||
* recognition of the ] and ] | |||
* appreciation of the importance of sexuality and of | |||
* the ].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Mitchell |first1=Juliet |title=Psychoanalysis and Feminism |year=1975 |publisher=Pelican |page=343}}</ref> | |||
Using similar psychoanalytical terms, Freud's earlier colleagues ] and ] developed their own therapeutic methods: ] and ]. Freud wrote some criticisms of them and emphatically denied that they were forms of psychoanalysis.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Freud |first1=Sigmund |title=On the History of the Psycho-Analytic Movement |year=1966 |publisher=W. W. Norton |location=New York |page=5}}</ref> Later ] thinkers like ], ], and ] branched psychoanalysis in different directions.<ref name="Birnbach, Martin 1961">Birnbach, Martin. 1961. ''Neo-Freudian Social Philosophy''. Stanford: ]. p. 3.</ref> ]'s work essentially represents a return to Freud.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Julien |first1=Phillope |title=Jacques Lacan's Return to Freud |year=2021 |publisher=New York University Press |doi=10.18574/nyu/9780814743232.001.0001 |isbn=978-0-8147-4323-2 }}</ref> He described Freudian ] as a technical elaboration of the ] and examined primarily the ].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Lacan |first1=Jacques |title=Freud's Papers on Technique (Seminar of Jacques Lacan) |publisher=Jacques Alain}}</ref> | |||
The basic tenets of psychoanalysis include the following: | |||
# Human behavior, experience, and cognition<!-- NOTE TO POTENTIAL FURTHER EDITOR: If you seek to remove 'and thinking', ie, if you seek to have it say that only behaviour, not thinking, is strongly influenced by unconscious drives, then also correct the rest of the article, e.g. text further below, under Theories, insists that thinking, not just behaviour, is strongly affected by unconscious elements: 'most continue to stress the strong influence of unconscious elements affecting people's MENTAL LIVES'; such quotation does not even mention behaviour (block capitals added). --> are largely determined by irrational drives; | |||
# Those drives are largely ]; | |||
# Attempts to bring those drives into awareness meet ] in the form of ]s; | |||
# Beside the inherited constitution of personality, one's development is determined by events in early childhood; | |||
# Conflicts between conscious view of reality and unconscious (repressed) material can result in mental disturbances such as neurosis, neurotic traits, anxiety, depression etc.; | |||
# The liberation from the effects of the unconscious material is achieved through bringing this material into the consciousness (via e.g. skilled guidance).<ref>Erich Fromm (1992:13–14) The Revision of Psychoanalysis</ref> | |||
== Overview == | |||
Under the broad umbrella of psychoanalysis there are at least 22 theoretical orientations regarding human mental development. The various approaches in treatment called "psychoanalysis" vary as much as the theories do. The term also refers to a method of studying ]. | |||
]. In general, this instance contains the socialisation that takes place during childhood. If it complement the needs, the organism remains mentally healthy – the 'rider' carries out the will of his 'animal' as if it were his own.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=Freud |first=Sigmund |title=The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Volume XIX (1923–26) ''The Ego and the Id and Other Works'' |publisher=Hogarth Press |others=Strachey, James., Freud, Anna, 1895–1982, Rothgeb, Carrie Lee, Richards, Angela., Scientific Literature Corporation. |year=1978 |isbn=0701200677 |location=London |pages=19 |oclc=965512}}</ref>]] | |||
Freud distinguished between the conscious and unconscious realms of the psyche and argued that the contents of unconscious largely determine ] and ]. He found that many of the drives – which his ] locates in the ‘id’ – are repressed into the unconscious as a result of traumatic experiences during childhood and that attempts to integrate them into the conscious perception of the ego triggers ]. These and other ] ‘want’ to maintain the ] – not least with the means of enigma, censorship, internalised fear of punishment or mother-love withdrawal – while the affected instincts resist. All in all, an inner war rages between the ] and the ] conscious values, which manifests itself in more or less conspicuous mental disorders, although Freud did not equate the statistical normality of our society with ‘healthy’. "Health can only be described in metapsychological terms."<ref name=":1">{{cite book |last1=Freud |first1=Sigmund |url=https://www.fischerverlage.de/buch/sigmund-freud-werke-aus-den-jahren-1932-1939-9783104001661 |title=Die endliche und die unendliche Analyse |date=1937 |publisher=S. Fischer |pages=Gesammelte Werke, Band XVI, 57–99}}</ref> | |||
Freudian psychoanalysis refers to a specific type of treatment in which the "analysand" (analytic patient) verbalizes thoughts, including ], ], and ], from which the analyst induces the ] conflicts causing the patient's symptoms and character problems, and interprets them for the patient to create insight for resolution of the problems. | |||
He discovered that the instinctive impulses are expressed most clearly – albeit still encoded – in the symbols of ] as well as in the ]atic detours of ] and ]s. Psychoanalysis was developed in order to clarify the ] of disorders and to restore mental health<ref name="Zoja_1983">{{cite journal |vauthors=Zoja L |date=1983 |title=Working against Dorian Gray: analysis and the old |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1465-5922.1983.00051.x?sid=nlm%3Apubmed |journal=J Anal Psychol |volume=28 |issue=1 |pages=51–64 |doi=10.1111/j.1465-5922.1983.00051.x |pmid=6826461}}</ref> by enabling the ego to become aware of the id's needs that have been repressed into the unconscious and to find realistic ways of satisfying and/or controlling them. Freud summarised this goal of his therapy in the demand "Where id was, ego shall became", equating the libido as driving energy of innate needs with the ] of Socratic-Platonic philosophy.<ref name="Neue Folge der Vorlesungen zur Einf">{{cite book |last1=Freud |first1=Sigmund |title=Neue Folge der Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse |date=1933 |page=31. Vorlesung: Die Zerlegung der psychischen Persönlichkeit}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{cite book |last1=Freud |first1=Sigmund |title=Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse |pages=99}}</ref> | |||
The specifics of the analyst's interventions typically include confronting and clarifying the patient's pathological ], wishes and ]. Through the analysis of conflicts, including those contributing to ] and those involving ] onto the analyst of distorted reactions, psychoanalytic treatment can hypothesize how patients unconsciously are their own worst enemies: how unconscious, symbolic reactions that have been stimulated by experience are causing symptoms. | |||
=== Oedipus rising === | |||
The assumptions of psychoanalysis have been criticised on numerous fronts including the view that they constitute ], but psychoanalysis still has many practitioners of various schools. | |||
Freud attached great importance to ] of his ]. The metapsychological specification of the functions and interlocking of the three instances was intended to ensure the full connectivity of this ‘psychic apparatus’ with biological sciences, in particular Darwin's theory of evolution of species, including ] with his behaviour, natural thinking ability and technological creativity. Such insight is indispensable for the ] prozess (''sickness'' can only be realised as a deviation from ''health'': the optimal cooperation of all mental-organic functions), but Freud had to be modest. He had to leave his model of human's soul in the unfinished state of a '']''<ref>{{cite book |last1=Freud |first1=Sigmund |title=Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 14. Selbstdarstellung |pages=85}}</ref> because – as he stated one last time in ] – there was no well-founded primate research in the first half of 20th century.<ref name="Sigmund Freud: Der Mann Moses und d">{{cite book |last1=Freud |first1=Sigmund |title=Sigmund Freud: Der Mann Moses und die monotheistische Religion |pages=180 (Kapitel 3, Abschnitt C)}}</ref> Without knowledge of the instinctive social structure of our genetically ] in animal kingdom (instead of Freud's single ‘super-strong primal father’, they show combative male groups, but despite their remarkable intelligence still no ability to form political organisations), his thesis of the Darwinian primordial horde as presented for discussion in ] cannot be tested and, where necessary, replaced by a realistic model. | |||
Horde life and its abolition through introduction of monogamy (as a political agreement between the sons who murdered the polygamous forefather of the horde) embodies the evolutionary and cultural-historical core of psychoanalysis. The latter aspect is decisive for Freud's '']''; his assumption of the outbreak of Oedipus complex in human history is based on it. It led to the formulation of rules of behaviour such as the prohibition of adultery and incest, and thus to the beginning of totemic cultures. All further historical stages of coexistence in societies are rooted in this, from feudalism to our modern nations with their monotheism centralising ], organisations of military, politics and trade (s. ]). | |||
] | |||
Freud's thesis of violent introduction of monogamous cohabitation stand in contrast to the religiously enigmatic reports about the origin of ] on earth as an expression of divine will, but closer to the ancient trap to pacify political conflicts among the groups of Neolithic mankind. Examples include ]' uprising against Zeus, who created ] as a fatal wedding gift for Epimetheus to divide and rule the titanic brothers; Plato's myth of spherical men cut into isolated individuals for the same reason;<ref>{{cite book |last1=Plato |title=Symposion |chapter=Aristophanes' speech}}</ref> and the similarly resolved revolt of inferior gods in the Flood epic ]. Nonetheless, without an examination in the light of modern primate research, as demanded by Freud, these ideas remain in the status of an unproven ] of ], merely a "''just so story'' as a not unpleasant English critic wittily called it. But I mean it honours a hypothesis if it shows capable of creating context and understanding in new areas."<ref name="Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse">{{cite book |last1=Freud |first1=Sigmund |title=Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse |publisher=textlog.de |pages=X - Die Masse und die Urhorde |url=https://www.textlog.de/freud/abhandlungen/massenpsychologie/x-die-masse-und-die-urhorde#fnref-1}}</ref> | |||
According to Freud, this hypothesis explains the present-day son's conflict with his father over his mother, naming this view after ]' tragedy '']'', and supplementing it with case studies such as the ''Phobia of a five-year-old boy''.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Freud |first1=Sigmund |title=Analyse der Phobie eines fünfjährigen Knaben |date=1909}}</ref> However, the author not only discovered this complex and the 'oral fixatet' Syndrom of Narzissos' ] back into amniotic fluid (as far as possible given the state of science at the time), but also devised a hypothesis of healthy emotional development, which by nature completes in three successive stages: the ]. Whereby the sexual drive of latter takes a ‘latency’ break – the ''Sleeping Beauty'' – between the ages of about 7 and 12 for the benefit of social-intellectual growth. | |||
===Traditional setting=== | |||
Psychoanalysts place large emphasis on experiences of ], try to overcome ]. In traditional Freudian setting, the patient lies on a couch, and the analyst sits just behind or somehow out of sight. The patient should express all his thoughts, all secrets and dreams, including ] and ]. In addition to its task of strengthening the ego with its ability to ] – Freud's ''primacy of intellect'' –, therapy also aims to induce ]. The patient thus ] his educated him mother and father as internalised in his superego since birth onto the analyst. As he once did as a baby and little child, he experiences again the feelings of helpless dependence, all the futile longing for love, anger, rage and urge for revenge on the failing parents, but now with the possibility of processing these contents that have chaped his persona.<ref>Chessick, Richard D. 2007. ''The Future of Psychoanalysis''. Albany: ]. p. 125.</ref><ref>]. 1992. ''The Revision of Psychoanalysis''. New York: Open Road. pp. 12–13. (points 1 to 6).</ref> All people who have been brought up in moralic culturs project irrational fears and hopes for happiness everywhere. The term ] means that the analyst himself projects such content onto his patient; then he has an own open problem and has to go to his own analyst if he is not yet able to help himself due to inexperience.<ref>]. 2017. ''History of Countertransference: From Freud to the British Object Relations School''. London: ]. {{ISBN|978-1138214613}}.</ref> | |||
From the sum of what is shown and communicated, the analyst deduces unconscious conflicts with imposed traumas that are causing the patient's symptoms, his persona and character problems, and works out a ]. This explanation of the origin of loss of mental health and the analytical processes as a whole confronts the patients ego with the pathological defence mechanisms, makes him aware of them as well as the instinctive contents of the id that have been repressed by them, and thus helps him to better understand himself and the world in which he lives, was born and educated. | |||
===Touching infinity=== | |||
], combinated with findings of modern neurology. The drawing refers to the basic theses of Freuds metapsychology. According to it, the ''soul'' with its innate needs, consciousness and memory resembles a ''"psychic apparatus"'' to which ''"spatial extension and composition of several parts can be attributed (...)"'' and whose ''"location ... is the brain (nervous system)"''.<ref>Sigmund Freud: ''Abriß der Psychoanalyse''. (1938), p. 6</ref> Decisive for this view of Freud was his ]. Written in 1895, he develops there the thesis that the brain is able to store experiences in its neuronal network through ''"a permanent change after an event"'': one of the superego's main functions.]] | |||
Not least this includes the fact that the ] of psychoanalysis recently provided evidence that the brain stores experiences in specialised neuronal networks (memory function of the superego) and the ego performances its highest focus of conscious thinking in ].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Centonze|first1=Diego|last2=Siracusano|first2=Alberto|last3=Calabresi|first3=Paolo|last4=Bernardi|first4=Giorgio|date=November 2004|title=The Project for a Scientific Psychology (1895): a Freudian anticipation of LTP-memory connection theory|journal=Brain Research Reviews|volume=46|issue=3|pages=310–314|doi=10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.07.006|pmid=15571772|s2cid=7871434|issn=0165-0173}}</ref><ref>{{Citation|last=Fotopoulou|first=Aikaterini|title=The history and progress of neuropsychoanalysis|date=May 2012|work=From the Couch to the Lab|pages=12–24|publisher=Oxford University Press|doi=10.1093/med/9780199600526.003.0002|isbn=978-0-19-960052-6}}</ref> In some respects, Freud himself embodies the founder of this field of modern research. Parallel to the consolidation of psychoanalysis, however, he turned away from it with the argument that ''consciousness'' is directly given - not to be explained by insights into physiological details. Essentially, two things were known about the living soul: The brain with its nervous system extending over the entire organism and the acts of consciousness. In Freud's view, therefore any number of phenomena can be integrated between "both endpoints of our knowledge" (findings of modern neurology just as well as the position of our planet in the universe, for example), but this only contribute to the spatial "localisation of the acts of consciousness", not to their understanding.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Freud |first1=Sigmund |title=Abriß der Psychoanalyse, Gesammelte Werke |date=1940 |pages=63−138, here S. 67}}</ref> | |||
With reference to Descartes, contemporary neuropsychoanalysts explain this situation as ], namely both as two total different kinds of 'stuff': an objekt and the subjekt that can'nt objectify itself. With regard to Freud's libido they call this dichotomy the "dual-aspect monism".<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Radner|first=Daisie|date=1971|title=Descartes' Notion of the Union of Mind and Body|journal=Journal of the History of Philosophy|volume=9|issue=2|pages=159–170|doi=10.1353/hph.2008.1109|s2cid=144808035|issn=1538-4586}}</ref> It touches on the point of psychoanalysis that is most difficult to grasp with the means of empirically based sciences – in fact, only under Kant's assumption that living systems always make judgements about the phenomena they perceive with regard to the satisfaction of their immanent needs. Therefore, Freud conceptualised libido as the ] element of his three-fold soul model, a desiring energy that links ''cause'' and ''purpose'', instead of mere ‘effect’. This universal force embodies the ''psychicaly'' source that drives all instinctual needs of living beings, as well as the ] of their ''physicaly'' evolution. On this path, sexual behaviour realises Darwin's Law of ] by favouring the ] and aesthetically well-proportioned body forms in reproduction.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Freud |first1=Sigmund |title=Drei Abhandlungen zur Sexualtheorie |pages=Kap. 2, Abschnitt Beschauen und Betasten Consideration of a teleological effect behind the evolutionary processes of ‘’mutation and natural selection‘’, which Freud generally bases on the excitability of libidinal energy.)}}</ref> Freud was no less well acquainted with the energetic-''economic'' aspect of evolution and psychic processes (s. def. of the three metapsychological vectors)<ref>{{Cite book |last=Freud |first=Sigmund |title=Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 14 |pages=85 |chapter=Selbstdarstellung}}</ref> than with the trinity of Greek philosophy, especially Plato's transcendent ]: that it expresses the good and the beauty in equal measure, anchored in the proportions of golden ratio. | |||
===''The Question of Lay Analysis''=== | |||
Freud's worldview, with dream interpretation as ''the royal way into unconscious'', wasn't conceived as an source of income (''money is not a child's desire''), but as a method whose appropriation is open to everyone. In the ''Wednesday round'' of young psychoanalysis, academics and ‘uneducated’ worked together on an equal footing to rediscover the happiness lost in the Dark Continent of the human soul – not easy to understand for some outsiders.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Freud |first1=Sigmund |title=Freud's letters to Fliess |date=16 January 1897 |pages=320 |quote=Happiness is the subsequent fulfilment of a prehistoric wish. That is why wealth makes us so unhappy; money was not a childhood wish.}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Gay |first1=Peter |title=Freud. Eine Biographie für unsere Zeit |date=1995 |publisher=Fischer |location=Frankfurt am Main |page=200}}</ref> In order to counteract misunderstandings, Freud clearly sets out the only condition for being able to pursue this interest seriously in his treatise on '']'': the methodical examination of one's own inner situation, wherever possible with assistance of an already experienced psychoanalyst. | |||
Psychoanalysis has been a controversial discipline from the outset and its effectiveness as a treatment remains contested, although its influence on psychology and ] is undisputed.<ref group="lower-roman">"Psychoanalysis has existed before the turn of the 20th century and, in that span of years, has established itself as one of the fundamental disciplines within psychiatry. The science of psychoanalysis is the bedrock of psychodynamic understanding and forms the fundamental theoretical frame of reference for a variety of forms of therapeutic intervention, embracing not only psychoanalysis itself but also various forms of psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy and related forms of therapy using psychodynamic concepts." Sadock, Benjamin J., and Virginia A. Sadock. 2007. ''Kaplan and Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry'' (10th ed.). ]. p. 190.</ref><ref group="lower-roman">"Psychoanalysis continues to be an important paradigm organizing the way many psychiatrists think about patients and treatment. However, its limitations are more widely recognized and it is assumed that many important advances in the future will come from other areas, particularly biologic psychiatry. As yet unresolved is the appropriate role of psychoanalytic thinking in organizing the treatment of patients and the training of psychiatrists after that biologic revolution has born fruit. Will treatments aimed at biologic defects or abnormalities become technical steps in a program organized in a psychoanalytic framework? Will psychoanalysis serve to explain and guide supportive intervention for individuals whose lives are deformed by biologic defect and therapeutic interventions, much as it now does for patients with chronic physical illness, with the psychoanalyst on the psychiatric dialysis program? Or will we look back on the role of psychoanalysis in the treatment of the seriously mentally ill as the last and most scientifically enlightened phase of the humanistic tradition in psychiatry, a tradition that became extinct when advances in biology allowed us to cure those we had so long only comforted?" ]. 1999. "." ''The Challenge for Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy: Solutions for the Future''. New York: ]. Archived 6 June 2009.</ref> Psychoanalytic perspectives are also widely used outside the therapeutic field, for example in film and ], interpretation of fairy tales or philosophical concepts (replacing Kant's ] with the conditions of mental apparatus),<ref>{{cite book |last1=Freud |first1=Sigmund |author1-link=Ergebnisse, Ideen, Probleme |editor1-link=Band 17 |title=Gesammelte Werke |date=1972 |location=Frankfurt am Main |pages=152 |edition=5}}</ref> ideologies such as ] and the phenomenon of technological as well as cultural creativity of mankind and its zoological closest relatives. | |||
==History== | ==History== | ||
=== |
===1885-1900=== | ||
The idea of psychoanalysis began to receive serious attention in the 1890s; Freud called it first ].<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Tarzian |first1=Martin |last2=Ndrio |first2=Mariana |last3=Fakoya |first3=Adegbenro O |title=An Introduction and Brief Overview of Psychoanalysis |journal=Cureus |date=2023 |volume=15 |issue=9 |pages=e45171 |doi=10.7759/cureus.45171 |doi-access=free |issn=2168-8184 |pmid=37842377|pmc=10575551 }}</ref> During this time, he worked as a ] in a children's hospital, where attempts were made to develop an effective treatment for the so-called neurotic symptoms, but detailed examinations didn't reveal any organic defects. In the ] written on this subject, Freud documents his suspicion that neurotic symptoms could have psychological causes.<ref>Stengel, E. 1953. ''Sigmund Freud on Aphasia'' ''(1891)''. New York: ].</ref> | |||
The idea of psychoanalysis came into full prominence under Sigmund Freud. Sigmund Freud formulated his own theory of psychoanalysis in Vienna in the 1890s. Freud was a ] interested in finding an effective treatment for patients with ] or ] symptoms. Freud had become aware of the existence of mental processes that were not conscious as a result of his neurological consulting job at the Children's Hospital, where he noticed that many ] children had no apparent organic cause for their symptoms. He then wrote a ] about this subject.<ref>{{citation|author=Stengel E|year=1953|title= Sigmund Freud on Aphasia (1891)|location= New York|publisher= International Universities Press}}</ref> In the late 1880s, Freud obtained a grant to study with ], the famed neurologist and syphilologist, at the ] in Paris. Charcot had become interested in patients who had symptoms that mimicked ] (neuropsychiatric disorder affecting the brain and central nervous system, caused by syphilis infection). | |||
In 1885, Freud was given the opportunity to study at the ] in Paris under the famous neurologist ]. Charcot had specialised in the field of hysterical paralysis and anaesthesia and established hypnosis as a research tool, the experimental application of which actually made it possible to eliminate symptoms of this kind. Paralysed people could suddenly walk again, blind ones could see. Although this effect is not known to last long – as Freud discovered in own experiments – the phenomenon of hypnotic false-healing played a decisive role in convincing him of the psycho-traumatical causation of the multifaceted neurotic clinical picture. | |||
Freud's first theory to explain hysterical symptoms was presented in '']'' (1895) co-authored with Josef Breuer.<ref>Freud, S. ''Studies on Hysteria'' (1895), ''Standard Edition'', vol. 2, Hogarth Press, 1955.</ref> He contended that at the root of hysterical symptoms were repressed memories of distressing occurrences, almost always having direct or indirect sexual associations. Around the same time he attempted to develop a neuro-physiological theory of unconscious mental mechanisms, which he soon gave up. It remained unpublished in his lifetime.<ref>Freud, S. (1895), "Project for a Scientific Psychology", ''Standard Edition'', vol. 1, Hogarth Press, 1966.</ref> | |||
Freud's first attempt to explain neurotical symptoms was presented in '']'' (1895). Co-authored with his mentor ], this is generally seen as the birth of psychoanalysis.<ref name="Freud 1895" /> The work based on Freud's and Breuer's partly joint treatment of ], referred to in the case studies by the pseudonym ]. Berta herself had dubbed the treatment '']''. Breuer, a distinguished physician, was astonished but remained unspecific; while Freud formulated his hypothesis that Anna's hystera seemed to be caused by distressing but unconscious experiences related to sexuality, basing his assumption on corresponding associations made by the young women.<ref name="Freud 1895">Freud, Sigmund, and ]. 1955 . '']'', '']'' 2, edited by ]. London: ].</ref> She herself sometimes liked to jokingly rename her talking cure as '']'' (an association about the fairy tale through which place the ] into house) – or in ] words: "The more Anna provided ], the more she chattered on, the better it went."<ref>Jacques Lacan, ''The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis'' (London 1994) p. 157</ref> | |||
In 1896 Freud published his so-called ] which proposed that aliens are sexual excitations in infancy, and he claimed to have uncovered repressed memories of incidents of sexual abuse for all his current patients.<ref>Freud, S. (1896), "The Aetiology of Hysteria", ''Standard Edition'', vol. 7, Hogarth Press, 1953.</ref> However by 1898 he had privately acknowledged to his friend and colleague Wilhelm Fliess that he no longer believed in his theory, though he did not state this publicly until 1906.<ref>Freud, S. (1906), "My Views on the Part Played by Sexuality in the Aetiology of the Neuroses", ''Standard Edition'', vol 7, Hogarth Press, 1953.</ref> Though in 1896 he had reported that his patients "had no feeling of remembering the scenes", and assured him "emphatically of their unbelief",<ref>Freud, S. 1896, p. 204</ref> in later accounts he claimed that they had ''told'' him that they had been sexually abused in infancy. This became the received historical account until challenged by several Freud scholars in the latter part of the 20th century who argued that he had imposed his preconceived notions on his patients.<ref>Cioffi, F. (1973), "Was Freud a Liar", reprinted in ''Freud and the Question of Pseudoscience'' (1998), Open Court, pp. 199–204.</ref><ref>Schimek, J. G. (1987). "Fact and Fantasy in the Seduction Theory: a Historical Review", ''Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association'', xxxv: 937–65.</ref><ref>Esterson, A. "Jeffrey Masson and Freud's Seduction Theory: A New Fable Based on Old Myths", ''History of the Human Sciences'', 11 (1), pp. 1–21. </ref> However, building on his claims that the patients ''reported'' infantile sexual abuse experiences, Freud subsequently contended that his clinical findings in the mid-1890s provided evidence of the occurrence of unconscious fantasies, supposedly to cover up memories of infantile masturbation.<ref>Freud, S. (1906).</ref> Only much later did he claim the same findings as evidence for Oedipal desires.<ref>Freud, S. (1925), "An Autobiographical Study", ''Standard Edition'', vol. 20, Hogarth Press, 1959.</ref> | |||
Around the same time, Freud had started to develop a ] hypothesis about mental phenomena such as memory, but soon abandoned this attempt and left it unpublished.<ref>Freud, Sigmund. 1966 . "." Pp. 347–445 in '']'' 3, edited by ]. London: ].</ref> Insights into neuronal-biochemical processes that store experiences in the brain – like engraving the proverbial ] with some code – belongs to the ] branch of science and lead in a different direction of research than the psychological question of what the differences between consciousness and unconsciousness are. After some thought about a suitable term, Freud called his new instrument and field of research ''psychoanalysis'', introduced in his essay “Inheritance and Etiology of Neuroses”, written and published in French in 1896.<ref>Freud, Sigmund. 1896. "" . '']'' 4(6):161–69. via Psychanalyste Paris.</ref><ref>], and Michel Plon. 2011 . ''Dictionnaire de la psychanalyse''. Paris: ]. p. 1216.</ref> | |||
====The abuse thesis==== | |||
In 1896, Freud also published his ], in which he assumed as certain that he had uncovered repressed memories of incidents of sexual abuse in each of his previous patients. This type of ] of the child would therefore be the prerequisite for the later development of ] and other kinds of neurotical symptoms.<ref name="Freud 1896">Freud, Sigmund. 1953 . "]." Pp. 191–221 in '']'' 3, edited by ]. London: ]. via ].</ref> | |||
It contradicts the seduction thesis that Freud reported in the same year about patients who expressed their "emphatic disbelief" in this respect: that they "had no feeling of remembering the ] scenes".<ref name="Freud 1896" />{{Rp|204}} In the course of his further research, Freud began to doubt his thesis that such abuse should be almost omnipresent in our society. Initially he expressed his suspicion of having made a mistake in private, to his friend and colleague ] in 1898; but it took another 8 years before he had clarified the obscure connections sufficiently enough to publicly revoke his thesis, stating the reasons.<ref name="Freud 1906">Freud, Sigmund. 1953 . "My Views on the Part Played by Sexuality in the Aetiology of the Neuroses." Pp. 269–79 in '']'' 7, edited by ]. London: ].</ref> (Freud's final position on the origin of neurosis in general is summarized in his late work '']''. According to this, the causes do not lie in general sexual abuse of children, but in the way in which each generation educates the next to adopt the rules of coexistence known as morality. See also '']''.) | |||
====The secrecy mechanism==== | |||
In the mid-1890s, he was still upholding his hypothesis of sexual abuse. In this context, he reported on fantasies of several patients, which on the one hand would point to memories of scenes of ] stored in the unconscious, while the more conscious parts on the other hand would aim to make these morally forbidden acts of childish pleasure unrecognisable, to cover up them. The interesting point for Freud here was not so much the secretiveness itself (a well-known behaviour of ]), but the following twofold realisation: That children – at that time considered as ''innocent'' little angels – initiate pleasurable actions of their own accord (have ‘drives’ at all, as later assigned to the ‘id’); and the presumably by aducation initiated emergence of a ] mechanism, whose ability consists in being able to hide impulses of this kind from one's own consciousness.<ref name="Freud 1906" /> Short after he assumed that the same findings would have some evidence for a kind of ] desires. | |||
====From blood disgrace to self-castration==== | |||
In the tragedy '']'', to which Freud refers, there occurs no sexual exploitation of a child by its parents or other adults. Sophocles' poetic treatment of this ancient Greek myth is about Oedipus' own sexual desire addresses to his mother Jocasta – admittedly as an already genitally mature man and without knowing about the close blood relationship including an not less unconscious patricide – which the woman reciprocates just as unsuspectingly. Freud interprets the passage where Oedipus – after realising his serious violation of the moral-totemic ] – pokes out his eyes with the golden needle clasp of his wife's and mother's nightdress (while Jocasta commits suicide) as a manifestation of the same ‘cover-up’ mechanism that he began to uncover in the above-mentioned fantasies. In his eyes psychoanalysis works in opposite direction to this mechanism of preconscious self-delusion, by bringing the due to incest taboo have been repressed desires (the ‘id’) back into realm of inner perception, own conscious thinking.<ref>Freud, Sigmund. 1959 . "." Pp. 7–74 in ] 20, edited by ]. London: ]. – via ]. via Michigan Mental Health Networker.</ref> This raised the question for Freud of the first origin of moral prohibitions. A field of research that led him deep into the evolutionary and cultural (prä)history of mankind (see Darwin's primal horde; its abolition through patricide and introduction of monogamy in ]) and which, according to his own information, he had to leave unfinished as an untested hypothesis due to the lack of ].<ref name="Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse" /><ref name="Sigmund Freud: Der Mann Moses und d" /> | |||
====The meaning of dreams==== | |||
In 1899, Freud's work had progressed far enough that he was able to publish '']''. This, for him, was the most important of his writings,<ref>Gay, Peter. 1988. ''Freud: A Life for Our Time''. New York: ]. pp. 3–4, 103.</ref><ref>Freud, Sigmund. 1913 . '']''. ].</ref> as it formulated the realisation that every dream contains a symbolically disguised message that can be decoded with help of the dreamer's ]. The purpose of every dream is therefore to inform the dreamer about his complex inner situation: in essence, a conflict arising from the demands of innate needs and externally imposed behavioural rules that prohibit their satisfaction. Freud called the former the ''primary process'', taking place predominantly in the unconscious, and the latter the ''secondary process'' of predominantly conscious, more or less coherent thoughts. | |||
Freud summarised this view in his first model of the soul. Known as the '']'', it divides the organism into three areas or systems: The unconscious, the preconscious and the conscious. Sexual needs belong to the unconscious and are forced to remain there if the contents of conscious ward them off. This is the case in societys that generally consider all extra- and premarital sexual activity – including homoeroticism, that of biblical ] and incest – to be a ‘sin’, passing this value on to the next generation through concrete or threatened punishments. Moral education creates fears of punitive violence or the deprive of love in the child's soul. They are stored neuronally in the preconscious and influences the consciousness in the sense of the imprinted rules of behaviour. (Freud's second model of the soul, ], introduces a clearer distinction. ''Topology'' is no longer the decisive factor here, but the specific ''function'' of each of the three instances. This new model did not replace the first one: it integrated it.) | |||
''The Interpretation of Dreams'' includes the first comprehensive conceptualisation of ]: The little boy admires his father because of the mental and physical advantages of the adult man and wants to become like him, but also comes into conflict with him over the women around, cause of the ]. This initiates - starting from the id - anger that can grow into a deadly urge for revenge against the father. Impulses that the little boy cannot act out (not least due to the child's deep dependence on his parents love) and therefore are repressed into unconscious. Symptomatically, this inner situation manifests itself as a feeling of inferiority, even a castration complex. The myth of Oedipus is about the attempt to liberate the 'amputated' potency of the id, but fails because of the remaining unconscious motives. As the ego is overwhelmed by the punitive fear of the moral content of its ‘preconscious’ superego, it cuts off the instinctive desire for knowledge from itself (blinds itself). | |||
Attempts to find a female equivalent of the Oedipus complex have not yielded good results. According to Freud, girls, because of their anatomically different genitals, cannot identify with their father, nor develop a ] as sons do, so this syndrome seems to be reserved for the opposite sex.<ref>Sigmund Freud, ''On Sexuality'' (Penguin Freud Library 7) p. 342.</ref> Feminist psychoanalysts debate whether the father of psychoanalysis might have been a victim of ] in this case. To compensate for the perceived disadvantage, they postulate a ] consisting of an ] desire of mothers for their infant sons;<ref>{{cite book |last1=Olivier |first1=Christiane |title=Jokastes Kinder: Die Psyche der Frau im Schatten der Mutter}}</ref> but other analysts criticise this naming and attempt to generalise, since Sophocles' Jocasta in particular does not exhibit this behaviour. (Instead, she gave her baby away to be killed). The witch's special interest in ] (while she merely abuses his sister as a kitchen slave) offers much better evidence here, although such "Crunchy house syndrome" again should not as omnipresent as the Oedipus complex itself. | |||
====Critics of abuse thesis and Freud in general==== | |||
In the later second part of the 20th century, several Freud researchers questioned the author's perception that his patients had informed him of childhood sexual abuse. Some of them argued that Freud had imposed his preconceived view on his patients, while others raised the suspicion of conscious forgery.<ref>Cioffi, F. 1998 . "Was Freud a Liar?" Pp. 199–204 in ''Freud and the Question of Pseudoscience''. ].</ref><ref>Schimek, J. G. 1987. "Fact and Fantasy in the Seduction Theory: a Historical Review." '']'' 35:937–65.</ref><ref>Esterson, Allen. 1998. "Jeffrey Masson and Freud's seduction theory: A new fable based on old myths (synopsis in Human Nature Review)." '']'' 11(1):1–21. {{doi|10.1177/095269519801100101}}.</ref> | |||
These are two different arguments. The latter questions whether Freud deliberately lied in order to make the allegedly unfounded psychoanalysis appear as a legitimate science; the former assumes an unknowingly committed act. Freud replied at various places in his work the same to both types of argument: That natural science is a process based on ]. A slow but sure becoming, in which it is impossible to have precisely defined concepts from the outset, respectively phenomena that from now on have been clarified without any gaps and contradictions. "Indeed, even physics would have missed out on its entire development if it had been forced to wait until its concepts of matter, energy, gravity and others reached the desirable clarity and precision."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Freud |first1=Sigmund |title=Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 14. Selbstdarstellung |pages=84–85}}</ref> | |||
The psychologist ] points out in his book ''Freud, Biologist of the Mind: Beyond the Psychoanalytic Legend'' that the theories and hypotheses of psychoanalysis are anchored in the findings of contemporary biology. He mentions the profound influence of ]‘s theory of evolution on Freud and quotes this sense from the writings of ], ], ] and ].<ref name="Borch-Jacobsen 2012" />{{Rp|30}} | |||
===1900–1940s=== | ===1900–1940s=== | ||
{{Multiple issues|{{More citations needed|date=September 2024}} | |||
] and ] in the center]] | |||
{{Technical|date=September 2024}}}} | |||
In 1905, Freud published '']'' in which he laid out his discovery of the ], which categorised early childhood development into five stages depending on what sexual affinity a child possessed at the stage:<ref>Freud, Sigmund. 1955 . "]." '']'' 7, edited by ]. London: ].</ref> | |||
* Oral (ages 0–2); | |||
By 1900, Freud had conjectured that dreams had symbolic significance, and generally were specific to the dreamer. Freud formulated his second psychological theory— which postulates that the unconscious has or is a "primary process" consisting of symbolic and condensed thoughts, and a "secondary process" of logical, conscious thoughts. This theory was published in his 1900 book, '']''.<ref>{{citation|author=Freud S|title= The Interpretation of Dreams|edition=2nd |volume= IV and V|publisher= Hogarth Press, 1955|year= 1900}}</ref> Chapter VII was a re-working of the earlier "Project" and Freud outlined his "Topographic Theory." In this theory, which was mostly later supplanted by the Structural Theory, unacceptable sexual wishes were repressed into the "System Unconscious," unconscious due to society's condemnation of premarital sexual activity, and this repression created anxiety. | |||
* Anal (2–4); | |||
* Phallic-oedipal or First genital (3–6); | |||
* Latency (6–puberty); and | |||
* Mature genital (puberty–onward). | |||
His early formulation included the idea that because of societal restrictions, sexual wishes were repressed into an unconscious state, and that the energy of these unconscious wishes could be result in anxiety or physical symptoms. Early treatment techniques, including hypnotism and ], were designed to make the unconscious conscious in order to relieve the pressure and the apparently resulting symptoms. This method would later on be left aside by Freud, giving free association a bigger role. | |||
In '']'' (1914), Freud turned his attention to the titular subject of ].<ref>Freud, Sigmund. 1955 . "." Pp. 73–102 in ] 14, edited by ]. London: ]. – via ].</ref> Freud characterized the difference between energy directed at the self versus energy directed at others using a system known as '']''. By 1917, in "]", he suggested that certain depressions were caused by turning guilt-ridden anger on the self.<ref name="Freud 1917">Freud, Sigmund. 1955 . " {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150501002425/http://www.english.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Freud_MourningAndMelancholia.pdf |date=2015-05-01 }}." Pp. 243–58 in ] 17, edited by ]. London: ]. – via ]. | |||
In '']'' (1915)<ref>{{citation|author=Freud S|title= On Narcissism|edition=2nd|volume= XIV|publisher= Hogarth Press, 1955|year=1915}}</ref> Freud turned his attention to the subject of narcissism. Still utilizing an energic system, Freud conceptualized the question of energy directed at the self versus energy directed at others, called ]. By 1917, In "Mourning and Melancholia," he suggested that certain depressions were caused by turning guilt-ridden anger on the self.<ref>{{citation|author=Freud S|year=1917|title= Mourning and Melancholia|edition=2nd|volume= XVII|publisher= Hogarth Press, 1955}}</ref> In 1919 in "A Child is Being Beaten" he began to address the problems of self-destructive behavior (moral masochism) and frank sexual masochism.<ref>{{citation|year=1919|author=Freud S|title= A Child is Being Beaten|edition=2nd| volume= XVII|publisher= Hogarth Press, 1955}}</ref> Based on his experience with depressed and self-destructive patients, and pondering the carnage of ], Freud became dissatisfied with considering only oral and sexual motivations for behavior. By 1920, Freud addressed the power of identification (with the leader and with other members) in groups as a motivation for behavior (''Group Psychology and Analysis of the Ego'').<ref>{{citation|author=Freud S|title= Group Psychology and Analysis of the Ego|edition=2nd|journal=Nature|volume=XVII|issue=2784|page=321|publisher=Hogarth Press, 1955|year=1920|doi=10.1038/111321d0|bibcode=1923Natur.111T.321.}}</ref> In that same year (1920) Freud suggested his "dual drive" theory of sexuality and aggression in '']'', to try to begin to explain human destructiveness.<ref>{{citation|author=Freud S|title= Beyond the Pleasure Principle|edition=2nd|volume= XVIII |publisher=Hogarth Press, 1955|year=1920}}</ref> | |||
Also available via .</ref> In 1919, through "A Child is Being Beaten", he began to address the problems of ] and ].<ref>Freud, Sigmund. 1955 . " {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806220225/https://icpla.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Freud-S.-Child-is-Being-Beaten%E2%80%99-A-Contribution-to-the-Study-of-the-Origin-of-Sexual-Perversions.pdf |date=2020-08-06 }}." Pp. 175–204 in ] 17, edited by ]. London: ]. – via The Institute of Contemporary Psychoanalysis.</ref> Based on his experience with depressed and self-destructive patients, and pondering the carnage of ], Freud became dissatisfied with considering only oral and sexual motivations for behavior. By 1920, Freud addressed the power of identification (with the leader and with other members) in groups as a motivation for behavior in '']''.<ref>Freud, Sigmund. 1922 . "Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego," translated by ]. New York: ]. {{Hdl|2027/mdp.39015003802348}}. | |||
In 1923, he presented his new "structural theory" of an ] in a book entitled, '']''.<ref>{{citation|author=Freud S|title= The Ego and the Id|edition=2nd|volume= XIX|year=1923|publisher=Hogarth Press, 1955}}</ref> Therein, he revised the whole theory of mental functioning, now considering that repression was only one of many defense mechanisms, and that it occurred to reduce anxiety. Note that repression, for Freud, is both a cause of anxiety and a response to anxiety. In 1926, in ''Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety,'' Freud laid out how intrapsychic conflict among drive and superego (wishes and guilt) caused ], and how that anxiety could lead to an inhibition of mental functions, such as intellect and speech.<ref>{{citation|year=1926|author=Freud S|title= Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety|edition=2nd|volume= XX|publisher=Hogarth Press, 1955}}</ref> ''Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety'' was written in response to ], who, in 1924, published ''Das Trauma der Geburt'' (translated into English in 1929 as ''The Trauma of Birth''), exploring how art, myth, religion, philosophy and therapy were illuminated by separation anxiety in the "phase before the development of the Oedipus complex" (p. 216). But there was no such phase in Freud’s theories. The ], Freud explained tirelessly, was the nucleus of the neurosis and the foundational source of all art, myth, religion, philosophy, therapy—indeed of all human culture and civilization. It was the first time that anyone in the ] had dared to suggest that the Oedipus complex might not be the only factor contributing to intrapsychic development. | |||
— 1955 . " {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210108174249/http://freudians.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Freud_Group_Psychology.pdf |date=2021-01-08 }}." Pp. 65–144 in ] 18, translated by J. Strachey. London: ].</ref><ref>"Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego" (review). '']'' 3(2784):321. ] 1923. {{doi|10.1038/111321d0}}. {{Bibcode|1923Natur.111T.321.}}.</ref> In that same year, Freud suggested his ''dual drive theory'' of sexuality and aggression in '']'', to try to begin to explain human destructiveness. Also, it was the first appearance of his "structural theory" consisting of three new concepts ].<ref>Freud, Sigmund. 1920. "," translated by C. J. M. Hubback. ''International Psycho-Analytic Library'' 4, edited by ]. London: International Psycho-Analytic Press. – via Library of Social Science. | |||
By 1936, the "Principle of Multiple Function" was clarified by ].<ref>{{citation|author=Waelder R|title= The Principles of Multiple Function: Observations on Over-Determination|year=1936|publisher= IJP}}</ref> He widened the formulation that psychological symptoms were caused by and relieved conflict simultaneously. Moreover, symptoms (such as ]s and ]) each represented elements of some drive wish (sexual and/or aggressive), superego, anxiety, reality, and defenses. Also in 1936, ], Sigmund's famous daughter, published her seminal book, ''The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense'', outlining numerous ways the mind could shut upsetting things out of consciousness.<ref>{{citation|author=Freud A|title= The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense|publisher= IUP|year= 1966}}</ref> | |||
— 1955 . "]." In ] 18, translated by ]. London: ].</ref> | |||
===1940s–2000s=== | |||
Following the death of Freud, a new group of psychoanalysts began to explore the function of the ego. Led by ], Kris, Rappaport and Lowenstein, the group built upon understandings of the synthetic function of the ego as a mediator in psychic functioning. Hartmann in particular distinguished between autonomous ego functions (such as memory and intellect which could be secondarily affected by conflict) and synthetic functions which were a result of compromise formation. These "Ego Psychologists" of the '50s paved a way to focus analytic work by attending to the defenses (mediated by the ego) before exploring the deeper roots to the unconscious conflicts. In addition there was burgeoning interest in child psychoanalysis. Although criticized since its inception, psychoanalysis has been used as a research tool into childhood development,<ref>(cf. the journal The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child)</ref> and is still used to treat certain mental disturbances.<ref name="Wallerstein 2000">{{citation|author= Wallerstein|year=2000|title= Forty-Two Lives in Treatment: A Study of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy}}</ref> In the 1960s, Freud's early thoughts on the childhood development of ] were challenged; this challenge led to the development of a variety of understandings of female sexual development, many of which modified the timing and normality of several of Freud's theories (which had been gleaned from the treatment of women with mental disturbances). Several researchers<ref>Blum H. Masochism, the Ego Ideal and the Psychology of Women, JAPA 1976</ref> followed ]'s studies of societal pressures that influence the development of women. Most contemporary North American psychoanalysts employ theories that, while based on those of Sigmund Freud, include many modifications of theory and practice developed since his death in 1939. | |||
Three years later, in 1923, he summarised the ideas of id, ego, and superego in '']''.<ref name="Freud 1923">Freud, Sigmund. 1955 . "]." In ] 19, edited by ]. London: ]. | |||
In the first decade of the 21st century there are approximately 35 training institutes for psychoanalysis in the United States accredited by the ]<ref></ref><ref>{{citation|url=http://apsa.org/|title=American Psychoanalytic Association}}</ref> which is a component organization of the ], and there are over 3,000 graduated psychoanalysts practicing in the United States. The International Psychoanalytical Association accredits psychoanalytic training centers throughout the rest of the world, including countries such as Serbia, France, Germany, Austria, Italy, Switzerland, and many others, as well as about six institutes directly in the U.S. Freud published a paper entitled ] in 1914, German original being first published in the ''Jahrbuch der Psychoanalyse''. | |||
Lay summaries via and . via University of Notre Dame.</ref> In the book, he revised the whole theory of mental functioning, now considering that repression was only one of many defense mechanisms, and that it occurred to reduce anxiety. Hence, Freud characterised repression as both a cause and a result of anxiety. In 1926, in "Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety", Freud characterised how intrapsychic conflict among drive and superego caused ], and how that anxiety could lead to an inhibition of mental functions, such as intellect and speech.<ref name="Freud 1926">Freud, Sigmund. 1955 . "Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety." In ] 20, edited by ]. London: ]. {{doi|10.1080/21674086.1936.11925270}}. {{S2CID|142804158}}.</ref> In 1924, ] published ], which analysed culture and philosophy in relation to separation anxiety which occurred before the development of an ].<ref>{{cite book|last=Mustafa, A.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RpWuBwAAQBAJ&pg=PT378|title=Organisational Behaviour|date=2013|publisher=Global Professional Publishing Limited|isbn=978-1-908287-36-6|via=Google Books}}</ref> Freud's theories, however, characterized no such phase. According to Freud, the Oedipus complex was at the centre of neurosis, and was the foundational source of all art, myth, religion, philosophy, therapy—indeed of all human culture and civilization. It was the first time that anyone in ] had characterised something other than the Oedipus complex as contributing to intrapsychic development, a notion that was rejected by Freud and his followers at the time. | |||
==Theories== | |||
The predominant psychoanalytic theories can be grouped into several theoretical "schools." Although these theoretical "schools" differ, most of them continue to stress the strong influence of unconscious elements affecting people's mental lives. There has also been considerable work done on consolidating elements of conflicting theory (cf. the work of Theodore Dorpat, B. Killingmo, and S. Akhtar). As in all fields of healthcare, there are some persistent conflicts regarding specific causes of some syndromes, and disputes regarding the best treatment techniques. In the 21st century, psychoanalytic ideas are embedded in Western culture, especially in fields such as ], ], ], ], and ], particularly ]. Though there is a ] of evolved analytic ]s, there are groups who follow the ]s of one or more of the later theoreticians. Psychoanalytic ideas also play roles in some types of literary analysis such as ]. | |||
By 1936 the "Principle of Multiple Function" was clarified by ].<ref>]. 1936. "The Principles of Multiple Function: Observations on Over-Determination." '']'' 5:45–62. {{doi|10.1080/21674086.1936.11925272}}.</ref> He widened the formulation that psychological symptoms were caused by and relieved conflict simultaneously. Moreover, symptoms (such as ]s and ]) each represented elements of some drive wish (sexual and/or aggressive), superego, anxiety, reality, and defenses. Also in 1936, ], Sigmund's daughter, published her seminal book, ''The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense'', outlining numerous ways the mind could shut upsetting things out of consciousness.<ref name="Freud 1937">]. 1968 . ''The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence'' (revised ed.). London: ].</ref> | |||
===Topographic theory=== | |||
===1940s–present=== | |||
Topographic theory was first described by Freud in '']'' (1900).<ref>{{citation|author=Freud S|title= The Interpretation of Dreams|year= 1900|edition=2nd|volume= IV and V|publisher=Hogarth Press, 1955}}</ref><ref>{{citation|author=Freud S|title=The Unconscious|year= 1915|edition=2nd|volume= XIV|publisher=Hogarth Press, 1955}}</ref> The theory posits that the mental apparatus can be divided in to the systems Conscious, Pre-conscious and Unconscious. These systems are not anatomical structures of the brain but, rather, mental processes. Although Freud retained this theory throughout his life he largely replaced it with the Structural theory. The Topographic theory remains as one of the metapsychological points of view for describing how the mind functions in classical psychoanalytic theory. | |||
When ]'s power grew, the Freud family and many of their colleagues fled to London. Within a year, Sigmund Freud died.<ref>{{cite book|author=Kuriloff, Emily A.|title=Contemporary Psychoanalysis and the Legacy of the Third Reich|publisher=Routledge|year=2013|isbn=978-1-136-93041-6|page=45}}</ref> In the United States, also following the death of Freud, a new group of psychoanalysts began to explore the function of the ego. Led by ], the group built upon understandings of the ''synthetic'' function of the ego as a mediator in psychic functioning, distinguishing such from ''autonomous'' ego functions (e.g. memory and intellect). These "ego psychologists" of the 1950s paved a way to focus analytic work by attending to the defenses (mediated by the ego) before exploring the deeper roots to the unconscious conflicts. | |||
In addition, there was growing interest in ]. Psychoanalysis has been used as a research tool into childhood development,<ref group="lower-roman">cf. '']'', academic journal</ref> and is still used to treat certain mental disturbances.<ref name="Wallerstein 2000">Wallerstein. 2000. ''Forty-Two Lives in Treatment: A Study of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy''.</ref> In the 1960s, Freud's early thoughts on the childhood development of ] were challenged; this challenge led to the development of a variety of understandings of female sexual development,<ref>{{Cite book|last=Horney|first=Karen|url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/780458101|title=Feminine psychology|date=1973|publisher=Norton|isbn=0-393-00686-7|oclc=780458101}}</ref> many of which modified the timing and normality of several of Freud's theories. Several researchers followed ]'s studies of societal pressures that influence the development of women.<ref>Blum, H. 1979. ''Masochism, the Ego Ideal and the Psychology of Women.'' JAPA.</ref> | |||
===Structural theory=== | |||
In the first decade of the 21st century, there were approximately 35 training institutes for psychoanalysis in the United States accredited by the ] (APsaA), which is a component organization of the ] (IPA), and there are over 3000 graduated psychoanalysts practicing in the United States. The IPA accredits psychoanalytic training centers through such "component organisations" throughout the rest of the world, including countries such as Serbia, France, Germany, Austria, Italy, Switzerland,<ref>{{citation |url = http://www.ipa.org.uk/en/Societies/Europe/ComponentSocieties.aspx |title = IPA Component Organisations in Europe |access-date = 2012-11-20 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20151023113323/http://www.ipa.org.uk/en/Societies/Europe/ComponentSocieties.aspx |archive-date = 2015-10-23 |url-status = dead }}</ref> and many others, as well as about six institutes directly in the United States. | |||
Structural theory divides the psyche into the ], the ], and the ]. The id is present at birth as the repository of basic instincts, which Freud called "''Triebe''" ("drives"): unorganised and unconscious, it operates merely on the 'pleasure principle', without realism or foresight. The ego develops slowly and gradually, being concerned with mediating between the urgings of the id and the realities of the external world; it thus operates on the 'reality principle'. The super-ego is held to be the part of the ego in which self-observation, self-criticism and other reflective and judgemental faculties develop. The ego and the super-ego are both partly conscious and partly unconscious. | |||
=== |
===Psychoanalysis as a movement=== | ||
Freud founded the ''Psychological Wednesday Society'' in 1902, which ] argues was the beginning of psychoanalysis as a movement. This society became the ] in 1908 in the same year as the first international congress of psychoanalysis held in Salzburg, Austria.<ref name="Shorter 2005" />{{Rp|page=110}} ] was one of the most active members in this society in its early years.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Ellenberger|first=Henri F.|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/68543|title=The discovery of the unconscious : the history and evolution of dynamic psychiatry|date=1970|isbn=0-465-01672-3|location=New York|oclc=68543 |publisher=Basic Books}}</ref>{{Rp|page=584}} | |||
The second congress of psychoanalysis took place in Nuremberg, Germany in 1910.<ref name="Shorter 2005" />{{Rp|page=110}} At this congress, ] called for the creation of an International Psychoanalytic Association with ] as president for life.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Eisold|first=Kenneth|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/994873775|title=The Organizational Life of Psychoanalysis : Conflicts, Dilemmas, and the Future of the Profession|date=2017|publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-315-39006-2|oclc=994873775}}</ref>{{Rp|page=15}} A third congress was held in Weimar in 1911.<ref name="Shorter 2005">{{Cite book|last=Shorter|first=Edward|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/65200006|title=A historical dictionary of psychiatry|date=2005|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-803923-5|location=New York|oclc=65200006}}</ref>{{Rp|page=110}} The London Psychoanalytical Society was founded in 1913 by ].<ref>{{Cite web|last=Robinson|first=Ken|title=A Brief History of the British Psychoanalytic Society|url=http://psychoanalysis.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/pages/history_of_the_bps_by_ken_robinson_0.pdf|publisher=British Psychoanalytical Society}}</ref> | |||
] was initially suggested by Freud in ''Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety'' (1926). The theory was refined by ], Loewenstein, and Kris in a series of papers and books from 1939 through the late 1960s. Leo Bellak was a later contributor. This series of constructs, paralleling some of the later developments of cognitive theory, includes the notions of autonomous ego functions: mental functions not dependent, at least in origin, on intrapsychic conflict. Such functions include: sensory perception, motor control, symbolic thought, logical thought, speech, abstraction, integration (synthesis), orientation, concentration, judgment about danger, reality testing, adaptive ability, executive decision-making, hygiene, and self-preservation. Freud noted that inhibition is one method that the mind may utilize to interfere with any of these functions in order to avoid painful emotions. Hartmann (1950s) pointed out that there may be delays or deficits in such functions. | |||
===Developments of alternative forms of psychotherapy=== | |||
Frosch (1964) described differences in those people who demonstrated damage to their relationship to reality, but who seemed able to test it. Deficits in the capacity to organize thought are sometimes referred to as blocking or loose associations (]), and are characteristic of the schizophrenias. Deficits in abstraction ability and self-preservation also suggest psychosis in adults. Deficits in orientation and ] are often indicative of a medical illness affecting the brain (and therefore, autonomous ego functions). Deficits in certain ego functions are routinely found in severely sexually or physically abused children, where powerful effects generated throughout childhood seem to have eroded some functional development. | |||
====Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)==== | |||
In the 1950s, psychoanalysis was the main modality of ]. Behavioural models of psychotherapy started to assume a more central role in psychotherapy in the 1960s.<ref group="lower-roman">"By the 1960s it would assume a more central place in the psychotherapy arena"</ref><ref name="NorcrossVandenBos2011">{{cite book|author1=John C. Norcross|author2=Gary R. VandenBos|author3=Donald K. Freedheim|title=History of Psychotherapy: Continuity and Change|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xBkbQwAACAAJ|year=2011|publisher=American Psychological Association|isbn=978-1-4338-0762-6}}</ref> ], a psychiatrist trained in a psychoanalytic tradition, set out to test the psychoanalytic models of depression empirically and found that conscious ruminations of loss and personal failing were correlated with depression. He suggested that distorted and biased beliefs were a causal factor of depression, publishing an influential paper in 1967 after a decade of research using the construct of ] to explain the depression.<ref name="NorcrossVandenBos2011" />{{Rp|221}} Beck developed this empirically supported hypothesis for the cause of depression into a talking therapy called ] (CBT) in the early 1970s. | |||
====Attachment theory==== | |||
Ego strengths, later described by ] (1975), include the capacities to control oral, sexual, and destructive impulses; to tolerate painful effects without falling apart; and to prevent the eruption into consciousness of bizarre symbolic fantasy. Synthetic functions, in contrast to autonomous functions, arise from the development of the ego and serve the purpose of managing conflictual processes. Defenses are synthetic functions that protect the conscious mind from awareness of forbidden impulses and thoughts. One purpose of ego psychology has been to emphasize that some mental functions can be considered to be basic, rather than derivatives of wishes, affects, or defenses. However, autonomous ego functions can be secondarily affected because of unconscious conflict. For example, a patient may have an hysterical amnesia (memory being an autonomous function) because of intrapsychic conflict (wishing not to remember because it is too painful). | |||
{{See also|Attachment theory#Psychoanalysis}} | |||
] was developed theoretically by ] and formalized empirically by ].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Bretherton|first=Inge|date=1992|title=The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth.|url=http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0012-1649.28.5.759|journal=Developmental Psychology|language=en|volume=28|issue=5|pages=759–775|doi=10.1037/0012-1649.28.5.759|issn=0012-1649}}</ref> Bowlby was trained psychoanalytically but was concerned about some properties of psychoanalysis;<ref name="Goldberg 1995">{{Cite book|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/32856560|title=Attachment theory : social, developmental, and clinical perspectives|date=1995|publisher=Analytic Press|editor-first1=Susan|editor-last1=Goldberg|editor-first2=Roy|editor-last2=Muir|editor-first3=John|editor-last3=Kerr|isbn=0-88163-184-1|location=Hillsdale, NJ|oclc=32856560}}</ref>{{Rp|23}} he was troubled by the dogmatism of psychoanalysis at the time, its arcane terminology, the lack of attention to environment in child behaviour, and the concepts derived from talking therapy to child behaviour.<ref name="Goldberg 1995" />{{Rp|23}} In response, he developed an alternative conceptualization of child behaviour based on principles on ].<ref name="Goldberg 1995" />{{Rp|24}} Bowlby's theory of attachment rejects Freud's model of ] based on the Oedipal model.<ref name="Goldberg 1995" />{{Rp|25}} For his work, Bowlby was shunned from psychoanalytical circles who did not accept his theories. Nonetheless, his conceptualization was adopted widely by mother-infant research in the 1970s.<ref name="Goldberg 1995" />{{Rp|26}} | |||
==Theories== | |||
Taken together, the above theories present a group of '''metapsychological assumptions'''. Therefore, the inclusive group of the different classical theories provides a cross-sectional view of human mentation. There are six "points of view", five described by Freud and a sixth added by Hartmann. Unconscious processes can therefore be evaluated from each of these six points of view. The "points of view" are: 1. Topographic 2. Dynamic (the theory of conflict) 3. Economic (the theory of energy flow) 4. Structural 5. Genetic (propositions concerning origin and development of psychological functions) and 6. Adaptational (psychological phenomena as it relates to the external world).<ref>{{citation|author=Rapaport, Gill|title=The Points of View and Assumptions of Metapsychology|journal= IJP|year=1959}}</ref> | |||
The predominant psychoanalytic theories can be organised into several theoretical schools. Although these perspectives differ, most of them emphasize the influence of unconscious elements on the conscious. There has also been considerable work done on consolidating elements of conflicting theories.<ref>] Dorpat, Theodore, B. Killingmo, and S. Akhtar. 1976. ''Journal of the American Psychoanalytical Association'' 24:855–74.</ref> | |||
There are some persistent conflicts among psychoanalysts regarding specific causes of certain syndromes, and some disputes regarding the ideal treatment techniques. In the 21st century, psychoanalytic ideas have found influence in fields such as ], ], ], ], ], and particularly ]. Though most mainstream psychoanalysts subscribe to modern strains of psychoanalytical thought, there are groups who follow the precepts of a single psychoanalyst and their school of thought. Psychoanalytic ideas also play roles in some types of literary analysis such as ].<ref>{{Cite book|first=Charles E. |last=Bressler |url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/651487421|title=Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice |date=2011|publisher=Pearson Longman|isbn=978-0-205-79169-9|pages=123–142|oclc=651487421}}</ref> | |||
====Modern conflict theory==== | |||
===Topographic theory=== | |||
A variation of ego psychology, termed "modern conflict theory", is more broadly an update and revision of structural theory (Freud, 1923, 1926); it does away with some of structural theory's more arcane features, such as where repressed thoughts are stored. Modern conflict theory looks at how emotional symptoms and character traits are complex solutions to mental conflict.<ref>{{citation|author=Brenner|year=2006|title=Psychoanalysis: Mind and Meaning|location= New York|journal= Psychoanalytic Quarterly Press}}</ref> It dispenses with the concepts of a fixed ], and instead posits conscious and unconscious conflict among wishes (dependent, controlling, sexual, and aggressive), guilt and shame, emotions (especially anxiety and depressive affect), and defensive operations that shut off from consciousness some aspect of the others. Moreover, healthy functioning (adaptive) is also determined, to a great extent, by resolutions of conflict. | |||
''Topographic theory'' was named and first described by ] in '']'' (1899).<ref>Freud, Sigmund. 1955 . "The Unconscious." In ] 14, edited by ]. London: ].</ref> The theory hypothesizes that the mental apparatus can be divided into the systems ], ], and ]. These systems are not ] structures of the brain but, rather, mental processes. Although Freud retained this theory throughout his life, he largely replaced it with the ''structural theory''.<ref name="Langs R 2010">]. 2010. ''Freud on a Precipice: How Freud's Fate pushed Psychoanalysis over the Edge''. Lanham, MD: ].</ref> | |||
===Structural theory=== | |||
A major objective of modern conflict-theory psychoanalysis is to change the balance of conflict in a patient by making aspects of the less adaptive solutions (also called "compromise formations") conscious so that they can be rethought, and more adaptive solutions found. Current theoreticians following ]'s many suggestions (see especially Brenner's 1982 book, ''The Mind in Conflict'') include Sandor Abend, MD (Abend, Porder, & Willick, (1983), ''Borderline Patients: Clinical Perspectives''), Jacob Arlow (Arlow and Brenner (1964), ''Psychoanalytic Concepts and the Structural Theory''), and Jerome Blackman (2003), ''101 Defenses: How the Mind Shields Itself''). | |||
Structural theory divides the psyche into the ], the ], and the ]. The id is present at birth as the repository of basic instincts, which Freud called "''Triebe''" ("drives"). Unorganized and unconscious, it operates merely on the 'pleasure principle', without realism or foresight. The ego develops slowly and gradually, being concerned with mediating between the urging of the id and the realities of the external world; it thus operates on the 'reality principle'. The super-ego is held to be the part of the ego in which self-observation, ] and other reflective and judgmental faculties develop. The ego and the super-ego are both partly conscious and partly unconscious.<ref name="Langs R 2010"/> | |||
===Neuropsychoanalysis=== | |||
====Object relations theory==== | |||
In the late 20th century, neuropsychoanalysis was introduced. The aim of this new field was to bridge the gap between psychoanalytic concepts and neuroscientific findings. Solms theorizes that for every cognition based action, there is a neurological reason behind it. According to Daniela Mosri, nueropsychoanalysis was coined by Solms and is a continuation of the original model proposed by Freud in 1895.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Johnson |first1=Brian |last2=Flores Mosri |first2=Daniela |date=2016-10-13 |title=The Neuropsychoanalytic Approach: Using Neuroscience as the Basic Science of Psychoanalysis |journal=Frontiers in Psychology |language=English |volume=7 |page=1459 |doi=10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01459 |doi-access=free |pmid=27790160 |pmc=5063004 |issn=1664-1078}}</ref> Neuropsychoanalysis is an interdisciplinary approach that focuses on how neurobiological mechanisms influence the psychological aspects of the human mind with emphasis on repression, the dynamics of dreams, therapeutic relationships. Neuroimaging is one of the methods used to empirically validate psychoanalytic concepts. | |||
] attempts to explain vicissitudes of human relationships through a study of how internal representations of self and others are structured. The clinical symptoms that suggest object relations problems (typically developmental delays throughout life) include disturbances in an individual's capacity to feel warmth, empathy, trust, sense of security, identity stability, consistent emotional closeness, and stability in relationships with significant others. (It is not suggested that one should trust everyone, for example.) Concepts regarding internal representations (also sometimes termed, "introjects," "self and object representations," or "internalizations of self and other") although often attributed to ], were actually first mentioned by Sigmund Freud in his early concepts of drive theory ('']'', 1905). Freud's 1917 paper "Mourning and Melancholia", for example, hypothesized that unresolved grief was caused by the survivor's internalized image of the deceased becoming fused with that of the survivor, and then the survivor shifting unacceptable anger toward the deceased onto the now complex self image. | |||
====Ego psychology==== | |||
], in "Linking Objects and Linking Phenomena", expanded on Freud's thoughts on this, describing the syndromes of "Established pathological mourning" vs. "reactive depression" based on similar dynamics. Melanie Klein's hypotheses regarding internalizations during the first year of life, leading to paranoid and depressive positions, were later challenged by ] (e.g., ''The First Year of Life'', 1965), who divided the first year of life into a coenesthetic phase of the first six months, and then a diacritic phase for the second six months. ] (Mahler, Fine, and Bergman, "The Psychological Birth of the Human Infant", 1975) and her group, first in New York, then in Philadelphia, described distinct phases and subphases of child development leading to "separation-individuation" during the first three years of life, stressing the importance of constancy of parental figures, in the face of the child's destructive aggression, to the child's internalizations, stability of affect management, and ability to develop healthy autonomy. | |||
] was initially suggested by Freud in ''Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety'' (1926),<ref name="Freud 1926" /> while major steps forward would be made through ]'s work on ], first published in her book ''The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence'' (1936).<ref name="Freud 1937" /> | |||
The theory was refined by ], Loewenstein, and Kris in a series of papers and books from 1939 through the late 1960s. Leo Bellak was a later contributor. This series of constructs, paralleling some of the later developments of cognitive theory, includes the notions of autonomous ego functions: mental functions not dependent, at least in origin, on intrapsychic conflict. Such functions include: sensory perception, motor control, symbolic thought, logical thought, speech, abstraction, integration (synthesis), orientation, concentration, judgment about danger, reality testing, adaptive ability, executive decision-making, hygiene, and self-preservation. Freud noted that inhibition is one method that the mind may utilize to interfere with any of these functions in order to avoid painful emotions. Hartmann (1950s) pointed out that there may be delays or deficits in such functions.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Hartmann|first=Heinz|title=Essays on Ego Psychology Selected Problems in Psychoanalytic Theory}}</ref> | |||
Later developers of the theory of self and object constancy as it affects adult psychiatric problems such as psychosis and borderline states have been John Frosch, ], ] and ]. Peter Blos described (in a book called ''On Adolescence'', 1960) how similar separation-individuation struggles occur during adolescence, of course with a different outcome from the first three years of life: the teen usually, eventually, leaves the parents' house (this varies with the culture). During adolescence, ] (1950–1960s) described the "identity crisis," that involves identity-diffusion anxiety. In order for an adult to be able to experience "Warm-ETHICS" (warmth, empathy, trust, holding environment (]), identity, closeness, and stability) in relationships (see Blackman, ''101 Defenses: How the Mind Shields Itself'', 2001), the teenager must resolve the problems with identity and redevelop self and object constancy. | |||
Frosch (1964) described differences in those people who demonstrated damage to their relationship to reality, but who seemed able to test it.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Frosch|first=John|date=1964|title=The psychotic character: Clinical psychiatric considerations|journal=The Psychiatric Quarterly|volume=38|issue=1–4|pages=81–96|doi=10.1007/bf01573368|pmid=14148396|s2cid=9097652|issn=0033-2720}}</ref> | |||
====Self psychology==== | |||
] emphasizes the development of a stable and integrated ] through empathic contacts with other humans, primary significant others conceived of as "selfobjects." Selfobjects meet the developing self's needs for mirroring, idealization, and twinship, and thereby strengthen the developing self. The process of treatment proceeds through "transmuting internalizations" in which the patient gradually internalizes the selfobject functions provided by the therapist. | |||
Self psychology was proposed originally by ], and has been further developed by Arnold Goldberg, Frank Lachmann, Paul and Anna Ornstein, Marian Tolpin, and others. | |||
According to ego psychology, ego strengths, later described by ] (1975), include the capacities to control oral, sexual, and destructive impulses; to tolerate painful affects without falling apart; and to prevent the eruption into consciousness of bizarre symbolic fantasy.<ref>]. 1975. ''Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism''. New York: ].</ref> Synthetic functions, in contrast to autonomous functions, arise from the development of the ego and serve the purpose of managing conflict processes. Defenses are synthetic functions that protect the conscious mind from awareness of forbidden impulses and thoughts. One purpose of ego psychology has been to emphasize that some mental functions can be considered to be basic, rather than derivatives of wishes, affects, or defenses. However, autonomous ego functions can be secondarily affected because of unconscious conflict.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Hauser |first1=S. |title=International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences |chapter=Ego Psychology and Psychoanalysis |date=1 January 2001 |pages=4365–4369 |doi=10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00393-4|isbn=978-0-08-043076-8 }}</ref> For example, a patient may have an hysterical amnesia (memory being an autonomous function) because of intrapsychic conflict (wishing not to remember because it is too painful). | |||
====Jacques Lacan and Lacanian psychoanalysis==== | |||
], which integrates psychoanalysis with ] and ]ian philosophy, is especially popular in France and parts of Latin America. Lacanian psychoanalysis is a departure from the traditional British and American psychoanalysis, which is predominantly ]. ] frequently used the phrase "retourner à Freud" ("return to Freud") in his seminars and writings, as he claimed that his theories were an extension of Freud's own, contrary to those of ], the Ego Psychology, ] and "self" theories and also claims the necessity of reading Freud's complete works, not only a part of them. Lacan's concepts concern the "]", the "Real", the "Imaginary" and the "Symbolic", and the claim that "the unconscious is structured as a language".<ref>Lacan, Jacques, ''The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis''. Trans. Bruce Fink. New York – London: W.W. Norton, 2006.</ref> | |||
Taken together, the above theories present a group of ] assumptions. Therefore, the inclusive group of the different classical theories provides a cross-sectional view of human mental processes. There are six "points of view", five described by Freud and a sixth added by Hartmann. Unconscious processes can therefore be evaluated from each of these six points of view:<ref>Rapaport, Gill. 1959. "The Points of View and Assumptions of Metapsychology." '']'' 40: 153–62. {{PMID|14436240}}.</ref> | |||
Though a major influence on psychoanalysis in France and parts of Latin America, Lacan and his ideas have had little to no impact on psychoanalysis or psychotherapy in the English-speaking world, where his ideas are most widely used to analyze texts in ].<ref>Evans, Dylan "From Lacan to Darwin", in The Literary Animal; Evolution and the Nature of Narrative, eds. Jonathan Gottschall and David Sloan Wilson, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2005.</ref> Due to his unorthodox methods and theories, Lacan was expelled by the ],<ref>Webster, Richard. "."</ref> and many of Lacan's psychoanalytic concepts have been described as nonsensical, inconsistent or pseudoscientific.<ref>Evans, 2005.</ref><ref>]. "" in The Times Higher Education Supplement, 31 October 1997, p. 20.</ref><ref>Holland, Norman (1992). ''The Critical I'', Columbia University Press, ISBN 0-231-07650-9</ref> | |||
# Topographic | |||
====Interpersonal psychoanalysis==== | |||
# Dynamic (the theory of conflict) | |||
] accents the nuances of interpersonal interactions, particularly how individuals protect themselves from anxiety by establishing collusive interactions with others, and the relevance of actual experiences with other persons developmentally (e.g. family and peers) as well as in the present. This is contrasted with the primacy of intrapsychic forces, as in classical psychoanalysis. Interpersonal theory was first introduced by ], MD, and developed further by ], ], ], and others who contributed to the founding of the ] and Interpersonal Psychoanalysis in general. | |||
# Economic (the theory of energy flow) | |||
# Structural | |||
# Genetic (i.e. propositions concerning origin and development of psychological functions) | |||
# Adaptational (i.e. psychological phenomena as it relates to the external world) | |||
==== |
====Modern conflict theory==== | ||
''Modern conflict theory'', a variation of ], is a revised version of structural theory, most notably different by altering concepts related to where repressed thoughts were stored.<ref name="Freud 1923" /><ref name="Freud 1926" /> Modern conflict theory addresses emotional symptoms and character traits as complex solutions to mental conflict.<ref>]. 2006. "Psychoanalysis: Mind and Meaning." ''].''</ref> It dispenses with the concepts of a fixed ], and instead posits conscious and unconscious conflict among wishes (dependent, controlling, sexual, and aggressive), guilt and shame, emotions (especially anxiety and depressive affect), and defensive operations that shut off from consciousness some aspect of the others. Moreover, healthy functioning (adaptive) is also determined, to a great extent, by resolutions of conflict. | |||
{{Main|Culturalist psychoanalysts}} | |||
Some psychoanalysts have been labeled ''culturalist'', because of the prominence they attributed culture in the genesis of behavior.<ref name="Guimon">J. Guimón (2003) ''Relational mental health: beyond evidence-based interventions'' p.68</ref> Among others, ], ], ], have been called '''culturalist psychoanalysts'''.<ref name="Guimon"/> They were famously in conflict with orthodox psychoanalysts.<ref>Deleuze and Guattari (1972) '']'' pp. 190–1</ref> | |||
A major objective of modern conflict-theory psychoanalysis is to change the balance of conflict in a patient by making aspects of the less adaptive solutions (also called "compromise formations") conscious so that they can be rethought, and more adaptive solutions found. Current theoreticians who follow the work of ], especially ''The Mind in Conflict'' (1982), include Sandor Abend,<ref>Abend, Sandor, Porder, and Willick. 1983. ''Borderline Patients: Clinical Perspectives''.</ref> ],<ref>] and ]. 1964. ''Psychoanalytic Concepts and the Structural Theory''.</ref> and Jerome Blackman.<ref name="Blackman">Blackman, Jerome. 2003. ''101 Defenses: How the Mind Shields Itself''.</ref> | |||
====Relational psychoanalysis==== | |||
] combines interpersonal psychoanalysis with object-relations theory and with inter-subjective theory as critical for mental health, was introduced by ].<ref>{{citation|author=Mitchell S|title= Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis|journal= The Analytic Press|year= 1997}}</ref> Relational psychoanalysis emphasizes how the individual's personality is shaped by both real and imagined relationships with others, and how these relationship patterns are re-enacted in the interactions between analyst and patient. In New York, key proponents of relational psychoanalysis include ], ], and Adrienne Harris. ] and Target, in London, have propounded their view of the necessity of helping certain detached, isolated patients, develop the capacity for "mentalization" associated with thinking about relationships and themselves. Arietta Slade, ], and ] in New York have additionally contributed to the application of relational psychoanalysis to treatment of the adult patient-as-parent, the clinical study of mentalization in parent-infant relationships, and the intergenerational transmission of attachment and trauma. | |||
====Object relations theory==== | |||
====Interpersonal-relational psychoanalysis==== | |||
'']'' attempts to explain human relationships through a study of how mental representations of the self and others are organized.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Object Relations Theory|url=https://web.sonoma.edu/users/d/daniels/objectrelations.html|access-date=2020-07-20|website=web.sonoma.edu|archive-date=2020-09-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200927190929/https://web.sonoma.edu/users/d/daniels/objectrelations.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> The clinical symptoms that suggest object relations problems (typically developmental delays throughout life) include disturbances in an individual's capacity to feel: warmth, empathy, trust, sense of security, identity stability, consistent emotional closeness, and stability in relationships with significant others. | |||
The term interpersonal-relational psychoanalysis is often used as a professional identification. Psychoanalysts under this broader umbrella debate about what precisely are the differences between the two schools, without any current clear consensus. | |||
Klein discusses the concept of ], creating a mental representation of external objects; and ], applying this mental representation to reality.<ref name="Abrahams 2021">{{Cite book |last1=Abrahams |first1=Deborah |last2=Rohleder |first2=Poul |title=A clinical guide to psychodynamic psychotherapy |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1239743018 |date=2021 |location=Abingdon, Oxfordshire |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-351-13858-1 |oclc=1239743018}}</ref>{{Rp|24}} ] introduced the concept of ''containment'' of projections in the mother-child relationship where a mother understands an infants projections, modifies them and returns them to the child.<ref name="Abrahams 2021" />{{Rp|27}} | |||
====Intersubjective psychoanalysis==== | |||
The term "]" was introduced in psychoanalysis by George E. Atwood and ] (1984). Intersubjective approaches emphasize how both personality development and the therapeutic process are influenced by the interrelationship between the patient's subjective perspective and that of others. The authors of the interpersonal-relational and intersubjective approaches: ], ], ], ], Bernard Brandchaft, J. Fosshage, Donna M.Orange, Arnold "Arnie" Mindell, Thomas Ogden, Owen Renik, Irwin Z. Hoffman, ], Colwyn Trewarthen, Edgar A. Levenson, Jay R. Greenberg, Edward R. Ritvo, Beatrice Beebe, Frank M. Lachmann, ] and ]. | |||
Concepts regarding internal representation (aka 'introspect', 'self and object representation', or 'internalization of self and other'), although often attributed to ], were actually first mentioned by Sigmund Freud in his early concepts of drive theory ('']'', 1905). Freud's 1917 paper "]", for example, hypothesized that unresolved grief was caused by the survivor's internalized image of the deceased becoming fused with that of the survivor, and then the survivor shifting unacceptable anger toward the deceased onto the now complex ].<ref name="Freud 1917" /> | |||
====Modern psychoanalysis==== | |||
"]" is a term coined by Hyman Spotnitz and his colleagues to describe a body of theoretical and clinical approaches that aim to extend Freud's theories so as to make them applicable to the full spectrum of emotional disorders and broaden the potential for treatment to pathologies thought to be untreatable by classical methods. Interventions based on this approach are primarily intended to provide an emotional-maturational communication to the patient, rather than to promote intellectual insight. These interventions, beyond insight directed aims, are used to resolve resistances that are presented in the clinical setting. This school of psychoanalysis has fostered training opportunities for students in the United States and from countries worldwide. Its journal Modern Psychoanalysis has been published since 1976. | |||
Melanie Klein's hypotheses regarding internalization during the first year of life, leading to paranoid and depressive positions, were later challenged by ] (e.g., ''The First Year of Life'', 1965), who divided the first year of life into a coenesthetic phase of the first six months, and then a diacritic phase for the second six months. ], Fine, and Bergman (1975) describe distinct phases and subphases of child development leading to "separation-individuation" during the first three years of life, stressing the importance of constancy of parental figures in the face of the child's destructive aggression, internalizations, stability of affect management, and ability to develop healthy ].<ref>], Fine, and Bergman. 1975. ''The Psychological Birth of the Human Infant''.</ref> | |||
==Psychopathology (mental disturbances)== | |||
===Adult patients=== | |||
The various psychoses involve deficits in the autonomous ego functions (see above) of integration (organization) of thought, in abstraction ability, in relationship to reality and in reality testing. In depressions with psychotic features, the self-preservation function may also be damaged (sometimes by overwhelming depressive affect). Because of the integrative deficits (often causing what general psychiatrists call "loose associations," "blocking," "]," "verbigeration," and "thought withdrawal"), the development of self and object representations is also impaired. Clinically, therefore, psychotic individuals manifest limitations in warmth, empathy, trust, identity, closeness and/or stability in relationships (due to problems with self-object fusion anxiety) as well. | |||
During adolescence, ] (1950–1960s) described the 'identity crisis', that involves identity-diffusion anxiety. In order for an adult to be able to experience "Warm-ETHICS: (warmth, Empathy, Trust, ], Identity, Closeness, and Stability) in relationships, the teenager must resolve the problems with identity and redevelop self and object constancy.<ref name="Blackman" /> | |||
In patients whose autonomous ego functions are more intact, but who still show problems with object relations, the diagnosis often falls into the category known as "borderline." Borderline patients also show deficits, often in controlling impulses, affects, or fantasies – but their ability to test reality remains more or less intact. Adults who do not experience guilt and shame, and who indulge in criminal behavior, are usually diagnosed as psychopaths, or, using ], ]. | |||
====Self psychology==== | |||
Panic, phobias, conversions, obsessions, compulsions and depressions (analysts call these "neurotic symptoms") are not usually caused by deficits in functions. Instead, they are caused by intrapsychic conflicts. The conflicts are generally among sexual and hostile-aggressive wishes, guilt and shame, and reality factors. The conflicts may be conscious or unconscious, but create anxiety, depressive affect, and anger. Finally, the various elements are managed by defensive operations – essentially shut-off brain mechanisms that make people unaware of that element of conflict. "Repression" is the term given to the mechanism that shuts thoughts out of consciousness. "Isolation of affect" is the term used for the mechanism that shuts sensations out of consciousness. Neurotic symptoms may occur with or without deficits in ego functions, object relations, and ego strengths. Therefore, it is not uncommon to encounter obsessive-compulsive schizophrenics, panic patients who also suffer with ], etc. | |||
{{Unreferenced section|date=October 2022}} | |||
'']'' emphasizes the development of a stable and integrated ] through empathic contacts with other humans, primary significant others conceived of as ']'. ''Selfobjects'' meet the developing self's needs for mirroring, idealization, and twinship, and thereby strengthen the developing self. The process of treatment proceeds through "transmuting internalizations" in which the patient gradually internalizes the selfobject functions provided by the therapist. | |||
Self psychology was proposed originally by ], and has been further developed by ], Frank Lachmann, ] and ], Marian Tolpin, and others. | |||
This section above is partial to ego psychoanalytic theory "autonomous ego functions." As the "autonomous ego functions" theory is only a theory, it may yet be proven incorrect. | |||
====Lacanian psychoanalysis==== | |||
], which integrates psychoanalysis with ] and ]ian philosophy, is especially popular in France and parts of Latin America. Lacanian psychoanalysis is a departure from the traditional British and American psychoanalysis. ] frequently used the phrase "retourner à Freud" ("return to Freud") in his seminars and writings, as he claimed that his theories were an extension of Freud's own, contrary to those of Anna Freud, the Ego Psychology, ] and "self" theories and also claims the necessity of reading Freud's complete works, not only a part of them. Lacan's concepts concern the "]", ], ], and ], and the claim that "the unconscious is structured as a language."<ref>]. 2006. ''The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis'', translated by ]. New York: ].</ref> | |||
Though a major influence on psychoanalysis in France and parts of Latin America, Lacan and his ideas have taken longer to be translated into English and he has thus had a lesser impact on psychoanalysis and psychotherapy in the English-speaking world. In the United Kingdom and the United States, his ideas are most widely used to analyze texts in ].<ref>Evans, Dylan. 2005. "From Lacan to Darwin." In ''The Literary Animal; Evolution and the Nature of Narrative'', edited by ] and ]. Evanston: ].</ref> Due to his increasingly critical stance towards the deviation from Freud's thought, often singling out particular texts and readings from his colleagues, Lacan was excluded from acting as a training analyst in the IPA, thus leading him to create his own school in order to maintain an ] for the many candidates who desired to continue their analysis with him.<ref>]. 1990 . '']''.</ref> | |||
====Adaptive paradigm==== | |||
{{Main|Robert Langs}} | |||
The ''adaptive paradigm'' of psychotherapy develops out of the work of ]. The ''adaptive paradigm'' interprets psychic conflict primarily in terms of conscious and unconscious adaptation to reality. Langs' recent work in some measure returns to the earlier Freud, in that Langs prefers a modified version of the ] of the mind (conscious, preconscious, and unconscious) over the ] (id, ego, and super-ego), including the former's emphasis on trauma (though Langs looks to death-related traumas rather than sexual traumas).<ref name="Langs R 2010"/> At the same time, Langs' model of the mind differs from Freud's in that it understands the mind in terms of evolutionary biological principles.<ref>]. 2010. ''Fundamentals of Adaptive Psychotherapy and Counseling''. London: ].</ref> | |||
====Relational psychoanalysis==== | |||
'']'' combines interpersonal psychoanalysis with object-relations theory and with inter-subjective theory as critical for mental health. It was introduced by ].<ref>]. 1997. ''Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis''. ].</ref> Relational psychoanalysis stresses how the individual's personality is shaped by both real and imagined relationships with others, and how these relationship patterns are re-enacted in the interactions between analyst and patient. Relational psychoanalysts have propounded their view of the necessity of helping certain detached, isolated patients, develop the capacity for "mentalization" associated with thinking about relationships and themselves. | |||
==Psychopathology (mental disturbances)== | |||
===Childhood origins=== | ===Childhood origins=== | ||
Freudian theories |
Freudian theories hold that ] problems can be traced to unresolved conflicts from certain phases of childhood and ], caused by fantasy, stemming from their own drives. Freud, based on the data gathered from his patients early in his career, suspected that neurotic disturbances occurred when children were sexually abused in childhood (i.e. '']''). Later, Freud came to believe that, although child abuse occurs, neurotic symptoms were not associated with this. He believed that neurotic people often had unconscious conflicts that involved incestuous fantasies deriving from different stages of development. He found the stage from about three to six years of age (preschool years, today called the "first genital stage") to be filled with fantasies of having romantic relationships with both parents. Arguments were quickly generated in early 20th-century Vienna about whether adult seduction of children, i.e. ], was the basis of neurotic illness. There still is no complete agreement, although nowadays professionals recognize the negative effects of child sexual abuse on mental health.<ref>{{cite web |url = http://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/pages/child_sexual_abuse.asp |title = Child Sexual Abuse | publisher = National Center for PTSD, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130728202304/http://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/pages/child_sexual_abuse.asp |archive-date = 2013-07-28 }}</ref> | ||
The theory on origins of pathologically dysfunctional relationships was further developed by the specialist in ] Jürg Willi (* 16. March 1934 in ]; † 8. April 2019) into the ] concept. The concept takes the observations of ] about the narcissistic, the oral, the anal and the phallic phases and translates them into a two-couples-relationship model, with respect to dysfunctions in the relationship resulting from childhood trauma.<ref>{{cite book | last = Willi | first = Jürg | date = 2011 | title = Die Zweierbeziehung |language=de | publisher = rowolth | isbn = 978-3-499-62758-3}}</ref> | |||
Many psychoanalysts who work with children have studied the actual effects of child abuse, which include ego and object relations deficits and severe neurotic conflicts. Much research has been done on these types of trauma in childhood, and the adult sequelae of those. On the other hand, many adults with symptom neuroses and character pathology have no history of childhood sexual or physical abuse. In studying the childhood factors that start neurotic symptom development, Freud found a constellation of factors that, for literary reasons, he termed the ] (based on the play by ], '']'', where the protagonist unwittingly kills his father ] and marries his mother ]). The shorthand term, "oedipal" — later explicated by ] in "On the Concept Superego" (1960) and modified by Charles Brenner in "The Mind in Conflict" (1982) — refers to the powerful attachments that children make to their parents in the preschool years. These attachments involve fantasies of sexual relationships with either (or both) parent, and, therefore, competitive fantasies toward either (or both) parents. Humberto Nagera (1975) has been particularly helpful in clarifying many of the complexities of the child through these years. | |||
====Oedipal conflicts==== | |||
The terms "positive" and "negative" oedipal conflicts have been attached to the heterosexual and homosexual aspects, respectively. Both seem to occur in development of most children. Eventually, the developing child's concessions to reality (that they will neither marry one parent nor eliminate the other) lead to identifications with parental values. These identifications generally create a new set of mental operations regarding values and guilt, subsumed under the term "superego." Besides superego development, children "resolve" their preschool oedipal conflicts through channeling wishes into something their parents approve of ("sublimation") and the development, during the school-age years ("latency") of age-appropriate ] defensive maneuvers (rules, repetitive games). | |||
Many psychoanalysts who work with children have studied the actual effects of child abuse, which include ego and object relations deficits and severe neurotic conflicts. Much research has been done on these types of trauma in childhood, and the adult sequelae of those. In studying the childhood factors that start neurotic symptom development, Freud found a constellation of factors that, for literary reasons, he termed the ], based on the play by ], '']'', in which the protagonist unwittingly kills his father and marries his mother. The validity of the ''Oedipus complex'' is now widely disputed and rejected.<ref name="Miller, Alice 1984, pp. 105">Miller, Alice. 1984. ''Thou Shalt Not Be Aware: Society's Betrayal of the Child''. New York: ]. pp. 105–227.</ref><ref name="Kupfersmid, Joel">Kupfersmid, Joel. 1995. ''Does the Oedipus complex exist?'' ].</ref> | |||
The shorthand term, ''oedipal''—later explicated by ] in "On the Concept Superego" (1960)<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Sandler|first=Joseph|date=January 1960|title=On the Concept of Superego1|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00797308.1960.11822572|journal=The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child|language=en|volume=15|issue=1|pages=128–162|doi=10.1080/00797308.1960.11822572|pmid=13746181|issn=0079-7308}}</ref> and modified by ] in ''The Mind in Conflict'' (1982)—refers to the powerful attachments that children make to their parents in the preschool years. These attachments involve fantasies of sexual relationships with either (or both) parent, and, therefore, competitive fantasies toward either (or both) parents. Humberto Nagera (1975) has been particularly helpful in clarifying many of the complexities of the child through these years.{{Citation needed|date=May 2020}} | |||
"Positive" and "negative" oedipal conflicts have been attached to the heterosexual and homosexual aspects, respectively. Both seem to occur in development of most children. Eventually, the developing child's concessions to reality (that they will neither marry one parent nor eliminate the other) lead to identifications with parental values. These identifications generally create a new set of mental operations regarding values and guilt, subsumed under the term ''superego''. Besides superego development, children "resolve" their preschool oedipal conflicts through channeling wishes into something their parents approve of ("sublimation") and the development, during the school-age years ("latency") of age-appropriate ] defensive maneuvers (rules, repetitive games).{{Citation needed|date=May 2020}} | |||
==Treatment== | ==Treatment== | ||
{{More citations needed section|date=May 2020}} | |||
Using the various analytic and psychological techniques to assess mental problems, some believe that there are particular constellations of problems that are especially suited for analytic treatment (see below) whereas other problems might respond better to medicines and other interpersonal interventions. To be treated with psychoanalysis, whatever the presenting problem, the person requesting help must demonstrate a desire to start an analysis. The person wishing to start an analysis must have some capacity for speech and communication. As well, they need to be able to have or develop trust and insight within the psychoanalytic session. Potential patients must undergo a preliminary stage of treatment to assess their amenability to psychoanalysis at that time, and also to enable the analyst to form a working psychological model which the analyst will use to direct the treatment. Psychoanalysts mainly work with neurosis and hysteria in particular; however, adapted forms of psychoanalysis are used in working with schizophrenia and other forms of psychosis or mental disorder. Finally, if a prospective patient is severely suicidal a longer preliminary stage may be employed, sometimes with sessions which have a twenty minute break in the middle. There are numerous modifications in technique under the heading of psychoanalysis due to the individualistic nature of personality in both analyst and patient. | |||
Using the various analytic and psychological techniques to ] mental problems, some believe{{by whom|date=July 2021}} that there are particular constellations of problems that are especially suited for analytic treatment (see below) whereas other problems might respond better to medicines and other interpersonal interventions.<ref name="INSERM" /> To be treated with psychoanalysis, whatever the presenting problem, the person requesting help must demonstrate a desire to start an analysis. The person wishing to start an analysis must have some capacity for speech and communication. As well, they need to be able to have or develop trust and insight within the psychoanalytic session. Potential patients must undergo a preliminary stage of treatment to assess their amenability to psychoanalysis at that time, and also to enable the analyst to form a working psychological model, which the analyst will use to direct the treatment. Psychoanalysts mainly work with neurosis and hysteria in particular; however, adapted forms of psychoanalysis are used in working with schizophrenia and other forms of psychosis or mental disorder. Finally, if a prospective patient is severely suicidal a longer preliminary stage may be employed, sometimes with sessions which have a twenty-minute break in the middle. There are numerous modifications in technique under the heading of psychoanalysis due to the individualistic nature of personality in both analyst and patient. | |||
The most common problems treatable with psychoanalysis include: ]s, ], ], ], ], ], ]s, a wide variety of relationship problems (such as dating and marital strife), and a wide variety of character problems (for example, painful shyness, meanness, obnoxiousness, workaholism, hyperseductiveness, hyperemotionality, hyperfastidiousness). The fact that many of such patients also demonstrate deficits above makes diagnosis and treatment selection difficult. | |||
Analytical organizations such as the IPA, APsaA and the European Federation for Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy have established procedures and models for the indication and practice of psychoanalytical therapy for trainees in analysis. The match between the analyst and the patient can be viewed as another contributing factor for the indication and contraindication for psychoanalytic treatment. The analyst decides whether the patient is suitable for psychoanalysis. This decision made by the analyst, besides made on the usual indications and pathology, is also based to a certain degree by the "fit" between analyst and patient. A person's suitability for analysis at any particular time is based on their desire to know something about where their illness has come from. Someone who is not suitable for analysis expresses no desire to know more about the root causes of their illness. | |||
The most common problems treatable with psychoanalysis include: ]s, ], ], ], ], attacks, ], ]s, a wide variety of relationship problems (such as dating and marital strife), and a wide variety of character problems (for example, painful shyness, meanness, obnoxiousness, workaholism, hyperseductiveness, hyperemotionality, hyperfastidiousness). The fact that many of such patients also demonstrate deficits above makes diagnosis and treatment selection difficult. | |||
Analytical organizations such as the ],<ref>{{citation|title=International Psychoanalytic Organization|url=http://www.ipa.org.uk/}}</ref> ,<ref>{{citation|title=American Psychoanalytic Association|url=http://www.apsa.org}}</ref> and the European Federation for Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy,<ref>{{citation|title=European Federation for Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy|url=http://www.efpp.org}}</ref> have established procedures and models for the indication and practice of psychoanalytical therapy for trainees in analysis. The match between the analyst and the patient can be viewed as another contributing factor for the indication and contraindication for psychoanalytic treatment. The analyst decides whether the patient is suitable for psychoanalysis. This decision made by the analyst, besides made on the usual indications and pathology, is also based to a certain degree by the "fit" between analyst and patient. A person's suitability for analysis at any particular time is based on their desire to know something about where their illness has come from. Someone who is not suitable for analysis expresses no desire to know more about the root causes of their illness. | |||
An evaluation may include one or more other analysts' independent opinions and will include discussion of the patient's financial situation and insurances. | An evaluation may include one or more other analysts' independent opinions and will include discussion of the patient's financial situation and insurances. | ||
===Techniques=== | ===Techniques=== | ||
The |
The foundation of psychoanalysis is interpretation of the patient's unconscious conflicts that are interfering with current-day functioning – conflicts that are causing painful symptoms such as phobias, anxiety, depression, and compulsions. ] (1936) stressed that figuring out ways the patient distorted perceptions about the analyst led to understanding what may have been forgotten.<ref group="lower-roman">also see Freud's paper "Repeating, Remembering, and Working Through"</ref> In particular, unconscious hostile feelings toward the analyst could be found in symbolic, negative reactions to what ] later called the "frame" of the therapy<ref>]. 1998. ''Ground Rules in Psychotherapy and Counselling''. London: Karnac.</ref>—the setup that included times of the sessions, payment of fees, and necessity of talking. In patients who made mistakes, forgot, or showed other peculiarities regarding time, fees, and talking, the analyst can usually find various unconscious "resistances" to the flow of thoughts (aka ]). | ||
When the patient reclines on a couch with the analyst out of view, the patient tends to remember more experiences, more resistance and transference, and is able to reorganize thoughts after the development of insight – through the interpretive work of the analyst. Although fantasy life can be understood through the examination of ]s, masturbation fantasies<ref group="lower-roman">] Marcus, I. and J. Francis. 1975. ''Masturbation from Infancy to Senescence''.</ref> are also important. The analyst is interested in how the patient reacts to and avoids such fantasies.<ref>Gray, Paul. 1994. ''The Ego and Analysis of Defense''. J. Aronson.</ref> Various memories of early life are generally distorted—what Freud called ]—and in any case, very early experiences (before age two)—cannot be remembered.<ref group="lower-roman">see the child studies of Eleanor Galenson on "evocative memory"</ref> | |||
] | |||
When the patient reclines on a couch with the analyst out of view, the patient tends to remember more, experiences more resistance and transference, and is able to reorganize thoughts after the development of insight – through the interpretive work of the analyst. Although fantasy life can be understood through the examination of ]s, masturbation fantasies (cf. Marcus, I. and Francis, J. (1975), ''Masturbation from Infancy to Senescence'') are also important. The analyst is interested in how the patient reacts to and avoids such fantasies (cf. Paul Gray (1994), ''The Ego and the Analysis of Defense'').<ref>{{citation|author=Gray P|title= The Ego and Analysis of Defense|publisher= J. AronsonYear= 1994}}</ref> Various memories of early life are generally distorted – Freud called them "screen memories" – and in any case, very early experiences (before age two) – cannot be remembered (See the child studies of Eleanor Galenson on "evocative memory"). | |||
====Variations in technique==== | ====Variations in technique==== | ||
There is what is known among psychoanalysts as ''classical technique'', although Freud throughout his writings deviated from this considerably, depending on the problems of any given patient. | |||
There is what is known among psychoanalysts as "classical technique," although Freud throughout his writings deviated from this considerably, depending on the problems of any given patient. Classical technique was summarized by Allan Compton, MD, as comprising instructions (telling the patient to try to say what's on their mind, including interferences); exploration (asking questions); and clarification (rephrasing and summarizing what the patient has been describing). As well, the analyst can also use confrontation to bringing an aspect of functioning, usually a defense, to the patient's attention. The analyst then uses a variety of interpretation methods, such as dynamic interpretation (explaining how being too nice guards against guilt, e.g. – defense vs. affect); genetic interpretation (explaining how a past event is influencing the present); resistance interpretation (showing the patient how they are avoiding their problems); ] interpretation (showing the patient ways old conflicts arise in current relationships, including that with the analyst); or dream interpretation (obtaining the patient's thoughts about their dreams and connecting this with their current problems). Analysts can also use reconstruction to estimate what may have happened in the past that created some current issue. | |||
''Classical technique'' was summarized by Allan Compton as comprising:<ref>{{cite web |title=Psychoanalytic Techniques |url=https://psynso.com/psychoanalytic-techniques/ |publisher=Psynso |access-date=24 December 2022}}</ref> | |||
These techniques are primarily based on ] (see above). As object relations theory evolved, supplemented by the work of ], ], and ], techniques with patients who had more severe problems with basic trust (], 1950) and a history of maternal deprivation (see the works of Augusta Alpert) led to new techniques with adults. These have sometimes been called interpersonal, intersubjective (cf. Stolorow), relational, or corrective object relations techniques. These techniques include expressing an empathic attunement to the patient or warmth; exposing a bit of the analyst's personal life or attitudes to the patient; allowing the patient autonomy in the form of disagreement with the analyst (cf. I.H. Paul, ''Letters to Simon''.); and explaining the motivations of others which the patient misperceives. Ego psychological concepts of deficit in functioning led to refinements in supportive therapy. These techniques are particularly applicable to psychotic and near-psychotic (cf., Eric Marcus, "Psychosis and Near-psychosis") patients. These supportive therapy techniques include discussions of reality; encouragement to stay alive (including hospitalization); psychotropic medicines to relieve overwhelming depressive affect or overwhelming fantasies (hallucinations and delusions); and advice about the meanings of things (to counter abstraction failures). | |||
* Instructions: telling the patient to try to say what's on their mind, including interferences; | |||
The notion of the "silent analyst" has been criticized. Actually, the analyst listens using Arlow's approach as set out in "The Genesis of Interpretation"), using active intervention to interpret resistances, defenses creating pathology, and fantasies. Silence is not a technique of psychoanalysis (also see the studies and opinion papers of Owen Renik, MD). "Analytic Neutrality" is a concept that does not mean the analyst is silent. It refers to the analyst's position of not taking sides in the internal struggles of the patient. For example, if a patient feels guilty, the analyst might explore what the patient has been doing or thinking that causes the guilt, but not reassure the patient not to feel guilty. The analyst might also explore the identifications with parents and others that led to the guilt. | |||
* Exploration: asking questions; and | |||
* Clarification: rephrasing and summarizing what the patient has been describing. | |||
As well, the analyst can also use confrontation to bringing an aspect of functioning, usually a defense, to the patient's attention. The analyst then uses a variety of interpretation methods, such as: | |||
Interpersonal-Relational psychoanalysts emphasize the notion that it is impossible to be neutral. ] introduced the term "participant-observer" to indicate the analyst inevitably interacts with the analysand, and suggested the ] as an alternative to interpretation. The detailed inquiry involves noting where the analysand is leaving out important elements of an account and noting when the story is obfuscated, and asking careful questions to open up the dialogue. | |||
* Dynamic interpretation: explaining how being too nice guards against guilt (e.g. defense vs. affect); | |||
* Genetic interpretation: explaining how a past event is influencing the present; | |||
* Resistance interpretation: showing the patient how they are avoiding their problems; | |||
* ] interpretation: showing the patient ways old conflicts arise in current relationships, including that with the analyst; or | |||
* Dream interpretation: obtaining the patient's thoughts about their dreams and connecting this with their current problems. | |||
Analysts can also use reconstruction to estimate what may have happened in the past that created some current issue. These techniques are primarily based on ] (see above). As ''object relations theory'' evolved, supplemented by the work of ] and ], techniques with patients who had more severe problems with basic trust (], 1950) and a history of ] (see the works of Augusta Alpert) led to new techniques with adults. These have sometimes been called interpersonal, intersubjective (cf. ]), relational, or corrective object relations techniques. | |||
Ego psychological concepts of deficit in functioning led to refinements in supportive therapy. These techniques are particularly applicable to psychotic and near-psychotic (cf., Eric Marcus, "Psychosis and Near-psychosis") patients. These supportive therapy techniques include discussions of reality; encouragement to stay alive (including hospitalization); psychotropic medicines to relieve overwhelming depressive affect or overwhelming fantasies (hallucinations and delusions); and advice about the meanings of things (to counter abstraction failures). | |||
The notion of the "silent analyst" has been criticized. Actually, the analyst listens using Arlow's approach as set out in "The Genesis of Interpretation", using active intervention to interpret resistances, defenses creating pathology, and fantasies. Silence is not a technique of psychoanalysis (see also the studies and opinion papers of Owen Renik). "]" is a concept that does not mean the analyst is silent. It refers to the analyst's position of not taking sides in the internal struggles of the patient. For example, if a patient feels guilty, the analyst might explore what the patient has been doing or thinking that causes the guilt, but not reassure the patient not to feel guilty. The analyst might also explore the identifications with parents and others that led to the guilt.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Leider |first=Robert J. |date=1983-01-01 |title=Analytic neutrality—a historical review |url=https://doi.org/10.1080/07351698309533520 |journal=Psychoanalytic Inquiry |volume=3 |issue=4 |pages=665–674 |doi=10.1080/07351698309533520 |issn=0735-1690}}</ref><ref>Greenberg, J. (1986) {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220608093724/https://www.wawhite.org/uploads/PDF/E1f_10%20Greenberg_J_Analytic_Neutrality.pdf |date=2022-06-08 }}. Contemp. Psychoanal., 22:76-86</ref> | |||
Interpersonal–relational psychoanalysts emphasize the notion that it is impossible to be neutral. ] introduced the term '']'' to indicate the analyst inevitably interacts with the analysand, and suggested the detailed inquiry as an alternative to interpretation. The detailed inquiry involves noting where the analysand is leaving out important elements of an account and noting when the story is obfuscated, and asking careful questions to open up the dialogue.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Green |first=Maurice R. |date=1977-07-01 |title=Sullivan's Participant Observation |url=https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.1977.10745493 |journal=Contemporary Psychoanalysis |volume=13 |issue=3 |pages=358–360 |doi=10.1080/00107530.1977.10745493 |issn=0010-7530}}</ref> | |||
===Group therapy and play therapy=== | ===Group therapy and play therapy=== | ||
Although single-client sessions remain the norm, psychoanalytic theory has been used to develop other types of psychological treatment. Psychoanalytic group therapy was pioneered by ], Joseph Pratt, Paul F. Schilder, Samuel R. Slavson, ], and Wolfe. Child-centered counseling for parents was instituted early in analytic history by Freud, and was later further |
Although single-client sessions remain the norm, psychoanalytic theory has been used to develop other types of psychological treatment. Psychoanalytic group therapy was pioneered by ], Joseph Pratt, ], ], ], and Wolfe. Child-centered counseling for parents was instituted early in analytic history by Freud, and was later further developed by ], Edith Schulhofer, and Gilbert Kliman. Psychoanalytically based couples therapy has been promulgated and explicated by Fred Sander. Techniques and tools developed in the first decade of the 21st century have made psychoanalysis available to patients who were not treatable by earlier techniques. This meant that the analytic situation was modified so that it would be more suitable and more likely to be helpful for these patients. Eagle (2007) believes that psychoanalysis cannot be a self-contained discipline but instead must be open to influence from and integration with findings and theory from other disciplines.<ref>Eagle, Morris N. 2007. "." '']'' 24:10–24. {{doi|10.1037/0736-9735.24.1.10}}.</ref> | ||
Psychoanalytic constructs have been adapted for use with children with treatments such as ], ], and ]. Throughout her career, from the 1920s through the 1970s, ] adapted psychoanalysis for children through play. This is still used today for children, especially those who are preadolescent |
Psychoanalytic constructs have been adapted for use with children with treatments such as ], ], and ]. Throughout her career, from the 1920s through the 1970s, ] adapted psychoanalysis for children through play. This is still used today for children, especially those who are preadolescent.<ref group="lower-roman">see Leon Hoffman, New York Psychoanalytic Institute Center for Children</ref> Using toys and games, children are able to symbolically demonstrate their fears, fantasies, and defenses; although not identical, this technique, in children, is analogous to the aim of free association in adults. Psychoanalytic play therapy allows the child and analyst to understand children's conflicts, particularly defenses such as disobedience and withdrawal, that have been guarding against various unpleasant feelings and hostile wishes. In art therapy, the counselor may have a child draw a portrait and then tell a story about the portrait. The counselor watches for recurring themes—regardless of whether it is with art or toys.{{Citation needed|date=May 2020}} | ||
===Cultural variations=== | ===Cultural variations=== | ||
Psychoanalysis can be adapted to different ], as long as the therapist or counselor understands the client's culture. For example, Tori and Blimes found that defense mechanisms were valid in a normative sample of 2,624 ]. The use of certain defense mechanisms was related to cultural values. For example Thais value calmness and collectiveness (because of Buddhist beliefs), so they were low on ]. Psychoanalysis also applies because Freud used techniques that allowed him to get the subjective perceptions of his patients. He takes an objective approach by not facing his clients during his talk therapy sessions. He met with his patients wherever they were, such as when he used free |
Psychoanalysis can be adapted to different ], as long as the therapist or counselor understands the client's culture.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hall |first1=Gordon C. Nagayama |last2=Kim-Mozeleski |first2=Jin E. |last3=Zane |first3=Nolan W. |last4=Sato |first4=Hiroshi |last5=Huang |first5=Ellen R. |last6=Tuan |first6=Mia |last7=Ibaraki |first7=Alicia Y. |title=Cultural adaptations of psychotherapy: Therapists' applications of conceptual models with Asians and Asian Americans. |journal=Asian American Journal of Psychology |date=March 2019 |volume=10 |issue=1 |pages=68–78 |doi=10.1037/aap0000122 <!--|access-date=29 March 2023-->|pmid=30854159 |pmc=6402600 }}</ref> For example, Tori and Blimes found that defense mechanisms were valid in a normative sample of 2,624 ]. The use of certain defense mechanisms was related to cultural values. For example, Thais value calmness and collectiveness (because of ] beliefs), so they were low on ]. Psychoanalysis also applies because Freud used techniques that allowed him to get the subjective perceptions of his patients. He takes an objective approach by not facing his clients during his talk therapy sessions. He met with his patients wherever they were, such as when he used free association—where clients would say whatever came to mind without self-censorship. His treatments had little to no structure for most cultures, especially Asian cultures. Therefore, it is more likely that Freudian constructs will be used in structured therapy.<ref name="Thompson">Thompson, M. Guy. 2004. ''The Ethic of Honesty: The Fundamental Rule of Psychoanalysis''. ]. p. 75.</ref> In addition, Corey postulates that it will be necessary for a therapist to help clients develop a ] as well as an ego identity. | ||
===Psychodynamic therapy=== | |||
According to the NIH, psychodynamic therapy focuses on how an individual’s present behavior is affected by past experiences and the unconscious processes. <ref>{{Citation |last1=Opland |first1=Caitlin |title=Psychodynamic Therapy |date=2024 |work=StatPearls |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK606117/ |access-date=2024-11-09 |place=Treasure Island (FL) |publisher=StatPearls Publishing |pmid=39163451 |last2=Torrico |first2=Tyler J.}}</ref>The main goal associated with psychodynamic therapy is internal reflection; for the patient to be able to understand more about their current behaviors after self-reflection and a critical analyzation of their past with their therapist. In order for this method of treatment to be effective there must be a strong foundation of trust between the patient and their therapist. Often psychodynamic therapy requires a large time investment taking many years for considerable improvement and is not considered a quick solution. | |||
===Cost and length of treatment=== | ===Cost and length of treatment=== | ||
The cost to the patient of psychoanalytic treatment ranges widely from place to place and between practitioners. Low-fee analysis is often available in a psychoanalytic training clinic and graduate schools. Otherwise, the fee set by each analyst varies with the analyst's training and experience. Since, in most locations in the United States, unlike in Ontario and Germany, classical analysis (which usually requires sessions three to five times per week) is not covered by health insurance, many analysts may negotiate their fees with patients whom they feel they can help, but who have financial difficulties. The modifications of analysis, which include |
The cost to the patient of psychoanalytic treatment ranges widely from place to place and between practitioners.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Berghout |first1=Caspar C. |last2=Zevalkink |first2=Jolien |last3=Roijen |first3=Leona Hakkaart-van |date=January 2010 |title=A cost-utility analysis of psychoanalysis versus psychoanalytic psychotherapy |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care/article/abs/costutility-analysis-of-psychoanalysis-versus-psychoanalytic-psychotherapy/DEB6C109AAAE748C7295574C591F7046 |journal=International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care |language=en |volume=26 |issue=1 |pages=3–10 |doi=10.1017/S0266462309990791 |pmid=20059775 |s2cid=1941768 |issn=1471-6348|hdl=2066/90761 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> Low-fee analysis is often available in a psychoanalytic training clinic and graduate schools.<ref name="academic.oup.com">{{cite book | last=Sharpless | first=Brian A. | editor-first1=Brian A. | editor-last1=Sharpless | title=Psychodynamic Therapy Techniques | chapter=The Process of Interpretation | publisher=Oxford University Press | date=2019 | isbn=978-0-19-067627-8 | doi=10.1093/med-psych/9780190676278.003.0013 | pages=152–176}}</ref> Otherwise, the fee set by each analyst varies with the analyst's training and experience. Since, in most locations in the United States, unlike in Ontario and Germany, classical analysis (which usually requires sessions three to five times per week) is not covered by health insurance, many analysts may negotiate their fees with patients whom they feel they can help, but who have financial difficulties. The modifications of analysis, which include psychodynamic therapy, brief therapies, and certain types of group therapy,<ref group="lower-roman">cf. Slavson, S. R., ''A Textbook in Analytic Group Therapy''</ref> are carried out on a less frequent basis—usually once, twice, or three times a week – and usually the patient sits facing the therapist. As a result of the ]s and the lack of access to the unfathomable elements of the unconscious, psychoanalysis can be an expansive process that involves 2 to 5 sessions per week for several years. This type of therapy relies on the belief that reducing the symptoms will not actually help with the root causes or irrational drives. The analyst typically is a 'blank screen', disclosing very little about themselves in order that the client can use the space in the relationship to work on their unconscious without interference from outside.<ref name="Kernberg 287–288">{{Cite journal |last=Kernberg |first=Otto F. |date=October 2016 |title=The four basic components of psychoanalytic technique and derived psychoanalytic psychotherapies |journal=World Psychiatry |volume=15 |issue=3 |pages=287–288 |doi=10.1002/wps.20368 |issn=1723-8617 |pmc=5032492 |pmid=27717255}}</ref> | ||
The psychoanalyst uses various methods to help the patient to become more self-aware, insightful and uncover meanings of symptoms. Firstly, the psychoanalyst attempts to develop a safe and confidential atmosphere where the patient can report feelings, thoughts and fantasies.<ref name="Kernberg 287–288"/> Analysands (as people in analysis are called) are asked to report whatever comes to mind without fear of reprisal. Freud called this the "fundamental rule". Analysands are asked to talk about their lives, including their early life, current life and hopes and aspirations for the future. They are encouraged to report their fantasies, "flash thoughts" and dreams. In fact, Freud believed that dreams were, "the royal road to the unconscious"; he devoted an entire volume to the interpretation of dreams. Freud had his patients lay on a couch in a dimly lit room and would sit out of sight, usually directly behind them, as to not influence the patient's thoughts by his gestures or expressions.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Hergenhahn|first1=Baldwin|title=An Introduction to Theories of Personality|last2=Olson|first2=Matthew|publisher=Pearson Prentice Hall|year=2007|isbn=978-0-13-194228-8|location=Upper Saddle River, New Jersey|pages=45–46}}</ref> | |||
Many studies have also been done on briefer "dynamic" treatments; these are more expedient to measure, and shed light on the therapeutic process to some extent. Brief Relational Therapy (BRT), Brief Psychodynamic Therapy (BPT), and Time-Limited Dynamic Therapy (TLDP) limit treatment to 20–30 sessions. On average, classical analysis may last 5.7 years, but for phobias and depressions uncomplicated by ego deficits or object relations deficits, analysis may run for a shorter period of time. Longer analyses are indicated for those with more serious disturbances in object relations, more symptoms, and more ingrained character pathology (such as obnoxiousness, severe passivity, or heinous procrastination). | |||
The psychoanalyst's task, in collaboration with the analysand, is to help deepen the analysand's understanding of those factors, outside of his awareness, that drive his behaviors. In the safe environment psychoanalysis offers, the analysand becomes attached to the analyst and pretty soon he begins to experience the same conflicts with his analyst that he experiences with key figures in his life such as his parents, his boss, his significant other, etc. It is the psychoanalyst's role to point out these conflicts and to interpret them. The transferring of these internal conflicts onto the analyst is called "]".<ref name="Kernberg 287–288"/> | |||
==Training and research== | |||
Psychoanalytic training in the United States, in most locations, involves personal analytic treatment for the trainee, conducted confidentially, with no report to the Education Committee of the Analytic Training Institute; approximately 600 hours of class instruction, with a standard curriculum, over a four-year period. Classes are often a few hours per week, or for a full day or two every other weekend during the academic year; this varies with the institute; and supervision once per week, with a senior analyst, on each analytic treatment case the trainee has. The minimum number of cases varies between institutes, often two to four cases. Male and female cases are required. Supervision must go on for at least a few years on one or more cases. Supervision is done in the supervisor's office, where the trainee presents material from the analytic work that week, examines the unconscious conflicts with the supervisor, and learns, discusses, and is advised about technique. | |||
Many studies have also been done on briefer "dynamic" treatments; these are more expedient to measure, and shed light on the therapeutic process to some extent. Brief Relational Therapy (BRT), Brief Psychodynamic Therapy (BPT), and Time-Limited Dynamic Therapy (TLDP) limit treatment to 20–30 sessions. On average, classical analysis may last 5.7 years, but for phobias and depressions uncomplicated by ego deficits or object relations deficits, analysis may run for a shorter period of time.{{medical citation needed|date=September 2018}} Longer analyses are indicated for those with more serious disturbances in object relations, more symptoms, and more ingrained character pathology.<ref>{{Citation |last=Treatment |first=Center for Substance Abuse |title=Chapter 7—Brief Psychodynamic Therapy |date=1999 |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK64952/ |work=Brief Interventions and Brief Therapies for Substance Abuse |access-date=2023-12-06 |publisher=Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US) |language=en}}</ref> | |||
Many psychoanalytic training centers in the United States have been accredited by special committees of the ]<ref></ref> or the International Psychoanalytical Association. Because of theoretical differences, other independent institutes arose, usually founded by psychologists, who until 1987 were not permitted access to psychoanalytic training institutes of the American Psychoanalytic Association. Currently there are between 75 and 100 independent institutes in the United States. As well, other institutes are affiliated to other organizations such as the ], and the National Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis. At most psychoanalytic institutes in the United States, qualifications for entry include a terminal degree in a mental health field, such as Ph.D., Psy.D., M.S.W., or M.D. A few institutes restrict applicants to those already holding an M.D. or Ph.D., and most institutes in Southern California confer a Ph.D. or ] in psychoanalysis upon graduation, which involves completion of the necessary requirements for the state boards that confer that doctoral degree.The first training institute in America to educate non-medical psychoanalysts was The National Psychological Association for Psychoanalysis., (1978) in New York City. It was founded by the analyst Theodor Reik. | |||
==Training and research<!--'Psychoanalytic psychotherapy' redirects here-->== | |||
Some psychoanalytic training has been set up as a post-doctoral fellowship in university settings, such as at Duke University, Yale University, , Adelphi University, and Columbia University. Other psychoanalytic institutes may not be directly associated with universities, but the faculty at those institutes usually hold contemporaneous faculty positions with psychology Ph.D. programs and/or with medical school psychiatry residency programs. | |||
Psychoanalysis continues to be practiced by psychiatrists, social workers, and other mental health professionals; however, its practice has declined.<ref name="Science">{{cite journal|date=25 February 2005|title=French Psychoflap|journal=Science|volume=307|issue=5713|pages=1197a|doi=10.1126/science.307.5713.1197a|s2cid=220106659}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|title=Is Psychoanalysis Still Relevant to Psychiatry?|year=2017|pmc=5459228|last1=Paris|first1=J.|journal=Canadian Journal of Psychiatry|volume=62|issue=5|pages=308–312|doi=10.1177/0706743717692306|pmid=28141952}}</ref> It has been largely replaced by the similar but broader ] in the mid-20th century.<ref name=encMH>{{cite book |last1=Freedheim |first1=D.K. |last2=DiFilippo |first2=J.M |last3=Klostermann |first3=S. |title=Encyclopedia of Mental Health |date=2015 |publisher=Elsevier |location=New York |isbn=978-0-12-397753-3 |pages=348–356 |edition=2nd}}</ref> Psychoanalytic approaches continue to be listed by the UK ] as possibly helpful for depression.<ref>{{cite web|title=Clinical depression – Treatment|url=https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/clinical-depression/treatment/|date=2017-10-24}}</ref> | |||
===United States=== | |||
The ] (IPA) is the world's primary accrediting and regulatory body for psychoanalysis. Their mission is to assure the continued vigour and development of psychoanalysis for the benefit of psychoanalytic patients. It works in partnership with its 70 constituent organizations in 33 countries to support 11,500 members. In the US, there are 77 psychoanalytical organizations, institutes associations in the United States, which are spread across the states of America. The ] (APSaA) has 38 affiliated societies, which have 10 or more active members who practice in a given geographical area. The aims of the APSaA and other psychoanalytical organizations are: provide ongoing educational opportunities for its members, stimulate the development and research of psychoanalysis, provide training and organize conferences. There are eight affiliated study groups in the USA (two of them are in Latin America). A study group is the first level of integration of a psychoanalytical body within the ] (IPA), followed by a provisional society and finally a member society. | |||
{{More citations needed section|date=May 2020}} | |||
Psychoanalytic training in the United States tends to vary according to the program, but it involves a personal psychoanalysis for the trainee, approximately 300 to 600 hours of class instruction, with a standard curriculum, over a two to five-year period.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Winarick |first=Kenneth |date=2010-03-01 |title=Training at the American Institute for Psychoanalysis |url=https://doi.org/10.1057/ajp.2009.43 |journal=The American Journal of Psychoanalysis |language=en |volume=70 |issue=1 |pages=61–62 |doi=10.1057/ajp.2009.43 |pmid=20212440 |s2cid=40577817 |issn=1573-6741}}</ref> | |||
Typically, this psychoanalysis must be conducted by a Supervising and Training Analyst. Most institutes (but not all) within the American Psychoanalytic Association, require that Supervising and Training Analysts become certified by the American Board of Psychoanalysts. Certification entails a blind review in which the psychoanalyst's work is vetted by psychoanalysts outside of their local community. After earning certification, these psychoanalysts undergo another hurdle in which they are specially vetted by senior members of their own institute and held to the highest ethical and moral standards. Moreover, they are required to have extensive experience conducting psychoanalyses.<ref>{{cite web|title=What is Certification?|url=https://www.abpsa.org/page-18053|date=2017-06-09}}</ref> | |||
The Division of Psychoanalysis (39) of the American Psychological Association (APA) was established in the early 1980s by several psychologists. Until the establishment of the Division of Psychoanalysis, psychologists who had trained in independent institutes had no national organization. The Division of Psychoanalysis now has approximately 4,000 members and approximately 30 local chapters in the United States. The Division of Psychoanalysis holds two annual meetings or conferences and offers continuing education in theory, research and clinical technique, as do their affiliated local chapters. The European Psychoanalytical Federation (EPF) is the organization which consolidates all European psychoanalytic societies. This organization is affiliated with the IPA. In 2002 there were approximately 3,900 individual members in 22 countries, speaking 18 different languages. There are also 25 psychoanalytic societies. | |||
Candidates generally have an hour of supervision each week per psychoanalytic case. The minimum number of cases varies between institutes. Candidates often have two to four cases; both male and female cases are required. Supervision extends at least a few years on one or more cases. During supervision the trainee presents material from the psychoanalytic work that week. With the supervisor, the trainee then explores the patient's unconscious conflicts with examination of transference-countertransference constellations.<ref name="academic.oup.com"/> | |||
The American Association of Psychoanalysis in Clinical Social Work (AAPCSW) was established by Crayton Rowe in 1980 as a division of the Federation of Clinical Societies of Social Work and became an independent entity in 1990. Until 2007 is was known as the National Membership Committee on Psychoanalysis. The organization was originally founded because although social workers represented the larger number of people who were training to be psychoanalysts, they were underrepresented as supervisors and teachers at the institutes they attended. AAPCSW now has over 1000 members and has over 20 chapters. It holds a bi-annual national conference and numerous annual local conferences. | |||
Many psychoanalytic training centers in the United States have been accredited by special committees of the APsaA or the IPA. Because of theoretical differences, there are independent institutes, usually founded by psychologists, who until 1987 were not permitted access to psychoanalytic training institutes of the APsaA. Currently there are between 75 and 100 independent institutes in the United States. As well, other institutes are affiliated to other organizations such as the ], and the National Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis. At most psychoanalytic institutes in the United States, qualifications for entry include a terminal degree in a mental health field, such as Ph.D., Psy.D., M.S.W., or M.D. A few institutes restrict applicants to those already holding an M.D. or Ph.D., and most institutes in Southern California confer a Ph.D. or ] in psychoanalysis upon graduation, which involves completion of the necessary requirements for the state boards that confer that doctoral degree. The first training institute in America to educate non-medical psychoanalysts was The National Psychological Association for Psychoanalysis (1978) in New York City. It was founded by the analyst Theodor Reik. The Contemporary Freudian (originally the New York Freudian Society) an offshoot of the National Psychological Association has a branch in Washington, DC. It is a component society/institute or the IPA.{{Citation needed|date=May 2020}} | |||
===Psychoanalysis in Britain=== | |||
Some psychoanalytic training has been set up as a post-doctoral fellowship in university settings, such as at Duke University, Yale University, New York University, Adelphi University and Columbia University. Other psychoanalytic institutes may not be directly associated with universities, but the faculty at those institutes usually hold contemporaneous faculty positions with psychology Ph.D. programs and/or with medical school psychiatry residency programs.{{Citation needed|date=May 2020}} | |||
The London Psychoanalytical Society was founded by ] on 30 October 1913. With the expansion of psychoanalysis in the United Kingdom the Society was renamed the ] in 1919. Soon after, the Institute of Psychoanalysis was established to administer the Society’s activities. These include: the training of psychoanalysts, the development of the theory and practice of psychoanalysis, the provision of treatment through The London Clinic of Psychoanalysis, the publication of books in ]. The Institute of Psychoanalysis also publishes '']'', maintains a library, furthers research, and holds public lectures. The society has a Code of Ethics and an Ethical Committee. The society, the institute and the clinic are all located at Byron House. | |||
The IPA is the world's primary accrediting and regulatory body for psychoanalysis. Their mission is to assure the continued vigor and development of psychoanalysis for the benefit of psychoanalytic patients. It works in partnership with its 70 constituent organizations in 33 countries to support 11,500 members. In the US, there are 77 psychoanalytical organizations, institutes and associations, which are spread across the states. APsaA has 38 affiliated societies which have 10 or more active members who practice in a given geographical area. The aims of APsaA and other psychoanalytical organizations are: provide ongoing educational opportunities for its members, stimulate the development and research of psychoanalysis, provide training and organize conferences. There are eight affiliated study groups in the United States. A study group is the first level of integration of a psychoanalytical body within the IPA, followed by a provisional society and finally a member society.{{Citation needed|date=May 2020}} | |||
The society is a component of the ], a body with members on all five continents that safeguards professional and ethical practice. The society is a member of the British Psychoanalytic Council (BPC); the BPC publishes a register of British psychoanalysts and psychoanalytical psychotherapists. All members of the British Psychoanalytical Society are required to undertake continuing professional development. | |||
The Division of Psychoanalysis (39) of the ] (APA) was established in the early 1980s by several psychologists. Until the establishment of the Division of Psychoanalysis, psychologists who had trained in independent institutes had no national organization. The Division of Psychoanalysis now has approximately 4,000 members and approximately 30 local chapters in the United States. The Division of Psychoanalysis holds two annual meetings or conferences and offers continuing education in theory, research and clinical technique, as do their affiliated local chapters. The European Psychoanalytical Federation (EPF) is the organization which consolidates all European psychoanalytic societies. This organization is affiliated with the IPA. In 2002, there were approximately 3,900 individual members in 22 countries, speaking 18 different languages. There are also 25 psychoanalytic societies.{{Citation needed|date=May 2020}} | |||
Through its work – and the work of its individual members – the British Psychoanalytical Society has made an unrivalled contribution the understanding and treatment of mental illness. Members of the Society have included Michael Balint, ], John Bowlby, ], ], Joseph Sandler, and ]. | |||
The American Association of Psychoanalysis in Clinical Social Work (AAPCSW) was established by Crayton Rowe in 1980 as a division of the Federation of Clinical Societies of Social Work and became an independent entity in 1990. Until 2007 it was known as the National Membership Committee on Psychoanalysis. The organization was founded because although social workers represented the larger number of people who were training to be psychoanalysts, they were underrepresented as supervisors and teachers at the institutes they attended. AAPCSW now has over 1000 members and has over 20 chapters. It holds a bi-annual national conference and numerous annual local conferences.{{Citation needed|date=May 2020}} | |||
The ] is the foremost publisher of psychoanalytic literature. The 24-volume ''Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud'' was conceived, translated, and produced under the direction of the British Psychoanalytical Society. The Society, in conjunction with ], will soon publish a new, revised and expanded Standard Edition. With the Institute continues to publish the books of leading theorists and practitioners. ''The International Journal of Psychoanalysis'' is published by the Institute of Psychoanalysis. Now in its 84th year, it has one of the largest circulation of any psychoanalytic journal. | |||
Experiences of psychoanalysts and psychoanalytic psychotherapists and research into infant and child development have led to new insights. Theories have been further developed and the results of ] are now more integrated in the ].<ref name="NPI">{{citation |url = http://www.psychoanalytischinstituut.nl/ |title = Nederlands Psychoanalytisch Instituut |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081014064319/http://www.psychoanalytischinstituut.nl/ |archive-date = 2008-10-14 }}</ref> | |||
===United Kingdom=== | |||
{{More citations needed section|date=May 2020}} | |||
The London Psychoanalytical Society was founded by ] on 30 October 1913.{{Citation needed|date=May 2020}} After ] with the expansion of psychoanalysis in the United Kingdom, the Society was reconstituted and named the ] in 1919. Soon after, the Institute of Psychoanalysis was established to administer the Society's activities. These include: the training of psychoanalysts, the development of the theory and practice of psychoanalysis, the provision of treatment through The London Clinic of Psychoanalysis, the publication of books in The New Library of Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalytic Ideas. The Institute of Psychoanalysis also publishes '']'', maintains a library, furthers research, and holds public lectures. The society has a Code of Ethics and an Ethical Committee. The society, the institute and the clinic are all located at ''Byron House'' in ].<ref>{{Cite web |last=wbepba |title=Our history |url=https://www.psychoanalysis-bpa.org/about/history/ |access-date=2023-12-15 |website=BPA |language=en-GB}}</ref> | |||
The Society is a constituent society of the ] (IPA) a body with members on all five continents which safeguards professional and ethical practice.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Home |url=https://www.ipa.world/ |access-date=2023-12-15 |website=www.ipa.world}}</ref> The Society is a member of the British Psychoanalytic Council (BPC); the BPC publishes a register of British psychoanalysts and psychoanalytical psychotherapists. All members of the British Psychoanalytic Council are required to undertake ], CPD. Members of the Society teach and hold posts on other approved psychoanalytic courses, e.g.: ] and in academic departments, e.g.]. | |||
Members of the Society have included: ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]. | |||
The ] is the foremost publisher of psychoanalytic literature. The 24-volume ''Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud'' was conceived, translated, and produced under the direction of the British Psychoanalytical Society. The Society, in conjunction with ], will soon publish a new, revised and expanded Standard Edition. With the New Library of Psychoanalysis the Institute continues to publish the books of leading theorists and practitioners. ''The International Journal of Psychoanalysis'' is published by the Institute of Psychoanalysis. For over 100 years, it has one of the largest circulations of any psychoanalytic journal.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Admin |title=Home |url=https://www.theijp.org/ |access-date=2023-12-15 |website=The International Journal of Psychoanalysis |language=en-GB}}</ref> | |||
===Psychoanalytic psychotherapy=== | |||
There are different forms of psychoanalysis and ] in which psychoanalytic thinking is applied. In addition to classical psychoanalysis there is for example '''psychoanalytic psychotherapy''', an approach that expands "the accessibility of psychoanalytic theory and clinical practices that had evolved over 100 plus years to a larger number of individuals."<ref></ref> Other examples of well known therapies which also use insights of psychoanalysis are ] (MBT), and ] (TFP).<ref name="NPI"/> There is also a continuing influence of psychoanalytic thinking in mental health care and psychiatric care.<ref>{{citation |url = http://www.npg-utrecht.nl/npg.htm |title = Nederlands Psychoanalytisch Genootschap |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090916045816/http://www.npg-utrecht.nl/npg.htm |archive-date = September 16, 2009 }}</ref> | |||
===Research=== | ===Research=== | ||
{{More citations needed section|date=May 2020}} | |||
Over a hundred years of case reports and studies in the journal ''Modern Psychoanalysis'', the ''Psychoanalytic Quarterly'', the ''International Journal of Psychoanalysis'' and the '']'' have analyzed efficacy of analysis in cases of ] and character or ] problems. Psychoanalysis modified by object relations techniques has been shown to be effective in many cases of ingrained problems of intimacy and relationship (cf. the many books of Otto Kernberg). As a therapeutic treatment, psychoanalytic techniques may be useful in a one-session consultation.<ref>{{citation|author= Blackman J|year=1994|title=Psychodynamic Technique during Urgent Consultation Interviews|journal=Journal Psychotherapy Practice & Research}}</ref> Psychoanalytic treatment, in other situations, may run from about a year to many years, depending on the severity and complexity of the pathology. | |||
Over a hundred years of case reports and studies in the journal ''Modern Psychoanalysis'', the '']'', the ''International Journal of Psychoanalysis'' and the '']'' have analyzed the efficacy of analysis in cases of ] and character or ] problems. Psychoanalysis modified by object relations techniques has been shown to be effective in many cases of ingrained problems of intimacy and relationship (cf. the many books of Otto Kernberg).<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Christopher |first1=John Chambers |last2=Bickhard |first2=Mark H. |last3=Lambeth |first3=Gregory Scott |date=October 2001 |title=Otto Kernberg's Object Relations Theory: A Metapsychological Critique |url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0959354301115006 |journal=Theory & Psychology |language=en |volume=11 |issue=5 |pages=687–711 |doi=10.1177/0959354301115006 |s2cid=145583990 |issn=0959-3543}}</ref> Psychoanalytic treatment, in other situations, may run from about a year to many years, depending on the severity and complexity of the pathology. | |||
Psychoanalytic theory has, from its inception, been the subject of criticism and controversy. Freud remarked on this early in his career, when other physicians in Vienna ostracized him for his findings that hysterical conversion symptoms were not limited to women. Challenges to analytic theory began with ] and ] (turn of the 20th century), continued with behaviorists (e.g. ]) into the 1940s and '50s, and have persisted (e.g. ]). Criticisms come from those who object to the notion that there are mechanisms, thoughts or feelings in the mind that could be unconscious. Criticisms also have been leveled against the idea of "infantile sexuality" (the recognition that children between ages two and six imagine things about procreation). Criticisms of theory have led to variations in analytic theories, such as the work of ], ], and ]. In the past 30 years or so, the criticisms have centered on the issue of empirical verification. With it being difficult to substantiate the efficacy of psychoanalytic treatments in a psychiatric context.<ref>{{citation |author = Tallis RC |year = 1996 |url = http://www.human-nature.com/freud/tallis.html |title = Burying Freud |journal = Lancet |volume = 347 |pages = 669–671 |pmid = 8596386 |doi = 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)91210-6 |issue = 9002 |s2cid = 35537033 }}</ref> | |||
Psychoanalysis has been used as a research tool into childhood development (cf. the journal ''The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child''), and has developed into a flexible, effective treatment for certain mental disturbances.<ref name="Wallerstein 2000"/> In the 1960s, Freud's early (1905) thoughts on the childhood development of ] were challenged; this challenge led to major research in the 1970s and 80s, and then to a reformulation of female sexual development that corrected some of Freud's concepts.<ref>{{citation |editor = Blum HP |year = 1977 |title = Female Psychology |location = New York |publisher = International Universities Press }}</ref> Also see the various works of Eleanor Galenson, ], ], ], ], ], and others. Most recently, psychoanalytic researchers who have integrated attachment theory into their work, including Alicia Lieberman and ], have explored the role of parental traumatization in the development of young children's mental representations of self and others.<ref>{{cite journal |author1 = Schechter DS |author2 = Zygmunt A |author3 = Coates SW |author4 = Davies M |author5 = Trabka KA |author6 = McCaw J |author7 = Kolodji A. |author8 = Robinson JL |year = 2007 |title = Caregiver traumatization adversely impacts young children's mental representations of self and others |journal = Attachment & Human Development |volume = 9 |issue = 3 |pages = 187–20 |doi = 10.1080/14616730701453762 |pmid = 18007959 |pmc = 2078523 }}</ref> | |||
==Effectiveness== | |||
The psychoanalytic profession has been resistant to researching efficacy.<ref name="Business Insider">{{Cite web |last=Vickers |first=Christine Brett |date=15 August 2016 |title=Here's what psychoanalysis really is, and what research says about its effectiveness |url=https://www.businessinsider.com.au/heres-what-psychoanalysis-is-and-what-research-says-about-its-effectiveness-2016-8/amp |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220319083134/https://www.businessinsider.com.au/heres-what-psychoanalysis-is-and-what-research-says-about-its-effectiveness-2016-8/amp |archive-date=19 March 2022 |website=]}}</ref> Evaluations of effectiveness based on the interpretation of the therapist alone cannot be proven.<ref name="Psychology: Tenth edition in modules">Myers, D. G. (2014). ''Psychology: Tenth edition in modules''. New York: ].{{page needed|date=June 2018}}</ref> | |||
===Research results=== | |||
Numerous studies have shown that the efficacy of therapy is primarily related to the quality of the therapeutic alliance.<ref name="Horvath A 2001 365–372">Horvath, A. 2001. "The Alliance." '']'' 38(4):365–72. {{doi|10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.365}}.</ref> | |||
] in 2019 found psychoanalytic and psychodynamic therapy effective at improving psychosocial wellbeing, reducing suicidality, as well as self harm behavior in patients at a 6-month interval.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Briggs |first1=Stephen |last2=Netuveli |first2=Gopalakrishnan |last3=Gould |first3=Nick |last4=Gkaravella |first4=Antigone |last5=Gluckman |first5=Nicole S. |last6=Kangogyere |first6=Patricia |last7=Farr |first7=Ruby |last8=Goldblatt |first8=Mark J. |last9=Lindner |first9=Reinhard |date=June 2019 |title=The effectiveness of psychoanalytic/psychodynamic psychotherapy for reducing suicide attempts and self-harm: systematic review and meta-analysis |journal=The British Journal of Psychiatry |language=en |volume=214 |issue=6 |pages=320–328 |doi=10.1192/bjp.2019.33 |pmid=30816079 |issn=0007-1250|doi-access=free }}</ref> There has also been evidence for psychoanalytic psychotherapy as an effective treatment for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Conduct Disorder when compared with behavioral management treatments with or without ].<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Laezer |first1=Katrin Luise |last2=Tischer |first2=Inka |last3=Gaertner |first3=Birgit |last4=Leuzinger-Bohleber |first4=Marianne |date=September 2021 |title= |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34519617/ |journal=Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie |volume=70 |issue=6 |pages=499–519 |doi=10.13109/prkk.2021.70.6.499 |issn=0032-7034 |pmid=34519617|s2cid=239414619 }}</ref> Meta-analysis in 2012 and 2013 found support or evidence for the efficacy of psychoanalytic therapy.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Leichsenring | first1=Falk | last2=Abbass | first2=Allan | last3=Luyten | first3=Patrick | last4=Hilsenroth | first4=Mark | last5=Rabung | first5=Sven | title=The Emerging Evidence for Long-Term Psychodynamic Therapy | journal=Psychodynamic Psychiatry | publisher=Guilford Publications | volume=41 | issue=3 | year=2013 | issn=2162-2590 | doi=10.1521/pdps.2013.41.3.361 | pages=361–384 |pmid=24001160|s2cid=10911045|s2cid-access=free |url=http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/729f/6f7721dd8491f768cd53eefae8d06afc5629.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190226202546/http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/729f/6f7721dd8491f768cd53eefae8d06afc5629.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-date=2019-02-26}}</ref><ref name="de Maat 2013">{{cite journal | last1=de Maat | first1=Saskia | last2=de Jonghe | first2=Frans | last3=de Kraker | first3=Ruth | last4=Leichsenring | first4=Falk | last5=Abbass | first5=Allan | last6=Luyten | first6=Patrick | last7=Barber | first7=Jacques P. | last8=Van | first8=Rien | last9=Dekker | first9=Jack | title=The Current State of the Empirical Evidence for Psychoanalysis: A meta-analytic approach | journal=Harvard Review of Psychiatry | publisher=Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) | volume=21 | issue=3 | year=2013 | issn=1067-3229 | doi=10.1097/hrp.0b013e318294f5fd | pages=107–137|pmid=23660968|doi-access=free}}</ref> Other meta-analyses published in recent years{{when|date=September 2024}} showed psychoanalysis and ] to be effective, with outcomes comparable to or greater than other kinds of ] or ],<ref>{{Citation|author=Shedler|first=Jonathan|title=The Efficacy of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy|journal=American Psychologist|volume=65|issue=2|pages=98–109|year=2010|citeseerx=10.1.1.607.2980|doi=10.1037/a0018378|pmid=20141265|s2cid=2034090 }}</ref><ref>{{citation|last1=Leichsenring|first1=F.|title=Are psychodynamic and psychoanalytic therapies effective|journal=International Journal of Psychoanalysis|volume=86|issue=3|pages=841–68|year=2005|doi=10.1516/rfee-lkpn-b7tf-kpdu|pmid=16096078|s2cid=38880785|s2cid-access=free}}</ref><ref>Leichsenring, Falk, and Sven Rabung. 2011. "." '']'' 199(1):15–22. {{doi|10.1192/bjp.bp.110.082776}}. {{PMID|21719877}} – via ].</ref> but these meta-analyses have been subjected to various criticisms.<ref>McKay, Dean. 2011. "{{Access indicator|closed}}." '']'' 66(2):147–8. {{doi|10.1037/a0021195}}. {{PMID|21299262}}.</ref><ref>Thombs, Brett D., Lisa R. Jewett, and Marielle Bassel. 2011. "Is there room for criticism of studies of psychodynamic psychotherapy?" '']'' 66(2):148–49. {{doi|10.1037/a0021248}}. {{PMID|21299263}}.</ref><ref>Anestis, Michael D., Joye C. Anestis, and Scott O. Lilienfeld. 2011. "When it comes to evaluating psychodynamic therapy, the devil is in the details." '']'' 66(2):149–51. {{doi|10.1037/a0021190}}. {{PMID|21299264}}.</ref><ref>Tryon, Warren W., and Georgiana S. Tryon. 2011. "No ownership of common factors." '']'' 66(2):151–52. {{doi|10.1037/a0021056}}. {{PMID|21299265}}.</ref> In particular, the inclusion of pre/post studies rather than randomized controlled trials, and the absence of adequate comparisons with control treatments, is a serious limitation in interpreting the results.<ref name="de Maat 2013" /> A French 2004 report from ] concluded that psychoanalytic therapy is less effective than other psychotherapies (including ]) for certain diseases.<ref name="INSERM" /> | |||
Psychoanalytic theory has, from its inception, been the subject of criticism and controversy. Freud remarked on this early in his career, when other physicians in Vienna ostracized him for his findings that hysterical conversion symptoms were not limited to women. Challenges to analytic theory began with ] and ] (turn of the 20th century), continued with behaviorists (e.g. ]) into the 1940s and '50s, and have persisted. Criticisms come from those who object to the notion that there are mechanisms, thoughts or feelings in the mind that could be unconscious. Criticisms also have been leveled against the discovery of "infantile sexuality" (the recognition that children between ages two and six imagine things about procreation). Criticisms of theory have led to variations in analytic theories, such as the work of ], ], and ]. In the past 30 years or so, the criticisms have centered on the issue of empirical verification,<ref>{{citation|author=Tallis RC|year=1996|url=http://www.human-nature.com/freud/tallis.html |title= Burying Freud|journal=Lancet|volume= 347|pages= 669–671|pmid=8596386|doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(96)91210-6|issue=9002}}</ref> in spite of many empirical, prospective research studies that have been empirically validated (e.g., See the studies of Barbara Milrod, at Cornell University Medical School, et al.{{Citation needed|date=July 2010}}). In the scientific literature there are some research supporting some of Freud's ideas, e.g. ], ] etc.<ref>{{Citation|author=Westen, D.| year=1999|title=The scientific status of unconscious processes: Is Freud really dead?|journal=Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association|issue=49|pages=1–30|url=http://www.psychology.sunysb.edu/ewaters/345/1_2009_freud/weston_status_of_unconscious.pdf|postscript=.}}</ref> | |||
In 2011, the ] reviewed 103 ] comparisons between psychodynamic treatment and a non-dynamic competitor, which had been published between 1974 and 2010, and among which 63 were deemed of adequate quality. Out of 39 comparisons with an active competitor, they found that 6 psychodynamic treatments were superior, 5 were inferior, and 28 showed no difference. The study found these results promising but explicited the necessity of further good quality trials replicating positive results on specific disorders.<ref name="Gerber">{{cite journal|last1=Gerber|first1=Andrew J|last2=Kocsis|first2=James H|last3=Milrod|first3=Barbara L|last4=Roose|first4=Steven P|last5=Barber|first5=Jacques P|last6=Thase|first6=Michael E|last7=Perkins|first7=Patrick|last8=Leon|first8=Andrew C|year=2011|title=A Quality-Based Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy|journal=]|volume=168|issue=1|pages=19–28|doi=10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.08060843|pmid=20843868}}</ref> | |||
Psychoanalysis has been used as a research tool into childhood development (cf. the journal ''The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child''), and has developed into a flexible, effective treatment for certain mental disturbances.<ref name="Wallerstein 2000"/> In the 1960s, Freud's early (1905) thoughts on the childhood development of ] were challenged; this challenge led to major research in the 1970s and 80s, and then to a reformulation of female sexual development that corrected some of Freud's concepts.<ref>{{citation|editor= Blum HP|year=1977|title=Female Psychology|location= New York| publisher= International Universities Press}}</ref> Also see the various works of Eleanor Galenson, ], ], Francoise Dolto, ], ], and others. Most recently, psychoanalytic researchers who have integrated attachment theory into their work, including Alicia Lieberman, ], and ] have explored the role of parental traumatization in the development of young children's mental representations of self and others.<ref>Schechter DS, Zygmunt A, Coates SW, Davies M, Trabka KA, McCaw J, Kolodji A., Robinson JL (2007). Caregiver traumatization adversely impacts young children’s mental representations of self and others. Attachment & Human Development, 9(3), 187–20.</ref> | |||
Meta-analyses of Short Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (STPP) have found ]s (]) ranging from 0.34 to 0.71 compared to no treatment and was found to be slightly better than other therapies in follow up.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Anderson |first1=Edward M. |last2=Lambert|first2=Michael J. |year=1995|title=Short-term dynamically oriented psychotherapy: A review and meta-analysis|journal=Clinical Psychology Review|volume=15|issue=6|pages=503–514|doi=10.1016/0272-7358(95)00027-m}}</ref> Other reviews have found an effect size of 0.78 to 0.91 for ]s compared to no treatment<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Abbass |first1=Allan |last2=Kisely |first2=Stephen |last3=Kroenke |first3=Kurt |year=2009|title=Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Somatic Disorders. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials|journal=Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics|volume=78|issue=5|pages=265–74|doi=10.1159/000228247|pmid=19602915|hdl=10072/30557|s2cid=16419162|hdl-access=free}}</ref> and 0.69 for treating depression.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Abass, Allen A.|display-authors=etal|year=2010|title=The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: A meta-analysis|journal=Clinical Psychology Review|volume=30|issue=1|pages=25–36|doi=10.1016/j.cpr.2009.08.010|pmid=19766369|s2cid=21768475 }}</ref> A 2012 '']'' meta-analysis of Intensive Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy (ISTDP) found effect sizes ranging from 0.84 for interpersonal problems to 1.51 for depression. Overall ISTDP had an effect size of 1.18 compared to no treatment.<ref>{{cite journal |last1 = Abbass |first1=Allan |last2=Town|first2 = Joel |last3 = Driessen|first3= Ellen |year = 2012 |title = Intensive Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcome Research |journal = Harvard Review of Psychiatry |volume = 20 |issue = 2 |pages = 97–108 |doi = 10.3109/10673229.2012.677347 |pmid = 22512743 |citeseerx=10.1.1.668.6311 |s2cid=6432516 }}</ref> | |||
Several ] have shown psychoanalysis and ] to be effective, with outcomes comparable or greater than other kinds of ] or ].<ref>{{Citation|doi=10.1037/a0018378|author=Shedler, J.|year=2010|title=The Efficacy of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy|journal=American Psychologist|volume=65|issue=2|pages=98–109 |url=http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/amp-65-2-shedler.pdf|pmid=20141265|postscript=.}}</ref> These arguments have also been subjected to various criticisms.<ref>{{cite doi|10.1037/a0021195}}</ref><ref>{{cite doi|10.1037/a0021248}}</ref><ref>{{cite doi|10.1037/a0021190}}</ref><ref>{{cite doi|10.1037/a0021056}}</ref> ] has shown also that "proper", long-term psychoanalysis, when patient lies on a coach and meets with analyst at least three times a week, is also effective.<ref>{{Citation|author=de Maat, S., Dekker, J., Schoevers, R., & de Jonghe, F.|year=2006|title=Relative efficacy of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy in the treatment of depression: A meta-analysis|journal=Psychotherapy Research|volume=16|issue=16|pages=562–572| doi=10.1080/10503300600756402|postscript=.}}</ref> A 2005 review of ]s found that "psychoanalytic therapy is (1) more effective than no treatment or treatment as usual, and (2) more effective than shorter forms of psychodynamic therapy".<ref>{{citation |title=Are psychodynamic and psychoanalytic therapies effective|journal=International Journal of Psychoanalysis|year= 2005|volume=93 |pmid=16096078 |last1=Leichsenring |first1=F |issue=Pt 3 |pages=841–68}}</ref> ] on the efficacy of psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapy has also become prominent among psychoanalytic researchers. Recently, however, the methodologies of some meta-analytic studies have been criticised<ref>Kliem, S., Beller, J., Kröger. C. (2012). . ''British Journal of Psychiatry''. Available Online: http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/199/1/15/reply#bjrcpsych_el_40294</ref>. | |||
A meta-analysis of Long Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy in 2012 found an overall effect size of 0.33, which is modest. This study concluded the recovery rate following LTPP was equal to control treatments, including treatment as usual, and found the evidence for the effectiveness of LTPP to be limited and at best conflicting.<ref name="ReferenceA">{{cite journal |last1 = Smit |first1 = Y. |last2 = Huibers |first2 = J. |last3 = Ioannidis |first3 = J. |last4 = van Dyck |first4 = R. |last5 = van Tilburg |first5 = W. |last6 = Arntz |first6 = A. |title = The effectiveness of long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy — A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |journal = Clinical Psychology Review |volume = 32 |issue = 2 |pages = 81–92 |year = 2012 |doi = 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.11.003 |pmid = 22227111 }}</ref> Others have found effect sizes of 0.44–0.68.<ref>{{cite journal |last1 = Leichsenring |first1 = Falk |last2 = Rabung |first2 = Sven |title = Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in complex mental disorders: update of a meta-analysis |journal = The British Journal of Psychiatry |year = 2011 |doi = 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.082776 |pmid = 21719877 |volume = 199 |issue = 1 |pages = 15–22 |doi-access = free }}</ref> | |||
Research on ] treatment of some populations shows mixed results. Research by analysts such as Bertram Karon and colleagues at ] had suggested that when trained properly, psychodynamic therapists can be effective with ] patients. More recent research casts doubt on these claims. The Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team<ref></ref> (PORT) report argues in its Recommendation 22<ref></ref> against the use of ] in cases of schizophrenia, arguing that more trials are necessary to verify its effectiveness. Others argue that supporting empirical data already exit.<ref></ref> | |||
According to a 2004 French review conducted by ], psychoanalysis was presumed or proven effective at treating ], ], and ], but did not find evidence of its effectiveness in treating ], ], ], ] and ].<ref name="INSERM">INSERM Collective Expertise Centre. 2004. "." ''INSERM Collective Expert Reports.'' Paris: ] (2000). {{PMID|21348158}}. ] {{NCBIBook2|NBK7123}}.</ref> | |||
A 2001 systematic review of the medical literature by the ] concluded that no data exist demonstrating that psychodynamic psychotherapy is effective in treating schizophrenia, and cautioned that medication should always be used alongside any type of ] in schizophrenia cases.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Mamberg | first1 = L. | authorlink = | last2 = Fenton | first2 = M. | last3 = Rathbone | first3 = J. | title = Individual psychodynamic psychotherapy and psychoanalysis for schizophrenia and severe mental illness | journal = Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | volume = | issue = 3 | date = 2001 | url = http://summaries.cochrane.org/CD001360/individual-psychodynamic-psychotherapy-and-psychoanalysis-for-schizophrenia-and-severe-mental-illness | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD001360}}</ref> Dr. Hyman Spotnitz and the practitioners of his theory known as Modern Psychoanalysis, a specific sub-specialty, still report (2007) much success in using their enhanced version of psychoanalytic technique in the treatment of schizophrenia. Further data also suggest that psychoanalysis is not effective (and possibly even detrimental) in the treatment of sex offenders.<ref></ref> Experiences of psychoanalysts and psychoanalytic psychotherapists and research into infant and child development have led to new insights. Theories have been further developed and the results of ] are now more integrated in the ].<ref name="NPI">{{citation|url=http://www.psychoanalytischinstituut.nl/ |title= Nederlands Psychoanalytisch Instituut}}</ref> | |||
A 2001 systematic review of the medical literature by the ] concluded that no data exist demonstrating that psychodynamic psychotherapy is effective in treating schizophrenia and severe mental illness, and cautioned that medication should always be used alongside any type of ] in schizophrenia cases.<ref name=pmid11686988>{{cite journal |doi=10.1002/14651858.CD001360 |pmid=11686988 |pmc=4171459 |title=Individual psychodynamic psychotherapy and psychoanalysis for schizophrenia and severe mental illness |journal=Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews |issue=3 |pages=CD001360 |year=2001 |last1=Malmberg |first1=Lena |last2=Fenton |first2=Mark |last3=Rathbone |first3=John |volume=2012 }}</ref> A French review from 2004 found the same.<ref name="INSERM"/> The Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team advises against the use of ] in cases of schizophrenia, arguing that more trials are necessary to verify its effectiveness.<ref>{{cite journal | pmc=2800150 | year=2009 | last1=Kreyenbuhl | first1=J. | last2=Buchanan | first2=R. W. | last3=Dickerson | first3=F. B. | last4=Dixon | first4=L. B. | author5=Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) | title=The Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT): Updated Treatment Recommendations 2009 | journal=Schizophrenia Bulletin | volume=36 | issue=1 | pages=94–103 | doi=10.1093/schbul/sbp130 | pmid=19955388 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033303|pmid=9502543|title=Patterns of Usual Care for Schizophrenia: Initial Results from the Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Client Survey |year=1998 |last1=Lehman |first1=A. F. |last2=Steinwachs |first2=D. M. |journal=Schizophrenia Bulletin |volume=24 |issue=1 |pages=11–20 |doi-access=free }}</ref> | |||
There are different forms of psychoanalysis and ] in which psychoanalytic thinking is practiced. Besides classical psychoanalysis there is for example psychoanalytic ]. Other examples of well known therapies which also use insights of psychoanalysis are Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT), and Transference-Focused Psychotherapy (TFP).<ref name="NPI"/> There is also a continuing influence of psychoanalytic thinking in different settings in the mental health care.<ref>{{citation|url=http://www.npg-utrecht.nl/npg.htm|title=Nederlands Psychoanalytisch Genootschap}} {{Dead link|date=June 2010}}</ref> To give an example: in the psychotherapeutic training in the Netherlands, psychoanalytic and system therapeutic theories, drafts, and techniques are combined and integrated. Other psychoanalytic schools include the ], ], and ]ian schools. | |||
==Criticism== | ==Criticism== | ||
{{see also-text|]|]}} | |||
{{cleanup|reason=The prose is redundant (Popper is quoted twice) and disorganized|date=June 2012}} | |||
{{Over-quotation|section|date=November 2022}} | |||
The theoretical foundations of psychoanalysis lay in the same philosophical currents that lead to interpretive ] rather than in those that lead to ] ], making the theory largely incompatible with scientific approaches to the study of the mind.<ref>Fuller Torrey E (1986), Witchdoctors and Psychiatrists, p. 76</ref><ref>Popper KR, "Science: Conjectures and Refutations", reprinted in Grim P (1990)Philosophy of Science and the Occult, Albany, pp. 104–110. See also Conjectures and Refutations.</ref><ref>Frank Cioffi (November 9, 2005). "Was Freud a Pseudoscientist?". Retrieved April 13, 2011. "The strongest reason for considering Freud a pseudo-scientist is that he claimed to have tested – and thus to have provided the most cogent grounds for accepting – theories which are either untestable or even if testable had not been tested. It is spurious claims to have tested an untestable or untested theory which are the most pertinent grounds for deeming Freud and his followers pseudoscientists (though pseudo-hermeneut would have been a more apposite and felicitous description)."</ref><ref>Chomsky.info</ref><ref name="Webster, Richard 1996">Webster, Richard (1996), ''Why Freud was wrong". Sin, science and psychoanalysis''. London: HarperCollinsPublishers</ref> | |||
<!-- ] and ] redirect here --> | |||
Both Freud and psychoanalysis have been criticized in extreme terms.<ref name="Brunner">{{Citation |title = Freud and the politics of psychoanalysis |year = 2001 |author = Brunner, José |page = xxi |publisher = Transaction |isbn = 978-0-7658-0672-7 }}</ref> Exchanges between critics and defenders of psychoanalysis have often been so heated that they have come to be characterized as the '''Freud Wars'''.<ref>{{cite news |url = https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/books/chap1/dispatchesfromthefreudwars.htm |title = washingtonpost.com: Dispatches from the Freud Wars: Psychoanalysis and Its Passions |newspaper = ] }}</ref> Linguist ] has criticized psychoanalysis for lacking a scientific basis.<ref>{{cite interview|last=Chomsky|first=Noam|subject-link=Noam Chomsky|title=The Professorial Provocateur|interviewer-last=Solomon|interviewer-first=Deborah|interviewer-link=Deborah Solomon|url=http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/20031102.htm|work=The New York Times|date=2 November 2003|via=chomsky.info|access-date=19 June 2010|archive-date=23 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150923203132/http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/20031102.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref> Evolutionary biologist ] considered psychoanalysis influenced by pseudoscientific theories such as ].<ref>{{cite book|last1=Gould|first1=Stephen Jay|url=https://archive.org/details/ontogenyphylogen00goul|title=Ontogeny and Phylogeny|date=1977|publisher=]|isbn=978-0-674-63940-9|author-link=Stephen Jay Gould|url-access=registration}}</ref> Psychologists ], ], and others have also criticized the field as pseudoscience.<ref>]. 1985. '']''.</ref><ref>] 2012 . "" (updated ed.). ''John F. Kihlstrom''. Berkley: ]. Archived from the 10 May 2013. | |||
— 2000/2003/2009. "Is Freud Still Alive? No, Not Really." '']'' (13/14/15th ed.), edited by R. Atkinson, R. C. Atkinson, E. E. Smith, D. J. Bem, and S. Nolen-Hoeksema. New York: ].</ref><ref name="Popper1981">{{cite book | last = Popper | first = Karl Raimund | author-link = Karl Popper | title = Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge | publisher = Routledge | edition = 4th | date = 1981 | location = London | pages = 38 | url = https://www.routledge.com/9780415285940 | doi = | isbn = 978-0-415-28594-0 | quote = And as for Freud's epic of the Ego, the Super-ego, and the Id, no substantially stronger claim to scientific status can be made for it than for Homer's collected stories from Olympus. }}</ref><ref name="Georgiev2017">{{cite book | last = Georgiev | first = Danko D. | author-link = | title = Quantum Information and Consciousness: A Gentle Introduction | publisher = CRC Press | edition = 1st | date = 2017-12-06 | location = Boca Raton | pages = 4 | language = English | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=OtRBDwAAQBAJ | doi = 10.1201/9780203732519 | oclc = 1003273264 | isbn = 978-1-138-10448-8 | zbl = 1390.81001 | quote = Terms such as ''subconsciousness'' or ''superego'' that are frequently used in ''psychoanalysis'' originated by Sigmund Freud (1856–1939) are relegated to the realm of pseudoscience where most of Freud's work justifiably belongs. }}</ref> | |||
Early critics of psychoanalysis believed that its theories were based too little on quantitative and ], and too much on the clinical case study method. Some even accused Freud of fabrication, most famously in the case of ] (Borch-Jacobsen 1996). An increasing amount of empirical research from academic ] and ] has begun to address this criticism. A survey of scientific research suggested that while personality traits corresponding to Freud's oral, anal, Oedipal, and genital phases can be observed, they do not necessarily manifest as stages in the development of children. These studies also have not confirmed that such traits in adults result from childhood experiences (Fisher & Greenberg, 1977, p. 399). However, these stages should not be viewed as crucial to modern psychoanalysis. What is crucial to modern psychoanalytic theory and practice is the power of the unconscious and the transference phenomenon. | |||
===Debate over status as scientific=== | |||
Numerous studies have shown that its efficiency is related to the quality of the therapist, rather than the psychoanalytic school or technique or training.<ref>{{citation|author=Horvath A|year=2001|title= The Alliance|journal= Psychotherapy: Theory, research, practice, training|volume=38|issue=4|pages= 365–372|doi=10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.365}}</ref> | |||
The theoretical foundations of psychoanalysis lie in the same philosophical currents that lead to interpretive ] rather than in those that lead to ] ], making the theory largely incompatible with positivist approaches to the study of the mind.<ref name="Torrey" /><ref name="Popper">]. 1990. "Science: Conjectures and Refutations." Pp. 104–10 in ''Philosophy of Science and the Occult'', edited by P. Grim. Albany, p. 109, See also '']''.</ref><ref name="Webster, Richard 1995">]. 1995. ''Why Freud was Wrong: Sin, Science, and Psychoanalysis''. London: Harper Collins.</ref> | |||
Early critics of psychoanalysis believed that its theories were based too little on quantitative and ], and too much on the clinical case study method.{{citation needed|date=July 2021}} Philosopher ] cites false claims of a sound scientific verification of the theory and its elements as the strongest basis for classifying the work of Freud and his school as pseudoscience.<ref>]. 2005. "" ''Butterflies & Wheels''. | |||
A French 2004 report from ] said that psychoanalytic therapy is far less effective than other psychotherapies (among which ]). It used a ] of numerous other studies to find whether the treatment was "proven" or "presumed" to be effective on different diseases.<ref name="INSERM">{{citation|author=National Institute for health and medical research|year=2004|title=Psychotherapy: Three approaches evaluated|PMID=21348158}}</ref> | |||
Translated and published in {{cite book |editor-last1=Meyer |editor-first1=Catherine |display-editors=etal<!-- M. Borch-Jacobsen, J. Cottraux, D. Pleux, and J. Van Rillaer --> |title=Le livre noir de la psychanalyse: Vivre, penser et aller mieux sans Freud |trans-title=The black book of psychoanalysis: living, thinking and doing better without Freud |url=http://www.psychaanalyse.com/pdf/LE%20LIVRE%20NOIR%20DE%20LA%20PSYCHANALYSE%20%28833%20Pages%20-%2018.8%20Mo%29.pdf |date=2005 |location=Paris |publisher=Les Arènes |access-date=2023-06-13}}</ref> | |||
Numerous studies have shown that its efficacy is related to the quality of the therapist, rather than the psychoanalytic school or technique or training,<ref>{{citation|author=Horvath A|year=2001|title= The Alliance|journal= Psychotherapy: Theory, research, practice, training|volume=38|issue=4|pages= 365–372|doi=10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.365}}</ref> while a French 2004 report from ] says instead, that psychoanalysis therapy is far less effective than other psychotherapies (among which ]).<ref name="INSERM">{{citation|author=National Institute for health and medical research|year=2004|title=Psychotherapy: Three approaches evaluated|PMID=21348158}}</ref> | |||
] argued that psychoanalysis is a ] because its claims are not testable and cannot be refuted; that is, they are not ]:<ref name="Popper" />{{blockquote|text=....those "clinical observations" which analysts naively believe confirm their theory cannot do this any more than the daily confirmations which astrologers find in their practice. And as for Freud's epic of the Ego, the Super-ego, and the Id, no substantially stronger claim to scientific status can be made for it than for Homer's collected stories from the Olympus.}}In addition, ] wrote that "Freudians have been nonplussed by Popper's basic challenge concerning scientific honesty. Indeed, they have refused to specify experimental conditions under which they would give up their basic assumptions."<ref>]. 1978. "The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes." ''Philosophical Papers'' 1, edited by I. Lakatos, ], and ]. Cambridge: ]. p. .</ref> In ''Sexual Desire'' (1986), philosopher ] rejects Popper's arguments pointing to the theory of repression as an example of a Freudian theory that does have testable consequences. Scruton nevertheless concluded that psychoanalysis is not genuinely scientific, on the grounds that it involves an unacceptable dependence on metaphor.<ref>{{cite book|author=Scruton, Roger|title=Sexual Desire: A Philosophical Investigation|publisher=Phoenix Books|year=1994|isbn=978-1-85799-100-0|page=201|author-link=Roger Scruton}}</ref> The philosopher and physicist ] argued that psychoanalysis is a pseudoscience because it violates the ] and ] inherent to science.<ref name="Bunge">{{cite news|last=Bunge|first=Mario|year=1984|title=What is pseudoscience?|volume=9|pages=36–46|publisher=The Skeptical Inquirer}}</ref> According to Bunge, most psychoanalytic theories are either untestable or unsupported by evidence.<ref name="Bunge2">{{cite news|last=Bunge|first=Mario|year=2001|title=Philosophy in Crisis: The Need for Reconstruction|pages=229–235|publisher=Prometheus Lectures}}</ref> | |||
The idea of "unconscious" is contested because human behavior can be observed while human mental activity has to be inferred. However, the unconscious is now a popular topic of study in the fields of experimental and social psychology (e.g., implicit attitude measures, ], and ], and other indirect tests). The idea of unconscious, and the transference phenomenon, have been widely researched and, it is claimed, validated in the fields of ] and social psychology (Westen & Gabbard 2002), though a Freudian interpretation of unconscious mental activity is not held by the majority of cognitive psychologists. Recent developments in neuroscience have resulted in one side arguing that it has provided a biological basis for unconscious emotional processing in line with psychoanalytic theory i.e., ] (Westen & Gabbard 2002), while the other side argues that such findings make psychoanalytic theory obsolete and irrelevant. | |||
], in particular, have also weighed in. ], a prominent academic in ], wrote that:<ref>], ''Authentic Happiness'' (The Free Press, Simon & Schuster, 2002), pp. 64–65.</ref>{{blockquote|text=Thirty years ago, the cognitive revolution in psychology overthrew both Freud and the behaviorists, at least in academia.… The imperialistic Freudian view claims that emotion always drives thought, while the imperialistic cognitive view claims that thought always drives emotion. The evidence, however, is that each drives the other at times.}}] argues in ''Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis'' (1993) that psychoanalytic based theories are falsifiable, but that the causal claims of psychoanalysis are unsupported by the available clinical evidence.<ref name="Grünbaum">]. 1993. ''Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis: A Study in the Philosophy of Psychoanalysis''. Madison, CT: ]. {{ISBN|978-0-8236-6722-2}}. {{OCLC|26895337}}.{{page needed|date=June 2018}}</ref> | |||
Both Freud and psychoanalysis have been criticized in very extreme terms.<ref name=Brunner>{{Citation|title=Freud and the politics of psychoanalysis|author=Brunner, José|isbn=0-7658-0672-X|publisher=Transaction|page=xxi|year=2001}}</ref> Exchanges between critics and defenders of psychoanalysis have often been so heated that they have come to be characterized as the . ] argued that psychoanalysis is a ] because its claims are not testable and cannot be refuted; that is, they are not falsifiable.<ref name="Popper">Popper KR, "Science: Conjectures and Refutations", reprinted in Grim P (1990) ''Philosophy of Science and the Occult'', Albany, pp. 104–110. See also '']''.</ref> ], an Austrian satirist, was the subject of a book written by noted ] author ]. The book ''Anti-Freud: Karl Kraus's Criticism of Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry'', originally published under the name ''Karl Kraus and the Soul Doctors'', portrayed Kraus as a harsh critic of Sigmund Freud and of psychoanalysis in general. Other commentators, such as Edward Timms, author of ''Karl Kraus – Apocalyptic Satirist'', have argued that Kraus respected Freud, though with reservations about the application of some of his theories, and that his views were far less black-and-white than Szasz suggests. Grünbaum argues that psychoanalytic based theories are falsifiable, but that the causal claims of psychoanalysis are unsupported by the available clinical evidence. A prominent academic in ] wrote that 'Thirty years ago, the cognitive revolution in psychology overthrew both Freud and the behaviorists, at least in academia. ... hinking ... is not just a of emotion or behavior. ... motion is always generated by cognition, not the other way around.'<ref>], Authentic Happiness (The Free Press, Simon & Schuster, 2002), at p64 (viewable for free on one or more well-known commercial booksellers on the Web, accessed 2011-May-12)</ref> | |||
Historian ], who researched the history of Freud, Jung, Adler, and Janet,<ref name="Borch-Jacobsen 2012">{{Cite book|last1=Borch-Jacobsen|first1=Mikkel|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ifXXnQEACAAJ|title=The Freud Files: An Inquiry into the History of Psychoanalysis|last2=Shamdasani|first2=Sonu|date=2012|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-72978-9|language=en}}</ref>{{Rp|20}} while writing his book ''The Discovery of the Unconscious: The History and Evolution of Dynamic Psychiatry'',<ref name="Borch-Jacobsen 2012" />{{Rp|17}} argued that psychoanalysis was not scientific on the grounds of both its methodology and social structure:<ref name="Borch-Jacobsen 2012" />{{Rp|21}} | |||
] and ] claimed that the institution of psychoanalysis has become a center of power and that its ] techniques resemble the ].<ref>{{Citation |author=Weeks, Jeffrey |title=Sexuality and its Discontents: Meanings, Myths, and Modern Sexualities |publisher=Routledge |location=New York |year= 1989|page=176 |isbn=0-415-04503-7}}</ref> ] criticized the emphasis of some American and British psychoanalytical traditions on what he has viewed as the suggestion of imaginary "causes" for symptoms, and recommended the return to Freud.<ref>{{citation|author=Lacan J|title=Ecrits. A Selection and The Seminars|location= London|publisher= Tavistock|year= 1977|others=Alan Sheridan }}</ref> Together with Gilles Deleuze, ] criticised the Oedipal structure.<ref>{{citation|author=Deleuze G, Guattari F|title=Anti-Oedipus|location= London|publisher= Athlone|year= 1984|isbn= 0-485-30018-4}}</ref> ] criticised psychoanalysis, employing Jacques Derrida's concept of phallogocentrism to describe the exclusion of the woman from Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalytical theories.<ref>{{citation|author= Irigaray L|title=Speculum|location= Paris|publisher= Minuit|year= 1974|isbn= 2-7073-0024-1}}</ref> | |||
{{Blockquote|text=Psychoanalysis, is it a science? It does not meet the criteria (unified science, defined domain and methodology). It corresponds to the traits of a philosophical sect (closed organisation, highly personal initiation, a doctrine which is changeable but defined by its official adoption, cult and legend of the founder).|author=Henri Ellenberger}} | |||
===Freud=== | |||
] explains that Materialism that flourished in the 19th Century severely harmed religion and rejected whatever called spiritual. The institution of the confession priest in particular was badly damaged. The empty void that this institution left behind was swiftly occupied by the newborn psychoanalysis. | |||
Some have accused Freud of fabrication, most famously in the case of ].<ref>]. 1996. ''Remembering Anna O: A Century of Mystification.'' London: Routledge. {{ISBN|0-415-91777-8}}.</ref> Others have speculated that patients had conditions that are now easily identifiable and unrelated to psychoanalysis; for instance, Anna O. is thought to have had an organic impairment such as ] or ], rather than Freud's diagnosis of hysteria.<ref name="Webster, Richard 1996">]. 1996. ''Why Freud was Wrong. Sin, Science and Psychoanalysis''. London: Harper Collins.</ref> | |||
In his writings Kalo claims that psychoanalysis basic approach is erroneous. It represents the mainline wrong assumptions that happiness is unreachable and that the natural desire of a human being is to exploit his fellow men for his own pleasure and benefit.<ref>Kalo, Shlomo ''Powerlessness as a Parable'', 1997, D.A.T. Publ., p. 16 and backcover text</ref> | |||
] and ] argue that Freud and his followers created an inaccurate legend of Freud to popularize psychoanalysis.<ref name="Borch-Jacobsen 2012" />{{Rp|12}} ] and ] argue that this legend has been adapted to different times and situations.<ref name="Borch-Jacobsen 2012" />{{Rp|13}} ] states that psychoanalytic circles have tried to stop historians from accessing documents about the life of Freud.<ref name="Borch-Jacobsen 2012" />{{Rp|32}} | |||
Freud's psychoanalysis was criticized by his wife, Martha. ] reported Martha Freud saying, "I must admit that if I did not realize how seriously my husband takes his treatments, I should think that psychoanalysis is a form of pornography." To Martha there was something vulgar about psychoanalysis, and she dissociated herself from it. According to ], Martha was upset with her husband's work and his treatment of sexuality.<ref>{{citation|last=Behling|first=Katja |title=Martha Freud|pages=164–165|isbn=978-0-7456-3338-1 | |||
|publisher=Polity Press|year=2005}}</ref> | |||
===Witch doctors=== | |||
] and ], in their 1972 work '']'', take the cases of ], ] and ], prominent members of the most respected associations (]), to suggest that, traditionally, psychoanalysis enthusiastically embraces a police state:<ref>Deleuze, Guattari (1972) '']'', section 2.4 ''The disjunctive synthesis of recording'' p.89</ref> | |||
] wrote off psychoanalysts as mere "witch doctors":<ref>{{Cite book|last=Feynman|first=Richard|title=The Meaning of It All: Thoughts of a Citizen-Scientist|publisher=Penguin|year=2007|location=London|pages=114–5|author-link=Richard Feynman|orig-year=1998}} Feynman was also speaking here of psychiatrists.</ref> | |||
{{Blockquote| If you look at all of the complicated ideas that they have developed in an infinitesimal amount of time, if you compare to any other of the sciences how long it takes to get one idea after the other, if you consider all the structures and inventions and complicated things, the ids and the egos, the tensions and the forces, and the pushes and the pulls, I tell you they can't all be there. It's too much for one brain or a few brains to have cooked up in such a short time.<ref group=lower-roman>Feynman was also speaking here of psychiatrists.</ref>|author=|title=|source=}} | |||
], writing in ''Witchdoctors and Psychiatrists'' (1986), stated that psychoanalytic theories have no more scientific basis than the theories of traditional native healers, "witchdoctors" or modern "cult" alternatives such as ].<ref>{{citation|author=Fuller Torrey E|title=Witchdoctors and Psychiatrists|year=1986|page=76}}</ref> Frank Cioffi, author of ''Freud and the Question of Pseudoscience'', cites false claims of a sound scientific verification of the theory and its elements as the strongest basis for classifying the work of Freud and his school as pseudoscience.<ref>{{cite web|title=Was Freud a Pseudoscientist?|url=http://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/2005/was-freud-a-pseudoscientist/|accessdate=April 13, 2011|author=Frank Cioffi|date=November 9, 2005|quote=The strongest reason for considering Freud a pseudo-scientist is that he claimed to have tested – and thus to have provided the most cogent grounds for accepting – theories which are either untestable or even if testable had not been tested. It is spurious claims to have tested an untestable or untested theory which are the most pertinent grounds for deeming Freud and his followers pseudoscientists (though pseudo-hermeneut would have been a more apposite and felicitous description).}}</ref> Among philosophers, ] argued that Freud's theory of the unconscious was not ] and therefore not ].<ref name="Popper"/> Popper did not object to the idea that some mental processes could be unconscious but to investigations of the mind that were not falsifiable. In other words, if it were possible to connect every conceivable experimental outcome with Freud's theory of the unconscious mind, then no ] could refute the theory. ] has also criticized psychoanalysis for lacking a scientific basis.<ref></ref> | |||
Likewise, psychiatrist ], in ''Witchdoctors and Psychiatrists'' (1986), agreed that psychoanalytic theories have no more scientific basis than the theories of traditional native healers, "witchdoctors" or modern "cult" alternatives such as ].<ref name="Torrey">]. 1986. ''Witchdoctors and Psychiatrists''. p. 76.</ref> Psychologist ] charged psychoanalysis with being similar to the ], which she described in her book ''For Your Own Good''. She scrutinized and rejected the validity of Freud's ], including the Oedipus complex, which, according to her and ], blames the child for the abusive sexual behavior of adults.<ref>{{cite book |title = ''Thou shalt not be aware: society's betrayal of the child'' |last = Miller |first = Alice |publisher = Meridan Printing |year = 1984 |location = NY }}</ref> Psychologist Joel Kupfersmid investigated the validity of the Oedipus complex, examining its nature and origins. He concluded that there is little evidence to support the existence of the Oedipus complex.<ref name="Kupfersmid, Joel" /> | |||
] states that psychoanalysis is a pseudoscience, as claims like that of the ] are contrary to observational evidence. | |||
===Critical perspectives=== | |||
The philosopher ] argued that psychoanalysis can be considered a type of textual interpretation or ]. Like cultural critics and literary scholars, Ricoeur contended, psychoanalysts spend their time interpreting the nuances of language. He classified psychoanalysis as a ''hermeneutics of suspicion''. By this he meant that psychoanalysis searches for deception in language, and thereby destabilizes our usual reliance on clear, obvious meanings. | |||
{{Further|Anti-psychiatry|Deinstitutionalisation}} | |||
Contemporary French philosophers ] and ] asserted that the institution of psychoanalysis has become a ] and that its ] resemble ] within the ].<ref>]. 1989. ''Sexuality and its Discontents: Meanings, Myths, and Modern Sexualities''. New York: Routledge. {{ISBN|978-0-415-04503-2}}. p. 176.</ref> Their most in-depth criticism of the power structure of psychoanalysis and its connivance with ] are found in '']'' (1972)<ref>], and ]. 1984 . '']''. London: Athlone. {{ISBN|978-0-485-30018-5}}.</ref> and '']'' (1980), the two volumes of their theoretical work '']''.<ref name="Lecercle 2012">{{cite journal |last=Lecercle |first=Jean-Jacques |title=Machinations deleuzo-guattariennes |date=October 2012 |url=https://www.cairn-int.info/journal-actuel-marx-2012-2-page-108.htm?contenu=article |editor1-last=Ducange |editor1-first=Jean-Numa |editor2-last=Sibertin-Blanc |editor2-first=Guillaume |journal=Actuel Marx |publisher=P.U.F. |location=] |volume=52 |issue=2 |pages=108–120 |doi=10.3917/amx.052.0108 |eissn=1969-6728 |isbn=978-2-13-059331-7 |issn=0994-4524 |via=]|doi-access=free }}</ref> In ''Anti-Oedipus'', Deleuze and Guattari take the cases of ], ], and ], prominent members of the most respected psychoanalytical associations (including the ]), to suggest that, traditionally, psychoanalysis had always enthusiastically enjoyed and embraced a ] throughout its history.<ref>], and ]. 1984 . "The Disjunctive Synthesis of Recording." Section 2.4 in ]. London: Athlone. {{ISBN|978-0-485-30018-5}}. p. 89.</ref> | |||
French psychoanalyst ] criticized the emphasis of some American and British psychoanalytical traditions on what he has viewed as the suggestion of imaginary "causes" for symptoms, and recommended the return to Freud.<ref>]. 1977. ''Ecrits: A Selection and The Seminars'', translated by ]. London: Tavistock.</ref> | |||
] incorporated aspects of psychoanalytic theory into his theory of ] in order to question what he called the ']'. Derrida also turns some of these ideas against Freud, to reveal tensions and contradictions in his work. For example, although Freud defines religion and metaphysics as displacements of the identification with the father in the resolution of the Oedipal complex, Derrida insists in ''The Postcard: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond'' that the prominence of the father in Freud's own analysis is itself indebted to the prominence given to the father in Western metaphysics and theology since Plato. | |||
Belgian psycholinguist and psychoanalyst ] also criticized psychoanalysis, employing ]'s concept of ] to describe the exclusion of the woman both from Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalytical theories.<ref>{{citation |author = Irigaray L |title = Speculum |location = Paris |publisher = Minuit |year = 1974 |isbn = 978-2-7073-0024-9 }}</ref> | |||
Some ]s<ref>http://www.celiabrickman.com/</ref> argue that psychoanalysis imposes a white, ] of human development on those without European heritage, hence they will argue Freud's theories are a form or instrument of intellectual imperialism. | |||
===Freudian theory=== | |||
{{quote box|width=30%|align=right|quote=Many aspects of Freudian theory are indeed out of date, and they should be: Freud died in 1939, and he has been slow to undertake further revisions. His critics, however, are equally behind the times, attacking Freudian views of the 1920s as if they continue to have some currency in their original form. Psychodynamic theory and therapy have evolved considerably since 1939 when Freud's bearded countenance was last sighted in earnest. Contemporary psychoanalysts and psychodynamic therapists no longer write much about ids and egos, nor do they conceive of treatment for psychological disorders as an archaeological expedition in search of lost memories.|source=—], 1998<ref>Drew Westen, "The Scientific Legacy of Sigmund Freud Toward a Psychodynamically Informed Psychological Science". November 1998 Vol. 124, No. 3, 333–371</ref>}} | |||
A survey of scientific research suggested that while personality traits corresponding to Freud's oral, anal, Oedipal, and genital phases can be observed, they do not necessarily manifest as stages in the development of children. These studies also have not confirmed that such traits in adults result from childhood experiences.<ref>Fisher, Seymour, and Roger P. Greenberg. 1977. ''The Scientific Credibility of Freud's Theories and Therapy''. New York: ]. p. 399.</ref> However, these stages should not be viewed as crucial to modern psychoanalysis. What is crucial to modern psychoanalytic theory and practice is the power of the unconscious and the transference phenomenon.<ref>{{cite book|author=Milton, Jane.|title=Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Behaviour Therapy|year=2000|pages=440}}</ref> | |||
The idea of "unconscious" is contested because human behavior can be observed while human mental activity has to be inferred. However, the unconscious is now a popular topic of study in the fields of experimental and social psychology (e.g., implicit attitude measures, ], and ], and other indirect tests). The idea of unconscious, and the transference phenomenon, have been widely researched and, it is claimed, validated in the fields of ] and social psychology,<ref name="Westen and Gabbard">Westen and Gabbard, 2002</ref>{{Full citation needed|date=February 2022}} though a Freudian interpretation of unconscious mental activity is not held by the majority of cognitive psychologists. Recent developments in neuroscience have resulted in one side arguing that it has provided a biological basis for unconscious emotional processing in line with psychoanalytic theory i.e., ],<ref name="Westen and Gabbard" /> while the other side argues that such findings make psychoanalytic theory obsolete and irrelevant. | |||
] explains that the ] that flourished in the 19th century severely harmed religion and rejected whatever called spiritual. The institution of the ] priest in particular was badly damaged. The empty void that this institution left behind was swiftly occupied by the newborn psychoanalysis. In his writings, Kalo claims that psychoanalysis basic approach is erroneous. It represents the mainline wrong assumptions that happiness is unreachable and that the natural desire of a human being is to exploit his fellow men for his own pleasure and benefit.<ref>]. 1997. "Powerlessness as a Parable." ''The Trousers – Parables for the 21st Century''. UK: D.A.T. Publications. pp. 16, back cover.</ref> | |||
] incorporated aspects of psychoanalytic theory into his theory of ] in order to question what he called the ']'. Derrida also turns some of these ideas against Freud, to reveal tensions and contradictions in his work. For example, although Freud defines religion and metaphysics as displacements of the identification with the father in the resolution of the Oedipal complex, Derrida (]) insists that the prominence of the father in Freud's own analysis is itself indebted to the prominence given to the father in Western metaphysics and theology since ].<ref>], and Bass, Alan. 1987. '']''. Chicago: ].</ref>{{page needed|date=June 2018}} | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
==Notes== | |||
{{Reflist|35em|group=lower-roman}} | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{ |
{{Reflist|25em}} | ||
==Further reading== | |||
{{refbegin|30em}} | |||
== |
===Introductions=== | ||
{{Refbegin|2}} | |||
;Introductions | |||
*Brenner, Charles (1954). ''An Elementary Textbook of Psychoanalysis''. | *Brenner, Charles (1954). ''An Elementary Textbook of Psychoanalysis''. | ||
*Elliott, Anthony (2002). ''Psychoanalytic Theory: An Introduction'' |
*Elliott, Anthony (2002). ''Psychoanalytic Theory: An Introduction'' (2nd ed.). ]. --<br />An introduction that explains psychoanalytic theory with interpretations of major theorists. | ||
* Fine, Reuben (1990). ''The History of Psychoanalysis.'' |
* Fine, Reuben (1990). ''The History of Psychoanalysis.'' (expanded ed.). Northvale: Jason Aronson.{{ISBN|0-8264-0452-9|}} | ||
* Samuel, Lawrence R. (2013). ''Shrink: A Cultural History of Psychoanalysis in America''. University of Nebraska Press. 253 pp. | |||
*Freud, Sigmund (2014) . "." '']'' | |||
* | |||
====Reference works==== | |||
*''International dictionary of psychoanalysis'' |
*], ed. (2005). ''International dictionary of psychoanalysis'' 1,2,&3. Detroit: Thomson/Gale. | ||
*] and J.B. Pontalis |
*], and J. B. Pontalis (1974). "The Language of Psycho-Analysis". W. W. Norton & Company. {{ISBN|0-393-01105-4|}} | ||
*Freud, Sigmund (1940). ''An Outline of Psychoanalysis''. ePenguin.;General {{ISBN|978-0393001518|}} | |||
*Edelson, Marshall (1984). ''Hypothesis and Evidence in Psychoanalysis''. Chicago: Chicago University Press. {{ISBN|0-226-18432-3|}} | |||
;General | |||
*] (2005). ''The Fundamentals of Psychoanalytic Technique'' (new ed.). Karnac Books. {{ISBN|1-85575-455-X|}} | |||
*Marshall Edelson (1984). ''Hypothesis and Evidence in Psychoanalysis.'' Chicago University Press, Chicago. ISBN 0-226-18432-3 | |||
*]. ''The Psychoanalytic Movement: The Cunning of Unreason'', . A critical view of Freudian theory. {{ISBN|0-8101-1370-8|}} | |||
*], ''The Fundamentals of Psychoanalytic Technique'', Karnac Books ed., New Ed, 2005, ISBN 1-85575-455-X | |||
*] (2005). "Psychoanalysis: A Paradigm For Clinical Thinking". ]. {{ISBN|1-85343-773-5|}} | |||
*], ''The Psychoanalytic Movement: The Cunning of Unreason'', . A critical view of Freudian theory. ISBN 0-8101-1370-8 | |||
*] (2004). ''Key Writings''. Continuum. {{ISBN|0-8264-6940-X|}} | |||
*]: "Psychoanalysis: A Paradigm For Clinical Thinking", ], 2005, ISBN 1-85343-773-5 | |||
*] (1976). ''Depression; Comparative Studies of Normal, Neurotic, and Psychotic Conditions''. ]. {{ISBN|0-8236-1195-7|}} | |||
*], "Key Writings". Continuum, 2004, ISBN 0-8264-6940-X | |||
* ] (1993). ''Severe Personality Disorders: Psychotherapeutic Strategies''. Yale University Press. {{ISBN|0-300-05349-5|}} | |||
*]: "Depression; Comparative Studies of Normal, Neurotic, and Psychotic Conditions", Publisher: ], 1976, ISBN 0-8236-1195-7 | |||
*] (2000). ''Analysis of the Self: Systematic Approach to Treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorders''. ]. {{ISBN|0-8236-8002-9|}} | |||
*]: "Severe Personality Disorders: Psychotherapeutic", Yale University Press; edition 1993, ISBN 0-300-05349-5 | |||
*] (2007). ''Liberating Oedipus? Psychoanalysis as Critical Theory''. Lexington Books. {{ISBN|0-7391-1148-5|}} | |||
*]: "Analysis of the Self: Systematic Approach to Treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorders", ], 2000, ISBN 0-8236-8002-9 | |||
*] |
*] (1986). ''The Kristeva Reader'', edited by T. Moi. Columbia University Press. {{ISBN|0-231-06325-3|}} | ||
*] (1983). ''Dream-Life: A Re-Examination of the Psycho-Analytical Theory and Technique''. Karnac Books. {{ISBN|0-902965-17-4|}} | |||
*] ''The Kleinian Development'' (New edition), Karnac Books; Reprint edition 1998, ISBN 1-85575-194-1 | |||
*— (1998). ''The Kleinian Development'' (new ed.). Karnac Books; reprint: {{ISBN|1-85575-194-1|}} | |||
*]: "Dream-Life: A Re-Examination of the Psycho-Analytical Theory and Technique" Publisher: Karnac Books, 1983, ISBN 0-902965-17-4 | |||
*Mitchell, S.A., |
*Mitchell, S. A., and M. J. Black (1995). ''Freud and beyond: a history of modern psychoanalytic thought.'' New York: Basic Books. pp. xviii–xx. | ||
*] |
*] (2006). "Beyond Oedipus. Feminist Thought, Psychoanalysis, and Mythical Figurations of the Feminine." In ''Laughing with Medusa'', edited by V. Zajko and M. Leonard. Oxford: Oxford University Press. {{ISBN|0-19-927438-X|}} | ||
*] |
*] (1993). ''Destruction as cause of becoming''. {{OCLC|44450080}} | ||
*] |
*] (1993). ''Presentations of Gender''. Yale University Press. {{ISBN|0-300-05474-2|}} | ||
* |
*Stolorow, Robert, George Atwood, and Donna Orange (2002). ''Worlds of Experience: Interweaving Philosophical and Clinical Dimensions in Psychoanalysis''. New York: Basic Books. | ||
*] |
*] (2006). ''The First Year of Life: Psychoanalytic Study of Normal and Deviant Development of Object Relations''. International Universities Press. {{ISBN|0-8236-8056-8|}} | ||
*Veikko |
*Tähkä, Veikko (1993). ''Mind and Its Treatment: A Psychoanalytic Approach.'' Madison, CT: International Universities Press. {{ISBN|0-8236-3367-5|}} | ||
{{Refend}} | {{Refend}} | ||
===Analyses, discussions and critiques=== | |||
;Book series | |||
{{refbegin|30em}} | |||
*], Rodopi, Amsterdam/New York. | |||
*Aziz, Robert (2007). ''The Syndetic Paradigm: The Untrodden Path Beyond Freud and Jung'', Albany: ]. {{ISBN|978-0-7914-6982-8|}} | |||
*] (1991). ''Lacan: The Absolute Master'', Stanford: Stanford University Press. {{ISBN|0-8047-1556-4|}} | |||
==Analyses, discussions, and critiques of psychoanalysis== | |||
*Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel (1996). ''Remembering Anna O: A Century of Mystification'', London: Routledge. {{ISBN|0-415-91777-8|}} | |||
{{Refbegin|2}} | |||
* |
*Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel and ] (2012). ''The Freud Files: An Inquiry into the History of Psychoanalysis'', Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-521-72978-9|}}. | ||
*{{cite journal|author=Brockmeier Jens|year=1997|title=Autobiography, narrative and the Freudian conception of life history|journal=Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology|volume=4|pages=175–200}} | |||
*Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel (1991). Lacan: The Absolute Master, Stanford: Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-1556-4 | |||
* Burnham, John, ed. (2012). ''After Freud Left: A Century of Psychoanalysis in America'', University of Chicago Press. | |||
*Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel (1996). ''Remembering Anna O: A century of mystification'' London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-91777-8 | |||
*]. (1998). ''Freud and the Question of Pseudoscience'', Open Court Publishing Company. {{ISBN|0-8126-9385-X|}} | |||
*Brockmeier, Jens (1997). Autobiography, narrative and the Freudian conception of life history. ''Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 4'', 175–200. | |||
*] (1986). ''Skeptical Engagements'', New York: Oxford University Press. {{ISBN|0-19-503950-5}}. Part I of this volume, entitled "The Freudian Temptation," includes five essays critical of psychoanalysis written between 1975 and 1986. | |||
*Cioffi, Frank. (1998). ''Freud and the Question of Pseudoscience'', Open Court Publishing Company. ISBN 0-8126-9385-X | |||
*Crews, Frederick (1995). |
*] (1995). ''The Memory Wars: Freud's Legacy in Dispute'', New York: New York Review of Books. {{ISBN|1-86207-010-5|}} | ||
*Crews, Frederick, ed. (1998). |
*Crews, Frederick, ed. (1998). ''Unauthorized Freud: Doubters Confront a Legend'', New York: Viking. {{ISBN|0-14-028017-0|}} | ||
*Crews, Frederick (2017). ''Freud: The Making of an Illusion'', Metropolitan Books. {{ISBN|9781627797177|}} | |||
*Dufresne, Todd (2000). Tales From the Freudian Crypt: The Death Drive in Text and Context, Stanford: Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-3885-8 | |||
*Dufresne, Todd ( |
*Dufresne, Todd (2000). ''Tales From the Freudian Crypt: The Death Drive in Text and Context'', Stanford: Stanford University Press. {{ISBN|0-8047-3885-8|}} | ||
*— (2007). ''Against Freud: Critics Talk Back'', Stanford: Stanford University Press. {{ISBN|0-8047-5548-5|}} | |||
*Erwin, Edward, ''A Final Accounting: Philosophical and Empirical Issues in Freudian Psychology'' ISBN 0-262-05050-1 | |||
*Erwin, Edward (1996), ''A Final Accounting: Philosophical and Empirical Issues in Freudian Psychology''. {{ISBN|0-262-05050-1|}} | |||
*Esterson, Allen. ''Seductive Mirage: An Exploration of the Work of Sigmund Freud.'' Chicago: Open Court, 1993. ISBN 0-8126-9230-6 | |||
*Esterson, Allen (1993). ''Seductive Mirage: An Exploration of the Work of Sigmund Freud.'' Chicago: Open Court. {{ISBN|0-8126-9230-6|}} | |||
*Fisher, Seymour, Greenberg Roger P. (1977). ''The Scientific Credibility of Freud's Theories and Therapy''. New York: Basic Books. | |||
*Fisher, Seymour, |
*Fisher, Seymour, and Roger P. Greenberg (1977). ''The Scientific Credibility of Freud's Theories and Therapy''. New York: Basic Books. | ||
*— (1996). ''Freud Scientifically Reappraised: Testing the Theories and Therapy''. New York: John Wiley. | |||
*Gellner, Ernest, ''The Psychoanalytic Movement: The Cunning of Unreason. A critical view of Freudian theory'', ISBN 0-8101-1370-8 | |||
*Gellner, Ernest (1993), ''The Psychoanalytic Movement: The Cunning of Unreason''. A critical view of Freudian theory. {{ISBN|0-8101-1370-8|}} | |||
*Grünbaum, Adolf (1979). Is Freudian Psychoanalytic Theory Pseudo-Scientific by Karl Popper's Criterion of Demarcation? ''American Philosophical Quarterly, 16'', 131-141. | |||
*{{cite journal|author=Grünbaum Adolf|year=1979|title=Is Freudian Psychoanalytic Theory Pseudo-Scientific by Karl Popper's Criterion of Demarcation?|journal=American Philosophical Quarterly|volume=16|pages=131–141}} | |||
*Grünbaum, Adolf (1985). ''The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique'' ISBN 0-520-05017-7 | |||
*] (1921). ''''. New York: Thomas Seltzer. | |||
*Macmillan, Malcolm, ''Freud Evaluated: The Completed Arc'' ISBN 0-262-63171-7 | |||
*Macmillan, Malcolm (1997), ''Freud Evaluated: The Completed Arc''. {{ISBN|0-262-63171-7|}} | |||
*Morley S, Eccleston C, Williams A. (1999). Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache. ''Pain, 80''(1–2), 1–13. | |||
*{{cite journal|vauthors=Morley S, Eccleston C, Williams A|year=1999|title=Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache|journal=Pain|volume=80|issue=1–2|pages=1–13|doi=10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00255-3|pmid=10204712|s2cid=21572242}} | |||
*Roustang, Francois (1982). Dire Mastery: Discipleship From Freud to Lacan, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 0-88048-259-1 | |||
* |
*Roustang, Francois (1982). ''Dire Mastery: Discipleship from Freud to Lacan''. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. {{ISBN|0-88048-259-1|}} | ||
* |
*]. (1995). ''Why Freud Was Wrong: Sin, Science, and Psychoanalysis'', New York: Basic Books, HarperCollins. {{ISBN|0-465-09128-8|}} | ||
*], editor. (1974). ''Freud: A Collection of Critical Essays.'' New York: Anchor Books. {{ISBN|0-385-07970-2|}} | |||
{{Refend}} | {{Refend}} | ||
==Responses to critiques== | ===Responses to critiques=== | ||
{{Refbegin |
{{Refbegin}} | ||
* Köhler, Thomas 1996: ''Anti-Freud-Literatur von ihren Anfängen bis heute. Zur wissenschaftlichen Fundierung von Psychoanalyse-Kritik.'' Stuttgart: |
* Köhler, Thomas 1996: ''Anti-Freud-Literatur von ihren Anfängen bis heute. Zur wissenschaftlichen Fundierung von Psychoanalyse-Kritik.'' Stuttgart: ]. {{ISBN|3-17-014207-0}} | ||
* Ollinheimo, Ari — Vuorinen, Risto (1999): Metapsychology and the Suggestion Argument: A Reply to |
* Ollinheimo, Ari — Vuorinen, Risto (1999): Metapsychology and the Suggestion Argument: A Reply to Grünbaum's Critique of Psychoanalysis. ''Commentationes Scientiarum Socialium'', 53. Helsinki: Finnish Academy of Science and Letters. {{ISBN|951-653-297-7}} | ||
*Robinson, Paul (1993). ''Freud and his Critics.'' Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN |
*Robinson, Paul (1993). ''Freud and his Critics.'' Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press. {{ISBN|0-520-08029-7}} | ||
*Gomez, Lavinia: . Routledge, 2005. : ''Psychodynamic Practice'' 14(1):108–111. Feb., 2008. | |||
{{Refend}} | {{Refend}} | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
{{Library resources box|by=no|onlinebooks=no|about=yes|lcheading=psychoanalysis}} | |||
{{Wiktionary}} | {{Wiktionary}} | ||
{{Commons category}} | |||
* – |
* – world's primary regulatory body for psychoanalysis, founded by Sigmund Freud (archived 18 January 1998) | ||
* | |||
* | |||
<!--======================== {{No more links}} ============================ | <!--======================== {{No more links}} ============================ | ||
| PLEASE BE CAUTIOUS IN ADDING MORE LINKS TO THIS ARTICLE. Misplaced Pages | | |||
| is not a collection of links nor should it be used for advertising. | | |||
| | | |||
| | | |||
| Excessive or inappropriate links WILL BE DELETED. | | |||
| See ] & ] for details. | | |||
| | | |||
| | | |||
| If there are already plentiful links, please propose additions or | | |||
| replacements on this article's discussion page, or submit your link | | |||
| to the relevant category at the Open Directory Project (dmoz.org) | | |||
| and link back to that category using the {{dmoz}} template. | | |||
======================= {{No more links}} =============================--> | |||
*{{dmoz|Science/Social_Sciences/Psychology/Psychoanalytic_and_Psychodynamic|Psychoanalytic_and_Psychodynamic}} | |||
{{Psychotherapy}} | {{Psychotherapy}} | ||
{{Sigmund Freud}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
{{Link FA|bg}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 10:56, 23 December 2024
Set of therapeutic techniques established by Sigmund FreudMedical intervention
The words Die Psychoanalyse in Sigmund Freud's handwriting, 1938 | |
ICD-9-CM | 94.31 |
---|---|
MeSH | D011572 |
[edit on Wikidata] |
Part of a series of articles on |
Psychoanalysis |
---|
Sigmund Freud's couch |
Concepts |
Important figures |
Important works
|
Schools of thought |
Training |
See also |
Psychoanalysis is a theory and field of research developed by Sigmund Freud. It describes the human mind as an apparatus that emerged along the path of evolution and consists mainly of three instances: a set of innate needs, a consciousness to satisfy them by ruling the muscular apparatus, and a memory for storing experiences that arises during this. Furthermore the theory includes insights into the effects of traumatic education and a technique for bringing repressed content back into the consciousness, in particular the diagnostic interpretation of dreams. Overall, psychoanalysis is a method for the examination and treatment of mental disorders.
Founded in the early 1890s, initially in co-operation with Josef Breuer's and others' clinical research, Freud continued to revise and refine theory and practice of psychoanalysis until his death in 1939. An encyclopaedic article quotes him with following cornerstones of psychoanalysis:
- the assumption that there are unconscious mental processes
- recognition of the theory of repression and resistance
- appreciation of the importance of sexuality and of
- the Oedipus complex.
Using similar psychoanalytical terms, Freud's earlier colleagues Alfred Adler and Carl Jung developed their own therapeutic methods: individual psychology and analytical psychology. Freud wrote some criticisms of them and emphatically denied that they were forms of psychoanalysis. Later Freudian thinkers like Erich Fromm, Karen Horney, and Harry Stack Sullivan branched psychoanalysis in different directions. Jacques Lacan's work essentially represents a return to Freud. He described Freudian metapsychology as a technical elaboration of the three-instance model of the psyche and examined primarily the logical structure of the unconscious.
Overview
Freud distinguished between the conscious and unconscious realms of the psyche and argued that the contents of unconscious largely determine cognition and behaviour. He found that many of the drives – which his structural model locates in the ‘id’ – are repressed into the unconscious as a result of traumatic experiences during childhood and that attempts to integrate them into the conscious perception of the ego triggers resistance. These and other defense mechanisms ‘want’ to maintain the repression – not least with the means of enigma, censorship, internalised fear of punishment or mother-love withdrawal – while the affected instincts resist. All in all, an inner war rages between the id and the ego's conscious values, which manifests itself in more or less conspicuous mental disorders, although Freud did not equate the statistical normality of our society with ‘healthy’. "Health can only be described in metapsychological terms."
He discovered that the instinctive impulses are expressed most clearly – albeit still encoded – in the symbols of dreams as well as in the symptomatic detours of neuroticism and Freudian slips. Psychoanalysis was developed in order to clarify the causes of disorders and to restore mental health by enabling the ego to become aware of the id's needs that have been repressed into the unconscious and to find realistic ways of satisfying and/or controlling them. Freud summarised this goal of his therapy in the demand "Where id was, ego shall became", equating the libido as driving energy of innate needs with the Eros of Socratic-Platonic philosophy.
Oedipus rising
Freud attached great importance to coherence of his structural model. The metapsychological specification of the functions and interlocking of the three instances was intended to ensure the full connectivity of this ‘psychic apparatus’ with biological sciences, in particular Darwin's theory of evolution of species, including mankind with his behaviour, natural thinking ability and technological creativity. Such insight is indispensable for the diagnostic prozess (sickness can only be realised as a deviation from health: the optimal cooperation of all mental-organic functions), but Freud had to be modest. He had to leave his model of human's soul in the unfinished state of a torso because – as he stated one last time in Moses and Monotheism – there was no well-founded primate research in the first half of 20th century. Without knowledge of the instinctive social structure of our genetically closest relatives in animal kingdom (instead of Freud's single ‘super-strong primal father’, they show combative male groups, but despite their remarkable intelligence still no ability to form political organisations), his thesis of the Darwinian primordial horde as presented for discussion in Totem and Taboo cannot be tested and, where necessary, replaced by a realistic model.
Horde life and its abolition through introduction of monogamy (as a political agreement between the sons who murdered the polygamous forefather of the horde) embodies the evolutionary and cultural-historical core of psychoanalysis. The latter aspect is decisive for Freud's Unease in Culture; his assumption of the outbreak of Oedipus complex in human history is based on it. It led to the formulation of rules of behaviour such as the prohibition of adultery and incest, and thus to the beginning of totemic cultures. All further historical stages of coexistence in societies are rooted in this, from feudalism to our modern nations with their monotheism centralising totemic diversity, organisations of military, politics and trade (s. Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego).
Freud's thesis of violent introduction of monogamous cohabitation stand in contrast to the religiously enigmatic reports about the origin of first human couples on earth as an expression of divine will, but closer to the ancient trap to pacify political conflicts among the groups of Neolithic mankind. Examples include Prometheus' uprising against Zeus, who created Pandora as a fatal wedding gift for Epimetheus to divide and rule the titanic brothers; Plato's myth of spherical men cut into isolated individuals for the same reason; and the similarly resolved revolt of inferior gods in the Flood epic Atra-Hasis. Nonetheless, without an examination in the light of modern primate research, as demanded by Freud, these ideas remain in the status of an unproven hypothesis of paleoanthropology, merely a "just so story as a not unpleasant English critic wittily called it. But I mean it honours a hypothesis if it shows capable of creating context and understanding in new areas."
According to Freud, this hypothesis explains the present-day son's conflict with his father over his mother, naming this view after Sophocles' tragedy Oedipus, and supplementing it with case studies such as the Phobia of a five-year-old boy. However, the author not only discovered this complex and the 'oral fixatet' Syndrom of Narzissos' regress back into amniotic fluid (as far as possible given the state of science at the time), but also devised a hypothesis of healthy emotional development, which by nature completes in three successive stages: the oral, anal and genital phases. Whereby the sexual drive of latter takes a ‘latency’ break – the Sleeping Beauty – between the ages of about 7 and 12 for the benefit of social-intellectual growth.
Traditional setting
Psychoanalysts place large emphasis on experiences of early childhood, try to overcome infantile amnesia. In traditional Freudian setting, the patient lies on a couch, and the analyst sits just behind or somehow out of sight. The patient should express all his thoughts, all secrets and dreams, including free associations and fantasies. In addition to its task of strengthening the ego with its ability to think dialectical – Freud's primacy of intellect –, therapy also aims to induce transference. The patient thus projects his educated him mother and father as internalised in his superego since birth onto the analyst. As he once did as a baby and little child, he experiences again the feelings of helpless dependence, all the futile longing for love, anger, rage and urge for revenge on the failing parents, but now with the possibility of processing these contents that have chaped his persona. All people who have been brought up in moralic culturs project irrational fears and hopes for happiness everywhere. The term countertransference means that the analyst himself projects such content onto his patient; then he has an own open problem and has to go to his own analyst if he is not yet able to help himself due to inexperience.
From the sum of what is shown and communicated, the analyst deduces unconscious conflicts with imposed traumas that are causing the patient's symptoms, his persona and character problems, and works out a diagnosis. This explanation of the origin of loss of mental health and the analytical processes as a whole confronts the patients ego with the pathological defence mechanisms, makes him aware of them as well as the instinctive contents of the id that have been repressed by them, and thus helps him to better understand himself and the world in which he lives, was born and educated.
Touching infinity
Not least this includes the fact that the neurological branch of psychoanalysis recently provided evidence that the brain stores experiences in specialised neuronal networks (memory function of the superego) and the ego performances its highest focus of conscious thinking in frontal lobe. In some respects, Freud himself embodies the founder of this field of modern research. Parallel to the consolidation of psychoanalysis, however, he turned away from it with the argument that consciousness is directly given - not to be explained by insights into physiological details. Essentially, two things were known about the living soul: The brain with its nervous system extending over the entire organism and the acts of consciousness. In Freud's view, therefore any number of phenomena can be integrated between "both endpoints of our knowledge" (findings of modern neurology just as well as the position of our planet in the universe, for example), but this only contribute to the spatial "localisation of the acts of consciousness", not to their understanding.
With reference to Descartes, contemporary neuropsychoanalysts explain this situation as mind-body dichotomy, namely both as two total different kinds of 'stuff': an objekt and the subjekt that can'nt objectify itself. With regard to Freud's libido they call this dichotomy the "dual-aspect monism". It touches on the point of psychoanalysis that is most difficult to grasp with the means of empirically based sciences – in fact, only under Kant's assumption that living systems always make judgements about the phenomena they perceive with regard to the satisfaction of their immanent needs. Therefore, Freud conceptualised libido as the teleological element of his three-fold soul model, a desiring energy that links cause and purpose, instead of mere ‘effect’. This universal force embodies the psychicaly source that drives all instinctual needs of living beings, as well as the First Cause of their physicaly evolution. On this path, sexual behaviour realises Darwin's Law of Natural Selection by favouring the most fitting and aesthetically well-proportioned body forms in reproduction. Freud was no less well acquainted with the energetic-economic aspect of evolution and psychic processes (s. def. of the three metapsychological vectors) than with the trinity of Greek philosophy, especially Plato's transcendent unity of truth: that it expresses the good and the beauty in equal measure, anchored in the proportions of golden ratio.
The Question of Lay Analysis
Freud's worldview, with dream interpretation as the royal way into unconscious, wasn't conceived as an source of income (money is not a child's desire), but as a method whose appropriation is open to everyone. In the Wednesday round of young psychoanalysis, academics and ‘uneducated’ worked together on an equal footing to rediscover the happiness lost in the Dark Continent of the human soul – not easy to understand for some outsiders. In order to counteract misunderstandings, Freud clearly sets out the only condition for being able to pursue this interest seriously in his treatise on The Question of Lay Analysis: the methodical examination of one's own inner situation, wherever possible with assistance of an already experienced psychoanalyst.
Psychoanalysis has been a controversial discipline from the outset and its effectiveness as a treatment remains contested, although its influence on psychology and psychiatry is undisputed. Psychoanalytic perspectives are also widely used outside the therapeutic field, for example in film and literary criticism, interpretation of fairy tales or philosophical concepts (replacing Kant's a priori with the conditions of mental apparatus), ideologies such as Marxism and the phenomenon of technological as well as cultural creativity of mankind and its zoological closest relatives.
History
1885-1900
The idea of psychoanalysis began to receive serious attention in the 1890s; Freud called it first Free Association. During this time, he worked as a neurologist in a children's hospital, where attempts were made to develop an effective treatment for the so-called neurotic symptoms, but detailed examinations didn't reveal any organic defects. In the monograph written on this subject, Freud documents his suspicion that neurotic symptoms could have psychological causes.
In 1885, Freud was given the opportunity to study at the Salpêtrière in Paris under the famous neurologist Jean-Martin Charcot. Charcot had specialised in the field of hysterical paralysis and anaesthesia and established hypnosis as a research tool, the experimental application of which actually made it possible to eliminate symptoms of this kind. Paralysed people could suddenly walk again, blind ones could see. Although this effect is not known to last long – as Freud discovered in own experiments – the phenomenon of hypnotic false-healing played a decisive role in convincing him of the psycho-traumatical causation of the multifaceted neurotic clinical picture.
Freud's first attempt to explain neurotical symptoms was presented in Studies on Hysteria (1895). Co-authored with his mentor Josef Breuer, this is generally seen as the birth of psychoanalysis. The work based on Freud's and Breuer's partly joint treatment of Bertha Pappenheim, referred to in the case studies by the pseudonym Anna O.. Berta herself had dubbed the treatment talking cure. Breuer, a distinguished physician, was astonished but remained unspecific; while Freud formulated his hypothesis that Anna's hystera seemed to be caused by distressing but unconscious experiences related to sexuality, basing his assumption on corresponding associations made by the young women. She herself sometimes liked to jokingly rename her talking cure as chimney sweeping (an association about the fairy tale through which place the stork brings a baby into house) – or in Lacan's words: "The more Anna provided signifers, the more she chattered on, the better it went."
Around the same time, Freud had started to develop a neurological hypothesis about mental phenomena such as memory, but soon abandoned this attempt and left it unpublished. Insights into neuronal-biochemical processes that store experiences in the brain – like engraving the proverbial tabula rasa with some code – belongs to the physiological branch of science and lead in a different direction of research than the psychological question of what the differences between consciousness and unconsciousness are. After some thought about a suitable term, Freud called his new instrument and field of research psychoanalysis, introduced in his essay “Inheritance and Etiology of Neuroses”, written and published in French in 1896.
The abuse thesis
In 1896, Freud also published his seduction theory, in which he assumed as certain that he had uncovered repressed memories of incidents of sexual abuse in each of his previous patients. This type of sexual excitations of the child would therefore be the prerequisite for the later development of hysterical and other kinds of neurotical symptoms.
It contradicts the seduction thesis that Freud reported in the same year about patients who expressed their "emphatic disbelief" in this respect: that they "had no feeling of remembering the infantile sexual scenes". In the course of his further research, Freud began to doubt his thesis that such abuse should be almost omnipresent in our society. Initially he expressed his suspicion of having made a mistake in private, to his friend and colleague Wilhelm Fliess in 1898; but it took another 8 years before he had clarified the obscure connections sufficiently enough to publicly revoke his thesis, stating the reasons. (Freud's final position on the origin of neurosis in general is summarized in his late work The Discomfort in Culture. According to this, the causes do not lie in general sexual abuse of children, but in the way in which each generation educates the next to adopt the rules of coexistence known as morality. See also The Future of an Illusion.)
The secrecy mechanism
In the mid-1890s, he was still upholding his hypothesis of sexual abuse. In this context, he reported on fantasies of several patients, which on the one hand would point to memories of scenes of infantile masturbation stored in the unconscious, while the more conscious parts on the other hand would aim to make these morally forbidden acts of childish pleasure unrecognisable, to cover up them. The interesting point for Freud here was not so much the secretiveness itself (a well-known behaviour of Victorian era), but the following twofold realisation: That children – at that time considered as innocent little angels – initiate pleasurable actions of their own accord (have ‘drives’ at all, as later assigned to the ‘id’); and the presumably by aducation initiated emergence of a psychopathological mechanism, whose ability consists in being able to hide impulses of this kind from one's own consciousness. Short after he assumed that the same findings would have some evidence for a kind of Oedipal desires.
From blood disgrace to self-castration
In the tragedy Oedipus, to which Freud refers, there occurs no sexual exploitation of a child by its parents or other adults. Sophocles' poetic treatment of this ancient Greek myth is about Oedipus' own sexual desire addresses to his mother Jocasta – admittedly as an already genitally mature man and without knowing about the close blood relationship including an not less unconscious patricide – which the woman reciprocates just as unsuspectingly. Freud interprets the passage where Oedipus – after realising his serious violation of the moral-totemic incest taboo – pokes out his eyes with the golden needle clasp of his wife's and mother's nightdress (while Jocasta commits suicide) as a manifestation of the same ‘cover-up’ mechanism that he began to uncover in the above-mentioned fantasies. In his eyes psychoanalysis works in opposite direction to this mechanism of preconscious self-delusion, by bringing the due to incest taboo have been repressed desires (the ‘id’) back into realm of inner perception, own conscious thinking. This raised the question for Freud of the first origin of moral prohibitions. A field of research that led him deep into the evolutionary and cultural (prä)history of mankind (see Darwin's primal horde; its abolition through patricide and introduction of monogamy in Totem and Taboo) and which, according to his own information, he had to leave unfinished as an untested hypothesis due to the lack of primate research.
The meaning of dreams
In 1899, Freud's work had progressed far enough that he was able to publish The Interpretation of Dreams. This, for him, was the most important of his writings, as it formulated the realisation that every dream contains a symbolically disguised message that can be decoded with help of the dreamer's free associations. The purpose of every dream is therefore to inform the dreamer about his complex inner situation: in essence, a conflict arising from the demands of innate needs and externally imposed behavioural rules that prohibit their satisfaction. Freud called the former the primary process, taking place predominantly in the unconscious, and the latter the secondary process of predominantly conscious, more or less coherent thoughts.
Freud summarised this view in his first model of the soul. Known as the topological model, it divides the organism into three areas or systems: The unconscious, the preconscious and the conscious. Sexual needs belong to the unconscious and are forced to remain there if the contents of conscious ward them off. This is the case in societys that generally consider all extra- and premarital sexual activity – including homoeroticism, that of biblical Onan and incest – to be a ‘sin’, passing this value on to the next generation through concrete or threatened punishments. Moral education creates fears of punitive violence or the deprive of love in the child's soul. They are stored neuronally in the preconscious and influences the consciousness in the sense of the imprinted rules of behaviour. (Freud's second model of the soul, the three-instance or structural model, introduces a clearer distinction. Topology is no longer the decisive factor here, but the specific function of each of the three instances. This new model did not replace the first one: it integrated it.)
The Interpretation of Dreams includes the first comprehensive conceptualisation of Oedipus complex: The little boy admires his father because of the mental and physical advantages of the adult man and wants to become like him, but also comes into conflict with him over the women around, cause of the taboo of incest. This initiates - starting from the id - anger that can grow into a deadly urge for revenge against the father. Impulses that the little boy cannot act out (not least due to the child's deep dependence on his parents love) and therefore are repressed into unconscious. Symptomatically, this inner situation manifests itself as a feeling of inferiority, even a castration complex. The myth of Oedipus is about the attempt to liberate the 'amputated' potency of the id, but fails because of the remaining unconscious motives. As the ego is overwhelmed by the punitive fear of the moral content of its ‘preconscious’ superego, it cuts off the instinctive desire for knowledge from itself (blinds itself).
Attempts to find a female equivalent of the Oedipus complex have not yielded good results. According to Freud, girls, because of their anatomically different genitals, cannot identify with their father, nor develop a castration phobia as sons do, so this syndrome seems to be reserved for the opposite sex. Feminist psychoanalysts debate whether the father of psychoanalysis might have been a victim of sexism in this case. To compensate for the perceived disadvantage, they postulate a Jocasta complex consisting of an incestuous desire of mothers for their infant sons; but other analysts criticise this naming and attempt to generalise, since Sophocles' Jocasta in particular does not exhibit this behaviour. (Instead, she gave her baby away to be killed). The witch's special interest in little Hansel (while she merely abuses his sister as a kitchen slave) offers much better evidence here, although such "Crunchy house syndrome" again should not as omnipresent as the Oedipus complex itself.
Critics of abuse thesis and Freud in general
In the later second part of the 20th century, several Freud researchers questioned the author's perception that his patients had informed him of childhood sexual abuse. Some of them argued that Freud had imposed his preconceived view on his patients, while others raised the suspicion of conscious forgery. These are two different arguments. The latter questions whether Freud deliberately lied in order to make the allegedly unfounded psychoanalysis appear as a legitimate science; the former assumes an unknowingly committed act. Freud replied at various places in his work the same to both types of argument: That natural science is a process based on trial and error. A slow but sure becoming, in which it is impossible to have precisely defined concepts from the outset, respectively phenomena that from now on have been clarified without any gaps and contradictions. "Indeed, even physics would have missed out on its entire development if it had been forced to wait until its concepts of matter, energy, gravity and others reached the desirable clarity and precision."
The psychologist Frank Sulloway points out in his book Freud, Biologist of the Mind: Beyond the Psychoanalytic Legend that the theories and hypotheses of psychoanalysis are anchored in the findings of contemporary biology. He mentions the profound influence of Charles Darwin‘s theory of evolution on Freud and quotes this sense from the writings of Haeckel, Wilhelm Fliess, Krafft-Ebing and Havelock Ellis.
1900–1940s
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
In 1905, Freud published Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality in which he laid out his discovery of the psychosexual phases, which categorised early childhood development into five stages depending on what sexual affinity a child possessed at the stage:
- Oral (ages 0–2);
- Anal (2–4);
- Phallic-oedipal or First genital (3–6);
- Latency (6–puberty); and
- Mature genital (puberty–onward).
His early formulation included the idea that because of societal restrictions, sexual wishes were repressed into an unconscious state, and that the energy of these unconscious wishes could be result in anxiety or physical symptoms. Early treatment techniques, including hypnotism and abreaction, were designed to make the unconscious conscious in order to relieve the pressure and the apparently resulting symptoms. This method would later on be left aside by Freud, giving free association a bigger role.
In On Narcissism (1914), Freud turned his attention to the titular subject of narcissism. Freud characterized the difference between energy directed at the self versus energy directed at others using a system known as cathexis. By 1917, in "Mourning and Melancholia", he suggested that certain depressions were caused by turning guilt-ridden anger on the self. In 1919, through "A Child is Being Beaten", he began to address the problems of self-destructive behavior and sexual masochism. Based on his experience with depressed and self-destructive patients, and pondering the carnage of World War I, Freud became dissatisfied with considering only oral and sexual motivations for behavior. By 1920, Freud addressed the power of identification (with the leader and with other members) in groups as a motivation for behavior in Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. In that same year, Freud suggested his dual drive theory of sexuality and aggression in Beyond the Pleasure Principle, to try to begin to explain human destructiveness. Also, it was the first appearance of his "structural theory" consisting of three new concepts id, ego, and superego.
Three years later, in 1923, he summarised the ideas of id, ego, and superego in The Ego and the Id. In the book, he revised the whole theory of mental functioning, now considering that repression was only one of many defense mechanisms, and that it occurred to reduce anxiety. Hence, Freud characterised repression as both a cause and a result of anxiety. In 1926, in "Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety", Freud characterised how intrapsychic conflict among drive and superego caused anxiety, and how that anxiety could lead to an inhibition of mental functions, such as intellect and speech. In 1924, Otto Rank published The Trauma of Birth, which analysed culture and philosophy in relation to separation anxiety which occurred before the development of an Oedipal complex. Freud's theories, however, characterized no such phase. According to Freud, the Oedipus complex was at the centre of neurosis, and was the foundational source of all art, myth, religion, philosophy, therapy—indeed of all human culture and civilization. It was the first time that anyone in Freud's inner circle had characterised something other than the Oedipus complex as contributing to intrapsychic development, a notion that was rejected by Freud and his followers at the time.
By 1936 the "Principle of Multiple Function" was clarified by Robert Waelder. He widened the formulation that psychological symptoms were caused by and relieved conflict simultaneously. Moreover, symptoms (such as phobias and compulsions) each represented elements of some drive wish (sexual and/or aggressive), superego, anxiety, reality, and defenses. Also in 1936, Anna Freud, Sigmund's daughter, published her seminal book, The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense, outlining numerous ways the mind could shut upsetting things out of consciousness.
1940s–present
When Hitler's power grew, the Freud family and many of their colleagues fled to London. Within a year, Sigmund Freud died. In the United States, also following the death of Freud, a new group of psychoanalysts began to explore the function of the ego. Led by Heinz Hartmann, the group built upon understandings of the synthetic function of the ego as a mediator in psychic functioning, distinguishing such from autonomous ego functions (e.g. memory and intellect). These "ego psychologists" of the 1950s paved a way to focus analytic work by attending to the defenses (mediated by the ego) before exploring the deeper roots to the unconscious conflicts.
In addition, there was growing interest in child psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis has been used as a research tool into childhood development, and is still used to treat certain mental disturbances. In the 1960s, Freud's early thoughts on the childhood development of female sexuality were challenged; this challenge led to the development of a variety of understandings of female sexual development, many of which modified the timing and normality of several of Freud's theories. Several researchers followed Karen Horney's studies of societal pressures that influence the development of women.
In the first decade of the 21st century, there were approximately 35 training institutes for psychoanalysis in the United States accredited by the American Psychoanalytic Association (APsaA), which is a component organization of the International Psychoanalytical Association (IPA), and there are over 3000 graduated psychoanalysts practicing in the United States. The IPA accredits psychoanalytic training centers through such "component organisations" throughout the rest of the world, including countries such as Serbia, France, Germany, Austria, Italy, Switzerland, and many others, as well as about six institutes directly in the United States.
Psychoanalysis as a movement
Freud founded the Psychological Wednesday Society in 1902, which Edward Shorter argues was the beginning of psychoanalysis as a movement. This society became the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society in 1908 in the same year as the first international congress of psychoanalysis held in Salzburg, Austria. Alfred Adler was one of the most active members in this society in its early years.
The second congress of psychoanalysis took place in Nuremberg, Germany in 1910. At this congress, Ferenczi called for the creation of an International Psychoanalytic Association with Jung as president for life. A third congress was held in Weimar in 1911. The London Psychoanalytical Society was founded in 1913 by Ernest Jones.
Developments of alternative forms of psychotherapy
Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)
In the 1950s, psychoanalysis was the main modality of psychotherapy. Behavioural models of psychotherapy started to assume a more central role in psychotherapy in the 1960s. Aaron T. Beck, a psychiatrist trained in a psychoanalytic tradition, set out to test the psychoanalytic models of depression empirically and found that conscious ruminations of loss and personal failing were correlated with depression. He suggested that distorted and biased beliefs were a causal factor of depression, publishing an influential paper in 1967 after a decade of research using the construct of schemas to explain the depression. Beck developed this empirically supported hypothesis for the cause of depression into a talking therapy called cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in the early 1970s.
Attachment theory
See also: Attachment theory § PsychoanalysisAttachment theory was developed theoretically by John Bowlby and formalized empirically by Mary Ainsworth. Bowlby was trained psychoanalytically but was concerned about some properties of psychoanalysis; he was troubled by the dogmatism of psychoanalysis at the time, its arcane terminology, the lack of attention to environment in child behaviour, and the concepts derived from talking therapy to child behaviour. In response, he developed an alternative conceptualization of child behaviour based on principles on ethology. Bowlby's theory of attachment rejects Freud's model of psychosexual development based on the Oedipal model. For his work, Bowlby was shunned from psychoanalytical circles who did not accept his theories. Nonetheless, his conceptualization was adopted widely by mother-infant research in the 1970s.
Theories
The predominant psychoanalytic theories can be organised into several theoretical schools. Although these perspectives differ, most of them emphasize the influence of unconscious elements on the conscious. There has also been considerable work done on consolidating elements of conflicting theories.
There are some persistent conflicts among psychoanalysts regarding specific causes of certain syndromes, and some disputes regarding the ideal treatment techniques. In the 21st century, psychoanalytic ideas have found influence in fields such as childcare, education, literary criticism, cultural studies, mental health, and particularly psychotherapy. Though most mainstream psychoanalysts subscribe to modern strains of psychoanalytical thought, there are groups who follow the precepts of a single psychoanalyst and their school of thought. Psychoanalytic ideas also play roles in some types of literary analysis such as archetypal literary criticism.
Topographic theory
Topographic theory was named and first described by Sigmund Freud in The Interpretation of Dreams (1899). The theory hypothesizes that the mental apparatus can be divided into the systems Conscious, Preconscious, and Unconscious. These systems are not anatomical structures of the brain but, rather, mental processes. Although Freud retained this theory throughout his life, he largely replaced it with the structural theory.
Structural theory
Structural theory divides the psyche into the id, the ego, and the super-ego. The id is present at birth as the repository of basic instincts, which Freud called "Triebe" ("drives"). Unorganized and unconscious, it operates merely on the 'pleasure principle', without realism or foresight. The ego develops slowly and gradually, being concerned with mediating between the urging of the id and the realities of the external world; it thus operates on the 'reality principle'. The super-ego is held to be the part of the ego in which self-observation, self-criticism and other reflective and judgmental faculties develop. The ego and the super-ego are both partly conscious and partly unconscious.
Neuropsychoanalysis
In the late 20th century, neuropsychoanalysis was introduced. The aim of this new field was to bridge the gap between psychoanalytic concepts and neuroscientific findings. Solms theorizes that for every cognition based action, there is a neurological reason behind it. According to Daniela Mosri, nueropsychoanalysis was coined by Solms and is a continuation of the original model proposed by Freud in 1895. Neuropsychoanalysis is an interdisciplinary approach that focuses on how neurobiological mechanisms influence the psychological aspects of the human mind with emphasis on repression, the dynamics of dreams, therapeutic relationships. Neuroimaging is one of the methods used to empirically validate psychoanalytic concepts.
Ego psychology
Ego psychology was initially suggested by Freud in Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety (1926), while major steps forward would be made through Anna Freud's work on defense mechanisms, first published in her book The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence (1936).
The theory was refined by Hartmann, Loewenstein, and Kris in a series of papers and books from 1939 through the late 1960s. Leo Bellak was a later contributor. This series of constructs, paralleling some of the later developments of cognitive theory, includes the notions of autonomous ego functions: mental functions not dependent, at least in origin, on intrapsychic conflict. Such functions include: sensory perception, motor control, symbolic thought, logical thought, speech, abstraction, integration (synthesis), orientation, concentration, judgment about danger, reality testing, adaptive ability, executive decision-making, hygiene, and self-preservation. Freud noted that inhibition is one method that the mind may utilize to interfere with any of these functions in order to avoid painful emotions. Hartmann (1950s) pointed out that there may be delays or deficits in such functions.
Frosch (1964) described differences in those people who demonstrated damage to their relationship to reality, but who seemed able to test it.
According to ego psychology, ego strengths, later described by Otto F. Kernberg (1975), include the capacities to control oral, sexual, and destructive impulses; to tolerate painful affects without falling apart; and to prevent the eruption into consciousness of bizarre symbolic fantasy. Synthetic functions, in contrast to autonomous functions, arise from the development of the ego and serve the purpose of managing conflict processes. Defenses are synthetic functions that protect the conscious mind from awareness of forbidden impulses and thoughts. One purpose of ego psychology has been to emphasize that some mental functions can be considered to be basic, rather than derivatives of wishes, affects, or defenses. However, autonomous ego functions can be secondarily affected because of unconscious conflict. For example, a patient may have an hysterical amnesia (memory being an autonomous function) because of intrapsychic conflict (wishing not to remember because it is too painful).
Taken together, the above theories present a group of metapsychological assumptions. Therefore, the inclusive group of the different classical theories provides a cross-sectional view of human mental processes. There are six "points of view", five described by Freud and a sixth added by Hartmann. Unconscious processes can therefore be evaluated from each of these six points of view:
- Topographic
- Dynamic (the theory of conflict)
- Economic (the theory of energy flow)
- Structural
- Genetic (i.e. propositions concerning origin and development of psychological functions)
- Adaptational (i.e. psychological phenomena as it relates to the external world)
Modern conflict theory
Modern conflict theory, a variation of ego psychology, is a revised version of structural theory, most notably different by altering concepts related to where repressed thoughts were stored. Modern conflict theory addresses emotional symptoms and character traits as complex solutions to mental conflict. It dispenses with the concepts of a fixed id, ego and superego, and instead posits conscious and unconscious conflict among wishes (dependent, controlling, sexual, and aggressive), guilt and shame, emotions (especially anxiety and depressive affect), and defensive operations that shut off from consciousness some aspect of the others. Moreover, healthy functioning (adaptive) is also determined, to a great extent, by resolutions of conflict.
A major objective of modern conflict-theory psychoanalysis is to change the balance of conflict in a patient by making aspects of the less adaptive solutions (also called "compromise formations") conscious so that they can be rethought, and more adaptive solutions found. Current theoreticians who follow the work of Charles Brenner, especially The Mind in Conflict (1982), include Sandor Abend, Jacob Arlow, and Jerome Blackman.
Object relations theory
Object relations theory attempts to explain human relationships through a study of how mental representations of the self and others are organized. The clinical symptoms that suggest object relations problems (typically developmental delays throughout life) include disturbances in an individual's capacity to feel: warmth, empathy, trust, sense of security, identity stability, consistent emotional closeness, and stability in relationships with significant others.
Klein discusses the concept of introjection, creating a mental representation of external objects; and projection, applying this mental representation to reality. Wilfred Bion introduced the concept of containment of projections in the mother-child relationship where a mother understands an infants projections, modifies them and returns them to the child.
Concepts regarding internal representation (aka 'introspect', 'self and object representation', or 'internalization of self and other'), although often attributed to Melanie Klein, were actually first mentioned by Sigmund Freud in his early concepts of drive theory (Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality, 1905). Freud's 1917 paper "Mourning and Melancholia", for example, hypothesized that unresolved grief was caused by the survivor's internalized image of the deceased becoming fused with that of the survivor, and then the survivor shifting unacceptable anger toward the deceased onto the now complex self-image.
Melanie Klein's hypotheses regarding internalization during the first year of life, leading to paranoid and depressive positions, were later challenged by René Spitz (e.g., The First Year of Life, 1965), who divided the first year of life into a coenesthetic phase of the first six months, and then a diacritic phase for the second six months. Mahler, Fine, and Bergman (1975) describe distinct phases and subphases of child development leading to "separation-individuation" during the first three years of life, stressing the importance of constancy of parental figures in the face of the child's destructive aggression, internalizations, stability of affect management, and ability to develop healthy autonomy.
During adolescence, Erik Erikson (1950–1960s) described the 'identity crisis', that involves identity-diffusion anxiety. In order for an adult to be able to experience "Warm-ETHICS: (warmth, Empathy, Trust, Holding environment, Identity, Closeness, and Stability) in relationships, the teenager must resolve the problems with identity and redevelop self and object constancy.
Self psychology
This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (October 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Self psychology emphasizes the development of a stable and integrated sense of self through empathic contacts with other humans, primary significant others conceived of as 'selfobjects'. Selfobjects meet the developing self's needs for mirroring, idealization, and twinship, and thereby strengthen the developing self. The process of treatment proceeds through "transmuting internalizations" in which the patient gradually internalizes the selfobject functions provided by the therapist.
Self psychology was proposed originally by Heinz Kohut, and has been further developed by Arnold Goldberg, Frank Lachmann, Paul and Anna Ornstein, Marian Tolpin, and others.
Lacanian psychoanalysis
Lacanian psychoanalysis, which integrates psychoanalysis with structural linguistics and Hegelian philosophy, is especially popular in France and parts of Latin America. Lacanian psychoanalysis is a departure from the traditional British and American psychoanalysis. Jacques Lacan frequently used the phrase "retourner à Freud" ("return to Freud") in his seminars and writings, as he claimed that his theories were an extension of Freud's own, contrary to those of Anna Freud, the Ego Psychology, object relations and "self" theories and also claims the necessity of reading Freud's complete works, not only a part of them. Lacan's concepts concern the "mirror stage", the "Real", the "Imaginary", and the "Symbolic", and the claim that "the unconscious is structured as a language."
Though a major influence on psychoanalysis in France and parts of Latin America, Lacan and his ideas have taken longer to be translated into English and he has thus had a lesser impact on psychoanalysis and psychotherapy in the English-speaking world. In the United Kingdom and the United States, his ideas are most widely used to analyze texts in literary theory. Due to his increasingly critical stance towards the deviation from Freud's thought, often singling out particular texts and readings from his colleagues, Lacan was excluded from acting as a training analyst in the IPA, thus leading him to create his own school in order to maintain an institutional structure for the many candidates who desired to continue their analysis with him.
Adaptive paradigm
Main article: Robert LangsThe adaptive paradigm of psychotherapy develops out of the work of Robert Langs. The adaptive paradigm interprets psychic conflict primarily in terms of conscious and unconscious adaptation to reality. Langs' recent work in some measure returns to the earlier Freud, in that Langs prefers a modified version of the topographic model of the mind (conscious, preconscious, and unconscious) over the structural model (id, ego, and super-ego), including the former's emphasis on trauma (though Langs looks to death-related traumas rather than sexual traumas). At the same time, Langs' model of the mind differs from Freud's in that it understands the mind in terms of evolutionary biological principles.
Relational psychoanalysis
Relational psychoanalysis combines interpersonal psychoanalysis with object-relations theory and with inter-subjective theory as critical for mental health. It was introduced by Stephen Mitchell. Relational psychoanalysis stresses how the individual's personality is shaped by both real and imagined relationships with others, and how these relationship patterns are re-enacted in the interactions between analyst and patient. Relational psychoanalysts have propounded their view of the necessity of helping certain detached, isolated patients, develop the capacity for "mentalization" associated with thinking about relationships and themselves.
Psychopathology (mental disturbances)
Childhood origins
Freudian theories hold that adult problems can be traced to unresolved conflicts from certain phases of childhood and adolescence, caused by fantasy, stemming from their own drives. Freud, based on the data gathered from his patients early in his career, suspected that neurotic disturbances occurred when children were sexually abused in childhood (i.e. seduction theory). Later, Freud came to believe that, although child abuse occurs, neurotic symptoms were not associated with this. He believed that neurotic people often had unconscious conflicts that involved incestuous fantasies deriving from different stages of development. He found the stage from about three to six years of age (preschool years, today called the "first genital stage") to be filled with fantasies of having romantic relationships with both parents. Arguments were quickly generated in early 20th-century Vienna about whether adult seduction of children, i.e. child sexual abuse, was the basis of neurotic illness. There still is no complete agreement, although nowadays professionals recognize the negative effects of child sexual abuse on mental health.
The theory on origins of pathologically dysfunctional relationships was further developed by the specialist in psychiatry Jürg Willi (* 16. March 1934 in Zürich; † 8. April 2019) into the Collusion (psychology) concept. The concept takes the observations of Sigmund Freud about the narcissistic, the oral, the anal and the phallic phases and translates them into a two-couples-relationship model, with respect to dysfunctions in the relationship resulting from childhood trauma.
Oedipal conflicts
Many psychoanalysts who work with children have studied the actual effects of child abuse, which include ego and object relations deficits and severe neurotic conflicts. Much research has been done on these types of trauma in childhood, and the adult sequelae of those. In studying the childhood factors that start neurotic symptom development, Freud found a constellation of factors that, for literary reasons, he termed the Oedipus complex, based on the play by Sophocles, Oedipus Rex, in which the protagonist unwittingly kills his father and marries his mother. The validity of the Oedipus complex is now widely disputed and rejected.
The shorthand term, oedipal—later explicated by Joseph J. Sandler in "On the Concept Superego" (1960) and modified by Charles Brenner in The Mind in Conflict (1982)—refers to the powerful attachments that children make to their parents in the preschool years. These attachments involve fantasies of sexual relationships with either (or both) parent, and, therefore, competitive fantasies toward either (or both) parents. Humberto Nagera (1975) has been particularly helpful in clarifying many of the complexities of the child through these years.
"Positive" and "negative" oedipal conflicts have been attached to the heterosexual and homosexual aspects, respectively. Both seem to occur in development of most children. Eventually, the developing child's concessions to reality (that they will neither marry one parent nor eliminate the other) lead to identifications with parental values. These identifications generally create a new set of mental operations regarding values and guilt, subsumed under the term superego. Besides superego development, children "resolve" their preschool oedipal conflicts through channeling wishes into something their parents approve of ("sublimation") and the development, during the school-age years ("latency") of age-appropriate obsessive-compulsive defensive maneuvers (rules, repetitive games).
Treatment
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (May 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Using the various analytic and psychological techniques to assess mental problems, some believe that there are particular constellations of problems that are especially suited for analytic treatment (see below) whereas other problems might respond better to medicines and other interpersonal interventions. To be treated with psychoanalysis, whatever the presenting problem, the person requesting help must demonstrate a desire to start an analysis. The person wishing to start an analysis must have some capacity for speech and communication. As well, they need to be able to have or develop trust and insight within the psychoanalytic session. Potential patients must undergo a preliminary stage of treatment to assess their amenability to psychoanalysis at that time, and also to enable the analyst to form a working psychological model, which the analyst will use to direct the treatment. Psychoanalysts mainly work with neurosis and hysteria in particular; however, adapted forms of psychoanalysis are used in working with schizophrenia and other forms of psychosis or mental disorder. Finally, if a prospective patient is severely suicidal a longer preliminary stage may be employed, sometimes with sessions which have a twenty-minute break in the middle. There are numerous modifications in technique under the heading of psychoanalysis due to the individualistic nature of personality in both analyst and patient.
The most common problems treatable with psychoanalysis include: phobias, conversions, compulsions, obsessions, anxiety attacks, depressions, sexual dysfunctions, a wide variety of relationship problems (such as dating and marital strife), and a wide variety of character problems (for example, painful shyness, meanness, obnoxiousness, workaholism, hyperseductiveness, hyperemotionality, hyperfastidiousness). The fact that many of such patients also demonstrate deficits above makes diagnosis and treatment selection difficult.
Analytical organizations such as the IPA, APsaA and the European Federation for Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy have established procedures and models for the indication and practice of psychoanalytical therapy for trainees in analysis. The match between the analyst and the patient can be viewed as another contributing factor for the indication and contraindication for psychoanalytic treatment. The analyst decides whether the patient is suitable for psychoanalysis. This decision made by the analyst, besides made on the usual indications and pathology, is also based to a certain degree by the "fit" between analyst and patient. A person's suitability for analysis at any particular time is based on their desire to know something about where their illness has come from. Someone who is not suitable for analysis expresses no desire to know more about the root causes of their illness.
An evaluation may include one or more other analysts' independent opinions and will include discussion of the patient's financial situation and insurances.
Techniques
The foundation of psychoanalysis is interpretation of the patient's unconscious conflicts that are interfering with current-day functioning – conflicts that are causing painful symptoms such as phobias, anxiety, depression, and compulsions. Strachey (1936) stressed that figuring out ways the patient distorted perceptions about the analyst led to understanding what may have been forgotten. In particular, unconscious hostile feelings toward the analyst could be found in symbolic, negative reactions to what Robert Langs later called the "frame" of the therapy—the setup that included times of the sessions, payment of fees, and necessity of talking. In patients who made mistakes, forgot, or showed other peculiarities regarding time, fees, and talking, the analyst can usually find various unconscious "resistances" to the flow of thoughts (aka free association).
When the patient reclines on a couch with the analyst out of view, the patient tends to remember more experiences, more resistance and transference, and is able to reorganize thoughts after the development of insight – through the interpretive work of the analyst. Although fantasy life can be understood through the examination of dreams, masturbation fantasies are also important. The analyst is interested in how the patient reacts to and avoids such fantasies. Various memories of early life are generally distorted—what Freud called screen memories—and in any case, very early experiences (before age two)—cannot be remembered.
Variations in technique
There is what is known among psychoanalysts as classical technique, although Freud throughout his writings deviated from this considerably, depending on the problems of any given patient.
Classical technique was summarized by Allan Compton as comprising:
- Instructions: telling the patient to try to say what's on their mind, including interferences;
- Exploration: asking questions; and
- Clarification: rephrasing and summarizing what the patient has been describing.
As well, the analyst can also use confrontation to bringing an aspect of functioning, usually a defense, to the patient's attention. The analyst then uses a variety of interpretation methods, such as:
- Dynamic interpretation: explaining how being too nice guards against guilt (e.g. defense vs. affect);
- Genetic interpretation: explaining how a past event is influencing the present;
- Resistance interpretation: showing the patient how they are avoiding their problems;
- Transference interpretation: showing the patient ways old conflicts arise in current relationships, including that with the analyst; or
- Dream interpretation: obtaining the patient's thoughts about their dreams and connecting this with their current problems.
Analysts can also use reconstruction to estimate what may have happened in the past that created some current issue. These techniques are primarily based on conflict theory (see above). As object relations theory evolved, supplemented by the work of John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth, techniques with patients who had more severe problems with basic trust (Erikson, 1950) and a history of maternal deprivation (see the works of Augusta Alpert) led to new techniques with adults. These have sometimes been called interpersonal, intersubjective (cf. Stolorow), relational, or corrective object relations techniques.
Ego psychological concepts of deficit in functioning led to refinements in supportive therapy. These techniques are particularly applicable to psychotic and near-psychotic (cf., Eric Marcus, "Psychosis and Near-psychosis") patients. These supportive therapy techniques include discussions of reality; encouragement to stay alive (including hospitalization); psychotropic medicines to relieve overwhelming depressive affect or overwhelming fantasies (hallucinations and delusions); and advice about the meanings of things (to counter abstraction failures).
The notion of the "silent analyst" has been criticized. Actually, the analyst listens using Arlow's approach as set out in "The Genesis of Interpretation", using active intervention to interpret resistances, defenses creating pathology, and fantasies. Silence is not a technique of psychoanalysis (see also the studies and opinion papers of Owen Renik). "Analytic neutrality" is a concept that does not mean the analyst is silent. It refers to the analyst's position of not taking sides in the internal struggles of the patient. For example, if a patient feels guilty, the analyst might explore what the patient has been doing or thinking that causes the guilt, but not reassure the patient not to feel guilty. The analyst might also explore the identifications with parents and others that led to the guilt.
Interpersonal–relational psychoanalysts emphasize the notion that it is impossible to be neutral. Sullivan introduced the term participant-observer to indicate the analyst inevitably interacts with the analysand, and suggested the detailed inquiry as an alternative to interpretation. The detailed inquiry involves noting where the analysand is leaving out important elements of an account and noting when the story is obfuscated, and asking careful questions to open up the dialogue.
Group therapy and play therapy
Although single-client sessions remain the norm, psychoanalytic theory has been used to develop other types of psychological treatment. Psychoanalytic group therapy was pioneered by Trigant Burrow, Joseph Pratt, Paul F. Schilder, Samuel R. Slavson, Harry Stack Sullivan, and Wolfe. Child-centered counseling for parents was instituted early in analytic history by Freud, and was later further developed by Irwin Marcus, Edith Schulhofer, and Gilbert Kliman. Psychoanalytically based couples therapy has been promulgated and explicated by Fred Sander. Techniques and tools developed in the first decade of the 21st century have made psychoanalysis available to patients who were not treatable by earlier techniques. This meant that the analytic situation was modified so that it would be more suitable and more likely to be helpful for these patients. Eagle (2007) believes that psychoanalysis cannot be a self-contained discipline but instead must be open to influence from and integration with findings and theory from other disciplines.
Psychoanalytic constructs have been adapted for use with children with treatments such as play therapy, art therapy, and storytelling. Throughout her career, from the 1920s through the 1970s, Anna Freud adapted psychoanalysis for children through play. This is still used today for children, especially those who are preadolescent. Using toys and games, children are able to symbolically demonstrate their fears, fantasies, and defenses; although not identical, this technique, in children, is analogous to the aim of free association in adults. Psychoanalytic play therapy allows the child and analyst to understand children's conflicts, particularly defenses such as disobedience and withdrawal, that have been guarding against various unpleasant feelings and hostile wishes. In art therapy, the counselor may have a child draw a portrait and then tell a story about the portrait. The counselor watches for recurring themes—regardless of whether it is with art or toys.
Cultural variations
Psychoanalysis can be adapted to different cultures, as long as the therapist or counselor understands the client's culture. For example, Tori and Blimes found that defense mechanisms were valid in a normative sample of 2,624 Thais. The use of certain defense mechanisms was related to cultural values. For example, Thais value calmness and collectiveness (because of Buddhist beliefs), so they were low on regressive emotionality. Psychoanalysis also applies because Freud used techniques that allowed him to get the subjective perceptions of his patients. He takes an objective approach by not facing his clients during his talk therapy sessions. He met with his patients wherever they were, such as when he used free association—where clients would say whatever came to mind without self-censorship. His treatments had little to no structure for most cultures, especially Asian cultures. Therefore, it is more likely that Freudian constructs will be used in structured therapy. In addition, Corey postulates that it will be necessary for a therapist to help clients develop a cultural identity as well as an ego identity.
Psychodynamic therapy
According to the NIH, psychodynamic therapy focuses on how an individual’s present behavior is affected by past experiences and the unconscious processes. The main goal associated with psychodynamic therapy is internal reflection; for the patient to be able to understand more about their current behaviors after self-reflection and a critical analyzation of their past with their therapist. In order for this method of treatment to be effective there must be a strong foundation of trust between the patient and their therapist. Often psychodynamic therapy requires a large time investment taking many years for considerable improvement and is not considered a quick solution.
Cost and length of treatment
The cost to the patient of psychoanalytic treatment ranges widely from place to place and between practitioners. Low-fee analysis is often available in a psychoanalytic training clinic and graduate schools. Otherwise, the fee set by each analyst varies with the analyst's training and experience. Since, in most locations in the United States, unlike in Ontario and Germany, classical analysis (which usually requires sessions three to five times per week) is not covered by health insurance, many analysts may negotiate their fees with patients whom they feel they can help, but who have financial difficulties. The modifications of analysis, which include psychodynamic therapy, brief therapies, and certain types of group therapy, are carried out on a less frequent basis—usually once, twice, or three times a week – and usually the patient sits facing the therapist. As a result of the defense mechanisms and the lack of access to the unfathomable elements of the unconscious, psychoanalysis can be an expansive process that involves 2 to 5 sessions per week for several years. This type of therapy relies on the belief that reducing the symptoms will not actually help with the root causes or irrational drives. The analyst typically is a 'blank screen', disclosing very little about themselves in order that the client can use the space in the relationship to work on their unconscious without interference from outside.
The psychoanalyst uses various methods to help the patient to become more self-aware, insightful and uncover meanings of symptoms. Firstly, the psychoanalyst attempts to develop a safe and confidential atmosphere where the patient can report feelings, thoughts and fantasies. Analysands (as people in analysis are called) are asked to report whatever comes to mind without fear of reprisal. Freud called this the "fundamental rule". Analysands are asked to talk about their lives, including their early life, current life and hopes and aspirations for the future. They are encouraged to report their fantasies, "flash thoughts" and dreams. In fact, Freud believed that dreams were, "the royal road to the unconscious"; he devoted an entire volume to the interpretation of dreams. Freud had his patients lay on a couch in a dimly lit room and would sit out of sight, usually directly behind them, as to not influence the patient's thoughts by his gestures or expressions.
The psychoanalyst's task, in collaboration with the analysand, is to help deepen the analysand's understanding of those factors, outside of his awareness, that drive his behaviors. In the safe environment psychoanalysis offers, the analysand becomes attached to the analyst and pretty soon he begins to experience the same conflicts with his analyst that he experiences with key figures in his life such as his parents, his boss, his significant other, etc. It is the psychoanalyst's role to point out these conflicts and to interpret them. The transferring of these internal conflicts onto the analyst is called "transference".
Many studies have also been done on briefer "dynamic" treatments; these are more expedient to measure, and shed light on the therapeutic process to some extent. Brief Relational Therapy (BRT), Brief Psychodynamic Therapy (BPT), and Time-Limited Dynamic Therapy (TLDP) limit treatment to 20–30 sessions. On average, classical analysis may last 5.7 years, but for phobias and depressions uncomplicated by ego deficits or object relations deficits, analysis may run for a shorter period of time. Longer analyses are indicated for those with more serious disturbances in object relations, more symptoms, and more ingrained character pathology.
Training and research
Psychoanalysis continues to be practiced by psychiatrists, social workers, and other mental health professionals; however, its practice has declined. It has been largely replaced by the similar but broader psychodynamic psychotherapy in the mid-20th century. Psychoanalytic approaches continue to be listed by the UK National Health Service as possibly helpful for depression.
United States
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (May 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Psychoanalytic training in the United States tends to vary according to the program, but it involves a personal psychoanalysis for the trainee, approximately 300 to 600 hours of class instruction, with a standard curriculum, over a two to five-year period.
Typically, this psychoanalysis must be conducted by a Supervising and Training Analyst. Most institutes (but not all) within the American Psychoanalytic Association, require that Supervising and Training Analysts become certified by the American Board of Psychoanalysts. Certification entails a blind review in which the psychoanalyst's work is vetted by psychoanalysts outside of their local community. After earning certification, these psychoanalysts undergo another hurdle in which they are specially vetted by senior members of their own institute and held to the highest ethical and moral standards. Moreover, they are required to have extensive experience conducting psychoanalyses.
Candidates generally have an hour of supervision each week per psychoanalytic case. The minimum number of cases varies between institutes. Candidates often have two to four cases; both male and female cases are required. Supervision extends at least a few years on one or more cases. During supervision the trainee presents material from the psychoanalytic work that week. With the supervisor, the trainee then explores the patient's unconscious conflicts with examination of transference-countertransference constellations.
Many psychoanalytic training centers in the United States have been accredited by special committees of the APsaA or the IPA. Because of theoretical differences, there are independent institutes, usually founded by psychologists, who until 1987 were not permitted access to psychoanalytic training institutes of the APsaA. Currently there are between 75 and 100 independent institutes in the United States. As well, other institutes are affiliated to other organizations such as the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, and the National Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis. At most psychoanalytic institutes in the United States, qualifications for entry include a terminal degree in a mental health field, such as Ph.D., Psy.D., M.S.W., or M.D. A few institutes restrict applicants to those already holding an M.D. or Ph.D., and most institutes in Southern California confer a Ph.D. or Psy.D. in psychoanalysis upon graduation, which involves completion of the necessary requirements for the state boards that confer that doctoral degree. The first training institute in America to educate non-medical psychoanalysts was The National Psychological Association for Psychoanalysis (1978) in New York City. It was founded by the analyst Theodor Reik. The Contemporary Freudian (originally the New York Freudian Society) an offshoot of the National Psychological Association has a branch in Washington, DC. It is a component society/institute or the IPA.
Some psychoanalytic training has been set up as a post-doctoral fellowship in university settings, such as at Duke University, Yale University, New York University, Adelphi University and Columbia University. Other psychoanalytic institutes may not be directly associated with universities, but the faculty at those institutes usually hold contemporaneous faculty positions with psychology Ph.D. programs and/or with medical school psychiatry residency programs.
The IPA is the world's primary accrediting and regulatory body for psychoanalysis. Their mission is to assure the continued vigor and development of psychoanalysis for the benefit of psychoanalytic patients. It works in partnership with its 70 constituent organizations in 33 countries to support 11,500 members. In the US, there are 77 psychoanalytical organizations, institutes and associations, which are spread across the states. APsaA has 38 affiliated societies which have 10 or more active members who practice in a given geographical area. The aims of APsaA and other psychoanalytical organizations are: provide ongoing educational opportunities for its members, stimulate the development and research of psychoanalysis, provide training and organize conferences. There are eight affiliated study groups in the United States. A study group is the first level of integration of a psychoanalytical body within the IPA, followed by a provisional society and finally a member society.
The Division of Psychoanalysis (39) of the American Psychological Association (APA) was established in the early 1980s by several psychologists. Until the establishment of the Division of Psychoanalysis, psychologists who had trained in independent institutes had no national organization. The Division of Psychoanalysis now has approximately 4,000 members and approximately 30 local chapters in the United States. The Division of Psychoanalysis holds two annual meetings or conferences and offers continuing education in theory, research and clinical technique, as do their affiliated local chapters. The European Psychoanalytical Federation (EPF) is the organization which consolidates all European psychoanalytic societies. This organization is affiliated with the IPA. In 2002, there were approximately 3,900 individual members in 22 countries, speaking 18 different languages. There are also 25 psychoanalytic societies.
The American Association of Psychoanalysis in Clinical Social Work (AAPCSW) was established by Crayton Rowe in 1980 as a division of the Federation of Clinical Societies of Social Work and became an independent entity in 1990. Until 2007 it was known as the National Membership Committee on Psychoanalysis. The organization was founded because although social workers represented the larger number of people who were training to be psychoanalysts, they were underrepresented as supervisors and teachers at the institutes they attended. AAPCSW now has over 1000 members and has over 20 chapters. It holds a bi-annual national conference and numerous annual local conferences.
Experiences of psychoanalysts and psychoanalytic psychotherapists and research into infant and child development have led to new insights. Theories have been further developed and the results of empirical research are now more integrated in the psychoanalytic theory.
United Kingdom
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (May 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
The London Psychoanalytical Society was founded by Ernest Jones on 30 October 1913. After World War I with the expansion of psychoanalysis in the United Kingdom, the Society was reconstituted and named the British Psychoanalytical Society in 1919. Soon after, the Institute of Psychoanalysis was established to administer the Society's activities. These include: the training of psychoanalysts, the development of the theory and practice of psychoanalysis, the provision of treatment through The London Clinic of Psychoanalysis, the publication of books in The New Library of Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalytic Ideas. The Institute of Psychoanalysis also publishes The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, maintains a library, furthers research, and holds public lectures. The society has a Code of Ethics and an Ethical Committee. The society, the institute and the clinic are all located at Byron House in West London.
The Society is a constituent society of the International Psychoanalytical Association (IPA) a body with members on all five continents which safeguards professional and ethical practice. The Society is a member of the British Psychoanalytic Council (BPC); the BPC publishes a register of British psychoanalysts and psychoanalytical psychotherapists. All members of the British Psychoanalytic Council are required to undertake continuing professional development, CPD. Members of the Society teach and hold posts on other approved psychoanalytic courses, e.g.: British Psychotherapy Foundation and in academic departments, e.g.University College London.
Members of the Society have included: Michael Balint, Wilfred Bion, John Bowlby, Ronald Fairbairn, Anna Freud, Harry Guntrip, Melanie Klein, Donald Meltzer, Joseph J. Sandler, Hanna Segal, J. D. Sutherland and Donald Winnicott.
The Institute of Psychoanalysis is the foremost publisher of psychoanalytic literature. The 24-volume Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud was conceived, translated, and produced under the direction of the British Psychoanalytical Society. The Society, in conjunction with Random House, will soon publish a new, revised and expanded Standard Edition. With the New Library of Psychoanalysis the Institute continues to publish the books of leading theorists and practitioners. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis is published by the Institute of Psychoanalysis. For over 100 years, it has one of the largest circulations of any psychoanalytic journal.
Psychoanalytic psychotherapy
There are different forms of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy in which psychoanalytic thinking is applied. In addition to classical psychoanalysis there is for example psychoanalytic psychotherapy, an approach that expands "the accessibility of psychoanalytic theory and clinical practices that had evolved over 100 plus years to a larger number of individuals." Other examples of well known therapies which also use insights of psychoanalysis are mentalization-based treatment (MBT), and transference focused psychotherapy (TFP). There is also a continuing influence of psychoanalytic thinking in mental health care and psychiatric care.
Research
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (May 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Over a hundred years of case reports and studies in the journal Modern Psychoanalysis, the Psychoanalytic Quarterly, the International Journal of Psychoanalysis and the Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association have analyzed the efficacy of analysis in cases of neurosis and character or personality problems. Psychoanalysis modified by object relations techniques has been shown to be effective in many cases of ingrained problems of intimacy and relationship (cf. the many books of Otto Kernberg). Psychoanalytic treatment, in other situations, may run from about a year to many years, depending on the severity and complexity of the pathology.
Psychoanalytic theory has, from its inception, been the subject of criticism and controversy. Freud remarked on this early in his career, when other physicians in Vienna ostracized him for his findings that hysterical conversion symptoms were not limited to women. Challenges to analytic theory began with Otto Rank and Alfred Adler (turn of the 20th century), continued with behaviorists (e.g. Wolpe) into the 1940s and '50s, and have persisted (e.g. Miller). Criticisms come from those who object to the notion that there are mechanisms, thoughts or feelings in the mind that could be unconscious. Criticisms also have been leveled against the idea of "infantile sexuality" (the recognition that children between ages two and six imagine things about procreation). Criticisms of theory have led to variations in analytic theories, such as the work of Ronald Fairbairn, Michael Balint, and John Bowlby. In the past 30 years or so, the criticisms have centered on the issue of empirical verification. With it being difficult to substantiate the efficacy of psychoanalytic treatments in a psychiatric context.
Psychoanalysis has been used as a research tool into childhood development (cf. the journal The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child), and has developed into a flexible, effective treatment for certain mental disturbances. In the 1960s, Freud's early (1905) thoughts on the childhood development of female sexuality were challenged; this challenge led to major research in the 1970s and 80s, and then to a reformulation of female sexual development that corrected some of Freud's concepts. Also see the various works of Eleanor Galenson, Nancy Chodorow, Karen Horney, Françoise Dolto, Melanie Klein, Selma Fraiberg, and others. Most recently, psychoanalytic researchers who have integrated attachment theory into their work, including Alicia Lieberman and Daniel Schechter, have explored the role of parental traumatization in the development of young children's mental representations of self and others.
Effectiveness
The psychoanalytic profession has been resistant to researching efficacy. Evaluations of effectiveness based on the interpretation of the therapist alone cannot be proven.
Research results
Numerous studies have shown that the efficacy of therapy is primarily related to the quality of the therapeutic alliance.
Meta-analyses in 2019 found psychoanalytic and psychodynamic therapy effective at improving psychosocial wellbeing, reducing suicidality, as well as self harm behavior in patients at a 6-month interval. There has also been evidence for psychoanalytic psychotherapy as an effective treatment for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Conduct Disorder when compared with behavioral management treatments with or without methylphenidate. Meta-analysis in 2012 and 2013 found support or evidence for the efficacy of psychoanalytic therapy. Other meta-analyses published in recent years showed psychoanalysis and psychodynamic therapy to be effective, with outcomes comparable to or greater than other kinds of psychotherapy or antidepressant drugs, but these meta-analyses have been subjected to various criticisms. In particular, the inclusion of pre/post studies rather than randomized controlled trials, and the absence of adequate comparisons with control treatments, is a serious limitation in interpreting the results. A French 2004 report from INSERM concluded that psychoanalytic therapy is less effective than other psychotherapies (including cognitive behavioral therapy) for certain diseases.
In 2011, the American Psychological Association reviewed 103 RCT comparisons between psychodynamic treatment and a non-dynamic competitor, which had been published between 1974 and 2010, and among which 63 were deemed of adequate quality. Out of 39 comparisons with an active competitor, they found that 6 psychodynamic treatments were superior, 5 were inferior, and 28 showed no difference. The study found these results promising but explicited the necessity of further good quality trials replicating positive results on specific disorders.
Meta-analyses of Short Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (STPP) have found effect sizes (Cohen's d) ranging from 0.34 to 0.71 compared to no treatment and was found to be slightly better than other therapies in follow up. Other reviews have found an effect size of 0.78 to 0.91 for somatoform disorders compared to no treatment and 0.69 for treating depression. A 2012 Harvard Review of Psychiatry meta-analysis of Intensive Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy (ISTDP) found effect sizes ranging from 0.84 for interpersonal problems to 1.51 for depression. Overall ISTDP had an effect size of 1.18 compared to no treatment.
A meta-analysis of Long Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy in 2012 found an overall effect size of 0.33, which is modest. This study concluded the recovery rate following LTPP was equal to control treatments, including treatment as usual, and found the evidence for the effectiveness of LTPP to be limited and at best conflicting. Others have found effect sizes of 0.44–0.68.
According to a 2004 French review conducted by INSERM, psychoanalysis was presumed or proven effective at treating panic disorder, post-traumatic stress, and personality disorders, but did not find evidence of its effectiveness in treating schizophrenia, obsessive compulsive disorder, specific phobia, bulimia and anorexia.
A 2001 systematic review of the medical literature by the Cochrane Collaboration concluded that no data exist demonstrating that psychodynamic psychotherapy is effective in treating schizophrenia and severe mental illness, and cautioned that medication should always be used alongside any type of talk therapy in schizophrenia cases. A French review from 2004 found the same. The Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team advises against the use of psychodynamic therapy in cases of schizophrenia, arguing that more trials are necessary to verify its effectiveness.
Criticism
See also: Science wars and Theory warsThis section contains too many or overly lengthy quotations. Please help summarize the quotations. Consider transferring direct quotations to Wikiquote or excerpts to Wikisource. (November 2022) |
Both Freud and psychoanalysis have been criticized in extreme terms. Exchanges between critics and defenders of psychoanalysis have often been so heated that they have come to be characterized as the Freud Wars. Linguist Noam Chomsky has criticized psychoanalysis for lacking a scientific basis. Evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould considered psychoanalysis influenced by pseudoscientific theories such as recapitulation theory. Psychologists Hans Eysenck, John F. Kihlstrom, and others have also criticized the field as pseudoscience.
Debate over status as scientific
The theoretical foundations of psychoanalysis lie in the same philosophical currents that lead to interpretive phenomenology rather than in those that lead to scientific positivism, making the theory largely incompatible with positivist approaches to the study of the mind.
Early critics of psychoanalysis believed that its theories were based too little on quantitative and experimental research, and too much on the clinical case study method. Philosopher Frank Cioffi cites false claims of a sound scientific verification of the theory and its elements as the strongest basis for classifying the work of Freud and his school as pseudoscience.
Karl Popper argued that psychoanalysis is a pseudoscience because its claims are not testable and cannot be refuted; that is, they are not falsifiable:
....those "clinical observations" which analysts naively believe confirm their theory cannot do this any more than the daily confirmations which astrologers find in their practice. And as for Freud's epic of the Ego, the Super-ego, and the Id, no substantially stronger claim to scientific status can be made for it than for Homer's collected stories from the Olympus.
In addition, Imre Lakatos wrote that "Freudians have been nonplussed by Popper's basic challenge concerning scientific honesty. Indeed, they have refused to specify experimental conditions under which they would give up their basic assumptions." In Sexual Desire (1986), philosopher Roger Scruton rejects Popper's arguments pointing to the theory of repression as an example of a Freudian theory that does have testable consequences. Scruton nevertheless concluded that psychoanalysis is not genuinely scientific, on the grounds that it involves an unacceptable dependence on metaphor. The philosopher and physicist Mario Bunge argued that psychoanalysis is a pseudoscience because it violates the ontology and methodology inherent to science. According to Bunge, most psychoanalytic theories are either untestable or unsupported by evidence. Cognitive scientists, in particular, have also weighed in. Martin Seligman, a prominent academic in positive psychology, wrote that:
Thirty years ago, the cognitive revolution in psychology overthrew both Freud and the behaviorists, at least in academia.… The imperialistic Freudian view claims that emotion always drives thought, while the imperialistic cognitive view claims that thought always drives emotion. The evidence, however, is that each drives the other at times.
Adolf Grünbaum argues in Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis (1993) that psychoanalytic based theories are falsifiable, but that the causal claims of psychoanalysis are unsupported by the available clinical evidence.
Historian Henri Ellenberger, who researched the history of Freud, Jung, Adler, and Janet, while writing his book The Discovery of the Unconscious: The History and Evolution of Dynamic Psychiatry, argued that psychoanalysis was not scientific on the grounds of both its methodology and social structure:
Psychoanalysis, is it a science? It does not meet the criteria (unified science, defined domain and methodology). It corresponds to the traits of a philosophical sect (closed organisation, highly personal initiation, a doctrine which is changeable but defined by its official adoption, cult and legend of the founder).
— Henri Ellenberger
Freud
Some have accused Freud of fabrication, most famously in the case of Anna O. Others have speculated that patients had conditions that are now easily identifiable and unrelated to psychoanalysis; for instance, Anna O. is thought to have had an organic impairment such as tuberculous meningitis or temporal lobe epilepsy, rather than Freud's diagnosis of hysteria.
Henri Ellenberger and Frank Sulloway argue that Freud and his followers created an inaccurate legend of Freud to popularize psychoanalysis. Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen and Sonu Shamdasani argue that this legend has been adapted to different times and situations. Isabelle Stengers states that psychoanalytic circles have tried to stop historians from accessing documents about the life of Freud.
Witch doctors
Richard Feynman wrote off psychoanalysts as mere "witch doctors":
If you look at all of the complicated ideas that they have developed in an infinitesimal amount of time, if you compare to any other of the sciences how long it takes to get one idea after the other, if you consider all the structures and inventions and complicated things, the ids and the egos, the tensions and the forces, and the pushes and the pulls, I tell you they can't all be there. It's too much for one brain or a few brains to have cooked up in such a short time.
Likewise, psychiatrist E. Fuller Torrey, in Witchdoctors and Psychiatrists (1986), agreed that psychoanalytic theories have no more scientific basis than the theories of traditional native healers, "witchdoctors" or modern "cult" alternatives such as EST. Psychologist Alice Miller charged psychoanalysis with being similar to the poisonous pedagogies, which she described in her book For Your Own Good. She scrutinized and rejected the validity of Freud's drive theory, including the Oedipus complex, which, according to her and Jeffrey Masson, blames the child for the abusive sexual behavior of adults. Psychologist Joel Kupfersmid investigated the validity of the Oedipus complex, examining its nature and origins. He concluded that there is little evidence to support the existence of the Oedipus complex.
Critical perspectives
Further information: Anti-psychiatry and DeinstitutionalisationContemporary French philosophers Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze asserted that the institution of psychoanalysis has become a center of power and that its confessional techniques resemble those included and utilized within the Christian religion. Their most in-depth criticism of the power structure of psychoanalysis and its connivance with capitalism are found in Anti-Oedipus (1972) and A Thousand Plateaus (1980), the two volumes of their theoretical work Capitalism and Schizophrenia. In Anti-Oedipus, Deleuze and Guattari take the cases of Gérard Mendel, Bela Grunberger, and Janine Chasseguet-Smirgel, prominent members of the most respected psychoanalytical associations (including the IPA), to suggest that, traditionally, psychoanalysis had always enthusiastically enjoyed and embraced a police state throughout its history.
French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan criticized the emphasis of some American and British psychoanalytical traditions on what he has viewed as the suggestion of imaginary "causes" for symptoms, and recommended the return to Freud.
Belgian psycholinguist and psychoanalyst Luce Irigaray also criticized psychoanalysis, employing Jacques Derrida's concept of phallogocentrism to describe the exclusion of the woman both from Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalytical theories.
Freudian theory
—Drew Westen, 1998Many aspects of Freudian theory are indeed out of date, and they should be: Freud died in 1939, and he has been slow to undertake further revisions. His critics, however, are equally behind the times, attacking Freudian views of the 1920s as if they continue to have some currency in their original form. Psychodynamic theory and therapy have evolved considerably since 1939 when Freud's bearded countenance was last sighted in earnest. Contemporary psychoanalysts and psychodynamic therapists no longer write much about ids and egos, nor do they conceive of treatment for psychological disorders as an archaeological expedition in search of lost memories.
A survey of scientific research suggested that while personality traits corresponding to Freud's oral, anal, Oedipal, and genital phases can be observed, they do not necessarily manifest as stages in the development of children. These studies also have not confirmed that such traits in adults result from childhood experiences. However, these stages should not be viewed as crucial to modern psychoanalysis. What is crucial to modern psychoanalytic theory and practice is the power of the unconscious and the transference phenomenon.
The idea of "unconscious" is contested because human behavior can be observed while human mental activity has to be inferred. However, the unconscious is now a popular topic of study in the fields of experimental and social psychology (e.g., implicit attitude measures, fMRI, and PET scans, and other indirect tests). The idea of unconscious, and the transference phenomenon, have been widely researched and, it is claimed, validated in the fields of cognitive psychology and social psychology, though a Freudian interpretation of unconscious mental activity is not held by the majority of cognitive psychologists. Recent developments in neuroscience have resulted in one side arguing that it has provided a biological basis for unconscious emotional processing in line with psychoanalytic theory i.e., neuropsychoanalysis, while the other side argues that such findings make psychoanalytic theory obsolete and irrelevant.
Shlomo Kalo explains that the scientific materialism that flourished in the 19th century severely harmed religion and rejected whatever called spiritual. The institution of the confession priest in particular was badly damaged. The empty void that this institution left behind was swiftly occupied by the newborn psychoanalysis. In his writings, Kalo claims that psychoanalysis basic approach is erroneous. It represents the mainline wrong assumptions that happiness is unreachable and that the natural desire of a human being is to exploit his fellow men for his own pleasure and benefit.
Jacques Derrida incorporated aspects of psychoanalytic theory into his theory of deconstruction in order to question what he called the 'metaphysics of presence'. Derrida also turns some of these ideas against Freud, to reveal tensions and contradictions in his work. For example, although Freud defines religion and metaphysics as displacements of the identification with the father in the resolution of the Oedipal complex, Derrida (1987) insists that the prominence of the father in Freud's own analysis is itself indebted to the prominence given to the father in Western metaphysics and theology since Plato.
See also
- Glossary of psychoanalysis
- List of schools of psychoanalysis
- Psychoanalytic sociology
- Training analysis
Notes
- From Ancient Greek: psykhḗ 'soul' + análysis 'investigate'
- "What is psychoanalysis? Of course, one is supposed to answer that it is many things – a theory, a research method, a therapy, a body of knowledge. In what might be considered an unfortunately abbreviated description, Freud said that anyone who recognizes transference and resistance is a psychoanalyst, even if he comes to conclusions other than his own... I prefer to think of the analytic situation more broadly, as one in which someone seeking help tries to speak as freely as he can to someone who listens as carefully as he can with the aim of articulating what is going on between them and why. David Rapaport (1967a) once defined the analytic situation as carrying the method of interpersonal relationship to its last consequences." Gill, Merton M. 1999. "Psychoanalysis, Part 1: Proposals for the Future." The Challenge for Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy: Solutions for the Future. New York: American Mental Health Foundation. Archived 10 June 2009.
- "All psychoanalytic theories include the idea that unconscious thoughts and feelings are central in mental functioning." Milton, Jane, Caroline Polmear, and Julia Fabricius. 2011. A Short Introduction to Psychoanalysis. SAGE. p. 27.
- "Psychoanalysis has existed before the turn of the 20th century and, in that span of years, has established itself as one of the fundamental disciplines within psychiatry. The science of psychoanalysis is the bedrock of psychodynamic understanding and forms the fundamental theoretical frame of reference for a variety of forms of therapeutic intervention, embracing not only psychoanalysis itself but also various forms of psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy and related forms of therapy using psychodynamic concepts." Sadock, Benjamin J., and Virginia A. Sadock. 2007. Kaplan and Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry (10th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 190.
- "Psychoanalysis continues to be an important paradigm organizing the way many psychiatrists think about patients and treatment. However, its limitations are more widely recognized and it is assumed that many important advances in the future will come from other areas, particularly biologic psychiatry. As yet unresolved is the appropriate role of psychoanalytic thinking in organizing the treatment of patients and the training of psychiatrists after that biologic revolution has born fruit. Will treatments aimed at biologic defects or abnormalities become technical steps in a program organized in a psychoanalytic framework? Will psychoanalysis serve to explain and guide supportive intervention for individuals whose lives are deformed by biologic defect and therapeutic interventions, much as it now does for patients with chronic physical illness, with the psychoanalyst on the psychiatric dialysis program? Or will we look back on the role of psychoanalysis in the treatment of the seriously mentally ill as the last and most scientifically enlightened phase of the humanistic tradition in psychiatry, a tradition that became extinct when advances in biology allowed us to cure those we had so long only comforted?" Michels, Robert. 1999. "Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry: A Changing Relationship." The Challenge for Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy: Solutions for the Future. New York: American Mental Health Foundation. Archived 6 June 2009.
- cf. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, academic journal
- "By the 1960s it would assume a more central place in the psychotherapy arena"
- also see Freud's paper "Repeating, Remembering, and Working Through"
- cf. Marcus, I. and J. Francis. 1975. Masturbation from Infancy to Senescence.
- see the child studies of Eleanor Galenson on "evocative memory"
- see Leon Hoffman, New York Psychoanalytic Institute Center for Children
- cf. Slavson, S. R., A Textbook in Analytic Group Therapy
- Feynman was also speaking here of psychiatrists.
References
- Mitchell, Juliet. 2000. Psychoanalysis and Feminism: A Radical Reassessment of Freudian Psychoanalysis. London: Penguin Books. p. 341.
- Mitchell J (1975). Psychoanalysis and Feminism. Pelican. p. 343.
- Freud S (1966). On the History of the Psycho-Analytic Movement. New York: W. W. Norton. p. 5.
- Birnbach, Martin. 1961. Neo-Freudian Social Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University Press. p. 3.
- Julien P (2021). Jacques Lacan's Return to Freud. New York University Press. doi:10.18574/nyu/9780814743232.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-8147-4323-2.
- Lacan J. Freud's Papers on Technique (Seminar of Jacques Lacan). Jacques Alain.
- Freud S (1978). The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Volume XIX (1923–26) The Ego and the Id and Other Works. Strachey, James., Freud, Anna, 1895–1982, Rothgeb, Carrie Lee, Richards, Angela., Scientific Literature Corporation. London: Hogarth Press. p. 19. ISBN 0701200677. OCLC 965512.
- Freud S (1937). Die endliche und die unendliche Analyse. S. Fischer. pp. Gesammelte Werke, Band XVI, 57–99.
- Zoja L (1983). "Working against Dorian Gray: analysis and the old". J Anal Psychol. 28 (1): 51–64. doi:10.1111/j.1465-5922.1983.00051.x. PMID 6826461.
- Freud S (1933). Neue Folge der Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse. p. 31. Vorlesung: Die Zerlegung der psychischen Persönlichkeit.
- Freud S. Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse. p. 99.
- Freud S. Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 14. Selbstdarstellung. p. 85.
- ^ Freud S. Sigmund Freud: Der Mann Moses und die monotheistische Religion. pp. 180 (Kapitel 3, Abschnitt C).
- Plato. "Aristophanes' speech". Symposion.
- ^ Freud S. Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse. textlog.de. pp. X - Die Masse und die Urhorde.
- Freud S (1909). Analyse der Phobie eines fünfjährigen Knaben.
- Chessick, Richard D. 2007. The Future of Psychoanalysis. Albany: State University of New York Press. p. 125.
- Fromm, Erich. 1992. The Revision of Psychoanalysis. New York: Open Road. pp. 12–13. (points 1 to 6).
- Stefana, Alberto. 2017. History of Countertransference: From Freud to the British Object Relations School. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1138214613.
- Sigmund Freud: Abriß der Psychoanalyse. (1938), p. 6
- Centonze D, Siracusano A, Calabresi P, Bernardi G (November 2004). "The Project for a Scientific Psychology (1895): a Freudian anticipation of LTP-memory connection theory". Brain Research Reviews. 46 (3): 310–314. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.07.006. ISSN 0165-0173. PMID 15571772. S2CID 7871434.
- Fotopoulou A (May 2012), "The history and progress of neuropsychoanalysis", From the Couch to the Lab, Oxford University Press, pp. 12–24, doi:10.1093/med/9780199600526.003.0002, ISBN 978-0-19-960052-6
- Freud S (1940). Abriß der Psychoanalyse, Gesammelte Werke. pp. 63−138, here S. 67.
- Radner D (1971). "Descartes' Notion of the Union of Mind and Body". Journal of the History of Philosophy. 9 (2): 159–170. doi:10.1353/hph.2008.1109. ISSN 1538-4586. S2CID 144808035.
- Freud S. Drei Abhandlungen zur Sexualtheorie. pp. Kap. 2, Abschnitt Beschauen und Betasten Consideration of a teleological effect behind the evolutionary processes of ‘’mutation and natural selection‘’, which Freud generally bases on the excitability of libidinal energy.).
- Freud S. "Selbstdarstellung". Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 14. p. 85.
- Freud S (16 January 1897). Freud's letters to Fliess. p. 320.
Happiness is the subsequent fulfilment of a prehistoric wish. That is why wealth makes us so unhappy; money was not a childhood wish.
- Gay P (1995). Freud. Eine Biographie für unsere Zeit. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer. p. 200.
- Freud S (1972). Gesammelte Werke (5 ed.). Frankfurt am Main. p. 152.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Tarzian M, Ndrio M, Fakoya AO (2023). "An Introduction and Brief Overview of Psychoanalysis". Cureus. 15 (9): e45171. doi:10.7759/cureus.45171. ISSN 2168-8184. PMC 10575551. PMID 37842377.
- Stengel, E. 1953. Sigmund Freud on Aphasia (1891). New York: International Universities Press.
- ^ Freud, Sigmund, and Josef Breuer. 1955 . Studies on Hysteria, Standard Editions 2, edited by J. Strachey. London: Hogarth Press.
- Jacques Lacan, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis (London 1994) p. 157
- Freud, Sigmund. 1966 . "Project for a Scientific Psychology." Pp. 347–445 in Standard Editions 3, edited by J. Strachey. London: Hogarth Press.
- Freud, Sigmund. 1896. "L'hérédité et l'étiologie des névroses" . Revue neurologique 4(6):161–69. via Psychanalyste Paris.
- Roudinesco, Élisabeth, and Michel Plon. 2011 . Dictionnaire de la psychanalyse. Paris: Fayard. p. 1216.
- ^ Freud, Sigmund. 1953 . "The Aetiology of Hysteria." Pp. 191–221 in The Standard Edition 3, edited by J. Strachey. London: Hogarth Press. Lay summary via University of Washington.
- ^ Freud, Sigmund. 1953 . "My Views on the Part Played by Sexuality in the Aetiology of the Neuroses." Pp. 269–79 in The Standard Edition 7, edited by J. Strachey. London: Hogarth Press.
- Freud, Sigmund. 1959 . "An Autobiographical Study." Pp. 7–74 in Standard Edition 20, edited by J. Strachey. London: Hogarth Press. – via University of Pennsylvania.Transcribed version via Michigan Mental Health Networker.
- Gay, Peter. 1988. Freud: A Life for Our Time. New York: W. W. Norton. pp. 3–4, 103.
- Freud, Sigmund. 1913 . The Interpretation of Dreams. Macmillan.
- Sigmund Freud, On Sexuality (Penguin Freud Library 7) p. 342.
- Olivier C. Jokastes Kinder: Die Psyche der Frau im Schatten der Mutter.
- Cioffi, F. 1998 . "Was Freud a Liar?" Pp. 199–204 in Freud and the Question of Pseudoscience. Open Court.
- Schimek, J. G. 1987. "Fact and Fantasy in the Seduction Theory: a Historical Review." Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 35:937–65.
- Esterson, Allen. 1998. "Jeffrey Masson and Freud's seduction theory: A new fable based on old myths (synopsis in Human Nature Review)." History of the Human Sciences 11(1):1–21. doi:10.1177/095269519801100101.
- Freud S. Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 14. Selbstdarstellung. pp. 84–85.
- ^ Borch-Jacobsen M, Shamdasani S (2012). The Freud Files: An Inquiry into the History of Psychoanalysis. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-72978-9.
- Freud, Sigmund. 1955 . "Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality." Standard Editions 7, edited by J. Strachey. London: Hogarth Press.
- Freud, Sigmund. 1955 . "On Narcissism." Pp. 73–102 in Standard Edition 14, edited by J. Strachey. London: Hogarth Press. – via University of Pennsylvania.
- ^ Freud, Sigmund. 1955 . "Mourning and Melancholia Archived 2015-05-01 at the Wayback Machine." Pp. 243–58 in Standard Edition 17, edited by J. Strachey. London: Hogarth Press. – via University of Pennsylvania. Also available via Internet Archive.
- Freud, Sigmund. 1955 . "A Child is Being Beaten Archived 2020-08-06 at the Wayback Machine." Pp. 175–204 in Standard Edition 17, edited by J. Strachey. London: Hogarth Press. – via The Institute of Contemporary Psychoanalysis.
- Freud, Sigmund. 1922 . "Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego," translated by J. Strachey. New York: Boni & Liveright. hdl:2027/mdp.39015003802348. — 1955 . "Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego Archived 2021-01-08 at the Wayback Machine." Pp. 65–144 in Standard Edition 18, translated by J. Strachey. London: Hogarth Press.
- "Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego" (review). Nature 3(2784):321. Nature Publishing Group 1923. doi:10.1038/111321d0. Bibcode:1923Natur.111T.321..
- Freud, Sigmund. 1920. "Beyond the Pleasure Principle," translated by C. J. M. Hubback. International Psycho-Analytic Library 4, edited by E. Jones. London: International Psycho-Analytic Press. – via Library of Social Science. — 1955 . "Beyond the Pleasure Principle." In Standard Edition 18, translated by J. Strachey. London: Hogarth Press.
- ^ Freud, Sigmund. 1955 . "The Ego and the Id." In Standard Edition 19, edited by J. Strachey. London: Hogarth Press. Lay summaries via Simply Psychology and JSTOR Daily Roundtable. Glossary via University of Notre Dame.
- ^ Freud, Sigmund. 1955 . "Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety." In Standard Edition 20, edited by J. Strachey. London: Hogarth Press. doi:10.1080/21674086.1936.11925270. S2CID 142804158.
- Mustafa, A. (2013). Organisational Behaviour. Global Professional Publishing Limited. ISBN 978-1-908287-36-6 – via Google Books.
- Waelder, Robert. 1936. "The Principles of Multiple Function: Observations on Over-Determination." The Psychoanalytic Quarterly 5:45–62. doi:10.1080/21674086.1936.11925272.
- ^ Freud, Anna. 1968 . The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence (revised ed.). London: Hogarth Press.
- Kuriloff, Emily A. (2013). Contemporary Psychoanalysis and the Legacy of the Third Reich. Routledge. p. 45. ISBN 978-1-136-93041-6.
- ^ Wallerstein. 2000. Forty-Two Lives in Treatment: A Study of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy.
- Horney K (1973). Feminine psychology. Norton. ISBN 0-393-00686-7. OCLC 780458101.
- Blum, H. 1979. Masochism, the Ego Ideal and the Psychology of Women. JAPA.
- IPA Component Organisations in Europe, archived from the original on 2015-10-23, retrieved 2012-11-20
- ^ Shorter E (2005). A historical dictionary of psychiatry. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-803923-5. OCLC 65200006.
- Ellenberger HF (1970). The discovery of the unconscious : the history and evolution of dynamic psychiatry. New York: Basic Books. ISBN 0-465-01672-3. OCLC 68543.
- Eisold K (2017). The Organizational Life of Psychoanalysis : Conflicts, Dilemmas, and the Future of the Profession. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-315-39006-2. OCLC 994873775.
- Robinson K. "A Brief History of the British Psychoanalytic Society" (PDF). British Psychoanalytical Society.
- ^ John C. Norcross, Gary R. VandenBos, Donald K. Freedheim (2011). History of Psychotherapy: Continuity and Change. American Psychological Association. ISBN 978-1-4338-0762-6.
- Bretherton I (1992). "The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth". Developmental Psychology. 28 (5): 759–775. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.28.5.759. ISSN 0012-1649.
- ^ Goldberg S, Muir R, Kerr J, eds. (1995). Attachment theory : social, developmental, and clinical perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press. ISBN 0-88163-184-1. OCLC 32856560.
- cf. Dorpat, Theodore, B. Killingmo, and S. Akhtar. 1976. Journal of the American Psychoanalytical Association 24:855–74.
- Bressler CE (2011). Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. Pearson Longman. pp. 123–142. ISBN 978-0-205-79169-9. OCLC 651487421.
- Freud, Sigmund. 1955 . "The Unconscious." In Standard Edition 14, edited by J. Strachey. London: Hogarth Press.
- ^ Langs, Robert. 2010. Freud on a Precipice: How Freud's Fate pushed Psychoanalysis over the Edge. Lanham, MD: Jason Aronson.
- Johnson B, Flores Mosri D (2016-10-13). "The Neuropsychoanalytic Approach: Using Neuroscience as the Basic Science of Psychoanalysis". Frontiers in Psychology. 7: 1459. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01459. ISSN 1664-1078. PMC 5063004. PMID 27790160.
- Hartmann H. Essays on Ego Psychology Selected Problems in Psychoanalytic Theory.
- Frosch J (1964). "The psychotic character: Clinical psychiatric considerations". The Psychiatric Quarterly. 38 (1–4): 81–96. doi:10.1007/bf01573368. ISSN 0033-2720. PMID 14148396. S2CID 9097652.
- Kernberg, Otto. 1975. Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism. New York: Jason Aronson.
- Hauser S (1 January 2001). "Ego Psychology and Psychoanalysis". International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. pp. 4365–4369. doi:10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00393-4. ISBN 978-0-08-043076-8.
- Rapaport, Gill. 1959. "The Points of View and Assumptions of Metapsychology." The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 40: 153–62. PMID 14436240.
- Brenner, Charles. 2006. "Psychoanalysis: Mind and Meaning." Psychoanalytic Quarterly.
- Abend, Sandor, Porder, and Willick. 1983. Borderline Patients: Clinical Perspectives.
- Arlow, Jacob and Charles Brenner. 1964. Psychoanalytic Concepts and the Structural Theory.
- ^ Blackman, Jerome. 2003. 101 Defenses: How the Mind Shields Itself.
- "Object Relations Theory". web.sonoma.edu. Archived from the original on 2020-09-27. Retrieved 2020-07-20.
- ^ Abrahams D, Rohleder P (2021). A clinical guide to psychodynamic psychotherapy. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-351-13858-1. OCLC 1239743018.
- Mahler, Margaret, Fine, and Bergman. 1975. The Psychological Birth of the Human Infant.
- Lacan, Jacques. 2006. The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis, translated by B. Fink. New York: W. W. Norton.
- Evans, Dylan. 2005. "From Lacan to Darwin." In The Literary Animal; Evolution and the Nature of Narrative, edited by J. Gottschall and D. S. Wilson. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
- Lacan, Jacques. 1990 . Television: A Challenge to the Psychoanalytic Establishment.
- Langs, Robert. 2010. Fundamentals of Adaptive Psychotherapy and Counseling. London: Palgrave-MacMillan.
- Mitchell, Stephen. 1997. Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis. The Analytic Press.
- "Child Sexual Abuse". National Center for PTSD, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Archived from the original on 2013-07-28.
- Willi J (2011). Die Zweierbeziehung (in German). rowolth. ISBN 978-3-499-62758-3.
- Miller, Alice. 1984. Thou Shalt Not Be Aware: Society's Betrayal of the Child. New York: Farrar Straus and Giroux. pp. 105–227.
- ^ Kupfersmid, Joel. 1995. Does the Oedipus complex exist? American Psychological Association.
- Sandler J (January 1960). "On the Concept of Superego1". The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child. 15 (1): 128–162. doi:10.1080/00797308.1960.11822572. ISSN 0079-7308. PMID 13746181.
- ^ INSERM Collective Expertise Centre. 2004. "Psychotherapy: Three approaches evaluated." INSERM Collective Expert Reports. Paris: Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (2000). PMID 21348158. NCBI NBK7123.
- Langs, Robert. 1998. Ground Rules in Psychotherapy and Counselling. London: Karnac.
- Gray, Paul. 1994. The Ego and Analysis of Defense. J. Aronson.
- "Psychoanalytic Techniques". Psynso. Retrieved 24 December 2022.
- Leider RJ (1983-01-01). "Analytic neutrality—a historical review". Psychoanalytic Inquiry. 3 (4): 665–674. doi:10.1080/07351698309533520. ISSN 0735-1690.
- Greenberg, J. (1986) The Problem of Analytic Neutrality Archived 2022-06-08 at the Wayback Machine. Contemp. Psychoanal., 22:76-86
- Green MR (1977-07-01). "Sullivan's Participant Observation". Contemporary Psychoanalysis. 13 (3): 358–360. doi:10.1080/00107530.1977.10745493. ISSN 0010-7530.
- Eagle, Morris N. 2007. "Psychoanalysis and its critics." Psychoanalytic Psychology 24:10–24. doi:10.1037/0736-9735.24.1.10.
- Hall GC, Kim-Mozeleski JE, Zane NW, Sato H, Huang ER, Tuan M, et al. (March 2019). "Cultural adaptations of psychotherapy: Therapists' applications of conceptual models with Asians and Asian Americans". Asian American Journal of Psychology. 10 (1): 68–78. doi:10.1037/aap0000122. PMC 6402600. PMID 30854159.
- Thompson, M. Guy. 2004. The Ethic of Honesty: The Fundamental Rule of Psychoanalysis. Rodopi. p. 75.
- Opland C, Torrico TJ (2024), "Psychodynamic Therapy", StatPearls, Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, PMID 39163451, retrieved 2024-11-09
- Berghout CC, Zevalkink J, Roijen LH (January 2010). "A cost-utility analysis of psychoanalysis versus psychoanalytic psychotherapy". International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 26 (1): 3–10. doi:10.1017/S0266462309990791. hdl:2066/90761. ISSN 1471-6348. PMID 20059775. S2CID 1941768.
- ^ Sharpless BA (2019). "The Process of Interpretation". In Sharpless BA (ed.). Psychodynamic Therapy Techniques. Oxford University Press. pp. 152–176. doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190676278.003.0013. ISBN 978-0-19-067627-8.
- ^ Kernberg OF (October 2016). "The four basic components of psychoanalytic technique and derived psychoanalytic psychotherapies". World Psychiatry. 15 (3): 287–288. doi:10.1002/wps.20368. ISSN 1723-8617. PMC 5032492. PMID 27717255.
- Hergenhahn B, Olson M (2007). An Introduction to Theories of Personality. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. pp. 45–46. ISBN 978-0-13-194228-8.
- Treatment Cf (1999), "Chapter 7—Brief Psychodynamic Therapy", Brief Interventions and Brief Therapies for Substance Abuse, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US), retrieved 2023-12-06
- "French Psychoflap". Science. 307 (5713): 1197a. 25 February 2005. doi:10.1126/science.307.5713.1197a. S2CID 220106659.
- Paris J (2017). "Is Psychoanalysis Still Relevant to Psychiatry?". Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 62 (5): 308–312. doi:10.1177/0706743717692306. PMC 5459228. PMID 28141952.
- Freedheim D, DiFilippo J, Klostermann S (2015). Encyclopedia of Mental Health (2nd ed.). New York: Elsevier. pp. 348–356. ISBN 978-0-12-397753-3.
- "Clinical depression – Treatment". 2017-10-24.
- Winarick K (2010-03-01). "Training at the American Institute for Psychoanalysis". The American Journal of Psychoanalysis. 70 (1): 61–62. doi:10.1057/ajp.2009.43. ISSN 1573-6741. PMID 20212440. S2CID 40577817.
- "What is Certification?". 2017-06-09.
- ^ Nederlands Psychoanalytisch Instituut, archived from the original on 2008-10-14
- wbepba. "Our history". BPA. Retrieved 2023-12-15.
- "Home". www.ipa.world. Retrieved 2023-12-15.
- Admin. "Home". The International Journal of Psychoanalysis. Retrieved 2023-12-15.
- Nederlands Psychoanalytisch Genootschap, archived from the original on September 16, 2009
- Christopher JC, Bickhard MH, Lambeth GS (October 2001). "Otto Kernberg's Object Relations Theory: A Metapsychological Critique". Theory & Psychology. 11 (5): 687–711. doi:10.1177/0959354301115006. ISSN 0959-3543. S2CID 145583990.
- Tallis RC (1996), "Burying Freud", Lancet, 347 (9002): 669–671, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)91210-6, PMID 8596386, S2CID 35537033
- Blum HP, ed. (1977), Female Psychology, New York: International Universities Press
- Schechter DS, Zygmunt A, Coates SW, Davies M, Trabka KA, McCaw J, et al. (2007). "Caregiver traumatization adversely impacts young children's mental representations of self and others". Attachment & Human Development. 9 (3): 187–20. doi:10.1080/14616730701453762. PMC 2078523. PMID 18007959.
- Vickers CB (15 August 2016). "Here's what psychoanalysis really is, and what research says about its effectiveness". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 19 March 2022.
- Myers, D. G. (2014). Psychology: Tenth edition in modules. New York: Worth Publishers.
- Horvath, A. 2001. "The Alliance." Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 38(4):365–72. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.365.
- Briggs S, Netuveli G, Gould N, Gkaravella A, Gluckman NS, Kangogyere P, et al. (June 2019). "The effectiveness of psychoanalytic/psychodynamic psychotherapy for reducing suicide attempts and self-harm: systematic review and meta-analysis". The British Journal of Psychiatry. 214 (6): 320–328. doi:10.1192/bjp.2019.33. ISSN 0007-1250. PMID 30816079.
- Laezer KL, Tischer I, Gaertner B, Leuzinger-Bohleber M (September 2021). "[Psychoanalytic Treatments without Medication and Behavioral Therapy Treatments with and without Medication in Children with the Diagnosis of ADHD and/or Conduct Disorder]". Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie. 70 (6): 499–519. doi:10.13109/prkk.2021.70.6.499. ISSN 0032-7034. PMID 34519617. S2CID 239414619.
- Leichsenring F, Abbass A, Luyten P, Hilsenroth M, Rabung S (2013). "The Emerging Evidence for Long-Term Psychodynamic Therapy" (PDF). Psychodynamic Psychiatry. 41 (3). Guilford Publications: 361–384. doi:10.1521/pdps.2013.41.3.361. ISSN 2162-2590. PMID 24001160. S2CID 10911045. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-02-26.
- ^ de Maat S, de Jonghe F, de Kraker R, Leichsenring F, Abbass A, Luyten P, et al. (2013). "The Current State of the Empirical Evidence for Psychoanalysis: A meta-analytic approach". Harvard Review of Psychiatry. 21 (3). Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health): 107–137. doi:10.1097/hrp.0b013e318294f5fd. ISSN 1067-3229. PMID 23660968.
- Shedler J (2010), "The Efficacy of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy", American Psychologist, 65 (2): 98–109, CiteSeerX 10.1.1.607.2980, doi:10.1037/a0018378, PMID 20141265, S2CID 2034090
- Leichsenring F (2005), "Are psychodynamic and psychoanalytic therapies effective", International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86 (3): 841–68, doi:10.1516/rfee-lkpn-b7tf-kpdu, PMID 16096078, S2CID 38880785
- Leichsenring, Falk, and Sven Rabung. 2011. "Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in complex mental disorders: update of a meta-analysis." British Journal of Psychiatry 199(1):15–22. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.110.082776. PMID 21719877 – via Cambridge University Press.
- McKay, Dean. 2011. "Methods and mechanisms in the efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy ." American Psychologist 66(2):147–8. doi:10.1037/a0021195. PMID 21299262.
- Thombs, Brett D., Lisa R. Jewett, and Marielle Bassel. 2011. "Is there room for criticism of studies of psychodynamic psychotherapy?" American Psychologist 66(2):148–49. doi:10.1037/a0021248. PMID 21299263.
- Anestis, Michael D., Joye C. Anestis, and Scott O. Lilienfeld. 2011. "When it comes to evaluating psychodynamic therapy, the devil is in the details." American Psychologist 66(2):149–51. doi:10.1037/a0021190. PMID 21299264.
- Tryon, Warren W., and Georgiana S. Tryon. 2011. "No ownership of common factors." American Psychologist 66(2):151–52. doi:10.1037/a0021056. PMID 21299265.
- Gerber AJ, Kocsis JH, Milrod BL, Roose SP, Barber JP, Thase ME, et al. (2011). "A Quality-Based Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy". American Journal of Psychiatry. 168 (1): 19–28. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.08060843. PMID 20843868.
- Anderson EM, Lambert MJ (1995). "Short-term dynamically oriented psychotherapy: A review and meta-analysis". Clinical Psychology Review. 15 (6): 503–514. doi:10.1016/0272-7358(95)00027-m.
- Abbass A, Kisely S, Kroenke K (2009). "Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Somatic Disorders. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials". Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. 78 (5): 265–74. doi:10.1159/000228247. hdl:10072/30557. PMID 19602915. S2CID 16419162.
- Abass, Allen A., et al. (2010). "The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: A meta-analysis". Clinical Psychology Review. 30 (1): 25–36. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.08.010. PMID 19766369. S2CID 21768475.
- Abbass A, Town J, Driessen E (2012). "Intensive Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcome Research". Harvard Review of Psychiatry. 20 (2): 97–108. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.668.6311. doi:10.3109/10673229.2012.677347. PMID 22512743. S2CID 6432516.
- Smit Y, Huibers J, Ioannidis J, van Dyck R, van Tilburg W, Arntz A (2012). "The effectiveness of long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy — A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials". Clinical Psychology Review. 32 (2): 81–92. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.11.003. PMID 22227111.
- Leichsenring F, Rabung S (2011). "Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in complex mental disorders: update of a meta-analysis". The British Journal of Psychiatry. 199 (1): 15–22. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.110.082776. PMID 21719877.
- Malmberg L, Fenton M, Rathbone J (2001). "Individual psychodynamic psychotherapy and psychoanalysis for schizophrenia and severe mental illness". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012 (3): CD001360. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001360. PMC 4171459. PMID 11686988.
- Kreyenbuhl J, Buchanan RW, Dickerson FB, Dixon LB, Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) (2009). "The Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT): Updated Treatment Recommendations 2009". Schizophrenia Bulletin. 36 (1): 94–103. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbp130. PMC 2800150. PMID 19955388.
- Lehman AF, Steinwachs DM (1998). "Patterns of Usual Care for Schizophrenia: Initial Results from the Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Client Survey". Schizophrenia Bulletin. 24 (1): 11–20. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033303. PMID 9502543.
- Brunner, José (2001), Freud and the politics of psychoanalysis, Transaction, p. xxi, ISBN 978-0-7658-0672-7
- "washingtonpost.com: Dispatches from the Freud Wars: Psychoanalysis and Its Passions". The Washington Post.
- Chomsky N (2 November 2003). "The Professorial Provocateur". The New York Times (Interview). Interviewed by Solomon D. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 19 June 2010 – via chomsky.info.
- Gould SJ (1977). Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-63940-9.
- Eysneck, Hans. 1985. Decline and Fall of the Freudian Empire.
- Kihlstrom, John F. 2012 . "Is Freud Still Alive? No, Not Really" (updated ed.). John F. Kihlstrom. Berkley: University of California, Berkeley. Archived from the original 10 May 2013. — 2000/2003/2009. "Is Freud Still Alive? No, Not Really." Hilgard's Introduction to Psychology (13/14/15th ed.), edited by R. Atkinson, R. C. Atkinson, E. E. Smith, D. J. Bem, and S. Nolen-Hoeksema. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Popper KR (1981). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (4th ed.). London: Routledge. p. 38. ISBN 978-0-415-28594-0.
And as for Freud's epic of the Ego, the Super-ego, and the Id, no substantially stronger claim to scientific status can be made for it than for Homer's collected stories from Olympus.
- Georgiev DD (2017-12-06). Quantum Information and Consciousness: A Gentle Introduction (1st ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press. p. 4. doi:10.1201/9780203732519. ISBN 978-1-138-10448-8. OCLC 1003273264. Zbl 1390.81001.
Terms such as subconsciousness or superego that are frequently used in psychoanalysis originated by Sigmund Freud (1856–1939) are relegated to the realm of pseudoscience where most of Freud's work justifiably belongs.
- ^ Torrey, E. Fuller. 1986. Witchdoctors and Psychiatrists. p. 76.
- ^ Popper, Karl R. 1990. "Science: Conjectures and Refutations." Pp. 104–10 in Philosophy of Science and the Occult, edited by P. Grim. Albany, p. 109, Preview Google Books See also Conjectures and Refutations.
- Webster, Richard. 1995. Why Freud was Wrong: Sin, Science, and Psychoanalysis. London: Harper Collins.
- Cioffi, Frank. 2005. "Was Freud a Pseudoscientist?" Butterflies & Wheels. Translated and published in Meyer C, et al., eds. (2005). Le livre noir de la psychanalyse: Vivre, penser et aller mieux sans Freud [The black book of psychoanalysis: living, thinking and doing better without Freud] (PDF). Paris: Les Arènes. Retrieved 2023-06-13.
- Lakatos, Imre. 1978. "The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes." Philosophical Papers 1, edited by I. Lakatos, J. Worrall, and G. Currie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 146.
- Scruton, Roger (1994). Sexual Desire: A Philosophical Investigation. Phoenix Books. p. 201. ISBN 978-1-85799-100-0.
- Bunge M (1984). "What is pseudoscience?". Vol. 9. The Skeptical Inquirer. pp. 36–46.
- Bunge M (2001). "Philosophy in Crisis: The Need for Reconstruction". Prometheus Lectures. pp. 229–235.
- Seligman, Martin, Authentic Happiness (The Free Press, Simon & Schuster, 2002), pp. 64–65.
- Grünbaum, Adolf. 1993. Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis: A Study in the Philosophy of Psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: International Universities Press. ISBN 978-0-8236-6722-2. OCLC 26895337.
- Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel. 1996. Remembering Anna O: A Century of Mystification. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-91777-8.
- Webster, Richard. 1996. Why Freud was Wrong. Sin, Science and Psychoanalysis. London: Harper Collins.
- Feynman R (2007) . The Meaning of It All: Thoughts of a Citizen-Scientist. London: Penguin. pp. 114–5. Feynman was also speaking here of psychiatrists.
- Miller A (1984). Thou shalt not be aware: society's betrayal of the child. NY: Meridan Printing.
- Weeks, Jeffrey. 1989. Sexuality and its Discontents: Meanings, Myths, and Modern Sexualities. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-04503-2. p. 176.
- Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1984 . Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Athlone. ISBN 978-0-485-30018-5.
- Lecercle JJ (October 2012). Ducange JN, Sibertin-Blanc G (eds.). "Machinations deleuzo-guattariennes". Actuel Marx. 52 (2). Paris: P.U.F.: 108–120. doi:10.3917/amx.052.0108. eISSN 1969-6728. ISBN 978-2-13-059331-7. ISSN 0994-4524 – via Cairn.info.
- Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1984 . "The Disjunctive Synthesis of Recording." Section 2.4 in Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Athlone. ISBN 978-0-485-30018-5. p. 89.
- Lacan, Jacques. 1977. Ecrits: A Selection and The Seminars, translated by Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock.
- Irigaray L (1974), Speculum, Paris: Minuit, ISBN 978-2-7073-0024-9
- Drew Westen, "The Scientific Legacy of Sigmund Freud Toward a Psychodynamically Informed Psychological Science". November 1998 Vol. 124, No. 3, 333–371
- Fisher, Seymour, and Roger P. Greenberg. 1977. The Scientific Credibility of Freud's Theories and Therapy. New York: Basic Books. p. 399.
- Milton, Jane. (2000). Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. p. 440.
- ^ Westen and Gabbard, 2002
- Kalo, Shlomo. 1997. "Powerlessness as a Parable." The Trousers – Parables for the 21st Century. UK: D.A.T. Publications. pp. 16, back cover.
- Derrida, Jacques, and Bass, Alan. 1987. The Post Card: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Further reading
Introductions
- Brenner, Charles (1954). An Elementary Textbook of Psychoanalysis.
- Elliott, Anthony (2002). Psychoanalytic Theory: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Duke University Press. --
An introduction that explains psychoanalytic theory with interpretations of major theorists. - Fine, Reuben (1990). The History of Psychoanalysis. (expanded ed.). Northvale: Jason Aronson.ISBN 0-8264-0452-9
- Samuel, Lawrence R. (2013). Shrink: A Cultural History of Psychoanalysis in America. University of Nebraska Press. 253 pp.
- Freud, Sigmund (2014) . "Psychoanalysis." Encyclopædia Britannica
- McWilliams Nancy. Psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Practice Guide
Reference works
- de Mijolla, Alain, ed. (2005). International dictionary of psychoanalysis 1,2,&3. Detroit: Thomson/Gale.
- Laplanche, Jean, and J. B. Pontalis (1974). "The Language of Psycho-Analysis". W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-01105-4
- Freud, Sigmund (1940). An Outline of Psychoanalysis. ePenguin.;General ISBN 978-0393001518
- Edelson, Marshall (1984). Hypothesis and Evidence in Psychoanalysis. Chicago: Chicago University Press. ISBN 0-226-18432-3
- Etchegoyen, Horacio (2005). The Fundamentals of Psychoanalytic Technique (new ed.). Karnac Books. ISBN 1-85575-455-X
- Gellner, Ernest. The Psychoanalytic Movement: The Cunning of Unreason, . A critical view of Freudian theory. ISBN 0-8101-1370-8
- Green, André (2005). "Psychoanalysis: A Paradigm For Clinical Thinking". Free Association Books. ISBN 1-85343-773-5
- Irigaray, Luce (2004). Key Writings. Continuum. ISBN 0-8264-6940-X
- Jacobson, Edith (1976). Depression; Comparative Studies of Normal, Neurotic, and Psychotic Conditions. International Universities Press. ISBN 0-8236-1195-7
- Kernberg, Otto (1993). Severe Personality Disorders: Psychotherapeutic Strategies. Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-05349-5
- Kohut, Heinz (2000). Analysis of the Self: Systematic Approach to Treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorders. International Universities Press. ISBN 0-8236-8002-9
- Kovacevic, Filip (2007). Liberating Oedipus? Psychoanalysis as Critical Theory. Lexington Books. ISBN 0-7391-1148-5
- Kristeva, Julia (1986). The Kristeva Reader, edited by T. Moi. Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-06325-3
- Meltzer, Donald (1983). Dream-Life: A Re-Examination of the Psycho-Analytical Theory and Technique. Karnac Books. ISBN 0-902965-17-4
- — (1998). The Kleinian Development (new ed.). Karnac Books; reprint: ISBN 1-85575-194-1
- Mitchell, S. A., and M. J. Black (1995). Freud and beyond: a history of modern psychoanalytic thought. New York: Basic Books. pp. xviii–xx.
- Pollock, Griselda (2006). "Beyond Oedipus. Feminist Thought, Psychoanalysis, and Mythical Figurations of the Feminine." In Laughing with Medusa, edited by V. Zajko and M. Leonard. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-927438-X
- Spielrein, Sabina (1993). Destruction as cause of becoming. OCLC 44450080
- Stoller, Robert (1993). Presentations of Gender. Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-05474-2
- Stolorow, Robert, George Atwood, and Donna Orange (2002). Worlds of Experience: Interweaving Philosophical and Clinical Dimensions in Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
- Spitz, René (2006). The First Year of Life: Psychoanalytic Study of Normal and Deviant Development of Object Relations. International Universities Press. ISBN 0-8236-8056-8
- Tähkä, Veikko (1993). Mind and Its Treatment: A Psychoanalytic Approach. Madison, CT: International Universities Press. ISBN 0-8236-3367-5
Analyses, discussions and critiques
- Aziz, Robert (2007). The Syndetic Paradigm: The Untrodden Path Beyond Freud and Jung, Albany: State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-6982-8
- Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel (1991). Lacan: The Absolute Master, Stanford: Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-1556-4
- Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel (1996). Remembering Anna O: A Century of Mystification, London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-91777-8
- Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel and Shamdasani, Sonu (2012). The Freud Files: An Inquiry into the History of Psychoanalysis, Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-72978-9.
- Brockmeier Jens (1997). "Autobiography, narrative and the Freudian conception of life history". Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology. 4: 175–200.
- Burnham, John, ed. (2012). After Freud Left: A Century of Psychoanalysis in America, University of Chicago Press.
- Cioffi, Frank. (1998). Freud and the Question of Pseudoscience, Open Court Publishing Company. ISBN 0-8126-9385-X
- Crews, Frederick (1986). Skeptical Engagements, New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-503950-5. Part I of this volume, entitled "The Freudian Temptation," includes five essays critical of psychoanalysis written between 1975 and 1986.
- Crews, Frederick (1995). The Memory Wars: Freud's Legacy in Dispute, New York: New York Review of Books. ISBN 1-86207-010-5
- Crews, Frederick, ed. (1998). Unauthorized Freud: Doubters Confront a Legend, New York: Viking. ISBN 0-14-028017-0
- Crews, Frederick (2017). Freud: The Making of an Illusion, Metropolitan Books. ISBN 9781627797177
- Dufresne, Todd (2000). Tales From the Freudian Crypt: The Death Drive in Text and Context, Stanford: Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-3885-8
- — (2007). Against Freud: Critics Talk Back, Stanford: Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-5548-5
- Erwin, Edward (1996), A Final Accounting: Philosophical and Empirical Issues in Freudian Psychology. ISBN 0-262-05050-1
- Esterson, Allen (1993). Seductive Mirage: An Exploration of the Work of Sigmund Freud. Chicago: Open Court. ISBN 0-8126-9230-6
- Fisher, Seymour, and Roger P. Greenberg (1977). The Scientific Credibility of Freud's Theories and Therapy. New York: Basic Books.
- — (1996). Freud Scientifically Reappraised: Testing the Theories and Therapy. New York: John Wiley.
- Gellner, Ernest (1993), The Psychoanalytic Movement: The Cunning of Unreason. A critical view of Freudian theory. ISBN 0-8101-1370-8
- Grünbaum Adolf (1979). "Is Freudian Psychoanalytic Theory Pseudo-Scientific by Karl Popper's Criterion of Demarcation?". American Philosophical Quarterly. 16: 131–141.
- D. H. Lawrence (1921). Psychoanalysis and the unconscious. New York: Thomas Seltzer.
- Macmillan, Malcolm (1997), Freud Evaluated: The Completed Arc. ISBN 0-262-63171-7
- Morley S, Eccleston C, Williams A (1999). "Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache". Pain. 80 (1–2): 1–13. doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00255-3. PMID 10204712. S2CID 21572242.
- Roustang, Francois (1982). Dire Mastery: Discipleship from Freud to Lacan. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 0-88048-259-1
- Webster, Richard. (1995). Why Freud Was Wrong: Sin, Science, and Psychoanalysis, New York: Basic Books, HarperCollins. ISBN 0-465-09128-8
- Wollheim, Richard, editor. (1974). Freud: A Collection of Critical Essays. New York: Anchor Books. ISBN 0-385-07970-2
Responses to critiques
- Köhler, Thomas 1996: Anti-Freud-Literatur von ihren Anfängen bis heute. Zur wissenschaftlichen Fundierung von Psychoanalyse-Kritik. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer Verlag. ISBN 3-17-014207-0
- Ollinheimo, Ari — Vuorinen, Risto (1999): Metapsychology and the Suggestion Argument: A Reply to Grünbaum's Critique of Psychoanalysis. Commentationes Scientiarum Socialium, 53. Helsinki: Finnish Academy of Science and Letters. ISBN 951-653-297-7
- Robinson, Paul (1993). Freud and his Critics. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-08029-7
- Gomez, Lavinia: The Freud Wars: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Psychoanalysis. Routledge, 2005. Review: Psychodynamic Practice 14(1):108–111. Feb., 2008.
External links
Library resources aboutPsychoanalysis
- International Psychoanalytical Association (IPA) – world's primary regulatory body for psychoanalysis, founded by Sigmund Freud (archived 18 January 1998)
- Psychoanalysis – Division 39 – American Psychological Association (APA)
Sigmund Freud | |
---|---|
Books |
|
Essays |
|
Case studies | |
Original concepts | |
Related | |
Cultural depictions |
|
Family |