Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:10, 1 May 2006 editTheMadTim (talk | contribs)243 edits []← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:52, 11 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(24 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was '''Keep''', per ]. Making no accusations here, but there's no point putting this through the process when it isn't going anywhere. ] (]) 10:38, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
] refers - article is simple word definition, entry at ] 02:04, 1 May 2006 (UTC) ] refers - article is simple word definition, entry at ] 02:04, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Line 4: Line 11:
*'''Delete''' as nominator. ] refers. This article is a simple dictionary definition. The entry on Wiktionary evidences this. *'''Delete''' as nominator. ] refers. This article is a simple dictionary definition. The entry on Wiktionary evidences this.
--] 02:10, 1 May 2006 (UTC) --] 02:10, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - World famous term and song. Article is hardly a dicdef. --] 02:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Strong Keep.''' There's a lot more to the article than a simple dictionary definition, as the "Trivia" and "In Popular Culture" sections clearly illustrate. ] 02:34, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' per Rob. -- ] 02:56, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' per Rob. -- ] 03:38, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' per above. ] 04:01, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' per Rob. -- ] 04:09, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' per ekedolphin. -- ] 04:34, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' per Rob. You're joking about the 'merely a definition' thing, right? See, because its ''not really a word.'' ] 06:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' per above. ] 06:06, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
* '''Strong keep''' -- very well-established cultural notability (who hasn't heard of this?) Also an informative article, more than a dicdef. ]]] 06:10, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
* '''Keep'''. Another bizarre AfD. --] <small>(])</small> 14:09, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' per Rob. ] <small>(])</small> 15:40, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
* '''Strong Keep'''. What do dictionary definitions of words look like?? See http://dictionary.reference.com and look up any word you wish and you will get an example of what a dictionary definition looks like. ] 21:46, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' per above. -- ] 23:10, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Speedy keep''' . ] 23:47, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Strong keep''' per Rob and ekedolphin ] 02:24, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' per ekedolphin -- ] 02:34, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Strong keep''' ] 09:25, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' That was ]'s first contribution to Misplaced Pages.--] 04:32, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 18:52, 11 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep, per WP:SNOW. Making no accusations here, but there's no point putting this through the process when it isn't going anywhere. Stifle (talk) 10:38, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious

WP:WINAD refers - article is simple word definition, entry at Wiktionary TheMadTim 02:04, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete as nominator. WP:WINAD refers. This article is a simple dictionary definition. The entry on Wiktionary evidences this.

--TheMadTim 02:10, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.