| Revision as of 15:02, 31 August 2012 editOne Night In Hackney (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,879 edits →31 August 2012: +1← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:03, 13 November 2024 edit undoVanjagenije (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators130,579 edits Archiving case section to w:en:Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Marquis de la Eirron/Archive (using spihelper.js)Tags: Replaced Manual revert | ||
| (590 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | ||
| {{SPIarchive notice|Marquis de la Eirron}} | {{SPIarchive notice|Marquis de la Eirron|crosswiki=yes}} | ||
| {{SPIpriorcases}} | {{SPIpriorcases}} | ||
| =====<big>31 August 2012</big>===== | |||
| {{SPI case status|CUrequest}} | |||
| ;Suspected sockpuppets | |||
| * {{checkuser|1=English Picturio}} | |||
| * {{checkuser|1=Stark House}} | |||
| * {{checkuser|1=Pride Affair}} | |||
| * {{checkIP|1=80.2.37.65}} | |||
| <!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> | |||
| * <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> | |||
| For English Picturio the usual style of edits in the usual areas of interest, with one dead giveaway. by English Picturio just happens to pretty much replicate by previous sock Where Did You Walk. The additions for Virginia Wheeler, Duncan Larcombe, an unnamed 50-year-old man and an unnamed 43-year-old woman, Clodagh Hartley, Neil Millard (and so on throughout the events added) are all word for word the same and using the same Wiki markup. | |||
| Stark House appears to be another sock used to split the contributions between English politicians and American Republican ones, since it's documented in previous cases for this sockmaster that both are his editing areas and one account doing both is a dead giveaway. ], ] and ] are frequent targets of his. The image uploads of ], ] and more are identical to the behaviour of a recent sock, where he links to the main page of a Congressperson's website where the image doesn't even appear, done here at ], ], ] and so on. His socks almost always upload to Commons now, since his images get deleted a lot easier here due to him being community banned. Plus he's also back at frequent target ]. <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 14:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| IP listed as well, obviously checkuser won't be commenting on that. Sole purpose of the IP is to reinstate the edits of a previous Marquis sock, so ] is enough for that. | |||
| Pride Affair added also, per . Three Commons accounts blocked at the same time for sockpuppetry, the other two just happen to be the other two socks listed here. <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 15:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | |||
| <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | |||
| * I have been adding relevant information to various articles, as no-one else seems to do it, I have actively participated in making these articles more accessible to the public to read. One Night in Hackney complains about my editing yet if it was not for me the articles would stay factual incorrect or lacking up to date information. I am helping wikipedia, whilst One Night in Hackney seems content to let articles slip into the unknown, by reverting legit edits that improve the article. Surely if someone is going out of their way to improve an article that is a good thing, regardless of who they are, but even with references and sources One Night in Hackney seems intent on reverting, which could be seen as a deliberate act of vandalism, since he is removing valuable and often crucial content from the article. ] (]) 14:49, 31 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::You may as well hold up a big sign saying "I am a sock". You , and I've made three edits to articles so far today, and none of them happen to be editing articles that you have. Hopefully one day you'll get the message that the Misplaced Pages community has banned you and therefore you aren't welcome to edit here. <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 14:52, 31 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | |||
| ---- | |||
| <!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | |||
Latest revision as of 22:03, 13 November 2024
Marquis de la Eirron
Marquis de la Eirron (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Marquis de la Eirron/Archive.
A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Marquis de la Eirron.
This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.