Revision as of 20:44, 4 September 2012 editNeptunekh2 (talk | contribs)3,401 edits →Where can I read PPsailor moon]] Kodansha comics online? Not the old mixx version.?: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:53, 27 December 2024 edit undoDouble sharp (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers102,010 editsm →regarding the comparative difficulty of Chopin's etudes | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{Misplaced Pages:Reference desk/header|WP:RD/E}} | <noinclude> | ||
{{Misplaced Pages:Reference desk/header|WP:RD/E}} | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
</noinclude> | </noinclude> | ||
= December 13 = | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Reference_desk/Archives/Entertainment/2012 August 28}} | |||
== Small question about sourcing release dates == | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Reference_desk/Archives/Entertainment/2012 August 29}} | |||
Hello, I apologize if this is the wrong spot to ask this. I'm currently doing the "suggested edits" from my own home page, to try and gain a bit more practical editing experience, and the first I got was ]. | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Reference_desk/Archives/Entertainment/2012 August 30}} | |||
A lot of the "citation needed" templates seem to be concerning justifying the release dates of each work; right now, I'm looking e.g. at {{tq|"The following year, the sequel titled ''Ultraman Zearth 2: Superhuman Big Battle - Light and Shadow'' premiered."}} from the "'''1978–1998: Rising popularity with ''Superman'', ''Kamen Rider'', ''Batman'', and ''Ultraman Zearth'''''" section, and I'm wondering what's the best practice to source this kind of thing. | |||
= September 1 = | |||
I'm assuming that, per ], that website (which on my personal time would be the first source I look at for release dates) doesn't work because it's ]; so, where else should I be looking? | |||
== Bourekas films list == | |||
Thank you for any help! ] (]) 17:55, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Is there a website that list Israeli films as Bourekas films? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 02:22, 1 September 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:Two sources for the year 1997: , . --] 18:57, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== French films == | |||
::Hmm - I would normally be okay with Rotten Tomatoes, but ] does also state that {{tq|"There is consensus that Rotten Tomatoes should not be used for biographical information, cast and crew data, or other film and television data, as it is sourced from user-generated and user-provided content with a lack of oversight and verification."}} | |||
::Should I just use Apple TV and be done with it, then? Or do you think RT, in this case, is fine despite the above? ] (]) 20:00, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::, not listed at ], also has 1997. --] 15:32, 14 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Thanks again for your help! I think I'll try using the two you mentioned that aren't at RSP, then. | |||
::::Anyway, if editors looking at the page in the future find issue with these sources, they can always discuss on the talk page, or at ]. Or better yet, add more reliable sourcing. ] (]) 17:19, 14 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
= December 15 = | |||
Are there French films that deals with a hero of non-French origin (Arabs and African origin) and a heroine of White French origin? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 02:42, 1 September 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:The TV series '']'' (marketed in English as ''Spiral'') featured, in ], an undercover cop named Samy, of (I think) Moroccan descent. The main female character throughout the series, Captain Laure Berthaud (]), is white. I'm not sure to what extent either could be described as a hero/-ine though. They both have fairly serious character flaws, despite being on the side of the 'good guys'. - ] (]) 18:28, 1 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::It was an American film, but the characters and actors were French, ] features a French couple which has an important heroic role in the film. He's black and she's white. --]''''']''''' 19:51, 1 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:] is in theaters now (in the US). The story is about a married couple played by ] (white French) and ] (african American). ] (]) 11:40, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== BBC Sunday-Night Play DVD == | |||
:'']'' (the French film, not its inferior US remake) and its sequels, star ] (of Algerian descent) trying to woo his white girlfriend ] while helping the police. ] (]) 19:19, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
] was a British tv series which air on the ] from 1960-1963. A very short amount of the episodes have survived and I've been trying to find out if any of the surviving episodes have ever been released on DVD. ] (]) 14:34, 15 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Sound recording error in '']'' ? == | |||
:In the cases (perhaps all of them) where the true answer is "no", it may be hard to demonstrate (though it's not logically ''impossible'' to ], it can be impractically difficult), but it would help to try to find answers if you could list the 15 plays in question, by using the references in the series' article to subtract the 123 listed 'lost' plays (Reference 4) from the list of all 138 of the plays (Reference 1). {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 17:45, 16 December 2024 (UTC) ] (]) 17:45, 16 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Near the end, when ] and other women are walking down the hall to visit Mr. Brown, on his deathbed, the sound of rustling dresses overwhelms the sound track. Was this intentional, or a mistake ? ] (]) 03:25, 1 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== regarding the comparative difficulty of Chopin's etudes == | |||
:Does the sound obscure any speech? If so, turn on the subtitles and see what they say. You might also want to check that both sound channels are working.--]|] 07:50, 1 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
I'm curious: is Op.10 No.1 or Op.10 No.2 commonly considered to be harder? | |||
== Power balance in ParaCycling == | |||
(I always found Op.10 No.1 much harder, but this is probably because for me stretching beyond an octave hurts.) ] (]) 18:12, 15 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
I'm watching the cycling at the ] - right now it's the B1 time trial for blind cyclists on a tandem with a ]. The visually impaired athlete sits at the back and acts as the ]. | |||
What I'm wondering is how much effect each of the riders contributes to the overall speed. Is the stoker the 'engine room' of the team, or could a better pilot have a disproportionate effect on performance? In other words, if I (a reasonably competent but unfit and slow cyclist) was to lose my sight, how close would I get to a Paralympic medal by teaming up with ]? (I'm aware that there are restrictions on using current world-championship cyclists, but let's assume that Sir Chris would give up his career for the chance to pilot me.) If it helps, the teams seem to be using ] pedalling, suggesting a fairly close balance of leg strength. I'm happy to pedal out-of-phase with Sir Chris when when we get to ] though. - ] (]) 09:42, 1 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
: Hard is a somewhat subjective judgement. For me, comparing these two is like comparing one kind of impossible with another. Oh, I can play the notes ok but my speed is ridiculously slow. -- ] </sup></span>]] 19:22, 15 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:If you look closely at the bike, you will see that the stoker's pedals are also connected to the pilot's pedals by a long chain. This arrangement seems to be quite vulnerable to mechanical failure as we have seen today. It means that the stoker provides most of the motive power for the tandem, as opposed to the "normal" tandem which is, in effect, two bikes stuck together as far as the pedal arrangements go. --] (]) 13:12, 1 September 2012 (UTC) The long chain is clearly visible in . --] (]) 13:14, 1 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:{{tq|‘Mr. Horowitz, which are the most difficult of the Chopin Etudes?’ — “Ah, all are terrible. For me, the most difficult of all is the C Major, the first one, Op. 10, No. 1. Also, I can’t do the A minor, Op. 10, No. 2. Richter told me he could never do it, either.”}}<sup></sup> --] 10:59, 16 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
: ] (]) 23:00, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::{{+1}} I think a 7/8-size keyboard would solve my problems indeed. | |||
::I wonder if Chopin's keyboard was also smaller than the modern standard. Bar 31 of Op.10/1 (with an F7 arpeggio fingered 1245 for C-E{{music|b}}-A-E{{music|b}}) seems like it would require absolutely huge hands on a standard keyboard. :) ] (]) 05:47, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
= December 18 = | |||
::Sorry to be dense, but I don't quite understand. What's the difference between this arrangement and a (assuming that I've linked to a normal tandem), and what effect does the chain link have on power? Is there anything like a ] test showing respective power of each rider? - ] (]) 18:38, 1 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== White flashes in the 90s music videos == | |||
:::I see what you mean. I'd seen another picture of the paralympic tandem with two sprocket arrangements on linked by the long chain, but with each rider's sprocket also attached separately. There is a short chain as well as the long chain. I'll try and find another photo showing that. I had found a photo showing that but couldn't link to it. --] (]) 20:49, 1 September 2012 (UTC) Meanwhile, here is a link to our ] article which covers different drive arrangements. --] (]) 20:52, 1 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::I'm quite frustrated as I can't find a still picture of the coverage of the broken tandem that happened yesterday that showed the set up clearly. However, as I'm watching it this morning I can report that the pilot is pushing a smaller sprocket than the stoker. There's some sort of mechanism that allows both cyclists to pedal at the same rate. --] (]) 08:46, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::::Morning. Is the 3rd picture on what you're looking for? I'm starting to see what you're getting at - I can now see a visual difference between this arrangement and the road tandem - but I'm still not quite sure what the effect this has on power output - or whether this is a deliberate effort to ensure the stoker does most of the work, or a reaction to the fact that the stoker is a stronger pedaller. I found which asserts that 'the captain' (the front guy) does most of the work, but there's no citation for that - ] (]) 09:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Ah yes. Now you can see that the pedals of the pilot are not attached to his own wheel at all, only to the pedals of the stoker. The pedals of the stoker are attached to his own wheel and to the pedals of the pilot. --] (]) 12:02, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::::::That's the same for any bike. The pedals are never attached to the front wheel. ] (]) 18:02, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::Not necessarily: see ] .--] (]) 19:13, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
Apparently in the 1990s and early 2000s there was an international trend of using repeated white flashes for artistic effect in music videos, particularly when shooting indoors, e.g. in , , etc. (now seemingly less used). Is this effect mentioned/discussed somewhere? ]<sup>]</sup> 19:26, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Early television programming == | |||
== Frog and Toad All Year audiobook == | |||
The ] article says there were television sets available in the UK from 1928 on. What sort of advertising was available that early? ] (]) 23:48, 1 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
British actor ] narrated an audio cassette tape titled ] which I believe was released in 1976 although being trying to find out if the audio cassette tape is available to buy anywhere. ] (]) 21:47, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
: Perhaps none. The article ] says that the first TV ad in the UK aired in 1955. ] (]) 02:34, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::''The first British television broadcast was made by Baird Television's electromechanical system over the BBC radio transmitter in September 1929. Baird provided a limited amount of programming five days a week by 1930''. What kinds of programs were provided? ] (]) 03:28, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::: ''The Man With the Flower in His Mouth'' on 14 July 1930. ] (]) 04:20, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:The audio CD version (sold together with the book) is listed on Amazon (see ). Whether this is the Sallis recording or a different narrator is not mentioned. Copies ''might'' crop up on e.g. Ebay or similar 2nd-hand vendors, but cassette tape eventually deteriorates so the playability of one made almost 50 years ago would be iffy. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ] (]) 23:47, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:The ] didn't start broadcasting until 1954. --] (]) 08:43, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::September 1955 to be exact. Before that, the ] had a monopoly. The BBC is funded by everybody buying a licence for their television (in those days you needed a radio licence too), and so is wonderfully free from advertisements. Whether it's worth the £145.50 we have to pay for it these days is a matter of debate. ] (]) 21:13, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::Some information about BBC TV in the 1930s . | |||
::::But most of that is about radio. I also found which mentions Baird's television demonstrations at the ] exhibition hall in London; ''"...which included half an hour of songs and droll Irish stories by a star of the day, Peggy O’Neil, and the world’s first television advertisement, for the ]. In 1929 Baird provided the first-ever BBC television programme, in black-and-white, which led to half-hour programmes five mornings a week, and in 1931 screened ], with much favourable publicity." ] (]) 21:28, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::::There are a few scanned pages from the ] , covering 1936 to 1939. (The 1936/37 pages cover the period when the BBC alternated between the Baird system and the Marconi/EMI system each week). Primetime highlights for a Friday night in November 1936 include "A Laundry Demonstration" with Mrs Daisy Pain, which included "some tips about ironing" <font face="monospace" color="#004080">]·(])</font> 22:38, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::::(PS) And there's a programme schedule for the Baird 30-line broadcasts from December 1930 . <font face="monospace" color="#004080">]·(])</font> 22:56, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::::<small>Thank you for those links, Flowerpotman, which I found absolutely fascinating. Leaving aside the dubious political correctness of some of the items, I think it says a lot that I would rather watch variety acts and laundry demonstrations than what passes for entertainment on British daytime TV these days. - ]] 12:10, 3 September 2012 (UTC)</small> | |||
= |
= December 19 = | ||
== Little Bear 1996 Audiobooks == | |||
==]== | |||
{{resolved}} | |||
] question—why do ]s catch a ] when the infield fly rule is invoked? The batter is ] anyway, so why do they make the effort to catch the ball? Is it counted as an ] if they let it fall? ] (]) 19:52, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
In 1996 British actor ] narrated two audiobooks those being ] and Little Bear's Visit and I've been trying to find if any websites that sell it so I can buy it. ] (]) 14:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
: If they let it fall, and it takes a bad bounce and gets away from them, the runners could advance. ] (]) 19:57, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:If any websites sell 'something', they need customers to be able to find them. The 'something' would therefore almost certainly show up in any appropriately-worded web search. If you have web-searched for 'something' and not found it, it's a strong indication that the 'something' is not currently being advertised and/or sold (at least online), either new or (currently) via Ebay and other resale sites. On the latter, of course, ''any'' 2nd-hand item ''might'' show up at any time. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ] (]) 20:59, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Indeed, while the batter-runner is out when the infield fly rule is invoked, the ball is still live, so if the infielder ''were'' to let it drop, and it bounced off unpredictably, the other runners are allowed to advance. --]''''']''''' 20:05, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::RudolfRed and Jayron32 have nailed this one. (A secondary point is that if it's not clear whether the ball will land fair or foul, the infielder would need to set up to catch the ball to get the out even if it winds up foul. The batter is automatically out under the infield-fly rule only if the infield fly is fair.) ] (]) 20:14, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::Plus, there's also the practice of catching the ball is so ingrained in baseball players that it is difficult not to. It's also why basketball players will still lay the ball into the hoop even well after the score wouldn't matter (like at the end of the quarter of obviously after a foul or shot clock violation). They've got the ball in their hands, there's a hoop, and they just put it in without a careful assessment of whether or not it is the best course of action. Likewise, the baseball player catches the ball just because he can, not because he's carefully weighed and considered all of the various implications, and decided that it is absolutely necessary. A lot of sports is automatic: you do what you are trained to do. There isn't time to think, so you train yourself to react and not think. --]''''']''''' 20:25, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks. ] (]) 00:43, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:Another way to put it is that although the batter is out, it is otherwise a normal fly ball. So, as noted above, if the infielder lets it drop, accidentally or on purpose, runners can try to advance, or they can stay put, as they choose. However, if a runner has wandered off base before the ball was caught, the ball could then be caught and the runner could be doubled up. That would be known technically as a "bonehead" play by the runner. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 22:12, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::::Thanks. ] (]) 00:43, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::Thanks. ] (]) 00:43, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::Thanks. ] (]) 00:43, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks. ] (]) 00:43, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
= December 20 = | |||
:There are occasions when the fielder will let the ball drop on purpose, hoping to catch a runner trying to advance. ] (]) 02:42, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::The infielder has to be careful. As per rule 6.05(l): If he lets the ball hit the ground untouched, you're right. But if he touches it on the fly and then purposely drops it, then the batter is out, the ball is dead, and the runners are not forced. This is true in any force situation, i.e. even if there is only a runner on first base. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 13:42, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::Yes, although that's always a tough call for an umpire. The most famous non-call where that allegedly happened was in a World Series game in the 1970s—I was reading about it in an umpire's memoir, probably one of Ron Luciano's books, I'll have to find it—but the controversy over whether the ball was dropped on purpose was swallowed up because that was the same play on which (depending on whom you believe) a throw hit Reggie Jackson in the hip, or Reggie Jackson put his hip in front of a throw. ] (]) 15:09, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::1978, Game 4, 6th inning. Box score: There may be some Youtube footage, but my buffering is slow as a dog today. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 21:57, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::Thanks. ] (]) 00:06, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks. ] (]) 00:06, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Biggest game between two teams from Indiana ever? == | |||
= September 3 = | |||
Any candidates other than this Indiana+ND game? Thanks, ]<span style="color:#00FF00;">e</span>]<small>]</small> 04:13, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== "Mermaids: The Body Found" == | |||
:Define "biggest". ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 04:35, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:: <small>"Most big" <small>←] (]) 15:37, 20 December 2024 (UTC)</small></small> | |||
:::: {{Small|Most supercalifragilisticexpialidociously ginormous, of course. What do they teach in school, these days??? ] (]) 21:40, 20 December 2024 (UTC)}} | |||
:::Most important potential outcome? Largest spectator attendance? Largest combined score? Most hyped in the media? ''We'' cannot know what ''you'' (or the OP, if different) mean by "biggest" (or "most big") unless you define it. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ] (]) 20:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== The Moonstone characters that die 1972 == | |||
What kind of game are the producers playing in ]? It's aired on Discovery affiliates like a documentary; it starts out with a very plausible description of the Navy being involved in some kind of very loud low-frequency sound production that injured and killed whales. But then it moves into complete weirdness about mermaids at sea, based on photos so iffy that even a sympathetic eye can't find in them what is claimed. I looked up "Paul Robertson" and NOAA and see claims online that he is altogether imaginary. Is this some kind of Navy disinformation campaign about what's really going on with underwater noise, or producers with half a dozen reels of snippets trying to splice together an hour-long feature, or what? Can anyone explain the genesis of this ... object? ] (]) 01:29, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
] book appears to have three characters from the book that die and it appears that in the 1972 tv series adaptation less of the characters die so how many of the characters from The Moonstone 1972 tv series adaptation die. Also tell me if I was right saying that three of the characters from ] book die and if I was right tell me each character from the book that dies as well. ] (]) 19:58, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:The article ] could be of interest. --] (]) 11:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:A question better asked on the Italian Misplaced Pages, since this Italian-language adaptation was made and broadcast in Italy. It's ''possible'' that some responder on this en.Misplaced Pages Ref desk might be able to find out, but seems to me unlikely. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ] (]) 20:50, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Unfortunately, some of the specials run by channels that are supposed to be "educational" are giving false credence to conspiracy theories and hoaxes. I recall something the History Channel ran last May, which was riddled with factual errors and consequent crazy speculation. I saw that "mermaid" ad the other day, and my immediate thought was, "The Discovery Channel has literally gone off the deep end." ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 13:34, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::However, ] was made by the ] in English and subsequently shown in the USA by ] (but I don't know the answer). ] (]) 13:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Ah, right. I didn't spot this one, because in ] (where I looked), it's appended to the entry for the 1959 version and thus less noticeable, and the next entry is for the Italian production, which I assumed was the one the OP meant – apologies. Obviously, one would have to both re-read the book (which would take days – it's 450+ pages, nearly 193,000 words) ''and'' watch the DVD to work out the answers to the questions, and I do not possess the latter. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ] (]) 17:39, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::I have now separated the two BBC versions in our article. ] (]) 21:40, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
= December 21 = | |||
::Hey, I ''believe'' in the "aquatic ape hypothesis", sort of, if you count that what I mean is an origin at the ] where fire and water periodically reshape a highly chaotic landscape. Several species evolved special foot adaptations there, of which humans would be one; navigating the deep waters upright is known to the ]s ... and the regular pattern of wildfires surrounding the area creates a huge precedent of cooked food waiting for those clever enough to dodge the flames. And I believe in mermaids, at least if you count ]... it's just the part about free-ranging tribes of ocean-faring humanoids that I balk at. ] (]) 23:42, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::If they've got evidence to present in support of that hypothesis, that's fine. But as you noted, the ads for the show are slanted in the same way as you might expect from a pseudo-documentary about the Loch Ness Monster. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 00:00, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== ] "Discrimination" == | |||
== I am looking for a good RP(Role playing) experience online == | |||
Have PEGI ever mentioned or otherwise announced why they discontinued their "Discrimination" content descriptor despite? | |||
I am looking for a good RP(Role playing) experience online. where can i get one i have thought of making a few games on here. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 03:35, 3 September 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:Our article ] links to various places you may find helpful, including various lists of role-playing games. If by "on here" you mean hosting role-playing games on Misplaced Pages, I'm afraid that's not permitted: ]. - ]] 08:22, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
https://pegi.info/en/search-pegi?q=&age%5B%5D=&descriptor%5B%5D=Discrimination | |||
== ] == | |||
Looking at their database it was only used on five games from 2004 to 2006 which is miniscule ] (]) 02:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
:https://rating-system.fandom.com/Discrimination_descriptor ] (]) 06:27, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
I'm trying to identify the band members of ] on this picture. I'm fairly sure the one on the left is Danny Whitten, and the one on the right might be drummer Ralph Molina. The picture was taken on 21 June 1972. Who can help me? ] (]) 16:16, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:I think the one with the mustache is Billy Talbot (bass) - check . --] (]) 18:04, 3 September 2012 (UTC) And the one with the shades is Jack Nitzsche, per . --] (]) 18:09, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you very much! :) ] (]) 18:34, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::{{small|I'd've thought the guy on the left would be Sitting Bull. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 22:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
:::By the way, the photo is a cropped, b/w version of (or, at least, taken at the same shoot as) ] on the cover of ]. The full photo shows a 5th person, standing with their back to the camera. - ] (]) 08:28, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Episode plot about a community in which everyone stays youthful but has to die when reaching a certain age == | |||
= December 27 = | |||
I think it's an episode of some TV show that I saw years ago. The storyline is roughly this: there's an out-of-the-way town or community with a secret--the residents stay youthful despite their physical age but they have a covenant among themselves that when someone reaches a certain age (100 years old, or something like that), the person will have to die. | |||
I thought it was an episode of ''The X-Files'', but I've searched the Web and couldn't find the it. | |||
Can someone help? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:39, 3 September 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:It sounds like a varient on the well known book and film '']'', though the age when everyone is expected to die is 21 (in the book) or 30 (in the film), not 100. There was also a short lived TV series ]. The theme of programmed death at a certain age is a common one in various works of dystopian science fiction as well. --]''''']''''' 22:43, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::The arrangement Jayron32 describes – a government/society imposing mandatory suicide/euthanasia at a specified age – has long been a theme in science fiction. Our article on ] mentions several works that incorporate this concept; Isaac Asimov's '']'' is probably the earliest well-known work of this genre. | |||
::However, none of those stories deal with effectively-immortal (or extremely long-lived) individuals who commit suicide as a (rather dramatic) way to conceal their extremely slow aging. Most secretly-immortal fictional characters tend to take the less-final approach of periodically assuming new, younger identities (sometimes as 'their own' child or grandchild); see TV Tropes' entry for for any number of such examples. | |||
::TV Tropes also offers up the theme of for yet more mandatory-suicide dystopias. Unfortunately, I still can't find the TV episode the original poster is looking for. ](]) 23:26, 3 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:]? ] (]) 03:25, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
::Also ]. <font face="Century Gothic"> → ] ] ] ]</font> 03:57, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::Darn. Someone beat me to the ''Star Trek'' cites. ] (]) 13:26, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:Closest ''X-Files'' storyline is ], which is half the story arc. ] (]) 04:39, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:]'s novel '']'' has a related motif. —] (]) 19:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
= September 4 = | |||
== Who or what the robot ] in ] was based on? == | |||
Who or what the robot ] in ] was based on? ] (]) 20:25, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Where can I read PPsailor moon]] ] comics online? Not the old mixx version.? == | |||
Where can I read ] ] comics online? Not the old mixx version.? ] (]) 20:44, 4 September 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:53, 27 December 2024
Welcome to the entertainment sectionof the Misplaced Pages reference desk. skip to bottom Select a section: Shortcut Want a faster answer?
Main page: Help searching Misplaced Pages
How can I get my question answered?
- Select the section of the desk that best fits the general topic of your question (see the navigation column to the right).
- Post your question to only one section, providing a short header that gives the topic of your question.
- Type '~~~~' (that is, four tilde characters) at the end – this signs and dates your contribution so we know who wrote what and when.
- Don't post personal contact information – it will be removed. Any answers will be provided here.
- Please be as specific as possible, and include all relevant context – the usefulness of answers may depend on the context.
- Note:
- We don't answer (and may remove) questions that require medical diagnosis or legal advice.
- We don't answer requests for opinions, predictions or debate.
- We don't do your homework for you, though we'll help you past the stuck point.
- We don't conduct original research or provide a free source of ideas, but we'll help you find information you need.
How do I answer a question?
Main page: Misplaced Pages:Reference desk/Guidelines
- The best answers address the question directly, and back up facts with wikilinks and links to sources. Do not edit others' comments and do not give any medical or legal advice.
December 13
Small question about sourcing release dates
Hello, I apologize if this is the wrong spot to ask this. I'm currently doing the "suggested edits" from my own home page, to try and gain a bit more practical editing experience, and the first I got was Superhero film.
A lot of the "citation needed" templates seem to be concerning justifying the release dates of each work; right now, I'm looking e.g. at "The following year, the sequel titled Ultraman Zearth 2: Superhuman Big Battle - Light and Shadow premiered."
from the "1978–1998: Rising popularity with Superman, Kamen Rider, Batman, and Ultraman Zearth" section, and I'm wondering what's the best practice to source this kind of thing.
I'm assuming that, per WP:IMDB, that website (which on my personal time would be the first source I look at for release dates) doesn't work because it's USERGENERATED; so, where else should I be looking?
Thank you for any help! NewBorders (talk) 17:55, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Two sources for the year 1997: Rotten Tomatoes, Apple TV+. --Lambiam 18:57, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm - I would normally be okay with Rotten Tomatoes, but WP:ROTTENTOMATOES does also state that
"There is consensus that Rotten Tomatoes should not be used for biographical information, cast and crew data, or other film and television data, as it is sourced from user-generated and user-provided content with a lack of oversight and verification."
- Should I just use Apple TV and be done with it, then? Or do you think RT, in this case, is fine despite the above? NewBorders (talk) 20:00, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Roku, not listed at WP:RSP, also has 1997. --Lambiam 15:32, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks again for your help! I think I'll try using the two you mentioned that aren't at RSP, then.
- Anyway, if editors looking at the page in the future find issue with these sources, they can always discuss on the talk page, or at WP:RSN. Or better yet, add more reliable sourcing. NewBorders (talk) 17:19, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Roku, not listed at WP:RSP, also has 1997. --Lambiam 15:32, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm - I would normally be okay with Rotten Tomatoes, but WP:ROTTENTOMATOES does also state that
December 15
BBC Sunday-Night Play DVD
BBC Sunday-Night Play was a British tv series which air on the BBC Television from 1960-1963. A very short amount of the episodes have survived and I've been trying to find out if any of the surviving episodes have ever been released on DVD. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 14:34, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- In the cases (perhaps all of them) where the true answer is "no", it may be hard to demonstrate (though it's not logically impossible to prove a negative, it can be impractically difficult), but it would help to try to find answers if you could list the 15 plays in question, by using the references in the series' article to subtract the 123 listed 'lost' plays (Reference 4) from the list of all 138 of the plays (Reference 1). {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 17:45, 16 December 2024 (UTC) 94.1.223.204 (talk) 17:45, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
regarding the comparative difficulty of Chopin's etudes
I'm curious: is Op.10 No.1 or Op.10 No.2 commonly considered to be harder?
(I always found Op.10 No.1 much harder, but this is probably because for me stretching beyond an octave hurts.) Double sharp (talk) 18:12, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hard is a somewhat subjective judgement. For me, comparing these two is like comparing one kind of impossible with another. Oh, I can play the notes ok but my speed is ridiculously slow. -- Jack of Oz 19:22, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
‘Mr. Horowitz, which are the most difficult of the Chopin Etudes?’ — “Ah, all are terrible. For me, the most difficult of all is the C Major, the first one, Op. 10, No. 1. Also, I can’t do the A minor, Op. 10, No. 2. Richter told me he could never do it, either.”
--Lambiam 10:59, 16 December 2024 (UTC)- "Mass production of both grand and upright pianos consolidated a ‘standard’ key size that is too big for most pianists. It took more than 100 years for serious questioning of this situation and, since the 1990s, there has been increasing interest in, and agitation for, providing keyboards that suit more of the piano playing population. Now, a movement advocating narrower key options is providing hope." Rhonda Boyle, Standard piano keys are too wide for too many. But alternatively sized keyboards are on the way. May 20, 2021, (Pearls and Irritations, John Menadue's Public Policy Journal). Modocc (talk) 23:00, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- +1 I think a 7/8-size keyboard would solve my problems indeed.
- I wonder if Chopin's keyboard was also smaller than the modern standard. Bar 31 of Op.10/1 (with an F7 arpeggio fingered 1245 for C-E♭-A-E♭) seems like it would require absolutely huge hands on a standard keyboard. :) Double sharp (talk) 05:47, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
December 18
White flashes in the 90s music videos
Apparently in the 1990s and early 2000s there was an international trend of using repeated white flashes for artistic effect in music videos, particularly when shooting indoors, e.g. in Tarkan - Şımarık, Philipp Kirkorov - Ogon i voda, etc. (now seemingly less used). Is this effect mentioned/discussed somewhere? Brandmeister 19:26, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Frog and Toad All Year audiobook
British actor Peter Sallis narrated an audio cassette tape titled Frog and Toad All Year which I believe was released in 1976 although being trying to find out if the audio cassette tape is available to buy anywhere. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 21:47, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- The audio CD version (sold together with the book) is listed on Amazon (see here). Whether this is the Sallis recording or a different narrator is not mentioned. Copies might crop up on e.g. Ebay or similar 2nd-hand vendors, but cassette tape eventually deteriorates so the playability of one made almost 50 years ago would be iffy. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 94.1.223.204 (talk) 23:47, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
December 19
Little Bear 1996 Audiobooks
In 1996 British actor Peter Sallis narrated two audiobooks those being Little Bear and Little Bear's Visit and I've been trying to find if any websites that sell it so I can buy it. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 14:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- If any websites sell 'something', they need customers to be able to find them. The 'something' would therefore almost certainly show up in any appropriately-worded web search. If you have web-searched for 'something' and not found it, it's a strong indication that the 'something' is not currently being advertised and/or sold (at least online), either new or (currently) via Ebay and other resale sites. On the latter, of course, any 2nd-hand item might show up at any time. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 94.1.223.204 (talk) 20:59, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
December 20
Biggest game between two teams from Indiana ever?
Any candidates other than this Indiana+ND game? Thanks, Abeg92contribs 04:13, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Define "biggest". ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 04:35, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- "Most big" ←136.56.165.118 (talk) 15:37, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Most supercalifragilisticexpialidociously ginormous, of course. What do they teach in school, these days??? Clarityfiend (talk) 21:40, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Most important potential outcome? Largest spectator attendance? Largest combined score? Most hyped in the media? We cannot know what you (or the OP, if different) mean by "biggest" (or "most big") unless you define it. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 94.1.223.204 (talk) 20:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- "Most big" ←136.56.165.118 (talk) 15:37, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
The Moonstone characters that die 1972
The Moonstone book appears to have three characters from the book that die and it appears that in the 1972 tv series adaptation less of the characters die so how many of the characters from The Moonstone 1972 tv series adaptation die. Also tell me if I was right saying that three of the characters from The Moonstone book die and if I was right tell me each character from the book that dies as well. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 19:58, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- A question better asked on the Italian Misplaced Pages, since this Italian-language adaptation was made and broadcast in Italy. It's possible that some responder on this en.Misplaced Pages Ref desk might be able to find out, but seems to me unlikely. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 94.1.223.204 (talk) 20:50, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- However, The Moonstone (1972 TV series) was made by the BBC in English and subsequently shown in the USA by PBS (but I don't know the answer). Alansplodge (talk) 13:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, right. I didn't spot this one, because in The Moonstone#Adaptations (where I looked), it's appended to the entry for the 1959 version and thus less noticeable, and the next entry is for the Italian production, which I assumed was the one the OP meant – apologies. Obviously, one would have to both re-read the book (which would take days – it's 450+ pages, nearly 193,000 words) and watch the DVD to work out the answers to the questions, and I do not possess the latter. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 94.1.223.204 (talk) 17:39, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I have now separated the two BBC versions in our article. Alansplodge (talk) 21:40, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, right. I didn't spot this one, because in The Moonstone#Adaptations (where I looked), it's appended to the entry for the 1959 version and thus less noticeable, and the next entry is for the Italian production, which I assumed was the one the OP meant – apologies. Obviously, one would have to both re-read the book (which would take days – it's 450+ pages, nearly 193,000 words) and watch the DVD to work out the answers to the questions, and I do not possess the latter. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 94.1.223.204 (talk) 17:39, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- However, The Moonstone (1972 TV series) was made by the BBC in English and subsequently shown in the USA by PBS (but I don't know the answer). Alansplodge (talk) 13:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
December 21
PEGI "Discrimination"
Have PEGI ever mentioned or otherwise announced why they discontinued their "Discrimination" content descriptor despite?
https://pegi.info/en/search-pegi?q=&age%5B%5D=&descriptor%5B%5D=Discrimination
Looking at their database it was only used on five games from 2004 to 2006 which is miniscule Trade (talk) 02:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- https://rating-system.fandom.com/Discrimination_descriptor Polygnotus (talk) 06:27, 21 December 2024 (UTC)