Misplaced Pages

Not in Our Name: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:57, 3 May 2006 editMorton devonshire (talk | contribs)6,576 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 09:20, 19 August 2024 edit undoChristian Roess (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users17,615 editsm →Signatories: wikify Rose Styron 
(139 intermediate revisions by 85 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|American anti-war group (2002–2008)}}
⚫ {{Anti-war topics}}
{{for multi|the Charlie Haden Liberation Music Orchestra album|Not in Our Name (album)|the Impeach Tony Blair CD|Not In Our Name CD (album)}}
⚫ '''Not in Our Name''' (NION) is a ] organization founded on ], ], in order to resist the U.S. government's course in the wake of the ], largely by members of the ].
{{redirect|NION|the letter of the Ogham alphabet|Nion}}

⚫ '''Not in Our Name''' ('''NION''') was a United States organization founded on March 23, 2002 to protest the U.S. government's course in the wake of the ]; it disbanded on March 31, 2008.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://notinourname.net/|title=Not in Our Name - National Anti-War Effort (2002-2007)|website=Not in Our Name}}</ref>


==Two key documents== ==Two key documents==
Early in their existence, NION produced two documents&mdash;the "Pledge of Resistance" and the "Statement of Conscience" &mdash;that are widely credited with providing focus and expression to the U.S. anti-war movement. Early in their existence, NION produced two documents&mdash;the "Pledge of Resistance"<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.notinourname.net/pledge_about.html |title=Archived copy |access-date=2004-08-12 |archive-date=2008-03-13 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080313104210/http://www.notinourname.net/pledge_about.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> and the "Statement of Conscience"<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.notinourname.net/statement_conscience.html |title=Archived copy |access-date=2004-08-12 |archive-date=2008-03-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080311200106/http://www.notinourname.net/statement_conscience.html |url-status=dead }}</ref>&mdash;that NION members believe provide focus and expression to the U.S. anti-war movement.


==="Pledge of Resistance"=== ==="Pledge of Resistance"===
Line 23: Line 26:
</blockquote> </blockquote>


The pledge opposes what it characterizes as "endless ]", "]s of ] for ]", invasions of foreign countries, bombing ]s, and killing children. It goes on, "Not in our name / will you erode the very freedoms / you have claimed to fight for." It implicitly accuses the ] of deeming "whole ] or ]" as "]" and pledges, among other things, "...alliance with those/ who have come under attack / The pledge opposes what it characterizes as "endless ]", "] of ] for ]", invasions of foreign countries, bombing ]s, and killing children. It goes on, "Not in our name / will you erode the very freedoms / you have claimed to fight for." It implicitly accuses the ] of deeming "whole ] or ]" as "]" and pledges, among other things, "...alliance with those/ who have come under attack /
for voicing opposition to the war / or for their religion or ethnicity." for voicing opposition to the war / or for their religion or ethnicity."

The '']'' EP was released in May 2003 by Saul Williams with assistance from ], DJ Goo and ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.allmusic.com/album/not-in-my-name-mw0000031222|title=Saul Williams - Not in My Name|date=May 20, 2003|publisher=]|accessdate=7 January 2013}}</ref>


==="Statement of Conscience"=== ==="Statement of Conscience"===
NION's "Statement of Conscience", drafted in spring 2002, first lists a series of criticisms of the Bush Administration and (secondarily) the ] and calls on the people of the U.S. "...to resist the policies and overall political direction that have emerged since September 11, 2001, and which pose grave dangers to the people of the world." ]NION's "Statement of Conscience", drafted in spring 2002, first lists a series of criticisms of the Bush Administration and (secondarily) the ] and calls on the people of the U.S. "...to resist the policies and overall political direction that have emerged since September 11, 2001, and which pose grave dangers to the people of the world."


Among the specific principles advocated in the statement are the right of ] for peoples and nations and the importance of ] and dissent. The statement expresses "shock" at "the horrific events of September 11, 2001" but, evoking "similar scenes in ], ], and, a generation ago, ]", describes ] as "a country which has no connection to the horror of September 11", and deplores the administration's "spirit of revenge" and the "simplistic script of 'good vs. evil': "In our name, the Bush administration, with near unanimity from Congress, not only attacked ] but arrogated to itself and its allies the right to rain down military force anywhere and anytime." Among the specific principles advocated in the statement are the right of ] for peoples and nations and the importance of ] and dissent. The statement expresses "shock" at "the horrific events of September 11, 2001" but, evoking "similar scenes in ], ], and, a generation ago, ]", describes ] as "a country which has no connection to the horror of September 11", and deplores the administration's "spirit of revenge" and the "simplistic script of 'good vs. evil': "In our name, the Bush administration, with near unanimity from Congress, not only attacked ] but arrogated to itself and its allies the right to rain down military force anywhere and anytime."


Referring to the U.S. government's treatment of immigrants in the wake of September 11, the statement accuses the U.S. government of creating "two classes of people: those to whom the basic rights of the U.S. legal system are at least promised, and those who now seem to have no rights at all," and evokes "the infamous ]s for ]s in ]." Referring to the U.S. government's treatment of immigrants in the wake of September 11, the statement accuses the U.S. government of creating "two classes of people: those to whom the basic rights of the U.S. legal system are at least promised, and those who now seem to have no rights at all", and evokes "the infamous ]".


Protesting "a pall of repression" and referring specifically to the ] as emblematic of that repression, it accuses the ] of usurping "the roles and functions of the other branches of government," and continues, "We must take the highest officers of the land seriously when they talk of a war that will last a generation and when they speak of a new domestic order. We are confronting a new openly imperial policy towards the world and a domestic policy that manufactures and manipulates fear to curtail rights." Protesting "a pall of repression" and referring specifically to the ] as emblematic of that repression, it accuses the ] of usurping "the roles and functions of the other branches of government," and continues, "We must take the highest officers of the land seriously when they talk of a war that will last a generation and when they speak of a new domestic order. We are confronting a new openly imperial policy towards the world and a domestic policy that manufactures and manipulates fear to curtail rights."


NION urges a movement of resistance: "President Bush has declared: 'you’re either with us or against us.' Here is our answer: We refuse to allow you to speak for all the American people... We refuse to be party to these wars and we repudiate any inference that they are being waged in our name or for our welfare..." It indicates as inspiration "...]i reservists who, at great personal risk, declare ']' and refuse to serve in the occupation of the ] and ]", the ], and "those who defied the ]" and concludes, "we will resist the machinery of war and repression and rally others to do everything possible to stop it." NION urges a movement of resistance: "President Bush has declared: 'you're either with us or against us.' Here is our answer: We refuse to allow you to speak for all the American people ... We refuse to be party to these wars and we repudiate any inference that they are being waged in our name or for our welfare ..." It indicates as inspiration "...]i reservists who, at great personal risk, declare 'there IS a limit' and ] in the occupation of the ] and ]", the ], and "those who defied the ]" and concludes, "we will resist the machinery of war and repression and rally others to do everything possible to stop it."

The Statement of Conscience has been cited by a supporter of NION as instrumental to the initiation of the ] mock tribunal, and a mock investigation into alleged crimes against humanity allegedly perpetrated by the ].


===Signatories=== ===Signatories===

NION's web site lists a broad array of signatories to the pledge, listing only those who signed before ] ]. Among those are: NION's web site lists a broad array of signatories to the pledge, listing only those who signed before July 17, 2002. Among those are:
* ], former U.S. Senator
{|
⚫ * Dr. ]
|
⚫ * ], film director
* ], performance artist *], former U.S. Senator
⚫ *Dr. ]
⚫ * ], co-founder, ]
⚫ *], film director
⚫ * ]
*], performance artist
* ]
⚫ *], co-founder, ]
* ]
⚫ *]
⚫ * ], former U.S. Attorney General and founder of ]
* ], actor *]
* ] *]
⚫ *], former U.S. Attorney General and founder of ]
* ]
*], actor
⚫ * ] of ]
* ] *]
* ] *]
⚫ *], of ]
* ]
* ] *]
*]
* ], Revolutionary Communist Party
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
*]
⚫ * Fifty-three ] priests and brothers
* ] *]
⚫ *Fifty-three ] priests and brothers
⚫ * ] of ]
* ] *]
⚫ *], of ]
* The ]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* Rev. ] *Rev. ]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ], author of ''Blowback'' *], author of ''Blowback''
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
|
* Rabbi ], editor, ] *Rabbi ], editor, ]
* ] of the ] *], of the ]
⚫ * ], U.S. representative
* ], former U.S. representative *], U.S. representative
⚫ *], U.S. representative
* ]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
*]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
*]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* Rev. ] *Rev. ]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
* ] *]
*]
|}


==2005 Statement of Conscience== ==2005 Statement of Conscience==
NION issued an updated Statement of Conscience in January 2005, expressing dissent on the occasion of the re-inauguration of ] as ]. NION issued an updated Statement of Conscience in January 2005, expressing dissent on the occasion of the re-inauguration of ] as ].<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.notinourname.net/soc-jan05.htm |title=Archived copy |access-date=2005-07-27 |archive-date=2008-03-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080311181316/http://www.notinourname.net/soc-jan05.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref>


==Slogans== ==Slogans==
Line 136: Line 143:
* No Round-ups and Detentions * No Round-ups and Detentions


==Controversies==
⚫ ==Role in the anti-war movement==
⚫ In certain ways, the founding of NION parallels that of ]. ANSWER is an anti-war coalition that was founded on the eve of the ], largely by members of the ] (WWP). (Four years later, however, the ], an offshoot of WWP, has replaced WWP's influence in ANSWER). NION was founded six months later, largely by members of the ] (RCP), which continues to be prominent among its leadership.


⚫ ===Role in the anti-war movement===
⚫ NION has a broad set of endorsers and is generally regarded as a cooperative participant in the broader anti-war movement. Typical among expressions of this sentiment is an October 2002 article by ] and ] in ] magazine. After excoriating the RCP for holding various positions that Albert and Shalom find abhorrent, they then write, "Despite these views, however, RCP does not push its specific positions on NION to the degree that ] does on ANSWER. For example, while the ANSWER website offers such things as… IAC backgrounder on Afghanistan…, the NION website and its public positions have no connection to the sometimes bizarre views of the RCP." This is reflected in the wide range of signatories to their ].
{{More citations needed section|date=July 2009}}
⚫ A partial parallel for the founding of '''Not in Our Name''' (NION) is the founding of the anti-war coalition ]. ANSWER was founded on 14 September 2001, on the eve of the ], largely by members of the ] (WWP). NION was founded on 23 March 2002, largely by members of the ] (RCP), which continues to be prominent among its leadership. (In 2005, four years after its founding, the ], an offshoot of WWP, became a more prominent influence than the WWP in the leadership of ANSWER.)


⚫ Nonetheless, in contrast to ANSWER, NION has a broad set of endorsers and is generally regarded as a cooperative participant in the broader ]. An October 2002 article by ] and ] in ] magazine is typical among expressions by anti-war critics of the RCP that, despite its origins, NION is a cooperative participant in the movement. After excoriating the RCP for holding various positions that Albert and Shalom find abhorrent, they then write, "Despite these views, however, RCP does not push its specific positions on NION to the degree that ] does on ANSWER. For example, while the ANSWER website offers such things as ... IAC backgrounder on Afghanistan ..., the NION website and its public positions have no connection to the sometimes bizarre views of the RCP."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=15&ItemID=2527 |title=ZNet &#124;Anti War &#124; Ten Q&A; on Antiwar Organizing |accessdate=2008-02-22 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080311064711/http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=15&ItemID=2527 |archivedate=2008-03-11 }}</ref> This is reflected in the wide range of signatories to their ].
⚫ Also, NION is itself now a member of a broader coalition ], founded in October 2002 (a year after ANSWER) by individuals and groups seeking to curb ANSWER's influence in the antiwar movement.


⚫ Also, NION is itself now a member of a broader coalition ], founded in October 2002 (a year after ANSWER) by individuals and groups seeking to curb ANSWER's influence in the ].
⚫ An example of NION's willingness to cooperate came when they postponed their national ] against the war to coincide with the ] ] "Books Not Bombs" student strike called by the ].

⚫ An example of NION's willingness to cooperate came when they postponed their national moratorium against the war to coincide with the March 5, 2003 "Books Not Bombs" student strike called by the ].

===Donation from Larry Flynt===
{{Unbalanced|date=July 2009}}
In 2004, Robert Corsini, an organizer for Not in Our Name publicized ] ]'s support for one of their campaigns. ], a ] radio producer and news anchor for KPFK, objected privately in e-mail and asked to be removed from the organization's mailing list. Corsini forwarded his response to Bogado (including a copy of the original private e-mail) to NION national organizers, her employers at ], and to Bruce David at Larry Flynt Publishing. Bogado replied to Corisini in detail on NION's public e-mail list, and participated in a sharp debate over the e-mail list that followed. After ''Hustler'' published a series of articles and sexual caricatures attacking Bogado, she made her criticism public in , published on ] in June 2005. Bogado charged that Leftist leaders were tacitly supporting ] and ] by aligning themselves with Flynt, and specifically criticized ], ], ], and ]. The discussion of her article inspired similar criticism of Leftist leaders cooperating with Flynt by feminists such as ]<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.hustlingtheleft.com/|title=Hustling The Left|website=www.hustlingtheleft.com}}</ref> and pro-feminist Leftists such as ] (<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://stangoff.com/?p=163#comment-1760 |title=Feral Scholar » HUSTLING THE LEFT WEBSITE OPENING |access-date=2007-11-24 |archive-date=2007-08-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070814051249/http://stangoff.com/?p=163#comment-1760 |url-status=dead }}</ref>). Shortly after the publication of her article, the Not in Our Name Steering Committee issued a and objected to the treatment of Bogado in ''Hustler''.


==Antecedents of the name== ==Antecedents of the name==
Prior to the founding of Not in Our Name, other anti-war groups had used the name, including a group of families who were victims of the ], and ]ish youth protesting ]'s militarism in the ]. "Not in Our Name" is also a slogan used by the UK ]. Prior to the founding of Not in Our Name, other anti-war groups had used the name, including a group of families who were victims of the ], and Jewish youth protesting Israel's policies in the ]. "Not in Our Name" is also a slogan used by the UK ]. "Not in Our Name" has also been a petition drive to be signed by Muslims by ], in which they say it is "not in the name of Muslims" that terrorist leaders such as Osama bin Ladin and Hambali are making these claims.

==See also==
*]
*]

== References ==

{{Reflist}}

⚫ ==External links==
*
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061223191701/http://notinourname.org.au/ |date=2006-12-23 }}

==="Hustling the Left" controversy===
* Aura Bogado, '']'' June 5, 2005
* ], '']'' June 9, 2005
* Aura Bogado, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929134734/http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=91&ItemID=8074 |date=2007-09-29 }} '']'' June 14, 2005
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929115906/http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=8099 |date=2007-09-29 }} Not In Our Name National Steering Committee, '']'' June 17, 2005
* ] and ], ''LarryFlynt.com Reporter's Notebook'' August 2005
* ], ''LarryFlynt.com Reporter's Notebook''
* ], (the website was established by Nikki Craft to highlight the issues raised by Bogado's article; it was not created by Aura Bogado herself).


⚫ {{anti-war}}
⚫ ==External link==
*


{{DEFAULTSORT:Not In Our Name}}
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]

Latest revision as of 09:20, 19 August 2024

American anti-war group (2002–2008) For the Charlie Haden Liberation Music Orchestra album, see Not in Our Name (album). For the Impeach Tony Blair CD, see Not In Our Name CD (album). "NION" redirects here. For the letter of the Ogham alphabet, see Nion.

Not in Our Name (NION) was a United States organization founded on March 23, 2002 to protest the U.S. government's course in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks; it disbanded on March 31, 2008.

Two key documents

Early in their existence, NION produced two documents—the "Pledge of Resistance" and the "Statement of Conscience"—that NION members believe provide focus and expression to the U.S. anti-war movement.

"Pledge of Resistance"

The Pledge is written by Starhawk and Saul Williams, in the style of free verse, beginning:

We believe that as people living
in the United States it is our
responsibility to resist the injustices
done by our government,
in our names

Not in our name
will you wage endless war

and concluding

Another world is possible
and we pledge to make it real.

The pledge opposes what it characterizes as "endless war", "transfusions of blood for oil", invasions of foreign countries, bombing civilians, and killing children. It goes on, "Not in our name / will you erode the very freedoms / you have claimed to fight for." It implicitly accuses the Bush administration of deeming "whole peoples or countries" as "evil" and pledges, among other things, "...alliance with those/ who have come under attack / for voicing opposition to the war / or for their religion or ethnicity."

The Not in My Name EP was released in May 2003 by Saul Williams with assistance from DJ Spooky, DJ Goo and Coldcut.

"Statement of Conscience"

These flags became an international symbol of solidarity with this statement

NION's "Statement of Conscience", drafted in spring 2002, first lists a series of criticisms of the Bush Administration and (secondarily) the U.S. Congress and calls on the people of the U.S. "...to resist the policies and overall political direction that have emerged since September 11, 2001, and which pose grave dangers to the people of the world."

Among the specific principles advocated in the statement are the right of self-determination for peoples and nations and the importance of due process and dissent. The statement expresses "shock" at "the horrific events of September 11, 2001" but, evoking "similar scenes in Baghdad, Panama City, and, a generation ago, Vietnam", describes Iraq as "a country which has no connection to the horror of September 11", and deplores the administration's "spirit of revenge" and the "simplistic script of 'good vs. evil': "In our name, the Bush administration, with near unanimity from Congress, not only attacked Afghanistan but arrogated to itself and its allies the right to rain down military force anywhere and anytime."

Referring to the U.S. government's treatment of immigrants in the wake of September 11, the statement accuses the U.S. government of creating "two classes of people: those to whom the basic rights of the U.S. legal system are at least promised, and those who now seem to have no rights at all", and evokes "the infamous concentration camps for Japanese-Americans in World War II".

Protesting "a pall of repression" and referring specifically to the USA PATRIOT Act as emblematic of that repression, it accuses the executive branch of usurping "the roles and functions of the other branches of government," and continues, "We must take the highest officers of the land seriously when they talk of a war that will last a generation and when they speak of a new domestic order. We are confronting a new openly imperial policy towards the world and a domestic policy that manufactures and manipulates fear to curtail rights."

NION urges a movement of resistance: "President Bush has declared: 'you're either with us or against us.' Here is our answer: We refuse to allow you to speak for all the American people ... We refuse to be party to these wars and we repudiate any inference that they are being waged in our name or for our welfare ..." It indicates as inspiration "...Israeli reservists who, at great personal risk, declare 'there IS a limit' and refuse to serve in the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza", the abolitionists, and "those who defied the Vietnam war" and concludes, "we will resist the machinery of war and repression and rally others to do everything possible to stop it."

Signatories

NION's web site lists a broad array of signatories to the pledge, listing only those who signed before July 17, 2002. Among those are:

2005 Statement of Conscience

NION issued an updated Statement of Conscience in January 2005, expressing dissent on the occasion of the re-inauguration of George W. Bush as president of the United States.

Slogans

The group uses the following phrases in its rhetoric:

  • Not by our will
  • Not in our name
  • Not by our hearts
  • I Say NO to the Bush Agenda
  • No War On the World
  • No Police State Restrictions
  • No Round-ups and Detentions

Controversies

Role in the anti-war movement

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (July 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

A partial parallel for the founding of Not in Our Name (NION) is the founding of the anti-war coalition ANSWER. ANSWER was founded on 14 September 2001, on the eve of the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, largely by members of the Workers World Party (WWP). NION was founded on 23 March 2002, largely by members of the Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP), which continues to be prominent among its leadership. (In 2005, four years after its founding, the Party for Socialism and Liberation, an offshoot of WWP, became a more prominent influence than the WWP in the leadership of ANSWER.)

Nonetheless, in contrast to ANSWER, NION has a broad set of endorsers and is generally regarded as a cooperative participant in the broader anti-war movement. An October 2002 article by Michael Albert and Stephen R. Shalom in Z magazine is typical among expressions by anti-war critics of the RCP that, despite its origins, NION is a cooperative participant in the movement. After excoriating the RCP for holding various positions that Albert and Shalom find abhorrent, they then write, "Despite these views, however, RCP does not push its specific positions on NION to the degree that IAC does on ANSWER. For example, while the ANSWER website offers such things as ... IAC backgrounder on Afghanistan ..., the NION website and its public positions have no connection to the sometimes bizarre views of the RCP." This is reflected in the wide range of signatories to their "Statement of Conscience".

Also, NION is itself now a member of a broader coalition United for Peace and Justice, founded in October 2002 (a year after ANSWER) by individuals and groups seeking to curb ANSWER's influence in the anti-war movement.

An example of NION's willingness to cooperate came when they postponed their national moratorium against the war to coincide with the March 5, 2003 "Books Not Bombs" student strike called by the National Youth and Student Peace Coalition.

Donation from Larry Flynt

This article may be unbalanced toward certain viewpoints. Please improve the article by adding information on neglected viewpoints, or discuss the issue on the talk page. (July 2009)

In 2004, Robert Corsini, an organizer for Not in Our Name publicized Hardcore pornographer Larry Flynt's support for one of their campaigns. Aura Bogado, a feminist radio producer and news anchor for KPFK, objected privately in e-mail and asked to be removed from the organization's mailing list. Corsini forwarded his response to Bogado (including a copy of the original private e-mail) to NION national organizers, her employers at KPFK, and to Bruce David at Larry Flynt Publishing. Bogado replied to Corisini in detail on NION's public e-mail list, and participated in a sharp debate over the e-mail list that followed. After Hustler published a series of articles and sexual caricatures attacking Bogado, she made her criticism public in "Hustling the Left", published on ZNet in June 2005. Bogado charged that Leftist leaders were tacitly supporting racism and misogyny by aligning themselves with Flynt, and specifically criticized Greg Palast, Amy Goodman, Susie Bright, and Amy Alkon. The discussion of her article inspired similar criticism of Leftist leaders cooperating with Flynt by feminists such as Nikki Craft and pro-feminist Leftists such as Stan Goff (). Shortly after the publication of her article, the Not in Our Name Steering Committee issued a public apology to Bogado and objected to the treatment of Bogado in Hustler.

Antecedents of the name

Prior to the founding of Not in Our Name, other anti-war groups had used the name, including a group of families who were victims of the 9-11 World Trade Center attack, and Jewish youth protesting Israel's policies in the Palestinian territories. "Not in Our Name" is also a slogan used by the UK Stop the War Coalition. "Not in Our Name" has also been a petition drive to be signed by Muslims by CAIR, in which they say it is "not in the name of Muslims" that terrorist leaders such as Osama bin Ladin and Hambali are making these claims.

See also

References

  1. "Not in Our Name - National Anti-War Effort (2002-2007)". Not in Our Name.
  2. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2008-03-13. Retrieved 2004-08-12.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  3. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2008-03-11. Retrieved 2004-08-12.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  4. "Saul Williams - Not in My Name". AllMusic. May 20, 2003. Retrieved 7 January 2013.
  5. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2008-03-11. Retrieved 2005-07-27.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  6. "ZNet |Anti War | Ten Q&A; on Antiwar Organizing". Archived from the original on 2008-03-11. Retrieved 2008-02-22.
  7. "Hustling The Left". www.hustlingtheleft.com.
  8. "Feral Scholar » HUSTLING THE LEFT WEBSITE OPENING". Archived from the original on 2007-08-14. Retrieved 2007-11-24.

External links

"Hustling the Left" controversy

Anti-war and peace movement
Peace advocates
Ideologies
Media and cultural
Slogans and tactics
Opposition to specific
wars or their aspects
Countries
Categories: