Misplaced Pages

User talk:Donfarberman: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:28, 17 September 2012 editDonfarberman (talk | contribs)16 edits →Did I inspire you to join Misplaced Pages?← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:19, 26 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(10 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:
== Did I inspire you to join Misplaced Pages? == == Did I inspire you to join Misplaced Pages? ==


{{Retracted|intentional=yes}} ] (]) 00:23, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
I noticed that all of your contributions have been on two articles that I have been criticising. Perhaps you jumped into the talk pages, saw my contributions, and decided to make an account? There have already been attempts (some successful) to silence me on Misplaced Pages. Why? Because I unapologetically point out blatant dishonesty in articles that are spun to advance a leftist narrative. Stirring the pot on Misplaced Pages upsets the status quo. So I am derided and slandered as a "troll", "soapboxer", or "ranter", because they cannot counter anything I've said and need to deflect from their pathetic "research" and "editing". These are the desperate attempts of dishonest Wikipedians who are committed to preserving the leftist echo chamber. After coming to Misplaced Pages since its inception, I've observed as it's become an increasingly dishonest source of information (due to the demographics of its "editors", of course), and I just felt compelled to make an account and levy a few criticisms. Cheers. ] (]) 00:23, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
:The majority of editors are idiots, hiding behind "rules" they make up to push their narrative. I am glad someone agrees. :The majority of editors are idiots, hiding behind "rules" they make up to push their narrative. I am glad someone agrees.
::It's not the rules themselves that are poorly conceived, rather it's the attitude that a certain demeanour and candour somehow hides an editor's dishonest motives. I initially thought you were an account created in order to caricature me in a negative light, because you're using some of the exact same language I've used. ] (]) 00:37, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

== AN/I notice ==

Hello. There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you.

] (]) 00:55, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

== September 2012 ==
] Please stop your ]. If you continue to ] Misplaced Pages, as you did at ], you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning3 --> ''You really need to stop removing talk page content. You'll get yourself blocked pretty easily that way.'' ]] <small>(note: not a ]!)</small> 01:00, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

*Based on , you're either an incompetent sock, or someone trying to do a joe job. Either way, go play somewhere else. --] (]) 01:55, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the ] first. </div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef -->
::Thank you for posting that difference. It is obvious that Donfarberman is an account created by one of my detractors in order to falsely accuse me of operating a secondary account with maligning intent.] (]) 02:12, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
:::Actually, it's obvious that Donfarberman and Bobinisrael (both now blocked indefinitely) were the same person. -- ] (]) 05:24, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:19, 26 February 2023

Hi. Welcome to Misplaced Pages.

Please note that:

(a) You should not delete other's postings from talk pages.
(b) Articles are based on published reliable sources - not on contributor's opinion's ,,
(c) Only non-controversial edits should be marked as minor.

AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:28, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:46, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Persistent deletion of article talk page discussion

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 76.248.149.47 (talk) 00:00, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Nobody can 'close' a discussion by selectively deleting comments they don't like or disagree with. 76.248.149.47 (talk) 00:00, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Did I inspire you to join Misplaced Pages?

(Retracted) Bobinisrael (talk) 00:23, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

The majority of editors are idiots, hiding behind "rules" they make up to push their narrative. I am glad someone agrees.
It's not the rules themselves that are poorly conceived, rather it's the attitude that a certain demeanour and candour somehow hides an editor's dishonest motives. I initially thought you were an account created in order to caricature me in a negative light, because you're using some of the exact same language I've used. Bobinisrael (talk) 00:37, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

AN/I notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:55, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Talk:Anders Behring Breivik, you may be blocked from editing. You really need to stop removing talk page content. You'll get yourself blocked pretty easily that way. I, Jethrobot (note: not a bot!) 01:00, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
Thank you for posting that difference. It is obvious that Donfarberman is an account created by one of my detractors in order to falsely accuse me of operating a secondary account with maligning intent.Bobinisrael (talk) 02:12, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Actually, it's obvious that Donfarberman and Bobinisrael (both now blocked indefinitely) were the same person. -- Jibal (talk) 05:24, 29 December 2019 (UTC)