| Revision as of 08:54, 5 October 2012 editE4024 (talk | contribs)7,905 edits Unacceptable incivil personal-communal attack to certain users← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:42, 6 March 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,291,830 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Roscelese/Archive 18) (botTag: Manual revert | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 70K | |maxarchivesize = 70K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 18 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 4 | |minthreadsleft = 4 | ||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| |archive = User talk:Roscelese/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Roscelese/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{archive box|] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]}} | {{archive box|] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]}} | ||
| == February 2016 – Discretionary Sanctions/Alert (topic=ab) – abortion == | |||
| == Sandra Fluke Delection == | |||
| {{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' | |||
| == CfA talk == | |||
| '''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| Was your statement "that's plainly false" directed at me, or were you missing an indent and responding to Arzel? ]{{SubSup||]|]}} 16:20, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Arzel. I'll fix it. –] (] ⋅ ]) 16:33, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you. BTW I hope I didn't sound like I was throwing down the gauntlet, thats part of the reason I asked here. ]{{SubSup||]|]}} 17:00, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding ], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| == '''The Olive Branch''': A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1) == | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| Welcome to the first edition of ''The Olive Branch''. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in ] (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are ], but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
| ] | |||
| In this issue: | |||
| * '''Background''': A brief overview of the DR ecosystem. | |||
| * '''Research''': The most recent DR data | |||
| * '''Survey results''': Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey | |||
| * '''Activity analysis''': Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums | |||
| * '''DR Noticeboard comparison''': How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August | |||
| * '''Discussion update''': Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate | |||
| * '''Proposal''': It's time to close the ]. Agree or disagree? | |||
| <big><center>]</center></big> | |||
| == False accusation of rape article == | |||
| --''The Olive Branch'' 19:26, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:False_accusation_of_rape#Percents_in_lead | |||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0345 --> | |||
| == |
== Catholic Church and homosexuality == | ||
| == July 2020 == | |||
| Hi Roscelese. I'm trying to tutor a new user (]) in vandalism but he's struggling and i'm not sure i've explained it properly. Are you any good with this kinda stuff? Thanks and enjoy the rest of your day/evening ''']<font color="purple">]</font> <sup>(])</sup>''' 20:19, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed your changing some of my edits content from ] without explaining why. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> ] (]) 22 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :I really, really like your "challenge" idea! For vandalism, the "Recent changes" section is definitely the place to start but I recommend using filters - WP has a few tools which identify suspicious edits, so edits caught by a particular filter are more likely to be vandalism. –] (] ⋅ ]) 20:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::I suggested hiding logged-in users edits but he's struggling more with identifying vandalism than anything. I'm not sure how to explain it better. Thanks ''']<font color="purple">]</font> <sup>(])</sup>''' 20:48, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::I'm gonna be a budinski. Tell your new editor to not only hide logged in users, but search for the word "school". Chances are he will see lots of vandalism examples. ]{{SubSup||]|]}} 22:36, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Edits to articles on schools are picked up by the "possible libel or vandalism" filter (other good filters: "possible vandalism," "repeating characters," "nonsense characters," and "blanking"). Interestingly, the list appears to have been compiled in such a way that it also picks up fictional schools. Anyway, vandalistic edits are ones that are made with the intention of disrupting rather than improving the encyclopedia. –] (] ⋅ ]) 22:54, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Thank you both for that. He's able to identify vandalism now but i'll have to test him more on this as he may have just lucked out with the last attempt. Thanks again though and you both have a nice day/evening! ''']<font color="purple">]</font> <sup>(])</sup>''' 23:16, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Talkback == | |||
| {{talkback|Mr. Vernon|More about the campaign climate...|ts=07:14, 5 September 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
| ] (]) 07:14, 5 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Cumin == | |||
| No apology necessary. I was playing with something similar, but never hit on a satisfying summary. I added Latin American, because it's one of the main spices used at least in Mexico. Good luck! ] (]) 16:11, 5 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Notice of Dispute resolution discussion == | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "]". Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> ] <sup>''] / ]''</sup> 08:45, 7 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Ray Long DYK? Nomination == | |||
| I think that I formatted my article for this DYK? nomination correctly now. Please look at it whenever you can. Thank you. ] (]) 00:53, 10 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Incomplete DYK nomination == | |||
| ] Hello! Your submission of ''']''' at the ] is not complete; see ]. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{tl|db-g7}}, or ask a ]. Thank you. <!--Template:DYK nomination needs transcluded--> ] (]) 15:31, 10 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == WP:MMA == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| i noticed you edited a Mixed Martial Arts page in August, but you haven't listed yourself as a ] on the ] for Mixed Martial Arts pages. I've decided to try to drum up interest to get ]! | |||
| ] (]) 01:18, 11 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I do not even remember editing such a page and have no knowledge of MMA, sorry. –] (] ⋅ ]) 01:49, 11 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Talkback == | |||
| {{talkback|Talk:Censorship in Islamic societies|Suggestion|ts=23:53, 16 September 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
| <span style="border:1px solid #900;padding:2px;background:#fffff4">] ]</span> 23:53, 16 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Talkback == | |||
| {{talkback|Talk:Censorship in Islamic societies|Suggestion|ts=01:26, 17 September 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
| <span style="border:1px solid #900;padding:2px;background:#fffff4">] ]</span> 01:26, 17 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Talkback == | |||
| {{talkback|Talk:Censorship in Islamic societies|Suggestion|ts=02:24, 17 September 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
| If you don't believe the discussion is worthwhile, I don't have a problem with being ] and restoring the material. <span style="border:1px solid #900;padding:2px;background:#fffff4">] ]</span> 02:24, 17 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for the heads-up, I was aware of being at 3RR and was not going to go past that. I might mention that it would pay to be careful for you too, as there have been 4 reverts in just over 24 hrs (which is sometimes viewed poorly by admins). There is nothing in this article that is worth either of us (or anyone else for that matter) being blocked over. Why don't we wait and see how the discussion on AfD and the talkpage go? That is one of the reasons that I listed the refs on the AfD rather than just inserting material. Later today, if I get the time I was planning on placing proposed material on the talkpage, along with the supporting citations. Regards, <span style="border:1px solid #900;padding:2px;background:#fffff4">] ]</span> 18:18, 17 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Zeng Qinghong == | |||
| The source was a diplomatic cable released by WikiLeaks. The person who wrote that cable was Kenneth Jarrett, the former U.S. consul general in Shanghai. How does that not qualify as a reliable source? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:32, 17 September 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :First of all, it's hearsay, which would be questionable even if it came from a vetted secondary source, but I don't know what the decision of the WP community has been on leaked stuff as sources for BLP. It seems questionable but you could check RSN or BLPN. –] (] ⋅ ]) 15:14, 17 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| In what sense is it hearsay and why is that a problem? This isn't a court of law. I guess you could argue that it's hearsay from the standpoint of the cable was written by a U.S. diplomat based on what someone else said. But if that's your criteria for evidence then I would think virtually all the sources on Misplaced Pages would qualify as hearsay. I would bet that most of the sources on Misplaced Pages are news sources. If you consider what they publish as testimony then I would bet that pretty much all their evidence is based on what other people tell them and would therefore be hearsay. I would think the only thing that doesn't qualify as hearsay would be opeds written by the people newspapers usually talk to. Now, if you're talking about what Andrew Zhang said as being hearsay, again, I'm not sure why that's a problem as this isn't a court of law. But actually there is nothing in what he said that indicates it was hearsay. From my reading of the cable, it just appears that he flatly says that you can bribe Zeng Qinghong for 500,000 yuan. He doesn't say that he heard that from a third party. He may have heard it from a third party. Or he may have first hand experience with it. He works for JP Morgan China which indicates that he is in China doing business. This indicates he has first hand experience with dealing with government officials such as Zeng. Why would using leaked documents be questionable? The only difference I could see is if people didn't believe the leaked documents were authentic. But if the WikiLeaks documents aren't authentic then why did the New York Times and a bunch of other new outlets write stories based on the leaked cables? Why is Bradley Manning being locked up? As I am new to Misplaced Pages I don't know who or what RSN or BLPN is. Who are then and how do I contact them? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 07:55, 18 September 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :RSN is the ], and BLPN is the ]. They will help answer your questions! –] (] ⋅ ]) 15:07, 18 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Talkback == | |||
| {{talkback|Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents|ts=21:24, 17 September 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
| ] (]) 21:24, 17 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :The link doesn't work unless the TB is on some kind of talk page, but I just wanted to give you a heads up. ] (]) 21:25, 17 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == "Citizenship Change" == | |||
| There is no reliable source citing the individual's Slo citizenship. They may cite birth-place, ability to speak language, and the like, but there is no source citing his nationality. In fact, I know he is not Slovenian by his citizenship. Feel free to change this without the explicit RS, but be sure that you will be asserting a wrong info. This is a riskier move than leave this piece of info blank. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:57, 18 September 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :No, the cited source explicitly states that he holds Slovenian citizenship. If you believe something has changed, please produce a more recent reliable source. –] (] ⋅ ]) 02:12, 18 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| I see. You are right, there is one old source. Let me try to see what I can do as I know this is not accurate.--] (]) 02:28, 18 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Mea culpa == | |||
| Sorry for . I should have looked more carefully, and seen the colons. Thanks for correcting the mistake, and explaining in your edit summary. ] (]) 20:01, 18 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :No problem! –] (] ⋅ ]) 20:38, 18 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Talkback == | |||
| {{talkback|Talk:Censorship in Islamic societies|Amended definition of censorship|ts=00:24, 20 September 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
| Revised definition of censorship. <span style="border:1px solid #900;padding:2px;background:#fffff4">] ]</span> 00:24, 20 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == September 2012 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> | |||
| Please be particularly aware, ] states: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts. | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> <span style="border:1px solid #900;padding:2px;background:#fffff4">] ]</span> 02:27, 20 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Hello. There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. | |||
| == DYK for Jordan Anderson == | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |style = notice | |||
| |small = | |||
| |image = {{#switch: {{Currentdaymonth}} | 31 October = ] | ]}} | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that when ] ''']''' ''(pictured)'' was asked to come back and work for his old master, he replied with a ] letter asking for 52 years' back pay as proof of good faith?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Jordan Anderson|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Jordan Anderson|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }} ] (] '''·''' ]) 00:02, 25 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == NCLR see also link == | |||
| The reason I added Athlete Ally to NCLR is because they are an advocacy organization, albeit with a different focus. So you know it was not just random or arbitrary, the addition was based on reciprocity in the fact that the NCLR is listed at . – ] 12:14, 25 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Copyvios fixed == | |||
| That should pass muster now. ] (]) 17:35, 29 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Fine, explain to me exactly what is wrong with it. ] (]) 11:16, 2 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Gun Powder Ma reverted you, I reverted him as he was replacing scanned pdfs of letters, etc, but he put them back again citing BRD which he didn't cite until I reverted him. I took the scanned letters to RSN, but besides the other problems I note that the article links to a number of copyvio YouTube videos. Anyway, GPM wants a discussion on the talk page... ] (]) 06:18, 30 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Since when? == | |||
| See talk. - ]] 04:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Since for some time you've been the only editor arguing for it with everyone else in opposition. –] (] ⋅ ]) 04:24, 4 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::And? I'm sorry, you seem to be under the impression Misplaced Pages is a democracy. More to the point, my points remain unanswered on the talk page, which is fine by you? If they got "fed up" that's their call, but my points aren't salient? Such as ABC clinical research? - ]] 04:34, 4 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::I was so sure you were going to cry "Misplaced Pages isn't a democracy." I don't know why I decided against responding to that in my first comment. Know what else Misplaced Pages isn't? An autocracy. You do not get to impose your view over the disagreement of every single other user in the discussion. We decide things based on consensus here; perhaps you've heard of it. –] (] ⋅ ]) 07:47, 4 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::Also, quit the childishness; you're acting as though you presented Oxford University Press and they responded with a Wordpress blog. The sources presented by the users disagreeing with you are equally valid or (because not out-of-date) more valid, and you've already had this explained to you so the claim about your points standing uncontested is just false. –] (] ⋅ ]) 07:49, 4 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Sometimes they do, but point taken. Presenting the ABC topic, hard to do well with some sources and redundant phrases. Their sources are better -- that's why they come later / closer to the conclusion. Jasen is an excellent comprehensive source; Mastcell conveyed only what ze wanted. I consider Misplaced Pages a meritocracy... when it works. Thank you for replying with candor, for the record this isn't about getting my way. - ]] 01:23, 5 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == A kitten for you! == | |||
| ] | |||
| Thank you for inserting some sanity in the article about ]. | |||
| ] (]) 08:55, 4 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| <br style="clear: both"/> | |||
| ==WikiWomen's Collaborative== | |||
| {| style="{{Divbox/style/orange}}{{border-radius|8px}}" | |||
| |- | |||
| ! colspan="2" style="font-size: 150%;" | WikiWomen Unite! <br /> | |||
| |- | |||
| | <div style="background: #fff;margin-right: 10px;">]</div> | |||
| | style="text-align: left;" | Hi '''{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}ROOTPAGENAME}}'''! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Misplaced Pages are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the '''WikiWomen's Collaborative'''.<br/> | |||
| As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: | |||
| *Liking the and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen | |||
| *Join the conversation on our | |||
| *Reading and writing for our | |||
| We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our ] (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!<Br/> | |||
| <br/>Can't wait to have you involved! ] (]) 02:30, 5 October 2012 (UTC) (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
Latest revision as of 06:42, 6 March 2024
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
February 2016 – Discretionary Sanctions/Alert (topic=ab) – abortion
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Abortion, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.False accusation of rape article
Catholic Church and homosexuality
July 2020
Hello, I'm Sorinam. I noticed your changing some of my edits content from Sexual abuse cases in Brooklyn's Haredi community without explaining why. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sorinam (talk) 22 July 2020 (UTC)