Revision as of 23:37, 12 October 2012 editMissvain (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators235,628 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:25, 26 March 2023 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,668,586 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (4x)Tag: Fixed lint errors | ||
(168 intermediate revisions by 62 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Retired}} | |||
{{{icon|]}}} Welcome to Misplaced Pages. At least one of ]{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{1|}}}|, such as the edit you made to ],}} did not appear to be constructive and has been ] or removed. Please use ] for any test edits you would like to make. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the ] which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. {{{2|Thank you.}}}<!-- Template:uw-disruptive1 --><noinclude> | |||
== Notification of Discretionary Sanction == | |||
Per this discussion at . You are formally topic banned from GMOs broadly construed. If you wish to appeal this sanction you can use AE, AN or ARCA. Instructions to be found on AE. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 11:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
== ]: Voting now open! == | |||
==IDM article== | |||
But I don't see any tags that say citation needed. Are you talking about parts of the article that no one tagged that need references? That's the only thing that I can think about that you're talking about. Let me know. ] (]) 20:21, 13 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
:I ''re'' reviewed your message. I think that that's what you're talking about, but please confirm. Thanks. ] (]) 20:31, 13 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
::You know what, that's an interesting thought, and that really makes sense. Yeah, because those citation tags really make an article look ugly and messy. Wow! I learned something new! ] (]) 20:03, 14 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
:::Well, to be perfectly honest, I see them both as ugly. But the one I see as worse(r) is the one we both definitely don't like. I mean I guess it all boils down to personal taste really, you know because they're both different styles of approaching Misplaced Pages. You probably see it the same way, I'm sure. ] (]) 19:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
::::But just as a side note, another reason I find the top banners as ugly is because when I'm flipping through articles, or when I add an article to my watchlist, its because its an article that I'm interested in. And to find out that the article has issues, gives me this, "oh, no!" feeling. So, it's not like if I find it ugly because I think its not necessary. ] (]) 19:47, 15 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
::::You're preaching to the choir; I'm a creative type. I'm not logical at all. That's what my main problem is here on Misplaced Pages, that I'm not tech savvy. ] (]) 20:37, 15 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Semitransgenic. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
== User subpage templates == | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
You might know about this since you've been here awhile. Do you know where I could find a list of templates related to user subpages? I've asked more or less random people here on Misplaced Pages, but I've only gotten an indifferent response. You know how it is here on Misplaced Pages, ]. Well anyway, thanks. Hope to hear from you. ] (]) 20:35, 15 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
You know, like banners (kind of like what we were talking about) at the top of the user subpage telling you what kind of page it is. Like for example whether its an essay, a sandbox; you know templates that I'm assuming you sometimes have to put at the top of those pages designating what that page is about. I pretty much just want to know if there is a list (somevere here on vikipedia) relating specifically to user subpage templates. All I could find were templates for user pages but not user subpages. If you still don't understand please let me know. Thanks. ] (]) 21:11, 15 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/28&oldid=750606345 --> | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:KraftwerkCW.jpeg== | |||
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:38, 14 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
So, do you have to put those templates on top of those user subpages? I'm assuming from what you said that it's not a requirement. Let me know. ] (]) 21:23, 15 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Electronic musical instrument== | |||
But there are situations when you have to use them (as I understand); like for example, like I said, essays, and sandboxes. I want to create a page where I can store templates that I've created (when I say that I've created, take that with a grain of salt, ha ha..), and take them when I need them. I just don't want to do something, and get fired for doing it (..from the collective, as it were). Ha ha ha. ] (]) 21:52, 15 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
] contains some incomplete citations from June 2008. Would you happen to remember them or be able to complete them? ] (]) 22:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
==Development of various electronic music articles == | |||
Here's the page. I just created it right now. Check it out: ]. ] (]) 22:36, 15 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
Hi I noticed your fine work at ] and was curious if you would like to take a stab at ], ], ], ], ] etc. I've found some better sources for these genre articles (on talk pages) and have started an update to many of them but I am not much of a music expert or even good with WP policy. I put the B level ] article together for your review. I am interested in your thoughts on collaborating. Thank you for the consideration. ] (]) 15:55, 4 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
==Non-Free rationale for File:L430xH465 jpg Schaeffer big-2eb70.jpg== | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
] | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ] but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages is acceptable. Please go to ] and edit it to include a ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on ]. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no Non-Free rationale-notice --> ] (]) 09:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> - <span style="padding:1px 2px;background:#ADE6E1;border:1px solid"><span style="color:black;">'''The'''</span></span><span style="padding:1px 5px;background:black;">]</span> 19:28, 9 July 2017 (UTC) | |||
=="Dearth"== | |||
"Dearth": A scarcity or lack of something. That seems to be the opposite of what you were trying to say. <b>] ] </b> 23:16, 9 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Discussion at ]== | |||
== Spaced out (Space age .. / isn't actually NEW - at least not to someone.. whom (obviously) "knows" == | |||
]You are invited to join the discussion at ] as a participant of ]. - <span style="padding:1px 2px;background:#ADE6E1;border:1px solid"><span style="color:black;">'''The'''</span></span><span style="padding:1px 5px;background:black;">]</span> 13:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC) | |||
==File permission problem with File:Tekknozid3.jpg== | |||
] | |||
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. | |||
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either | |||
ie: from the SPACEAGE discussion page itself: | |||
* make a note permitting reuse under the ] or another acceptable free license (see ]) '''at the site of the original publication'''; or | |||
Taking it from the top: | |||
* Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to '''permissions-en@wikimedia.org''', stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter ]. If you take this step, add {{tl|OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion. | |||
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to '''permissions-en@wikimedia.org'''. | |||
Space music, also spelled spacemusic, is an umbrella term used to describe music that evokes a feeling of contemplative spaciousness. Space music can be found within a wide range of genres. It is particularly associated with ambient, new age, and electronic music. Some music from the western classical, world, Celtic, traditional, experimental and other idioms also falls within the definition of space music. | |||
If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tl|non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at ], and add a ] justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. | |||
the definition provided here stems from one internet source, which is a commercial radio show - in fact it's possible that there may be a WP:UNDUE issue with the amount of emphasis placed upon this one source - however I note that none of the citations explicitly supports either point 1)Space music can be found within a wide range of genres or point 2)Some music from the western classical, world, Celtic, traditional, experimental and other idioms also falls within the definition of space music. Are there sources that demonstrably show both of these statements to be true? If not this is one of the first examples of synthesis that needs to be highlighted. Semitransgenic (talk) 21:59, 7 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in . '''Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described in ]. You may wish to read Misplaced Pages's ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no permission-notice --> | |||
<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">ATTENTION</span>: This is an automated, ]-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details. Thanks, ] (]) 01:02, 16 July 2018 (UTC) | |||
Try doing a google search.. (all together) on the 'following' (video, audio & / or music) | |||
==Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Reason4 screenshot.jpg== | |||
KEYWORD TAGS: | |||
] | |||
Thank you for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by ]. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from ] is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an ]; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. | |||
Ethereal Surreal Gothic Analogue Floating Surround Sound Echoes | |||
And look.! | |||
On youtube-- there IS at least ONE video (accoustically) showing.? OMG- just that effect. | |||
And in OLD STYLE "analogue" multi_facetted "surround_sound" too.! | |||
oo7 says - Don't just let Ur Dreams(ES)cape - ... | |||
p.s.. | |||
U may (also) be delighted in reading the "more-info" section there (& it's related comments). | |||
] (]) 04:24, 19 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
==] nomination of ]== | |||
]<!-- use ] for YELLOW flag --> | |||
{{Quote box | |||
| quote = You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the ].''''' | |||
| source = Thank you. | |||
| width = 20% | |||
| align = right | |||
}} | |||
A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under the ], because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see ] for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on ] subjects and should provide references to ] that ] their content. | |||
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: '''Click here to contest this speedy deletion''' which appears inside of the speedy deletion (<code><nowiki>{{db-...}}</nowiki></code>) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit ''']''' to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Empty-warn --> ] (]) 18:24, 7 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
==] of ]== | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because, under Misplaced Pages policy, all newly created ''']''' must have at least one reference to a ] that directly supports material in the article. | |||
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see ], or ask at the ]. Once you have provided at least one ], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Adam Werritty|request that it be undeleted|]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> ''']'''<sup>]</sup> 18:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Werritty == | |||
Check it yourself. 80%, not 890%. More than "little attention". | |||
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2047232/Liam-Fox-Adam-Werritty-Dubai-Harvey-Boulter-told-deny-meeting.html?ito=feeds-newsxml | |||
Cheers, | |||
S <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 12:48, 10 October 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Discuss == | |||
You say "discuss on article talk do not revert", yet didn't do so yourself. I'm just about happy now, with the words "received a little attention at the end of the meeting" (I'd be happier with "received attention at the end of the meeting"). But I don't see any gain to me from getting your back up even more, so shall we call a truce now? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 14:15, 10 October 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
PS: newest mods meet with my approval and reflect his statement, 10 mins ago, in the house. It's a pleasure to wiki with you. S <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:05, 10 October 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Advisor == | |||
re: widely known as an "adviser | |||
The may have been mistaken by others as an advisor, but his is not an advisor unless he is on govt payroll. Replace my comments. In future, "discuss on article talk do not revert". Cheers. S. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 08:14, 12 October 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
==]== | |||
{{User Good Article|Synthpop}}{{clear}} | |||
Nice one. ''']''' ''']''' 21:12, 3 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Trance == | |||
Please move back Trance (music) to Trance music. It appears to me that the majority of other pop genres use this format. Note that ] explicitly says, "If there are several possible choices for disambiguating with a class or context, use the same disambiguating phrase already commonly used for other topics within the same class and context, if any. " Thus, since we can choose between the two names, we need to choose the one consistent with other topics of the same type. Now, I'm willing to engage in a discussion about the issue, but page moves on highly read pages should not be done without consensus of other editors. The correct thing for you to do is to move the article title back, then start a Requested Move discussion and see what the consensus of other editors is. ] (]) 13:40, 27 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Proposed deletion of ] == | |||
I have removed the prod tag you placed on ], as per policy an article that has been discussed at ] – as this one has been twice (links are on the talk page) – is permanently ineligible for deletion via prod. Compliance with policy is the only reason I did this; I have no comment on the merits of deletion. If you still wish to pursue deletion, feel free to open another AfD. I highly recommend going over ] as well as the arguments made in the previous AfDs before doing so. —<span style="color:#808080">]</span><sup><span style="color:#008080">]</span></sup> 15:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Techno == | |||
What was inaccurate about my techno description? I wrote that techno has a 4/4 rhythm (which it has, and is sourced), that it is generally instrumental and percussive (also true and supported by sources in the text), and that it often abandons the structures of Western harmony, supported by a source in the main text. What was inaccurate about it? --] (]) 10:40, 16 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
:Techno, though, is by nature highly repetitive. Anyway, would "Techno music usually follows a 4/4 rhythm, and is often instrumental and repetitive in nature. Synthesizers and drum machines are commonly used in techno music, and, placing more of an emphasis on rhythm than melody, techno often abandons many of the harmonic structures of traditional Western music" or something similar work? I can take out the "repetitive", but it is sourced in the text, and, additionally, it is a matter of fact that techno music is really very repetitive, far more than lot of electronic music (in many cases, the track repeats a short riff over and over and over again right until the end, maybe with a few variations throughout the piece).--] (]) 15:02, 16 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Brostep== | |||
please stop putting brostep back. It is not backed up by the citations given and is misleading. I am not the only person on the discussion page who thinks this.] (]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added 23:54, 28 December 2011 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
It says clearly in the article that 12th planet is the godfather of US style dubstep which we are calling brostep. Therefore he is the godfather of brostep. Bassnectar is called brostep and therefore can be considred a pioneer] (]) 07:48, 31 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
I read the first citation which in the brostep section which does mention brostep, but does not explicitly state or imply that skrillex is brostep so by your logic that should be deleted too] (]) 07:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
12th planet has that aggressive style with the distorted metal sounding bass] (]) 07:59, 31 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Techno intro == | |||
Well done for the brilliant intro. Informative, concise, and very accurate - bravo. | |||
Thank you for taking the time to write it. | |||
Best wishes, | |||
--] (]) 17:44, 12 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
== "False BLP claims" == | |||
When you head a talk page section with the phrase ''False BLP claims'' it is probably a good idea firstly to identify the BLP claims that you are discussing and secondly to explain with some care why you believe them to be false (as opposed to, say, mistaken or disputed). Otherwise it might seem that you were indulging in mud-slinging. ] (]) 20:21, 15 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
{{Talkback|User_talk:208.81.184.4|Template:New Religious Movements, Cults, and Sects| ts = 15:59, 6 March 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
== Techno drama == | |||
FYI: ] —] (]) 03:34, 16 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 23:24, 17 March 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:Moving the template while the TfD is ongoing broke the link to the TfD discussion. I've attempted to restore with an anchor. Hopefully there won't be any underlying technical issues due to the intervening name change. In general, it's probably best not to rename something that may be subject to deletion while it's still being discussed.--] (]) 09:25, 29 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
::OK, thanks for the note, that discussion looks done to me, with no consensus to delete being the outcome. I'm also not sure why this deletion discussion should supersede other matters: such as the page getting locked, and the fact that editors were discussing template renaming at the same time as someone proposed the deletion. Also, the deletion proposal now relates to the preceding template configuration, why not leave it listed as such, and copy the latest configuration to a new template called NRMs? ] <sub><small>]</small></sub> 10:41, 29 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::No problem. I agree that it shouldn't be deleted. I just thought it better to keep the discussion together because the existing TfD template was modified to that effect. My main concern is that there may be underlying technical issues with TfD templates listing a deletion discussion for something that no longer exists. | |||
:::I had actually thought the template had been locked prior to the TfD.--] (]) 11:13, 29 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Merging articles == | |||
I think you need to add the templates to one or other of the talk pages - but not both - to make sure the discussion takes place on one page, not two. There is guidance at ]. ] (]) 09:37, 27 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Osho == | |||
{{Talkback|Talk:Osho|definitely shouldn't be a redirect|ts = 14:12, 19 April 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for April 20== | |||
Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:26, 20 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Wendy Carlos == | |||
<s>The paragraphs you deleted were sourced, relevant, and the result of consensus. If you have an issue with them, then please bring it up in talk rather than just deleting them. —] ] 15:26, 15 May 2012 (UTC)</s> | |||
Ignore me, I'm an idiot. I should never go on Misplaced Pages before I've had coffee. I rolled back my changes. I'm very sorry for the mixup.—] ] 15:28, 15 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Dubstep and ketamine == | |||
Just curious, what was your gripe with ? It seems like this article could be used as a source even if the paragraph was written in a slightly misleading way (the ketamine connection didn't come along til a lot later). <font face="trebuchet MS">- ]]</font> 11:50, 29 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
== FYI == | |||
] <font face="trebuchet MS">- ]]</font> 14:33, 1 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
== June 2012 == | |||
] Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of ] did not appear to be constructive and has been ] or removed. Please use ] for any test edits you would like to make, and read the ] to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --> ] (]) 19:04, 7 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
:lol, you can't cite someone for edit warring when you're the one doing it and I'm the one repairing the damage, especially when I asked you to discuss it THREE times. I'm not the only person removing the link, you're the only person who keeps putting it back despite being given an explanation why it isn't acceptable. Keep right on truckin' with those accusations though. '''EDIT''' To clarify, removing the link in general, not this particular time. ] (]) 19:28, 7 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Suggestion for Prometheus == | |||
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with ]. If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-disputed fair use rationale-notice --> | |||
I saw you've been editing the opening line of the Prometheus article, and I thought I'd suggest a change: | |||
Also: | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">ATTENTION</span>: This is an automated, ]-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details. Thanks, ] (]) 01:03, 16 July 2018 (UTC) | |||
Standing by a river, a ] alien consumes a dark liquid as his ] departs the planet. | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The file ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
Just a suggestion to consider. ] (]) 10:35, 11 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
== Re: Suggestion for Prometheus == | |||
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> | |||
{{Talkback|Coastside|Suggestion for Prometheus|ts = 10:49, 11 June 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:01, 1 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
==WikiWomen's Collaborative== | |||
{| style="{{Divbox/style/orange}}{{border-radius|8px}}" | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="2" style="font-size: 150%;" | WikiWomen Unite! <br /> | |||
|- | |||
| <div style="background: #fff;margin-right: 10px;">]</div> | |||
| style="text-align: left;" | Hi '''{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}ROOTPAGENAME}}'''! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Misplaced Pages are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the '''WikiWomen's Collaborative'''.<br/> | |||
As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: | |||
*Liking the and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen | |||
*Join the conversation on our | |||
*Reading and writing for our | |||
Feel free to drop by our ] (under construction) to see how else you can participate!<Br/> | |||
<br/>Can't wait to have you involved! ] (]) 23:37, 12 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
|} |
Latest revision as of 14:25, 26 March 2023
Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.Notification of Discretionary Sanction
Per this discussion at AE. You are formally topic banned from GMOs broadly construed. If you wish to appeal this sanction you can use AE, AN or ARCA. Instructions to be found on AE. Spartaz 11:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Semitransgenic. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:KraftwerkCW.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:KraftwerkCW.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Electronic musical instrument
Electronic musical instrument contains some incomplete citations from June 2008. Would you happen to remember them or be able to complete them? Hyacinth (talk) 22:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Development of various electronic music articles
Hi I noticed your fine work at Techno and was curious if you would like to take a stab at Breakbeat, Florida breaks, Miami bass, New Beat, Orlando's Summer of Love etc. I've found some better sources for these genre articles (on talk pages) and have started an update to many of them but I am not much of a music expert or even good with WP policy. I put the B level Beacham Theatre article together for your review. I am interested in your thoughts on collaborating. Thank you for the consideration. Johnvr4 (talk) 15:55, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of List of progressive house artists for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of progressive house artists is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of progressive house artists until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - TheMagnificentist 19:28, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Electronic music#Sub-project EDM
You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Electronic music#Sub-project EDM as a participant of WP:WikiProject Electronic music. - TheMagnificentist 13:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Tekknozid3.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tekknozid3.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Misplaced Pages:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Misplaced Pages's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Reason4 screenshot.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Reason4 screenshot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Misplaced Pages:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Also:
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of File:Schaeffer 260x257.jpg
The file File:Schaeffer 260x257.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 December 2019 (UTC)