Revision as of 14:51, 13 August 2004 editFormeruser-81 (talk | contribs)22,309 edits subheadings and beyond psychoanalysis link← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:05, 24 December 2024 edit undoHemmers (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users4,624 edits Undid revision 1264165557 by Iggy pop goes the weasel (talk) per WP:BIDI article not included in templateTag: Undo | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|American political activist (1922–2019)}} | |||
] | |||
{{pp-pc1}} | |||
{{TotallyDisputed}} | |||
{{pp-pc|small=yes}} | |||
---- | |||
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2021}} | |||
'''Lyndon Hermyle LaRouche, Jr.''' (born ], ]), ] political activist, leads political organizations in the United States and other countries. Although he has no formal qualifications, he describes himself as an economist and has written extensively on economic as well as political subjects. He is a ] for the position of ] having run eight times, but has never gained significant electoral support. | |||
{{Infobox person | |||
| name = Lyndon LaRouche | |||
| image = LaRouche 1988 (filter).jpg | |||
| caption = LaRouche, circa 1988 | |||
| birth_name = Lyndon Hermyle LaRouche Jr. | |||
| birth_date = {{birth date|1922|9|8}} | |||
| birth_place = ], U.S. | |||
| death_date = {{death date and age|2019|2|12|1922|9|8}} | |||
| death_place = <!-- New York Times and Los Angeles Times obituaries did not specify a location. --> | |||
| education = ] (no degree) | |||
| organization = ] | |||
| other_names = Lyn Marcus | |||
| party = {{ubl|] (after 1979)|] (1973–1979)|] (1949–1964)}} | |||
| movement = ] | |||
| spouse = {{ubl | {{marriage|Janice Neuberger|1954|1963|end=div}} | {{marriage|]|1977}}}} | |||
| signature = | |||
{{Infobox officeholder|embed=yes | |||
| office = Leader of the ] | |||
| term_start = 1973 | |||
| term_end = 1979 | |||
| predecessor = ''Party established'' | |||
| successor = ''Party dissolved'' | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
'''Lyndon Hermyle LaRouche Jr.''' (September 8, 1922 – February 12, 2019) was an American political activist who founded the ] and its main organization, the ] (NCLC).<ref name="NYTDeath">{{cite web |last1=Severo |first1=Richard |title=Lyndon LaRouche, Cult Figure Who Ran for President 8 Times, Dies at 96 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/13/obituaries/lyndon-larouche-dead.html |website=The New York Times |date=February 13, 2019 |access-date=February 13, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190214141656/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/13/obituaries/lyndon-larouche-dead.html |archive-date=February 14, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.tulsaworld.com/archive/cult-leaders-use-mind-control/article_b5c1be46-5e0e-5813-b7f9-ac8b9dc17c62.html|title=Cult Leaders Use Mind Control|website=Tulsa World|date=March 14, 1993 |language=en|access-date=October 4, 2019|archive-date=December 7, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191207035606/https://www.tulsaworld.com/archive/cult-leaders-use-mind-control/article_b5c1be46-5e0e-5813-b7f9-ac8b9dc17c62.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sTu47pGfD84C&pg=PA377 |pages=377–380 |editor=Kathlyn Gay |title=American Dissidents: An Encyclopedia of Activists, Subversives, and Prisoners of Conscience |publisher=ABC-CLIO |year=2011 |isbn=978-1598847659 |access-date=June 17, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017120129/https://books.google.com/books?id=sTu47pGfD84C&pg=PA377 |archive-date=October 17, 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=":7">{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X7ad8GzRf0QC&pg=PA108 |page=108 |title=Encyclopedia of Right-Wing Extremism In Modern American History |last=Atkins |first=Steven E. |publisher=ABC-CLIO |year=2011 |isbn=978-1598843507 |access-date=June 17, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017120129/https://books.google.com/books?id=X7ad8GzRf0QC&pg=PA108 |archive-date=October 17, 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref> He was a prominent ] and ].<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2">{{Cite web |last=Walker |first=Jesse |title=Lyndon LaRouche: The Conspiracist Who Earned a Following |url=https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2019/12/29/lyndon-larouche-obituary-conspiracist-with-a-well-connected-following-086493 |access-date=2022-10-30 |website=] |date=December 29, 2019 }}</ref> He began in ] politics in the 1940s and later supported the ]; however, in the 1970s, he moved to the ].<ref name=":7" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> His movement is sometimes described as, or likened to, a ].<ref name=":4">{{Cite news |last=Smith |first=Timothy R. |date=2019-02-13 |title=Lyndon LaRouche Jr., conspiracy theorist and presidential candidate, dies at 96 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/lyndon-larouche-jr-conspiracy-theorist-and-presidential-candidate-dies-at-96/2019/02/13/22170d42-2f21-11e9-813a-0ab2f17e305b_story.html |access-date=2022-10-30 |newspaper=] |quote=He built a political organization often likened to a cult and ran for president eight times, once while in prison for mail fraud.}}</ref><ref name=":3" />{{Sfn|Atkins|2011|p=109}} Convicted of fraud, he served five years in prison from 1989 to 1994.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> | |||
LaRouche is probably the best-known exponent of ] in the United States. He is frequently described as an extremist or a ] leader, and is frequently accused of being a ] and ]. He denies these charges, and his followers regard him as a major political figure, indeed a world leader. In ] LaRouche was sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment for conspiracy, mail fraud and tax code violations. | |||
== Early life== | |||
LaRouche was born in ], where his father, an immigrant from ], was a shoe salesman. He was raised as a ] and enrolled at ] in ], but dropped out in ]. As a Quaker, he was at first a ] during ], but in ] he joined the ], serving in medical units in ]. During this period he read works by ] and was converted to ]. After leaving the Army in ], LaRouche attempted to resume his university education, but again dropped out of Northeastern but settled in Boston where, in ], he joined the ] (SWP), a small ] party. In the SWP he used the pseudonym '''Lyn Marcus'''. In ] he moved to ] and married a fellow SWP member, Janice Neuberger. | |||
Born in ], LaRouche was drawn to ] and ] movements in his twenties during ]. In the 1950s, while a ], he was also a ] in New York City.<ref name=":8">{{Cite book |last=Berlet |first=Chip |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/671568128 |title=Culture wars : an encyclopedia of issues, viewpoints, and voices |date=2010 |publisher=M.E. Sharpe |others=Roger Chapman |isbn=978-1849727136 |location=Armonk, N.Y. |pages=315 |oclc=671568128}}</ref> By the 1960s, he became engaged in increasingly smaller and more radical splinter groups. During the 1970s, he created the foundation of the LaRouche movement and became more engaged in conspiratorial beliefs and violent and illegal activities. Instead of the radical left, he embraced ] politics and ].<ref name=":8" />{{Sfn|Atkins|2011|pp=108–109}} At various times, he alleged that he had been targeted for assassination by ], Zionist mobsters, his own associates (who he said had been drugged and brainwashed by ] and British spies), in addition to others.<ref name="Blum, October 7, 1979" /><ref name=":5" /> | |||
As a member of the SWP, LaRouche obtained work at a ] factory in ]. In ] he suffered a ] and was fired from his job for absenteeism. Twenty years later, LaRouche said of his breakdown that he went through a serious period of introspection: | |||
:stripping away all the layers of my persona, like an onion. If you take this far enough, you get to the point where you become terrified that there's nothing inside all the peelings-that you're a nobody. This put me in a suicidal state. It was only my tremendous ego-strength, which my parents had provided me, that saved me from suicide. | |||
It is estimated that the LaRouche movement never exceeded a few thousand members, but it had an outsize political influence,<ref name=":4" /> raising more than $200 million by one estimate,<ref name=":1" /> and running candidates in more than 4,000 elections in the 1980s.<ref name=":8" /> It was noted for disguising its candidates as conservative Democrats and harassing opponents.<ref name=":8" /><ref name=":4" /> It reached its height in electoral success when Larouchite candidates won the Democratic primaries for the ] and related state offices; this alarmed Democratic Party officials, whose national spokesman called the Larouchites "kook fringe".<ref name=":6" /> The defeated mainstream Democratic candidates ran in the general election as members of the ]; the Larouchite Democrats all finished a distant third. Later in the 1980s, as part of the ], criminal investigations led to convictions of several LaRouche movement members, including LaRouche himself. He was sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment but served only five. | |||
Following his recovery, LaRouche obtained work as a management consultant including, paradoxically for a Marxist, advising companies on how to use computers to maximise efficiency and speed-up production to the detriment of workers. | |||
LaRouche was a perennial candidate for ]. He ran in every election from 1976 to 2004 as a candidate of third parties established by members of his movement, peaking at around 78,000 votes in the ].<ref name=":4" /><ref>{{Cite news |last=Mintz |first=John |date=January 13, 1985 |title=Group Makes Political Inroads |newspaper=] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/cult/larouche/larou5.htm |ref=none}}</ref> He also tried to gain the Democratic presidential nomination. In the ], he received 5% of the total nationwide vote. In 2000, he received enough primary votes to qualify for delegates in some states, but the ] refused to seat his delegates and barred LaRouche from attending the ].<ref name=":9" /><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Norrander |first=Barbara |date=2006 |title=The Attrition Game: Initial Resources, Initial Contests and the Exit of Candidates during the US Presidential Primary Season |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4092259 |journal=British Journal of Political Science |volume=36 |issue=3 |pages=487–507 |doi=10.1017/S0007123406000251 |jstor=4092259 |issn=0007-1234}}</ref> | |||
LaRouche remained in the SWP until ], making him a veteran member in a group which always had a high turnover of members. He now maintains that he was soon disillusioned with Marxism and stayed in the SWP only as an informant for the ]. His ex-wife and other SWP members from that time dispute this, saying that he was a loyal and zealous party member, although this is not definitive evidence that he was not an FBI informer. During these years LaRouche developed his interests in economics, ], ], business management and other subjects. He is undoubtedly well-read in these and other subjects. Janice left him in ] (they had one son, Daniel, born in ]) and, in the late ], she became a leader of the New York City branch of the ]. In the ]s she was a founder of ]. It is unknown if LaRouche's strident criticisms of feminism is a product of the breakdown of his first marriage. | |||
==Early life== | |||
In ] LaRouche, while still in the SWP (he was to be expelled the next year), became a supporter of the ''Revolutionary Tendency'' which had been expelled from the party and was under the influence of the ] dissident Trotskyist leader ], leader of the British ] (ancestor of the later ]). Those familiar with the left in this period believe that LaRouche was heavily influenced by Healy's conspiratorial world-view and his advocacy of violence and intimidation, something foreign to the intellectual tradition of mainstream Trotskyism. For six months he worked closely with American Healyite leader ] who later wrote: | |||
LaRouche was born in Rochester, New Hampshire, the oldest of three children of Jessie Lenore ({{nee}} Weir) and Lyndon H. LaRouche Sr.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://ead.lib.virginia.edu/vivaxtf/view?docId=tbl/viletbl00152.xml|title=A Guide to the Lyndon LaRouche Collection, 1979–1986 Lyndon LaRouche Collection SC 0075|website=ead.lib.virginia.edu|accessdate=May 28, 2022|archive-date=February 24, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210224035620/https://ead.lib.virginia.edu/vivaxtf/view?docId=tbl%2Fviletbl00152.xml|url-status=live}}</ref> His paternal grandfather's family emigrated to the United States from ], Quebec, whereas his maternal grandfather was born in ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.wargs.com/political/larouche.html|title=Ancestry of Lyndon LaRouche|access-date=December 27, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081219230746/http://wargs.com/political/larouche.html|archive-date=December 19, 2008|url-status=live}}</ref> His father worked for the ] in Rochester before the family moved to ].<ref>{{harvnb|Montgomery|1974}} and {{harvnb|King|1989|pp=17–18, 20, 25–26}}.</ref> | |||
His parents became ] after his father converted from ]. They forbade him from fighting with other children, even in self-defense, which he said led to "years of hell" from bullies at school. As a result, he spent much of his time alone, taking long walks through the woods and identifying in his mind with great philosophers. He wrote that, between the ages of 12 and 14, he read philosophy extensively, embracing the ideas of ] and rejecting those of ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].<ref>For the parents' religions and other details, see {{harvnb|Witt|2004}}, p. 3, and {{harvnb|King|1989|p=4}}.</ref><ref>For "years of hell" and bullying, see {{harvnb|LaRouche|1979|pp=38–39}}.</ref><ref>For spending time alone and identifying with philosophers, see {{harvnb|LaRouche|1979|pp=55, 58}}.</ref><ref>For the particular philosophers he read, see {{harvnb|LaRouche|1987|p=17}}.</ref> He graduated from ] in 1940. In the same year, the Lynn Quakers expelled his father from the group, for reportedly accusing other Quakers of misusing funds, while writing under the pen name Hezekiah Micajah Jones. LaRouche and his mother resigned in sympathy for his father.<ref>For his graduation, see {{harvnb|Tong|1994}}.</ref><ref>For his father's expulsion, see {{harvnb|King|1989|pp=5–6}}.</ref><ref>For an entry mentioning LaRouche in Quaker records, see Stattler, Richard. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170923144835/https://neym.org/archives/guide |date=September 23, 2017 }}, Rhode Island Historical Society, 1997, p. 92.</ref> | |||
:LaRouche had a gargantuan ego. Convinced he was a genius, he combined his strong conviction in his own abilities with an arrogance expressed in the cadences of upper-class New England. He assumed that the comment in the ] that "a small section of the ruling class cuts itself adrift, and joins the revolutionary class..." was written specifically for him. And he believed that the working class was lucky to obtain his services. | |||
===University studies, Marxism, marriage=== | |||
:LaRouche possessed a marvelous ability to place any world happening in a larger context, which seemed to give the event additional meaning, but his thinking was schematic, lacking factual detail and depth. It was contradictory. His explanations were a bit too pat, and his mind worked so quickly that I always suspected his bravado covered over superficiality. He had an answer for everything. Sessions with him reminded me of a parlor game: present a problem, no matter how petty, and without so much as blinking his eye, LaRouche would dream up the solution. | |||
LaRouche attended ] in ] and left in 1942. He later wrote that his teachers "lacked the competence to teach me on conditions I was willing to tolerate".<ref name=Witt2004p3>{{harvnb|Witt|2004}}, p. 3</ref> As a Quaker, he was a ] during ] and joined a ] camp in lieu of military service.<ref>{{harvnb|King|1989|p=6}}</ref> In 1944, he decided to enlist in the ] and served with the ] in ] and ] during the ]. At the end of the war, LaRouche was working as a clerk in the ], and later described his decision to enlist as of the most important decision of his life.<ref>{{harvnb|LaRouche|1987|pp=37–38}}</ref> In his 1988 autobiography, LaRouche claimed that being asked to express his views on the death of President ] to a group of fellow ]s led him to define his "principal lifelong political commitment, that the United States should take postwar world leadership in establishing a world order dedicated to promoting the economic development of what we call today "]".<ref>{{harvnb|LaRouche|1987|pp=36–37}}</ref> | |||
In ], LaRouche left Wohlforth's group and joined the ], another Trotskyist group, which had also split with Wohlforth. He left the Spartacist League after a few months and then wrote a letter to the SWP declaring that all factions and sections of the Trotskyist ] were dead, and announcing that he and his new common-law wife, Carol Schnitzer, were going to build the Fifth International. | |||
LaRouche wrote that he discussed ] in the CO camp, and while traveling home on the SS ''General Bradley'' in 1946, he met Don Merrill, a fellow soldier, also from Lynn, who converted him to ]. Back in the U.S., he resumed his education at Northeastern University but dropped out.<ref name=":8" /> He returned to Lynn in 1948 and the next year joined the ] (SWP) to recruit at the GE River Works there, adopting the name "Lyn Marcus" for his political work.<ref>For how he adopted Marxism and Trotskyism, for his studies, and joining the SWP, see {{harvnb|LaRouche|1987}}, pp. 62–64. For his use of Lyn Marcus, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190412124434/https://www.heritage.org/report/the-us-domestic-issues-labor-party |date=April 12, 2019 }}.</ref><ref name=":8" /> He arrived in New York City in 1953, where he worked as a ].<ref>For his work as a management consultant, see {{harvnb|LaRouche|1979}}, p. 4.</ref> In 1954 he married Janice Neuberger, a member of the SWP. Their son, Daniel, was born in 1956.<ref>{{harvnb|King|1989}}, pp. 8–9.</ref> | |||
After his break with Trotskyism LaRouche remained active in the left. In ], the LaRouches joined the ] ''Committee for Independent Political Action'' and formed a branch in New York's ]. He began giving classes for the New York ] on "]" and attacted around him a group of graduate students from ] many of whom were involved with the ] ] (PL) group which was itself very prominent in the ] (SDS). | |||
==Career== | |||
LaRouche's movement was heavily involved in the ] occupation of Columbia University and student strike and he was able to win control of Columbia's SDS and PL branches by putting forward a political program linking student struggles with those of Blacks in ] (located just off campus). His growing following allowed him to create a third tendency within the SDS competing with the two dominant tendencies, the "Action Faction" led by ] (which soon became the ]) and the "Praxis Axis" which saw students as the vanguard of the revolution. | |||
===1960s=== | |||
====Teaching and the National Caucus of Labor Committees==== | |||
{{Further|National Caucus of Labor Committees}} | |||
{{Quote box|width=25%|align=right|salign=right | |||
| quote=Twenty to thirty students would ... sit on the floor surrounding LaRouche, who now sported a very shaggy beard ... LaRouche gave them esoteric assignments, such as searching through the writings of ] to discover ]'s anarchistic origins, or studying ]'s ''The Accumulation of Capital.'' | |||
| source= —]<ref name=Wohlforth/>}} | |||
By 1961, the LaRouches were living on ] in ], and LaRouche's activities were mostly focused on his career and not on the SWP. He and his wife separated in 1963, and he moved into a ] apartment with another SWP member, Carol Schnitzer, also known as Larrabee.<ref>{{harvnb|King|1989}}, p. 9.</ref> In 1964 he began an association with an SWP faction called the ], a faction later expelled from the SWP, and came under the influence of British Trotskyist leader ].<ref>{{harvnb|LaRouche|1970}}.</ref> | |||
LaRouche organised his faction as the "SDS Labor Committee" because LaRouche criticized SDS, and the ] in general, for being too oriented toward the ], and not enough toward labor. (This was a common complaint in the New Left, which was largely composed of students and of drop-outs like LaRouche.) He held meetings in the Columbia area. Wohlforth attended one and writes: | |||
For six months, LaRouche worked with American Healyite leader ], who later wrote that LaRouche had a "gargantuan ego" and "a marvelous ability to place any world happening in a larger context, which seemed to give the event additional meaning, but his thinking was schematic, lacking factual detail and depth." Leaving Wohlforth's group, LaRouche briefly joined the rival ] before announcing his intention to build a new ].<ref name=Wohlforth>{{harvnb|Wohlforth}}, undated.</ref> | |||
:Twenty to 30 students would gather in a large apartment and sit on the floor surrounding LaRouche, who now sported a very shaggy beard. The meeting would sometimes go on as long as seven hours. It was difficult to tell where discussions of tactics left off and educational presentation began. Encouraging the students, LaRouche gave them esoteric assignments, such as searching through the writings of ] to discover Rudd's anarchistic origins, or studying ]'s ''The Accumulation of Capital''. Since SDS was strong on spirit and action but rather bereft of theory, the students appeared to thoroughly enjoy this work. | |||
In 1967, LaRouche began teaching classes on Marx's ] at New York City's Free School,<ref name="Lewers">{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=53peAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA200 |title=A Voter's Journey |publisher=] |author=Lewers, Bill |year=2013 |pages=200 |isbn=978-1483686776 |access-date=November 13, 2016 |archive-date=May 28, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220528151549/https://books.google.com/books?id=53peAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA200 |url-status=live }}{{self-published source|date=December 2017}}</ref>{{Self-published inline|certain=yes|date=December 2017}} and attracted a group of students from ] and the ], recommending that they read '']'', as well as ], Kant, and Leibniz. During the ], he organized his supporters under the name '']'' (NCLC).<ref name="Lewers"/> The aim of the NCLC was to win control of the ] (SDS) branch{{snd}}the university's main activist group{{snd}}and build a political alliance between students, local residents, organized labor, and the Columbia faculty.<ref>Fraser, Steve. "NCLC Frame Up", ''Great Speckled Bird'', February 22, 1971.</ref><ref>Also see {{harvnb|LaRouche|1987}}, p. 116.</ref><ref>The NCLC was at first called the SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) Labor Committee.</ref><ref>For LaRouche's teaching, see {{harvnb|King|1989}}, pp. 13–14.</ref> By 1973, the NCLC had over 600 members in 25 cities{{snd}}including West Berlin and Stockholm{{snd}}and produced what LaRouche's biographer, Dennis King, called the most literate of the far-left papers, ''New Solidarity''.<ref>{{harvnb|King|1989}}, pp. 17–18.</ref><ref>Also see Rose, Gregory F. "The Swarmy Life and Times of the NCLC", '']'', March 30, 1979.</ref> The NCLC's internal activities became highly regimented over the next few years. Members gave up their jobs and devoted themselves to the group and its leader, believing it would soon take control of America's trade unions and overthrow the government.<ref>{{harvnb|Mintz|1985a}}.</ref><ref>For members giving up their jobs, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200318073137/https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1974/01/20/93255116.html?pdf_redirect=true&site=false |date=March 18, 2020 }}</ref><ref>For members giving up their jobs, see: {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121103174644/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A46883-2004Oct20_3.html |date=November 3, 2012 }}.</ref> | |||
He was heavily involved in SDS despite not being a student, and in the PL's internal battles despite not being a member. Once again, LaRouche now maintains that he was an FBI agent during all this activism, but his closest colleagues from this period dismiss this suggestion as absurd. | |||
===1970s=== | |||
== LaRouche and the NCLC == | |||
====1971: Intelligence network==== | |||
In ] LaRouche formed the ] (NCLC), a grouping of ex-SDS activists and other ex-Trotskyists. Despite its name the NCLC had no significant connection with the labor movement. It soon developed the hallmarks of a ], with a charismatic leader (LaRouche), a ] and conspiratorial ideology, and an esoteric vocabulary known only to initiates. NCLC members gave up their jobs and private lives and became entirely devoted to the group and its leader. Like many cults, the LaRouche organization developed an internal discipline technique, called "ego stripping," which reinforced conformity and loyalty to LaRouche. | |||
{{Further|LaRouche movement}} | |||
] writes that LaRouche first established an NCLC "intelligence network" in 1971. Members all over the world sent information to NCLC headquarters, which would distribute the information via briefings and other publications. LaRouche organized the network as a series of news services and magazines, which critics say was done to gain access to government officials under press cover.<ref>{{harvnb|Johnson|1983}}, p. 189.</ref> The publications included '']'', founded in 1974. Other periodicals under his aegis included ''New Solidarity'', ''Fusion Magazine'', ''21st Century Science and Technology'', and ''Campaigner Magazine''. His news services and publishers included American System Publications, Campaigner Publications, New Solidarity International Press Service, and The New Benjamin Franklin House Publishing Company. LaRouche acknowledged in 1980 that his followers impersonated reporters and others, saying it had to be done for his security.<ref> | |||
{{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180722100214/https://www.nytimes.com/1980/02/16/archives/larouche-says-his-supporters-take-covert-roles-in-campaign.html?sq=LaRouche+Says+His+Supporters+Take+Covert+Roles+in+Campaign&scp=1&st=p |date=July 22, 2018 }}, ''The New York Times'', February 15, 1980: "Lyndon H. LaRouche, the former head of the U.S. Labor Party who is now running as a Democrat, has said that his campaign workers impersonate reporters and others, contending that the covert operation is needed for his security." | |||
* Other publications included ''International Journal of Fusion'', ''Investigative Leads'', ''War on Drugs'', ''The Young Scientist'', ''American Labor Beacon'', ''New Federalist'', ''Nouvelle Solidarité'', and ''Neue Solidarität''. | |||
</ref> In 1982, '']'' sued New Solidarity International Press Service and Campaigner Publications for damages, alleging that members were impersonating its reporters in phone calls.<ref> | |||
Lynch, Pat. "Is Lyndon LaRouche using ''your'' name?", ''Columbia Journalism Review'', March–April 1985, pp. 42–46. | |||
* Also see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110804224001/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/cult/larouche/larou1.htm |date=August 4, 2011 }}. | |||
</ref> | |||
U.S. sources told '']'' in 1985 that the LaRouche organization had assembled a worldwide network of government and military contacts, and that his researchers sometimes supplied information to government officials. ], the CIA's deputy director in 1981 and 1982, said LaRouche and his wife had visited him, offering information about the West German Green Party. A CIA spokesman said LaRouche met Deputy Director John McMahon in 1983 to discuss one of LaRouche's trips overseas. An aide to Deputy Secretary of State ] said when LaRouche's associates discussed technology or economics, they made good sense and seemed qualified. Norman Bailey, formerly with the ], said in 1984 that LaRouche's staff comprised "one of the best private intelligence services in the world. ... They do know a lot of people around the world. They do get to talk to prime ministers and presidents." Several government officials feared a security leak from the government's ties with the movement.<ref> | |||
===Theoretical underpinnings=== | |||
For Bailey's comment in 1984, see {{harvnb|Copulus|1984}}. | |||
LaRouche's theory was influenced by what he called his "Theory of Hegemony" which was derived from ]'s view of the role of intellectuals in being a ] helping workers develop their consciousness and realise their leading role in society. He was also influnced by ]'s concept of a ] as an intellectual and cultural elite which directs social thought. LaRouche's theory saw himself and his followers as being able to become such a hegemonic force. | |||
* For the rest, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110804224001/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/cult/larouche/larou1.htm |date=August 4, 2011 }}. | |||
</ref> According to critics, the supposed behind-the-scenes processes were more often flights of fancy than inside information. Douglas Foster wrote in '']'' in 1982 that the briefings consisted of disinformation, "hate-filled" material about enemies, phony letters, intimidation, fake newspaper articles, and dirty tricks campaigns.<ref>{{cite magazine |title=Teamster Madness |magazine=] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ouYDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30 |author=Douglas Foster |date=January 1982 |page=30 |access-date=June 17, 2015 |archive-date=October 17, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017120129/https://books.google.com/books?id=ouYDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30 |url-status=live }}</ref> Opponents were accused of being gay or ], or were linked to murders, which the movement called "psywar techniques".<ref>For psywar techniques, see {{harvnb|Johnson|1983}}, p. 190.</ref><ref>For Alexander, {{harvnb|Alexander|1991}}, p. 948.</ref> | |||
From the 1970s to the first decade of the 21st century, LaRouche founded several groups and companies. In addition to the National Caucus of Labor Committees, there was the ] (Australia), the National Democratic Policy Committee, the ], and the ]. In 1984, he founded the ] in Germany with his second wife, and three political parties there{{snd}}the '']'', ''Patrioten für Deutschland'', and '']''{{snd}}and in 2000 the ]. His printing services included Computron Technologies, Computype, World Composition Services, and PMR Printing Company, Inc, or PMR Associates.<ref>{{harvnb|Copulus|1984|pp=2–3}}. | |||
LaRouche was also influenced by his readings of Luxemburg's ''The Accumulation of Capital'' and ]'s '']'' developing his own "theory of reindustralization," arguing that the west would attempt to industrialize the ], particularly ], and attempt to solve the economic crisis both by developing new markets in the Third World and using its cheap and surplus labor to increase profits and minimise costs. This attempt would be unsuccessful, however, and would lead to catastrophic economic collapse. To oppose this, LaRouche argued for a "reindustrialization" of the United States with himself at the vanguard of the effort allowing him to personally resolve the crisis of capitalism. Though his arguments have since been stripped of their quasi-Marxist language and citations, his core theories have remained essentially the same since the late ]s. | |||
* Other groups included the International Caucus of Labor Committees, the Club of Life, the Committee for a Fair Election, the Humanist Academy, the International Workingman's Defense Fund, the Lafayette Academy for the Arts and Sciences, the LaRouche Campaign, the National Anti-Drug Coalition, the National Unemployed and Welfare Rights Organization, and the Revolutionary Youth Movement. | |||
* For more on the companies, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170817102329/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/cult/larouche/larou3.htm |date=August 17, 2017 }}. | |||
</ref> | |||
====1973: Political shift; "Operation Mop-Up"==== | |||
Wohlforth writes: | |||
] | |||
:This scheme, which shaped LaRouche writings and agitation in the late '60s and early '70s, was presented in an increasingly frenetic manner, bolstered by predictions of economic doom. LaRouche was a crisis-monger of the highest order. LaRouche and his followers became increasingly convinced that the fate of the world rested with their group and their great leader. The problem lay with the stupidity of the nation's leaders and the boorishness of the masses. If only LaRouche were in power, all the world's troubles - perhaps even the rats problem in ] - would be resolved swiftly. | |||
LaRouche wrote in his 1987 autobiography that violent altercations had begun in 1969 between his NCLC members and several ] groups when ]'s faction began assaulting LaRouche's faction at Columbia University.<ref>{{harvnb|LaRouche|1987}}, p. 117.</ref> Press accounts alleged that between April and September 1973, during what LaRouche called "Operation Mop-Up", NCLC members began physically attacking members of leftist groups that LaRouche classified as "left-protofascists"; an editorial in LaRouche's ''New Solidarity'' said of the ] that the movement "must dispose of this stinking corpse".<ref>For the name "Operation Mop-Up", see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200318073137/https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1974/01/20/93255116.html?pdf_redirect=true&site=false |date=March 18, 2020 }}.</ref><ref>For the ''Village Voice'', see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017120129/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=waleAAAAIBAJ&sjid=B4wDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6208,1251030&dq=of-thugs-and-liars&hl=en |date=October 17, 2015 }}, pp. 8, 10, and for its discussion of the ''New Solidarity'' editorial, see p. 30.</ref><ref>Also see {{harvnb|Alexander|1991}}, p. 946.</ref> Armed with chains, bats, and martial-art ] sticks, NCLC members assaulted Communist Party, SWP, and ] members and ] activists on the streets and during meetings. At least 60 assaults were reported. The operation ended when police arrested several of LaRouche's followers; there were no convictions, and LaRouche maintained they had acted in self-defense. Journalist and LaRouche biographer Dennis King writes that the ] may have tried to aggravate the strife, using measures such as anonymous mailings, to keep the groups at each other's throats.<ref>For the description of the assaults, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200318073137/https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1974/01/20/93255116.html?pdf_redirect=true&site=false |date=March 18, 2020 }}, and {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017120129/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=waleAAAAIBAJ&sjid=B4wDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6208,1251030&dq=of-thugs-and-liars&hl=en |date=October 17, 2015 }}, pp. 8, 10, 30.</ref><ref>For the number of assaults, see {{harvnb|Alexander|1991}}, p. 947.</ref><ref>For the arrests, see {{harvnb|King|1989}}, pp. 23–24.</ref><ref>Also see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180722100139/https://www.nytimes.com/1973/10/11/archives/two-held-in-a-double-street-gang-stabbing-on-lower-east-side.html?sq=Two+Held+in+a+Double+Street+Gang+Stabbing+on+Lower+East+Side&scp=1&st=p |date=July 22, 2018 }}.</ref><ref>For no convictions see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107184233/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/73846043.html?dids=73846043:73846043&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Sep+20%2C+1987&author=John+Mintz&pub=The+Washington+Post+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&desc=Inside+the+Weird+World+of+Lyndon+LaRouche&pqatl=google |date=November 7, 2012 }}.</ref><ref>For LaRouche saying he acted in self-defence, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121103174644/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A46883-2004Oct20_3.html |date=November 3, 2012 }}.</ref> LaRouche said he met representatives of the Soviet Union at the United Nations in 1974 and 1975 to discuss attacks by the Communist Party USA on the NCLC and propose a merger, but said he received no assistance from them.<ref>{{harvnb|Perlman|1984}}.</ref> One FBI memo, obtained under the ], proposes assisting the CPUSA in an investigation "for the purpose of ultimately eliminating him and the threat of the NCLC" (see image to left).{{Third-party inline|date=October 2022}} | |||
==="Operation Mop-Up" and "Beyond Psychoanalysis"=== | |||
In the 1970s LaRouche developed an intense interest in fascism, and began to adopt some of its slogans and practices, while maintaining (as he still does) an outward stance of anti-fascism. He began to regard himself and his followers as "]," superior to all other people, and under his direction the NCLC adopted violent and disruptive tactics, physically attacking meetings of the ] and later of the SWP and other groups, who were classed by LaRouche as "left-protofascists." "Operation Mop-Up" began with LaRouche's declaration that ""We must take hegemony from the CP-from here on in, the CP cannot hold a meeting on the East Coast. We'll mop them up in two months." NCLC members engaged in a series of well-documented beatings of members of the Communist Party . Some ex-NCLC members who left the group at this time say that LaRouche was studying the career of ] and consciously adopting the tactics of the early ]. | |||
LaRouche's critics, such as King and ], allege that in 1973, with little warning, LaRouche adopted more extreme ideas, a process accompanied by a campaign of violence against his opponents on the left, and the development of conspiracy theories and paranoia about his personal safety.<ref name=Lerman212>{{harvnb|Lerman|1988}}, p. 212.</ref> According to these accounts, he began to believe he was under threat of assassination from the Soviet Union, the CIA, Libya, drug dealers, and bankers.<ref name=MintzDec181987> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107165033/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/73863058.html?dids=73863058:73863058&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Dec+18%2C+1987&author=John+Mintz&pub=The+Washington+Post+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&edition=&startpage=a.18&desc=Defense+Calls+LaRouche%2C+Followers+%60Most+Annoying%27 |date=November 7, 2012 }}.</ref> He also established a "Biological Holocaust Task Force", which, according to LaRouche, analyzed the public health consequences of ] (IMF) austerity policies for impoverished nations in Africa, and predicted that epidemics of ] as well as possibly entirely new diseases would strike Africa in the 1980s.<ref name="Toumey-1996-pp.87-92">{{harvnb|Toumey|1996|pp=87–92}}.</ref><ref>Grauerholz, Dr. John, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190215155936/https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1990/eirv17n33-19900817/eirv17n33-19900817_014-the_aids_epidemic_four_years_lat.pdf |date=February 15, 2019 }}, ''EIR'' August 17, 1990</ref> | |||
In 1972 LaRouche's second wife, Carol Schnitzer, left him for Christopher White, a younger man who was a member of the LaRouche movement in Britain. LaRouche is thought to have had a breakdown as a result and his writings became obsessively anti-feminist to the point of ] and obsessed with sex. In one of his articles, "The Sexual Impotency of the Puerto Rican Socialist Party", LaRouche wrote: | |||
:The classical case is the sexually athletic Macho who regards himself as a successful performer in bed, the Macho who has much to say and think respecting his capacities for various modes of penetration and frequency and cubic centimeters of ejaculations. The ugly secret of the matter is that he is almost totally sexually impotent. | |||
====1973: U.S. Labor Party==== | |||
:Firstly, his sexual relations are not relations at all, but are essentially sexual performances before an internalized audience. He is admittedly somewhat ambivalent about inviting a large audience to witness his performance with even a prostitute, which does not inhibit his homosexual impulse to recount his fantasy of the performance in the most painstaking detail (somewhat “improved” in the telling) before the first large audience he deems suitable for this purpose. His relationship to the woman is immediately a relationship of himself, as performer in a fantasy, to an audience for this fantasy. | |||
{{Further|U.S. Labor Party}} | |||
LaRouche founded the U.S. Labor Party in 1973 as the political arm of the NCLC.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190412124434/https://www.heritage.org/report/the-us-domestic-issues-labor-party |date=April 12, 2019 }}.</ref><ref>Also see Rose, Gregory F. "The Swarmy Life and Times of the NCLC", ''National Review'', March 30, 1979</ref> At first, the party was "preaching Marxist revolution"; however, by 1977, it shifted from left-wing to ].<ref>Reich, Kenneth (September 21, 1977). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107165255/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/654015532.html?dids=654015532:654015532&FMT=CITE&FMTS=CITE:AI&type=historic&date=Sep+21%2C+1977&author=&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&desc=QUITS+LEFTIST+CAMP&pqatl=google |date=November 7, 2012 }}. ''Los Angeles Times'', page A3.</ref> A two-part article in '']'' in 1979 by ] and ] alleged that LaRouche had turned the party (at that point with 1,000 members in 37 offices in North America, and 26 in Europe and Latin America) into an extreme-right, ] organization, despite the presence of Jewish members. LaRouche denied the newspaper's charges, and said he had filed a $100 million libel suit; his press secretary said the articles were intended to "set up a credible climate for an assassination hit".<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107182611/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/boston/access/685425541.html?dids=685425541:685425541&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Feb+17%2C+1980&author=Charles+Kenney+Globe+Staff&pub=Boston+Globe+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&desc=FRINGE+CANDIDATE+OR+A+THREAT%3F%3B+%3B+THE+LYNDON+LAROUCHE+CAMPAIGN&pqatl=google |date=November 7, 2012 }}.</ref> | |||
The ''Times'' alleged that members had taken courses in how to use knives and rifles; that a farm in upstate New York had been used for guerrilla training; and that several members had undergone a six-day anti-terrorist training course run by ], an arms dealer and former member of the ], who said he had ties to the ]. Journalists and publications the party regarded as unfriendly were harassed, and it published a list of potential assassins it saw as a threat. LaRouche expected members to devote themselves entirely to the party, place their savings and possessions at its disposal, and take out loans on its behalf. Party officials decided who each member should live with, and if someone left the movement, the remaining member was expected to live separately from the ex-member. LaRouche questioned spouses about their partner's sexual habits, the ''Times'' said, and in one case reportedly ordered a member to stop having sex with his wife, because it was making him "politically impotent".<ref name=Blum1979> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180722100150/https://www.nytimes.com/1979/10/07/archives/us-labor-party-cult-surrounded-by-controversy-the-us-labor-party.html?sq=%2522U.S.%2520Labor%2520Party%3A%2520Cult%2520Surrounded%2520by%2520Controversy&scp=1&st=cse |date=July 22, 2018 }}.</ref><ref>For Mitchell Werbell saying he had ties to the CIA, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180722101707/https://www.nytimes.com/1979/10/08/archives/one-man-leads-us-labor-party-on-its-erratic-path-federal-election.html?sq=One%2520Man%2520Leads%2520U.S.%2520Labor%2520Party%2520on%2520His%2520Erratic%2520Path&scp=1&st=cse |date=July 22, 2018 }}.</ref><ref>LaRouche hired WerBell as a security consultant for protection against an assassination threat and to train his security staff; see {{harvnb|Donner|Rothenberg|1980}}.</ref> | |||
:Secondly, the woman with whom he is psychologically mating is seldom (if ever) the woman in bed with him; he is making love to a woman of pure fantasy. The actual woman's relationship to this fantasy is predominantly negative. She must, of course, suggest the woman of his fantasy to him, either by a resemblance to the fantasy-object or by the law of reaction-formation. Her essential duty to the performer is to play her part in such a way that she re-enforces and does not unmask the fantasy. | |||
====1973: "Ego-stripping" and "brainwashing" allegations====<!--this subhead is linked to the redirect "Ego-stripping"--> | |||
:Hence, among the Macho's favorite prostitutes and mistresses, the art of playing various fantasy-supporting roles is the quality which the poor, impotent Macho finds most endearing. She, too, is merely giving a performance, and participating in the game in terms of her own fantasies. | |||
LaRouche began writing in 1973 about the use of certain psychological techniques on recruits. In an article called "Beyond Psychoanalysis", he wrote that a worker's persona had to be stripped away to arrive at a state he called "little me", from which it would be possible to "rebuild their personalities around a new socialist identity", according to '']''.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121103174644/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A46883-2004Oct20_3.html |date=November 3, 2012 }}.</ref><ref>Marcus, L. (Lyndon LaRouche). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110718072746/http://wlym.com/PDF-68-76/CAM74BP.pdf |date=July 18, 2011 }}, ''The Campaigner'', Vol 6, Nos. 3–4; September/October 1973.</ref> ''The New York Times'' wrote that the first such session{{snd}}which LaRouche called "ego-stripping"{{snd}}involved a German member, Konstantin George, in the summer of 1973. LaRouche said that during the session he discovered that a plot to assassinate him had been implanted in George's mind.<ref name=MontgomeryWitt/> | |||
He recorded sessions with a 26-year-old British member, Chris White, who had moved to England with LaRouche's former partner, Carol Schnitzer. In December 1973 LaRouche asked the couple to return to the U.S. His followers sent tapes of the subsequent sessions with White to ''The New York Times'' as evidence of an assassination plot. According to the ''Times'', "here are sounds of weeping, and vomiting on the tapes, and Mr. White complains of being deprived of sleep, food and cigarettes. At one point someone says 'raise the voltage', but says this was associated with the bright lights used in the questioning rather than an electric shock." The ''Times'' wrote: "Mr. White complains of a terrible pain in his arm, then LaRouche can be heard saying, 'That's not real. That's in the program'." LaRouche told the newspaper White had been "reduced to an eight-cycle infinite loop with look-up table, with homosexual bestiality". He said White had not been harmed and that a physician{{snd}}a LaRouche movement member{{snd}}had been present throughout.<ref name=MontgomeryWitt> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200318073137/https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1974/01/20/93255116.html?pdf_redirect=true&site=false |date=March 18, 2020 }}, p. 51, column 5.</ref><ref>Also see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121103174644/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A46883-2004Oct20_3.html |date=November 3, 2012 }}.</ref> White ended up telling LaRouche he had been programmed by the CIA and British intelligence to set up LaRouche for assassination by Cuban exile frogmen.<ref name=Tourish2000p74>{{harvnb|Tourish|Wohlforth|2000|p=74}}.</ref> | |||
:Sometimes—often enough—her fantasy is not specifically sexual at all, but rather one of pure female sadism. With the (typically) frigid woman, the gratification of sexual performances originates in the sense of power over the male whom she sees as essentially pathetic. | |||
According to ''The Washington Post'', "brainwashing hysteria" took hold of the movement. One activist said he attended meetings where members were writhing on the floor saying they needed de-programming.<ref name=Witt2004p3/> In two weeks in January 1974, the group issued 41 separate press releases about brainwashing. One activist, Alice Weitzman, expressed skepticism about the claims.<ref>For the Weitzman details, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200318073137/https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1974/01/20/93255116.html?pdf_redirect=true&site=false |date=March 18, 2020 }}, p. 1; for 41 press releases about brainwashing, see p. 51, column 2. | |||
In ] and ], on the heels of Operation Mop-Up, the LaRouche organization took a further turn towards misogyny and psychological mistreatment of its members. LaRouche issued an article called "" which instituted a regime of "ego-stripping" sessions and social coercion in which individuals would be subjected to incessant group criticism. | |||
* For the police investigation, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180722100201/https://www.nytimes.com/1974/01/24/archives/trial-date-is-set-for-6-radicals-accused-of-kidnapping-woman.html?sq=Trial+Date+Is+Set+for+6+Radicals+Accused+of+Kidnapping+Woman&scp=1&st=p |date=July 22, 2018 }} and {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180722100649/https://www.nytimes.com/1974/02/27/archives/6-marxists-here-absolved-of-imprisoning-a-member.html?scp=1 |date=July 22, 2018 }}. | |||
* Also see {{harvnb|Tourish|Wohlforth|2000}}, pp. 74–75.</ref> | |||
===1974: Contacts with far-right groups, intelligence gathering=== | |||
In her resignation statement from the executive of the NCLC, Christine Berle wrote: | |||
LaRouche established contacts with ]'s ] and elements of the ] in 1974.<ref>{{harvnb|Johnson|1989}}<br />{{*}} {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308142334/https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-05-31-me-8256-story.html |date=March 8, 2021 }}<br />{{*}}{{cite magazine|last=Spiro|first=Peter|title=Paranoid Politics: Your tax dollars at work.|pages=10–12|magazine=The New Republic|date=February 6, 1984}}<br />{{*}}{{cite book|editor-last=Chanes|editor-first=Jerome A.|title=Antisemitism in America today: outspoken experts explode the myths|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jcxtAAAAMAAJ|access-date=February 16, 2012|date= 1995|publisher=Carol Pub. Group|isbn=978-1559722902|page=192|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131108081941/http://books.google.com/books?id=jcxtAAAAMAAJ|archive-date=November 8, 2013|url-status=live}}<br />{{*}}{{harvnb|Michael|2008|pp=110–111}}<br />{{*}}{{cite book|last=Hamilton|first=Neil A.|title=Rebels and renegades: a chronology of social and political dissent in the United States|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jZymqT1HmqAC|access-date=February 16, 2012|year=2002|publisher=Taylor & Francis|isbn=978-0415936392|page=283|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131108113951/http://books.google.com/books?id=jZymqT1HmqAC|archive-date=November 8, 2013|url-status=live}}</ref> ] and ] wrote that he made successful overtures to the Liberty Lobby and ]'s ], adding that the "racist" policies of LaRouche's U.S. Labor Party endeared it to members of the Ku Klux Klan.<ref>{{harvnb|Donner|Rothenberg|1980}}</ref> ], in ''Willis Carto and the American Far Right'', says that LaRouche shared with the Liberty Lobby's ] an antipathy towards the ].<ref name=Michael>{{Harvnb|Michael|2008|pp=110–111}}</ref> The Liberty Lobby defended its alliance with LaRouche by saying the U.S. Labor Party had been able to "confuse, disorient, and disunify the Left".<ref name=Michael/> | |||
Gregory Rose, a former chief of counter-intelligence for LaRouche who became an FBI informant in 1973, said that while the LaRouche movement had extensive links to the Liberty Lobby, there was also copious evidence of a connection to the ]. George and Wilcox say neither connection amounted to much{{snd}}they assert that LaRouche was "definitely not a Soviet agent" and state that while the contact with the Liberty Lobby is often used to imply {{"'}}links' and 'ties' between LaRouche and the extreme right", it was in fact transient and marked by mutual suspicion. The Liberty Lobby soon pronounced itself disillusioned with LaRouche, citing his movement's adherence to "basic socialist positions" and his softness on "the major ] groups" as fundamental points of difference. According to George and Wilcox, American ] leaders expressed misgivings over the number of Jews and members of other minority groups in his organization, and did not consider LaRouche an ally.<ref>For Gregory Rose's position, see Johnson 1983, p. 204. | |||
:The psychological climate that had been engendered by Operation Mop-Up set the stage for a tendency which has since crippled the organization. Since the political content of any disagreement with the policies of the leadership during Mop-Up could be dismissed not on its own terms, but as a pathology . A situation was created in which members were intimidated by peer-group pressure from voicing their own doubts; and indeed the terror of taking such an independent position compelled them to actually begin to consider these doubts within themselves as the consequence of a neurosis. Hence, the transformation of an organization composed of creative individuals capable of collectively synthesizing new concepts by means of a dialectic into an organization of rank-and-file automatons. | |||
* {{harvnb|George|Wilcox|1992|pp=317–318, 322}}.</ref> George Johnson, in ''Architects of Fear'', similarly states that LaRouche's overtures to far right groups were pragmatic rather than sincere. A 1975 party memo spoke of uniting with these groups only to overthrow the established order, adding that once that goal had been accomplished, "eliminating our right-wing opposition will be comparatively easy".<ref>{{harvnb|Johnson|1983}}, p. 207.</ref> | |||
] wrote in ''The New York Times'' that, from 1976 onward, party members sent reports to the FBI and local police regarding members of left-wing organizations. In 1977, he wrote, commercial reports on U.S. anti-apartheid groups were prepared by LaRouche members for the South African government, student dissidents were reported to the Shah of Iran's ] secret police, and the anti-nuclear movement was investigated on behalf of power companies.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Kilgore|first=Ed|date=2019-02-13|title=Political Cult Leader Lyndon LaRouche Dies at 96|url=https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/02/political-cult-leader-lyndon-larouche-dies-at-96.html|access-date=2021-08-13|website=Intelligencer|language=en-us|archive-date=March 28, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190328042317/http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/02/political-cult-leader-lyndon-larouche-dies-at-96.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=":0" /> Johnson says the intelligence network was made up of "obnoxious devotees commandeering ]s and tricking bureaucrats into giving them information".<ref name="Johnson1989">{{harvnb|Johnson|1989}}</ref> By the late 1970s, members were exchanging almost daily information with ], a government informant and infiltrator of both far right and far left groups who was involved with the ] and the ].<ref name="Wilcox-1992-pp319-320"/><ref name=":0">{{cite news|last1=Montgomery|first1=Paul L.|last2=Blum|first2=Howard|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1979/10/07/archives/us-labor-party-cult-surrounded-by-controversy-the-us-labor-party.html|title=U.S. Labor Party: Cult Surrounded by Controversy|work=The New York Times|date=October 7, 1979|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160807013922/http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9802E7DB1438E432A25754C0A9669D946890D6CF|archive-date=August 7, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Shenon|1986}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Sims|1996}}, p. 63.</ref> The LaRouche organization believed Frankhouser to be a federal agent who had been assigned to infiltrate right-wing and left-wing groups, and that he had evidence that these groups were actually being manipulated or controlled by the FBI and other agencies.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1975/eirv02n32-19750723/eirv02n32-19750723_009-leaa_gestapo_operations_in_readi.pdf|title=LEAA Gestapo Operations in Reading, Pa.|access-date=April 25, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170314060337/http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1975/eirv02n32-19750723/eirv02n32-19750723_009-leaa_gestapo_operations_in_readi.pdf|archive-date=March 14, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>"The Busing Plot: CIA Plans Fall Race Riots, Organizes Both Sides" {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170314051439/http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1974/eirv01n10-19740708/eirv01n10-19740708_016-the_busing_plot_cia_plans_fall_r.pdf|date=March 14, 2017}}, EIR, July 8, 1974</ref> LaRouche and his associates considered Frankhouser to be a valuable intelligence contact, and took his links to extremist groups to be a cover for his intelligence work.<ref name="Wilcox-1992-pp319-320">{{harvnb|George|Wilcox|1992|pp=319–320}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|King|1989|p=201}}</ref><ref name="Blum, October 7, 1979"/> Frankhouser played into these expectations, misrepresenting himself as a conduit for communications to LaRouche from "Mr. Ed", an alleged CIA contact who did not exist in reality.<ref name="Wilcox-1992-pp319-320"/><ref>{{harvnb|King|1989|p=201}}.</ref> | |||
:...Marcus' pseudo-psychoanalytical sessions, begun in Aug. 1975 with the NEC and all people in leading positions of responsibility, provid(ing) the final link in a process that culminated in Marcus' total hegemony over the organization. | |||
Blum wrote, at around this time, that LaRouche's Computron Technologies Corporation included Mobil Oil and Citibank among its clients, that his World Composition Services had one of the most advanced typesetting complexes in the city and had the ] among its clients, and that his PMR Associates produced the party's publications and some high school newspapers.<ref name="Blum, October 7, 1979"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220528151549/https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1979/10/07/112124074.html?pdf_redirect=true&site=false |date=May 28, 2022 }}.</ref> | |||
:According to Marcus, the purpose of the sessions was to create a new kind of leadership based on the capacity to withstand psychological terror; but in reality the content of the sessions themselves was pure psychological terror. What the leaders were asked to withstand was described by Marcus as the stripping away of the persona before the entire group; but in actuality what was stripped away was their very identities. | |||
Around the same time, according to Blum, LaRouche was telling his membership several times a year that he was being targeted for assassination, including by the ], Zionist mobsters, the ], the Justice Department, and the ].<ref name="Blum, October 7, 1979"/> LaRouche sued the City of New York in 1974, saying the CIA and British spies had tortured and drugged his associates to brainwash his associates into killing him.<ref name=":5">{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1987/05/17/larouche-filings-plots-spies/8c26cef7-bdbc-4b27-88fa-3b491451934a/|title=LaRouche Filings: Plots, Spies|last=Mintz|first=John|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=May 17, 1987|access-date=April 3, 2022|archive-date=May 28, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220528151557/https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1987/05/17/larouche-filings-plots-spies/8c26cef7-bdbc-4b27-88fa-3b491451934a/|url-status=live}}</ref> According to '']'' of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, LaRouche said he had been "threatened by Communists, Zionists, narcotics gangsters, the Rockefellers and international terrorists."<ref>"Federal Probe Pins Top Aides of LaRouche", Philip Shenon, ''Patriot – News'', October 7, 1986</ref> LaRouche later said: | |||
Further, she wrote: | |||
{{Quote|style=font-size:100%;|text=Since late 1973, I have been repeatedly the target of serious assassination threats and my wife has been three times the target of attempted assassination. ... My enemies are the circles of McGeorge Bundy, Henry Kissinger, Soviet General Secretary ], ], certain powerful bankers, and the Socialist and Nazi Internationals, as well as international drug traffickers, ], ], and the ] lobby.<ref>"Oddball tycoon wins some battles", John King, '']'', January 26, 1984</ref>}} | |||
:It is scarcely surprising that the participants of the sessions should have been prey, to all, sorts of deep-seated feelings of self-hatred and worthlessness. Or that Marcus could have been able to manipulate those feelings to the point that any allegation, and particularly one that diagnosed a neurosis, would have to be believed. Moreover, Marcus was extremely skillful at turning the group on an individual who had been selected on the basis of rumors that he had failed to perform politically during the week, so that, from a congress of leaders, the group was transformed into sniveling informers vying with each other for Marcus' approval. | |||
====1975–1976: presidential campaign==== | |||
Similarly, following his resignation from the NCLC, ] who is a ] by training, wrote in his open letter to the NCLC: "With each passing day it becomes more and more transparently obvious that the National Caucus of Labor Committees' minimal understanding of psychosis and psychotic behavior derives not from its "electrifying" theoretical breakthroughs but rather from its capacity to produce psychosis and to opportunistically manipulate it in the name of socialist politics." | |||
{{Further|Lyndon LaRouche U.S. presidential campaigns|Views of Lyndon LaRouche and the LaRouche movement#LaRouche's campaign platforms}} | |||
] | |||
], FBI Director, called the NCLC a "violence-oriented organization".<ref name=Rosenfeld1976/>]] | |||
In March 1975, ], director of the FBI, testified before the ] that the NCLC was "a violence-oriented organization of 'revolutionary socialists' with a membership of nearly 1,000 in chapters in some 50 cities". He said that during the previous two years its members had been "involved in fights, beatings, using drugs, kidnappings, brainwashings, and at least one shooting. They are reported to be armed, to have received defensive training such as karate, and to attend cadre schools and training schools to learn military tactics".<ref name=Rosenfeld1976> | |||
{{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107165429/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost_historical/access/120029198.html?dids=120029198:120029198&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&date=Sep+24%2C+1976&author=Stephen+S.+Rosenfeld&pub=The+Washington+Post++%281974-Current+file%29&edition=&startpage=A15&desc=NCLC%3A+%27A+Domestic+Political+Menace%27 |date=November 7, 2012 }}. | |||
* For Clarence Kelley's statement, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017120129/https://books.google.com/books?id=ktURAAAAIAAJ&q=%22involved+in+fights,+beatings,+using+drugs,+kidnappings,+brainwashings,+and+at+least+one+shooting%22&en&ei=TQZlTfvFA8vSgQfmyc2SBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA |date=October 17, 2015 }}, Committee on Foreign Relations, January 25, 1977, p. 49. | |||
</ref> | |||
In 1975, under the name ''Lyn Marcus'', LaRouche published '']'', described by its only reviewer as "the most peculiar and idiosyncratic" introduction to economics he had ever seen. Mixing economics, history, anthropology, sociology and a surprisingly large helping of ], the work argued that most prominent Marxists had misunderstood Marx, and that ] economics arose when philosophy took a wrong, ] turn under ] like ] and ].<ref name=HigherEd>McLemee, Scott. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110417133920/http://www.insidehighered.com/views/mclemee/mclemee132 |date=April 17, 2011 }}, '']'', July 11, 2007</ref><ref name=Bronf>Bronfenbrenner, Martin. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190214174501/https://www.jstor.org/stable/1830175 |date=February 14, 2019 }}, '']'', Vol. 84, No. 1 (Feb. 1976), pp. 123–130</ref> | |||
LaRouche's theories of sexual dyanamics and female domination of men resulted in a breakdown of relations between the sexes and the break up of dozens of relationships as women were attacked for being "sadistic bitches" and "witches," and for "mother-dominating" men. | |||
In 1976, LaRouche campaigned for the first time in a presidential election as a U.S. Labor Party candidate, polling 40,043 votes (0.05%). It was the first of eight consecutive presidential elections in which he ran between 1976 and 2004. It enabled him to attract $5.9 million in federal ]; candidates seeking their party's presidential nomination qualify for matching funds if they raise $5,000 in each of at least 20 states.<ref> | |||
Berle commented: | |||
{{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121103174644/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A46883-2004Oct20_3.html |date=November 3, 2012 }}. | |||
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120321103409/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/americas/2000/us_elections/glossary/e-f/652632.stm |date=March 21, 2012 }}, BBC News, February 22, 2000. | |||
* For the number of votes, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190426132914/https://www.britannica.com/event/United-States-presidential-election-of-1976 |date=April 26, 2019 }}, ''Encyclopædia Britannica'', 2011, Retrieved March 22, 2011. | |||
</ref> His platform predicted financial disaster by 1980 accompanied by famine and the virtual extinction of the human race within 15 years, and proposed a debt moratorium; nationalization of banks; government investment in industry especially in the aerospace sector, and an "International Development Bank" to facilitate higher food production.<ref>Dabilis, Andy. "Labor candidates explain platform", ''The Sunday Sun'', (Lowell, Mass), May 30, 1976, p. B5. | |||
* Also see Johnson, Donald Bruce. ''National Party Platforms: 1960–1976''. Volume 2, University of Illinois Press, 1978, p. 1007.</ref> When ] appeared in the U.S. that year, he said it was a continuation of the ], and that senators who opposed vaccination were suppressing the link as part of a "genocidal policy".<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190216040736/https://newint.org//features/1987/03/05/unclean/ |date=February 16, 2019 }}.</ref> | |||
His campaign included a paid half-hour television address, which allowed him to air his views before a national audience, something that became a regular feature of his later campaigns. There were protests about this, and about the NCLC's involvement in public life generally. Writing in ''The Washington Post'', ] said LaRouche's ideas belonged to the radical right, neo-Nazi fringe, and that his main interests lay in disruption and disinformation; Rosenfeld called the NCLC one of the "chief polluters" of political democracy. Rosenfeld argued that the press should be "chary" of offering them print or airtime: "A duplicitous violence-prone group with fascistic proclivities should not be presented to the public, unless there is reason to present it in those terms." LaRouche wrote in 1999 that this comment had "openly declared ... a policy of malicious lying" against him.<ref> | |||
:Women were hit particularly viciously with this form of reductionism even to the point of tracing their sexuality to the proximity of the anus and the vagina with only the thin strip of the perineum distinguishing between the two. Marcus claimed that this anatomical peculiarity was the origin of women's feelings of degradation, since it gave rise to their confusion of the sexual act with the act of excretion. | |||
For Rosenfeld in ''The Washington Post'', see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107165429/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost_historical/access/120029198.html?dids=120029198:120029198&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&date=Sep+24%2C+1976&author=Stephen+S.+Rosenfeld&pub=The+Washington+Post++%281974-Current+file%29&edition=&startpage=A15&desc=NCLC%3A+%27A+Domestic+Political+Menace%27 |date=November 7, 2012 }}. | |||
* For LaRouche's view of Rosenfeld's article, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171109213718/http://larouchepub.com/lar/1999/lar_littleton_2627.html |date=November 9, 2017 }}, footnote 25. | |||
* For another account of the Detroit attack on the SWP, see {{harvnb|Sheppard|2005|p=328}} | |||
</ref> | |||
] in 2005]] | |||
===The pendulum swings right=== | |||
LaRouche steered the NCLC away from the left and towards the extreme right, while retaining some of the slogans and attitudes of the left (as did the founder of fascism, the ex-Socialist ], and many others since). The Marxist concept of the ] was converted by LaRouche into a gigantic ], in which world capitalism was controlled by a secret cabal including the ], the ], ], the ] and other standard villains of the extreme right, many though not all of them Jewish. LaRouche added some novel variations on this theme. The heart of the conspiracy, according to LaRouche, was the financial elite of the ]. LaRouche has always been violently anti-British - a trait shared by many American isolationists - and has included ], among others, in his list of conspirators. | |||
====1977: Second marriage==== | |||
In the 1980s LaRouche's political rhetoric and accusations grew more detached from generally accepted reality. Hitler had been a British agent. ] was a Nazi. ] were "a product shaped according to British ] Division specifications." Both Communism and Fascism were facets of the great overarching conspiracy of the "]," an oligarchical network of financiers and manipulators who rule the world. Only LaRouche and his "humanist elite" fully understand this vast conspiracy, and possess the willpower and knowledge to withstand it. LaRouche's personal egotism is a significant force driving his politics. In ] he wrote: "My principal accomplishment is that of being, by a large margin of advantage, the leading economist of the twentieth century to date." Some of LaRouche's conspiracy theories appear to border on self-parody, "Who is pushing the world toward war?" he asked in "An Open Letter to President ]" (], ]). "It is the forces behind the ], the ], and the heritage of ] and the evil ]." | |||
LaRouche married again in 1977. His wife, ], was then a leading activist in the ] branch of the movement. She went on to work closely with LaRouche for the rest of her career, standing for election in Germany in 1980 for his ''Europäische Arbeiterpartei'' (European Workers Party), and founding the ] in Germany in 1984.<ref>For the election, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629054146/http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-14331971.html |date=June 29, 2011 }}, ''Der Spiegel'', September 22, 1980; {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120314044047/http://wissen.spiegel.de/wissen/image/show.html?did=14331971&aref=image036%2F2006%2F06%2F16%2Fcq-sp198003901310133.pdf&thumb=false |date=March 14, 2012 }}; {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220528151550/http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&sl=de&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.spiegel.de%2Fspiegel%2Fprint%2Fd-14331971.html&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&twu=1&usg=ALkJrhgRk3XatovJKMCgsTRH0xTYM67j5g |date=May 28, 2022 }}. | |||
* For the Schiller Institute, see {{harvnb|King|1989}}, pp. xiii, 41.</ref> | |||
===1980s=== | |||
LaRouche claims that there is also a conspiracy by the "Establishment" and the press it allegedly controls to deny him coverage and prevent his views becoming known. He cites as evidence for this a ], ] opinion piece in the '']'', entitled "NCLC: A Domestic Political Menace," and written by ], a senior editor. Rosenfeld wrote: "We of the press should be chary of offering them print or air time. There is no reason to be too delicate about it: every day we decide whose voices to relay. A duplicitous violence-prone group with fascistic proclivities should not be presented to the public unless there is reason to present it in those terms." In fact LaRouche has continued to receive considerable press coverage, more in fact than the real importance of his organization might seem to warrant, although most of this coverage has been hostile. | |||
====National Democratic Policy Committee, "October Surprise" theory==== | |||
From the autumn of 1979, the LaRouche movement conducted most of its U.S. electoral activities as the National Democratic Policy Committee (NDPC), a political action committee.<ref> | |||
Frank, Lynn. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160506075951/http://www.nytimes.com/1982/09/20/nyregion/klenetsky-opposes-moynihan-with-unusual-list-of-charges.html?scp=1&sq=&st=nyt |date=May 6, 2016 }}, ''The New York Times'', September 20, 1982. | |||
* Also see Richard, Clay F. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017120129/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=rQwhAAAAIBAJ&sjid=XHIFAAAAIBAJ&pg=1280,2361605&dq=national-democratic-policy-committee&hl=en |date=October 17, 2015 }}, UPI, March 27, 1986. | |||
</ref> The name drew complaints from the Democratic Party's ]. Democratic Party leaders refused to recognize LaRouche as a party member, or to seat the few delegates he received in his seven primary campaigns as a Democrat.<ref>{{harvnb|Bradley|2004}}.</ref> In its 2019 obituary of LaRouche, '']'' magazine reported that LaRouche's attempts to pose as a Democrat were originally an attempt at a spoiler operation to divide the opponents of ].<ref name="NYM20190213">{{cite news|last=Kilgore|first=Ed|url=https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/02/political-cult-leader-lyndon-larouche-dies-at-96.html|title=Political Cult Leader Lyndon LaRouche Dies at 96|work=]|date=February 13, 2019|access-date=March 28, 2021|archive-date=March 28, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190328042317/http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/02/political-cult-leader-lyndon-larouche-dies-at-96.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
LaRouche's campaign platforms advocated a return to the ], including a gold-based national and world monetary system; fixed exchange rates; and abolishing the ].<ref>Benshoff, Anastasia. "Bush and Clinton aren't the only candidates in presidential race," Associated Press, August 27, 1992.</ref> He supported the replacement of the ] system, including the U.S. ] System, with a "national bank";<ref>{{harvnb|Tipton|1986}}.</ref> a war on drug trafficking and prosecution of banks involved in money laundering;<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107165409/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/boston/access/685443211.html?dids=685443211:685443211&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Feb+26%2C+1980&author=&pub=Boston+Globe+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&desc=ON+THE+LYNDON+LAROUCHE+CAMPAIGN&pqatl=google |date=November 7, 2012 }}.</ref> building a ]; the building of nuclear power plants; and a crash program to build ]s and lasers, including support for elements of the ] (SDI). He opposed the Soviet Union and supported a military buildup to prepare for imminent war; supported the screening and quarantine of ] patients; and opposed environmentalism, deregulation, outcome-based education, and abortion:<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121024164646/http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=CSTB&p_theme=cstb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB36CF805E74BFE&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM |date=October 24, 2012 }}, ''Chicago Sun-Times'', March 20, 1986, p. 4.</ref> | |||
==Economic views== | |||
{{Quote |style=font-size: 100%; |text=No more will the United States fight World Wars to save the ] in any shape or guise. No more will the United States tolerate the British system, whether colonial or ]. No more will the United States tolerate the economics of ] in any part of the world. We are going to take this aching, poor, hungry world and we're going to transform it with American methods. We're going to transform it through the export and development of high technology, we're going to have ]s and ] projects and every '']'', Federally-directed, scientific crazed program that we deem necessary.|author=Lyndon LaRouche|title=at the opening of the ], 1979}} | |||
Although he has no academic qualifications, LaRouche claims to be an economist, and has written extensively on economic subjects. Since he is not taken seriously by mainstream economists, there is no academic literature analysing his economic ideas. He claims that his economic ideas are descended from the "]," a slogan originally associated with ] (] under ] and the main critic of the policies of ] ]), and later with ]. In practice this amounts to advocating centralised, though not socialist, state control of the economy, with heavy state investment in industry and science. Economists would classify these ideas as ], some of his opponents call them reminiscent of Mussolini's ]. | |||
In December 1980, LaRouche and his followers started what came to be known as the "]" allegation,<ref name="Newsweek; November 10, 1991">{{cite news |last=Barry |first=John |date=November 10, 1991 |title=Making Of A Myth |url=https://www.newsweek.com/making-myth-201934 |newspaper=Newsweek |access-date=April 5, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150313144428/http://www.newsweek.com/making-myth-201934 |archive-date=March 13, 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref> namely that in October 1980 Ronald Reagan's campaign staff conspired with the Iranian government during the ] to delay the release of 52 American hostages held in Iran, with the aim of helping Reagan win the ] against ]. The Iranians had agreed to this, according to the theory, in exchange for future weapons sales from the Reagan administration. The first publication of the story was in LaRouche's ''Executive Intelligence Review'' on December 2, 1980, followed by his ''New Solidarity'' on September 2, 1983, alleging that ], one of LaRouche's regular targets, had met Iran's Ayatollah ] in Paris, according to Iranian sources in Paris. The theory was later echoed by former Iranian President ] and former Naval intelligence officer and National Security Council member ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1991/05/07/world/bani-sadr-in-us-renews-charges-of-1980-deal.html|title=Bani-Sadr, in U.S., Renews Charges of 1980 Deal|date=May 7, 1991|newspaper=The New York Times|last1=Lewis|first1=Neil A.|access-date=February 10, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090423081211/http://www.nytimes.com/1991/05/07/world/bani-sadr-in-us-renews-charges-of-1980-deal.html|archive-date=April 23, 2009|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
LaRouche's theory is that the principal subject of economics is the ability of the cognitive powers of the individual human mind to make new "discoveries of universal principles." These discoveries, LaRouche says, lead to revolutions in technology, which re-define man's relationship to nature in a "non-linear way." Such revolutions, he says, are contingent on the "viability of the culture," on its capacity to absorb and transmit new ideas: LaRouche asserts that the most historically successful variety of culture is what he terms the classical culture of ] during the time of ], or the culture of ] in the centuries following the ]. | |||
====1983: Move from New York to Loudoun County==== | |||
LaRouche claims to draw upon the ideas of mathematicians ] and ] to describe the "non-linear" effects of the technological revolutions he describes, and he uses the term "potential relative population density" to describe a measure of the success of a given economy or society. According to LaRouche's followers, a Russian scientist, ], proposed that the unit for measuring this parameter be called the "La" (for "LaRouche"). | |||
''The Washington Post'' wrote that LaRouche and his wife moved in August 1983 from New York to a 13-room Georgian mansion on a 250-acre section of the ], near ], ], ]. The property was owned at the time by a company registered in Switzerland. Companies associated with LaRouche continued to buy property in the area, including part of Leesburg's industrial park, purchased by LaRouche's Lafayette/Leesburg Ltd. Partnership to develop a printing plant and office complex.<ref name=MintzJan131985/> | |||
Neighbors said they saw LaRouche guards in camouflage clothes carrying semi-automatic weapons, and the ''Post'' wrote that the house had sandbag-buttressed guard posts nearby, along with metal spikes in the driveway and concrete barriers on the road. One of his aides said LaRouche was safer in Loudoun County: "The terrorist organizations which have targeted Mr. LaRouche do not have bases of operations in Virginia." LaRouche said his new home meant a shorter commute to Washington. A former associate said the move also meant his members would be more isolated from friends and family than they had been in New York.<ref name=MintzJan131985> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170817102329/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/cult/larouche/larou3.htm |date=August 17, 2017 }}.</ref> According to the ''Post'' in 2004, local people who opposed him for any reason were accused in LaRouche publications of being communists, homosexuals, drug pushers, and terrorists. He reportedly accused the Leesburg Garden Club of being a nest of Soviet sympathizers, and a local lawyer who opposed LaRouche on a zoning matter went into hiding after threatening phone calls and a death threat.<ref name=Witt2004p3/> In leaflets supporting his application of concealed weapons permits for his bodyguards in Leesburg, Virginia, he wrote: | |||
In practical rather than theoretical terms, LaRouche's economic policies are not particularly radical or original. He opposes deregulation, ], ] and ]. He advocates government-issued credits for infrastructure projects, and claims to be an admirer of the ] economic policies of ]. He calls for greater federal investment in science and technology, particularly the ]. These are all staples of both the traditional left and the modern anti-globalization movement. | |||
{{Quote |style=font-size: 100%; |text=I have a major personal security problem ... the assassination teams of professional mercenaries now being trained in Canada and along the Mexico border may be expected to start arriving on the streets of Leesburg ... If they come, there will be many people dead or mutilated within as short an interval as 60 seconds of fire.<ref>"Man who calls Queen a pusher worries town", Matthew Wald. ''Gazette''. Montreal, Quebec April 14, 1986</ref>}} | |||
LaRouche maintains that financial institutions (such as the ]), which he sees as controlled by the London financiers and therefore agents of the "Synarchy," are committed to a policy of "looting the living standards of the world's populations through ] and ]," while contracting the actual productive base of these economies: a policy that he claimed was a revival of the economic approach of the ] central banker ], who held office both before and during the ] government of ]. | |||
Of LaRouche's paramilitary security force, armed with semi-automatic weapons,<ref>"1986 Authorities See Pattern of Threats, Plots Dark Side of LaRouche Empire Surfaces", Kevin Roderick, '']'', October 14, 1986</ref> a spokesperson said that it was necessary because LaRouche was the subject of "assassination conspiracies".<ref>"CBS Sells Time To Fringe Candidate For Talk", Petter Kerr, '']'' January 22, 1984</ref> | |||
Despite LaRouche's rhetorical skill in presenting them as revolutionary, LaRouche's economic ideas are hardly original: they are similar to the policies of ] under ] and the corporatism of ] under ] and ] under ]. What makes LaRouche's ideas distinctive is his belief that capitalism is not, as Marxists argue, the principal enemy of progress. Instead he has developed the elaborate conspiracy theory described above, in which he claims that a secret elite called the Synarchy really rules the world. This ] conspiracy, he says, predates and transcends both capitalism and socialism. | |||
] | |||
====1984: Schiller Institute, television spots, contact with Reagan administration==== | |||
==Biographical issues== | |||
{{Further|Schiller Institute}} | |||
Helga Zepp-LaRouche founded the Schiller Institute in Germany in 1984.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171122012441/http://www.nytimes.com/1985/05/29/world/state-dept-official-s-speech-is-interrupted-by-a-rightist.html |date=November 22, 2017 }}.</ref> In the same year, LaRouche raised enough money to purchase 14 television spots, at $330,000 each, in which he called ]—the Democratic Party's presidential nominee—a Soviet agent of influence, triggering over 1,000 telephone complaints.<ref> | |||
For the cost of the spots, see {{harvnb|Lowther|1986}}. | |||
* For Mondale, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160105072257/http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/10/world/americas/10iht-10buy.16836896.html |date=January 5, 2016 }}. | |||
* For the 1,000 complaints, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107165127/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/674450182.html?dids=674450182:674450182&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&type=historic&date=Oct+24%2C+1984&author=&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&desc=TV+Viewers+Irate+Over+Slur+at+Mondale&pqatl=google |date=November 7, 2012 }}. | |||
* For his allegations about Henry Kissinger, see {{dead link|date=February 2019|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}, PR Newswire, March 26, 1984. | |||
</ref> On April 19, 1986, NBC's '']'' aired a sketch satirizing the ads, portraying the Queen of the United Kingdom and Henry Kissinger as drug dealers. LaRouche received 78,773 votes in the 1984 presidential election.<ref>For Saturday Night Live, see . | |||
* For the number of votes, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190404084849/https://www.britannica.com/event/United-States-presidential-election-of-1984 |date=April 4, 2019 }}, ''Encyclopædia Britannica'', 2011, Retrieved March 23, 2011.</ref> | |||
In 1984, media reports stated that LaRouche and his aides had met Reagan administration officials, including Norman Bailey, senior director of international economic affairs for the National Security Council (NSC), and Richard Morris, special assistant to ] There were also reported contacts with the ], the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the CIA. The LaRouche campaign said the reporting was full of errors.<ref> | |||
Separating fact from fiction in LaRouche's biography is made difficult by the barrages of conflicting propaganda generated both by LaRouche and by the many anti-LaRouche commentaries. According to LaRouche's writings and of the material produced by his followers, LaRouche developed his present political and economic ideas in the ] and has advocated them consistently ever since. He is represented as a respected economist and commentator on world affairs. He is credited with pioneering such ideas as the ], manned space flight to ], the ] or "Star Wars," and the so-called Eurasian Land-Bridge. It has been claimed that he regularly meets with world leaders and that they listen respectfully to his ideas. It also claimed that he was used by the ] administration as a "back-channel" for negotiations with the ]. | |||
For Bailey and Morris meetings, and for LaRouche saying the report was mistaken, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181106191658/http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=DN&s_site=philly&p_multi=PI%7CDN&p_theme=realcities&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB2972D3AF2D413&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM |date=November 6, 2018 }}, ''Philadelphia Daily News'', November 1, 1984. | |||
* For DEA, DIA, and CIA, see {{harvnb|Green|1985}}. | |||
</ref> In 1984 two Pentagon officials spoke at a LaRouche rally in Virginia; a Defense Department spokesman said the Pentagon viewed LaRouche's group as a "conservative group ... very supportive of the administration." White House spokesman ] said the Administration was "glad to talk to" any American citizen who might have information.<ref>{{harvnb|King|1989|pp=132–133}}. | |||
* .</ref> According to Bailey, the contacts were broken off when they became public.<ref>{{harvnb|Mintz|1985b}}.</ref> Three years later, LaRouche blamed his criminal indictment on the NSC, saying he had been in conflict with ] over LaRouche's opposition to the Nicaraguan ].<ref>{{harvnb|St. Petersburg Times|1987}}</ref> According to a LaRouche publication, a court-ordered search of North's files produced a May 1986 telex from ] defendant General ], discussing the gathering of information to be used against LaRouche.<ref> | |||
{{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160506080705/http://www.nytimes.com/1988/04/07/us/larouche-lawyers-seek-north-s-notebooks.html |date=May 6, 2016 }}, Associated Press, April 7, 1988. | |||
* {{cite web |url=https://larouchepub.com/exon/exon_add4_virginia.html |title=It's Time for Truth-In-Justice in Virginia: The LaRouche Cases in Virginia |access-date=September 18, 2009 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071114022738/https://larouchepub.com/exon/exon_add4_virginia.html |archive-date=November 14, 2007 }}, ''Executive Intelligence Review'', October 12, 2008. | |||
</ref> According to King, LaRouche's ''Executive Intelligence Review'' was the first to report important details of the Iran–Contra affair, predicting that a major scandal was about to break months before mainstream media picked up on the story.<ref>{{harvnb|King|1989|p=161}}.</ref> | |||
====Strategic Defense Initiative==== | |||
Some of these claims are clearly untrue. LaRouche did not develop his current political and economic ideas in the 1950s or '60s: until at least ] he was a Trotskyist, although an increasingly unorthodox one. He would have been expelled from the SWP much earlier than he was had he advocated anything like his current ideas at that time. Some of his specific claims can be disproved. Although the expression "Eurasian Land-Bridge," for example, has been used to refer to the proposed ], there is no evidence that LaRouche has ever had anything to do with this project. Other claims cannot be definitely disproved, but are highly unlikely to be true. | |||
{{Main|Fusion Energy Foundation}} | |||
], which housed the ] in the 1980s.]] | |||
The LaRouche campaign supported Reagan's ] (SDI). Dennis King wrote that LaRouche had been speculating about space-based weaponry as early as 1975. He set up the Fusion Energy Foundation, which held conferences and tried to cultivate scientists, with some success. In 1979, FEF representatives attended a Moscow conference on ]. LaRouche began to promote the use of lasers and related technologies for both military and civilian purposes, calling for a "revolution in ]s."<ref name="The Last Rosicrucian">Benedictine, Kirll, and Diunov, Michael, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170222003430/http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.terra-america.ru%2Fposlednii-rozenkreicer-part1.aspx&ei=a8OMT4DPEsSoiQKm5KS1CA&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CDsQ7gEwAw&prev=%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dsite%3Aterra-america.ru%2B%25D0%259B%25D0%25B0%25D1%2580%25D1%2583%25D1%2588%26hl%3Den%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D569%26prmd%3Dimvns |date=February 22, 2017 }} Terra-America, April 16, 2012</ref> | |||
According to King, LaRouche's associates had for some years been in contact with members of the Reagan administration about LaRouche's space-based weapons ideas.<ref>{{harvnb|King|1989|p=61}}</ref> LaRouche proposed the development of defensive beam technologies as a policy that was in the interest of both the U.S. and the Soviet Union, as the alternative to an arms race in offensive weapons and as a generator of spin-off economic benefits. Between February 1982 and February 1983, with the NSC's approval, LaRouche met with Soviet embassy representative Evgeny Shershnev to discuss the proposal. During this period, Soviet economists also began to study LaRouche's economic forecasting model. But after Reagan's public announcement of the SDI in March 1983, Soviet representatives broke off contact with LaRouche and his representatives.<ref name="The Last Rosicrucian"/> | |||
It is true, however, that LaRouche had some contacts with low-level officials of the Reagan Administration. Between ] and ] LaRouche met with ], then a member of the ] (NSC), and with some other NSC and ] officials. This followed a concerted campaign by LaRouche to develop close relations with the ], by publishing flattering articles about administration officials in the LaRouche press. Bailey later claimed that LaRouche was able to provide him with useful information, gathered by LaRouche's network of affiliates in many countries, but other intelligence officials deny the Administration gained any useful intelligence from LaRouche. The contacts between LaRouche and the administration ended after protests from former ] ] and other prominent ]. | |||
Physicist ], a proponent of SDI and X-ray lasers, told reporters in 1984 that he had been courted by LaRouche but had kept his distance. LaRouche began calling his plan the "LaRouche-Teller proposal," though they had never met. Teller said LaRouche was "a poorly informed man with fantastic conceptions."<ref name=Siano1992>{{harvnb|Siano|1992}}.</ref> | |||
The only substantial biography of LaRouche is ''Lyndon LaRouche and the New American Fascism'', by ] (Doubleday, ]). King is not a historian or a political scientist, and his book is avowedly hostile to LaRouche. King's thesis is that LaRouche is both a fascist and an anti-Semite (although LaRouche expresses these views in coded language), and that his organization is the spearhead of a dangerous "new American fascism." | |||
LaRouche later attributed the ] to its refusal to follow his advice to accept Reagan's offer to share the technology.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://larouchein2004.net/pages/questions/youth/030201penn004.htm |title=LaRouche, February 1, 2003 |access-date=March 25, 2017 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20031011204719/http://larouchein2004.net/pages/questions/youth/030201penn004.htm |archive-date=October 11, 2003 }}. | |||
Demonstrating this thesis lends King's book a polemical tone which in the opinion of some reviewers weakens its credibility, but King has nevertheless researched LaRouche's writings thoroughly, and the factual basis of his book (as opposed to his opinions) has not been successfully challenged. LaRouche polemicists have made much of the fact that King received funding from the conservative ] to write the book, but there has been no clear demonstration that this funding influenced the content of the book. | |||
* LaRouche's promotion of space colonization included dealings with German scientists and engineers who had worked under the Nazi government during the Second World War, some of whom had emigrated to the U.S. and had ended up working for NASA. They included ] and several other Peenemunde rocket experts, such as ], ], ], and ]. When Rudolph was forced to renounce his U.S. citizenship after an investigation into his past, LaRouche supporters formed a defense fund for him. LaRouche also collaborated with Ehricke on ideas about the colonization of the moon and Mars; after Ehricke's death, LaRouche sponsored the "Krafft Ehricke Memorial Conference," and in 1988 delivered a national TV broadcast titled "The Woman on Mars." | |||
See {{harvnb|LaRouche Political Action Committee|1988}} | |||
* {{harvnb|King|1989|pp=80–81}} | |||
* {{harvnb|Siano|1992}}</ref> Former Secretary of Defense ] reported in his 2011 memoir that at a 2001 dinner in Russia with leading officials, he was told by General ], then the second highest-ranking officer in the Russian military, that LaRouche was the brains behind SDI. Rumsfeld said he believed LaRouche had had no influence on the program, and surmised that Baluyevsky must have obtained the information off the Internet.<ref>Rumsfeld, Donald, ''Known and Unknown'', Sentinel, 2011, {{ISBN|978-1595230676}}, p. 309</ref> In 2012 the former head of the Russian bureau of Interpol, General Vladimir Ovchinsky, also described LaRouche as the man who proposed the SDI.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190214175814/https://www.smol.kp.ru/daily/25839/2812048/ |date=February 14, 2019 }} Komsomolskaya Pravda{{snd}}February 22, 2012</ref> | |||
====1984: NBC lawsuit==== | |||
==Presidential bids== | |||
In January 1984, ] aired a news segment about LaRouche, and in March a "First Camera" report produced by Pat Lynch. The reports called LaRouche "the leader of a violence-prone, anti-Semitic cult that smeared its opponents and sued its critics", as Lynch wrote in 1985 in the '']''.<ref name=Lynch1985>{{harvnb|Lynch|1985}}, p. 42. | |||
* For information about Pat Lynch, see , ''The Huffington Post'', Retrieved February 14, 2011. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150407030055/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/pat-lynch |date=April 7, 2015}}</ref> In interviews, former members of the movement gave details about their fundraising practices, and alleged that LaRouche had spoken about assassinating President ]. The reports said an investigation by the ] would lead to an indictment, and quoted ], the ]'s fact-finding director, who called LaRouche a "small-time ]". After the broadcast, LaRouche members picketed NBC's office carrying signs saying "Lynch Pat Lynch," and the NBC switchboard said it received a death threat against her. Another NBC researcher said someone placed fliers around her parents' neighborhood saying she was running a call-girl ring from her parents' home.<ref>Mintz, John. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161226011947/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/cult/larouche/larou4.htm |date=December 26, 2016 }}, ''The Washington Post'', January 14, 1985.</ref> Lynch said LaRouche members began to impersonate her and her researchers in telephone calls, and called her "Fat Lynch" in their publications.<ref name=Lynch1985/> | |||
LaRouche filed a defamation suit against NBC and the ADL, arguing that the programs were the result of a deliberate campaign of defamation against him.<ref> | |||
From the late 1970s to the present, LaRouche has pursued a dual strategy. He has continued to promote his apocalyptic conspiracy theories and to make regular predictions of imminent economic catastrophe. These are a staple of the extreme right, although also characteristic of Trotskyism. At the same time he has sought to enter the political mainstream by contesting elections and ]. In ] he founded the ] as a vehicle for electoral politics, but this achieved no success and was wound up in ]. In ] he ran for ] as a U.S. Labor Party candidate, polling 40,043 votes (0.05%). | |||
LaRouche, Lyndon. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303222253/http://www.larouchepub.com/exon/exon_lhl_testimony.html |date=March 3, 2016 }}, ''Executive Intelligence Review''], undated. | |||
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303205239/http://www.larouchepub.com/exon/exon2.html |date=March 3, 2016 }}, ''Executive Intelligence Review'', undated. | |||
</ref> The judge ruled that NBC need not reveal its sources, and LaRouche lost the case. NBC won a countersuit, the jury awarding the network $3 million in damages, later reduced to $258,459, for misuse of libel law, in what was called one of the more celebrated countersuits by a libel defendant.<ref> | |||
{{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160430053342/http://www.nytimes.com/1984/11/02/us/larouche-jury-gives-3-million-to-nbc-tv.html?scp=74&sq=LaRouche&st=nyt |date=April 30, 2016 }}, ''The New York Times'', November 2, 1984. | |||
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110804224001/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/cult/larouche/larou1.htm |date=August 4, 2011 }}. | |||
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081220002208/http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9906E7DF1339F937A15751C0A963948260 |date=December 20, 2008 }}. | |||
* {{harvnb|Constantini|Nash|1990}}. | |||
</ref> LaRouche failed to pay the damages, pleading poverty, which the judge described as "completely lacking in credibility."<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081220002208/http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9906E7DF1339F937A15751C0A963948260 |date=December 20, 2008 }}, Associated Press, February 24, 1985.</ref> LaRouche said he had been unaware since 1973 who paid the rent on the estate, or for his food, lodging, clothing, transportation, bodyguards, and lawyers. The judge fined him for failing to answer. After the judge signed an order to allow discovery of LaRouche's personal finances, a cashier's check was delivered to the court to end the case.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160430055141/http://www.nytimes.com/1986/09/20/us/larouche-to-pay-250000-to-nbc.html?scp=19&sq=LaRouche&st=nyt |date=April 30, 2016 }}, Associated Press, September 20, 1986. | |||
* Also see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220528151553/https://www.nytimes.com/1986/11/16/us/nbc-gets-a-258459-check-to-end-larouche-court-fight.html |date=May 28, 2022 }}, Associated Press, November 16, 1986.</ref> When LaRouche appealed, the ], rejecting his arguments, set forth a three-pronged test, later called the "LaRouche test," to decide when anonymous sources must be named in libel cases.<ref> | |||
{{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100515155700/http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/780/780.F2d.1134.html |date=May 15, 2010 }}, 780 F.2d 1134, 1139 (4th Cir. 1986). | |||
* {{cite web |url=https://www.eff.org/legal/cases/Jane_Doe_v_John_Hritz/20001013_doe_quash_memo.html |title=Memo from AOL libel suit |access-date=December 29, 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041028154636/http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/Jane_Doe_v_John_Hritz/20001013_doe_quash_memo.html |archive-date=October 28, 2004 }}, Electronic Frontier Foundation, October 13, 2000, accessed February 9, 2011. | |||
</ref> | |||
====1985–1986: PANIC, LaRouche's AIDS initiative==== | |||
Since ] LaRouche has concentrated on infiltrating his followers into the ]. In ] he formed a ] called the ] (NDPC), a name designed to convey the impression that it is part of the Democratic Party. Since ] LaRouche has run for the Democratic nomination for ] six times. His current Political Action Committee is called "LaRouche PAC." | |||
{{Main|1986 California Proposition 64}} | |||
LaRouche interpreted the AIDS pandemic as fulfillment of his 1973 prediction that an epidemic would strike humanity in the 1980s. According to Christopher Toumey, his subsequent campaign followed a familiar LaRouche pattern: challenging the scientific competence of government experts, and arguing that LaRouche had special scientific insights, and his own scientific associates were more competent than government scientists. LaRouche's view of AIDS agreed with orthodox medicine in that HIV caused AIDS, but differed from it in arguing that HIV spread like the cold virus or malaria, by way of casual contact and insect bites{{snd}}which, if true, would make HIV-positive people extremely dangerous. He advocated testing anyone working in schools, restaurants, or healthcare, and quarantining those who tested positive. Some of LaRouche's views on AIDS were developed by ], a British ] who proposed that AIDS was created in a Soviet laboratory. Seale's highly speculative writings were published in three prestigious medical journals, lending these ideas some appearance of being hard science.<ref name="Toumey-1996-pp.87-92"/> | |||
LaRouche and his associates devised a "Biological Strategic Defense Initiative" that would cost $100 billion per annum, which they said would have to be directed by LaRouche. Toumey writes that those opposing the program, such as the ] and ], were accused of "viciously lying to the world," and of following an agenda of genocide and euthanasia.<ref name=Toumey87>{{harvnb|Toumey|1996|pp=87–88}}</ref> In 1986 LaRouche proposed that AIDS be added to California's List of Communicable Diseases. Sponsored by his "Prevent AIDS Now Initiative Committee" (PANIC), Proposition 64{{snd}}or the "LaRouche initiative"{{snd}}qualified for the California ballot in 1986, with the required signature gatherers mostly paid for by LaRouche's Campaigner Publications. Seale, presented as an AIDS expert by PANIC, supported the LaRouche initiative, but disagreed with several of LaRouche's views, including that HIV could be spread by insects, and described the group's political beliefs and conspiracy theories as "rather odd".<ref>Petit, Charles. "Doctor Supports Prop. 64{{snd}}Sort Of", ''San Francisco Chronicle'', September 30, 1986, pg. 8</ref> According to ], professor of public policy at the ], the proposal would have required that 300,000 people in the area with HIV or AIDS be reported to public health authorities; might have removed over 100,000 of them from their jobs in schools, restaurants and agriculture; and would have forced 47,000 children to stay away from school.<ref name=Kirp1986>Kirp, David L. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170110102904/http://www.nytimes.com/1986/09/11/opinion/larouche-turns-to-aids-politics.html |date=January 10, 2017 }}, ''The New York Times'', September 11, 1986.</ref> | |||
The Democratic Party has consistently asserted that LaRouche is not a Democrat, but the U.S. electoral system makes it impossible for the party to prevent LaRouche followers entering Democratic primaries. LaRouche himself has polled negligible vote totals, but continues to promote himself as a serious political candidate, a pretension which is sometimes accepted by elements of the media and some political figures. In ], however, a court ruled that the ] had the right to keep LaRouche from electing delegates to the ], based on a party requirement that a Democratic nominee must be a registered voter. LaRouche, as a convicted felon, is not eligible to be a registered voter in the state of ], where he lives. | |||
The proposal was opposed by leading scientists and local health officials as based on inaccurate scientific information and, as the public health schools put it, running "counter to all public health principles." It was defeated, reintroduced two years later, and defeated again, with two million votes in favor the first time, and 1.7 million the second. AIDS became a leading plank in LaRouche's platform during his 1988 presidential campaign.<ref>{{harvnb|Roderick|1986}}. | |||
The use of the NDPC name has, however, allowed LaRouche followers to compete seriously in Democratic primaries for lesser offices, and even occasionally to win them. The best known example was in ], when a LaRouche candidate, ], won the Democratic primary for the post of Lieutenant-Governor of ]. The Democratic gubernatorial candidate, former Senator ], refused to run on the same ticket as Fairchild and formed a new party for the election. Fairchild's victory was attributed to low voter turnout and a poor "regular" candidate, but also to some genuine support for the LaRouche anti-establishment message. NDPC candidates have won several other Democratic primaries in various states, but LaRouche's organizations have never suceeded in entering the mainstream. | |||
* For criticism from leading scholars, including California schools of public health and Stanford University, see {{harvnb|Toumey|1996|pp=88–89}}. | |||
* For opposition campaigns and number of votes in favor, see {{harvnb|Berlet|Lyons|2000|p=237}}. | |||
* "LaRouche says he'll be swept into office," ''The Boston Globe'', June 28, 1987.</ref> | |||
====1986: Electoral success in Illinois; press conference allegations==== | |||
Some of the LaRouche organization's successes have come from exploiting public fears about the ], which they blame on international conspirators. In ] LaRouche wrote: "It is in the strategic interests of ] to see to it that the West does nothing to stop this pandemic; within a few years, at the present rates, the spread of AIDS in Asia, Africa, Western Europe, and the Americas would permit Moscow to take over the world almost without firing a shot." This prediction, like all of LaRouche's apocalyptic warnings, has proved to be baseless. | |||
{{main|1986 Illinois gubernatorial election}} | |||
In March 1986, Mark Fairchild and ]{{snd}}LaRouche National Democratic Policy Committee candidates{{snd}}won the Democratic primary for statewide offices in ], gaining national attention for LaRouche.<ref>{{harvnb|Frantz|1986}}, p. 2.</ref> The Democratic gubernatorial candidate, ], withdrew his nomination rather than run on the same slate as LaRouche members, and told reporters the party was "exploring every legal remedy to purge these bizarre and dangerous extremists from the Democratic ticket." A spokesman for the Democratic National Committee said it would have to do a better job of communicating to the electorate that LaRouche's National Democratic Policy Committee was unrelated to the Democratic Party.<ref name=":6"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017120129/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=p54rAAAAIBAJ&sjid=PvwFAAAAIBAJ&pg=3574,4204889&dq=lyndon-larouche+perennial+candidate&hl=en |date=October 17, 2015 }}, Associated Press, March 20, 1986.</ref> ''The New York Times'' wrote that Democratic Party officials were trying to identify LaRouche candidates in order to alert voters, and asked the LaRouche organization to release a full list of its candidates.<ref> | |||
{{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160430033116/http://www.nytimes.com/1986/04/26/us/democrats-step-up-larouche-alert.html?scp=40&sq=LaRouche&st=nyt |date=April 30, 2016 }}, ''The New York Times'', April 26, 1986. | |||
* Also see Moynihan, Daniel Patrick. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160506080334/http://www.nytimes.com/1986/04/01/opinion/the-links-between-larouche-and-new-york-corruption.html?scp=112&sq=LaRouche&st=nyt |date=May 6, 2016 }}, ''The New York Times'', April 1, 1986. | |||
</ref> | |||
A month later, LaRouche held a press conference to accuse the Soviet government, British government, drug dealers, international bankers, and journalists of being involved in multiple conspiracies. Flanked by bodyguards, he said: "If Abe Lincoln were alive, he'd probably be standing up here with me today," and that there was no criticism of him that did not originate "with the drug lobby or the Soviet operation ..." He said he had been in danger from Soviet assassins for over 13 years, and had to live in safe houses. He refused to answer a question from an NBC reporter, saying "How can I talk with a drug pusher like you?" He called the leadership of the United States "idiotic" and "berserk," and its foreign policy "criminal or insane." He warned of the imminent collapse of the banking system and accused banks of laundering drug money. Asked about the movement's finances, he said "I don't know. ... I'm not responsible, I'm not involved in that."<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190708030033/https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-04-10-mn-3099-story.html |date=July 8, 2019 }}, ''Los Angeles Times'', April 10, 1986. | |||
==LaRouche and the Jews== | |||
* Also see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107165111/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/chicagotribune/access/25002845.html?dids=25002845:25002845&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Apr+10%2C+1986&author=Chicago+Tribune+wires&pub=Chicago+Tribune+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&desc=LAROUCHE+SEES+DEATH+PLOT+BY+DRUG+DEALERS%2C+SOVIETS&pqatl=google |date=November 7, 2012 }}, ''Chicago Tribune'', April 10, 1986. | |||
* For the variety of conspiracies, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017120129/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=l1UcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=q1IEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6978,5074258&dq=the-drug-lobby-or-the-soviet-operation-which-is-sometimes-the-same-thing&hl=en |date=October 17, 2015 }}. | |||
* For his response about the movement's finances, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304065851/http://articles.philly.com/1986-04-10/news/26077542_1_national-democratic-policy-committee-perennial-presidential-candidate-larouche-group |date=March 4, 2016 }}.</ref> | |||
====1986–1988: Raids and criminal convictions==== | |||
LaRouche has been regularly accused of ] and ]. Jewish organisations such as the ] and the ] of ] have devoted much time and energy to documenting LaRouche's various writings and speeches on these subjects. LaRouche for his part has denied these accusations. | |||
{{Main|LaRouche criminal trials}} | |||
In October 1986, hundreds of state and federal officers raided LaRouche offices in Virginia and Massachusetts. A federal grand jury indicted LaRouche and twelve of his associates on credit card fraud and obstruction of justice. The charges stated that they had attempted to defraud people of millions of dollars, including several elderly people, by borrowing money they did not intend to repay. LaRouche disputed the charges, alleging that they were politically motivated.<ref name=LATimes1989> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308102038/https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1989-01-27-mn-1754-story.html |date=March 8, 2021 }}," Associated Press, January 27, 1989. | |||
* Mintz, John. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107165044/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/73831679.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Jul+3%2C+1987&author=John+Mintz&pub=The+Washington+Post+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&edition=&startpage=a.01&desc=LaRouche+Indicted+in+Conspiracy%3B+Justice+Dept.+Alleges+Va.-Based+Extremist+Tried+to+Scuttle+Probe |date=November 7, 2012 }}, ''The Washington Post'', July 3, 1987. | |||
* Also see Mintz, John. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107184233/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/73846043.html?dids=73846043:73846043&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Sep+20%2C+1987&author=John+Mintz&pub=The+Washington+Post+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&desc=Inside+the+Weird+World+of+Lyndon+LaRouche&pqatl=google |date=November 7, 2012 }}, ''The Washington Post'', September 20, 1987. | |||
* {{harvnb|Edds|1995}}.</ref> | |||
When LaRouche's "heavily fortified"<ref>"LaRouche Group, Long on the Political Fringe Gets Mainstream Scrutiny After Illinois Primary", Ellen Hume, '']'', March 28, 1986</ref> estate was surrounded, he at first warned law-enforcement officials not to arrest him, saying that any attempt to do so would be an attempt to kill him. A spokesman would not rule out the use of violence against officials in response. While surrounded, LaRouche sent a telegram to president Ronald Reagan saying that an attempt to arrest him "would be an attempt to kill me. I will not submit passively to such an arrest, ... I will defend myself."<ref>{{cite news|last=Mintz|first=John|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1987/01/31/prosecutor-moves-to-disarm-larouche-guards/7a7f5abb-8181-44c4-b0ab-b8710480df61/|title=Prosecutor Moves to Disarm LaRouche Guards|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=January 31, 1987|access-date=April 3, 2022}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Shenon|1986}}. | |||
The truth about LaRouche's attitude to the Jews is not easy to determine. Indeed it is likely that there is no single truth, since many of LaRouche's statements on this as on other subjects have been obscure and contradictory. From the early 1970s LaRouche regularly used the word "]" as a term of abuse. The use of "Zionist" as a code word for "Jew" is a common practice among anti-Semitic groups (see for example and ). In the 1970s also, according to his biographer Dennis King, LaRouche developed connections with the ] and the ], a leading extreme right group, both well-known for anti-Semitism. | |||
* Frantz, Douglas. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121106213222/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/chicagotribune/access/24948685.html?dids=24948685:24948685&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Oct+12%2C+1986&author=Douglas+Frantz%2C+Chicago+Tribune&pub=Chicago+Tribune+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&desc=RAID+BARES+LAROUCHE+DARK+WORLD&pqatl=google |date=November 6, 2012 }}, ''Chicago Tribune'', October 12, 1986. | |||
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210309061932/https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-10-19-mn-6216-story.html |date=March 9, 2021 }}, ''Los Angeles Times'', October 19, 1986. | |||
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160430083752/http://www.nytimes.com/1986/10/30/us/guardians-named-for-woman-over-850000-larouche-gift.html?scp=139&sq=LaRouche&st=nyt |date=April 30, 2016 }}, ''The New York Times'', October 30, 1986. | |||
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220528151552/https://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F4071FFB39580C718EDDA00894DF484D81&legacy=true&status=nf |date=May 28, 2022 }}, ''The New York Times'', September 22, 1987. | |||
* For the charges of defrauding, see Murphy, Caryle. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121106213159/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/73649679.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Dec+17%2C+1988&author=Caryle+Murphy&pub=The+Washington+Post+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&edition=&startpage=a.01&desc=LaRouche+Convicted+of+Mail+Fraud%3B+6+Associates+of+Extremist+Also+Found+Guilty+in+Loan+Solicitations |date=November 6, 2012 }}, ''The Washington Post'', December 17, 1988. | |||
* Howard, Alison. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121106213206/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/72591215.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=May+23%2C+1990&author=Alison+Howard&pub=The+Washington+Post+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&edition=&startpage=d.01&desc=Elderly+Seek+Refunds+From+LaRouche |date=November 6, 2012 }}, ''The Washington Post'', May 23, 1990.</ref> | |||
In 1987, a number of LaRouche entities, including the ], were taken over through an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding. The government's use of a sealed order in this proceeding was regarded as a rare legal maneuver.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200619050526/https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1987-04-21-mn-356-story.html |date=June 19, 2020 }}, Associated Press, April 21, 1987.</ref> | |||
In NCLC publications during the 1970s the Jews were accused of running the ], controlling ] and the ]. LaRouche also claimed that the "Zionist lobby" controlled the U.S. government and the ]: not far short of the "]" rhetoric of ] organisations. Any American professing "Zionist loyalties" was, he said, a "national security risk." | |||
On December 16, 1988, LaRouche was convicted of conspiracy to commit ] involving more than $30 million in defaulted loans; eleven counts of actual mail fraud involving $294,000 in defaulted loans; and a single count of conspiring to defraud the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.{{Citation needed|date=April 2023}} He was sentenced to 15 years in federal prison, but was released on parole after serving five years on January 26, 1994.<ref name="NYTDeath" /> | |||
In ''The Case of ]'' (]), LaRouche (under the pen name L. Marcus) said that "Jewish culture... is merely the residue left to the Jewish home after everything saleable has been marketed to the Goyim." In an editorial in ''New Solidarity'' in ] he wrote: "America must be cleansed for its righteous war by the immediate elimination of the Nazi Jewish Lobby and other British agents from the councils of government, industry, and labor." | |||
Thirteen associates were sentenced to prison terms ranging from one month to 77 years for mail fraud and conspiracy.<ref name=LATimes1989/> | |||
LaRouche has been regularly accused of ], widely seen as a hallmark of anti-Semitism. In ] LaRouche wrote (in "New Pamphlet to Document Cult Origins of Zionism," ''New Solidarity'', ], ]) that "only" 1.5 million Jews died during ], and that their deaths were not the result of a deliberate campaign of extermination by the Nazis. | |||
The trial judge called LaRouche's claim of a political ] "arrant nonsense", and said "the idea that this organization is a sufficient threat to anything that would warrant the government bringing a prosecution to silence them just defies human experience."<ref> | |||
:''It is argued that the culmination of the persecution of the Jews in the Nazi holocaust proves that Zionism is so essential to "Jewish survival" that any anti-Zionist is therefore not only an anti-Semite, but that any sort of criminal action is excusable against anti-Zionists in memory of the mythical "six million Jewish victims" of the Nazi "holocaust." | |||
{{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121106213159/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/73649679.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Dec+17%2C+1988&author=Caryle+Murphy&pub=The+Washington+Post+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&edition=&startpage=a.01&desc=LaRouche+Convicted+of+Mail+Fraud%3B+6+Associates+of+Extremist+Also+Found+Guilty+in+Loan+Solicitations |date=November 6, 2012 }}, ''The Washington Post'', December 17, 1988. | |||
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107171022/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/73885816.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Jul+4%2C+1989&author=&pub=The+Washington+Post+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&edition=&startpage=b.05&desc=LaRouche+Appeal+Is+Rebuffed+by+Supreme+Court |date=November 7, 2012 }}, ''The Washington Post'', July 4, 1989. | |||
* For LaRouche's sentencing, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160430094940/http://www.nytimes.com/1989/01/28/us/larouche-receives-15-year-sentence.html?scp=10&sq=LaRouche&st=nyt |date=April 30, 2016 }}, Associated Press, January 28, 1989. | |||
</ref> | |||
Defense lawyers filed unsuccessful appeals that challenged the conduct of the grand jury, the contempt fines, the execution of the search warrants, and various trial procedures. At least ten appeals were heard by the United States Court of Appeals, and three were heard by the U.S. Supreme Court.{{Citation needed|date=April 2023}} | |||
:''This is worse than sophistry. It is a lie. True, about a million and a half Jews did die as a result of the Nazi policy of labor-intensive "appropriate technology" for the employment of "inferior races," a small fraction of the tens of million of others - especially Slavs - who were murdered in the same way Jewish refugee Felix Rohaytin proposes today. Even on a relative scale, what the Nazis did to Jewish victims was mild compared with the virtual extermination of ] and the butchery of Communists.'' | |||
Former ] ] joined the defense team for two appeals, writing that the case involved "a broader range of deliberate and systematic misconduct and abuse of power over a longer period of time in an effort to destroy a political movement and leader, than any other federal prosecution in my time or to my knowledge."<ref name="Clark 1995">{{harvnb|Clark|1995}}</ref> | |||
These statements are sufficient to convict LaRouche beyond any reasonable doubt of Holocaust denial. Not only does he place "holocaust" in inverted commas and refer to the "the mythical six million Jewish victims", his assertion that Jews died only as a result of forced labour can only be read as a denial that the ] existed, a denial of the fact that the Nazis directly and deliberately killed millions of Jews, both in these camps and by means of the '']''. | |||
In his 1988 autobiography, LaRouche says the raid on his operation was the work of ].<ref>''The Power of Reason: 1988'', an autobiography by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., 1987, Executive Intelligence Review, Designed by World Composition Services, {{ISBN|0943235006}}, p. 309</ref> In an interview that same year, he said that the ] opposed him, because he had invented the ]. "The Soviet government hated me for it. Gorbachev also hated my guts and called for my assassination and imprisonment and so forth." He asserted that he had survived these threats, because he had been protected by unnamed U.S. government officials. "Even when they don't like me, they consider me a national asset, and they don't like to have their national assets killed."<ref>"Outsider making his 8th White House bid / LaRouche says he'd fix economy", Rachel Gravges, '']'', March 6, 2004</ref> | |||
Whether LaRouche can fairly be accused of anti-Semitism is a more complex question. Neither Dennis King nor LaRouche's other critics have cited any statements in LaRouche's writings of hostility towards or condemnation of the Jews as a race or of the Jewish religion, or any assertions that the Jews ''as a people'' are guilty of any of the crimes that classical anti-Semitism ascribes to them. LaRouche should therefore be acquitted of being an anti-Semite of the traditional or classical type. | |||
LaRouche received 25,562 votes in the 1988 presidential election.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190402083314/https://www.britannica.com/event/United-States-presidential-election-of-1988 |date=April 2, 2019 }}, ''Encyclopædia Britannica'', 2011, Retrieved March 23, 2011.</ref> | |||
But Anti-Semitism assumes different guises in different circumstances and at different times: thus the anti-Semitism of ] differed in form from that of ] while being equal in intensity. LaRouche's critics say that he is a "disguised anti-Semite," in that he takes the classical anti-Semitic conspiracy theory and substitutes the word "Zionist" for the word "Jew", and ascribes the classical anti-Semite's caricature of the evil, scheming Jew to particular, named, Jews and groups of Jews, rather than to the Jews as a whole. | |||
====1989: Musical interests and Verdi tuning initiative==== | |||
The ] article quoted above would seem to corroborate this accusation. In this article, LaRouche acknowledges that he accepts the classical anti-Semite conspiracy theory, with the caveat that he ascibes it to ''groups of Jews'' rather than to ''all Jews''. | |||
LaRouche had an interest in classical music up to the period of ]. A motto of LaRouche's European Workers' Party is "Think like ]"; movement offices typically include a piano and posters of German composers, and members are known for their choral singing at protest events and for using satirical lyrics tailored to their targets.<ref> | |||
For LaRouche's interests, see LaRouche, Lyndon. "Correspondence: Classical Composition," ''The New Republic'', December 26, 1988. | |||
* For the movement's interests, see Roderick. Kevin. "Raid Stirs Reports of LaRouche's Dark Side," ''Los Angeles Times'', October 14, 1986. | |||
* For "Think like Beethoven," see Smith, Susan, J. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017120129/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=aiwrAAAAIBAJ&sjid=HnIFAAAAIBAJ&pg=1095,596948&dq=bonn+exhibit+depicts+germany%27s+beethoven+cult&hl=en |date=October 17, 2015 }}, Associated Press, September 29, 1986. | |||
* For singing at events, see Fitzgerald, Michael. "Plenty of weirdness in 2007," ''The Record'', Stockton, CA, January 2, 2008. | |||
* For an example of a LaRouche choir singing at a protest, see Milbank, Dana. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161210083822/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/04/26/AR2005042601248.html |date=December 10, 2016 }}, ''The Washington Post'', April 27, 2005. | |||
* Roddy, Dennis. "LaRouchies, Anarchists doth protest, but not too much," ''Pittsburgh Post-Gazette'', July 30, 2004. | |||
* Yamamura, Kevin. "Governor begins Mexico visit with praise for Dems," Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, November 10, 2006. | |||
* Roderick, Kevin. "Raid Stirs Reports of LaRouche's Dark Side," ''Los Angeles Times'', October 14, 1986. | |||
</ref> LaRouche abhorred popular music; he said in 1980, "Rock was not an accidental thing. This was done by people who set out in a deliberate way to subvert the United States. It was done by British intelligence," and wrote that ] were "a product shaped according to British Psychological Warfare Division specifications."<ref> | |||
For rock, see Hume, Ellen. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190215050320/https://www.newspapers.com/clip/28412562/lyndon_larouche_trying_to_lose/ |date=February 15, 2019 }} ''Los Angeles Times'', February 16, 1980, pp. 20–21. | |||
* For the Beatles, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107165346/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/newsday/access/410201901.html?dids=410201901:410201901&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Sep+23%2C+2003&author=Jeff+Pearlman.+STAFF+WRITER&pub=Newsday+%28Combined+editions%29&desc=Lyndon+LaRouche%27s+LONG+Campaign+%2F+He+ran+one+presidential+campaign+from+a+federal+jail+cell+and+can%27t+even+vote+for+himself%2C+but+the+quadrennial+candidate+is+back+on+the+stump+again&pqatl=google |date=November 7, 2012 }}. | |||
</ref> | |||
LaRouche movement members have protested at performances of ]'s operas, denouncing Wagner as an anti-Semite who found favor with the Nazis, and called a conductor "satanic" because he played contemporary music.<ref> | |||
:''The Czarist ]'s "]" include a hard kernel of truth which no mere Swiss court decision could legislate out of existence. The fallacy of the "Protocols of Zion" is that it attributes the alleged conspiracy to Jews generally, to Judaism. A corrected version of the Protocols would stipulate that the evil oaths cited were actually the practices of variously a Paris branch of ] and the evidence the Okhrana turned up in tracing the penetration of the Romanian branch of B'nai B'rith (Zion) into such Russian centres of relevance as ]..." | |||
{{cite news |url=https://latimesblogs.latimes.com/culturemonster/2010/05/las-ring-cycle-begins-with-protests-outside-mixed-reaction-inside.html |last=Ng |first=David |date=May 30, 2010 |title=L.A.'s 'Ring' cycle begins with protests outside, mixed reaction inside |work=Los Angeles Times |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190215161354/https://latimesblogs.latimes.com/culturemonster/2010/05/las-ring-cycle-begins-with-protests-outside-mixed-reaction-inside.html |archive-date=February 15, 2019 }} | |||
* Also see {{cite news|ref=none |last=Ng |first=David |title=Protesters greet start of 'Ring' |work=Los Angeles Times |date=May 31, 2010}} | |||
</ref> | |||
In 1989, LaRouche advocated that classical orchestras should use a ] based on ] above middle C (A<sub>4</sub>) tuned to 432 Hz, which the Schiller Institute called the "Verdi pitch", a pitch that ] had suggested as optimal, though he also composed and conducted in other pitches such as the French official ''diapason normal'' of 435 Hz, including his ] in 1874.<ref name=Rosen>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=t_iB90JnPrwC&q=Verdi+tuning&pg=PA17 |title=Rosen, David, ''Verdi, Requiem'' |access-date=June 17, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017120129/https://books.google.com/books?id=t_iB90JnPrwC&pg=PA17&dq=Verdi+tuning&ei=dbVwSqXPK4WyNq7gzM4O |archive-date=October 17, 2015 |url-status=live |isbn=978-0521397674 |last1=Rosen |first1=David |date= 1995 |publisher=Cambridge University Press }}</ref> | |||
(] is a Jewish service organisation. LaRouche's animus towards it is connected to the fact that it is the parent organisation of the ], which has been assiduous in researching and documenting LaRouche's activities since the early 1970s. "The ADL," says LaRouche in the same article, "is literally the ] of the British secret intelligence in the urban centers of the United States.") | |||
The Schiller Institute initiative attracted support from more than 300 opera stars, including ], ], and ], who according to ''Opera Fanatic'' may not have been aware of LaRouche's politics. A spokesman for Domingo said Domingo had simply signed a questionnaire, had not been aware of its origins, and would not agree with LaRouche's politics. ] and ], who were running for the European Parliament on LaRouche's "Patriots for Italy" platform, attended Schiller Institute conferences as featured speakers. The discussions led to debates in the Italian parliament about reinstating "Verdi" legislation. LaRouche gave an interview to ] on the initiative from prison. The initiative was opposed by the editor of ''Opera Fanatic'', ], who objected to the establishment of a "pitch police," and argued that LaRouche was using the issue to gain credibility.<ref>{{dead link|date=July 2024|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}, ''Richmond Times Dispatch'', September 16, 1989. | |||
LaRouche's principal target in this article is "Zionism," to which he attributes almost every conceivable type of evil. Zionism is a Jewish political movement supporting the creation and (since 1948) defence of a Jewish state in Palestine. For LaRouche, however, it is an underground conspiracy, existing since the 16th century. "Modern Zionism was not created by Jews, but was a project developed chiefly by ]," LaRouche says. | |||
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017120129/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=hv4gAAAAIBAJ&sjid=NXQFAAAAIBAJ&pg=2431,360446&dq=larouche+verdi+tuning&hl=en |date=October 17, 2015 }}, ''The Hour'', May 2, 1989. | |||
* , '']'', May 27, 1989. | |||
* Orchestras' pitches have risen since the 18th century, because a higher pitch produces a more brilliant orchestral sound, while imposing an additional strain on singers' voices when singing the highest notes, though it made the lower notes easier. ] pushed through legislation in Italy to fix 432 Hz as the reference pitch for ], though such legislation did not stop orchestras from using other pitches. In 1938, the international standard was raised to 440 Hz, with some major orchestras tuning as high as 450 Hz in recent times. For some background, see Abdella, Fred T. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220528151552/https://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FA0716FC3D540C708DDDA10894D1484D81&pagewanted=all&legacy=true&status=nf |date=May 28, 2022 }}, ''The New York Times'', August 13, 1989.</ref> | |||
===1990s=== | |||
Today, LaRouche says, Zionism is controlled by the financiers of London: "Zionism is the state of collective psychosis through which London manipulates most of the international Jewry", and "Zionist cultism is among the most important of the levers through which British criminality and miscalculation is plunging the world towards ." LaRouche attributes to "Zionism" the various crimes which the classic anti-Semite attributes to Jews: conspiracy, manipulation, treason and secret control of international finance, media and government. | |||
====Imprisonment, release on parole, attempts at exoneration, visits to Russia==== | |||
LaRouche began his sentence in 1989, serving it at the ] in ]. From there he ran for Congress in 1990, seeking to represent the ], but he received less than one percent of the vote. He ran for president again in 1992 with ] as his running mate, a civil rights activist who had represented the LaRouche movement in its pursuit of the ]. It was only the second-ever campaign for president from prison.<ref>{{harvnb|Dorr|1992}}. | |||
* Also see Howe, Robert F. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107184139/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/73883811.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Jun+23%2C+1989&author=Robert+F.+Howe&pub=The+Washington+Post+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&edition=&startpage=a.11&desc=LaRouche+Announces+Race+for+House+From+Jail+Cell%3BFormer+Presidential+Candidate+to+Seek+Virginia%27s+10th+District+Seat+Held+by+Rep.+Wolf |date=November 7, 2012 }}, ''The Washington Post'', June 23, 1989. | |||
* For it being the second campaign from jail, see Morrison, Pat. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201021133415/https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2004-jan-05-me-polcol5-story.html |date=October 21, 2020 }}, ''Los Angeles Times'', January 5, 2004. The first to stand from jail was perennial ] candidate ] in 1920.</ref> He received 26,334 votes, standing again as the "Economic Recovery" party.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190428193428/https://www.britannica.com/event/United-States-presidential-election-of-1992 |date=April 28, 2019 }}, ''Encyclopædia Britannica'', 2011, Retrieved March 23, 2011.</ref> For a time he shared a cell with televangelist ]. Bakker later wrote of his astonishment at LaRouche's detailed knowledge of the Bible. According to Bakker, LaRouche received a daily intelligence report by mail, and at times had information about news events days before they happened. Bakker also wrote that LaRouche believed their cell was bugged. In Bakker's view, "to say LaRouche was a little paranoid would be like saying that the '']'' had a little leak."<ref>{{harvnb|Witt|2004}}, p. 2. | |||
* Also see {{harvnb|Bakker|Abraham|1996}}, pp. 250–251.</ref> | |||
Viktor Kuzin, a member of the Moscow City Council and a founder of the ] in Russia,<ref>McFaul, Michael and Markov, Sergei, ''The Troubled Birth of Russian Democracy: Parties, Personalities, and Programs'' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017120129/https://books.google.com/books?id=0JV-QtLl3I0C&pg=PA25&lpg=PA25&dq=viktor+kuzin+moscow+city+council&source=bl&ots=tYe7jjyUwk&sig=0e2JJzW0iqLQMD4zwjm79VSeFi0&hl=en&sa=X&ei=tGzPT9PLG6rY2gXBzLimDA&ved=0CFAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=viktor%20kuzin%20moscow%20city%20council&f=false|date=October 17, 2015}} Hoover Press, 1993</ref> travelled to Minnesota in 1993 to meet LaRouche in prison, and afterwards participated in international campaigns to exonerate LaRouche.<ref>Mitrofanov, Sergei, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121111045253/http://old.russ.ru/persons/99-03-30/mitrof.htm |date=November 11, 2012 }}</ref> An advertisement calling for exoneration was published in several U.S. newspapers, signed by Kuzin, Civil Rights attorney ], former Ugandan president ], and others.<ref>''Alabama Times Daily'', {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017120129/https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1842&dat=19940928&id=7lAeAAAAIBAJ&sjid=wscEAAAAIBAJ&pg=4374,4247988|date=October 17, 2015}} September 28, 1994</ref> Chestnut was interviewed in the '']'' saying that when he met LaRouche, "I told him that he might as well be black and in Alabama."<ref>Reeves, Jay, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017120129/https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1817&dat=19940929&id=F0ggAAAAIBAJ&sjid=vaUEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6418,9049416 |date=October 17, 2015 }}, ''The Tuscaloosa News'', September 30, 1994</ref> | |||
LaRouche denies equating "Zionism" with the Jews. "You cannot be a Zionist and also a Jew," he writes. LaRouche can be acquitted of the charge of anti-Semtitism only if this premise is accepted. But since the great majority of Jews are in fact Zionists, the statement that "You cannot be a Zionist and also a Jew" is ridiculous. When LaRouche accuses "Zionists" of treason and conspiracy, he is therefore seen by Jews, and many others, to be levelling those accusations against most Jews. When he accuses organisations such as B'nai B'rith and the ADL, and many individual Jews, of various crimes, he is seen to be attacking the great majority of Jews who support those organisations and those individuals, ''particularly'' since he attributes to them the classic crimes of the sterotypical Jew of the anti-Semitic imagination. | |||
The exoneration campaigns garnered the support of a number of State Representatives and State Senators in the U.S., as well as a former justice of the Washington State Supreme Court.<ref>Miller, Dean, , ''The Spokesman-Review'', August 21,</ref><ref>Pittmen, David, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141010231801/http://tucsoncitizen.com/morgue2/1995/06/30/111451-four-lawmakers-seek-exoneration-of-lyndon-larouche/ |date=October 10, 2014}}, ''Tucson Citizen'', June 20, 1995</ref> | |||
In this sense LaRouche can fairly be described as having been an anti-Semite in ], when this article was published. He has never explicitly repudiated the views expressed in this article. | |||
LaRouche was released on parole in January 1994, and returned to Loudoun County. ''The Washington Post'' wrote that he would be supervised by parole and probation officers until January 2004.<ref>Pea, Peter and Smith, Leef. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170728161618/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/cult/larouche/larou8.htm |date=July 28, 2017 }}, January 24, 1994.</ref> Also in 1994, his followers joined members of the ] to blame the ] for what they alleged were crimes and conspiracies against African Americans, reportedly one of several such meetings since 1992.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Goodstein |first=Laurie |date=1994-09-02 |title=Nation of Islam official assails Jewish group |language=en-US |newspaper=] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1994/09/02/nation-of-islam-official-assails-jewish-group/9f5df911-86ef-43da-b6ac-390aea72c763/ |access-date=2022-10-30 |issn=0190-8286}}</ref> | |||
In recent years, however, LaRouche appears to have modified his views on these subjects - without of course conceding that he has done so. In a ] LaRouche published an article called "A Personal Statement from Lyndon LaRouche on Music, Judaism, and Hitler." In this article he several times refers to "the Jew," a usage typical of anti-Semites and one which he must have known is offensive to Jews. | |||
Former U.S. Attorney General ] wrote a letter in 1995 to then-Attorney General ] in which he said that the case against LaRouche involved "a broader range of deliberate and systematic misconduct and abuse of power over a longer period of time in an effort to destroy a political movement and leader, than any other federal prosecution in my time or to my knowledge". He asserted that, "The government, ex parte, sought and received an order effectively closing the doors of these publishing businesses, all of which were involved in First Amendment activities, effectively preventing the further repayment of their debts." He called the convictions "a tragic miscarriage of justice which at this time can only be corrected by an objective review and courageous action by the Department of Justice".<ref>{{cite web |last= Clark |first= Ramsey |title= Letter from former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark to Attorney General Janet Reno |work= LaRouche in 2004|access-date= October 11, 2008 |date= April 26, 1995 |url= http://larouchein2004.net/exoneration/clarkletter.htm |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20061221170153/http://larouchein2004.net/exoneration/clarkletter.htm|archive-date= December 21, 2006}}</ref> The LaRouche movement organized two panels to review the cases: the Curtis Clark Commission,<ref>{{cite web |title= The Curtis Clark Commission Findings: Exonerate Lyndon LaRouche |access-date= October 11, 2008 |date= September 3, 1994 |work= LaRouche in 2004 |url= http://larouchein2004.net/exoneration/exonappendix1.htm |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20031219040856/http://larouchein2004.net/exoneration/exonappendix1.htm|archive-date= December 19, 2003}}</ref> and the ].<ref>{{cite web|title= Statement of Mann-Chestnut Commission|publisher= ]|access-date= October 11, 2008|url= https://larouchepub.com/pr/1997/schiller_pr_04-21-97.html|format= Press release|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20081014050826/http://www.larouchepub.com/pr/1997/schiller_pr_04-21-97.html|archive-date= October 14, 2008|url-status= live|df= mdy-all}}</ref> | |||
Nevertheless, in the course of a discussion of ], LaRouche acknowledges the contribution made by Jews to European civilization. He says: "Germany can never be truly freed from the legacy of Hitler's crimes, until the contributions of German Jews, in particular, are celebrated as an integral part of the honorable history of Germany." The article contains several other statements in similar vein. There is even a word of praise for ], an archetypal Jewish business figure of the kind so savagely denounced by LaRouche throughout his career. | |||
Beginning in 1994, LaRouche made numerous visits to Russia, participating in conferences of the ] of the ] (RAS), the RAS Institute of the Far East, and other places. He addressed seminars at the RAS Institute of Economics, the RAS Institute of Oriental Studies. He spoke at hearings in the ] of the Russian Federation on measures to ensure the development of the Russian economy at the point of destabilization of the world financial system.{{Clarify|reason=What is the "point of destabilization of the world financial system"?|date=October 2022}} Two of his books were translated into Russian.<ref name="zavtra.ru"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190214061614/http://zavtra.ru/blogs/slovo-o-larushe |date=February 14, 2019 }}, editorial in ''Zavtra'' ("Tomorrow,") September 5, 2012 -translation into English available {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121008021800/http://larouchepac.com/node/23825 |date=October 8, 2012 }}, accessed September 21, 2012</ref> | |||
In this article also LaRouche acknowledges that the Holocaust is not mostly mythological or a Zionist swindle. He says: "We can not allow 2,000 years of Jewish survival in Europe to be buried under the faceless stone epitaph which speaks only of a bare 13-odd years of Hitler's Holocaust." He explicity states that "Yes, Hitler killed millions of Jews," a direct repudiation of his ] statement that only 1.5 million died and those not as a result of a deliberate plan of extermination. This article can be seen as a significant (if unacknowledged) retreat by LaRouche from his statements of the 1970s and 1980s. Whether LaRouche can be fairly described as an anti-Semite today is thus an open question. | |||
On September 18, 1996, a full-page advertisement appeared in the ''New Federalist'', a LaRouche publication, as well as '']'' and '']''. Entitled "Officials Call for LaRouche's Exoneration", its signatories included ], former ]; figures from the 1960s American ] such as ] (a leader of the Larouche-affiliated ]), ] (a Larouche movement participant) and ]; former ] ] and Democratic presidential candidate ]; ], who chaired the ]; and artists such as classical vocalist ] and violinist ], former 1st Violin of the ].<ref>{{cite web |title= Exonerate LaRouche|access-date= October 11, 2008 |work= LaRouche in 2004 |url= http://larouchein2004.net/exoneration/exonstatement.htm |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20040228111029/http://larouchein2004.net/exoneration/exonstatement.htm|archive-date= February 28, 2004}} LaRouche's Schiller Institute paid for the advertisement. Amelia Boynton Robinson was at that time a board member of the Institute. James Bevel and William Warfield had been active in various LaRouche organizations.</ref>{{Third-party source-inline|date=October 2022}} | |||
==Criminal conviction== | |||
In 1996, LaRouche was invited to speak at a convention organized by the Nation of Islam's ] and ], then of the National African American Leadership Summit. As soon as he began speaking, he was booed off the stage.<ref>{{harvnb|Quinton|1996}}.</ref> | |||
By the 1980s LaRouche and Helga Zepp-LaRouche had built a extensive political network, including the ''Schiller Institute'' in Germany, headed by Zepp-LaRouche, and branches in several other countries. The ] claimed to have affiliates in ], ], ], ] and several South American countries. In ] LaRouche operatives took over an older extreme-right group, the ] (CEC), and regularly contest elections. The LaRouche organisation publishes a twice-weekly newspaper, ''The New Federalist'' and a weekly newsmagazine, ''Executive Intelligence Review''. The LaRouche publishing house, Benjamin Franklin Books, issues a steady stream of works by LaRouche and his followers. The real membership of LaRouche's organisation is not known. | |||
In the ], he received enough votes in Louisiana and Virginia to get one delegate from each state, but before the primaries began, the Democratic National Committee chair, ], ruled that LaRouche was not a "bona fide Democrat" because of his "expressed political beliefs ... which are explicitly racist and anti-Semitic," and because of his "past activities, including exploitation of and defrauding contributors and voters." Fowler instructed state parties to disregard votes for LaRouche.<ref> | |||
The size of the LaRouche empire led to investigations of the source of its apparently extensive financial resources. The LaRouche organisation devotes much of its energy to the sale of literature and the soliciting of small donations at airports and on university campuses. It also operates more sophisticated ] groups, soliciting donations by phone, usually under the guise of various patriotic front organisations to conceal the real source of the phone calls. More seriously, however, LaRouche was accused of fraudently soliciting "loans" from vulnerable elderly people, sometimes giving completely misleading explanations for the loan ("funding the ]" or "finding a cure for AIDS"). The funds thus raised were then directed into a maze of dummy companies so as to avoid both taxation and attempts to recover the "loans." | |||
{{harvnb|Bligh|2008}}. | |||
* LaRouche sued in federal court, claiming a violation of the ]. After losing in the district court, the case was appealed to the First District Court of Appeals, which upheld the lower court's decision. See {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190215155904/https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/152/974/543769/ |date=February 15, 2019 }}, August 28, 1998. | |||
</ref> | |||
LaRouche opposed attempts to impeach President ], charging it was a plot by the British Intelligence to destabilize the U.S. government.<ref>{{cite news|title=A long list of conspiracy feeders|first=Martin|last=Walker|work=The Gazette|location=Montreal, Que.|date=July 15, 1995|page=B.5}}</ref><ref>, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110703234240/http://wlym.com/~oakland/brutish/BritKillPrez.pdf |date=July 3, 2011 }} ''The New Federalist'' (December 1994)</ref> In 1996 he called for the impeachment of Pennsylvania governor ].<ref>{{cite news|title=LaRouche takes call for Ridge impeachment to TV {{!}} Supporters have criticized changes in welfare program|work=The Patriot|location=Harrisburg, Pennsylvania|date=August 24, 1996|page=B.6}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://larouchepub.com/impeach_ridge/index.html|title=Impeach Tom Ridge!|access-date=April 25, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303233645/http://www.larouchepub.com/impeach_ridge/index.html|archive-date=March 3, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
In October ] the FBI and Virginia state authorities raided the LaRouche headquarters in ] in search of evidence to support the persistent accusations of fraud and extortion made against LaRouche. He and six associates were charged with ] and ], and LaRouche was also charged with conspiring to hide his personal income since ], the last year he had filed a federal tax return. In December ] a federal jury in ] convicted LaRouche and his associates, and LaRouche was sentenced to fifteen years in prison, of which he served five. | |||
Efforts to clear LaRouche's name continued, including in Australia, where the Parliament acknowledged receipt of 1,606 petition signatures in 1998.<ref> {{dead link|date=June 2022|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}, June 29, 1998</ref> | |||
The prosecution alleged that LaRouche and his staff solicited loans with false assurances to potential lenders and showed "reckless disregard" of the facts. Assistant U.S. Attorney ] presented evidence that LaRouche's organisation had solicited US$34 million in loans since ]. The most important evidence was the testimony of lenders, many of them elderly retirees, who had lost thousands of dollars in loans to LaRouche that were never repaid. Several witnesses were LaRouche followers who testified under immunity from prosecution. | |||
In 1999, China's press agency, the ], reported that LaRouche had criticized the ], a congressional investigation that accused the Chinese of stealing U.S. nuclear weapons secrets, calling it a "scientifically illiterate hoax."<ref>{{dead link|date=February 2019|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}, Xinhua News Agency, June 4, 1999.</ref> On October 13, 1999, during a press conference to announce his plans to run for president, he predicted the collapse of the world's financial system, saying, "There's nothing like it in this century. ... it is systematic and therefore inevitable." He said the U.S. and other nations had built the "biggest financial bubble in all history," which was close to bankruptcy.<ref>"LaRouche Vows to Change U.S. Politics if Elected President," Xinhua News Agency, October 25, 1999.</ref> | |||
In addition to LaRouche, his chief fund-raiser, ], was convicted on ten mail fraud counts. LaRouche's legal adviser, ], and several other fundraising operatives were convicted of conspiracy to commit mail fraud. LaRouche denied all the charges, calling them "an all-out frame-up by a state and federal task force," and said that the federal government was trying to kill him. "The purpose of this frame-up is not is not to send me to prison. It's to kill me," LaRouche said. "In prison it's fairly easy to kill me... If this sentence goes through, I'm dead." This proved to be another false prediction: LaRouche was released unharmed in ]. | |||
===2000s=== | |||
One of the most striking aspects of the trial was the revelation of LaRouche's personal wealth. While lenders were told that LaRouche had no money to repay their loans, he in fact spent US$4.2 million on real estate in Virginia and on "improvements" to his 200-acre Leesburg estate. These included a swimming pool and horse riding ring. | |||
====2000–2003: Worldwide LaRouche Youth Movement, September 11 attacks, presidential run==== | |||
] | |||
LaRouche founded the Worldwide LaRouche Youth Movement (WLYM) in 2000, saying in 2004 that it had hundreds of members in the U.S. and a lesser number overseas. During the Democratic primaries in June 2000, he received 53,280 votes, or 22% of the total, in ].<ref>For the founding of WYLM and the membership figures, see {{harvnb|Witt|2004}}, p. 2, and {{harvnb|Silva|2006}}. | |||
Former U.S. Attorney General ] has tried to clear LaRouche's name, arguing that investigators and political opponents had abused the legal process to eliminate him. Clark wrote in 1995, in a letter to then serving Attorney General ]: "I bring this matter to you directly, because I believe it involves a broader range of deliberate and systematic misconduct and abuse of power over a longer period of time in an effort to destroy a political movement and leader, than any other federal prosecution in my time or to my knowledge." | |||
* For the Democratic primaries figures, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200815142426/https://www.economist.com/united-states/2000/06/22/is-lyndon-a-democrat |date=August 15, 2020 }}, ''The Economist'', June 22, 2000.</ref> Despite finishing above the 15% threshold needed to obtain delegates, LaRouche was denied any delegates and was barred from attending the ].<ref name=":9">{{cite web|title=Political Briefing; A Spot for LaRouche? No Way, Party Says| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2000/06/11/us/political-briefing-a-spot-for-larouche-no-way-party-says.html|work=The New York Times|date=August 15, 2000|access-date=October 29, 2022}}</ref> | |||
In 2002, LaRouche's ''Executive Intelligence Review'' argued that the ] in 2001 had been an ] and "attempted coup d'etat", and that Iran was the first country to question it. The article received wide coverage in Iran, and was cited by senior Iranian government officials, including ] and ]. Mahmoud Alinejad wrote that, in a subsequent telephone interview with the ''Voice of the Islamic Republic of Iran'', LaRouche said the attacks had been organized by rogue elements inside the U.S., aiming to use the incident to promote a war against Islam, and that Israel was a dictatorial regime prepared to commit Nazi-style crimes against the ].<ref>{{harvnb|Alinejad|2004|pp=105–106}}.</ref> | |||
In the early 1990s, while LaRouche was in prison, full page advertisements, calling for LaRouche to be exonerated, appeared in papers such as the ''New York Times'' and ''Washington Post.'' Among the signators were heads of state and cabinet-level officials from around the world, including ], former President of Argentina; leaders of the ], including ] (the heroine of ]) and ]; former Minnesota Senator and Democratic Presidential Candidate ]; and prominent artists, such as violinist ], former primarius of the ]. | |||
It is interesting, and perhaps puzzling, that these individuals came to the defense of a man who has been so universally condemned in the press throughout the English-speaking world. | |||
In 2003, LaRouche was living in a "heavily guarded" rented house in ].<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180428093533/https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/magazine/2004/10/24/no-joke/882986fd-53f1-4443-95f8-f4f265d38f61/ |date=April 28, 2018 }} Retrieved May 7, 2018.</ref> | |||
==See also== | |||
LaRouche again entered the primary elections for the Democratic Party's nomination in 2004, setting a record for the number of consecutive presidential campaigns; Democratic Party officials did not allow him to participate in candidate forum debates. He did not run in 2008.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190227061710/https://www.cbsnews.com/news/lyndon-larouche-tries-again/ |date=February 27, 2019 }}. | |||
*] | |||
* That he did not run in 2008, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110605165602/http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2007/0711.klein.html |date=June 5, 2011 }}.</ref> | |||
*] | |||
As during the preceding decade, LaRouche and his followers denied that human civilization had harmed the environment through ], ]s, or ]. According to ], "Pro-LaRouche publications have been at the forefront of denying the reality of ]".<ref>{{cite web|title=Lyndon LaRouche: Man of Vision or Venom?: What's the Real Story?|first=Chip|last=Berlet|publisher=Political Research Associates|date=September 13, 2007|url=http://www.publiceye.org/larouche/truestory.html|access-date=May 12, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514144919/http://www.publiceye.org/larouche/truestory.html|archive-date=May 14, 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
==External links== | |||
===Media reports=== | |||
* by Terry Kirby, July 2004 (]) | |||
* | |||
* by John Mintz 1985 (Washington Post) | |||
* by John Mintz 1985 (Washington Post) | |||
* by John Mintz 1985 (Washington Post) | |||
* by John Mintz 1985 (Washington Post) | |||
* by John Mintz 1985 (Washington Post) | |||
* By Caryle Murphy 1988 (Washington Post) | |||
* By Alison Howard 1990 (Washington Post) | |||
* By Peter Pae and Leef Smith 1994 (Washington Post) | |||
* (''Newsday'' article on LaRouche's record of eight consecutive Presidential campaigns) | |||
* | |||
* ~ ''from the website of'' ] | |||
====2003–2012: Overseas press coverage, financial crisis==== | |||
===Critical sites=== | |||
] | |||
* ~ '']'' | |||
Iqbal Qazwini wrote in the Arabic-language daily '']'' in 2003 that LaRouche was one of the first to predict the fall of the ] in 1988 and ]. He said LaRouche had urged the West to pursue a policy of economic cooperation similar to the ] for the advancement of the economy of the socialist countries. According to Qazwini, recent years have seen a proliferation of LaRouche's ideas in China and South Asia. Qazwini referred to him as the spiritual father of the revival of the new ] or ], which aims to link the continents through a network of ground transportation.<ref>Qazwini, Iqbal. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170222171129/http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=ar&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aawsat.com%2Fleader.asp%3Fsection%3D3%26issueno%3D8822%26article%3D148496 |date=February 22, 2017 }}, ''Asharq Al-Awsat'', January 23, 2003.</ref> | |||
* | |||
* | |||
In 2005, the '']'' of China covered LaRouche's economic forecasts and published an eight-part interview with him; the interviewer wrote that LaRouche was "quite famous in mainland China today".<ref>{{harvnb|Tang|2005}}</ref><ref>Tang Yong, ''People's Daily'', {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130513210957/http://world.people.com.cn/GB/41217/3317833.html|date=May 13, 2013}}, April 13, 2005.</ref> | |||
* | |||
* | |||
In 2007, LaRouche began a national lobbying campaign to restore the ], saying that it would be possible to save the U.S. banking system by reorganizing it under bankruptcy protection.<ref>*Lindo, Bill, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220528151555/https://amandala.com.bz/news/ |date=May 28, 2022 }}, ''Amandala Online'', March 31, 2009 | |||
* ~ book by ] | |||
* Paine, Laura, {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203083630/http://www.patriotledger.com/your_vote/election-1/x128165993/Frank-meets-LaRouche-candidate-Brown-in-only-primary-debate |date=December 3, 2013 }}, ''Patriot-Ledger'', February 8, 2010</ref> Also in 2007, he proposed a "Homeowners and Bank Protection Act". This called for the establishment of a federal agency that would "place federal- and state-chartered banks under protection, freeze all existing home mortgages for a period of time, adjust mortgage values to fair prices, restructure existing mortgages at appropriate interest rates, and write off speculative debt obligations of mortgage-backed securities". The bill envisioned a foreclosure moratorium, allowing homeowners to make the equivalent of rental payments for an interim period, and an end to bank bailouts, forcing banks to reorganize under bankruptcy laws.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190214233440/http://www.saukvalley.com/articles/2007/11/02/news/state/293146607163817.txt |date=February 14, 2019 }}, saukvalley.com, November 2, 2007.</ref> In spring 2007 he was an honorary foreign guest at a ceremony in honor of the 80th birthday of ] at the Russian Academy of Sciences.<ref name="zavtra.ru" /> | |||
* ~ '']'' | |||
* | |||
====2009: U.S. health care reform<!-- Death panel links here-->==== | |||
* ~ '']'' (Temple Of The Screaming Electron website) | |||
] with a ]]] | |||
During the discussion of U.S. health care reform in 2009, LaRouche advocated a ] bill and took exception to what he described as President ]'s proposal that "independent boards of doctors and health care experts make the life-and-death decisions of what care to provide, and what not, based on cost-effectiveness criteria." LaRouche said the proposed boards would amount to the same thing as the ]' ] euthanasia program. A press release from his political action committee asserted: "Lyndon LaRouche and the LaRouchePAC are the source of the campaign to expose the Obama ‘health care’ policy as modeled on that of Hitler in 1939."<ref>{{cite news|last=Mackey|first=Robert|url=https://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/25/visitors-from-planet-larouche|title=Visitors from Planet LaRouche|work=The New York Times|date=August 25, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170710153015/https://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/25/visitors-from-planet-larouche/|archive-date=July 10, 2017 }}</ref> | |||
Images at tables of volunteers compared Obama to ], and at least one had a picture of Obama with a Hitler-style mustache. In Seattle, police were called twice in response to people threatening to attack the volunteers. During one widely reported public meeting, Congressman ] called the images "vile, contemptible nonsense."<ref>Overley, Jeff. "LaRouche activists press message; Demonstrators battle health care overhaul by likening ideas to Hitler's policies", ''Orange County Register'', August 23, 2009.</ref><ref>For the pamphlets and posters, see {{harvnb|Schultz|2009}}.</ref><ref>For the police being called, see {{harvnb|McNerthney|2009}}.</ref><ref>For Barney Frank, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090901172319/http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/08/18/frank.heath.care/index.html |date=September 1, 2009 }}.</ref> | |||
==Ideology and beliefs== | |||
{{Main|Views of Lyndon LaRouche and the LaRouche movement}} | |||
] political philosophers ] and ] write of LaRouche that "t must be nearly unique in American politics that a presidential candidate ... makes the interpretation of ] a major issue in his campaign."<ref>Zuckert, Catherine H and Michael P, ''The Truth about Leo Strauss: Political Philosophy and American Democracy'', p. 12</ref> | |||
According to ], LaRouche saw history as a battle between ], who believe in absolute truth, and ], who rely on ] data. Johnson characterizes LaRouche's views as follows: the Platonists include figures such as ], ], ], ], and ]. LaRouche believed that many of the world's ills result from the dominance of Aristotelianism as embraced by the ] (such as ], ], ], and ]), leading to a culture that favors the empirical over the ], embraces ], and seeks to keep the general population uninformed. Industry, technology, and classical music should be used to enlighten the world, LaRouche argued, whereas the Aristotelians use ], drugs, ], jazz, environmentalism, and ] to bring about a new Dark Age in which the world will be ruled by ]. Left and right are false distinctions for LaRouche; what matters is the Platonic versus Aristotelian outlook, a position that has led him to form relationships with groups as disparate as farmers, nuclear engineers, ], ], and ] advocates. | |||
In ''Architects of Fear'' (1983), Johnson compares LaRouche's view to an ]; Johnson writes that after he wrote about LaRouche in '']'', LaRouche's followers denounced him as part of a conspiracy of elitists that began in ].{{sfn|Johnson|1983|pp=187ff}}{{sfn|Copulus|1984|p=2}}{{sfn|Johnson|1983|pp=14}}{{sfn|George|Wilcox|1992|pp=314ff}}<ref>For LaRouche on his philosophy, see LaRouche, Lyndon. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110609111116/http://wlym.com/PDF-77-85/CAM7806.pdf |date=June 9, 2011 }}, ''The Campaigner'', May–June 1978, p. 5ff.</ref> But according to LaRouche, Aristotelians are not necessarily in communication or coordination with one another: "From their standpoint, are proceeding by instinct," LaRouche said. "If you're asking how their policy is developed{{snd}}if there is an inside group sitting down and making plans{{snd}}no, it doesn't work that way ... History doesn't function quite that consciously."<ref>{{harvnb|Toumey|1996|p=85ff.}}</ref>{{sfn|Johnson|1983|pp=187ff}}<ref>For the empiricists, see also {{harvnb|Robins|Post|1997|p=196}}.</ref><ref>For the list of friends and foes, see {{harvnb|Johnson|1983|pp=22, 188, 192–193, 198}}</ref><ref>For LaRouche's comment about the conspirators not needing to be in touch with each other, see {{harvnb|Johnson|1983|p=198}}.</ref> | |||
In 2011, Stephen E. Adkins's ''Encyclopedia of Right-Wing Extremism In Modern American History'' called LaRouche "the leading neo-fascist politician in the United States".{{Sfn|Atkins|2011|p=108}} | |||
==Controversy== | |||
LaRouche was described as having "] tendencies", taking positions on the ] (despite his self-identification with the ] and some left-wing policies), and creating ].<ref>For Rosenfeld in ''The Washington Post'', see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107165429/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost_historical/access/120029198.html?dids=120029198:120029198&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&date=Sep+24%2C+1976&author=Stephen+S.+Rosenfeld&pub=The+Washington+Post++%281974-Current+file%29&edition=&startpage=A15&desc=NCLC%3A+%27A+Domestic+Political+Menace%27 |date=November 7, 2012 }}.</ref> | |||
===Designation as a conspiracy theorist=== | |||
LaRouche was commonly regarded as a conspiracy theorist: for example, in his Fox News obituary.<ref>{{cite web |title=Lyndon LaRouche, perennial presidential candidate, dead at 96 |website=] |url=https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lyndon-larouche-perennial-presidential-candidate-dead-at-96 |access-date=March 28, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190328012303/https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lyndon-larouche-perennial-presidential-candidate-dead-at-96 |archive-date=March 28, 2019 |url-status=live |date=February 13, 2019 }}</ref> An article in the ]<ref>{{cite web |title='Prophet: Debt crisis a new world order plot |url=https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2011/08/02/%E2%80%98prophet%E2%80%99-debt-crisis-new-world-order-plot |access-date=March 28, 2019 |language=en |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190328012313/https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2011/08/02/%25E2%2580%2598prophet%25E2%2580%2599-debt-crisis-new-world-order-plot |archive-date=March 28, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> website names him as "a fringe ideologue and conspiracy theorist whom Chip Berlet, senior analyst at ] and an expert on the radical right calls "the man who brought us fascism wrapped in an American flag". An NPR obituary is titled ''Conspiracy Theorist And Frequent Presidential Candidate Lyndon LaRouche Dies At 96''.<ref name=":1">{{cite web |title=Conspiracy Theorist And Frequent Presidential Candidate Lyndon LaRouche Dies At 96 |website=] |date=February 14, 2019 |url=https://www.npr.org/2019/02/14/694626800/conspiracy-theorist-and-frequent-presidential-candidate-lyndon-larouche-dies-at- |access-date=March 28, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190320115156/https://www.npr.org/2019/02/14/694626800/conspiracy-theorist-and-frequent-presidential-candidate-lyndon-larouche-dies-at- |archive-date=March 20, 2019 |url-status=live |df=mdy-all |last1=Doubek |first1=James }}</ref> ''The Washington Post'' obituary reports he was "often described as an extremist crank and fringe figure" and that he "built a worldwide following based on conspiracy theories, economic doom, anti-Semitism, homophobia and racism".<ref>{{cite news |title=Lyndon LaRouche Jr., conspiracy theorist and presidential candidate, dies at 96 |newspaper=] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/lyndon-larouche-jr-conspiracy-theorist-and-presidential-candidate-dies-at-96/2019/02/13/22170d42-2f21-11e9-813a-0ab2f17e305b_story.html |access-date=March 28, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190328012306/https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/lyndon-larouche-jr-conspiracy-theorist-and-presidential-candidate-dies-at-96/2019/02/13/22170d42-2f21-11e9-813a-0ab2f17e305b_story.html |archive-date=March 28, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
===Allegations of antisemitism=== | |||
Beginning in the mid-1970s, allegations began to appear saying that LaRouche had ] and antisemitic tendencies.<ref> | |||
For example, see {{harvnb|Rosenfeld|1976}}; {{harvnb|Horowitz|1981}}; {{harvnb|Lerman|1988}}; {{harvnb|Griffin|Feldman|2003}}, p. 144; and {{harvnb|Blamires|2006}}. | |||
* Also see Chavis, Benjamin F. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017120129/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=4ZglAAAAIBAJ&sjid=XfUFAAAAIBAJ&pg=5005,516671&dq=fascists+julian-bond+larouche&hl=en |date=October 17, 2015 }}, ''Washington Afro-American'', August 12, 1986. | |||
</ref> | |||
In 1977, LaRouche married his second wife, ], a German 27 years younger than he. Her 1984 book, ''The Hitler Book'', argues that "We need a movement that can finally free Germany from the control of the ] and ] treaties, thanks to which we have staggered from one catastrophe to another for an entire century."<ref>In German: "Wir brauchen eine Bewegung, die Deutschland endlich aus der Kontrolle der Kräfte von Versailles und Jalta befreit, die uns schon ein ganzes Jahrhundert lang von einer Katastrophe in die andere stürzt."</ref> Helga founded the ], which has been described as ] by the '']'' and ], a nonprofit research group that studies right-wing, white supremacist, and militia groups.<ref>{{cite news |language=de |title=Tod auf der Straße |url=http://www.berlinonline.de/berliner-zeitung/archiv/.bin/dump.fcgi/2008/1023/seite3/0006/index.html |publisher=Berlineonline.de |work=Berliner Zeitung |date=October 23, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081029030433/http://www.berlinonline.de/berliner-zeitung/archiv/.bin/dump.fcgi/2008/1023/seite3/0006/index.html |archive-date=October 29, 2008 |access-date=May 13, 2014}} Article title in English is "Death on the Streets".</ref><ref name=Newsnight>Samuels, Tim. "Jeremiah Duggan's death and Lyndon LaRouche," ''Newsnight'', February 12, 2004.</ref> | |||
LaRouche claimed that he was ], not antisemitic.<ref name=Montgomery1979>{{harvnb|Montgomery|1979}}.</ref> When the ] (ADL) accused LaRouche of antisemitism in 1979, he filed a $26-million libel suit; the case failed when Justice Michael Dontzin of the ] ruled that it was ] and that the facts "reasonably give rise" to that description.<ref>{{harvnb|Copulus|1984|p=4, footnote 5}}.</ref><ref>Also see Binder, Sarah. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017120129/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=0URgAAAAIBAJ&sjid=tHANAAAAIBAJ&pg=5372,277201&dq=dontzin+larouche&hl=en |date=October 17, 2015 }}, The Canadian Press, September 1, 1984.</ref> LaRouche started a campaign against the ADL and set up a group called "The Provisional Committee to Clean Up B'nai Brith."{{citation needed|date=July 2016}} | |||
LaRouche said in 1986 that descriptions of him as a neo-fascist or anti-Semite stemmed from "the drug lobby or the Soviet operation{{snd}}which is sometimes the same thing,"<ref>For the drug lobby quote, see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017120129/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=l1UcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=q1IEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6978,5074258&dq=the-drug-lobby-or-the-soviet-operation-which-is-sometimes-the-same-thing&hl=en |date=October 17, 2015 }}.</ref><ref>Also see "LaRouche alleges conspiracy from Moscow to White House", Associated Press, April 19, 1986.</ref> and in 2006 wrote that "religious and racial hatred, such as antisemitism, or hatred against Islam, or, hatred of Christians, is, on record of known history, the most evil expression of criminality to be seen on the planet today."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://larouchepac.com/pages/writings_files/2006/060917_bernard_lewis_prt.htm |title=LaRouche, September 17, 2006 |access-date=October 22, 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061022223546/http://larouchepac.com/pages/writings_files/2006/060917_bernard_lewis_prt.htm |archive-date=October 22, 2006}}.</ref> ] wrote in 1988 that LaRouche used "the British" as a code word for "Jews,"<ref>{{harvnb|Lerman|1988|p=213}}.</ref> a theory also propounded by Dennis King, author of ''Lyndon LaRouche and the New American Fascism'' (1989). George Johnson argued that King's presentation failed to take into account that several members of LaRouche's inner circle were Jewish.<ref>{{harvnb|Johnson|1989|p=2}}.</ref> ] wrote in 1997 that LaRouche's references to the British really were to the British, though he agreed that an alleged British-Jewish alliance lay at the heart of LaRouche's conspiracism.<ref>{{harvnb|Pipes|1997|pp=137, 142}}.</ref> | |||
As of 2016, the ] states that "The international organization run by Lyndon LaRouche is a major source of such masked antisemitic theories globally. In the U.S. the LaRouchites spread these conspiracy theories in an alliance with aides to Minister ] of the ]. A series of LaRouchite pamphlets calls the neoconservative movement the 'Children of Satan', which links Jewish neo-conservatives to the historic rhetoric of the ]."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/neo-nazism-2 |title=Neo-Nazism |access-date=April 25, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190502155600/https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/neo-nazism-2 |archive-date=May 2, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
===Allegations of racism=== | |||
] of ] wrote in 1998 that LaRouche tried in the mid-1980s to build bridges to the black community. Marable argued that most of the community was not fooled and quoted the ], an organization for African American trade unionists, declaring that "LaRouche appeals to fear, hatred and ignorance. He seeks to exploit and exacerbate the anxieties and frustrations of Americans by offering an array of scapegoats and enemies: Jews, Zionists, international bankers, blacks, labor unions{{snd}}much the way Hitler did in Germany."<ref name="Manning 1998">{{harvnb|Manning|1998}}.</ref> During LaRouche's slander suit against NBC in 1984, ], leader of the ], took the stand for LaRouche as a character witness, stating under oath that LaRouche's views on racism were "consistent with his own." Asked whether he had seen any indication of racism in LaRouche's associates, he replied that he had not.<ref>{{harvnb|George|Wilcox|1992|pp=317, 322}}.</ref> | |||
===Disputed record as economist and forecaster=== | |||
LaRouche material frequently acclaims him as the world's greatest economist and the world's most successful forecaster. For example, his book title ''The Economics of the Noösphere: Why Lyndon LaRouche Is the World's Most Successful Economic Forecaster of the Past Four Decades''.<ref>The book has the puff: "American Economist Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., has been right in his long-range economic and related forecasts{{snd}}in contrast to virtually all other economists and political leaders, who have been simply wrong." {{cite book |title=(Book sales page) |isbn = 978-1980307884|last1 = Vernadsky|first1 = Vladimir|last2 = Larouche|first2 = Lyndon|date = February 16, 2018| publisher=Independently Published }}</ref> However, a website of disgruntled ex-movement leaders lists incorrect predictions of sudden world economic collapse, war or depression in 1956, 1961–1970, 1972, 1975–1992,<ref>] occurred, however LaRouche's actual statements in advance were to refer lukewarmly to predictions made by unnamed "leading European financial officials" {{cite web |id=laroucheplanet |url=http://laroucheplanet.info/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=Cult.FcrasH |title=The "Financial Crash/Economic Depression" |access-date=March 28, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181116064709/http://laroucheplanet.info/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=Cult.FcrasH |archive-date=November 16, 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref> and 1994–2011.<ref name="auto">{{cite web |id=laroucheplanet |url=http://laroucheplanet.info/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=Cult.FcrasH |title=The "Financial Crash/Economic Depression" |access-date=March 28, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181116064709/http://laroucheplanet.info/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=Cult.FcrasH |archive-date=November 16, 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Apart from the numerous failed predictions are claimed some successful predictions or proposals: the eventual reunification of Germany,<ref name="auto"/> the Star Wars initiative, the New Silk Road<ref name="auto"/> (claimed as a precursor to the Chinese ].){{Third-party inline|date=October 2022}} | |||
==Movement== | |||
{{Main|LaRouche movement}} | |||
Estimates of the size of LaRouche's movement have varied over the years; most say there is a core membership of 500 to 2,000. The estimated 600 members in 1978 paid monthly dues of $24. Johnson wrote in 1983 that both the ] and the National Democratic Policy Committee had attracted some 20,000 members, as well as 300,000 magazine subscribers.<ref>In 1974 Larouche said the NCLC had 1,000 members and his other organizations 1,000 to 2,000; see Valentine, Paul W. (February 25, 1974), "NCLC Fights a Psychic War Against CIA and Left Rivals", ''The Capital Times'' (Madison, Wis.): pp. 22–23.</ref><ref>For 20,000 members in the Fusion Energy Foundation and National Democratic Policy Committee, and 300,000 magazine subscribers, see {{harvnb|Johnson|1983|p=191}}.</ref><ref>In 1987 John Mintz of the ''Washington Post'' wrote that there more than 500 members worldwide; see Mintz, September 20, 1987.</ref><ref>In 2004 ''The Washington Post'' estimated that the LaRouche Youth Movement had hundreds of members in the U.S. and more abroad; see {{harvnb|Witt|2004}}.</ref> | |||
According to Christopher Toumey, LaRouche's ] within the movement was grounded on members' belief that he possessed a unique level of insight and expertise. He identified an emotionally charged issue, conducted in-depth research into it, and then proposed a simplistic solution, which usually involved restructuring of the economy or national security apparatus. He and the membership portrayed anyone opposing him as immoral and part of the conspiracy.<ref>{{harvnb|Toumey|1996|p=86}}</ref><ref>Mintz, September 20, 1987; see above.</ref><ref>{{cite web |agency=The Washington Post |first1=Timothy R. | last1=Smith |title=Lyndon LaRouche Jr. – conspiracy theorist, presidential candidate and longtime Virginian – dies |url=https://www.richmond.com/news/obituary/lyndon-larouche-jr-conspiracy-theorist-presidential-candidate-and-longtime-virginian/article_ae264da7-71de-58cd-8884-c39b02abffb9.html |url-access=subscription |website=Richmond Times-Dispatch |date=February 13, 2019 |access-date=February 14, 2019 |language=en |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190214144258/https://www.richmond.com/news/obituary/lyndon-larouche-jr-conspiracy-theorist-presidential-candidate-and-longtime-virginian/article_ae264da7-71de-58cd-8884-c39b02abffb9.html |archive-date=February 14, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
===Description as a cult=== | |||
The LaRouche movement has been described as a cult or cult-like by critics and anti-cult organizations.<ref>The LaRouche movement was treated in a series on cults in the Washington Post in 1985, in company with for example the ] (Orange People){{cite news |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/cult/larouche/main.htm |title=Ideological Odyssey: From Old Left to Far Right |author=John Mintz |newspaper=] |access-date=July 6, 2004 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040113074000/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/cult/larouche/main.htm |archive-date=January 13, 2004 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=":3">"One of America’s contributions to the 20th-century’s rich legacy of dangerous political cult leaders" {{cite web |title=Political Cult Leader Lyndon LaRouche Dies at 96 |date=February 13, 2019 |url=https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/02/political-cult-leader-lyndon-larouche-dies-at-96.html |access-date=March 28, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190328042317/http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/02/political-cult-leader-lyndon-larouche-dies-at-96.html |archive-date=March 28, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/the-cult-and-the-candidate-553850.html |title=The cult and the candidate |website=] |date=July 20, 2004 |access-date=March 28, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110528205628/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/the-cult-and-the-candidate-553850.html |archive-date=May 28, 2011 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>"But in Germany, they are seen as a political cult{{snd}}and a potentially dangerous one" {{cite web |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/09/18/lyndon-larouche-is-running-a-pro-china-party-in-germany/ |website=Foreign Policy |title=Lyndon LaRouche Is Running A Pro-China Party In Germany |date=September 18, 2017 |access-date=March 28, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190328042318/https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/09/18/lyndon-larouche-is-running-a-pro-china-party-in-germany/ |archive-date=March 28, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
A 1987 article by John Mintz in ''The Washington Post'' reported that members of the LaRouche movement lived hand-to-mouth in crowded apartments, with their basic needs paid for by the movement. They worked raising money or selling newspapers for LaRouche, doing research for him, or singing in a group choir, spending almost every waking hour together.<ref name=MintzSep201987> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107184131/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/73846043.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Sep+20%2C+1987&author=John+Mintz&pub=The+Washington+Post+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&edition=&startpage=c.01&desc=Inside+the+Weird+World+of+Lyndon+LaRouche |date=November 7, 2012 }}.</ref> | |||
The group is known for its caustic attacks on opponents and former members. It has justified what it calls "psywar techniques" as necessary to shake people up; Johnson in 1983 quoted a LaRouche associate: "We're not very nice, so we're hated. Why be nice? It's a cruel world. We're in a war and the human race is up for grabs".<ref>{{harvnb|Johnson|1983|pp=191–192}}.</ref> Charles Tate, a former LaRouche associate, told ''The Washington Post'' in 1987 that members see themselves as exempt from the ordinary laws of society: "They feel that the continued existence of the human race is totally dependent on what they do in the organization, that nobody would be here without LaRouche. They feel justified in a peculiar way doing anything whatsoever."<ref name=MintzSep201987/> | |||
==Death== | |||
LaRouche's death was announced on the website of one of his organizations. He died on February 12, 2019, at age 96. Neither the place nor cause of his death was specified.<ref name="NYTDeath"/> | |||
==Publications== | |||
{{Refbegin|40em}} | |||
* (as Lyn Marcus). New York: West Village Committee for Independent Political Action (1967). | |||
* ''Mass Action'', with ]. Ann Arbor, Michigan: ] (1968).<!--check this--> | |||
* ''The Philosophy of Socialist Education''. New York: ] (1969). | |||
* ''Centrism as a Social Phenomenon: How Not to Build a Revolutionary Party'' (as Lyn Marcus), with Uwe Henke von Parpart. New York: ] (1970). | |||
* ''Education, Science and Politics''. New York: ] (1972). | |||
* New York: Campaigner Publications (1975). ''The Campaigner'', vol. 8, no. 9 (Nov. 1975). | |||
* New York: Campaigner Publications (1975). | |||
* ''A Presidential Campaign White Paper on Agricultural Production''. New York: New Solidarity International Press Service (1975). | |||
* ''The Rothschilds, from Pitt to Rockefeller'' (1976). {{OCLC|4895071}}. | |||
* New York: Heath (1975). {{ISBN|0669853089}}. | |||
* New York: Campaigner Publications (1977). {{ISBN|0918388066}}. | |||
* New York: New Benjamin Franklin House (1979). {{ISBN|0933488033}}. | |||
* New York: New Benjamin Franklin House (1979). {{ISBN|0933488017}}. | |||
* New York: New Benjamin Franklin House (1979). {{ISBN|0933488025}}. | |||
* New York: New Benjamin Franklin House (1980). {{ISBN|0933488041}}. | |||
* New York: New Benjamin Franklin House (1980). {{ISBN|0933488068}}. | |||
* New York: New Benjamin Franklin House (1980). {{ISBN|0933488084}}. | |||
* , with ]. New York: New Benjamin Franklin House (1980). {{ISBN|0933488092}}. | |||
* New York: ] (1982). | |||
* New York: New Benjamin Franklin House (1983). {{ISBN|0933488319}}. | |||
* New York: New Benjamin Franklin House (1984). {{ISBN|0943235138}}. | |||
* New York: New Benjamin Franklin House (1984). {{ISBN|0933488335}}. | |||
* ''The Power of Reason, 1988: An Autobiography''. Washington, D.C.: '']'' (1987). {{ISBN|0943235006}}. | |||
* ''In Defense of Common Sense''. Washington, D.C.: ] (1989). {{ISBN|0962109533}}. | |||
* ''The Science of Christian Economy''. Washington, D.C.: ] (1991). {{ISBN|0962109568}}. | |||
* , with Paul Gallager. Washington, D.C.: ] (1992). {{ISBN|0962109576}}. | |||
* ''Now, Are You Ready to Learn About Economics?'' Washington, D.C.: ] (2000). {{ISBN|0943235189}}. | |||
* ''The Economics of the Nöosphere''. Washington, D.C.: ] (2001). {{ISBN|0943235200}}. | |||
{{Refend}} | |||
== References == | |||
{{Reflist}} | |||
{{anchor|Books general}} | |||
===Works cited=== | |||
;Books or chapters about LaRouche | |||
{{refbegin|indent=yes}} | |||
* {{citation |last1=Alexander |first1=Robert Jackson |date=1991 |chapter=The Strange Case of the National Caucus of Labor Committees |title=International Trotskyism, 1929–1985: A Documented Analysis of the Movement |isbn=978-0-8223-1066-2 |publisher=Duke University Press |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_eUtQjseKaIC&pg=PA944}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Blamires |first=Cyprian |date=2006 |title=Lyndon LaRouche |encyclopedia=World Fascism: A Historical Encyclopedia, Volume 1 |publisher=ABC-CLIO |isbn=1-57607-940-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nvD2rZSVau4C&pg=PA375}} | |||
* {{Citation |last1=George |first1=John |last2=Wilcox |first2=Laird M. |chapter=The LaRouche Network |title=Nazis, Communists, Klansmen, and Others on the Fringe: Political Extremism in America |date=1992 |publisher=Prometheus Books |page=312ff |isbn=978-0-87975-680-2 |url=http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=58647858}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Johnson |first=George |date=1983 |chapter=The 'New Dark Ages' Conspiracy |title=Architects of Fear: Conspiracy Theories and Paranoia in American Politics |publisher=J.P Tarcher |isbn=0-87477-275-3}} | |||
* {{citation |last=King |first=Dennis |date=1989 |title=Lyndon LaRouche and the New American Fascism |work=Doubleday |isbn=978-0-385-23880-9 |url=https://archive.org/details/larouchenewamericanfascism}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Lerman |first=Antony |date=1988 |chapter=Le Pen and LaRouche: Political Extremism in Democratic Societies |editor-last=Frankel |editor-first=William |isbn=978-0-8386-3322-9 |title=Survey of Jewish Affairs 1987 |publisher=Fairleigh Dickinson University Press |page=202 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9IMiLBWqCsAC&pg=PA202}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Manning |first=Marable |date=1998 |chapter=Black Fundamentalism: Louis Farrakhan and the Politics of Conservative Black Nationalism (part IV) |title=Black Leadership |publisher=Columbia University Press |pages=175–182}} | |||
* {{citation |last1=Robins |first1=Robert S. |last2=Post |first2=Jerrold M. |date=1997 |chapter=Lyndon LaRouche: The Extremity of Reason |title=Political Paranoia: The Psychopolitics of Hatred |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=0-300-07027-6}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Toumey |first=Christopher P. |chapter=The LaRouche Theory of AIDS/HIV |title=Conjuring Science: Scientific Symbols and Cultural Meanings in American Life |date=1996 |publisher=Rutgers University Press |isbn=978-0-8135-2285-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kV7j8tUq0rcC&pg=PA84}} | |||
* {{citation |last1=Tourish |first1=Dennis |last2=Wohlforth |first2=Tim |date=2000 |title=On the Edge: Political Cults Right and Left |publisher=M.E Sharpe |isbn=0-7656-0639-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xXcsNRUuHEUC}} | |||
{{refend}} | |||
;Books (general) | |||
{{Refbegin|indent=yes}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Alinejad |first=Mahmoud |editor1-last=Van Der Weer |editor1-first=Peter |date=2004 |chapter=Political Islam in Iran and the emergence of a religious public sphere: The impact of September 11 |title=Media, War, and Terrorism: Responses from the Middle East and Asia |publisher=Routledge |isbn=0-415-33140-4}} | |||
* {{citation |last1=Bakker |first1=Jim |last2=Abraham |first2=Ken |date=1996 |title=I Was Wrong |publisher=T. Nelson |isbn=978-0-7852-7425-4}} | |||
* {{citation |last1=Berlet |first1=Chip |last2=Lyons |first2=Matthew Nemiroff |title=Right-wing populism in America: too close for comfort |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Md1aRhWNk1QC |date=2000 |publisher=Guilford Press |isbn=978-1-57230-562-5}} | |||
* {{citation |last1=Griffin |first1=Roger |last2=Feldman |first2=Matthew |date=2003 |title=Fascism: Critical Concepts in Political Science |publisher=Volume 5, Routledge |isbn=0-415-29020-1}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Michael |first=George |author-link=George Michael (professor) |title=Willis Carto and the American Far Right |publisher=University Press of Florida |isbn=978-0-8130-3198-9 |date=2008}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Pipes |first=Daniel |date=1997 |title=Conspiracy: How the Paranoid Style Flourishes and Where It Comes From |publisher=Free Press |isbn=0-684-83131-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PPdv8sAtZ4UC}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Sheppard |first=Barry |title=The Party: The Socialist Workers Party 1960–1988 |isbn=1-876646-50-0 |publisher=Resistance Books |date=2005}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Sims |first=Patsy |date=1996 |title=The Klan |publisher=University Press of Kentucky |isbn=0-8131-0887-X}} | |||
{{refend}} | |||
;News articles | |||
{{refbegin|indent=yes}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Bradley |first=Paul |title=An old thorn back in Democrats' side; for the eighth time, Lyndon LaRouche is seeking the presidency |work=Richmond Times |date=February 8, 2004 |url=http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/timesdispatch/access/543226331.html?dids=543226331:543226331&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Feb+08%2C+2004&author=Paul+Bradley%3B+*+Contact+Paul+Bradley+at+%28703%29+548-8758+or+pbradley%40timesdispatch.com&pub=Richmond+Times+-+Dispatch&desc=AN+OLD+THORN+BACK+IN+DEMOCRATS%27+SIDE+%3B+FOR+THE+EIGHTH+TIME%2C+LYNDON+LAROUCHE+IS+SEEKING+THE+PRESIDENCY&pqatl=google}}{{dead link|date=October 2024|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}. | |||
* {{citation |last1=Donner |first1=Frank |last2=Rothenberg |first2=Randall |title=The Strange Odyssey of Lyndon LaRouche |work=The Nation |date=August 16, 1980 |pages=142–147 |url=http://www.thenation.com/archive/strange-odyssey-lyndon-larouche}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=Dorr |first=Robert |title=Activist in Franklin Probe Is LaRouche Running Mate |work=Omaha World—Herald |date=September 20, 1992}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Edds |first=Margaret |title=James S. Gilmore III: Intense, All-Business Attorney General Already Has Stepped From Allen's Shadow |work=The Virginian-Pilot |date=April 2, 1995}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=Frantz |first=Douglas |title=Raid bares LaRouche dark world |work=Chicago Tribune |date=October 12, 1986 |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/1986/10/12/raid-bares-larouche-dark-world/}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=Green |first=Stephen |title=A merchant of political hate |work=The San Diego Union |date=January 19, 1985}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=Johnson |first=George |title=A menace or just a crank? |work=The New York Times |date=June 18, 1989 |url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=950DE5DF123CF93BA25755C0A96F948260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=3}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=Lowther |first=William |title=U.S. extremist grows as political force |work=Toronto Star |date=March 30, 1986}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=McNerthney |first=Casey |title=LaRouche supporter threatened for linking Obama to Hitler |work=Seattle Post Intelligencer |date=July 14, 2009 |url=http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattle911/archives/173712.asp}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=Mintz |first=John |title=Ideological Odyssey: From Old Left to Far Right |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=January 14, 1985a |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/cult/larouche/main.htm}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=Mintz |first=John |title=Some Officials Find Intelligence Network 'Useful' |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=January 15, 1985b |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/cult/larouche/larou1.htm}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=Montgomery |first=Paul L. |title=How a Radical-Left Group Moved Toward Savagery |work=The New York Times |date=January 20, 1974 |url=http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=F50E17FB385F107A93C2AB178AD85F408785F9}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=Montgomery |first=Paul L. |title=One Man Leads U.S. Labor Party on His Erratic Path |work=New York Times |date=October 8, 1979 |url=http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F1061FF93F5C11728DDDA10894D8415B898BF1D3&scp=1&sq=One%20Man%20Leads%20U.S.%20Labor%20Party%20on%20His%20Erratic%20Path&st=cse}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=Perlman |first=Jeffrey A. |title=No Longer Written Off by Political Opponents, LaRouche Elbowing Into Limelight |work=Los Angeles Times |date=May 27, 1984 |url=http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/676757122.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&type=historic&date=May+27%2C+1984&author=JEFFREY+A+PERLMAN&pub=Los+Angeles+Times+%281923-Current+File%29&edition=&startpage=A16&desc=Politics+%2784|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107184149/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/676757122.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&type=historic&date=May+27%2C+1984&author=JEFFREY+A+PERLMAN&pub=Los+Angeles+Times+%281923-Current+File%29&edition=&startpage=A16&desc=Politics+%2784|url-status=dead|archive-date=November 7, 2012}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=Quinton |first=Robinson |title=Million Man drive dips to hundreds; Gathering backs probe of CIA |work=The Commercial Appeal |date=September 30, 1996}}. | |||
* {{cite news |last1=Roderick |first1=Kevin |title=LaRouche Wrote of Using AIDS to Win Presidency |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-10-17-mn-5571-story.html |work=Los Angeles Times |date=17 October 1986}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Rosenfeld |first=Stephen |title=NCLC: A Domestic Political Menace |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=September 24, 1976 |url=http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost_historical/access/120029198.html?dids=120029198:120029198&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&date=Sep+24%2C+1976&author=Stephen+S.+Rosenfeld&pub=The+Washington+Post++(1974-Current+file)&edition=&startpage=A15&desc=NCLC%3A+%27A+Domestic+Political+Menace%27|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130104132803/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost_historical/access/120029198.html?dids=120029198:120029198&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&date=Sep+24,+1976&author=Stephen+S.+Rosenfeld&pub=The+Washington+Post++(1974-Current+file)&edition=&startpage=A15&desc=NCLC:+'A+Domestic+Political+Menace'|url-status=dead|archive-date=January 4, 2013}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=Schultz |first=Erin |title=Obama's plan blasted as Nazi-like: LaRouche demonstrations across the North Fork question health care policy |work=The Suffolk Times |date=July 23, 2009 |url=http://www2.timesreview.com/ST/Stories/T071609_Obama_ES}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=Shenon |first=Philip |title=LaRouche warns U.S on any move to arrest him |work=The New York Times |date=October 8, 1986 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/1986/10/08/us/larouche-warns-us-on-any-move-to-arrest-him.html?scp=1&sq=&st=nyt}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=Siano |first=Brian |title=The Skeptical Eye: Big Head's Back |work=The Humanist |date=May 1992 |volume=52 |issue=3}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=Silva |first=Christina |title=Colleges consider stressing danger of pressure groups |work=Boston Globe |date=April 14, 2006}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=St. Petersburg Times |title=LaRouche claims security council behind indictment |date=July 9, 1987}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=Tang |first=Yong |title='I'll get to China sometime': Interview (VIII) |work=People's Daily |date=November 22, 2005 |url=http://english.people.com.cn/200511/22/eng20051122_223153.html}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=Tipton |first=Virgil |title=LaRouchies set sights on Missouri |work=Chicago Tribune |date=March 31, 1986}}. | |||
* {{citation |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=May 1, 2007 |title=Kenneth L.Kronberg: Sterling Businessman |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/30/AR2007043001772_pf.html}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=Tong |first=Betsy |title=Class acts most likely to ... Notable graduates of Boston area high schools |work=Boston Globe |date=June 12, 1994 |url=http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/boston/access/61972367.html?dids=61972367:61972367&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Jun+12%2C+1994&author=Material+for+this+yearbook+issue+was+compiled+and+researched+by+Betsy+QM+Tong&pub=Boston+Globe+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&desc=CLASS+ACTS+MOST+LIKELY+TO+.+.+.+Notable+graduates+of+Boston+area+high+schools&pqatl=google|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110628221653/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/boston/access/61972367.html?dids=61972367:61972367&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Jun+12,+1994&author=Material+for+this+yearbook+issue+was+compiled+and+researched+by+Betsy+QM+Tong&pub=Boston+Globe+(pre-1997+Fulltext)&desc=CLASS+ACTS+MOST+LIKELY+TO+.+.+.+Notable+graduates+of+Boston+area+high+schools&pqatl=google|url-status=dead|archive-date=June 28, 2011}}. | |||
* {{citation |last=Witt |first=April |title=No Joke |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=October 24, 2004 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A46883-2004Oct20.html}}. | |||
{{refend}} | |||
;Journal and other papers, records | |||
{{refbegin|indent=yes}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Bligh |first=Gur |date=2008 |title=Extremism in the Electoral Arena: Challenging the Myth of American Exceptionalism |work=Brigham Young University Law Review |issue=5 |page=1367 |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3736/is_200809/ai_n31426505/?tag=content;col1}} | |||
* {{citation |last1=Constantini |first1=E. |last2=Nash |first2=M.P. |date=1990 |title=SLAPP/SLAPPback: The Misuse of Libel Law for Political Purposes and a Countersuit Response |journal=Journal of Law & Politics |volume=7 |page=417 ff |url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/jlp7&div=21&id=&page=}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Copulus |first=Milton R. |title=The LaRouche Network |work=Institutional Analysis, No. 28, Heritage Foundation |date=July 19, 1984 |url=http://www.heritage.org/Research/PoliticalPhilosophy/upload/91214_1.pdf |access-date=February 13, 2011 |archive-date=January 19, 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060119064440/http://www.heritage.org/Research/PoliticalPhilosophy/upload/91214_1.pdf |url-status=dead }} | |||
* {{citation |last=Horowitz |first=Irving Louis |title=Left-wing fascism: An infantile disorder |work=Society, Vol 18, Number 4 |publisher=Springer New York |date=May 1981 |url=http://www.springerlink.com/content/172k1667567466l2/ |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130105074203/http://www.springerlink.com/content/172k1667567466l2/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=January 5, 2013 }} | |||
* {{citation |last=Lynch |first=Pat |title=Is Lyndon LaRouche using ''your'' name? |work=Columbia Journalism Review |date=March 1985}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Wohlforth |first=Tim |title=A '60s Socialist Takes a Hard Right |work=Public Eye |access-date=September 4, 2009 |url=http://www.publiceye.org/larouche/Wohlforth.html}} | |||
{{refend}} | |||
;LaRouche publications | |||
{{refbegin|indent=yes}} | |||
* {{citation |last=LaRouche |first=Lyndon |date=1979 |title=The Power of Reason: A Kind of Autobiography |publisher=New Benjamin Franklin House |isbn=978-0-933488-01-4 |url=https://archive.org/details/ThePowerOfReason1988AnAutobiography}} | |||
* {{citation |last=LaRouche |first=Lyndon |date=1987 |title=The Power of Reason: An Autobiography |publisher=Executive Intelligence Review |isbn=978-0-943235-00-4}} | |||
* {{citation |last=LaRouche |first=Lyndon |title=How The Workers League Decayed |work=NCLC internal document |date=June 27, 1970}} | |||
* {{citation |last=LaRouche Political Action Committee |title=The Woman on Mars |date=1988 |url=http://larouchepac.com/node/7 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100102032055/http://larouchepac.com/node/7 |archive-date=January 2, 2010}} | |||
{{refend}} | |||
==Further reading== | |||
{{Refbegin|indent=yes}} | |||
* {{citation|last=Davidson|first=Osha Gray|year=1990|title=Broken heartland: The Rise of America's Rural Ghetto|publisher=Free Press|isbn= 978-0029070550}} | |||
* {{citation|last=Hunt|first=Linda|orig-year= 1975|year=1991|title=Secret Agenda: The United States Government, Nazi Scientists, and Project Paperclip, 1945 to 1990|publisher=St. Martin's Press}} | |||
* {{citation|last=Jacobs|first=Harold|year=1971|title=Weatherman|publisher=Ramparts Press|isbn=978-0671207250|url=https://archive.org/details/weatherman00jaco}} | |||
* {{citation|last=Johnson|first=Donald Bruce|year=1978|title=National Party Platforms: 1960–1976|publisher=University of Illinois Press|isbn= 978-0252006883}} | |||
* {{citation|last=Markus|first=Andrew|year=2001|title=Race: John Howard and the Remaking of Australia|publisher=Allen & Unwin|isbn=978-1864488661|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UA0-5v3JN0QC|access-date=June 17, 2015|archive-date=August 9, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130809095219/http://books.google.com/books?id=UA0-5v3JN0QC&printsec=frontcover|url-status=live}} | |||
* {{citation|last=Pipes|first=Daniel|year=2003|chapter=October Surprise|editor1-last=Knight|editor1-first=Peter|title=Conspiracy Theories in American History: An Encyclopedia, Volume 2|publisher=ABC-Clio|pages=547–50|chapter-url=http://www.danielpipes.org/1654/the-october-surprise-theory|access-date=September 11, 2009|archive-date=July 1, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090701050931/http://www.danielpipes.org/1654/the-october-surprise-theory|url-status=live}} | |||
* {{citation|last=Seife|first=Charles|year=2008|title=Sun in a Bottle: The Strange History of Fusion and the Science of Wishful Thinking|publisher=Penguin Group|isbn= 978-0670020331}} | |||
* {{citation|last1=Weir|first1=David|first2=Noyes|last2=Dan|year=1983|title=Raising Hell: How the Center for Investigative Reporting Gets the Story|publisher=Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc|isbn=978-0201108590|url=https://archive.org/details/raisinghellhowce00weir}} | |||
{{Refend}} | |||
==External links== | |||
{{Sister project links|d=Q550629|c=Category:Lyndon LaRouche|n=no|b=no|v=no|voy=no|m=no|mw=no|s=no|wikt=no|species=no}} | |||
* | |||
* | |||
<!-- ========================({{No More Links}})============================ | |||
| PLEASE BE CAUTIOUS IN ADDING MORE LINKS TO THIS ARTICLE. WIKIPEDIA | | |||
| IS NOT A COLLECTION OF LINKS NOR SHOULD IT BE USED FOR ADVERTISING. | | |||
| | | |||
| Excessive or inappropriate links WILL BE DELETED. | | |||
| See ] & ] for details. | | |||
| | | |||
| If there are already plentiful links, please propose additions or | | |||
| replacements on this article's discussion page, or submit your link | | |||
| to the relevant category at the Open Directory Project (dmoz.org) | | |||
| and link back to that category using the {{Curlie}} template. | | |||
=======================({{No More Links}})============================= --> | |||
* {{C-SPAN|1008872}} | |||
{{LaRouche movement|state=expanded}} | |||
====Recollections by former colleagues==== | |||
{{1976 United States presidential election}} | |||
* by Clara Fraser, a former colleague of LaRouche in his Trotskyist days - reproduced in the second part of this email to the Marxmail e-list. | |||
{{1980 United States presidential election}} | |||
* 1975 article published by the ] whose members joined LaRouche's NCLC for a period in the early 1970s. | |||
{{1984 United States presidential election}} | |||
* by ] who worked closely with LaRouche in 1964 and 1965 and also observed him afterwards. | |||
{{1988 United States presidential election}} | |||
{{1992 United States presidential election}} | |||
{{1996 United States presidential election}} | |||
{{2000 United States presidential election}} | |||
{{2004 United States presidential election}} | |||
{{Portal bar|Politics|United States}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Larouche, Lyndon}} | |||
===LaRouche sponsored sites=== | |||
] | |||
* : sponsors of ] and ] | |||
] | |||
* | |||
] | |||
* | |||
] | |||
* : LaRouche Publications | |||
] | |||
* | |||
] | |||
* | |||
] | |||
* | |||
] | |||
* | |||
] | |||
* | |||
] | |||
* | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 13:05, 24 December 2024
American political activist (1922–2019)
Lyndon LaRouche | |
---|---|
LaRouche, circa 1988 | |
Born | Lyndon Hermyle LaRouche Jr. (1922-09-08)September 8, 1922 Rochester, New Hampshire, U.S. |
Died | February 12, 2019(2019-02-12) (aged 96) |
Other names | Lyn Marcus |
Education | Northeastern University (no degree) |
Organization | National Caucus of Labor Committees |
Political party |
|
Movement | LaRouche movement |
Spouses |
|
Signature | |
Leader of the U.S. Labor Party | |
In office 1973–1979 | |
Preceded by | Party established |
Succeeded by | Party dissolved |
Lyndon Hermyle LaRouche Jr. (September 8, 1922 – February 12, 2019) was an American political activist who founded the LaRouche movement and its main organization, the National Caucus of Labor Committees (NCLC). He was a prominent conspiracy theorist and perennial presidential candidate. He began in far-left politics in the 1940s and later supported the civil rights movement; however, in the 1970s, he moved to the far-right. His movement is sometimes described as, or likened to, a cult. Convicted of fraud, he served five years in prison from 1989 to 1994.
Born in Rochester, New Hampshire, LaRouche was drawn to socialist and Marxist movements in his twenties during World War II. In the 1950s, while a Trotskyist, he was also a management consultant in New York City. By the 1960s, he became engaged in increasingly smaller and more radical splinter groups. During the 1970s, he created the foundation of the LaRouche movement and became more engaged in conspiratorial beliefs and violent and illegal activities. Instead of the radical left, he embraced radical right politics and antisemitism. At various times, he alleged that he had been targeted for assassination by Queen Elizabeth II, Zionist mobsters, his own associates (who he said had been drugged and brainwashed by CIA and British spies), in addition to others.
It is estimated that the LaRouche movement never exceeded a few thousand members, but it had an outsize political influence, raising more than $200 million by one estimate, and running candidates in more than 4,000 elections in the 1980s. It was noted for disguising its candidates as conservative Democrats and harassing opponents. It reached its height in electoral success when Larouchite candidates won the Democratic primaries for the 1986 Illinois gubernatorial election and related state offices; this alarmed Democratic Party officials, whose national spokesman called the Larouchites "kook fringe". The defeated mainstream Democratic candidates ran in the general election as members of the Illinois Solidarity Party; the Larouchite Democrats all finished a distant third. Later in the 1980s, as part of the LaRouche criminal trials, criminal investigations led to convictions of several LaRouche movement members, including LaRouche himself. He was sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment but served only five.
LaRouche was a perennial candidate for President of the United States. He ran in every election from 1976 to 2004 as a candidate of third parties established by members of his movement, peaking at around 78,000 votes in the 1984 United States presidential election. He also tried to gain the Democratic presidential nomination. In the 1996 Democratic Party presidential primaries, he received 5% of the total nationwide vote. In 2000, he received enough primary votes to qualify for delegates in some states, but the Democratic National Committee refused to seat his delegates and barred LaRouche from attending the Democratic National Convention.
Early life
LaRouche was born in Rochester, New Hampshire, the oldest of three children of Jessie Lenore (née Weir) and Lyndon H. LaRouche Sr. His paternal grandfather's family emigrated to the United States from Rimouski, Quebec, whereas his maternal grandfather was born in Scotland. His father worked for the United Shoe Machinery Corporation in Rochester before the family moved to Lynn, Massachusetts.
His parents became Quakers after his father converted from Catholicism. They forbade him from fighting with other children, even in self-defense, which he said led to "years of hell" from bullies at school. As a result, he spent much of his time alone, taking long walks through the woods and identifying in his mind with great philosophers. He wrote that, between the ages of 12 and 14, he read philosophy extensively, embracing the ideas of Leibniz and rejecting those of Hume, Bacon, Hobbes, Locke, Berkeley, Rousseau, and Kant. He graduated from Lynn English High School in 1940. In the same year, the Lynn Quakers expelled his father from the group, for reportedly accusing other Quakers of misusing funds, while writing under the pen name Hezekiah Micajah Jones. LaRouche and his mother resigned in sympathy for his father.
University studies, Marxism, marriage
LaRouche attended Northeastern University in Boston and left in 1942. He later wrote that his teachers "lacked the competence to teach me on conditions I was willing to tolerate". As a Quaker, he was a conscientious objector during World War II and joined a Civilian Public Service camp in lieu of military service. In 1944, he decided to enlist in the United States Army and served with the Medical Corps in India and Burma during the Burma campaign. At the end of the war, LaRouche was working as a clerk in the Ordnance Corps, and later described his decision to enlist as of the most important decision of his life. In his 1988 autobiography, LaRouche claimed that being asked to express his views on the death of President Franklin D. Roosevelt to a group of fellow G.I.s led him to define his "principal lifelong political commitment, that the United States should take postwar world leadership in establishing a world order dedicated to promoting the economic development of what we call today "developing nations".
LaRouche wrote that he discussed Marxism in the CO camp, and while traveling home on the SS General Bradley in 1946, he met Don Merrill, a fellow soldier, also from Lynn, who converted him to Trotskyism. Back in the U.S., he resumed his education at Northeastern University but dropped out. He returned to Lynn in 1948 and the next year joined the Socialist Workers Party (SWP) to recruit at the GE River Works there, adopting the name "Lyn Marcus" for his political work. He arrived in New York City in 1953, where he worked as a management consultant. In 1954 he married Janice Neuberger, a member of the SWP. Their son, Daniel, was born in 1956.
Career
1960s
Teaching and the National Caucus of Labor Committees
Further information: National Caucus of Labor Committees—Tim WohlforthTwenty to thirty students would ... sit on the floor surrounding LaRouche, who now sported a very shaggy beard ... LaRouche gave them esoteric assignments, such as searching through the writings of Georges Sorel to discover Rudd's anarchistic origins, or studying Rosa Luxemburg's The Accumulation of Capital.
By 1961, the LaRouches were living on Central Park West in Manhattan, and LaRouche's activities were mostly focused on his career and not on the SWP. He and his wife separated in 1963, and he moved into a Greenwich Village apartment with another SWP member, Carol Schnitzer, also known as Larrabee. In 1964 he began an association with an SWP faction called the Revolutionary Tendency, a faction later expelled from the SWP, and came under the influence of British Trotskyist leader Gerry Healy.
For six months, LaRouche worked with American Healyite leader Tim Wohlforth, who later wrote that LaRouche had a "gargantuan ego" and "a marvelous ability to place any world happening in a larger context, which seemed to give the event additional meaning, but his thinking was schematic, lacking factual detail and depth." Leaving Wohlforth's group, LaRouche briefly joined the rival Spartacist League before announcing his intention to build a new Fifth International.
In 1967, LaRouche began teaching classes on Marx's dialectical materialism at New York City's Free School, and attracted a group of students from Columbia University and the City College of New York, recommending that they read Das Kapital, as well as Hegel, Kant, and Leibniz. During the 1968 Columbia University protests, he organized his supporters under the name National Caucus of Labor Committees (NCLC). The aim of the NCLC was to win control of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) branch – the university's main activist group – and build a political alliance between students, local residents, organized labor, and the Columbia faculty. By 1973, the NCLC had over 600 members in 25 cities – including West Berlin and Stockholm – and produced what LaRouche's biographer, Dennis King, called the most literate of the far-left papers, New Solidarity. The NCLC's internal activities became highly regimented over the next few years. Members gave up their jobs and devoted themselves to the group and its leader, believing it would soon take control of America's trade unions and overthrow the government.
1970s
1971: Intelligence network
Further information: LaRouche movementRobert J. Alexander writes that LaRouche first established an NCLC "intelligence network" in 1971. Members all over the world sent information to NCLC headquarters, which would distribute the information via briefings and other publications. LaRouche organized the network as a series of news services and magazines, which critics say was done to gain access to government officials under press cover. The publications included Executive Intelligence Review, founded in 1974. Other periodicals under his aegis included New Solidarity, Fusion Magazine, 21st Century Science and Technology, and Campaigner Magazine. His news services and publishers included American System Publications, Campaigner Publications, New Solidarity International Press Service, and The New Benjamin Franklin House Publishing Company. LaRouche acknowledged in 1980 that his followers impersonated reporters and others, saying it had to be done for his security. In 1982, U.S. News & World Report sued New Solidarity International Press Service and Campaigner Publications for damages, alleging that members were impersonating its reporters in phone calls.
U.S. sources told The Washington Post in 1985 that the LaRouche organization had assembled a worldwide network of government and military contacts, and that his researchers sometimes supplied information to government officials. Bobby Ray Inman, the CIA's deputy director in 1981 and 1982, said LaRouche and his wife had visited him, offering information about the West German Green Party. A CIA spokesman said LaRouche met Deputy Director John McMahon in 1983 to discuss one of LaRouche's trips overseas. An aide to Deputy Secretary of State William Clark said when LaRouche's associates discussed technology or economics, they made good sense and seemed qualified. Norman Bailey, formerly with the U.S. National Security Council, said in 1984 that LaRouche's staff comprised "one of the best private intelligence services in the world. ... They do know a lot of people around the world. They do get to talk to prime ministers and presidents." Several government officials feared a security leak from the government's ties with the movement. According to critics, the supposed behind-the-scenes processes were more often flights of fancy than inside information. Douglas Foster wrote in Mother Jones in 1982 that the briefings consisted of disinformation, "hate-filled" material about enemies, phony letters, intimidation, fake newspaper articles, and dirty tricks campaigns. Opponents were accused of being gay or Nazis, or were linked to murders, which the movement called "psywar techniques".
From the 1970s to the first decade of the 21st century, LaRouche founded several groups and companies. In addition to the National Caucus of Labor Committees, there was the Citizens Electoral Council (Australia), the National Democratic Policy Committee, the Fusion Energy Foundation, and the U.S. Labor Party. In 1984, he founded the Schiller Institute in Germany with his second wife, and three political parties there – the Europäische Arbeiterpartei, Patrioten für Deutschland, and Bürgerrechtsbewegung Solidarität – and in 2000 the Worldwide LaRouche Youth Movement. His printing services included Computron Technologies, Computype, World Composition Services, and PMR Printing Company, Inc, or PMR Associates.
1973: Political shift; "Operation Mop-Up"
LaRouche wrote in his 1987 autobiography that violent altercations had begun in 1969 between his NCLC members and several New Left groups when Mark Rudd's faction began assaulting LaRouche's faction at Columbia University. Press accounts alleged that between April and September 1973, during what LaRouche called "Operation Mop-Up", NCLC members began physically attacking members of leftist groups that LaRouche classified as "left-protofascists"; an editorial in LaRouche's New Solidarity said of the Communist Party that the movement "must dispose of this stinking corpse". Armed with chains, bats, and martial-art nunchuk sticks, NCLC members assaulted Communist Party, SWP, and Progressive Labor Party members and Black Power activists on the streets and during meetings. At least 60 assaults were reported. The operation ended when police arrested several of LaRouche's followers; there were no convictions, and LaRouche maintained they had acted in self-defense. Journalist and LaRouche biographer Dennis King writes that the FBI may have tried to aggravate the strife, using measures such as anonymous mailings, to keep the groups at each other's throats. LaRouche said he met representatives of the Soviet Union at the United Nations in 1974 and 1975 to discuss attacks by the Communist Party USA on the NCLC and propose a merger, but said he received no assistance from them. One FBI memo, obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, proposes assisting the CPUSA in an investigation "for the purpose of ultimately eliminating him and the threat of the NCLC" (see image to left).
LaRouche's critics, such as King and Antony Lerman, allege that in 1973, with little warning, LaRouche adopted more extreme ideas, a process accompanied by a campaign of violence against his opponents on the left, and the development of conspiracy theories and paranoia about his personal safety. According to these accounts, he began to believe he was under threat of assassination from the Soviet Union, the CIA, Libya, drug dealers, and bankers. He also established a "Biological Holocaust Task Force", which, according to LaRouche, analyzed the public health consequences of International Monetary Fund (IMF) austerity policies for impoverished nations in Africa, and predicted that epidemics of cholera as well as possibly entirely new diseases would strike Africa in the 1980s.
1973: U.S. Labor Party
Further information: U.S. Labor PartyLaRouche founded the U.S. Labor Party in 1973 as the political arm of the NCLC. At first, the party was "preaching Marxist revolution"; however, by 1977, it shifted from left-wing to right-wing politics. A two-part article in The New York Times in 1979 by Howard Blum and Paul L. Montgomery alleged that LaRouche had turned the party (at that point with 1,000 members in 37 offices in North America, and 26 in Europe and Latin America) into an extreme-right, antisemitic organization, despite the presence of Jewish members. LaRouche denied the newspaper's charges, and said he had filed a $100 million libel suit; his press secretary said the articles were intended to "set up a credible climate for an assassination hit".
The Times alleged that members had taken courses in how to use knives and rifles; that a farm in upstate New York had been used for guerrilla training; and that several members had undergone a six-day anti-terrorist training course run by Mitchell WerBell III, an arms dealer and former member of the Office of Strategic Services, who said he had ties to the CIA. Journalists and publications the party regarded as unfriendly were harassed, and it published a list of potential assassins it saw as a threat. LaRouche expected members to devote themselves entirely to the party, place their savings and possessions at its disposal, and take out loans on its behalf. Party officials decided who each member should live with, and if someone left the movement, the remaining member was expected to live separately from the ex-member. LaRouche questioned spouses about their partner's sexual habits, the Times said, and in one case reportedly ordered a member to stop having sex with his wife, because it was making him "politically impotent".
1973: "Ego-stripping" and "brainwashing" allegations
LaRouche began writing in 1973 about the use of certain psychological techniques on recruits. In an article called "Beyond Psychoanalysis", he wrote that a worker's persona had to be stripped away to arrive at a state he called "little me", from which it would be possible to "rebuild their personalities around a new socialist identity", according to The Washington Post. The New York Times wrote that the first such session – which LaRouche called "ego-stripping" – involved a German member, Konstantin George, in the summer of 1973. LaRouche said that during the session he discovered that a plot to assassinate him had been implanted in George's mind.
He recorded sessions with a 26-year-old British member, Chris White, who had moved to England with LaRouche's former partner, Carol Schnitzer. In December 1973 LaRouche asked the couple to return to the U.S. His followers sent tapes of the subsequent sessions with White to The New York Times as evidence of an assassination plot. According to the Times, "here are sounds of weeping, and vomiting on the tapes, and Mr. White complains of being deprived of sleep, food and cigarettes. At one point someone says 'raise the voltage', but says this was associated with the bright lights used in the questioning rather than an electric shock." The Times wrote: "Mr. White complains of a terrible pain in his arm, then LaRouche can be heard saying, 'That's not real. That's in the program'." LaRouche told the newspaper White had been "reduced to an eight-cycle infinite loop with look-up table, with homosexual bestiality". He said White had not been harmed and that a physician – a LaRouche movement member – had been present throughout. White ended up telling LaRouche he had been programmed by the CIA and British intelligence to set up LaRouche for assassination by Cuban exile frogmen.
According to The Washington Post, "brainwashing hysteria" took hold of the movement. One activist said he attended meetings where members were writhing on the floor saying they needed de-programming. In two weeks in January 1974, the group issued 41 separate press releases about brainwashing. One activist, Alice Weitzman, expressed skepticism about the claims.
1974: Contacts with far-right groups, intelligence gathering
LaRouche established contacts with Willis Carto's Liberty Lobby and elements of the Ku Klux Klan in 1974. Frank Donner and Randall Rothenberg wrote that he made successful overtures to the Liberty Lobby and George Wallace's American Independent Party, adding that the "racist" policies of LaRouche's U.S. Labor Party endeared it to members of the Ku Klux Klan. George Michael, in Willis Carto and the American Far Right, says that LaRouche shared with the Liberty Lobby's Willis Carto an antipathy towards the Rockefeller family. The Liberty Lobby defended its alliance with LaRouche by saying the U.S. Labor Party had been able to "confuse, disorient, and disunify the Left".
Gregory Rose, a former chief of counter-intelligence for LaRouche who became an FBI informant in 1973, said that while the LaRouche movement had extensive links to the Liberty Lobby, there was also copious evidence of a connection to the Soviet Union. George and Wilcox say neither connection amounted to much – they assert that LaRouche was "definitely not a Soviet agent" and state that while the contact with the Liberty Lobby is often used to imply "'links' and 'ties' between LaRouche and the extreme right", it was in fact transient and marked by mutual suspicion. The Liberty Lobby soon pronounced itself disillusioned with LaRouche, citing his movement's adherence to "basic socialist positions" and his softness on "the major Zionist groups" as fundamental points of difference. According to George and Wilcox, American neo-Nazi leaders expressed misgivings over the number of Jews and members of other minority groups in his organization, and did not consider LaRouche an ally. George Johnson, in Architects of Fear, similarly states that LaRouche's overtures to far right groups were pragmatic rather than sincere. A 1975 party memo spoke of uniting with these groups only to overthrow the established order, adding that once that goal had been accomplished, "eliminating our right-wing opposition will be comparatively easy".
Howard Blum wrote in The New York Times that, from 1976 onward, party members sent reports to the FBI and local police regarding members of left-wing organizations. In 1977, he wrote, commercial reports on U.S. anti-apartheid groups were prepared by LaRouche members for the South African government, student dissidents were reported to the Shah of Iran's Savak secret police, and the anti-nuclear movement was investigated on behalf of power companies. Johnson says the intelligence network was made up of "obnoxious devotees commandeering WATS lines and tricking bureaucrats into giving them information". By the late 1970s, members were exchanging almost daily information with Roy Frankhouser, a government informant and infiltrator of both far right and far left groups who was involved with the Ku Klux Klan and the American Nazi Party. The LaRouche organization believed Frankhouser to be a federal agent who had been assigned to infiltrate right-wing and left-wing groups, and that he had evidence that these groups were actually being manipulated or controlled by the FBI and other agencies. LaRouche and his associates considered Frankhouser to be a valuable intelligence contact, and took his links to extremist groups to be a cover for his intelligence work. Frankhouser played into these expectations, misrepresenting himself as a conduit for communications to LaRouche from "Mr. Ed", an alleged CIA contact who did not exist in reality.
Blum wrote, at around this time, that LaRouche's Computron Technologies Corporation included Mobil Oil and Citibank among its clients, that his World Composition Services had one of the most advanced typesetting complexes in the city and had the Ford Foundation among its clients, and that his PMR Associates produced the party's publications and some high school newspapers.
Around the same time, according to Blum, LaRouche was telling his membership several times a year that he was being targeted for assassination, including by the Queen of the United Kingdom, Zionist mobsters, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Justice Department, and the Mossad. LaRouche sued the City of New York in 1974, saying the CIA and British spies had tortured and drugged his associates to brainwash his associates into killing him. According to The Patriot-News of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, LaRouche said he had been "threatened by Communists, Zionists, narcotics gangsters, the Rockefellers and international terrorists." LaRouche later said:
Since late 1973, I have been repeatedly the target of serious assassination threats and my wife has been three times the target of attempted assassination. ... My enemies are the circles of McGeorge Bundy, Henry Kissinger, Soviet General Secretary Yuri Andropov, W. Averell Harriman, certain powerful bankers, and the Socialist and Nazi Internationals, as well as international drug traffickers, Colonel Gaddafi, Ayatollah Khomeini, and the Malthusian lobby.
1975–1976: presidential campaign
Further information: Lyndon LaRouche U.S. presidential campaigns and Views of Lyndon LaRouche and the LaRouche movement § LaRouche's campaign platformsIn March 1975, Clarence M. Kelley, director of the FBI, testified before the House Appropriations Committee that the NCLC was "a violence-oriented organization of 'revolutionary socialists' with a membership of nearly 1,000 in chapters in some 50 cities". He said that during the previous two years its members had been "involved in fights, beatings, using drugs, kidnappings, brainwashings, and at least one shooting. They are reported to be armed, to have received defensive training such as karate, and to attend cadre schools and training schools to learn military tactics".
In 1975, under the name Lyn Marcus, LaRouche published Dialectical Economics: An Introduction to Marxist Political Economy, described by its only reviewer as "the most peculiar and idiosyncratic" introduction to economics he had ever seen. Mixing economics, history, anthropology, sociology and a surprisingly large helping of business administration, the work argued that most prominent Marxists had misunderstood Marx, and that bourgeois economics arose when philosophy took a wrong, reductionist turn under British empiricists like Locke and Hume.
In 1976, LaRouche campaigned for the first time in a presidential election as a U.S. Labor Party candidate, polling 40,043 votes (0.05%). It was the first of eight consecutive presidential elections in which he ran between 1976 and 2004. It enabled him to attract $5.9 million in federal matching funds; candidates seeking their party's presidential nomination qualify for matching funds if they raise $5,000 in each of at least 20 states. His platform predicted financial disaster by 1980 accompanied by famine and the virtual extinction of the human race within 15 years, and proposed a debt moratorium; nationalization of banks; government investment in industry especially in the aerospace sector, and an "International Development Bank" to facilitate higher food production. When Legionnaires' disease appeared in the U.S. that year, he said it was a continuation of the swine flu outbreak, and that senators who opposed vaccination were suppressing the link as part of a "genocidal policy".
His campaign included a paid half-hour television address, which allowed him to air his views before a national audience, something that became a regular feature of his later campaigns. There were protests about this, and about the NCLC's involvement in public life generally. Writing in The Washington Post, Stephen Rosenfeld said LaRouche's ideas belonged to the radical right, neo-Nazi fringe, and that his main interests lay in disruption and disinformation; Rosenfeld called the NCLC one of the "chief polluters" of political democracy. Rosenfeld argued that the press should be "chary" of offering them print or airtime: "A duplicitous violence-prone group with fascistic proclivities should not be presented to the public, unless there is reason to present it in those terms." LaRouche wrote in 1999 that this comment had "openly declared ... a policy of malicious lying" against him.
1977: Second marriage
LaRouche married again in 1977. His wife, Helga Zepp, was then a leading activist in the West German branch of the movement. She went on to work closely with LaRouche for the rest of her career, standing for election in Germany in 1980 for his Europäische Arbeiterpartei (European Workers Party), and founding the Schiller Institute in Germany in 1984.
1980s
National Democratic Policy Committee, "October Surprise" theory
From the autumn of 1979, the LaRouche movement conducted most of its U.S. electoral activities as the National Democratic Policy Committee (NDPC), a political action committee. The name drew complaints from the Democratic Party's Democratic National Committee. Democratic Party leaders refused to recognize LaRouche as a party member, or to seat the few delegates he received in his seven primary campaigns as a Democrat. In its 2019 obituary of LaRouche, New York magazine reported that LaRouche's attempts to pose as a Democrat were originally an attempt at a spoiler operation to divide the opponents of Ronald Reagan.
LaRouche's campaign platforms advocated a return to the Bretton Woods system, including a gold-based national and world monetary system; fixed exchange rates; and abolishing the International Monetary Fund. He supported the replacement of the central bank system, including the U.S. Federal Reserve System, with a "national bank"; a war on drug trafficking and prosecution of banks involved in money laundering; building a tunnel under the Bering Strait; the building of nuclear power plants; and a crash program to build particle-beam weapons and lasers, including support for elements of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). He opposed the Soviet Union and supported a military buildup to prepare for imminent war; supported the screening and quarantine of AIDS patients; and opposed environmentalism, deregulation, outcome-based education, and abortion:
No more will the United States fight World Wars to save the British Empire in any shape or guise. No more will the United States tolerate the British system, whether colonial or neo-colonial. No more will the United States tolerate the economics of Adam Smith in any part of the world. We are going to take this aching, poor, hungry world and we're going to transform it with American methods. We're going to transform it through the export and development of high technology, we're going to have Manhattan Projects and NASA projects and every dirigiste, Federally-directed, scientific crazed program that we deem necessary.
— Lyndon LaRouche, at the opening of the National Democratic Policy Committee, 1979
In December 1980, LaRouche and his followers started what came to be known as the "October Surprise" allegation, namely that in October 1980 Ronald Reagan's campaign staff conspired with the Iranian government during the Iran hostage crisis to delay the release of 52 American hostages held in Iran, with the aim of helping Reagan win the 1980 United States presidential election against Jimmy Carter. The Iranians had agreed to this, according to the theory, in exchange for future weapons sales from the Reagan administration. The first publication of the story was in LaRouche's Executive Intelligence Review on December 2, 1980, followed by his New Solidarity on September 2, 1983, alleging that Henry Kissinger, one of LaRouche's regular targets, had met Iran's Ayatollah Beheshti in Paris, according to Iranian sources in Paris. The theory was later echoed by former Iranian President Abolhassan Banisadr and former Naval intelligence officer and National Security Council member Gary Sick.
1983: Move from New York to Loudoun County
The Washington Post wrote that LaRouche and his wife moved in August 1983 from New York to a 13-room Georgian mansion on a 250-acre section of the Woodburn Estate, near Leesburg, Loudoun County, Virginia. The property was owned at the time by a company registered in Switzerland. Companies associated with LaRouche continued to buy property in the area, including part of Leesburg's industrial park, purchased by LaRouche's Lafayette/Leesburg Ltd. Partnership to develop a printing plant and office complex.
Neighbors said they saw LaRouche guards in camouflage clothes carrying semi-automatic weapons, and the Post wrote that the house had sandbag-buttressed guard posts nearby, along with metal spikes in the driveway and concrete barriers on the road. One of his aides said LaRouche was safer in Loudoun County: "The terrorist organizations which have targeted Mr. LaRouche do not have bases of operations in Virginia." LaRouche said his new home meant a shorter commute to Washington. A former associate said the move also meant his members would be more isolated from friends and family than they had been in New York. According to the Post in 2004, local people who opposed him for any reason were accused in LaRouche publications of being communists, homosexuals, drug pushers, and terrorists. He reportedly accused the Leesburg Garden Club of being a nest of Soviet sympathizers, and a local lawyer who opposed LaRouche on a zoning matter went into hiding after threatening phone calls and a death threat. In leaflets supporting his application of concealed weapons permits for his bodyguards in Leesburg, Virginia, he wrote:
I have a major personal security problem ... the assassination teams of professional mercenaries now being trained in Canada and along the Mexico border may be expected to start arriving on the streets of Leesburg ... If they come, there will be many people dead or mutilated within as short an interval as 60 seconds of fire.
Of LaRouche's paramilitary security force, armed with semi-automatic weapons, a spokesperson said that it was necessary because LaRouche was the subject of "assassination conspiracies".
1984: Schiller Institute, television spots, contact with Reagan administration
Further information: Schiller InstituteHelga Zepp-LaRouche founded the Schiller Institute in Germany in 1984. In the same year, LaRouche raised enough money to purchase 14 television spots, at $330,000 each, in which he called Walter Mondale—the Democratic Party's presidential nominee—a Soviet agent of influence, triggering over 1,000 telephone complaints. On April 19, 1986, NBC's Saturday Night Live aired a sketch satirizing the ads, portraying the Queen of the United Kingdom and Henry Kissinger as drug dealers. LaRouche received 78,773 votes in the 1984 presidential election.
In 1984, media reports stated that LaRouche and his aides had met Reagan administration officials, including Norman Bailey, senior director of international economic affairs for the National Security Council (NSC), and Richard Morris, special assistant to William P. Clark, Jr. There were also reported contacts with the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the CIA. The LaRouche campaign said the reporting was full of errors. In 1984 two Pentagon officials spoke at a LaRouche rally in Virginia; a Defense Department spokesman said the Pentagon viewed LaRouche's group as a "conservative group ... very supportive of the administration." White House spokesman Larry Speakes said the Administration was "glad to talk to" any American citizen who might have information. According to Bailey, the contacts were broken off when they became public. Three years later, LaRouche blamed his criminal indictment on the NSC, saying he had been in conflict with Oliver North over LaRouche's opposition to the Nicaraguan Contras. According to a LaRouche publication, a court-ordered search of North's files produced a May 1986 telex from Iran–Contra defendant General Richard Secord, discussing the gathering of information to be used against LaRouche. According to King, LaRouche's Executive Intelligence Review was the first to report important details of the Iran–Contra affair, predicting that a major scandal was about to break months before mainstream media picked up on the story.
Strategic Defense Initiative
Main article: Fusion Energy FoundationThe LaRouche campaign supported Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Dennis King wrote that LaRouche had been speculating about space-based weaponry as early as 1975. He set up the Fusion Energy Foundation, which held conferences and tried to cultivate scientists, with some success. In 1979, FEF representatives attended a Moscow conference on laser fusion. LaRouche began to promote the use of lasers and related technologies for both military and civilian purposes, calling for a "revolution in machine tools."
According to King, LaRouche's associates had for some years been in contact with members of the Reagan administration about LaRouche's space-based weapons ideas. LaRouche proposed the development of defensive beam technologies as a policy that was in the interest of both the U.S. and the Soviet Union, as the alternative to an arms race in offensive weapons and as a generator of spin-off economic benefits. Between February 1982 and February 1983, with the NSC's approval, LaRouche met with Soviet embassy representative Evgeny Shershnev to discuss the proposal. During this period, Soviet economists also began to study LaRouche's economic forecasting model. But after Reagan's public announcement of the SDI in March 1983, Soviet representatives broke off contact with LaRouche and his representatives.
Physicist Edward Teller, a proponent of SDI and X-ray lasers, told reporters in 1984 that he had been courted by LaRouche but had kept his distance. LaRouche began calling his plan the "LaRouche-Teller proposal," though they had never met. Teller said LaRouche was "a poorly informed man with fantastic conceptions."
LaRouche later attributed the collapse of the Soviet Union to its refusal to follow his advice to accept Reagan's offer to share the technology. Former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld reported in his 2011 memoir that at a 2001 dinner in Russia with leading officials, he was told by General Yuri Baluyevsky, then the second highest-ranking officer in the Russian military, that LaRouche was the brains behind SDI. Rumsfeld said he believed LaRouche had had no influence on the program, and surmised that Baluyevsky must have obtained the information off the Internet. In 2012 the former head of the Russian bureau of Interpol, General Vladimir Ovchinsky, also described LaRouche as the man who proposed the SDI.
1984: NBC lawsuit
In January 1984, NBC aired a news segment about LaRouche, and in March a "First Camera" report produced by Pat Lynch. The reports called LaRouche "the leader of a violence-prone, anti-Semitic cult that smeared its opponents and sued its critics", as Lynch wrote in 1985 in the Columbia Journalism Review. In interviews, former members of the movement gave details about their fundraising practices, and alleged that LaRouche had spoken about assassinating President Jimmy Carter. The reports said an investigation by the Internal Revenue Service would lead to an indictment, and quoted Irwin Suall, the Anti-Defamation League's fact-finding director, who called LaRouche a "small-time Hitler". After the broadcast, LaRouche members picketed NBC's office carrying signs saying "Lynch Pat Lynch," and the NBC switchboard said it received a death threat against her. Another NBC researcher said someone placed fliers around her parents' neighborhood saying she was running a call-girl ring from her parents' home. Lynch said LaRouche members began to impersonate her and her researchers in telephone calls, and called her "Fat Lynch" in their publications.
LaRouche filed a defamation suit against NBC and the ADL, arguing that the programs were the result of a deliberate campaign of defamation against him. The judge ruled that NBC need not reveal its sources, and LaRouche lost the case. NBC won a countersuit, the jury awarding the network $3 million in damages, later reduced to $258,459, for misuse of libel law, in what was called one of the more celebrated countersuits by a libel defendant. LaRouche failed to pay the damages, pleading poverty, which the judge described as "completely lacking in credibility." LaRouche said he had been unaware since 1973 who paid the rent on the estate, or for his food, lodging, clothing, transportation, bodyguards, and lawyers. The judge fined him for failing to answer. After the judge signed an order to allow discovery of LaRouche's personal finances, a cashier's check was delivered to the court to end the case. When LaRouche appealed, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, rejecting his arguments, set forth a three-pronged test, later called the "LaRouche test," to decide when anonymous sources must be named in libel cases.
1985–1986: PANIC, LaRouche's AIDS initiative
Main article: 1986 California Proposition 64LaRouche interpreted the AIDS pandemic as fulfillment of his 1973 prediction that an epidemic would strike humanity in the 1980s. According to Christopher Toumey, his subsequent campaign followed a familiar LaRouche pattern: challenging the scientific competence of government experts, and arguing that LaRouche had special scientific insights, and his own scientific associates were more competent than government scientists. LaRouche's view of AIDS agreed with orthodox medicine in that HIV caused AIDS, but differed from it in arguing that HIV spread like the cold virus or malaria, by way of casual contact and insect bites – which, if true, would make HIV-positive people extremely dangerous. He advocated testing anyone working in schools, restaurants, or healthcare, and quarantining those who tested positive. Some of LaRouche's views on AIDS were developed by John Seale, a British venereological physician who proposed that AIDS was created in a Soviet laboratory. Seale's highly speculative writings were published in three prestigious medical journals, lending these ideas some appearance of being hard science.
LaRouche and his associates devised a "Biological Strategic Defense Initiative" that would cost $100 billion per annum, which they said would have to be directed by LaRouche. Toumey writes that those opposing the program, such as the World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control, were accused of "viciously lying to the world," and of following an agenda of genocide and euthanasia. In 1986 LaRouche proposed that AIDS be added to California's List of Communicable Diseases. Sponsored by his "Prevent AIDS Now Initiative Committee" (PANIC), Proposition 64 – or the "LaRouche initiative" – qualified for the California ballot in 1986, with the required signature gatherers mostly paid for by LaRouche's Campaigner Publications. Seale, presented as an AIDS expert by PANIC, supported the LaRouche initiative, but disagreed with several of LaRouche's views, including that HIV could be spread by insects, and described the group's political beliefs and conspiracy theories as "rather odd". According to David Kirp, professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley, the proposal would have required that 300,000 people in the area with HIV or AIDS be reported to public health authorities; might have removed over 100,000 of them from their jobs in schools, restaurants and agriculture; and would have forced 47,000 children to stay away from school.
The proposal was opposed by leading scientists and local health officials as based on inaccurate scientific information and, as the public health schools put it, running "counter to all public health principles." It was defeated, reintroduced two years later, and defeated again, with two million votes in favor the first time, and 1.7 million the second. AIDS became a leading plank in LaRouche's platform during his 1988 presidential campaign.
1986: Electoral success in Illinois; press conference allegations
Main article: 1986 Illinois gubernatorial electionIn March 1986, Mark Fairchild and Janice Hart – LaRouche National Democratic Policy Committee candidates – won the Democratic primary for statewide offices in Illinois, gaining national attention for LaRouche. The Democratic gubernatorial candidate, Adlai Stevenson III, withdrew his nomination rather than run on the same slate as LaRouche members, and told reporters the party was "exploring every legal remedy to purge these bizarre and dangerous extremists from the Democratic ticket." A spokesman for the Democratic National Committee said it would have to do a better job of communicating to the electorate that LaRouche's National Democratic Policy Committee was unrelated to the Democratic Party. The New York Times wrote that Democratic Party officials were trying to identify LaRouche candidates in order to alert voters, and asked the LaRouche organization to release a full list of its candidates.
A month later, LaRouche held a press conference to accuse the Soviet government, British government, drug dealers, international bankers, and journalists of being involved in multiple conspiracies. Flanked by bodyguards, he said: "If Abe Lincoln were alive, he'd probably be standing up here with me today," and that there was no criticism of him that did not originate "with the drug lobby or the Soviet operation ..." He said he had been in danger from Soviet assassins for over 13 years, and had to live in safe houses. He refused to answer a question from an NBC reporter, saying "How can I talk with a drug pusher like you?" He called the leadership of the United States "idiotic" and "berserk," and its foreign policy "criminal or insane." He warned of the imminent collapse of the banking system and accused banks of laundering drug money. Asked about the movement's finances, he said "I don't know. ... I'm not responsible, I'm not involved in that."
1986–1988: Raids and criminal convictions
Main article: LaRouche criminal trialsIn October 1986, hundreds of state and federal officers raided LaRouche offices in Virginia and Massachusetts. A federal grand jury indicted LaRouche and twelve of his associates on credit card fraud and obstruction of justice. The charges stated that they had attempted to defraud people of millions of dollars, including several elderly people, by borrowing money they did not intend to repay. LaRouche disputed the charges, alleging that they were politically motivated.
When LaRouche's "heavily fortified" estate was surrounded, he at first warned law-enforcement officials not to arrest him, saying that any attempt to do so would be an attempt to kill him. A spokesman would not rule out the use of violence against officials in response. While surrounded, LaRouche sent a telegram to president Ronald Reagan saying that an attempt to arrest him "would be an attempt to kill me. I will not submit passively to such an arrest, ... I will defend myself."
In 1987, a number of LaRouche entities, including the Fusion Energy Foundation, were taken over through an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding. The government's use of a sealed order in this proceeding was regarded as a rare legal maneuver.
On December 16, 1988, LaRouche was convicted of conspiracy to commit mail fraud involving more than $30 million in defaulted loans; eleven counts of actual mail fraud involving $294,000 in defaulted loans; and a single count of conspiring to defraud the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. He was sentenced to 15 years in federal prison, but was released on parole after serving five years on January 26, 1994.
Thirteen associates were sentenced to prison terms ranging from one month to 77 years for mail fraud and conspiracy.
The trial judge called LaRouche's claim of a political vendetta "arrant nonsense", and said "the idea that this organization is a sufficient threat to anything that would warrant the government bringing a prosecution to silence them just defies human experience."
Defense lawyers filed unsuccessful appeals that challenged the conduct of the grand jury, the contempt fines, the execution of the search warrants, and various trial procedures. At least ten appeals were heard by the United States Court of Appeals, and three were heard by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Former Attorney General Ramsey Clark joined the defense team for two appeals, writing that the case involved "a broader range of deliberate and systematic misconduct and abuse of power over a longer period of time in an effort to destroy a political movement and leader, than any other federal prosecution in my time or to my knowledge."
In his 1988 autobiography, LaRouche says the raid on his operation was the work of Raisa Gorbachev. In an interview that same year, he said that the Soviet Union opposed him, because he had invented the Strategic Defense Initiative. "The Soviet government hated me for it. Gorbachev also hated my guts and called for my assassination and imprisonment and so forth." He asserted that he had survived these threats, because he had been protected by unnamed U.S. government officials. "Even when they don't like me, they consider me a national asset, and they don't like to have their national assets killed."
LaRouche received 25,562 votes in the 1988 presidential election.
1989: Musical interests and Verdi tuning initiative
LaRouche had an interest in classical music up to the period of Brahms. A motto of LaRouche's European Workers' Party is "Think like Beethoven"; movement offices typically include a piano and posters of German composers, and members are known for their choral singing at protest events and for using satirical lyrics tailored to their targets. LaRouche abhorred popular music; he said in 1980, "Rock was not an accidental thing. This was done by people who set out in a deliberate way to subvert the United States. It was done by British intelligence," and wrote that the Beatles were "a product shaped according to British Psychological Warfare Division specifications."
LaRouche movement members have protested at performances of Richard Wagner's operas, denouncing Wagner as an anti-Semite who found favor with the Nazis, and called a conductor "satanic" because he played contemporary music.
In 1989, LaRouche advocated that classical orchestras should use a concert pitch based on A above middle C (A4) tuned to 432 Hz, which the Schiller Institute called the "Verdi pitch", a pitch that Verdi had suggested as optimal, though he also composed and conducted in other pitches such as the French official diapason normal of 435 Hz, including his Requiem in 1874.
The Schiller Institute initiative attracted support from more than 300 opera stars, including Joan Sutherland, Plácido Domingo, and Luciano Pavarotti, who according to Opera Fanatic may not have been aware of LaRouche's politics. A spokesman for Domingo said Domingo had simply signed a questionnaire, had not been aware of its origins, and would not agree with LaRouche's politics. Renata Tebaldi and Piero Cappuccilli, who were running for the European Parliament on LaRouche's "Patriots for Italy" platform, attended Schiller Institute conferences as featured speakers. The discussions led to debates in the Italian parliament about reinstating "Verdi" legislation. LaRouche gave an interview to National Public Radio on the initiative from prison. The initiative was opposed by the editor of Opera Fanatic, Stefan Zucker, who objected to the establishment of a "pitch police," and argued that LaRouche was using the issue to gain credibility.
1990s
Imprisonment, release on parole, attempts at exoneration, visits to Russia
LaRouche began his sentence in 1989, serving it at the Federal Medical Center in Rochester, Minnesota. From there he ran for Congress in 1990, seeking to represent the 10th District of Virginia, but he received less than one percent of the vote. He ran for president again in 1992 with James Bevel as his running mate, a civil rights activist who had represented the LaRouche movement in its pursuit of the Franklin child prostitution ring allegations. It was only the second-ever campaign for president from prison. He received 26,334 votes, standing again as the "Economic Recovery" party. For a time he shared a cell with televangelist Jim Bakker. Bakker later wrote of his astonishment at LaRouche's detailed knowledge of the Bible. According to Bakker, LaRouche received a daily intelligence report by mail, and at times had information about news events days before they happened. Bakker also wrote that LaRouche believed their cell was bugged. In Bakker's view, "to say LaRouche was a little paranoid would be like saying that the Titanic had a little leak."
Viktor Kuzin, a member of the Moscow City Council and a founder of the Democratic Union in Russia, travelled to Minnesota in 1993 to meet LaRouche in prison, and afterwards participated in international campaigns to exonerate LaRouche. An advertisement calling for exoneration was published in several U.S. newspapers, signed by Kuzin, Civil Rights attorney J. L. Chestnut, former Ugandan president Godfrey Binaisa, and others. Chestnut was interviewed in the Tuscaloosa News saying that when he met LaRouche, "I told him that he might as well be black and in Alabama."
The exoneration campaigns garnered the support of a number of State Representatives and State Senators in the U.S., as well as a former justice of the Washington State Supreme Court.
LaRouche was released on parole in January 1994, and returned to Loudoun County. The Washington Post wrote that he would be supervised by parole and probation officers until January 2004. Also in 1994, his followers joined members of the Nation of Islam to blame the Anti-Defamation League for what they alleged were crimes and conspiracies against African Americans, reportedly one of several such meetings since 1992.
Former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark wrote a letter in 1995 to then-Attorney General Janet Reno in which he said that the case against LaRouche involved "a broader range of deliberate and systematic misconduct and abuse of power over a longer period of time in an effort to destroy a political movement and leader, than any other federal prosecution in my time or to my knowledge". He asserted that, "The government, ex parte, sought and received an order effectively closing the doors of these publishing businesses, all of which were involved in First Amendment activities, effectively preventing the further repayment of their debts." He called the convictions "a tragic miscarriage of justice which at this time can only be corrected by an objective review and courageous action by the Department of Justice". The LaRouche movement organized two panels to review the cases: the Curtis Clark Commission, and the Mann-Chestnut hearings.
Beginning in 1994, LaRouche made numerous visits to Russia, participating in conferences of the Vernadsky State Geological Museum of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), the RAS Institute of the Far East, and other places. He addressed seminars at the RAS Institute of Economics, the RAS Institute of Oriental Studies. He spoke at hearings in the State Duma of the Russian Federation on measures to ensure the development of the Russian economy at the point of destabilization of the world financial system. Two of his books were translated into Russian.
On September 18, 1996, a full-page advertisement appeared in the New Federalist, a LaRouche publication, as well as The Washington Post and Roll Call. Entitled "Officials Call for LaRouche's Exoneration", its signatories included Arturo Frondizi, former president of Argentina; figures from the 1960s American civil rights movement such as Amelia Boynton Robinson (a leader of the Larouche-affiliated Schiller Institute), James Bevel (a Larouche movement participant) and Rosa Parks; former Minnesota Senator and Democratic presidential candidate Eugene McCarthy; Mervyn Dymally, who chaired the Congressional Black Caucus; and artists such as classical vocalist William Warfield and violinist Norbert Brainin, former 1st Violin of the Amadeus Quartet.
In 1996, LaRouche was invited to speak at a convention organized by the Nation of Islam's Louis Farrakhan and Ben Chavis, then of the National African American Leadership Summit. As soon as he began speaking, he was booed off the stage.
In the 1996 Democratic Party presidential primaries, he received enough votes in Louisiana and Virginia to get one delegate from each state, but before the primaries began, the Democratic National Committee chair, Donald Fowler, ruled that LaRouche was not a "bona fide Democrat" because of his "expressed political beliefs ... which are explicitly racist and anti-Semitic," and because of his "past activities, including exploitation of and defrauding contributors and voters." Fowler instructed state parties to disregard votes for LaRouche.
LaRouche opposed attempts to impeach President Bill Clinton, charging it was a plot by the British Intelligence to destabilize the U.S. government. In 1996 he called for the impeachment of Pennsylvania governor Tom Ridge.
Efforts to clear LaRouche's name continued, including in Australia, where the Parliament acknowledged receipt of 1,606 petition signatures in 1998.
In 1999, China's press agency, the Xinhua News Agency, reported that LaRouche had criticized the Cox Report, a congressional investigation that accused the Chinese of stealing U.S. nuclear weapons secrets, calling it a "scientifically illiterate hoax." On October 13, 1999, during a press conference to announce his plans to run for president, he predicted the collapse of the world's financial system, saying, "There's nothing like it in this century. ... it is systematic and therefore inevitable." He said the U.S. and other nations had built the "biggest financial bubble in all history," which was close to bankruptcy.
2000s
2000–2003: Worldwide LaRouche Youth Movement, September 11 attacks, presidential run
LaRouche founded the Worldwide LaRouche Youth Movement (WLYM) in 2000, saying in 2004 that it had hundreds of members in the U.S. and a lesser number overseas. During the Democratic primaries in June 2000, he received 53,280 votes, or 22% of the total, in Arkansas. Despite finishing above the 15% threshold needed to obtain delegates, LaRouche was denied any delegates and was barred from attending the 2000 Democratic National Convention.
In 2002, LaRouche's Executive Intelligence Review argued that the September 11 attacks in 2001 had been an "inside job" and "attempted coup d'etat", and that Iran was the first country to question it. The article received wide coverage in Iran, and was cited by senior Iranian government officials, including Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and Hassan Rouhani. Mahmoud Alinejad wrote that, in a subsequent telephone interview with the Voice of the Islamic Republic of Iran, LaRouche said the attacks had been organized by rogue elements inside the U.S., aiming to use the incident to promote a war against Islam, and that Israel was a dictatorial regime prepared to commit Nazi-style crimes against the Palestinians.
In 2003, LaRouche was living in a "heavily guarded" rented house in Round Hill, Loudoun County, Virginia.
LaRouche again entered the primary elections for the Democratic Party's nomination in 2004, setting a record for the number of consecutive presidential campaigns; Democratic Party officials did not allow him to participate in candidate forum debates. He did not run in 2008.
As during the preceding decade, LaRouche and his followers denied that human civilization had harmed the environment through DDT, chlorofluorocarbons, or carbon dioxide. According to Chip Berlet, "Pro-LaRouche publications have been at the forefront of denying the reality of global warming".
2003–2012: Overseas press coverage, financial crisis
Iqbal Qazwini wrote in the Arabic-language daily Asharq Al-Awsat in 2003 that LaRouche was one of the first to predict the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1988 and German reunification. He said LaRouche had urged the West to pursue a policy of economic cooperation similar to the Marshall Plan for the advancement of the economy of the socialist countries. According to Qazwini, recent years have seen a proliferation of LaRouche's ideas in China and South Asia. Qazwini referred to him as the spiritual father of the revival of the new Silk Road or Eurasian Landbridge, which aims to link the continents through a network of ground transportation.
In 2005, the People's Daily of China covered LaRouche's economic forecasts and published an eight-part interview with him; the interviewer wrote that LaRouche was "quite famous in mainland China today".
In 2007, LaRouche began a national lobbying campaign to restore the Glass-Steagall Act, saying that it would be possible to save the U.S. banking system by reorganizing it under bankruptcy protection. Also in 2007, he proposed a "Homeowners and Bank Protection Act". This called for the establishment of a federal agency that would "place federal- and state-chartered banks under protection, freeze all existing home mortgages for a period of time, adjust mortgage values to fair prices, restructure existing mortgages at appropriate interest rates, and write off speculative debt obligations of mortgage-backed securities". The bill envisioned a foreclosure moratorium, allowing homeowners to make the equivalent of rental payments for an interim period, and an end to bank bailouts, forcing banks to reorganize under bankruptcy laws. In spring 2007 he was an honorary foreign guest at a ceremony in honor of the 80th birthday of Stanislav Menshikov at the Russian Academy of Sciences.
2009: U.S. health care reform
During the discussion of U.S. health care reform in 2009, LaRouche advocated a single-payer health care bill and took exception to what he described as President Barack Obama's proposal that "independent boards of doctors and health care experts make the life-and-death decisions of what care to provide, and what not, based on cost-effectiveness criteria." LaRouche said the proposed boards would amount to the same thing as the Nazis' Action T4 euthanasia program. A press release from his political action committee asserted: "Lyndon LaRouche and the LaRouchePAC are the source of the campaign to expose the Obama ‘health care’ policy as modeled on that of Hitler in 1939."
Images at tables of volunteers compared Obama to Adolf Hitler, and at least one had a picture of Obama with a Hitler-style mustache. In Seattle, police were called twice in response to people threatening to attack the volunteers. During one widely reported public meeting, Congressman Barney Frank called the images "vile, contemptible nonsense."
Ideology and beliefs
Main article: Views of Lyndon LaRouche and the LaRouche movementUniversity of Notre Dame political philosophers Catherine Zuckert and Michael Zuckert write of LaRouche that "t must be nearly unique in American politics that a presidential candidate ... makes the interpretation of Plato a major issue in his campaign."
According to George Johnson, LaRouche saw history as a battle between Platonists, who believe in absolute truth, and Aristotelians, who rely on empirical data. Johnson characterizes LaRouche's views as follows: the Platonists include figures such as Beethoven, Mozart, Shakespeare, Leonardo da Vinci, and Leibniz. LaRouche believed that many of the world's ills result from the dominance of Aristotelianism as embraced by the empirical philosophers (such as Hobbes, Locke, Berkeley, and Hume), leading to a culture that favors the empirical over the metaphysical, embraces moral relativism, and seeks to keep the general population uninformed. Industry, technology, and classical music should be used to enlighten the world, LaRouche argued, whereas the Aristotelians use psychotherapy, drugs, rock music, jazz, environmentalism, and quantum theory to bring about a new Dark Age in which the world will be ruled by oligarchs. Left and right are false distinctions for LaRouche; what matters is the Platonic versus Aristotelian outlook, a position that has led him to form relationships with groups as disparate as farmers, nuclear engineers, Black Muslims, Teamsters, and anti-abortion advocates.
In Architects of Fear (1983), Johnson compares LaRouche's view to an Illuminati conspiracy theory; Johnson writes that after he wrote about LaRouche in The Minneapolis Star, LaRouche's followers denounced him as part of a conspiracy of elitists that began in ancient Egypt. But according to LaRouche, Aristotelians are not necessarily in communication or coordination with one another: "From their standpoint, are proceeding by instinct," LaRouche said. "If you're asking how their policy is developed – if there is an inside group sitting down and making plans – no, it doesn't work that way ... History doesn't function quite that consciously."
In 2011, Stephen E. Adkins's Encyclopedia of Right-Wing Extremism In Modern American History called LaRouche "the leading neo-fascist politician in the United States".
Controversy
LaRouche was described as having "fascistic tendencies", taking positions on the far right (despite his self-identification with the left and some left-wing policies), and creating disinformation.
Designation as a conspiracy theorist
LaRouche was commonly regarded as a conspiracy theorist: for example, in his Fox News obituary. An article in the Southern Poverty Law Center website names him as "a fringe ideologue and conspiracy theorist whom Chip Berlet, senior analyst at Political Research Associates and an expert on the radical right calls "the man who brought us fascism wrapped in an American flag". An NPR obituary is titled Conspiracy Theorist And Frequent Presidential Candidate Lyndon LaRouche Dies At 96. The Washington Post obituary reports he was "often described as an extremist crank and fringe figure" and that he "built a worldwide following based on conspiracy theories, economic doom, anti-Semitism, homophobia and racism".
Allegations of antisemitism
Beginning in the mid-1970s, allegations began to appear saying that LaRouche had fascist and antisemitic tendencies.
In 1977, LaRouche married his second wife, Helga Zepp-LaRouche, a German 27 years younger than he. Her 1984 book, The Hitler Book, argues that "We need a movement that can finally free Germany from the control of the Versailles and Yalta treaties, thanks to which we have staggered from one catastrophe to another for an entire century." Helga founded the Schiller Institute, which has been described as promoting antisemitic conspiracy theories by the Berliner Zeitung and Political Research Associates, a nonprofit research group that studies right-wing, white supremacist, and militia groups.
LaRouche claimed that he was anti-Zionist, not antisemitic. When the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) accused LaRouche of antisemitism in 1979, he filed a $26-million libel suit; the case failed when Justice Michael Dontzin of the New York Supreme Court ruled that it was fair comment and that the facts "reasonably give rise" to that description. LaRouche started a campaign against the ADL and set up a group called "The Provisional Committee to Clean Up B'nai Brith."
LaRouche said in 1986 that descriptions of him as a neo-fascist or anti-Semite stemmed from "the drug lobby or the Soviet operation – which is sometimes the same thing," and in 2006 wrote that "religious and racial hatred, such as antisemitism, or hatred against Islam, or, hatred of Christians, is, on record of known history, the most evil expression of criminality to be seen on the planet today." Antony Lerman wrote in 1988 that LaRouche used "the British" as a code word for "Jews," a theory also propounded by Dennis King, author of Lyndon LaRouche and the New American Fascism (1989). George Johnson argued that King's presentation failed to take into account that several members of LaRouche's inner circle were Jewish. Daniel Pipes wrote in 1997 that LaRouche's references to the British really were to the British, though he agreed that an alleged British-Jewish alliance lay at the heart of LaRouche's conspiracism.
As of 2016, the Jewish Virtual Library states that "The international organization run by Lyndon LaRouche is a major source of such masked antisemitic theories globally. In the U.S. the LaRouchites spread these conspiracy theories in an alliance with aides to Minister Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam. A series of LaRouchite pamphlets calls the neoconservative movement the 'Children of Satan', which links Jewish neo-conservatives to the historic rhetoric of the blood libel."
Allegations of racism
Manning Marable of Columbia University wrote in 1998 that LaRouche tried in the mid-1980s to build bridges to the black community. Marable argued that most of the community was not fooled and quoted the A. Philip Randolph Institute, an organization for African American trade unionists, declaring that "LaRouche appeals to fear, hatred and ignorance. He seeks to exploit and exacerbate the anxieties and frustrations of Americans by offering an array of scapegoats and enemies: Jews, Zionists, international bankers, blacks, labor unions – much the way Hitler did in Germany." During LaRouche's slander suit against NBC in 1984, Roy Innis, leader of the Congress of Racial Equality, took the stand for LaRouche as a character witness, stating under oath that LaRouche's views on racism were "consistent with his own." Asked whether he had seen any indication of racism in LaRouche's associates, he replied that he had not.
Disputed record as economist and forecaster
LaRouche material frequently acclaims him as the world's greatest economist and the world's most successful forecaster. For example, his book title The Economics of the Noösphere: Why Lyndon LaRouche Is the World's Most Successful Economic Forecaster of the Past Four Decades. However, a website of disgruntled ex-movement leaders lists incorrect predictions of sudden world economic collapse, war or depression in 1956, 1961–1970, 1972, 1975–1992, and 1994–2011.
Apart from the numerous failed predictions are claimed some successful predictions or proposals: the eventual reunification of Germany, the Star Wars initiative, the New Silk Road (claimed as a precursor to the Chinese One Belt One Road initiative.)
Movement
Main article: LaRouche movementEstimates of the size of LaRouche's movement have varied over the years; most say there is a core membership of 500 to 2,000. The estimated 600 members in 1978 paid monthly dues of $24. Johnson wrote in 1983 that both the Fusion Energy Foundation and the National Democratic Policy Committee had attracted some 20,000 members, as well as 300,000 magazine subscribers.
According to Christopher Toumey, LaRouche's charismatic authority within the movement was grounded on members' belief that he possessed a unique level of insight and expertise. He identified an emotionally charged issue, conducted in-depth research into it, and then proposed a simplistic solution, which usually involved restructuring of the economy or national security apparatus. He and the membership portrayed anyone opposing him as immoral and part of the conspiracy.
Description as a cult
The LaRouche movement has been described as a cult or cult-like by critics and anti-cult organizations.
A 1987 article by John Mintz in The Washington Post reported that members of the LaRouche movement lived hand-to-mouth in crowded apartments, with their basic needs paid for by the movement. They worked raising money or selling newspapers for LaRouche, doing research for him, or singing in a group choir, spending almost every waking hour together.
The group is known for its caustic attacks on opponents and former members. It has justified what it calls "psywar techniques" as necessary to shake people up; Johnson in 1983 quoted a LaRouche associate: "We're not very nice, so we're hated. Why be nice? It's a cruel world. We're in a war and the human race is up for grabs". Charles Tate, a former LaRouche associate, told The Washington Post in 1987 that members see themselves as exempt from the ordinary laws of society: "They feel that the continued existence of the human race is totally dependent on what they do in the organization, that nobody would be here without LaRouche. They feel justified in a peculiar way doing anything whatsoever."
Death
LaRouche's death was announced on the website of one of his organizations. He died on February 12, 2019, at age 96. Neither the place nor cause of his death was specified.
Publications
- The Third Stage of Imperialism (as Lyn Marcus). New York: West Village Committee for Independent Political Action (1967). archive
- Mass Action, with Tony Papert. Ann Arbor, Michigan: SDS Regional Labor Committee (1968).
- The Philosophy of Socialist Education. New York: National Caucus of Labor Committees (1969).
- Centrism as a Social Phenomenon: How Not to Build a Revolutionary Party (as Lyn Marcus), with Uwe Henke von Parpart. New York: National Caucus of SDS Labor Committees (1970).
- Education, Science and Politics. New York: National Caucus of Labor Committees (1972).
- The Question of Stalinism Today. New York: Campaigner Publications (1975). The Campaigner, vol. 8, no. 9 (Nov. 1975). Full issue.
- How the International Development Bank Will Work. New York: Campaigner Publications (1975).
- A Presidential Campaign White Paper on Agricultural Production. New York: New Solidarity International Press Service (1975).
- The Rothschilds, from Pitt to Rockefeller (1976). OCLC 4895071.
- Dialectical Economics An Introduction to Marxist Political Economy. New York: Heath (1975). ISBN 0669853089. archive
- The Case of Walter Lippmann: A Presidential Strategy. New York: Campaigner Publications (1977). ISBN 0918388066. archive
- How to Defeat Liberalism and William F. Buckley: 1980 Campaign Policy. New York: New Benjamin Franklin House (1979). ISBN 0933488033. archive
- The Power of Reason: A Kind of Autobiography. New York: New Benjamin Franklin House (1979). ISBN 0933488017. archive
- Will the Soviets Rule During the 1980s? New York: New Benjamin Franklin House (1979). ISBN 0933488025. archived
- Basic Economics for Conservative Democrats. New York: New Benjamin Franklin House (1980). ISBN 0933488041.
- What Every Conservative Should Know About Communism. New York: New Benjamin Franklin House (1980). ISBN 0933488068. archive
- Why Revival of "SALT" Won't Stop War. New York: New Benjamin Franklin House (1980). ISBN 0933488084. archive
- The Ugly Truth About Milton Friedman, with David P. Goldman. New York: New Benjamin Franklin House (1980). ISBN 0933488092. archive
- Operation Juárez: Mexico/Ibero-America Policy Study. New York: Executive Intelligence Review (1982).
- There Are No Limits to Growth. New York: New Benjamin Franklin House (1983). ISBN 0933488319.
- So, You Wish to Learn All About Economics? A Text on Elementary Mathematical Economics. New York: New Benjamin Franklin House (1984). ISBN 0943235138. archive
- Imperialism: The Final Stage of Bolshevism. New York: New Benjamin Franklin House (1984). ISBN 0933488335. archive
- The Power of Reason, 1988: An Autobiography. Washington, D.C.: Executive Intelligence Review (1987). ISBN 0943235006.
- In Defense of Common Sense. Washington, D.C.: Schiller Institute (1989). ISBN 0962109533.
- The Science of Christian Economy. Washington, D.C.: Schiller Institute (1991). ISBN 0962109568.
- Cold Fusion: A Challenge to U.S. Science Policy, with Paul Gallager. Washington, D.C.: Schiller Institute (1992). ISBN 0962109576.
- Now, Are You Ready to Learn About Economics? Washington, D.C.: EIR News Service (2000). ISBN 0943235189.
- The Economics of the Nöosphere. Washington, D.C.: EIR News Service (2001). ISBN 0943235200.
References
- ^ Severo, Richard (February 13, 2019). "Lyndon LaRouche, Cult Figure Who Ran for President 8 Times, Dies at 96". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 14, 2019. Retrieved February 13, 2019.
- "Cult Leaders Use Mind Control". Tulsa World. March 14, 1993. Archived from the original on December 7, 2019. Retrieved October 4, 2019.
- Kathlyn Gay, ed. (2011). American Dissidents: An Encyclopedia of Activists, Subversives, and Prisoners of Conscience. ABC-CLIO. pp. 377–380. ISBN 978-1598847659. Archived from the original on October 17, 2015. Retrieved June 17, 2015.
- ^ Atkins, Steven E. (2011). Encyclopedia of Right-Wing Extremism In Modern American History. ABC-CLIO. p. 108. ISBN 978-1598843507. Archived from the original on October 17, 2015. Retrieved June 17, 2015.
- ^ Doubek, James (February 14, 2019). "Conspiracy Theorist And Frequent Presidential Candidate Lyndon LaRouche Dies At 96". NPR. Archived from the original on March 20, 2019. Retrieved March 28, 2019.
- ^ Walker, Jesse (December 29, 2019). "Lyndon LaRouche: The Conspiracist Who Earned a Following". Politico. Retrieved October 30, 2022.
- ^ Smith, Timothy R. (February 13, 2019). "Lyndon LaRouche Jr., conspiracy theorist and presidential candidate, dies at 96". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 30, 2022.
He built a political organization often likened to a cult and ran for president eight times, once while in prison for mail fraud.
- ^ "One of America’s contributions to the 20th-century’s rich legacy of dangerous political cult leaders" "Political Cult Leader Lyndon LaRouche Dies at 96". February 13, 2019. Archived from the original on March 28, 2019. Retrieved March 28, 2019.
- Atkins 2011, p. 109.
- ^ Berlet, Chip (2010). Culture wars : an encyclopedia of issues, viewpoints, and voices. Roger Chapman. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe. p. 315. ISBN 978-1849727136. OCLC 671568128.
- Atkins 2011, pp. 108–109.
- ^ Blum, October 7, 1979 Archived May 28, 2022, at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ Mintz, John (May 17, 1987). "LaRouche Filings: Plots, Spies". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on May 28, 2022. Retrieved April 3, 2022.
- ^ "Win by LaRouche candidate shocks national Democrats" Archived October 17, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, Associated Press, March 20, 1986.
- Mintz, John (January 13, 1985). "Group Makes Political Inroads". The Washington Post.
- ^ "Political Briefing; A Spot for LaRouche? No Way, Party Says". The New York Times. August 15, 2000. Retrieved October 29, 2022.
- Norrander, Barbara (2006). "The Attrition Game: Initial Resources, Initial Contests and the Exit of Candidates during the US Presidential Primary Season". British Journal of Political Science. 36 (3): 487–507. doi:10.1017/S0007123406000251. ISSN 0007-1234. JSTOR 4092259.
- "A Guide to the Lyndon LaRouche Collection, 1979–1986 Lyndon LaRouche Collection SC 0075". ead.lib.virginia.edu. Archived from the original on February 24, 2021. Retrieved May 28, 2022.
- "Ancestry of Lyndon LaRouche". Archived from the original on December 19, 2008. Retrieved December 27, 2008.
- Montgomery 1974 and King 1989, pp. 17–18, 20, 25–26.
- For the parents' religions and other details, see Witt 2004, p. 3, and King 1989, p. 4.
- For "years of hell" and bullying, see LaRouche 1979, pp. 38–39.
- For spending time alone and identifying with philosophers, see LaRouche 1979, pp. 55, 58.
- For the particular philosophers he read, see LaRouche 1987, p. 17.
- For his graduation, see Tong 1994.
- For his father's expulsion, see King 1989, pp. 5–6.
- For an entry mentioning LaRouche in Quaker records, see Stattler, Richard. "Guide to the Records of the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) in New England" Archived September 23, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, Rhode Island Historical Society, 1997, p. 92.
- ^ Witt 2004, p. 3
- King 1989, p. 6
- LaRouche 1987, pp. 37–38
- LaRouche 1987, pp. 36–37
- For how he adopted Marxism and Trotskyism, for his studies, and joining the SWP, see LaRouche 1987, pp. 62–64. For his use of Lyn Marcus, see Watson, July 19, 1978 Archived April 12, 2019, at the Wayback Machine.
- For his work as a management consultant, see LaRouche 1979, p. 4.
- King 1989, pp. 8–9.
- ^ Wohlforth, undated.
- King 1989, p. 9.
- LaRouche 1970.
- ^ Lewers, Bill (2013). A Voter's Journey. Xlibris Corporation. p. 200. ISBN 978-1483686776. Archived from the original on May 28, 2022. Retrieved November 13, 2016.
- Fraser, Steve. "NCLC Frame Up", Great Speckled Bird, February 22, 1971.
- Also see LaRouche 1987, p. 116.
- The NCLC was at first called the SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) Labor Committee.
- For LaRouche's teaching, see King 1989, pp. 13–14.
- King 1989, pp. 17–18.
- Also see Rose, Gregory F. "The Swarmy Life and Times of the NCLC", National Review, March 30, 1979.
- Mintz 1985a.
- For members giving up their jobs, see Montgomery, January 20, 1974 Archived March 18, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
- For members giving up their jobs, see: Witt, October 24, 2004, p. 3 Archived November 3, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.
- Johnson 1983, p. 189.
-
"LaRouche Says His Supporters Take Covert Roles in Campaign" Archived July 22, 2018, at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times, February 15, 1980: "Lyndon H. LaRouche, the former head of the U.S. Labor Party who is now running as a Democrat, has said that his campaign workers impersonate reporters and others, contending that the covert operation is needed for his security."
- Other publications included International Journal of Fusion, Investigative Leads, War on Drugs, The Young Scientist, American Labor Beacon, New Federalist, Nouvelle Solidarité, and Neue Solidarität.
-
Lynch, Pat. "Is Lyndon LaRouche using your name?", Columbia Journalism Review, March–April 1985, pp. 42–46.
- Also see Mintz, January 15, 1985 Archived August 4, 2011, at the Wayback Machine.
-
For Bailey's comment in 1984, see Copulus 1984.
- For the rest, see Mintz, January 15, 1985 Archived August 4, 2011, at the Wayback Machine.
- Douglas Foster (January 1982). "Teamster Madness". Mother Jones. p. 30. Archived from the original on October 17, 2015. Retrieved June 17, 2015.
- For psywar techniques, see Johnson 1983, p. 190.
- For Alexander, Alexander 1991, p. 948.
- Copulus 1984, pp. 2–3.
- Other groups included the International Caucus of Labor Committees, the Club of Life, the Committee for a Fair Election, the Humanist Academy, the International Workingman's Defense Fund, the Lafayette Academy for the Arts and Sciences, the LaRouche Campaign, the National Anti-Drug Coalition, the National Unemployed and Welfare Rights Organization, and the Revolutionary Youth Movement.
- For more on the companies, see Mintz, January 13, 1985 Archived August 17, 2017, at the Wayback Machine.
- LaRouche 1987, p. 117.
- For the name "Operation Mop-Up", see Montgomery, January 20, 1974 Archived March 18, 2020, at the Wayback Machine.
- For the Village Voice, see Hentoff, January 24, 1974 Archived October 17, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, pp. 8, 10, and for its discussion of the New Solidarity editorial, see p. 30.
- Also see Alexander 1991, p. 946.
- For the description of the assaults, see Montgomery, January 20, 1974 Archived March 18, 2020, at the Wayback Machine, and Hentoff, January 24, 1974 Archived October 17, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, pp. 8, 10, 30.
- For the number of assaults, see Alexander 1991, p. 947.
- For the arrests, see King 1989, pp. 23–24.
- Also see Clines, October 11, 1973 Archived July 22, 2018, at the Wayback Machine.
- For no convictions see Mintz, September 20, 1987 Archived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.
- For LaRouche saying he acted in self-defence, see Witt, October 24, 2004, p. 3 Archived November 3, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.
- Perlman 1984.
- Lerman 1988, p. 212.
- Mintz, December 18, 1987 Archived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ Toumey 1996, pp. 87–92.
- Grauerholz, Dr. John, The AIDS Epidemic Four Years Later: LaRouche Was Right Archived February 15, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, EIR August 17, 1990
- Watson, July 19, 1978 Archived April 12, 2019, at the Wayback Machine.
- Also see Rose, Gregory F. "The Swarmy Life and Times of the NCLC", National Review, March 30, 1979
- Reich, Kenneth (September 21, 1977). "Tiny U.S. Labor Party Seeks Allies on the Right" Archived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine. Los Angeles Times, page A3.
- Kenney, February 17, 1980 Archived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.
- Blum, October 7, 1979 Archived July 22, 2018, at the Wayback Machine.
- For Mitchell Werbell saying he had ties to the CIA, see Montgomery, October 8, 1979 Archived July 22, 2018, at the Wayback Machine.
- LaRouche hired WerBell as a security consultant for protection against an assassination threat and to train his security staff; see Donner & Rothenberg 1980.
- Witt, October 24, 2004, p. 3 Archived November 3, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.
- Marcus, L. (Lyndon LaRouche). "Beyond Psychoanalysis" Archived July 18, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, The Campaigner, Vol 6, Nos. 3–4; September/October 1973.
- ^ Montgomery, January 20, 1974 Archived March 18, 2020, at the Wayback Machine, p. 51, column 5.
- Also see Witt, October 24, 2004, p. 3 Archived November 3, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.
- Tourish & Wohlforth 2000, p. 74.
- For the Weitzman details, see Montgomery, January 20, 1974 Archived March 18, 2020, at the Wayback Machine, p. 1; for 41 press releases about brainwashing, see p. 51, column 2.
- For the police investigation, see The New York Times, January 24, 1974 Archived July 22, 2018, at the Wayback Machine and February 27, 1974 Archived July 22, 2018, at the Wayback Machine.
- Also see Tourish & Wohlforth 2000, pp. 74–75.
- Johnson 1989
• Boyer, May 31, 1986 Archived March 8, 2021, at the Wayback Machine
• Spiro, Peter (February 6, 1984). "Paranoid Politics: Your tax dollars at work". The New Republic. pp. 10–12.
• Chanes, Jerome A., ed. (1995). Antisemitism in America today: outspoken experts explode the myths. Carol Pub. Group. p. 192. ISBN 978-1559722902. Archived from the original on November 8, 2013. Retrieved February 16, 2012.
• Michael 2008, pp. 110–111
• Hamilton, Neil A. (2002). Rebels and renegades: a chronology of social and political dissent in the United States. Taylor & Francis. p. 283. ISBN 978-0415936392. Archived from the original on November 8, 2013. Retrieved February 16, 2012. - Donner & Rothenberg 1980
- ^ Michael 2008, pp. 110–111
- For Gregory Rose's position, see Johnson 1983, p. 204.
- George & Wilcox 1992, pp. 317–318, 322.
- Johnson 1983, p. 207.
- Kilgore, Ed (February 13, 2019). "Political Cult Leader Lyndon LaRouche Dies at 96". Intelligencer. Archived from the original on March 28, 2019. Retrieved August 13, 2021.
- ^ Montgomery, Paul L.; Blum, Howard (October 7, 1979). "U.S. Labor Party: Cult Surrounded by Controversy". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 7, 2016.
- Johnson 1989
- ^ George & Wilcox 1992, pp. 319–320
- Shenon 1986
- Sims 1996, p. 63.
- "LEAA Gestapo Operations in Reading, Pa" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on March 14, 2017. Retrieved April 25, 2019.
- "The Busing Plot: CIA Plans Fall Race Riots, Organizes Both Sides" Archived March 14, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, EIR, July 8, 1974
- King 1989, p. 201
- King 1989, p. 201.
- "Federal Probe Pins Top Aides of LaRouche", Philip Shenon, Patriot – News, October 7, 1986
- "Oddball tycoon wins some battles", John King, The Globe and Mail, January 26, 1984
- ^
Rosenfeld, September 24, 1976 Archived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.
- For Clarence Kelley's statement, see "Nomination of Hon. Andrew Young as U.S. Representative to U.N." Archived October 17, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, Committee on Foreign Relations, January 25, 1977, p. 49.
- McLemee, Scott. The LaRouche Youth Movement Archived April 17, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, Inside Higher Ed, July 11, 2007
- Bronfenbrenner, Martin. "Economics in Dialectical Dialect" Archived February 14, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 84, No. 1 (Feb. 1976), pp. 123–130
-
Witt, October 24, 2004, p. 3 Archived November 3, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.
- "Federal matching funds" Archived March 21, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, BBC News, February 22, 2000.
- For the number of votes, see "American president election, 1976" Archived April 26, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Encyclopædia Britannica, 2011, Retrieved March 22, 2011.
- Dabilis, Andy. "Labor candidates explain platform", The Sunday Sun, (Lowell, Mass), May 30, 1976, p. B5.
- Also see Johnson, Donald Bruce. National Party Platforms: 1960–1976. Volume 2, University of Illinois Press, 1978, p. 1007.
- Gregg, March 1987 Archived February 16, 2019, at the Wayback Machine.
-
For Rosenfeld in The Washington Post, see Rosenfeld, September 24, 1976 Archived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.
- For LaRouche's view of Rosenfeld's article, see LaRouche, July 2, 1999 Archived November 9, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, footnote 25.
- For another account of the Detroit attack on the SWP, see Sheppard 2005, p. 328
- For the election, see "Dunkle Kräfte" Archived June 29, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, Der Spiegel, September 22, 1980; pdf here Archived March 14, 2012, at the Wayback Machine; Google translation Archived May 28, 2022, at the Wayback Machine.
- For the Schiller Institute, see King 1989, pp. xiii, 41.
-
Frank, Lynn. "Klenetsky opposes Moynihan with unusual list of charges" Archived May 6, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times, September 20, 1982.
- Also see Richard, Clay F. "Radical LaRouche Allies Seeking Many Offices" Archived October 17, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, UPI, March 27, 1986.
- Bradley 2004.
- Kilgore, Ed (February 13, 2019). "Political Cult Leader Lyndon LaRouche Dies at 96". New York. Archived from the original on March 28, 2019. Retrieved March 28, 2021.
- Benshoff, Anastasia. "Bush and Clinton aren't the only candidates in presidential race," Associated Press, August 27, 1992.
- Tipton 1986.
- The Boston Globe, February 26, 1980 Archived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.
- "Rightist LaRouche started out as a Marxist" Archived October 24, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, Chicago Sun-Times, March 20, 1986, p. 4.
- Barry, John (November 10, 1991). "Making Of A Myth". Newsweek. Archived from the original on March 13, 2015. Retrieved April 5, 2015.
- Lewis, Neil A. (May 7, 1991). "Bani-Sadr, in U.S., Renews Charges of 1980 Deal". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 23, 2009. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
- ^ Mintz, January 13, 1985 Archived August 17, 2017, at the Wayback Machine.
- "Man who calls Queen a pusher worries town", Matthew Wald. Gazette. Montreal, Quebec April 14, 1986
- "1986 Authorities See Pattern of Threats, Plots Dark Side of LaRouche Empire Surfaces", Kevin Roderick, Los Angeles Times, October 14, 1986
- "CBS Sells Time To Fringe Candidate For Talk", Petter Kerr, New York Times January 22, 1984
- The New York Times, May 29, 1985 Archived November 22, 2017, at the Wayback Machine.
-
For the cost of the spots, see Lowther 1986.
- For Mondale, see The New York Times, undated Archived January 5, 2016, at the Wayback Machine.
- For the 1,000 complaints, see Associated Press, October 24, 1984 Archived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.
- For his allegations about Henry Kissinger, see "Lyndon H. LaRouche to speak on ABC-TV at midnight", PR Newswire, March 26, 1984.
- For Saturday Night Live, see Springston, April 23, 1986.
- For the number of votes, see American presidential election, 1984" Archived April 4, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Encyclopædia Britannica, 2011, Retrieved March 23, 2011.
-
For Bailey and Morris meetings, and for LaRouche saying the report was mistaken, see "CIA admits talks with rightist pol" Archived November 6, 2018, at the Wayback Machine, Philadelphia Daily News, November 1, 1984.
- For DEA, DIA, and CIA, see Green 1985.
- King 1989, pp. 132–133.
- Mintz 1985b.
- St. Petersburg Times 1987
-
"LaRouche Lawyers Seek North's Notebooks" Archived May 6, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, Associated Press, April 7, 1988.
- "It's Time for Truth-In-Justice in Virginia: The LaRouche Cases in Virginia". Archived from the original on November 14, 2007. Retrieved September 18, 2009., Executive Intelligence Review, October 12, 2008.
- King 1989, p. 161.
- ^ Benedictine, Kirll, and Diunov, Michael, "The Last Rosicrucian" Archived February 22, 2017, at the Wayback Machine Terra-America, April 16, 2012
- King 1989, p. 61
- Siano 1992.
- "LaRouche, February 1, 2003". Archived from the original on October 11, 2003. Retrieved March 25, 2017..
- LaRouche's promotion of space colonization included dealings with German scientists and engineers who had worked under the Nazi government during the Second World War, some of whom had emigrated to the U.S. and had ended up working for NASA. They included Arthur Rudolph and several other Peenemunde rocket experts, such as Krafft Arnold Ehricke, Adolf Busemann, Konrad Dannenberg, and Hermann Oberth. When Rudolph was forced to renounce his U.S. citizenship after an investigation into his past, LaRouche supporters formed a defense fund for him. LaRouche also collaborated with Ehricke on ideas about the colonization of the moon and Mars; after Ehricke's death, LaRouche sponsored the "Krafft Ehricke Memorial Conference," and in 1988 delivered a national TV broadcast titled "The Woman on Mars."
- King 1989, pp. 80–81
- Siano 1992
- Rumsfeld, Donald, Known and Unknown, Sentinel, 2011, ISBN 978-1595230676, p. 309
- "Will the Third World flare up in 2012?" Archived February 14, 2019, at the Wayback Machine Komsomolskaya Pravda – February 22, 2012
- ^ Lynch 1985, p. 42.
- For information about Pat Lynch, see "Pat Lynch", The Huffington Post, Retrieved February 14, 2011. Archived April 7, 2015, at the Wayback Machine
- Mintz, John. "Critics of LaRouche Group Hassled, Ex-Associates Say" Archived December 26, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, January 14, 1985.
-
LaRouche, Lyndon. "LaRouche testifies on his case" Archived March 3, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, Executive Intelligence Review], undated.
- "Have the mass media brainwashed your neighbor about Lyndon LaRouche?" Archived March 3, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, Executive Intelligence Review, undated.
-
"LaRouche Jury Gives $3 Million to NBC-TV" Archived April 30, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times, November 2, 1984.
- Mintz, January 15, 1985 Archived August 4, 2011, at the Wayback Machine.
- Associated Press, February 24, 1985 Archived December 20, 2008, at the Wayback Machine.
- Constantini & Nash 1990.
- "Judgment is reduced in LaRouche-NBC Case" Archived December 20, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, Associated Press, February 24, 1985.
- "LaRouche to pay $250,000 to NBC" Archived April 30, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, Associated Press, September 20, 1986.
- Also see "NBC Gets a $258,459 Check To End LaRouche Court Fight" Archived May 28, 2022, at the Wayback Machine, Associated Press, November 16, 1986.
-
LaRouche v. National Broadcasting Company Archived May 15, 2010, at the Wayback Machine, 780 F.2d 1134, 1139 (4th Cir. 1986).
- "Memo from AOL libel suit". Archived from the original on October 28, 2004. Retrieved December 29, 2006., Electronic Frontier Foundation, October 13, 2000, accessed February 9, 2011.
- Toumey 1996, pp. 87–88
- Petit, Charles. "Doctor Supports Prop. 64 – Sort Of", San Francisco Chronicle, September 30, 1986, pg. 8
- Kirp, David L. "LaRouche Turns To AIDS Politics" Archived January 10, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times, September 11, 1986.
- Roderick 1986.
- For criticism from leading scholars, including California schools of public health and Stanford University, see Toumey 1996, pp. 88–89.
- For opposition campaigns and number of votes in favor, see Berlet & Lyons 2000, p. 237.
- "LaRouche says he'll be swept into office," The Boston Globe, June 28, 1987.
- Frantz 1986, p. 2.
-
"Democrats step up LaRouche alert" Archived April 30, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times, April 26, 1986.
- Also see Moynihan, Daniel Patrick. "The links between LaRouche and New York corruption" Archived May 6, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times, April 1, 1986.
- "LaRouche Calls Critics Insane, Wants Regan Put in Jail" Archived July 8, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Los Angeles Times, April 10, 1986.
- Also see "LaRouche sees death plot by drug dealers Soviets" Archived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, Chicago Tribune, April 10, 1986.
- For the variety of conspiracies, see McLaughlin, April 11, 1986 Archived October 17, 2015, at the Wayback Machine.
- For his response about the movement's finances, see Eichel, April 10, 1986 Archived March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ "LaRouche Gets 15 Years for Cheating His Backers, IRS: 6 Aides Also Get Prison Terms, Fines Archived March 8, 2021, at the Wayback Machine," Associated Press, January 27, 1989.
- Mintz, John. "LaRouche Indicted in Conspiracy; Justice Dept. Alleges Va.-Based Extremist Tried to Scuttle Probe" Archived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, July 3, 1987.
- Also see Mintz, John. "Inside the Weird World of Lyndon LaRouche" Archived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, September 20, 1987.
- Edds 1995.
- "LaRouche Group, Long on the Political Fringe Gets Mainstream Scrutiny After Illinois Primary", Ellen Hume, The Wall Street Journal, March 28, 1986
- Mintz, John (January 31, 1987). "Prosecutor Moves to Disarm LaRouche Guards". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 3, 2022.
- Shenon 1986.
- Frantz, Douglas. "Raid bares LaRouche dark world" Archived November 6, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, Chicago Tribune, October 12, 1986.
- "LaRouche Groups' Bank Assets Frozen in Fraud Scheme" Archived March 9, 2021, at the Wayback Machine, Los Angeles Times, October 19, 1986.
- "Guardians Named for Woman Over $850,000 LaRouche Gift" Archived April 30, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times, October 30, 1986.
- "Screening of Jurors Begins in LaRouche Trial" Archived May 28, 2022, at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times, September 22, 1987.
- For the charges of defrauding, see Murphy, Caryle. "LaRouche Convicted of Mail Fraud; 6 Associates of Extremist Also Found Guilty in Loan Solicitations" Archived November 6, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, December 17, 1988.
- Howard, Alison. "Elderly Seek Refunds From LaRouche" Archived November 6, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, May 23, 1990.
- "U.S. Agents Take Over 3 LaRouche Companies" Archived June 19, 2020, at the Wayback Machine, Associated Press, April 21, 1987.
-
"LaRouche Convicted of Mail Fraud; 6 Associates of Extremist Also Found Guilty in Loan Solicitations" Archived November 6, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, December 17, 1988.
- "LaRouche Appeal Is Rebuffed by Supreme Court" Archived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, July 4, 1989.
- For LaRouche's sentencing, see "LaRouche receives 15-year sentence" Archived April 30, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, Associated Press, January 28, 1989.
- Clark 1995
- The Power of Reason: 1988, an autobiography by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., 1987, Executive Intelligence Review, Designed by World Composition Services, ISBN 0943235006, p. 309
- "Outsider making his 8th White House bid / LaRouche says he'd fix economy", Rachel Gravges, Houston Chronicle, March 6, 2004
- "American presidential election, 1988" Archived April 2, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Encyclopædia Britannica, 2011, Retrieved March 23, 2011.
-
For LaRouche's interests, see LaRouche, Lyndon. "Correspondence: Classical Composition," The New Republic, December 26, 1988.
- For the movement's interests, see Roderick. Kevin. "Raid Stirs Reports of LaRouche's Dark Side," Los Angeles Times, October 14, 1986.
- For "Think like Beethoven," see Smith, Susan, J. "Bonn exhibit depicts Germany's Beethoven cult" Archived October 17, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, Associated Press, September 29, 1986.
- For singing at events, see Fitzgerald, Michael. "Plenty of weirdness in 2007," The Record, Stockton, CA, January 2, 2008.
- For an example of a LaRouche choir singing at a protest, see Milbank, Dana. "Where Does the Bean Soup Fit In?" Archived December 10, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, April 27, 2005.
- Roddy, Dennis. "LaRouchies, Anarchists doth protest, but not too much," Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, July 30, 2004.
- Yamamura, Kevin. "Governor begins Mexico visit with praise for Dems," Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, November 10, 2006.
- Roderick, Kevin. "Raid Stirs Reports of LaRouche's Dark Side," Los Angeles Times, October 14, 1986.
-
For rock, see Hume, Ellen. "LaRouche Trying to Lose Splinter Label," Archived February 15, 2019, at the Wayback Machine Los Angeles Times, February 16, 1980, pp. 20–21.
- For the Beatles, see Pearlman, September 23, 2003 Archived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.
-
Ng, David (May 30, 2010). "L.A.'s 'Ring' cycle begins with protests outside, mixed reaction inside". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on February 15, 2019.
- Also see Ng, David (May 31, 2010). "Protesters greet start of 'Ring'". Los Angeles Times.
- Rosen, David (1995). Rosen, David, Verdi, Requiem. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521397674. Archived from the original on October 17, 2015. Retrieved June 17, 2015.
- "Shall Lyndon LaRouche call the tuning pitch?", Richmond Times Dispatch, September 16, 1989.
- "Eavesdropping" Archived October 17, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, The Hour, May 2, 1989.
- Lyndon LaRouche's Pitch Battle; At Lisner, a Concert With A Verdi Special Difference, The Washington Post, May 27, 1989.
- Orchestras' pitches have risen since the 18th century, because a higher pitch produces a more brilliant orchestral sound, while imposing an additional strain on singers' voices when singing the highest notes, though it made the lower notes easier. Giuseppe Verdi pushed through legislation in Italy to fix 432 Hz as the reference pitch for A, though such legislation did not stop orchestras from using other pitches. In 1938, the international standard was raised to 440 Hz, with some major orchestras tuning as high as 450 Hz in recent times. For some background, see Abdella, Fred T. "As Pitch in Opera Rises, So Does Debate" Archived May 28, 2022, at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times, August 13, 1989.
- Dorr 1992.
- Also see Howe, Robert F. "LaRouche Announces Race for House From Jail Cell" Archived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, June 23, 1989.
- For it being the second campaign from jail, see Morrison, Pat. "Felons Make Lineup for State's Presidential Primary" Archived October 21, 2020, at the Wayback Machine, Los Angeles Times, January 5, 2004. The first to stand from jail was perennial Socialist Party candidate Eugene V. Debs in 1920.
- "American presidential election, 1992" Archived April 28, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Encyclopædia Britannica, 2011, Retrieved March 23, 2011.
- Witt 2004, p. 2.
- Also see Bakker & Abraham 1996, pp. 250–251.
- McFaul, Michael and Markov, Sergei, The Troubled Birth of Russian Democracy: Parties, Personalities, and Programs Archived October 17, 2015, at the Wayback Machine Hoover Press, 1993
- Mitrofanov, Sergei, Линдон Ларуш против мирового порядка ("Lyndon LaRouche against the world order"), Russian Journal, March 31, 1999 Archived November 11, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
- Alabama Times Daily, Archived October 17, 2015, at the Wayback Machine September 28, 1994
- Reeves, Jay, LaRouche Contact Shocks Judge England Archived October 17, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, The Tuscaloosa News, September 30, 1994
- Miller, Dean, State senators sign petition to clear LaRouche, Document demands exoneration of fraud conviction, The Spokesman-Review, August 21,
- Pittmen, David, Four lawmakers seek `exoneration' of Lyndon LaRouche Archived October 10, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, Tucson Citizen, June 20, 1995
- Pea, Peter and Smith, Leef. "LaRouche Back in Loudoun After 5 Years in Prison" Archived July 28, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, January 24, 1994.
- Goodstein, Laurie (September 2, 1994). "Nation of Islam official assails Jewish group". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved October 30, 2022.
- Clark, Ramsey (April 26, 1995). "Letter from former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark to Attorney General Janet Reno". LaRouche in 2004. Archived from the original on December 21, 2006. Retrieved October 11, 2008.
- "The Curtis Clark Commission Findings: Exonerate Lyndon LaRouche". LaRouche in 2004. September 3, 1994. Archived from the original on December 19, 2003. Retrieved October 11, 2008.
- "Statement of Mann-Chestnut Commission" (Press release). Schiller Institute. Archived from the original on October 14, 2008. Retrieved October 11, 2008.
- ^ A Word About LaRouche – On the 90th birthday of the famous American non-conformist Archived February 14, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, editorial in Zavtra ("Tomorrow,") September 5, 2012 -translation into English available here Archived October 8, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, accessed September 21, 2012
- "Exonerate LaRouche". LaRouche in 2004. Archived from the original on February 28, 2004. Retrieved October 11, 2008. LaRouche's Schiller Institute paid for the advertisement. Amelia Boynton Robinson was at that time a board member of the Institute. James Bevel and William Warfield had been active in various LaRouche organizations.
- Quinton 1996.
-
Bligh 2008.
- LaRouche sued in federal court, claiming a violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. After losing in the district court, the case was appealed to the First District Court of Appeals, which upheld the lower court's decision. See LaRouche v. Fowler Archived February 15, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, August 28, 1998.
- Walker, Martin (July 15, 1995). "A long list of conspiracy feeders". The Gazette. Montreal, Que. p. B.5.
- "Why The British Kill American Presidents", Archived July 3, 2011, at the Wayback Machine The New Federalist (December 1994)
- "LaRouche takes call for Ridge impeachment to TV | Supporters have criticized changes in welfare program". The Patriot. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. August 24, 1996. p. B.6.
- "Impeach Tom Ridge!". Archived from the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved April 25, 2019.
- Records of Australian Parliament , June 29, 1998
- "U.S. Scholars Refute Cox Report", Xinhua News Agency, June 4, 1999.
- "LaRouche Vows to Change U.S. Politics if Elected President," Xinhua News Agency, October 25, 1999.
- For the founding of WYLM and the membership figures, see Witt 2004, p. 2, and Silva 2006.
- For the Democratic primaries figures, see "Is Lyndon a Democrat?" Archived August 15, 2020, at the Wayback Machine, The Economist, June 22, 2000.
- Alinejad 2004, pp. 105–106.
- No Joke – The Washington Post Archived April 28, 2018, at the Wayback Machine Retrieved May 7, 2018.
- Roberts, May 2, 2003 Archived February 27, 2019, at the Wayback Machine.
- That he did not run in 2008, see Klein, November 2007 Archived June 5, 2011, at the Wayback Machine.
- Berlet, Chip (September 13, 2007). "Lyndon LaRouche: Man of Vision or Venom?: What's the Real Story?". Political Research Associates. Archived from the original on May 14, 2011. Retrieved May 12, 2011.
- Qazwini, Iqbal. "Major International Crises Need a Giant Project to Overcome Them" Archived February 22, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, Asharq Al-Awsat, January 23, 2003.
- Tang 2005
- Tang Yong, People's Daily, U.S. Treasury and American experts: to force the appreciation of the renminbi is a mistake Archived May 13, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, April 13, 2005.
- *Lindo, Bill, Behind the scenes in the Obama administration Archived May 28, 2022, at the Wayback Machine, Amandala Online, March 31, 2009
- Paine, Laura, Frank meets LaRouche candidate Brown in only primary debate Archived December 3, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, Patriot-Ledger, February 8, 2010
- "Former candidate returns to Illinois" Archived February 14, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, saukvalley.com, November 2, 2007.
- Mackey, Robert (August 25, 2009). "Visitors from Planet LaRouche". The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 10, 2017.
- Overley, Jeff. "LaRouche activists press message; Demonstrators battle health care overhaul by likening ideas to Hitler's policies", Orange County Register, August 23, 2009.
- For the pamphlets and posters, see Schultz 2009.
- For the police being called, see McNerthney 2009.
- For Barney Frank, see CNN, August 19, 2009 Archived September 1, 2009, at the Wayback Machine.
- Zuckert, Catherine H and Michael P, The Truth about Leo Strauss: Political Philosophy and American Democracy, p. 12
- ^ Johnson 1983, pp. 187ff.
- Copulus 1984, p. 2.
- Johnson 1983, pp. 14.
- George & Wilcox 1992, pp. 314ff.
- For LaRouche on his philosophy, see LaRouche, Lyndon. "The Secrets Known Only to the Inner Elites" Archived June 9, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, The Campaigner, May–June 1978, p. 5ff.
- Toumey 1996, p. 85ff.
- For the empiricists, see also Robins & Post 1997, p. 196.
- For the list of friends and foes, see Johnson 1983, pp. 22, 188, 192–193, 198
- For LaRouche's comment about the conspirators not needing to be in touch with each other, see Johnson 1983, p. 198.
- Atkins 2011, p. 108.
- For Rosenfeld in The Washington Post, see Rosenfeld, September 24, 1976 Archived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.
- "Lyndon LaRouche, perennial presidential candidate, dead at 96". Fox News. February 13, 2019. Archived from the original on March 28, 2019. Retrieved March 28, 2019.
- "'Prophet: Debt crisis a new world order plot". Archived from the original on March 28, 2019. Retrieved March 28, 2019.
- "Lyndon LaRouche Jr., conspiracy theorist and presidential candidate, dies at 96". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on March 28, 2019. Retrieved March 28, 2019.
-
For example, see Rosenfeld 1976; Horowitz 1981; Lerman 1988; Griffin & Feldman 2003, p. 144; and Blamires 2006.
- Also see Chavis, Benjamin F. "LaRouche Invades Black Community" Archived October 17, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, Washington Afro-American, August 12, 1986.
- In German: "Wir brauchen eine Bewegung, die Deutschland endlich aus der Kontrolle der Kräfte von Versailles und Jalta befreit, die uns schon ein ganzes Jahrhundert lang von einer Katastrophe in die andere stürzt."
- "Tod auf der Straße". Berliner Zeitung (in German). Berlineonline.de. October 23, 2008. Archived from the original on October 29, 2008. Retrieved May 13, 2014. Article title in English is "Death on the Streets".
- Samuels, Tim. "Jeremiah Duggan's death and Lyndon LaRouche," Newsnight, February 12, 2004.
- Montgomery 1979.
- Copulus 1984, p. 4, footnote 5.
- Also see Binder, Sarah. "Commonwealth candidates cause concern" Archived October 17, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, The Canadian Press, September 1, 1984.
- For the drug lobby quote, see McLaughlin, April 11, 1986 Archived October 17, 2015, at the Wayback Machine.
- Also see "LaRouche alleges conspiracy from Moscow to White House", Associated Press, April 19, 1986.
- "LaRouche, September 17, 2006". Archived from the original on October 22, 2006. Retrieved October 22, 2006..
- Lerman 1988, p. 213.
- Johnson 1989, p. 2.
- Pipes 1997, pp. 137, 142.
- "Neo-Nazism". Archived from the original on May 2, 2019. Retrieved April 25, 2019.
- Manning 1998.
- George & Wilcox 1992, pp. 317, 322.
- The book has the puff: "American Economist Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., has been right in his long-range economic and related forecasts – in contrast to virtually all other economists and political leaders, who have been simply wrong." Vernadsky, Vladimir; Larouche, Lyndon (February 16, 2018). (Book sales page). Independently Published. ISBN 978-1980307884.
- Black Monday of 1987 occurred, however LaRouche's actual statements in advance were to refer lukewarmly to predictions made by unnamed "leading European financial officials" "The "Financial Crash/Economic Depression"". laroucheplanet. Archived from the original on November 16, 2018. Retrieved March 28, 2019.
- ^ "The "Financial Crash/Economic Depression"". laroucheplanet. Archived from the original on November 16, 2018. Retrieved March 28, 2019.
- In 1974 Larouche said the NCLC had 1,000 members and his other organizations 1,000 to 2,000; see Valentine, Paul W. (February 25, 1974), "NCLC Fights a Psychic War Against CIA and Left Rivals", The Capital Times (Madison, Wis.): pp. 22–23.
- For 20,000 members in the Fusion Energy Foundation and National Democratic Policy Committee, and 300,000 magazine subscribers, see Johnson 1983, p. 191.
- In 1987 John Mintz of the Washington Post wrote that there more than 500 members worldwide; see Mintz, September 20, 1987.
- In 2004 The Washington Post estimated that the LaRouche Youth Movement had hundreds of members in the U.S. and more abroad; see Witt 2004.
- Toumey 1996, p. 86
- Mintz, September 20, 1987; see above.
- Smith, Timothy R. (February 13, 2019). "Lyndon LaRouche Jr. – conspiracy theorist, presidential candidate and longtime Virginian – dies". Richmond Times-Dispatch. The Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 14, 2019. Retrieved February 14, 2019.
- The LaRouche movement was treated in a series on cults in the Washington Post in 1985, in company with for example the Rajneesh movement (Orange People)John Mintz. "Ideological Odyssey: From Old Left to Far Right". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on January 13, 2004. Retrieved July 6, 2004.
- "The cult and the candidate". Independent.co.uk. July 20, 2004. Archived from the original on May 28, 2011. Retrieved March 28, 2019.
- "But in Germany, they are seen as a political cult – and a potentially dangerous one" "Lyndon LaRouche Is Running A Pro-China Party In Germany". Foreign Policy. September 18, 2017. Archived from the original on March 28, 2019. Retrieved March 28, 2019.
- ^ Mintz, September 20, 1987 Archived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.
- Johnson 1983, pp. 191–192.
Works cited
- Books or chapters about LaRouche
- Alexander, Robert Jackson (1991), "The Strange Case of the National Caucus of Labor Committees", International Trotskyism, 1929–1985: A Documented Analysis of the Movement, Duke University Press, ISBN 978-0-8223-1066-2
- Blamires, Cyprian (2006), "Lyndon LaRouche", World Fascism: A Historical Encyclopedia, Volume 1, ABC-CLIO, ISBN 1-57607-940-6
- George, John; Wilcox, Laird M. (1992), "The LaRouche Network", Nazis, Communists, Klansmen, and Others on the Fringe: Political Extremism in America, Prometheus Books, p. 312ff, ISBN 978-0-87975-680-2
- Johnson, George (1983), "The 'New Dark Ages' Conspiracy", Architects of Fear: Conspiracy Theories and Paranoia in American Politics, J.P Tarcher, ISBN 0-87477-275-3
- King, Dennis (1989), "Lyndon LaRouche and the New American Fascism", Doubleday, ISBN 978-0-385-23880-9
- Lerman, Antony (1988), "Le Pen and LaRouche: Political Extremism in Democratic Societies", in Frankel, William (ed.), Survey of Jewish Affairs 1987, Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, p. 202, ISBN 978-0-8386-3322-9
- Manning, Marable (1998), "Black Fundamentalism: Louis Farrakhan and the Politics of Conservative Black Nationalism (part IV)", Black Leadership, Columbia University Press, pp. 175–182
- Robins, Robert S.; Post, Jerrold M. (1997), "Lyndon LaRouche: The Extremity of Reason", Political Paranoia: The Psychopolitics of Hatred, Yale University Press, ISBN 0-300-07027-6
- Toumey, Christopher P. (1996), "The LaRouche Theory of AIDS/HIV", Conjuring Science: Scientific Symbols and Cultural Meanings in American Life, Rutgers University Press, ISBN 978-0-8135-2285-2
- Tourish, Dennis; Wohlforth, Tim (2000), On the Edge: Political Cults Right and Left, M.E Sharpe, ISBN 0-7656-0639-9
- Books (general)
- Alinejad, Mahmoud (2004), "Political Islam in Iran and the emergence of a religious public sphere: The impact of September 11", in Van Der Weer, Peter (ed.), Media, War, and Terrorism: Responses from the Middle East and Asia, Routledge, ISBN 0-415-33140-4
- Bakker, Jim; Abraham, Ken (1996), I Was Wrong, T. Nelson, ISBN 978-0-7852-7425-4
- Berlet, Chip; Lyons, Matthew Nemiroff (2000), Right-wing populism in America: too close for comfort, Guilford Press, ISBN 978-1-57230-562-5
- Griffin, Roger; Feldman, Matthew (2003), Fascism: Critical Concepts in Political Science, Volume 5, Routledge, ISBN 0-415-29020-1
- Michael, George (2008), Willis Carto and the American Far Right, University Press of Florida, ISBN 978-0-8130-3198-9
- Pipes, Daniel (1997), Conspiracy: How the Paranoid Style Flourishes and Where It Comes From, Free Press, ISBN 0-684-83131-7
- Sheppard, Barry (2005), The Party: The Socialist Workers Party 1960–1988, Resistance Books, ISBN 1-876646-50-0
- Sims, Patsy (1996), The Klan, University Press of Kentucky, ISBN 0-8131-0887-X
- News articles
- Bradley, Paul (February 8, 2004), "An old thorn back in Democrats' side; for the eighth time, Lyndon LaRouche is seeking the presidency", Richmond Times.
- Donner, Frank; Rothenberg, Randall (August 16, 1980), "The Strange Odyssey of Lyndon LaRouche", The Nation, pp. 142–147.
- Dorr, Robert (September 20, 1992), "Activist in Franklin Probe Is LaRouche Running Mate", Omaha World—Herald
- Edds, Margaret (April 2, 1995), "James S. Gilmore III: Intense, All-Business Attorney General Already Has Stepped From Allen's Shadow", The Virginian-Pilot.
- Frantz, Douglas (October 12, 1986), "Raid bares LaRouche dark world", Chicago Tribune.
- Green, Stephen (January 19, 1985), "A merchant of political hate", The San Diego Union.
- Johnson, George (June 18, 1989), "A menace or just a crank?", The New York Times.
- Lowther, William (March 30, 1986), "U.S. extremist grows as political force", Toronto Star.
- McNerthney, Casey (July 14, 2009), "LaRouche supporter threatened for linking Obama to Hitler", Seattle Post Intelligencer.
- Mintz, John (January 14, 1985a), "Ideological Odyssey: From Old Left to Far Right", The Washington Post.
- Mintz, John (January 15, 1985b), "Some Officials Find Intelligence Network 'Useful'", The Washington Post.
- Montgomery, Paul L. (January 20, 1974), "How a Radical-Left Group Moved Toward Savagery", The New York Times.
- Montgomery, Paul L. (October 8, 1979), "One Man Leads U.S. Labor Party on His Erratic Path", New York Times.
- Perlman, Jeffrey A. (May 27, 1984), "No Longer Written Off by Political Opponents, LaRouche Elbowing Into Limelight", Los Angeles Times, archived from the original on November 7, 2012.
- Quinton, Robinson (September 30, 1996), "Million Man drive dips to hundreds; Gathering backs probe of CIA", The Commercial Appeal.
- Roderick, Kevin (October 17, 1986). "LaRouche Wrote of Using AIDS to Win Presidency". Los Angeles Times.
- Rosenfeld, Stephen (September 24, 1976), "NCLC: A Domestic Political Menace", The Washington Post, archived from the original on January 4, 2013.
- Schultz, Erin (July 23, 2009), "Obama's plan blasted as Nazi-like: LaRouche demonstrations across the North Fork question health care policy", The Suffolk Times.
- Shenon, Philip (October 8, 1986), "LaRouche warns U.S on any move to arrest him", The New York Times.
- Siano, Brian (May 1992), "The Skeptical Eye: Big Head's Back", The Humanist, vol. 52, no. 3.
- Silva, Christina (April 14, 2006), "Colleges consider stressing danger of pressure groups", Boston Globe.
- St. Petersburg Times (July 9, 1987), LaRouche claims security council behind indictment.
- Tang, Yong (November 22, 2005), "'I'll get to China sometime': Interview (VIII)", People's Daily.
- Tipton, Virgil (March 31, 1986), "LaRouchies set sights on Missouri", Chicago Tribune.
- "Kenneth L.Kronberg: Sterling Businessman", The Washington Post, May 1, 2007.
- Tong, Betsy (June 12, 1994), "Class acts most likely to ... Notable graduates of Boston area high schools", Boston Globe, archived from the original on June 28, 2011.
- Witt, April (October 24, 2004), "No Joke", The Washington Post.
- Journal and other papers, records
- Bligh, Gur (2008), "Extremism in the Electoral Arena: Challenging the Myth of American Exceptionalism", Brigham Young University Law Review, no. 5, p. 1367
- Constantini, E.; Nash, M.P. (1990), "SLAPP/SLAPPback: The Misuse of Libel Law for Political Purposes and a Countersuit Response", Journal of Law & Politics, 7: 417 ff
- Copulus, Milton R. (July 19, 1984), "The LaRouche Network" (PDF), Institutional Analysis, No. 28, Heritage Foundation, archived from the original (PDF) on January 19, 2006, retrieved February 13, 2011
- Horowitz, Irving Louis (May 1981), "Left-wing fascism: An infantile disorder", Society, Vol 18, Number 4, Springer New York, archived from the original on January 5, 2013
- Lynch, Pat (March 1985), "Is Lyndon LaRouche using your name?", Columbia Journalism Review
- Wohlforth, Tim, "A '60s Socialist Takes a Hard Right", Public Eye, retrieved September 4, 2009
- LaRouche publications
- LaRouche, Lyndon (1979), The Power of Reason: A Kind of Autobiography, New Benjamin Franklin House, ISBN 978-0-933488-01-4
- LaRouche, Lyndon (1987), The Power of Reason: An Autobiography, Executive Intelligence Review, ISBN 978-0-943235-00-4
- LaRouche, Lyndon (June 27, 1970), "How The Workers League Decayed", NCLC internal document
- LaRouche Political Action Committee (1988), The Woman on Mars, archived from the original on January 2, 2010
Further reading
- Davidson, Osha Gray (1990), Broken heartland: The Rise of America's Rural Ghetto, Free Press, ISBN 978-0029070550
- Hunt, Linda (1991) , Secret Agenda: The United States Government, Nazi Scientists, and Project Paperclip, 1945 to 1990, St. Martin's Press
- Jacobs, Harold (1971), Weatherman, Ramparts Press, ISBN 978-0671207250
- Johnson, Donald Bruce (1978), National Party Platforms: 1960–1976, University of Illinois Press, ISBN 978-0252006883
- Markus, Andrew (2001), Race: John Howard and the Remaking of Australia, Allen & Unwin, ISBN 978-1864488661, archived from the original on August 9, 2013, retrieved June 17, 2015
- Pipes, Daniel (2003), "October Surprise", in Knight, Peter (ed.), Conspiracy Theories in American History: An Encyclopedia, Volume 2, ABC-Clio, pp. 547–50, archived from the original on July 1, 2009, retrieved September 11, 2009
- Seife, Charles (2008), Sun in a Bottle: The Strange History of Fusion and the Science of Wishful Thinking, Penguin Group, ISBN 978-0670020331
- Weir, David; Dan, Noyes (1983), Raising Hell: How the Center for Investigative Reporting Gets the Story, Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc, ISBN 978-0201108590
External links
- The LaRouche Organization website
- Lyndon LaRouche Political Action Committee website
- Appearances on C-SPAN
LaRouche movement | ||
---|---|---|
History | ||
Active organizations | ||
Defunct organizations | ||
Members |
| |
Members who separated from the movement | ||
Critics | ||
Related persons | ||
(← 1976) 1980 United States presidential election (1984 →) | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Republican Party |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Democratic Party |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Independent |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
(← 1980) 1984 United States presidential election (1988 →) | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Republican Party |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Democratic Party |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
(← 1984) 1988 United States presidential election (1992 →) | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Republican Party |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Democratic Party |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
(← 1988) 1992 United States presidential election (1996 →) | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic Party |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Republican Party |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Independent |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
(← 1992) 1996 United States presidential election (2000 →) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic Party |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Republican Party |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Reform Party |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(← 1996) 2000 United States presidential election (2004 →) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Republican Party |
| ||||||||||
Democratic Party |
| ||||||||||
Constitution Party |
| ||||||||||
Green Party |
| ||||||||||
Libertarian Party |
| ||||||||||
Reform Party |
| ||||||||||
Natural Law Party |
| ||||||||||
Prohibition Party |
| ||||||||||
Socialist Party |
| ||||||||||
Socialist Workers Party |
| ||||||||||
Workers World Party |
| ||||||||||
Independent | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
(← 2000) 2004 United States presidential election (2008 →) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Republican Party |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Democratic Party |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Controversies | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
- 1922 births
- 2019 deaths
- American anti-war activists
- American conscientious objectors
- American conspiracy theorists
- United States Army personnel of World War II
- American people convicted of fraud
- American people convicted of tax crimes
- American people of French-Canadian descent
- American people of Scottish descent
- Criminals from New Hampshire
- Former Marxists
- Former Quakers
- Energy economists
- LaRouche movement
- Members of the Civilian Public Service
- Members of the Socialist Workers Party (United States)
- Military personnel from New Hampshire
- New Hampshire politicians convicted of crimes
- Northeastern University alumni
- People from Rochester, New Hampshire
- Politicians from Lynn, Massachusetts
- U.S. Labor Party politicians
- Virginia Democrats
- Candidates in the 1976 United States presidential election
- Candidates in the 1980 United States presidential election
- Candidates in the 1984 United States presidential election
- Candidates in the 1988 United States presidential election
- Candidates in the 1992 United States presidential election
- Candidates in the 1996 United States presidential election
- Candidates in the 2000 United States presidential election
- Candidates in the 2004 United States presidential election
- United States Army soldiers
- Virginia politicians convicted of crimes
- Massachusetts politicians convicted of crimes
- American founders