Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Sollentuna Hundred: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:43, 18 October 2012 editGene93k (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers468,040 editsm Listing on WP:DELSORT under Sweden← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:06, 11 March 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''keep'''. ] (]) 13:25, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|P}}


:{{la|Sollentuna Hundred}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) :{{la|Sollentuna Hundred}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>)
:({{Find sources|Sollentuna Hundred}}) :({{Find sources|Sollentuna Hundred}})
One-liner without references or proof of notability. Fails ]. Can be merged with ] (although that list seems to be incompleet). ] ] 01:00, 17 October 2012 (UTC) One-liner without references or proof of notability. Fails ]. Can be merged with ] (although that list seems to be incompleet). ] ] 01:00, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' - I should note that the of the article contains more information and sources. Perhaps a user or two fluent with Swedish can translate the content? ] ] 03:02, 17 October 2012 (UTC) *'''Comment''' - I should note that the of the article contains more information and sources. Perhaps a user or two fluent with Swedish can translate the content? ] ] 03:02, 17 October 2012 (UTC)


*'''Keep''' - this is a valid geographic area historically, and Swedish WP already lists sources, so on both grounds GNG is not really an issue. I can translate it as and when, but the AfD does not depend on that: notability is shown by the existence of sources, not their inclusion in an article. I would oppose a merge to the list of hundreds; there is plenty to say about this one place. ] (]) 09:55, 17 October 2012 (UTC) *'''Keep''' - this is a valid geographic area historically, and Swedish WP already lists sources, so on both grounds GNG is not really an issue. I can translate it as and when, but the AfD does not depend on that: notability is shown by the existence of sources, not their inclusion in an article. I would oppose a merge to the list of hundreds; there is plenty to say about this one place. ] (]) 09:55, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Line 14: Line 20:
*:When you don't have arguments, you better shut up then starting to throw PAs. ] ] 11:05, 18 October 2012 (UTC) *:When you don't have arguments, you better shut up then starting to throw PAs. ] ] 11:05, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 22:43, 18 October 2012 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 22:43, 18 October 2012 (UTC)</small>

*'''Strong keep''' per Chiswick Chap and Colapeninsula. I may just translate the sv-wiki article tonight. ~~ ] (]) 02:04, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
**Translated. I don't think there's really any argument to delete this page now, nor should there ever have been if 10 seconds had been spent skimming the Swedish article. If you don't read Swedish and/or are sceptical of anything in a foreign language, then use Google Translate or something. Really, now. ~~ ] (]) 05:55, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 15:06, 11 March 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:25, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Sollentuna Hundred

Sollentuna Hundred (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One-liner without references or proof of notability. Fails WP:GNG. Can be merged with List of hundreds of Sweden (although that list seems to be incompleet). The Banner talk 01:00, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Keep - this is a valid geographic area historically, and Swedish WP already lists sources, so on both grounds GNG is not really an issue. I can translate it as and when, but the AfD does not depend on that: notability is shown by the existence of sources, not their inclusion in an article. I would oppose a merge to the list of hundreds; there is plenty to say about this one place. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:55, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep As I understand policy, officially recognised geographical entities are notable (per WP:NGEO), whether they're still used officially or not - since notability isn't temporary (WP:NTEMP), we don't delete things that are no longer official geographical entities. If it's identical with a modern entity you might merge there, but nobody's suggested that. One of the functions of Misplaced Pages is to serve as a gazetteer. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:55, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.