Misplaced Pages

Adam Smith Institute: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:21, 23 October 2012 editRadicalrand (talk | contribs)12 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:22, 15 May 2024 edit undoDavemck (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users119,503 editsm renumber duplicate parms 
(269 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|British neo-liberal think tank and lobby group}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2011}}
{{Hatnote|Not to be confused with the ] or Adam Smith International}}
{{infobox organization
{{Redirect|Liberty League (UK)|the 1920s organization|Liberty League (Historic)}}
|name = Adam Smith Institute
{{EngvarB|date=October 2015}}
|image = Adam Smith Institute logo.png
{{Use dmy dates|date=January 2018}}
|size =
{{primary sources|date=February 2022}}
|abbreviation = ASI
{{Infobox organisation
|motto =
| name = Adam Smith Institute
|formation = 1977
| image = Adam Smith Institute logo.png
|type = ] ] ]
| size =
|headquarters = 23 Great Smith Street, London, United Kingdom
| abbreviation = ASI
|leader_title = President<br>Director
| motto =
|leader_name = ]<br>]
| formation = {{start date and age|df=yes|1977}}
|website =
| type = ]
| headquarters = ], {{postcode|SW|1}}<br />United Kingdom
| coords = {{coord|51.4979|-0.1294|display=inline,title}}
| leader_title = Chairman
| leader_name = James Lawson
| leader_title2 = President
| leader_name2 = ]
| leader_title3 = Director
| leader_name3 = ]
| website = {{URL|adamsmith.org}}
| funding = Undisclosed, some funding from the tobacco industry
}} }}
The '''Adam Smith Institute''', abbreviated to '''ASI''', is a ] based in the ], named after one of the founders of modern economics, ]. It espouses ] and ] views, in particular by creating radical policy options in the light of ], which politicians can then develop. Its president, ], has said "We propose things which people regard as being on the edge of lunacy. The next thing you know, they're on the edge of policy".<ref>{{cite news |title=Adam Smith Institute's sense and nonsense |first=Alan |last=Rusbridger |authorlink=Alan Rusbridger |newspaper=] |date=22 December 1987 |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1672317,00.html |page=30 |accessdate=19 January 2010 }}</ref> The '''Adam Smith Institute''' ('''ASI''') is a UK-based ] ] and ], named after ], a Scottish moral philosopher and ].<ref>{{cite book|page=|title=Political Issues in Britain Today|editor-first=Bill|editor-last=Jones|publisher=Manchester University Press|location=Manchester|year=1999|edition=5th|isbn=0719054311|url=https://archive.org/details/politicalissuesi0000unse_o2x6/page/6}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|page=77|title=Ideas and Think Tanks in Contemporary Britain|editor1-first=Michael David|editor1-last=Kandiah|editor2-first=Anthony|editor2-last=Seldon|publisher=Routledge|location=New York|isbn=978-0714647432|year=2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title='Poverty barons' who make a fortune from taxpayer-funded aid budget|first=Andrew|last=Gilligan|author-link=Andrew Gilligan|work=]|date=15 September 2012|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9545584/Poverty-barons-who-make-a-fortune-from-taxpayer-funded-aid-budget.html|access-date=12 January 2016}}</ref> The Institute advocates ] and ] ideas, primarily via the formation of policy options with regard to ], which political decision makers seek to develop upon. ASI President ] has sought to describe the activity of the organisation as "e propose things which people regard as being on the edge of lunacy. The next thing you know, they're on the edge of policy".<ref>{{cite news|title=Adam Smith Institute's sense and nonsense|first=Alan|last=Rusbridger|author-link=Alan Rusbridger|newspaper=]|date=22 December 1987|url=https://www.theguardian.com/comment/story/0,3604,1672317,00.html|page=30|access-date=19 January 2010}}</ref>


It was the primary intellectual force behind privatisation in the ] era,<ref>{{cite news |title=Private Ayes |author= |newspaper=] |date=5 January 1986 |page=38 |url= |accessdate= }}</ref> and, with the ] and ], helped drive ] policy on privatisation, taxation, education, and health.<ref>{{cite news |title=Britain weighs pleas to cut capital-gains and inheritance taxes |author= |newspaper=] |date=6 February 1989 |page= |url= |accessdate= }}</ref> Several of the Institute's policies have been adopted by the ] and ] governments, and the ASI has also advised governments overseas.<ref>{{cite news |title=Menem asks Adam Smith Institute for privatisation advice |author= |newspaper=] |date=13 November 1989 |page= |url= |accessdate= }}</ref><ref name="Influence without responsibility">{{cite journal |last1=Denham |first1=Andrew |last2=Garnett |first2=Mark |year=January 1999 |title=Influence without responsibility? Think-tanks in Britain |journal=] |volume=51 |issue=1 |pages=46–57 |url= |doi=10.1093/pa/52.1.46 }}</ref> The ASI formed the primary intellectual force behind the privatisation of state-owned industries during the premiership of ],<ref>{{cite news|title=Private Ayes|newspaper=]|date=5 January 1986|page=38}}</ref>{{better source needed|date=May 2016}} and alongside the ] and ] advanced a neoliberal approach toward public policy on privatisation, taxation, education and healthcare.<ref>{{cite news|title=Britain weighs pleas to cut capital-gains and inheritance taxes|newspaper=]|date=6 February 1989}}</ref> A number of the policies presented by organisation were adopted by the administrations of ] and ] and members of the ASI have also advised non-United Kingdom governments.<ref>{{cite news|title=Menem asks Adam Smith Institute for privatisation advice|newspaper=]|date=13 November 1989}}</ref><ref name="Influence without responsibility">{{cite journal|last1=Denham|first1=Andrew|last2=Garnett|first2=Mark|date=January 1999|title=Influence without responsibility? Think-tanks in Britain|journal=]|volume=51|issue=1|pages=46–57|doi=10.1093/pa/52.1.46}}</ref> Beyond policy development, the organisation advocates free market ideas through the publication and distribution of literature, the promotion of ], the hosting of speaker events for students and young people, media appearances and blogging.


The ASI is rated as one of the least transparent think tanks in the United Kingdom in relation to funding and has been shown to receive funding from the tobacco industry.<ref>{{Cite web |title=How transparent are think tanks about who funds them 2016? |url=https://static1.squarespace.com/static/52e1f399e4b06a94c0cdaa41/t/5773022de6f2e1ecf70b26d1/1467154992324/Transparify+2016+Think+Tanks+Report.pdf |access-date=30 November 2016 |publisher=Transparify}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Doward |first=Jamie |date=1 June 2013 |title=Health groups dismayed by news 'big tobacco' funded rightwing thinktanks |url=https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/jun/01/thinktanks-big-tobacco-funds-smoking |website=Theguardian.com}}</ref>
The Institute currently advocates the free market by publishing books and policy proposals, advising foreign governments, calculating the British ], hosting speaker events for young people, and publishing a popular blog.


==History== ==History==
===Foundation=== ===Foundation===
<!-- Deleted image removed: ] was one of the ASI's three co-founders, and remains its Director.]] --> ], President of the ASI, has been described as the leading architect of Margaret Thatcher's privatisation programme<ref name="Is Margaret Thatcher leading"/>]]
] and brothers ] and ] were students together at the ] in Scotland.<ref>Denham, Andrew and Garnett, Mark (1998). ''British Thinktanks and the Climate of Opinion'', London: UCL Press, p. 155</ref> Pirie left in 1974 to work for the Republican Study Committee in Washington, D.C., and then took up a professorship in Philosophy at ]. He was joined there by Stuart Butler while Eamonn Butler went to work with ], who became co-founder and director of the free-market think tank ].
], President of the ASI, is widely seen as the architect of Thatcher's privatisation policy.<ref name="Is Margaret Thatcher leading" />]]
], and brothers ] & ] were students together at the ] in Scotland, and delegates of the university's Conservative Association to the 1971 Conservative Party Conference.<ref>Denham, Andrew and Garnett, Mark (1998). ''British Thinktanks and the Climate of Opinion'', London: UCL Press, p. 155</ref> In 1973, they left Scotland to work with ], who became co-founder of the free-market ] ]. After their apprenticeship in the United States, Pirie and Eamonn Butler returned to Scotland in 1977 to found their own think tank, the Adam Smith Institute, set up with the help of ] of the ]. Stuart Butler is a conservative activist in Washington, D.C., remaining at the ].


After their experience in the United States, they returned to the United Kingdom in 1977 to found their own think tank, called the Adam Smith Institute. After a year, Stuart Butler returned to the United States as Vice President of the Heritage in charge of domestic policy while Eamonn Butler remained with Madsen Pirie as co-directors of the institute.
The ASI recruited ], another St Andrews alumnus and member of the university's Conservative Association,<ref>{{cite news |title=Douglas Mason: local councillor known as the 'father of the poll tax' |first=Eamonn |last=Butler |authorlink=Eamonn Butler |newspaper=] |date=14 December 2004 |url=http://news.independent.co.uk/people/obituaries/article24672.ece |accessdate=19 January 2010 }}</ref> who did his most influential work for the Institute. Mason became one of its regular authors,<ref>{{cite news |title=Douglas Mason: an engineer of the Thatcher revolution and 'father of the poll tax' |first=Alex |last=Singleton |authorlink=Alex Singleton |newspaper=] |date=16 December 2004 |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2004/dec/16/guardianobituaries |accessdate=19 January 2010 }}</ref> and, in 1982, led the ASI's ''Omega Project'' report, which argued in favour of the compulsory contracting-out of most local services such as refuse collection, the replacement of the welfare state by private insurance, and further privatisation of public sector services and industries, including aspects of the police force.<ref>Kavanagh, Dennis (1987). ''Thatcherism and British politics: the end of consensus?'', Oxford University Press, p. 88)</ref><ref>Denham and Garnett (1998), p. 157</ref><ref>South, Nigel (1988). ''Policing for profit: the private security sector'', London: Sage Publishing, p. 153)</ref>


One of their St Andrews friends, ],<ref>{{cite news|title=Douglas Mason: local councillor known as the 'father of the poll tax' |first=Eamonn |last=Butler |author-link=Eamonn Butler |newspaper=] |date=14 December 2004 |url=http://news.independent.co.uk/people/obituaries/article24672.ece |accessdate=19 January 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071001062711/http://news.independent.co.uk/people/obituaries/article24672.ece |archive-date=1 October 2007 }}</ref> who had been active in the university's Conservative Association, did his most influential research and writing for the institute. Mason became one of its regular authors.
===Thatcher's inner circle===
The Thatcher era was the high water mark for the think tank movement, and with the ] (IEA) and the ] (CPS), the ASI was one of three relied upon by the Thatcher government for policy.<ref name="Influence without responsibility" /> Unlike the CPS, which had been established by Thatcher and ], and the IEA, which focused on more theoretical matters, the ASI was well-placed to produce bold and direct policies.<ref name="Influence without responsibility" /> Despite this role, the Adam Smith Institute developed an iconoclastic reputation, cynical about politicians, but enthusiastic to engage with them.<ref name="Influence without responsibility" /> The Institute's relationship with Thatcher was not without troubles. Although Madsen Pirie was the architect of much of the privatisation policy,<ref name="Is Margaret Thatcher leading">{{cite news |title=Is Margaret Thatcher leading the way in education reform? |first=Warren T. |last=Brookes |newspaper=] |date=4 May 1988 |url= |accessdate= }}</ref> he had no emotional ties to Thatcher, nor did the ASI propose policies on a range of social issues, despite its Thatcherite reputation.<ref name="The prophet of private profit">{{cite news |title=The prophet of private profit – Dr Madsen Pirie |first=Ed |last=Pearce |newspaper=] |date=19 April 1993 |url= |accessdate= }}</ref>


The ASI's Omega Project (1981–1983) led by Peter Young produced a series of 19 papers shadowing each Department of State and advocated such things as the compulsory contracting-out of most local services such as refuse collection, the replacement of much of the welfare state by private insurance and further privatisation of public sector services and industries, including aspects of police services.<ref>Kavanagh, Dennis (1987). ''Thatcherism and British politics: the end of consensus?'', Oxford University Press, p. 88)</ref><ref>Denham and Garnett (1998), p. 157</ref><ref>South, Nigel (1988). ''Policing for profit: the private security sector'', London: Sage Publishing, p. 153)</ref>
A proposal for the sale of the UK's social housing stock claimed that the "perpetual search for profitability" of private-sector owners would " them to discover and produce what the consumer wants" and that, in this way, the market was "more genuinely democratic than the public sector, involving the decisions of far more individuals and at much more frequent intervals".<ref>Denham and Garnett (1998), p. 158</ref> The report's proposed scrapping of the existing local-government tax in favour of a per-capita charge was later implemented by the Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, whose government introduced the ] in Scotland in 1989, and in England and Wales in 1990. The poll tax was disastrous for the Thatcher government and is widely seen as a complete failure which precipitated the downfall of her leadership.


===Thatcher's inner circle===
Other policy recommendations for which Mason was responsible included the privatisation of the ] (''The Last Post'' −1991); the introduction of charges in British public libraries (''Ex Libris'' – 1986); the privatisation of the Forestry Commission;<ref>Butler (2004)</ref> the complete removal of arts subsidies (''Expounding The Arts'' – 1987); and the abolition of restrictions on drinking (''Time To Call Time'' – 1986).
The ] era saw the think tank movement come of age and achieve influence and with the ] (CPS) and the ] (IEA) and the ASI was one of three relied upon by the Thatcher government for policy.<ref name="Influence without responsibility" /> Unlike the CPS, which had been established by Thatcher and ]; and the IEA, which focused on more theoretical matters, the ASI was well-placed to produce bold and direct policies.<ref name="Influence without responsibility" /> Despite this role, the Institute developed an iconoclastic reputation, cynical about politicians, but enthusiastic to engage with them.<ref name="Influence without responsibility"/> The institute's relationship with Thatcher was not without troubles. Although Madsen Pirie was the architect of much of the privatisation policy,<ref name="Is Margaret Thatcher leading">{{cite news |title=Is Margaret Thatcher leading the way in education reform? |first=Warren T. |last=Brookes |newspaper=] |date=4 May 1988 }}</ref> he had no emotional ties to Thatcher, nor did the ASI propose policies on a range of social issues despite its ] reputation.<ref name="The prophet of private profit">{{cite news |title=The prophet of private profit – Dr Madsen Pirie |first=Ed |last=Pearce |newspaper=] |date=19 April 1993 }}</ref>


The ASI took the view that the market was "more genuinely democratic than the public sector, involving the decisions of far more individuals and at much more frequent intervals".<ref>Denham and Garnett (1998), p. 158</ref> The Institute published Douglas Mason's recommendation that local government rates (the local government tax) should be replaced by a per-capita charge. A version of this was later implemented by the ] government introducing the ] in Scotland in 1989 and in England and Wales in 1990. It brought unpopularity for the Thatcher government and was seen by some as having weakened her political hand ahead of her departure from office, though her attitude to Europe was a more significant factor.{{Citation needed|date=August 2017}}
===ASI after Thatcher===
In 1992, the Institute founded a consulting company, Adam Smith International Ltd, which was "charged with overseeing the overseas work of the institute... an attempt to capitalise on the growing international trend towards economic liberalization and marketization".<ref name="Denham and Garnett 1998, p. 153">Denham and Garnett (1998), p. 153</ref> While Eamonn Butler and Madsen Pirie were, as of 1998, members of the management board of both organisations,<ref name="Denham and Garnett 1998, p. 153"/> the management team of Adam Smith International and the Adam Smith Institute is now separate.<ref></ref>


Other policy recommendations which Douglas Mason published with the ASI included the privatisation of the ] (''The Last Post'' − 1991); the introduction of charges in British public libraries (''Ex Libris'' – 1986); the privatisation of the Forestry Commission;<ref>Butler (2004)</ref> the complete removal of arts subsidies (''Expounding The Arts'' – 1987); and the abolition of restrictions on drinking (''Time To Call Time'' – 1986).
In November 1994, the Institute began a review of welfare reform, called 'Operation Underclass',<ref name="Replacing the welfare state">{{cite news |title=Replacing the welfare state |first= |last= |newspaper=] |date=16 February 1995 |url= |accessdate= }}</ref> aimed at methods of creating jobs for the long-term unemployed.<ref>{{cite news |title=Help for long-term unemployed urged |first= |last= |newspaper=] |date=7 November 1994 |url= |accessdate= }}</ref> Some elements of the programme were adopted by the government within months.<ref name="Replacing the welfare state" />


===After Thatcher===
The ejection of the Conservative government in 1997 did not have as dramatic an effect on the ASI as some had anticipated. The Institute praised the government's ] programmes, describing it as 'the most successful policy initiative of this century',<ref>{{cite news |title=Rightwing think-tank applauds Blair on welfare-to-work |first=Mark |last=Atkinson |newspaper=] |date=16 February 1998 |page=3 }}</ref> while a month into the Labour government, during which time Labour had implemented the long-held ASI aim of an independent Bank of England,<ref>{{cite news |title=Why Britain's best-known right-wing think tank is enjoying working with Tony Blair |first=Madsen |last=Pirie |newspaper=] |date=15 June 1997 |page=19 }}</ref> Madsen Pirie gave it a nine out of ten for performance.<ref>{{cite news |title=Thatcherite guru gives Blair 9 out of 10 for performance |first=Denis |last=Campbell |newspaper=] |date=15 June 1997 |page=1 }}</ref> Eamonn Butler has ascribed this flexibility to who is in power to their role not being 'to be political or shout slogans', but to be 'policy engineers'.<ref>{{cite news |title=Think tanks – who's hot (and who's not) |first=David |last=Smith |newspaper=] |date=1 May 1998 |page= }}</ref>
In November 1994, the Institute began a review of welfare reform called Operation Underclass,<ref name="Replacing the welfare state">{{cite news |title=Replacing the welfare state |newspaper=] |date=16 February 1995 }}</ref> aimed at methods of creating jobs for the long-term unemployed.<ref>{{cite news |title=Help for long-term unemployed urged |newspaper=] |date=7 November 1994 }}</ref> Some elements of the programme were adopted by the government within months.<ref name="Replacing the welfare state" />


The ejection of the Conservative government in 1997 did not have as dramatic an effect on the ASI as some had anticipated. The Institute praised the government's welfare-to-work programmes, describing it as "the most successful policy initiative of this century".<ref>{{cite news |title=Rightwing think-tank applauds Blair on welfare-to-work |first=Mark |last=Atkinson |newspaper=] |date=16 February 1998 |page=3 }}</ref> The ASI publicly welcomed the news that ] had implemented the long-held ASI aim of an independent Bank of England,<ref>{{cite news |title=Why Britain's best-known right-wing think tank is enjoying working with Tony Blair |first=Madsen |last=Pirie |newspaper=] |date=15 June 1997 |page=19 }}</ref> Madsen Pirie gave it a nine out of ten for performance.<ref>{{cite news |title=Thatcherite guru gives Blair 9 out of 10 for performance |first=Denis |last=Campbell |newspaper=] |date=15 June 1997 |page=1 }}</ref> Eamonn Butler has ascribed this flexibility to who is in power to their role not being "to be political or shout slogans", but to be "policy engineers".<ref>{{cite news |title=Think tanks – who's hot (and who's not) |first=David |last=Smith |newspaper=] |date=1 May 1998 }}</ref>
==Activities==
===Tax Freedom Day===
The Adam Smith Institute publishes the British version of ], the day in the year when the average person has earned enough to pay his or her annual tax bill.<ref name="147 days at work foots">{{cite news |title=147 days at work foots the tax bill |first=Debbie |last=Hill |newspaper=] |date=17 May 1998 |url= |accessdate= }}</ref> The Institute calculates the figure using a range of statistics, including the macroeconomic health of the economy, foreign and domestic investment, and tax policy.<ref name="147 days at work foots" /> The ASI uses Tax Freedom Day to call attention to UK tax rates and fiscal policy.


The ASI then collaborated with the ] organisation on a series of opinion polls to measure such things as the goals of young people and students, and public attitudes to state services.
===The Next Generation===
The Adam Smith Institute facilitates regular meetings of young people who have interests in free markets. These 16- to 30-year olds form a group called The Next Generation (TNG). MPs and prominent media figures are typical guest speakers at monthly meetings of The Next Generation. The , an affiliated network for freedom-loving groups across the UK, was founded by members of the TNG Committee.


The ASI's libertarian label was officially changed to neoliberal on 10 October 2016.<ref>{{cite web |title=Adam Smith Institute on Twitter |url=https://twitter.com/ASI/status/785519509864153088 |access-date=9 April 2017 |publisher=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Coming out as neoliberals |url=https://www.adamsmith.org/blog/coming-out-as-neoliberals |accessdate=9 April 2017 |website=Adamsmith.org|date=11 October 2016 }}</ref>
==Influence==
In January 2009 '']'' and the ] named the Adam Smith Institute among the top 10 think-tanks in the world outside of the US.<ref></ref> The Institute is highly influential in UK public policy, and was "a pioneer of ]"<ref>, ], c 1994</ref> in the UK and elsewhere. Early Institute papers proposed the ] of local government services (1980), the fundamentals of the ] (1981–1985), and the ] and ] of transportation (1980). The privatisation of British Rail in 1997 was also based on a plan suggested by the Institute. Other influences include the UK's cutting of the highest rate of ] from 83% to 40% in the late 1980s, and its liberalisation of alcohol licensing laws.


In February 2022, the ASI wrote a paper arguing that the ] should be privatized to eliminate poverty on Earth. The paper argued that the Moon's land should be divided and given to different countries that would then be rented to companies in order to increase economic growth through ] and exploration. The ] of 1967 prohibits individuals and countries from owning property in space.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Plummer |first=Kate |date=February 15, 2022 |title=The Moon should be privatised to help wipe out poverty on Earth, economists say |url=https://www.indy100.com/science-tech/moon-privatise-adam-smith-institute |access-date=2023-08-13 |website=] |language=en}}</ref> According to '']'', the report received an "outraged online reaction".<ref>{{Cite news |last=Mahdawi |first=Arwa |date=2022-02-17 |title=Privatising the moon may sound like a crazy idea but the sky's no limit for avarice |language=en-GB |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/feb/17/privatising-moon-economists-advocate |access-date=2023-08-13 |issn=0261-3077}}</ref>
The Institute has released a series of Roadmap to Reform papers, calling for shifts in public policy in Health, Deregulation and Europe. In 2006, the Institute released a paper calling for a rethink of Britain's countryside policy.<ref>, ], 17 April 2006</ref>


=== Public Sector Reform === === International work ===
In 1992, the Institute founded a consulting company, Adam Smith International Ltd, which was "charged with overseeing the overseas work of the institute an attempt to capitalise on the growing international trend towards ] and marketization".<ref name="Denham and Garnett 1998, p. 153">Denham and Garnett (1998), p. 153</ref> While Eamonn Butler and Madsen Pirie were as of 1998 members of the management board of both organisations,<ref name="Denham and Garnett 1998, p. 153"/> the management teams of ] and the Institute are now separate.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.adamsmithinternational.com/content/management-team-0|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090508055720/http://www.adamsmithinternational.com/content/management-team-0|url-status=dead|archive-date=8 May 2009|title=Management team - Adam Smith International|date=8 May 2009|accessdate=1 December 2018}}</ref>


== Funding ==
'''Internal Markets''' – ASI proposed that the ] establish an ] with hospitals buying the use of facilities from other districts and from the private sector. Internal markets are now NHS policy.
Think tank ], which is funded by the ], ranked the Institute as one of the four least transparent think tanks in the United Kingdom in relation to funding. Transparify's report ''How Transparent are Think Tanks about Who Funds Them 2016?'' rated them as "highly opaque", one of "a handful of think tanks that refuse to reveal even the identities of their donors".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://static1.squarespace.com/static/52e1f399e4b06a94c0cdaa41/t/5773022de6f2e1ecf70b26d1/1467154992324/Transparify+2016+Think+Tanks+Report.pdf|title=How transparent are think tanks about who funds them 2016?|publisher=Transparify|access-date=30 November 2016}}</ref> In 2022, the website ] rated the Institute as E, the lowest transparency rating (rating goes from A to E).<ref>{{Cite web |title=WhoFundsYou? Adam Smith Institute |url=https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/who-funds-you/adam-smith-institute/ }}</ref> TobaccoTactics, the website of the Tobacco Control Research Group at the ], details the institute's funding by the tobacco industry.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://tobac.tuxic.nl/index.php/Adam_Smith_Institute#Received_Funding_from_Tobacco_Industry/|title=Adam Smith Institute|website=Tobac.tuxic.nl|accessdate=1 December 2016|archive-date=1 December 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161201212517/http://tobac.tuxic.nl/index.php/Adam_Smith_Institute#Received_Funding_from_Tobacco_Industry/|url-status=dead}}</ref> '']'' report that the Institute received three percent of its funding from the tobacco industry in 2013.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/jun/01/thinktanks-big-tobacco-funds-smoking|title=Health groups dismayed by news 'big tobacco' funded rightwing thinktanks|first=Jamie|last=Doward|date=1 June 2013|website=Theguardian.com}}</ref>


=== Investigated for breaches of charities rules ===
ASI also recommended an internal market system for UK schools that would have state funds to follow students to independently run academic institutions. This approach to school funding is now Conservative policy.
In December 2018, the institute, which consists of at least three different legal entities (a British company, a British charity and an American non-profit foundation), was reported to be under investigation by the ] for improper use of funds. Charities in England and Wales are required to be genuinely independent from other entities, and cannot perform political campaigning. Contributors giving £1,000 a year were offered "opportunities to attend power lunches and patrons dinners with influential figures, including politicians, ministers, journalists and academics."<ref name="Guardian Pegg">{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/dec/01/rightwing-thinktank-deletes-offer-of-access-to-ministers-for-donors|title=Rightwing thinktank deletes offer of access to ministers for donors|first1=David|last1=Pegg|first2=Rob|last2=Evans|first3=Felicity|last3=Lawrence|date=1 December 2018|website=The Guardian|accessdate=1 December 2018}}</ref>


== Activities ==
'''National Government''' – ASI proposed that ]s be reduced in number and subject to increased scrutiny. QUANGOs were subsequently cut by 20 percent and put under parliamentary review.{{Citation needed|date=June 2009}}
=== Tax Freedom Day ===
The Institute publishes the British version of ], the day in the year when the average person has earned enough to pay his or her annual tax bill.<ref name="147 days at work foots">{{cite news |title=147 days at work foots the tax bill |first=Debbie |last=Hill |newspaper=] |date=17 May 1998 }}</ref> The Institute calculates the figure by expressing the government's take of the economy as a percentage of the year, including all forms of taxation, direct and indirect, national and local.<ref name="147 days at work foots" />


=== The Next Generation ===
'''Local Government''' – Following the Institute's call for the use of private businesses by local governments, many local services, such as waste collection and cleaning, were contracted out. Additionally, local governments are now required to solicit competitive bids for local services{{Citation needed|date=June 2009}}
The Liberty League was a United Kingdom student organisation in the early 2010s, was founded by members of the Next Generation Committee (James Lawson, William Hamilton and Anton Howes). It aimed to support classical liberalism. Its annual Freedom Forum conference was transferred to the institute.<ref name="Owenchampagne">{{cite news|last1=Owen|first1=James|title=The Champagne Flows in the City|work=The Independent|date=22 March 2012|id={{ProQuest|929400497}}}}</ref><ref name="CroucherGenerationNext">{{cite news|last1=Croucher|first1=James|title=Rise of the New Libertarians: Meet Britain's Next Political Generation|url=http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/rise-new-libertarians-meet-britains-next-political-generation-1469233|accessdate=22 May 2017|work=International Business Times|date=10 October 2014}}</ref><ref name="MovingLeft">{{cite news|title=As the Social Attitudes Survey reveals softening views on welfare, is Britain moving to the Left?|work=City A.M.|date=10 September 2013|id={{ProQuest|1431127967}}}}</ref><ref name="economist">{{cite magazine|url=https://www.economist.com/news/britain/21578666-britains-youth-are-not-just-more-liberal-their-elders-they-are-also-more-liberal-any|title=Generation Boris|magazine=economist.com|date=June 2013|accessdate=28 July 2016}}</ref>


== Influence ==
'''Welfare''' – ASI called for a radical shake-up of welfare policy, which would make work requirements absolutely central to the benefits system. Many of ASI's proposals subsequently became ] policy, and some even found favour among ] MPs.
{{third-party|section|date=April 2016}}
In January 2009, '']'' and the ] named the Institute among the top 10 think-tanks in the world outside of the United States.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4598&page=2&#93; |title=Foreign Policy: The Think Tank Index |access-date=1 December 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100106120507/http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4598 |archive-date=6 January 2010 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }}</ref> The institute is highly influential in United Kingdom public policy and was "a pioneer of privatisation"<ref>, ], c 1994</ref> in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. Early Institute papers proposed the outsourcing of local government services (1980), the fundamentals of the ] (1981–1985)<ref>A poll tax was ]. It was unpopular and abolished following replacement of Margaret Thatcher by John Major</ref> and the ] and ] of transportation (1980). Other influences include the United Kingdom's cutting of the highest rate of ] from 83% to 40% in the late 1980s and its liberalisation of alcohol licensing laws.


The institute has released a series of Roadmap to Reform papers, calling for shifts in public policy in Health, Deregulation and Europe. In 2006, the Institute released a paper calling for a rethink of Britain's countryside policy.<ref>, ], 17 April 2006</ref>
'''Health''' – ASI lobbied for a change in ] regulations to facilitate the outsourcing of ancillary hospital services. The government now requires a solicitation of bids from private contractors for cleaning and catering services. VAT regulations have been modified to put in-house work and outside tenders on an equal basis. It is estimated that these actions saves £100 million per annum.


According to the ''2014 Global Go To ] Index Report'' (], ]), the ASI is ranked number 69 (of 150) of the "Top Think Tanks Worldwide".<ref name="Global Go To">{{cite web| author=James G. McGann (Director) |author-link=James McGann|url=http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=think_tanks|title=2014 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report |date=4 February 2015 |accessdate=14 February 2015 }} Other "Top Think Tank" rankings include No. 3 (of 80) in Domestic Economic Policy, No. 5 (of 50) in International Economic Policy, No. 17 (of 60) for Best Use of Social Networks, No. 40 (of 60) of Think Tanks with the Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program, No. 24 (of 70) for the Most Significant Impact on Public Policy, and No. 12 (of 60) for Outstanding Policy-Oriented Public Programs.</ref>{{undue weight inline|date=February 2022}}
'''Education''' – The ] reflected many policy changes proposed by ASI including increasing representation of parents on state school governing boards, shifting control of state schools from the local authority to the board and head teachers, abolishing fixed school catchment areas.<ref></ref>


=== Tax reform ===
'''Transport''' – Urban and local bus services have been deregulated and the ] has been privatized into more than 60 companies following ASI's suggestion that the National Bus Company be broken up and urban and local bus services be opened to competition and choice.
A 2005 paper by the Institute proposed a flat-rate income tax of 22% for United Kingdom taxpayers, with the above-referenced tax-free personal allowance of £12,000.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.adamsmith.org/images/stories/flattaxuk.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090212031530/http://www.adamsmith.org/images/stories/flattaxuk.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-date=2009-02-12|title=A Flat Tax for the UK – a Practical Reality|date=12 February 2009}}</ref> '']'' editor Allister Heath said of this report that "rarely has a think-tank publication been this influential so quickly. Its arguments have been dissected by the UK Treasury, are well known among the Shadow Treasury Team, have had an influence on some parts of the Liberal Democrats and were even adopted by several minor political parties".<ref> Alistair Heath, 2006 p.104</ref> The ASI continues to campaign for a ].


=== Public sector reform ===
'''Justice''' – In accordance with ASI's proposals, the government resolved to experiment with privately contracted prisons and electronic tracking tags for low-security prisoners.
==== Education ====
The ] reflected many policy changes proposed by the institute, including increasing representation of parents on state school governing boards, shifting control of state schools from the local authority to the board and head teachers and abolishing fixed school catchment areas.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.adamsmith.org/publications/education/open-access-for-uk-schools/|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20101224060621/http://www.adamsmith.org/publications/education/open-access-for-uk-schools/|url-status=dead|title=Open Access for UK Schools: What Britain Can Learn from Swedish Education Reform|archivedate=24 December 2010}}</ref>


=== Tax Reform === ==== Rail privatisation ====
]
With its author Kenneth Irvine, the ASI says it pioneered the ] with private companies competing for franchises on a separately owned national network (The Right Lines – 1987). This policy was enacted by ]'s government.<ref name=successfulrailway>{{cite web|url=http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/regulation-industry/what-would-we-consider-a-successful-railway-system/ |title=What would we consider a successful railway system?|website=Adamsmith.org|date=19 August 2014 }}</ref>


==== Immigration ====
'''Tax Rates''' – As recommended by the Adam Smith Institute, the top tax rate was reduced from 60% to 40% in ]'s 1988 budget.
The institute is one of the strongest{{according to whom|date=February 2022}} defenders of ].<ref name="TTIP">{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/11296902/From-immigration-to-trade-and-the-NHS-politics-is-about-open-vs-closed.html|title=From immigration to trade and the NHS, politics is about open vs closed|date=17 December 2014|accessdate=8 May 2017|newspaper=Daily Telegraph|first=James|last=Kirkup}}</ref>


== Current viewpoints ==
'''Personal Allowance''' – Prior to the ] 2008 pre-budget report, ASI made a case for the personal income tax allowance to be raised to £12,000 (from the current £6,035 allowance) for all UK taxpayers. Such a policy would take 7 million people out of the tax system, and low-income earners would not pay at all. The ASI calculated that this reform would be equivalent to giving the average worker an extra £1,730 per year in gross pay, making them £100 per month better off. The cost to the Exchequer would be £18.9 billion.
=== Green belt ===
The ASI has written extensively about the effect the ] has had on house prices by restricting where houses can be built. In its paper ''The Green Noose'', the Institute wrote that "simply removing restrictions on land 10 minutes’ walk of a railway station would allow the development of 1 million more homes within the Green Belt surrounding London alone". The ASI believes that instead of simply putting a blanket ban on building in the areas surrounding cities, planning permission should be granted based on the environmental, historic and scientific value of the land.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.adamsmith.org/research/reports/the-green-noose/ |title=The Green Noose « |access-date=28 February 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160319220654/http://www.adamsmith.org/research/reports/the-green-noose/ |archive-date=19 March 2016 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }}</ref>


=== Rail policy ===
'''Flat Tax''' – A 2005 paper by the Institute proposed a flat-rate income tax of 22% for UK taxpayers, with the above-referenced tax-free personal allowance of £12,000.<ref></ref> City AM editor Allister Heath said of this report, "rarely has a think-tank publication been this influential so quickly. Its arguments have been dissected by the UK Treasury, are well known among the Shadow Treasury Team, have had an influence on some parts of the Liberal Democrats and were even adopted by several minor political parties".<ref> Alistair Heath, 2006 p.104</ref> The ASI continues to campaign for a ].
Amid ongoing debate about the railways, the ASI has been an advocate of the privatised system, writing that much of the rise in passenger numbers since privatisation cannot be attributed to other factors. It has called for increased competition through the use of open access operators or having two operators sharing a franchise and competing with each other.<ref name=successfulrailway/>


==Publications== == Publications ==
===Books=== ; Books
* ''Economy and Local Government'', Eamonn Butler & Madsen Pirie, 1981 {{ISBN|978-0906517109}}
*'''', Eamonn Butler, 2010
* ''Aid by Enterprise'', Eamonn Butler & Madsen Pirie, 1984 {{ISBN|978-0906517406}}
*'''', Eamonn Butler & Jeff Riggenbach, 2010 (Audiobook)
* ''Hayek'', Eamonn Butler, 1985 {{ISBN|978-0876634752}}
*'''', Eamonn Butler & Jeff Riggenbach, 2010 (Audiobook)
*'''', Eamonn Butler, 2009 * ''Milton Friedman: A Guide to His Economic Thought'', Eamonn Butler, 1985 {{ISBN|978-0876634769}}
* ''Micropolitics: Creation of a Successful Policy'', Madsen Pirie, 1988 {{ISBN|978-0704531031}}
*'''', Madsen Pirie, 2008
* ''Wayward Elite: A Critique of British Teacher-Education'', ], 1990 {{ISBN|978-1870109765}}
*'''', Eamonn Butler, 2008
* ''Adam Smith's Legacy'', ] et al., 1990 {{ISBN|978-1870109840}}
*'''', Eamonn Butler, 2007
* ''A country at ease with itself'', ], 1991 {{ISBN|978-1873712023}}
*'']'', Eamonn Butler (ed. Dr. ]), 2006
* ''Taming the Trade Unions'', Eamonn Butler, 1991 {{ISBN|978-0333531860}}
*'''', Eamonn Butler, 1998
* ''Blueprint for a Revolution'', Madsen Pirie, 1993 {{ISBN|978-1873712375}}
*'''', ], 1998
* ''Vision: Targets for Britain'', Madsen Pirie, 1994 {{ISBN|978-1873712467}}
*'''' (ed. John Raybould), 1998
* ''Shephard's Warning: Setting Schools Back on Course'', ], 1994 {{ISBN|978-1873712474}}
*'''' (ed. Detmar Doering), 1995
*'''', Eamonn Butler & Madsen Pirie, 1994 * ''The End of the Welfare State'', Eamonn Butler & Madsen Pirie, 1994 {{ISBN|978-1873712450}}
* ''Readings in Liberalism'' (ed. Detmar Doering), 1995 {{ISBN|978-1873712399}}
*'''', ], 1994
* ''Hayek: A Commemorative Album'' (ed. John Raybould), 1998 {{ISBN|978-1873712955}}
*'''', Madsen Pirie, 1994
* ''City in the Mist'', ], 1998 {{ISBN|978-1873712993}}
*'''', Madsen Pirie, 1993
*'''', Eamonn Butler, 1991 * ''Simply No Mistake: How the Stakeholder Pension Must Work'', Eamonn Butler, 1998 {{ISBN|978-1902737218}}
* ''The Future of the NHS'', Eamonn Butler (ed. Dr. Michelle Tempest), 2008 {{ISBN|978-1858113692}}
*'''', ], 1991
* ''Adam Smith – A Primer'', Eamonn Butler, 2007 {{ISBN|978-0255366083}}
*'''', Norman Barry et al., 1990
* ''The Best Book on the Market'', Eamonn Butler, 2008 {{ISBN|978-1906465056}}
*'''', ], 1990
* ''Freedom 101'', Madsen Pirie, 2008 {{ISBN|978-1902737560}}
*'''', Madsen Pirie, 1988
* ''The Rotten State of Britain'', Eamonn Butler, 2009 {{ISBN|978-1906142346}}
*'''', Eamonn Butler, 1985
* ''Ludwig Von Mises: Fountainhead of the Modern Microeconomics Revolution'', Eamonn Butler & Jeff Riggenbach, 2010 (Audiobook) {{ISBN|978-1441713087}}
*'''', Eamonn Butler, 1985
* ''Hayek: His Contribution to the Political and Economic Thought of Our Time'', Eamonn Butler & Jeff Riggenbach, 2010 (Audiobook) {{ISBN|978-1441717580}}
*'''', Eamonn Butler & Madsen Pirie, 1984
* ''The Alternative Manifesto'', Eamonn Butler, 2010 {{ISBN|978-1906142698}}
*'''', Eamonn Butler & Madsen Pirie, 1981
* ''Economics Made Simple'', Madsen Pirie 2012 {{ISBN|978-0857191427}}
* ''Think Tank'', Madsen Pirie 2012 {{ISBN|978-1849541848}}


== See also ==
===Reports & Briefings===
* ]
<u>Topics:</u>
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*


==See also== == Footnotes ==
*]

==Footnotes==
{{Reflist}} {{Reflist}}


==References== == References ==
* {{cite book |title=British Think-tanks and the Climate of Opinion |last=Denham |first=Andrew |coauthors=Garnett, Mark |year=1998 |publisher=UCL Press |location=London |isbn=978-1-85728-497-3 }} * {{cite book|title=British Think-tanks and the Climate of Opinion|last1=Denham|first1=Andrew|last2=Garnett|first2=Mark|year=1998|publisher=UCL Press|location=London|isbn=978-1-85728-497-3 }}


==External links== == External links ==
<!-- Per ], choose one official website only. -->
*
* * {{Official website|http://www.adamsmith.org/}}

* , an affiliated network for freedom-loving groups across the UK.
{{Authority control}}


] ]
] ]
]

]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 00:22, 15 May 2024

British neo-liberal think tank and lobby group Not to be confused with the Smith Institute or Adam Smith International "Liberty League (UK)" redirects here. For the 1920s organization, see Liberty League (Historic).

This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources.
Find sources: "Adam Smith Institute" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (February 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Adam Smith Institute
AbbreviationASI
Formation1977; 47 years ago (1977)
Typethink tank
HeadquartersLondon, SW1
United Kingdom
Coordinates51°29′52″N 0°07′46″W / 51.4979°N 0.1294°W / 51.4979; -0.1294
ChairmanJames Lawson
PresidentMadsen Pirie
DirectorEamonn Butler
FundingUndisclosed, some funding from the tobacco industry
Websiteadamsmith.org

The Adam Smith Institute (ASI) is a UK-based neoliberal think tank and lobbying group, named after Adam Smith, a Scottish moral philosopher and classical economist. The Institute advocates free market and classical liberal ideas, primarily via the formation of policy options with regard to public choice theory, which political decision makers seek to develop upon. ASI President Madsen Pirie has sought to describe the activity of the organisation as "e propose things which people regard as being on the edge of lunacy. The next thing you know, they're on the edge of policy".

The ASI formed the primary intellectual force behind the privatisation of state-owned industries during the premiership of Margaret Thatcher, and alongside the Centre for Policy Studies and Institute of Economic Affairs advanced a neoliberal approach toward public policy on privatisation, taxation, education and healthcare. A number of the policies presented by organisation were adopted by the administrations of John Major and Tony Blair and members of the ASI have also advised non-United Kingdom governments. Beyond policy development, the organisation advocates free market ideas through the publication and distribution of literature, the promotion of Tax Freedom Day, the hosting of speaker events for students and young people, media appearances and blogging.

The ASI is rated as one of the least transparent think tanks in the United Kingdom in relation to funding and has been shown to receive funding from the tobacco industry.

History

Foundation

Madsen Pirie, President of the ASI, has been described as the leading architect of Margaret Thatcher's privatisation programme

Madsen Pirie and brothers Eamonn and Stuart Butler were students together at the University of St Andrews in Scotland. Pirie left in 1974 to work for the Republican Study Committee in Washington, D.C., and then took up a professorship in Philosophy at Hillsdale College. He was joined there by Stuart Butler while Eamonn Butler went to work with Edwin Feulner, who became co-founder and director of the free-market think tank The Heritage Foundation.

After their experience in the United States, they returned to the United Kingdom in 1977 to found their own think tank, called the Adam Smith Institute. After a year, Stuart Butler returned to the United States as Vice President of the Heritage in charge of domestic policy while Eamonn Butler remained with Madsen Pirie as co-directors of the institute.

One of their St Andrews friends, Douglas Mason, who had been active in the university's Conservative Association, did his most influential research and writing for the institute. Mason became one of its regular authors.

The ASI's Omega Project (1981–1983) led by Peter Young produced a series of 19 papers shadowing each Department of State and advocated such things as the compulsory contracting-out of most local services such as refuse collection, the replacement of much of the welfare state by private insurance and further privatisation of public sector services and industries, including aspects of police services.

Thatcher's inner circle

The Margaret Thatcher era saw the think tank movement come of age and achieve influence and with the Centre for Policy Studies (CPS) and the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) and the ASI was one of three relied upon by the Thatcher government for policy. Unlike the CPS, which had been established by Thatcher and Keith Joseph; and the IEA, which focused on more theoretical matters, the ASI was well-placed to produce bold and direct policies. Despite this role, the Institute developed an iconoclastic reputation, cynical about politicians, but enthusiastic to engage with them. The institute's relationship with Thatcher was not without troubles. Although Madsen Pirie was the architect of much of the privatisation policy, he had no emotional ties to Thatcher, nor did the ASI propose policies on a range of social issues despite its Thatcherite reputation.

The ASI took the view that the market was "more genuinely democratic than the public sector, involving the decisions of far more individuals and at much more frequent intervals". The Institute published Douglas Mason's recommendation that local government rates (the local government tax) should be replaced by a per-capita charge. A version of this was later implemented by the Conservative government introducing the Community Charge in Scotland in 1989 and in England and Wales in 1990. It brought unpopularity for the Thatcher government and was seen by some as having weakened her political hand ahead of her departure from office, though her attitude to Europe was a more significant factor.

Other policy recommendations which Douglas Mason published with the ASI included the privatisation of the Royal Mail (The Last Post − 1991); the introduction of charges in British public libraries (Ex Libris – 1986); the privatisation of the Forestry Commission; the complete removal of arts subsidies (Expounding The Arts – 1987); and the abolition of restrictions on drinking (Time To Call Time – 1986).

After Thatcher

In November 1994, the Institute began a review of welfare reform called Operation Underclass, aimed at methods of creating jobs for the long-term unemployed. Some elements of the programme were adopted by the government within months.

The ejection of the Conservative government in 1997 did not have as dramatic an effect on the ASI as some had anticipated. The Institute praised the government's welfare-to-work programmes, describing it as "the most successful policy initiative of this century". The ASI publicly welcomed the news that Labour had implemented the long-held ASI aim of an independent Bank of England, Madsen Pirie gave it a nine out of ten for performance. Eamonn Butler has ascribed this flexibility to who is in power to their role not being "to be political or shout slogans", but to be "policy engineers".

The ASI then collaborated with the MORI organisation on a series of opinion polls to measure such things as the goals of young people and students, and public attitudes to state services.

The ASI's libertarian label was officially changed to neoliberal on 10 October 2016.

In February 2022, the ASI wrote a paper arguing that the Moon should be privatized to eliminate poverty on Earth. The paper argued that the Moon's land should be divided and given to different countries that would then be rented to companies in order to increase economic growth through space tourism and exploration. The Outer Space Treaty of 1967 prohibits individuals and countries from owning property in space. According to The Guardian, the report received an "outraged online reaction".

International work

In 1992, the Institute founded a consulting company, Adam Smith International Ltd, which was "charged with overseeing the overseas work of the institute an attempt to capitalise on the growing international trend towards economic liberalization and marketization". While Eamonn Butler and Madsen Pirie were as of 1998 members of the management board of both organisations, the management teams of Adam Smith International and the Institute are now separate.

Funding

Think tank Transparify, which is funded by the Open Society Foundations, ranked the Institute as one of the four least transparent think tanks in the United Kingdom in relation to funding. Transparify's report How Transparent are Think Tanks about Who Funds Them 2016? rated them as "highly opaque", one of "a handful of think tanks that refuse to reveal even the identities of their donors". In 2022, the website Who Funds You? rated the Institute as E, the lowest transparency rating (rating goes from A to E). TobaccoTactics, the website of the Tobacco Control Research Group at the University of Bath, details the institute's funding by the tobacco industry. The Guardian report that the Institute received three percent of its funding from the tobacco industry in 2013.

Investigated for breaches of charities rules

In December 2018, the institute, which consists of at least three different legal entities (a British company, a British charity and an American non-profit foundation), was reported to be under investigation by the Charity Commission for improper use of funds. Charities in England and Wales are required to be genuinely independent from other entities, and cannot perform political campaigning. Contributors giving £1,000 a year were offered "opportunities to attend power lunches and patrons dinners with influential figures, including politicians, ministers, journalists and academics."

Activities

Tax Freedom Day

The Institute publishes the British version of Tax Freedom Day, the day in the year when the average person has earned enough to pay his or her annual tax bill. The Institute calculates the figure by expressing the government's take of the economy as a percentage of the year, including all forms of taxation, direct and indirect, national and local.

The Next Generation

The Liberty League was a United Kingdom student organisation in the early 2010s, was founded by members of the Next Generation Committee (James Lawson, William Hamilton and Anton Howes). It aimed to support classical liberalism. Its annual Freedom Forum conference was transferred to the institute.

Influence

This section may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. Please help improve it by replacing them with more appropriate citations to reliable, independent, third-party sources. (April 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In January 2009, Foreign Policy and the University of Pennsylvania named the Institute among the top 10 think-tanks in the world outside of the United States. The institute is highly influential in United Kingdom public policy and was "a pioneer of privatisation" in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. Early Institute papers proposed the outsourcing of local government services (1980), the fundamentals of the poll tax (1981–1985) and the deregulation and privatisation of transportation (1980). Other influences include the United Kingdom's cutting of the highest rate of income tax from 83% to 40% in the late 1980s and its liberalisation of alcohol licensing laws.

The institute has released a series of Roadmap to Reform papers, calling for shifts in public policy in Health, Deregulation and Europe. In 2006, the Institute released a paper calling for a rethink of Britain's countryside policy.

According to the 2014 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report (Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program, University of Pennsylvania), the ASI is ranked number 69 (of 150) of the "Top Think Tanks Worldwide".

Tax reform

A 2005 paper by the Institute proposed a flat-rate income tax of 22% for United Kingdom taxpayers, with the above-referenced tax-free personal allowance of £12,000. City A.M. editor Allister Heath said of this report that "rarely has a think-tank publication been this influential so quickly. Its arguments have been dissected by the UK Treasury, are well known among the Shadow Treasury Team, have had an influence on some parts of the Liberal Democrats and were even adopted by several minor political parties". The ASI continues to campaign for a flat tax.

Public sector reform

Education

The Education Reform Act 1988 reflected many policy changes proposed by the institute, including increasing representation of parents on state school governing boards, shifting control of state schools from the local authority to the board and head teachers and abolishing fixed school catchment areas.

Rail privatisation

Rail passengers in Great Britain from 1829 to 2021 showing the increase in passengers that started just before privatisation.

With its author Kenneth Irvine, the ASI says it pioneered the privatisation of British Rail with private companies competing for franchises on a separately owned national network (The Right Lines – 1987). This policy was enacted by John Major's government.

Immigration

The institute is one of the strongest defenders of immigration.

Current viewpoints

Green belt

The ASI has written extensively about the effect the green belt has had on house prices by restricting where houses can be built. In its paper The Green Noose, the Institute wrote that "simply removing restrictions on land 10 minutes’ walk of a railway station would allow the development of 1 million more homes within the Green Belt surrounding London alone". The ASI believes that instead of simply putting a blanket ban on building in the areas surrounding cities, planning permission should be granted based on the environmental, historic and scientific value of the land.

Rail policy

Amid ongoing debate about the railways, the ASI has been an advocate of the privatised system, writing that much of the rise in passenger numbers since privatisation cannot be attributed to other factors. It has called for increased competition through the use of open access operators or having two operators sharing a franchise and competing with each other.

Publications

Books

See also

Footnotes

  1. Jones, Bill, ed. (1999). Political Issues in Britain Today (5th ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press. p. 6. ISBN 0719054311.
  2. Kandiah, Michael David; Seldon, Anthony, eds. (2013). Ideas and Think Tanks in Contemporary Britain. New York: Routledge. p. 77. ISBN 978-0714647432.
  3. Gilligan, Andrew (15 September 2012). "'Poverty barons' who make a fortune from taxpayer-funded aid budget". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 12 January 2016.
  4. Rusbridger, Alan (22 December 1987). "Adam Smith Institute's sense and nonsense". The Guardian. p. 30. Retrieved 19 January 2010.
  5. "Private Ayes". The Dallas Morning News. 5 January 1986. p. 38.
  6. "Britain weighs pleas to cut capital-gains and inheritance taxes". The Wall Street Journal. 6 February 1989.
  7. "Menem asks Adam Smith Institute for privatisation advice". The Guardian. 13 November 1989.
  8. ^ Denham, Andrew; Garnett, Mark (January 1999). "Influence without responsibility? Think-tanks in Britain". Parliamentary Affairs. 51 (1): 46–57. doi:10.1093/pa/52.1.46.
  9. "How transparent are think tanks about who funds them 2016?" (PDF). Transparify. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
  10. Doward, Jamie (1 June 2013). "Health groups dismayed by news 'big tobacco' funded rightwing thinktanks". Theguardian.com.
  11. ^ Brookes, Warren T. (4 May 1988). "Is Margaret Thatcher leading the way in education reform?". San Francisco Chronicle.
  12. Denham, Andrew and Garnett, Mark (1998). British Thinktanks and the Climate of Opinion, London: UCL Press, p. 155
  13. Butler, Eamonn (14 December 2004). "Douglas Mason: local councillor known as the 'father of the poll tax'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 1 October 2007. Retrieved 19 January 2010.
  14. Kavanagh, Dennis (1987). Thatcherism and British politics: the end of consensus?, Oxford University Press, p. 88)
  15. Denham and Garnett (1998), p. 157
  16. South, Nigel (1988). Policing for profit: the private security sector, London: Sage Publishing, p. 153)
  17. Pearce, Ed (19 April 1993). "The prophet of private profit – Dr Madsen Pirie". The Guardian.
  18. Denham and Garnett (1998), p. 158
  19. Butler (2004)
  20. ^ "Replacing the welfare state". The Wall Street Journal. 16 February 1995.
  21. "Help for long-term unemployed urged". Financial Times. 7 November 1994.
  22. Atkinson, Mark (16 February 1998). "Rightwing think-tank applauds Blair on welfare-to-work". The Guardian. p. 3.
  23. Pirie, Madsen (15 June 1997). "Why Britain's best-known right-wing think tank is enjoying working with Tony Blair". Scotland on Sunday. p. 19.
  24. Campbell, Denis (15 June 1997). "Thatcherite guru gives Blair 9 out of 10 for performance". Scotland on Sunday. p. 1.
  25. Smith, David (1 May 1998). "Think tanks – who's hot (and who's not)". Management Today.
  26. "Adam Smith Institute on Twitter". Twitter. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  27. "Coming out as neoliberals". Adamsmith.org. 11 October 2016. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  28. Plummer, Kate (15 February 2022). "The Moon should be privatised to help wipe out poverty on Earth, economists say". Indy100. Retrieved 13 August 2023.
  29. Mahdawi, Arwa (17 February 2022). "Privatising the moon may sound like a crazy idea but the sky's no limit for avarice". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 13 August 2023.
  30. ^ Denham and Garnett (1998), p. 153
  31. "Management team - Adam Smith International". 8 May 2009. Archived from the original on 8 May 2009. Retrieved 1 December 2018.
  32. "How transparent are think tanks about who funds them 2016?" (PDF). Transparify. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
  33. "WhoFundsYou? Adam Smith Institute".
  34. "Adam Smith Institute". Tobac.tuxic.nl. Archived from the original on 1 December 2016. Retrieved 1 December 2016.
  35. Doward, Jamie (1 June 2013). "Health groups dismayed by news 'big tobacco' funded rightwing thinktanks". Theguardian.com.
  36. Pegg, David; Evans, Rob; Lawrence, Felicity (1 December 2018). "Rightwing thinktank deletes offer of access to ministers for donors". The Guardian. Retrieved 1 December 2018.
  37. ^ Hill, Debbie (17 May 1998). "147 days at work foots the tax bill". The Sunday Times.
  38. Owen, James (22 March 2012). "The Champagne Flows in the City". The Independent. ProQuest 929400497.
  39. Croucher, James (10 October 2014). "Rise of the New Libertarians: Meet Britain's Next Political Generation". International Business Times. Retrieved 22 May 2017.
  40. "As the Social Attitudes Survey reveals softening views on welfare, is Britain moving to the Left?". City A.M. 10 September 2013. ProQuest 1431127967.
  41. "Generation Boris". economist.com. June 2013. Retrieved 28 July 2016.
  42. "Foreign Policy: The Think Tank Index". Archived from the original on 6 January 2010. Retrieved 1 December 2018.
  43. The Influence of the Adam Smith Institute, Philip Morris, c 1994
  44. A poll tax was introduced in the UK in 1989/90. It was unpopular and abolished following replacement of Margaret Thatcher by John Major
  45. 'Woods and homes' green belt call, BBC News, 17 April 2006
  46. James G. McGann (Director) (4 February 2015). "2014 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report". Retrieved 14 February 2015. Other "Top Think Tank" rankings include No. 3 (of 80) in Domestic Economic Policy, No. 5 (of 50) in International Economic Policy, No. 17 (of 60) for Best Use of Social Networks, No. 40 (of 60) of Think Tanks with the Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program, No. 24 (of 70) for the Most Significant Impact on Public Policy, and No. 12 (of 60) for Outstanding Policy-Oriented Public Programs.
  47. "A Flat Tax for the UK – a Practical Reality" (PDF). 12 February 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 February 2009.
  48. Flat Tax – Towards a British Model Alistair Heath, 2006 p.104
  49. "Open Access for UK Schools: What Britain Can Learn from Swedish Education Reform". Archived from the original on 24 December 2010.
  50. ^ "What would we consider a successful railway system?". Adamsmith.org. 19 August 2014.
  51. Kirkup, James (17 December 2014). "From immigration to trade and the NHS, politics is about open vs closed". Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 8 May 2017.
  52. "The Green Noose «". Archived from the original on 19 March 2016. Retrieved 28 February 2016.

References

  • Denham, Andrew; Garnett, Mark (1998). British Think-tanks and the Climate of Opinion. London: UCL Press. ISBN 978-1-85728-497-3.

External links

Categories: