Misplaced Pages

User talk:Afg96: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:59, 15 November 2012 editNightscream (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers169,234 edits November 2012: ce← Previous edit Latest revision as of 08:35, 14 January 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Replaced obsolete font tags and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(22 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:

'''Welcome!'''

Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!&nbsp; ] 12:20, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

== October 2008 == == October 2008 ==


] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The <span class="plainlinks"></span> you made to ] has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the ] for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative ]. You may also wish to read the ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-huggle1 --> ]</font><sup> (],])</sup> 21:48, 11 October 2008 (UTC) ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The <span class="plainlinks"></span> you made to ] has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the ] for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative ]. You may also wish to read the ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-huggle1 --> ]<sup> (],])</sup> 21:48, 11 October 2008 (UTC)


] The <span class="plainlinks"></span> you made to ] constitutes ], and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the ] for testing. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-huggle2 --> ]</font><sup> (],])</sup> 21:52, 11 October 2008 (UTC) ] The <span class="plainlinks"></span> you made to ] constitutes ], and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the ] for testing. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-huggle2 --> ]<sup> (],])</sup> 21:52, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

==] nomination of ]==
] Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as ], to Misplaced Pages. Doing so is not in accordance with our ]. If you would like to experiment, please use the ].

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that they ] the page or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-vandalism-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 06:20, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

==] nomination of ]==
] Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Misplaced Pages has a strict policy against ]. ] and images '''are not tolerated''' by Misplaced Pages and are ]. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our ] policy will be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. <!-- Template:Db-attack-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 06:21, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


== Mehmet Oz article == == Mehmet Oz article ==
Line 47: Line 25:
==John Stossel== ==John Stossel==
Hi. You removed content from Misplaced Pages with , but without providing a rationale for this in an Edit Summary. When removing material, please specify a reason in the ] and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's ]. Thanks. :-) ] (]) 17:58, 15 November 2012 (UTC) Hi. You removed content from Misplaced Pages with , but without providing a rationale for this in an Edit Summary. When removing material, please specify a reason in the ] and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's ]. Thanks. :-) ] (]) 17:58, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

== April 2013 ==

{{{icon|]}}} Please stop your ], as you did at ]. Your edits have been ] or removed.
* If you are engaged in an article ] with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's ] page, and ask for independent help at one of the ].
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ].
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through ]. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being ]. -- ] (]) 04:09, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

== You've been mentioned in a ] discussion regarding the ] page ==

Hello. There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ]. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. -- ] (]) 05:43, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

: Here is an update. In ], ] asked for further talk page discussion of Oz's religion, so I have created ] for that purpose. If you wish to have Oz's religion mentioned in the article, you must participate in the talk page discussions and achieve ]. -- ] (]) 05:56, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

== April 2019 ==
] Hello, and ]. You appear to be repeatedly ] other editors' contributions at ]. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is known as "]" and is usually seen as obstructing the ], as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a ] on the ].

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ]]] 16:11, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

== Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion ==
]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ]]] 16:56, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
===NPA warning===
] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you make ] on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.<!-- Template:uw-npa4 -->. ] 18:00, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

==Edit warring==
You have already received a 3RR-warning, so I won't give you another one, I'll just remind you that you have already made three reverts, making the next revert, if any, a CLEAR violation of the rules. I have also commented on the talk page of the article (]), and strongly suggest you read my comment. -&nbsp;'''Tom'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;] ] 18:59, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

===Block===
You have been blocked from editing for <s>24</s> 72 hours for violating the ] and for ]. Please be more careful in the future. I already warned you about not making personal attacks, so it's disappointing that you did so again anyway. Please do better. ] 19:34, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
--------
Misplaced Pages has prompted me that you've sent an email — however, I have not received it. At any rate, my preference is to discuss the block here, in the open. ] 20:11, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
-------
I have increased your block to 2 weeks for block evasion. ] 20:19, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

-------

I understand that I have violated wikipedia rules, but Thomas W. Is factually incorrect. This is the reason why people don't trust wikipedia. As long as you have the consensus of the ignorant then you are presumed correct on wikipedia. A simple google search would show that University of Bologna is not the oldest, you can even compare that false claim with encyclopedia Britannica. Can you check our discussion on University of Bologna talk page. He has bias, and I would even say racist views. He doesn't even know what madrasa even means. The contributor with an agenda often prevails. In theory, the intellectual sparring at the heart of Misplaced Pages's group editing process results in a consensus that removes unreliable contributions and edits. But often the contributor who “wins” is not the one with the soundest information, but rather the one with the strongest agenda. This is what is happening here right now. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small>

:Accusing someone of racist views is a serious personal attack, the third one you made today — you were warned and sanctioned for that already. That's just unacceptable, regardless if the facts are on your side. I've blocked you indefinitely until such time that you can demonstrate you can adhere to our rules of conduct. You did yourself and your position a dis-service by engaging in this and you have no one to blame but yourself. ] 22:39, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Why was I blocked indefinitely? I merely expressed an opinion to you! There is a difference in the tone of the language and the figure of speech. You are acting tyrannical, you are given authority on Misplaced Pages yet you are abusing your power kind of like Stalin, Lenin, and Che who you seem to admire. I guess the apple doesn't fall far from the tree does it? I hope you are not hurt by that, and I hope I didn't hurt your feels. I'm sorry if I did. But seriously man, you just admitted that Misplaced Pages doesn't care about facts by stating "That's just unacceptable, regardless if the facts are on your side". So if that is the case why don't we just make up facts, you basically proving the point of many teachers and academics as to why Misplaced Pages shouldn't be trusted I guess they were right.<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small>

:You were blocked indefinitely, as stated, because you continue to violate our ] policy over and over again; and for block evasion (, ). That's all I have to say. I'm not going to respond to your invective and straw man further. ] 01:10, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:35, 14 January 2022

October 2008

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to Kennedy Collegiate Institute has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Excirial 21:48, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Kennedy Collegiate Institute constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Excirial 21:52, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Mehmet Oz article

The issue of whether Mehmet Oz's article should call him a muslim has already been discussed on the article's talk page. The current decision on the talk page is that the article should not call him a muslim. Please keep in mind that Misplaced Pages's policy on consensus says that "editors who ignore talk page discussions yet continue to edit in or revert disputed material may be guilty of disruptive editing and incur sanctions." -- JTSchreiber (talk) 05:19, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Mehmet Oz. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- JTSchreiber (talk) 05:39, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

September 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Mehmet Oz. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- JTSchreiber (talk) 05:33, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

John Stossel

Hi. You removed content from Misplaced Pages with this edit of yours to John Stossel, but without providing a rationale for this in an Edit Summary. When removing material, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 17:58, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

April 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Mehmet Oz. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. -- JTSchreiber (talk) 04:09, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

You've been mentioned in a WP:AN/I discussion regarding the Mehmet Oz page

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruption by user:Afg96. Thank you. -- JTSchreiber (talk) 05:43, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Here is an update. In this follow-up section, User:NE Ent asked for further talk page discussion of Oz's religion, so I have created a new section for that purpose. If you wish to have Oz's religion mentioned in the article, you must participate in the talk page discussions and achieve consensus. -- JTSchreiber (talk) 05:56, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

April 2019

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at University of Bologna‎. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. ——SerialNumber54129 16:11, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Afg96 reported by User:Serial Number 54129 (Result: ). Thank you. ——SerialNumber54129 16:56, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

NPA warning

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.. El_C 18:00, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Edit warring

You have already received a 3RR-warning, so I won't give you another one, I'll just remind you that you have already made three reverts, making the next revert, if any, a CLEAR violation of the rules. I have also commented on the talk page of the article (Talk:University of Bologna#Not the oldest university?), and strongly suggest you read my comment. - Tom | Thomas.W 18:59, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Block

You have been blocked from editing for 24 72 hours for violating the 3 revert rule and for personal attacks. Please be more careful in the future. I already warned you about not making personal attacks, so it's disappointing that you did so again anyway. Please do better. El_C 19:34, 27 April 2019 (UTC)


Misplaced Pages has prompted me that you've sent an email — however, I have not received it. At any rate, my preference is to discuss the block here, in the open. El_C 20:11, 27 April 2019 (UTC)


I have increased your block to 2 weeks for block evasion. El_C 20:19, 27 April 2019 (UTC)


I understand that I have violated wikipedia rules, but Thomas W. Is factually incorrect. This is the reason why people don't trust wikipedia. As long as you have the consensus of the ignorant then you are presumed correct on wikipedia. A simple google search would show that University of Bologna is not the oldest, you can even compare that false claim with encyclopedia Britannica. Can you check our discussion on University of Bologna talk page. He has bias, and I would even say racist views. He doesn't even know what madrasa even means. The contributor with an agenda often prevails. In theory, the intellectual sparring at the heart of Misplaced Pages's group editing process results in a consensus that removes unreliable contributions and edits. But often the contributor who “wins” is not the one with the soundest information, but rather the one with the strongest agenda. This is what is happening here right now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afg96 (talkcontribs)

Accusing someone of racist views is a serious personal attack, the third one you made today — you were warned and sanctioned for that already. That's just unacceptable, regardless if the facts are on your side. I've blocked you indefinitely until such time that you can demonstrate you can adhere to our rules of conduct. You did yourself and your position a dis-service by engaging in this and you have no one to blame but yourself. El_C 22:39, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Why was I blocked indefinitely? I merely expressed an opinion to you! There is a difference in the tone of the language and the figure of speech. You are acting tyrannical, you are given authority on Misplaced Pages yet you are abusing your power kind of like Stalin, Lenin, and Che who you seem to admire. I guess the apple doesn't fall far from the tree does it? I hope you are not hurt by that, and I hope I didn't hurt your feels. I'm sorry if I did. But seriously man, you just admitted that Misplaced Pages doesn't care about facts by stating "That's just unacceptable, regardless if the facts are on your side". So if that is the case why don't we just make up facts, you basically proving the point of many teachers and academics as to why Misplaced Pages shouldn't be trusted I guess they were right.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Afg (talkcontribs)

You were blocked indefinitely, as stated, because you continue to violate our no personal attacks policy over and over again; and for block evasion (one, two). That's all I have to say. I'm not going to respond to your invective and straw man further. El_C 01:10, 28 April 2019 (UTC)