Revision as of 09:23, 11 May 2006 editPatrickJ83 (talk | contribs)628 edits His tomb....← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:21, 23 November 2024 edit undoRandomstaplers (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,088 edits Add note about recent copyvio (cv-revdel) | ||
(972 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header|search=yes}} | |||
Can you please tell me why the quote was bogus? | |||
{{Article history | |||
|action1=GAN | |||
|action1date=19:10, 13 August 2006 | |||
|action1result=listed | |||
|action1oldid=69354079 | |||
|action2=PR | |||
|action2date=10:12, 17 August 2006 | |||
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Cyrus the Great/archive1 | |||
|action2result=Reviewed | |||
|action2oldid=69354079 | |||
|action3=FAC | |||
|action3date=16:30, 16 September 2006 | |||
|action3link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Cyrus the Great/archive1 | |||
|action3result=Failed | |||
|action3oldid=75863546 | |||
|action4=WAR | |||
|action4date=16:50, 26 September 2006 | |||
|action4link=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Cyrus the Great/archive1 | |||
|action4result=approved | |||
|action4oldid=77749459 | |||
|action5=FAC | |||
|action5date=20:17, 9 January 2007 | |||
|action5link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Cyrus the Great/archive2 | |||
|action5result=Failed | |||
|action5oldid=98661349 | |||
|action6=WAR | |||
|action6link=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Biography/A-class review/Cyrus the Great | |||
|action6date=4 May 2007 | |||
|action6result=failed | |||
|action6oldid=128014235 | |||
|action7=GAR | |||
|action7link=Talk:Cyrus the Great#GA Sweeps | |||
|action7date=7 June 2008 | |||
|action7result=delisted | |||
|action7oldid=217653931 | |||
|action8=WAR | |||
|action8date=05:01, 26 February 2009 | |||
|action8link=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Cyrus the Great | |||
|action8result=demoted | |||
|action8oldid=273250566 | |||
|currentstatus=DGA | |||
|topic=History | |||
|otd1date=2014-10-29|otd1oldid=631652103 | |||
|otd2date=2017-10-29|otd2oldid=807625984 | |||
|otd3date=2020-10-29|otd3oldid=985976671 | |||
|otd4date=2021-10-29|otd4oldid=1052468987 | |||
}} | |||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|collapsed=yes|vital=yes|living=n|listas=Cyrus The Great|1= | |||
{{WikiProject Biography|core=yes|military-work-group=y|military-priority=Top|royalty-work-group=y|royalty-priority=Top}} | |||
{{WikiProject Military history|A-Class=fail|Biography=y|Classical=y|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes}} | |||
{{WikiProject Ancient Near East|importance=top}} | |||
{{WikiProject Assyria|importance=high}} | |||
{{WikiProject Zoroastrianism|importance=low}} | |||
{{WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome|importance=Top}} | |||
{{WikiProject Iran|importance=Top}} | |||
{{WikiProject Bible|importance=Top}} | |||
{{WikiProject European history|importance=Low}} | |||
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=Top}} | |||
{{WikiProject Judaism|importance=Top}} | |||
{{WikiProject Jewish history|importance=Mid}} | |||
{{WikiProject Turkey|importance=Mid}} | |||
}} | |||
{{copied|from=Cyrus the Great|to=Wars of Cyrus the Great|diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Wars_of_Cyrus_the_Great&oldid=671137544}} | |||
{{annual readership|scale=log}} | |||
== Conflicting dates for Cyrus II's ascension of the throne and his father's death == | |||
:''This decree was discovered "at Achmetha ]"], in the palace that is in the province of the Medes" (Ezra 6:2).'' | |||
please note that: | |||
What does that mean? Where and when was the decree discovered? What does the Bible have to do with anything? Man, this Bible dictionary really sucks. ] 21:31 Feb 9, 2003 (UTC) | |||
''']''' | |||
* also known as Cyrus the Great | |||
* son of Cambyses I | |||
''']''' | |||
-- | |||
* also known as Atradates | |||
* father of Cyrus II | |||
===== Here's the root of the conflicting dates: ===== | |||
I just wanted to give props to whoever wrote this article - and, I assume, a lot of the near-east history articles - for doing stuff like digging up historical figures' real names, like Sharrukin and Koroush. Lord knows the Anglicized and Latinized versions are what people know these days, but having an idea of what these guys called *themselves* can only provide that much more of a connection to the past. | |||
excerpt from ]: "Cyrus the Great succeeded to the throne in 559 BC following his father's death" | |||
== Yes, but... == | |||
excerpt from ]: "...his original name was Atradates, and he was wounded and later died in the ] which he, with his son, fought against ]. It occurred in about 551 BC..." | |||
I too give "props" the inclusion of English transliterations of the Persian names in addition to the Latinized Hellenized forms that have come down to us, but I think it should be noted that the ancient Persians did not use the Arabo-Persian alphabet. All these names are given in the modern rendering, and though they are pretty close to how the Persians in question would have ''pronounced'' their own names, they do not reflect how they would have ''spelled'' them. If only we could get Pahlavi fonts to work here, we could include those spellings too. Which gives me another idea: how about a chart of Persian names in their Pahlavi, Arabo-Persian, Greek and Anglo-Latin forms, for comparison? | |||
--] 20:52, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
:Oops, I meant Perso-Arabic, of course ;) | |||
==== I cannot find any evidence that clears up these conflicting dates. In my mind, there are two outstanding questions: ==== | |||
== Another thing... == | |||
# when and in what manner did Cyrus II ascend the throne of the ]? | |||
# when did Cambyses I / Atradates die? | |||
==== After researching these topics as thoroughly as possible, my conclusions are: ==== | |||
The transliteration of Cyrus's name as given at the top of the article would be "Koroush Kabir." But "kabir" is an ] word. Wouldn't they have called him something else in pre-Arab times? Like "Koroush Bozorg?" Or did they use some form of "Kabir" via ]. --] 19:41, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
# Cyrus II ascended the throne of the ] in 559bce after his father, Cambyses I, abdicated. | |||
# Cambyses I / Atradates died at the ] in 551bce. | |||
'''Can anyone provide evidence to substantiate or refute these conclusions?''' | |||
== Not sure if this was an HW assignment or a suggestion for making the article better... == | |||
== What era style should this article use? == | |||
Just a question: who was Cyrus married to? I can't find anything about it! I know some of his daughters and his mother, but I cannot find ANYTHING about his wife! Please answer in the space below. | |||
Wife's name: | |||
How old she was when married Cyrus: | |||
Wife's native country: | |||
Wife's birth and death date: | |||
I noticed that it happened quite a few times that people changed the ] of this article from AD/BC to CE/BCE. Per ], I think this is something that should be discussed on the talk page. Although I am not at all familiar with this article (I am merely a pending changes reviewer), using the CE/BCE style seems appropriate to me because this article does not have much to do with Christianity. ―] (]) 21:47, 30 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
I removed the above from the top of the page. See the Article History for more info. | |||
:Yah, I agree with you. ]<sup>]</sup> 22:31, 30 April 2021 (UTC). | |||
--] 17:17, 12 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
::It's not about what religion is present, it's about the wiki MoS which says original style gets used. ] very first section says "retaining existing styles". Also, in this article 2 different styles were used. the MoS also says use the same style throughout. | |||
:"BC/AD" is not about Christianity so much as it is about long-established use by historians of the Western world. It's completely viable, and it is only in modern times that certain cranks got their ire up about it. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 08:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion == | |||
==Dates and numbers in this article== | |||
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: | |||
'''Misplaced Pages policy is clear on the use of ] in articles''': | |||
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2021-08-03T10:38:43.350563 | Cyrus the Great (Persian Drawing).jpg --> | |||
Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 10:38, 3 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Suggest image change == | |||
:''Both the BCE/CE era names and the BC/AD era names are acceptable, but be consistent within an article. Normally you should use plain numbers for years in the Common Era, but when events span the start of the Common Era, use AD or CE for the date at the end of the range (note that AD precedes the date and CE follows it). For example, ]–] or ]–]. | |||
I suggest that the existing image, which is a painting of a winged man from Wallis, be replaced with a photograph taken of the lithograph itself in Pasargad. ]<sup> ]</sup> 15:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
:I also suggest an image change, as it is likely that the figure depicted is inspired by an Assyrian Genius rather than meant to be an actual depiction of Cyrus. ] (]) 10:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
It is up to the author(s) of an article to determine the dating system to be used and there must be consistency with each article. In this case, for a non-Christian topic in a non-Christian region of the world, BCE/CE appears to make the most sense. ] 17:59, 2005 May 22 (UTC) | |||
== How did Cyrus get his name if he was originally named Agradates == | |||
::The authors of the article appeared quite happy with BC/AD until Slrubenstein's friends decided to implement his failed proposal - which is already quite divisive and causes enormous offence to many people worldwide. Why do you wish to perpetuate this silly offensive dispute? ] 18:09, 22 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
"Cyrus's father, Cambyses 1st, named him Cyrus after his grandfather, " KJV Isaiah 45 3,4 ---Here it states that God surnamed Cyrus. Verse 4--"I have surnamed thee" God only named 4 people in the scripitures (Cyrus, Issac, Solomon, Josiah-- KJV Companion Bible's sidebar concordance) Although a Persian Cyrus allowed the Temple walls and foundation laid by Nehimiah in Jerusalem. | |||
:::I don't know who you mean by "Slrubenstein's friends." Perhaps we could take a poll of authors of this article and other articles on Persia and other non-Christian regions of the world to see which dating system they prefer. ] 18:16, 2005 May 22 (UTC) | |||
::::Using AD for this guy makes about as much sense as putting his name in the anachronistic Arabic alphabet and using the Arabic "kabeer." But since we're doing that, we might as well be consistently whacked and us "AD" as well. --] 18:39, 22 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
KJV: Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego are figures from the biblical Book of Daniel, primarily chapter 3. In the narrative, the three Hebrew men are thrown into a fiery furnace by '''Nebuchadnezzar''' II, King of '''Babylon''' | |||
:::::I'm not sure I understand your logic here. Would "two wrongs don't make a right," perhaps apply? ] 19:04, 2005 May 22 (UTC) | |||
Cyrus conguered Babylon (as well as Media, Lydia) Cyrus = "possess thou the furnace" (Strongs Concordance, Hebrew dictionary) <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 13:24, 8 January 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
::::::Yes, it would. I guess what I mean to say is that the whole AD/CE issue is just one of the ''many'' problems with this article, which aren't being addressed. There's a lot more that needs to be changed than that. | |||
:I don't think the Bible is really a strong piece of evidence for anything relating to Achaemenid naming customs. ] (]) 17:45, 12 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
:The ] dates to the 2nd century BCE, about 4 centuries following Cyrus' death. The author makes veiled references to the military campaigns of ], but not to the king's death. Suggesting a composition date shortly prior to Antiochus' death in 164 BCE. Nothing in the book is historically reliable, and the fictional Daniel is possibly named after the legendary hero ]. Danel is also referenced in the ]. ] (]) 19:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Is the "Bachenheimer" source a forgery? == | |||
So far we have one author of this article (]), who has indicated his preferance for BCE/CE. Anyone else who has worked on this article care to weigh in? Meanwhile, I will revert to that. ] 06:43, 2005 May 23 (UTC) | |||
Came across a blog post, , which references this Misplaced Pages page and claims that the source cited as "Bachenheimer, Avi (2018). Old Persian: Dictionary, Glossary and Concordance. Wiley and Sons. pp. 1–799" is actually a forgery not published by Wiley. | |||
==Use of language== | |||
...these Arabo-Persian spellings aren't somehow more "authentic" than the Latinate names. Cyrus the Great didn't spell his name "Cyrus," but he didn't spell it کوروش either. Actually, he probably didn't spell anything at all -- he dictated to a bunch of scribes. | |||
At the beginning of the article, it should give Cyrus's Latinate name (which is what he is most commonly known by in English), followed by Old Persian cuneiform (when technically feasible), followed by a Latin-alphabet transliteration of the Old Persian with appropriate diacritics. ''Then'' we should give the Modern Persian and Greek spellings. The Arabo-Persian spellings of names other than Cyrus should be taken out and put in their respective articles. Yes, these people remain important to modern Iranians, and many of them were important in Greek literature as well, and we should include those spellings. But کمبوجیه etc. just clutter up this article. کمبوجیه belongs at the beginning of the ] article, and nowhere else. | |||
Seems to have been originally added in ]. | |||
:What you are saying makes sense to me but I'm way out of my league on Persia. You may want to get some others who regularly work on Persian topics to comment. On the other hand, it's a wiki, so you can go ahead with the approach you describe and see what others think. Be bold. If you describe what you are doing on the talk page, people who have concerns can comment. ] 21:25, 2005 May 22 (UTC) | |||
Should it be removed? | |||
== Cyrus to Do List == | |||
--- ] <small>(])</small> - 08:01, 13 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
*Clean up clutter (Beautiful Arabo-Persian letters that curve like a sexy womans' body, but still clutter) | |||
*<strike>Make the Rulers of Persia template more attractive and colorful (check out the ] template).</strike> Done, for this article and for immediate predecessor & successor. Repeat for other articles as neccessary. | |||
*Continue to use BCE dating and ''add dates of his reign in ancient dating systems where appropriate, if appropriate. Same if you think AH dates are appropriate, since he is still revered in modern Iran.'' | |||
*<strike>Definitely ''do not'' mention ] (we all love him, but he doesn't belong here).</strike> That was mostly intended as a joke - and maybe, just maybe - mention of him might belong here. How did his family come to adopt that surname? Was one of his ancestors a fan of Xenophon or Sir Thomas Browne, or perhaps an evangelical Christian who read about the King of Persia in his KJV? If anybody can dig the information up in a published source, they should feel free to put it here. --] 21:36, 22 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
::Wait, they should put it in the Billie Ray Cyrus article, and have it link here. Ok, ''why'' am I obsessing over this issue? Time to go do something productive - like mowing the lawn. | |||
:Looks like a good plan of action. I will help out with the clean-up. With respect to the reproduction of the Persian characters, I do think they look good. Take a look at ] for an example of the reproduction of letters of the native language pertinent to the article. Perhaps we could get other authors of articles on Persia (such as ] or ]) to comment. ] 16:27, 2005 May 23 (UTC) | |||
I went ahead and removed it. But perhaps something more global needs to be done about it. Not sure how many other pages it's been used on. --- ] <small>(])</small> - 08:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
I think it would be good to include a bit more biblical reference, namely the fact that Isaiah prophesied the coming of Cyrus to overthrow Babylon 100 years before Cyrus was born. Isaisah 45:1-4 "1)Thus saith the LORD to his anointed, to Cyrus, whose right hand I have holden, to subdue nations before him...2) I will go before thee...I will break in pieces the gates of brass...4)...I have even called thee by thy name: I have surnamed thee though thou hast not known me." Indeed, the Bible has a lot to do with it.... ] | |||
:@Good catch, see ] ] 11:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
==Continuing discussion on dates and numbers== | |||
Jguk has reverted again, with the edit summary "''rv - restore consistency (per policy) and use original authors style (as recommended as a last resort by policy''." I request that he specify what policy he is refering to. Please direct me to it in case I have overlooked something. ] 19:57, 2005 May 24 (UTC) | |||
== Phoenicia ? == | |||
:Jguk is clearly not respecting the views of Jpbrenna who is a major contributor to this article and refuses to discuss this on the talk page appropriately, instead choosing to revert to what he prefers (and he is not a contributor). ] 16:18, 25 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
In the section on the Lydian revolt, it says that Harpagus captured "Lycia, Cilicia and Phoenicia" and then continues by saying "using the technique of building earthworks to breach the walls of besieged cities, a method unknown to the <u>Greeks</u>." Now Lycia checks out, but Cilicia and Phoenicia is what bothers me. With Cilicia it’s plausible there were maybe some greeks (?), but I’m very familiar with Herodotus’ account and I know that at least he does not mention Cilicia as being part of the revolt. Plus Cilicia was, if I remember correctly, already a part of the Median Empire so its most likely not filled with Greek city-states Harpagus would have been fighting there. | |||
== Achaemenid To Do/Policy == | |||
] - Comments? | |||
--] 21:49, 25 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
As to <u>Phoenicia</u>, that’s just impossible, Cyrus hadn’t even conquered Babylon and all its vassals yet. And moreover I thought Harpagus was fighting Greek city-states (the Lydian revolt having already been put down) so while Cilicia is already a bit far off, Phoenicia, in addition to not even being "properly" Persian yet, is completely away from the original region he was fighting in. Moreover the phrase doesn’t even work because according to my understanding the Cilicians (again I could be wrong about this) are not Greek, nor are the Phonenicians; so either way the phrase needs to be reformulated. | |||
== Please think of our readers == | |||
Anyway the paragraph is unsourced so I don’t know if what I’m saying is totally wrong and I just don’t have the proper source material, but this phrase just seems a bit unrealistic. ] (]) 19:09, 5 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
Please think of our readers - we have a worldwide audience from lots of different backgrounds, not just a US academic one. Our readers should always come first. The article was already in the style that is preferred and most used worldwide (and by a very very large margin at that). We don't all come from a US academic background - we all want to be able to understand and like reading articles without having to submit to neologisms and changes for changes sake, ] 06:22, 26 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
:Anyways I just want to make sure I’m not missing out on anything here. I will be replacing Cilicia and Phoenicia with maybe Lycia, Aeolia and Caria. Now again my Only, and I mean Only source here is Herodotus so I’ll be using him as reference. ] (]) 19:25, 5 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
:It seems you think you know best what our readers need to read. As I've mentioned to you before, but you don't get it: This is an encyclopedia. It is all about learning. Some people may actually become more conscious of things like dating conventions and how they relate to cultural imperialism. You can go on with your bloody crusade as far as I'm concerned. I wish you well. May you find peace. ] 07:43, 2005 May 26 (UTC) | |||
== Removed for the lead summary, possibly more detailed and/or better sourced than the same content in the article body, can be used there == | |||
Please do not use such emotional words as "crusade". Such language is clearly inappropriate here. | |||
:I try to chose my words carefully. This one seemed apt, given the behavior. I'm sorry if the truth is upsetting to you. ] 07:00, 2005 May 27 (UTC) | |||
In the 1970s, ], the last ], identified Cyrus' inscriptions on the ] as the oldest-known declaration of human rights,<ref name="MacGregor">Neil MacGregor, "The whole world in our hands", in ''Art and Cultural Heritage: Law, Policy, and Practice'', pp. 383–84, ed. Barbara T. Hoffman. Cambridge University Press, 2006. {{ISBN|0-521-85764-3}}</ref> and the Cylinder has since been popularized as such.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.britishmuseum.org/about_us/news_and_press/press_releases/2012/cyrus_cylinder_travels_to_us.aspx |title=The Cyrus Cylinder travels to the US |publisher=British Museum |year=2012 |access-date=21 September 2013 |archive-date=22 September 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130922205417/http://www.britishmuseum.org/about_us/news_and_press/press_releases/2012/cyrus_cylinder_travels_to_us.aspx |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Associated Press">{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/sep/10/cyrus-cylinder-returns-iran |title=Cyrus cylinder, world's oldest human rights charter, returns to Iran on loan |agency=Associated Press |newspaper=The Guardian |date=10 September 2010 |access-date=21 September 2013 |archive-date=9 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190609144703/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/sep/10/cyrus-cylinder-returns-iran |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="kqed.org">{{cite news |url=http://www.kqed.org/arts/visualarts/article.jsp?essid=124632 |title=Oldest Known Charter of Human Rights Comes to San Francisco |date=13 August 2013 |access-date=21 September 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130922152858/http://www.kqed.org/arts/visualarts/article.jsp?essid=124632 |archive-date=22 September 2013 |url-status=dead }}</ref> However, this view has also been criticized by some Western historians as a misunderstanding of the Cylinder's generic nature as a traditional statement that ancient monarchs made at the beginning of their reign.<ref name="Daniel">{{cite book |ref=Daniel |last=Daniel |first=Elton L. |title=The History of Iran |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group |location=Westport, CT |year=2000 |isbn=0-313-30731-8}}</ref><ref name="Associated Press"/><ref name="kqed.org"/><ref name="Arnold">{{cite book |ref=Arnold |author1=Arnold, Bill T. |author2=Michalowski, Piotr |editor=Chavelas, Mark W. |chapter=Achaemenid Period Historical Texts Concerning Mesopotamia |title=The Ancient Near East: Historical Sources in Translation |publisher=Blackwell |location=London |year=2006 |isbn=0-631-23581-7}}</ref><ref name="Mitchell">{{cite book |ref=Mitchell |last=Mitchell |first=T.C. |title=Biblical Archaeology: Documents from the British Museum |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=London |year=1988 |isbn=0-521-36867-7}}</ref> ] (]) 05:22, 2 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
Readers come to learn an encylopaedia to learn about what they want to know. And we should provide text to them that they find easy to read (from a stylistic point of view). Writing in a style that suits US academics is just not appropriate - almost all of our readers are not US academics. We should write in a style that suits them. It is not by chance that Encarta, Britannica, www.historychannel.com, www.discoverychannel.com, and others choose BC/AD. It is because they recognise that that is the style the world uses nowadays (and by an overwhelming advantage at that). Since you and I have come to agreement that we should put our readers first, I am surprised that you continue to preach invective rather than address quite what it is that our readers expect. Kind regards, ] 19:51, 26 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
:Brittanica is using BCE now ;)--] 00:00, 27 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
::And the History Channel are American. What do those Yanks know about Ye Queene's Propeur English? --His Grace John Bull, <small> CMG, GCB &c.</small>...ok, ok, it was really --] 00:00, 27 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
{{reflist-talk}} | |||
== Cyrus Cylinder == | |||
== Let's make this puppy a good article! == | |||
:''He is perhaps best known for having declared the first ever charter of human rights (the ])'' | |||
For the following reasons: | |||
#The Cyrus Cylinder is not a "]". | |||
#The Cyrus Cylinder has nothing to do with ]. | |||
#In no way is Cyrus the Great "best known" for issuing it. | |||
--] 22:29, 4 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
Lets do this? ] (]) 03:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
As far as I can say - and my view is confirmed by a really remarkable part of people and historians - the declaration of Babylon contains a really amazing amount of ideas which represent thoughts and values protected by a modern understanding of "human rights": e. g. Cyrus condemns slavery (throughout the world!), regards the freedom of religion and the freedom of choice of profession as elementar rights of individuals, he strictly fights the violation of rights etc. The modern ideas of "human rights" are rather seen on the base of some occidental philosophical and social developments. However, this is not contradictory to the fact that similar ideas and values were expressed, realized and even translated into policy by some other, ancient cultures with different philosophical and religious origins and experience. Regarding the question wether the word "charter" is used correctly it would be of value to emphasize that the other, perhaps more adequate term often used in order to depict this document is "declaration". Furthermore, here Cyrus identifies himself as the "King of Iran" (and not "King of Persia" which would correspond to the Greek term used for that country). (195.93.60.145) | |||
== Image changes == | |||
*The text is available . In no way is that a "Charter of Human Rights". It is the decree of an absolute monarch who is saying "I am great, I am just, etc." A standard declaration that would be issued after a great victory. It doesn't "condem slavery throughout the world!" or say anything about the "elementary rights of individuals". Such concepts would have been alien to this time.--] 03:31, 5 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
@] welcome to Misplaced Pages! Generally, on major article you want to discuss changes like swapping out the images used on the talk page first, to establish consensus for the changes. ]] 13:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
*Also, it doesn't say "King of Iran".--] 19:19, 5 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
:Hi. I am sorry, but exactly discussion for what? for adding a picture, any user should discuss with who ? why ? ] (]) 14:01, 17 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
::generally, if you're changing or adding a picture you should explain why, is all. sorry if i've been unclear! ]] 14:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::OK. I get the picture from academic book. i introduce the source in wiki commons. This picture is from french painter which i introduce it in article page. have you another question ? ] (]) 14:17, 17 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Winged figure at Pasargadae and Cyrus == | |||
I have seen many topics suggest an image change. I also support an image change and I want to add that although the caption says that the winged figure at Pasargadae is Cyrus, this is hardly a consensus. Sekunda: | |||
"If the figure represents a mortal, then it should represent Cyrus himself. Such an interpretation seems to be ruled out by the fact that the figure is winged, which can hardly be a mortal attribute. An inscription is known to have once stood above the winged figure in Gate R and is recorded in early drawings of the relief, for example in the Ker Porter engraving reproduced here (Fig. 22.10). It runs “I, Cyrus the King, an Achaemenid”. Below the two lines of Old Persian (at the top) the inscription is repeated in one line of Elamite and then in one line of Babylonian. It was once held that the figure must represent Cyrus because he is labelled with this inscription. It has since been pointed out, however, that the inscription is not unique, either to this doorway or to this particular figure. Two other examples of the same inscription still survive engraved on stone antae at Pasargadae, and two further examples of this same inscription (CMa in Kent’s categorization) are known to have once flanked the south-west portico of Palace S. These inscriptions are now known to have been retrospectively inscribed by Darius at a later date (Stronach 1990). They did not label anything. As far as one can tell they were inscribed on undecorated architectural members and are to be considered “building inscriptions” in the tradition of Mesopotamian building inscriptions of this type. Thus, although the inscription is in the first person, the inscription is to be understood as meaning “I, Cyrus the King, an Achaemenid (built this)”. They can be compared to the trilingual inscription DSc, which runs “I, Darius the Great King, King of Kings, King of countries, son of Hystaspes, an Achaemenid” and is preserved in two examples each written on the base of a column. Consequently the inscription cannot be used to support the argument that the winged figure is a portrait of Cyrus himself." https://www.google.ca/books/edition/The_World_of_Achaemenid_Persia/DmGJDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=pasargadae%20hmhm&pg=PA268&printsec=frontcover | |||
* Cyrus the Great has been regarded and respected as a symbol of tolerance throughout history and cultures (even by the Bible and the Old Greeks (see e. g. Herodot)). In this document, he defines visions of individual rights which should not be violated by anyone and he declares that he will defend such rights against violators: rights such as freedom of religion, freedom of profession, prevention and prohibition of slavery: | |||
"I prevent unpaid, forced labor. Today, I announce that everyone is free to choose a religion. People are free to live in all regions and take up a job provided that they never violate other's rights... I prevent slavery and my governors and subordinates are obliged to prohibit exchanging men and women as slaves within their own ruling domains. Such a traditions should be exterminated the world over. " Of course, he did declare a clear opposition to slavery "the world over". Self-evidently, the terminology used in ancient iranian times was not exactly the same as today regarding modern philosophical developments. But the values defined, expressed and defended here (more than 2544 years ago) by a king who would have been able to act in another way (but did not) are the same. | |||
Furthermore, Cyrus defines himself as the King of "Iran" and not as the King of "Persia" which is a term used in Old Greece and consequently in European languages: | |||
" Now that I put the crown of kingdom of Iran ... Until I am the king of Iran" etc. | |||
For this reason we should decide on a new image and in the meantime change the caption to reflect that this may not be Cyrus. ] (]) 00:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
See for example the precise translation by '''The Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies at The School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) - University of London''' which is the only higher education institution in the UK specialising in the study of Asia and Africa: link: | |||
To add: | |||
http://www.cais-soas.com/CAIS/History/hakhamaneshian/Cyrus-the-great/cyrus_cylinder.htm | |||
"Yet as most scholars have long since acknowledged, the figure in the relief lacks all Achaemenid kingly attributes, including a scepter or a bow, a long beard, a lotus held in one hand, a royal tiara, or a Persian robe. In addition, it possesses wings, a strictly superhuman attribute. Also, at whatever exact date the trilingual Old Persian, Elamite, and Akkadian CMa inscription was carved above the winged figure (fig. 11), this specific copy was never intended to refer specifically to the figure beneath it. As Nylander has pointed out, the rules of symmetry in Achaemenid art would have dictated that this same inscription was carved in eight separate locations within Gate R, eight further locations in Palace S and in at least two locations in Palace P. In all these circumstances it is close to impossible to suppose that the four-winged figure was ever meant to represent a formal portrait of Cyrus." | |||
Signed: 195.93.60.74 | |||
https://www.jstor.org/stable/43896116 pg. 9 | |||
*I question the accuracy of that website. See my comments at ]. The bit at the end (with the "I abolish slavery", and "I will impose my monarchy on no nation" language) seems remarkable intact, compared to the other sections which have gaps (corresponding to places where the clay has chipped off. Other translations on other websites don't contain this last part. I would like to see a translation from a more reputable source. On the face of it, it seems dubious. Of course slavery was part of the Persian Empire, and of course the Empire was based on conquest. The modern concept of "human rights" would have been completely alien to people at this time. --] 19:27, 22 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
] (]) 03:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
I disagree. The author claims that the Persian word for sun is ''khour'' which is incorrect. The word for sun is آفتاب | |||
== towered boats or towed boats? == | |||
"building bridges and towered war boats along his side of the river". Did he really build towered boats? Could one of the following readings be intended? | |||
:: What are you saying? Slavery in Persian Empire? As Cyrus the Great said in his cylinder, he mentioned that i payed all those who worked for me. That was what separated Persians and Greeks. And Cyrus cylinder was the first inscription of human rights. 2500 years ago someone wrote an inscription like this. It's not supposed to be like the human rights of these days. (] 23:18, 13 March 2006 (UTC)) | |||
"building bridges, towers, and war boats along his side of the river" | |||
::: As it is mentioned here: I prevent unpaid, forced labor. READ please. (] 23:22, 13 March 2006 (UTC)) | |||
"building bridges and towing war boats along his side of the river" | |||
== Why did you guys erase the Persian writing of Cyrus' name? == | |||
Since bridges aren't built "alongside of" rivers, the third reading seems the most plausible. | |||
I think it's very important to add Persian spelling of Cyrus the Great, since he's is Persian. Thank You. (] 23:26, 13 March 2006 (UTC)) | |||
If the "towered boat" reading is correct, this rewrite would forestall confusion: | |||
"building bridges and war boats with towers" ] (]) 12:05, 7 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Bozorg not Kabir == | |||
== Copyright problem removed == | |||
the persian word for great is '''Bozorg''' and not '''Kabir''' | |||
] Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Cyrus-the-Great?anchor=ref91538. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, {{Em|unless}} it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see ] if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or ] if you are.) | |||
kabir is an Arabic word. | |||
For ], we cannot accept ] text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of {{Em|information}}, and, if allowed under ], may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and ] properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original {{Em|or}} ] from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our ] for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations '''very seriously''', and persistent violators '''will''' be ] from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. <!-- Template:Cclean --> ⸺(])] 05:21, 23 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
] 10:38, 24 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
:: There is no doubt that Kabir is an Arabic word. But it is also a word in Farsi. Persian in English language means Farsi and not Parsi (old Persian). Korosh-e Kabir is the most common used name of Cyrus the Great in Persian (Farsi). {{unsigned|66.36.157.210}} | |||
:I put Kabir there, I was not sure whether its Arabic or not but Kabir the highest of Persian titles given to a ruler, given only to the best and certainly not given to any Arab rulers of Iran so its up to you if you wanna change it or not --]<sup>] | </sup> 10:38, 27 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
::: Kabir or Bozorg in this sense are used interchangibly. The fact that Kabir is originated from Arabic makes Kabir a bit more formal. Like you do not use Kabir to describe a thing but you would for a king but you use Bozorg for a king and for a thing. Arabic to Persian is like Latin or French to English. In fact the only text I have read with little or almost no Arabic word in Persian is ] and I am impressed how ] could do it. If you try to use pure Persian words only, say in the Iranian capital, Tehran, you could hardly be understood in a day-to-day conversation. Also remember once I tried to read one of very Persianized book of Nashre-Daneshgaahi on Physics. I could hardly understood the text without the help English glossary at the end of the book. They had used "Kheft" for "Toul" (Length in English) and "Behanjaaresh" for "Normal Kardan" (Normaliztion in English)! Mind you, some of those efforts have been good and successfull. Sometimes, I envy Americans for not being have to care too much about purity of their language and they use whatever comes into their language. ] 01:05, 3 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
== His tomb.... == | |||
Dumb question.... | |||
Is his tomb now empty? When was it emptied out? And what happened to his body? ] 09:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:21, 23 November 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cyrus the Great article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
Cyrus the Great was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from Cyrus the Great was copied or moved into Wars of Cyrus the Great with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Conflicting dates for Cyrus II's ascension of the throne and his father's death
please note that:
- also known as Cyrus the Great
- son of Cambyses I
- also known as Atradates
- father of Cyrus II
Here's the root of the conflicting dates:
excerpt from Cyrus the Great: "Cyrus the Great succeeded to the throne in 559 BC following his father's death"
excerpt from Cambyses I: "...his original name was Atradates, and he was wounded and later died in the Battle of the Persian Border which he, with his son, fought against Astyages. It occurred in about 551 BC..."
I cannot find any evidence that clears up these conflicting dates. In my mind, there are two outstanding questions:
- when and in what manner did Cyrus II ascend the throne of the Achaemenid Kingdom?
- when did Cambyses I / Atradates die?
After researching these topics as thoroughly as possible, my conclusions are:
- Cyrus II ascended the throne of the Achaemenid Kingdom in 559bce after his father, Cambyses I, abdicated.
- Cambyses I / Atradates died at the Battle of the Persian Border in 551bce.
Can anyone provide evidence to substantiate or refute these conclusions?
What era style should this article use?
I noticed that it happened quite a few times that people changed the era style of this article from AD/BC to CE/BCE. Per MOS:STYLERET, I think this is something that should be discussed on the talk page. Although I am not at all familiar with this article (I am merely a pending changes reviewer), using the CE/BCE style seems appropriate to me because this article does not have much to do with Christianity. ―JochemvanHees (talk) 21:47, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Yah, I agree with you. History of Asia 22:31, 30 April 2021 (UTC).
- It's not about what religion is present, it's about the wiki MoS which says original style gets used. Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style very first section says "retaining existing styles". Also, in this article 2 different styles were used. the MoS also says use the same style throughout.
- "BC/AD" is not about Christianity so much as it is about long-established use by historians of the Western world. It's completely viable, and it is only in modern times that certain cranks got their ire up about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.44.55 (talk) 08:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:38, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Suggest image change
I suggest that the existing image, which is a painting of a winged man from Wallis, be replaced with a photograph taken of the lithograph itself in Pasargad. Sardar 15:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- I also suggest an image change, as it is likely that the figure depicted is inspired by an Assyrian Genius rather than meant to be an actual depiction of Cyrus. CramYourTram (talk) 10:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
How did Cyrus get his name if he was originally named Agradates
"Cyrus's father, Cambyses 1st, named him Cyrus after his grandfather, " KJV Isaiah 45 3,4 ---Here it states that God surnamed Cyrus. Verse 4--"I have surnamed thee" God only named 4 people in the scripitures (Cyrus, Issac, Solomon, Josiah-- KJV Companion Bible's sidebar concordance) Although a Persian Cyrus allowed the Temple walls and foundation laid by Nehimiah in Jerusalem.
KJV: Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego are figures from the biblical Book of Daniel, primarily chapter 3. In the narrative, the three Hebrew men are thrown into a fiery furnace by Nebuchadnezzar II, King of Babylon Cyrus conguered Babylon (as well as Media, Lydia) Cyrus = "possess thou the furnace" (Strongs Concordance, Hebrew dictionary) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.134.101.41 (talk) 13:24, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think the Bible is really a strong piece of evidence for anything relating to Achaemenid naming customs. Ichthyovenator (talk) 17:45, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- The Book of Daniel dates to the 2nd century BCE, about 4 centuries following Cyrus' death. The author makes veiled references to the military campaigns of Antiochus IV Epiphanes, but not to the king's death. Suggesting a composition date shortly prior to Antiochus' death in 164 BCE. Nothing in the book is historically reliable, and the fictional Daniel is possibly named after the legendary hero Danel. Danel is also referenced in the Book of Ezekiel. Dimadick (talk) 19:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Is the "Bachenheimer" source a forgery?
Came across a blog post, A New Old Persian Forgery, which references this Misplaced Pages page and claims that the source cited as "Bachenheimer, Avi (2018). Old Persian: Dictionary, Glossary and Concordance. Wiley and Sons. pp. 1–799" is actually a forgery not published by Wiley.
Seems to have been originally added in this edit.
Should it be removed?
--- Wikitiki89 (talk) - 08:01, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
I went ahead and removed it. But perhaps something more global needs to be done about it. Not sure how many other pages it's been used on. --- Wikitiki89 (talk) - 08:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Good catch, see Doug Weller talk 11:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Phoenicia ?
In the section on the Lydian revolt, it says that Harpagus captured "Lycia, Cilicia and Phoenicia" and then continues by saying "using the technique of building earthworks to breach the walls of besieged cities, a method unknown to the Greeks." Now Lycia checks out, but Cilicia and Phoenicia is what bothers me. With Cilicia it’s plausible there were maybe some greeks (?), but I’m very familiar with Herodotus’ account and I know that at least he does not mention Cilicia as being part of the revolt. Plus Cilicia was, if I remember correctly, already a part of the Median Empire so its most likely not filled with Greek city-states Harpagus would have been fighting there.
As to Phoenicia, that’s just impossible, Cyrus hadn’t even conquered Babylon and all its vassals yet. And moreover I thought Harpagus was fighting Greek city-states (the Lydian revolt having already been put down) so while Cilicia is already a bit far off, Phoenicia, in addition to not even being "properly" Persian yet, is completely away from the original region he was fighting in. Moreover the phrase doesn’t even work because according to my understanding the Cilicians (again I could be wrong about this) are not Greek, nor are the Phonenicians; so either way the phrase needs to be reformulated.
Anyway the paragraph is unsourced so I don’t know if what I’m saying is totally wrong and I just don’t have the proper source material, but this phrase just seems a bit unrealistic. Reman Empire (talk) 19:09, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
- Anyways I just want to make sure I’m not missing out on anything here. I will be replacing Cilicia and Phoenicia with maybe Lycia, Aeolia and Caria. Now again my Only, and I mean Only source here is Herodotus so I’ll be using him as reference. Reman Empire (talk) 19:25, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Removed for the lead summary, possibly more detailed and/or better sourced than the same content in the article body, can be used there
In the 1970s, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the last Shah of Iran, identified Cyrus' inscriptions on the Cyrus Cylinder as the oldest-known declaration of human rights, and the Cylinder has since been popularized as such. However, this view has also been criticized by some Western historians as a misunderstanding of the Cylinder's generic nature as a traditional statement that ancient monarchs made at the beginning of their reign. 5.173.54.81 (talk) 05:22, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
References
- Neil MacGregor, "The whole world in our hands", in Art and Cultural Heritage: Law, Policy, and Practice, pp. 383–84, ed. Barbara T. Hoffman. Cambridge University Press, 2006. ISBN 0-521-85764-3
- "The Cyrus Cylinder travels to the US". British Museum. 2012. Archived from the original on 22 September 2013. Retrieved 21 September 2013.
- ^ "Cyrus cylinder, world's oldest human rights charter, returns to Iran on loan". The Guardian. Associated Press. 10 September 2010. Archived from the original on 9 June 2019. Retrieved 21 September 2013.
- ^ "Oldest Known Charter of Human Rights Comes to San Francisco". 13 August 2013. Archived from the original on 22 September 2013. Retrieved 21 September 2013.
- Daniel, Elton L. (2000). The History of Iran. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 0-313-30731-8.
- Arnold, Bill T.; Michalowski, Piotr (2006). "Achaemenid Period Historical Texts Concerning Mesopotamia". In Chavelas, Mark W. (ed.). The Ancient Near East: Historical Sources in Translation. London: Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-23581-7.
- Mitchell, T.C. (1988). Biblical Archaeology: Documents from the British Museum. London: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-36867-7.
Let's make this puppy a good article!
Lets do this? Arotparaarms (talk) 03:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Image changes
@Onusread welcome to Misplaced Pages! Generally, on major article you want to discuss changes like swapping out the images used on the talk page first, to establish consensus for the changes. Remsense诉 13:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi. I am sorry, but exactly discussion for what? for adding a picture, any user should discuss with who ? why ? Onusread (talk) 14:01, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- generally, if you're changing or adding a picture you should explain why, is all. sorry if i've been unclear! Remsense诉 14:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- OK. I get the picture from academic book. i introduce the source in wiki commons. This picture is from french painter which i introduce it in article page. have you another question ? Onusread (talk) 14:17, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- generally, if you're changing or adding a picture you should explain why, is all. sorry if i've been unclear! Remsense诉 14:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Winged figure at Pasargadae and Cyrus
I have seen many topics suggest an image change. I also support an image change and I want to add that although the caption says that the winged figure at Pasargadae is Cyrus, this is hardly a consensus. Sekunda:
"If the figure represents a mortal, then it should represent Cyrus himself. Such an interpretation seems to be ruled out by the fact that the figure is winged, which can hardly be a mortal attribute. An inscription is known to have once stood above the winged figure in Gate R and is recorded in early drawings of the relief, for example in the Ker Porter engraving reproduced here (Fig. 22.10). It runs “I, Cyrus the King, an Achaemenid”. Below the two lines of Old Persian (at the top) the inscription is repeated in one line of Elamite and then in one line of Babylonian. It was once held that the figure must represent Cyrus because he is labelled with this inscription. It has since been pointed out, however, that the inscription is not unique, either to this doorway or to this particular figure. Two other examples of the same inscription still survive engraved on stone antae at Pasargadae, and two further examples of this same inscription (CMa in Kent’s categorization) are known to have once flanked the south-west portico of Palace S. These inscriptions are now known to have been retrospectively inscribed by Darius at a later date (Stronach 1990). They did not label anything. As far as one can tell they were inscribed on undecorated architectural members and are to be considered “building inscriptions” in the tradition of Mesopotamian building inscriptions of this type. Thus, although the inscription is in the first person, the inscription is to be understood as meaning “I, Cyrus the King, an Achaemenid (built this)”. They can be compared to the trilingual inscription DSc, which runs “I, Darius the Great King, King of Kings, King of countries, son of Hystaspes, an Achaemenid” and is preserved in two examples each written on the base of a column. Consequently the inscription cannot be used to support the argument that the winged figure is a portrait of Cyrus himself." https://www.google.ca/books/edition/The_World_of_Achaemenid_Persia/DmGJDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=pasargadae%20hmhm&pg=PA268&printsec=frontcover
For this reason we should decide on a new image and in the meantime change the caption to reflect that this may not be Cyrus. Pogenplain (talk) 00:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
To add:
"Yet as most scholars have long since acknowledged, the figure in the relief lacks all Achaemenid kingly attributes, including a scepter or a bow, a long beard, a lotus held in one hand, a royal tiara, or a Persian robe. In addition, it possesses wings, a strictly superhuman attribute. Also, at whatever exact date the trilingual Old Persian, Elamite, and Akkadian CMa inscription was carved above the winged figure (fig. 11), this specific copy was never intended to refer specifically to the figure beneath it. As Nylander has pointed out, the rules of symmetry in Achaemenid art would have dictated that this same inscription was carved in eight separate locations within Gate R, eight further locations in Palace S and in at least two locations in Palace P. In all these circumstances it is close to impossible to suppose that the four-winged figure was ever meant to represent a formal portrait of Cyrus."
https://www.jstor.org/stable/43896116 pg. 9
Pogenplain (talk) 03:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
towered boats or towed boats?
"building bridges and towered war boats along his side of the river". Did he really build towered boats? Could one of the following readings be intended?
"building bridges, towers, and war boats along his side of the river"
"building bridges and towing war boats along his side of the river"
Since bridges aren't built "alongside of" rivers, the third reading seems the most plausible. If the "towered boat" reading is correct, this rewrite would forestall confusion:
"building bridges and war boats with towers" Mdmi (talk) 12:05, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Cyrus-the-Great?anchor=ref91538. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. ⸺(Random)staplers 05:21, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Categories:- Delisted good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- B-Class level-3 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-3 vital articles in People
- B-Class vital articles in People
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (military) articles
- Top-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- B-Class biography (royalty) articles
- Top-importance biography (royalty) articles
- Royalty work group articles
- B-Class biography (core) articles
- Core biography articles
- Top-importance biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class biography (military) articles
- C-Class Classical warfare articles
- Classical warfare task force articles
- Failed requests for military history A-Class review
- B-Class Ancient Near East articles
- Top-importance Ancient Near East articles
- Ancient Near East articles by assessment
- B-Class Assyrian articles
- High-importance Assyrian articles
- WikiProject Assyria articles
- B-Class Zoroastrianism articles
- Low-importance Zoroastrianism articles
- WikiProject Zoroastrianism articles
- B-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- Top-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
- B-Class Iran articles
- Top-importance Iran articles
- WikiProject Iran articles
- B-Class Bible articles
- Top-importance Bible articles
- WikiProject Bible articles
- B-Class European history articles
- Low-importance European history articles
- All WikiProject European history pages
- B-Class Religion articles
- Top-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- B-Class Judaism articles
- Top-importance Judaism articles
- B-Class Jewish history-related articles
- Mid-importance Jewish history-related articles
- WikiProject Jewish history articles
- B-Class Turkey articles
- Mid-importance Turkey articles
- All WikiProject Turkey pages