| Revision as of 16:35, 28 December 2012 editMor2 (talk | contribs)1,226 edits →ARBPIA notice← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:31, 22 December 2016 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,139,578 edits →Extended confirmed protection policy RfC: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
| (428 intermediate revisions by 84 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ] Thank you for ]. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: | |||
| : ] ''']''' | |||
| : <big><big><big><font color="orange">'''5'''</font></big></big></big><!----> ''']''' | |||
| : ] ''']''' | |||
| : ] ''']''' | |||
| : ] ''']''' | |||
| : ] ''']''' | |||
| : ] ''']''' | |||
| : ] ''''']''''' | |||
| ==Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction== | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! | |||
| ⚫ | {{Ivmbox | ||
| |2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg | |||
| |imagesize=50px | |||
| |1=The following sanction now applies to you: | |||
| {{Talkquote|1=You are indefinitely banned from the topic of the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed.}} | |||
| If you want your edits to stick it would be a good idea to read through some of the links above. Importantly always provide a reference for anything you add that may be subject to challenge. Also if editing in controversial subjects such as the Israel/Palestine conflict it might be worthwhile to make one edit at a time, then non-controversial edits will not be undone, while more controversial ones can be discussed further on the talk page. Another important thing to remember is not to ]: In topics related to the Israel/Palestine conflict, you are only allowed to make one ] per article in 24 hours after that you should go to the article's talk page. Unfortunately even if you have good intentions, if you do not stick to the rules you will find that you won't be editing in the topic area for very long. ] (]) 14:57, 15 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to . | |||
| ==Request for comment== | |||
| This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an ] under the authority of the ]'s decision at ] and, if applicable, the procedure described at ]. This sanction has been recorded in the ]. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the ] to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be ] for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions. | |||
| You are receiving this message because you have submitted at least one edit to the ] article during the past thirty days. Your attention is called to ]. Sincerely, ] (]) | |||
| You may appeal this sanction using the process described ]. I recommend that you use the ] if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction.--> ''']''' ~ (]) 20:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion== | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] ] 01:48, 4 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == December 2012 == | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of ], such as the one you made to ], because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks, <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->] (]) 01:01, 27 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I removed racist soapboxing from the talk page, please do not re-add racist soapboxing to the page for obvious reasons. ] (]) 01:05, 27 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Your edit == | |||
| has reverted several edits, including with meaningless edit summary 'anti-resistance propaganda'. | |||
| I'm reverting this change. Maybe splitting your change into more manageable and organized smaller edits could help. Generally a removal of a ] ] content should be discussed. Please take it to the article talk page, if you wish to reinstate your edit or part of it and also read ]. ] (]) 08:30, 28 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Do hypocrites realize their hypocrisy? Do not make wide scale reverts due to your laziness, making your changes "into more manageable and organized smaller edits could help". I am happy to see the part you objected and you re-added was removed by another editor for the same reason I removed it. I will be undoing the collateral damage which you wreaked upon the article. Unless you can explain why the other editor and I have removed your addition I do not see further discussions with you on any matter to ever be fruitful. ] (]) 14:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == ARBPIA notice == | |||
| ⚫ | {{Ivmbox | ||
| | image = yes | |||
| | The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page. | |||
| Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> | |||
| | valign = center | |||
| | ] | |||
| }} | }} | ||
| == Extended confirmed protection policy RfC == | |||
| Operation Pillar of Defense is on a 1RR restriction which you just broke, please self revert ] (]) 14:48, 28 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I have heard of no arguments in favour of the previous version, one which I find to be blatantly bias, falsely sourced, and distortive of reality - in other words, unacceptable and far inferior to the current version. Any rule which burdens me to make an edit to the detriment of the article's quality is a rule I will always ignore per ], which my edit clearly does fall under. ] (]) 15:48, 28 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a ] ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ ]<sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">]</sup> <small>(sent by ] (]) 16:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC))</small> | |||
| * Sepsis II, I see that you blanked my request ("revert" section) and continued with reverting several sources again . Even though I just noted that one of them was subject of discussion, another my edit which you provided no reason to revert and third reinstated removal of content by a sockpupet. Note that I have no objection(or at least opinion) on part of the edit(I even pointed out an edit by the sock, that didn't removed a long standing sourced matrials). However, I find your cumulative reverts, none informational edit summaries, ignoring discussion or attempts to resolve this with you, just bluntly reverting a section that was already a subject of editing waring in the last week, disruptive. Please self revert. After that you can make each edits with the appropriate summary(or better yet lets talk).--] (]) 16:35, 28 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:BU Rob13@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:BU_Rob13/MMS-Sandbox&oldid=756193177 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 16:31, 22 December 2016
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
The following sanction now applies to you:
You are indefinitely banned from the topic of the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed.
You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 20:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection policy RfC
You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob13 (sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC))