Misplaced Pages

Template talk:Arguments: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:23, 5 January 2013 editUnscintillating (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,833 edits document for talk page readers that material was removed and restored← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:24, 3 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
⚫ I have restored the link the ], because I feel that essay is a legitimate viewpoint shared by a large proportion of the community. ] ] 23:03, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
{{archive-top|status=consensus by withdrawal of objection|result=The one objector has withdrawn from the discussion.  ] (]) 11:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)}}

⚫ I have restored the link the ], because I feel that essay is a legitimate viewpoint shared by a large proportion of the community. ] <sub>]</sub> 23:03, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
:(1)&nbsp;As the creator of the essay, Reyk is not an impartial source.&nbsp; (2)&nbsp;The essay is a fork of material removed from WP:ATA, removed because it was not compliant with policy/guidelines.&nbsp; (3)&nbsp;The entry doesn't belong here in any case, and there has been no response thus far to the edit comment that identifies the entry as "superfluous".&nbsp; ] (]) 23:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC) :(1)&nbsp;As the creator of the essay, Reyk is not an impartial source.&nbsp; (2)&nbsp;The essay is a fork of material removed from WP:ATA, removed because it was not compliant with policy/guidelines.&nbsp; (3)&nbsp;The entry doesn't belong here in any case, and there has been no response thus far to the edit comment that identifies the entry as "superfluous".&nbsp; ] (]) 23:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
::(1) Irrelevant. Besides, your objection to the link is that you have a personal grudge against me, not because of its actual content. Don't think I don't know that. (2) False. The material was spun out because it was long enough to constitute a stand-alone essay, not because it was unsuitable content for ]. (3) If you feel ] is so unacceptable that it should not be linked to from anywhere, take it to MfD. ] <sub>]</sub> 23:56, 1 January 2013 (UTC) ::(1) Irrelevant. Besides, your objection to the link is that you have a personal grudge against me, not because of its actual content. Don't think I don't know that. (2) False. The material was spun out because it was long enough to constitute a stand-alone essay, not because it was unsuitable content for ]. (3) If you feel ] is so unacceptable that it should not be linked to from anywhere, take it to MfD. ] ] 23:56, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
:::No reasonable editor on Misplaced Pages would agree that Reyk as the creator of the essay has no bias.&nbsp; ] (]) 04:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC) :::No reasonable editor on Misplaced Pages would agree that Reyk as the creator of the essay has no bias.&nbsp; ] (]) 04:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
:::Regarding the claim that the essay was "spun out", I have documented the history at ].&nbsp; ] (]) 04:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC) :::Regarding the claim that the essay was "spun out", I have documented the history at ].&nbsp; ] (]) 04:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
:::As for the disparaging and scatological edit comment, and the material added as an afterthought, I believe that these do not belong on this page.&nbsp; ] (]) 04:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC) :::As for the disparaging and scatological edit comment, and the material added as an afterthought, I believe that these do not belong on this page.&nbsp; ] (]) 04:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
:::The point remains that Reyk's essay has no relevance to this template.&nbsp; ] (]) 04:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC) :::The point remains that Reyk's essay has no relevance to this template.&nbsp; ] (]) 04:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
::::Per ], I will not be sucked into this pointless argument. The material stays. Don't like that? Take it to MfD. ] <sub>]</sub> 05:11, 2 January 2013 (UTC) ::::Per ], I will not be sucked into this pointless argument. The material stays. Don't like that? Take it to MfD. ] ] 05:11, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
:::::As shown in the history I posted at WT:ATA, the forked material was removed twice from WP:ATA.&nbsp; The essay is unlike the other entries on this template, and no attempt has been made to refute the point that the entry is superfluous.&nbsp; ] (]) 06:11, 3 January 2013 (UTC) :::::As shown in the history I posted at WT:ATA, the forked material was removed twice from WP:ATA.&nbsp; The essay is unlike the other entries on this template, and no attempt has been made to refute the point that the entry is superfluous.&nbsp; ] (]) 06:11, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
:::::It appears that Reyk has withdrawn from the discussion.&nbsp; ] (]) 03:06, 4 January 2013 (UTC) :::::It appears that Reyk has withdrawn from the discussion.&nbsp; ] (]) 03:06, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
::::::I do not deign to indulge your trolling any longer. ] <sub>]</sub> 03:16, 4 January 2013 (UTC) ::::::I do not deign to indulge your trolling any longer. ] ] 03:16, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

{{archive-bottom}}
*'''Comment'''&nbsp; Note that material was removed from and restored to the above discussion.&nbsp; ] (]) 23:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC) *'''Comment'''&nbsp; Note that material was removed from and restored to the above discussion.&nbsp; ] (]) 23:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:24, 3 February 2022

I have restored the link the WP:MUSTBESOURCES, because I feel that essay is a legitimate viewpoint shared by a large proportion of the community. Reyk YO! 23:03, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

(1) As the creator of the essay, Reyk is not an impartial source.  (2) The essay is a fork of material removed from WP:ATA, removed because it was not compliant with policy/guidelines.  (3) The entry doesn't belong here in any case, and there has been no response thus far to the edit comment that identifies the entry as "superfluous".  Unscintillating (talk) 23:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
(1) Irrelevant. Besides, your objection to the link is that you have a personal grudge against me, not because of its actual content. Don't think I don't know that. (2) False. The material was spun out because it was long enough to constitute a stand-alone essay, not because it was unsuitable content for WP:ATA. (3) If you feel WP:MUSTBESOURCES is so unacceptable that it should not be linked to from anywhere, take it to MfD. Reyk YO! 23:56, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
No reasonable editor on Misplaced Pages would agree that Reyk as the creator of the essay has no bias.  Unscintillating (talk) 04:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Regarding the claim that the essay was "spun out", I have documented the history at WT:ATA#History of TMBS.  Unscintillating (talk) 04:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
As for the disparaging and scatological edit comment, and the material added as an afterthought, I believe that these do not belong on this page.  Unscintillating (talk) 04:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
The point remains that Reyk's essay has no relevance to this template.  Unscintillating (talk) 04:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Per WP:DNFTT, I will not be sucked into this pointless argument. The material stays. Don't like that? Take it to MfD. Reyk YO! 05:11, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
As shown in the history I posted at WT:ATA, the forked material was removed twice from WP:ATA.  The essay is unlike the other entries on this template, and no attempt has been made to refute the point that the entry is superfluous.  Unscintillating (talk) 06:11, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
It appears that Reyk has withdrawn from the discussion.  Unscintillating (talk) 03:06, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
I do not deign to indulge your trolling any longer. Reyk YO! 03:16, 4 January 2013 (UTC)