Misplaced Pages

User talk:Hex: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:47, 7 January 2013 editX! (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators23,642 edits Arbitration motion regarding User:Hex← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:57, 20 December 2024 edit undoHex (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators25,309 edits →Vandalism: The correct place for this conversation is Talk:Alcohol (drug)Tags: Manual revert 2017 wikitext editor 
(974 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tmbox|text=This page will be cleared from time to time. For old messages please consult the history, which is the only tamper-proof form of archive.}}
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="letter-spacing: -0.075em; font-weight: bold; font-family: 'Segoe UI', sans-serif; margin-bottom: 0.25em;">User talk:Hex</span>}}{{User talk:Hex/Tabs|4}}
{{nbsp}}
{{tmbox|type=style|text=Welcome to my talk page!<br />'''Please help me keep organized by leaving your comment in the appropriate area from the tabs above.''' Thank you.}}
{{nbsp}}
----
{{TOC right}}
]


== Use of RD3 ==
== ] ==
{{atop
| status = resolved
| result = ]
}}
:Hi, Scott. Just noting that I wanted to raise this issue with you too but only recently got 'round to this. Putting aside the fact that these revisions are very old for now, {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Revision deletion|Misuse}} states that {{tq|RevisionDelete does not exist to remove "ordinary" offensive comments and incivility{{nbsp}}... Material must be grossly offensive}}. Things like ']', ']{{-'}}, ], and ']' do not fall under that and should not be deleted. Please reconsider your refusal. ] (]) 03:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
::Hi Sdrqaz. I'm afraid your interpretation is at odds with established consensus, which isn't surprising given the poorly-written preamble that you quote which appears to contradict the definition of RD3. The last time that I'm aware of that the community discussed limiting the use of RD3 to such a context was ], at which time the sentiment "RevDel is a useful tool in denying recognition to regular vandals" was the most endorsed, which is in keeping with the definition of "purely disruptive material". If you feel that the criterion is inadequately defined you can certainly reopen the topic for discussion. In the meantime, however, I've attempted to resolve the contradiction. &nbsp;— ] <span class="tmp-color" style="color:#900">•</span> ] 10:57, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
:::I have brought this up ] (]). You are invited to respond to the concerns there, per ]. Thanks, ] (]) 21:41, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
{{abottom}}


== Revision hide request ==
Are you sure it's wise to attach a notability guideline tag to this page with only a poorly-advertised RfC gaining minimal attendance? The guideline itself doesn't appear to be very fleshed out and some participants have brought up concerns of contradictions and clarity. ''']]]''' 23:53, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
:Replied there. — ] ] 11:46, 18 December 2012 (UTC)


hey there was a pretty bad edit on ]. I'm not sure if it is worthy of a revdel but it seems pretty racist, so I'm reporting it just in case. Cheers! <br>
== WP:NGEO ==
link to revision: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hurricane_Beryl&diff=prev&oldid=1233915555 <br> ] (]) 15:52, 11 July 2024 (UTC)


:Yeah, I agree. Thanks for spotting it. &nbsp;— ] <span class="tmp-color" style="color:#900">•</span> ] 16:48, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I think an update of {{tl|Notability}} with a new parameter value will be good as well. ] (]) 02:20, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
::no problem! ] (]) 16:51, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
:{{done}} — ] ] 11:46, 18 December 2012 (UTC)


== Revdel request ==
== RFC/U for Apteva: move to close ==


Here after picking your name from the revdel roster: requesting removal of https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Yasir_Al-Rumayyan&diff=prev&oldid=1161251713 where an IP has posted personal information, when you've got a moment. Thanks. ] (]) 18:36, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
I am notifying all participants in ] that Dicklyon has moved to close the RFC/U, with a summary on the talkpage. Editors may now support or oppose the motion, or add comments:


:Done, thanks for spotting it. &nbsp;— ] <span style="color:#900">•</span> ] 19:58, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
* ]


== Misplaced Pages talk:List of hoaxes on Misplaced Pages/Amberlihisar ==
Please consider adding your signature, so that the matter can be resolved.


Hey, why did you subtst the WikiProject banner at ]? ] (]) 08:08, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Best wishes,


:Hiya, it was to turn off the categories but retain the presence of the template, because I couldn't immediately work out how to do it another way. &nbsp;— ] <span style="color:#900">•</span> ] 09:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
<font color="blue"><big>N</big><small>oetica</small></font><sup><small>]</small></sup> 04:18, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
::I think {{tlx|WikiProject Articles for creation|category{{=}}no}} should work. ] (]) 09:36, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
:::That still produces a couple of categories, so I've just nowiki'd it instead. &nbsp;— ] <span style="color:#900">•</span> ] 09:47, 17 July 2024 (UTC)


== File:Ten Year Society.svg ==
== 2013 ==


Hey, is there any five year version of ] anywhere?<span id="The_Herald:1723187677366:User_talkFTTCLNScott" class="FTTCmt"> —&nbsp;] (]) 07:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC)</span>
{| style="border: 2px solid red; background-color: #FFFAF0;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |'''Have an enjoyable ]!'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid green;" | '''Hello Hex: Thanks for all of your contributions to Misplaced Pages, and have a happy and enjoyable ]!''' Cheers, <small><font face="arial">]<sup>]</sup></font></small> 15:59, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
|}
{{-}}


:Hi there. I'm not involved with that any more. Best of luck. &nbsp;— ] <span style="color:#900">•</span> ] 16:08, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
== Squatting ==


== Review requests at ] ==
Hi Hex,
I'm excited to have stumbled across ] and I'll sign up. If you have time, I'd welcome your opinion on a dilemma concerning ], posted . It's a problem of categorisation more than anything else and worth resolving now since I envisage ] the page steadily growing larger, so we'll probably need to fork it more in future. All the best for 2013! ] (]) 11:25, 3 January 2013 (UTC)


Hello {{u|Scott}}, hope you are well. Could you please review the requests at ], I've been waiting for a few days to have my request reviewed. Many thanks! ] (]) 00:14, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
== WP:DWG ==


I've updated ]. Please see what you think. Should deceased users' Ë-mail this user" feature be deactivated? <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 23:24, 4 January 2013 (UTC) :Hello, I'm afraid I've never had any involvement with that so I'm the wrong person to ask. &nbsp;— ] <span style="color:#900">•</span> ] 22:50, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
::Oh it's fine then. I've been waiting a few days that's all. Thanks anyway. ] (]) 01:45, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
::I see that you are willing to revision delete on your categories. Could you perhaps delete my block log, I was blocked awhile ago for sockpuppetry because I changed to this account, because on my other account it revealed on real name. On the reason of my block on the log it also states my real name. Could you delete that for me. Thank you! ] (]) 01:49, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
:::Unfortunately, revision deletion can only be used on personal information if it was revealed accidentally. Pretty much the only thing it's possible to do to completely separate yourself from a former account at your real name is a ]. Sorry, I know that's not a great option. &nbsp;— ] <span style="color:#900">•</span> ] 14:43, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
::::It is personal information on the reason because the person who blocked me stated my real life name on the reason which is personal and private. It is possible to do on block logs. Even if I do go for a clean start, it will not resolve my issue because the block log is still there with my personal name on. Please if there is anyway I can delete it even if other admins agree with it and a discussion is made. ] (]) 15:18, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but it's really not going to be possible. The problem is that the block log is used for accountability and as a record of how/where/when things happened. In your case there was some confusion regarding the use of more than one account, and the discussion which led to a block on your current account being unlifted was made on the user talk page of your old account. Keeping track of the sequence of events is why the (un)blocking admin made note of it in the log.
:::::Because you intentionally created the account under your offline name, and used that until switching to another account, there's nothing in our policies which allows it to be considered "private" and thus eligible to be hidden. Every other admin will tell you the same thing, as well as pointing out that the account registration page already has a comment that "Your username is public and cannot be made private later".
:::::If it helps at all, our log pages are hidden from search engines on the web so they're not going to show up if someone searches Google for your name. &nbsp;— ] <span style="color:#900">•</span> ] 14:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
== Nomination for deletion of ] ==
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 12:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)


== Obtain a copy of my Deleted Article. ==
== Hi ==


Hey ]!
Can you ping me if you write {{plainlink|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Wikipedia_talk:Administrators&diff=523540172&oldid=523521913|name=that essay}} please? --] (]) 12:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
:Certainly! Best, — ] ] 12:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC).
::Cheers. :) --] (]) 20:10, 6 January 2013 (UTC)


My article had been rejected yesterday. So, I wanna proofread it. So, can i obtain a copy of my article for it?<nowiki><br></nowiki>
== Courtesy note regarding arbitration motion ==


Thank You.
Hi Hex. Please know that I've proposed a motion in relation to the present RFAR concerning your block of O'Dea. The motion is located ]. Regards, ] ]] 15:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)


] (]) 14:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
== Arbitration motion regarding ] ==


:Hi ChessFan,
Resolved by <span class="plainlinks"></span> at ] that:
:Unfortunately I'm not able to do that, for two reasons - firstly, it seems that you're writing about yourself, which ]. Secondly, although you're clearly a promising player, you don't meet our ], which is that multiple reliable sources have to have discussed you in detail. Yes, you've been mentioned in newspapers for your tournament positions, but it's not detailed enough for us to have an article for you at present. So there's really not any point of me getting the text of your draft back because there's no way currently that it will be accepted as an article. Sorry.
:Kind regards,
:Scott. &nbsp;— ] <span style="color:#900">•</span> ] 00:49, 1 October 2024 (UTC)


== Invitation to participate in a research ==
<blockquote>
The Arbitration Committee has considered the request for arbitration concerning {{admin|Hex}}'s block of {{user|O'Dea}}. There is no evidence of a significant, recurring problem with Hex's use of his administrator permissions. However, Hex is:


Hello,
:(A) Reminded that he must obey the community's ];
:(B) Admonished for blocking O'Dea when no block was appropriate; and
:(C) Reminded that he must be fully responsive to valid criticism by the community of his actions.
</blockquote>


The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''.
For the Arbitration Committee, <small>(]&nbsp;·&nbsp;]) &nbsp;·&nbsp;] &nbsp;·&nbsp;</small> 19:47, 7 January 2013 (UTC)<br>

:''']'''
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

]

<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 -->

== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research ==

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ].

Take the survey ''''''.

Kind Regards,

]

<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 -->

== Restore the deleted content as a draft ==

Hello ,I’m reaching out to request your assistance in restoring the content of the previously deleted ''University of International Business and Economics'' article to my userspace.

I’d like to work on revising the article to align with Misplaced Pages’s guidelines and would appreciate having access to the original content for reference.

Thank you in advance for your help ] (]) 14:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

:Hi Cakkkot, I didn't have the opportunity to look at this earlier, apologies for the delayed response. I can't see any deleted versions of ]. Do you mean the text which was in ] until 2018? That's available in the page history, if so. &nbsp;— ] <span style="color:#900">•</span> ] 17:43, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

== Blast from the past! ==

] - Thanks for dealing with the move, and bringing up such an interesting memory. :) - ] ] 16:22, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

:Ahaha! I didn't expect that there would be any old-timers with pages from that group on their watchlist. 20 years later and Misplaced Pages drama really hasn't changed... 😄 &nbsp;— ] <span style="color:#900">•</span> ] 17:32, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
== You've got mail ==

{{You've got mail}} <span style="font-family: Arial; padding: 2px 3px 1px 3px;">] ]</span> 17:26, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

:Thank you, got it. &nbsp;— ] <span style="color:#900">•</span> ] 17:29, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
::No Problem! <span style="font-family: Arial; padding: 2px 3px 1px 3px;">] ]</span> 17:30, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:57, 20 December 2024

This page will be cleared from time to time. For old messages please consult the history, which is the only tamper-proof form of archive.

Use of RD3

RESOLVED See discussion at WP:AN.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hi, Scott. Just noting that I wanted to raise this issue with you too but only recently got 'round to this. Putting aside the fact that these revisions are very old for now, Misplaced Pages:Revision deletion § Misuse states that RevisionDelete does not exist to remove "ordinary" offensive comments and incivility ... Material must be grossly offensive. Things like 'When people eat Pringles, it is very yummy according to the people who eat/ate it', 'WORST WEB PAGE ON THE WEB "LULZ!"', keysmashing, and 'SUNNY TOSS MAFIYA' do not fall under that and should not be deleted. Please reconsider your refusal. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi Sdrqaz. I'm afraid your interpretation is at odds with established consensus, which isn't surprising given the poorly-written preamble that you quote which appears to contradict the definition of RD3. The last time that I'm aware of that the community discussed limiting the use of RD3 to such a context was in 2011, at which time the sentiment "RevDel is a useful tool in denying recognition to regular vandals" was the most endorsed, which is in keeping with the definition of "purely disruptive material". If you feel that the criterion is inadequately defined you can certainly reopen the topic for discussion. In the meantime, however, I've attempted to resolve the contradiction.  — Scott • talk 10:57, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I have brought this up at the administrators' noticeboard (diff). You are invited to respond to the concerns there, per policy. Thanks, Sdrqaz (talk) 21:41, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Revision hide request

hey there was a pretty bad edit on Hurricane Beryl. I'm not sure if it is worthy of a revdel but it seems pretty racist, so I'm reporting it just in case. Cheers!
link to revision: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hurricane_Beryl&diff=prev&oldid=1233915555
Gaismagorm (talk) 15:52, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, I agree. Thanks for spotting it.  — Scott • talk 16:48, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
no problem! Gaismagorm (talk) 16:51, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Revdel request

Here after picking your name from the revdel roster: requesting removal of https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Yasir_Al-Rumayyan&diff=prev&oldid=1161251713 where an IP has posted personal information, when you've got a moment. Thanks. Belbury (talk) 18:36, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Done, thanks for spotting it.  — Scott • talk 19:58, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:List of hoaxes on Misplaced Pages/Amberlihisar

Hey, why did you subtst the WikiProject banner at Misplaced Pages talk:List of hoaxes on Misplaced Pages/Amberlihisar? Gonnym (talk) 08:08, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Hiya, it was to turn off the categories but retain the presence of the template, because I couldn't immediately work out how to do it another way.  — Scott • talk 09:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
I think {{WikiProject Articles for creation|category=no}} should work. Gonnym (talk) 09:36, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
That still produces a couple of categories, so I've just nowiki'd it instead.  — Scott • talk 09:47, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Ten Year Society.svg

Hey, is there any five year version of File:Ten Year Society.svg anywhere? — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi there. I'm not involved with that any more. Best of luck.  — Scott • talk 16:08, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Review requests at AfC Participants

Hello Scott, hope you are well. Could you please review the requests at AfC Participants, I've been waiting for a few days to have my request reviewed. Many thanks! Azarctic (talk) 00:14, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm afraid I've never had any involvement with that so I'm the wrong person to ask.  — Scott • talk 22:50, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Oh it's fine then. I've been waiting a few days that's all. Thanks anyway. Azarctic (talk) 01:45, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
I see that you are willing to revision delete on your categories. Could you perhaps delete my block log, I was blocked awhile ago for sockpuppetry because I changed to this account, because on my other account it revealed on real name. On the reason of my block on the log it also states my real name. Could you delete that for me. Thank you! Azarctic (talk) 01:49, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, revision deletion can only be used on personal information if it was revealed accidentally. Pretty much the only thing it's possible to do to completely separate yourself from a former account at your real name is a clean start. Sorry, I know that's not a great option.  — Scott • talk 14:43, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
It is personal information on the reason because the person who blocked me stated my real life name on the reason which is personal and private. It is possible to do on block logs. Even if I do go for a clean start, it will not resolve my issue because the block log is still there with my personal name on. Please if there is anyway I can delete it even if other admins agree with it and a discussion is made. Azarctic (talk) 15:18, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but it's really not going to be possible. The problem is that the block log is used for accountability and as a record of how/where/when things happened. In your case there was some confusion regarding the use of more than one account, and the discussion which led to a block on your current account being unlifted was made on the user talk page of your old account. Keeping track of the sequence of events is why the (un)blocking admin made note of it in the log.
Because you intentionally created the account under your offline name, and used that until switching to another account, there's nothing in our policies which allows it to be considered "private" and thus eligible to be hidden. Every other admin will tell you the same thing, as well as pointing out that the account registration page already has a comment that "Your username is public and cannot be made private later".
If it helps at all, our log pages are hidden from search engines on the web so they're not going to show up if someone searches Google for your name.  — Scott • talk 14:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ClockBlock

Template:ClockBlock has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Obtain a copy of my Deleted Article.

Hey User:Scott!

My article had been rejected yesterday. So, I wanna proofread it. So, can i obtain a copy of my article for it?<br>

Thank You.

ChessFan069 (talk) 14:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi ChessFan,
Unfortunately I'm not able to do that, for two reasons - firstly, it seems that you're writing about yourself, which we ask people not to do. Secondly, although you're clearly a promising player, you don't meet our general requirement of notability, which is that multiple reliable sources have to have discussed you in detail. Yes, you've been mentioned in newspapers for your tournament positions, but it's not detailed enough for us to have an article for you at present. So there's really not any point of me getting the text of your draft back because there's no way currently that it will be accepted as an article. Sorry.
Kind regards,
Scott.  — Scott • talk 00:49, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Restore the deleted content as a draft

Hello ,I’m reaching out to request your assistance in restoring the content of the previously deleted University of International Business and Economics article to my userspace.

I’d like to work on revising the article to align with Misplaced Pages’s guidelines and would appreciate having access to the original content for reference.

Thank you in advance for your help Cakkkot (talk) 14:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi Cakkkot, I didn't have the opportunity to look at this earlier, apologies for the delayed response. I can't see any deleted versions of University of International Business and Economics. Do you mean the text which was in University of Economics and Business until 2018? That's available in the page history, if so.  — Hex • talk 17:43, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Blast from the past!

Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct disputes archive/Lizard King (UtherSRG) - Thanks for dealing with the move, and bringing up such an interesting memory. :) - UtherSRG (talk) 16:22, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Ahaha! I didn't expect that there would be any old-timers with pages from that group on their watchlist. 20 years later and Misplaced Pages drama really hasn't changed... 😄  — Hex • talk 17:32, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Hex. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Gaismagorm (talk) 17:26, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, got it.  — Hex • talk 17:29, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
No Problem! Gaismagorm (talk) 17:30, 15 December 2024 (UTC)