Misplaced Pages

Latest revision as of 09:54, 24 December 2024

Islamic Resistance Movement حركة المقاومة الإسلامية
Emblem of Hamas' political wing
Chairman of the Political Bureau	Temporary committee leadership (acting)
Deputy Chairman of the Political Bureau	Khalil al-Hayya
Chairman of the Shura Council	Abu Omar Hassan
Leader in the Gaza Strip	Yahya Sinwar †
Military commander	Mohammed Deif X
Founder	Ahmed Yassin X Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi X ... and others Mahmoud al-Zahar Mohammad Taha Imad al-Alami Abdul Fatah Dukhan Ibrahim Fares Al-Yazouri 'Isa al-Nashshar Ibrahim Quqa Mohammed Hassan Shama'a Hassan Yousef
Founded	10 December 1987; 37 years ago (10 December 1987)
Headquarters	Gaza City, Gaza Strip
Military wing	Al-Qassam Brigades
Ideology	Palestinian nationalism Islamic nationalism Islamic fundamentalism Islamism Anti-Zionism
Religion	Sunni Islam
International affiliation	Axis of Resistance (informal)
Political alliance	Alliance of Palestinian Forces
Colours	Green
Palestinian Legislative Council	74 / 132
Party flag
Website
hamasinfo.info
Politics of Palestine Political parties Elections

The Islamic Resistance Movement, abbreviated Hamas (an Arabic acronym from Arabic: حركة المقاومة الإسلامية, romanized: Ḥarakat al-Muqāwamah al-ʾIslāmiyyah), is a Palestinian nationalist Sunni Islamist political organisation with a military wing called the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades. It has governed the Israeli-occupied Gaza Strip since 2007.

The Hamas movement was founded by Palestinian Islamic scholar Ahmed Yassin in 1987, after the outbreak of the First Intifada against the Israeli occupation. It emerged from his 1973 Mujama al-Islamiya Islamic charity affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood. In 2006 Palestinian legislative election, Hamas secured a majority in the Palestinian Legislative Council by campaigning on promises of a corruption-free government and advocating for resistance as a means to liberate Palestine from Israeli occupation. In the Battle of Gaza (2007), Hamas seized control of the Gaza Strip from rival Palestinian faction Fatah, and has since governed the territory separately from the Palestinian National Authority. After Hamas's takeover, Israel significantly intensified existing movement restrictions and imposed a complete blockade of the Gaza Strip. Egypt began its blockade of Gaza in 2007. This was followed by multiple wars with Israel, including those in 2008–09, 2012, 2014, 2021, and an ongoing one since 2023, which began with the 7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel.

Hamas has promoted Palestinian nationalism in an Islamic context. While initially seeking a state in all of former Mandatory Palestine it began acquiescing to 1967 borders in the agreements it signed with Fatah in 2005, 2006 and 2007. In 2017, Hamas released a new charter that supported a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders without recognizing Israel. Hamas's repeated offers of a truce (for a period of 10–100 years) based on the 1967 borders are seen by many as being consistent with a two-state solution, while others state that Hamas retains the long-term objective of establishing one state in former Mandatory Palestine. While the 1988 Hamas charter was widely described as antisemitic, Hamas's 2017 charter removed the antisemitic language and said Hamas's struggle was with Zionists, not Jews. It has been debated whether the charter has reflected an actual change in policy.

In terms of foreign policy, Hamas has historically sought out relations with Egypt, Iran, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria and Turkey; some of its relations have been impacted by the Arab Spring. Hamas and Israel have engaged in protracted armed conflict. Key aspects of the conflict include the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the status of Jerusalem, Israeli settlements, borders, water rights, the permit regime, Palestinian freedom of movement, and the Palestinian right of return. Hamas has attacked Israeli civilians, including using suicide bombings, as well as launching rockets at Israeli cities. A number of countries, including Australia, Canada, Israel, Japan, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States have designated Hamas as a terrorist organization. In 2018, a motion at the United Nations to condemn Hamas was rejected.

Etymology

Hamas is an acronym of the Arabic phrase حركة المقاومة الإسلامية or Ḥarakah al-Muqāwamah al-ʾIslāmiyyah, meaning "Islamic Resistance Movement". This acronym, HMS, was glossed in the 1988 Hamas Covenant by the Arabic word ḥamās (حماس) which itself means "zeal", "strength", or "bravery".

History

Hamas was established in 1987, and allegedly has its origins in Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood movement, which had been active in the Gaza Strip since the 1950s and gained influence through a network of mosques and various charitable and social organizations. Unlike other Palestinian factions, after the Israeli occupation of Gaza in 1967, the Brotherhood in Gaza refused to join the resistance boycott against Israel. In the 1980s, it emerged as a powerful political factor, challenging the influence of the PLO, whose Fatah faction it had played a core role in creating. In December 1987, the Brotherhood adopted a more nationalist and activist line under the name of Hamas. Hamas was initially discretely supported by Israel as a counter-balance to the secular PLO. During the 1990s and early 2000s, the organization conducted numerous suicide bombings and other attacks against Israel.

In the Palestinian legislative election of January 2006, Hamas gained a large majority of seats in the Palestinian Parliament, defeating the ruling Fatah party. After the elections, conflicts arose between Hamas and Fatah, which they were unable to resolve. In June 2007, Hamas defeated Fatah in a series of violent clashes, and since that time Hamas has governed the Gaza portion of the Palestinian Territories, while at the same time they were ousted from government positions in the West Bank. Israel and Egypt then imposed an economic blockade on Gaza and largely sealed their borders with the territory.

After acquiring control of Gaza, Hamas-affiliated and other militias launched rocket attacks upon Israel, which Hamas ceased in June 2008 following an Egyptian-brokered ceasefire. The ceasefire broke down late in 2008, with each side accusing the other of responsibility. In late December 2008, Israel attacked Gaza, withdrawing its forces in mid-January 2009. Since 2009, Hamas has faced multiple military confrontations with Israel, notably the 2012 and 2014 Gaza Wars, leading to substantial casualties. Hamas has maintained control over Gaza, often clashing with the Palestinian Authority led by Fatah. Efforts at reconciliation between Hamas and Fatah have seen limited success. Hamas continued to face international isolation and blockades, while engaging in sporadic rocket attacks and tunnel construction activities against Israel.

On October 7, 2023, Hamas and other Palestinian militants attacked Israel killing nearly 1,200 Israelis, about two thirds of them civilians. Approximately 250 Israeli civilians and soldiers were taken back to the Gaza Strip, with the aim of securing the release of Palestinian prisoners in Israel (as part of a prisoner swap). Hamas said its attack was in response to Israel's continued occupation, blockade of Gaza, and settlements expansion, as well as alleged threats to the Al-Aqsa Mosque and the plight of Palestinians. There are also reports of sexual violence by Hamas militants, allegations that Hamas has denied. Israel responded by invading the Gaza Strip, killing over 42,000 Palestinians, 52% of them women and children according to the Gaza Ministry of Health.

On 31 July 2024, Ismail Haniyeh was assassinated in Tehran, after attending the inauguration ceremony of Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian. In August 2024, Yahya Sinwar, the leader of Hamas in Gaza, was elected chairman of the group, replacing Haniyeh. Per Hamas officials, he was elected due to his considerable popularity in the Arab and Islamic worlds following the 7 October attacks and his strong connections with Iran and the "Axis of Resistance," an informal Iranian-led political and military coalition. On 16 October 2024, IDF troops killed Sinwar during a routine patrol and a chance encounter in southern Rafah.

Policies towards Israel and Palestine

Hamas' policy towards Israel has evolved. Historically, Hamas envisioned a Palestinian state on all of the territory that belonged to the British Mandate for Palestine (that is, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea). In 2006, Hamas signed the Palestinian Prisoners' Document which supports the quest for a Palestinian state "on all territories occupied in 1967". This document also recognized authority of the President of the Palestinian National Authority to negotiate with Israel. Hamas also signed the Cairo Declaration in 2005, which emphasized the goal of ending the Israeli occupation and establishing a Palestinian state. On 2 May 2017, Khaled Mashal, chief of the Hamas Political Bureau, presented a new Charter, in which Hamas accepted the establishment of a Palestinian state "on the basis of June 4, 1967" (West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem) acceptable. But the new Charter did not recognize Israel nor relinquish Palestinian claims to all of historical Palestine. Many scholars saw Hamas' acceptance of the 1967 borders as a tacit acceptance of another entity on the other side while others state that Hamas retains the long-term objective of establishing one state in former Mandatory Palestine.

Truce proposals

Hamas has repeatedly offered Israel a hudna, Arabic word for armistice, of varying durations (50 years, even a 100 years). During the hudna both the Israelis and Palestinians would refrain from any violent attacks on the other. Under Islamic international law, a hudna is a binding and the Qur'an prohibits its violation. Hamas's spokesperson, Ahmed Yousef, said that a "hudna" is more than a ceasefire and it "obliges parties to use the period to seek a permanent, non-violent resolution to their differences."

Hamas first proposed Israel with a hudna, long-term armistice, in 1999. In exchange Israel would have to end the occupation of West Bank and Gaza Strip and release all Palestinian prisoners. But the 1999 proposal omitted two difficult issues: the issue of Palestinian refugees and the recognition of Israel. The idea was that Israel and Hamas would use the period of calm to continue negotiating these two difficult issues until they reached a final peace agreement, at which point the temporary peace would convert into a permanent peace agreement.

In 2006, Ismail Haniyeh, shortly after being elected as Prime Minister, sent messages both to US President George W. Bush and to Israel's leaders, offering a long-term truce. Neither Israel nor the United States responded. Haniyeh's proposal reportedly was a fifty-year armistice with Israel, if a Palestinian state is created along the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital. A Hamas official added that the armistice would renew automatically each time. In mid-2006, University of Maryland's Jerome Segal suggested that a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders and a truce for many years could be considered Hamas's de facto recognition of Israel. A similar proposal was once again offered by Hamas to Israel in November 2006.

In November 2008, in a meeting, on Gaza Strip soil, with 11 European members of parliaments, Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh re-stated that Hamas was willing to accept a Palestinian state "in the territories of 1967" (Gaza Strip and West Bank), and offered Israel a long-term truce if Israel recognized the Palestinians' national rights; and stated that Israel rejected this proposal. A Hamas finance minister around 2018 contended that such a "long-term ceasefire as understood by Hamas and a two-state settlement are the same".

Mkhaimer Abusada, a political scientist at Al Azhar University, wrote in 2008 that Hamas talks "of hudna , not of peace or reconciliation with Israel. They believe over time they will be strong enough to liberate all historic Palestine." Some scholars have noted that alongside offering a long-term truce, Hamas retains its objective of establishing one state in former Mandatory Palestine. Hamas originally proposed a 10-year truce, or hudna, to Israel, contingent on the creation of a Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders. Sheikh Ahmed Yassin indicated that such truce could be extended for 30, 40, or even 100 years, but it would never signal a recognition of Israel. A Hamas official explained that having an indefinite truce with Israel doesn't contradict Hamas's lack of recognition of Israel, comparing it to the Irish Republican Army's willingness to accept a permanent armistice with the United Kingdom without recognizing the UK's sovereignty over Northern Ireland.

Recognition of Israel

Whether Hamas would recognize Israel is debated. Hamas leaders have emphasized they do not recognize Israel, but indicate they "have a de facto acceptance of its presence". According to some scholars, Hamas accepted the 1967 borders and thus acknowledged the existence of another entity on the other side, implicitly recognizing Israel and "drop the call for the destruction of Israel from its manifesto." Other scholars believe that Hamas retains the long-term objective of establishing one state in former Mandatory Palestine.

Mousa Abu Marzook, then the vice-president of Hamas' Political Bureau, explained in 2011, that while Hamas did not recognize Israel as a state, it considered the existence of Israel as "amr waqi" (or fait accompli, meaning something that has happened and cannot be changed). He called this "de facto recognition" of Israel.

According to Martin Kear, Israel treats "any form of resistance from Palestinians as acts of terrorism", and therefore responds to any resistance with extraordinary force. In contrast, writes Kear, Hamas operationalizes "...its resistance to Israeli occupation through its invocation of jihad ... Accordingly, Hamas refuses to recognise Israel as a legitimate actor..." However, Kear goes on to note that without expressly stating it Hamas agreed to respect the Oslo Accords, and by extension Israel's existence: "The signing of the 2007 Mecca Agreement also meant that Hamas had met two of the three stipulations set down by Israel and the Quartet: recognising Israel and respecting all previous Israeli-Palestinian agreements."

Graham Usher said that while Hamas did not consider Israel to be legitimate, it accepted Israel as political reality. According to Tareq Baconi, Hamas' implicit recognition of Israel is in contrast to most Israeli political parties who have long opposed the idea of a Palestinian state.

Allegations of antisemitism

The 1988 Hamas charter proclaims that jihad against Jews is required until Judgement Day. The "governing" 1988 charter of Hamas was said, in 2018, to "openly dedicate(s) Hamas to genocide against the Jewish people", referring to the Hamas 1988 charter, article 7. More authors have characterized the violent language against all Jews in the original Hamas charter as genocidal, incitement to genocide, or antisemitic. The charter attributes collective responsibility to Jews, not just Israelis, for various global issues, including both World Wars.

The American Interest magazine has wrote that the charter "echoes" Nazi propaganda in claiming that Jews profited during World War II. Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic magazine, has compared statements in the 1988 charter with those that appear in The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Hamas has called for the annihilation of Israel, and has stated that to be necessary for creating a pan-Islamic empire.

On the other hand, Hamas's 2017 charter removed the anti-Semitic language, saying that their struggle is against Zionism and not Jews, while also advancing goals for a Palestinian state which are seen by many as being consistent with a two-state solution. Ahmed Yassin, the founder of Hamas, said in a 1988 interview, reacting to accusations that 'Hamas hate Jews':

"We don't hate Jews and fight Jews because they are Jewish. They are a people of faith and we are a people of faith, and we love all people of faith. If my brother, from my own mother and father and my own faith takes my home and expels me from it, I will fight him. I will fight my cousin if he takes my home and expels me from it. So when a Jew takes my home and expels me from it, I will fight him. I don't fight other countries because I want to be at peace with them, I love all people and wish peace for them, even the Jews. The Jews lived with us all of our lives and we never assaulted them, and they held high positions in government and ministries. But if they take my home and make me a refugee like 4 million Palestinians in exile? Who has more right to this land? The Russian immigrant who left this land 2000 years ago or the one who left 40 years ago? We don't hate the Jews, we only ask for them to give us our rights."

Evolution of positions

1988–1992 (first charter)

In its early days, Hamas functioned as a social-religious charity center. Its members armed themselves for the ongoing resistance against the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories, and in August 1988 published their first charter in which Hamas stated that "Israel" should be "eliminated" through a "clash with the enemies", a "struggle against Zionism" and "conflict with Israel". They wrote that 'Palestine', that is all of the territory that belonged to the British Mandate for Palestine (that is, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea), should be "liberated" from "Zionism" and transformed into an Islamic Waqf (Islamic charitable endowment) in which "followers of all religions can coexist in security and safety". Practically speaking, Hamas is and was at war with Israel's army (later also attacking Israeli civilians) since the spring of 1989, initially as part of the First Intifada, a general protest movement that gradually turned more riotous and violent.

1992–2005

Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, founder of Hamas, who died in 2004 (killed by Israel), has at unreported date offered Israel a ten-year hudna (truce, armistice) in return for establishment of a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza. Yassin later added, the hudna could be renewed, even for longer periods, but would never signal a recognition of Israel.

In 2005, Hamas signed the Palestinian Cairo Declaration, which confirms "the right of the Palestinian people to resistance in order to end the occupation, establish a Palestinian state with full sovereignty with Jerusalem as its capital" (etc.), aiming to reconcile several Palestinian factions but not describing specific steps or strategies towards Israel.

2006–2007: 1967 borders and a truce

In March 2006, after winning an absolute majority in the 2006 Palestinian legislative elections, Hamas published its government program in which Hamas claimed sovereignty for the Palestinian territories but did not repeat its claim to all of mandatory Palestine, instead declared their willingness to have contacts with Israel "in all mundane affairs: business, trade, health, and labor". The program further stated: "The question of recognizing Israel is not the jurisdiction of one faction, nor the government, but a decision for the Palestinian people." Since then until today, spokesmen of Hamas seem to disagree about their attitudes towards Israel, and debates are running as to whether the original 1988 Hamas charter has since March 2006 become obsolete and irrelevant or on the contrary still spells out Hamas's genuine and ultimate goals (see: 1988 Hamas charter, § Relevance).

The March 2006 Hamas legislative program was further explained on 6 June 2006 by Hamas' MP Riad Mustafa: "Hamas will never recognize Israel", but if a popular Palestinian referendum would endorse a peace agreement including recognition of Israel, "we would of course accept their verdict".

Also on 6 June 2006, Ismail Haniyeh, senior political leader of Hamas and at that time Prime Minister of the Palestinian National Authority, sent a letter to US President George W. Bush (via University of Maryland's Jerome Segal), stating: "We are so concerned about stability and security in the area that we don't mind having a Palestinian state in the 1967 borders and offering a truce for many years", and asking Bush for a dialogue with the Hamas government. A similar message he sent to Israel's leaders. Haniyeh had reportedly proposed a fifty-year armistice. Neither Washington nor Israel replied. Nuancing sheikh Ahmed Yassin's statements before 2004 about a hudna (truce) with Israel (see above), Hamas's (former) senior adviser Ahmed Yousef has said (at unknown date) that a "hudna" (truce, armistice) is more than a ceasefire and "obliges parties to use the period to seek a permanent, non-violent resolution to their differences."

On 28 June 2006, Hamas signed the second version of (originally) 'the Palestinians' Prisoners Document' which supports the quest for a Palestinian state "on all territories occupied in 1967". This document also recognized the PLO as "the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people", and states that "the negotiations" should be conducted by PLO and President of the Palestinian National Authority and eventual agreements must be ratified by either the Palestinian National Council or a general referendum "held in the homeland and the Diaspora". Leila Seurat also notes that this document "implicitly recognized the June 1967 borders, agreed on the construction of a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as a capital and accepted limitations to the resistance in the territories occupied in 1967", and was produced following consultations with the entire Political Bureau.

In an August 2006 interview with The New York Times, Ismail Haniyeh, senior political leader of Hamas and then Prime Minister of the Palestinian National Authority, said: "We have no problem with a sovereign Palestinian state over all our lands within the 1967 borders, living in calm."

In February 2007, Hamas signed the Fatah–Hamas Mecca Agreement, stressing "the importance of national unity as basis for (...) confronting the occupation" and "activate and reform the PLO", but without further details about how to confront or deal with Israel. At the time of signing that 2007 agreement, Mousa Abu Marzook, Deputy Chairman of the Hamas Political Bureau, underlined his view of the Hamas position: "I can recognize the presence of Israel as a fait accompli (amr wâqi') or, as the French say, a de facto recognition, but this does not mean that I recognize Israel as a state". More Hamas leaders, through the years, have made similar statements.

In June 2007, Hamas ousted the Fatah movement from the Gaza Strip, took control there, and since then Hamas occasionally fired rockets from the Gaza Strip on Israel, purportedly to retaliate Israeli aggression against the people of Gaza.

2008–2016

In April 2008, former US President Jimmy Carter met with Khaled Mashal, the recognized Hamas leader since 2004. Mashal said to Carter, Hamas would "accept a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders" and accept the right of Israel "to live as a neighbour" if such a deal would be approved by a referendum among the "Palestinians". Nevertheless, Mashal did not offer a unilateral ceasefire (as Carter had suggested him to do). The US State Department showed utter indifference for Mashal's new stance; Israel's Prime Minister Ehud Olmert even refused to meet with Carter in Jerusalem, not to mention paying attention to the new Hamas stance.

On 19 June 2008, Hamas and Israel agreed to a six-month cease-fire, which Hamas declared finished at 18 December amidst mutual accusations of breaching the agreed conditions.

Meanwhile, in November 2008, in a meeting with 11 European members of parliaments, Hamas senior official Ismail Haniyeh repeated what he had written in June 2006 to U.S. President George W. Bush but with one extra condition: Hamas was willing to accept a Palestinian state "in the territories of 1967" and offered Israel a long-term truce if Israel recognized the Palestinians' national rights – which he said Israel had declined.

In September 2009, Ismail Haniyeh, head of the Hamas government in the Gaza Strip, wrote to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon – like he had told the New York Times in August 2006: "We would never thwart efforts to create an independent Palestinian state with borders June 4, 1967, with Jerusalem as its capital."

In May 2010, Khaled Mashal, chairman of the Hamas Political Bureau (thus Hamas' highest leader), again stated that a state "Israel" living next to "a Palestinian state on the borders of 1967" would be acceptable for Hamas – but only if a referendum among "the Palestinian people" would endorse this arrangement. In November 2010, Ismail Haniyeh, also proposed a Palestinian state on 1967 borders, though added three further conditions: "resolution of the issue of refugees", "the release of Palestinian prisoners", and "Jerusalem as its capital"; and he made the same reservation as Mashal in May 2010 had made, that a Palestinian referendum needed to endorse this arrangement.

On December 1, 2010, Ismail Haniyeh (senior Hamas leader, see above), in a news conference in Gaza, repeated his November 2010 message: "We accept a Palestinian state on the borders of 1967, with Jerusalem as its capital, the release of Palestinian prisoners, and the resolution of the issue of refugees," but only if such arrangement would be endorsed by "a referendum" held among all Palestinians: in Gaza, West Bank, and the diaspora.

In May 2011, Hamas and Fatah signed an agreement in Cairo, agreeing to form a ('national unity') government and appoint the Ministers "in consensus between them", but it contained no remarks about how to confront or deal with Israel. In February 2012, Hamas and Fatah signed the Fatah–Hamas Doha Agreement, agreeing (again) to form an interim national consensus government, which (again) did not materialize.

Still in February 2012, according to the Palestinian authority (either the Fatah branch in West Bank or the Hamas branch in Gaza), Hamas forswore the use of violence against Israel ("ceasefire", an Israeli news website called it), followed by a few weeks without violence between Hamas and Israel. But violence between Israel and Palestinian militant groups, in the Gaza Strip and southern Israel, also involving Hamas, would soon resume.

2017– 6 Oct. 2023 (new charter)

On 1 May 2017, in a press conference in Doha (Qatar) presenting a new charter, Khaled Mashal, chief of the Hamas Political Bureau (thus acknowledged as to be highest Hamas leader), declared that, though Hamas considered the establishment of a Palestinian state "on the basis of June 4, 1967" (West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem being not under Israeli reign) acceptable, Hamas would in that case still not recognise the statehood of Israel and not relinquish their goal of liberating all of Palestine from "the Zionist project".

Around 2018, a Hamas finance minister has suggested that a "long-term ceasefire as understood by Hamas and a two-state settlement are the same". In 2021 Hamas organized and financed a conference among 250 Gaza citizens about the future management of the State of Palestine following the takeover of Israel which was predicted to come soon. According to the conclusions of the conference, the Jewish Israeli fighters would be killed, while the peaceful individuals could be integrated or be allowed to leave. At the same time the highly skilled and educated would be prevented from leaving. In 2020 Ismail Haniyeh said in an interview that one of the principles of Hamas was "Palestine from the sea to the river." In 2022, Yahya Sinwar cautioned Israelis that Hamas would one day "march through your walls to uproot your regime."

7 Oct. 2023–present

In a flash attack on 7 October 2023, Hamas and associates murdered 767 civilians and killed a further 376 security personnel of the state of Israel. Israel retaliated with warfare in the Gaza Strip, aiming at Hamas militants but also harming much civilian infrastructure and directly killing tens of thousands of civilians, as admitted even by Israel (not counting the presumed multiple number of indirect deaths). A number of conflicting statements since then were made by Hamas senior leaders regarding the Hamas policy towards Israel.

On 24 October, Ghazi Hamad—member of the decision-making Hamas Political Bureau—explained the 7 October attack: "Israel is a country that has no place on our land. We must remove that country because it constitutes a security, military and political catastrophe to the Arab and Islamic nation". "We are called a nation of martyrs and we are proud to sacrifice martyrs". Hamad called the creation of the Jewish state "illogical": "(...) We are the victims of the occupation. Therefore, nobody should blame us for the things we do".

On 1 November 2023, Ismail Haniyeh, then incumbent highest Hamas leader (but assassinated by Israel 31 July 2024), stated that if Israel agreed to a ceasefire in the Israel–Hamas war, if humanitarian corridors would be opened, and aid would be allowed into Gaza, Hamas would be "ready for political negotiations for a two-state solution with Jerusalem as the capital of Palestine". Haniyeh also praised the support of movements in Yemen, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon for the Palestinian struggle.

In January 2024, Khaled Mashal, top Hamas leader until 2017 and now heading the Hamas diaspora office – in contradiction with Haniyeh's proclamation from November 2023 – repeated his stance from 1 May 2017: a (preliminary) Palestinian state "on the 1967 borders", that is "21 per cent of Palestine", would be accepted by Hamas but not as the permanent "two-state solution" which "The West" since a long time envisions and promotes; "our Palestinian project" remains "our right in Palestine from the sea to the river", which Hamas will not give up, therefore Hamas will not recognise the legitimacy of "the usurping entity ".

Hamas Member of Parliament Khalil al-Hayya, also deputy chairman of the Hamas Political Bureau, told the Associated Press in April 2024 that Hamas is willing to agree to a truce of five years or more with Israel and that it would lay down its weapons and convert into a political party if an independent Palestinian state is established along pre-1967 borders. The Associated Press considered this a "significant concession", but presumed that Israel would not even want to consider this scenario following the October 2023 attack.

Hamas top leader Haniyeh in November 2023 suggested that Hamas was willing and "ready for negotiations for a two-state solution". Former Hamas leader Mashal in January 2024 slighted "The West", saying that returning to their talk about "the two-state solution" in which "Palestine" would only get "21 per cent of ... its land ... this cannot be accepted", claiming "our right in Palestine from the sea to the river". although he reiterated that Hamas "accepts a state on the 1967 borders with Jerusalem as its capital, with complete independence and with the right of return without recognising the legitimacy of the Zionist entity."

Comments from non-Hamas-members

The vision that Hamas articulated in its original 1988 charter resembles the vision of certain Zionist groups regarding the same territory, as noted by several authors. This may suggest that Hamas's views were inspired by those Zionist perspectives.

Several (other) authors have interpreted the 1988 Hamas charter as a call for "armed struggle against Israel".

In 2009, Taghreed El-khodary And Ethan Bronner wrote in the New York Times, that Hamas' position is that it doesn't recognize Israel's right to exist, but is willing to accept as a compromise a Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders.

Imad Alsoos stated that Hamas has both a short and long-term objective: "The short-term objective aims to establish a Palestinian state in Gaza and the West Bank, while the long-term objective still strives to liberate Mandate Palestine in its entirety. Establishing a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza (as part of a hudna deal) would be Hamas's interim solution, during which Israel would not be formally recognized.

In mid-2006, University of Maryland's Jerome Segal suggested that a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders and a truce for many years could be considered Hamas's de facto recognition of Israel.

As of January 2007, Israeli, American and European news media considered Hamas to be the "dominant political force" within the Palestinian territories.

Journalist Zaki Chehab wrote in 2007 that Hamas's public concessions following the 2006 elections were "window-dressing" and that the organisation would never recognise Israel's right to exist.

As to the question whether Hamas would be capable to enter into a long-term non-aggression treaty with Israel without being disloyal to their understanding of Islamic law and God's word, the Atlantic magazine columnist Jeffrey Goldberg in January 2009 stated: "I tend to think not, though I've noticed over the years a certain plasticity of belief among some Hamas ideologues. Also, this is the Middle East, so anything is possible".

Professor Mohammed Ayoob in his 2020 book, while discussing the 2017 Hamas charter, stated that “acceptance of the 1967 borders can be interpreted as a de facto acceptance of the preconditions for a two-state solution”.

Religious policy

Gaza Strip

Hamas' Change and Reform electoral list for the 2006 Palestinian legislative election included a Palestinian Christian candidate, Hosam al-Taweel, running as an independent for the Christian reserved seat in Gaza City. Israeli media were surprised by the team. Hosam al-Taweel won the seat, one of six seats reserved for Palestine's Christian minority, with the highest winning vote of the six elected, due to the endorsement of Hamas and other nationalist groups.

The gender ideology outlined in the Hamas charter, the importance of women in the religious-nationalist project of liberation is asserted as no lesser than that of males. Their role was defined primarily as one of manufacturing males and caring for their upbringing and rearing, though the charter recognized they could fight for liberation without obtaining their husband's permission and in 2002 their participation in jihad was permitted. The doctrinal emphasis on childbearing and rearing as woman's primary duty is not so different from Fatah's view of women in the First Intifada and it also resembles the outlook of Jewish settlers, and over time it has been subjected to change. A few were worried about imposition of Islamic dress codes, but most Christians in the Gaza Strip said these worries were baseless were not worried about the Hamas government.

In 1989, during the First Intifada, a small number of Hamas followers campaigned for polygamy, and also insisted women stay at home and be segregated from men. In the course of this campaign, women who chose not to wear the hijab were verbally and physically harassed, with the result that the hijab was being worn 'just to avoid problems on the streets'. The harassment dropped drastically when, after 18 months, the Unified National Leadership of the Uprising (UNLU) condemned it, though similar campaigns reoccurred. Polygamy is practised in some Bedouin communities in Israel, and some Palestinians with Israeli citizenship, particularly in the Negev desert (Arabic pronunciation: Naqab) surrounding the Gaza Strip.

Since Hamas took control of the Gaza Strip in 2007, some of its members have attempted to impose Islamic dress or the hijab head covering on women. The government's "Islamic Endowment Ministry" has deployed Virtue Committee members to warn citizens of the dangers of immodest dress, card playing, and dating. There are no government laws imposing dress and other moral standards, and the Hamas education ministry reversed one effort to impose Islamic dress on students. There has also been successful resistance to attempts by local Hamas officials to impose Islamic dress on women. Hamas officials deny having any plans to impose Islamic law, one legislator stating that "What you are seeing are incidents, not policy," and that Islamic law is the desired standard "but we believe in persuasion".

In 2013, UNRWA canceled its annual marathon in Gaza after Hamas prohibited women from participating in the race.

In the West Bank

In 2005, the human rights organization Freemuse released a report titled "Palestine: Taliban-like attempts to censor music", which said that Palestinian musicians feared that harsh religious laws against music and concerts will be imposed since Hamas group scored political gains in the Palestinian Authority local elections of 2005.

The attempt by Hamas to dictate a cultural code of conduct in the 1980s and early 1990s led to a violent fighting between different Palestinian sectors. Hamas members reportedly burned down stores that stocked videos they deemed indecent and destroyed books they described as "heretical".

In 2005, an outdoor music-and-dance performance in Qalqiliya was suddenly banned by the Hamas-led municipality, for the reason that such an event would be "haram", i.e. forbidden by Islam. The municipality also ordered that music no longer be played in the Qalqiliya zoo, and mufti Akrameh Sabri issued a religious edict affirming the municipality decision. In response, the Palestinian national poet Mahmoud Darwish warned that "There are Taliban-type elements in our society, and this is a very dangerous sign."

The Palestinian columnist Mohammed Abd Al-Hamid, a resident of Ramallah, wrote that this religious coercion could cause the migration of artists, and said "The religious fanatics in Algeria destroyed every cultural symbol, shattered statues and rare works of art and liquidated intellectuals and artists, reporters and authors, ballet dancers and singers—are we going to imitate the Algerian and Afghani examples?"

Erdoğan's Turkey as a role model

Some Hamas members have stated that the model of Islamic government that Hamas seeks to emulate is that of Turkey under the rule of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. The foremost members to distance Hamas from the practices of the Taliban and to publicly support the Erdoğan model were Ahmed Yousef and Ghazi Hamad, advisers to Prime Minister Hanieh. Yusuf, the Hamas deputy foreign minister, reflected this goal in an interview with a Turkish newspaper, stating that while foreign public opinion equates Hamas with the Taliban or al-Qaeda, the analogy is inaccurate. Yusuf described the Taliban as "opposed to everything", including education and women's rights, while Hamas wants to establish good relations between the religious and secular elements of society and strives for human rights, democracy and an open society. According to professor Yezid Sayigh of King's College in London, how influential this view is within Hamas is uncertain, since both Ahmad Yousef and Ghazi Hamad were dismissed from their posts as advisers to Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Hanieh in October 2007. Both have since been appointed to other prominent positions within the Hamas government. Khaled al-Hroub of the West Bank-based and anti-Hamas Palestinian daily Al Ayyam added that despite claims by Hamas leaders that it wants to repeat the Turkish model of Islam, "what is happening on the ground in reality is a replica of the Taliban model of Islam."

Charter and policy documents

1988 charter

Hamas published its charter in August 1988, wherein it defined itself as a chapter of the Muslim Brotherhood and its desire to establish "an Islamic state throughout Palestine". The foundational document was written by a single individual and made public without going through the usual prior consultation process. It was then signed on August 18, 1988. It compares Israeli attacks on civilians to that by Nazi Germany. The charter also claims all of historical Palestine but promises religious coexistence under Islam's rule. Article 6 states that the movement's aim is to "raise the banner of Allah over every inch of Palestine, for under the wing of Islam followers of all religions can coexist in security and safety where their lives, possessions and rights are concerned". The charter rejects a two-state solution, stating that the conflict cannot be resolved "except through jihad".

Many scholars have pointed out that both the 1988 Hamas's charter and the Likud party platform sought full control of the land, thus denouncing the two-state solution.

2017 document of principles

In May 2017, Hamas published a document titled "A Document of General Principles and Policies". While this policy document was much shorter than the 1988 charter, and Hamas leaders stated that it did not replace the 1988 charter, it covers some of the same topics and is referred to as the "2017 charter". It accepted a Palestinian state in the 1967 borders, without recognizing Israel, which is seen by many as being consistent with a two-state solution, while others state that Hamas retains the long-term objective of establishing one state in former Mandatory Palestine. The charter also argued that armed resistance to occupation is supported by international law. Hamas has described these changes as adaptation within a specific context, as opposed to abandonment of its principles.

While the 1988 Hamas charter was widely described as antisemitic, Hamas's 2017 charter removed the antisemitic language and said Hamas's struggle was with Zionists, not Jews. Some sources maintain its condemnation of Zionists is antisemitic: it describes Zionism as the enemy of all Muslims and a danger to international security, what author J.S. Spoerl in 2020 has disqualified as "hardly (...) a serious repudiation of anti-Semitism".

Organization

Leadership and structure

Hamas inherited from its predecessor a tripartite structure that consisted in the provision of social services, of religious training and military operations under a Shura Council. Traditionally it had four distinct functions: (a) a charitable social welfare division (dawah); (b) a military division for procuring weapons and undertaking operations (al-Mujahideen al Filastinun); (c) a security service (Jehaz Aman); and (d) a media branch (A'alam). Hamas has both an internal leadership within the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, and an external leadership, split between a Gaza group directed by Mousa Abu Marzook from his exile first in Damascus and then in Egypt, and a Kuwaiti group (Kuwaidia) under Khaled Mashal. The Kuwaiti group of Palestinian exiles began to receive extensive funding from the Gulf States after its leader Mashal broke with Yasser Arafat's decision to side with Saddam Hussein in the Invasion of Kuwait, with Mashal insisting that Iraq withdraw. On May 6, 2017, Hamas' Shura Council chose Ismail Haniyeh to become the new leader, to replace Mashal.

The exact structure of the organization is unclear as it is shrouded in a veil of secrecy in order to conceal operational activities. Formally, Hamas maintains the wings are separate and independent, but this has been questioned. It has been argued that its wings are both separate and combined for reasons of internal and external political necessity. Communication between the political and military wings of Hamas is made difficult by the thoroughness of Israeli intelligence surveillance and the existence of an extensive base of informants. After the assassination of Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi the political direction of the militant wing was diminished and field commanders were given wider discretional autonomy over operations.

Shura Council and Political Bureau

Hamas's overarching governing body is the Majlis al-Shura (Shura Council), based on the Quranic concept of consultation and popular assembly (shura), which Hamas leaders argue provides for democracy within an Islamic framework. As the organization grew more complex and Israeli pressure increased, the Shura Council was renamed the General Consultative Council, with members elected from local council groups. The council elects the 15-member Political Bureau (al-Maktab al-Siyasi) that makes decisions for Hamas. Representatives come from Gaza, the West Bank, leaders in exile and Israeli prisons. The Political Bureau was based in Damascus until January 2012, when Hamas's support for the Syrian opposition to Bashar al-Assad during the Syrian civil war led to the office's relocation to Qatar.

Finances and funding

Hamas, like its predecessor the Muslim Brotherhood, assumed the administration of Gaza's waqf properties, endowments which extend over 10% of all real estate in the Gaza Strip, with 2,000 acres of agricultural land held in religious trusts, together with numerous shops, rentable apartments and public buildings.

In the first five years of the 1st Intifada, the Gaza economy, 50% of which depended on external sources of income, plummeted by 30–50% as Israel closed its labour market and remittances from the Palestinian expatriates in the Gulf countries dried up following the 1991–1992 Gulf War. At the 1993 Philadelphia conference, Hamas leaders' statements indicated that they read George H. W. Bush's outline of a New World Order as embodying a tacit aim to destroy Islam, and that therefore funding should focus on enhancing the Islamic roots of Palestinian society and promoting jihad, which also means zeal for social justice, in the occupied territories. Hamas became particularly fastidious about maintaining separate resourcing for its respective branches of activity—military, political and social services. It has had a holding company in East Jerusalem (Beit al-Mal), a 20% stake in Al Aqsa International Bank which served as its financial arm, the Sunuqrut Global Group and al-Ajouli money-changing firm.

By 2011, Hamas's budget, calculated to be roughly US$70 million, derived even more substantially (85%) from foreign, rather than internal Palestinian, sources. Only two Israeli-Palestinian sources figure in a list seized in 2004, while the other contributors were donor bodies located in Jordan, Qatar, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Britain, Germany, the United States, United Arab Emirates, Italy and France. Much of the money raised comes from sources that direct their assistance to what Hamas describes as its charitable work for Palestinians, but investments in support of its ideological position are also relevant, with Persian Gulf States and Saudi Arabia prominent in the latter. Matthew Levitt claims that Hamas also taps money from corporations, criminal organizations and financial networks that support terror. It is also alleged that it engages in cigarette and drug smuggling, multimedia copyright infringement and credit card fraud. The United States, Israel and the EU have shut down many charities and organs that channel money to Hamas, such as the Holy Land Foundation for Relief. Between 1992 and 2001, this group is said to have provided $6.8 million to Palestinian charities of the $57 million collected. By 2001, it was alleged to have given Hamas $13 million, and was shut down shortly afterwards.

About half of Hamas's funding came from states in the Persian Gulf down to the mid-2000s. Saudi Arabia supplied half of the Hamas budget of $50 million in the early 2000s, but, under US pressure, began to cut its funding by cracking down on Islamic charities and private donor transfers to Hamas in 2004, which by 2006 drastically reduced the flow of money from that area. Iran and Syria, in the aftermath of Hamas's 2006 electoral victory, stepped in to fill the shortfall. Saudi funding, negotiated with third parties including Egypt, remained supportive of Hamas as a Sunni group but chose to provide more assistance to the PNA, the electoral loser, when the EU responded to the outcome by suspending its monetary aid. During the 1980s, Iran began to provide 10% of Hamas's funding, which it increased annually until by the 1990s it supplied $30 million. It accounted for $22 million, over a quarter of Hamas's budget, by the late 2000s. According to Matthew Levitt, Iran preferred direct financing to operative groups rather than charities, requiring video proof of attacks. Much of the Iran funding is said to be channeled through Hezbollah. After 2006, Iran's willingness to take over the burden of the shortfall created by the drying up of Saudi funding also reflected the geopolitical tensions between the two, since, though Shiite, Iran was supporting a Sunni group traditionally closely linked with the Saudi kingdom. The US imposed sanctions on Iran's Bank Saderat, alleging it had funneled hundreds of millions to Hamas. The US has expressed concerns that Hamas obtains funds through Palestinian and Lebanese sympathizers of Arab descent in the Foz do Iguaçu area of the tri-border region of Latin America, an area long associated with arms trading, drug trafficking, contraband, the manufacture of counterfeit goods, money-laundering and currency fraud. The State Department adds that confirmatory information of a Hamas operational presence there is lacking.

After 2009, sanctions on Iran made funding difficult, forcing Hamas to rely on religious donations by individuals in the West Bank, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia. Funds amounting to tens of millions of dollars raised in the Gulf states were transferred through the Rafah Border Crossing. These were not sufficient to cover the costs of governing the Strip and running the al Qassam Brigades, and when tensions arose with Iran over support of President Assad in Syria, Iran dropped its financial assistance to the government, restricting its funding to the military wing, which meant a drop from $150 million in 2012 to $60 million the following year. A further drop occurred in 2015 when Hamas expressed its criticisms of Iran's role in the Yemeni Civil War.

In 2017, the PA government imposed its own sanctions against Gaza, including, among other things, cutting off salaries to thousands of PA employees, as well as financial assistance to hundreds of families in the Gaza Strip. The PA initially said it would stop paying for the electricity and fuel that Israel supplies to the Gaza Strip, but after a year partially backtracked. The Israeli government has allowed millions of dollars from Qatar to be funneled on a regular basis through Israel to Hamas, to replace the millions of dollars the PA had stopped transferring to Hamas. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu explained that letting the money go through Israel meant that it could not be used for terrorism, saying: "Now that we are supervising, we know it's going to humanitarian causes."

According to U.S. officials, as of 2023 Hamas has an investment portfolio that is worth anywhere from 500 million to US$1 billion, including assets in Sudan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Algeria and the United Arab Emirates. Hamas has denied such allegations.

In 2024, financial activity in Gaza is mainly carried out via money changers in order to bypass the international financial authorities.

Social services wing

Hamas developed its social welfare programme by replicating the model established by Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood. For Hamas, charity and the development of one's community are both prescribed by religion and to be understood as forms of resistance. In Islamic tradition, dawah (lit. transl. "the call to God") obliges the faithful to reach out to others by both proselytising and by charitable works, and typically the latter centre on the mosques which make use of both waqf endowment resources and charitable donations (zakat, one of the five pillars of Islam) to fund grassroots services such as nurseries, schools, orphanages, soup kitchens, women's activities, library services and even sporting clubs within a larger context of preaching and political discussions. In the 1990s, some 85% of its budget was allocated to the provision of social services. Hamas has been called perhaps the most significant social services actor in Palestine. By 2000, Hamas or its affiliated charities ran roughly 40% of the social institutions in the West Bank and Gaza and, with other Islamic charities, by 2005, was supporting 120,000 individuals with monthly financial support in Gaza. Part of the appeal of these institutions is that they fill a vacuum in the administration by the PLO of the Palestinian territories, which had failed to cater to the demand for jobs and broad social services, and is widely viewed as corrupt. As late as 2005, the budget of Hamas, drawing on global charity contributions, was mostly tied up in covering running expenses for its social programmes, which extended from the supply of housing, food and water for the needy to more general functions such as financial aid, medical assistance, educational development and religious instruction. A certain accounting flexibility allowed these funds to cover both charitable causes and military operations, permitting transfer from one to the other.

The dawah infrastructure itself was understood, within the Palestinian context, as providing the soil from which a militant opposition to the occupation would flower. In this regard it differs from the rival Palestinian Islamic Jihad which lacks any social welfare network, and relies on spectacular terrorist attacks to recruit adherents. In 2007, through funding from Iran, Hamas managed to allocate at a cost of $60 million, monthly stipends of $100 for 100,000 workers, and a similar sum for 3,000 fishermen laid idle by Israel's imposition of restrictions on fishing offshore, plus grants totalling $45 million to detainees and their families. Matthew Levitt argues that Hamas grants to people are subject to a rigorous cost-benefit analysis of how beneficiaries will support Hamas, with those linked to terrorist activities receiving more than others. Israel holds the families of suicide bombers accountable and bulldozes their homes, whereas the families of Hamas activists who have been killed or wounded during militant operations are given an initial, one-time grant varying between $500–$5,000, together with a $100 monthly allowance. Rent assistance is also given to families whose homes have been destroyed by Israeli bombing though families unaffiliated with Hamas are said to receive less.

Until 2007, these activities extended to the West Bank, but, after a PLO crackdown, now continue exclusively in the Gaza Strip. After the 2013 Egyptian coup d'état deposed the elected Muslim Brotherhood government of Mohamed Morsi in 2013, Hamas found itself in a financial straitjacket and has since endeavoured to throw the burden of responsibility for public works infrastructure in the Gaza Strip back onto the Palestinian National Authority, but without success.

Military wing

The Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades is Hamas' military wing. While the number of members is known only to the Brigades leadership, Israel estimates the Brigades have a core of several hundred members who receive military style training, including training in Iran and in Syria (before the Syrian Civil War). Additionally, the brigades have an estimated 10,000–17,000 operatives, other sources say 15,000–40,000 militants, forming a backup force whenever circumstances call for reinforcements for the Brigade. Recruitment training lasts for two years. The group's ideology outlines its aim as the liberation of Palestine and the restoration of Palestinian rights under the dispensations set forth in the Qur'an, and this translates into three policy priorities:

To evoke the spirit of Jihad (Resistance) among Palestinians, Arabs, and Muslims; to defend Palestinians and their land against the Zionist occupation and its manifestations; to liberate Palestinians and their land that was usurped by the Zionist occupation forces and settlers.

According to its official stipulations, the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades' military operations are to be restricted to operating only inside Palestine, engaging with Israeli soldiers, and in exercising the right of self-defense against armed settlers. They are to avoid civilian targets, to respect the enemy's humanity by refraining from mutilation, defacement or excessive killing, and to avoid targeting Westerners either in the occupied zones or beyond.

Down to 2007, the Brigades are estimated to have lost some 800 operatives in conflicts with Israeli forces. The leadership has been consistently undermined by targeted assassinations. Aside from Yahya Ayyash (January 5, 1996), it has lost Emad Akel (November 24, 1993), Salah Shehade (July 23, 2002), Ibrahim al-Makadmeh (March 8, 2003), Ismail Abu Shanab (August 21, 2003), Ahmed Yassin (March 22, 2004), and Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi (April 17, 2004).

The Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades groups its fighters in 4–5 man cells, which in turn are integrated into companies and battalions. Unlike the political section, which is split between an internal and external structure, the Brigades are under a local Palestinian leadership, and disobedience with the decisions taken by the political leadership have been relatively rare.

Although the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades are an integral part of Hamas, the exact nature of the relationship is hotly debated. They appear to operate at times independently of Hamas, exercising a certain autonomy. Some cells have independent links with the external leadership, enabling them to bypass the hierarchical command chain and political leadership in Gaza. Ilana Kass and Bard O'Neill, likening Hamas's relationship with the Brigades to the political party Sinn Féin's relationship to the military arm of the Irish Republican Army, quote a senior Hamas official as stating: "The Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigade is a separate armed military wing, which has its own leaders who do not take their orders from Hamas and do not tell us of their plans in advance."

Gaza forces, October 2023

During the 2023 Gaza war, the IDF published its intelligence about the Hamas military in the Strip. They put the strength of the Qassam Brigades there at the start of the war at 30,000 fighters, organised by area in five brigades, consisting in total of 24 battalions and c. 140 companies. Each regional brigade had a number of strongholds and outposts, and included specialised arrays for rocket firing, anti-tank missiles, air defenses, snipers, and engineering.

Media

Al-Aqsa TV

Al-Aqsa TV is a television channel founded by Hamas. The station began broadcasting in the Gaza Strip on January 9, 2006, less than three weeks before the Palestinian legislative elections. It has shown television programs, including some children's television, which deliver antisemitic messages. Hamas has stated that the television station is "an independent media institution that often does not express the views of the Palestinian government headed by Ismail Haniyeh or of the Hamas movement", and that Hamas does not hold antisemitic views. The programming includes ideologically tinged children's shows, news talk, and religiously inspired entertainment. According to the Anti-Defamation League, the station promotes terrorist activity and incites hatred of Jews and Israelis. Al-Aqsa TV is headed by the controversial Fathi Ahmad Hammad, chairman of al-Ribat Communications and Artistic Productions—a Hamas-run company that also produces Hamas's radio station, Voice of al-Aqsa, and its biweekly newspaper, The Message. Hamad has made a number of controversial comments, including a speech in which he reportedly stated: 'you have Jews everywhere and we must attack every Jew on the globe by way of slaughtering and killing'

Al-Fateh magazine

This section's factual accuracy is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help to ensure that disputed statements are reliably sourced. (October 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Al-Fateh ("the conqueror") is the Hamas children's magazine, published biweekly in London, and also posted in an online website. It began publication in September 2002, and its 108th issue was released in mid-September 2007. The magazine features stories, poems, riddles, and puzzles, and states it is for "the young builders of the future".

According to the Anti-Defamation League, al-Fateh promotes violence and antisemitism, with praise for and encouragement to become suicide bombers, and that it "regularly includes photos of children it claims have been detained, injured or killed by Israeli police, images of children firing slingshots or throwing rocks at Israelis and children holding automatic weapons and firebombs."

Social media

Hamas has traditionally presented itself as a voice of suffering of the Palestinian people. According to Time magazine, a new social media strategy was employed in the wake of the October 7 attack: Hamas asserted itself as the dominant resistance force in the Middle East by recording and broadcasting the brutality of their attacks.

According to Dr. Harel Horev, historian and researcher of Palestinian affairs at Tel Aviv University, Hamas has used social media to dehumanize Israelis/Jews. According to his research, Hamas took over the most popular accounts on Palestinian networks in a covert manner that did not reveal its involvement. This control gave it the ability to significantly influence the Palestinian discourse online through content that denies the humanity and right to life of Israelis. These included posters, songs and videos glorifying threats; computer games that encourage the murder of Jews; training videos for carrying out effective and indiscriminate stabbing and shooting attacks; and anti-Semitic cartoons as a central means of dehumanizing the Israeli/Jew in the Palestinian online discourse.

Internal security

The General Security Service, formally part of the Hamas political party, operates akin to a governmental body within Gaza. Under the direct oversight of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, it conducts extensive surveillance on Palestinians, compiling files on various individuals including journalists and government critics. This secret police force relies on a network of informants and employs tactics such as censorship and surveillance to maintain control. Before the conflict with Israel, the unit reportedly had a monthly budget of $120,000 and consisted of 856 personnel, including more than 160 individuals paid to spread Hamas propaganda and conduct online attacks against opponents.

Other powerful internal security bodies in Gaza include Military Intelligence, which focuses on Israel, and the Internal Security Service, an arm of the Interior Ministry.

Symbols

The flag of Hamas is a green field (a traditionally respected color in Islam) charged in the middle with the writing of the Shahada, an Islamic statement of faith, in white calligraphic script: "There is no god but God" and "Muhammad is the messenger of God".

The emblems of their political and military wings are distinctly different. The emblem of Hamas' political wing features Islamic and militaristic motifs. It shows two crossed swords in front of the central building of the Al-Aqsa mosque complex, in Jerusalem. The mosque is framed by two Palestinian flags that feature the two statements that comprise the Shahada. Above Al Aqsa is a map of Palestine, matching the borders of Mandatory Palestine. Immediately below the Dome it reads "Palestine" and below that in the green banner: "Islamic Resistance Movement – Hamas". The emblem of their Al-Qassam Brigades militant wing does not include a map or a Palestinian flag, the militant wing emblem is a cartoon drawing of a man holding a gun and a Quran, with his face mostly covered by a black and white Palestinian keffiyeh. He is standing in front of a green flag and the golden dome of the Al-Aqsa mosque, but the building is more stylised than it is in the political wing emblem.

Violence

Hamas has used both political activities and violence in pursuit of its goals. For example, while politically engaged in the 2006 Palestinian Territories parliamentary election campaign, Hamas stated in its election manifesto that it was prepared to use "armed resistance to end the occupation". Hamas has repeatedly justified its violence by arguing "People under occupation have a right to resist that occupation". Hamas also argues its armed resistance only started after decades of Israeli occupation.

From 2000 to 2004, Hamas was responsible for killing nearly 400 Israelis and wounding more than 2,000 in 425 attacks, according to the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. From 2001 through May 2008, Hamas launched more than 3,000 Qassam rockets and 2,500 mortar attacks into Israel.

Attacks on civilians

Hamas have committed massacres targeting Israeli civilians. Hamas's most deadly suicide bombing was an attack on a Netanya hotel on March 27, 2002, in which 30 people were killed and 140 were wounded. The attack has also been referred to as the Passover massacre since it took place on the first night of the Jewish festival of Passover at a Seder.

Hamas has defended suicide attacks as a legitimate aspect of its asymmetric warfare against Israel. In 2003, according to Stephen Atkins, Hamas resumed suicide bombings in Israel as a retaliatory measure after the failure of peace talks and an Israeli campaign targeting members of the upper echelon of the Hamas leadership. but they are considered as crimes against humanity under international law. In a 2002 report, Human Rights Watch stated that Hamas leaders "should be held accountable" for "war crimes and crimes against humanity" committed by the al-Qassam Brigades.

In 2008, Hamas leader Khaled Mashal, offered that Hamas would attack only military targets if the IDF would stop causing the deaths of Palestinian civilians. Following a June 19, 2008, ceasefire, the al-Qassam Brigades ended its rocket attacks and arrested Fatah militants in Gaza who had continued sporadic rocket and mortar attacks against Israel. The al-Qassam Brigades resumed the attacks after the November 4 Israeli incursion into Gaza.

During the 2023 Hamas attack on Israel, Hamas infiltrated homes, shot civilians en masse, and took scores of Israeli civilians and soldiers as hostages into Gaza. According to Human Rights Watch, the deliberate targeting of civilians, indiscriminate attacks, and taking of civilians as hostages amount to war crimes under international humanitarian law. During its October 2023 offensive against Israel, Hamas massacred 364 people at the Re'im music festival, while abucting others. During the same offensive, it also was reported that Hamas had massacred the population of the Kfar Aza kibbutz. About 10 percent of the residents of the Be'eri kibbutz were killed. Hamas militants attacked the Psyduck festival, that took place near kibutz Nir Oz, killing 17 Israeli partygoers. Video footage shows children being deliberately killed during the kibbutz attacks, as well as what appears to be an attempt to decapitate a living person using a garden hoe. Forensic teams who examined bodies of victims said many bodies showed signs of torture as well as sexual and gender-based violence, and testimonies to this effect were also collected by Israeli police. Haaretz later reported that forensic pathologists who examined bodies of some 25 percent of the victims taken the Shura Base for identification found "no signs on any of those bodies attesting to sexual relations having taken place or of mutilation of genitalia."

Rocket attacks on Israel

Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel
A rocket fired from the Gaza Strip into Israel, 2008
By year (list)
2001 2002–2006 2007 2008 2008 ceasefire Gaza War 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Groups responsible
Fatah Hamas Islamic Jihad PFLP DFLP PRC Ansar al-Sunna Force 17 Army of Islam Tawhid wal-Jihad Abdullah Azzam Brigades Mujahideen Shura Council
Rocket types
Mortar Qassam Al-Quds Katyusha Grad Fajr-5
Cities affected
Ashdod Ashkelon Beersheba Eilat Gedera Kiryat Gat Kiryat Malakhi Netivot Sderot Ofakim Yavne Tel Aviv Jerusalem
Regional Council areas affected
Hof Ashkelon Karmia Netiv HaAsara Yad Mordechai Zikim Eshkol Nir Oz Nirim Yesha Sha'ar HaNegev Kfar Aza Nahal Oz Nir Am Sdot Negev Alumim Sa'ad Merhavim Be'er Tuvia Yoav Bnei Shimon Gush Etzion
Settlements affected (evacuated)
Atzmona Dugit Elei Sinai Gadid Ganei Tal Katif Kfar Darom Morag Netzarim Netzer Hazani Neve Dekalim Nisanit Rafiah Yam Slav
Defense and response
Civil defense in Israel Red Color Iron Dome ZAKA
See also
Rocket attacks on Eilat Projectile attacks from Lebanon
v t e

Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups have launched thousands of rockets into Israel since 2001, killing 15 civilians, wounding many more, and posing an ongoing threat to the nearly 800,000 Israeli civilians who live and work in the weapons' range. Hamas officials have said that the rockets were aimed only at military targets, saying that civilian casualties were the "accidental result" of the weapons' poor quality. According to Human Rights Watch, statements by Hamas leaders suggest that the purpose of the rocket attacks was indeed to strike civilians and civilian objects. From January 2009, following Operation Cast Lead, Hamas largely stopped launching rocket attacks on Israel and has on at least two occasions arrested members of other groups who have launched rockets, "showing that it has the ability to impose the law when it wants". In February 2010, Hamas issued a statement regretting any harm that may have befallen Israeli civilians as a result of Palestinian rocket attacks during the Gaza war. It maintained that its rocket attacks had been aimed at Israeli military targets but lacked accuracy and hence sometimes hit civilian areas. Israel responded that Hamas had boasted repeatedly of targeting and murdering civilians in the media.

According to one report, commenting on the 2014 conflict, "nearly all the 2,500–3,000 rockets and mortars Hamas has fired at Israel since the start of the war seem to have been aimed at towns", including an attack on "a kibbutz collective farm close to the Gaza border", in which an Israeli child was killed. Former Israeli Lt. Col. Jonathan D. Halevi stated that "Hamas has expressed pride in aiming long-range rockets at strategic targets in Israel including the nuclear reactor in Dimona, the chemical plants in Haifa, and Ben-Gurion Airport", which "could have caused thousands" of Israeli casualties "if successful".

In July 2008, Barack Obama, then the Democratic presidential candidate, said: "If somebody was sending rockets into my house, where my two daughters sleep at night, I'm going to do everything in my power to stop that, and I would expect Israelis to do the same thing." On December 28, 2008, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said in a statement: "the United States strongly condemns the repeated rocket and mortar attacks against Israel." On March 2, 2009, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton condemned the attacks.

On October 7, 2023, Hamas claimed responsibility for a barrage of missile attacks originating from the Gaza Strip.

Guerrilla warfare

Hamas has made great use of guerrilla tactics in the Gaza Strip and to a lesser degree the West Bank. It has successfully adapted these techniques over the years since its inception. According to a 2006 report by rival Fatah party, Hamas had smuggled between several hundred and 1,300 tons of advanced rockets, along with other weaponry, into Gaza.

Hamas has used IEDs and anti-tank rockets against the IDF in Gaza. The latter include standard RPG-7 warheads and home-made rockets such as the Al-Bana, Al-Batar and Al-Yasin. The IDF has a difficult, if not impossible, time trying to find hidden weapons caches in Palestinian areas—this is due to the high local support base Hamas enjoys.

Extrajudicial killings of rivals

In addition to killing Israeli civilians and armed forces, Hamas has also murdered suspected Palestinian Israel collaborators and Fatah rivals. According to the Associated Press, collaborating with Israel is a crime punishable by death in Gaza. Hundreds of Palestinians were executed by both Hamas and Fatah during the First Intifada. In the wake of the 2006 Israeli conflict with Gaza, Hamas was accused of systematically rounding up, torturing and summarily executing Fatah supporters suspected of supplying information to Israel. Human Rights Watch estimates several hundred Gazans were "maimed" and tortured in the aftermath of the conflict. Seventy-three Gazan men accused of "collaborating" had their arms and legs broken by "unidentified perpetrators", and 18 Palestinians accused of helping Israel were executed by Hamas security officials in the first days of the conflict. In November 2012, Hamas's Izzedine al-Qassam brigade publicly executed six Gaza residents accused of collaborating with Israel. According to the witnesses, six alleged informers were shot dead one by one in Gaza City, while the corpse of the sixth victim was tied by a cable to the back of a motorcycle and dragged through the streets. In 2013, Human Rights Watch issued a statement condemning Hamas for not investigating and giving a proper trial to the six men. Their statement was released the day before Hamas issued a deadline for "collaborators" to turn themselves in, or they will be pursued "without mercy". During the 2014 Israel-Gaza conflict, Hamas executed at least 23 accused collaborators after three of its commanders were assassinated by Israeli forces, with Amnesty International also reporting instances of torture used by Hamas forces. An Israeli source denied that any of the commanders had been targeted on the basis of human intelligence.

Frequent killings of unarmed people have also occurred during Hamas-Fatah clashes. NGOs have cited a number of summary executions as particular examples of violations of the rules of warfare, including the case of Muhammad Swairki, 28, a cook for Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas's presidential guard, who was thrown to his death, with his hands and legs tied, from a 15-story apartment building in Gaza City. Hamas security forces reportedly shoot and torture Palestinians who opposed Hamas rule in Gaza. In one case, a Palestinian had criticized Hamas in a conversation on the street with some friends. Later that day, more than a dozen armed men with black masks and red kaffiyeh took the man from his home, and brought him to a solitary area where they shot him three times in the lower legs and ankles. The man told Human Rights Watch that he was not politically active.

On 14 August 2009, Hamas fighters stormed the Mosque of extremist cleric Abdel-Latif Moussa. The cleric was protected by at least 100 fighters from Jund Ansar Allah ("Army of the Helpers of God"), an Islamist group with links to Al-Qaeda. The resulting battle left at least 13 people dead, including Moussa and six Hamas fighters, and 120 people injured.

According to Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas, during 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict, Hamas killed more than 120 Palestinian youths for defying house arrest imposed on them by Hamas, in addition to 30–40 Palestinians killed by Hamas in extrajudicial executions after accusing them of being collaborators with Israel. Referring to the killing of suspected collaborators, a Shin Bet official stated that "not even one" of those executed by Hamas provided any intelligence to Israel, while the Shin Bet officially "confirmed that those executed during Operation Protective Edge had all been held in prison in Gaza in the course of the hostilities".

Terrorist designation

The United States designated Hamas as a terrorist organisation in 1995, as did Canada in November 2002, and the United Kingdom in November 2021. In May 2021, the Organization of American States designated Hamas as a terrorist organisation. The European Union so designated Hamas's military wing in 2001 and, under US pressure, designated Hamas in 2003. Hamas challenged this decision, which was upheld by the European Court of Justice in July 2017. Japan and New Zealand have designated the military wing of Hamas as a terrorist organisation. The organisation is banned in Jordan. In late February 2024, New Zealand re-designated the entire Hamas organisation as a terror entity. In September 2024, Switzerland approved a draft law on to ban the group.

Hamas is not regarded as a terrorist organisation by Afghanistan, Algeria, Iran, Russia, Norway, Turkey, China, Egypt, Syria, and Brazil. "Many other states, including Russia, China, Syria, Turkey and Iran consider the (armed) struggle waged by Hamas to be legitimate."

Tobias Buck, a journalist with the British Financial Times newspaper wrote in 2012 that Hamas is "listed as a terrorist organisation by Israel, the US and the EU, but few dare to treat it that way" and in the Arab and Muslim world it had lost its pariah status with its emissaries welcomed in capitals of Islamic countries. In the early 2010s, Hamas was considered a terrorist group by some governments and academics, others regarded Hamas as a complex organisation, with terrorism as only one component.

Criticism

Aside from its use of political violence in pursuit of its goals, Hamas has been widely criticised for a variety of reasons, including the use of antisemitic hate speech by its representatives, frequent calls for the military destruction of Israel, its reported use of human shields and child combatants as part of its military operations, its restriction of political freedoms within the Gaza Strip, and human rights abuses.

After the start of the 2023 war, the European Parliament passed a motion stating the need for Hamas to be eliminated, with US President Biden having expressed the same sentiment. Hamas was accused of having committed genocide against Israelis on 7 October 2023 by 240 legal experts, including jurists and academics.

Electoral performance

Legislative Council

In the 2006 Palestinian legislative election, the party won 44.45% of the vote, becoming the largest party of the Legislative Council.

Support

Israeli policy towards Hamas

Benjamin Netanyahu had been Israel's prime minister for most of the two decades preceding the 2023 Israel–Hamas war, and was criticized for having championed a policy of empowering Hamas in Gaza. This policy was part of a strategy to sabotage a two-state solution by confining the Palestinian Authority to the West Bank and weakening it, and to demonstrate to the Israeli public and western governments that Israel has no partner for peace. This criticism was leveled by several Israeli officials, including former prime minister Ehud Barak, and former head of Shin Bet security services Yuval Diskin. Saudi Arabia and the Palestinian Authority were also critical of Israel under Netanyahu allowing suitcases of Qatari money to be given to Hamas, in exchange for maintaining the ceasefire. The Times of Israel reported after the Hamas attack that Netanyahu's policy to treat the Palestinian Authority as a burden and Hamas as an asset had "blown up in our faces".

Public support

A poll conducted in 2021 found that 53% of Palestinians believed Hamas was "most deserving of representing and leading the Palestinian people". Only 14% preferred Abbas's Fatah party. At the same time, a majority of Gazans also saw Hamas as corrupt, but were frightened to criticize the group. Polls conducted in September 2023 found that support for Hamas among Palestinians stood at around 27–31%.

Public opinions of Hamas deteriorated after it took control of the Gaza Strip in 2007. Prior to the takeover, 62% of Palestinians had held a favorable view of the group, while a third had negative views. According to a 2014 Pew Research survey just prior to the 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict, only about a third had positive opinions, and more than half viewed Hamas negatively. Furthermore, 68% of Israeli Arabs viewed Hamas negatively. In July 2014, 65% of Lebanese viewed Hamas negatively. In Jordan and Egypt, roughly 60% viewed Hamas negatively, and in Turkey, 80% had a negative view of Hamas. In Tunisia, 42% had a negative view of Hamas, while 56% of Bangladeshis and 44% of Indonesians had a negative opinion of Hamas.

Hamas popularity surged after the war in July–August 2014 with polls reporting that 81 percent of Palestinians felt that Hamas had "won" that war.

Following the Hamas-led attack on Israel in October 2023 and the Israel–Hamas war that followed, Hamas's popularity in Gaza fell while increasing in the West Bank. A May 2024 poll by the Arab World for Research and Development, a West Bank-based independent organization, only a quarter of Gazans supported Hamas, while 76% of Palestinians in the West Bank views Hamas positively. Views on the attack among Gazans plummeted from 50% support to 24% in favor from a poll taken in November 2023 to the May 2024 poll. According to the poll conducted by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy from November 14 to December 6, 2023, 40% of Saudi participants expressed a positive view of Hamas.

Foreign relations

After winning the Palestinian elections, Hamas leaders made multi-national diplomatic tours abroad. In April 2006, Mahmoud al-Zahar (then foreign minister) visited Saudi Arabia, Syria, Kuwait, Bahrein, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Yemen, Libya, Algeria, Sudan and Egypt. He met the Saudi foreign minister Prince Faysal. In Syria he held talks on the issue of Palestinians stuck on the Syrian-Iraqi border. He also stated that he unofficially met officials from Western Europe in Qatar who did not wish to be named. In May 2006, Hamas foreign minister visited Indonesia, Malaysia, the Sultanate of Brunei, Pakistan, China, Sri Lanka and Iran. The minister also participated in China–Arab States Cooperation Forum. Ismail Haniyeh in 2006 visited Egypt, Syria, Kuwait, Iran, Lebanon, Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

Hamas has always maintained leadership abroad. The movement is deliberately fragmented to ensure that Israel cannot kill its top political and military leaders. Hamas used to be strongly allied with both Iran and Syria. Iran gave Hamas an estimated $13–15 million in 2011 as well as access to long-range missiles. Hamas's political bureau was once located in the Syrian capital of Damascus before the start of the Syrian civil war. Relations between Hamas, Iran, and Syria began to turn cold when Hamas refused to back the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Instead, Hamas backed the Sunni rebels fighting against Assad. As a result, Iran cut funding to Hamas, and Iranian ally Hezbollah ordered Hamas members out of Lebanon. Hamas was then forced out of Syria, and subsequently has tried to mend fences with Iran and Hezbollah. Hamas contacted Jordan and Sudan to see if either would open up its borders to its political bureau, but both countries refused, although they welcomed many Hamas members leaving Syria.

From 2012 to 2013, under the short-lived leadership of Muslim Brotherhood President Mohamed Morsi, Hamas had the support of Egypt. After Morsi was removed from office, his successor Abdul Fattah al-Sisi outlawed the Muslim Brotherhood and destroyed the tunnels Hamas built into Egypt. In 2015, Egypt declared Hamas a terrorist organization. But this decision was overturned by Egypt in June of the same year. There was a rapprochement between Hamas and Egypt, when a Hamas delegation visited Cairo on 12 March 2016. Hamas has assisted Egypt in controlling the insurgency in Sinai. Hamas denied Egypt's request to deploy its own militants in the Sinai leading to tensions between the two.

Egypt has occasionally served as mediator between Hamas and Fatah, seeking to unify the two factions. In 2017, Yahya Sinwar visited Cairo for 5 weeks and convinced the Egyptian government to open the Rafah crossing, letting in cement and fuel in exchange for Hamas committing to better relations with Fatah; this subsequently led to the signing of the 2017 Fatah–Hamas Agreement.

The United Arab Emirates has been hostile to Hamas designating the Brotherhood as a terrorist organization and Hamas was at the time viewed as the Brotherhood's Palestinian equivalent.

Hamas enjoyed close relations with Saudi Arabia in its early years. Saudi Arabia funded most of its operations from 2000 to 2004, but reduced its support due to US pressure. In 2020, many Hamas members in Saudi Arabia were arrested. In 2022, Saudi Arabia began releasing Hamas members from prison. In April 2023, Ismail Haniyeh visited Riyadh, a sign of improving relations. Haniyeh had long sought to visit Saudi Arabia, and his requests to do so had been long ignored up until then.

Despite its Sunni Islamist ideology, Hamas has been flexible and pragmatic in its foreign policy, moderating and toning down its religious rhetoric when expedient; it has developed strong ties with Iran, and has also established relations with constitutionally secular states such as Syria and Russia. Kyrylo Budanov, the chief of Ukraine's Main Directorate of Intelligence, has accused Russia of supporting Hamas by supplying the group with stolen Ukrainian weaponry, and the National Resistance Center of Ukraine alleged that the Russian Wagner Group trained Hamas militants ahead of the October 7 attacks.

North Korea supplies Hamas with weaponry. Ali Barakeh, a Hamas official living in Lebanon, claimed the two are allies.

Hamas leaders reportedly re-established relations with Kuwait, Libya and Oman, all of which reportedly have not had warm relations with Fatah. The cool relationship between Fatah and Kuwait owed to Arafat's support for Saddam during the First Gulf War, which lead to the Palestinian exodus from Kuwait (1990–91). This rapproachment is in part due to Hamas's policy of non-interference in the internal affairs of Arab countries. Mahmoud al-Zahar stated that Hamas does not "play the game" of siding with one Arab nation against another (e.g. in the Gulf War). When Yusuf al-Qaradawi, and other Sunni ulema, called for an uprising against Assad's regime in Syria, Mahmoud al-Zahar maintained that taking sides would harm the Palestinian cause.

After the fall of the Assad regime in Syria, Hamas congratulated the Syrian people for achieving their "aspirations for freedom and justice," and expressed hope that the new Syrian government would continue "its historical and pivotal role in supporting the Palestinian people."

Qatar and Turkey

According to Middle East experts, now Hamas has two firm allies: Qatar and Turkey. Both give Hamas public and financial assistance estimated to be in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Qatar has transferred more than $1.8 billion to Hamas. Shashank Joshi, senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, says that "Qatar also hosts Hamas's political bureau which includes Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal." Meshaal also visits Turkey frequently to meet with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Erdogan has dedicated himself to breaking Hamas out of its political and economic seclusion. On US television, Erdogan said in 2012 that "I don't see Hamas as a terror organization. Hamas is a political party."

Qatar has been called Hamas' most important financial backer and foreign ally. In 2007, Qatar was, with Turkey, the only country to back Hamas after the group ousted the Palestinian Authority from the Gaza Strip. The relationship between Hamas and Qatar strengthened in 2008 and 2009 when Khaled Meshaal was invited to attend the Doha Summit where he was seated next to the then Qatari Emir Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani, who pledged $250 million to repair the damage caused by Israel in the Israeli war on Gaza. These events caused Qatar to become the main player in the "Palestinian issue". Qatar called Gaza's blockade unjust and immoral, which prompted the Hamas government in Gaza, including former Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, to thank Qatar for their "unconditional" support. Qatar then began regularly handing out political, material, humanitarian and charitable support for Hamas.

In 2011, U.S. President Barack Obama personally requested that Qatar, one of the U.S.'s most important Arab allies, provide a base for the Hamas leadership. At the time, the U.S. were seeking to establish communications with Hamas and believed that a Hamas office in Qatar would be easier to access than a Hamas bureau in Iran, the group's main backer.

In 2012, Qatar's former Emir, Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani, became the first head of state to visit Gaza under Hamas rule. He pledged to raise $400 million for reconstruction. Sources say that advocating for Hamas is politically beneficial to Turkey and Qatar because the Palestinian cause draws popular support amongst their citizens at home.

Speaking in reference to Qatar's support for Hamas, during a 2015 visit to Palestine, Qatari official Mohammad al-Emadi, said Qatar is using the money not to help Hamas but rather the Palestinian people as a whole. He acknowledges that giving to the Palestinian people means using Hamas as the local contact. Emadi said, "You have to support them. You don't like them, don't like them. But they control the country, you know." Some argue that Hamas's relations with Qatar are putting Hamas in an awkward position because Qatar has become part of the regional Arab problem. Hamas says that having contacts with various Arab countries establishes positive relations which will encourage Arab countries to do their duty toward the Palestinians and support their cause by influencing public opinion in the Arab world. In March 2015, Hamas has announced its support of the Saudi Arabian-led military intervention in Yemen against the Shia Houthis and forces loyal to former President Ali Abdullah Saleh. In a controversial deal, Israel's government under Benjamin Netanyahu supported Qatar's payments to Hamas for many years, in the hope that it would turn Hamas into an effective counterweight to the Palestinian Authority and prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state.

In May 2018, Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan tweeted to the Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu that Hamas is not a terrorist organization but a resistance movement that defends the Palestinian homeland against an occupying power. During that period there were conflicts between Israeli troops and Palestinian protestors in the Gaza Strip, due to the decision of the United States to move their embassy to Jerusalem. Also in 2018 the Israel Security Agency accused SADAT International Defense Consultancy (a Turkish private military company with connections to the Turkish government) of transferring funds to Hamas.

In February 2020, Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh met with Turkish President Erdoğan. On 26 July 2023, Haniyeh met with Erdoğan and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. Behind the meeting was Turkey's effort to reconcile Fatah with Hamas. On 7 October 2023, the day of the Hamas attack on Israel, Haniyeh was in Istanbul, Turkey. On 21 October 2023, Haniyeh spoke with Erdoğan about the latest developments in the Israel–Hamas war and the current situation in Gaza. On 25 October 2023, Erdoğan said that Hamas was not a terrorist organisation but a liberation group fighting to protect Palestinian lands and people.

See also

• Hamas war crimes
• Hamastan
• History of Hamas
• List of leaders of Hamas
• List of political parties in the State of Palestine
• Politics of Palestine
• Israeli support for Hamas

Notes

1. Consists of Khaled Mashal, Khalil al-Hayya, Zaher Jabarin, Muhammad Ismail Darwish, and an unnamed senior member of Hamas.
2. The assassination of Deif was claimed by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). However, it was denied by Hamas.
3. UK: /həˈmæs/ hə-MASS, US: /həˈmɑːs/ hə-MAHSS; Arabic: حَمَاس, romanized: Ḥamās, IPA: [ħaˈmaːs]
4. commonly Arabic: حركة حماس, romanized: Haraka Hamas, lit. 'Hamas Movement'.
5. A two-thirds majority was required for the motion to pass. 87 voted in favour, 58 against, 32 abstained and 16 did not vote.
6. Haniyeh at the time was the (overall) Prime Minister of the State of Palestine but as such dismissed by his President Abbas in 2007; nevertheless still head of the Hamas government in the Gaza Strip
7. The notion of "Palestine from the river to the sea" is nothing but the boundaries of Eretz Israel as imagined by the first Zionists. The notion was enshrined in the founding charter of the Likud party which states that "between the Sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty." One can thus entertain the chilling irony that Hamas owes its cherished slogan to the Zionists. After all, what is "free Palestine from the river to the sea" but a utopian parody of "Greater Israel"?
8. His name has been spelled: Hussam al-Tawil, Hossam Al-Tawil, or Hosam al-Taweel.
9. 'The Charter was written in early 1988 by one individual and was made public without appropriate general Hamas consultation, revision or consensus, to the regret of Hamas's leaders in later years. The author of the Charter was one of the 'old guard' of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Gaza Strip, completely cut off from the outside world. All kinds of confusions and conflations between Judaism and Zionism found their way into the Charter, to the disservice of Hamas ever since, as this document has managed to brand it with charges of 'anti-Semitism' and a naïve world-view' Hamas leaders and spokespeople have rarely referred to the Charter or quoted from it, evidence that it has come to be seen as a burden rather than an intellectual platform that embraces the movement's principles.'
10. 'The second major component in Palestine's sanctity, according to Hamas, is its designation as a waqf by the Caliph 'Umar b. al-Khattab. When the Muslim armies conquered Palestine in the year 638, the Hamas Charter says, the Caliph 'Umar b. al-Khattab decided not to divide the conquered land among the victorious soldiers, but to establish it as a waqf, belonging to the entire Muslim nation until the day of resurrection.'
11. 'In a 1995 lecture, Sheikh Jamil Hamami, a party to the foundation of Hamas and a senior member of its West Bank leadership, expounded the importance of Hamas' dawa infrastructure as the soil from which militancy would flower.'
12. 'Consistent attacks on army units by Hamas activists are as new as the use of anti-tank missiles against civilian homes by the Israeli military.'
13. Matthew Levitt on the other hand claims that Hamas's welfare institutions act as a mere façade or front for the financing of terrorism, and dismisses the idea of two wings as a 'myth'. He cites Ahmed Yassin stating in 1998: "We can not separate the wing from the body. If we do so, the body will not be able to fly. Hamas is one body."
14. 'This ceasefire ended when Israel started targeting Hamas leaders for assassination in July 2003. Hamas retaliated with a suicide bombing in Israel on August 19, 2003, that killed 20 people, including 6 children. Since then Israelis have mounted an assassination campaign against the senior leadership of Hamas that has killed 13 Hamas members, including Ismail Abu Shanab, one of the most moderate leaders of Hamas. ... After each of these assassinations, Hamas has sent a suicide bomber into Israel in retaliation.'
15. "In 2006, Norway explicitly distanced itself from the EU proscription regime, claiming that it was causing problems for its role as a 'neutral facilitator.'"

References

1. "Hamas to be temporarily led by five-member ruling committee". The Arab Weekly. Retrieved 24 October 2024.
2. "Who will lead Hamas after killing of Yahya Sinwar?". BBC. Retrieved 24 October 2024.
3. Downs, Ray. "Hamas leader dead after 'accidental' gunshot to head". UPI. Archived from the original on 7 December 2023. Retrieved 31 January 2024.
4. Abdelal 2016, p. 122.
5. Dalloul 2017.
6. Abu-Amr 1993, p. 10.
7. Litvak 1998, p. 151.
8. Barzak 2011.
9. AFP 2019.
10. ^ Dalacoura 2012, pp. 66–67.
11. Gelvin 2014, p. 226: "As with Islamic political organizations elsewhere, Hamas offers its followers an ideology that appropriates the universal message of Islam for what is, in effect, a nationalist struggle."
12. Stepanova 2008, p. 113.
13. Cheema 2008, p. 465: "Hamas considers Palestine the main front of jihad and viewed the uprising as an Islamic way of fighting the Occupation. The organisation's leaders argued that Islam gave the Palestinian people the power to confront Israel and described the Intifada as the return of the masses to Islam. Since its inception, Hamas has tried to reconcile nationalism and Islam. Hamas claims to speak as a nationalist movement but with an Islamic-nationalist rather than a secular nationalist agenda."
14. Litvak 2004, pp. 156–57: "Hamas is primarily a religious movement whose nationalist worldview is shaped by its religious ideology."
15. Klein, Menachem (2007). "Hamas in Power". Middle East Journal. 61 (3): 442–459. doi:10.3751/61.3.13. ISSN 0026-3141. JSTOR 4330419.
16. ^ May, Tiffany (8 October 2023). "A Quick Look at Hamas". The New York Times. Retrieved 25 September 2024.
17. Maqdsi, Muhammad. "Charter of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) of Palestine" (PDF). Palestine Studies. University of California Press. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 February 2024. Retrieved 20 March 2024.
18. Dunning 2016, p. 270.
19. Mišʿal, Šāʾûl; Sela, Avraham; Selaʿ, Avrāhām (2006). The Palestinian Hamas: vision, violence, and coexistence ; [with a new introduction]. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. ISBN 9780231116756. Archived from the original on 6 November 2023. Retrieved 20 October 2023.
20. "Hamas, n. meanings, etymology and more". Oxford English Dictionary.
21. Taraki, Lisa (January–February 1989). "The Islamic Resistance Movement in the Palestinian Uprising". Middle East Report. No. 156. Tacoma, WA: MERIP. pp. 30–32. doi:10.2307/3012813. ISSN 0899-2851. JSTOR 3012813. OCLC 615545050. Archived from the original on 1 February 2022. Retrieved 1 February 2022.
22. "HAMAS". National Counterterrorism Center. Director of National Intelligence#Office of the Director of National Intelligence. September 2022. Archived from the original on 1 November 2023. Retrieved 4 February 2024.
23. Lopez, Anthony; Ireland, Carol; Ireland, Jane; Lewis, Michael (2020). The Handbook of Collective Violence: Current Developments and Understanding. Taylor & Francis. p. 239. ISBN 9780429588952. The most successful radical Sunni Islamist group has been Hamas, which began as a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood in Palestine in the early 1980s. It used terrorist attacks against civilians - particularly suicide bombings – to help build a larger movement, going so far as to emerge as the recognized government of the Gaza Strip in the Palestine Authority.
24. Kear 2018, p. 22.
25. "What is Hamas? A simple guide to the armed Palestinian group". Al Jazeera. 8 October 2023. Archived from the original on 8 October 2023. Retrieved 26 June 2024.
26. Higgins, Andrew (24 January 2009). "How Israel Helped to Spawn Hamas". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 26 September 2009. Retrieved 25 January 2023. When Israel first encountered Islamists in Gaza in the 1970s and '80s, they seemed focused on studying the Quran, not on confrontation with Israel. The Israeli government officially recognized a precursor to Hamas called Mujama Al-Islamiya, registering the group as a charity. It allowed Mujama members to set up an Islamic university and build mosques, clubs and schools. Crucially, Israel often stood aside when the Islamists and their secular left-wing Palestinian rivals battled, sometimes violently, for influence in both Gaza and the West Bank. 'When I look back at the chain of events I think we made a mistake,' says David Hacham, who worked in Gaza in the late 1980s and early '90s as an Arab-affairs expert in the Israeli military. 'But at the time nobody thought about the possible results.' Israeli officials who served in Gaza disagree on how much their own actions may have contributed to the rise of Hamas. They blame the group's recent ascent on outsiders, primarily Iran. This view is shared by the Israeli government. 'Hamas in Gaza was built by Iran as a foundation for power, and is backed through funding, through training and through the provision of advanced weapons,' Mr. Olmert said last Saturday. Hamas has denied receiving military assistance from Iran.
27. "Hamas wins huge majority". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 5 August 2024.
28. McGreal, Chris (27 January 2006). "Hamas faces unexpected challenge: how to deal with power". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 5 August 2024.
29. Davis 2017, pp. 67–69.
30. Mukhimer 2012, pp. vii, 58.
31. "The Gaza Strip | The humanitarian impact of 15 years of blockade – June 2022". Archived from the original on 9 April 2024. Retrieved 7 August 2024.
32. Gelvin 2014, p. 226
33. Seurat 2019, pp. 17–19: "Indeed, since 2006, Hamas has unceasingly highlighted its acceptance of the 1967 borders, as well as accords signed by the PLO and Israel. This position has been an integral part of reconciliation agreements between Hamas and Fatah since 2005: the Cairo Agreement in 2005, the Prisoners' Document in 2006, the Mecca Agreement in 2007 and finally the Cairo and Doha Agreements in 2011 and 2012."
34. ^ *Baconi 2018, pp. 114–116: " enshrined many issues that had already been settled, including statehood on the 1967 borders; UN Resolution 194 for the right of return; and the right to resist within the occupied territories...This agreement was in essence a key text that offered a platform for unity between Hamas and Fatah within internationally defined principles animating the Palestinian struggle." *Roy 2013, p. 210: "Khaled Meshal, as chief of Hamas's Political Bureau in Damascus, as well as Hamas prime minister Ismail Haniyeh similarly confirmed the organization's willingness to accept the June 4, 1967, borders and a two-state solution should Israel withdraw from the occupied territories, a reality reaffirmed in the 2006 Palestinian Prisoners' Document, in which most major Palestinian factions had reached a consensus on a two-state solution, that is, a Palestinian state within 1967 borders including East Jerusalem and the refugee right of return."
35. ^ Baconi 2018, pp. 82: "The Cairo Declaration formalized what Hamas's military disposition throughout the Second Intifada had alluded to: that the movement's immediate political goals were informed by the desire to create a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders."
36. ^ "Hamas accepts Palestinian state with 1967 borders: Khaled Meshaal presents a new document in which Hamas accepts 1967 borders without recognising state of Israel Gaza". Al Jazeera. 2 May 2017.
37. Sources that believe that Hamas' 2017 charter accepted the 1967 borders:
    • Bjorn Brenner (2022). Gaza Under Hamas. I. B. Tauris. p. 206.
    • Mohammed Ayoob. The Many Faces of Political Islam, Second Edition. University of Michigan Press. p. 133.
    • Maria Koinova. Diaspora Entrepreneurs and Contested States. Oxford University Press. p. 150.
    • Zartman 2020, p. 230
    • Asaf Siniver (ed.). Routledge Companion to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict.
    • Seurat 2019, pp. 61–62
38. "What does Israel's declaration of war mean for Palestinians in Gaza?". Al Jazeera. 9 October 2023.
39. "What will the Israeli-Palestinian conflict look like in 30 years?". The Jerusalem Post. 22 September 2023. Even Hamas in 2017 said it was ready to accept a Palestinian state with 1967 borders if it is clear this is the consensus of the Palestinians.
40. ^ Scott Atran, Robert Axelrod (2008). "Reframing Sacred Values" (PDF). Negotiation Journal. 24 (3): 221–246. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2008.00182.x. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 January 2024. Retrieved 20 March 2024.
41. ^ *Halim Rane (2009). Reconstructing Jihad Amid Competing International Norms. p. 34. Asher Susser, director of the Dayan Centre at Tel Aviv University, conveyed to me in an interview that "Hamas' 'hudna' is not significantly different from Sharon's 'long-term interim agreement." Similarly, Daniel Levy, a senior Israeli official for the Geneva Initiative (GI), informed me that certain Hamas officials find the GI acceptable, but due to the concerns about their Islamically oriented constituency and their own Islamic identity, they would "have to express the final result in terms of a "hudna," or "indefinite" ceasefire," rather than a formal peace agreement."
    • Loren D. Lybarger (2020). Palestinian Chicago. University of California Press. p. 199. Hamas too would signal a willingness to accept a long-term "hudna" (cessation of hostilities, truce) along the armistice lines of 1948 (an effective acceptance of the two-state formula).
    • Tristan Dunning (2016). Hamas, Jihad and Popular Legitimacy. Routledge. pp. 179–180.
42. ^ Baconi 2018, p. 108: "Hamas's finance minister in Gaza stated that 'a long-term ceasefire as understood by Hamas and a two-state settlement are the same. It's just a question of vocabulary.'"
43. ^ Alsoos, Imad (2021). "From jihad to resistance: the evolution of Hamas's discourse in the framework of mobilization". Middle Eastern Studies. 57 (5): 833–856. doi:10.1080/00263206.2021.1897006. S2CID 234860010.
44. ^ Qossay Hamed (2023). Hamas in Power: The Question of Transformation. IGI Global. p. 161.
45. ^ Seurat 2019, p. 17.
46. ^ Amira, Hass (3 May 2017). "Why Hamas' New Charter Is Aimed at Palestinians, Not Israelis". Haaretz. Archived from the original on 23 April 2023. Retrieved 12 November 2024.
47. ^ Timea Spitka (2023). National and International Civilian Protection Strategies in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Springer International Publishing. pp. 88–89.
48. ^ "Khaled Meshaal: Struggle is against Israel, not Jews". Al-Jazeera. 6 May 2017. Archived from the original on 19 November 2023. Retrieved 19 November 2023.
49. ^ Spoerl, Joseph S. (2020). "Parallels between Nazi and Islamist Anti-Semitism". Jewish Political Studies Review. 31 (1/2). Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs: 210–244. ISSN 0792-335X. JSTOR 26870795. Archived from the original on 16 January 2024. Retrieved 27 January 2024. Strictly speaking, the Hamas Covenant of 1988 focused its anti-Semitic language on Zionists, for example, describing The Protocols of the Elders of Zion as the blueprint for the Zionist project (Article 32) and accusing the Zionists of aiming to "annihilate Islam" (Article 28). The May 2017 "Document" continues in this vein, albeit in somewhat less florid language, asserting that "the Zionist project does not target the Palestinian people alone; it is the enemy of the Arabic and Islamic Ummah posing a grave threat to its security and interests. It is also hostile to the Ummah's aspirations for unity, renaissance, and liberation and has been the major source of its troubles. The Zionist project also poses a danger to international security and peace and to mankind…." (#15). As in the 1988 Covenant, the 2017 "Document" merely takes all the classical tropes of anti-Semitism and focuses them on Zionism, noting that "it is the Zionists who constantly identify Judaism and the Jews with their own colonial project and illegal entity" (#16). In effect, Hamas is saying that it is at war with all Jews except those who are anti-Zionist, thus it is not anti-Semitic. This can hardly be regarded as a serious repudiation of anti-Semitism.
50. ^ Seurat 2022, p. 88.
51. Baconi 2018, p. 181.
52. ^ Samuel Ramani (1 September 2015). "Hamas's Pivot to Saudi Arabia". Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
53. Seurat 2022, p. 254.
54. Seurat 2022, p. 115,214.
55. "Canadian Policy on Key Issues in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict". Government of Canada. Archived from the original on 18 February 2018. Retrieved 13 March 2010.
56. "Movement and Access Restrictions in the West Bank: Uncertainty and Inefficiency in the Palestinian Economy" (PDF). World Bank. 9 May 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 April 2010. Retrieved 29 March 2010. Currently, freedom of movement and access for Palestinians within the West Bank is the exception rather than the norm contrary to the commitments undertaken in a number of Agreements between GOI and the PA. In particular, both the Oslo Accords and the Road Map were based on the principle that normal Palestinian economic and social life would be unimpeded by restrictions
57. DW 2018.
58. Dupret, Baudouin; Lynch, Michael; Berard, Tim (2015). Law at Work: Studies in Legal Ethnomethods. Oxford University Press. p. 279. ISBN 9780190210243. Hamas cynically abuses its own civilian population and their suffering for propaganda purposes.
59. "UN rejects US motion to condemn Hamas – DW – 12/07/2018". dw.com. Retrieved 5 August 2024.
60. Jefferis 2016, p. 119.
61. Herzog 2006, p. 84.
62. ^ Filiu 2012, p. 55.
63. Filiu 2012, p. 66.
64. Khalidi, Rashid (2020). The Hundred Years' War on Palestine. Metropolitan Books. p. 223. ISBN 978-1-627-79855-6.
65. Kimmerling, Baruch (2009). The Palestinian People: A History. Harvard University Press. p. 372. ISBN 9780674039599. Retrieved 31 July 2024.
66. "The Gangs of Gaza" Archived 2010-07-08 at the Wayback Machine, Newsweek, June 26, 2006.
67. al-Mughrabi, Nidal and Assadi, Mohammed. Palestinian in-fighting provokes despair, frustration Archived 2008-12-07 at the Wayback Machine, Reuters, October 3, 2006.
68. "The Palestinian National Unity Government". 24 February 2007. Archived from the original on 14 August 2011. Retrieved 4 June 2010.
69. "Who are Hamas?". London: BBC News. 26 January 2006. Archived from the original on 24 January 2016. Retrieved 23 September 2010.
70. Exposing the bitter truth of Gaza carnage Archived 2009-01-13 at the Wayback Machine The Age, June 23, 2007
71. "Gaza faces economic disaster if blockade continues, U.N. official warns" International Herald Tribune
72. Dion Nissenbaum. "Olmert aide supports free Gaza" Archived 2014-10-06 at the Wayback Machine. McClatchy Newspapers. December 8, 2008.
73. ^ "The Six Months of the Lull Arrangement pdf" (PDF). Tel Aviv Terrorism Information Center. December 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 October 2009. Retrieved 15 October 2009.
74. ^ Qassam lands in western Negev, no injuries Archived 2011-01-06 at the Wayback Machine Ynet News November 20, 2008
75. Lefkovits, Etgar (19 January 2009). "Pool of 8 foreign journalists allowed into Gaza". Archived from the original on 13 August 2011.
76. "Israel withdraws its troops from Gaza" Archived 2011-05-10 at the Wayback Machine Times Online
77. "Israel social security data reveals true picture of Oct 7 deaths". France 24. 15 December 2023. Archived from the original on 17 December 2023. Retrieved 4 January 2024.
78. Al Jazeera Staff. "Hamas says it has enough Israeli captives to free all Palestinian prisoners". Al Jazeera.
79. "Fears of a ground invasion of Gaza grow as Israel vows 'mighty vengeance'". Al Jazeera. 7 October 2023. Archived from the original on 8 October 2023. Retrieved 8 October 2023.
80. McKernan, Bethan (18 January 2024). "Evidence points to systematic use of rape and sexual violence by Hamas in 7 October attacks". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 21 January 2024. Retrieved 17 February 2024.
81. ^ "Reported impact snapshot | Gaza Strip (16 October 2024)". United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs – occupied Palestinian territory. 16 October 2024. Retrieved 18 October 2024.
82. Cordall, Simon Speakman. "War on Gaza, the view from Israel". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
83. Al-Mughrabi, Nidal; Hafezi, Parisa (31 July 2024). "Hamas chief Ismail Haniyeh killed in Iran, Hamas says". Reuters. Retrieved 2 August 2024.
84. "Behind the scenes as Hamas chose its new leader". www.bbc.com. Retrieved 9 August 2024.
85. Khadder, Kareem; Lister, Tim; Salman, Abeer; Kourdi, Eyad; John, Tara (6 August 2024). "Hamas names Oct. 7 architect Yahya Sinwar new political leader. What does it mean for ceasefire talks?". CNN. Retrieved 9 August 2024.
86. Baker, Graeme (17 October 2024). "How Israel killed enemy number one Yahya Sinwar". BBC News. Retrieved 19 October 2024.
87. ^ O'Malley 2015, p. 118.
88. ^ Abbas risks all with vote strategy Archived 27 October 2023 at the Wayback Machine. Roger Hardy, BBC, 8 June 2006
89. ^ Seurat 2019, p. 47
90. "National Conciliation Document of the Prisoners (28 June 2006) - Non-UN document". Question of Palestine. Archived from the original on 15 November 2024. Retrieved 15 December 2024. The Palestinian people in the homeland and in the Diaspora seek and struggle to liberate their land and remove the settlements and evacuate the settlers and remove the apartheid and annexation and separation wall and to achieve their right to freedom, return and independence and to exercise their right to self-determination, including the right to establish their independent state with al-Quds al-Shareef as its capital on all territories occupied in 1967, and to secure the right of return for refugees to their homes and properties from which they were evicted and to compensate them and to liberate all prisoners and detainees without any discrimination and all of this is based on the historical right of our people on the land of our forefathers and based on the UN Charter and international law and legitimacy in a way that does not affect the rights of our people.
91. Brenner 2017, p. 206.
92. ^ Zartman 2020, p. 230.
93. ^ Jacqueline S. Ismael; Tareq Y. Ismael; Glenn Perry (2011). Government and Politics of the Contemporary Middle East Continuity and Change. Routledge. p. 67. ISBN 9780415491440.
94. ^ Sumantra Bose. Contested Lands: Israel-Palestine, Kashmir, Bosnia, Cyprus, and Sri Lanka. Harvard University Press. p. 283.
95. ^ Tuastad, Dag. "The Hudna: Hamas's Concept of a Long-Term Ceasefire" (PDF). Peace Research Institute Oslo.
96. ^ Dunning 2016, p. 179.
97. ^ Dr. Lorenzo Kamel, "Why do Palestinians in Gaza support Hamas?" Archived 10 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine, Haaretz, August 5, 2014
98. Slater 2020, p. 285.
99. ^ Barak Ravid (14 November 2008). "In 2006 letter to Bush, Haniyeh offered compromise with Israel". Haaretz. Archived from the original on 25 November 2015. Retrieved 18 March 2012.
100. Brenner 2022, p. 36.
101. ^ Amira Hass (9 November 2008). "Hamas willing to accept Palestinian state with 1967 borders". Haaretz. Archived from the original on 10 October 2017. Retrieved 16 April 2014.
102. Baconi 2018, p. 108" Hamas's finance minister in Gaza stated that "a long-term ceasefire as understood by Hamas and a two-state settlement are the same. It's just a question of vocabulary.""
103. Erlanger, Steven (1 April 2008). "In Gaza, Hamas's Insults to Jews Complicate Peace". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 4 August 2024.
104. Hroub, Khaled (2010). "Hamas, Israel and Judaism". Hamas: A Beginner's Guide (2nd ed.). St. Martin's Press. p. 55. ISBN 9781783714667. Would Hamas ever recognize Israel and conclude peace agreements with it? It is not inconceivable that Hamas would recognize Israel. Hamas's pragmatism and its realistic approach to issues leave ample room for such a development. Yet most of the conditions that could create a conducive climate for such a step lie in the hands of the Israelis. As long as Israel refuses to acknowledge the basic rights of the Palestinian people in any end result based on the principle of a two-state solution, Hamas will find it impossible to recognize Israel.
105. "Hamas: Ideological Rigidity and Political Flexibility". United States Institute of Peace. pp. 16–18. Retrieved 2 November 2024.
106. "Top Hamas Official Suggests Recognizing Israel, Following Official PLO Stance". Haaretz. 14 December 2023. Retrieved 2 November 2024.
107. ^ Baconi 2018, p. 230.
108. Brenner 2022, p. 206.
109. ^ Seurat 2022, p. 50.
110. ^ Kear, Martin (2019). Hamas and Palestine: The Contested Road to Statehood (Hardcover). Routledge. p. 217. ISBN 9781138585416. Without expressly stating as much, Hamas had agreed to 'respect' UNSC Resolutions 242 and 338, the once reviled Oslo Accords, and by extension, the problematic issue of Israel's existence. While Hamas had previously proposed hudnas with Israel, this was the fi rst time that they had signed any Agreement that tacitly accepted that any future Palestinian state would only consist of the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem. After the Agreement, Meshaal reiterated Hamas's position concerning its understanding of what any prospective peace agreement with Israel would look like: that any Palestinian state should be established along the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital, acknowledgement of the right of return for all Palestinian refugees, the dismantling of all West Bank settlements, and the complete withdrawal of all vestiges of Israeli rule ( Tamimi 2009 : 261; Caridi 2012 : 248). This truncated version of any future Palestinian state was a key ideological concession from Hamas that finally brought it in line with Fatah, and more importantly, with the views of most of the Palestinian public.
111. Usher, Graham (1 April 2006). "The Democratic Resistance : Hamas , Fatah, and the Palestinian Elections". Journal of Palestine Studies. 35 (3): 20–36. doi:10.1525/jps.2006.35.3.20. ISSN 0377-919X.
112. "Tareq Baconi: Hamas, Explained". UNSETTLED Podcast. 17 May 2021.
113. ^ Bruce Hoffman (10 October 2023). "Understanding Hamas's Genocidal Ideology". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 11 October 2023. Retrieved 20 October 2023.
114. "Have war crimes been committed in Israel and Gaza and what laws govern the conflict?". CNN. 16 November 2023. Retrieved 18 November 2023.
115. Bayefsky, Anne F.; Blank, Laurie R. (22 March 2018). Incitement to Terrorism. BRILL. p. 91. ISBN 978-90-04-35982-6. Archived from the original on 15 October 2023. Retrieved 20 March 2024. The governing charter of Hamas, "The Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement," openly dedicates Hamas to genocide against the Jewish people (…) The Covenant (…) 1988. Articles 7, …
116. Tsesis, Alexander (2014–2015). "Antisemitism and Hate Speech Studies". Rutgers Journal of Law and Religion. 16: 352. Archived from the original on 15 October 2023. Retrieved 20 March 2024. For Jews, the Holocaust remains a real concern in an age when Hamas, a Palestinian terrorist organization, continues to advocate genocide in its core Charter.
117. Gourevitch, Philip (2 August 2014). "An Honest Voice in Israel". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on 22 October 2020. Retrieved 9 May 2020.
118. ^ Goldberg, Jeffrey (4 August 2014). "What Would Hamas Do If It Could Do Whatever It Wanted?". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 23 April 2020. Retrieved 9 May 2020.
119. Breedon, Jennifer R. (2015–2016). "Why the Combination of Universal Jurisdiction and Polical Lawfare Will Destroy the Sacred Sovereignty of States". Journal of Global Justice and Public Policy. 2: 389. Archived from the original on 15 October 2023. Retrieved 20 March 2024. The Hamas Charter not only calls for the militant, perhaps genocidal, liberation of Palestine (e.g., "raise the banner of Allah over every inch of Palestine"), but also demonstrates anti-Semitic, murderous intent.
120. Freilich, C. D. (2018). Israeli National security: a new strategy for an Era of change. Oxford University Press. p. 34, 37
121. Herf, Jeffrey (1 August 2014). "Why They Fight: Hamas' Too-Little-Known Fascist Charter". The American Interest. Archived from the original on 10 March 2017. Retrieved 3 May 2017.
122. Afflerbach, Holger; Strachan, Hew (26 July 2012). How Fighting Ends: A History of Surrender. OUP Oxford. p. 427. ISBN 978-0-19-969362-7.
123. Lange, Armin; Mayerhofer, Kerstin; Porat, Dina; Schiffman, Lawrence H. (10 May 2021). Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. p. 86. ISBN 978-3-11-067203-9.
124. • Halim Rane (2009). Reconstructing Jihad Amid Competing International Norms. p. 34. Asher Susser, director of the Dayan Centre at Tel Aviv University, conveyed to me in an interview that "Hamas' 'hudna' is not significantly different from Sharon's 'long-term interim agreement." Similarly, Daniel Levy, a senior Israeli official for the Geneva Initiative (GI), informed me that certain Hamas officials find the GI acceptable, but due to the concerns about their Islamically oriented constituency and their own Islamic identity, they would "have to express the final result in terms of a "hudna," or "indefinite" ceasefire," rather than a formal peace agreement."
     • Tristan Dunning (2016). Hamas, Jihad and Popular Legitimacy. Routledge. pp. 179–180.
     • Loren D. Lybarger (2020). Palestinian Chicago. University of California Press. p. 199. Hamas too would signal a willingness to accept a long-term "hudna" (cessation of hostilities, truce) along the armistice lines of 1948 (an effective acceptance of the two-state formula).
125. "فلسطين.. ووهم أسلمة الصراع!". Al Jazeera. 18 December 2017. Archived from the original on 26 February 2024. Retrieved 7 December 2023.
126. ^ "The Charter of the HAMAS (1988) (full text, translated at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem)". Intelligence Resource Project. Federation of American Scientists. Archived from the original on 15 November 2023. Retrieved 15 November 2023.
127. ^ "Hamas Covenant 1988: The Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement". The Avalon Project: Documents in Law, History and Diplomacy. Yale Law School. 18 August 1988. Archived from the original on 17 November 2015. Retrieved 15 February 2009.
128. Dalacoura 2012, p. 67.
129. Hroub, Khaled (2006). "A "New Hamas" through Its New Documents". Journal of Palestine Studies. 35 (1 (Summer 2006)): 6–27. doi:10.1525/jps.2006.35.4.6. Archived from the original on 18 September 2008.
130. ^ Seth Ackerman (September–October 2006). "Nixed Signals". Extra!. Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. Archived from the original on 24 January 2024. Retrieved 18 March 2012.
131. Sumantra Bose. Contested Lands: Israel-Palestine, Kashmir, Bosnia, Cyprus, and Sri Lanka. Harvard University Press. p. 283.
132. Seurat 2019, p. 199.
133. SCOTT ATRAN (17 August 2006). "Is Hamas Ready to Deal?". New York Times.
134. Seurat 2019, p. 49.
135. Seurat 2019, p. 50.
136. ^ Al Jazeera, "Hamas ready to accept 1967 borders" Archived 22 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine. April 22, 2008.
137. ^ "Hamas declares Israel truce over", BBC News, 22 December 2008, archived from the original on 18 January 2009, retrieved 3 January 2010
138. Jacobs, Phil (30 December 2008), "Tipping Point After years of rocket attacks, Israel finally says, 'Enough!'", Baltimore Jewish Times, archived from the original on 15 January 2009, retrieved 7 January 2009
139. Yoav Segev (22 September 2009). "Haniyeh to UN chief: Hamas accepts Palestinian state in '67 borders". Haaretz. Archived from the original on 8 October 2013. Retrieved 25 February 2012.
140. "Abbas sacks Hamas-led government". BBC News. 14 June 2007. Archived from the original on 27 August 2007. Retrieved 14 June 2007.
141. Peter Beinart, The Crisis of Zionism, Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine Melbourne University Press 2012, p. 219. Statement of Mashal in May 2010: 'If Israel withdraws to the borders of 1967, it doesn't mean that it gives us back all the land of the Palestinians. But we do consider this as an acceptable solution to have a Palestinian state on the borders of 1967... the Palestinian state will have a referendum and the Palestinian people will decide. We in Hamas will respect the decision of the Palestinian majority.' Haniyeh in November 2010: 'We accept a Palestinian state on the borders of 1967, with Jerusalem as its capital, the release of Palestinian prisoners, and the resolution of the issue of refugees.... Hamas will respect the results (of a referendum) regardless of whether it differs with its ideology and principles.' (Beinart refers to the original sources of those statements, respectively Current Affairs 28 May 2010 and Haaretz 1 December 2010.)
142. ^ David Whitten, Smith, Elizabeth Geraldine Burr, Understanding World Religions: A Road Map for Justice and Peace Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine, Rowman & Littlefield, 2014 p. 250
143. "Hamas Vows to Honor Palestinian Referendum on Peace with Israel: Islamist Leader Ismail Haniyeh Says He Would Accept a Deal with Israel Based on 1967 Borders and Denies that Gaza has Become a Stronghold for Al-Qaida". Haaretz. Reuters. 1 December 2010. Archived from the original on 15 October 2015. Retrieved 25 February 2012.
144. Text of the Hamas-Fatah Agreement, made in Cairo on 3 May 2011.. Website peacemaker.un.org. Retrieved 21 February 2024.
145. Ben Zion, Ilan (14 March 2012). "The eye of the Islamic Jihad storm". The Times of Israel. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023. Retrieved 9 October 2023.
146. Tracy, Marc (12 March 2012). "Terrorist Killing Prompts Gaza Rocket Exchange". Tablet Magazine. Archived from the original on 2 April 2012. Retrieved 31 March 2012.
147. ^ "Hamas in 2017: The document in full". MiddleEastEye. Archived from the original on 24 October 2017. Retrieved 6 January 2018.
148. "Suffering, dreaming and forgetting in Gaza". Neue Zürcher Zeitung. 4 November 2021. Archived from the original on 8 April 2024. Retrieved 8 April 2024.
149. "Hamas Actually Believed It Would Conquer Israel. In Preparation, It Divided the Country Into Cantons". Haaretz. 5 April 2024. Archived from the original on 7 April 2024. Retrieved 8 April 2024.
150. "حوار مع إسماعيل هنية ، رئيس المكتب السياسي لحركة حماس" (in Arabic). Lusail news. 27 July 2020. Retrieved 13 October 2024. 11:40
151. "Hamas envisioned deeper attacks, aiming to provoke an Israeli war". The Washington Post. 13 November 2023. Archived from the original on 13 November 2023. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
152. Martin, Clémence. ""Israël n'a pas sa place sur notre terre" : qui est Ghazi Hamad, la "voix du Hamas" depuis le massacre du 7 octobre ?" ['Israel has no place on our land': who is Ghazi Hamad, the 'voice of Hamas' since the October 7 massacre?]. Libération (in French). Retrieved 6 November 2023.
153. Pacchiani, Gianluca (1 November 2023). "Hamas official says group will repeat Oct. 7 attack 'twice and three times' to destroy Israel". Times of Israel. Archived from the original on 7 March 2024. Retrieved 17 February 2024.
154. Leifer, Joshua (21 March 2024). "What is the real Hamas?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 April 2024. He said that "Al-Aqsa Flood", Hamas's name for its armed offensive, "is just the first time, and there will be a second, a third, a fourth". Once considered a thoughtful observer of Palestinian politics, Hamad now declared that "nobody should blame us for what we do – on 7 October, on 10 October, on October 1,000,000. Everything we do is justified."
155. ^ "Haniyeh says Hamas ready for negotiations on a two-state solution if Israel stops war on Gaza". Al-Ahram. 1 November 2023. Archived from the original on 20 March 2024. Retrieved 20 March 2024.
156. ^ "Meshaal: Hamas rejects 'two-state solution'". Middle East Monitor. 18 January 2024. Archived from the original on 19 January 2024. Retrieved 20 January 2024.
157. ^ Sewell, Abby (25 April 2024). "Hamas official says group would lay down its arms if an independent Palestinian state is established". AP News. Retrieved 1 May 2024.
158. Louise Fawcett, International Relations of the Middle East Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine, Oxford University Press 2013 p. 49: 'The Hamas platform calls for full Muslim-Palestinian control of the Mediterranean to the Jordan River—the mirror image of Likud's platform for Jewish control of the same land.'
159. Dunning, Tristan (20 November 2014), Israel's policy on statehood merits the same scrutiny as Hamas gets, archived from the original on 15 October 2023, retrieved 20 March 2024
160. Assi 2018.
161. Glenn Frankel, Beyond the Promised Land: Jews and Arabs on the Hard Road to a New Israel, Simon and Schuster, 1996 pp. 389–91, cites Binjamin Netanyahu as declaring: 'You say the Bible is not a property deed. But I say the opposite-the Bible is our mandate, the Bible is our deed'. Yitzhak Rabin at the time charged that "Bibi Netyanyahu is a Hamas collaborator. ... Hamas and Likud have the same political goal.'
162. O'Malley 2015, p. 26: Israel incessantly invokes provisions of Hamas's charter that call for the elimination of Jews and the destruction of Israel, and its refusal to recognize the state of Israel. ... Hamas also calls attention to the clauses in the Likud charter that explicitly denounce a two-state solution. A double standard, says Hamas.
163. ^ Hamas Fights Over Gaza's Islamist Identity Archived 19 January 2017 at the Wayback Machine The New York Times, September 5, 2009
164. Hroub, Khaled (2000). Hamas : political thought and practice. Institute for Palestine Studies. pp. 72–73. ISBN 0887282768.
165. Byman, Daniel; Palmer, Alexander (7 October 2023). "What You Need to Know About the Israel-Hamas Violence". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on 7 October 2023. Retrieved 8 October 2023.
166. Urquhart, Conal (10 January 2007). "Hamas leader acknowledges 'reality' of Israel". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 15 October 2023. Retrieved 9 October 2023.
167. Aviad, G. (2009). "'Hamas' Military Wing in the Gaza Strip: Development, Patterns of Activity, and Forecast'" (PDF). Military and Strategic Affairs, Institute for National Security Studies (Israel). Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 October 2023. Retrieved 9 October 2023. However, once Hamas became the dominant political force in Palestinian society...
168. Chehab 2007, p. 203.
169. "Nizar Rayyan of Hamas on God's Hatred of Jews" (by Jeffrey Goldberg) Archived January 22, 2009, at the Wayback Machine, The Atlantic, (January 2, 2009).
170. Mohammed Ayoob. The Many Faces of Political Islam, Second Edition (January 2020). University of Michigan Press. p. 133.
171. ^ "Hamas boosts image by backing Christian candidate". 24 January 2006.
172. ^ "Christian candidate on Hamas ticket".
173. "MP Hussam al-Tawil dies in Gaza". 31 October 2012.
174. "Palestinian relatives of Christian Hossam Al-Tawil mourn on his body during his funeral at the Church of Saint Porphyrius". www.apaimages.info AP Images.
175. ^ "Palestinian Christians: 'We don't feel threatened by rise of Hamas'". 4 March 2006.
176. Davis 2017, p. 55.
177. Shitrit 2015, pp. 73–74.
178. ^ Phillips 2011, p. 81.
179. Shitrit 2015, p. 74.
180. Rubenberg 2001, pp. 230–31.
181. Gerner 2007, p. 27.
182. Aburabia, Rawia (2017). "Trapped Between National Boundaries and Patriarchal Structures: Palestinian Bedouin Women and Polygamous Marriage in Israel". Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 48 (3): 339–349. doi:10.3138/jcfs.48.3.339. ISSN 0047-2328. JSTOR 44509032.
183. Boulos, Sonia (2 January 2021). "National Interests Versus Women's Rights: The Case of Polygamy Among the Bedouin Community in Israel". Women & Criminal Justice. 31: 53–76. doi:10.1080/08974454.2019.1658692. ISSN 0897-4454.
184. Lidman, Melanie (16 February 2016). "Polygamy is illegal in Israel. So why is it allowed to flourish among Negev Bedouin?". www.timesofisrael.com.
185. "No more than 1 wife: Israel looks to tackle Bedouin polygamy". AP News. 9 January 2019.
186. "Bedouin women are pushing Israel to crack down on polygamy". NBC News. 22 October 2018.
187. "Hamas encourages Gaza women to follow Islamic code _English_Xinhua". Xinhua News Agency. 3 January 2010. Archived from the original on 14 May 2011. Retrieved 2 August 2011.
188. ^ Hamas Bans Women Dancers, Scooter Riders in Gaza Push Archived November 18, 2015, at the Wayback Machine By Daniel Williams, Bloomberg, November 30, 2009
189. Hamas patrols beaches in Gaza to enforce conservative dress code Archived 10 February 2017 at the Wayback Machine The Guardian (UK), October 18, 2009
190. Rettig, Haviv (5 March 2013). "UN Cancels Gaza Marathon". The Times of Israel. Archived from the original on 10 March 2013. Retrieved 27 March 2013.
191. ^ "Palestine: Taliban-like attempts to censor music". Freemuse.org. 17 August 2006. Archived from the original on 7 August 2011. Retrieved 2 August 2011.
192. ^ "Afghanistan in Palestine" Archived 15 October 2015 at the Wayback Machine, by Zvi Bar'el, Haaretz, July 26, 2005
193. "Battling over the public sphere: Islamic reactions to the music of today". Jonas Otterbeck. Contemporary Islam. Volume 2, Number 3, 211–28,doi:10.1007/s11562-008-0062-y. "... the over-all argument was that the event was haram"
194. "Palestinians Debate Whether Future State Will be Theocracy or Democracy". Associated Press, July 13, 2005.
195. Gaza Taliban? Archived 7 September 2011 at the Wayback Machine by Editorial Staff, The New Humanist, volume 121 issue 1, January/February 2006
196. ^ Hamas Rule in Gaza: Three Years On Archived 2 April 2012 at the Wayback Machine, Yezid Sayigh, Crown Center for Middle East studies, March 2010
197. See also: Letter from Gaza Archived 27 June 2010 at the Wayback Machine, Hamas's tunnel diplomacy, By Thanassis Cambanis, June 18, 2010. Foreign Affairs. "They want to know if we are more like the Taliban or Erdogan. They will see that we are closer to Erdogan."
198. Hamas: 'We want Erdoğan's model, not Taliban's' Archived 10 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine. Cansu Çamlibel, The Daily Hurriyet. June 10, 2010
199. A Leader of Hamas Warns of West Bank Peril for Fatah Archived 25 April 2009 at the Wayback Machine The New York Times. June 21, 2006. "Mr. Sawaf's West Bank office in Ramallah has been destroyed, and the Palestinian paper Al Ayyam has refused to continue printing his paper in the West Bank."
200. Hamas-Gaza-extremism Archived 23 November 2023 at the Wayback Machine, The Weekly Middle East Reporter (Beirut, Lebanon), August 8, 2009
201. ^ Gumrukcu, Tuvan; Hayatsever, Huseyin (25 October 2023). "Turkey's Erdogan says Hamas is not terrorist organisation, cancels trip to Israel". Reuters. Archived from the original on 10 November 2023. Retrieved 26 October 2023.
202. Kabahā 2014, p. 324.
203. Hroub 2006, p. 33.
204. Ronni Shaked, 'Ethos of Conflict of the Palestinian Society,' in Keren Sharvit, Eran Halperin (eds.) A Social Psychology Perspective on The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: Celebrating the Legacy of Daniel Bar-Tal, Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine Springer, 2016 Volume 2 pp. 133–49 .
205. • Hroub 2006b, p. 6cited Michael Schulz, "Hamas Between Sharia Rule and Demo-Islam", in Ashok Swain, Ramses Amer, Joakim Öjendal (eds.),Globalization and Challenges to Building Peace Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine, pp. 195–201: 'Hamas continues to be characterized with reference to its 1988 charter drawn up less than a year after the movement was established in direct response to the outbreak of the third intifada and when its raison d'être was armed resistance to the occupation. Yet when its election and post-election documents are compared to the charter, it becomes clear that what is being promoted is a profondly different organization'
     • 'The non-Zionist Jew is one who belongs to the Jewish culture, whether as a believer in the Jewish faith or simply by accident of birth, but...(who) takes no part in aggressive actions against our land and our nation. ... Hamas will not adopt a hostile position in practice against anyone because of his ideas or his creed but will adopt such a position if those ideas and creed are translated into hostile or damaging actions against our people.' (1990) Khaled Hroub, p. 34 Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine.
     • Picco, Giandomenico; Rifkind, Gabrielle (2013). The Fog of Peace: The Human Face of Conflict Resolution. I.B. Tauris. pp. 47–48. ISBN 978-0857723437. Archived from the original on 20 March 2024. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
206. Robinson 2004, p. 130.
207. Litvak 1998, p. 153.
208. Gabriel Weimann,Terror on the Internet: The New Arena, the New Challenges, US Institute of Peace Press, 2006 p. 82.
209. Jim Zanotti, Hamas: Background and Issues for Congress Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine, Diane Publishing, 2011 p. 15.
210. Roberts p. 68 Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine:'The Charter condemns world Zionism and the efforts to isolate Palestine, defines the mission of the organization, and locates that mission within Palestinian, Arab and Islamic elements. It does not condemn the West or non-Muslims, but does condemn aggression against the Palestinian people, arguing for a defensive jihad. It also calls for fraternal relations with the other Palestinian nationalist groups'.
211. Shaul Mishal, Avraham Sela,The Palestinian Hamas: vision, violence, and coexistence Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine, Columbia University Press, 2006 p. 178.
212. Beinart 2012, p. 219, n.53.
213. Ayala H. Emmett, Our Sisters' Promised Land: Women, Politics, and Israeli-Palestinian Coexistence, Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine University of Michigan Press, 2003 pp. 100–02.
214. Noam Chomsky, in Elliot N. Dorff, Danya Ruttenberg, Louis E Newman (eds.), Jewish Choices, Jewish Voices: War and National Security Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine, Jewish Publication Society, 2010 pp. 26–27
215. Al-Mughrabi, Nidal (10 May 2017). "Leading Hamas official says no softened stance toward Israel". Reuters.
216. ^ Khaled Hroub: A Newer Hamas? The Revised Charter Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine. In: Journal of Palestine Studies. Vol. 46, No. 4 (184), Summer 2017, p. 100–111.
217. Jean-François Legrain: Hamas according to Hamas: A reading of its Document of General Principles. In: Shahram Akbarzadeh (Hrsg.): Routledge Handbook of Political Islam, Routledge, London 2020, pp. 79–90.
218. Seurat 2022, p. 18.
219. Levitt 2006, pp. 10–11.
220. Levitt 2006, pp. 11–12.
221. Roy 2013, p. 30.
222. Andrew Carey and Joe Sterling (6 May 2017). "Ismail Haniya elected new Hamas leader". CNN. Archived from the original on 20 October 2023. Retrieved 20 March 2024.
223. Davis 2016, pp. 44–45.
224. A. Hovdenak, "Hamas in Transition:The Failure of Sanctions", in Michelle Pace, Peter Seeberg (eds.), The European Union's Democratization Agenda in the Mediterranean Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine, Routledge, 2013 pp. 50–79 .
225. ^ Peter Mandaville,Islam and Politics Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine, Routledge, 2014 Rev.ed, p. 282.
226. ^ Benedetta Berti, Armed Political Organizations: From Conflict to Integration Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine, JHU Press, 2013 p. 88.
227. Mohammed Ayoob, Will the Middle East Implode?, John Wiley & Sons, 2014 p. 47.
228. Abu-Amr 1993, p. 8.
229. ^ Roy 1993, p. 21.
230. Levitt 2006, p. 148.
231. Vittori 2011, p. 72.
232. ^ Vittori 2011, p. 73.
233. Levitt 2006, pp. 143–44.
234. Clarke 2015, p. 97.
235. Interpal and Development and the Al-Aqsa Charitable Foundation Fund. pp. 146, 154–59.
236. ^ Marsh E. Burfeindt, 'Rapprochement with Iran', in Thomas A. Johnson (ed.), Power, National Security, and Transformational Global Events: Challenges Confronting America, China, and Iran Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine. CRC Press. 2012. pp. 185–235 .
237. ^ Jodi Vittori, Terrorist Financing and Resourcing Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011 pp. 72–74, 193 notes 50, 51.
238. Levitt 2006, p. 173.
239. Gleis & Berti 2012, p. 156.
240. Robert Mason, Foreign Policy in Iran and Saudi Arabia: Economics and Diplomacy in the Middle East Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine, I.B. Tauris, 2015 pp. 48–49
241. Levitt 2006, pp. 172–74.
242. Lawrence Rubin, Islam in the Balance: Ideational Threats in Arab Politics Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Stanford University Press, 2014 p. 104
243. Jalil Roshandel, Alethia H. Cook, The United States and Iran: Policy Challenges and Opportunities Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine, Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. p. 104.
244. Mark P. Sullivan, 'Latin America: Terrorism Issues' Archived 21 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine. Congressional Research Service. July 14, 2009. p. 4.
245. Davis, p. 173 Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine.
246. "Palestinian Authority rejects Israeli, U.S. ideas to help Gaza". The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on 20 October 2023. Retrieved 20 March 2024.
247. The Jerusalem Post, March 12, 2019, "Netanyahu: Money to Hamas Part of Strategy to Keep Palestinians Divided" Archived 30 October 2023 at the Wayback Machine
248. Stein, Jeff (4 November 2023). "Far from war in Gaza, Hamas chief oversees vast financial network". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on 17 December 2023. Retrieved 15 December 2023.
249. "US sanctions Hamas official, finance network". Al-Jazeera English. Archived from the original on 15 December 2023. Retrieved 15 December 2023.
250. Targeting a shadow economy, Haaretz
251. Dunning 2016, p. 136.
252. Levitt 2006, pp. 16–23.
253. Phillips 2011, p. 78.
254. ^ Shitrit 2015, p. 71.
255. Phillips 2011, p. 75.
256. Davis 2016, pp. 47ff.
257. Levitt 2006, p. 23.
258. Levitt 2006, pp. 25–26.
259. Mohsen Saleh, The Palestinian Strategic Report 2006 Archived 20 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine, Al Manhal, 2007 p. 198.
260. James J.F. Forrest, "Conclusion", in James Dingley, Combating Terrorism in Northern Ireland, Routledge, 2008 pp. 280–300 .
261. Levitt 2006, pp. 122–23.
262. Davis 2016, p. 48.
263. Davis 2016, pp. 48–49.
264. ^ "Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades. The military wing of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas)". Al Jazeera Arabic. 18 December 2023. Archived from the original on 18 September 2024. Retrieved 18 September 2024. (image caption) Arabic: شعار كتائب عز الدين القسام الجناح العسكري لحركة المقاومة الإسلامية حماس (الجزيرة), lit. 'Logo of the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, the military wing of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas).'
265. Beaumont, Peter (12 October 2023). "What is Hamas, the militant group that rules Gaza?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 18 March 2024. Retrieved 16 October 2023.
266. ^ Guidère 2012, p. 173.
267. Najib & Friedrich 2007, p. 106.
268. (IISS), International Institute for Strategic Studies (14 February 2018). The Military Balance, 2018, Vol. 118, No. 1, February 2018. Routledge. ISBN 9781857439557.
269. (in French) Christian Chesnot, Michel Goya : "Militairement, le Hamas monte en gamme depuis 2010", France Culture, 18 May 2021.
270. Najib & Friedrich 2007, p. 105.
271. Najib & Friedrich 2007, pp. 105–06.
272. Najib & Friedrich 2007, p. 107.
273. Hueston, Pierpaoli & Zahar 2014, p. 67.
274. Najib & Friedrich 2007, pp. 107–08.
275. Levitt 2008, pp. 89ff..
276. Davis 2004, p. 100.
277. Herrick 2011, p. ?.
278. John L.Esposito (1 August 1998). Islam and Violence. Syracuse University Press. p. 231. ISBN 978-0-8156-2774-6. Archived from the original on 26 April 2024.
279. Gunning 2007, pp. 123–55: p. 134
280. Kass & O'Neill 1997, p. 267.
281. Herrick 2011, p. 179.
282. Levitt 2006, p. 24.
283. ^ "Gallant: Hamas has lost control in Gaza; gunmen who fired from hospital entrance killed | The Times of Israel". The Times of Israel. 13 November 2023. Archived from the original on 14 November 2023. Retrieved 14 November 2023.
284. "Hamas leader killed in air strike". London: BBC News. 1 January 2009. Archived from the original on 4 January 2009. Retrieved 1 January 2009.
285. "Hamas TV station shut down". Archived from the original on 9 October 2007. Retrieved 9 October 2007., news24.com, January 22, 2006
286. ^ "Terrorism: Al Aqsa TV". ADL. Archived from the original on 20 January 2013.
287. Küntzel, Matthias (16 May 2008). "Anti-Semitic Hate Speech in the Name of Islam". Spiegel Online International. Archived from the original on 25 October 2023.
288. "Hamas condemns the Holocaust". The Guardian. 12 May 2008. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 15 October 2023.
289. Westervelt, Eric (3 February 2006). "Hamas Launches Television Network". NPR. Archived from the original on 27 April 2006. Retrieved 3 February 2006.
290. Johnson, Alan (15 May 2008). "Hamas and antisemitism". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 19 January 2017. Retrieved 11 December 2016.
291. Cohen, Danny (2 February 2024). "The blinkered BBC shamefully ignores Hamas's genocidal aims". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Archived from the original on 18 March 2024. Retrieved 18 March 2024.
292. "Online Terrorists Prey on the Vulnerable". Globalpolitician.com. Archived from the original on 20 July 2011. Retrieved 1 August 2011.
293. "Hamas Magazine for Kids Promotes Martyrdom and Hatred". Anti-Defamation League. Archived from the original on 4 August 2011. Retrieved 1 August 2011.
294. "The Oct. 7 Massacre Revealed a New Hamas Social Media Strategy". Time. 31 October 2023. Archived from the original on 28 November 2023. Retrieved 29 November 2023.
295. "מה ידענו ומדוע סירבנו להפנים את הכוונות הרצחניות של חמאס?" (in Hebrew). Maariv. 7 November 2023. Archived from the original on 18 November 2023. Retrieved 19 November 2023.
296. "קולקטיבינדואליזם: הדור הפלסטיני הצעיר בין אינדיבידואליזם לקולקטיביזם והאתגר לחמאס". Tel Aviv University. The Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African studies (in Hebrew). Archived from the original on 18 November 2023. Retrieved 19 November 2023.
297. ^ Rasgon, Adam; Bergman, Ronen (13 May 2024). "Secret Hamas Files Show How It Spied on Everyday Palestinians". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 13 May 2024.
298. Marshall, Tim. A Flag Worth Dying For: The Power and Politics of National Symbols. Scribner. p. 148.
299. McLaughlin, Jenna. "Stop mixing up the Islamic flags: A guide for lazy journalists". Mother Jones. Retrieved 12 November 2023.
300. ^ "حركة حماس.. مقاومة للاحتلال انطلقت مع انتفاضة الحجارة | الموسوعة | الجزيرة نت".
301. ^ Bullock, Tom (19 June 2007). "Q&A: Hamas and Fatah". NPR.
302. ^ "Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades. The military wing of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas)". Al Jazeera Arabic. 18 December 2023. Archived from the original on 20 September 2024. Retrieved 20 September 2024. (image caption) Arabic: شعار كتائب عز الدين القسام الجناح العسكري لحركة المقاومة الإسلامية حماس (الجزيرة), lit. 'Logo of the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, the military wing of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas).'
303. ^ "ar: حماس قد توجه هجمات ضخمة من داخل قطاع غزة". Times of Israel (Arabic edition). 13 December 2015. (image caption) The logo of the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, the military wing of Hamas…
304. ^ "הופל אתר עז א-דין אל קסאם, דף הפייסבוק שלהם הוסר". Haaretz (Hebrew edition). 17 July 2014. Archived from the original on 20 September 2024. Retrieved 20 September 2024.
305. Lybarger, Loren (23 December 2017). "Other Jerusalem Realities: The "City of Prayer" in Palestinian Nationalist Imaginaries". Contending Modernities. Retrieved 12 November 2023.
306. Madelene Axelsson (27 January 2006). "Islamistisk politik vinner mark" (in Swedish). Stockholms Fria Tidning. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 10 April 2006.
307. ^ Sen, Somdeep (2020). Decolonizing Palestine: Hamas between the anticolonial and the postcolonial. Ithaca : Cornell University Press. pp. 60–62. ISBN 9781501752735.
308. Israel At 'War to the Bitter End,' Strikes Key Hamas Sites December 29, 2008, Fox News
309. Atkins 2004, p. 123.
310. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. "Refworld | Erased In A Moment: Suicide Bombing Attacks Against Israeli Civilians". UNHCR. Archived from the original on 16 April 2013. Retrieved 27 March 2013.
311. Saarnivaara, Minn (2008). "Suicide Campaigns as a Strategic Choice: The Case of Hamas". Policing. 2 (4): 423–33. doi:10.1093/police/pan061.
312. Erased In A Moment: Suicide Bombing Attacks Against Israeli Civilians V. Structures and Strategies of the Perpetrator Organizations, Human Rights Watch, October 2002. ISBN 1564322807
313. "Indiscriminate Fire, Palestinian Rocket Attacks on Israel and Israeli Artillery Shelling in the Gaza Strip". Human Rights Watch. 30 June 2007. Archived from the original on 24 May 2010. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
314. "Civilians under Assault, Hezbollah's Rocket Attacks on Israel in the 2006 War". Human Rights Watch. 28 August 2007. Archived from the original on 24 May 2010. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
315. "Mashaal offers to cease civilian attacks". Archived from the original on 9 June 2008. Retrieved 1 June 2016. March 31, 2008, The Jerusalem Post
316. Debre, Isabel (8 October 2023). "Israeli hostage crisis in Hamas-ruled Gaza becomes a political trap for Netanyahu". AP News. Archived from the original on 14 October 2023. Retrieved 15 October 2023.
317. Gold, Hadas; Murphy, Paul P.; Salma, Abeer; Dahman, Ibrahim; Khadder, Kareem; Mezzofiore, Gianluca; Goodwin, Allegra (8 October 2023). "Hamas captures hostages as Israelis share photos of those missing". CNN. Archived from the original on 14 October 2023. Retrieved 15 October 2023.
318. "Israel/Palestine: Devastating Civilian Toll as Parties Flout Legal Obligations". Human Rights Watch. 9 October 2023. Archived from the original on 9 October 2023.
319. "Death count from Re'im music festival massacre reportedly updated to 364 — a third of Oct. 7 fatalities". The Times of Israel. 17 November 2023. Retrieved 20 November 2023.
320. Morris, Loveday; Piper, Imogen; Sohyun Lee, Joyce; George, Susannah (8 October 2023). "How a night of dancing and revelry in Israel turned into a massacre". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 8 October 2023. Retrieved 8 October 2023.
321. Lubell, Maayan (10 October 2023). "Bodies of residents and militants lie in the grounds of ravaged Israeli kibbutz". Reuters. Retrieved 10 October 2023.
322. "10 Percent of Kibbutz Population Found Dead After Hamas Massacre in Southern Israel". Haaretz. 10 October 2023.
323. Ntieb, Arnold (10 October 2023). "לא רק ברעים: המסיבה הנוספת בדרום שמשתתפיה טרם שבו הביתה" [לא רק ברעים: המסיבה הנוספת בדרום שמשתתפיה טרם שבו הביתה Not only in Re'im: The participants of the other southern festival who did not come back]. maariv (in Hebrew). Retrieved 20 December 2023.
324. Carroll, Rory (23 October 2023). "Israel shows footage of Hamas killings 'to counter denial of atrocities'". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 26 October 2023.
325. "Israel shows Hamas bodycam attack footage to journalists". BBC News. 23 October 2023. Retrieved 26 October 2023.
326. "Israel investigates an elusive, horrific enemy: Rape as a weapon of war". Washington Post. 25 November 2023. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
327. "The Scope of Hamas' Campaign of Rape Against Israeli Women Is Revealed, Testimony After Testimony". Haaretz. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
328. "Israeli forensic teams describe signs of torture, abuse". Reuters. 15 October 2023. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
329. "Israeli Police Collect Eyewitness Testimony of Gang Rape During Hamas Attack". Haaretz. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
330. Rozovsky, Liza (18 April 2024). "15 Witnesses, Three Confessions, a Pattern of Naked Dead Bodies. All the Evidence of Hamas Rape on October 7". Haaretz. Retrieved 28 November 2024.
331. HRW report April 11, 2010
332. Al-Mughrabi, Nidal (5 February 2010). "Hamas "regrets" civilian deaths, Israel unmoved". Reuters. Archived from the original on 1 January 2016.
333. Baker, Luke (24 August 2014). "Israel says it found Hamas training manual in Gaza". Reuters. Archived from the original on 24 August 2014. Retrieved 25 August 2014.
334. Halevi, Jonathan D. (4 August 2014). "The Hamas Threat to the West Is No Different from ISIS". Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. Retrieved 25 August 2014.
335. Steven Lee Myers and Helene Cooper, Obama Defers to Bush, for Now, on Gaza Crisis, New York Times December 28, 2009
336. U.S. Condemns Hamas in Midst of Israeli Strikes Archived June 25, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, Fox News December 28, 2008
337. Clinton calls for 'durable' Gaza truce, condemns rockets, AFP March 2, 2009
338. "'We are at war': Palestinian militants launch new military operation, Israel strikes targets in Gaza". ABC News. 7 October 2023.
339. ^ "Report: Hamas weighing large-scale conflict with Israel". Ynetnews. 3 October 2006.
340. Issam Aburaiya (3 October 2006). "Hamas and Palestinian Nationalism" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 November 2003.
341. Corey Flintoff (31 July 2008). "Palestinian Rivals Accused Of Human Rights Abuses". NPR.
342. "Fatah, Hamas gunbattles kill 7". Toronto Star. 1 October 2006. Archived from the original on 5 August 2011.
343. Associated Press (2 April 2021). "Gaza Activist: After Lengthy Torture, Hamas Forced Me to Divorce". Voice of America. Retrieved 16 October 2023.
344. Yosif Mahmoud Haj-Yahis; et al. (2009). Alleged Palestinian Collaborators with Israel and Their Families: A Study of Victims of Internal Political Violence. Harry S. Truman Research Institute for the Advancement of Peace, Hebrew University of Jerusalem. pp. 18–19.
345. ^ Under Cover of War|Human Rights Watch Archived 19 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine. Human Rights Watch (April 20, 2009). Retrieved on August 21, 2010.
346. B'Tselem – Violations of the human rights of Palestinians by Palestinians – Severe human rights violations in inter-Palestinian clashes. Btselem.org (November 12, 2007). Retrieved on August 21, 2010.
347. Kalman, Matthew (22 January 2009). "Hamas executes suspected Fatah traitors in Gaza". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 7 September 2013.
348. The Associated Press (20 November 2012). "Hamas militants kill 6 suspected informers, witnesses say". CBC News. Retrieved 6 January 2013.
349. "Rights group pans Hamas for not probing executions". The Times of Israel.
350. "Amnesty International: Hamas guilty of torture, summary executions". The Washington Post. 27 May 2015. Archived from the original on 26 January 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2023.
351. "Large number of alleged Israeli informers killed in Gaza". Palestinian News.Net. 22 August 2014. Archived from the original on 26 August 2014. Retrieved 23 August 2014.
352. ^ Klein, Aaron J.; Ginsburg, Mitch (3 September 2014). "None of alleged Gaza collaborators were Israeli assets, intel official says". The Times of Israel. Retrieved 23 September 2014.
353. "Middle East | Unrest erupts in Gaza Strip". BBC News. 3 July 2002. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
354. Levinson, Charles (10 June 2007). "Shot by their own side, healed by the enemy". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 15 June 2007. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
355. "Gaza: Armed Palestinian Groups Commit Grave Crimes". Human Rights Watch. 13 June 2007.
356. Agence France-Presse (21 April 2009). "Hamas must stop killings: HRW". Taipei Times. Retrieved 16 October 2023.
357. "Mosque gun battle rages in Gaza". London: BBC News. 14 August 2009.
358. "Gaza Islamist leader dies in raid". London: BBC News. 15 August 2009.
359. "Abbas hints PA close to ending unity agreement with Hamas". The Jerusalem Post.
360. The World Almanac of Islamism: 2014, American Foreign Policy Council/Rowman & Littlefield, 2014, p. 15.
361. "Proscribed terrorist groups or organisations". GOV.UK. Archived from the original on 19 July 2021. Retrieved 26 November 2021.
362. "Qualification of Hamas as a Terrorist Organization by the OAS General Secretariat". oas.org. 19 May 2021. Retrieved 4 September 2024.
363. Gunning 2004, p. 234.
364. Levitt 2006, pp. 50–51.
365. Statement by High Representative/Vice-president Federica Mogherini on the decision to appeal the Judgment regarding Hamas, January 19, 2015
366. "EU court keeps Hamas on terrorism list, removes Tamil Tigers". Reuters. 26 July 2017. The lower court had found that the listing was based on media and internet reports rather than decisions by a "competent authority". But the ECJ said such decisions were not required for groups to stay on the list, only for their initial listing.
367. According to Michael Penn, (Japan and the War on Terror: Military Force and Political Pressure in the US-Japanese Alliance, I.B. Tauris 2014 pp. 205–06), Japan initially welcomed the democratic character of the elections that brought Hamas to power, and only set conditions on its aid to Palestine, after intense pressure was exerted by the Bush Administration on Japan to alter its policy.
368. "Lists associated with Resolution 1373". New Zealand Police. 20 July 2014. Retrieved 16 August 2014.
369. David Sobek,The Causes of War, John Wiley & Sons, 2013 p. 45.
370. Levitt 2006, p. 49.
371. "NZ designates entirety of Hamas as terrorist entity". Beehive.govt.nz. New Zealand Government. 29 February 2024. Retrieved 29 February 2024.
372. "Swiss government approves draft law to ban Hamas". The Jerusalem Post | JPost.com. 4 September 2024. Retrieved 4 September 2024.
373. Alethia H. Cook, "The Subtle Impact of Iran on the Flotilla Incident", in Thomas E. Copeland (ed.), Drawing a Line in the Sea: The Gaza Flotilla Incident and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Lexington Books, 2011 pp. 35–44 .
374. Robert O. Freedman, 'Russia,' in Joel Peters, David Newman (eds.), The Routledge Handbook on the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Routledge, 2013 pp. 325–33
375. Haspeslagh 2016, p. 199.
376. David J. Whittaker (ed.), The Terrorism Reader, Routledge (2001), 2012, p. 84.
377. Samuel Feldberg,'Israel and Brazil:An Emerging Power and its Quest for Influence in the Middle East,' in Colin Shindler (ed.), The World Powers:Diplomatic Alliances and International Relations Beyond the Middle East, I.B. Tauris, 2014 pp. 187–99
378. Fisher, Max (21 November 2012). "9 questions about Israel-Gaza you were too embarrassed to ask". The Washington Post. Retrieved 6 January 2018.
379. Amossy 2017, p. 273, n4.
380. Brenner 2017, p. 203, n.27.
381. Buck, Tobias (22 November 2012). "Five lessons from the Gaza conflict". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022. Retrieved 6 January 2013.
382. Krista E. Wiegand, Bombs and Ballots: Governance by Islamist Terrorist and Guerrilla Groups, Ashgate Publishing, Revised edition 2013 p. 124. "Officially, Hamas is considered by American and Israeli policymakers and some academics as the epitome of a terrorist group. Due to the gravity and consequences of Hamas's use of terrorism as a tactic, all other aspects of Hamas, including its extensive social services programs and its role as a political party are overshadowed and often ignored by policy makers. Others recognize the complexity of Hamas as an organisation and suggest that Hamas will continue to transform itself into a full political party and eventually disarm and cease all violent tactics. They view Hamas as a complex organisation with terrorism as only one component, which is likely to evolve into a non-violent political party."
383. Luke Peterson, Palestine-Israel in the Print News Media: Contending Discourses, Routledge 2014 p. 99.
384. Taub, Amanda (7 August 2014). "Did Israel violate international law in Gaza?". Vox. Retrieved 29 January 2024. It is true that Hamas and other-Gaza based militants aren't complying with international law themselves. They target Israeli civilians in rocket attacks, commingle military sites and operations with civilian institutions, and, according to some reports, force people to remain in buildings after warnings from the Israeli military in order to serve as human shields.
385. "European Parliament calls for Hamas to be 'eliminated,' urges release of hostages". www.timesofisrael.com. Retrieved 21 October 2023.
386. Bose, Nandita; Jackson, Katharine (16 October 2023). "Biden says Hamas must be eliminated, US officials warn of escalation". Reuters. Retrieved 21 October 2023.
387. • "Genocide Emergency Alert: Israel and Gaza". genocidewatch. 19 October 2023. Retrieved 7 December 2023.
     • "Israeli families bring war crime complaint to ICC: lawyer". France 24. 3 November 2023. Retrieved 7 December 2023.
     • "Deadly Hamas Rampage Constitutes 'International Crime of Genocide,' Hundreds of Legal Experts Say". Haaretz. Retrieved 7 December 2023.
     • Winer, Stuart (15 October 2023). "Hamas actions are war crimes, could constitute genocide – international law experts". Times of Israel.
     • Winer, Stuart (18 October 2023). "Legal Experts: Hamas committed War Crimes, Genocide". genocidewatch. Retrieved 7 December 2023.
388. ^ "For years, Netanyahu propped up Hamas. Now it's blown up in our faces". The Times of Israel. 8 October 2023. Retrieved 28 October 2023.
389. "Israel's Big New Shift in Hamas Policy". Foreign Policy. 15 June 2021. Retrieved 28 October 2023.
390. "Benjamin Netanyahu failed Israel". Vox. 9 October 2023. Retrieved 28 October 2023.
391. "How Benjamin Netanyahu empowered Hamas ... and broke Israel". The Telegraph. 16 October 2023. Retrieved 28 October 2023.
392. ^ "How Netanyahu's Hamas policy came back to haunt him — and Israel". CBS News. 28 October 2023. Retrieved 28 October 2023.
393. The Jerusalem Post, 12 Mar. 2019 "Netanyahu: Money to Hamas Part of Strategy to Keep Palestinians Divided: 'Now that we are supervising, we know it's going to humanitarian causes," the source said, paraphrasing Netanyahu"
394. "Poll finds dramatic rise in Palestinian support for Hamas". Associated Press. 15 June 2021.
395. Fattel, Isabel. "What is Hamas?" The Atlantic. 9 October 2023. 9 October 2023.
396. "Public Opinion Poll No (89)". Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research. 13 September 2023. Retrieved 10 October 2023.
397. ^ Concerns about Islamic Extremism on the Rise in Middle East. Pew Research. July 1, 2014.
398. "Hamas popularity 'surges after Gaza war'". Al Jazeera English. 2 September 2014.
399. "Poll: Hamas popularity surges after war with Israel". The Washington Post. 2 September 2014.
400. Scheindlin, Dahlia (17 July 2024). "How Popular Is Hamas, in Gaza and Outside of It, After Nine Months of War?". Haaretz.com. Retrieved 21 October 2024.
401. "Saudis Overwhelmingly Oppose Ties With Israel, Poll Finds". The New York Times. 22 December 2023.
402. ^ Seurat 2022, p. 69.
403. Seurat 2022, p. 70.
404. Seurat 2022, p. 71.
405. ^ Schanzer, Jonathan (21 June 2013). "How Hamas Lost the Arab Spring". The Atlantic.
406. ^ Gidda, Mirren (25 July 2014). "Hamas Still Has Some Friends Left". Time. Archived from the original on 14 April 2019. Retrieved 18 October 2023.
407. ^ "Hamas Ties to Qatar Have Cost". 22 April 2013. Archived from the original on 16 June 2016.
408. Seurat 2022, p. 108.
409. ^ Seurat 2022, p. 109.
410. Seurat 2022, p. 110.
411. ^ "Saudi Arabia to host first Hamas delegation in over a decade". Middle East Eye.
412. Seurat 2022, p. 84-85.
413. ^ Seurat 2022, p. 185.
414. ^ Seurat 2022, p. x.
415. Bigg, Matthew Mpoke (12 October 2023). "As World's Eyes Shift, Ukraine and Russia Look to Sway Opinions". The New York Times. Retrieved 25 July 2024.
416. Struck, Julia (9 October 2023). "Wagner Trained Hamas Militants for Attack on Israel, Ukrainian Partisans Claim". Kyiv Post. Retrieved 25 July 2024.
417. "Evidence shows Hamas militants likely used some North Korean weapons in attack on Israel". AP News. 19 October 2023. Retrieved 18 November 2023.
418. PACCHIANI, GIANLUCA (5 November 2023). "Hamas official says North Korea is ally, insinuates it could one day target the US". Times of Israel.
419. "Hamas official says North Korea could attack US over Gaza war". Radio Free Asia. Retrieved 18 November 2023.
420. ^ Seurat 2022, p. 144.
421. Seurat 2022, p. 145.
422. Seurat 2022, p. 224-225.
423. Agencies and ToI Staff (9 December 2024). "Hamas, Islamic Jihad congratulate Syrians on achieving 'freedom and justice' by toppling Assad". Times of Israel.
424. ^ Ehl, David (15 May 2021). "What is Hamas and who supports it?". Deutsche Welle. Archived from the original on 11 October 2023. Retrieved 20 March 2024.
425. "Hamas is feeling the pain of Qatar's crisis, and is looking to Egypt for help". Los Angeles Times. 19 June 2017.
426. England, Andrew (18 April 2024). "Qatar reconsiders mediator role between Hamas and Israel". Financial Times. Retrieved 26 April 2024.
427. ^ Koelbl, Susanne (2 November 2023). "NATO Partner and Hamas Host". Der Spiegel. ISSN 2195-1349. Retrieved 21 April 2024.
428. Black, Ian; Sherwood, Harriet (23 October 2012). "Qatari emir's visit to Gaza is a boost for Hamas". The Guardian.
429. Levs, Josh (6 August 2014). "Which Mideast power brokers support Hamas?". CNN.
430. "Why Israel Lets Qatar Give Millions To Hamas". NPR. 18 June 2015.
431. Hamas supports military operation for political legitimacy in Yemen Archived August 7, 2016, at the Wayback Machine. Arab News. March 30, 2015.
432. Elbagir, Nima; Arvanitidis, Barbara; Platt, Alex; Razek, Raja; Ebrahim, Nadeen (11 December 2023). "Qatar sent millions to Gaza for years – with Israel's backing. Here's what we know about the controversial deal". CNN. Retrieved 6 April 2024.
433. "Erdogan: Hamas is not a terrorist organization". Israel National News. 16 May 2018.
434. Dr. Hay Eytan Cohen Yanarocak; Dr. Jonathan Spyer (25 January 2021). "Turkish Militias and Proxies". trendsresearch. Archived from the original on 16 May 2022. Retrieved 17 April 2022.
435. "US Criticizes Turkey for Hosting Hamas Leaders". VOA News. 26 August 2020.
436. "Erdogan hosts PA's Abbas, Hamas head Haniyeh to prepare for détente talks". The Times of Israel. 26 July 2023.
437. "Report: Hamas chiefs were asked to leave Turkey after October 7 attacks". The Times of Israel. 23 October 2023.
438. "Turkey's Erdogan discussed Gaza with Hamas leader – Turkish presidenc". Reuters. 21 October 2023.