| Revision as of 22:33, 20 January 2013 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by 92.40.254.14 - "→Aleppo dispute: "← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:06, 3 November 2024 edit undoZ1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators29,422 edits John D. Rockefeller listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper) | ||
| (144 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 70K | |maxarchivesize = 70K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 9 | ||
| |algo = old(5d) | |algo = old(5d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Wüstenfuchs/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Wüstenfuchs/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| == Disambiguation link notification for December 31 == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| <blockquote>'''Too many issues with the article. Looks like garbage.'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| == GOCE Copy Edit Request - ] == | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> | |||
| Hi ] - I just wanted to send you a quick message to inform you that your requested copy edit of the article ] is complete. Best of luck on your GA! PS - I also added some wikilinks to the article, and performed some minor spacing cleanup to the wiki markup. Cheers, <b><i><font style="color:maroon" size="font-weight:normal" face="Tempus Sans ITC">]</font></i></b> <i><sup><font color="orange" face="Tempus Sans ITC">]</font></sup></i> 00:36, 2 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 18:24, 29 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 18:24, 29 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
| == Re: History of BiH (1878-1918) == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 22:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| "Bosnia and Herzegovina in Austria-Hungary" sounds like a good title, but because the occupation was made legit through the form of a condominium, I'm not sure if that should be the title. Please start a discussion on the talk page. --] (]) 09:39, 2 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 13:16, 2 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| == RfC/RM == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 14:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi | |||
| Two of us have been working on fixing the listing created by adding an RfC tag to an RM{{diff|Talk:History of Bosnia and Herzegovina %281878%E2%80%931918%29|531449287|530951518}}. Basically, in making a page move, if it is uncontroversial, any autoconfirmed user can just make the move, unless there is something in the way preventing that, in which case there are a couple of ways to get an admin to make the move or at least remove the impediment. | |||
| In the case of a potentially controversial move there are basically three choices, one, if it is already an article with a lot of watchers, a discussion such as "should this be moved" can be held, and based on the outcome, moved or not. | |||
| There are two formal ways of asking for more help. One, ], which lists the page for seven days after which a decision is made. Two, ], which lists the discussion for 30 days, after which a decision is made. It is really not necessary to use both, and just confuses the situation. I would recommend deciding on one of the two, a 7 day discussion or a 30 day discussion and just deleting the other template. I added a comment just to allow the RfC bot to work, and all of that can be deleted, including the section heading that was created. Please feel free to ask if you have any questions. ] (]) 02:56, 9 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Aleppo dispute == | |||
| Need your help at the Aleppo battle article. An anonymous user is refusing to acknowledge the New York times as a reliable source and refusing to acknowledge there is a stalemate in Aleppo at the moment. And is thus edit warring. ] (]) 17:20, 18 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Yeah, he seems to have given up. ] (]) 15:40, 19 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :EkoGraf, you are the one that gave up; you gave up pushing your regime propagandist worldview backed by poor referencing. A pleasant consequence of this episode is that it nicely exposes you for what you are; edit-warring on an article, and then running to a 10 time blocked User like Wüstenfuchs for help. Your disruptive editing will continue to be monitored. We are Legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:00, 19 January 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ::Oh, no... Anonymus is monitoring me! What to do, what to do?! --<font face="Old English Text MT">]</font> 19:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::No, monitoring EkoGraf. You are just an obvious loser Wüstenfuchs who gets blocked constantly. Sooner than later it will be a permanent block. | |||
| ::::Those guys getting "constantly blocked" were ChronicalUsual. Not Wustenfuchs. ] (]) 20:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::How do we know that Wüstenfuchs and ChronicalUsual arn't the same person? They have identical editing histories, have both been blocked countless times, as well as both displaying a flawed grasp of the English language (suggesting a non native speaker). This link is something that should be looked into. | |||
| ::::::I believe you are San culottes, and obviously you don't like me... I don't mind. --<font face="Old English Text MT">]</font> 22:18, 19 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Based on his way of talking to other editors (insulting all the time) it seems you are right that it most likely is San culottes. In that case I will just stop talking to him. ] (]) 05:50, 20 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::This "San culottes" was actually female if you check the edit history. But hey don't let facts get in the way of hating Users you disagree with. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 08:14, 20 January 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :::::::::I don't care what he was, and I'm not interested in his edit history... perhaps you shouldn't be interested in mine as well, as I feel harassed by you. --<font face="Old English Text MT">]</font> 14:04, 20 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::Ignoring the facts once presented... so Wüstenfuchs! Stop hating Muslims then people won't have to correct your hate crime edits. Pretty simple. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:32, 20 January 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Hello == | |||
| There is a new armed force in syria. As you are a quality registered user from a long time, could you add it on the main syria civil war page? | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/National_Defense_Army_of_Syria <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:15, 19 January 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :This article seems to be erased. --<font face="Old English Text MT">]</font> 19:17, 19 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Allahu Akbar, it was just ChronicalUsual trying to impersonate me. ] (]) 19:34, 19 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::I saw it's not you... --<font face="Old English Text MT">]</font> 22:17, 19 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:06, 3 November 2024
If you leave a message on my talk page, I will reply on my talk page. You can leave a message here.
Proposed deletion of Bilal Bosnić
The article Bilal Bosnić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Too many issues with the article. Looks like garbage.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Nomination for deletion of Template:House of Peoples of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina delegates
Template:House of Peoples of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina delegates has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 18:24, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Government of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Template:Government of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 18:24, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Largest municipalities of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Template:Largest municipalities of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Vyacheslav Molotov
Vyacheslav Molotov has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 13:16, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for John D. Rockefeller
John D. Rockefeller has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)