Misplaced Pages

User talk:Johnny Squeaky: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:49, 21 January 2013 editJohnny Squeaky (talk | contribs)2,359 edits →As you seem to be ignoring all advice← Previous edit Latest revision as of 09:05, 10 April 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(314 intermediate revisions by 59 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Editing against consensus ==
'''Please feel free to leave "talk" here''', ''but please do not revert or edit OTHER PEOPLE'S messages.'' In general, I clear out the old stuff every few months.


is contrary to established consensus. Please discuss this issue and establish a consensus to support the change before doing this again. Thanks. - ] (]) 05:56, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
== 2013 ==
:
⚫ ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. - ] (]) 06:44, 29 December 2013 (UTC)


== Discussion page edits ==
{| style="border: 2px solid red; background-color: #FFFAF0;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |'''Have an enjoyable ]!'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid green;" | '''Hello Johnny Squeaky: Thanks for all of your contributions to Misplaced Pages, and have a happy and enjoyable ]!''' Cheers, <small><font face="arial">]<sup>]</sup></font></small> 19:39, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
<br><br>
:<small>Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year 2013}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.</small>
|}</div>{{-}}


When posting to discussion pages do not interpose comments in the middle of other editor's posts as you did . Also, do not re-order the discussion as you did . These are disruptive practices as they make the thread difficult to follow. ]] 07:41, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
== Indian women ==
:Understood, thanks for the pointer! =//= ] 01:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


== AN/I: Community restrictions ==
] is a container category. It should not contain biographical articles.] (]) 18:56, 12 January 2013 (UTC)


Hello,
==WTF?==
Why are you being antagnostic with other editors, insulting them in Talk, accusing them of sockpuppetry, and labeling their edits vandalism when they're not? Cut out the personal attacks. If you believe others are using sockpuppets, bring it up ]. If you believe someone is repeatedly engaging in vandalism, report it ]. ] (]) 23:19, 20 January 2013 (UTC)


I closed the {{diff2|588759576|Proposal|AN/I discussion}} with regards to your edits on "In popular culture" / "Trivia" sections. As a result, community consensus has restricted you to a ] throughout the project, and you are prohibited from changing the title of section headings to "Trivia", broadly construed. You may appeal these restrictions in the future by requesting it at ]. ''']]''' 04:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
:I don't appreciate you're rude and aggressive attitude, and it is really quite unacceptable that you are STALKING me and my Misplaced Pages activity. It is entirely unacceptable. Please stop. =//= ]


== Your "name"? ==
⚫ :: Hello. There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 03:55, 21 January 2013 (UTC)


Hey there, I was scanning very quickly down the edit history of an article when your "name" jumped out at me. I stopped and stared for a couple of seconds. Then it hit me, and I laughed. So I just can't resist inquiring, is your choice of name purely coincidental, or are you an ] fan? :)
== January 2013 ==
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br>
Please be particularly aware, ] states:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 17:14, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
:You have a clear COI on this issue, and if you "ban" me I will make a complaint as to that. You need to step back and let a different Admin handle this.


== March 2014 ==
:I’m sorry, but you seem really quite angry. Your edit comments are very aggressive. You need to resist the urge to change Misplaced Pages articles based on personal feelings. One wonders if perhaps you are a Yale guy, or perhaps were rejected by Cornell, or maybe you just don’t like these “snooty” Ivy League schools? Whatever the case may be, the combination of your comments and your edits indicate a POV that may be inappropriate as the basis of edits on this article. As well, I’m thinking that eventually you will use your “Admin” rights to push your POV. This would be a clear COI, and not a particularly honest thing to do. =//= ] 17:19, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you made a change to an article, ], but you didn't provide a ]. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to ] and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the ] tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> ] (]) 17:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
::I don't think the personal attacks help much. When you're writing about an ivy league school, the credentials can speak for themselves, you don't need to add the boosterism.&nbsp;]&nbsp;] 17:25, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
:::Ryan, I am simpley calling a clear COI. It's not a "personal attack", it's an observation. I resent your personal attack on me, please don't do it again. =//= ] 17:31, 21 January 2013 (UTC)


==Sockpuppet investigation==
: Johnny, it seems to me that you might be operating with some fundamental misunderstandings about this project, and I fear that the situation is escalating against you. It probably a good time to back up, and reflect on the ] of Misplaced Pages as a whole. For example, a warning by anyone (including an admin) is not a ''threat'' nor is it a '']''. Being told to follow Misplaced Pages's rules is also not a personal attack - have a quick glance at ]. You seem to be making things difficult on yourself by picking the strangest fights with people who are simply trying to ''guide you''. Warnings are given to ''prevent'' blocks by guiding behaviour - ] and ] contrary to those warnings will indeed lead to a block, and I think that would beb truly unfortunate (]''']''']) 18:24, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
{{Ivmbox

|Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into ] by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Misplaced Pages account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at ], where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ], and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Misplaced Pages administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you ''have'' been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Misplaced Pages policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Misplaced Pages community.{{#if:yes|&nbsp;] (]) 03:04, 20 April 2014 (UTC)}}
== Please discuss, not revert ==
|]

}}
Johnny, right now, you're engaged in a content dispute and unfortunately are edit warring over it, which can result in being blocked. I would urge you to, rather than ], discuss it with your fellow editors to attain ]. It seems that the consensus is against you right now, so all you're doing by edit warring over it is escalating the problem. Misplaced Pages does have a ] that you're welcome to follow, but in this case, since five others disagree with you, I would suggest you ] and move on. Thanks again, and don't hesitate to let me know should you have any questions. Thank you. ] ]] 17:45, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
== Blocked for sockpuppetry ==

{{Tmbox
==As you seem to be ignoring all advice==
| style = background: #f8eaba
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for making personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the ] first. &nbsp;(]''']''']) 19:14, 21 January 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block -->
| image = ]
::Shameful. 19:49, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
| text = '''''This account has been ] indefinitely''''' from editing&#32;for a period of '''indefinite''' for ]{{#if:]|&#32;per evidence presented at ]}}. Note that multiple accounts are ], but using them for '']'' reasons '''is not''', and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans ]. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include "tlx|". -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;}} below. However, you should read the ] first. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 09:54, 20 April 2014 (UTC)<!-- Template:uw-sockblock -->}}

Latest revision as of 09:05, 10 April 2022

Editing against consensus

This is contrary to established consensus. Please discuss this issue and establish a consensus to support the change before doing this again. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 05:56, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Johnny_Squeaky_and_.22Trivia.22 regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 06:44, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Discussion page edits

When posting to discussion pages do not interpose comments in the middle of other editor's posts as you did here. Also, do not re-order the discussion as you did here. These are disruptive practices as they make the thread difficult to follow. Tiderolls 07:41, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Understood, thanks for the pointer! =//= Johnny Squeaky 01:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

AN/I: Community restrictions

Hello,

I closed the AN/I discussion with regards to your edits on "In popular culture" / "Trivia" sections. As a result, community consensus has restricted you to a one-revert rule throughout the project, and you are prohibited from changing the title of section headings to "Trivia", broadly construed. You may appeal these restrictions in the future by requesting it at WP:AN/I. LFaraone 04:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Your "name"?

Hey there, I was scanning very quickly down the edit history of an article when your "name" jumped out at me. I stopped and stared for a couple of seconds. Then it hit me, and I laughed. So I just can't resist inquiring, is your choice of name purely coincidental, or are you an opera fan? :)

March 2014

Information icon Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tanning addiction, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 17:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Misplaced Pages account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnny Squeaky, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Misplaced Pages administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Misplaced Pages policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Misplaced Pages community. Betty Logan (talk) 03:04, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indefinite for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnny Squeaky. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:54, 20 April 2014 (UTC)